3.1. Spatial Variation in Extreme Precipitation in Wei River Basin
Based on the analysis method proposed in the second section of this paper, the extreme precipitation indicators of the Wei River Basin were calculated and analyzed. The results show that the geographical distribution of the 10 extreme precipitation indicators in the Wei River Basin decreases from south to north. The spatial distribution of the extreme precipitation indicator is shown in
Figure 3. Among the four regions of the Wei River Basin, the maximum values of EPIs usually occur in the Guanzhong Plain. Specifically, the extreme precipitation indices in the Jing River Basin and Northern Luohe River Basin are usually smaller than those in the southern Loess Hills and Guanzhong Plain regions. In addition, being affected by terrain, rainfall frequency (R10mm and R20mm), rainfall intensity (Rx1day and Rx3day), and rainfall duration (CWD) in the Loess Hills area often showed a low trend. Specifically, the areas with intensive rainfall frequency are mostly located in the southern region, where the maximum values of R1mm, R10mm, and R20mm are 65 days, 22 days, and 9 days, which are about 40 days, 12 days, and 7 days different from the lowest values in the north, indicating that the southern region experiences precipitation events more frequently. Similarly, R95p, R99p, and prcp, which represent rainfall intensity, are also concentrated in the southern region. The maximum value of R95p and R99p is 99.89 mm in the southwest of the Loess Plateau, while the maximum value of prcp is 626.30 mm in the southwest of the Guanzhong Plain. The difference from the lowest value in the north is about 126.26 mm. In addition, the highest value of CWD, which represents the duration of rainfall, also appears in the southern Guanzhong Plain at a value of 6.12 mm, further showing that the southern region has a significant advantage in precipitation events. However, the highest values of Rx1day, Rx3Day, and SDII, which represent rainfall frequency, appear in the western Northern Luohe River Basin, which are 62.01 mm, 88.39 mm, and 11.31 mm/d, respectively.
The differences in the spatial distribution of EPIs may be affected by a combination of elements, including geographical features, topography, and climatic conditions. There is a strong east–west topographic boundary in Wei Plain, and when warm and wet air passes through this area from the east, the air will be affected by mountain uplift. The rising air cools at higher elevations and condenses into clouds, which form precipitation. This topographic uplift generally leads to more intense precipitation events in the southern and western areas, especially at the border between mountains and plains.
3.2. Temporal Variation Characteristics of the Extreme Precipitation Index
The annual variation trend in extreme precipitation in four different regions of the Wei River Basin is shown in
Figure 4. Overall, except for CWD, which showed a certain downward trend, other extreme precipitation indices all showed an upward trend to varying degrees, among which the two precipitation indexes R95p and R99p showed particularly significant growth trends. The analysis results of extreme precipitation indicators show that the intensity and frequency of extreme precipitation events in the Wei River Basin as a whole are gradually increasing, while the longest wet period within a year has decreased. In addition, with the exception of R95p and R99p, other EPIs show significant inter-annual fluctuations, which may be affected by meteorological phenomena (such as El Niño events) and short-term climate changes, resulting in the instability of this precipitation change trend.
On the other hand, the inter-annual variation in EPIs in different regions also showed different trend characteristics. The analysis results in
Figure 4 show that Loess Hills has the lowest EPIs overall but shows the most significant upward trend in R95p and R99p. By 2021, the extreme precipitation was predicted to increase by about 50 mm, indicating that even at a low precipitation level, the precipitation intensity in this region is increasing continuously, which may have a greater impact on flood risk and soil erosion. Compared with the hilly areas, the Guanzhong Plain has certain advantages in terms of precipitation intensity, precipitation frequency, and precipitation duration. Precipitation frequency and precipitation intensity also have the most significant increase, which indicates that the meteorological change in the Guanzhong Plain is relatively significant. In particular, the rainfall frequency (R10mm and R20mm) in the Guanzhong Plain shows relatively obvious inter-annual fluctuation characteristics, which indicates that this region may be more susceptible to short-term meteorological changes, resulting in a longer precipitation cycle. EPIs in the Jinghe River Basin and the Northern Luohe River Basin are similar to some extent and have significant inter-annual fluctuation characteristics in precipitation intensity (Rx1day, Rx3day, and SDII). The maximum inter-annual difference in annual precipitation intensity in this region is up to 100 mm, while the maximum inter-annual difference in SDII is about 6 mm/d. This indicates that the precipitation intensity varies significantly from year to year, and further analysis is needed to identify the reasons for this difference.
Figure 4.
Temporal variation characteristics of the extreme precipitation index in the Wei River Basin. (subfigure (
a) represents the temporal variability of the extreme precipitation indicator CWD; subfigure (
b) represents the temporal variability of the extreme precipitation indicator PRCP; subfigure (
c) represents the temporal variability of the extreme precipitation indicator SDII; subfigure (
d) represents the temporal variability of the extreme precipitation indicator R10mm; subfigure (
e) represents the temporal variability of the extreme precipitation indicator R20mm; subfigure (
f) represents the temporal variability of the extreme precipitation indicator Rx1day; subfigure (
g) represents the temporal variability of the extreme precipitation indicator Rx3day; subfigure (
h) represents the temporal variability of the extreme precipitation indicator R95p; subfigure (
i) represents the temporal variability of the extreme precipitation indicator R99p; K represents the change trend in the long-term series curve; K > 0 means that the curve shows an upward trend; K < 0 means that the curve shows a downward trend). This study uses the Mann–Kendall (Mann–Kendall) trend analysis method to study the EPI time trend in each site and divides the time series trend into five types according to the calculated significance level. The types are strong negative trend, negative trend, strong positive trend, positive trend, and no trend, respectively, and the results are shown in
Figure 5. The results show that the EPI variation trend in most stations has a positive trend. CWD (100%), PRCPTOT (54.79%), R95P (100%), R99P (100%), SDII (59.80%), R1mm (100%), R10mm (100%), R20mm (98.63%), Rx1day (100%), Rx3day (100%) had a strong positive trend. The results indicated that the number of sites with an increasing trend and no significant change trend was greater than the number of sites with a decreasing trend, indicating that the 10 EPI time series in the Wei River Basin have generally shown a positive trend over the past 40 years.
Figure 4.
Temporal variation characteristics of the extreme precipitation index in the Wei River Basin. (subfigure (
a) represents the temporal variability of the extreme precipitation indicator CWD; subfigure (
b) represents the temporal variability of the extreme precipitation indicator PRCP; subfigure (
c) represents the temporal variability of the extreme precipitation indicator SDII; subfigure (
d) represents the temporal variability of the extreme precipitation indicator R10mm; subfigure (
e) represents the temporal variability of the extreme precipitation indicator R20mm; subfigure (
f) represents the temporal variability of the extreme precipitation indicator Rx1day; subfigure (
g) represents the temporal variability of the extreme precipitation indicator Rx3day; subfigure (
h) represents the temporal variability of the extreme precipitation indicator R95p; subfigure (
i) represents the temporal variability of the extreme precipitation indicator R99p; K represents the change trend in the long-term series curve; K > 0 means that the curve shows an upward trend; K < 0 means that the curve shows a downward trend). This study uses the Mann–Kendall (Mann–Kendall) trend analysis method to study the EPI time trend in each site and divides the time series trend into five types according to the calculated significance level. The types are strong negative trend, negative trend, strong positive trend, positive trend, and no trend, respectively, and the results are shown in
Figure 5. The results show that the EPI variation trend in most stations has a positive trend. CWD (100%), PRCPTOT (54.79%), R95P (100%), R99P (100%), SDII (59.80%), R1mm (100%), R10mm (100%), R20mm (98.63%), Rx1day (100%), Rx3day (100%) had a strong positive trend. The results indicated that the number of sites with an increasing trend and no significant change trend was greater than the number of sites with a decreasing trend, indicating that the 10 EPI time series in the Wei River Basin have generally shown a positive trend over the past 40 years.
For the PRCPTOT index, only two stations showed a strong negative trend, while the other stations showed a positive trend, which was consistent with the positive trend in most stations for R1mm (100%), R10mm (100%), and R20mm (98.63%). The indexes of CWD and R20mm showed no trend at 10.95% and 1.37% stations, respectively, which may be the result of natural geographical factors, meteorological conditions, or other EPIs that had little impact on the overall upward trend in the EPIs in the Wei River Basin. Although the SDII index showed a positive trend on the whole, the changing trend in each station was significantly different, among which 30.17% of the sites showed a significant negative correlation trend, mainly distributed in the western part of the basin and the northern edge of the eastern Wei Plain. Considering that the time series of most stations for R1mm (100%), R10mm (100%), and R20mm (98.63%) showed a positive trend, both a strong negative trend and a strong positive trend existed, which may be caused by the difference in the increasing rate of days of R1mm, R10mm, and R20mm. The analysis results show that nearly 70% of the sites have a strong negative trend in SDII, and about 30% of the sites have a strong positive trend, indicating that in the past 40 years, the areas of extreme precipitation increased in the Wei River Basin are more than the areas decreased.
Figure 5.
Significant results of EPIs based on the Mann–Kendall trend in the Wei River Basin. (subfigure (a) represents the trends in spatial variation of the extreme precipitation indicator CWD; sub-figure (b) represents the trends in spatial variation of the extreme precipitation indicator PRCP; subfigure (c) represents the trends in spatial variation of the extreme precipitation indicator SDII; subfigure (d) represents the trends in spatial variation of the extreme precipitation indicator R10mm; subfigure (e) represents the trends in spatial variation of the extreme precipitation indicator R20mm; subfigure (f) represents the trends in spatial variation of the extreme precipitation indicator Rx1day; subfigure (g) represents the trends in spatial variation of the extreme precipitation indicator Rx3day; subfigure (h) represents the trends in spatial variation of the extreme precipitation indicator R95p; subfigure (i) represents the trends in spatial variation of the extreme precipitation indicator R99p).
Figure 5.
Significant results of EPIs based on the Mann–Kendall trend in the Wei River Basin. (subfigure (a) represents the trends in spatial variation of the extreme precipitation indicator CWD; sub-figure (b) represents the trends in spatial variation of the extreme precipitation indicator PRCP; subfigure (c) represents the trends in spatial variation of the extreme precipitation indicator SDII; subfigure (d) represents the trends in spatial variation of the extreme precipitation indicator R10mm; subfigure (e) represents the trends in spatial variation of the extreme precipitation indicator R20mm; subfigure (f) represents the trends in spatial variation of the extreme precipitation indicator Rx1day; subfigure (g) represents the trends in spatial variation of the extreme precipitation indicator Rx3day; subfigure (h) represents the trends in spatial variation of the extreme precipitation indicator R95p; subfigure (i) represents the trends in spatial variation of the extreme precipitation indicator R99p).
3.4. Impact of Climatic Factors on Extreme Precipitation
The correlation between the ENSO index and the EPI calculation results was analyzed, and the findings suggest that the extreme precipitation index and the ENSO index present a negative correlation at most stations. The related analysis is presented in
Figure 10. Specifically, EPIs such as R1mm (71.24%), R10mm (49.31%), R95p (5.34%), R99p (75.34%), and Rx1day (32.88%) had a significant negative correlation with the ENSO index. This suggests that with an increase in the ENSO index, EPIs in the Wei River Basin tend to have a downward trend, including precipitation intensity, frequency, and duration. In addition, the responses of EPIs to ENSO were different. Prcp (60%), R10mm (49.32%), Rx3day (52.05%), SDII (41.1%), and EPI indexes showed a strong negative correlation with ENSO events. This reflects the fact that frequent El Niño events can reduce rainfall and suppress extreme precipitation events, which can lead to insufficient rainfall or drought.
In addition, the results further show that the correlation patterns between R10mm, R20mm, Rx1day, Rx3day, and ENSO have obvious spatial variation characteristics. For example, R10mm, R20mm, Rx1day, and Rx3day in the Loess Hills areas are often positively correlated with ENSO, that is, the precipitation intensity and frequency in these areas usually increase during ENSO events, while the Guanzhong Plain and Northern Luohe River Basin located in the east of the Wei River Basin show an opposite trend. This suggests that local topographic features may have an impact on the terrazzo so that some areas show a strong positive correlation with ENSO events. It is noteworthy that, in contrast to other EPIs, CWD does not have a significant correlation with ENSO, indicating that ENSO events have a negligible impact on the duration of precipitation in the Wei River Basin.
Because of the possible lag effect of the climate change factor ENSO on precipitation, this study analyzes the effect of a winter ENSO event on precipitation in the spring and summer of the following year. According to the statistical analysis of historical ENSO events in the Wei River Basin, strong ENSO events occurred in 1988, 1998, 1999, 2007, and 2010. We plotted extreme precipitation indicators in the spring and summer to determine whether ENSO events have a significant impact on seasonal precipitation.
Figure 11 shows the spring precipitation departure curve. It can be seen from the figure that except for the 1998 ENSO event, the other four ENSO events caused the extreme precipitation indicators in the second year to be significantly lower than the average level over the long series.
Figure 12 illustrates the summer extreme precipitation indicator departure curves, from which it can be seen that all five strong ENSO events in 1988, 1998, 1999, 2007, and 2010 caused the extreme precipitation indicator in the second year to be significantly lower than the multi-year average.
The global land–ocean temperature index is a meteorological index that measures the change in the earth’s surface temperature and can reflect the trend in the global temperature rise to a certain extent. In general, an increase in LOTI means an increase in global temperature, while a decrease in LOTI means a decrease in temperature.
Figure 13 shows that global temperature rise has a strong positive correlation with EPIs. The rainfall frequency and intensity of most stations will increase significantly due to global temperature rises, such as prcp (60%), R1mm (60.27%), R95p (79.45%), and R99p (79.45%). This trend is particularly significant in the Jinghe River Basin. This strong dependence is consistent with the Clausius–Clapeyron equation, which states that global warming theoretically increases the amount of water in the atmosphere and increases the probability of precipitation [
7]. However, the CWD index showed a certain negative correlation with the LOTI, with 41.1% of the stations experiencing a trend of shortened rainfall duration due to the rise in the global temperature, indicating that precipitation events caused by global warming tend to be more frequent, more intense, and shorter in duration, which is highly likely to lead to more serious flood events.
The correlation between the land surface temperature (LST) and the regional extreme precipitation indicators was analyzed, and the results of the correlation analysis are shown in
Figure 14. The results showed that multiple EPIs in the Wei River Basin showed significant positive correlations at most stations. For example, prcp (80%), R1mm (58.90%), R10mm (64.38%), R20mm (68.49%), R95p (73.97%), R99p (73.97%), Rx1day (47.94%), Rx3day (63.01%), and SDII (47.95%) have a consistent spatial distribution trend, which means that localized temperature increases may lead to more wet and heavy precipitation days. In addition, CWD has a strong negative correlation with LST, meaning that local temperature increases lead to fewer wet days. This correlation suggests that rising temperatures may cause more intense drought and flood events.
The formation of extreme precipitation is affected by the environmental temperature, environmental pressure, and other thermodynamic parameters. According to the C-C relationship in thermodynamic theory, the water vapor storage capacity of the atmosphere shows a growth trend of 7%/°C with an increase in temperature [
24,
25]. Based on the C-C relationship, the relationship between precipitation and temperature change
T can be obtained with an exponential regression of each percentage of precipitation value, as shown in Equation (3) [
26], where
Ta denotes the starting temperature and
Pa represents its corresponding precipitation and
Tb denotes a certain ending temperature and
Pb represents its corresponding precipitation, representing the rate of change in extreme precipitation.
In order to verify the correlation between extreme precipitation and temperature in the Wei River Basin, this study identified the changes in the extreme daily precipitation at the 99% percentile in the Wei River Basin with temperature changes. The correlation is shown in
Figure 15. It can be seen from the figure that when the temperature is between 10 and 25 °C, the precipitation increases with the increase in temperature, and the growth rate is about 6.6%/°C, which is basically consistent with the C-C relationship. However, when the temperature exceeds 25 °C, the 99% percentile of precipitation decreases slightly with the increase in temperature. This is because when the temperature exceeds a certain threshold, humidity will significantly decrease with the increase in temperature, which also inhibits the formation of precipitation. The relationship between extreme precipitation and temperature in the Wei River Basin shows that there is an inflection point structure between them.
In order to further analyze the relationship between air temperature and precipitation, this study analyzed the correlation between air temperature change and precipitation by counting the trends in the multi-year monthly average air temperature and precipitation, and the results are shown in
Figure 16. The figure shows the trends in the precipitation and temperature in different regions, respectively. The results show that there is a strong correlation between precipitation increase and temperature change (R
2 = 0.98). In the Wei River Basin, for every 1 °C increase in temperature, precipitation increases by about 5 mm, which further proves that as global temperatures rise, the Wei River Basin faces strong extreme precipitation and flood risks. Among them, the changing trends in the Loess Plateau, the Jing River Basin, and the Beiluo River Basin are consistent, while the precipitation change in the Guanzhong Plain is relatively smooth, indicating that temperature is not the only factor promoting precipitation increases. Changes in topography, vegetation, etc., can also affect precipitation increases.
In summary, global climate change factors are important driving factors for extreme precipitation events in the Wei River Basin. Among them, the occurrence of ENSO events may lead to a decrease in the risk of extreme precipitation events. The climate factor indicators LOTI and LST have a significant positive correlation with extreme precipitation, with LOTI having the strongest correlation with EPI. A vertex-structured relationship is shown between temperature and extreme precipitation.