Next Article in Journal
Inhibitory Effect of Combined Exposure to Copper Ions and Polystyrene Microplastics on the Growth of Skeletonema costatum
Previous Article in Journal
Water Insecurity and Rights Erosion: A Comprehensive Analysis of Rohingya Refugee Camps in New Delhi
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Phosphate and Arsenate on As Metabolism in Microcystis aeruginosa at Different Growth Phases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Soil and Water Management: Practices to Mitigate Nutrient Losses in Agricultural Watersheds

Lhasa Plateau Ecosystem Research Station, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Water 2024, 16(16), 2269; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16162269
Submission received: 6 August 2024 / Accepted: 8 August 2024 / Published: 12 August 2024

1. Introduction

As the world’s population grows, the demand for food is increasing as never before. In this scenario, the sustainable development of agricultural watersheds is an important foundation of food security [1]. Nutrient losses from agricultural watersheds lead to losses of nutrients (e.g., nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, etc.) from the soil due to runoff or a variety of other reasons, and are considered to be one of the most serious threats to farmland. Many studies have proven that nutrient losses from farmland may cause a decrease in soil fertility that affects crop growth and development, which leads to crop yield reduction [2]. Nutrients lost in the soil, especially nitrogen and phosphorus, may enter water bodies through surface runoff or erosion, leading to eutrophication and damage to water ecosystems. In addition, the loss of nutrients from agricultural land can lead to a number of problems such as soil salinization, changes in soil microbial communities, increased soil erosion, and soil compaction. Therefore, it is crucial to apply soil and water management to reduce nutrient loss from agricultural land and maintain sustainable agriculture [3].
Practices that can be used for mitigating nutrient losses in agricultural watersheds include conservation tillage, cover crops, precision agriculture, diversified cropping systems, etc. These practices have been proven to have a significant impact on the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil, such as soil organic matter content, nutrient availability, microbial biomass and diversity, and enzyme activities [4]. Conservation tillage practices have the effects of reducing soil erosion, maintaining soil structure, and enhancing soil nutrient contents [5]. The incorporation of cover crops into soils contributes to the enrichment of soil nutrients, robust nutrient cycling processes, and the improvement of nutrient availability [6]. Precision agriculture can effectively avoid the risk of over-applying chemical fertilizers, which can lead to a large amount of nitrogen and phosphorus escaping from farmland into the atmosphere and water bodies, exacerbating the risk of environmental pollution [7]. Diversified cropping systems can improve crop coverage to mitigate the scouring effects of rainfall, which in turn reduces runoff and thus nutrient losses in agricultural watersheds. In addition, diversified cropping systems can improve soil fertility, control insect pests and diseases, and help in attaining yield stability [8]. Choosing the appropriate soil and water management practices for different nutrient losses requires clarification of the transport patterns of nutrients lost on farmland and the damages caused by nutrient losses. The rising prevalence of these issues led to the creation of this Special Issue, entitled “Soil and Water Management: Practices to Mitigate Nutrient Losses in Agricultural Watersheds”. This Special Issue aims to explore the following topics: (1) Mechanisms of nutrient transport in agricultural watersheds. (2) Methods for the quantitative assessment of nutrient losses in agricultural watersheds. (3) Damages caused by nutrient loss in agricultural watersheds. (4) Practices that can be used for mitigating nutrient losses in agricultural watersheds, including conservation tillage, cover crops, precision agriculture, diversified cropping systems, etc.

2. Summary of the Special Issue

We selected five original research papers after a rigorous peer-review process. The below section outlines the list of contributions.
Contribution 1 assesses the intra- and extracellular metabolism of Arsenic (As), along with speciation changes, in Microcystis aeruginosa across three growth phases. The findings of this study revealed that extracellular iAsV remained the dominant As species during the lag and exponential growth phases of M. aeruginosa in the growth media, while intracellular trivalent As (iAsIII) emerged as the pronounced species during the exponential growth phase, but also exhibited a significant negative correlation with the P levels. Moreover, elevated P levels promoted the formation of intra- and extracellular dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) and monomethylarsonic acid (MMA) in the exponential growth phase. During the stationary growth phase, intracellular iAsV was found to decrease with increasing P levels. During all of the growth phases, P consistently reduced algal As absorption levels.
Contribution 2 used computational, experimental, and field methods to design and evaluate alternative tile intakes (ATIs)’ capacity to reduce sediment and nutrient export. The results demonstrated that the hydraulic conductivity of the layered gravel–woodchip configuration was 4.59 ± 0.36 cm/s. The sediment trapping efficiency of the ATIs was 86 ± 12%, leading to deposition rates of 5.44 ± 3.77 cm/yr, as quantified with 210 Pb profiles. Modeling using the Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework suggested watershed-scale load reductions of 1.6% for NO3 and 1.4% for total P for ATIs draining 6.8% of the modeled watershed.
Contribution 3 investigated the influencing factors of heavy metals and non-point source pollution in typical areas of the Tethys Himalayan Tectonic Domain by analyzing 44 water samples and 55 soil samples. The results indicated that 65.46% of soil As in the study area exceeded the screening value, while the concentrations of the eight selected elements in water remained below the standard limits. Factors such as the per capita net income, mean annual temperature, mean annual precipitation, geomorphic type, organic matter, geology type, and soil texture (sand, silt, and clay) constituted the primary controlling factors influencing the spatial distribution of HMs in soil.
Contribution 4 constructed a hydrographic connectivity evaluation system for Henan Province, China, spanning the preceding two decades (2000–2020). The results revealed that in terms of structural connectivity, agricultural land accounted for over 50% and prevailed as the primary land-use type; reservoir and lake areas initially increased before subsequently decreasing. Human activities have exerted a profound influence on these changes. Meanwhile, the structural form of the water system has gradually improved, exhibiting an increasing complexity of river networks and a stabilizing connectivity configuration. As for functional connectivity, the natural function remains well preserved, while the social function demonstrates a positive correlation with the expansion of industrial activities, eventually growing to an excellent level from an initial moderate level.
Contribution 5 collected overlying water and sediment samples for two typical agricultural ditches in Sanjiang Plain during the growing seasons of 2015–2017 to clarify the interception of internal and external nitrogen in ecological ditches. The results indicated that the N-NO3 in the overlying water was higher than N-NH4+, while in the sediment, N-NH4+ was higher than N-NO3. In contrast to the dryland ditch, the paddy ditch had a more significant amount of inorganic nitrogen both in the overlying water and sediment. In both the overlying water and the sediment of the ditches, nitrogen content fluctuated during different periods, and inter-annual variation was noticeable.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42301113), Key R&D Program of Tibet Autonomous Region (XZ202401ZY0089).

Acknowledgments

As the Guest Editor of this Special Issue, I would like to express my gratitude to all the authors and reviewers whose contributions have enhanced its quality.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Zhang, P.; Liu, J.; Yang, F.; Xie, S.; Wei, C. Effects of Phosphate and Arsenate on As Metabolism in Microcystis aeruginosa at Different Growth Phases. Water 2024, 16, 940. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16070940.
  • Wilson, C.G.; Streeter, M.T.; Ettema, W.D.; Abban, B.K.B.; Gonzalez, A.; Schilling, K.E.; Papanicolaou, A.N. Assessing the Effectiveness of Alternative Tile Intakes on Agricultural Hillslopes. Water 2024, 16, 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16020309.
  • An, J.; Zha, X.; Wang, H.; Deng, L.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Di, J.; Zhao, W. Analysis of Influencing Factors of Heavy Metals and Non-Point Source Pollution in Typical Areas of Tethys Himalayan Tectonic Domain. Water 2024, 16, 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16020291.
  • Li, Z.; Wei, C.; Zhou, J.; Yang, F. Temporal and Spatial Changes of Hydrographic Connectivity with the Development of Agriculture, Industry, and Urban Areas: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin in Henan Province during the Last Two Decades. Water 2023, 15, 4245. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15244245.
  • Lu, L.; Cheng, Q.; Xue, Q.; Zhang, X.; Yang, L. Characteristics of Nitrogen in Overlying Water and Sediment of Typical Agricultural Drainage Ditches during Different Periods in a Freezing-Thaw Area of China. Water 2023, 15, 2789. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15152789.

References

  1. Kumari, V.V.; Balloli, S.S.; Kumar, M.; Ramana, D.B.V.; Prabhakar, M.; Osman, M.; Indoria, A.K.; Manjunath, M.; Maruthi, V.; Ravindra Chary, G.; et al. Diversified Cropping Systems for Reducing Soil Erosion and Nutrient Loss and for Increasing Crop Productivity and Profitability in Rainfed Environments. Agric. Syst. 2024, 217, 103919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Montanarella, L. Agricultural Policy: Govern Our Soils. Nature 2015, 528, 32–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Al-Shammary, A.A.G.; Al-Shihmani, L.S.S.; Fernandez-Galvez, J.; Caballero-Calvo, A. Optimizing Sustainable Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review of Agronomic Practices and Their Impacts on Soil Attributes. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 364, 121487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Canet-Martí, A.; Morales-Santos, A.; Nolz, R.; Langergraber, G.; Stumpp, C. Quantification of Water Fluxes and Soil Water Balance in Agricultural Fields under Different Tillage and Irrigation Systems Using Water Stable Isotopes. Soil Till. Res. 2023, 231, 105732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jia, L.; Zhao, W.; Fu, B.; Daryanto, S.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhai, R. Effects of Minimum Soil Disturbance Practices on Controlling Water Erosion in China’s Slope Farmland: A Meta-Analysis. Land Degrad. Dev. 2019, 30, 706–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Biswas, T.; Bandyopadhyay, P.K.; Nandi, R.; Mukherjee, S.; Kundu, A.; Reddy, P.; Mandal, B.; Kumar, P. Impact of Mulching and Nutrients on Soil Water Balance and Actual Evapotranspiration of Irrigated Winter Cabbage (Brassica oleracea Var. Capitata L.). Agric. Water Manag. 2022, 263, 107456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gebbers, R.; Adamchuk, V.I. Precision Agriculture and Food Security. Science 2010, 327, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Martínez-Mena, M.; Carrillo-Lopez, E.; Boix-Fayos, C.; Almagro, M.; Franco, N.G.; DíazPereira, E.; De Vente, J. Long-term Effectiveness of Sustainable Land Management Practices to Control Runoff, Soil Erosion, and Nutrient Loss and the Role of Rainfall Intensity in Mediterranean Rainfed Agroecosystems. Catena 2020, 187, 104352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jia, L. Soil and Water Management: Practices to Mitigate Nutrient Losses in Agricultural Watersheds. Water 2024, 16, 2269. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16162269

AMA Style

Jia L. Soil and Water Management: Practices to Mitigate Nutrient Losses in Agricultural Watersheds. Water. 2024; 16(16):2269. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16162269

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jia, Lizhi. 2024. "Soil and Water Management: Practices to Mitigate Nutrient Losses in Agricultural Watersheds" Water 16, no. 16: 2269. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16162269

APA Style

Jia, L. (2024). Soil and Water Management: Practices to Mitigate Nutrient Losses in Agricultural Watersheds. Water, 16(16), 2269. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16162269

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop