Next Article in Journal
Investigating and Modeling of the Scour Downstream of a Tree Trunk Deflector in a Straight Channel
Next Article in Special Issue
Consideration of the Environment in Water-Energy-Food Nexus Research in the Aral Sea Basin
Previous Article in Journal
Twenty-Eight Years of Plant Community Development and Dynamics in the Balize Mississippi River Delta, Louisiana, USA
Previous Article in Special Issue
Occurrence of Radionuclides and Hazardous Elements in the Transboundary River Basin Kyrgyzstan–Kazakhstan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Integrating Open-Source Datasets to Analyze the Transboundary Water–Food–Energy–Climate Nexus in Central Asia

1
Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and River Research, Department of Water, Atmosphere and Environment, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1200 Vienna, Austria
2
Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, Department of Water, Atmosphere and Environment, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1180 Vienna, Austria
3
Hydrosolutions GmbH, 8050 Zürich, Switzerland
4
Chair of Hydraulic Engineering, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany
5
International Water Management Institute—Central Asia Office, 100000 Tashkent, Uzbekistan
6
CARTIF Technology Centre, Energy Division, Parque Tecnológico de Boecillo, 205, 47151 Valladolid, Spain
7
Department of Ecology and Water Resources Management, Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers, National Research University, 100000 Tashkent, Uzbekistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2023, 15(19), 3482; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15193482
Submission received: 24 July 2023 / Revised: 14 September 2023 / Accepted: 28 September 2023 / Published: 3 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Management in Central Asia)

Abstract

:
In today’s intrinsically connected world, the Water–Food–Energy–Climate Nexus (WFEC Nexus) concept provides a starting point for informed and transparent decision-making based on the trade-offs and synergies between different sectors, including aquatic ecosystems, food security, energy production, and climate neutrality. The WFEC Nexus approach is particularly applicable in regions requiring transboundary water management, such as Central Asia. Unfortunately, this region with unevenly distributed water resources—consisting of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan—is characterized by data scarcity, which limits informed decision-making. However, open-source geodata is becoming increasingly available. This paper aims to fill Central Asia’s WFEC Nexus data gap by providing an overview of key data. We collected geodata through an integrated survey of stakeholders and researchers, stakeholder consultation, and literature screening. Sixty unique datasets were identified, belonging to one of six thematic categories: (1) climate, (2) hydrology, (3) geography and topography, (4) geomorphology, (5) ecology, and (6) anthropogenic uses. For each dataset, a succinct description, including a link to the online source, is provided. We also provide possible applications of using the presented datasets, demonstrating how they can assist in conducting various studies linked to the WFEC Nexus in Central Asia and worldwide.

1. Introduction

Today’s world is intrinsically connected. Few topics can be considered in isolation from one another. Prevailing issues such as climate change [1], biodiversity loss [2], or social inequality [3] must be tackled by holistic approaches. In this regard, so-called ‘nexus’ perspectives have been gaining increased acceptance, as they are well suited to better understanding sector interlinkages [4]. A well-known interpretation of the nexus perspective is the Water–Food–Energy–Climate Nexus (WFEC Nexus), which establishes the groundwork for informed and transparent decision-making based on trade-offs and synergies in the sectors of aquatic ecosystems, food security, energy production, and climate neutrality [5]. The WFEC Nexus approach is particularly well-suited to regions characterized by water scarcity, high energy and food demands, and those impacted by climate change. An example is the fast-developing post-Soviet region of Central Asia [6], consisting of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan.
The case of Central Asia adds another layer to the Nexus: transboundary water management tensions. Central Asia has shifted from a centrally governed region to five republic states, with each market economy setting its own priorities, often in conflict with each other [7]. In addition, natural resources are unevenly distributed across Central Asian countries, which are strongly interdependent. While upstream countries with mountainous territories, for example, within the Pamir and Tian Shan Mountain ranges, have abundant water resources, downstream countries are characterized by natural water scarcity but are significant producers of agricultural products and are reliant on water inflows from upstream countries for crop irrigation [8]. In the Soviet era, the region’s energy production system was operated as one [9]. Nowadays, five independent countries manage it, resulting in an uneven distribution of energy resources. Countries in the steppes and deserts, such as Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, are key producers of fossil fuel energies. [8] In contrast, mountainous countries, such as Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, have abundant water resources for hydropower production. These water, food, and energy tensions are further exacerbated by climate change, with future water shortages expected in the valleys, steppes, and deserts [10] while increasing runoff in high-mountain Central Asia [11]. Considering the effect of one country’s decisions on its neighbors, the WFEC Nexus in Central Asia must not only integrate cross-sectoral considerations but also requires cross-border cooperation from a geographical and political point of view [12]. This integrated approach pertains to planning, management, and assessment [13], all requiring a sound data basis. However, poor data availability within the water, food, energy, and climate topics challenges the Nexus approach.

1.1. Data Scarcity in Central Asia

An inadequate capacity to collect and manage high-quality data, coupled with insufficient monitoring networks, is a major issue that hinders data availability in numerous regions worldwide, especially in developing countries. The transboundary context of Central Asian countries is affected by data scarcity due to the absence of a consolidated and credible platform, as well as the lack of progress on data exchange between countries [14]. As a result, policymakers struggle to make informed decisions about social, economic, water, and environmental issues in the region. Limited resources, including funding and personnel, further challenge data availability. Additionally, natural disasters or conflicts can disrupt data collection systems, impeding the collection of accurate and reliable information. To address these challenges, it is necessary to increase investment in data acquisition and management and improve data exchange mechanisms [15,16].
Data scarcity is particularly apparent in Central Asia’s water resources management sector, limiting informed decision-making and effective management strategies, which are especially needed in water-scarce regions [16]. The low density of the hydrometric monitoring network, the deterioration of the quality of the monitoring network after the 1990s, and the limited financial resources available to the hydrometric services in Central Asia constitute a challenge for the management of water resources [17]. Even though hydrometric data is available in hydrological yearbooks, it is not yet widely available in a digital format [18], and little reliable and up-to-date data is available on demand [15]. Data scarcity is also a prevalent problem in environmental research, primarily due to the low reliability of measurements and the high cost of monitoring [19]. For example, the lack of reliable observational data makes it difficult to assess the geomorphological and hydrological impacts of climate change in high-mountain Central Asia, as accurate measurements are needed to downscale global climate models [20]. This, together with limited knowledge of the detailed irrigation scheme and runoff in the artificial canals, negatively impacts forward-looking energy planning in the region. Furthermore, missing detailed data on crop yields, irrigation practices, and climate variability makes it challenging to predict the impact of climate change on agricultural production or to assess soil degradation in the region [21]. The lack of official information on existing infrastructure, such as power plants or transmission lines, further complicates holistic Nexus studies. More generally, data are needed to advance the WFEC Nexus approach in Central Asia and understand and quantify the impacts and interactions of different sectors.
Various studies have emphasized the need for data in Central Asia’s water management sector, promoting modern approaches such as remote sensing and prompting data sharing and stakeholder collaboration to fill this gap [15,16]. At the regional level, water information systems may collect, analyze, and share data on water resources and use, including providing up-to-date information on water availability, quality, and use [15]. However, until such systems are more widely established, scientists and stakeholders must rely on other data, such as globally available open-source data.

1.2. Open-Source Data for the Transboundary WFEC Nexus

Open-source data is crucial in diverse fields in today’s data-driven world, enabling evidence-based decision-making. Open-source data refer to freely accessible and shareable data that foster transparency, collaboration, and accountability [22]. As the volume of available open-source data grows exponentially, so do the possibilities to utilize it. In this regard, geospatial data is pivotal in understanding and managing various aspects of the WFEC Nexus. It empowers policymakers, scientists, and stakeholders to monitor and analyze changes in land use, vegetation cover, or other environmental factors affecting water resources [23]. By leveraging geospatial data, stakeholders can identify areas facing water scarcity, predict the impact of natural disasters, and formulate effective strategies to mitigate these risks. Moreover, geospatial data supports opportunities for conserving and restoring natural ecosystems, thus improving water quality, supporting biodiversity, and mitigating the impacts of climate change [24] Such data can also support renewable energy development by identifying suitable locations for renewable energy projects [25].
Geospatial data is vital in supporting the implementation of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs encompass a range of environmental concerns, including the development of renewable energy sources or water and natural resource management, where geospatial data is pivotal for tracking progress, ensuring evidence-based policies, and facilitating effective interventions [23].
This paper aims to provide an overview of the most relevant available datasets for WFEC Nexus topics in the data-scarce Central Asian context. A holistic WFEC Nexus approach demands comprehensive data from each sector to understand their complex interactions and ensure sustainable and equitable policy and decision-making. Therefore, this study delivers a detailed and easily accessible data basis for further research activities, discussing the relevance of various open-source datasets in different thematic fields related to the WFEC Nexus. Finally, we demonstrate possible applications of how the presented open-source datasets can be utilized to work on complex and interdisciplinary issues in the Central Asian context.

2. Materials and Methods

The geodata presented in this paper were collected by (i) an integrated survey of researchers and stakeholders, followed by (ii) stakeholder consultation and (iii) a screening of the literature.
In the first step, partners of the Hydro4U project consortium [26], consisting of hydrologists, ecologists, water resources managers, engineers, and spatial analysts from Central Asia and Europe (Table 1), were invited to participate in a data collection survey. The survey aimed to (a) identify relevant datasets and (b) institutions that could provide more data sources, as well as (c) establish a protocol for metadata collection. We identified six data categories into which they could be grouped from a practical point of view to improve their findability by a variety of users: (1) climate, (2) hydrology, (3) geography and topography, (4) geomorphology, (5) ecology, and (6) anthropogenic uses. The interlinkage between the six thematic fields with the four WEFC Nexus categories is shown in Figure 1. The relevance of each group within the WFEC Nexus context is briefly described in each subsection of the results.
In the second step, we consulted various stakeholders, including scientists, decision-makers, or organizations within the network of the Hydro4U project consortium, to identify additional open-source datasets that may have relevance regarding the WFEC Nexus.
Finally, we searched literature databases using a snowball approach and investigated data sources used by applied WFEC Nexus studies.
Each dataset was assigned to one of the six data categories (Figure 1), and key metadata was extracted to assist data findability and usability. This paper presents a non-exhaustive list of open-source datasets, including key metadata, such as the spatial and temporal extent, resolution, data creation/publication date, and type of data (e.g., vector, raster, tables, or time series). Each listed dataset carries a unique ID and a reference to the data origin and provider, including a link to the online source. A succinct data description provides an overview of the data’s purpose and content.
The aim of the data collection within the Hydro4U project was to provide a solid base for working on WFEC-related issues in Central Asia, e.g., assessing the sustainable hydropower potential, performing climate change modelling, or conducting trade-off analysis between hydropower and agricultural water needs. We demonstrate the relevance of each thematic field’s data in the context of the WFEC Nexus by linking key datasets with assessing the sustainable hydropower potential as a case study application.

3. Results

3.1. Climate

Water availability in a basin is driven by precipitation. In contrast, evaporation—water uptake by the atmosphere—is driven by temperature, solar radiation, wind speed, crop and soil type, and water availability in the uppermost soil layers [1,27]. Rising temperatures and precipitation intensity and frequency changes will, therefore, impact future water availability, affecting water-dependent economic sectors such as agriculture and putting additional pressure on domestic water supplies and ecosystems [1].
An overview of climate variable products is provided in Table 2. Weather station data shared publicly (C01–C02) can be complemented by gridded weather data products (C03–C11). Station data may further be used to correct biases in gridded data products. Evaporation is typically given as potential evaporation (C12) or actual evaporation (C13). Potential evaporation is the amount of water that would evaporate in a given time interval, subject to no limitation. Actual evaporation is the amount of water evaporating under natural, often sub-optimal, conditions. It can be estimated from remote sensing products or potential evaporation using correction factors for plant growth stage and land cover. These values are relevant for water availability studies.
When looking at the WFEC Nexus, projections of future climate are also relevant. We suggest selecting the four general circulation models (GCM) with the highest priority according to the ISIMIP3b protocol [28] in the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project (CMIP) phase 6, namely, GFDLESM4 (C14), IPSL-CM6A-LR (C15), MRI-ESM2.0 (C16), and UKESM1.0-LL (C17), for a first assessment of the WFEC Nexus.
Table 2. Open-source data related to climate.
Table 2. Open-source data related to climate.
IDNameDescriptionSpatial ExtentTemporal ExtentResolution (Accuracy)Data Created/PublishedType of DataData SourceData ProviderOnline Link
C01GHCN-daily V3Daily records of precipitation and temperature station dataGlobalAt least 30 years of data for each stationDaily2012, 2023Time series (csv)Menne et al. [29,30] NOAAhttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/metadata/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/gov.noaa.ncdc:C00861/html (accessed on 26 April 2023)
C02Central Asia temperature and precipitation dataMonthly records from station dataCentral AsiaVariable length time series between 1879–2003Monthly2003Time series (tab-delimited ASCII)Williams et al. [31]NSIDChttps://nsidc.org/data/g02174/versions/1#anchor-1 (accessed 26 April 2023)
C03CHELSA v2.1Monthly precipitation and temperature time seriesGlobal1979–2018, projected climatologies for selected GCM models for 1981–2010, 2011–2040,
2041–2070, and
2071–2100
30 arc-seconds, data quality should be validated prior to use.2021Raster (tif)Karger et al. [32,33,34]WSLhttps://chelsa-climate.org/ (accessed on 22 May 2023)
C04WorldClimHistorical monthly weather data downscaled from CRU-TS-4.03Global1960–20182.5 arc-minutes/monthly Raster (tif)WorldClim [35,36]WorldClimhttps://www.worldclim.org/data/monthlywth.html (accessed on 22 May 2023)
C05ERA5-LandSingle-level precipitation sum and air temperature at 2 m above groundGlobal1950–present6 arc-minutes/from hourly to monthly2023Raster (GRIB)CDS [37]CDShttps://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-land?tab=overview (accessed on 26 April 2023)
C06CRU-TS-4.06.01High-resolution gridded data of month-by-month variation in climateGlobal1901–202130 arc-minutes/monthly2023Raster (netCDF)University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit [38]CEDAhttps://data.ceda.ac.uk/badc/cru/data/cru_ts/cru_ts_4.06/data/ (accessed on 26 April 2023)
C07GPM IMERGDaily precipitation L3 (the successor product of TRMM).Global2000–present6 arc-minutes/daily2023Raster (netCDF)Huffman et al. [39] NASA GES DISChttps://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/datasets/GPM_3IMERGDF_06/summary (accessed on 26 April 2023)
C08APHRODITE v1801 R1Daily precipitation analysis productMonsoon Asia (incl. Central Asia)1998–201515 arc-minutes/daily 2018Raster (netCDF)Yatagai et al. [40]APHRODITEhttp://aphrodite.st.hirosaki-u.ac.jp/download/data/search/ (accessed on 26 April 2023)
C09GPCC Full Data Daily Version 2022Daily gridded precipitation dataGlobal1982–202060 arc-minutes/daily 2022Raster (netCDF)Ziese et al. [41,42]GPChttps://opendata.dwd.de/climate_environment/GPCC/full_data_monthly_v2022/025/ (accessed on 26 April 2023)
C10CHIRPSQuasi-global satellite and observation-based precipitation estimates over landQuasi-global1981–near present3 arc-minutes/pentad to monthly2014Raters (netCDF)Funk et al. [43,44]Climate Hazard Center, UC Santa Barbarahttps://www.chc.ucsb.edu/data (accessed on 26 April 2023)
C11PERSIANN-CDR V1Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural NetworksGlobal1982–present (note large data gaps until 1999)2.4 arc-minutes/subdaily to annual2014Raster (netCDF)Sorooshian et al. [45,46]NCEI, NOAAhttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/metadata/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/gov.noaa.ncdc:C00854/html (accessed on 23 May 2023)
C12Global aridity and PET database v3Potential evaporation and aridity indexGlobalAverage data from 1970–200030 arc-seconds2022Vector (shp)Zomer et al. [47,48] CGIARhttps://cgiarcsi.community/2019/01/24/global-aridity-index-and-potential-evapotranspiration-climate-database-v3/ (accessed on 23 May 2023)
C13SSEpopActual evaporationGlobalAnnual data from 2003–2021 Suitable for regional focus2020Raster (tif)Senay et al. [49]USGShttps://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/product/466 (accessed on 23 May 2023)
C14GFDLESM4Projections of future precipitation and temperature for shared socio-economic pathwaysGlobalDaily data from 1980 to 2100100 km resolution2018Raster (netCDF)Krasting et al. [50]NOAAhttps://www.wdc-climate.de/ui/cmip6?input=CMIP6.CMIP.NOAA-GFDL.GFDL-ESM4 (accessed on 13 September 2023)
C15IPSL-CM6A-LRProjections of future precipitation and temperature for shared socio-economic pathwaysGlobalDaily data from 1980 to 2100250 km resolution2018Raster (netCDF)Boucher et al. [51]IPLShttps://www.wdc-climate.de/ui/cmip6?input=CMIP6.CFMIP.IPSL.IPSL-CM6A-LR (accessed on 13 September 2023)
C16MRI-ESM2.0Projections of future precipitation and temperature for shared socio-economic pathwaysGlobalDaily data from 1980 to 2100250 km resolution2019Raster (netCDF)Yukimoto et al. [52]MRIhttps://www.wdc-climate.de/ui/cmip6?input=CMIP6.CMIP.MRI.MRI-ESM2-0.historical (accessed on 13 September 2023)
C17UKESM1.0-LLProjections of future precipitation and temperature for shared socio-economic pathwaysGlobalDaily data from 1980 to 2100250 km resolution2019Raster (netCDF)Tang et al. [53]MOHChttps://www.wdc-climate.de/ui/cmip6?input=CMIP6.CMIP.MOHC.UKESM1-0-LL.esm-piControl (accessed on 13 September 2023)
Several precipitation and temperature datasets covering Central Asia are available in the literature. We selected the products reported to perform well in Central Asia [54,55,56,57]. A thorough comparison of all precipitation products is unavailable but would be extremely helpful for practitioners. The CHELSA v2.1 weather data (C03) presents one of the newest data products and was recently used to assess projected climate change impacts on surface runoff in mountainous catchments of Central Asia [11]. The CHELSA dataset is based on a downscaling of ERA5 data with orographic correction and is bias-corrected using the GHCN station dataset (Figure 2). This bias correction works well in regions with high weather station density or few changes in weather station density and measurement quality. In mountainous regions with low and changing station densities (e.g., the parts of the Alai Mountain range), the bias correction algorithm can lead to erroneous trends in the CHELSA dataset [18]. Depending on the application, different weather datasets may be more suitable than others. Therefore, it is recommended to validate a weather data product before use.

3.2. Hydrology

Hydrology plays a crucial role in the Water–Food–Energy–Climate Nexus. Hydrological processes and variability significantly impact water resources planning and other aspects of the Nexus, including agriculture, ecosystem dynamics, food security, or energy production. Lakes and rivers are essential for aquatic and riparian ecosystems [60], providing income from fisheries and supplying water for agriculture and industry [61]. Lakes act as storage reservoirs, dampening a river runoff signal, thus providing flood protection and water in the low flow season [62], and recharging groundwater reservoirs [60]. Soil hydraulic properties are an essential driver for water transport and storage in the uppermost soil layers, which are relevant for agricultural production. Snow melt is the most significant contributor to seasonal river discharge in many basins in Central Asia. Snow melt data can be used to calibrate and validate snow modules of hydrological models in the absence of local data. Adequate representation of snow melt processes in hydrological models is essential for assessing climate change’s impact on a shift from solid to liquid precipitation [63]. Permafrost is a highly under-researched topic in Central Asia, with a high-risk potential for cascading events involving rockfalls, landslides, lake dam breaches, and debris flows [64].
The data relating to hydrology presented in Table 3 covers a wide range of spatial, temporal, and qualitative properties: from global data to regional data, processed satellite observations to model simulation results, and point data to time series data.
The first group of data pertains to rivers and includes river networks (H01), basin outlines (H02, H04), gauge locations on rivers (H04), mean river discharge (H04, H13), and time series of river discharge (H04). The data can be used to assess past and current water availability for various uses (notably for irrigation and hydropower production) and to calibrate and validate water balance models [65]. This can subsequently be used for scenario analysis to plan viable infrastructure projects [66], to optimize the operation of hydraulic infrastructure [67], to design climate change mitigation strategies [11,68], and for the allocation of water for different uses [69]. Combined with a topographical layer, river runoff data can be used to estimate the theoretical hydropower potential [70].
The second group of data refers to glaciers, specifically, to glacier geometry (H05, H07) and current and projected glacier melt (H07, H08, H09, H10, H11). Data related to glacier melt is characterized by large uncertainties of 50% to 150%. Because of the glacier data scarcity in the high mountainous region of Central Asia [64], these uncertainties have to be accepted. Glacier melt provides a critical water supply in late summer [71] when precipitation in the downstream water use zone is minimal. The expected decline in glacier melt contributions to discharge will impact hydropower production, agricultural production, and water availability for households and industries.
Further geospatial layers in the hydrology section pertain to lake outlines (H03), soil hydraulic properties (H12), a reanalysis product of snow water equivalents (H06), and a permafrost extent probability map (H14). Finally, the data list delivers a real-time dataset regarding soil moisture (H15). Such information can be valuable for various applications such as weather and climate modelling, predicting and monitoring droughts and floods, or estimating crop productivity [72].
Table 3. Open-source data related to hydrology.
Table 3. Open-source data related to hydrology.
IDNameDescriptionSpatial ExtentTemporal ExtentResolution (Accuracy)Data Created/PublishedType of DataData SourceData ProviderOnline Link
H01HydroRIVERS V1.0River networkGlobalNASuitable for regional focus2013Vector (shp)Lehner et al. [73]WWF HydroSHEDShttps://www.hydrosheds.org/products/hydrorivers (accessed on 6 September 2023)
H02HydroBASINS V1.0Basin outlines consistent with river networkGlobalNASuitable for regional focus2013Vector (shp)Lehner et al. [73]WWF HydroSHEDShttps://www.hydrosheds.org/products/hydrobasins (accessed on 6 September 2023)
H03HydroLAKES V1.0Lake outlinesGlobalNASuitable for regional focus2013Vector (shp)Messager et al. [74]WWF HydroSHEDShttps://www.hydrosheds.org/products/hydrolakes (accessed on 6 September 2023)
H04CA-discharge data setGeolocations of river gauges in mountainous Central Asia, including basin outlines, discharge, and basin characterizationMountainous parts of the drainage basins Issy Kul, Chu, Talas, Syr Darya, Amu Darya, Murghab, HarirudTime series of various lengths between 1915–2012Suitable for water balance modelling at basin scale2023Vector as geopackage (shp/gpkg)Marti et al. [18]Zenodo.orghttps://www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7743778 (accessed on 24 July 2023)
H05Randolph Glacier Inventory V6.0Glacier outlinesGlobal2014Suitable for regional focus2017Vector (shp)RGI Consortium [75]Global Land Ice Measurements from Space Initiative (GLIMS)https://www.glims.org/RGI/ (accessed on 3 April 2023)
H06High Mountain Asia Snow ReanalysisV1Snow cover and snow water equivalentsHigh mountain Asia1 October 1999–30 September 201716 arc-second2021Raster (netCDF)Liu et al. [76]National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC)https://nsidc.org/data/hma_sr_d/versions/1 (accessed on 3 April 2023)
H07Glacier thickness FarinottiGlacier thickness on RGI based on inverse modellingGlobal2014Suitable for regional focus2019Raster (tif)Farinotti et al. [77]ETH Zurichhttps://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/315707 (accessed on 3 April 2023)
H08Glacier thickness MillanGlacier thickness on RGI based on inverse modellingGlobal2014~50 m2022Raster (tif)Millan et al. [78]SEDOOhttps://www.sedoo.fr/theia-publication-products/?uuid=55acbdd5-3982-4eac-89b2-46703557938c (accessed on 3 April 2023)
H09Glacier thinning ratesGlacier thinning rates on RGIGlobalAverage rate of change between 2000–2019Suitable for regional focus2021Table (csv)Hugonnet et al. [79]SEDOOhttps://doi.org/10.6096/13 (accessed on 3 April 2023)
H10Glacier ablation ratesGlacier ablation rates for many of the glaciers with area >2 km2 in High Mountain AsiaHigh Mountain AsiaAverage ablation rate between 2000–2016Suitable for regional focus in basins dominated by glacier melt from larger glaciers2021Table (csv)Miles et al. [80]ZENODOhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3843292 (accessed on 24 July 2023)
H11Projections of glacier meltProjections of glacier melt under CMIP 6 climate projectionsGlobal2000–2100Suitable for regional focus2023Raster (netCDF)Rounce et al. [81]National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC)https://nsidc.org/data/hma2_ggp/versions/1 (accessed on 24 July 2023)
H12HiHydroSoils V2.0High resolution (250 m) soil maps hydraulic propertiesGlobalNA~250 m2020Raster (tif)FutureWater [82]FutureWaterhttps://www.futurewater.eu/projects/hihydrosoil/ (accessed on 24 April 2023)
H13FLO1KMap of average mean, minimum and maximum river runoffGlobalAverages between 1960–201530 arc-seconds.
Suitable where discharge measurements are unavailable
2018Raster (netCDF)Barbarossa et al. [83]Figsharehttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3890224.v1 (accessed on 3 May 2023)
H14Northern Hemisphere Permafrost–Ground Temperature Map (2000-2016)Provides modeled mean annual ground temperatures at the top layer of the permafrostNorthern HemisphereBased on average temperatures between
2000–2016
30 arc-seconds2018Raster (netCDF)Obu et al. [84,85]Arctic Permafrost Geospatial Centerhttps://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.888600 (accessed on 3 April 2023)
H15Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP)Two datasets (near real-time as well as historic data) providing estimates of global land surface moisture measured by a passive microwave radiometerGlobalNear real-time data, as well as from 2015–today36 km22021/2022Raster (HDF5)O’Neill et al. [86,87]National Snow and Ice Data Centerhttps://doi.org/10.5067/NCTT8THPWRTL (accessed on 6 September 2023)
https://doi.org/10.5067/LPJ8F0TAK6E0 (accessed on 6 September 2023)
The gauge locations (H04) and basin outlines (H04) are presented in Figure 3. This dataset focuses on the zone of runoff formation, i.e., the mountainous region of Central Asia. The dataset H04 has been used in a stochastic soil water balance model to estimate the impact of the projected future climate on river runoff in Central Asia [11] and validate a hydrological model (H13). The dataset has further been used to calibrate semi-distributed hydrological models to estimate the impact of climate change on the flow duration curve of specific demonstration sites and plan for sustainable small hydropower production under a changing climate [88].

3.3. Geography and Topography

Geographic and topographic data constitute the basis for various WFEC Nexus analyses, including delineating different administrative areas and information on elevation and surface cover (Table 4).
The first dataset (T01) provides an overview of Central Asia’s administrative areas. Aside from country borders, T01 contains subdivisions such as subnational regions (oblasts) and districts (tuman) for each country. The subsequent datasets (T02, T03) deliver information on Central Asia’s topography through digital elevation models (DEM) and products derived from them. For example, HydroSHEDS (T03) is a DEM derived from elevation data of the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) (T02) [89] and is best suited for hydrological applications. Several post-processing techniques like deepening open water surfaces, weeding of coastal zones, stream burning, filtering, molding of valley courses, sink filling, or carving through barriers have been applied. In addition to a DEM, it includes further information such as flow direction and accumulation data, which is highly relevant for many hydrological applications such as flow network modelling. Such pre-computed products can significantly reduce computational efforts in large areas like Central Asia.
The last set of data is related to land cover. Copernicus Global Land Service (T04) provides yearly information between 2015 and 2019 on land coverage categorized into 23 classes at a 100 m resolution. In addition, Copernicus Climate Change Service [90] delivers global land cover maps at 300 m spatial resolution annually between 1992 and 2020 (T05). Such information is critical for assessments dealing with water [91] or food availability [92], especially given that land cover can strongly affect local climate conditions [93]. In addition to being valuable within the climate-modelling communities, these datasets serve a wide range of applications, including land accounting, forest monitoring, and combatting desertification.
Table 4. Open-source data related to geography and topography.
Table 4. Open-source data related to geography and topography.
IDNameDescriptionSpatial ExtentTemporal ExtentResolution (Accuracy)Data Created/PublishedType of DataData SourceData ProviderOnline Link
T01Global Administrative Areas (GADM)Delineation of country and administrative boundariesGlobalNASuitable for regional focus2022Vector (shp/gpkg)GADM [58]GADMhttps://gadm.org/data.html (accessed on 22 May 2023)
T02Digital Elevation—Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM)Void-filled and non-void-filled options obtained by radar from spaceGlobalNA1 arc-seconds
or 3 arc-seconds
2000/2018Raster (tif)Earth Resources Observation and Science Center (EROS) [94]United States Geological Survey (USGS)—Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Centerhttps://doi.org/10.5066/F7PR7TFT (accessed on 22 May 2023)
T03HydroSHEDS V1.0Hydrological conditioned DEM and other DEM-based products (flow direction, flow accumulation, land mask grid)GlobalNA3, 15, 30 arc-seconds and 5, 6 arc-minutes2007/2008Raster (tif)Lehner et al. [95] WWF HydroShedshttps://www.hydrosheds.org/downloads (accessed on 22 May 2023)
T04Copernicus Global Land ServiceLand cover data of 23 classes, including transitions of land cover classes over time capturing land cover changesGlobalAnnual between 2015—2019~100 m
(Mapping accuracy is just over 80%)
2020Raster (tif)Buchhorn et al. [96]Copernicus Global Land Servicehttps://land.copernicus.eu/global/products/lc (accessed on 6 September 2023)
T05Land cover classification gridded mapsGlobal maps categorizing the land surface into 22 classes, defined by the FAO Land Cover Classification System GlobalAnnual between 1992—2020~300 m2019Raster (netCDF4)Copernicus Climate Change Service [90]Copernicus Climate Change Service https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.006f2c9a (accessed on 17 May 2023)
A possible application of the data by HydroSHEDS (T03) is shown in Figure 4. The overall river network was calculated using the flow direction and accumulation raster presented in T03. Comparing the modelled runoff scheme between regular DEMs and the HydroSHEDS data, the benefits of the hydrologically conditioned HydroSHEDS data become evident. The geographic location of the scheme is consistent with the rivers displayed in topographic maps [97]. The slope of the channel in the generated river network was derived from the underlying DEM.

3.4. Geomorphology

Understanding the landscape characteristics of one’s study area is crucial for water-related planning. Data on geology and geomorphology are helpful for acquiring basic information on dominant rock types to understand the ground’s specific characteristics. The data in this section include the fields of lithology, geology, soil erosion, and landslide hazards (Table 5). These aspects are directly or indirectly related to the WFEC Nexus. The geomorphological characteristics of the catchment influence the hydrological processes, such as infiltration and associated groundwater recharge. They, therefore, influence the spatial and temporal availability of water and its geochemical composition. Soil properties result from geomorphological processes and, together with water availability, impact the agricultural use of land, directly affecting food production. Information on the potential risk of soil loss on agricultural land and the risk of landslides are highly relevant in the WFEC Nexus. Soil loss negatively affects the productivity of agricultural areas and the water quality of associated surface water where the sediments deposit. Landslides threaten human lives or infrastructure (e.g., in this context, especially power plants) but also account for local soil movements affecting agricultural areas and surface waters. As geomorphology directly influences water processes and food production, and the risk related to geomorphology can affect critical infrastructure, it is highly relevant to be considered in the WFEC Nexus.
Lithological information describes the rock’s geochemical, mineralogical, and physical properties [98]. More broadly, it also provides information on the sediments transported in the river system, affecting water quality, river type, and river morphology. This lithological data is available as a global dataset (G01), classifying rock types (including unconsolidated sediments). It uses a three-level classification system, providing information on the main lithological class (level 1), more specific rock attributes (level 2), and the presence of other rock types (level 3) [98]. Geological data describing the geological periods of the local rock types are available for the former Soviet Union (G02). The widely used RUSLE approach [99] estimates soil erosion per unit area by a simple multiplication of six factors available globally (G03) but shows some data gaps, especially in the high mountain region. It represents soil loss due to inter-rill and rill erosion but does not account for gullying or tillage erosion [99]. The globally available landslide hazard map (G04) indicates six hazard classes from medium to high risk, differentiating between rainfall- and earthquake-induced landslides.
Table 5. Open-source data related to geomorphology.
Table 5. Open-source data related to geomorphology.
IDNameDescriptionSpatial ExtentTemporal ExtentResolution (Accuracy)Data Created/PublishedType of DataData SourceData ProviderOnline Link
G01Global lithological map (GLiM)Lithological map with three-level classification system for rock typesGlobal-Suitable for regional focus2012Vector (shp)Moosdorf and Hartmann [98,100]Commission for the Geological Map of the Worldhttps://ccgm.org/en/product/world-lithology-map/ (accessed on 24 July 2023)
G02Generalized Geology of the Former Soviet UnionGeological map showing geology, oil and gas fields, and geologic provincesFormer Soviet Union-Suitable for regional focus1999Vector (shp)Persits et al. [101]United States Geological Survey (USGS)https://certmapper.cr.usgs.gov/data/apps/world-maps/ (accessed on 5 May 2023)
G03Soil ErosionAssessment of global soil erosion using the RUSLE methodGlobal2001, 2012~25 km2017/2019Raster (tif)Borrelli et al. [102,103]Joint Research Centre of the European Commissionhttps://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/content/global-soil-erosion
(Available upon request) (accessed on 5 May 2023)
G04Landslide HazardGlobal landslide hazard map containing rainfall and earthquake-induced landslide hazardsGlobal-~1 km2020/2021Raster (tif)The World Bank [104]The World Bankhttps://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/0037584 (accessed on 5 February 2023)
In WFEC Nexus applications, the geomorphology data can provide insights into primary rock type and soil movement characteristics, such as the example shown for the upper part of the At-Bashy River catchment, Kyrgyzstan. This geomorphological data was, for example, used to assess the hydromorphological processes within the basin as part of the planning process for a small hydropower plant by using the landslide hazard data (S04) to estimate the planned hydropower plant’s susceptibility to landslides. For the At-Bashy hydropower site [88], the hazard of landslides from rainfall or earthquakes is moderate and moderate to medium, respectively (Figure 5). In the catchment upstream of the planned hydropower plant, however, the hazard for earthquake-triggered landslides is classified as high for most of the area. Therefore, the At-Bashy River riverbed may be affected by landslides due to high sediment inputs, which needs to be considered for the operation of the plant and can, therefore, affect energy production.

3.5. Ecology

Water is essential for life. Therefore, settlements, infrastructure, and production facilities are often found near freshwater ecosystems. River landscapes provide water for drinking, cooling, energy production, and irrigation, as well as offer fish for food supply and areas for flood protection. However, such uses often entail significant modifications (e.g., channelization and flow alterations), affecting ecological functions [105] and the ability of nature to contribute to society [106]. Degraded ecosystems often have reduced biodiversity and may no longer provide fundamental services, so conservation and restoration efforts are imperative [107,108]. In this regard, geodata provide the fundamental information needed to assess the ecological status quo [109,110,111] and, based thereupon, derive prioritization frameworks for conservation and restoration [112,113] at various spatial levels [114]. To this aim, Table 6 presents key data related to freshwater ecology.
Identifying exceptionally biodiverse and imperiled systems is indispensable for water management decisions [115]. In this context, the first five datasets provide insights into the distribution of freshwater species. As a starting point, the ecoregion concept describes the large-scale distribution of biodiversity [116]. The Freshwater Ecoregions of the World (FEOW) dataset (E01) complements the terrestrial [117] and marine classification approaches [118]. Aside from providing multiple measures of species diversity (e.g., share of endemic species), the FEOW delineation constitutes a fundamental conservation planning unit [119] and may aid in identifying priorities at the continental scale [120,121], particularly in combination with the Key Biodiversity Areas (E02), a dataset on areas that are globally the most important for biodiversity. At the regional scale, ecoregions can sub-divide major basins [122] or identify rare river types. Conservation planning at the sub-regional scale will benefit from including other freshwater biodiversity data [123]. These data may include the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s (IUCN’s) spatial data of the Red List of Threatened Species (E03), the global EPTO (E04), or the Living Planet Index database (E05). The IUCN provides datasets on mammals, amphibians, reptiles, fishes, marine groups, plants, and freshwater groups. Particularly, the freshwater group (E03), including crabs, crayfishes, fishes (i.e., Actinopterygii), mollusks, Odonata (i.e., dragonflies and damselflies), and others, is relevant for WFEC Nexus assessments. The data contains taxonomy, distribution status, and IUCN Red List Category information. Also, the EPTO dataset (E04), containing global georeferenced records of four major macroinvertebrate taxa groups (i.e., Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, and Odonata), may be used for such approaches. The four insect genera recorded in dataset E04 not only constitute a proxy measure of the overall richness of macroinvertebrate assemblages [124,125], but they exhibit different sensitivities to water pollution and habitat degradation [126], thereby helping to assess human pressure gradients at various spatial levels.
From a temporal perspective, the Living Planet Index database (E05) provides a time series of population abundance data for amphibians, birds, fishes, mammals, and reptiles on the species level. Dataset E06 presents the connectivity status of 8.5 million river reaches, showing the extent to which these rivers are free-flowing based on the Connectivity Status Index (CSI). The CSI integrates five central pressures: river fragmentation, flow regulation, sediment trapping, water consumption, and infrastructure development. The global Free-Flowing Rivers dataset can aid in identifying protection and restoration priorities on global or supra-regional scales. The dataset must be used cautiously at smaller scales since it is based upon global dam databases [127,128] and is, therefore, missing countless small dams. Consequently, national or basin-scale decisions must incorporate higher-quality data [129].
The next two datasets include information on protected areas. The first (E07) encompasses the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and the World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WD-OECM). These datasets illustrate the status (proposed, inscribed, adopted, designated, established, and the respective year of enactment) and designation type (national, regional, international) of protected areas, among others. At the international level, the Ramsar sites, Wetlands of International Importance, and World Heritage Sites are listed. In contrast, sites of Community Importance [130] or Special Protection Areas [131] are listed at the regional level. The associated IUCN categories (Ia, Ib, II, III, IV, V, and VI) are provided where applicable. Even though Ramsar sites are also included in dataset E07, it might be worthwhile to use the Ramsar Sites Information Service (RSIS; E08), which does not only provide up-to-date point information (and in some cases also boundaries) on Ramsar sites but further details on each site. On a global or regional scale, the coarse information on the presence of a Ramsar site might be sufficient, but especially at smaller scales, the exact delineation of Ramsar areas might be required. Dataset E09 includes the statistically derived Global Environmental Stratification (GEnS). By distinguishing 125 strata with relatively homogeneous bioclimatic conditions, it provides a novel global spatial framework for integrating and analyzing ecological and environmental data. This robust spatial analytical framework can be used to interconnect local observations, identify gaps in current monitoring efforts, and systematically design new monitoring and research efforts [132,133].
Table 6. Open-source data related to ecology.
Table 6. Open-source data related to ecology.
IDNameDescriptionSpatial ExtentTemporal ExtentResolution (Accuracy)Data created/PublishedType of DataData SourceData ProviderOnline Link
E01Freshwater EcoregionsDelineation of 426 freshwater conservation units with distinct freshwater communitiesGlobalNASuitable for global and regional focus2008Vector (shp)Abell et al. [123]The Nature Conservancy and World Wildlife Fund 2019www.feow.org (accessed on 2 May 2023)
E02Key Biodiversity AreasAreas contributing significantly to biodiversityGlobalUpdated regularlySuitable for global, regional, and national focus2016Vector (shp)IUCN [134]Bird Life International (2022)www.keybiodiversityareas.org/kba-data (Available upon request) (accessed on 2 May 2023)
E03IUCN Red List of Freshwater speciesDistribution ranges of freshwater speciesGlobalUpdated regularlySuitable for global and regional focus2021Vector (shp)IUCN [135]IUCNwww.iucnredlist.org/resources/spatial-data-download (accessed on 2 May 2023)
E04Global EPTO DatabaseComprehensive table of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, and Odonata (EPTO) occurrence recordsGlobal1951–2021 (94% with complete date)Suitable for global, regional, and national focus2023Table (csv) with coordinates and catchment IDsGrigoropoulou et al. [136]IGB Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisherieshttps://fred.igb-berlin.de/data/package/829 (accessed on 2 May 2023)
E05Living Planet Index DatabaseTime-series of population abundance data for vertebrate species (public version)Global1970–2021Varying2022Table (csv) of species with yearly abundance metrics and site coordinatesLiving Planet Index [137]Zoological Society of London and WWF 2022www.livingplanetindex.org (accessed on 2 May 2023)
E06Free-Flowing RiversGlobal river network including a connectivity status assessment on the reach scaleGlobalNASuitable for global and regional focus2019Vector (gdb)Grill et al. [129,138]Grill and Lehner (2019)https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7688801 (accessed on 2 May 2023)
E07World Database on Protected AreasGlobal Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WD-OECM)GlobalUpdated regularlySuitable for global, regional, and national focus2023Vector (shp)UNEP-WCMC and IUCN [139]Protected Planetwww.protectedplanet.net (accessed on 2 May 2023)
E08Ramsar sitesGlobal point information of Ramsar SitesGlobalNASuitable for global and regional focus2021Table (csv) with coordinates or Vector (shp)Ramsar [140]Ramsar Sites Information Servicehttps://rsis.ramsar.org (accessed on 2 May 2023)
E09Global Environmental Stratification (GEnS)High-resolution bioclimate map of the worldGlobalNA30 arc-seconds2018Raster, Vector (tif, shp)Metzger [132,133] M. Metzgerhttps://datashare.ed.ac.uk/handle/10283/3089 (accessed on 2 May 2023)
Figure 6 shows the number of endangered (CR, EN, and VU) freshwater fish species per basin (H02—HydroBASIN, see Section 3.2). It was generated based on the IUCN Red List dataset (E03), focusing on endangered freshwater fish species classified as native and extant in Central Asia. The map highlights the areas that are potentially inhabited by multiple endangered fish species (e.g., Ural, Amu-Darya, and Syr-Darya) and can therefore be considered to be sensitive to future developments (e.g., the construction of hydropower plants) and their associated pressures (e.g., impoundments, water abstraction). Ideally, areas with a high frequency of endangered species should not be subjected to further pressures and, therefore, should be excluded from new hydropower development. Consequently, such maps are indispensable for conservation planning at the global or regional scale.

3.6. Anthropogenic Uses

The Nexus approach holistically connects different thematic areas and balances human activities such as energy production or agriculture. Irrigation or land use changes, as well as energy production, significantly impact water availability and quality. Both, energy and food production and consumption patterns impact greenhouse gas emissions and, therefore, the climate on a global scale. Human activities intensify the interconnection of WFEC Nexus-related topics further due to growing water, food, and energy demands. The data presented in Table 7 cover a wide range of spatial, temporal, and qualitative properties related to human activities: from global to regional data, processed satellite observations to model simulation results, and point data to time series. The data have been classified into three sub-groups covering infrastructure, agriculture, and social development.
Different types of infrastructure are needed to facilitate the efficient and sustainable management of these interconnected systems. The first set of data includes different uses of water management, including the location of dams for hydropower production (A01) and other purposes, such as irrigation, industry, or domestic use (A02). These two previous datasets can be highly relevant when defining effective transboundary water management strategies or developing national and regional hydropower development plans. Large reservoirs leading to natural flow regime shifts can cause multiple conflicts for the WFEC Nexus [142,143]. The location of different types of canals is accessible through Open Street Maps (A03) [144]. When applying hydrological models (e.g., H13) to estimate the flow in a river system, it is critical to consider the canal system and, particularly, the irrigation scheme. However, working with the data has shown that the dataset must be used cautiously, as completeness and detail vary from region to region. The final dataset in this group is OpenStreetMaps’ Electricity Network (A04), which includes substations, towers, power lines, and underground/underwater cables. Such information is essential when discussing energy development in a region.
Agriculture provides the basis for food production but can also affect the natural water balance. About 80% of the water used to irrigate agricultural land in Central Asia comes from surface water [145,146], affecting the downstream water availability. AQUASTAT (A05), provided by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), provides information on irrigation and drainage development, including irrigated crop yield, irrigated area, cropping intensity, and drainage development—all on a national, annual basis. The data presents a chronological overview of the development within these themes of the different countries without providing spatial information at a sub-national level. Similar data within sub-national boundaries or river basin scales are rarely available. The Crop Calendar dataset (A06), developed by FAO in collaboration with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), provides spatial information on the crop planting and harvesting dates of 19 major crop types. In addition, the MapSPAM model (A07) provides detailed patterns of crop harvested area (rainfed and irrigated) and crop yields annually for 2000, 2005, and 2010. The FAO has also delivered the Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD), including agroecological zones (A08).
Table 7. Open-source data related to anthropogenic uses.
Table 7. Open-source data related to anthropogenic uses.
IDNameDescriptionSpatial ExtentTemporal ExtentResolution (Accuracy)Data Created/PublishedType of DataData SourceData ProviderOnline Link
A01Global Energy Observatory—Hydro PowerPlantsConsolidated and processed dataset of hydropower plantsGlobalNASuitable for regional focusVaried, modified in 2018Vector (shp) and table (xls)Global Energy Observatory [147]Global Energy Observatory (GEO)https://globalenergyobservatory.org/list.php?db=PowerPlants&type=Hydro (accessed on 19 May 2023)
A02Global Georeferenced Database of Dams (GOODD)Location of >38,000 dams and associated watershedsGlobalNASuitable for regional focus. Older structures are mostly complete, newer ones are incomplete2020Vector (shp)Mulligan et al. [148]Global Dam Watchhttps://www.globaldamwatch.org/ (accessed on 19 May 2023)
A03Irrigation canals by OpenStreetMap (OSM)Location of OSM irrigation channelsGlobal--Suitable for regional focus (incomplete)2020Vector (shp)OpenStreetMap contributors [149]OpenStreetMaphttps://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=6/40.388/68.994 (accessed on 20 November 2023)
A04Electricity network by OpenStreetMapOpenStreetMap electricity networkGlobal--Suitable for regional focus (incomplete)2020Vector (shp)OpenStreetMap contributors [149]OpenStreetMaphttps://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=6/40.388/68.994 (accessed on 20 November 2023)
A05AQUASTAT Data on harvested area, crop yields, renewable water resources, and agricultural water withdrawalGlobal1964–2020Suitable for regional and national focus1993Table (xls)FAO [146]FAOhttps://tableau.apps.fao.org/views/ReviewDashboard-v1/country_dashboard?%3Aembed=y&%3AisGuestRedirectFromVizportal=y (accessed on 20 May 2023)
A06Crop CalendarGlobal crop planting/harvesting dates for 19 major crops; combined data from Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)GlobalNA5 arc-minutes or 0.5 arc-degrees2010Raster (netCDF, ArcINFO ASCII)Sacks et al. [150,151] Center for Sustainability and the Global
Environment (SAGE), University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA,
https://sage.nelson.wisc.edu/data-and-models/datasets/crop-calendar-dataset/ (accessed on 21 June 2023)
A07MapSPAMCrop production indicators for 42 crop types, including physical area, harvest area, production, and yieldGlobal2000, 2005, 20105 arc-minutes2010Raster (csv)MapSPAM (CGIAR, FAO, World bank etc.) [152]Harvard databasehttps://www.mapspam.info/data/ (accessed on 19 February 2023)
A08Harmonized World Soil database (HWSD) v 1.2Dataset of harmonized soil propertiesGlobal 30 arc-seconds2009Raster (mdb)FAO, IIASA, ISRIC-World Soil Information, Institute of Soil Science-Chinese Academy of Sciences (ISSCAS), and the JRC [153]FAOhttps://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-survey/soil-maps-and-databases/harmonized-world-soil-database-v12/en/ (accessed on 19 May 2023)
A09Gridded Population of the World (GPW) v4Gridded population counts aggregated from national and sub-national levelsGlobal2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, 202030 arc-seconds2018Raster (tif, ASCII; netCDF4)Center for International Earth Science Information Network—CIESIN—Columbia University [154]Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN)- Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC)https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/gpw-v4-population-count-rev11 (accessed on 19 May 2023)
A10Human Development Index (HDI)An index for assessing human developments considering three dimensions: (i) a long and healthy life, (ii) the status of knowledge, and (iii) the standard of livingGlobal1990–2021Suitable for regional focus2020Table (csv, xls)United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) [155]UNDPhttp://hdr.undp.org/en/content/download-data (accessed on 19 May 2023)
The last group relates to the social developments affecting the WFEC Nexus, such as a gridded population count (A09). These data can be used to evaluate critical information, such as food, water, or energy demand at different spatial scales. Finally, the Human Development Index (A10) can provide information on vulnerability to water scarcity, energy shortages, and food insecurity. By comparing the changes in the HDI over time, it is possible to assess the impact of WFEC Nexus-related policies on human development.
In the absence of official statistical data at the sub-national level in Central Asia, agricultural data can be assessed using the MapSPAM model (A06). This open-access and georeferenced information makes it possible to evaluate the total agricultural water withdrawal at the sub-national level (Figure 7). Each pixel in the region is associated with a harvested irrigated area and a specific crop yield. The latter can be transformed into agricultural water withdrawals by means of the water requirements for each crop type, which are identified in relevant publications [146,156,157,158]. For most crops, the literature provides water consumption intervals depending on the type of irrigation system, the geographical area, and the climate. In the case of the example shown in Figure 7, the mean value of each interval was selected for the calculation of agricultural water use. Given that water withdrawal for agricultural activities affects water availability downstream, such analyses are a critical element of WFEC Nexus studies, as upstream water consumption affects food production, domestic water availability, hydropower generation, and local climate conditions downstream.

4. Discussion

4.1. Data Updates and Integration

The presented datasets cannot be seen as static since new datasets are constantly being released, and existing ones are continuously updated and improved with more recent and more accurate data. For instance, HydroSHEDS [95], a set of hydrological products, announced an updated version for 2023 (HydroSHEDS V2). The underlying DEM will be replaced with a more detailed one, increasing the spatial extent and improving the raster resolution from 3 arc-seconds to 1 arc-second [159]. Another example is the French–U.S. SWOT mission (Surface Water and Ocean Topography), which started in 2022 and will provide an unprecedented view of the globe’s water. The SWOT mission aims to measure the surface water heights of lakes, rivers, flood zones, and the deep and coastal oceans based on a wide-swath Ka-band radar measurement from space. When the project reaches its goal, the results and digital terrain models could, for example, be used globally for hydrodynamic modelling to improve river discharge estimates [160].
Freely available satellite data with high spatial and temporal resolution (e.g., multispectral Sentinel2 data) already offer the possibility of obtaining crucial spatial information on land use, topography, or the availability of different resources. These datasets can be integrated with cloud-computing systems such as Google Earth Engine (GEE), thereby facilitating data analysis for large areas and extended periods. This data integration can provide vital information to fill existing data gaps, such as identifying areas of deposition and erosion in surface waters [161] or alterations of the river course [162].
In addition to new or updated datasets, more recent developments in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning offer significant potential in generating global datasets. Case studies and developed AI tools already exist, which point to possible applications. Examples include recent advances in Machine Learning applications in algal bloom and shellfish contamination forecasting [163], evapotranspiration estimation for agricultural water management in semi-arid environments [164], and the prediction of Arsenic exceeding permissible thresholds in drinking water [165]. Machine Learning is considered a key tool in data analysis, classification, and prediction of the increasing volume of environmental data [166]. AI techniques are decreasing model development costs and prediction errors, leading to more accurate models [167]. The accuracy claimed by model creators is often impressive. However, such statements must be handled cautiously. Spatial and environmental data can be highly affected by autocorrelation, and the results of testing accuracy can therefore be misleading [168]. Also, the availability of sufficient data is fundamental to form the baseline necessary to develop AI applications. Training, validation, and testing datasets are required to ensure rigorous model training, optimization, and validation processes [169]. In areas like Central Asia, where minimal data exists, local conditions may differ from the training data. Therefore, models might deliver less accurate results in data-scarce regions [168].

4.2. Real-Time Applications

Adaptive management practices based on real-time information will become increasingly important in a region such as Central Asia, which is highly water-stressed and where summer shortages are predicted to increase due to climate change [10]. Indeed, there has been development in this area in Central Asia. One such example is the web application tool ‘Count4D’, designed for irrigation and water resources management in Central Asia. The application has separate components intended for administrators, districts, and water user associations and a tool allowing field observers to send water level measurements, which are automatically converted to discharge values [170]. Another successful case study in this area is an Integrated Water Resources Management project in the Fergana Valley. Among other interventions, an automated water monitoring system (updated every 10 min) and a management information system were employed. The system was designed to plan, assess, and correct water distribution between different water user associations. The project has led to a dramatic decrease in conflicts between the governing administration and water user associations and a reduction of common water delivery by 12–25% [7].

4.3. WFEC Nexus Application in Central Asia: The Case of Hydropower

Hydropower is a highly relevant issue within the WFEC Nexus [171], particularly in Central Asia. Several Central Asian governments have set ambitious targets for increasing the share of renewable energies and developing the region’s hydropower sector, as energy demand continues to rise and electricity supply in many rural areas is still highly unstable [172]. However, hydropower development in the region needs to be approached with caution as it is closely linked to all WFEC-related issues. Hydropower operations can affect the daily, seasonal, and annual flow regime through reservoir operations, e.g., reducing water availability downstream [105,143]. Such changes in water availability can affect food production in Central Asia [173], which relies heavily on surface water irrigation [145,146]. In addition, hydropower can negatively impact aquatic ecosystems, lowering fish stocks [174] and thus putting pressure on the fisheries sector. At the same time, existing irrigation infrastructure, such as non-powered dams in the complex canal system, can be electrified, and careful operation could lead to synergies between energy production and agriculture [175]. Hydropower has a high potential to cover the increasing energy demand, replacing fossil energy sources and consequently contributing to tackling climate change on a global scale [173].
Identifying a region’s existing hydropower potential [70,97] is an essential step in formulating holistic, sustainable hydropower development plans. The examples of data applications shown in the results provide essential information for determining the sustainable hydropower potential of the region. The climate information shown in Figure 2 can be used to develop a climate change model that estimates future changes in discharge to ensure long-term sustainability. The hydrological data on discharge at the gauging station shown in Figure 3 are essential input data for climate change modelling. However, they are also necessary to validate hydrological models, which are needed to assess flow conditions in ungauged basins. The calculated river network and slopes displayed in Figure 4 provide information on the available head within specific river reaches. Besides the discharge, the hydraulic head is the primary determinant of the technical hydropower potential [70,97]. Therefore, the map displayed in Figure 4 depicts areas best suited for hydropower generation concerning topography. In order to consider sustainability aspects in hydropower potential assessments, it is necessary to also consider geomorphological processes in mountainous regions, such as landslides (Figure 5), to exclude hazard zones. In addition, including ecological criteria, such as the presence of endangered fish species (Figure 6), is essential to preserve the aquatic ecosystem, as hydropower can negatively affect aquatic flora and fauna. Finally, the proportion of the flow required for irrigation (Figure 7) must be assessed to avoid conflict between hydropower production and other Nexus components, ensuring food security. This example demonstrates the practical relevance of the database for applications directly related to the WFEC Nexus.

4.4. Data Limitations

The quality of the datasets holds significant potential for various fields and regions, but their availability and quality also face limitations. Open-source data can be used in various applications at the regional scale or serve to substitute point data of hydrological stations. Using these datasets to assess the sustainable hydropower potential or conduct a tradeoff analysis between water needs for agricultural irrigation and hydropower production, we validated the data used to work on Nexus-related issues at a regional level (Section 4.3). In this regard, the results of the hydropower potential study fit well with detailed site-specific studies of hydropower plants currently under construction in the project Hydro4U [176]. However, these datasets, which are often of global scope, are too coarse for detailed planning, such as the sizing of a hydroelectric plant. In many cases, local measurements, which are rarely available in Central Asia, are needed to validate model results or refine the spatial or temporal resolution. Nevertheless, the database can serve as a starting point for such detailed studies, providing information on where and which additional or more detailed data is needed. In general, an overall validation of the dataset for all kinds of applications has not been conducted in this study. The user must always consider the data resolution specified for each dataset and decide whether it is sufficient for a particular application. Understanding and accepting the potential limitations and accuracy described in the dataset references for the specific application is also essential.
Open datasets and the ability to access these remotely allow individuals and organizations worldwide to work on solutions to pressing societal issues. On the one hand, this allows the necessary democratization of innovation, but, especially with further development of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, it also leads to the development of even more data and tools with regional or global coverage [177], which may not be validated for all regions, including Central Asia. Screening open datasets for their suitability for regional Nexus-type modelling is essential but neither scientifically nor commercially rewarding. Funding periodic benchmarking studies of open data and tools would improve their useability for the benefit of society.

4.5. Promoting Data Sharing and Fostering Collaboration

There is a high dependency on globally available, open-source data when studying Nexus-related issues in Central Asia. To date, local measurements are rarely available due to outdated infrastructure, resource constraints, and data protection regulations. To overcome these challenges and bridge data gaps, promoting open data initiatives and fostering collaborations among local authorities, academic institutions, civil society organizations, and private entities is necessary. Standardizing data collection methods, developing data-sharing agreements, and leveraging emerging technologies can enhance data quality and accessibility. Additionally, political will is needed to invest in modernizing outdated infrastructure, including data collection and dissemination systems, which can improve data availability and accuracy. By addressing these issues, effective decision-making, transparency, and accountability can be fostered in Central Asia and beyond. Recognizing the interdependence of water, energy, food systems, and climate, the WFEC Nexus approach highlights the need for integrated data collection and management strategies.

5. Conclusions

This paper presents a synopsis of open-source geodata grouped into six data categories that can be used for transboundary WFEC Nexus analysis. Such data are particularly relevant for Central Asia, where the availability of regional geodata is still scarce. The data sources presented in this article allow researchers and decision-makers to integratively consider topics such as water resources (management), biodiversity, climate change, anthropogenic uses, and development scenarios [97,178,179], thereby providing an invaluable foundation to conduct a variety of assessments linked to the WFEC Nexus. The datasets are insufficient for every site-specific application where high data resolution is required. More data must be collected and published to ensure the sustainable development of WFEC-related issues in Central Asia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.D.K., D.S.H., B.W. and H.H.; methodology, D.S.H. and B.W.; investigation, J.D.K., D.S.H., T.S., B.M., C.S., H.S., O.A., Z.G., E.K., R.M.L.F. and I.R.D.; writing—original draft preparation, J.D.K., D.S.H., B.M., C.S., H.S., O.A., Z.G., R.M.L.F., I.R.D., B.A. and J.C.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, J.D.K. and D.S.H.; supervision, H.H.; project administration, J.D.K. and H.H.; funding acquisition, D.S.H., T.S., O.A., Z.G., R.M.L.F., B.A., B.K., B.W. and H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 101022905.

Data Availability Statement

All data are presented in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. IPCC. Fact Sheets|Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022; ISBN 9789291691623. [Google Scholar]
  2. Butchart, S.H.M.; Walpole, M.; Collen, B.; van Strien, A.; Scharlemann, J.P.W.; Almond, R.E.A.; Baillie, J.E.M.; Bomhard, B.; Brown, C.; Bruno, J.; et al. Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines. Science 2010, 328, 1164–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ravallion, M. On Measuring Global Poverty. Annu. Rev. Econom. 2020, 12, 167–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Simpson, G.B.; Jewitt, G.P. The Water-Energy-Food Nexus in the Anthropocene: Moving from ‘Nexus Thinking’ to ‘Nexus Action’. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2019, 40, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. European Commission. Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystem Nexus. Available online: https://international-partnerships.ec.europa.eu/policies/climate-environment-and-energy/water-energy-food-ecosystem-nexus_en (accessed on 25 May 2023).
  6. de Strasser, L.; Lipponen, A.; Howells, M.; Stec, S.; Bréthaut, C. A Methodology to Assess the Water Energy Food Ecosystems Nexus in Transboundary River Basins. Water 2016, 8, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dukhovny, V.A.; Sokolov, V.I.; Ziganshina, D.R. Integrated Water Resources Management in Central Asia, as a Way of Survival in Conditions of Water Scarcity. Quat. Int. 2013, 311, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hamidov, A.; Helming, K.; Balla, D. Impact of Agricultural Land Use in Central Asia: A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 36, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yazdani, E. Geopolitical Dynamics of the Persian Gulf and Central Asia in the US Global Policy. Shanlax Int. J. Arts Sci. Humanit. 2020, 8, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sorg, A.; Mosello, B.; Shalpykova, G.; Allan, A.; Hill Clarvis, M.; Stoffel, M. Coping with Changing Water Resources: The Case of the Syr Darya River Basin in Central Asia. Environ. Sci. Policy 2014, 43, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Siegfried, T.; Mujahid, A.U.H.; Marti, B.S.; Molnar, P.; Krager, D.N.; Yakovlev, A. Assessing Future Hydrological Impacts of Climate Change on High-Mountain Central Asia: Insights from a Stochastic Soil Moisture Water Balance Model. EGUsphere 2023, 2023, 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, J.; Hull, V.; Godfray, H.C.J.; Tilman, D.; Gleick, P.; Hoff, H.; Pahl-Wostl, C.; Xu, Z.; Chung, M.G.; Sun, J.; et al. Nexus Approaches to Global Sustainable Development. Nat. Sustain. 2018, 1, 466–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Estoque, R.C. Complexity and Diversity of Nexuses: A Review of the Nexus Approach in the Sustainability Context. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 854, 158612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Djumaboev, K.; Anarbekov, O.; Holmatov, B.; Hamidov, A.; Gafurov, Z.; Murzaeva, M.; Sušnik, J.; Maskey, S.; Mehmood, H.; Smakhtin, V. Surface Water Resources. In The Aral Sea Basin; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2019; pp. 25–38. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pohl, B.; Annika, K.; Hull, W.; Blumstein, S.; Abdullaev, I.; Kazbekov, J.; Reznikova, T.; Ekaterina, S.; Eduard, I.; Görlitz, S. Rethinking Water in Central Asia—The Costs of Inaction and Benefits of Water Cooperation; Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation: Bern, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  16. Alamanos, A. Sustainable Water Resources Management under Water-Scarce and Limited-Data Conditions. Cent. Asian J. Water Res. 2021, 7, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gerlitz, L.; Vorogushyn, S.; Gafurov, A. Climate Informed Seasonal Forecast of Water Availability in Central Asia: State-of-the-Art and Decision Making Context. Water Secur. 2020, 10, 100061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Marti, B.; Yakovlev, A.; Karger, D.N.; Ragettli, S.; Zhumabaev, A.; Wakil, A.W.; Siegfried, T. CA-Discharge: Geo-Located Discharge Time Series for Mountainous Rivers in Central Asia. Sci. Data 2023, 10, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gorgoglione, A.; Castro, A.; Chreties, C.; Etcheverry, L. Overcoming Data Scarcity in Earth Science. Data 2020, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Y.; Li, W.; Fang, G.; Li, Z. Review Article: Hydrological Modeling in Glacierized Catchments of Central Asia—Status and Challenges. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2017, 21, 669–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gosling, S.N.; Arnell, N.W. A Global Assessment of the Impact of Climate Change on Water Scarcity. Clim. Chang. 2016, 134, 371–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Strobl, J.; Nazarkulova, A. Open Geospatial Data: New Opportunities for GIS and GIScience in Central Asia? In Proceedings of the Annual Central Asia GIS Conference GISCA, Urumqi, China, 29–31 May 2014.
  23. United Nations Development Programme. Using Geospatial Data for Sustainable Development; United Nations Development Programme: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  24. Singh, C.; Solomon, D.; Rao, N. How Does Climate Change Adaptation Policy in India Consider Gender? An Analysis of 28 State Action Plans. Clim. Policy 2021, 21, 958–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ostapenko, O.; Olczak, P.; Koval, V.; Hren, L.; Matuszewska, D.; Postupna, O. Application of Geoinformation Systems for Assessment of Effective Integration of Renewable Energy Technologies in the Energy Sector of Ukraine. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Reisenbüchler, M.; Alapfy, B.; Rutschmann, P.; Siegfried, T. Hydro4U—Nachhaltige Kleinwasserkraft in Zentralasien. WasserWirtschaft 2021, 111, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, X.; Dong, Q.; Cheng, L.; Xia, J. A Budyko-Based Framework for Quantifying the Impacts of Aridity Index and Other Factors on Annual Runoff. J. Hydrol. 2019, 579, 124224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. ISIMIP3 Consortium. ISIMIP3 Simulation Protocol. Available online: https://www.isimip.org/protocol/3/ (accessed on 26 April 2023).
  29. Menne, M.J.; Imke, D.; Bryant, K.; McNeill, S.; Thomas, K.; Yin, X.; Anthony, S.; Ray, R.; Vose, R.S.; E.Gleason, B.E.; et al. Global Historical Climatology Network—Daily (GHCN-Daily) Version 6. 2021. Available online: https://doi.org/10.7289/V5D21VHZ (accessed on 26 April 2023).
  30. Menne, M.J.; Durre, I.; Vose, R.S.; Gleason, B.E.; Houston, T.G. An Overview of the Global Historical Climatology Network-Daily Database. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2012, 29, 897–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Williams, M.W.; Konovalov, V.G. Central Asia Temperature and Precipitation Data, 1879–2003. 2008. Available online: https://doi.org/10.7265/N5NK3BZ8 (accessed on 26 April 2023).
  32. Karger, D.N.; Conrad, O.; Böhner, J.; Kawohl, T.; Kreft, H.; Soria-Auza, R.W.; Zimmermann, N.E.; Linder, H.P.; Kessler, M. Climatologies at High Resolution for the Earth’s Land Surface Areas. Sci. Data 2017, 4, 170122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Karger, D.N.; Conrad, O.; Böhner, J.; Kawohl, T.; Kreft, H.; Soria-Auza, R.W.; Zimmermann, N.E.; Linder, H.P.; Kessler, M. Climatologies at High Resolution for the Earth’s Land Surface Areas. 2021. Available online: https://doi.org/10.16904/envidat.228.v2.1 (accessed on 22 May 2023).
  34. Beck, H.E.; Wood, E.F.; McVicar, T.R.; Zambrano-Bigiarini, M.; Alvarez-Garreton, C.; Baez-Villanueva, O.M.; Sheffield, J.; Karger, D.N. Bias Correction of Global High-Resolution Precipitation Climatologies Using Streamflow Observations from 9372 Catchments. J. Clim. 2020, 33, 1299–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fick, S.E.; Hijmans, R.J. WorldClim 2: New 1-km Spatial Resolution Climate Surfaces for Global Land Areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2017, 37, 4302–4315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Harris, I.; Jones, P.D.; Osborn, T.J.; Lister, D.H. Updated High-Resolution Grids of Monthly Climatic Observations—The CRU TS3. 10 Dataset. Int. J. Climatol. 2014, 34, 623–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Muñoz Sabater, J. ERA5-Land Hourly Data from 1950 to Present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS). 2019. Available online: https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.e2161bac (accessed on 26 April 2023).
  38. University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit; Harris, I.C.; Jones, P.D.; Osborn, T. CRU TS4.06: Climatic Research Unit (CRU) Time-Series (TS) Version 4.06 of High-Resolution Gridded Data of Month-by-Month Variation in Climate (January 1901–December 2021). 2022. Available online: https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/e0b4e1e56c1c4460b796073a31366980 (accessed on 26 April 2023).
  39. Huffman, G.J.; Stocker, E.F.; Bolvin, D.T.; Nelkin, E.J.; Tan, J. GPM IMERG Final Precipitation L3 1 Day 0.1 Degree x 0.1 Degree Version 6. 2019. Available online: https://doi.org/10.5067/GPM/IMERGDF/DAY/06 (accessed on 26 April 2023).
  40. Yatagai, A.; Kamiguchi, K.; Arakawa, O.; Hamada, A.; Yasutomi, N.; Kitoh, A. APHRODITE: Constructing a Long-Term Daily Gridded Precipitation Dataset for Asia Based on a Dense Network of Rain Gauges. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2012, 93, 1401–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ziese, M.; Rauthe-Schöch, A.B.A.; Finger, P.; Rustemeier, E.; Hänsel, S.; Schneider, U. GPCC Full Data Daily Version 2022 at 1.0°: Daily Land-Surface Precipitation from Rain-Gauges Built on GTS-Based and Historic Data. 2022. Available online: https://doi.org/10.5676/DWD_GPCC/FD_D_V2022_100 (accessed on 23 April 2023).
  42. Schamm, K.; Ziese, M.; Becker, A.; Finger, P.; Meyer-Christoffer, A.; Schneider, U.; Schröder, M.; Stender, P. Global Gridded Precipitation over Land: A Description of the New GPCC First Guess Daily Product. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2014, 6, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Funk, C.; Peterson, P.; Landsfeld, M.; Pedreros, D.; Verdin, J.; Shukla, S.; Husak, G.; Rowland, J.; Harrison, L.; Hoell, A.; et al. The Climate Hazards Infrared Precipitation with Stations—A New Environmental Record for Monitoring Extremes. Sci. Data 2015, 2, 150066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Funk, C.C.; Peterson, P.J.; Landsfeld, M.F.; Pedreros, D.H.; Verdin, J.P.; Rowland, J.D.; Romero, B.E.; Husak, G.J.; Michaelsen, J.C.; Verdin, A.P. A Quasi-Global Precipitation Time Series for Drought Monitoring; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  45. Sorooshian, S.; Hsu, K.; Braithwaite, D.; Ashouri, H. NOAA CDR Program NOAA Climate Data Record (CDR) of Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information Using Artificial Neural Networks (PERSIANN-CDR), Version 1. 2014. Available online: https://doi.org/10.7289/V51V5BWQ (accessed on 23 May 2023).
  46. Ashouri, H.; Hsu, K.-L.; Sorooshian, S.; Braithwaite, D.K.; Knapp, K.R.; Cecil, L.D.; Nelson, B.R.; Prat, O.P. PERSIANN-CDR: Daily Precipitation Climate Data Record from Multisatellite Observations for Hydrological and Climate Studies. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2015, 96, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zomer, R.J.; Xu, J.; Trabucco, A. Version 3 of the Global Aridity Index and Potential Evapotranspiration Database. Sci. Data 2022, 9, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zomer, R.J.; Trabucco, A. Version 3 of the “Global Aridity Index and Potential Evapotranspiration (ET0) Database”: Estimation of Penman-Monteith Reference Evapotranspiration. 2022. Available online: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7504448.v4 (accessed on 23 May 2023).
  49. Senay, G.B.; Kagone, S.; Velpuri, N.M. Operational Global Actual Evapotranspiration: Development, Evaluation, and Dissemination. Sensors 2020, 20, 1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Krasting, J.P.; John, J.G.; Blanton, C.; McHugh, C.; Nikonov, S.; Radhakrishnan, A.; Rand, K.; Zadeh, N.T.; Balaji, V.; Durachta, J.; et al. NOAA-GFDL GFDL-ESM4 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP 2018, Version YYYYMMDD; Earth System Grid Federation: Chicago, IL, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  51. Boucher, O.; Denvil, S.; Levavasseur, G.; Cozic, A.; Caubel, A.; Foujols, M.-A.; Meurdesoif, Y.; Bony, S.; Flavoni, S.; Idelkadi, A.; et al. IPSL IPSL-CM6A-LR Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CFMIP 2018, Version YYYYMMDD; Earth System Grid Federation: Chicago, IL, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  52. Yukimoto, S.; Koshiro, T.; Kawai, H.; Oshima, N.; Yoshida, K.; Urakawa, S.; Tsujino, H.; Deushi, M.; Tanaka, T.; Hosaka, M.; et al. MRI MRI-ESM2.0 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP Historical 2019, Version YYYYMMDD; Earth System Grid Federation: Chicago, IL, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  53. Tang, Y.; Rumbold, S.; Ellis, R.; Kelley, D.; Mulcahy, J.; Sellar, A.; Walton, J.; Jones, C. MOHC UKESM1.0-LL Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP Esm-PiControl 2019, Version YYYYMMDD; Earth System Grid Federation: Chicago, IL, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  54. Peña-Guerrero, M.D.; Umirbekov, A.; Tarasova, L.; Müller, D. Comparing the Performance of High-resolution Global Precipitation Products across Topographic and Climatic Gradients of Central Asia. Int. J. Climatol. 2022, 42, 5554–5569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dilinuer, T.; Yao, J.; Chen, J.; Zhao, Y.; Mao, W.; Li, J.; Yang, L. Systematical Evaluation of Three Gridded Daily Precipitation Products Against Rain Gauge Observations Over Central Asia. Front. Earth Sci. 2021, 9, 699628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Salehie, O.; Ismail, T.; Shahid, S.; Ahmed, K.; Adarsh, S.; Asaduzzaman, M.; Dewan, A. Ranking of Gridded Precipitation Datasets by Merging Compromise Programming and Global Performance Index: A Case Study of the Amu Darya Basin. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2021, 144, 985–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zandler, H.; Haag, I.; Samimi, C. Evaluation Needs and Temporal Performance Differences of Gridded Precipitation Products in Peripheral Mountain Regions. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 15118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. GADM. GADM Data v4.1. 2022. Available online: https://gadm.org/data.html (accessed on 22 May 2023).
  59. Esri; Airbus DS; USGS; NGA; NASA; CGIAR; Robinson, N.; NCEAS; NLS; OS; et al. World Hillshade [ArcGIS Map Service]. 2022. Available online: https://services.arcgisonline.com/arcgis/rest/services/Elevation/World_Hillshade/MapServer (accessed on 10 May 2023).
  60. Zadereev, E.; Lipka, O.; Karimov, B.; Krylenko, M.; Elias, V.; Pinto, I.S.; Alizade, V.; Anker, Y.; Feest, A.; Kuznetsova, D.; et al. Overview of Past, Current, and Future Ecosystem and Biodiversity Trends of Inland Saline Lakes of Europe and Central Asia. Inl. Waters 2020, 10, 438–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Huang, W.; Duan, W.; Chen, Y. Rapidly Declining Surface and Terrestrial Water Resources in Central Asia Driven by Socio-Economic and Climatic Changes. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 784, 147193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Englmaier, G.K.; Hayes, D.S.; Meulenbroek, P.; Terefe, Y.; Lakew, A.; Tesfaye, G.; Waidbacher, H.; Malicky, H.; Wubie, A.; Leitner, P.; et al. Longitudinal River Zonation in the Tropics: Examples of Fish and Caddisflies from the Endorheic Awash River, Ethiopia. Hydrobiologia 2020, 847, 4063–4090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, Z.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y. Declining Snowfall Fraction in the Alpine Regions, Central Asia. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Barandun, M.; Fiddes, J.; Scherler, M.; Mathys, T.; Saks, T.; Petrakov, D.; Hoelzle, M. The State and Future of the Cryosphere in Central Asia. Water Secur. 2020, 11, 100072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hunger, M.; Döll, P. Value of River Discharge Data for Global-Scale Hydrological Modeling. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2008, 12, 841–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sarzaeim, P.; Bozorg-Haddad, O.; Zolghadr-Asli, B.; Fallah-Mehdipour, E.; Loáiciga, H.A. Optimization of Run-of-River Hydropower Plant Design under Climate Change Conditions. Water Resour. Manag. 2018, 32, 3919–3934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhao, G.; Gao, H.; Naz, B.S.; Kao, S.-C.; Voisin, N. Integrating a Reservoir Regulation Scheme into a Spatially Distributed Hydrological Model. Adv. Water Resour. 2016, 98, 16–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Siegfried, T.; Bernauer, T.; Guiennet, R.; Sellars, S.; Robertson, A.W.; Mankin, J.; Bauer-Gottwein, P.; Yakovlev, A. Will Climate Change Exacerbate Water Stress in Central Asia? Clim. Chang. 2012, 112, 881–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mirzaei, A.; Zibaei, M. Water Conflict Management between Agriculture and Wetland under Climate Change: Application of Economic-Hydrological-Behavioral Modelling. Water Resour. Manag. 2021, 35, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gernaat, D.E.H.J.H.J.; Bogaart, P.W.; van Vuuren, D.P.V.; Biemans, H.; Niessink, R. High-Resolution Assessment of Global Technical and Economic Hydropower Potential. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 821–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, Q.; Chen, Y.; Li, Z.; Fang, G.; Xiang, Y.; Li, Y.; Ji, H. Recent Changes in Water Discharge in Snow and Glacier Melt-Dominated Rivers in the Tienshan Mountains, Central Asia. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jet Propulsion Laboratory—Californica Institute of Technology SMAP—Soil Moisture Active Passive. Available online: https://smap.jpl.nasa.gov/ (accessed on 6 September 2023).
  73. Lehner, B.; Grill, G. Global River Hydrography and Network Routing: Baseline Data and New Approaches to Study the World’s Large River Systems. Hydrol. Process. 2013, 27, 2171–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Messager, M.L.; Lehner, B.; Grill, G.; Nedeva, I.; Schmitt, O. Estimating the Volume and Age of Water Stored in Global Lakes Using a Geo-Statistical Approach. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. RGI Consortium Randolph Glacier Inventory—A Dataset of Global Glacier Outlines, Version 6. 2017. Available online: https://www.glims.org/RGI/ (accessed on 3 April 2023).
  76. Liu, Y.; Fang, Y.; Margulis, S.A. Spatiotemporal Distribution of Seasonal Snow Water Equivalent in High Mountain Asia from an 18-Year Landsat–MODIS Era Snow Reanalysis Dataset. Cryosphere Discuss. 2021, 15, 5261–5280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Farinotti, D.; Round, V.; Huss, M.; Compagno, L.; Zekollari, H. Large Hydropower and Water-Storage Potential in Future Glacier-Free Basins. Nature 2019, 575, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Millan, R.; Mouginot, J.; Rabatel, A.; Morlighem, M. Ice Velocity and Thickness of the World’s Glaciers. Nat. Geosci. 2022, 15, 124–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hugonnet, R.; McNabb, R.; Berthier, E.; Menounos, B.; Nuth, C.; Girod, L.; Farinotti, D.; Huss, M.; Dussaillant, I.; Brun, F.; et al. Accelerated Global Glacier Mass Loss in the Early Twenty-First Century. Nature 2021, 592, 726–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Miles, E.; McCarthy, M.; Dehecq, A.; Kneib, M.; Fugger, S.; Pellicciotti, F. Health and Sustainability of Glaciers in High Mountain Asia. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Rounce, D.R.; Hock, R.; Maussion, F.; Hugonnet, R.; Kochtitzky, W.; Huss, M.; Berthier, E.; Brinkerhoff, D.; Compagno, L.; Copland, L.; et al. Global Glacier Change in the 21st Century: Every Increase in Temperature Matters. Science 2023, 379, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Simons, G.W.H.; Koster, R.; Droogers, P. HiHydroSoil v2.0—A High Resolution Soil Map of Global Hydraulic Properties. 2020. Available online: https://www.futurewater.eu/projects/hihydrosoil/ (accessed on 24 April 2023).
  83. Barbarossa, V.; Huijbregts, M.A.J.; Beusen, A.H.W.; Beck, H.E.; King, H.; Schipper, A.M. Data Descriptor: FLO1K, Global Maps of Mean, Maximum and Minimum Annual Streamflow at 1 Km Resolution from 1960 through 2015. Sci. Data 2018, 5, 180052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Obu, J.; Westermann, S.; Kääb, A.; Bartsch, A. Ground Temperature Map, 2000–2016, Northern Hemisphere Permafrost. 2018. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.888600 (accessed on 3 April 2023).
  85. Obu, J.; Westermann, S.; Bartsch, A.; Berdnikov, N.; Christiansen, H.H.; Dashtseren, A.; Delaloye, R.; Elberling, B.; Etzelmüller, B.; Kholodov, A.; et al. Northern Hemisphere Permafrost Map Based on TTOP Modelling for 2000–2016 at 1 Km2 Scale. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2019, 193, 299–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. O’Neill, P.E.; Chan, S.; Njoku, E.G.; Jackson, T.; Bindlish, R.; Chaubell, J. Near Real-Time SMAP L2 Radiometer Half-Orbit 36 Km EASE-Grid Soil Moisture, Version 107. 2022. Available online: https://doi.org/10.5067/NCTT8THPWRTL (accessed on 6 September 2023).
  87. O’Neill, P.E.; Chan, S.; Njoku, E.G.; Jackson, T.; Bindlish, R.; Chaubell, J. SMAP L2 Radiometer Half-Orbit 36 Km EASE-Grid Soil Moisture, Version 8. 2021. Available online: https://nsidc.org/data/spl2smp/versions/8 (accessed on 3 April 2023).
  88. Alapfy, B.; Hayes, D.S.; Schwedhelm, H.; Ramos, I.; Zeiringer, B.; Coeck, J.; López, R.; Verhelst, P.; Rüther, N.; Siegfried, T.; et al. European Innovations in Kyrgyzstan: Development of the At-Bashy Small Hydro Project. In Proceedings of the Hydropower & Dams ASIA Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 14–16 March 2023; Aqua-Media International: Wallington, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  89. Lehner, B. HydroSHEDS—Technical Documentation, Data Version 1.1; World Wildlife Fund US: Washington, DC, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  90. Copernicus Climate Change Service—Climate Data Store Land Cover Classification Gridded Maps from 1992 to Present Derived from Satellite Observation. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS). 2019. Available online: https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.006f2c9a (accessed on 17 May 2023).
  91. Siqueira, P.P.; Oliveira, P.T.S.; Bressiani, D.; Meira Neto, A.A.; Rodrigues, D.B.B. Effects of Climate and Land Cover Changes on Water Availability in a Brazilian Cerrado Basin. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 2021, 37, 100931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bhandari, A.; Joshi, R.; Thapa, M.S.; Sharma, R.P.; Rauniyar, S.K. Land Cover Change and Its Impact in Crop Yield: A Case Study from Western Nepal. Sci. World J. 2022, 2022, 5129423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mahmood, R.; Pielke, R.A.; Hubbard, K.G.; Niyogi, D.; Bonan, G.; Lawrence, P.; McNider, R.; McAlpine, C.; Etter, A.; Gameda, S.; et al. Impacts of Land Use/Land Cover Change on Climate and Future Research Priorities. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2010, 91, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. USGS EROS Archive—Digital Elevation—Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) 1 Arc-Second Global. 2018. Available online: https://www.usgs.gov/centers/eros/science/usgs-eros-archive-digital-elevation-shuttle-radar-topography-mission-srtm-1?qt-science_center_objects=0#overview (accessed on 4 April 2023).
  95. Lehner, B.; Verdin, K.; Jarvis, A. New Global Hydrography Derived From Spaceborne Elevation Data. Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 2008, 89, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Buchhorn, M.; Smets, B.; Bertels, L.; De Roo, B.; Lesiv, M.; Tsendbazar, N.-E.; Herold, M.; Fritz, S. Copernicus Global Land Service: Land Cover 100m: Collection 3: Epoch 2016: Globe. 2020. Available online: https://land.copernicus.eu/global/products/lc (accessed on 10 May 2023).
  97. Dhaubanjar, S.; Lutz, A.F.; Gernaat, D.E.H.J.; Nepal, S.; Smolenaars, W.; Pradhananga, S.; Biemans, H.; Ludwig, F.; Shrestha, A.B.; Immerzeel, W.W. A Systematic Framework for the Assessment of Sustainable Hydropower Potential in a River Basin—The Case of the Upper Indus. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 786, 147142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hartmann, J.; Moosdorf, N. The New Global Lithological Map Database GLiM: A Representation of Rock Properties at the Earth Surface. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2012, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Renard, K.G.; Foster, G.R.; Weesies, G.A.; Mccool, D.K.; Yoder, D.C. Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE); US Department of Agriculture (USDA): Washington DC, USA, 1997; ISBN 0160489385. [Google Scholar]
  100. Moosdorf, N.; Hartmann, J. Lithological Map of the World. Scale 1:35 000 000. 1st Edition. 2015. Available online: https://www.dropbox.com/s/9vuowtebp9f1iud/LiMW_GIS2015.gdb.zip?dl=0 (accessed on 16 May 2023).
  101. Persits, F.M.; Ulmishek, G.F.; Steinshouer, D.W. Maps Showing Geology, Oil and Gas Fields and Geologic Provinces of the Former Soviet Union: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-470-E: GIS Data 1999. Available online: https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr97470E (accessed on 5 May 2023).
  102. Borrelli, P.; Robinson, D.A.; Fleischer, L.R.; Lugato, E.; Ballabio, C.; Alewell, C.; Meusburger, K.; Modugno, S.; Schütt, B.; Ferro, V.; et al. An Assessment of the Global Impact of 21st Century Land Use Change on Soil Erosion. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. European Commission. J.R.C. European Soil Data Centre: Global Soil Erosion. 2019. Available online: https://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/content/global-soil-erosion (accessed on 5 May 2023).
  104. The World Bank Global Landslide Hazard Map. 2021. Available online: https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/0037584 (accessed on 5 February 2023).
  105. Hayes, D.S.; Brändle, J.M.; Seliger, C.; Zeiringer, B.; Ferreira, T.; Schmutz, S. Advancing towards Functional Environmental Flows for Temperate Floodplain Rivers. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 633, 1089–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Böck, K.; Polt, R.; Schülting, L. Ecosystem Services in River Landscapes. In Riverine Ecosystem Management; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 413–433. [Google Scholar]
  107. Lynch, A.J.; Cooke, S.J.; Arthington, A.H.; Baigun, C.; Bossenbroek, L.; Dickens, C.; Harrison, I.; Kimirei, I.; Langhans, S.D.; Murchie, K.J.; et al. People Need Freshwater Biodiversity. WIREs Water 2023, 10, e1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Tickner, D.; Opperman, J.J.; Abell, R.; Acreman, M.; Arthington, A.H.; Bunn, S.E.; Cooke, S.J.; Dalton, J.; Darwall, W.; Edwards, G.; et al. Bending the Curve of Global Freshwater Biodiversity Loss: An Emergency Recovery Plan. Bioscience 2020, 70, 330–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. He, F.; Zarfl, C.; Bremerich, V.; David, J.N.W.; Hogan, Z.; Kalinkat, G.; Tockner, K.; Jähnig, S.C. The Global Decline of Freshwater Megafauna. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2019, 25, 3883–3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Hayes, D.S.; Schaufler, G.; Schmutz, S.; Unfer, G.; Führer, S.; Auer, S.; Seliger, C. Hydro-Morphological Stressors Reduce Distribution Range and Affect Population Status of Cyprinid Fishes in Austria. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 991722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Carolli, M.; Garcia de Leaniz, C.; Jones, J.; Belletti, B.; Huđek, H.; Pusch, M.; Pandakov, P.; Börger, L.; van de Bund, W. Impacts of Existing and Planned Hydropower Dams on River Fragmentation in the Balkan Region. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 871, 161940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Brooks, T.M.; Mittermeier, R.A.; da Fonseca, G.A.B.; Gerlach, J.; Hoffmann, M.; Lamoreux, J.F.; Mittermeier, C.G.; Pilgrim, J.D.; Rodrigues, A.S.L. Global Biodiversity Conservation Priorities. Science 2006, 313, 58–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Seliger, C.; Scheikl, S.; Schmutz, S.; Schinegger, R.; Fleck, S.; Neubarth, J.; Walder, C.; Muhar, S. Hy:Con: A Strategic Tool for Balancing Hydropower Development and Conservation Needs. River Res. Appl. 2016, 32, 1438–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Scheikl, S.; Seliger, C.; Loach, A.; Preis, S.; Schinegger, R.; Walder, C.; Schmutz, S.; Muhar, S. Schutz Ökologisch Sensibler Fließgewässer: Konzepte Und Fallbeispiele. Osterr. Wasser Und Abfallwirtsch. 2016, 68, 288–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. WWF/TNC Freshwater Ecoregions of the World—A Global Biogeographical Regionalization of the Earth’s Freshwater Biodiversity. Available online: http://www.feow.org (accessed on 3 May 2023).
  116. Groves, C.R.; Jensen, D.B.; Valutis, L.L.; Redford, K.H.; Shaffer, M.L.; Scott, J.M.; Baumgartner, J.V.; Higgins, J.V.; Beck, M.W.; Anderson, M.G. Planning for Biodiversity Conservation: Putting Conservation Science into Practice. Bioscience 2002, 52, 499–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Olson, D.M.; Dinerstein, E.; Wikramanayake, E.D.; Burgess, N.D.; Powell, G.V.N.; Underwood, E.C.; D’amico, J.A.; Itoua, I.; Strand, H.E.; Morrison, J.C.; et al. Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth: A New Global Map of Terrestrial Ecoregions Provides an Innovative Tool for Conserving Biodiversity. Bioscience 2001, 51, 933–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Spalding, M.D.; Fox, H.E.; Allen, G.R.; Davidson, N.; Ferdaña, Z.A.; Finlayson, M.; Halpern, B.S.; Jorge, M.A.; Lombana, A.; Lourie, S.A.; et al. Marine Ecoregions of the World: A Bioregionalization of Coastal and Shelf Areas. Bioscience 2007, 57, 573–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Higgins, J.V. Maintaining the Ebbs and Flows of the Landscape: Conservation Planning for Freshwater Ecosystems. In Drafting a Conservation Blueprint: A Practitioner’s Guide to Regional Planning for Biodiversity.; Groves, C., Ed.; Nature Conservancy and Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2003; pp. 291–318. [Google Scholar]
  120. Abell, R.A.; Olson, D.; Dinerstein, E.; Hurley, P.T. Freshwater Ecoregions of North America: A Conservation Assessment; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  121. Thieme, M.L.; Abell, R.; Burgess, N.; World Wildlife Fund; Lehner, B.; Dinerstein, E.; Olsen, D.; Teugeln, G.; Kamdem-Toham, A.; Stiassny, M.L.J.; et al. Freshwater Ecoregions of Africa and Madagascar: A Conservation Assessment; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  122. Gilman, R.T.; Abell, R.A.; Williams, C.E. How Can Conservation Biology Inform the Practice of Integrated River Basin Management? Int. J. River Basin Manag. 2004, 2, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Abell, R.; Thieme, M.L.; Revenga, C.; Bryer, M.; Kottelat, M.; Bogutskaya, N.; Coad, B.; Mandrak, N.; Balderas, S.C.; Bussing, W.; et al. Freshwater Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Biogeographic Units for Freshwater Biodiversity Conservation. Bioscience 2008, 58, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Brito, J.G.; Martins, R.T.; Oliveira, V.C.; Hamada, N.; Nessimian, J.L.; Hughes, R.M.; Ferraz, S.F.B.; de Paula, F.R. Biological Indicators of Diversity in Tropical Streams: Congruence in the Similarity of Invertebrate Assemblages. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 85, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Martins, R.T.; Brito, J.; Dias-Silva, K.; Leal, C.G.; Leitão, R.P.; Oliveira, V.C.; Oliveira-Júnior, J.M.B.; de Paula, F.R.; Roque, F.O.; Hamada, N.; et al. Congruence and Responsiveness in the Taxonomic Compositions of Amazonian Aquatic Macroinvertebrate and Fish Assemblages. Hydrobiologia 2022, 849, 2281–2298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Schmidt-Kloiber, A.; Hering, D. Www.Freshwaterecology.Info—An Online Tool That Unifies, Standardises and Codifies More than 20,000 European Freshwater Organisms and Their Ecological Preferences. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 53, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Lehner, B.; Liermann, C.R.; Revenga, C.; Vörösmarty, C.; Fekete, B.; Crouzet, P.; Döll, P.; Endejan, M.; Frenken, K.; Magome, J.; et al. High-resolution Mapping of the World’s Reservoirs and Dams for Sustainable River-flow Management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2011, 9, 494–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Mulligan, M.; Saenz-Cruz, L.; van Soesbergen, A.; Smith, V.T.; Zurita, L. Global Dam Database and Geowiki v1. 2009. Available online: http://globaldamwatch.org/ (accessed on 2 May 2023).
  129. Grill, G.; Lehner, B. Mapping the World’s Free-Flowing Rivers: Data Set and Technical Documentation. Nature 2019, 569, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. European Commission. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (OJ L 206 22.07.1992 p. 7). In Documents in European Community Environmental Law; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2006; pp. 568–583. [Google Scholar]
  131. European Commission. Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the Conservation of Wild Birds. OJ L 20, 26.1.2010. 2009, pp. 7–25. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32009L0147 (accessed on 2 May 2023).
  132. Metzger, M.J.; Bunce, R.G.H.; Jongman, R.H.G.; Sayre, R.; Trabucco, A.; Zomer, R. A High-Resolution Bioclimate Map of the World: A Unifying Framework for Global Biodiversity Research and Monitoring. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2013, 22, 630–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Metzger, M.J. The Global Environmental Stratification: A High-Resolution Bioclimate Map of the World. 2018. Available online: https://doi.org/10.7488/ds/2354 (accessed on 9 May 2023).
  134. IUCN. A Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas. 2016. Available online: https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46259 (accessed on 2 May 2023).
  135. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2022. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed on 2 May 2023).
  136. Grigoropoulou, A.; Hamid, S.A.; Acosta, R.; Akindele, E.O.; Al-Shami, S.A.; Altermatt, F.; Amatulli, G.; Angeler, D.G.; Arimoro, F.O.; Aroviita, J.; et al. The Global EPTO Database: Worldwide Occurrences of Aquatic Insects. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2023, 32, 642–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. LPI Living Planet Index Database. 2022. Available online: https://www.livingplanetindex.org (accessed on 2 May 2023).
  138. Grill, G.; Lehner, B.; Thieme, M.; Geenen, B.; Tickner, D.; Antonelli, F.; Babu, S.; Borrelli, P.; Cheng, L.; Crochetiere, H.; et al. Mapping the World’s Free-Flowing Rivers. Nature 2019, 569, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). 2023. Available online: https://www.protectedplanet.net/en (accessed on 2 May 2023).
  140. Ramsar Ramsar Wetlands of International Importance. 2023. Available online: https://rsis.ramsar.org (accessed on 2 May 2023).
  141. Global Runoff Data Centre GRDC Major River Basins of the World. 2021. Available online: https://www.bafg.de/SharedDocs/ExterneLinks/GRDC/mrb_shp_zip.html?nn=201762 (accessed on 25 May 2023).
  142. Shi, H.; Luo, G.; Zheng, H.; Chen, C.; Hellwich, O.; Bai, J.; Liu, T.; Liu, S.; Xue, J.; Cai, P.; et al. A Novel Causal Structure-Based Framework for Comparing a Basin-Wide Water–Energy–Food–Ecology Nexus Applied to the Data-Limited Amu Darya and Syr Darya River Basins. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2021, 25, 901–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Hayes, D.S.; Schülting, L.; Carolli, M.; Greimel, F.; Batalla, R.J.; Casas-Mulet, R. Hydropeaking: Processes, Effects, and Mitigation. In Encyclopedia of Inland Waters; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 134–149. [Google Scholar]
  144. Black, N.; Coast, S. Geodata Collection in the 21st Century. Bull. Soc. Univ. Cartogr. 2006, 40, 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  145. Dankova, R.; Burton, M.; Salman, M.; Clark, A.K.; Pek, E. Modernizing Irrigation in Central Asia: Concept and Approaches. Directions in Investment, No. 6; FAO: Rome, Italy; World Bank: Rome, Italy, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  146. Food and Argiculture Organ Organization of the United Nations (FAO). AQUASTAT Crop Water Information. Available online: https://www.fao.org/land-water/databases-and-software/crop-information (accessed on 20 May 2023).
  147. Gupta, R.; Shankar, H.; Venkata, A.T.Y. Global Energy Observatory (GEO)—List of Hydro PowerPlants. Available online: https://globalenergyobservatory.org/list.php?db=PowerPlants&type=Hydro (accessed on 19 May 2023).
  148. Mulligan, M.; van Soesbergen, A.; Sáenz, L. GOODD, a Global Dataset of More than 38,000 Georeferenced Dams. Sci. Data 2020, 7, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. OpenStreetMap Contributors. 2015. Available online: https://planet.openstreetmap.org (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  150. Sacks, W.J.; Deryng, D.; Foley, J.A.; Ramankutty, N. Crop Planting Dates: An Analysis of Global Patterns. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2010, 19, 607–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Sacks, W.J.; Deryng, D.; Foley, J.A.; Ramankutty, N. Crop Calendar Dataset. 2010. Available online: https://sage.nelson.wisc.edu/data-and-models/datasets/crop-calendar-dataset/ (accessed on 21 June 2023).
  152. Mapspam Spatial Production Allocation Model. Available online: https://mapspam.info/ (accessed on 19 February 2023).
  153. FAO; IIASA; ISRIC-World Soil Information; Institute of Soil Science; Chinese Academy of Science (ISSCAS); Joint Research Centre of the European Commission (JRC). Harmonized World Soil Database v 1.2. 2009. Available online: https://www.fao.org/soils-portal/data-hub/soil-maps-and-databases/harmonized-world-soil-database-v12/en/ (accessed on 19 May 2023).
  154. Center for International Earth Science Information Network—CIESIN—Columbia University Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Count, Revision 11. Available online: https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/gpw-v4-population-count-rev11 (accessed on 19 May 2023).
  155. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). Human Development Report 2021/2022. 2022. Available online: https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/documentation-and-downloads (accessed on 19 May 2023).
  156. Oweis, T.; Hachum, A.; Pala, M. Lentil Production under Supplemental Irrigation in a Mediterranean Environment. Agric. Water Manag. 2004, 68, 251–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Mohamoud, M.; Abdalla, A.; Elhag, M.; Yousif, L. Estimation of Water Requirement and Water Productivity of Sesame Crop (Sesamum Indicum L.) in Dryland Areas of Sennar State, Sudan. Sudan J. Desertif. Res. 2019, 11, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  158. Torres, R.R.; Robaina, A.D.; Peiter, M.X.; Ben, L.H.B.; Mezzomo, W.; Kirchner, J.H.; Rosso, R.B.; Pimenta, B.D.; Pereira, A.C.; Loregian, M.V. Water Productivity and Production Function in Irrigated Millet Crop. Semin. Ciências Agrárias 2019, 40, 2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. HydroSHEDS V2. Available online: https://www.hydrosheds.org/hydrosheds-v2 (accessed on 25 May 2023).
  160. CNES SWOT—A Promising Hydrology and Oceanography Mission. Available online: https://swot.cnes.fr/en/SWOT/index.htm (accessed on 22 May 2023).
  161. Ragettli, S.; Donauer, T.; Molnar, P.; Delnoije, R.; Siegfried, T. Unraveling the Hydrology and Sediment Balance of an Ungauged Lake in the Sudano-Sahelian Region of West Africa Using Remote Sensing. Earth Surf. Dyn. 2022, 10, 797–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Boothroyd, R.J.; Williams, R.D.; Hoey, T.B.; Barrett, B.; Prasojo, O.A. Applications of Google Earth Engine in Fluvial Geomorphology for Detecting River Channel Change. WIREs Water 2021, 8, e21496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Cruz, R.C.; Reis Costa, P.; Vinga, S.; Krippahl, L.; Lopes, M.B. A Review of Recent Machine Learning Advances for Forecasting Harmful Algal Blooms and Shellfish Contamination. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Elbeltagi, A.; Srivastava, A.; Deng, J.; Li, Z.; Raza, A.; Khadke, L.; Yu, Z.; El-Rawy, M. Forecasting Vapor Pressure Deficit for Agricultural Water Management Using Machine Learning in Semi-Arid Environments. Agric. Water Manag. 2023, 283, 108302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Chakraborty, M.; Sarkar, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Shamsudduha, M.; Ahmed, K.M.; Bhattacharya, A.; Mitra, A. Modeling Regional-Scale Groundwater Arsenic Hazard in the Transboundary Ganges River Delta, India and Bangladesh: Infusing Physically-Based Model with Machine Learning. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 748, 141107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Zhu, M.; Wang, J.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Ren, H.; Wu, B.; Ye, L. A Review of the Application of Machine Learning in Water Quality Evaluation. Eco-Environ. Health 2022, 1, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Shirvani-Hosseini, S.; Samadi-Koucheksaraee, A.; Ahmadianfar, I.; Gharabaghi, B. Data Mining Methods for Modeling in Water Science. In Computational Intelligence for Water and Environmental Sciences; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022; pp. 157–178. [Google Scholar]
  168. Meyer, H.; Pebesma, E. Machine Learning-Based Global Maps of Ecological Variables and the Challenge of Assessing Them. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Ho, L.; Goethals, P. Machine Learning Applications in River Research: Trends, Opportunities and Challenges. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2022, 13, 2603–2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Hydrosolutions Count4D: A Web Application for Efficient Irrigation and Water Resources Management. Available online: https://www.hydrosolutions.ch/projects/count4d-a-web-application-for-efficient-irrigation-and-water-resources-management (accessed on 25 May 2023).
  171. Tilmant, A. Hydropower and the Water-Energy-Food Nexus. In The Zambezi River Basin; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 82–101. [Google Scholar]
  172. Sabyrbekov, R.; Overland, I.; Vakulchuk, R. Climate Change in Central Asia; Sabyrbekov, R., Overland, I., Vakulchuk, R., Eds.; SpringerBriefs in Climate Studies; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; ISBN 978-3-031-29830-1. [Google Scholar]
  173. Zeng, R.; Cai, X.; Ringler, C.; Zhu, T. Hydropower versus Irrigation—An Analysis of Global Patterns. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 034006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Hayes, D.S.; Lautsch, E.; Unfer, G.; Greimel, F.; Zeiringer, B.; Höller, N.; Schmutz, S. Response of European Grayling, Thymallus Thymallus, to Multiple Stressors in Hydropeaking Rivers. J. Environ. Manage. 2021, 292, 112737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Azimov, U.; Avezova, N. Sustainable Small-Scale Hydropower Solutions in Central Asian Countries for Local and Cross-Border Energy/Water Supply. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 167, 112726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Jorde, K.; Alapfy, B.; Schwelhelm, H.; Siegfried, T.; Habersack, H.; De Keyser, J.; Anarbekov, O. EU Supports Small Hydropower in Central Asia. Int. J. Hydropower Dams 2022, 29, 52–59. [Google Scholar]
  177. Tripathy, P.; Malladi, T. Global Flood Mapper: Democratising Open EO Resources for Flood Mapping. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly 2021, online, 19–30 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
  178. Seliger, C.; Scheikl, S.; Schmutz, S.; Schinegger, R.; Fleck, S.; Neubarth, J.; Walder, C.; Muhar, S. Note: Hy:Con: A Strategic Tool for Balancing Hydropower Development and Conservation Needs. River Res. Appl. 2017, 33, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Xu, R.; Zeng, Z.; Pan, M.; Ziegler, A.; Holden, J.; Spracklen, D.; Brown, L.; He, X.; Chen, D.; Bin, Y.; et al. A Global-Scale Framework for Hydropower Development Incorporating Strict Environmental Constraints. Nat. Water 2023, 1, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Linking the six categories by which the open-source datasets are classified with the WFEC Nexus elements.
Figure 1. Linking the six categories by which the open-source datasets are classified with the WFEC Nexus elements.
Water 15 03482 g001
Figure 2. The long-term average of annual surface temperature between 1980 and 2010 (data sources: [33,34,58]; background map: [59]).
Figure 2. The long-term average of annual surface temperature between 1980 and 2010 (data sources: [33,34,58]; background map: [59]).
Water 15 03482 g002
Figure 3. Gauge locations and basin outlines used for modelling the impact of climate change on future water availability in the mountainous river basins of Central Asia (data sources: [18,58], background map: [59]).
Figure 3. Gauge locations and basin outlines used for modelling the impact of climate change on future water availability in the mountainous river basins of Central Asia (data sources: [18,58], background map: [59]).
Water 15 03482 g003
Figure 4. Computed slope of the Central Asian river network. Note: Only rivers with a mean annual flow >1 m3/s are represented in the map; discharge information was obtained from dataset H13 (see Chapter 3.2) (data sources: [58,74,83,95], background map: [59]).
Figure 4. Computed slope of the Central Asian river network. Note: Only rivers with a mean annual flow >1 m3/s are represented in the map; discharge information was obtained from dataset H13 (see Chapter 3.2) (data sources: [58,74,83,95], background map: [59]).
Water 15 03482 g004
Figure 5. Landslide hazard divided into (a) earthquake- and (b) rainfall-induced landslides in the upper At-Bashy catchment (Kyrgyzstan); categories corresponding to representative annual frequency of landslide events per km2: moderate: 0.1–0.29%; moderate to medium: 0.3–0.64%; medium: 0.65–0.9%; medium to high: 1–2.9%; high: 3–9.9%, very high: ≥ 10% (data sources: [73,104]; background map: [59]).
Figure 5. Landslide hazard divided into (a) earthquake- and (b) rainfall-induced landslides in the upper At-Bashy catchment (Kyrgyzstan); categories corresponding to representative annual frequency of landslide events per km2: moderate: 0.1–0.29%; moderate to medium: 0.3–0.64%; medium: 0.65–0.9%; medium to high: 1–2.9%; high: 3–9.9%, very high: ≥ 10% (data sources: [73,104]; background map: [59]).
Water 15 03482 g005
Figure 7. Agricultural water withdrawals in Central Asia in 2010 (data sources: [58,146,152,156,157,158], background map: [59]).
Figure 7. Agricultural water withdrawals in Central Asia in 2010 (data sources: [58,146,152,156,157,158], background map: [59]).
Water 15 03482 g007
Figure 6. Number of endangered (CR, EN, and VU) freshwater fish species per HydroBASIN (level 8, H02) considering only (probably) extant and native species (E03) (data sources: [58,74,135,141]; background map: [59]).
Figure 6. Number of endangered (CR, EN, and VU) freshwater fish species per HydroBASIN (level 8, H02) considering only (probably) extant and native species (E03) (data sources: [58,74,135,141]; background map: [59]).
Water 15 03482 g006
Table 1. Stakeholders of the Hydro4U consortium sorted by background, institution, and role in the project and showing their expertise regarding WFEC Nexus elements.
Table 1. Stakeholders of the Hydro4U consortium sorted by background, institution, and role in the project and showing their expertise regarding WFEC Nexus elements.
BackgroundMain Institutions *Role in the ProjectnWFEC Nexus Expertise
EngineeringTUM, BOKU, ILF, SJE, Hydropower planning and construction, analysis of hydropower potential14Energy
HydrologyHSOLModelling of water resources and climate change effects2Water (hydrology), climate
EcologyBOKU, TIIAME, EV-INBOFish biodiversity and ecology assessments9Water (ecology)
Water and land resources managementIWMICross-border WFEC Nexus analyses with a focus on agricultural aspects3Food, water (management)
Spatial analysisCARTIF, IWMIBenefits and trade-off analyses in the context of the WFEC Nexus7Nexus modelling
Note(s): * Technical University of Munich (TUM), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), ILF Consulting Engineers GmbH (ILF), Ecohydraulic Engineering GmbH (SJE), hydrosolutions GmbH. (HSOL), Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers (TIIAME), Institute for Nature and Forest (EV-INBO), International Water Management Institute (IWMI), CARTIF Technology Center (CARTIF).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Keyser, J.; Hayes, D.S.; Marti, B.; Siegfried, T.; Seliger, C.; Schwedhelm, H.; Anarbekov, O.; Gafurov, Z.; López Fernández, R.M.; Ramos Diez, I.; et al. Integrating Open-Source Datasets to Analyze the Transboundary Water–Food–Energy–Climate Nexus in Central Asia. Water 2023, 15, 3482. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15193482

AMA Style

De Keyser J, Hayes DS, Marti B, Siegfried T, Seliger C, Schwedhelm H, Anarbekov O, Gafurov Z, López Fernández RM, Ramos Diez I, et al. Integrating Open-Source Datasets to Analyze the Transboundary Water–Food–Energy–Climate Nexus in Central Asia. Water. 2023; 15(19):3482. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15193482

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Keyser, Jan, Daniel S. Hayes, Beatrice Marti, Tobias Siegfried, Carina Seliger, Hannah Schwedhelm, Oyture Anarbekov, Zafar Gafurov, Raquel M. López Fernández, Ivan Ramos Diez, and et al. 2023. "Integrating Open-Source Datasets to Analyze the Transboundary Water–Food–Energy–Climate Nexus in Central Asia" Water 15, no. 19: 3482. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15193482

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop