Next Article in Journal
Micro-Nano Bubbles Conditioning Treatment of Contaminated Sediment for Efficient Reduction: Dehydration Characteristic and Mechanism
Next Article in Special Issue
Preparation of Cationic Cellulose as a Natural Flocculant/Sorbent and Its Application in Three Water Treatment Scenarios
Previous Article in Journal
Insights into the Morphology and Surface Properties of Microalgae at the Nanoscale by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM): A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Magnetic Natural Coagulants for Plastic Recycling Industry Wastewater Treatability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Use of Extracted Proteins from Oak Leaves as Bio-Coagulant for Water and Wastewater Treatment: Optimization by a Fractional Factorial Design

1
Higher Normal School of Constantine, Constantine 25000, Algeria
2
Laboratory of Process Engineering for Sustainable Development and Health Products (GPDDPS), Department of Process Engineering, National Polytechnic School of Constantine, Constantine 25000, Algeria
3
Laboratory LIPE, Faculty Process Engineering, University of Constantine 3, Ali Mendjeli Nouvelle Ville, Constantine 25000, Algeria
4
National Biotechnology School of Constantine, Ali Mendjeli Nouvelle Ville, Constantine 25000, Algeria
5
Department of Engineering, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, 81031 Aversa, Italy
6
Laboratory for Studies and Research on Wood Material-National School of Wood Technologies and Industries, University of Lorraine, 27 rue Philippe Seguin, 88000 Epinal, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2023, 15(11), 1984; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15111984
Submission received: 14 April 2023 / Revised: 17 May 2023 / Accepted: 21 May 2023 / Published: 24 May 2023

Abstract

:
The present work sheds light on the potentiality of proteins extracted from oak (Quercus robur) leaves to treat both drinking water and industrial oily wastewater. The work was structured in three steps: firstly, oak leaves in powder form were analyzed by FTIR, XRD and SEM, thus showing the presence of proteins acting as bio-coagulants; secondly, an experimental design was conducted. According to the design of experiences based on fractional design (28−4), the highest protein concentration (4.895 mg/g) was obtained for the following operating parameters: no filtration, pH of 12, temperature of 20 °C, stirring speed of 300 rpm, stirring time of 60 min, maceration time of 4 h, centrifugation speed of 400 rpm, centrifugation time of 10 min. Finally, a jar test apparatus was used to study the effects of proteins from oak leaves on the characteristics of both drinking water and industrial oily wastewater. In drinking water, the turbidity was reduced from 15.7 to 4.82 NTU when 0.098 mg/L of oak leaves protein was added, thus satisfying the requirements of the national drinking water standards; whereas, in industrial oily wastewater turbidity, total suspended solids, chemical oxygen demand and organic matter were reduced by 96.87, 89.86, 96.39 and 46.28%, respectively, when 0.538 mg/L of oak leaves protein was added. This study opens new perspectives related to the research and development of organic coagulants applicable to industrial wastewater treatment.

1. Introduction

Plants are a source of interest for scientists in relation to the effectiveness of some compounds extracted from them as active agents for different purposes, such as bio-coagulants for water treatments. Bio-coagulants have several advantages such as being renewable, easy to obtain, biodegradable, low or non-toxic and of a relatively low cost [1]. The extraction of compounds from plants is commonly based on their chemical or physical properties [2]. Several methods are used for extracting natural substances from plants. These include traditional extraction techniques (e.g., infusion, decoction or maceration) [2,3], modern extraction techniques (e.g., hydrodistillation, supercritical CO2, centrifugation) [4,5] and others. The proper extraction method is chosen accordingly to the characteristics of the raw material, as well as those of the desired end products (e.g., proteins, essential oils and total sugars) [6], and their uses in the different fields, such as medical (e.g., preparation of drugs) [7], parachemistry (e.g., manufacturing of cosmetics) [8] and environmental (e.g., water treatment) uses [9,10].
In general, the extraction of bio-coagulants from plants is achieved by three steps: (i) mechanical and physical treatments; (ii) extraction of the coagulant agent by using distilled water [11], either a saline solution [12,13,14,15,16] or a suitable solvent (i.e., acid or base) [13,17]; (iii) purification of the coagulant agent. This agent can belong to carbohydrates, proteins, flavonoids, tannins, total phenolics or cellulose, depending on the plant used to extract the active agent [18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Several studies have focused on searching for active compounds from plants capable to promote the coagulation process for treating drinking water, as well as industrial wastewater. According to Rasool et al., the coagulant agent extracted from Ocimum basilicum leaves is a polysaccharide [25], whereas Ndabigengesere et al., Taiwo et al. and Bouchareb et al. proved that the active component from Moringa oleifera seeds is a protein [26,27,28]. Conversely, Bello et al. successfully tested spruce tannin as a bio-coagulant for water clarification [29].
The present work is aimed at testing the potential effectiveness of a coagulant protein extracted from the Algerian local oak (Quercus robur) leaves in performing the coagulation/flocculation process used to treat drinking water as well as industrial oily wastewater. This work contributes to the valorization of the natural resources of our country through the development of biobased products for water treatment. Conversely, it allows the possibility of introducing new biodegradable products (oak leaves) during the physicochemical treatment in the coagulation/flocculation process. We hope to use this work to replace some mineral coagulants (such as ferric chloride and aluminum sulfate) widely used in the field of wastewater and drinking water treatment because they have adverse effects on the environment, especially human health [30,31]. Another objective of this study is the industrial oily wastewater treatment, which was generally discharged directly into the environment using a natural product (oak leaves) that is biodegradable and non-toxic for the environment, where this industrial water was responsible for nuisances and harmful impacts on the fauna and flora. This study was carried out in three steps: (i) a chemical analysis of the raw material; (ii) extraction of the protein responsible for promoting the coagulation/flocculation process according to a preliminary study conducted with Minitab software; (iii) use of the bio-coagulant extracted from oak leaves for water treatment. In the first step, oak leaves were analyzed by FTIR, XRD and SEM with the purpose to assess the presence of active agents. In the second step, proteins contained in oak leaves were extracted after the determination of the main factors influencing the extraction and subsequent purification of the coagulant agents according to the results of a preliminary experimental design. An ANOVA study was performed to reduce the number of experiments to be conducted. Finally, the quality of water was evaluated pre and post coagulation/flocculation treatment by measuring several water parameters, such as turbidity, pH, total alkalinity (TA), organic matter (OM) content, salinity, electrical conductivity (Ec), total suspended solids (TSS) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentration. The experimental part of this study was carried out at the Laboratory of Process Engineering for Sustainable Development and Health Products (GPDDPS), of the National Polytechnic School of Constantine.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Material for Bio-Coagulant Agent Extraction

Most plant-based coagulants are not all affordable due to cost and availability in some areas, making water treatment difficult to implement. Year-round availability is also an important factor to consider. This led us to choose a plant very abundant in Algeria, Quercus robur. Based on our previous studies conducted on the use of oak (Quercus robur) leaves for drinking water treatment, this treatment has also been of great effectiveness for the reduction of turbidity [18].

2.2. Extraction and Purification of Proteins from Oak Leaves

The coagulant agent based on proteins was extracted from oak leaves according to the procedure showed in Figure 1.
The powder coagulant was prepared as follows:
i.
Washing with tap water;
ii.
Drying at a relatively low temperature of 50 °C for 24 h to avoid denaturation of the active compounds responsible for coagulation [32];
iii.
Grinding for particle size reduction and sieving up to obtain a homogeneous fine powder;
iv.
Sieving through a 0.35 mm pore sieve.
A mass of 0.1 g of powdered dried oak leaves was suspended in 100 mL of distilled water to extract the active compounds responsible for coagulation (proteins) using an Erlenmeyer flask (250 mL) and mixed by a magnetic stirrer (RO-TILABO® MH 15).
This extraction was carried out at a variable pH, temperature and stirring time, and speed depending on the test matrix (see Table 1). After a maceration time variable between 1 and 4 h, the coagulating proteins were purified using two techniques, which are filtration and centrifugation, parts of the solutions are centrifuged with a variable speed and time (see Table 1) after their filtration by standard filter papers (porosity < 8 μm), other parts of the solutions are centrifuged directly after the maceration that is without filtration. Once the extracts are recovered, the proteins are determined and stored in a cold room at ±4 °C.
The optimization of the procedure was obtained through a fractional experimental design. According to the international literature [24,33,34], and taking into account that proteins are sensitive to the surrounding environmental conditions and are easily denatured [35,36], the operational parameters and the relating range of values reported in Table 1 were considered.
According to Table 1, the experimental study would have tested the effect of 8 parameters varying from the 2 extremes of a range of value. This experimental design would have required 28 (i.e., 256) tests to be conducted. With the aim to reduce the number of tests, a fractional design obtained by Minitab software, called 28−4, and composed of only 16 trials, was considered (Table 2)

2.3. Water Samples Collection

Proteins extracted from oak leaves were used to test their effectiveness in treating drinking water as well as industrial oily wastewater. Drinking water was collected from the water treatment plant of Oued El Athmania, Mila (36°27′1.01″ N; 6°15′51.98″ E). Industrial oily wastewater was collected from the industrial plant of Sonatrach, Ain Amenas (28°02′18″ N; 9°33′54″ E). The main characteristics of water samples are reported in Table 3.

2.4. Jar Test Experiments

The experimental coagulation/flocculation tests were performed using a jar test apparatus (LI-JTA-125, LABARD, Labard instruments, Bengala, India) under the operating conditions summarized in Table 1. The test is aimed at evaluating the optimal coagulant protein concentration. A series of 6 beakers filled with 1000 mL of water (i.e., drinking water and industrial oily wastewater, separately) were used to conduct the jar tests [32,39]. This was conducted in three steps: (i) coagulation at 160 rpm for 3 min; (ii) flocculation at 30 rpm for 20 min; (iii) settling for 30 min. After that, the supernatant was analyzed for pH, salinity, Ec, turbidity, TA and OM for drinking water, whereas turbidity, pH, OM, TSS and COD were measured for industrial oily wastewater. The removal efficiency was calculated according to the following Equation (1):
Removal   efficiency   % = Initial   value Residual   value × 100 Initial   value
where initial and residual values are, respectively, the value of the specific parameter investigated (e.g., turbidity, COD) with its relative unit (e.g., NTU, mg/L) pre and post jar test performance.

2.5. Analytical Methods

The Bruker’s X-ray diffraction system (K-Alpha (1.54), 40 kV, 30 mA, D8-Discover, Nancy, France), the Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectrometer (SHIMADZU Code: HI 98713, Chimadzu, Clujnapoca, Romania) and scanning electron microscope (Hitachi TM3400, France) were used to determine the presence of protein in the oak leaves.
The protein content was determined by the Bradford method [40]. pH, salinity, and Ec were evaluated by a multi-parameters device (Jenway model 3540, Camlab, Cambridge, United Kingdom). Turbidity and COD concentration were measured by using a turbidity meter (HANNA Code: HI 98713, Hanna instruments, Cluj-Napoca, Romania) and the Digital Reactor Block 200 (Jenway model 3540, Camlab, Cambridge, United Kingdom), respectively. TA, OM and TSS concentrations were evaluated by standard titrimetric methods [41].

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Characterization of Oak Leaves Powder

3.1.1. FTIR and XRD Analysis

According to Figure 2a, FTIR spectra of the oak leaves powder shows different peaks corresponding to the active functional groups responsible for the coagulation. Among them, the functional group of protein, according to Padhiyar et al., the C=O function of the ester group at 1721.2 cm−1, proves the presence of proteins [42]. Conversely, Magalhaes et al., in their study, reported that proteins were also observed at 1614.1 cm−1 [43].These functional groups are responsible for the destabilization of colloidal particles, thus promoting their coagulation and flocculation, and the subsequent removal of various organic and inorganic pollutants [9,44].
Figure 2b shows the X-ray diffraction pattern of oak leaves powder. The results reveal a crystallinity rate of 29.46% and the presence of proteins between 15 and 40 °C. These active agents are capable to remove various pollutants present in drinking water, municipal and industrial wastewater such as physical pollutants (turbidity and TSS), organic pollutants (COD, BOD5, OM) and biological pollutants (total coliforms) through a coagulation/flocculation process [28,45,46].
The studies carried out by Benalia et al. and Padhiyar et al. have, respectively, proved the effectiveness of coagulant proteins when Aloe vera and Moringa oleifera were used as organic coagulants to treat water [17,42].

3.1.2. SEM Analysis

The surface morphology of oak leaves was used to characterize their surface properties. SEM was used as a source of photographic images to evaluate the nature of the biomaterial for coagulation of various pollutants present in the water.
Figure 3 illustrates the surface morphology of oak leaves showing that it is characterized by a heterogeneous external surface (in terms of shape and size). This structure favors the coagulation process, due to the presence of several functional groups such as proteins in the oak leaves [46]. The presence of a fibrous structure favors the coagulation of pollutants present in water [47]. Thus, based on these characteristics, it can be concluded that oak leaves have a suitable morphological profile to facilitate the coagulation/flocculation process by improving the adsorption and bridging capacity.

3.2. Factorial Design

3.2.1. Effect of Operational Parameters on Protein Extraction

The effects of the 8 parameters investigated on the extraction efficiency of proteins from oak leaves are observable in Figure 4.
Stirring speed, centrifugation time and speed clearly result to be irrelevant (their effects are negligible), whereas protein extraction was found to be slightly affected by temperature, as protein concentration decreased when the temperature increased. At high temperatures, hydrogen bonds are broken and the proteins are unable to resume their original structure [48,49]. Therefore, stirring speed, centrifugation time, centrifugation speed and temperature have been considered as constants (Figure 4).
Moreover, Figure 4 shows that protein extraction efficiency is strongly affected by pH. Oak leaves present a very low solubility at acid pH (i.e., pH 2), whereas the solubility is high at basic pH (i.e., pH 12), thus reaching a maximum of protein extraction of approximately 3.8 mg/g at pH 12. Generally, the protein extraction rate and solubility are higher at alkaline pH than acidic. Nevertheless, extremely alkaline pH conditions could cause dissociation and disintegration of the proteins [50]. Proteins own a neutral charge at the isoelectric pH (pHi). At this pH, strong electrostatic repulsions take place between the ionized groups, thus promoting the denaturation of protein macromolecules [48]. Conversely, the presence of lipids in oak leaves is responsible for a decrease in protein dissolution rate because of the formation of an emulsion during the dissolution stage that avoids the protein extraction [48,51]. Stirring time, maceration time and filtration also affect the extraction process. The amount of protein extracted increased when the maceration time decreased. Thus, the maximum number of proteins was obtained at 10 min of stirring time and 4 h of maceration time. This result is a consequence of the presence of lipids and phenolic compounds in oak leaves that prevents the isolation of proteins and causes a decay in their chemical characteristics [51,52], and therefore, of their effectiveness as bio-coagulants.
According to Figure 4, the results clearly show that the extraction process performs better when the filtration step is not carried out, because a large protein amount remained on the filter paper. Several researchers have studied and confirmed the effect of pH, temperature and maceration time on the extraction of proteins from different plants [49,53].

3.2.2. Optimization of Protein Extraction

The number of proteins extracted from oak leaves corresponding to the 16 performed tests is reported in Figure 5.
According to Minitab software, the highest extracted protein concentration (4.895 mg/g) was obtained for the following operating parameters: no filtration, pH of 12, temperature of 20 °C, stirring speed of 300 rpm, stirring time of 60 min, maceration time of 4 h, centrifugation speed of 400 rpm, centrifugation time of 10 min.
The fractional design study resulted in the following empirical Equation (2), where the extracted protein concentration (Y) is expressed as a function of the only relevant factors:
Y = 3.0537 + 0.7432 X1 − 0.2092 X2 − 0.1781 X3 − 0.4001 X4 − 0.3754 X5 − 0.3873 X6+ 0.0993 X7 − 0.2674 X1×2 − 0.1888 X1 X3 + 0.1143 X1 X5 − 0.4863 X1 X6
In this study, the correlation coefficient R2 and R2 adjusted were 99.75 and 99.05%, respectively. Of equal interest, the p-value was less than 0.05. The quality of the model prediction will also be assessed by the residual curves (see Figure 6a,b) to visualize the difference between the model values and the actual (experimental) values. Figure 6a shows a distribution of residuals reasonably close to the zero axis. According to Figure 6b, all the residuals were well aligned with the Henry line.
The protein concentration extracted from oak leaves in this study was higher than that extracted from leucaena seed kernels (i.e., 1.59 mg/g) when a 3M NaCl solution was used as the solvent (5 g of seeds in 100 mL of 3M NaCl solution) [54], and that extracted from mustard crude (i.e., 4.1 mg/g) [55].

3.3. Application for Water and Wastewater Treatment

The optimal conditions obtained for maximum protein extraction were applied to the jar test experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of the coagulant protein on the drinking water and industrial wastewater quality.

3.3.1. Effect of the Coagulant Protein Dosage on Turbidity Removal from Water

Results regarding turbidity removal from industrial oily wastewater and drinking water by varying coagulant dosage are reported in Figure 7a and Figure 7b, respectively. A decrease in turbidity efficiency removal corresponding to an increase of coagulant dosage (Figure 7a for a dosage of 0.6 mg/L and Figure 7b for dosages higher than 0.17 mg/L) is a consequence of an increase of turbidity due to a combination of the following factors: increase of particle solids concentration (increase of coagulant dosage), re-stabilization of colloidal particles and potential occurrence of phenomena preventing the inter-particle bridges formation [27]. The optimal protein dosage to treat industrial oily wastewater resulted to be 0.538 mg/L, thus achieving a reduction of turbidity by 96.87%, as the value of this parameter dropped from 187 NTU down to 5.85 NTU (Figure 7a). The bio-coagulant was less efficient in treating drinking water, achieving a reduction of turbidity by 69.29%, as the turbidity dropped from 15.7 NTU down to 4.82 NTU (Figure 7b).
Coagulant proteins promote colloids coagulation and, therefore, contribute to their removal, thanks to adsorption and bridging phenomena [9,24]. Actually, proteins are molecules characterized for a long chain length as well as high molecular weight, and both factors are responsible for the formation of bridges involving colloidal particles. Additionally, the fine powder of the coagulant is surface charged and, therefore, is able to be adsorbed by the surface of colloids. This results in the neutralization of negatively charged colloidal particles and the consequent decrease of the zeta potential and suspension stability [33,56].
Several works from the literature have demonstrated the effectiveness of coagulants extracted from plants in removing turbidity from water. For instance, Bouchareb et al. reached a turbidity reduction by 97.14% from wastewater with an initial turbidity of 118 NTU [28]. Moreover, Landázuri-Rojas et al. tested proteins from Moringa oleifera seeds and obtained a turbidity removal by 40.77% [27]. Finally, Muthuraman et al. investigated the effectiveness of proteins extracted from Strychnos potatorum, Moringa oleifera and Phaseolus vulgaris to treat a wastewater with an initial turbidity of 250 NTU and reached a turbidity removal efficiencies of 90.3%, 93.2% and 84.3%, respectively [33].

3.3.2. Effect of Coagulant Protein Dosage on Other Water Parameters

Table 4 reports the variation of physical and chemical characteristics of industrial oily wastewater and drinking water after treatment with the bio-coagulant dosed according to the best performing dosage (i.e., 0.538 mg/L for industrial oily wastewater and 0.098 mg/L for drinking water). In Table 4, it can be noticed that the coagulant proteins were responsible for increasing the water pH from 7.75 to 8.46 in drinking water and from 9.0 to 9.68 in industrial oily wastewater. This increase is likely due to the bio-coagulant powder that was prepared in a basic medium (pH = 12) by adding NaOH.
Ec of drinking water increased from 782 µS/cm to 935 µS/cm. This variation is due to the natural presence of ions in the bio-coagulant (Na+ and OH), and all of them contribute to an increase in the Ec value. Similar results were obtained by Benalia et al. and Shan et al. [17,57]. The values of OM content after treatment were 5.2 mg O2/L and 9.4 mg O2/L for drinking water and industrial oily wastewater, respectively. The increase of OM content from 2.1 mg O2/L to 5.2 mg O2/L in drinking water is due to the supply of OM from the bio-coagulant, whereas the decrease of OM content from 17.5 mg O2/L to 9.4 mg O2/L in industrial oily wastewater is due to the turbidity removal induced by the coagulant that produced an OM content reduction greater than its increase due to the addition of bio-coagulant.
Several researchers have found that the use of coagulant proteins to treat drinking water is responsible for an increase of OM concentration [17,58].
Salinity in drinking water did not change as a consequence of the bio-coagulant addition, thus remaining equal to 0.6 g/L. This result is due to the absence of production or consumption of mineral salts responsible for water salinity, such as sodium chloride, potassium chloride, etc.
Adding 0.098 mg/L of bio-coagulant resulted in a small increase of TA, which moved from 134 mg CaCO3/L to 142 mg CaCO3/L. This result is a consequence of the basic nature of the bio-coagulant (pH = 12) that released hydroxide ions (OH) in water.
Concerning TSS and COD concentrations, the maximum removal efficiency obtained for 0.538 mg/L of the coagulant protein resulted in being 89.86% and 96.39%, respectively. This result is due to the destabilization of the colloidal suspension and the following aggregation of solids, promoted by charge neutralization and bridging mechanisms, as mentioned in a previous section, which favored their removal by settling [28,56].
Similar findings were observed by Shan et al., Benalia et al. and Bouchareb et al. [17,28,57].

4. Conclusions

The fractional design allowed to evaluate and reduce the number of factors affecting the extraction and purification of proteins. The quality of drinking water and industrial wastewater were also evaluated before and after treatment with proteins of oak (Quercus robur) leaves. Several water parameters were measured. In this case, the maximum protein extraction yield was applied for the water treatment. The maximum turbidity removal performances were 69.29% and 96.87% for drinking water and industrial oily wastewater, respectively. Moreover, the removal efficiency for COD, TSS and OM concentrations in industrial oily wastewater were 96.39%, 89.86% and 46.28%, respectively.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B., K.D., A.K., A.P. (Antonio Panico) and A.P. (Antonio Pizzi); methodology, A.B., A.K., A.P. (Antonio Panico), W.C., S.D. and K.D.; formal analysis, A.P. (Antonio Panico); investigation, A.B. and A.P. (Antonio Panico); data curation, A.B., K.D., A.M., R.B. and A.P. (Antonio Pizzi); writing—original draft preparation, A.B., A.K., A.P., W.C., S.D., A.M and A.P.; writing—review and editing, K.D., R.B., W.C., S.D. and A.P. (Antonio Pizzi); supervision, K.D., A.K., A.B. and A.P. (Antonio Pizzi); project administration, K.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We warmly thank the National Polytechnic School of Constantine for its support for the realization of the experimental part as well as the physicochemical analyzes and the characterization of the bio-coagulant.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

BOD5Biochemical oxygen demand
CODChemical oxygen demand
DOEDesign of experiences
EEast
EcElectrical conductivity
FTIRFourier-transform infrared spectrophotometry
NNorth
NTUNephelometric turbidity unit
OMOrganic matter
pHHydrogen potential
pHiIsoelectric pH
rpmRevolutions per minute
SEMScanning electron microscope
TTemperature
TATotal alkalinity
TSSTotal suspended solids
XRDX-ray diffractometer

References

  1. Moulin, M. Biochemical, Biophysical, and Structural Studies of Seed Proteins from Moringa Oleifera and Implications for Traditional Water Purification. Ph.D. Thesis, Keele University, Keele, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. Penchev, P.E. Étude Des Procédés D’extraction et de Purification de Produits Bioactifs à Partir de Plantes Par Couplage de Techniques Séparatives à Basses et Hautes Pressions. Ph.D. Thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, Toulouse, France, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jovanovic, A.; Petrovic, P.; Ðordjevic, V.; Zdunic, G.; Savikin, K.; Bugarski, B. Polyphenols Extraction from Plant Sources. Lek. Sirovine 2017, 37, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pourmortazavi, S.M.; Hajimirsadeghi, S.S. Supercritical Fluid Extraction in Plant Essential and Volatile Oil Analysis. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1163, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Morro Pérez, N. Distillation and Extraction of Herbs from Lamiaceae Family. Master’s Thesis, Valladolid University, Valladolid, Spain, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gray, A.I.; Satyajit, D.S.; Zahid, L. Natural Products Isolation, 2nd ed.; Institute, A.S., Ed.; Humana Press Inc.: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2006; ISBN 1588294471. [Google Scholar]
  7. Revutska, A.; Belava, V.; Golubenko, A.; Taran, N.; Chen, M. Plant Secondary Metabolites as Bioactive Substances for Innovative Biotechnologies. E3S Web Conf. 2021, 280, 07014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sharmeen, J.B.; Mahomoodally, F.M.; Zengin, G.; Maggi, F. Essential Oils as Natural Sources of Fragrance Compounds for Cosmetics and Cosmeceuticals. Molecules 2021, 26, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fatombi, J.K.; Lartiges, B.; Aminou, T.; Barres, O.; Caillet, C. A Natural Coagulant Protein from Copra (Cocos Nucifera): Isolation, Characterization, and Potential for Water Purification. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 116, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chandrashekar, S.; Vijayakumar, R.; Chelliah, R. Identification and Purification of Potential Bioactive Peptide of Moringa Oleifera Seed Extracts. Plants 2020, 9, 1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Vishali, S.; Roshini, S.K.; Samyuktha, M.R.; Ashish, K. Towards Zero Waste Production in the Paint Industry Wastewater Using an Agro-Based Material in the Treatment Train. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2018, 190, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Klašnja, M.; Antov, M.; Škrbic, B.; Šc, M. Removal of Water Turbidity by Natural Coagulants Obtained from Chestnut and Acorn. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 6639–6643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Benalia, A.; Derbal, K.; Khalfaoui, A.; Pizzi, A.; Medjahdi, G. The Use of Aloe Vera as Natural Coagulant in Algerian Drinking Water Treatment Plant. J. Renew. Mater. 2022, 10, 625–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dotto, J.; Fagundes-klen, M.R.; Veit, M.T.; Palácio, S.M.; Bergamasco, R. Performance of Different Coagulants in the Coagulation/Flocculation Process of Textile Wastewater. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 20, 656–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vishali, S.; Karthikeyan, R. Cactus Opuntia (Ficus-Indica): An Eco-Friendly Alternative Coagulant in the Treatment of Paint Effluent. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015, 56, 1489–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Megersa, M.; Gach, W.; Beyene, A.; Ambelu, A.; Triest, L. Effect of Salt Solutions on Coagulation Performance of Moringa Stenopetala and Maerua Subcordata for Turbid Water Treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 221, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Benalia, A.; Derbal, K.; Panico, A.; Pirozzi, F. Use of Acorn Leaves as a Natural Coagulant in a Drinking Water Treatment Plant. Water 2019, 11, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Subramonian, W.; Wu, T.Y.; Chai, S. A Comprehensive Study on Coagulant Performance and Floc Characterization of Natural Cassia Obtusifolia Seed Gum in Treatment of Raw Pulp and Paper Mill Effluent. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014, 61, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Marina, B.S.; Prodanovi, J.M. Extracts of Fava Bean (Vicia faba L.) Seeds as Natural Coagulants. Ecol. Eng. 2015, 84, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yin, C. Emerging Usage of Plant-Based Coagulants for Water and Wastewater Treatment. Process Biochem. 2010, 45, 1437–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hameed, Y.T.; Idris, A.; Hussain, S.A.; Abdullah, N.; Che Man, H. Effect of Pre-Treatment with a Tannin-Based Coagulant and Flocculant on a Biofilm Bacterial Community and the Nitrification Process in a Municipal Wastewater Biofilm Treatment Unit. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Trivedi, P.; Schaller, J.; Gustafsson, J.; Fardim, P. Supramolecular Design of Cellulose Hydrogel Beads. J. Renew. Mater. 2017, 5, 400–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Choy, S.Y.; Prasad, K.M.N.; Wu, T.Y.; Raghunandan, M.E.; Ramanan, R.N. Utilization of Plant-Based Natural Coagulants as Future Alternatives towards Sustainable Water Clarification. J. Environ. Sci. 2014, 26, 2178–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Petrovic, N.J.; Antov, M.G.; Šc, M.B. Proteins from Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Seed as a Natural Coagulant for Potential Application in Water Turbidity Removal. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 2167–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rasool, M.A.; Tavakoli, B.; Chaibakhsh, N.; Reza, A.; Aazam Sadat, M. Use of a Plant-Based Coagulant in Coagulation—Ozonation Combined Treatment of Leachate from a Waste Dumping Site. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 90, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ndabigengesere, A.; Narasiah, K.S.; Talbot, B.G. Active Agents and Mechanism of Coagulation of Turbid Waters Using Moringa oleifera. Water Res. 1995, 29, 703–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Taiwo, A.S.; Adenike, K.; Aderonke, O. Efficacy of a Natural Coagulant Protein from Moringa oleifera (Lam) Seeds in Treatment of Opa Reservoir Water, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bouchareb, R.; Derbal, K.; Benalia, A. Optimization of Active Coagulant Agent Extraction Method from Moringa Oleifera Seeds for Municipal Wastewater Treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 2021, 84, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bello, A.; Virtanen, V.; Salminen, J.P.; Leiviskä, T. Aminomethylation of Spruce Tannins and Their Application as Coagulants for Water Clarification. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 242, 116765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Benalia, A.; Derbal, K. Etude Expérimentale et Modélisation Du Processus de La Coagulation Floculation: Application Aux Eaux Destinée à La Consommation. Master’s Thesis, Université Constantine 3, El Khroub, Algeria, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  31. Desjardins, R. Traitement Des Eaux.Pdf, 2nd ed.; Montréal, Presses Polytechnique de de Montréal: Montréal, QC, Canada, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  32. Benalia, A.; Derbal, K.; Khalfaoui, A.; Bouchareb, R.; Panico, A.; Gisonni, C.; Crispino, G.; Pirozzi, F.; Pizzi, A. Use of Aloe Vera as an Organic Coagulant for Improving Drinking Water Quality. Water 2021, 13, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Muthuraman, G.; Sasikala, S.; Prakash, N. Proteins from Natural Coagulant for Potential Application of Turbidity Removal in Water. Int. J. Eng. Innov. Technol. 2013, 3, 278–283. [Google Scholar]
  34. Landázuri-Rojas, A.C.; Villarreal, J.S.; Núñez, E.R.; Pico, M.M.; Lagos, A.S.; Caviedes, M. Experimental Evaluation of Crushed Moringa oleifera Lam. Seeds and Powder Waste during Coagulation-Flocculation Processes. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 5443–5451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, W.; Scali, M.; Vignani, R.; Spadafora, A.; Sensi, E.; Mazzuca, S.; Cresti, M. Protein Extraction for Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis from Olive Leaf, a Plant Tissue Containing High Levels of Interfering Compounds. Electrophoresis 2003, 24, 2369–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rodhe, A.; Bella, N. Alkaline Protein Extraction of Oat Bran and Oat Endosperm Flour the Effect of PH during Extraction and Precipitation. Master’s Thesis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bouteflika, A. Valeurs Limites Des Paramètres de Rejets d’effluents Liquides Industriels. J. Off. République Algérienne 2006, 26, 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  38. Boutteflika, A. Paramètres de Qualité de L’eau de Consommation Humaine. J. Off. 2011, 18, 6–9. [Google Scholar]
  39. Benalia, A.; Derbal, K. Comparative Study between Aluminum Sulfate and Ferric Chloride in Water Treatment: Turbidity Removal. J. Dr. 2015, 1, 4–9. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bradford, M.M. A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-Dye Binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Rice, E.W.; Baird, R.B.; Eaton, A.D. ; American Public Health Association (APHA). (Eds.) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd ed.; American Water Works Association (AWWA) and Water Environment Federation (WEF): Washington, DC, USA, 2012; ISBN 978-087553-0130. [Google Scholar]
  42. Padhiyar, H.; Thanki, A.; Kumar, N.; Pandey, S.; Yadav, M. Parametric and Kinetic Investigations on Segregated and Mixed Textile Effluent Streams Using Moringa Oleifera Seed Powders of Different Sizes. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 34, 101159–101170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Magalhães, E.R.B.; Fonseca de Menezes, N.N.; Silva, F.L.; Alves Garrido, J.W.; Angélica dos Santos Bezerra Sousa, M.; dos Santos, E.S. Effect of Oil Extraction on the Composition, Structure, and Coagulant Effect of Moringa Oleifera Seeds. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 279, 123902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Saritha, V.; Karnena, M.K.; Dwarapureddi, B.K. “Exploring Natural Coagulants as Impending Alternatives towards Sustainable Water Clarification”—A Comparative Studies of Natural Coagulants with Alum. J. Water Process Eng. 2019, 32, 100982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Baquerizo-Crespo, R.J.; Nuñez, Y.; Albite, J.; Macías-Alcívar, J.A.; Cedeño-Zambrano, N.; Dueñas-Rivadeneira, A.A.; Gómez-Salcedo, Y.; Rodríguez-Díaz, J.M. Biocoagulants as an Alternative for Water Treatment. In Environmental and Microbial Biotechnology; Prasad, R., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 313–334. ISBN 9789811589997. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kebede, T.G.; Dube, S.; Mhuka, V.; Nindi, M.M. Bioremediation of Cd (II), Pb (II) and Cu (II) from Industrial Effluents by Moringa Stenopetala Seed Husk. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 2019, 54, 337–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dao, M.; Nguyen, V.; Tran, T.; Nguyen, X.; Vo, D.; Nguyen, V.; Hoang, L. Pilot-Scale Study of Real Domestic Textile Wastewater Treatment Using Cassia Fistula Seed-Derived Coagulant. J. Chem. 2021, 2021, 7608856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Selmane, D. Etude de l’extraction Des Protéines de Coproduits d’abattage et de Leur Valorisation Comme Ingrédients Fonctionnels. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Blaise Pascal-Clermont-Ferrand II, Clermont-Ferrand, France, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  49. Preece, K.E.; Hooshyar, N.; Zuidam, N.J. Whole Soybean Protein Extraction Processes: A Review. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2017, 43, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Potin, F. Effet de l’extraction Des Protéines de Tourteaux de Chanvre Sur Leurs Fonctionnalités. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besançon, France, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ragab, D.D.M.; Babiker, E.E.; Eltinay, A.H. Fractionation, Solubility and Functional Properties of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) Proteins as Affected by PH and/or Salt Concentration. Food Chem. 2004, 84, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arntfield, S.D. Effects of Divalent Cations, Phytic Acid, and Phenolic Compounds on the Gelation of Ovalbumin and Canola Proteins. In Macromolecular Interactions in Food Technology; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1996; Volume 650, pp. 80–92. [Google Scholar]
  53. Akyüz, A.; Ersus, S. Optimization of Enzyme Assisted Extraction of Protein from the Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Leaves for Alternative Plant Protein Concentrate Production. Food Chem. 2021, 335, 127673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kristianto, H.; Rahman, H.; Prasetyo, S.; Sugih, A.K. Removal of Congo Red Aqueous Solution Using Leucaena Leucocephala Seed’s Extract as Natural Coagulant. Appl. Water Sci. 2019, 9, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bodlund, I.; Pavankumar, A.R.; Chelliah, R.; Kasi, S.; Sankaran, K.; Rajarao, G.K. Coagulant Proteins Identified in Mustard: A Potential Water Treatment Agent. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 11, 873–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ang, W.L.; Mohammad, A.W. State of the Art and Sustainability of Natural Coagulants in Water and Wastewater Treatment. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 262, 121267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Shan, T.C.; Al Matar, M.; Makky, E.A.; Ali, E.N. The Use of Moringa Oleifera Seed as a Natural Coagulant for Wastewater Treatment and Heavy Metals Removal. Appl. Water Sci. 2017, 7, 1369–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jacques, F.K.; Josse, R.G.; Mama, D.; Aminou, T. Étude de l’activité Floculante de La Caséine Acide Extraite de La Crème de Cocos Nucifera Dans La Clarification Des Eaux de Surface. Rev. Sci. L’eau 2009, 22, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Extraction and purification procedure.
Figure 1. Extraction and purification procedure.
Water 15 01984 g001
Figure 2. Oak leaves powder: (a) infrared spectrum and (b) X-ray diffraction pattern.
Figure 2. Oak leaves powder: (a) infrared spectrum and (b) X-ray diffraction pattern.
Water 15 01984 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of oak leaves (a): 100 µm and (b): 10 µm.
Figure 3. SEM images of oak leaves (a): 100 µm and (b): 10 µm.
Water 15 01984 g003
Figure 4. Main effects plot for protein concentration.
Figure 4. Main effects plot for protein concentration.
Water 15 01984 g004
Figure 5. Protein concentration.
Figure 5. Protein concentration.
Water 15 01984 g005
Figure 6. The residual curves: (a) residue distribution and (b) Henry line.
Figure 6. The residual curves: (a) residue distribution and (b) Henry line.
Water 15 01984 g006
Figure 7. Effect of protein concentration on turbidity removal from: (a) industrial oily wastewater; (b) drinking water.
Figure 7. Effect of protein concentration on turbidity removal from: (a) industrial oily wastewater; (b) drinking water.
Water 15 01984 g007
Table 1. Statistical distribution of experimental data (real values of factors).
Table 1. Statistical distribution of experimental data (real values of factors).
ParametersUnitMinimumMaximum
pH (X1)/212
Temperature(X2)°C2060
Stirring speed(X3)rpm3001500
Stirring time(X4)min1060
Maceration time(X5)hr14
Filtration(X6)/WithoutWith
Centrifugation speed(X7)rpm10004000
Centrifugation time(X8)min1060
Table 2. Fractional experimental design.
Table 2. Fractional experimental design.
Standard RunpHTemperature
(°C)
Stirring Speed
(rpm)
Stirring Time
(min)
Maceration Time
(h)
Filtration *Centrifugation Speed
(rpm)
Centrifugation Time
(min)
12203001010100010
212203001011400060
32603001040400060
412603001041100010
522015001041400010
6122015001040100060
726015001011100060
8126015001010400010
92203006041100060
1012203006040400010
112603006011400010
1212603006010100060
1322015006010400060
14122015006011100010
1526015006040100010
16126015006041400060
Min 220 °C300 RPM10 min1 h01000 RPM10 min
Max 1260 °C1500 RPM60 min4 h14000 RPM60 min
Note: * 0 means there is no filtration and 1 means that filtration was performed.
Table 3. Quality of water samples.
Table 3. Quality of water samples.
ParametersIndustrial Oily WastewaterAlgerian Standards
[37]
Drinking WaterAlgerian Standards
[38]
Turbidity (NTU)1872015.75
pH96.5–8.57.756.5–9
OM (mgO2/L)17.5/2.15
TSS (mg/L)96935//
COD (mg/L)784.45120//
TA (mg CaCO3/L)//134500
Salinity (g/L)//0.6/
Ec (µs/cm)//7822800
Table 4. Effect of protein dosage on water characteristics.
Table 4. Effect of protein dosage on water characteristics.
ParametersIndustrial Oily WastewaterDrinking Water
Pre-TreatmentPost-TreatmentPre-TreatmentPost-Treatment
Protein dosage (mg/L)/0.538/0.098
Turbidity (NTU)1875.8515.74.82
Turbidity removal (%)/96.87/69.29
pH9 9.687.758.46
OM (mgO2/L)17.59.42.15.2
TSS (mg/L)969100//
TSS removal (%)/89.86//
COD (mg/L)784.4528.278//
COD removal (%)/96.395//
TA (mg CaCO3/L)//134142
Salinity (g/L)//0.60.6
Ec (µs/cm)//782935
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Benalia, A.; Chaibraa, W.; Djeghar, S.; Derbal, K.; Khalfaoui, A.; Mahfouf, A.; Bouchareb, R.; Panico, A.; Pizzi, A. Use of Extracted Proteins from Oak Leaves as Bio-Coagulant for Water and Wastewater Treatment: Optimization by a Fractional Factorial Design. Water 2023, 15, 1984. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15111984

AMA Style

Benalia A, Chaibraa W, Djeghar S, Derbal K, Khalfaoui A, Mahfouf A, Bouchareb R, Panico A, Pizzi A. Use of Extracted Proteins from Oak Leaves as Bio-Coagulant for Water and Wastewater Treatment: Optimization by a Fractional Factorial Design. Water. 2023; 15(11):1984. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15111984

Chicago/Turabian Style

Benalia, Abderrezzaq, Walid Chaibraa, Sara Djeghar, Kerroum Derbal, Amel Khalfaoui, Asma Mahfouf, Raouf Bouchareb, Antonio Panico, and Antonio Pizzi. 2023. "Use of Extracted Proteins from Oak Leaves as Bio-Coagulant for Water and Wastewater Treatment: Optimization by a Fractional Factorial Design" Water 15, no. 11: 1984. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15111984

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop