# Spatiotemporal Analysis of Groundwater Resources in the Saïss Aquifer, Morocco

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{4}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Materials and Methods

#### 2.1. Study Area and Data Collection

^{2}, 95 km length and 30 km width. It occupies a significant part of the Sebou watershed with the two largest cities (Fez and Meknes) and several centers (Figure 1). The Fez–Meknes basin is part of the south Rifin. The study area delimitation was based on the aquifer system extension and not on the watershed limit.

#### 2.2. Methodology

#### 2.2.1. Spatial Variability of the Groundwater Resources

#### Spatial Interpolation

#### Criteria for Evaluating the Performance of Interpolation Methods

#### 2.2.2. Temporal Variability of the Groundwater Resources

#### Reconstruction of Missing Time Series Data

_{t}} a series with mean μ, then, if the series is supposed to follow an ARIMA(p,d,q) (P,D,Q)

^{s}model, we can write:

## 3. Results and Discussion

#### 3.1. Data Processing and Quality Control

- -
- The existence of a spatial autocorrelation;
- -
- A distribution of values approaching the normal distribution;
- -
- The presence of a drift;
- -
- Anisotropic behavior;
- -
- The absence of abnormal values.

#### 3.2. Identification of the Optimal Spatial Interpolation Method

^{2}).

^{2}coefficient. The ranking of the optimal interpolation methods from the most accurate (OCK) to the least accurate (IDW) is given in Table 2.

^{2}= 0.987 demonstrates the existence of a strong correlation between the observed values and those predicted.

^{2}; nevertheless, ordinary kriging is more precise than cokriging from the point of view of the spatial distribution of uncertainty.

#### 3.3. Temporal Groundwater Level Modeling

#### Reconstruction of Time Series

^{2}), is illustrated in Figure 11. The results demonstrate that the model produces acceptable performance in simulating groundwater levels.

#### 3.4. Study of the Variation in the Groundwater Resources between 2005 and 2020

- -
- Category 1 corresponds to piezometers in which the groundwater level did not undergo a significant variation. For example, for piezometer 566/21, the groundwater level varies slightly between +/−4 m.
- -
- Category 2 corresponds to piezometers in which the groundwater level increased by approximately 20 m. These piezometers are mostly located in the irrigated perimeters with surface water. The development of this perimeter made it possible, on the one hand, to reduce the use of groundwater resources for irrigation. On the other hand, it made it possible to have an infiltration of this surface water. At the piezometer 237/15, the water table depth experienced significant fluctuations but with a general upward trend of 25 m.
- -
- Category 3 corresponds to piezometers whose groundwater levels of the aquifer experienced a decrease of approximately 7 m (Piezometer 3362/15). This drop in groundwater resources is due to excessive water pumping. Moreover, the majority of these piezometers are located in agricultural areas irrigated by groundwater resources. In addition, they are far from potential sources of recharge such as rivers.

## 4. Conclusions

^{2}and RMSE indicators). However, the ordinary kriging is more accurate than the cokriging from the point of view of the uncertainty of spatial distribution.

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Informed Consent Statement

## Data Availability Statement

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Hssaisoune, M.; Bouchaou, L.; Sifeddine, A.; Bouimetarhan, I.; Chehbouni, A. Moroccan Groundwater Resources and Evolution with Global Climate Changes. Geosciences
**2020**, 10, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Direction de la Recherche et de la Planification de l’Eau (DRPE). Eaux Souterraines au Maroc Comment Concilier Satisfaction des Besoins et Développement Durable des Ressources en Eau Souterraines. Unpublished Report. Ministère délégué auprès du Ministre de l’Energie, des Mines, de l’Eau et de l’Environnement Chargé de l’Eau: Rabat, Morocco, 2014; 1–53. [Google Scholar]
- NOVEC-Morocco. Etude pour L’évaluation des Impacts des Changements Climatiques sur les Ressources en Eau et L’identification des Mesures D’adaptation dans le Bassin du Sebou. Unpublished Report. NOVEC-Morocco: Rabat, Morocco, 2020; 200p. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, H.F.; Meng, R.F.; Bao, X.L.; Cao, W.G.; Li, Z.Y.; Xu, B.Y. Assessment of water level threshold for groundwater restoration and over-exploitation remediation the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Plain. J. Groundw. Sci. Eng.
**2022**, 10, 113–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chenini, I.; Mammou, A.; El May, M. Groundwater Recharge Zone Mapping Using GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Analysis: A Case Study in Central Tunisia (Maknassy Basin). Water Resour. Manag.
**2020**, 24, 921–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Adhikary, P.P.; Dash, C.J. Comparison of deterministic and stochastic methods to predict spatial variation of groundwater depth. Appl. Water Sci.
**2017**, 7, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Ahmadi, S.; Sedghamiz, A. Geostatistical Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Variations of Groundwater Level. Environ. Monit. Assess.
**2007**, 129, 277–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Delbari, M.; Motlagh, M.B.; Amiri, M. Spatio-temporal variability of groundwater depth in the Eghlid aquifer in southern Iran. Earth Sci. Res. J.
**2013**, 17, 105–114. [Google Scholar] - Khairul, H.; Sondipon, P.; Tareq, J.C.; Anzhelika, A. Analysis of groundwater table variability and trend using ordinary kriging: The case study of Sylhet, Bangladesh. Appl. Water Sci.
**2021**, 11, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Khazaz, L.; Oulidi, H.; Moutaki, S.; Ghafiri, A. Comparing and Evaluating Probabilistic and Deterministic Spatial Interpolation Methods for Groundwater Level of Haouz in Morocco. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst.
**2015**, 7, 631–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Manzione, R.L.; Castrignanò, A. A geostatistical approach for multi-source data fusion to predict water table depth. Sci. Total Environ.
**2019**, 996, 133763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Xiao, Y.; Gu, X.; Yin, S.; Shao, J.; Cui, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Niu, Y. Geostatistical interpolation model selection based on ArcGIS and spatio-temporal variability analysis of groundwater level in piedmont plains, northwest China. SpringerPlus
**2016**, 5, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Melloul, A.; Boughriba, M.; Boufaida, M. Étude de la contamination des ressources en eaux souterraines et cartographie de la vulnérabilité d’un aquifère soumis au climat semi-aride méditerranéen: Cas de la plaine côtière de Saïdia, Maroc. Sci. Changements Planétaires Sécheresse
**2009**, 20, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Iskandar, I.; Koike, K. Distinguishing potential sources of arsenic released to groundwater around a fault zone containing a mine site. Environ. Earth Sci.
**2011**, 63, 595–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nas, B. Geostatistical approach to assessment of spatial distribution of groundwater quality. Pol. J. Environ. Stud.
**2009**, 18, 1073–1082. [Google Scholar] - Nas, B.; Berktay, A. Groundwater quality mapping in urban groundwater using GIS. Environ. Monit. Assess.
**2010**, 160, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Marko, K.; Al-Amri, N.; Elfeki, A.M. Geostatistical analysis using GIS for mapping groundwater quality: Case study in the recharge area of Wadi Usfan, western Saudi Arabia. Arab. J. Geosci.
**2014**, 7, 5239–5252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mubarak, N.; Hussain, I.; Faisal, M.; Hussain, T.; Shad, M.; Abdel-Salam, N.; Shabbir, J. Spatial Distribution of Sulfate Concentration in Groundwater of South-Punjab, Pakistan. Water Qual. Expo. Health
**2015**, 7, 503–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Venkatramanan, S.; Chung, S.; Ramkumar, T.; Rajesh, R.; Gnanachandrasamy, G. Assessment of groundwater quality using GIS and CCME WQI techniques: A case study of Thiruthuraipoondi city in Cauvery deltaic region, Tamil Nadu, India. Desalination Water Treat.
**2015**, 57, 12058–12073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jarar Oulidi, H.; Benaabidate, L.; Fryar, A.; Benslimane, A. Utilisation du SIG pour la modélisation de la variabilité spatiale des valeurs de la transmissivité. In Incertitude et Envrionnement, fin des Certitudes Scientifiques; Allard, P., Fox, D., Picon, B., Eds.; Edisud: Aix en Provence, France, 2007; pp. 75–86. [Google Scholar]
- Lahlou, M.; Ajerame, M.M.; Bogaert, P.; Bousetta, B. Spatiotemporal Variability and Mapping of Groundwater Salinity in Tadla: Geostatistical Approach. In Developments in Soil Salinity Assessment and Reclamation; Shahid, S.A., Abdelfattah, M.A., Taha, F.K., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 167–182. [Google Scholar]
- Rochdane, S.; Reddy, D.V.; El Mandour, A. Hydrochemical and Isotopic Characterisation of Eastern Haouz Plain Groundwater, Morocco. Environ. Earth Sci.
**2015**, 73, 3487–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nouayti, A.; Khattach, D.; Hilali, M.; Nouayti, N.; Arabi, M. Assessment of groundwater quality using statistical techniques in high Basin of Guir (Eastern High Atlas, Morocco). Mater. Today Proc.
**2019**, 13, 1084–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Essahlaoui, A. Contribution à la Reconnaissance des Formations Aquifères Dans le Bassin de Meknès—Fès (Maroc): Prospection Géoélectrique, Etude Hydrogéologique et Inventaire des Ressources en Eau. Ph.D. Thesis, Mohammadia School of Engineering, Rabat, Morocco, 2000; 250p. [Google Scholar]
- Essahlaoui, A. Etude par Prospection Géoélectrique Dans le Plateau de Meknès et Essai de Reconnaissance du Bassin Hydrogeologique du Saïss; Mémoire de DEA, Faculty of Sciences of Meknes: Meknes, Morocco, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Benaabidate, L. Caractérisation du Bassin Versant de Sebou: Hydrogéologie, Qualité des Eaux et Géochimie des Sources Thermales. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques de Fès, Fes, Morocco, 2000; 250p. [Google Scholar]
- El Garouani, M.; Amyay, M.; Lahrach, A.; Oulidi, H.J. Land Surface Temperature in Response to Land Use/Cover Change Based on Remote Sensing Data and GIS Techniques: Application to Saïss Plain, Morocco. J. Ecol. Eng.
**2021**, 22, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - HCP (Haut-Commissariat au Plan, Maroc). Recensement général de la population et de l’habitat au Maroc. 2015. Available online: http://www.hcp.ma (accessed on 1 June 2022).
- Antonakos, A.; Lambrakis, N. Spatial interpolation for the distribution of groundwater level in an area of complex geology using widely available GIS tools. Environ. Process.
**2021**, 8, 993–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Triki, I. Evaluation de techniques d’interpolation spatiale de la piézométrie à l’aide de l’extension Geostatistical Analyst d’ArcGIS. Cas du système aquifère phréatique de Sfax (Tunisie). Géomatique Expert
**2014**, 99, 55–63. [Google Scholar] - Burgess, T.M.; Webster, R. Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties I: The semivariogram and punctual kriging. J. Soil Sci.
**1980**, 31, 315–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Agence du Bassin Hydraulique de Sebou (ABHS). Caractérisation de la Nappe de Saïss et Proposition d’un Programme de Renforcement du Réseau de Surveillance des Aquifères; Rapport ABHS, Phase1; Agence du Bassin Hydraulique de Sebou: Fès, Morocco, 2021; 110p. [Google Scholar]
- Brédy, J.J.; Gallichand, P.; Gumiere, S.J.C. Water table depth forecasting incranberry fields using two decision-tree-modeling approaches. Agric. Water Manag.
**2020**, 233, 106090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nayak, P.C.; Rao, Y.S.; Sudheer, K. Groundwater level forecasting in a shallow aquifer using artificial neural network approach. Water Resour. Manag.
**2006**, 20, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Beuchée, L.; Guyet, T.; Malinowski, S. Prédiction du niveau de nappes phréatiques: Comparaison d’approches locale, globale et hybride. In Proceedings of the EGC 2022—Conférence francophone sur l’Extraction et la Gestion des Connaissances, Blois, France, 24–28 January 2022; p. hal-03548071. [Google Scholar]
- Kisi, O.; Shiri, J.; Nikoofar, B. Forecasting daily lake levels using artificial intelligence approaches. Comput. Geosci.
**2012**, 41, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Osman, M.S.; Abu-Mahfouz, A.M.; Page, P.R. A Survey on Data Imputation Techniques: Water Distribution System as a Use Case. IEEE Access
**2018**, 6, 63279–63291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Semiromi, M.T.; Koch, M. Reconstruction of groundwater levels to impute missing values using singular and multichannel spectrum analysis: Application to the Ardabil Plain, Iran. Hydrol. Sci. J.
**2019**, 64, 1711–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Allison, P.D. Multiple imputation for missing data: A cautionary tale. Sociol. Methods Res.
**2000**, 3, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Benneuil, N. Traitement des données manquantes dans les séries issues des registres paroissiaux. Popul. Hist.
**1998**, 1–2, 249–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Belkacem, B. Prévision avec modèle ARIMA des températures mensuelles du bassin versant de la Seybouse du Nord Est Algérien. Rev. Sci. Tech. LJEE
**2018**, 32–33. [Google Scholar] - Choubin, B.; Malekian, A. Combined gamma and M-test-based ANN and ARIMA models for groundwater fluctuation forecasting in semiarid regions. Environ. Earth Sci.
**2017**, 76, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Delcor, L.; Delignières, D.; Cadopi, M.; Brouille, D. Analyse de la variabilité par les modèles ARIMA: Une source d’information pour la compréhension des processus mnésiques. L’Année Psychol.
**2008**, 108, 699–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Es-Sabar, A.; Pannier, M.L.; Godon, A.; Bigaud, D. Traitement des données manquantes pour des capteurs de bâtiments connectés. In Proceedings of the Conférence IBPSA France, Châlons en Champagne, France, 19–20 May 2022; p. hal-03687624. [Google Scholar]
- Addinsoft. XLSTAT User Guide. 2022. Available online: https://www.xlstat.com (accessed on 10 June 2022).
- Hyndman, R.J.; Athanasopoulos, G. Forecasting: Principles and Practice. OTexts. Available online: https://otexts.com/fpp3/ (accessed on 10 June 2022).
- Jeihouni, E.; Mohammadi, M.; Ghazi, B. Response of the Shabestar Plain aquifer to climate-change scenarios through statistical and hybrid soft computing techniques. Groundw. Sustain. Dev.
**2021**, 15, 100649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Delgado, J. A comparative study of shallow groundwater level simulation with three time series models in a coastal aquifer of South China. Appl. Water Sci.
**2018**, 7, 689–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Kumar, A.; Maroju, S.; Bhat, A. Application of ArcGIS geostatistical analyst for interpolating environmental data from observations. Environ. Prog.
**2007**, 26, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kumar, V. Optimal contour mapping of groundwater levels using universal kriging—A case study. Hydrol. Sci. J.
**2007**, 52, 1038–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sheikh Khozania, Z.; Banadkookib, F.B.; Ehteramc, M.; Najah Ahmedd, A.; El-Shafiee, A. Combining autoregressive integrated moving average with Long Short-Term Memory neural network and optimisation algorithms for predicting ground water level. J. Clean. Prod.
**2022**, 348, 131224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Valipour, M.; Banihabib, M.E.; Behbahani, S.M.R. Comparison of the ARMA, ARIMA, and the autoregressive artificial neural network models in forecasting the monthly inflow of Dez dam reservoir. J. Hydrol.
**2013**, 476, 433–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 6.**Control of data quality. (

**a**) Trend tool. (

**b**) Variographic surface: an anisotropic behavior with variability in the 45° direction. (

**c**) Semivariographic cloud: calculated values of the variance γ(h) for all pairs of the samples plotted on the y axis against the distance h separating the two locations, represented on the x axis.

**Figure 7.**(

**a**) Correlation between the groundwater level and the topographic elevation. (

**b**) Correlation between measured and predicted groundwater levels for 2020.

**Figure 8.**Groundwater level map interpolated by ordinary cokriging (OCK), ordinary kriging (OK), and empirical Bayesian kriging (EBK).

**Figure 9.**Groundwater level prediction errors map for ordinary kriging (OK), ordinary cokriging (OCK), and empirical Bayesian kriging (EBK).

**Figure 10.**(

**a**) Original groundwater level time series containing missing values. (

**b**) The reconstructed groundwater levels and gap values filled using ARIMA model for nine selected piezometers.

**Figure 11.**Scatterplot of predicted vs. observed values of groundwater level in six selected piezometric stations.

**Figure 12.**Comparison between measured and reconstructed groundwater level using ARIMA model for the six borehole piezometers.

**Figure 13.**Map of wells according to the value of the groundwater level difference between 2005 and 2020.

**Table 1.**Summary statistics of measurements of the groundwater level of the Saïss aquifer for 2005 and 2020.

Date | Min | Max | Average | Median | Standard Deviation | Skewness | Kurtosis | 1st Quartile | 3rd Quartile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

2005 | 373 | 762 | 528 | 517 | 122 | 0.22 | 1.7 | 406 | 621 |

2020 | 380 | 787 | 536 | 528 | 119 | 0.23 | 1.8 | 419 | 627 |

2020 | RMSE | R^{2} | ME |
---|---|---|---|

OCK | 13.25 | 0.987 | −0.49 |

UCK | 13.28 | 0.984 | −0.48 |

EBK | 13.77 | 0.979 | 0.19 |

OK | 16.04 | 0.978 | −0.86 |

UK | 16.14 | 0.977 | 0.97 |

LPI | 17.71 | 0.910 | −0.94 |

RBF | 37.12 | 0.900 | −1.51 |

IDW | 45.65 | 0.860 | −9.8 |

Piezometer | Valid Measurements | Missing Data | % |
---|---|---|---|

237/15 | 106 | 86 | 44.8 |

787/21 | 114 | 78 | 40.6 |

566/21 | 116 | 76 | 39.6 |

1309/22 | 117 | 75 | 39.1 |

2813/15 | 121 | 71 | 37.0 |

2366/15 | 152 | 40 | 20.8 |

2792/15 | 156 | 36 | 18.8 |

2604/15 | 158 | 34 | 17.7 |

290/22 | 172 | 20 | 10.4 |

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |

© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

El Garouani, M.; Radoine, H.; Lahrach, A.; Jarar Oulidi, H.
Spatiotemporal Analysis of Groundwater Resources in the Saïss Aquifer, Morocco. *Water* **2023**, *15*, 105.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010105

**AMA Style**

El Garouani M, Radoine H, Lahrach A, Jarar Oulidi H.
Spatiotemporal Analysis of Groundwater Resources in the Saïss Aquifer, Morocco. *Water*. 2023; 15(1):105.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010105

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

El Garouani, Manal, Hassan Radoine, Aberrahim Lahrach, and Hassane Jarar Oulidi.
2023. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of Groundwater Resources in the Saïss Aquifer, Morocco" *Water* 15, no. 1: 105.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010105