In the original article [1], there were the following mistakes:
- -
- In Table 4, where it reads “kap” it should read “kap”.
- -
- In Table 4, where it reads “C0” it should read “C0”.
- -
- In page 13, on last sentence, where it reads “in spite of being part of time equivalent to Figure 4, primarily” it should read “in spite of being part of time equivalent to the F3, primarily”.
- -
- In page 14, in the first paragraph, where it reads “it modified the buffering conditions (Figure 3) and reduced both the COD removal efficiency (Figure 2A and Table 1) and kinetic coefficient kap (Table 3)” it should be read “it modified the buffering conditions (Figure 3) and reduced both the COD removal efficiency (Figure 2A and Table 1) and kinetic coefficient kap (Table 4)”.
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original article has been updated.
Reference
- Pereira, E.L.; Borges, A.C.; da Silva, G.J. Effect of the Progressive Increase of Organic Loading Rate in an Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Reactor for Biodiesel Wastewater Treatment. Water 2022, 14, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).