Next Article in Journal
Integrated Hydrogeochemical Groundwater Flow Path Modelling in an Arid Environment
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimized Planting Density and Nitrogen Rate Increased Grain Yield and Water-Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Two Maize Cultivars under Mulched Drip Fertigation by Improving Population Photosynthesis and Grain-Filling Characteristics
Previous Article in Journal
New Interpretations of the Adsorption Process of Tetracycline on Biochar via Experimental and Theoretical Studies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Water and Nitrogen Coupling on Growth, Yield and Quality of Greenhouse Tomato
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Optimal Irrigation Levels Can Improve Maize Growth, Yield, and Water Use Efficiency under Drip Irrigation in Northwest China

Water 2022, 14(23), 3822; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14233822
by Mengjie Liu 1,2,3,†, Guodong Wang 3,4,†, Fei Liang 2,3,4,*, Quansheng Li 3,4, Yuxin Tian 3,5 and Hongtao Jia 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Water 2022, 14(23), 3822; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14233822
Submission received: 24 October 2022 / Revised: 18 November 2022 / Accepted: 21 November 2022 / Published: 23 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insight into Drip Irrigation)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The effects of different irrigation quotas on maize growth, yield and water use efficiency were studied by a 9-year continuous field experiments. The experimental period was long enough, therefore the conclusion was relatively reliable, which provided important reference for optimizing the selection of drip irrigation quota for maize in Xinjiang, China.

1. The test area is located in Xinjiang, Northwest China. As we all know, Xinjiang is the main cotton producing area. So, What is the planting area of maize? What is the proportion of drip irrigation in maize planting? Does the study of drip irrigation maize irrigation quotas in this area have production significance?

2. Why were 4200m3·hm-2,4800m3·hm-2,5400m3·hm-2 and 6000m3·hm-2 set in this experiment as four irrigation quotas? What is the basis for setting? Under these irrigation quotas, is maize fully irrigated or deficit irrigated? If deficit irrigation, what is the degree of deficit?

3. Water use efficiency (WUE) is of great significance to this paper. Precipitation and other reasons should be considered, therefore,  water use efficiency (WUE) indicators is recommended to be considered in the result part of the manuscript. Emphasizing WUE rather than irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) in the paper, which is conducive to comparison with other studies. It is recommended to directly change the title to “Optimal Irrigation Levels Improves Maize Growth, Yield, and Water Use Efficiency under Drip Irrigation in Northwest China”.

4. In the introduction part, the cited literature [20] has little to do with the theme of this article, and it is recommended to replace the relevant literature. The research results of reference [21] was not clear. (page2/line80-84)

5. The sowing time and harvest time (page3/line124-127) and sampling time (page5/line166-170) is suggested to be unified into a table for easy reading.

6. Add subheading 2.1 Experiment Site. Supplement groundwater depth data in test area. (page3/line99-107)

7. Authors should provided the test materials section with information on maize varieties and drip tapes. (page4/line136-144)

8. 3.1.2 Title for Dry Matter Accumulation (page6/line215) is different from the content (page7/line237-238) Fig.4 title, please make corresponding revision.

9. Different soil texture, planting patterns, soil conditions, drip irrigation belt configuration, irrigation system, maize varieties and other conditions will bring different research results. It is suggested to increase the discussion of research limitations. (page10/line340)

10. Some language expressions are suggested to be modified, such as (page11/line354) Hence optimizing the irrigation quota (5400m3·hm-2 treatment) can effectively improve maize growth, yield, and water use efficiency under drip irrigation in the northwest region. The (5400m3·hm-2 treatment) should be changed to 5400m3·hm-2. Please read the full text carefully, and please revise the similar expressions one by one.

11. Condense the conclusion part. (page11/line242-258)

Author Response

Thank you very much for the advice of the experts, we will reply to upload through the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see the attachment

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you very much for the advice of the experts, we will reply to upload through the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors! I appreciate your efforts in improving of manuscript.

Somewhere the references prepared not according to journals rules.

You could discuss and cite extra papers in article (which I suggest and others).

 Kind regards, ….

Author Response

Thank you very much for your valuable comments, we will upload the changes in the form of attachments.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop