Next Article in Journal
Nonstationary Analyses of the Maximum and Minimum Streamflow in Tamsui River Basin, Taiwan
Next Article in Special Issue
Imaging the Structure and the Saltwater Intrusion Extent of the Luy River Coastal Aquifer (Binh Thuan, Vietnam) Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrogeochemical and Hydrodynamic Assessment of Tirnavos Basin, Central Greece
Previous Article in Special Issue
Towards a Correlation between Long-Term Seawater Intrusion Response and Water Level Fluctuations

Review of Seawater Intrusion in Western Coastal Regions of South Korea

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences & The Earth and Environmental Science System Research Center, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju-si 54896, Korea
Department of Environment and Energy, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju-si 54896, Korea
Department of Science Education, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Eyal Shalev
Water 2021, 13(6), 761;
Received: 30 January 2021 / Revised: 26 February 2021 / Accepted: 6 March 2021 / Published: 11 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Seawater Intrusion into Coastal Aquifers)


Groundwater salinization in coastal aquifers because of seawater intrusion has raised serious concerns worldwide since it deteriorates the quality of drinking water and thereby threatens sustainable economic development. In particular, this problem has been a cause of growing concern in the western coastal regions of South Korea. In this paper, we review studies of seawater intrusion in western coastal regions of South Korea conducted over the past 20 years, particularly focusing on studies reported in international journals. We summarize the study locations, methods used, and major findings from individual and regional-scale studies. General methods used to identify and interpret seawater intrusion and subsequent geochemical processes are also presented. On the basis of insights gleaned from the previous studies, future research needs are discussed.
Keywords: seawater intrusion; saline water; groundwater; western coastal region; South Korea; mixing ratio seawater intrusion; saline water; groundwater; western coastal region; South Korea; mixing ratio

1. Introduction

In many regions of the world, coastal aquifers play an important role in supplying water for domestic and industrial use, since many cities and towns are located close to coastlines. In coastal aquifers, the interface between fresh groundwater and seawater is naturally in equilibrium, balancing oceanic and terrestrial hydrological systems. However, recent studies have provided evidence of this natural equilibrium being disturbed by several factors, causing the freshwater–seawater interface to move inland, a phenomenon termed “seawater intrusion” [1,2]. This phenomenon results in groundwater salinization, which is characterized by increased concentrations of major groundwater constituents, such as Na, Mg, Cl, and SO4, and high values of electrical conductivity (EC) or total dissolved solids (TDS) [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Thus, the phenomenon degrades the quality of groundwater and is therefore of significant concern in many regions.
There are two main reasons for seawater intrusion: natural and anthropogenic processes. It is generally accepted that sea levels will rise in the future because of climate changes. This natural process, which may also be influenced by human activities, will affect the equilibrium between oceanic and terrestrial hydrological systems, causing the freshwater–seawater interface to shift inland [10,11,12,13]. Anthropogenically, with the demand for groundwater continuously increasing in many coastal regions because of their economic development, overexploitation of groundwater in coastal aquifers can also induce seawater intrusion [14,15,16,17,18]. Unless coastal aquifers are recharged with freshwater through increased precipitation or artificially, the inland advance of the freshwater–seawater interface may irreversibly affect the quality of groundwater in the aquifers.
Seawater intrusion is a worldwide problem, and it has been reported in virtually all continents, including Asia [19,20,21], Africa [22,23], Europe [24,25], America [26,27], and Oceania [28,29,30]. In particular, East Asian countries affected by seawater intrusion include Japan and China. In an alluvial coastal aquifer in the Shiroishi lowland plain, Kyushu Island, Japan, intensive extraction of groundwater caused seawater intrusion and land subsidence [31]. Yamanaka et al. [32] investigated the origin of salinity in an aquifer in the Nobi plain in central Japan and determined the geochemical reactions occurring at the freshwater–seawater interface. Huang et al. [33] studied the groundwater chemistry in the coastal area of Dogguan, China, to determine the effects of anthropogenic and natural processes, including seawater intrusion. Han et al. [34] examined seawater intrusion in the coastal aquifer of Laizhou Bay, China, which has complex groundwater dynamics and seawater intrusion resulting from groundwater overexploitation. Liu et al. [35] investigated a sandy aquifer in Ting Kok, Hong Kong, and estimated the extent of the freshwater–seawater interface on the basis of a hydrogeochemical analysis.
In South Korea, seawater intrusion has been an issue on Jeju Island and in coastal regions of mainland South Korea (Table 1 and Figure 1; [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88]). Early studies on seawater intrusion in South Korea focused on the volcanic Jeju Island [89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97]. The primary source of drinking water on this island is groundwater [41,56], and therefore, groundwater management has been a very important issue on the island. With the rapid growth of the economy of this island, the island has witnessed significant development, particularly in terms of leisure facilities and agriculture. Exploitation of groundwater near coastal areas have caused seawater intrusion, particularly in the eastern parts of the island [49,80,81,83]. While studies on the groundwater on Jeju Island are considerably important in this regard, the general application of the study results to other regions of mainland South Korea is limited because the island has a unique geological feature: it mainly comprises basaltic lava flows and a smaller amount of pyroclastics and sedimentary rocks [41,49].
On the other hand, western coastal regions of South Korea have recently attracted interest for seawater intrusion studies. The western coastline generally forms a “ria”-type coast, which has a highly irregular and indented coastline, and it is characterized by a macrotidal regime, with a tidal range of up to 6 m. Thus, there is high potential of seawater intrusion in these regions [47]. Most of the papers related to seawater intrusion in these regions have been published after 2000 (Table 1), indicating that interest in groundwater resources in these regions is recent. In view of future research needs in these regions, such as studies on the impact of geological storage sites on groundwater quality [42,51,65,70,76,84], it is expected that groundwater salinization resulting from seawater intrusion could receive more attention in the near future. However, to date, there has been no review study to summarize the lessons learned from seawater intrusion studies in the western coastal regions of South Korea.
In this review paper, we overview the learnings from studies on seawater intrusion in the western coastal regions of South Korea conducted over the past 20 years. We summarize the features and results of the studies, including the study locations, methods used, and major findings from individual and regional-scale studies. The scope of our review is mainly confined to papers published in international journals, except for a few early studies, to ensure that it is of interest to international researchers. We also present the general methods used for the identification and interpretation of seawater intrusion, including freshwater and seawater mixing ratio calculations, and elucidate the accompanying geochemical processes. On the basis of the implications of the results of the past studies, future research needs are discussed.

2. Methods and Basic Scientific Approaches for Seawater Intrusion Studies

The major scientific questions on seawater intrusion can be summarized as follows:
How can we characterize seawater’s influence on groundwater?
To what extent does groundwater mix with seawater?
What are the hydrogeochemical processes that occur during seawater mixing?
The methods and basic approaches proposed for addressing these questions are discussed in this section.

2.1. Identification of Seawater Intrusion

Different approaches can be used in studies of seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers, such as hydrogeochemical methods (including analyses of major ions and isotopes), statistical analysis, and numerical modeling [26,28]. On the other hand, in zones where monitoring wells are scarce or absent, the application of geophysical methods can provide valuable information at a reasonable cost compared with the high cost of drilling new wells and installing piezometers for collecting groundwater samples for chemical analysis [25]. Electrical and electromagnetic techniques have been extensively used in hydrogeological investigations because of the relationship between the electrical (and hydraulic) properties of geological formations and the saturation of fluid contained in geological materials [98]. Three complementary geophysical methods, namely, gravity, vertical electrical sounding, and frequency domain electromagnetic methods, have been used in combination with hydrogeological and hydrogeochemical investigations for defining the characteristics of aquifers and assessing the extension of the seawater intrusion [25].
The basic statistics of the chemical composition of groundwater, especially in situ measurements (e.g., EC, TDS, pH, and temperature), have been widely used to identify the amount of seawater mixed with fresh groundwater. EC (greater than 1 mS/cm) or TDS can be used as an indication of the mixing of saline water with fresh groundwater. High temporal and spatial dispersions of the standard deviation, which may indicate variability in the hydrochemical composition of groundwater samples (temporal) and between samples (spatial), can indicate the presence of polluting sources. High standard deviations of Na+ and Cl indicate that the groundwater in the study area may be affected by various factors, such as seawater intrusion and silicate weathering [87]. The ion ratios between different chemical species are frequently used to evaluate seawater intrusion in coastal areas [87]. For example, the value of r(Cl/HCO3) has been referred to as an effective index for determining the extent of seawater mixing. A value less than 0.5 indicates that there is no effect of seawater, a value between 0.5 and 1.3 implies a slight effect, a value between 1.3 and 2.8 reflects a moderate one, a value between 2.8 and 6.6 indicates a severe effect, and a value of 6.6 or more can be interpreted as the seawater effect is very severe. The dissolved ion analysis of groundwater samples can be shown in a trilinear diagram, called a Piper diagram (Figure 2), in which water samples are classified into four types. This representation can be successfully used for evaluating a limited number of groundwater samples. However, a problem arises when the analysis requires identification of relationships between the chemical and physical parameters and their temporal variations because the tri-linear diagram is based on the ratio of the chemical compositions.
Multivariate statistical analysis, such as principal component analysis (PCA), has been used to identify the influence of seawater on groundwater. PCA reduces the information in many chemical variables into a set of weighted linear combinations of those variables, and it does not differentiate between common and unique variance [99,100,101]. Because PCA is based entirely on eigenvalue analysis of a correlation or covariance matrix, the data is not required to be normally distributed. Normally, PCA is applied to the correlation matrix because the chemical variables vary by different orders of magnitude. The summarized information in the PCA plot is used for finding relationships, patterns, and waters with extreme chemical compositions and for further statistical modeling [102,103].
Proper management of seawater intrusion issues requires good knowledge of aquifer systems and the ability to predict their future behavior under different scenarios of naturally forcing and anthropogenic interactions [104]. In this respect, numerical simulation is widely used to examine seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers and to evaluate alternative groundwater-resource-management scenarios [105]. Seawater intrusion is physically a density-dependent problem, where two different equations should be implicitly coupled. Among the available modeling approaches, variable-density groundwater flow models that track seawater movement can be classified into interface models and dispersive solute transport models [104]. Early modeling studies replaced the disperse transition zone representing the freshwater–seawater interface with a sharp front and introduced other simplifications, such as quasi three-dimensional layered aquifers or the Dupuit assumption of predominantly horizontal flow [106]. In dispersive solute transport models, such as SUTRA, FEFLOW, and SEAWAT, the fluid density can vary continuously or from cell to cell in a model domain [63]. Among the dispersive solute transport models, SUTRA and FEFLOW solve the flow and transport equations simultaneously, while SEAWAT has the option to solve the transport equation separately using particle-based or finite difference methods and compute a new flow field to represent a changing density field [104]. Seawater intrusion can be evaluated through the detailed geological reconstruction of coastal zones; this constitutes the core phase of the construction of a robust hydrogeological conceptual and numerical model. All other possible processes, such as sea level changes, changes in temperature and precipitation, coastline erosion, and land subsidence, should be considered in future simulations of seawater intrusion.

2.2. Mixing Calculations

Mixing ratios (x) based on conservative tracers, which have been widely used to determine the mixing of freshwater and seawater, can be obtained from the law of mass conservation as follows:
x = C s a m p l e C f r e s h w a t e r C s e a w a t e r C f r e s h w a t e r
where Cfreshwater, Cseawater, and Csample are the concentrations or isotopic ratios of freshwater, seawater, and the groundwater sample. While the determination of the chemical and isotopic compositions of end members for performing mixing analysis, namely, the end member mixing analysis (EMMA), is difficult in other hydrogeochemical studies, the selection of end members and the chemical and isotopic compositions of the chosen end members is relatively nonproblematic in seawater intrusion studies. The lowest value of the analyzed groundwater data in a study area can be used in EMMA by employing conservative tracers. We summarize the chloride and bromide concentrations used in previous studies (Table 2). Past studies have reported mixing ratios between fresh groundwater and seawater calculated using Equation (1). For example, Shin et al. [87] quantitatively calculated the influence of seawater on groundwater and found it to range from 0 to 7.6 (on the basis of Cl ions) and 0 to 10.4 (on the basis of Br ions).
Park et al. [47] suggested a seawater mixing index (SMI) based on the concentrations of the four major ion components in seawater, namely Na+, Cl, Mg2+, and SO42−:
S M I = 0.31 × C N a T N a + 0.04 × C M g T M g + 0.57 × C C l T C l + 0.08 × C S O 4 T S O 4
where C is the measured concentration (mg/L) and T is the regional threshold value, which can be calculated from the interpretation of the cumulative probability function. If the SMI is greater than 1, the groundwater can be significantly influenced by seawater. Park et al. [47] proved the effectiveness of the SMI; they found that samples with an SMI greater than 1 were located within 4 km from the western coastline.

2.3. Ionic Delta by Mixing Ratio

The ionic delta (Δ) has been utilized as an important indicator of the hydrogeochemical reactions between solid and liquid phases in coastal aquifers [35,47]. It denotes the difference between the measured and theoretical concentrations of ion i when fresh groundwater and seawater are mixed conservatively:
Δ C i = C i , s a m p l e C i , m i x
where ΔCi is the ionic delta of ion i, Ci,sample is the measured concentration of i in the sample, and Ci,mix is the theoretical concentration of i in the conservative mixture of fresh groundwater and seawater. The theoretical concentration is calculated by considering the seawater concentration (fsea) obtained from the conservative tracer concentration in the sample. For example, given the bromide concentration (CBr,sample), the Br concentration in the fresh groundwater (CBr,fg), and the Br concentration of the seawater (CBr,sea), fsea is given by
f s e a = C B r , s a m p l e C B r , f g C B r , s e a C B r , f g
In this way, the seawater concentration of each sample can be calculated, which is the same as the previous calculation method for the mixing ratio using Br ions (Equation (4)). This seawater concentration is then used to calculate the theoretical concentration of each ion:
C i , m i x = f s e a C i , s e a + 1 f s e a C i , f g
These calculations consider the fact that Br is a conservative tracer. Notably, Br is not usually removed from the system because of its high solubility. The only sources of Br are the aquifer matrix salts and a salinization source, such as seawater intrusion.

2.4. Understanding the Geochemical Processes Involved in Groundwater–Seawater Mixing

Cation exchange reactions are the one of the most important hydrogeochemical reactions in the soil and aquifers and govern the change of matter, migration, and weathering of minerals [1,3,4]. They are as follows:
2 N a + + C a X 2 2 N a X + C a 2 +
2 N a + + M g X 2 2 N a X + M g 2 +
Here, X is a soil ion exchanger. When groundwater and seawater mix in an aquifer, an ion exchange reaction occurs between Ca2+, Mg2+, and Na+ until the Na+ concentration of the seawater-intruded groundwater saturates because of the seawater. Overall, all the ionic deltas are positive (ΔNa+ + ΔK+ > 0, ΔMg2+ > 0, and ΔCa2+ > 0), which cannot simply be attributed to ion exchange. Positive ionic deltas were also observed in a sandy aquifer in the coastal area of Zealand, Denmark, and it could be explained by the external input of Ca2+ by the dissolution of calcite minerals in the aquifer [35]. However, calcite precipitation cannot be observed if the aquifers consist mostly of weathered granite, being unsaturated with respect to calcium ions.
The relationship between the seawater mixing ratio (X) and the ionic delta (Y) value of each ion is shown in Figure 3. In the case of ΔCa2+, it increased with the mixing ratio, while ΔNa+ showed a tendency to decrease with an increase in the mixing ratio. Since Na+ and Ca2+ participated in a cation exchange reaction, the Na ions were adsorbed by the ion exchangers and Ca2+ was released. Hence, as the seawater mixing ratio increased, ΔCa2+ increased and ΔNa+ decreased.
Figure 4 presents the relationship between ΔCa2+ and ΔMg2+ versus ΔNa+ + ΔK+. The data located in the second and fourth quadrants (the blue area) explain the cation exchange process. In the second quadrant, Mg2+ or Ca2+ is exchanged by Na+ or K+, while in the fourth quadrant, the reverse process occurs. In the first and third quadrants, the external sources (dissolution) or sinks (precipitation) play an important role in controlling the concentrations of ions in the groundwater. In the first quadrant, the input of ions would induce the exchange of this input ion with other cations adhered on the surface of the sediment and subsequently release the ions into the groundwater, resulting in the positive ionic delta (Δ) values for all cations. The third quadrant describes the net removal of ions from the groundwater, for example, through precipitation of minerals in the aquifer. For instance, if Mg2+ or Ca2+ precipitates as dolomite or calcite, respectively, then Mg2+ or Ca2+ in the groundwater decreases. To compensate the solution, Mg2+ or Ca2+ on the sediment exchanger will desorb into the groundwater.

3. Seawater Intrusion in South Korea

3.1. Overview of Seawater Intrusion Studies in South Korea

Before 2000, groundwater studies related to seawater intrusion in South Korea focused on Jeju Island and most papers were published in domestic journals. As mentioned, groundwater is the principal source of drinking water in Jeju Island [41,56,116], and therefore, groundwater studies have been important for this island. The residence time of groundwater on Jeju Island has been studied by using environmental tracers since the late 1960s [117,118]. Studies on seawater intrusion on Jeju Island commenced way back in 1986 [89]. Youn [89] investigated the salinity of groundwater throughout Jeju Island and found that groundwaters in the eastern part of the island had a higher salinity content than those in the western and central areas and that the eastern area was more susceptible to seawater intrusion. Since then, several studies have been conducted to investigate seawater intrusion into coastal aquifers on the island [90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97], and groundwater overexploitation has been suggested to be the main cause of seawater intrusion [91,92,93]. After 2000, diverse aspects of seawater intrusion, including geophysical monitoring, numerical modeling, and microbial investigation, have been studied on Jeju Island (Table 1). However, the results of studies on this island may not be directly applicable to other coastal regions of mainland South Korea since the island has a unique hydrogeological setting [39,41,49].

3.2. Seawater Intrusion Studies over Western Coastal Regions of South Korea

In mainland South Korea, western coastal regions are known to be more prone to seawater intrusion compared with southern and eastern coastal regions because of their topographic characteristics and excessive use of groundwater for agricultural irrigation. The western regions form topographically flat discharge zones with respect to the national-scale hydrogeological flow regime, and the groundwater levels are typically a few meters below the land surface [47]. The geologic strata comprising aquifers are moderately to highly permeable, and hence, they are vulnerable to seawater intrusion [47]. Heavy groundwater pumping for agricultural irrigation has also contributed to serious seawater intrusion problems in these regions. The resulting high salinity has adversely affected crop yield in some areas [55]. Furthermore, the ocean tide has a significant influence on the seawater intrusion [87]. Most papers related to seawater intrusion in the western coastal regions appeared after 2000. Table 1 summarizes seawater intrusion studies in South Korea published in international journals, including those pertaining to Jeju Island and other coastal regions of mainland South Korea. Figure 1 shows the location of each study site. In this section, we briefly summarize the results of studies pertaining to the western coastal regions of mainland South Korea. The studies are categorized on the basis of the methodologies employed in them.

3.2.1. Hydrogeochemical Analyses

Owing to significant differences in the chemical compositions of groundwater and seawater, hydrogeochemical analyses have been the most common and fundamental method used for investigations of seawater intrusion. Hydrogeochemical analyses have involved graphical representation of water chemistry, seawater mixing ratio calculations using compositions of major ions and isotopes, and stoichiometric analysis.
One of the early studies published in international journals was that of Kim and Park [36], who evaluated the hydrogeochemical characteristics of groundwater and seawater on Wido Island and Byeonsan Peninsula, Jeollabuk-do. The geology of the site consists of andesitic to acidic tuff, granite, and Kyeokpori Formation, which is composed of siliclastic and volcaniclastic sedimentary sequences. The Ca2+/Na+ and Ca2+/Mg2+ ratios were used to determine the status of the geochemical evolution of the groundwater with respect to seawater intrusion and cation exchange stages. Depending on the degree of seawater intrusion, the groundwater types were shifted from the carbonate hardness type to the noncarbonate hardness type (or ion exchange type) and eventually to the noncarbonated alkali type. The maximum mixing ratio of seawater, calculated using the chloride concentration, was 9.2%.
Kim et al. [44] investigated the groundwater in the coastal area of Kunsan, Jeollabuk-do, to identify the contaminant sources and their effects on the groundwater chemistry. The bedrocks of the study area are diorites and granites, which intruded the overlying sedimentary rocks and granitic gneiss and schist. The surface is covered by a thick alluvium that is up to 40 m. Owing to the existence of multiple contaminant sources and complex hydrochemical processes, a mass balance analysis based on the stoichiometry of mineral weathering was performed to evaluate the controlling processes. The results of the analysis showed that groundwater chemistry could be explained by mineral dissolution, nitrification and oxidation of organic matter, and chloride inputs (e.g., from seawater, deicer, and NaCl). For the chloride-rich group, the groundwater chemistry was considerably affected by seawater intrusion, which was followed by cation exchange reactions. The water chemistry was also shown to be considerably affected by mineral weathering, suggesting that seawater resided in the aquifer for a relatively long time before it affected the groundwater chemistry.
Kim et al. [48] used isotopic compositions (i.e., δD, δ18O, and δ13C) in addition to concentrations of major cations and anions, iodide, and total organic carbon to examine the groundwater salinization process in the coastal reclaimed area of Yeonggwang-gun, Jeollanam-do. The lithology of the study area consists mainly of Jurassic granite, biotite granite, and Quaternary alluvium. Due to the increased needs for agricultural and residential developments, many coastal areas in South Korea have been reclaimed from the see or muddy beaches, and the coastline used to be more inland than it is now. As a result, the hydrogeochemical properties of groundwaters in the reclaimed areas are expected to be different from those of areas directly impacted by seawater intrusion. On the basis of the hydrogeochemical features of the groundwaters at the study site, it was suggested that the groundwaters were predominantly influenced by three factors: seawater intrusion, fertilizers, and redox processes. It was also shown that land reclamation had caused the burial of a large amount of organic matter and its reduction in the sediments, controlling groundwater salinization in addition to seawater intrusion.

3.2.2. Statistical Analyses for Interpreting Groundwater Chemistry

In the western coastal regions of South Korea, industrial and agricultural activities are predominant, and therefore the groundwaters are susceptible to contamination by various sources, not only from salinization resulting from present and old seawater intrusion. In order to differentiate the salinity sources of groundwaters, seawater intrusion studies have successfully employed statistical analyses, including factor analysis, PCA, cluster analysis, and correlation analysis, as tools.
Jeen et al. [37] presented a basic approach for delineating groundwater salinization in a western coastal area. The approach involved combining the groundwater level measurement, interpretation of major chemistry and isotope composition, and statistical analysis. They studied the hydrogeological and hydrogeochemical characteristics of groundwater in Hwasung-gun, Gyeonggi-do. The bedrock of the study area is composed of Pre-Cambrian gneiss and a schist complex, which is overlaid with Quaternary alluvium. Their investigation conducted in both the dry and rainy seasons showed that the groundwater system was almost in a steady-state, and the pattern of groundwater flow was consistent with the spatial distribution of groundwater components. The groundwater geochemistry was characterized by a high chloride concentration and the cation concentrations deviated from those at a simple freshwater–seawater mixing line because of the cation exchange reactions between the aquifer materials and seawater. Groundwaters were grouped into the Ca(HCO3)2, CaCl2, and NaCl types, and it was suggested that the CaCl2 type could be used to determine the location of the interface between freshwater and seawater. The isotopic composition and factor analysis indicated that the hydrogeochemical characteristics of groundwater were affected by seawater intrusion and agricultural activities.
Kim et al. [39] examined the temporal and spatial differences in the physicochemical properties of groundwater in Kimje, Jeollabuk-do, to evaluate the main factors affecting the groundwater quality. The bedrock of the study area is Jurassic granite, which is overlaid with Quaternary alluvium. On the basis of its hydrogeochemical characteristics, the groundwater was largely grouped into the Na+−Cl and Ca2+ + Mg2+−NO3 + Cl types, which were affected by seawater intrusion, fertilizers, and redox processes. The Na+–Cl type of groundwater was shown to be affected by old seawater as well as modern seawater, while the Ca2+ + Mg2+−NO3 + Cl type was contaminated by fertilizers. It was also shown that the redox condition changed from oxic to suboxic/anoxic as the groundwater flowed from inland to the coastal area. In a subsequent paper of Kim et al. [40], using cluster analysis, the authors classified groundwater in the study area into four categories, A, B, C, and D. Present and old seawater intrusion was the major factor determining the groundwater quality of groups B, C, and D, while chemical fertilizers were the primary factor influencing the groundwater quality of group A. On the basis of previous studies and using factor analysis, Kim et al. [45] showed that three factors account for 82% of the total variance of 17 variables, namely, seawater intrusion, microbial activity, and chemical fertilizers. As groundwater flowed from inland (group A) to the coastal area (group D), the main factor controlling the groundwater quality gradually changed from chemical fertilizers to seawater intrusion and microbial activity. Furthermore, Kim et al. [46] applied correlation analysis to evaluate the influence of tide on groundwater quality. The tidal level governed the groundwater quality and the strength of the tidal effect varied with the tidal period. Based on a times series analysis, a conceptual model of seawater intrusion depending on the tidal level was proposed. According to the conceptual model, the freshwater–seawater interface moves inland during the spring tide because the increased tidal level can overcome the hydraulic pressure barrier between the seawater and groundwater. By contrast, during neap tide, the hydraulic pressure gap between the seawater and groundwater is the lowest as the tidal level decreases, and it results in recession of the seawater because of seaward-moving freshwater and hence less saline groundwater.
Underground storage facilities, such as liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) caverns, can act as artificial groundwater sinks. When these facilities are constructed in coastal areas, the hydrogeological and hydrogeochemical characteristics of the aquifer system can be affected by seawater intrusion. Lee et al. [51] investigated the hydrogeological system of an underground LPG cavern constructed in the coastal area of Pyeongtaek, Gyeonggi-do. The oldest rocks of the study area are mainly composed of arkosic sandstone and conglomerate, and most of the surface rocks are composed of andesitic lavas, welded tuffs, and acidic dykes. They interpreted the groundwater flow path by using cross-correlation analysis along with hydraulic properties and assessed the dominant components controlling the groundwater chemistry by using PCA. Three hydrogeochemical components, namely, host rock dissolution, encrusted cement dissolution, and seawater intrusion, were classified from the results of PCA. The freshwater–seawater mixing ratios, calculated from the chloride concentration, were estimated to be 0.3–4.8% for moderately saline water and 5.0–32.2% for saline groundwater.
Using cluster analysis, Kim et al. [79] classified groundwaters in the reclaimed coastal area of Yeonggwang-gun, Jeollanam-do, to evaluate the main factors affecting the hydrogeochemical characteristics of the groundwaters. On the basis of the results of the cluster analysis using physicochemical properties, groundwaters were classified into four groups, A, B, C, and D. Groups A and B were found to be affected by old seawater intrusion, on the basis of the correlation between chloride and the major cations/anions. These groups were also shown to be affected by Mn and Fe reduction. Furthermore, sulfate reduction appeared to occur since the sulfate concentration was significantly low compared with the values estimated from a simple freshwater–seawater mixing model. Additionally, enriched δ34SSO4 values (30.7–57.3‰) were observed in Groups A and B. It was concluded that the groundwater systems were affected by the reclamation process, land use, old seawater intrusion, and reduction processes.
Shin et al. [87] investigated the influence of seawater on the groundwater quality in an archipelago located in the southwestern sea in Jeollanam-do by using PCA and ionic deltas by mixing ratios. The geology of the study area consists of granite along with gneiss and schist, which is covered by the unconfined clastic sedimentary. The alluvial layer has covered the other strata unconformably. Groundwaters were classified on the basis of the water quality type and Cl/HCO3 molar ratio. Two water types, the Ca–Cl and Na–Cl types, were considered to be affected by seawater and accounted for 91.9% of the total samples. The seawater mixing ratio calculated from the chloride concentration was in the range of 0–10.4% (average of 1.0%), while the mixing ratio based on the bromide concentration was in the range of 0–7.6% (average of 0.6%). In PCA, the first component represented the influence of seawater and explained 54.1% of the variance, and groundwater samples with large seawater mixing ratios were from the region where this component had significant influence. Ionic delta values were used to identify the cation exchange reaction and groundwater–seawater mixing, and it was found that there was a specific relationship between the ionic delta value of each ion and the mixing ratio during seawater mixing and geochemical reactions.

3.2.3. Hydrogeological Investigation

While hydrogeochemical analyses have been used as basic methods to identify the effects of seawater intrusion on groundwater systems, hydrogeological investigations, including identification of saline water pathways or groundwater discharge flow paths, the freshwater–seawater interface, and groundwater age, have also been used to better understand hydrogeological systems in coastal zones.
Park et al. [62] performed a hydrogeological investigation in Muan, Jeollanam-do, to evaluate seawater intrusion in a tidal-forced coastal fractured aquifer, which had been subjected to intense groundwater pumping. The bedrock of the study area is granite gneiss, and the weathered soil is well developed on the surface. A time series analysis performed with the EC, groundwater level, tidal oscillation data, and flowmeter tests showed that seawater intrusion was caused by heavy groundwater pumping from the wells near the coast and that the intrusion was advancing through specific conductive fractures. The conductive fractures became a pathway for the deep saline water flowing up to the transition zone. The extent of the transition zone depended on changes in the groundwater level resulting from groundwater extraction and recharge. It was concluded that continuous heavy groundwater pumping could exacerbate seawater intrusion into the coastal fractured aquifer.
To identify an alternative water resource in the Saemangeum reclaimed area in Jeollabuk-do, Lee et al. [67] investigated coastal groundwater discharge (CGD), which is the subsurface flow from inland to the coast. The bedrock of the study area consists mainly of Jurassic granite, which is overlain by Quaternary alluvium. Cretaceous acidic volcanic rock intrudes the granite. On the basis of an electrical resistivity survey, a weathered-rock layer in the reclaimed land was identified as the main CGD pathway. Furthermore, vertical EC profiling revealed that the transition zone between freshwater and saline water was located 30–50 m below the surface. The aquifer in the reclaimed land was found to be more influenced by seawater compared with those inland. Using a saline water pumping test, they examined the possibility of water quality improvement if water flow in the CGD were to be enhanced. The results of the pumping test showed a notable enhancement of the water quality (EC decrease of 900–1600 μS cm−1), suggesting that CGD could be an alternative water resource for the reclaimed land.
Locating the freshwater–seawater interface is important for the management of coastal aquifer systems. Kim et al. [78] tested a freshwater–seawater interface tracking device (called “Interface-Egg”) to evaluate temporal changes in the interface during several pumping tests, which were conducted at monitoring wells in Seocheon, Chungcheongnam-do. In the study area, Quaternary alluvium overlies Carboniferous granite, which is underlain by Jurassic sedimentary rock and Precambrian gneiss. The tracking device has a density between those of freshwater and seawater and can therefore move up and down as the freshwater–seawater transition zone changes. During the pumping test, EC profiles showed that seawater upconing in the pumping well occurred rapidly, and the groundwater level recovered very slowly. Furthermore, time series groundwater head data and the location of the tracking device indicated that there was a tidal influence on the groundwater level. It was suggested that the tracking device could be practically used for the management of coastal aquifer systems, particularly for areas with dynamic groundwater extraction.
Ju et al. [88] used multiple groundwater age tracers, such as 3H, tritiogenic 3He, radiogenic 4He, CFC-11, CFC-12, and CFC-113, to study a coastal aquifer system in Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, where groundwater levels had been decreasing because of heavy groundwater utilization, raising concerns about seawater intrusion. The lithology of the study area is composed of Precambrian granite gneiss and Quaternary alluvial deposits. Groundwater age distributions around the seawater intrusion zone were inferred using the multiple tracers and Bayesian inference. The mean groundwater ages were in the range of 10.9 to 522.5 years, and the groundwater ages were not directly related to the regional head gradient, indicating that the aquifer system was not a simple recharge-to-discharge flow system. The estimated groundwater age distributions near the seawater intrusion interface had characteristics of heavy-tailed mixing structures, indicating that old groundwater rich in 4He at the seawater intrusion interface was forced to move upward into the shallow aquifer by density-driven flow. It was concluded that Bayesian inference could provide insights into the flow dynamics at a complex seawater interface.

3.2.4. Geophysical Monitoring

Geophysical surveys are an effective tool to understand coastal aquifer systems, and they complement hydrogeochemical and hydrogeological investigations. Lee et al. [38] combined geophysical monitoring techniques, namely the electromagnetic sounding technique and geochemical analysis of soil and groundwater, to detect the seawater-intruded zone in paddy fields near the Namyang reclamation site in Gyeonggi-do. The bedrock of the study area mainly consists of schist and gneiss and the alluvium is deposited under the paddy fields. Vertical electrical sounding (VES) revealed that the seawater intrusion zone was near the surface, and that there was a channel located 30 m below sea level. Furthermore, geochemical analyses of the top soils showed that a region with high concentrations of the major elements in seawater was consistent with a weakly consolidated zone near the surface, which was vulnerable to seawater intrusion. Statistical analysis showed that the Na, Cl, and Mg concentrations in soils could indicate the degree of salinization resulting from seawater intrusion.
Hwang et al. [43] used geophysical well logging and electrical soundings to delineate the spatial distribution of seawater intrusion in a coastal aquifer of Yeonggwang-gun, Jeollanam-do. The geological structure of the survey area consists of mud, sand, and granite bedrock. From the subsurface geology mapped from drilling and VES, they developed a simplified numerical model for groundwater flow and transport. The resistivity and porosity were estimated through geophysical well logging, and they were used to estimate the pore water resistivity of the aquifer. The location of the freshwater–seawater boundary was mapped using the equivalent NaCl concentration, which was determined from geophysical and hydrogeochemical data.
Lee and Song [53] studied seawater intrusion in Buan-gun, Jeollabuk-do, using groundwater chemistry and ionic ratios, along with cluster analysis. There are generally three hydrogeologic layers in the study site. The uppermost layer is a reclamation soil, which is classified into silty loam or silty clay loam. A weathered layer of sandy loam or loam exists in the middle, followed by the bottom layer, which is a fresh to slightly fractured sedimentary rock. They showed that the major groundwater compositions could be effectively used to ascertain the influence of seawater intrusion. In particular, the Cl and TDS concentrations and ionic ratios, such as HCO3/Cl, Na/Ca, Ca/Cl, Mg/Cl, and Ca/SO4, were found to be useful indicators of seawater intrusion. The results of the cluster analysis were consistent with those of major groundwater chemistry. At the same study site, Song et al. [54] conducted electrical resistivity surveys to map the spatial extent of seawater intrusion, along with core drillings and groundwater chemistry analysis. The VES indicated a highly conductive zone in the middle layer, which was identified as a weathered rock layer from the drilling log data. The conductive zone was mostly distributed near the coastal area, indicating the strong effect of seawater intrusion. Areas with low ionic ratios and high TDS values were consistent with the low-resistivity areas indicated by the VES results, suggesting that VES could be a useful tool for mapping coastal areas affected by seawater intrusion.

3.2.5. Numerical Modeling

Numerical modeling has been used to identify areas vulnerable to seawater intrusion and to evaluate the effects of countermeasures against seawater intrusion. Jun and Jang [63] used the groundwater analysis model FEMWATER to evaluate the features of seawater intrusion in Yeonggwang-gun, Jeollanam-do, where alluvium lies widely. Using groundwater level data and TDS values from seawater intrusion monitoring wells, they developed a three-dimensional numerical model and performed a simulation to evaluate the role of artificial recharge in reducing the negative impact of seawater intrusion. The simulation results showed that the freshwater–seawater boundary moved inland in spring because of the increase in water demand for the cultivation of arable land. The inland movement of the freshwater–seawater boundary could be efficiently reduced through artificial recharge of freshwater, indicating that such a recharge could be used as a measure to safeguard against damage caused by seawater intrusion.
Kim and Yang [77] proposed a three-step procedure to prioritize areas vulnerable to seawater intrusion. Countermeasures could then be applied to the areas to reduce the effect of seawater intrusion. First, using multicriteria decision-making methods, the area most susceptible to seawater intrusion was selected from among 25 areas in the western coast of South Korea. The area selected was Taean-gun in Chungcheongnam-do. Second, representative concentration pathways (RCPs) 4.5 and 8.5, which were used as sea level rise scenarios, and future groundwater-use scenarios, determined by linear-regression analysis, were used to predict areas of future seawater intrusion by employing a numerical model, SEAWAT. Finally, the effectiveness of countermeasures in reducing seawater intrusion areas was evaluated by considering a projected future scenario and local characteristics. The results showed that Taean-myeon in Taean-gun was the area where seawater intrusion could be prevented most effectively. Countermeasures considered in the simulation were the construction of recharge ponds and limiting the use of groundwater. It was suggested that other alternatives, such as seawater pumping, freshwater injection, and using a low permeable barrier, could also be considered in the future.
Jung et al. [85] assessed the applicability of a composite model for evaluating seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers resulting from climate changes. In their approach, flow in a saturated zone was simulated using a three-dimensional model, and flow in an unsaturated zone was simulated using a vertical one-dimensional model. The RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios were applied to compute the sea level rise for 91 country-managed reclaimed areas in South Korea. Furthermore, two representative reclaimed land areas, the Heungwang (Gyeonggi-do) and Deokchon (Jeollanam-do) reclaimed lands, were selected and seawater intrusion in these two areas were examined in detail. The simulation results showed that sea level rise could cause widespread damage in the 91 reclaimed land areas and groundwater salinization would be accelerated over time because of seawater intrusion. The 91 reclaimed land areas were characterized by the presence of ponds, pond locations, management water levels of the ponds, and the watershed size. It was shown that seawater could penetrate further inland in a small watershed, while ponds with water levels greater than the sea level could efficiently prevent seawater intrusion. The approach of Jung et al. [85] could be used to establish a national-level plan for the management of water resources.
Kim [86] used an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model to delineate the protection area of Gyeongin-Ara (GA) Waterway in Gyeonggi-do, which consists of riverside alluvial deposits, on the basis of two primary factors and five secondary factors associated with seawater intrusion. Several artificial neural network (ANN) models were developed using the secondary criteria of the AHP model and evaluation score. The final evaluation score calculated by the ANN model was used to select the groundwater protection area, where the evaluation score was greater than 2.0 and accounted for 15% of the total simulation cells. This area fell within 200 m of the GA Waterway and encompassed some sites where changes in hydrogeochemistry resulting from seawater intrusion were observed. It was concluded that the nonlinear ANN model could be more efficient than the AHP model for making predictions.

3.2.6. Regional-Scale Studies

A few regional-scale investigations have been conducted over the western coastal regions of South Korea to obtain general insights into seawater intrusion throughout the western coastline. Park et al. [47] conducted a regional-scale hydrogeochemical survey of shallow groundwaters along almost the entire length of the western coastline of South Korea. The survey showed that the groundwater chemistry was governed by several inter-related processes, such as seawater mixing, water–rock interaction, and anthropogenic contamination. On the basis of cumulative probability curves for the concentrations of chloride and nitrate, groundwaters were classified into four types, and about 5% of the groundwater samples were shown to be significantly influenced by seawater mixing. They proposed an SMI on the basis of the concentrations of Na, Mg, Cl, and SO4, and samples with SMI values greater than unity were regarded as having a noticeable impact on seawater mixing. The SMI values for the investigated groundwaters did not show a strong correlation with the distance from the coastline or well depth, suggesting that the hydrogeological setting of coastal aquifers in the western coastal regions of South Korea is quite complex.
As public concerns about groundwater contamination by seawater intrusion have been raised, the Korean government has established a seawater intrusion monitoring program. Official monitoring of seawater intrusion first started in 1992 at Jeju Island, and it was expanded to mainland South Korea in 1998 [55]. Starting with 10 monitoring wells in 1998, as of 2019, 190 monitoring wells of the Seawater Intrusion Monitoring Network (SIMN) are located along the coastal area of mainland South Korea. They are operated by the Korea Rural Community Corporation [119].
Using the data obtained from the automatic monitoring of the water level and EC and periodic chemical analysis collected from 55 monitoring wells of the SIMN in 2004, Lee and Song [52] evaluated the groundwater chemistries in the western and southern coastal regions of South Korea to identify the advance of seawater intrusion. The ranges of chemical components of the groundwater were quite large but generally showed a lognormal distribution. Large quantities of groundwater samples were grouped into the Na–Cl and Ca–Cl types, with the Na–Cl type representing the influence of seawater intrusion. High levels of EC extended over 1.6 km inland and high chloride concentrations reached up to 1.2 km inland. Further, Lee et al. [55] analyzed monitoring data from 45 monitoring wells of the SIMN by using correlation analysis and trend analyses. Decreases in groundwater levels were mostly associated with groundwater exploitation for irrigation and the accompanied increases in EC values. The locations of the monitoring wells with increasing trends of EC values were scattered somewhat evenly over the coastal areas, indicating that seawater intrusion is occurring widely.
Later, Song and Zemansky [60] evaluated the vulnerability of coastal groundwater systems to sea level rise using groundwater monitoring data collected from ten selected monitoring wells of the SIMN and sea level data from seven adjacent gauging stations. Cross-correlation analysis showed that spatial differences in sea level rise affected the groundwater level, particularly during the dry season. Vertical EC profiles showed that groundwater wells at reclaimed lands were more influenced by sea level variation compared with groundwater systems in the mainland. It was concluded that sea level changes resulting from climate change and rainfall could affect groundwater levels in South Korea.
Park et al. [61] used data from 92 monitoring wells of the SIMN during the period 2007–2009 to evaluate the groundwater geochemistry throughout the eastern, western, and southern coastal regions of South Korea. On the basis of EC values, groundwaters were grouped into fresh (56%), brackish (7%), and saline (37%). The threshold values of bicarbonate, chloride, and bromide were suggested to be suitable proxies for assessing the extent of the water–rock interaction and seawater mixing. It was shown that around 41–50% of the groundwater samples were affected by seawater mixing.

4. Summary and Future Perspectives

In this review paper, we overviewed the seawater intrusion studies conducted in the western coastal regions of South Korea over the past 20 years, and summarized the results of individual studies according to the study location, methods used, and major findings. The general methods to identify and interpret seawater intrusion and the accompanying geochemical processes are also discussed.
Among the four provinces in South Korea in contact with the western coastline (i.e., Gyeonggi-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Jeollabuk-do, and Jeollanam-do), studies on Chungcheongnam-do have been relatively limited (Figure 1), although Taean-gun in Chungcheongnam-do was selected as the area most vulnerable to seawater intrusion in the modeling study of Kim and Yang [77]. Other than regional-scale studies, including those using the SIMN [47,52,55,60,61], only one study has been conducted in Chungcheongnam-do, to test a device for detecting the freshwater–seawater interface [78]. Considering that Chungcheongnam-do is close to Daejeon and Sejong, which are highly populated and economically fast-growing cities in South Korea, more research in this province is anticipated in the future.
Previous studies have largely relied on geochemical investigations, along with statistical analysis. Geochemical investigations have involved graphical representation of hydrogeochemistry (e.g., contouring, Piper diagram, and water type classification), comparison with the molar ratios of seawater, and mixing ratio calculations using conservative anions, such as Cl and Br. Isotope analysis has also been a useful tool to identify sources of salinization and for the calculation of the freshwater and seawater water mixing ratios. Because there are many different contamination sources in coastal aquifers, statistical analyses, such as factor analysis, PCA, cluster analysis, and correlation analysis, have been used to differentiate multiple contamination sources. Geophysical investigations and numerical modeling have not been as abundant as geochemical investigations. Future research is expected to combine various research tools to acquire a better understanding of the hydrogeological systems in the coastal areas.
Through the investigations of individual studies and regional-scale studies, it has been found that groundwater geochemistry in the western coastal aquifers is largely affected by mixing with seawater, cation exchange processes during seawater intrusion, artificial contamination, water–rock interactions, and redox processes. Therefore, more precise methods to identify and interpret seawater intrusion processes is required. Seawater intrusion is prone to occur because of intensive groundwater exploitation in the coastal areas and sea level rise resulting from climate changes. National-level plans to reduce seawater intrusion and manage water resources in the coastal areas should be established. While climate change may have significant impacts on sea level rise, it is difficult to be controlled by local governments. Within the perspective of preventing seawater intrusion at the local scale, a strategy on limiting the exploitation of groundwater should be carefully implemented.
On the basis of lessons learned from previous studies, future research interests may include, but are not limited to, laboratory (column) experiments to understand the underlying geochemical processes, such as mineral dissolution and precipitation and ion exchange reactions; reactive transport modelling, incorporating cation exchange processes; groundwater flow modeling, including density-dependent flow and transient pumping scenarios; modeling of surface water–groundwater interaction, reflecting climate changes; implications of microbial communities with respect to ecological changes; and impacts of saline water on geological storage sites. In addition, the use of strontium, boron, and lithium isotopes can improve our knowledge of the hydrogeochemical processes [26]. The use of multi-isotope studies can provide complementary information from difference sources, enabling a comprehensive evaluation of natural and anthropogenic processes.
Pyrosequencing and microbial community analysis can be used to monitor groundwater quality and detect seawater intrusion. Distribution of bacterial species can be different among groundwaters with different salinities [71], and may be dependent on submarine groundwater discharge and tidal stage [72]. This method can be particularly useful in the areas where water chemistry may not be significantly different. Research needs for developing geological storage sites (e.g., underground LPG caverns [42,51,65,70,120], geological repositories for radioactive wastes [76,84], and carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) sites [121,122,123]) may increase in these regions in the future. Because seawater can affect the stability of concrete and steel structures [76,124], careful monitoring of groundwater systems is required to evaluate the potential impact of seawater intrusion on the management of those sites.

Author Contributions

S.-W.J.: investigation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing; J.K.: investigation, visualization, writing—review and editing; H.J.: investigation, visualization, writing—review and editing; J.L.: investigation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This research was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2019R1A2C1086667) and by research funds of Jeonbuk National University in 2020. This work was partially supported by two research grants, KIMST20190361 from the Korea Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries and the National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST) grant of the Korea government (MSIP) (CAP-17-05-KIGAM).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Andersen, M.S.; Nyvang, V.; Jakobsen, R.; Postma, D. Geochemical processes and solute transport at the seawater/freshwater interface of a sandy aquifer. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2005, 69, 3979–3994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Werner, A.D.; Bakker, M.; Post, V.E.A.; Vandenbohede, A.; Lu, C.; Ataie-Ashtiani, B.; Simmons, C.T.; Barry, D.A. Seawater intrusion processes, investigation and management: Recent advances and future challenges. Adv. Water Resour. 2013, 51, 3–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nadler, A.; Magaritz, M.; Mazor, E. Chemical reactions of seawater with rocks and freshwater experimental and field observations on brackish waters in Israel. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1981, 44, 879–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Magaritz, M.; Luzier, J.E. Water–rock interactions and seawater–freshwater mixing effects in the coastal dune aquifer, Coos Bay, Oregon. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1985, 49, 2515–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dixon, W.; Chiwell, B. The use of hydrochemical sections to identify recharge areas and saline intrusions in alluvial aquifers, Southeast Queensland, Australia. J. Hydrol. 1992, 135, 259–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Morell, I.; Giménez, E.; Esteller, M.V. Application of principal components analysis to the study of salinization on the Castellon Plain (Spain). Sci. Total Environ. 1996, 177, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Giménez, E.; Morell, I. Hydrogeochemical analysis of salinization processes in the coastal aquifer of Oropesa (Castellon, Spain). Environ. Geol. 1997, 29, 118–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Edet, A.E.; Okereke, C.S. A regional study of saltwater intrusion in southeastern Nigeria based on the analysis of geoelectrical and hydrochemical data. Environ. Geol. 2001, 40, 1278–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cruz, J.V.; Coutinho, R.; Pacheco, D.; Cymbron, R.; Antunes, P.; Freire, P.; Mendes, S. Groundwater salinization in the Azores archipelago (Portugal). Environ. Earth Sci. 2011, 62, 1273–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sherif, M.M.; Singh, V.P. Effect of climate change on sea water intrusion in coastal aquifers. Hydrol. Process. 1999, 13, 1277–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Werner, A.D.; Simmons, C.T. Impact of sea-level rise on sea water intrusion in coastal aquifers. Ground Water 2009, 47, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ferguson, G.; Gleeson, T. Vulnerability of coastal aquifers to groundwater use and climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2012, 2, 342–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rasmussen, P.; Sonnenborg, T.O.; Goncear, G.; Hinsby, K. Assessing impacts of climate change, sea level rise, and drainage canals on saltwater intrusion to coastal aquifer. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2013, 17, 421–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vengosh, A.; Rosenthal, E. Saline groundwater in Israel: Its bearing on the water crisis in the country. J. Hydrol. 1994, 156, 389–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ozler, H.M. Hydrochemistry and salt-water intrusion in the Van aquifer, east Turkey. Environ. Geol. 2003, 43, 759–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Han, D.M.; Cao, G.L.; McCallum, J.; Song, X.F. Residence times of groundwater and nitrate transport in coastal aquifer systems: Daweijia area, northeastern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 538, 539–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chatton, E.; Aquilina, L.; Petelet-Giraud, E.; Cary, L.; Bertrand, G.; Labasque, T.; Hirata, R.; Martins, V.; Montenegro, S.; Vergnaud, V.; et al. Glacial recharge, salinisation and anthropogenic contamination in the coastal aquifers of Recife (Brazil). Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 569, 1114–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vallejos, A.; Daniele, L.; Sola, F.; Molina, L.; Pulido-Bosch, A. Anthropic-induced salinization in a dolomite coastal aquifer. Hydrogeochemical processes. J. Geochem. Explor. 2020, 209, 106438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yechieli, Y.; Yokochi, R.; Ziberbrand, M.; Lu, Z.T.; Purtschert, R.; Sueltenfuss, J.; Jiang, W.; Zappala, J.; Mueller, P.; Bernier, R.; et al. Recent seawater intrusion into deep aquifer determined by the radioactive noble-gas isotopes 81Kr and 39Ar. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2019, 507, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rachid, G.; Alameddine, I.; Najm, M.A.; Qian, S.; El-Fadel, M. Dynamic Bayesian Networks to Assess Anthropogenic and Climatic Drivers of Saltwater Intrusion: A Decision Support Tool Toward Improved Management. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2021, 17, 202–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mondal, N.C.; Singh, V.P.; Singh, V.S.; Saxena, V.K. Determining the interaction between groundwater and saline water through groundwater major ions chemistry. J. Hydrol. 2010, 388, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alfarrah, N.; Walraevens, K. Groundwater overexploitation and seawater intrusion in coastal areas of arid and semi-arid regions. Water 2018, 10, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ouhamdouch, S.; Bahir, M.; Ouazar, D. Seawater intrusion into coastal aquifers from semi-arid environments, Case of the alluvial aquifer of Essaouira basin (Morocco). Carbonates Evaporites 2021, 36, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sánchez-Martos, F.; Pulido-Bosch, A.; Molina-Sánchez, L.; Vallejos-Izquierdo, A. Identification of the origin of salinization in groundwater using minor ions (Lower Andarax, Southeast Spain). Sci. Total Environ. 2002, 1–3, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kazakis, N.; Pavlou, A.; Vargemezis, G.; Voudouris, K.S.; Soulios, G.; Pliakas, F.; Tsokas, G. Seawater intrusion mapping using electrical resistivity tomography and hydrochemical data. An application in the coastal area of eastern Thermaikos Gulf, Greece. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 543, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mahlknecht, J.; Merchán, D.; Rosner, M.; Meixner, A.; Ledesma-Ruiz, R. Assessing seawater intrusion in an arid coastal aquifer under high anthropogenic influence using major constituents, Sr and B isotopes in groundwater. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 587, 282–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Boschetti, T.; González-Hernández, P.; Hernández-Díaz, R.; Naclerio, G.; Celico, F. Seawater intrusion in the Guanahacabibes Peninsula (Pinar del Rio Province, western Cuba): Effects on karst development and water isotope composition. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015, 73, 5703–5719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, Q.; Volker, R.E.; Lockington, D.A. Numerical investigation of seawater intrusion at Gooburrum, Bundaberg, Queensland, Australia. Hydrogeol. J. 2004, 12, 674–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Werner, A.D.; Laattoe, T. Terrestrial freshwater lenses in stable riverine settings: Occurrence and controlling factors. Water Resour. Res. 2016, 52, 3654–3662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Costall, A.R.; Harris, B.D.; Teo, B.; Schaa, R.; Wagner, F.M.; Pigois, J.P. Groundwater throughflow and seawater intrusion in high quality coastal aquifers. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Don, N.C.; Hang, N.T.M.; Araki, H.; Yamanishi, H.; Koga, K. Groundwater resources and management for paddy field irrigation and associated environmental problems in an alluvial coastal lowland plain. Agric. Water Manag. 2006, 84, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yamanaka, M.; Bottrell, S.H.; Wu, J.; Kumagai, Y.; Mori, K.; Satake, H. Chlorine stable isotope evidence for salinization processes of confined groundwater in southwestern Nobi Plain aquifer system, central Japan. J. Hydrol. 2014, 519, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huang, G.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Liu, F. Impact of anthropogenic and natural processes on the evolution of groundwater chemistry in a rapidly urbanized coastal area, South China. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 463, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Han, D.M.; Song, X.F.; Currell, M.J.; Yang, J.L.; Xiao, G.Q. Chemical and isotopic constraints on evolution of groundwater salinization in the coastal plain aquifer of Laizhou Bay, China. J. Hydrol. 2014, 508, 12–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, Y.; Jiao, J.J.; Liang, W.; Kuang, X. Hydrogeochemical characteristics in coastal groundwater mixing zone. Appl. Geochem. 2017, 85, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, O.-B.; Park, H.-Y. Variation of hydrochemical characteristics of major elements in groundwater by the seawater intrusion in the Byeonsan peninsular, Korea. Geosystem. Eng. 1998, 1, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jeen, S.-W.; Kim, J.-M.; Ko, K.-S.; Yum, B.; Chang, H.-W. Hydrogeochemical characteristics of groundwater in a mid-western coastal aquifer system, Korea. Geosci. J. 2001, 5, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lee, S.-H.; Kim, K.-W.; Ko, I.; Lee, S.-G.; Hwang, H.-S. Geochemical and geophysical monitoring of salinewater intrusion in Korean paddy fields. Environ. Geochem. Health 2002, 24, 277–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kim, J.H.; Kim, R.H.; Lee, J.; Chang, H.W. Hydrogeochemical characterization of major factors affecting the quality of shallow groundwater in the coastal area at Kimje in South Korea. Environ. Geol. 2003, 44, 478–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, J.-H.; Yun, B.-W.; Kim, R.-H.; Koh, D.-C.; Cheong, T.-J.; Lee, J.; Chang, H.-W. Application of cluster analysis for the hydrogeochemical factors of saline groundwater in Kimje, Korea. Geosci. J. 2003, 7, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, Y.; Lee, K.-S.; Koh, D.-C.; Lee, D.-H.; Lee, S.-G.; Park, W.-B.; Koh, G.-W.; Woo, N.-C. Hydrogeochemical and isotopic evidence of groundwater salinization in a coastal aquifer: A case study in Jeju volcanic island, Korea. J. Hydrol. 2003, 270, 282–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lee, J.; Kim, R.-H.; Chang, H.-W. Interaction between groundwater quality and hydraulic head in an area around an underground LPG storage cavern, Korea. Environ. Geol. 2003, 43, 901–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hwang, S.; Shin, J.; Park, I.; Lee, S. Assessment of seawater intrusion using geophysical well logging and electrical soundings in a coastal aquifer, Youngkwang-gun, Korea. Explor. Geophys. 2004, 35, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kim, K.; Rajmohan, N.; Kim, H.J.; Hwang, G.-S.; Cho, M.J. Assessment of groundwater chemistry in a coastal region (Kunsan, Korea) having complex contaminant sources: A stoichiometric approach. Environ. Geol. 2004, 46, 763–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kim, J.-H.; Kim, R.-H.; Lee, J.; Cheong, T.-J.; Yum, B.-W.; Chang, H.-W. Multivariate statistical analysis to identify the major factors governing groundwater quality in the coastal area of Kimje, South Korea. Hydrol. Process. 2005, 19, 1261–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kim, J.H.; Lee, J.; Cheong, T.-J.; Kim, R.-H.; Koh, D.-C.; Ryu, J.-S.; Chang, H.-W. Use of time series analysis for the identification of tidal effect on groundwater in the coastal area of Kimje, Korea. J. Hydrol. 2005, 300, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Park, S.-C.; Yun, S.-T.; Chae, K.-T.; Yoo, I.-S.; Shin, K.-S.; Heo, C.-H.; Lee, S.-K. Regional hydrochemical study on salinization of coastal aquifers, western coastal area of South Korea. J. Hydrol. 2005, 313, 182–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kim, R.-H.; Kim, J.-H.; Ryu, J.-S.; Chang, H.-W. Salinization properties of a shallow groundwater in a coastal reclaimed area, Yeonggwang, Korea. Environ. Geol. 2006, 49, 1180–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kim, K.-Y.; Seong, H.; Kim, T.; Park, K.-H.; Woo, N.-C.; Park, Y.-S.; Koh, G.-W.; Park, W.-B. Tidal effects on variations of fresh–saltwater interface and groundwater flow in a multilayered coastal aquifer on a volcanic island (Jeju Island, Korea). J. Hydrol. 2006, 330, 525–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kim, K.-Y.; Chon, C.-M.; Park, K.-H. A simple method for locating the fresh water–salt water interface using pressure data. Ground Water 2007, 45, 723–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lee, J.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, H.-M.; Chang, H.-W. Statistical approach to determine the salinized ground water flow path and hydrogeochemical features around the underground LPG cavern, Korea. Hydrol. Process. 2007, 21, 3615–3626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lee, J.-Y.; Song, S.-H. Evaluation of groundwater quality in coastal areas: Implications for sustainable agriculture. Environ. Geol. 2007, 52, 1231–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lee, J.-Y.; Song, S.-H. Groundwater chemistry and ionic ratios in a western coastal aquifer of Buan, Korea: Implication for seawater intrusion. Geosci. J. 2007, 11, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Song, S.H.; Lee, J.-Y.; Park, N. Use of vertical electrical soundings to delineate seawater intrusion in a coastal area of Byunsan, Korea. Environ. Geol. 2007, 52, 1207–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lee, J.-Y.; Yi, M.-J.; Song, S.-H.; Lee, G.-S. Evaluation of seawater intrusion on the groundwater data obtained from the monitoring network in Korea. Water Int. 2008, 33, 127–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kim, K.-Y.; Chon, C.-M.; Park, K.-H.; Park, Y.-S.; Woo, N.-C. Multi-depth monitoring of electrical conductivity and temperature of groundwater at a multilayered coastal aquifer: Jeju Island, Korea. Hydrol. Process. 2008, 22, 3724–3733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kim, K.-Y.; Park, Y.-S.; Kim, G.-P.; Pakr, K.-H. Dynamic freshwater–saline water interaction in the coastal zone of Jeju Island, South Korea. Hydrogeol. J. 2009, 17, 617–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chae, K.-T.; Yun, S.-T.; Yun, S.-M.; Kim, K.-H.; So, C.-S. Seawater–freshwater mixing and resulting calcite dissolution: An example from a coastal alluvial aquifer in eastern South Korea. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2012, 57, 1672–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kim, T.H.; Chung, S.Y.; Park, N.; Hamm, S.-Y.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, B.-W. Combined analyses of chemometrics and kriging for identifying groundwater contamination sources and origins at the Masan coastal area in Korea. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 67, 1373–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Song, S.-H.; Zemansky, G. Vulnerability of groundwater systems with sea level rise in coastal aquifers, South Korea. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 65, 1865–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Park, Y.; Lee, J.-Y.; Kim, J.-H.; Song, S.-H. National scale evaluation of groundwater chemistry in Korea coastal aquifers: Evidences of seawater intrusion. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 66, 707–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Park, H.-Y.; Jang, K.; Ju, J.W.; Yeo, I.W. Hydrogeological characterization of seawater intrusion in tidally-forced coastal fractured bedrock aquifer. J. Hydrol. 2012, 446–447, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jun, K.W.; Jang, C.D. Effects of salinization of groundwater along the western coast of Korea are reduced by artificially recharging with freshwater. J. Coast. Res. 2013, 65, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kim, K.-Y.; Han, W.S.; Park, E. The impact of highly permeable layer on hydraulic system in a coastal aquifer. Hydrol. Process. 2013, 27, 3128–3138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lim, J.-W.; Lee, E.; Moon, H.S.; Lee, K.-K. Integrated investigation of seawater intrusion around oil storage caverns in a coastal fractured aquifer using hydrogeochemical and isotopic data. J. Hydrol. 2013, 486, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kim, D.-M.; Yun, S.-T.; Kwon, M.J.; Mayer, B.; Kim, K.-H. Assessing redox zones and seawater intrusion in a coastal aquifer in South Korea using hydrogeological, chemical and isotopic approaches. Chem. Geol. 2014, 390, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lee, B.S.; Song, S.-H.; Kim, J.S.; Um, J.Y.; Nam, K. Availability of coastal groundwater discharge as an alternative water resource in a large-scale reclaimed land, Korea. Environ. Earth Sci. 2014, 71, 1521–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chung, S.Y.; Venkatramanan, S.; Kim, T.H.; Kim, D.S.; Ramkumar, T. Influence of hydrogeochemical processes and assessment of suitability for groundwater uses in Busan City, Korea. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2015, 17, 423–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Venkatramanan, S.; Chung, S.Y.; Kim, T.H.; Prasanna, M.V.; Hamm, S.Y. Assessment and distribution of metals contamination in groundwater: A case study of Busan city, Korea. Water Qual. Expo. Health 2015, 7, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lee, E.; Lim, J.-W.; Moon, H.S.; Lee, K.-K. Assessment of seawater intrusion into underground oil storage cavern and prediction of its sustainability. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015, 73, 1179–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Unno, T.; Kim, J.; Kim, Y.; Nguyen, S.G.; Guevarra, R.B.; Kim, G.P.; Lee, J.-H.; Sadowsky, M.J. Influence of seawater intrusion on microbial communities in groundwater. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 532, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lee, E.; Shin, D.; Hyun, S.P.; Ko, K.-S.; Moon, H.S.; Koh, D.-C.; Ha, K.; Kim, B.-Y. Periodic change in coastal microbial community structure associated with submarine groundwater discharge and tidal fluctuation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2017, 62, 437–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Venkatramanan, S.; Chung, S.Y.; Selvam, S.; Son, J.H.; Kim, Y.J. Interrelationship between geochemical elements of sediment and groundwater at Samrak Park Delta of Nakdong River Basin in Korea: Multivariate statistical analyses and artificial neural network approaches. Environ. Earth Sci. 2017, 76, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Venkatramanan, S.; Chung, S.Y.; Selvam, S.; Lee, S.Y.; Elzain, H.E. Factors controlling groundwater quality in the Yeonjegu District of Busan City, Korea, using the hydrogeochemical processes and fuzzy GIS. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 23679–23693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chung, S.Y.; Senapathi, V.; Sekar, S.; Kim, T.H. Time series analyses of hydrological parameter variations and their correlations at a coastal area in Busan, South Korea. Hydrogeol. J. 2018, 26, 1875–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kim, Y.-T.; Hyun, S.G.; Cheong, J.-Y.; Woo, N.C.; Lee, S. Hydrogeochemistry in the coastal area during construction of geological repository. J. Hydrol. 2018, 562, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kim, I.H.; Yang, J.-S. Prioritizing countermeasures for reducing seawater-intrusion area by considering regional characteristics using SEAWAT and a multicriteria decision-making method. Hydrol. Process. 2018, 32, 3741–3757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kim, Y.; Yoon, H.; Lee, S.-H. Freshwater-salt water interface dynamics during pumping tests. Acque Sotter. Ital. J. Groundw. 2019, 8, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kim, R.-H.; Kim, J.-H.; Ryu, J.-S.; Koh, D.-C. Hydrogeochemical characteristics of groundwater influenced by reclamation, seawater intrusion, and land use in the coastal area of Yeonggwang, Korea. Geosci. J. 2019, 23, 603–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chang, S.W.; Chung, I.-M.; Kim, M.-G.; Tolera, M.; Koh, G.-W. Application of GALDIT in assessing the seawater intrusion vulnerability of Jeju Island, South Korea. Water 2019, 11, 1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chang, S.W.; Chung, I.-M.; Kim, M.-G.; Yifru, B.A. Vulnerability assessment considering impact of future groundwater exploitation on coastal groundwater resources in northeastern Jeju Island, South Korea. Environ. Earth Sci. 2020, 79, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lee, B.D.; Jeong, C.H.; Lee, Y.C.; Lee, Y.J.; Yang, J.H.; Choo, C.O.; Jang, H.W.; Oh, Y.H.; Hong, J.W. Statistical analysis and thermodynamic equilibrium modelling for chemical composition of groundwater and spring water at Jeju Island, South Korea. Water 2020, 12, 777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Shin, J.; Hwang, S. A Borehole-based approach for seawater intrusion in heterogeneous coastal aquifers, eastern part of Jeju Island, Korea. Water 2020, 12, 609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kwon, E.; Park, J.; Lee, J.M.; Kim, Y.-T.; Woo, N.C. Spatiotemporal changes in hydrogeochemistry of coastal groundwater through the construction of underground disposal facility for low and intermediate level radioactive wastes in Korea. J. Hydrol. 2020, 584, 124750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Jung, E.; Park, N.; Park, J. Composite modeling for evaluation of groundwater and soil salinization on the multiple reclaimed land due to sea-level rise. Transp. Porous Med. 2020, 136, 271–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kim, G.-B. A study on the establishment of groundwater protection area around a saline waterway by combining artificial neural network and GIS-based AHP. Environ. Earth Sci. 2020, 79, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Shin, K.; Koh, D.-C.; Jung, H.; Lee, J. The hydrogeochemical characteristics of groundwater subjected to seawater intrusion in the archipelago, Korea. Water 2020, 12, 1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ju, Y.; Massoudieh, A.; Green, C.T.; Lee, K.-K.; Kaown, D. Complexity of groundwater age mixing near a seawater intrusion zone based on multiple tracers and Bayesian inference. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 753, 141994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Youn, J.-S. High salinity factors of ground-water in eastern part of Cheju Island, Korea. Chejudo Res. 1986, 3, 309–326, (In Korean with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  90. Lee, S.K.; Cho, J.D.; Koo, S.B. Evaluation of TEM sounding for detection of sea-water contamination. J. Geol. Soc. Korea 1988, 24, 71–81, (In Korean with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  91. Choi, S.H. Cheju Island formation and groundwater characteristics. Chejudo Res. 1988, 5, 59–77, (In Korean with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  92. Choi, S.-H.; Kim, Y.-K. Geochemical characteristics of groundwater in Cheju Island. J. Geol. Soc. Korea 1989, 25, 230–238, (In Korean with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  93. Choi, S.H.; Kim, Y.K.; Lee, D.Y. Sea water intrusion in the coastal area of Cheju Volcanic Island, Korea. J. Kor. Inst. Mining Geol. 1991, 24, 319–327. [Google Scholar]
  94. Lee, K. On the hydrodynamic balance of fresh and salt waters in the Cheju Island. J. Geol. Soc. Korea 1992, 28, 649–664. [Google Scholar]
  95. Lee, S.-B.; Kim, K.-Y.; Han, S.-R.; Hahn, J.-S. The study on the increased causes of chloride (Cl) concentration of the Samyan 3rd pumping station in Cheju Island. J. Korean Soc. Groundw. Environ. 1997, 4, 85–94, (In Korean with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  96. Park, N.-S.; Lee, Y.-D. Seawater intrusion due to ground water developments in eastern and central Cheju watersheds. J. Korean Soc. Groundw. Environ. 1997, 4, 5–13, (In Korean with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  97. Booh, S.A.; Jeong, G.C. Saline water intrusion into fresh groundwater aquifer of eastern area, the Cheju Island. J. Eng. Geol. 2000, 10, 115–130, (In Korean with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  98. Himi, M.; Tapias, J.; Benabdelouahab, S.; Salhi, A.; Rivero, L.; Elgettafi, M.; El Mandour, A.; Stitou, J.; Casas, A. Geophysical characterization of saltwater intrusion in a coastal aquifer: The case of Martil-Alila plain (North Morocco). J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2017, 126, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lee, J.; Ko, K.-S.; Kim, J.-M.; Chang, H.-W. Multivariate statistical analysis of underground gas storage caverns on groundwater chemistry in Korea. Hydrol. Process. 2008, 22, 3410–3417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ko, K.-S.; Lee, J.; Lee, K.-K.; Chang, H.-W. Multivariate statistical analysis for groundwater mixing ratios around underground storage caverns in Korea. Carbonates Evaporites 2010, 25, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kim, J.-M.; Lee, J. Time series analysis for evaluating hydrological responses of pore-water pressure to rainfall in a slope. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2017, 62, 1412–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Laaksoharju, M.; Skårman, C.; Skårman, E. Multivariate mixing and mass balance (M3) calculations, a new tool for decoding hydrogeochemical information. Appl. Geochem. 1999, 14, 861–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Stetzenbach, K.J.; Farnham, I.M.; Hodge, V.F.; Johannesson, K.H. Using multivariate statistical analysis of groundwater major cation and trace element concentrations to evaluate groundwater flow in a regional aquifer. Hydrol. Process. 1999, 13, 2655–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. De Filippis, G.; Foglia, L.; Giudici, M.; Mehl, S.; Margiotta, S.; Negri, S.L. Seawater intrusion in karstic, coastal aquifers: Current challenges and future scenarios in the Taranto area (southern Italy). Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 573, 1340–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Paniconi, C.; Khlaifi, I.; Lecca, G.; Giacomelli, A.; Tarhouni, J. Modeling and analysis of seawater intrusion in the coastal aquifer of Cap-Bon, Tunisia. Transp. Porous Med. 2001, 43, 3–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Mercer, J.W.; Larson, S.P.; Faust, C.R. Simulation of salt-water interface motion. Ground Water 1980, 18, 374–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kim, C.-S.; Kim, K.-S.; Bae, D.-S.; Song, S.-H. Hydrogeological characteristics of seawater intrusion in the coastal area. J. Korean Soc. Groundw. Environ. 1997, 4, 61–72, (In Korean with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  108. Shin, I.-H.; Park, C.-Y.; Ahan, K.-S.; Jeong, Y.-J. Hydrogeochemistry of groundwaters at the Gogum island area in Jeonnam, Korea. JKEES 2002, 23, 474–485, (In Korean with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  109. Pulido-Leboeuf, P. Seawater intrusion and associated processes in a small coastal complex aquifer (Castell de Ferro, Spain). Appl. Geochem. 2004, 19, 1517–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Na, C.-K.; Son, C.-I. Groundwater quality and pollution characteristics at Seomjin River Basin: Pollution source and risk assessment. Econ. Environ. Geol. 2005, 38, 261–272, (In Korean with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  111. Capaccioni, B.; Didero, M.; Paletta, C.; Didero, L. Saline intrusion and refreshening in a multilayer coastal aquifer in the Catania Plain (Sicily, Southern Italy): Dynamics of degradation processes according to the hydrochemical characteristics of groundwaters. J. Hydrol. 2005, 307, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Faye, S.; Maloszewki, P.; Stichler, W.; Trimborn, P.; Faye, S.C.; Gaye, C.B. Groundwater salinization in the Saloum (Senegal) delta aquifer: Minor elements and isotopic indicators. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 343, 243–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Kim, H.-J.; Hamm, S.-Y.; Kim, N.-H.; Cheong, J.-Y.; Lee, J.-H.; Jang, S. Characteristics of groundwater contamination caused by seawater intrusion and agricultural activity in Sacheon and Hadong areas, Republic of Korea. Econ. Environ. Geol. 2009, 42, 575–589, (In Korean with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  114. Han, D.; Post, V.E.A.; Song, X. Groundwater salinization processes and reversibility of seawater intrusion in coastal carbonate aquifers. J. Hydrol. 2015, 531, 1067–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Argamasilla, M.; Baberá, J.A.; Andreo, B. Factors controlling groundwater salinization and hydrogeochemical processes in coastal aquifers from southern Spain. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 580, 50–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Hamm, S.-Y.; Cheong, J.-Y.; Jang, S.; Jung, C.-Y.; Kim, B.-S. Relationship between transmissivity and specific capacity in the volcanic aquifers of Jeju Island, Korea. J. Hydrol. 2005, 310, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Davis, G.H.; Lee, C.K.; Bradley, E.; Payne, B.R. Geohydrologic interpretations of a volcanic island from environmental isotopes. Water Resour. Res. 1970, 6, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Maloszewski, P.; Zuber, A. Determining the turnover time of groundwater systems with the aid of environmental tracers: 1. Models and their applicability. J. Hydrol. 1982, 57, 207–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; Korea Rural Community Corporation. Annual Report on the Seawater Intrusion Monitoring Network in Korea (2019); 11-1543000-001105-10; Korea Rural Community Corporation: Naju, Korea, 2019. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
  120. Lee, J.-Y.; Lim, H.S. Identification and characterization of the encrusting materials in a coastal liquefied petroleum gas storage cavern. Environ. Earth Sci. 2010, 61, 1165–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Kwon, Y.K.; Chang, C.; Shinn, Y. Security and safety assessment of the small-scale offshore CO2 storage demonstration project in the Pohang Basin. J. Eng. Geol. 2018, 28, 217–246, (In Korean with English abstract). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. KIGAM. Evaluation of Large-Scale CO2 Geological Storage Potential; GP2017-027-2019; KIGAM: Daejeon, Korea, 2019. (In Korean)
  123. Kim, K.-H.; Yun, S.-T.; Yu, S.; Choi, B.-Y.; Kim, M.-J.; Lee, K.-J. Geochemical pattern recognitions of deep thermal groundwater in South Korea using self-organizing map: Identified pathways of geochemical reaction and mixing. J. Hydrol. 2020, 589, 125202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Luo, C.-Y.; Shen, S.-L.; Han, J.; Ye, G.-L.; Horpibulsuk, S. Hydrogeochemical environment of aquifer groundwater in Shanghai and potential hazards to underground infrastructures. Nat. Hazards 2015, 78, 753–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Locations of the seawater intrusion study sites in South Korea (W: western coastal region; S: southern coastal region; and E: eastern coastal region).
Figure 1. Locations of the seawater intrusion study sites in South Korea (W: western coastal region; S: southern coastal region; and E: eastern coastal region).
Water 13 00761 g001
Figure 2. Piper diagram representing the mixing of groundwater and seawater. A red star represents the chemical composition of seawater. The mixing between seawater and Ca-HCO3 is indicated by the red arrow and the mixing between seawater and Ca–Cl-type water is indicated by the blue arrow.
Figure 2. Piper diagram representing the mixing of groundwater and seawater. A red star represents the chemical composition of seawater. The mixing between seawater and Ca-HCO3 is indicated by the red arrow and the mixing between seawater and Ca–Cl-type water is indicated by the blue arrow.
Water 13 00761 g002
Figure 3. Plots of ΔCa2+, ΔMg2+, and ΔNa+ vs. the percentage of seawater equal to the mixing ratio using conservative ions.
Figure 3. Plots of ΔCa2+, ΔMg2+, and ΔNa+ vs. the percentage of seawater equal to the mixing ratio using conservative ions.
Water 13 00761 g003
Figure 4. Plot of ΔMg2+ or ΔCa2+ vs. ΔNa+ + ΔK+, showing the mechanism by which major cations participate in coastal groundwater mixing.
Figure 4. Plot of ΔMg2+ or ΔCa2+ vs. ΔNa+ + ΔK+, showing the mechanism by which major cations participate in coastal groundwater mixing.
Water 13 00761 g004
Table 1. Summary of studies on seawater intrusion in South Korea published in international journals.
Table 1. Summary of studies on seawater intrusion in South Korea published in international journals.
YearStudy SiteStudy MethodsMajor FindingsReference
1998Wido Island and Byeonsan Peninsula, Jeollabuk-do *Analysis of groundwater geochemistry;
mixing ratio calculation using Cl, I, and Br
Changes in major cation concentrations resulted from mixing and an ion exchange reaction;
mixing ratio of seawater was up to 10%
Kim and Park [36]
2001Hwasung-gun, Gyeonggi-do *Groundwater level measurement;
analysis of groundwater geochemistry;
analyses of isotopes (oxygen and hydrogen);
factor analysis
The groundwater flow system was nearly in a steady-state condition;
groundwater geochemistry was affected by seawater intrusion and agricultural activities, along with cation exchange and redox reactions
Jeen et al. [37]
2002Namyang reclamation
site, Gyeonggi-do *
Electromagnetic sounding;
chemical analysis of top soils and groundwater
Seawater intrusion occurred as a channel and extended to a depth of 30 m from the sea level;
the region having high concentrations of major elements was consistent with a weakly consolidated zone close to the ground surface
Lee et al. [38]
2003Kimje, Jeollabuk-do *Analyses of major groundwater chemistry and oxygen, hydrogen, and carbon isotopes;
core logging
The hydrogeochemical characteristics of groundwater were affected by seawater intrusion, fertilizers, and redox processes;
the tidal changes significantly affected the groundwater quality
Kim et al. [39]
2003Kimje, Jeollabuk-do *Chemical analysis (major cations and anions, total organic carbon, and oxygen, hydrogen, and carbon isotopes);
cluster analysis
One of the groundwater groups was mostly affected by chemical fertilizers, while the other three groundwater groups were strongly influenced by recent seawater and trapped ancient seawaterKim et al. [40]
2003Jeju IslandGeochemical and isotopic (O, H, S, and Sr) analysesChanges in groundwater composition were largely determined by salinization and cation exchange processes.Kim et al. [41]
2003Underground liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) cavern site, Yeosu, Jeollanam-doChemical analysis;
cross-correlation analysis
Seawater intrusion caused high concentrations of cations and anions in the LPG cavern seepage waters and groundwatersLee et al. [42]
2004Yeonggwang-gun, Jeollanam-do *Drilling and geophysical well logging;
electrical sounding;
numerical modeling
The freshwater–seawater boundary was determined from the equivalent NaCl concentration, which was estimated from geophysical and hydrogeochemical dataHwang et al. [43]
2004Kunsan, Jeollabuk-do *Chemical analysis;
stoichiometric analysis
Mineral weathering, anthropogenic activities, and chloride inputs, such as seawater and deicer, were important contributors to groundwater chemistryKim et al. [44]
2005Kimje, Jeollabuk-do *Cluster analysis;
factor analysis
The dominant factor affecting groundwater quality changed from chemical fertilizers to microbial activity, and then to seawater intrusion, as groundwater flowed toward the coastal areaKim et al. [45]
2005Kimje, Jeollabuk-do *Monitoring of physicochemical properties of groundwater;
correlation analysis
The groundwater quality was primarily governed by the tidal level, and the strength of the tidal effect was consistent with the tidal periodKim et al. [46]
2005Western coastal region of South Korea *Hydrogeochemical survey;
log-probability plots;
multivariate statistical
A “seawater mixing index (SMI)” based on the concentrations of Na, Mg, Cl, and SO4 was proposed;
at least around 5% of groundwaters were affected by seawater mixing
Park et al. [47]
2006Yeonggwang-gun, Jeollanam-do *Hydrogeochemical analysis;
analysis of total organic carbon and oxygen, hydrogen, and carbon isotopes;
core logging
Groundwater salinization was caused by saltwater intrusion, residual salts, and reduction of organic matter in the sedimentsKim et al. [48]
2006Jeju IslandTime series analysis with rainfall, tidal fluctuation, and groundwater level data;
geophysical logging and flowmeter analysis
The freshwater–seawater interface was located 6 to 8 km away from the coastline, and the extent of the interface was related to the geological featuresKim et al. [49]
2007Jeju IslandMathematical calculations for determining the depth of freshwater–seawater interface from pressure dataMethodology to determine the depth of freshwater–seawater interface from pressure data obtained from a single borehole was proposed;
the estimated depth of the freshwater–seawater interface agreed well with that determined from the measured electrical conductivity (EC) profile
Kim et al. [50]
2007Underground LPG cavern site, Pyeongtaek, Gyeonggi-do *Cross-correlation analysis;
principal component analysis (PCA)
Three hydrogeochemical factors, namely encrusted cement dissolution, host rock dissolution, and seawater intrusion, dominantly affected the groundwater quality;
groundwater salinization was characterized on the basis of the concentration of dissolved ions such as Br
Lee et al. [51]
2007Western * and southern coastal regions of South Korea (Seawater Intrusion Monitoring Network)Monitoring of water levels and water qualityGroundwater salinization was strongly related to the withdrawal of groundwater;
a high percentage of the groundwaters were categorized as
Na–Cl and Ca–Cl types, and the Na–Cl type showed the influence of seawater intrusion
Lee and Song [52]
2007Buan-gun, Jeollabuk-do *Groundwater chemistry and ionic ratios;
cross-correlation and cluster analysis
The groundwaters influenced by seawater intrusion showed high Cl concentration and high total dissolved solids (TDS);
Groundwater salinization was because of seawater mixing and cation exchange
Lee and Song [53]
2007Buan-gun, Jeollabuk-do *Vertical electrical sounding (VES);
core drilling;
chemical analysis of groundwater
Seawater intrusion was indicated by low electrical resistivity and ionic ratios;
VES is a useful tool to identify seawater intrusion
Song et al. [54]
2008Western * and southern coastal regions of South Korea (Seawater Intrusion Monitoring Network)Basic statistics of groundwater data;
correlation analysis and trend analyses (Sen’s test and Mann–Kendall test)
Groundwater levels were largely influenced by extraction of groundwater for irrigation and tidal fluctuation;
advance of seawater was indicated by the vertical EC profile
Lee et al. [55]
2008Jeju IslandMonitoring of EC and temperature with depth;
cross-correlation analysis;
end-member mixing analysis
While a sharp freshwater–seawater interface was observed at low tide, the diffusion zone extended to 20 m at high tideKim et al. [56]
2009Jeju IslandGroundwater level measurement;
multidepth EC and temperature monitoring
The multidepth monitoring system was helpful for evaluating freshwater–seawater interactionKim et al. [57]
2012Okgye, Gangwon-doMajor ion chemistry;
analysis of oxygen and hydrogen isotopes;
reaction path modeling
The main sources of salinity were rainwater impacted by sea-salt spray for the upstream aquifer and seawater intrusion for the downstream coastal aquiferChae et al. [58]
2012Masan, Gyeongsangnam-doHydrogeochemical analyses;
chemometrics (cluster analysis, factor analysis, and discriminant analysis) and kriging
Combined use of chemometrics and kriging was helpful for identifying sources of groundwater contamination, which included seawater intrusionKim et al. [59]
2012Western * and southern coastal regions of South Korea (Seawater Intrusion Monitoring Network)Basic statistics;
trend analysis and correlation analysis;
conductivity profiling
Groundwater levels in South Korea can be affected by rainfall and sea level changes, which are associated with climate changes and potentially cause increased seawater intrusionSong and Zemansky [60]
2012Eastern, western *, and
southern coastal regions of South Korea (Seawater Intrusion Monitoring Network)
Automatic monitoring of water level, EC, and temperature;
periodic chemical analysis
Based on the threshold values of Cl and Br, 41–50% of the groundwaters were impacted by mixing with seawaterPark et al. [61]
2012Muan, Jeollanam-do *Time series analysis (EC, groundwater level, and tidal oscillation);
hydraulic tests
The extent of seawater intrusion was highly dependent on hydrogeologic features such as hydraulic connectivity;
continuous withdrawal of groundwater could exacerbate seawater intrusion in the coastal fractured aquifer
Park et al. [62]
2013Yeonggwang-gun, Jeollanam-do *Monitoring of groundwater level and TDS;
groundwater analysis model (FEMWATER)
Inland movement of the freshwater–seawater boundary can be reduced by artificially recharging aquifers with freshwaterJun and Jang [63]
2013Jeju IslandNumerical simulation with sensitivity analysisThe horizontal length and vertical depth of highly permeable layers are important factors for inland seawater intrusionKim et al. [64]
2013Underground LPG cavern site, Yeosu, Jeollanam-doGeochemical and isotopic analyses;
The chemistry of the cavern seepage water was primarily influenced by seawater mixing and dissolution of cement material;
the estimated seawater mixing ratio in the seepage water ranged from less than 1% to 14%
Lim et al. [65]
2014Yangyang, Gangwon-doSediment coring;
chemical and isotopic (δ34S and δ18O) analyses
The coastal aquifer was affected by seawater intrusion, apart from being characterized by sulfate-reducing conditionsKim et al. [66]
2014Saemangeum reclaimed area, Jeollabuk-do *Chemical and isotopic (δ18O and δ2H) analyses;
electrical resistivity survey;
pumping test and automatic monitoring of groundwater level and EC
The transition zone between freshwater and seawater ranged from 30 to 50 m below the ground surface;
the seawater content of groundwater was higher in the reclaimed land compared with inland.
Lee et al. [67]
2015Suyeong district, Busan cityWater chemistry;
use of water quality index (WQI)
The groundwater composition was primarily determined by three dominant factors: weathering, seawater intrusion, and sewer leakageChung et al. [68]
2015Suyeong district, Busan cityWater chemistry;
geographic information system (GIS)-based spatial mapping;
correlation and cluster analyses
Seawater intrusion, salinized river water, leaked sewers, and groundwater discharge from a subway dominantly affected the groundwater qualityVenkatramanan et al. [69]
2015Underground LPG cavern site, Yeosu, Jeollanam-doField monitoring of groundwater levels and water chemistry;
numerical modeling
Modeled seawater mixing ratios of the cavern seepage waters ranged from 0.01% to 8.70%, while the measured mixing ratios based on Cl- concentrations ranged from 2.3% to 12.8%Lee et al. [70]
2015Jeju IslandPhysicochemical parameter analysis;
next generation sequencing (NGS)-based microbial community analysis
Groundwater samples with high salinity shared 6.7% of bacterial species with seawater, while the other groundwater samples shared less than 0.5%.Unno et al. [71]
2017Jeju IslandChemistry analyses;
microbial community statistical analyses;
groundwater level monitoring;
numerical simulation
Submarine groundwater discharge rate is a vital factor that affects the dynamics of the microbial community structure in coastal areasLee et al. [72]
2017Samrak Park Delta, Busan cityGeochemical analyses of sediments and groundwater;
multivariate statistical analysis;
multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (ANN) model
The chemical constituents of sediments and groundwater were mostly derived from source rocks and seawater intrusionVenkatramanan et al. [73]
2017Yeonjegu district, Busan cityHydrogeochemical analyses;
statistical analysis;
fuzzy GIS techniques
The major ion chemistry was mainly related to natural processes, while seawater intrusion and municipal contaminants were secondary sources of groundwater contaminationVenkatramanan et al. [74]
2018Nam-gu district, Busan cityTime series analysis using EC, water pressure, precipitation, and tide dataInland seawater intrusion had progressed significantly during the nine-year investigation period and it had significantly affected the groundwater qualityChung et al. [75]
2018Geological repository for low and intermediate radioactive waste (LILRW), southeastern coastal area of South KoreaMonitoring of groundwater level and hydrogeochemistryDuring the construction of the geological repository for LILRW, the groundwater level decreased below the sea level, resulting in an increase in EC in several wells near the coast;
the groundwater salinity was mainly because of seawater intrusion, with an important contribution from ion exchange
Kim et al. [76]
2018Western coastal area of South Korea (Taean-gun, Chungcheongnam-do) *Multicriteria decision-making
numerical modeling (SEAWAT)
Taean-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, was found to be the most susceptible to seawater intrusion among 25 areas over the western coastal regions of South Korea;
Taean-myeon in Taean-gun was determined to be a priority area for application of countermeasures against seawater intrusion
Kim and Yang [77]
2019Seocheon, Chungcheongnam-do *“Interface-Egg”;
pumping tests;
monitoring of groundwater level and EC
A freshwater–seawater interface tracking device (“Interface-Egg”) can be useful for evaluating temporal changes in the interfaceKim et al. [78]
2019Yeonggwang-gun, Jeollanam-do *Elemental and isotope analyses;
cluster analysis
The complex hydrogeochemical characteristics of the groundwater system resulted from the reclamation process, land use, old seawater intrusion, and reduction processesKim et al. [79]
2019Jeju IslandIndex-based seawater intrusion vulnerability model (GALDIT)The vulnerability of southwestern areas of Jeju Island to seawater intrusion is increasing because of the decreasing groundwater levelChang et al. [80]
2020Jeju IslandMonitoring of groundwater level and multidepth salinity;
numerical modeling (SEAWAT and GALDIT)
While the current use of groundwater from the coastal aquifer of Jeju Island may not cause seawater intrusion, seawater intrusion could occur if the dry conditions persist in the futureChang et al. [81]
2020Jeju IslandChemical analysis;
statistical analysis:
thermodynamic modeling
Seawater intrusion in the southeastern area was attributed to the distribution of Seogwipo Formation. However, this formation prevents intrusion in other areas by acting as an aquicludeLee et al. [82]
2020Jeju IslandGeophysical well logging;
borehole temperature monitoring
Seawater intrusion occurred through multilayered aquifers, which act as a flow pathwayShin and Hwang [83]
2020Geological repository for LILRW, southeastern coastal area of South KoreaGeochemical analysis;
isotopic (δD, δ18O, and δ34SSO4) analysis
Seawater intrusion in the fractured coastal aquifer resulted from groundwater discharge during the construction of the underground LILRW repository;
seawater intrusion and accompanying hydrogeochemical reactions varied considerably over time and space
Kwon et al. [84]
2020Ninety-one reclaimed land areas in western * and southern coastal regions of South Korea, with detailed analysis of Heungwang (Gyeonggi-do) * and
Deokchon (Jeollanam-do) reclaimed lands
Composite model for seawater intrusion and soil salinization with sea level rise scenariosGroundwater salinization can be accelerated in the 91 reclaimed land areas by seawater intrusion because of sea level rise;
small watersheds can have further inland penetration of seawater, while ponds with water levels higher than sea level can prevent seawater intrusion
Jung et al. [85]
2020Gyeongin-Ara Waterway, Gyeonggi-do *Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model;
artificial neural network (ANN) model
Seawater intrusion is occurring near the Gyeongin-Ara Waterway and is in progress in surrounding aquifersKim [86]
2020Archipelago in the southwestern sea, Jeollanam-do *Chemical analysis;
ionic delta by mixing ratio
Ca–Cl and Na–Cl types of groundwater were contaminated with seawater and accounted for 91.9% of the total samples;
seawater mixing ratios were calculated to be 0–10.4% and 0–7.6% on the basis of Cl and Br ions, respectively
Shin et al. [87]
2021Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do *Monitoring of groundwater level and hydrogeochemistry;
age-dating using 3H, tritiogenic 3He, radiogenic 4He, CFC-11, CFC-12, and CFC-113
Density-driven upward flow occurs at the interface of seawater intrusion, which forces old groundwater to flow into the shallow aquiferJu et al. [88]
* Study on western coastal regions.
Table 2. Chloride and bromide concentrations of seawater or brackish water reported in previous studies.
Table 2. Chloride and bromide concentrations of seawater or brackish water reported in previous studies.
YearStudy SiteCl (mg/L)Br (mg/L)Reference
1997Yeosu, South Korea14,230.5 ± 528.2NAKim et al. [107]
2001Mid-western coast, South Korea19,300.073.0Jeen et al. [37]
2002Gogum, South Korea17,164.0NAShin et al. [108]
2003Jeju, South Korea18,211.064.7Kim et al. [41]
2004Castell de Ferro, Spain21,259.0132.0Pulido-Leboeuf [109]
2005Western coastal area, South Korea19,350.0NAPark et al. [47]
2005Seomjin River, South Korea18,800.067.0Na and Son [110]
2005Sicily, Italy21,204.5 ± 34.7NACapaccioni et al. [111]
2005Saloum, Senegal19,888.7 ± 2423.467.0Faye et al. [112]
2006Yeonggwang, South Korea14,408.067.0Kim et al. [48]
2007Buan, South Korea16,716.0NALee and Song [53]
2009Sacheon and Hadong, South Korea2846.0NAKim et al. [113]
2015Daweijia, China16,211.5 ± 668.1NAHan et al. [114]
2017Marbella–Estepona, Spain19,472.066.0Argamasilla et al. [115]
2020Shinan, South Korea1554.75.2Shin et al. [87]
2020Hwaseong-si, South Korea1107.7NAJu et al. [88]
NA: Not analyzed.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Back to TopTop