Next Article in Journal
Effect of Freeze-Thaw Cycles on Soil Detachment Capacities of Three Loamy Soils on the Loess Plateau of China
Next Article in Special Issue
Nonstationary Ecological Instream Flow and Relevant Causes in the Huai River Basin, China
Previous Article in Journal
Spatio-Temporal Variations in Phytoplankton Communities in Sediment and Surface Water as Reservoir Drawdown—A Case Study of Pengxi River in Three Gorges Reservoir, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Precipitation and Potential Influencing Factors in the Loess Plateau before and after the Implementation of the Grain for Green Project
Article

Uncertainty Analysis of SWAT Modeling in the Lancang River Basin Using Four Different Algorithms

1
College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
2
Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China
3
Research Center for Climate Change, Nanjing 210029, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Chong-Yu Xu
Water 2021, 13(3), 341; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030341
Received: 29 December 2020 / Revised: 19 January 2021 / Accepted: 26 January 2021 / Published: 29 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hydrological Modeling in Water Cycle Processes)
The hydrological model is the primary tool for regional water resources management, allocation, and prediction. However, these models always suffer from large uncertainties from multiple sources. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct an uncertainty analysis before performing hydrological simulation. Sequential Uncertainty Fitting (SUFI-2), Parameter Solution (ParaSol), Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) integrated with the SWAT-CUP software were used to calibrate the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model and quantify the parameter sensitivity and prediction uncertainty of the SWAT in the Lancang River (LR) Basin, which is located in the southwest of China. This model was calibrated and validated using the four algorithms both at the daily scale, and the optimal simulation results derived by the four methods showed that the SWAT model performed well over the Yunjinghong station with Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) and coefficient of determination (R2) values greater than 0.8 both in the calibration (1975 to 1989) and validation (1990 to 2004) periods. Among the four algorithms, the ParaSol algorithm produced the best simulation result at the daily scale with NSE values of 0.89 and 0.90 for the calibration and validation periods, respectively. Furthermore, the ParaSol algorithm has the greatest proportion of simulations (94%) with an NSE greater than 0.5. Parameter sensitivity analysis results demonstrated that the four methods all can be used for parameter sensitivity analysis in streamflow simulation, and they all identified that the base flow factor for bank storage (ALPHA_BNK) and effective hydraulic conductivity in the main channel alluvium (CH_K2) were more sensitive. The uncertainty analysis of model parameters showed that the parameter 95PPU (95% prediction uncertainty) width yielded by the ParaSol algorithm was the smallest compared with that of the other methods, followed by PSO, SUFI-2, and GLUE. The uncertainty analysis of the model simulation indicated that the SUFI-2 and PSO methods can achieve satisfactory results (with P-factor > 0.7 and R-factor < 1.5) at the daily scale; among them, SUFI-2 (P-factor = 0.93, R-factor = 1.17) performed much better than PSO (P-factor = 0.78, R-factor = 1.14). In general, by comparing its evaluation criteria (NSE, R2, RE, P-factor, and R-factor) to other methods, ParaSol stood out as the most efficient tool for model calibration. However, SUFI-2 remains the most robust method to perform uncertainty analysis considering its uncertainties of model structure, model inputs, and parameters. This study provides insight into hydrological simulation of the LR Basin using the appropriate algorithm to calibrate the model and implement the uncertainty analysis. View Full-Text
Keywords: SWAT model; Lancang River Basin; uncertainty analysis; SWAT-CUP; hydrological simulation SWAT model; Lancang River Basin; uncertainty analysis; SWAT-CUP; hydrological simulation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, G.; Jin, J.; Liu, C.; Liu, Y.; He, R.; Bao, Z. Uncertainty Analysis of SWAT Modeling in the Lancang River Basin Using Four Different Algorithms. Water 2021, 13, 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030341

AMA Style

Tang X, Zhang J, Wang G, Jin J, Liu C, Liu Y, He R, Bao Z. Uncertainty Analysis of SWAT Modeling in the Lancang River Basin Using Four Different Algorithms. Water. 2021; 13(3):341. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tang, Xiongpeng; Zhang, Jianyun; Wang, Guoqing; Jin, Junliang; Liu, Cuishan; Liu, Yanli; He, Ruimin; Bao, Zhenxin. 2021. "Uncertainty Analysis of SWAT Modeling in the Lancang River Basin Using Four Different Algorithms" Water 13, no. 3: 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030341

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop