Next Article in Journal
Bioremediation of Landoltia punctata to Microcystis aeruginosa Contaminated Waters
Previous Article in Journal
Understanding Future Water Challenges in a Highly Regulated Indian River Basin—Modelling the Impact of Climate Change on the Hydrology of the Upper Narmada
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Experimental Investigation on Pouring Aggregate to Plug Horizontal Tunnel with Flow Water

Water 2020, 12(6), 1763; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061763
by Gailing Zhang 1, Shuang Hui 2, Weixin Li 3 and Wanghua Sui 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Water 2020, 12(6), 1763; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061763
Submission received: 16 May 2020 / Revised: 12 June 2020 / Accepted: 18 June 2020 / Published: 21 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Hydraulics and Hydrodynamics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

My comments are reported in the attached document.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper investigated the impact of particle size, flow velocity, and water-solid ratio on plugging of devised acrylic tunnel apparatus. The experiment is well designed and the manuscript is well written. The reviewer recommends to publish this paper in Water after addressing the following minor comments:

 

Title: I am not a native speaker, but to me, "water flow" sounds more natural than "flow water". I suggest to revise the title as follows:

"Experimental investigation on plugin horizontal tunnel with water flow by pouring aggregate"

Line 242: In this study, the increased effects of plugging points to a better seal. ==> what does this mean? hard for me to understand.

3.3.2. Main effects ==> please be more specific on title of this subsection. what does "main" here mean?

 

 

 

Author Response

please see the attachment.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors satisfactorily addressed my comments, and the manuscript has significantly improved. I am pleased to recommend its acceptance in the Water journal in the present form. Just one note, in Ref. 19 the name of the second authors is Matoušek, not Natoušek.

Back to TopTop