Next Article in Journal
Species-Richness Responses to Water-Withdrawal Scenarios and Minimum Flow Levels: Evaluating Presumptive Standards in the Tennessee and Cumberland River Basins
Next Article in Special Issue
CFD Modelling of Particle-Driven Gravity Currents in Reservoirs
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Assessment of Shear Boundary Layer Formation in Sewer Systems with Fluid-Sediment Phases
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Based Decision-Making Method for River Operation Management: Practice from China
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Comparison of Local and Global Optimization Methods for Calibration of a 3D Morphodynamic Model of a Curved Channel

Institute for Modelling Hydraulic and Environmental Systems, University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 61, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2020, 12(5), 1333; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051333
Received: 3 April 2020 / Revised: 2 May 2020 / Accepted: 4 May 2020 / Published: 8 May 2020
In curved channels, the flow characteristics, sediment transport mechanisms, and bed evolution are more complex than in straight channels, owing to the interaction between the centrifugal force and the pressure gradient, which results in the formation of secondary currents. Therefore, using an appropriate numerical model that considers this fully three-dimensional effect, and subsequently, the model calibration are substantial tasks for achieving reliable simulation results. The calibration of numerical models as a subjective approach can become challenging and highly time-consuming, especially for inexperienced modelers, due to dealing with a large number of input parameters with respect to hydraulics and sediment transport. Using optimization methods can notably facilitate and expedite the calibration procedure by reducing the user intervention, which results in a more objective selection of parameters. This study focuses on the application of four different optimization algorithms for calibration of a 3D morphodynamic numerical model of a curved channel. The performance of a local gradient-based method is compared with three global optimization algorithms in terms of accuracy and computational time (model runs). The outputs of the optimization methods demonstrate similar sets of calibrated parameters and almost the same degree of accuracy according to the achieved minimum of the objective function. Accordingly, the most efficient method concerning the number of model runs (i.e., local optimization method) is selected for further investigation by setting up additional numerical models using different sediment transport formulae and various discharge rates. The comparisons of bed topography changes in several longitudinal and cross-sections between the measured data and the results of the calibrated numerical models are presented. The outcomes show an acceptable degree of accuracy for the automatically calibrated models. View Full-Text
Keywords: 3D hydro-morphodynamic model; automatic calibration; optimization algorithms; curved channel; SSIIM; PEST 3D hydro-morphodynamic model; automatic calibration; optimization algorithms; curved channel; SSIIM; PEST
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Shoarinezhad, V.; Wieprecht, S.; Haun, S. Comparison of Local and Global Optimization Methods for Calibration of a 3D Morphodynamic Model of a Curved Channel. Water 2020, 12, 1333.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop