Next Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of Water Quality Disparities in the United States in Relation to Heavy Metals and Biological Contaminants
Next Article in Special Issue
Habitat Use by Pseudochondrostoma duriense and Squalius carolitertii Downstream of a Small-Scale Hydropower Plant
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Empirical Linkage of Water Level–Climate–Vegetation across the Three Georges Dam Areas
Previous Article in Special Issue
Head Losses of Horizontal Bar Racks as Fish Guidance Structures
Open AccessArticle

Contribution of Different Elements of Inclined Trash Racks to Head Losses Modeling

1
Institut Pprime, CNRS—Université de Poitiers—ENSMA, Pôle R & D écohydraulique OFB-IMFT-PPRIME, UPR 3346, 11 Boulevard Marie et Pierre Curie, Site du futuroscope, 86073 Poitiers, France
2
Office Français de la Biodiversité—DRAS, Pôle R & D écohydraulique OFB-IMFT-PPRIME, 2 Allée du Professeur Camille Soula, 31400 Toulouse, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2020, 12(4), 966; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12040966
Received: 14 February 2020 / Revised: 17 March 2020 / Accepted: 19 March 2020 / Published: 29 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fish in Hydropower Affected Rivers)
Low bar spacing trash racks have been widely investigated in order to guide fish toward bypasses. In addition to this biological function, the formulae to predict head losses, for hydropower plants, are still being discussed. This paper investigates and models the global head losses generated by inclined trash racks with six different bar shapes and two different supports, in an open channel for six angles and two low bar spacings. The girders that supported the trash racks were U-shaped and different profile shapes. In addition to the previously studied rectangular and “hydrodynamic” bars, four new bar shapes, combining different leading and trailing edges, were investigated. Water depths were measured upstream and downstream of the rack for each configuration, and head loss coefficients were characterized and modeled. Three of these new bar shapes generated lower head losses than the hydrodynamic bar shape. The most efficient bar profile reduced the shape coefficient by 40% compared to the hydrodynamic profile and by 67% compared to the conventional rectangular profile. Concerning the supports, the use of a profiled girder to replace a conventional U-shaped girder also significantly reduced the head losses. The addition of the girder effect in a global formula increased its accuracy in predicting head losses of inclined trash racks upstream of hydropower plants. View Full-Text
Keywords: inclined trash racks; head loss; hydropower plants; fish friendly; bar shape; support girder inclined trash racks; head loss; hydropower plants; fish friendly; bar shape; support girder
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Lemkecher, F.; Chatellier, L.; Courret, D.; David, L. Contribution of Different Elements of Inclined Trash Racks to Head Losses Modeling. Water 2020, 12, 966. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12040966

AMA Style

Lemkecher F, Chatellier L, Courret D, David L. Contribution of Different Elements of Inclined Trash Racks to Head Losses Modeling. Water. 2020; 12(4):966. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12040966

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lemkecher, Fatma; Chatellier, Ludovic; Courret, Dominique; David, Laurent. 2020. "Contribution of Different Elements of Inclined Trash Racks to Head Losses Modeling" Water 12, no. 4: 966. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12040966

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop