Next Article in Journal
Criteria for HydroSOS Quality Index. Application to Extra Virgin Olive Oil and Processed Table Olives
Previous Article in Journal
Operational Efficiency of Mexican Water Utilities: Results of a Double-Bootstrap Data Envelopment Analysis
Open AccessArticle

Comparative Evaluation of the GPM IMERG Early, Late, and Final Hourly Precipitation Products Using the CMPA Data over Sichuan Basin of China

1
College of Meteorological Observation, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, China
2
Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Sounding, China Meteorological Administration, Chengdu 610225, China
3
Department of Geography and Geology, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY 42101, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2020, 12(2), 554; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020554
Received: 5 January 2020 / Revised: 13 February 2020 / Accepted: 14 February 2020 / Published: 16 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Hydrology and Hydrogeology)
The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission has generated global precipitation products of improved accuracy and coverage that are promising for advanced hydrological and meteorological studies. This study evaluates three Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) Hourly products, including the Early-, Late-, and Final-run products (IMERG-HE, IMERG-HL, and IMERG-HF, respectively), over Sichuan Basin of China. This highly complex terrain of the steep mountainous region offers further scrutiny on the quality and applicability of the data. The China Meteorological Precipitation Analysis (CMPA) data from January 2016 to December 2018 are used as the reference for the evaluation. Results show that: (1) At grid scale, IMERG-HL and IMERG-HF outperform IMERG-HE in terms of correlation coefficient (CC) and root-mean-square error (RMSE), but IMERG-HL has smaller relative bias (RB) than that of the IMERG-HF (by 21.16%). IMERG-HF presents the highest probability of detection (POD = 0.52) and critical success index (CSI = 0.32), except for high false alarm ratio (FAR) for light precipitation. (2) At regional scale, IMERG-HF outperforms IMERG-HE and IMERG-HL in annual evaluation in all the metrics except for the serious overestimation as shown in RB (20.18%, 3.84%, and 4.97%, respectively). Its accumulative precipitation deviation mainly comes from moderate precipitation events (1–10 mm/h), while better detection capability is seen in light precipitation (<1 mm/h). Seasonally, IMERG-HF performs the best in winter, while IMERG-HL performs the best in the other seasons. (3) IMERG-HF captures the peak precipitation more accurately in all seasons. In reproducing the diurnal cycle, IMERG-HF performs better in winter, while IMERG-HL performs better in summer and autumn, and IMERG-HE in spring. However, all three products overestimate the early morning precipitation (01:00–08:00 local standard time) of the diurnal cycle in spring, summer, and autumn. View Full-Text
Keywords: Global Precipitation Measurement; precipitation; evaluation; Sichuan Basin Global Precipitation Measurement; precipitation; evaluation; Sichuan Basin
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, S.; Li, R.; He, J.; Wang, H.; Fan, X.; Yao, S. Comparative Evaluation of the GPM IMERG Early, Late, and Final Hourly Precipitation Products Using the CMPA Data over Sichuan Basin of China. Water 2020, 12, 554.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop