Integrated Water Resources Management Approaches to Improve Water Resources Governance
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Freshwater is a finite and vulnerable resource, essential to sustain life, development and the environment;
- Water development and management should be based on a participatory approach, involving users, planners and policymakers at all levels;
- Women play a central part in the provision, management and safeguarding of water; and
- Water has an economic value in all its competing uses and should be recognized as an economic good as well as a social good.
1.1. The Concept and Context of Water Resources Governance
1.2. Case of Water Resources Governance in Uganda: Trends and Status
1.3. Study Area
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Respondents’ Water Resources Governance Knowledge and Capacity
3.2. Water Resources Governance in the Catchments
3.3. Water Resources Governance Principles
4. Discussion
4.1. Observations of Respondent’s Knowledge and Capacity
4.2. Catchments’ Water Resources Governance
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Heathcote, I.W. Integrated Watershed Management: Principles and Practices, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009; ISBN 978-0-470-37625-6. [Google Scholar]
- Shiklomanov, I.A. Appraisal and Assessment of World Water Resources. Water Int. 2000, 25, 11–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNESCO, World Water Assessment Programme (United Nations) (Ed.) Water: A Shared Responsibility; United Nations world water development report; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO): Paris, France; Berghahn Books: New York, NY, USA, 2006; ISBN 978-92-3-104006-1. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations Sustainable Development. United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992 AGENDA21; United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA): New York, NY, USA, 1992; p. 351. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations; Environment Programme; United Nations; Development Programme. Status Report on the Application of Integrated Approaches To Water Resources Management; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2012; ISBN 978-92-807-3264-1. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations. Report of the United Nations Water Conference: Mar. del Plata, 14–25 March 1977; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 1977; p. 188. [Google Scholar]
- Brachet, C.; Valensuela, D. The Handbook for Integrated Water Resources Management in Transboundary Basins of Rivers, Lakes and Aquifers; International Network of Basin Organizations (INBO) and the Global Water Partnership (GWP): Paris, France, 2012; ISBN 978-91-85321-85-8. [Google Scholar]
- Agarwal, A.; Global Water Partnership. Integrated Water Resources Management; Global Water Partnership: Stockholm, Sweden, 2000; ISBN 978-91-630-9229-9. [Google Scholar]
- Solanes, M.; Gonzalez-Villarreal, F. The Dublin Principles for Water as Reflected in a Comparative Assessment of Institutional and Legal Arrangements for Integrated Water Resources Management; Global Water Partnership Technical Advisory Committee: Stockholm, Sweden, 1999; ISBN 978-91-586-7668-8. [Google Scholar]
- Lautze, J.; de Silva, S.; Giordano, M.; Sanford, L. Putting the cart before the horse: Water governance and IWRM: Putting the cart before the horse: Water governance and IWRM. Nat. Resour. Forum 2011, 35, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allan, A.; Rieu-Clarke, A. Good governance and IWRM—A legal perspective. Irrig. Drain. Syst. 2010, 24, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobson, M.; Meyer, F.; Ingvild, O.; Paavani, R.; Tropp, H. User’s Guide on Assessing Water Governance; United Nations Development Programme: Stockholm, Sweden, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Jacobson, M.; Mutono, S.; Nielsen, E.; O’Leary, D.; Rop, R. Promoting Transparency, Integrity and Accountability in the Water and Sanitation Sector in Uganda; Water Integrity Network: Berlin, Germany, 2010; p. 24. [Google Scholar]
- Tropp, H. Water governance: Trends and needs for new capacity development. Water Policy 2007, 9 (Suppl. 2), 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- UN Water. Sustainable Development Goal 6: Synthesis Report 2018 on Water and Sanitation; United Nations Publications; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2018; ISBN 978-92-1-101370-2. [Google Scholar]
- Jiménez, A.; Saikia, P.; Giné, R.; Avello, P.; Leten, J.; Liss Lymer, B.; Schneider, K.; Ward, R. Unpacking Water Governance: A Framework for Practitioners. Water 2020, 12, 827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rosa, W. (Ed.) Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. In A New Era in Global Health; Springer Publishing Company: New York, NY, USA, 2017; ISBN 978-0-8261-9011-6. [Google Scholar]
- Malzbender, D.; Goldin, J.; Turton, A.; Earle, A. Traditional Water Governance and South Africa’s “National Water Act”—Tension or Cooperation? Presented at African Water Laws: Plural Legislative Frameworks for Rural Water Management in Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa, 26–28 January 2005; p. 13. [Google Scholar]
- Kapfudzaruwa, F.; Sowman, M. Is there a role for traditional governance systems in South Africa’s new water management regime? Water SA 2009, 35, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Grigg, N.S. Governance and Management for Sustainable Water Systems; IWA Pub.: New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 2011; ISBN 978-1-78040-150-8. [Google Scholar]
- Lautze, J.; de Silva, S.; Giordano, M.; Sanford, L. Key concepts in water resource management: A review and critical evaluation. In Water Governance; Routledge-Earthscan: Oxon, UK, 2014; pp. 25–38. [Google Scholar]
- Vieira, E.d.O.; Sandoval-Solis, S.; Pedrosa, V.d.A.; Ortiz-Partida, J.P. (Eds.) Integrated Water Resource Management: Cases from Africa, Asia, Australia, Latin America and USA; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; ISBN 978-3-030-16564-2. [Google Scholar]
- Bucknall, J. Good Governance for Good Water Management. Annu. Rev. 2006, FY 2005–2006, 4. [Google Scholar]
- Kooiman, J. (Ed.) Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions; Sage: London, UK; Newbury Park, CA, USA, 1993; ISBN 978-0-8039-8890-3. [Google Scholar]
- Castro, J.E. Water governance in the twentieth-first century. Ambiente Soc. 2007, 10, 97–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Termeer, C.J.A.M.; Dewulf, A.; van Lieshout, M. Disentangling Scale Approaches in Governance Research: Comparing Monocentric, Multilevel, and Adaptive Governance. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15, art29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pahl-Wostl, C. Water Governance in the Face of Global Change: From Understanding to Transformation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; ISBN 978-3-319-21855-7. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations Development Report (Ed.) Human Development to Eradicate Poverty; Oxford Univ. Press: New York, NY, USA, 1997; ISBN 978-0-19-511997-8. [Google Scholar]
- Rogers, P.; Hall, A.W.; Global Water Partnership. Effective Water Governance; Global Water Partnership: Stockholm, Sweden, 2003; ISBN 978-91-974012-9-6. [Google Scholar]
- Tortajada, C.; Joshi, Y.K. Water Resources Management and Governance as Part of an Overall Framework for Growth and Development. Int. J. Water Gov. 2013, 1, 285–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michael, R.; van der Valk, V.; Penelope, K. Principles of good governance at different water governance levels. Presented at the International Hydrological Programme (IHP) of UNESCO, Delft, The Netherlands, 22 March 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Havekes, H.; Hofstra, M. Building Blocks for Good Water Governance; Water Governance Centre: The Hague, The Netherlands, 2016; p. 160. [Google Scholar]
- Nunan, F. Navigating multi-level natural resource governance: An analytical guide: Fiona Nunan/Natural Resources Forum. Nat. Resour. Forum 2018, 42, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tai, H.-S. Cross-Scale and Cross-Level Dynamics: Governance and Capacity for Resilience in a Social-Ecological System in Taiwan. Sustainability 2015, 7, 2045–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Peters, B.G.; Pierre, J. Developments in intergovernmental relations: Towards multi-level governance. Policy Politics 2001, 29, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pahl-Wostl, C.; Sendzimir, J.; Jeffrey, P.; Aerts, J.; Berkamp, G.; Cross, K. Managing Change toward Adaptive Water Management through Social Learning. Ecol. Soc. 2007, 12, art30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Folke, C.; Hahn, T.; Olsson, P.; Norberg, J. Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2005, 30, 441–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huitema, D.; Mostert, E.; Egas, W.; Moellenkamp, S.; Pahl-Wostl, C.; Yalcin, R. Adaptive Water Governance: Assessing the Institutional Prescriptions of Adaptive (Co-)Management from a Governance Perspective and Defining a Research Agenda. Ecol. Soc. 2009, 14, art26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development -Principles-on-Water-Governance 2015.
- Tantoh, H.B. Complexity and uncertainty in water resource governance in Northwest Cameroon: Reconnoitring the challenges and potential of community-based water resource management. Land Use Policy 2018, 75, 237–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ansell, C.; Gash, A. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2007, 18, 543–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tarko, V. Polycentric Governance: A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration. Ph.D. Dissertation, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Thiel, A. The Polycentricity Approach and the Research Challenges Confronting Environmental Governance; IRI THESys—Integrative Research Institute on Transformations of Human-Environment Systems Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin: Berlin, Germany, 2016; p. 30. [Google Scholar]
- Aligica, D.P.; Tarko, V. Polycentricity: From Polanyi to Ostrom, and Beyond. Gov. Int. J. Policy Adm. Inst. 2012, 25, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boettke, P.J.; Lemke, J.S.; Palagashvili, L. Polycentricity, Self-governance, and the Art & Science of Association. Rev. Austrian Econ. 2015, 28, 311–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gruening, G. Origin and theoretical basis of New Public Management. Int. Public Manag. J. 2001, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manning, N. The Legacy of the New Public Management in Developing Countries. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2001, 67, 297–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Asif, R.; Dawood, M. Does New Public Management Practices Lead to Effective Public Welfare Responses in Pakistan. Turk. Econ. Rev. 2017, 5, 150–173. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Water and Environment (MWE); Directorate of Water Resources Management. Uganda National Water Resources Assessment; Ministry of Water and Environment (MWE): Kampala, Uganda, 2013; ISBN 978-9970-467-00-6.
- Government of Uganda. The Water Act; Ministry of Water and Environment (MWE): Kampala, Uganda, 1995; p. 50.
- Songa, P.; Rumohr, J.; Musota, R. Policy and Institutional Framework Considerations in the Implementation of Catchment-Based Water Resources Management in Uganda: Highlights from the River Rwizi Catchment; A Coruña: Southampton, UK, 2015; pp. 15–26. [Google Scholar]
- Mehta, L.; Derman, B.; Manzungu, E. (Eds.) Flows and Practices: The Politics of Integrated Water Resources Management in Eastern and Southern Africa; Weaver Press: Harare, Zimbabwe, 2017; ISBN 978-1-77922-320-3. [Google Scholar]
- Rubarenzya, M.H. Integrated Water Resources Management in Uganda: Past, Present, and a Vision for the Future. In Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008; American Society of Civil Engineers: Honolulu, HI, USA, 2008; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Global Water Partnership (GWP). Integrated Water Resources Management in Eastern Africa: Dealing with “Complex.” Hydrology; Technical focus paper; Elanders: Stockholm, Sweden, 2015; ISBN 978-91-87823-21-3. [Google Scholar]
- Ruettinger, L.; Taenzler, D. Water, Crisis and Climate Change in Uganda: A Policy Brief; ADELPHI: Berlin, Germany, 2011; p. 18. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry for Water and Environment Catchment based Water Resources Management (CbWRM) in Uganda. Available online: https://www.mwe.go.ug/library/catchment-based-water-resources-management-cbwrm (accessed on 26 November 2020).
- United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Water a Shared Responsibility: The United Nations World Water Development Report 2; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Biswas, A.K. Integrated Water Resources Management: Is It Working? Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2008, 24, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schlüter, T.; Hampton, C. Geology of East Africa; Beiträge zur regionalen Geologie der Erde; Borntraeger: Berlin, Germany, 1997; ISBN 978-3-443-11027-7. [Google Scholar]
- Schlüter, T. Geological Atlas of Africa; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; ISBN 978-3-540-76324-6. [Google Scholar]
- National Environment Management Authority. Environmental Sensitivity Atlas for the Albertine Graben, 1st ed.; NEMA: Kampala, Uganda, 2009; ISBN 978-9970-881-01-7.
- Peel, M.C.; Finlayson, B.L.; Mcmahon, T.A. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2007, 4, 439–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Plumptre, A.J.; Davenport, T.R.B.; Behangana, M.; Kityo, R.; Eilu, G.; Ssegawa, P.; Ewango, C.; Meirte, D.; Kahindo, C.; Herremans, M.; et al. The biodiversity of the Albertine Rift. Biol. Conserv. 2007, 134, 178–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winterbottom, B.; Eilu, G. Uganda Biodiversity and Forest Assesment; USAID: Kampala, Uganda, 2006; p. 64. [Google Scholar]
- National Environment Management Authority. Environmental Sensitivity Atlas for the Albertine Graben, 2nd ed.; NEMA: Kampala, Uganda, 2010.
- National Environment Management Authority. The National Environment (Wetlands, River Banks and Lake Shores Management) Regulations; NEMA: Kampala, Uganda, 2000; p. 33.
- National Environment Management Authority. The National Environment (Hilly And Mountainous Area Management) Regulations; NEMA: Kampala, Uganda, 2000; p. 20.
- Butsel, V.J.; Donoso, N.; Gobeyn, S.; Troyer, D.N.; Echelpoel, V.W.; Lock, K.; Goethals, P.L.M.; Peeters, L.; Bwambale, G.; Muganzi, E.; et al. Ecological Water Quality Assessment of the Mpanga Catchment, Western Uganda; Protos: Ghent, Belgium, 2017; p. 37. [Google Scholar]
- Reinhardt, J.; Liersch, S.; Abdeladhim, M.A.; Diallo, M.; Dickens, C.; Fournet, S.; Hattermann, F.F.; Kabaseke, C.; Muhumuza, M.; Mul, M.L.; et al. Systematic evaluation of scenario assessments supporting sustainable integrated natural resources management: Evidence from four case studies in Africa. Ecol. Soc. 2018, 23, art5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Taylor, T.; Markandya, A.; Mwebaze, T.; Sebbit, A.; Rautenbach, H. Economic Assessment of the Impacts of Climate Change in Uganda: Case Study on Water and Energy Sector Impacts in the Mpanga River Catchment; Ministry of Water and Environment (MWE): Kampala, Uganda, 2015.
- UNDP. Human Development Report; UNDP: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Krejcie, R.V.; Morgan, D.W. Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1970, 30, 607–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uganda Bureau of Statistics. The National Population and Housing Census 2014—Main Report; UBOS: Kampala, Uganda, 2016; p. 108. [Google Scholar]
- O’Neill, K.; Weinthal, E.; Marion Suiseeya, K.R.; Bernstein, S.; Cohn, A.; Stone, M.W.; Cashore, B. Methods and Global Environmental Governance. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2013, 38, 441–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kayser, G.L.; Amjad, U.; Dalcanale, F.; Bartram, J.; Bentley, M.E. Drinking water quality governance: A comparative case study of Brazil, Ecuador, and Malawi. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 48, 186–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pahl-Wostl, C.; Lebel, L.; Knieper, C.; Nikitina, E. From applying panaceas to mastering complexity: Toward adaptive water governance in river basins. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 23, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gable, G.G. Integrating Case Study and Survey Research Methods: An Example In Information System. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 1994, 3, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stecher, B.; Borko, H. Integrating findings from surveys and case studies: Examples from a study of standards-based educational reform. J. Educ. Policy 2002, 17, 547–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barabas, J.; Jerit, J. Are Survey Experiments Externally Valid? Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 2010, 104, 226–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Onwuegbuzie, A.J.; Dickinson, W.B.; Leech, N.L.; Zoran, A.G. A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Data in Focus Group Research. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2009, 8, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ministry of Water and Environment. Uganda Water and Environment Sector Capacity Development Strategy 2012–2017; MWE: Kampala, Uganda, 2012.
- Ferber, R. The Effect of Respondent Ignorance on Survey Results. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1956, 51, 576–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heide, M.; Gronhaug, K. Respondents’ Moods As a Biasing Factor in Surveys: An Experimental Study. Assoc. Consum. Res. 1991, 18, 566–575. [Google Scholar]
- Helgeson, J.G.; Voss, K.E.; Terpening, W.D. Determinants of mail-survey response: Survey design factors and respondent factors. Psychol. Mark. 2002, 19, 303–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sauer, C.; Auspurg, K.; Hinz, T.; Liebig, S.; Schupp, J. Method Effects in Factorial Surveys: An Analysis of Respondents’ Comments, Interviewers’ Assessments, and Response Behavior. SSRN Electron. J. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Global Water Partnership (GWP Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) Toolbox. Available online: https://www.gwp.org/en/learn/iwrm-toolbox/About_IWRM_ToolBox (accessed on 12 April 2020).
- Schulte, A.; Suthfeld, R.; Vogt, B. E-Learning Project IWRM—Integrated Water Resources Management. Department of Earth Sciences, Freie Universitaet Berlin. Available online: https://www.geo.fu-berlin.de/en/v/iwrm/index.html (accessed on 12 April 2020).
- Alaerts, G.; Dickinson, N. (Eds.) Water for a Changing World—Developing Local Knowledge and Capacity. In Proceedings of the International Symposium “Water for a Changing World Developing Local Knowledge and Capacity”, Delft, The Netherlands, 13–15 June 2007; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008. ISBN 978-0-429-20688-7. [Google Scholar]
- Alaerts, G.J.; Kaspersma, J.M. Progress and Challenges in Knowledge and Capacity Development. In Capacity Development for Improved Water Management; Blokland, M.W., Alaerts, G.J., Kaspersma, J.M., Hare, M., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; pp. 3–30. ISBN 978-0-203-84930-9. [Google Scholar]
- Yinusa, S.O.; Wehn, U. Institutional dynamics in national strategy development: A case study of the capacity development strategy of Uganda’s water and environment sector. Water Policy 2016, 18, 1174–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagenet, L.P.; Pfeffer, M.J.; Sutphin, H.D.; Stycos, J.M. Adult Education and Watershed Knowledge In Upstate New York. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1999, 35, 609–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olsson, P.; Folke, C. Local Ecological Knowledge and Institutional Dynamics for Ecosystem Management: A Study of Lake Racken Watershed, Sweden. Ecosystems 2001, 4, 85–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vargas, V.; Carrasco, N.; Vargas, C. Local Participation in Forest Watershed Management: Design and Analysis of Experiences in Water Supply Micro-Basins with Forest Plantations in South Central Chile. Forests 2019, 10, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schiffer, E.; McCarthy, N.; Birner, R.; Waale, D.; Asante, F. Information Flow and Acquisition of Knowledge in Water Governance in the Upper East Region. of Ghana; The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI): Washington, DC, USA, 2008; p. 25. [Google Scholar]
- Pedregal, B.; Cabello, V.; Hernández-Mora, N.; Limones, N. Information and Knowledge for Water Governance in the Networked Society. Water Altern. 2015, 8, 20. [Google Scholar]
- Buuren, A. Knowledge for water governance: Trends, limits, and challenges. Int. J. Water Gov. 2013, 1, 157–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pahl-Wostl, C. An Evolutionary Perspective on Water Governance: From Understanding to Transformation. Water Resour. Manag. 2017, 31, 2917–2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mwangi, E.; Wardell, A. Multi-level governance of forest resources. Int. J. Commons 2012, 6, 79–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brels, S.; Coates, D.; Loures, F.; Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity; Center for International Forestry Research. Transboundary Water Resources Management: The Role of International Watercourse Agreements in Implementation of the CBD; Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2008; ISBN 978-92-9225-092-8. [Google Scholar]
- Conti, K.I.; Gupta, J. Global governance principles for the sustainable development of groundwater resources. Int. Environ. Agreem. Polit. Law Econ. 2016, 16, 849–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Villholth, K.G.; López-Gunn, E.; Conti, K.; Garrido, A.; van der Gun, J.A.M. (Eds.) Advances in Groundwater Governance; CRC Press/Balkema: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2018; ISBN 978-1-315-21002-5. [Google Scholar]
- Heslop, A.D. Political system. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/topic/political-system (accessed on 20 October 2019).
- Collier, P. The Political Economy of Natural Resources. Soc. Res. 2010, 77, 29. [Google Scholar]
- Saito, F. Local Council Commons Management in Uganda: A Theoretical Reassessment; Nagoya University: Nagoya, Japan, 2007; p. 22. [Google Scholar]
- Muhereza, F. Decentralising Natural Resource Management and the Politics of Institutional Resource Management in Uganda’s Forest Sub-Sector. Afr. Dev. 2006, 37, 67–101. [Google Scholar]
- Akello, C.E. Environmental Regulation in Uganda: Successes and Challenges; Law, Environment and Development Journal: New Delhi, India, 2007; p. 20. [Google Scholar]
- Naiga, R.; Penker, M.; Hogl, K. Challenging pathways to safe water access in rural Uganda: From supply to demand-driven water governance. Int. J. Commons 2015, 9, 237–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uhlendahl, T.; Salian, P.; Casarotto, C.; Doetsch, J. Good water governance and IWRM in Zambia: Challenges and chances. Water Policy 2011, 13, 845–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lenton, R.L.; Muller, M. (Eds.) Integrated Water Resources Management in Practice: Better Water Management for Development; Earthscan: London, UK; Sterling, VA, USA, 2009; ISBN 978-1-84407-649-9. [Google Scholar]
- Giordano, M.; Shah, T. From IWRM back to integrated water resources management. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2014, 30, 364–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, P.; Williams, J. Water Governance: A Policy Risk Perspective; WIT Press: Southampton, UK, 2013; pp. 73–84. [Google Scholar]
- Bakker, K.; Kooy, M.; Shofiani, N.E.; Martijn, E.-J. Governance Failure: Rethinking the Institutional Dimensions of Urban Water Supply to Poor Households. World Dev. 2008, 36, 1891–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pahl-Wostl, C.; Conca, K.; Kramer, A.; Maestu, J.; Schmidt, F. Missing Links in Global Water Governance: A Processes-Oriented Analysis. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18, art33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- MWE. Joint Water and Environment Sector Support Programme (JWESSP, 2013–2018); Ministry of Water and Environment: Kampala, Uganda, 2013; p. 215.
- Ministry for Water and Environment. Joint Water and Environment Sector Support. Programme Phase II 2018–2023; Ministry for Water and Environment: Kampala, Uganda, 2018; p. 158.
- Winpenny, J.; Hall, A.; Lindgaard-Jørgensen, P. Financing of Water Resources Management: Experiences from Sub-Saharan Africa; European Union Water Initiative Finance Working Group (EUWI-FWG): Stockholm, Sweden, 2012. [Google Scholar]
Water Resources System of Governance | Operational Meaning |
---|---|
Conventional | Also known as monocentric, “the government perspective”, “hierarchical governance”, “command and control systems of governance”, or the “classical modernist approach of governance”, where government centralises most powers at the top and commands from top-down while governing resources [24,40]. |
Collaborative | A governance arrangement where one or more public agencies directly engages non-state stakeholders in a collective decision-making process that is formal, consensus-oriented, and deliberative to make or implement public policy or manage public programs or assets. Collaborative governance involves criteria, actors, and decisions by consensus. The focus of the collaboration is on public policy or public management [41]. |
Polycentrism | Polycentric governance is characterised by an organisational structure where multiple independent actors mutually order their relationships with one another under a general system of rules. Polycentric governance comprises of multiple decision-making centres each with substantive autonomy and also located at varying levels [42,43,44]. Emphasis is put on deconcentrating power from political actors and instead keeping it dispersed among organised actors [24,42,45]. |
New Public Management (NPM) | A reformed public management administration theory or concept bred by the need to bring economics and markets to supplement governance. Easily understood as a Public-Private-Partnership [46,47,48]. |
Traditional | In some settings, indigenous, cultural or traditional form a core part of the power and, decision making regarding natural resources and water governance system [18,19]. |
System of Governance | Semliki Catchment % of the Total Observations | Mpanga Catchment % of the Total Observations |
---|---|---|
Conventional | 30 | 28 |
NPM | 24 | 17 |
Collaborative | 22 | 23 |
Polycentrism | 7 | 18 |
Traditional | 17 | 14 |
Variable | Semliki catchment | Mpanga Catchment | Both Catchments | t-Statistics | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | Std | Mean | Std | Mean | Std | ||
Knowledge and capacity | |||||||
Knowledge of water resources stakeholders, institutions | 1.432 | 0.497 | 1.577 | 0.496 | 1.498 | 0.501 | −2.679 * |
Capacity building opportunities accessed | 2.211 | 0.409 | 2.380 | 0.487 | 2.287 | 0.453 | −3.423 * |
Individual knowledge | 1.092 | 0.339 | 1.368 | 0.484 | 1.227 | 0.438 | −5.279 * |
Community resource user’ capacity | −0.398 | 2.091 | 0.234 | 2.263 | −0.114 | 2.189 | −2.531 ** |
Water resources governance | |||||||
Political systems presence | 2.135 | 0.343 | 2.618 | 0.487 | 2.374 | 0.485 | −10.052 * |
Traditional systems presence | 2.068 | 0.254 | 2.164 | 0.372 | 2.110 | 0.314 | −2.665 ** |
Economic systems presence | 2.000 | 0.000 | 2.191 | 0.395 | 2.085 | 0.279 | −6.435 * |
Administrative systems presence | 2.989 | 0.756 | 3.205 | 0.649 | 3.088 | 0.717 | −2.801 ** |
Functionality of systems | |||||||
Systems to report concerns and handle disputes | 2.531 | 0.500 | 2.600 | 0.491 | 2.563 | 0.496 | −1.242 |
Systems enabling water legal rights | 2.150 | 0.358 | 2.322 | 0.468 | 2.228 | 0.421 | −3.702 * |
Systems enabling obligations | 2.068 | 0.253 | 2.285 | 0.453 | 2.175 | 0.380 | −5.286 * |
Systems for resource management (Water Committees) | 2.367 | 0.483 | 2.454 | 0.501 | 2.396 | 0.490 | −1.3683 |
Water resources management | |||||||
Water resources management effectiveness | 1.622 | 1.221 | 2.473 | 1.506 | 2.008 | 1.419 | −4.9038 * |
Mpanga Catchment (IWRM Pilot Projects Site) | Semliki Catchment (No IWRM Pilot Projects Sites) | Both Catchments | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Principles | mean | std.dev. | mean | std.dev. | mean | std.dev. | t-statistics |
Participation | 1.127 | 1.109 | −0.051 | 1.295 | 0.472 | 1.349 | −8.103 * |
Accountability | −0.509 | 1.759 | −1.392 | 1.330 | −1.107 | 1.533 | −3.502 * |
Equity & Inclusion | 0.789 | 1.309 | −0.564 | 1.302 | −0.050 | 1.458 | −7.123 * |
Transparency | 0.308 | 1.281 | −0.681 | 1.502 | −0.268 | 1.492 | −4.809 * |
Rule of law | −0.282 | 1.495 | −100 | 1.316 | −0.723 | 1.427 | −3.418 * |
Integrity & anti-corruption | −0.572 | 1.806 | −0.935 | 1.682 | −0.813 | 1.728 | −1.439 |
Responsiveness | 0.910 | 1.538 | −1.020 | 1.545 | −0.169 | 1.813 | −8.266 * |
Effectiveness (governance) | 0.207 | 1.507 | −1.430 | 1.046 | −0.801 | 1.474 | −7.869 * |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Katusiime, J.; Schütt, B. Integrated Water Resources Management Approaches to Improve Water Resources Governance. Water 2020, 12, 3424. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123424
Katusiime J, Schütt B. Integrated Water Resources Management Approaches to Improve Water Resources Governance. Water. 2020; 12(12):3424. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123424
Chicago/Turabian StyleKatusiime, Juliet, and Brigitta Schütt. 2020. "Integrated Water Resources Management Approaches to Improve Water Resources Governance" Water 12, no. 12: 3424. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123424
APA StyleKatusiime, J., & Schütt, B. (2020). Integrated Water Resources Management Approaches to Improve Water Resources Governance. Water, 12(12), 3424. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123424