Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Water Quality Patterns of a Flow Regulated Tropical Lowland River
Previous Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal Variations in Seston C:N:P Stoichiometry in a Large Eutrophic Floodplain Lake (Lake Taihu): Do the Sources of Seston Explain Stoichiometric Flexibility?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Soil Water Content Estimation Using High-Frequency Ground Penetrating Radar
Open AccessArticle

Effects of Deforestation on Water Flow in the Vadose Zone

Agrosphere Institute (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2020, 12(1), 35;
Received: 14 November 2019 / Revised: 9 December 2019 / Accepted: 18 December 2019 / Published: 20 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecohydrologic Feedbacks between Vegetation, Soil, and Climate)
The effects of land use change on the occurrence and frequency of preferential flow (fast water flow through a small fraction of the pore space) and piston flow (slower water flow through a large fraction of the pore space) are still not fully understood. In this study, we used a five year high resolution soil moisture monitoring dataset in combination with a response time analysis to identify factors that control preferential and piston flow before and after partial deforestation in a small headwater catchment. The sensor response times at 5, 20 and 50 cm depths were classified into one of four classes: (1) non-sequential preferential flow, (2) velocity based preferential flow, (3) sequential (piston) flow, and (4) no response. The results of this analysis showed that partial deforestation increased sequential flow occurrence and decreased the occurrence of no flow in the deforested area. Similar precipitation conditions (total precipitation) after deforestation caused more sequential flow in the deforested area, which was attributed to higher antecedent moisture conditions and the lack of interception. At the same time, an increase in preferential flow occurrence was also observed for events with identical total precipitation. However, as the events in the treatment period (after deforestation) generally had lower total, maximum, and mean precipitation, this effect was not observed in the overall occurrence of preferential flow. The results of this analysis demonstrate that the combination of a sensor response time analysis and a soil moisture dataset that includes pre- and post-deforestation conditions can offer new insights in preferential and sequential flow conditions after land use change. View Full-Text
Keywords: deforestation; preferential flow; piston flow; soil moisture response time analysis deforestation; preferential flow; piston flow; soil moisture response time analysis
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Wiekenkamp, I.; Huisman, J.A.; Bogena, H.R.; Vereecken, H. Effects of Deforestation on Water Flow in the Vadose Zone. Water 2020, 12, 35.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop