Next Article in Journal
Prediction of Severe Drought Area Based on Random Forest: Using Satellite Image and Topography Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Are Groundwater Monitoring Networks Economical? Cost-Benefit Analysis on the Long-Term Groundwater Supply Project of South Korea
Previous Article in Journal
Pan-European Calculation of Hydrologic Stress Metrics in Rivers: A First Assessment with Potential Connections to Ecological Status
Previous Article in Special Issue
Commercial Tanker Water Demand in Amman, Jordan—A Spatial Simulation Model of Water Consumption Decisions under Intermittent Network Supply
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2019, 11(4), 704; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040704

Comparative Scorecard Assessment of Urban Water Pricing Policies—The Case of Jordan and Iran

1
Center for Sustainable Development, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
2
Institute for Technology and Resources Management the Tropics and Subtropics, TH-Köln—University of Applied Sciences, Betzdorfer Straße 2, 50679 Cologne, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 7 February 2019 / Revised: 2 April 2019 / Accepted: 2 April 2019 / Published: 5 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Socioeconomic Indicators for Sustainable Water Management)
  |  
PDF [276 KB, uploaded 5 April 2019]

Abstract

Urban water pricing is becoming increasingly important due to the rapid rate of urbanization and the expansion of water reclamation and reuse. The mounting evidence of failures of current pricing schemes makes analyzing their performance essential for understanding the adequacy of economic and sustainability policies in water management. However, urban water pricing policies are complex, serve multiple objectives, and vary widely across regions and countries. This paper presents an assessment framework for urban water pricing policies based on common conditions advocated for well-functioning pricing policies. Using a simplified scorecard, it compares the performance of urban water pricing policies in Jordan and Iran, two countries under growing scarcity pressure. Both countries show serious deficiencies with regard to the economic valuation of water services and the cost recovery of utilities. Public policies are rather oriented towards access and affordability, with Jordan showing a higher level of transparency and competition in tariff-setting. The assessment tool indicates a high potential for experience-sharing in future reforms, which should promote water as a scarce good. Such reforms need to prioritize full cost valuation, participation, and scientifically based designs of local and regional water tariffs. View Full-Text
Keywords: water prices; water sector performance; pricing assessment; full cost recovery; Iran; Jordan water prices; water sector performance; pricing assessment; full cost recovery; Iran; Jordan
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Saidi, M.; Dehnavi, S. Comparative Scorecard Assessment of Urban Water Pricing Policies—The Case of Jordan and Iran. Water 2019, 11, 704.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top