Next Article in Journal
Cost of Urban Wastewater Treatment and Ecotaxes: Evidence from Municipalities in Southern Europe
Next Article in Special Issue
An Inverse Transient-Based Optimization Approach to Fault Examination in Water Distribution Networks
Previous Article in Journal
Three-Dimensional Modelling of Heterogeneous Coastal Aquifer: Upscaling from Local Scale
Article

Comparison of Flow-Dependent Controllers for Remote Real-Time Pressure Control in a Water Distribution System with Stochastic Consumption

1
Built Environment, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Pretoria 0184, South Africa
2
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile e Architettura, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, 27100 Pavia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2019, 11(3), 422; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030422
Received: 14 January 2019 / Revised: 19 February 2019 / Accepted: 20 February 2019 / Published: 27 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Urban Water Networks)
The control of pressure at a remote critical node using a pressure control valve is a highly effective way to attain pressure management. To perform real-time control, various kinds of controllers can be used, including flow-dependent controllers. These controllers calculate valve setting adjustment based both on the deviation of the pressure from the set-point and on the flow rate at the valve site. After putting all the flow-dependent controllers present in the scientific literature within the same framework, this paper presents a numerical comparison of their performance under realistic conditions of stochastic demand. Two controllers were selected for the comparison, namely the simple LCF (parameter-less proportional controller with known constant pressure control valve flow); and LVF (parameter-less controller with known variable pressure control valve flow), which uses a flow rate forecast. Indeed, this study considered an upgrade of LVF, in which the flow rate forecast was tailored to the conditions of stochastic demand. The application in a specific example network proved the performance of these controllers to be quite similar, although LCF was preferable due to its simple structure. For LCF, the average pressure at the critical node had a clear relationship to the consumption pattern. LVF outperformed when the hourly variation dominates the fluctuations in the flow. The conditions under which this out-performance occurred are comprehensively discussed. View Full-Text
Keywords: hydraulic modelling; pressure control valve; pressure management; remote real-time control; stochastic consumption; water distribution system hydraulic modelling; pressure control valve; pressure management; remote real-time control; stochastic consumption; water distribution system
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Page, P.R.; Creaco, E. Comparison of Flow-Dependent Controllers for Remote Real-Time Pressure Control in a Water Distribution System with Stochastic Consumption. Water 2019, 11, 422. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030422

AMA Style

Page PR, Creaco E. Comparison of Flow-Dependent Controllers for Remote Real-Time Pressure Control in a Water Distribution System with Stochastic Consumption. Water. 2019; 11(3):422. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030422

Chicago/Turabian Style

Page, Philip R., and Enrico Creaco. 2019. "Comparison of Flow-Dependent Controllers for Remote Real-Time Pressure Control in a Water Distribution System with Stochastic Consumption" Water 11, no. 3: 422. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030422

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop