Next Article in Journal
A Traditional Closed-Loop Sanitation System in a Chronic Emergency: A Qualitative Study from Afghanistan
Next Article in Special Issue
Transferring Water While Transforming Landscape: New Societal Implications, Perceptions and Challenges of Management in the Reservoir System Franconian Lake District
Previous Article in Journal
Impacts of Antecedent Soil Moisture on the Rainfall-Runoff Transformation Process Based on High-Resolution Observations in Soil Tank Experiments
Article

Saving Water while Doing Business: Corporate Agenda-Setting and Water Sustainability

1
Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Ackerstrasse 113, CH-5070 Frick, Switzerland
2
University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Str. 4, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2019, 11(2), 297; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020297
Received: 5 January 2019 / Revised: 31 January 2019 / Accepted: 7 February 2019 / Published: 9 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Attention and Water Governance: An Agenda-Setting Perspective)
Organic and fair trade campaigns bring water sustainability onto public agendas, such as for example in the cotton/textile sector. Armedangels, a German company, advertises its t-shirts by arguing that their production requires only 1/10th of the water required in conventional production. This article studies the ambitions of such corporate agenda-setters. Methodologically, we develop a framework that contains six criteria and nine indicators, which allow us to code and assess the certification standards. In addition, we conducted semi-structured interviews, group discussions, and participatory observations in order to better understand whose agendas certification is promulgating. The criteria encompass the social and environmental dimensions of water sustainability. Our cases include Naturland (a private organic standard), the European Union (EU) Organic Regulation (a public organic standard), the Fairtrade Labeling Organization (FLO) (a fair trade initiative), and the Fair for Life (FFL) standard (an organic and fair trade standard). Our study also looks at the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI) and Cotton made in Africa (CmiA), which are two multi-stakeholder initiatives that operate on the conventional market in cooperation with non-governmental organizations (NGOs). The findings demonstrate that organic and fair trade companies rightly present themselves as water policy entrepreneurs. However, crucial aspects of water sustainability remain hidden. In particular, there is a cleavage between the environmental agendas of organic movements and NGOs that are represented in certification and the urgent social water problems in the Global South. View Full-Text
Keywords: cotton; certification; water sustainability; agenda setting; water governance cotton; certification; water sustainability; agenda setting; water governance
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kemper, L.; Partzsch, L. Saving Water while Doing Business: Corporate Agenda-Setting and Water Sustainability. Water 2019, 11, 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020297

AMA Style

Kemper L, Partzsch L. Saving Water while Doing Business: Corporate Agenda-Setting and Water Sustainability. Water. 2019; 11(2):297. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020297

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kemper, Laura, and Lena Partzsch. 2019. "Saving Water while Doing Business: Corporate Agenda-Setting and Water Sustainability" Water 11, no. 2: 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020297

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop