Next Article in Journal
Temperature Rise of Seawater Simulation under the Influence of Sediment-Water Heat Exchange
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Water Allocation and Delivery Performance of Jiamakou Irrigation Scheme, Shanxi, China
Article Menu
Issue 5 (May) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2018, 10(5), 655;

Evaluation of a UAV-Assisted Autonomous Water Sampling

Department of Agricultural Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0310, USA
Department of Statistics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1877, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 10 April 2018 / Revised: 8 May 2018 / Accepted: 15 May 2018 / Published: 18 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Water Quality and Ecosystems)
Full-Text   |   PDF [3660 KB, uploaded 18 May 2018]   |  


Water quality assessment programs for the management of water resources require the collection of water samples for physical, chemical, and biological analyses. Lack of personnel, accessibility of water bodies, and time constraints, especially after natural disasters and emergencies, are some of the challenges of water sampling. To overcome these challenges, a custom-made thief-style water sampling mechanism was developed and mounted on a multirotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for autonomous water sampling. The payload capacity and endurance of the UAV were determined using an indoor test station. The UAV was equipped with floatation, and electronic components were coated to prevent water damage in the event of a forced landing or for sample collection. Water samples from a 1.1 ha pond were collected with the developed UAV-assisted water sampling system and traditional manual methods. Dissolved oxygen (DO), electrical conductivity (EC), pH, temperature and chloride measurements were made on samples collected with both UAV-assisted and manual methods and compared. Percent differences between the two sampling methods for DO, EC, pH, and temperature were minimal except for chloride level. Percent differences between the two sampling methods for DO, EC, pH, and temperature measurements were 3.6%, 2.3%, 0.76%, and 0.03%, respectively. Measured chloride levels for the manual and UAV-assisted sampling methods were 3.97 and 5.46 mg/L. UAV-assisted water sampling may prove faster and safer than manual water sampling from large surface waters and from difficult to access water bodies. View Full-Text
Keywords: water quality; sampling; UAV; dissolved oxygen; electrical conductivity; temperature water quality; sampling; UAV; dissolved oxygen; electrical conductivity; temperature

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Koparan, C.; Koc, A.B.; Privette, C.V.; Sawyer, C.B.; Sharp, J.L. Evaluation of a UAV-Assisted Autonomous Water Sampling. Water 2018, 10, 655.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top