Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Nitrate in Wells and Springs in the North Central Ethiopian Highlands
Previous Article in Journal
Improvement of Two Evapotranspiration Estimation Models Using a Linear Spectral Mixture Model over a Small Agricultural Watershed
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2018, 10(4), 475;

Predictive Uncertainty Estimation in Water Demand Forecasting Using the Model Conditional Processor

Department of Electrical Engineering, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
Italian Hydrological Society, Piazza di Porta San Donato 1, 40126 Bologna, Italy
École Supérieure d’Ingénieurs en Électrotechnique et Électronique, Cité Descartes, 2 Boulevard Blaise Pascal, 93160 Noisy-le-Grand, Paris, France
Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Meraka Institute, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 24 February 2018 / Revised: 3 April 2018 / Accepted: 10 April 2018 / Published: 12 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Urban Water Management)
Full-Text   |   PDF [784 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]   |  


In a previous paper, a number of potential models for short-term water demand (STWD) prediction have been analysed to find the ones with the best fit. The results obtained in Anele et al. (2017) showed that hybrid models may be considered as the accurate and appropriate forecasting models for STWD prediction. However, such best single valued forecast does not guarantee reliable and robust decisions, which can be properly obtained via model uncertainty processors (MUPs). MUPs provide an estimate of the full predictive densities and not only the single valued expected prediction. Amongst other MUPs, the purpose of this paper is to use the multi-variate version of the model conditional processor (MCP), proposed by Todini (2008), to demonstrate how the estimation of the predictive probability conditional to a number of relatively good predictive models may improve our knowledge, thus reducing the predictive uncertainty (PU) when forecasting into the unknown future. Through the MCP approach, the probability distribution of the future water demand can be assessed depending on the forecast provided by one or more deterministic forecasting models. Based on an average weekly data of 168 h, the probability density of the future demand is built conditional on three models’ predictions, namely the autoregressive-moving average (ARMA), feed-forward back propagation neural network (FFBP-NN) and hybrid model (i.e., combined forecast from ARMA and FFBP-NN). The results obtained show that MCP may be effectively used for real-time STWD prediction since it brings out the PU connected to its forecast, and such information could help water utilities estimate the risk connected to a decision. View Full-Text
Keywords: forecasting; predictive uncertainty; short-term; water demand simulation forecasting; predictive uncertainty; short-term; water demand simulation

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Anele, A.O.; Todini, E.; Hamam, Y.; Abu-Mahfouz, A.M. Predictive Uncertainty Estimation in Water Demand Forecasting Using the Model Conditional Processor. Water 2018, 10, 475.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top