Next Article in Journal
Assessing Near Surface Hydrologic Processes and Plant Response over a 1600 m Mountain Valley Gradient in the Great Basin, NV, U.S.A.
Previous Article in Journal
Removal of Sb(III) and Sb(V) by Ferric Chloride Coagulation: Implications of Fe Solubility
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

A Comparative Assessment of Variable Selection Methods in Urban Water Demand Forecasting

1
School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics, Western Sydney University, Second Avenue, Kingswood, NSW 2751, Australia
2
School of Civil Engineering and Surveying, University of Southern Queensland, West St, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2018, 10(4), 419; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040419
Received: 9 January 2018 / Revised: 20 March 2018 / Accepted: 29 March 2018 / Published: 3 April 2018
Urban water demand is influenced by a variety of factors such as climate change, population growth, socio-economic conditions and policy issues. These variables are often correlated with each other, which may create a problem in building appropriate water demand forecasting model. Therefore, selection of the appropriate predictor variables is important for accurate prediction of future water demand. In this study, seven variable selection methods in the context of multiple linear regression analysis were examined in selecting the optimal predictor variable set for long-term residential water demand forecasting model development. These methods were (i) stepwise selection, (ii) backward elimination, (iii) forward selection, (iv) best model with residual mean square error criteria, (v) best model with the Akaike information criterion, (vi) best model with Mallow’s Cp criterion and (vii) principal component analysis (PCA). The results showed that different variable selection methods produced different multiple linear regression models with different sets of predictor variables. Moreover, the selection methods (i)–(vi) showed some irrational relationships between the water demand and the predictor variables due to the presence of a high degree of correlations among the predictor variables, whereas PCA showed promising results in avoiding these irrational behaviours and minimising multicollinearity problems. View Full-Text
Keywords: variable selection; principal component analysis; multiple regression; multicollinearity; long-term water demand forecasting; urban water variable selection; principal component analysis; multiple regression; multicollinearity; long-term water demand forecasting; urban water
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Haque, M.M.; Rahman, A.; Hagare, D.; Chowdhury, R.K. A Comparative Assessment of Variable Selection Methods in Urban Water Demand Forecasting. Water 2018, 10, 419.

AMA Style

Haque MM, Rahman A, Hagare D, Chowdhury RK. A Comparative Assessment of Variable Selection Methods in Urban Water Demand Forecasting. Water. 2018; 10(4):419.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Haque, Md M.; Rahman, Ataur; Hagare, Dharma; Chowdhury, Rezaul K. 2018. "A Comparative Assessment of Variable Selection Methods in Urban Water Demand Forecasting" Water 10, no. 4: 419.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop