Next Article in Journal
Spatial and Seasonal Patterns of Nutrients and Heavy Metals in Twenty-Seven Rivers Draining into the South China Sea
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of EMI and FDR Sensors to Assess the Fraction of Transpirable Soil Water over an Olive Grove
Previous Article in Journal
Removal of Hardness from Water Samples by a Carbonation Process with a Closed Pressure Reactor
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of the Age of Vines on Soil Hydraulic Conductivity in Vineyards in Eastern Spain
Open AccessArticle

Do As They Did: Peer Effects Explain Adoption of Conservation Agriculture in Malawi

1
Department of Environmental Studies, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
2
School of Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
3
National Smallholder Farmers’ Association of Malawi, Lilongwe 3, Malawi
4
International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC 20006, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2018, 10(1), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10010051
Received: 7 October 2017 / Revised: 13 November 2017 / Accepted: 17 November 2017 / Published: 10 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Water Conservation: Dynamics and Impact)
Adoption of the trinity of practices known commonly today as conservation agriculture (CA)—maintaining soil cover, reducing tillage, and enhancing soil nitrogen through legumes—is a critical process to the management of erosion in rural landscapes, and maintenance of aquatic habitats and hydropower potential. However, the large literature on the benefits and risks of CA fails to find any universal determinants of adoption, with competing uses for crop residues, availability of labor, and access to physical inputs common constraints appearing in different contexts. We conduct a study in the specific context of Malawi, using ethnographic interviewing to draw out possible decision criteria and machine learning to identify their explanatory power. This study is structured to inform the question: “How do farmers decide to adopt the specific activities of CA in Malawi?” We find that more than any other factor, adoption by neighbors (i.e., peer effects) matters, with possible implications for the overall cost of encouraging CA (e.g., through subsidies) as it is taken up across a landscape. Further, we note that little else within our household survey (save for more detailed articulation of neighbor and neighborhood characteristics) offers greater explanatory power than those factors identified by farmers themselves. Finally, we note that decisions made in the presence of an incentive are structurally different than those made without incentives, validating previous concerns in the literature regarding the basis most CA adoption studies, within CA promotion interventions. View Full-Text
Keywords: Malawi; conservation agriculture; peer effects; decision tree modeling Malawi; conservation agriculture; peer effects; decision tree modeling
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Bell, A.R.; Zavaleta Cheek, J.; Mataya, F.; Ward, P.S. Do As They Did: Peer Effects Explain Adoption of Conservation Agriculture in Malawi. Water 2018, 10, 51.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop