Next Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal Variation Patterns of and Response Differences in Water Conservation in China’s Nine Major River Basins Under Climate Change
Previous Article in Journal
Carbon Pricing Strategies and Policies for a Unified Global Carbon Market
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Modulation of Spring Barents and Kara Seas Ice Concentration on the Meiyu Onset over the Yangtze–Huaihe River Basin in China

1
Department of Mathematics and Physics, Suzhou Vocational University, Suzhou 215104, China
2
Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster (KLME), Ministry of Education & Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
3
Suzhou Meteorological Bureau, Suzhou 215131, China
4
Zhejiang Meteorological Observatory, Hangzhou 310002, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2025, 16(7), 838; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16070838
Submission received: 11 June 2025 / Revised: 2 July 2025 / Accepted: 9 July 2025 / Published: 10 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Meteorology)

Abstract

Meiyu is a critical component of the summer rainy season over the Yangtze–Huaihe River Basin (YHRB) in China, and the Meiyu onset date (MOD), serving as a key indicator of Meiyu, has garnered substantial attention. This article demonstrates an in-phase relationship between MOD and the preceding spring Barents–Kara Seas ice concentration (BKSIC) during 1979–2023. Specifically, the loss of spring BKSIC promotes an earlier MOD. Further analysis indicates that decreased spring BKSIC reduces the reflection of shortwave radiation, thereby enhancing oceanic solar radiation absorption and warming sea surface temperature (SST) in spring. The warming SST persists into summer and induces significant deep warming in the BKS through enhanced upward longwave radiation. The BKS deep warming triggers a wave train propagating southeastward to the East Asia–Northwest Pacific region, leading to a strengthened East Asian Subtropical Jet and an intensified Western North Pacific Subtropical High in summer. Under these conditions, the transport of warm and humid airflows into the YHRB is enhanced, promoting convective instability through increased low-level warming and humidity, combined with enhanced wind shear, which jointly contribute to an earlier MOD. These results may advance the understanding of MOD variability and provide valuable information for disaster prevention and mitigation.

1. Introduction

Meiyu (also known as Changma and Baiu in South Korea and Japan, respectively) is a unique weather and climate phenomenon in East Asia, fundamentally governed by the seasonal dynamics of the East Asian summer monsoon [1,2,3]. The main rainy season, occurring from June to July, can extend from the Yangtze–Huaihe River Basin (YHRB) in China to South Korea and Japan [4,5,6,7].
In China, Meiyu rainfall constitutes a pivotal determinant of the general trend of drought and flood conditions during the rainy season over the YHRB region excluding the influence of tropical cyclones; thus, the total rainfall and duration of the Meiyu season are of critical significance [4,5,6,7,8,9]. The YHRB region is one of the most important industrial and agricultural centers in China, characterized by a dense population and a relatively high level of economic development. During the Meiyu period, the region is highly susceptible to prolonged heavy rainfall and intense storm events, which can trigger severe flooding disasters [1,2,3,9,10,11,12,13]. Given that these events pose substantial threats to the safety of residents, resulting in considerable losses to human lives and agricultural production, deeply understanding the variability of Meiyu and its corresponding physical processes over the YHRB region is of paramount importance for regional agricultural production, flood control, and drought mitigation strategies.
As a manifestation of the seasonal dynamics of the East Asian summer monsoon, previous studies have reported that Meiyu is identified to be intricately associated with several key atmospheric circulation systems, including the Western North Pacific subtropical high (WNPSH) [14,15,16,17], the South Asian high [18,19,20], Eurasian blocking activities [21,22,23,24], and the westerly jet stream across Eurasia [25,26,27,28]. The sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies [29,30,31], the Arctic sea ice anomalies [32,33], soil moisture anomalies [34], and snow cover anomalies [35] can exert pronounced effects on the Meiyu variability by regulating the aforementioned atmospheric circulation systems. For example, it is reported that the 2020 extreme Meiyu–Baiu event was partially attributable to the sea ice loss along the Siberian coast by affecting the East Siberian blocking [32].
Given its direct and substantial influence on agricultural production, the Meiyu onset date (MOD) has attracted considerable concern. Previous studies have revealed that the MOD serves as a crucial factor influencing both the total precipitation and the duration of the Meiyu season. It has been demonstrated a significant correlation between the MOD and the total precipitation and the duration of Meiyu [36,37,38]. Specifically, an earlier (later) MOD is typically associated with increased (decreased) total precipitation and a longer (shorter) duration of the Meiyu period [38,39]. Concurrently, in light of its pivotal role in predicting regional hydroclimatic conditions, the variability and its related physical processes of the MOD have gained more attention from the scientific community, policymakers, and the general public.
To date, a multitude of influential factors like the WNPSH [38,40], the South Asian high [40], the westerly jet stream [28,41], intraseasonal oscillation [38,41], atmospheric quasi-biweekly oscillation [42], and teleconnection patterns [43,44,45] have been identified and documented to modulate the MOD over the YHRB region. Moreover, previous studies demonstrated that the MOD variability is also closely associated with the changes in SST [40,43,46,47,48,49], atmospheric latent heating over the Southeast Asian [50], and the Tibetan Plateau heating [46]. For instance, the extremely heavy Meiyu event in the summer of 2020, characterized by its early onset and extremely late retreat over the YHRB region, is considered to be jointly associated with the thermal effect of the Tibetan Plateau, the warm SST observed in the oceanic regions to the east of the Philippines, and the tropical Indian Ocean [40,46]. Wang et al. [43] showed that the tropical Pacific SST anomalies were highlighted to affect the variability of the MOD over the YHRB region by regulating the East Asian–Pacific and Japanese–Pacific teleconnection patterns. A cold (warm) phase of Central Pacific El Niño–Southern Oscillation (CP-ENSO) in spring may tend to an earlier (delayed) MOD over the YHRB region due to the early tropical warm wet water vapor transport to the YHRB region. The tropical South Atlantic SST anomalies are also identified as a contributing factor to the variability of the MOD through their modulation on the anticyclonic circulation over the western North Pacific [48].
However, the preceding studies mostly paid attention to the impact of the SST anomalies of the three oceans (Pacific, Indian, and Atlantic Oceans) on the MOD. Few studies have discussed the potential role of the Arctic Sea ice anomalies in modulating the MOD across the YHRB region. This deficiency is partly attributable to the predominant focus of existing studies on elucidating how the Arctic Sea ice anomalies influence Meiyu anomalies in the YHRB region, with relatively scant attention devoted to exploring their relationship with the MOD. Therefore, the aims of the present study are to identify the impact of the Arctic Sea ice anomalies on the MOD variability and investigate the underlying mechanism. These findings are helpful to deepen our understanding of the role of the Arctic Sea ice in the MOD variability across the YHRB region and thus provide a scientific basis for the Meiyu prediction and regional drought mitigation strategies.
The remainder of this paper is structured as follows: Section 2 presents a detailed description of the data and methods used in this study. Section 3 reveals the variability of the MOD and examines the relationship between the MOD and the preceding spring Barents–Kara Seas (BKS) ice. The possible physical mechanism is also explored in Section 3. Section 4 provides the conclusions and discussions.

2. Data and Methods

2.1. Data

The daily precipitation data of the CN05.1 gridded dataset, which has a horizontal resolution of 0.25° × 0.25° and is based on data from more than 2400 stations in China [51], was employed to calculate the MOD for the period 1979–2023. The monthly mean sea ice concentration (SIC) with a horizontal resolution of 1.0° × 1.0° was downloaded from the Met Office Hadley Centre Sea Ice and SST dataset (HadISST1) [52] and covers the time period 1979–2023. The monthly mean SST data of the Extended Reconstructed SST version 5 (ERSST v5) [53] at a horizontal resolution of 2.0° × 2.0° is available from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for the 1979–2023 period. The monthly mean atmospheric reanalysis data with a horizontal resolution of 2.5° × 2.5° were provided by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Reanalysis I [54] for the period 1979–2023. The monthly mean convective available potential energy data with a horizontal resolution of 0.25° × 0.25° from the ERA5 dataset [55] were downloaded from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) for the 1979–2023 period.

2.2. Definition of the MOD Across the YHRB Region

According to the Meiyu Monitoring Indices issued by the China Meteorological Administration in 2017, the MOD criteria are formulated as follows: (a) Define a certain day as a rainy day in the YHRB region (28–34° N, 110–122.5° E) if more than one-third of the monitoring stations (a total of 277 stations, with one-third being 93 stations) in the monitoring YHRB region have a daily mean precipitation rate greater than or equal to 0.1 mm day−1, and the average daily precipitation rate over the YHRB region is greater than or equal to 2.0 mm day−1. (b) If the number of rainy days in the YHRB region from the first rainy day to the next 2 days, 3 days, and until 10 days accounts for 50% or more of the total number of days in the corresponding period, then the first rainy day is defined as the start date of the rainy period. There can be multiple rainy periods within the Meiyu period, and the start date of the first rainy period is defined as the MOD of the Meiyu period.

2.3. Methods

The horizontal wave activity flux (W) was used to diagnose the energy propagation of quasi-stationary Rossby waves, which can be calculated as the following formula [56]:
W = p 2 U U ψ x 2 ψ ψ x x + V ( ψ x ψ y ψ ψ x y ) U ψ x ψ y ψ ψ x y + V ( ψ y 2 ψ ψ y y )
in which, ψ′ represents the perturbation stream function; |U| represents the horizontal wind speed; and p represents the pressure divided by 1000 hPa. U and V represent the original zonal and meridional component of the basic flow for the whole period, respectively.
Additionally, regression and correlation analyses were also employed. The statistical significance of the results for regression and correlation analyses was determined by the two-tailed Student’s t-test. Since the Meiyu period mainly occurrs from June to July every year, June and July are defined as the Meiyu period in this study. Spring and summer refer to March–April–May (MAM) and June–July (JJ), respectively. The time period for analysis in this research is from 1979 to 2023. To eliminate the possible influence of global warming and facilitate the elucidation of underlying physical mechanisms, all data were detrended prior to analysis, unless otherwise specified.

3. Results

3.1. Variability of the MOD over the YHRB Region

According to the definition of the MOD over the YHRB region, as detailed in Section 2.2, the MOD is depicted and calculated in Figure 1. For the period from 1979 to 2023, there is a certain interannual variability of the MOD without significant linear trends (Figure 1a), which is consistent with previous studies [45,48]. The average MOD is approximately June 10 (Figure 1a). Among these years, the earliest occurrences of the MOD were on May 25, observed in both 1995 and 2016 (Figure 1a), representing a 16-day advance from the average onset date (Figure 1b). Conversely, the latest MOD was recorded on July 10, 1981 (Figure 1a), which is 30 days later than the average MOD (Figure 1b). To facilitate the analysis, we define the normalized MOD as the MOD Index (MODI), represented by the green line in Figure 2. The original and detrended MODIs demonstrate consistent interannual variations and exhibit no discernible trends or interdecadal variations throughout the observational period (Figure 2).
To investigate the changes in synchronous atmospheric circulations associated with the variability of the MOD over the YHRB region for the period 1979–2023, we present the simultaneous regressions of the key atmospheric circulations against the sign-reversed MODI, including the summer zonal wind at 200 hPa, eddy geopotential height at 500 hPa, and horizontal wind at 850 hPa (Figure 3). The background atmospheric circulations associated with the earlier-than-normal MOD are characterized by a quasi-barotropic structure extending from the lower to the upper troposphere (Figure 3). In the upper troposphere, the zonal wind anomalies over the East Asia–Northwest Pacific region exhibit a distinct meridional dipole pattern, with a significant westerly anomaly to the north of the YHRB region and a pronounced easterly anomaly to its south (Figure 3a). This distribution is indicative of an intensified East Asian Subtropical Jet Stream (EASJ), as the climatological position of the summer EASJ is usually centered around 40° N (Figure 3a). This configuration enhances the in situ wind shear, thereby contributing to the convective instability over the YHRB region [25,57]. In the middle and lower troposphere over the East Asia–Northwest Pacific region, a meridional dipole structure with a pronounced northwest–southeast tilt is evident, with its centers situated over the Northwest Pacific Ocean of southern Japan and the Inner Mongolian Plateau, respectively (Figure 3b). Under the atmospheric circulations, the strengthening of the WNPSH facilitates the northward transport of the warm and moist water vapor from the South China Sea and western North Pacific toward the YHRB region, thereby providing ample moisture conditions conducive to the MOD. Additionally, the increased air temperature at the lower troposphere leads to an enhanced lapse rate, which also promotes convective instability and is further favorable for the MOD [58,59,60].

3.2. Role of the BKS Ice in the Variability of the MOD over the YHRB Region

Several preceding studies have documented that Meiyu has been susceptible to the Arctic Sea ice conditions, especially in the region from the Barents Sea to the East Siberian Sea [4,32,58]. To address the potential impacts of the Arctic Sea ice on the MOD over the YHRB region, Figure 4a illustrates the spatial distribution of preceding spring SIC anomalies associated with the sign-reversed MODI for the period of 1979–2023, shown with a polar projection. Associated with the earlier-than-normal MOD, the evident sea ice loss is observed in the BKS region, which is similar to previous research on Meiyu [4,32,58]. To facilitate the following analysis, we define the area-averaged spring SIC over the BKS region (68–79° N, 30–70° E, indicated by the green box in Figure 4) as the spring BKSIC index. The original spring BKSIC index exhibits a clear decreasing trend, while the detrended index reveals interannual variability (Figure 2). This spring BKSIC index exhibits a positive correlation of 0.51 with the MODI over the entire study period (Figure 2b), which is statistically significant at the 99% confidence level.
A question arises naturally: how does the spring BKSIC exert effects on the summer MOD over the YHRB region? To address this issue, we investigate the thermal effects linked to the BKSIC loss. Specifically, we present regression analyses of spring net shortwave radiation flux and spring and summer SST with respect to the sign-reversed BKSIC index from 1979 to 2023 (Figure 4b–d), which have been confirmed to be modulated by the sea ice variation [61,62,63,64]. Corresponding to the sea ice loss over the BKS region shown in Figure 4a, the increased open water area leads to a decrease in sea ice albedo, thereby reducing the amount of solar radiation reflected by sea ice. As a result, more solar radiation is absorbed by the ocean, triggering a positive sea ice albedo feedback mechanism that causes an increase in SST (Figure 4b,c) [61,62]. Owing to the long memory of the SST anomalies [64,65], the warmer SST anomalies can persist from spring through to summer (Figure 4d). We define the BKSST index as the area-averaged SST over the same BKS region (68–79° N, 30–70° E, indicated by the green box in Figure 4). The correlation coefficient between spring and summer BKSST indices is 0.60, which is significant at the 99% confidence level. The significant correlation between spring BKSIC and summer BKSST is −0.62, confirming this close relationship, although the intensity of the two indices may vary (Figure 2b).
The warming of SST can elicit a response in regional thermal conditions [64,66]. Figure 5 illustrates the anomalies of the upward longwave radiation flux and air temperature at 850 hPa regressed against the summer BKSST index during the period 1979–2023. The warming BKSST in summer is associated with a corresponding enhancement of the upward longwave radiation flux (Figure 5a). This increase in upward longwave radiation flux leads to an increase in diabatic heating, which in turn warms the atmosphere over the BKS region (Figure 5b). As shown in Figure 6a, pronounced deep warming is observed over the BKS region around 68–79° N, characterized by significantly positive air temperature anomalies extending from 1000 hPa to 400 hPa throughout the troposphere. These changes in thermal conditions further affect atmospheric circulation. Specifically, changes in the meridional air temperature gradient result in zonal westerly anomalies to the north of the BKS region and zonal easterly anomalies to the south (Figure 6b). The zonal wind anomalies extend from the lower troposphere to the middle and upper troposphere, forming a quasi-barotropic atmospheric circulation structure (Figure 6b), thereby facilitating the development of a regional anticyclonic circulation over the BKS region (Figure 7a).
Previous studies have documented the role of SSTs in modulating the MOD variability [40,46,47,48,49]. Thus, the summer BKSST warming, resulting from the spring BKSIC loss, is expected to affect the MOD through influencing atmospheric circulation. To further investigate the impact of the summer BKSST on the atmospheric circulation, the summer BKSST-related simultaneous wave activity flux is examined (Figure 7a). Under the influence of the basic flow, a well-organized atmospheric wave train can be observed, propagating from the BKS region southeastward to the Inner Mongolian Plateau, and subsequently shifting toward the East Asia–Northwest Pacific region in the upper troposphere, characterized by alternating positive and negative anomalies in the geopotential height (Figure 7a). Notably, two huge vectors of wave activity flux are observed from the region near Lake Baikal toward the Korean Peninsula and Japan (Figure 7b), which may be associated with the pronounced westerly basic flow at mid-latitudes [56,67]. Consequently, positive geopotential height anomalies (anticyclonic circulation anomalies) dominate the Northwest Pacific region (Figure 7a), resulting in upper-level anomalous westerlies on the north of the YHRB region, whereas anomalous easterlies appear on the south side, implying the enhancement of the EASJ (Figure 7b). Meanwhile, an anomalous anticyclonic circulation is observed over the Northwest Pacific region in the mid- and lower troposphere, indicating an intensified WNPSH (Figure 7c). Accordingly, the summer BKSST-related atmospheric patterns over the East Asia–Northwest Pacific region closely resemble those associated with an earlier-than-normal MOD, including the significant intensification of the EASJ and the WNPSH (Figure 3 and Figure 7). These patterns are beneficial for the intrusion of warm and moisture airflows into the YHRB region, resulting in an increase in the specific humidity over the YHRB region (Figure 8a). At the same time, the enhanced WNPSH induces positive air temperature advection in the lower troposphere (Figure 8b), thereby warming the air of the lower troposphere (Figure 8c) and increasing the lapse rate, which consequently promotes convective instability over the YHRB region (Figure 8d) [58,59,60], together with the enhancement of the wind shear driven by the intensified EASJ (Figure 7b) [25,57]. Such an atmospheric circulation structure indicates that the summer atmospheric conditions and thermodynamic processes associated with the summer BKSST warming, which results from the preceding spring BKSIC loss, are conducive to an earlier MOD.

4. Conclusions and Discussions

This study has investigated the variability of the MOD and explored the potential role of the precedent spring BKSIC on the MOD for the period 1979–2023. The results indicate that the MOD is predominantly characterized by interannual variability, and a pronounced in-phase relationship is observed between the MOD and the preceding spring BKSIC. Specifically, the reduction in the spring BKSIC can facilitate the advance of the MOD, and vice versa. Furthermore, the strengthening of the EASJ and the WNPSH during summer are identified as the key atmospheric circulation systems that contribute to the earlier MOD.
Further analysis reveals that the BKSIC loss in spring leads to a decrease in the reflection of shortwave radiation, thereby allowing the ocean to absorb more solar radiation. This process results in a warming of the spring SST over the BKS region, which persists into the summer season. Through enhanced upward longwave radiation flux, this BKSST warming induces a significant deep warming over the BKS region during summer. This consequent deep BKS air warming gives rise to a pronounced regional anticyclonic circulation, which may induce the quasi-barotropic anticyclonic circulation over the East Asia–Northwest Pacific region by an atmospheric wave train that propagates southeastward from the BKS region towards the East Asia–Northwest Pacific region. The anticyclonic circulation over the East Asia–Northwest Pacific region facilitates the enhancement of the EASJ and the WNPSH, both of which are associated with an early MOD in the YHRB region. Furthermore, the intensified WNPSH promotes the transport of warm and humid airflows into the YHRB region, resulting in local low-level warming and increased humidity. Combined with enhanced wind shear driven by the intensified EASJ, these conditions promote convective instability and finally contribute to the earlier MOD. It is noteworthy that the additional composite analysis has also yielded results that are virtually identical to those obtained from the regression analysis. This serves as a robust corroboration of the above physical mechanism.
In summary, the results of this study provide valuable information for further understanding the variability of the MOD, and they also hold significant implications for disaster prevention and mitigation over the YHRB region. However, the contribution of spring BKSIC to the MOD and the underlying physical mechanisms necessitate further validation through targeted numerical simulations employing sensitivity experiments. Additionally, given that the spring BKSIC may partly account for the variability of the MOD, as suggested by the inconsistency between the original BKSIC and MOD trends (Figure 2a), the potential impacts of other factors on the MOD also need more in-depth investigation in future research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.S. and X.Z.; formal analysis, Z.S., Y.H. and F.Z.; funding acquisition, Z.S.; investigation, Z.S., Y.H. and F.Z.; methodology, Z.S.; software, Z.S.; validation, Z.S., X.Z. and J.L.; writing—original draft, Z.S.; writing—review and editing, Z.S. and X.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Joint Open Project of KLME & CIC-FEMD, NUIST (Grant No. KLME202505) and the Fundamental Research Fund for Suzhou Vocational University (Grant No. 202405000023).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The CN05.1 dataset is from https://ccrc.iap.ac.cn/resource/detail?id=228 (accessed on 15 May 2025). The HadISST1 SIC data are obtained from https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadisst/data/download.html (accessed on 10 July 2024). The NOAA ERSST v5 data are available online at https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.noaa.ersst.v5.html (accessed on 10 July 2024). The NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data are downloaded from https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ncep.reanalysis.derived.html (accessed on 10 July 2024). The ERA5 reanalysis dataset of ECMWF is obtained from https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/datasets/reanalysis-era5-single-levels-monthly-means?tab=download (accessed on 19 May 2025).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the reviewers for their constructive and helpful suggestions and comments, which helped us to substantially improve the paper. In addition, thanks are extended for the support of the Research Center for Intelligent Data Inference and Secure Decision-Making of Suzhou Vocational University (Grant No. KY2025PT10).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BKSBarents–Kara Seas
EASJEast Asian Subtropical Jet Stream
JJJune–July
MAMMarch–April–May
MODMeiyu onset date
SICsea ice concentration
SSTsea surface temperature
WNPSHWestern North Pacific subtropical high
YHRBYangtze–Huaihe River Basin

References

  1. Ding, Y.; Liang, P.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y. Multiscale Variability of Meiyu and Its Prediction: A New Review. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2020, 125, e2019JD031496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tao, S.; Chen, L. A Review of Recent Research on the East Asian Monsoon in China. Monsoon Meteorol. 1987, 24, 60–92. [Google Scholar]
  3. He, J.; Ju, J.; Wen, Z.; Lü, J.; Jin, Q. A Review of Recent Advances in Research on Asian Monsoon in China. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 2007, 24, 972–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, X.; Wen, Z.; Song, Y.; Guo, Y. Causes of Extreme 2020 Meiyu-Baiu Rainfall: A Study of Combined Effect of Indian Ocean and Arctic. Clim. Dyn. 2022, 59, 3485–3501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guo, Q.; Hibino, K. Physical Responses of Baiu Extreme Precipitation to Future Warming: Examples of the 2018 and 2020 Western Japan Events. Weather Clim. Extrem. 2023, 39, 100547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Choi, J.W.; Kim, H.D.; Wang, B. Interdecadal Variation of Changma (Korean Summer Monsoon Rainy Season) Retreat Date in Korea. Int. J. Climatol. 2020, 40, 1348–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Choi, J.W.; Moon, I.J.; Khim, B.K. A Possible Relationship between Changma and Tropical Cyclone Genesis Frequency in the Western North Pacific Linked to the North Atlantic Oscillation. Int. J. Climatol. 2023, 43, 1367–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Song, Z.; Zhou, B.; Xu, X.; Yin, Z. Interdecadal Change in the Response of Winter North Atlantic Oscillation to the Preceding Autumn Sea Ice in the Barents-Kara Seas around the Early 1990s. Atmos. Res. 2024, 297, 107123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tong, M.; Zheng, Z.; Fu, Q. Characteristics of Meiyu Seen from Multiple Observational Analyses and Reanalyses. Earth Sp. Sci. 2021, 8, e2021EA001647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Ding, Y.; Wu, Z. Towards Influence of Arabian Sea SST Anomalies on the Withdrawal Date of Meiyu over the Yangtze-Huaihe River Basin. Atmos. Res. 2021, 249, 105340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, Z.; Yang, X.Q.; Tao, L.; Sun, L. Impact of Anomalous Eurasian Blocking Activities on the East Asian Meiyu Rainfall. Clim. Dyn. 2023, 61, 3127–3146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, X.; Kawamura, R.; Ichiyanagi, K.; Yoshimura, K. Moisture Sources and Isotopic Composition of the 2020 Extraordinary and Persistent Meiyu Rainfall in the Yangtze River Valley Modulated by Large-Scale Circulations. Atmos. Res. 2024, 297, 107114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sun, T.; Yao, S.; Huang, Q.; Guo, Q.; Xia, Y.; Zhang, H. Possible Mechanism of the Mid-High-Latitude Synoptic-Scale Disturbances Impact on Meiyu Precipitation Anomalies. Atmos. Res. 2024, 298, 107137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Singh, V.P.; Luo, M.; Xie, Z. Summer Extreme Precipitation in Eastern China: Mechanisms and Impacts. J. Geophys. Res. 2017, 122, 2766–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tseng, K.C.; Ho, Y.H. The Subseasoanl Predictability of the Western North Pacific Subtropical High and the 2020 Record-Breaking Event. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 2024, 7, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yu, R.; Zhai, P. An Objective Approach to Predict the Spatial Property of Anomalous Rain-Belt of Meiyu. Weather Clim. Extrem. 2022, 37, 100466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, X.; Kawamura, R.; Ichiyanagi, K.; Yoshimura, K. Moisture Sources and Isotopic Composition of a Record-Breaking Heavy Meiyu-Baiu Rainfall in Southwestern Japan in Early July 2020. Atmos. Res. 2023, 286, 106693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, B.; Yan, Y.; Zhu, C.; Ma, S.; Li, J. Record-Breaking Meiyu Rainfall Around the Yangtze River in 2020 Regulated by the Subseasonal Phase Transition of the North Atlantic Oscillation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2020, 47, e2020GL090342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, Y.; Luan, L.; Wu, G.; Ma, T. Impacts of the Surface Potential Vorticity Circulation over the Tibetan Plateau on the East Asian Monsoon in July. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, C.; Chou, M.D.; Fong, Y.H. Impact of the Himalayas on the Meiyu–Baiu Migration. Clim. Dyn. 2018, 50, 1307–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Siew, P.Y.F.; Li, C.; Ting, M.; Sobolowski, S.P.; Wu, Y.; Chen, X. North Atlantic Oscillation in Winter Is Largely Insensitive to Autumn Barents-Kara Sea Ice Variability. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabg4893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wu, Q.; Zheng, Z.; Li, L.; Wu, S.; Liu, Y. Prediction Skill and Predictability of Precipitation during Meiyu and Rainy Season in North China Using ECMWF Subseasonal Forecasts. Clim. Dyn. 2023, 61, 5429–5441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hu, R.; Wang, L. Variation of High and Low Level Circulation of Meiyu in Jiangsu Province in Recent 30 Years. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, L.; Ning, L.; Chen, K.; Yan, M.; Liu, J.; Liu, Z.; Qin, Y.; Xue, J.; Li, C. Influence and Mechanism of Solar Radiation Intensity on the Interdecadal Variability of Strong Meiyu Events during Historical Periods. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2023, 66, 408–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sampe, T.; Xie, S.P. Large-Scale Dynamics of the Meiyu-Baiu Rainband: Environmental Forcing by the Westerly Jet. J. Clim. 2010, 23, 113–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Du, Y.; Xie, Z.Q.; Miao, Q. Spatial Scales of Heavy Meiyu Precipitation Events in Eastern China and Associated Atmospheric Processes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2020, 47, e2020GL087086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, S.; Chen, T.; Xie, Y.; Luo, J.J. Different Impacts of the Variations of Western and Eastern Portions of the East Asian Westerly Jet Stream on Southern China Rainfalls in Meiyu Season. Atmos. Res. 2024, 300, 107229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jiang, N.; Yan, Q.; Wang, H.; Li, H. Earlier Onset and Shortened Meiyu Season During the Last Interglacial Based on Dynamical Downscaling Simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2022, 49, e2022GL101048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guo, Y.; Zhang, R.; Wen, Z.; Li, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhou, Z. Understanding the Role of SST Anomaly in Extreme Rainfall of 2020 Meiyu Season from an Interdecadal Perspective. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2021, 64, 1619–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, J.; Lü, J. Interdecadal Variation of the Warm Arctic-Cold Eurasia Mode and Its Association with North Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature. Chin. J. Atmos. Sci. 2021, 45, 915–930. [Google Scholar]
  31. Qiao, Y.; Nakamura, H.; Tomita, T. Warming of the Kuroshio Current Over the Last Four Decades Has Intensified the Meiyu-Baiu Rainband. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2024, 51, e2023GL107021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, X.; Dai, A.; Wen, Z.; Song, Y. Contributions of Arctic Sea-Ice Loss and East Siberian Atmospheric Blocking to 2020 Record-Breaking Meiyu-Baiu Rainfall. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2021, 48, e2021GL092748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, J.; Fu, N.; Liang, P.; Li, M. Possible Impact of Early Spring Arctic Sea Ice on Meiyu Cessation over the Yangtze–Huaihe River Basin. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dong, Y.; Chen, H.; Dong, X. Impact of Antecedent Soil Moisture Anomalies over the Indo-China Peninsula on the Super Meiyu Event in 2020. J. Meteorol. Res. 2023, 37, 234–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, G.; Wu, R.; Zhang, Y. Persistence of Snow Cover Anomalies over the Tibetan Plateau and the Implications for Forecasting Summer Precipitation over the Meiyu-Baiu Region. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. Lett. 2014, 7, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, J.; Xie, T.; Tang, X.; Wang, H.; Sun, C.; Feng, J.; Zheng, F.; Ding, R. Influence of the NAO on Wintertime Surface Air Temperature over East Asia: Multidecadal Variability and Decadal Prediction. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 2022, 39, 625–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hao, L.; Ding, Y.; Liu, Y. New Characteristics of Meiyu Precipitation Changes in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River since 2000. Front. Clim. 2024, 6, 1372460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Qian, Y.; Hsu, P.; Fu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Li, Q. Decadal Change of Meiyu Onset over Yangtze River and Its Causes. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, H.; Cui, C.; Wu, C.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhou, W.; Wang, J. Analysis and Comparison of Water Vapor Transport Features and Circulation Anomalies during the Super-Strong Meiyu Period of 2020 and 1998*. Weather Clim. Extrem. 2024, 44, 100654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Niu, R.; Zhai, P.; Tan, G. Anomalous Features of Extreme Meiyu in 2020 over the Yangtze-Huai River Basin and Attribution to Large-Scale Circulations. J. Meteorol. Res. 2021, 35, 799–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, J.; Liu, B.; Mao, J. Climatological Intraseasonal Oscillation in the Middle–Upper Troposphere and Its Effect on the Northward Migration of the East Asian Westerly Jet and Rain Belt over Eastern China. Int. J. Climatol. 2021, 41, 5084–5099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sun, T.; Yao, S.; Huang, Q. The Atmospheric Quasi-Biweekly Oscillation during the Jiangnan Meiyu Onset Period. Front. Earth Sci. 2022, 10, 986830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, J.; He, J.; Liu, X.; Wu, B. Interannual Variability of the Meiyu Onset over Yangtze-Huaihe River Valley and Analyses of Its Previous Strong Influence Signal. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2009, 54, 687–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, Y.; Ding, Y. Teleconnection between the Indian Summer Monsoon Onset and the Meiyu over the Yangtze River Valley. Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci. 2008, 51, 1021–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, H.; He, S.; Fan, K.; Wang, H. Relationship between the Onset Date of the Meiyu and the South Asian Anticyclone in April and the Related Mechanisms. Clim. Dyn. 2019, 52, 209–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bao, Y.; Liu, H.; Cai, X. Physical Mechanism of Phased Variation of 2020 Extremely Heavy Meiyu in Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River. J. Trop. Meteorol. 2022, 28, 273–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhu, X.; Wu, Z.; He, J. Anomalous Meiyu Onset Averaged over the Yangtze River Valley. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2008, 94, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, S.; Liu, Y.; Sheng, C.; Ma, T. Influence of Boreal Spring Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies over the Tropical South Atlantic on the Meiyu Onset. Clim. Dyn. 2023, 60, 3613–3628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jin, X.; Ma, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhong, S. Evolution Characteristics of Impact Weather System and SST Signals during Years of Anomalous Meiyu Onset over the Yangtze-Huaihe River Basin. Front. Earth Sci. 2023, 11, 1110898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wen, D.; Gui, S.; Cao, J. Impact of May Atmospheric Latent Heating over the Southeast Asian Low-Latitude Highlands on Interannual Variability in the Meiyu Onset Date. Atmos. Res. 2024, 298, 107158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wu, J.; Gao, X.J. A Gridded Daily Observation Dataset over China Region and Comparison with the Other Datasets. Acta Geophys. Sin. 2013, 56, 1102–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rayner, N.A.; Parker, D.E.; Horton, E.B.; Folland, C.K.; Alexander, L.V.; Rowell, D.P.; Kent, E.C.; Kaplan, A. Global Analyses of Sea Surface Temperature, Sea Ice, and Night Marine Air Temperature since the Late Nineteenth Century. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2003, 108, 4407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Huang, B.; Thorne, P.W.; Banzon, V.F.; Boyer, T.; Chepurin, G.; Lawrimore, J.H.; Menne, M.J.; Smith, T.M.; Vose, R.S.; Zhang, H.M. Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature, Version 5 (ERSSTv5): Upgrades, Validations, and Intercomparisons. J. Clim. 2017, 30, 8179–8205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kalnay, E.; Kanamitsu, M.; Kistler, R.; Collins, W.; Deaven, D.; Gandin, L.; Iredell, M.; Saha, S.; White, G.; Woollen, J.; et al. The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 1996, 77, 437–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hersbach, H.; Bell, B.; Berrisford, P.; Hirahara, S.; Horányi, A.; Muñoz-Sabater, J.; Nicolas, J.; Peubey, C.; Radu, R.; Schepers, D.; et al. The ERA5 Global Reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 2020, 146, 1999–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Takaya, K.; Nakamura, H. A Formulation of a Phase-Independent Wave-Activity Flux for Stationary and Migratory Quasigeostrophic Eddies on a Zonally Varying Basic Flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 2001, 58, 608–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yang, G.; Li, T. Moist Baroclinic Instability along the Subtropical Mei-Yu Front. J. Clim. 2023, 36, 805–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chen, X.; Wen, Z.; Liu, J.; Mei, W.; Zhang, R.; Huang, S.; Guo, Y.; Li, J. Sea-Ice Loss in Eurasian Arctic Coast Intensifies Heavy Meiyu-Baiu Rainfall Associated with Indian Ocean Warming. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 2024, 7, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Si, D.; Ding, Y.; Liu, Y. Decadal Northward Shift of the Meiyu Belt and the Possible Cause. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2009, 54, 4742–4748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ma, X.; Zhang, Y. Numerical Study of the Impacts of Urban Expansion on Meiyu Precipitation over Eastern China. J. Meteorol. Res. 2016, 29, 237–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Curry, J.A.; Schramm, J.L.; Ebert, E.E. Sea Ice-Albedo Climate Feedback Mechanism. J. Clim. 1995, 8, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Xie, T.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, R.; Wu, B.; Zhang, P. Sea Ice Reduction in the Barents-Kara Sea Enhances June Precipitation in the Yangtze River Basin. Cryosphere 2025, 19, 1303–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lv, X.; Liu, N.; Lin, L.; Yang, L.; Li, Y.; Fan, L.; Chen, H.; Wang, Y.; Kong, B.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Causes of the Drastic Change in Sea Ice on the Southern Northwind Ridge in July 2019 and July 2020: From a Perspective from Atmospheric Forcing. Front. Earth Sci. 2022, 10, 993074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Han, Y.; Si, D.; Lang, X.; Miao, J. Impact of Spring Barents Sea Ice on Summer Tibetan Plateau Precipitation. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 2025, 2023, 1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhou, B.; Song, Z.; Yin, Z.; Xu, X.; Sun, B.; Hsu, P.; Chen, H. Recent Autumn Sea Ice Loss in the Eastern Arctic Enhanced by Summer Asian-Pacific Oscillation. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 2798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Nie, Y.; Sun, J. Increase in Summer Precipitation over the Sichuan Basin in Recent Decades and Possible Causes. Int. J. Climatol. 2023, 43, 4269–4285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Q.; Yang, X.Q. The Linkage Between Arctic Sea Ice and Midlatitude Weather: In the Perspective of Energy. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2018, 123, 11536–11550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Time series of (a) the MOD and (b) its departure from the mean (unit: days) for 1979–2023. The horizontal dashed line in (a) delineates the climatological mean of the MOD (viz. 10 June). The red and blue bars in (b) represent positive and negative anomalies, respectively.
Figure 1. Time series of (a) the MOD and (b) its departure from the mean (unit: days) for 1979–2023. The horizontal dashed line in (a) delineates the climatological mean of the MOD (viz. 10 June). The red and blue bars in (b) represent positive and negative anomalies, respectively.
Atmosphere 16 00838 g001
Figure 2. Time series of the (a) original and (b) detrended normalized MODI (green line), spring BKSIC (blue line), and summer BKSST (red line) indices from 1979 to 2023.
Figure 2. Time series of the (a) original and (b) detrended normalized MODI (green line), spring BKSIC (blue line), and summer BKSST (red line) indices from 1979 to 2023.
Atmosphere 16 00838 g002
Figure 3. Regressions of summer (a) 200 hPa zonal wind (unit: m s−1) and (b) 500 hPa eddy geopotential height (shadings; unit: gpm) and 850 hPa horizontal winds (vectors; units: m s−1) with the sign-reversed MODI from 1979 to 2023. Regions above the 90% confidence level are dotted. Yellow lines in (a) indicate the contour of the climatological summer 200 hPa zonal wind (unit: m s−1, omitted below 24 m s−1, interval 2 m s−1) during 1979–2023. The green box indicates the research domain of the YHRB region (28–34° N, 110–122.5° E).
Figure 3. Regressions of summer (a) 200 hPa zonal wind (unit: m s−1) and (b) 500 hPa eddy geopotential height (shadings; unit: gpm) and 850 hPa horizontal winds (vectors; units: m s−1) with the sign-reversed MODI from 1979 to 2023. Regions above the 90% confidence level are dotted. Yellow lines in (a) indicate the contour of the climatological summer 200 hPa zonal wind (unit: m s−1, omitted below 24 m s−1, interval 2 m s−1) during 1979–2023. The green box indicates the research domain of the YHRB region (28–34° N, 110–122.5° E).
Atmosphere 16 00838 g003
Figure 4. Regressions of (a) spring SIC (unit: %) with the sign-reversed MODI, (b) spring net shortwave radiation flux (unit: W m−2, downward represented by positive values), and (c) spring and (d) summer SST (unit: K) with the sign-reversed BKSIC index during 1979–2023. Regions above the 90% confidence level are dotted. Green boxes indicate the BKS region (68–79° N, 30–70° E) used for the definition of the BKSIC and BKSST indices.
Figure 4. Regressions of (a) spring SIC (unit: %) with the sign-reversed MODI, (b) spring net shortwave radiation flux (unit: W m−2, downward represented by positive values), and (c) spring and (d) summer SST (unit: K) with the sign-reversed BKSIC index during 1979–2023. Regions above the 90% confidence level are dotted. Green boxes indicate the BKS region (68–79° N, 30–70° E) used for the definition of the BKSIC and BKSST indices.
Atmosphere 16 00838 g004
Figure 5. Regressions of summer (a) upward longwave radiation flux (unit: W m−2, upward represented by positive values), (b) 850 hPa air temperature (unit: K) with the summer BKSST index during 1979–2023. Regions above the 90% confidence level are dotted. Green boxes indicate the BKS region (68–79° N, 30–70° E) used for the definition of the BKSIC and BKSST indices.
Figure 5. Regressions of summer (a) upward longwave radiation flux (unit: W m−2, upward represented by positive values), (b) 850 hPa air temperature (unit: K) with the summer BKSST index during 1979–2023. Regions above the 90% confidence level are dotted. Green boxes indicate the BKS region (68–79° N, 30–70° E) used for the definition of the BKSIC and BKSST indices.
Atmosphere 16 00838 g005
Figure 6. Regressions of summer (a) air temperature (unit: K), and (b) zonal wind (unit: m s−1) averaged over the BKS region (along 30–70° E) against the summer BKSST index during 1979–2023. Regions above the 90% confidence level are dotted. Green dashed lines indicate the BKS region (68–79° N).
Figure 6. Regressions of summer (a) air temperature (unit: K), and (b) zonal wind (unit: m s−1) averaged over the BKS region (along 30–70° E) against the summer BKSST index during 1979–2023. Regions above the 90% confidence level are dotted. Green dashed lines indicate the BKS region (68–79° N).
Atmosphere 16 00838 g006
Figure 7. (a) 200 hPa eddy geopotential height (shading, unit: gpm) and horizontal wave activity flux (vector, unit: m2 s−2) in summer in association with the summer BKSST index during 1979–2023. Regressions of summer (b) 200 hPa zonal wind (unit: m s−1), (c) 500 hPa eddy geopotential height (shadings; unit: gpm), and 850 hPa horizontal winds (vectors; units: m s−1) upon the summer BKSST index from 1979 to 2023. Regions above the 90% confidence level are dotted. Yellow lines in (b) indicate the contour of the climatological summer 200 hPa zonal wind (unit: m s−1, omitted below 24 m s−1, interval 2 m s−1) during 1979–2023. The blue and green boxes indicate the research domain of the BKS region (68–79° N, 30–70° E) and the YHRB region (28–34° N, 110–122.5° E), respectively.
Figure 7. (a) 200 hPa eddy geopotential height (shading, unit: gpm) and horizontal wave activity flux (vector, unit: m2 s−2) in summer in association with the summer BKSST index during 1979–2023. Regressions of summer (b) 200 hPa zonal wind (unit: m s−1), (c) 500 hPa eddy geopotential height (shadings; unit: gpm), and 850 hPa horizontal winds (vectors; units: m s−1) upon the summer BKSST index from 1979 to 2023. Regions above the 90% confidence level are dotted. Yellow lines in (b) indicate the contour of the climatological summer 200 hPa zonal wind (unit: m s−1, omitted below 24 m s−1, interval 2 m s−1) during 1979–2023. The blue and green boxes indicate the research domain of the BKS region (68–79° N, 30–70° E) and the YHRB region (28–34° N, 110–122.5° E), respectively.
Atmosphere 16 00838 g007
Figure 8. Regressions of summer (a) specific humidity (shading, unit: g kg−1) and moisture flux (vectors, units: g s−1 hPa−1 cm−1) averaged from 1000 to 850 hPa, (b) advection of 850 hPa air temperature (unit: 10−6 K s−1), (c) 850 hPa air temperature (unit: K), and (d) convective available potential energy (unit: J kg−1) with the summer BKSST index from 1979 to 2023. Regions above the 90% confidence level are dotted. The green box indicates the research domain of the YHRB region (28–34° N, 110–122.5° E).
Figure 8. Regressions of summer (a) specific humidity (shading, unit: g kg−1) and moisture flux (vectors, units: g s−1 hPa−1 cm−1) averaged from 1000 to 850 hPa, (b) advection of 850 hPa air temperature (unit: 10−6 K s−1), (c) 850 hPa air temperature (unit: K), and (d) convective available potential energy (unit: J kg−1) with the summer BKSST index from 1979 to 2023. Regions above the 90% confidence level are dotted. The green box indicates the research domain of the YHRB region (28–34° N, 110–122.5° E).
Atmosphere 16 00838 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Song, Z.; Zhao, X.; Hu, Y.; Zhou, F.; Lu, J. Modulation of Spring Barents and Kara Seas Ice Concentration on the Meiyu Onset over the Yangtze–Huaihe River Basin in China. Atmosphere 2025, 16, 838. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16070838

AMA Style

Song Z, Zhao X, Hu Y, Zhou F, Lu J. Modulation of Spring Barents and Kara Seas Ice Concentration on the Meiyu Onset over the Yangtze–Huaihe River Basin in China. Atmosphere. 2025; 16(7):838. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16070838

Chicago/Turabian Style

Song, Ziyi, Xuejie Zhao, Yuepeng Hu, Fang Zhou, and Jiahao Lu. 2025. "Modulation of Spring Barents and Kara Seas Ice Concentration on the Meiyu Onset over the Yangtze–Huaihe River Basin in China" Atmosphere 16, no. 7: 838. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16070838

APA Style

Song, Z., Zhao, X., Hu, Y., Zhou, F., & Lu, J. (2025). Modulation of Spring Barents and Kara Seas Ice Concentration on the Meiyu Onset over the Yangtze–Huaihe River Basin in China. Atmosphere, 16(7), 838. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16070838

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop