Next Article in Journal
Research on the Emission Reduction Effect of International Technology Import in China’s Key Industries
Next Article in Special Issue
Particle Microphysical Parameters and the Complex Refractive Index from 3β + 2α HSRL/Raman Lidar Measurements: Conditions of Accurate Retrieval, Retrieval Uncertainties and Constraints to Suppress the Uncertainties
Previous Article in Journal
Contribution of Climate Change and Human Activities to Runoff and Sediment Discharge Changes Based on Budyko Theory and Water–Sediment Relationships during 1960–2019 in the Taohe River Basin, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Vertical Distributions of Aerosol Optical Characteristics Based on Lidar in Nanyang City from 2021 to 2022
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optical and Physical Characteristics of Aerosol Layers in Australia Based on CALIPSO

1
Academy of Remote Sensing Technology and Application, Nanyang Normal University, Wolong Road No. 1638, Nanyang 473061, China
2
Key Laboratory of Natural Disaster and Remote Sensing of Henan Province, Nanyang Normal University, Wolong Road No. 1638, Nanyang 473061, China
3
Engineering Research Center of Environmental Laser Remote Sensing Technology and Application of Henan Province, Nanyang Normal University, Wolong Road No. 1638, Nanyang 473061, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2023, 14(7), 1145; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14071145
Submission received: 5 June 2023 / Revised: 10 July 2023 / Accepted: 12 July 2023 / Published: 13 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Development of LIDAR Techniques for Atmospheric Remote Sensing)

Abstract

:
Atmospheric aerosols have important impacts on global radiative forcing, air pollution, and human health. This study investigated the optical and physical properties of aerosol layers over Australia from 2007 to 2019 using the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) Level 2 aerosol products. Australia was divided into three sub-regions (western highlands, central plains, and eastern ranges). Interannual and seasonal optical property variations in aerosol layers in the three sub-regions were analyzed and compared. Results showed that annual mean values of AODL (lowest aerosol layer AOD) and AODT (total AOD of all aerosol layers) were always higher in the eastern ranges region than the other two regions from 2007 to 2019. The reason could be that Australian population was predominantly located in the eastern ranges region, where more human activities could bring significant aerosol loadings. BL (base height of the lowest aerosol layer), HL (top height of the lowest aerosol layer), and HH (top height of the highest aerosol layer) all showed trends of “western highlands > eastern mountains > central plains”, indicating that the higher the elevation, the higher the BL, HL, and HH. TL (thickness of the lowest aerosol layer) was higher during the day than at night, which might account for increased diurnal atmospheric convection and nocturnal aerosol deposition. DRL (depolarization ratio of the lowest aerosol layer) was higher in the western highlands and central plains than the eastern mountains, probably because these two regions have large deserts with more irregularly shaped dust aerosols. CRL (color ratio of the lowest aerosol layer) had slightly higher values in the eastern ranges than the other two regions, probably due to the wet climate of the eastern ranges, where aerosols were more hygroscopic and had larger particle sizes. This study can provide technical support for the control and management of regional air pollutants.

1. Introduction

Atmospheric aerosols are suspended microscopic particles in the air, typically with aerodynamic diameters of 10−3–102 μm [1,2,3]. Atmospheric aerosols have a strong impact on global radiative forcing, air pollution, and human health [4,5,6,7]. Atmospheric aerosols can absorb or scatter solar short-wave and long-wave radiation, altering the radiation balance between the Earth and the atmosphere. Aerosols can also act as cloud condensation nuclei, altering the life cycle of clouds and affecting local or regional weather conditions [8,9,10,11,12]. Therefore, studies of atmospheric aerosols are of great importance, which can help scientists and government departments to understand global radiation changes and formulate air pollution control policies.
Many aerosol observation stations have been established around the world, which are helpful for the study of aerosols. For example, the AERONET (Aerosol Robotic Network), established by NASA, can obtain a continuous observation of aerosols’ physical and optical properties around the world [13,14]. The MODIS sensors on board TERRA and AQUA satellites can obtain large-scale aerosol optical parameters but still cannot obtain the vertical distribution properties of aerosols [15]. With the development of observation technology, lidar has become a more popular remote sensing device for atmospheric aerosol and gas observations [16,17,18,19,20,21]. Not only can it obtain information on the vertical distribution of aerosols, but it can also work continuously at nighttime and during the daytime. The NASA Micro-pulse Lidar Network (MPLNET), the European Lidar Observation Network (EARLINET), and the Asian Dust Lidar Observation Network (AD-NET) have been established worldwide in recent years [25,26,27]. NASA and CNES jointly launched the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) in April 2006, which was equipped with the orthogonal polarization cloud aerosol lidar CALIOP [28,29]. The CALIOP can provide vertical distribution, particles size, particle classification, and information on aerosols and clouds [30,31,32].
Australia is located between the South Pacific Ocean and the Indian Ocean. It is the only country in the world that is also a continent. In total, 70% of Australia is arid and semi-arid, with 3.4 million square kilometers of desert and semi-desert. Strong westerly winds can carry large amounts of dust from northern Australia, resulting in increased aerosol loadings in the middle part of Australia [33,34,35]. Australia has both a savannah climate and a tropical desert climate with high summer temperatures and low precipitation in the midwestern part [36]. As there have been no studies on the vertical distribution of aerosol layers in Australia, we took the opportunity to analyze the optical and physical properties of aerosol layers in Australia in this study utilizing CALIPSO Level 2 aerosol layer products. This study can provide scientific understanding and technical support to scientists and atmospheric environmental management departments. Research methods are explained in Section 2, results and discussions are presented in Section 3, and conclusions are in Section 4.

2. Methodology

2.1. Study Area

Figure 1 showed the topographic map of Australia. The total area of Australia is 7,692,000 square kilometers, and the coastline is 36,735 km long [37]. The landform of Australia consists of mountains in the east, plains in the center, and plateaus in the west. The average annual temperature is 27 °C in the north and 14 °C in the south. Australia straddles two climate zones, with the north being tropical and the south being temperate [33]. The mid-west has barren deserts with little rain, high temperatures, and large diurnal temperature differences. The coastal zone has plenty of rain and a humid environment. Due to the topography and climate, the Australian population is concentrated along the eastern seaboard. The western seaboard is less populated, and the middle part is almost uninhabited (Figure 2).

2.2. Materials and Methods

CALIPSO (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Path and Satellite Observation) carries three instruments (CALIOP, IIR, and WFC). The CALIOP is a visible and near-infrared polarimetric lidar used for observing the phase state of Earth’s aerosols and clouds [38]. The CALIOP has one 1064 nm channel and two channels of 532 nm horizontal polarization and vertical polarization, respectively [29,31]. The signal spanning is six orders of magnitude. The satellite orbit is sun-synchronous with 705 km elevation and 7 km/h orbital speed. The orbital period is 96 min, with a repeat period of 16 days. There are three levels of CALIOP data, and this paper uses the Level 2 (L2) aerosol layer datasets [39]. L2 aerosol layer datasets have a horizontal resolution of 5 km, and the parameters used are the AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (AODL), the total AOD of all aerosol layers (AODT), the base height of the lowest aerosol layer (BL), the top height of the lowest aerosol layer (HL), the top height of the highest aerosol layer (HH), the thickness of the lowest aerosol layer (TL), the number of aerosol layers (N), the AOD proportion for the lowest aerosol layer (PAODL), the receding ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (DRL), and the color ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (CRL). AODL, HL, BL, HH, DRL, CRL, and N can be obtained directly from L2, while AODT, TL, and PAODL are obtained indirectly, using the following equations:
A O D T = 1 N A O D N ; N = 1,2 , 7,8
T L = H L B L
P A O D L = A O D L A O D T × 100 %
where N = 1 represents the lowest aerosol layer, i.e.:
AOD L = AOD 1
To extrapolate temporal and spatial variabilities of aerosol characteristics conveniently in Australia, we divided Australia into three regions based on topography (Figure 1): western highlands (A), central plains (B), and eastern ranges (C). Seasons were defined as spring (September to November), summer (December to February), autumn (March to May), and winter (June to August). Annual and seasonal statistical information of aerosol variables were calculated over three subregions from 2007 to 2019. Null and negative values were removed first in this study; AODL and AODT values greater than 10, BL, HL, HH, and TL greater than 100 and DRL, and CRL greater than 10 were removed second, because these datasets were false noise interferences; then, the remaining datasets were utilized in the next step.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Interannual Variations in Aerosol Layer Optical Properties over Australia

Annual mean AODT values for the A, B, and C subregions were analyzed from 2007 to 2019. Figure 3b (daytime) and Figure 4b (nighttime) revealed that a slight increase in the annual mean AODT over Australia. The C region had a higher AODT than the A and B regions. The annual mean AODT (daytime: 0.20; nighttime: 0.16) was higher in the eastern mountains region, followed by the central plains (daytime: 0.16; nighttime: 0.13), and finally the western highlands (daytime: 0.14; nighttime: 0.13). This might be because Australia was controlled by the subtropical high-pressure belt and the effect of narrow eastern ranges, which could result in wet conditions in the east and arid conditions in the mid-west parts of Australia all year round [35,36]. Previous studies had shown that humidity had a positive correlation with AOD; therefore, AODT and AODL were higher in the eastern ranges than in the other two regions [33,40]. It might also be related to the distribution of population (Figure 2), economic development, and industrial activity in Australia. Figure 2 revealed that the population density in the east was high, and more populous cities existed in the eastern ranges region, such as Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane. High populations could lead to high anthropogenic particulate emissions, and therefore, high aerosol AODT and AODL values existed in the east [33].
The increase in AODT values between 2010 and 2012 might be due to forest fires (Margaret River Bushfires and Carnarvon Bushfires) resulting in the release of large amounts of organic matter and aerosols into the atmosphere. During this time, Australia experienced several dust storms resulting in large amounts of dust also being released into the atmosphere resulting in increased AOD values [33,35,36]. It might also be due to the rapid economic development of Australia during this period and the increase in human activities such as industrial production and transport, which may have led to increased concentrations of aerosols in the atmosphere and hence higher AOD values [33]. From 2012 to 2014, international cooperation might have contributed to reduced emissions of pollutants in the atmosphere, resulting in lower AOD values. Between 2014 and 2016, Australia experienced continued economic growth. Increased human activities, such as energy consumption, industrial production, and transport, led to increased aerosol concentrations in the atmosphere and consequently higher AOD values. It should be noted that decreases in AODL in 2012–2014 and in 2016–2018, as well as the increase in 2013–2016 in the C region (Eastern Australia), could be due to interannual variability in air humidity in this region. Also, it may be one of the reasons for the lower interannual variation in nighttime AODL compared to daytime in the C region.
Analysis was carried out on the AODL, which was strongly influenced by natural and anthropogenic activities [41,42]. Figure 3a,b (daytime) and Figure 4a,b (nighttime) showed that the annual mean AODL over Australia has a similar annual variability pattern to AODT, i.e., the annual mean AODL was higher in the eastern ranges (daytime: 0.16; nighttime: 0.11), followed by the central plains (daytime: 0.12; nighttime: 0.09), and finally the western highlands (daytime: 0.11; nighttime: 0.08). This might be because Australia is surrounded by sea, with cold currents in the west and warm currents in the east, creating a spatial distribution of a wetter climate in the east and a drier climate in the west, resulting in a higher AODL in the eastern ranges [33].
Figure 3c (daytime) and Figure 4c (nighttime) showed the interannual variation in BL, which is mainly influenced by elevations [41]. Results showed that BL was highest in the western highlands (daytime: 1.07 km; nighttime: 1.00 km), followed by the eastern mountains region (daytime: 0.78 km; nighttime: 0.87 km) and the central plains (daytime: 0.72 km; nighttime: 0.74 km). The main reason was the influence of elevation, with higher BL values in higher elevation areas. Annual mean HL and HH values (Figure 3d,e and Figure 4d,e) were also higher in the western highlands (daytime: 2.41 km; nighttime: 2.24 km), followed by the eastern mountains (daytime: 2.23 km; nighttime: 1.93 km) and the central plains (daytime: 2.01 km; nighttime: 1.91 km). This result showed that HL and HH were also more related to topography, with higher elevation regions having higher HL and HH values. This result was similar to that of Zhang’s study [41,42,43]. Figure 3f (daytime) and 4f (nighttime) showed the interannual variation in TL in the western highlands (daytime: 1.34 km; nighttime: 1.24 km), the central plains (daytime: 1.29 km; nighttime: 1.17 km), and the eastern mountains (daytime: 1.46 km; nighttime 1.06 km). As shown, values at night were relatively small compared to the daytime. This should be due to the mixed layer that was thicker in the daytime due to convective processes driven by solar radiation [44]. At the same time, low temperatures and weak vertical convection in the atmosphere at night could lead to thinner aerosol layers [41,42,45]. Figure 3g (daytime) and Figure 4g (nighttime) showed that there was little difference between annual averaged N values for the eastern ranges (daytime: 1.26; nighttime: 1.70), central plains (daytime: 1.25; nighttime: 1.58), and western highlands (daytime: 1.23; nighttime: 1.60) regions of Australia. However, annual averaged N values were slightly greater in the eastern ranges region than in the central plains and western highlands regions. One plausible reason for this was that the Australian population is predominantly distributed in the eastern ranges region, where anthropogenic factors contribute to the large atmospheric aerosol loadings, resulting in significant vertical stratifications of atmospheric aerosols [33].
According to Figure 3h and Figure 4h, it can be seen that there was little difference in PAODL values between the eastern mountains region (daytime: 89%; nighttime: 75%), the central plain region (daytime: 89%; nighttime: 77%), and the western plateau region (daytime: 90%; nighttime: 76%). PAODL was the ratio of AODL to AODT and was mainly influenced by N. Results showed that PAODL had a negative correlation with N. The larger the value of N, the smaller the PAODL. This was similar to the results of the Yellow River basin in China and Pakistan [41,43]. The DRL reflected the aerosol particle degree of non-sphericity in the lowest aerosol layer. The larger DRL values mean more non-spherical particles; smaller DRL values mean more spherical particles [41]. Results showed that annual mean DRL values were higher in the western highlands (daytime: 0.06; nighttime: 0.04) and the central plains (daytime: 0.06; nighttime: 0.04) than in the eastern mountains (daytime: 0.05; nighttime: 0.03), which indicated that more non-spherical particles were present in the A region and the B region, as these two regions had large areas of deserts with irregularly shaped dust aerosols. These results also indicated that more non-spherical particles were present during the daytime compared to the nighttime, which may be due to nighttime aerosol depositions. In addition, it may also be caused by nighttime water condensation on non-spherical particles. The water coating will make a particle more spherical, increasing the total sphericity of the particles [34,41]. CRL values represented particle sizes; the higher the CRL values, the larger the particle sizes. Figure 3j and Figure 4j reflected the annual mean variations in CRL in the lowest aerosol layer during the daytime and at nighttime. Results showed that larger CRL values existed in the eastern mountains region (daytime: 0.85; nighttime: 0.58) and western highlands region (daytime: 0.76; nighttime: 0.54) compared to the central plain region (daytime: 0.61; nighttime: 0.49). The larger size of aerosol particles in C region may be caused by sea salt [37]. The medium-sized aerosol particles in the A region may be due to sandy and dusty aerosols (the Great Sandy Desert, Great Victoria Desert, Gibson Desert, and Simpson Desert are all located in the western highlands region of Australia) [34].

3.2. Seasonal Variations in Aerosol Layer Optical Properties over Australia

Seasonal variations in aerosol layer optical properties over Australia were conducted during the daytime and nighttime (Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8). Results showed that AODT was more variable in the eastern mountains region, reaching its highest value in summer (daytime: 0.23; nighttime: 0.20). And AODT values were highest in the western highlands (daytime: 0.17; nighttime: 0.16) and the central plains (daytime: 0.18; nighttime: 0.14) in spring because of dust. This may be due to the influence of southeasterly trade winds in summer and the tall eastern mountains blocking the warm and humid airflow, resulting in more rain in the east and less rain in the mid-west. Hence, the highest AODT values in the eastern mountains was in summer, which was similar to the study results of Mitchell et al., where AOD and scattering coefficients peaked in the central plains of Australia in spring and summer [35]. Overall, AODT values were lowest in winter (daytime: 0.15; nighttime: 0.11) over most of the Australian continent, because high pressures can lead to a dry atmosphere and low humidity over most of the continent [35]. From spatial distribution maps (Figure 5 and Figure 6), AOD values were relatively high in the eastern ranges region of Australia compared to the other two regions, which may be because the Australian population was predominantly located in the eastern ranges region, leading to high anthropogenic pollution emissions, which was consistent with the findings of Mitchell et al. [36].
As shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6, HL and HH values were higher in the western highlands compared to the other two regions. Notably, HL and HH values were higher in spring in the western plateau region compared to the other three seasons, which may be the reason that the western plateau region had large areas of desert and was significantly affected by sand and dust aerosols in spring [33]. The seasonal plots showed gradual decreases in HL and HH values from spring to winter. These can be attributed to the intensification of vertical convection caused by seasonal temperature gradients, which can result in the enhanced vertical movement of the aerosol layers [37].
As shown in Figure 7g and Figure 8g, the highest N values were observed in spring (daytime: 1.31; nighttime: 1.76), and the lowest N values were observed in winter (daytime: 1.19; nighttime: 1.45). This may be due to a stronger vertical convection in spring and a weaker vertical convection in winter [37]. The nighttime N values were higher than those in the daytime (~0.37); the reason for this could be that atmosphere convection increased and fully mixed during the daytime, leading to a decrease in N and an increase in TL; during the night, atmospheric convection weakened and residual layer appeared, resulting in the stratification of the atmosphere and an increase in N [45]. High values of N were mainly found in the eastern ranges region, which is characterized by a dense population, high economic activity, and more industrial units and agricultural activities, resulting in more aerosol stratification [36]. The seasonal mean of TL was highest in spring (daytime: 1.42 km; nighttime: 1.22 km) and lowest in winter (daytime: 1.27 km; nighttime: 1.05 km). As TL was calculated from BL and HL, its variation mainly depended on the distribution of BL and HL (Figure 7d,e and Figure 8d,e). In addition, the TL values were slightly lower at nighttime than during the daytime (~0.2 km).
As shown in Figure 7h and Figure 8h, PAODL mean values for all seasons were almost the same for the whole of Australia (daytime: 89%; nighttime: 76%). The higher PAODL values in winter compared to the other seasons may be related to the properties of AODT (AODL) and N as discussed above. In addition, PAODL values were higher during the daytime than at nighttime, which may be due to higher aerosol loadings in the lowest aerosol layer, where coarse particles dominated [34,41]. Seasonal mean values of DRL were slightly higher in spring (daytime: 0.06; nighttime: 0.04) and summer (daytime: 0.07; nighttime: 0.04) than in autumn (daytime: 0.05; nighttime: 0.03) and winter (daytime: 0.05; nighttime: 0.03). This might be due to relatively heavy dust transports during these two seasons, resulting in a higher number of non-spherical aerosol particles [37]. DRL values were higher in the western highlands and central plains regions than in the eastern ranges region, which may be due to the high number of deserts and dust aerosols in the western highlands and central plains regions. Seasonal mean values of CRL did not vary significantly between the seasons (daytime: 0.74; nighttime: 0.54), and its spatial distribution showed higher CRL values in the eastern ranges and western highlands regions, indicating that larger aerosol particle sizes existed in these two regions. Mitchell et al. showed that as the atmospheric humidity increased, the aerosol particle sizes increased [33]. The eastern mountainous region was wet and rainy leading to larger CRL values. The larger CRL values in the western highlands may be due to the influence of sand and dust aerosols.

3.3. Correlation of Aerosol Properties in Australia

To better understand the spatial and temporal distribution of aerosol properties over Australia, seasonal correlations between some aerosol layer parameters during the daytime and at nighttime were carried out (Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11). We used the Pearson correlation coefficients in this part [46]. The results showed a more significant positive correlation between AODL and TL. And these relationships varied during the daytime and at nighttime and also changed at different seasons. Daytime correlations were mostly higher than nighttime correlations, which may be related to reduced anthropogenic factors at night. In terms of seasonal distribution, the highest correlations for the three Australian regions were found in spring, followed by summer and autumn, and the lowest correlations were found in winter, because aerosol contents in spring and summer were relatively high compared to those in autumn and winter. This was consistent with the results of the Yellow River basin in China and Pakistan [41,43].
Figure 10 depicts the correlation between N and HH in Australia. N was mainly distributed between 1 and 7 in regions A, B, and C, all of which had strong positive correlations with HH. This phenomenon revealed that the higher the HH, the greater the N values. This result was consistent with the existing knowledge reported for the Yellow River Basin and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [42,43]. Figure 11 depicts the correlation between N and PAODL in Australia. The results showed that N exhibited a significant negative correlation with PAODL. Based on the current knowledge, the larger the N value, the smaller the PAODL value, which was consistent with the previous research [41,42].

4. Conclusions

In this article, the optical and physical properties of aerosol layers over Australia were investigated using CALIPSO level 2 products from 2007 to 2019. The interannual, seasonal variabilities of AODL, AODT, BL, HL, HH, TL, N, PAODL, DRL, and CRL were analyzed and discussed for the daytime and the nighttime. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1) The annual mean values of AODT were highest in the eastern ranges. This may be related to Australian climatic characteristics (wet and rainy in the east, dry and low rainfall in the mid-west) and population distributions.
(2) AODT values reached maximum levels in the summer in the eastern range region and in the spring in the other two regions. This may be due to high atmospheric humidity in the summer over the eastern range region, while the other two regions had more frequent dusty weather in spring.
(3) BL, HL, and HH had clear correlations with elevation: the higher the elevation, the higher the values of BL, HL, and HH. BL, HL, and HH values gradually decreased from spring to winter. HH had a positive correlation with N.
(4) TL values were smaller at nighttime than during the daytime. This may be related to nocturnal aerosol depositions.
(5) DRL values were higher in the western highlands and central plains than in the eastern mountain ranges. This was because the central and western regions were dotted with large areas of deserts and because there were large amounts of non-spherical dust aerosols. More non-spherical particles were present during the daytime than at nighttime.
(6) CRL values were higher in the eastern mountainous regions and the western highland regions than in the central plain regions. This indicated that aerosol particles in the first two regions were of a larger particle size.
In future work, we will investigate dust emissions in the A and B regions using CALIOP data. Meanwhile, we will use more in situs datasets to observe more optical and physical parameters over Australia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Z.; methodology, M.Z. and Q.D.; software, N.W. and S.C.; validation, Y.W.; formal analysis, M.Z.; investigation, M.Z. and F.L.; resources, M.Z.; data curation, M.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Z.; writing—review and editing, P.Q.; visualization, M.Z.; supervision, F.L.; project administration, M.Z.; funding acquisition, M.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Programs for Science and Technology Development of Henan Province (No. 232102320069) and the Nanyang Normal University Scientific Research Project (No. 2020QN033).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank the editors for assisting in the linguistic refinement of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ackerman, A.; Kirkpatrick, M.; Stevens, D.; Toon, O. The impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate forcing. Nature 2004, 432, 1014–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Jacobson, M.Z. Strong radiative heating due to the mixing state of black carbon in atmospheric aerosols. Nature 2001, 409, 695–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kaufman, Y.J.; Tanré, D.; Boucher, O. A satellite view of aerosols in the climate system. Nature 2002, 419, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Q.; Jiang, X.; Tong, D.; Davis, S.J.; Zhao, H.; Geng, G.; Feng, T.; Zheng, B.; Lu, Z.; Streets, D.G.; et al. Transboundary health impacts of transported global air pollution and international trade. Nature 2017, 543, 705–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Article, R. Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon. Nat. Geosci. 2008, 36, 335–358. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cappa, C.D.; Onasch, T.B.; Massoli, P.; Worsnop, D.R.; Bates, T.S.; Cross, E.S.; Davidovits, P.; Hakala, J.; Hayden, K.L.; Jobson, B.T.; et al. Radiative Absorption Enhancements Due to the Mixing State of Atmospheric Black Carbon. Science 2012, 337, 1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Kaiser, J. How Dirty Air Hurts the Heart. Science 2005, 307, 1858–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Crutzen, P.J.; Andreae, M.O. Biomass burning in the tropics: Impact on atmospheric chemistry and biogeochemical cycles. Science 1990, 250, 1669–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kaiser, J.; Granmar, M. Mounting Evidence Indicts Fine-Particle Pollution. Science 2005, 307, 1858–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Menon, S.; Hansen, J.; Nazarenko, L.; Luo, Y. Climate Effects of Black Carbon Aerosols in China and India. Science 2002, 297, 2250–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Parrish, D.D.; Tong, Z. Climate change. Clean air for megacities. Science 2009, 326, 674–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ramanathan, V.; Crutzen, P.J.; Kiehl, J.T.; Rosenfeld, D. Aerosols, Climate, and the Hydrological Cycle. Science 2001, 294, 2119–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Smirnov, A.; Holben, B.N.; Eck, T.F.; Slutsker, I.; Chatenet, B.; Pinker, R.T. Diurnal variability of aerosol optical depth observed at AERONET (Aerosol Robotic Network) sites. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2002, 29, 301–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dubovik, O.; Smirnov, A.; Holben, B.N.; King, M.D.; Kaufman, Y.J.; Eck, T.F.; Slutsker, I. Accuracy assessments of aerosol optical properties retrieved from Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Sun and sky radiance measurements. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2000, 105, 9791–9806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Justice, C.O.; Townshend, J.R.G.; Vermote, E.F.; Masuoka, E.; Wolfe, R.E.; Saleous, N.; Roy, D.P.; Morisette, J.T. An overview of MODIS Land data processing and product status. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002, 83, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Niranjan, K.; Madhavan, B.L.; Sreekanth, V. Micro pulse lidar observation of high altitude aerosol layers at Visakhapatnam located on the east coast of India. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2007, 34, 340–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Huang, J.; Minnis, P.; Yi, Y.; Tang, Q.; Wang, X.; Hu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Ayers, K.; Trepte, C.; Winker, D. Summer dust aerosols detected from CALIPSO over the Tibetan Plateau. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2007, 34, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zhang, H.; Han, G.; Ma, X.; Chen, W.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Gong, W. Spectral Energy Model-Driven Inversion of XCO2 in IPDA Lidar Remote Sensing. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2023, 61, 4100609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Baars, H.; Ansmann, A.; Engelmann, R.; Althausen, D. Continuous monitoring of the boundary-layer top with lidar. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2008, 8, 7281–7296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Alejandro, S.B.; Koenig, G.G.; Bedo, D.; Swirbalus, T.; Frelin, R.; Woffinden, J.; Vaughan, J.M.; Brown, D.W.; Callan, R.; Davies, P.H.; et al. Atlantic atmospheric aerosol studies: 1. Program overview and airborne lidar. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 1995, 100, 1035–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shi, T.; Han, G.; Ma, X.; Mao, H.; Chen, C.; Han, Z.; Pei, Z.; Zhang, H.; Li, S.; Gong, W. Quantifying factory-scale CO2/CH4 emission based on mobile measurements and EMISSION-PARTITION model: Cases in China. Environ. Res. Lett. 2023, 18, 034028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, H.; Han, G.; Ma, X.; Chen, W.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Gong, W. Robust algorithm for precise XCO2 retrieval using single observation of IPDA LIDAR. Opt. Express 2023, 31, 11846–11863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sugimoto, N.; Shimizu, A.; Nishizawa, T.; Matsui, I.; Jin, Y.; Khatri, P.; Irie, H.; Takamura, T.; Aoki, K.; Thana, B. Aerosol characteristics in Phimai, Thailand determined by continuous observation with a polarization sensitive Mie–Raman lidar and a sky radiometer. Environ. Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 065003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shukla, K.K.; Phanikumar, D.V.; Kumar, K.N.; Kumar, A.; Naja, M.; Sharma, S.; Attada, R. Micro-Pulse Lidar observations of elevated aerosol layers over the Himalayan region. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 2021, 213, 105526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Volker, M.; Volker, F.; Aldo, A.; Ioan, B.; Dimitris, B.; Jens, B.S.; Anatoly, C.; Georgius, C.; Adolfo, C.; Arnaud, D. Aerosol lidar intercomparison in the framework of the EARLINET project. 1. Instruments. Appl. Opt. 2004, 43, 961–976. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ganguly, D.; Ginoux, P.; Ramaswamy, V.; Dubovik, O.; Welton, J.; Reid, E.A.; Holben, B.N. Inferring the composition and concentration of aerosols by combining AERONET and MPLNET data: Comparison with other measurements and utilization to evaluate GCM output. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2009, 114, 424–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Sugimoto, N.; Nishizawa, T.; Shimizu, A.; Matsui, I.; Jin, Y. Characterization of aerosols in East Asia with the Asian Dust and Aerosol Lidar Observation Network (AD-Net). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 9262, 1435–1437. [Google Scholar]
  28. Winker, D.M.; Pelon, J.R.; Mccormick, M.P. The CALIPSO mission: Spaceborne lidar for observation of aerosols and clouds. In Lidar Remote Sensing for Industry and Environment Monitoring III; SPIE: Bellingham, DC, USA, 2003; Volume 4893, pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim, M.-H.; Omar, A.H.; Tackett, J.L.; Vaughan, M.A.; Winker, D.M.; Trepte, C.R.; Hu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Poole, L.R.; Pitts, M.C.; et al. The CALIPSO Version 4 Automated Aerosol Classification and Lidar Ratio Selection Algorithm. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2018, 11, 6107–6135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Winker, D.M.; Tackett, J.L.; Getzewich, B.J.; Liu, Z.; Vaughan, M.A.; Rogers, R.R. The global 3-D distribution of tropospheric aerosols as characterized by CALIOP. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 3345–3361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Winker, D.M.; Vaughan, M.A.; Omar, A.; Hu, Y.; Powell, K.A.; Liu, Z.; Hunt, W.H.; Young, S.A. Overview of the CALIPSO Mission and CALIOP Data Processing Algorithms. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2009, 26, 2310–2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Winker, D.M.; Hunt, W.H.; Mcgill, M.J. Initial performance assessment of CALIOP. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2007, 34, 228–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Mitchell, R.M.; Forgan, B.W.; Campbell, S.K. The Climatology of Australian Aerosol. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2017, 17, 5131–5154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Karlson, L.R.; Greene, R.; Scott, K.M.; Stelcer, E.; O’Loingsigh, T. Characteristics of aeolian dust across northwest Australia. Aeolian Res. 2014, 12, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mitchell, R.M.; Campbell, S.K.; Qin, Y. Recent increase in aerosol loading over the Australian arid zone. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009, 10, 1689–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Mitchell, R.M.; Forgan, B.W.; Campbell, S.K.; Qin, Y. The climatology of Australian tropical aerosol: Evidence for regional correlation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2013, 40, 2384–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Radhi, M.; Box, M.A.; Box, G.P.; Mitchell, R.M.; Cohen, D.D.; Stelcer, E.; Keywood, M. Optical, physical and chemical characteristics of Australian continental aerosols: Results from a field experiment. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 5925–5942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Winker, D.M.; Pelon, J.; Coakley, J.A., Jr.; Ackerman, S.A.; Charlson, R.J.; Colarco, P.R.; Flamant, P.; Hoff, R.M.; Kittaka, C. The CALIPSO Mission: A Global 3D View of Aerosols and Clouds. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2010, 91, 1211–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Solanki, R.; Singh, N. LiDAR observations of the vertical distribution of aerosols in free troposphere: Comparison with CALIPSO level-2 data over the central Himalayas. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 99, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, M.; Wu, D.; Su, B.; Bilal, M.; Li, Y.; Li, B.L. Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of PM2.5, PM10, and AOD over Canal Head Taocha Station, Henan Province. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, M.S.B.; Bilal, M.; Atique, L.; Usman, M.; Qiu, Z.; Ali, M.A.; Han, G. An Investigation of Vertically Distributed Aerosol Optical Properties over Pakistan Using CALIPSO Satellite Data. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, M.; Wang, L.; Bilal, M.; Gong, W.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, G. The Characteristics of the Aerosol Optical Depth within the Lowest Aerosol Layer over the Tibetan Plateau from 2007 to 2014. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Zhang, M.; Liu, J.; Bilal, M.; Zhang, C.; Khedher, K.M.J.A. Optical and Physical Characteristics of the Lowest Aerosol Layers over the Yellow River Basin. Atmosphere 2019, 10, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Mcgrath-Spangler, E.L.S.; Denning, A. Global seasonal variations of midday planetary boundary layer depth from CALIPSO space-borne LIDAR. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2013, 118, 1226–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sawyer, Z.L.V. Detection, variations and intercomparison of the planetary boundary layer depth from radiosonde, lidar and infrared spectrometer. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 79, 518–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nicewander, J.L.R.W.A. Thirteen Ways to Look at the Correlation Coefficient. Am. Stat. 1988, 42, 59–66. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. A topographic map of Australia. The color change represents the elevation.
Figure 1. A topographic map of Australia. The color change represents the elevation.
Atmosphere 14 01145 g001
Figure 2. The distribution of population in Australia. Different colors represent population density differences.
Figure 2. The distribution of population in Australia. Different colors represent population density differences.
Atmosphere 14 01145 g002
Figure 3. Interannual variation in aerosol layer optical properties in Australia during the daytime from 2007 to 2019 (A: western plateau, B: central plains, and C: eastern ranges). (a) AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (AODL); (b) total AOD of all aerosol layers (AODT); (c) base height of the lowest aerosol layer (BL); (d) top height of the lowest aerosol layer (HL); (e) top height of the highest aerosol layer (HH); (f) thickness of the lowest aerosol layer (TL); (g) number of aerosol layers (N); (h) specific gravity of the AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (PAODL); (i) declination ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (DRL); (j) color ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (CRL).
Figure 3. Interannual variation in aerosol layer optical properties in Australia during the daytime from 2007 to 2019 (A: western plateau, B: central plains, and C: eastern ranges). (a) AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (AODL); (b) total AOD of all aerosol layers (AODT); (c) base height of the lowest aerosol layer (BL); (d) top height of the lowest aerosol layer (HL); (e) top height of the highest aerosol layer (HH); (f) thickness of the lowest aerosol layer (TL); (g) number of aerosol layers (N); (h) specific gravity of the AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (PAODL); (i) declination ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (DRL); (j) color ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (CRL).
Atmosphere 14 01145 g003
Figure 4. Interannual variation in aerosol layer optical properties in Australia at nighttime from 2007 to 2019 (A: western plateau, B: central plains, and C: eastern ranges). (a) AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (AODL); (b) total AOD of all aerosol layers (AODT); (c) base height of the lowest aerosol layer (BL); (d) top height of the lowest aerosol layer (HL); (e) top height of the highest aerosol layer (HH); (f) thickness of the lowest aerosol layer (TL); (g) number of aerosol layers (N); (h) specific gravity of the AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (PAODL); (i) declination ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (DRL); (j) color ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (CRL).
Figure 4. Interannual variation in aerosol layer optical properties in Australia at nighttime from 2007 to 2019 (A: western plateau, B: central plains, and C: eastern ranges). (a) AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (AODL); (b) total AOD of all aerosol layers (AODT); (c) base height of the lowest aerosol layer (BL); (d) top height of the lowest aerosol layer (HL); (e) top height of the highest aerosol layer (HH); (f) thickness of the lowest aerosol layer (TL); (g) number of aerosol layers (N); (h) specific gravity of the AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (PAODL); (i) declination ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (DRL); (j) color ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (CRL).
Atmosphere 14 01145 g004
Figure 5. Seasonal spatial distribution of AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (AODL), total AOD of all aerosol layers (AODT), base height of the lowest aerosol layer (BL), top height of the lowest aerosol layer (HL), top height of the highest aerosol layer (HH), thickness of the lowest aerosol layer (TL), number of aerosol layers (N), specific gravity of the AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (PAODL), declination ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (DRL), and color ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (CRL) over Australia during the daytime.
Figure 5. Seasonal spatial distribution of AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (AODL), total AOD of all aerosol layers (AODT), base height of the lowest aerosol layer (BL), top height of the lowest aerosol layer (HL), top height of the highest aerosol layer (HH), thickness of the lowest aerosol layer (TL), number of aerosol layers (N), specific gravity of the AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (PAODL), declination ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (DRL), and color ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (CRL) over Australia during the daytime.
Atmosphere 14 01145 g005
Figure 6. Seasonal spatial distribution of AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (AODL), total AOD of all aerosol layers (AODT), base height of the lowest aerosol layer (BL), top height of the lowest aerosol layer (HL), top height of the highest aerosol layer (HH), thickness of the lowest aerosol layer (TL), number of aerosol layers (N), specific gravity of the AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (PAODL), declination ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (DRL), and color ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (CRL) over Australia at nighttime.
Figure 6. Seasonal spatial distribution of AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (AODL), total AOD of all aerosol layers (AODT), base height of the lowest aerosol layer (BL), top height of the lowest aerosol layer (HL), top height of the highest aerosol layer (HH), thickness of the lowest aerosol layer (TL), number of aerosol layers (N), specific gravity of the AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (PAODL), declination ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (DRL), and color ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (CRL) over Australia at nighttime.
Atmosphere 14 01145 g006
Figure 7. Seasonal variation in the optical properties of aerosol layers over Australia during the daytime from 2007 to 2019 (A: western plateau, B: central plains, C: eastern ranges). (a) AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (AODL); (b) total AOD of all aerosol layers (AODT); (c) base height of the lowest aerosol layer (BL); (d) top height of the lowest aerosol layer (HL); (e) top height of the highest aerosol layer (HH); (f) thickness of the lowest aerosol layer (TL); (g) number of aerosol layers (N); (h) specific gravity of the AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (PAODL); (i) declination ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (DRL); (j) color ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (CRL).
Figure 7. Seasonal variation in the optical properties of aerosol layers over Australia during the daytime from 2007 to 2019 (A: western plateau, B: central plains, C: eastern ranges). (a) AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (AODL); (b) total AOD of all aerosol layers (AODT); (c) base height of the lowest aerosol layer (BL); (d) top height of the lowest aerosol layer (HL); (e) top height of the highest aerosol layer (HH); (f) thickness of the lowest aerosol layer (TL); (g) number of aerosol layers (N); (h) specific gravity of the AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (PAODL); (i) declination ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (DRL); (j) color ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (CRL).
Atmosphere 14 01145 g007
Figure 8. Seasonal variation in the optical properties of aerosol layers over Australia at nighttime from 2007 to 2019 (A: western plateau, B: central plains, C: eastern ranges). (a) AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (AODL); (b) total AOD of all aerosol layers (AODT); (c) base height of the lowest aerosol layer (BL); (d) top height of the lowest aerosol layer (HL); (e) top height of the highest aerosol layer (HH); (f) thickness of the lowest aerosol layer (TL); (g) number of aerosol layers (N); (h) specific gravity of the AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (PAODL); (i) declination ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (DRL); (j) color ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (CRL).
Figure 8. Seasonal variation in the optical properties of aerosol layers over Australia at nighttime from 2007 to 2019 (A: western plateau, B: central plains, C: eastern ranges). (a) AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (AODL); (b) total AOD of all aerosol layers (AODT); (c) base height of the lowest aerosol layer (BL); (d) top height of the lowest aerosol layer (HL); (e) top height of the highest aerosol layer (HH); (f) thickness of the lowest aerosol layer (TL); (g) number of aerosol layers (N); (h) specific gravity of the AOD of the lowest aerosol layer (PAODL); (i) declination ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (DRL); (j) color ratio of the lowest aerosol layer (CRL).
Atmosphere 14 01145 g008
Figure 9. Correlation of AODL and TL over Australia from 2007 to 2019: (a) western plateau daytime; (b) central plains daytime; (c) eastern ranges daytime; (d) western plateau nighttime; (e) central plains nighttime; (f) eastern ranges nighttime.
Figure 9. Correlation of AODL and TL over Australia from 2007 to 2019: (a) western plateau daytime; (b) central plains daytime; (c) eastern ranges daytime; (d) western plateau nighttime; (e) central plains nighttime; (f) eastern ranges nighttime.
Atmosphere 14 01145 g009
Figure 10. Correlation of N and HH over Australia from 2007 to 2019: (a) western plateau daytime; (b) central plains daytime; (c) eastern ranges daytime; (d) western plateau nighttime; (e) central plains nighttime; (f) eastern ranges nighttime.
Figure 10. Correlation of N and HH over Australia from 2007 to 2019: (a) western plateau daytime; (b) central plains daytime; (c) eastern ranges daytime; (d) western plateau nighttime; (e) central plains nighttime; (f) eastern ranges nighttime.
Atmosphere 14 01145 g010
Figure 11. Correlation of N and PAODL over Australia from 2007 to 2019: (a) western plateau daytime; (b) central plains daytime; (c) eastern ranges daytime; (d) western plateau nighttime; (e) central plains nighttime; (f) eastern ranges nighttime.
Figure 11. Correlation of N and PAODL over Australia from 2007 to 2019: (a) western plateau daytime; (b) central plains daytime; (c) eastern ranges daytime; (d) western plateau nighttime; (e) central plains nighttime; (f) eastern ranges nighttime.
Atmosphere 14 01145 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, M.; Deng, Q.; Wang, N.; Chen, S.; Wang, Y.; Lu, F.; Qi, P. Optical and Physical Characteristics of Aerosol Layers in Australia Based on CALIPSO. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 1145. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14071145

AMA Style

Zhang M, Deng Q, Wang N, Chen S, Wang Y, Lu F, Qi P. Optical and Physical Characteristics of Aerosol Layers in Australia Based on CALIPSO. Atmosphere. 2023; 14(7):1145. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14071145

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Miao, Qilin Deng, Na Wang, Shiyong Chen, Yunuo Wang, Fengxian Lu, and Pengcheng Qi. 2023. "Optical and Physical Characteristics of Aerosol Layers in Australia Based on CALIPSO" Atmosphere 14, no. 7: 1145. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14071145

APA Style

Zhang, M., Deng, Q., Wang, N., Chen, S., Wang, Y., Lu, F., & Qi, P. (2023). Optical and Physical Characteristics of Aerosol Layers in Australia Based on CALIPSO. Atmosphere, 14(7), 1145. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14071145

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop