Next Article in Journal
Impact of Shale Gas Exploration and Exploitation Activities on the Quality of Ambient Air—The Case Study of Wysin, Poland
Next Article in Special Issue
Satellite Support to Estimate Livestock Ammonia Emissions: A Case Study in Hebei, China
Previous Article in Journal
Atmospheric Modelling of Mercury in the Southern Hemisphere and Future Research Needs: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quantifying the Influence of a Burn Event on Ammonia Concentrations Using a Machine-Learning Technique
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of NH3 Emissions on Particulate Matter Pollution in South Korea: A Case Study of the Seoul Metropolitan Area

1
Korea Environment Institute (KEI), Sejong 30147, Korea
2
Division of Climate & Environmental Research, Seoul Institute of Technology (SIT), Seoul 03909, Korea
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
4
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, ON M3H 5T4, Canada
5
School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Gunagzhou 519082, China
6
Climate Air and Sustainability, TNO, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, NL-3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands
7
Atmospheric and Environment Research, Lexington, MA 02421, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2022, 13(8), 1227; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13081227
Submission received: 20 June 2022 / Revised: 21 July 2022 / Accepted: 29 July 2022 / Published: 2 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agricultural Ammonia Emission and Mitigation Effects)

Abstract

:
We analyzed the multi-year relationship between particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) concentrations and possible precursors including NO2, SO2, and NH3 based on local observations over the Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA) from 2015 to 2017. Surface NH3 concentrations were obtained from Cross-track Infrared Sounder (CrIS) retrievals, while other pollutants were observed at 142 ground sites. We found that NH3 had the highest correlation with PM2.5 (R = 0.51) compared to other precursors such as NO2 and SO2 (R of 0.16 and 0.14, respectively). The correlations indicate that NH3 emissions are likely a limiting factor in controlling PM2.5 over the SMA in a high-NOx environment. This implies that the current Korean policy urgently requires tools for controlling local NH3 emissions from the livestock industry (for example, from hog manure). These findings provide the first satellite-based trace gas evidence that implementing an NH3 control strategy could play a key role in improving air quality in the SMA.

1. Introduction

Particulate matter (PM) pollution in South Korea has improved since the 1990s due to active local and nationwide policies, including those specific to the Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA), but concentrations have not noticeably changed since 2012 [1,2]. There are many factors affecting PM pollution in South Korea, including (1) meteorological conditions and thermodynamics between atmospheric compositions such as nitrate, sulfate, and ammonia [1,3,4,5,6,7] and (2) uncertainty regarding the national emissions inventories reported by the Korea-United States Air Quality Study (underestimations of local volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in Korea) [8] and the underestimation of national NOx emissions by Goldberg et al. [9]. PM2.5 formed from ammonium nitrate (NH3NO3) is an important contributor to high PM concentrations in Korea and China when atmospheric conditions are stagnant [10,11,12,13,14,15]. Recent studies have found that ammonium nitrate is the dominant form of PM2.5 in Korea; the proportion of ammonium nitrate detected in the atmosphere tends to double (nearly 38% from NH4 and NO3, combined) during high-PM episodes [16,17]. The portion of NH4 in the composition of PM1 was 14%, estimated from the in situ gas and aerosol observations from a NASA DC-8 during the NASA-NIER KORUS-AQ (Korea-United States Air Quality) campaign ran from May to June of 2016 [18].
Efforts made by the Korean Government to control PM concentrations include reducing NOx emissions from coal power plants, motor vehicles and the industrial sector [19]. The Korean National Assembly has also enacted a law to strongly enforce PM pollution policies [20]. SOx emissions are considered local control issues, such as shipping near national harbors [21], or influenced by transboundary transport (i.e., Chinese emissions) [15,22]. Emissions estimates of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from industry came to approximately one million tons per year in 2015 [23], but this figure was found to be an underestimate due to limited emissions monitoring around industrial areas [8,13,21]. Ammonia emissions are also a contributing factor to PM formation [15,24,25,26] and the majority of these emissions in Korea are from the domestic livestock industry (>75% [23,27]), but as of yet there is no specific mitigation target or policy in place.
The Korean Ministry of Environment (KMOE) is currently devising a basic plan for regional air quality management, since the characteristics of PM pollution depend on geographic location and local emissions sources. Specifically, regional atmospheric chemical conditions (e.g., the HOx–NOy relationship) need to be better understood considering the shorter lifetime of atmospheric chemical species such as ammonia and VOCs.
Here, we tried to identify the main contributing factors to PM formation in South Korea with ground measurements of nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), PM10, and PM2.5 obtained nationwide from 2015 to 2017. In addition, we used the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Cross-track Infrared Sounder (CrIS) NH3 surface concentration data, since there are few NH3 ground measurements in South Korea. We used multi-year correlations between chemical species to help identify the main species or emission sources contributing to local PM formation. We focused on the Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA) to determine the regional contributing species, as dense ground measurements in the area support an understanding of the regional chemical environment.

2. Data and Methodology

2.1. Ground Measurements

In this study, data on air pollutants including NO2, SO2, CO, PM10 and PM2.5 collected at 142 national air monitoring stations were used (more than 75% of data available on an annual basis in SMA [6]).
Air pollutants such as SO2 and CO were measured using official test methods established by the Environmental Policy Act of Korea [28]. SO2 was measured using the pulsed ultraviolet (UV) fluorescence method, CO was measured via the non-dispersive infrared method, NO2 was measured using chemiluminescence analyses with a molybdenum convector and PM10 was measured via β-ray absorption [6]. Quality control and quality assessment of instruments were regularly conducted in accordance with the Environmental Examination and Inspection Act [28]. NO2 should be considered as the sum of NO2 and NOz, as the molybdenum convertor causes positive interference with NOz [29]. The detection limits of SO2, CO, NO2, and PM are 0.1, 50, 0.1 ppb and 5 μg/m3, respectively [28,29]. The measurements from the 142 stations in the SMA were sampled throughout the experimental period (more than 75% of data available on an annual basis) and used to perform correlation analyses.

2.2. Cross-Track Infrared Sounder Data

A cross-track infrared sounder (CrIS) is a satellite instrument with a Fourier-transform spectrometer onboard the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (NPP) satellite, which is part of the Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) program [30], launched in 2011. CrIS is in a sun-synchronous orbit, with mean local overpass times of 13:30 (ascending node) and 01:30 (descending node) [31,32,33,34]. CrIS has three bands in the infrared region (645–1095, 1210–1750, and 2155–2550 cm−1) with a 2200 km swath width and sets of three-by-three circular footprints, each approximately 14 km at the nadir [31,32,33]. The maximum sensitivity of CrIS NH3 is in the range of 900–750 hPa and the minimum detection limit near the surface is typically ~1 ppbv [31].
We used surface NH3 concentration data over South Korea during the period from 2015 to 2017 from CrIS Fast Physical Retrieval (CFPR) version 1.5 [31,34]. We used daytime measurements and removed low-quality data or outliers by applying the standard of quality flag (less than 4), degrees-of-freedom-of-signal (less than or equal to 0.1) and χ2 (greater than or equal to 0.5). These criteria were selected based on stronger correlation with two Korean NH3 ground based sites (Imsil, in the southwestern tip of Korea, and Kangwha, on the western coast near the SMA.) with a range of 0.5 < R < 0.7. The comparison for these local point source measurements with the regional satellite pixel observations showed that the satellite had systemic underestimation by a factor of 2.5 in this location. The range of the long-term (2000–2019) annual mean of ground ammonia measurements in Korea from the Acid Deposition Monitoring Network in East Asia (EANET) sites is 2.7~6.5 ppbv (https://monitoring.eanet.asia/document/public/index, accessed on 10 June 2020).
In total, 1512 CrIS data pixels were used from 2015 to 2017 (42 local samples per month); the retrieval method and data version 1.5 product have been described previously [31,34]. As there is limited independent vertical information [34], the surface and column CrIS NH3 products are highly correlated and show similar spatial variations over South Korea (not shown).

3. Results

We calculated the three-year correlations among the annual mean of PM10, PM2.5, NH3, NO2, and SO2 concentrations over the SMA from 2015 to 2017. We sampled all datasets on an annual basis with a horizontal resolution of 15 km to adjust for the footprint of the nadir CrIS (14 km), producing ~100 samples of the chemical species for the correlational analysis (the sample sizes and locations are shown in Figure 1).
The relatively higher CrIS NH3 concentrations over the northern and southern parts of the SMA (“N.GY” and “S.GY” in Figure 1) and the short lifetime of ammonia reveal that there are likely substantial ammonia emissions from the regional livestock industry (around 5000 tons per year; Pocheon in N.GY and Anseong and Icheon in S.GY; NIER, 2018b) (Figure 2) in these regions.
Table 1 shows that the NH3 concentrations have the strongest correlation with PM2.5 (R = 0.51) compared to other major PM precursors such as NO2 or SO2 (at R = 0.16 and 0.14, respectively). The correlation between NH3 and PM2.5 over the SMA, a relatively high-NOx chemical environment [6,9] (around 25 ppbv, Table 2), was higher than that of all national-level observations (R = 0.31, not in the table). The correlation between NH3 and PM2.5 was particularly high (R = 0.72) in 2016, when the PM2.5 levels over SMA were highest over the sample period. The correlation between NH3 and PM2.5 was stronger than the correlation between NH3 and PM10, implying that local atmospheric ammonia participated in secondary formation.
However, caution should be exercised when explaining the contribution of ammonia to PM2.5 over the entire SMA, owing to the complexity of diverse emissions and the atmospheric chemical environment, with emissions from transportation and industry over the cities of Seoul and Incheon (“S” and “IN” in Figure 1). Furthermore, there are studies demonstrating that the atmospheric conditions of Seoul have been ammonium-rich for two decades now, contributing to the increase in NH3NO3 via homogenous and heterogeneous reactions [14,35].
We calculated an additional correlation over the SMA excluding Seoul and Incheon; NH3 concentrations produced an even stronger correlation with PM2.5 (R = 0.59, Table 1). These results provide the clearest evidence yet of the contributions of rural livestock ammonia emissions to PM2.5 formation in the vicinity of the SMA (i.e., “N.GY” and “S.GY” in Figure 1), as this region includes cities such as Pochen, Anseong and Icheon, which are home to large livestock operations [8].
Figure 3 shows the average concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, NO2, and NH3 over the SMA from 2015 to 2017 at a 15 km horizontal resolution. The average NO2 concentrations over the SMA are consistently higher than 20 ppbv, with the highest over central Seoul (nearly 40 ppbv; Figure 4). The NO2 concentrations and the corresponding national NOx emission amounts over the SMA are reportedly underestimated [9], implying that the SMA is host to NOx-rich conditions. While the spatial distributions of PM10 and PM2.5 are different from that of NO2, the PM distributions are more similar to those in the CrIS NH3 data (Figure 3). In particular, the northern and southern peaks of NH3 levels (“N.GY” and “S.GY” in Figure 1) explain the higher PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations (Figure 3), which strongly suggests that local ammonia emissions from the livestock industry could be a limiting factor in controlling regional PM2.5 secondary formation.
PM concentrations over the SMA in Korea peak from December to March, when the impact of the continental emissions is stronger, and gradually decrease from April to September (Figure 5). On the other hand, the degree of secondary PM formation during winter decreases until April but rebounds from April to July, as reflected in PM2.5/PM10 ratios (Figure 5). Ammonia concentrations in the SMA are higher between April and June, and this seasonal peak of ammonia is likely associated with higher secondary PM2.5 formation in the SMA, which is supported by the highest correlation between PM2.5/PM10 and NH3 in May and June (R2 = 0.43, Figure 6), when the secondary formation of PM by local ammonia emissions such as livestock waste is relatively important. This relationship can be also explained by another study that found that the greater partitioning of nitrate (NO3) with higher ammonia conditions (and a higher PH) during the warm/dry season (typically May–June) in Korea can produce greater local PM2.5 formation [7].

4. Discussion

We analyzed the multi-year relationship of particulate matter (PM) concentrations with precursors such as NO2, SO2 and NH3 over the Seoul Metropolitan Area from 2015 to 2017. This study is unique in that we found measurement-based evidence of local limiting factors for regional PM formation using spatially dense measurements and satellite data (CrIS surface NH3).
We found NH3 concentrations over the NOx-rich SMA to be most highly correlated with PM2.5 (R = 0.51) compared to other precursors and PM10 (R = 0.32), indicating stronger secondary formation of PM2.5, likely due to local ammonia emissions.
These correlation patterns were not repetitive when we applied all nationwide measurements in South Korea (there were no higher correlations found), which implies that the controlling species (e.g., NO2, SO2 and NH3) need to be identified for regional air pollution policy. Doing so would require an assessment of the regional atmospheric chemical environment (e.g., NOx- or NH3-rich conditions) affected by local emissions and the transboundary transport of pollutants.
Our results show that NH3 emissions are likely to be a local limiting factor in controlling PM2.5 pollution over the NOx-rich SMA. Another recent study with in situ measurements in several parts of SMA also showed that ammonia could be a main controller of fine particle formation [36]. This suggests that the current Korean policy for mitigating NOx emissions from transportation, power plants and industry may not be as effective in some regions (such as the suburbs of the SMA) without an active reduction in local ammonia emissions, mostly from the livestock industry (and in particular from manure). One work showed that a 50% reduction in NH3 emissions can contribute to a 25% reduction in PM2.5 concentrations in winter over Europe [37]. Additionally, unlike other precursors being observed, the relative ammonium concentration has increased recently in Seoul (Han and Kim, 2015). However, a chemical environment with diverse emissions sources (such as the SMA) can be very complex [38]; Seo et al. [7] claimed that a NOx control strategy may be more effective in Seoul considering synergistic nitrate partitioning to the particle phase by wet particles depending on PH conditions. Therefore, more investigations are necessary with measurements of the chemical species of PM2.5 to better understand regional NOx or NH3 limiting conditions, which might vary seasonally. The other limitation of this study is that the relatively low CrIS sensitivity near the surface does not represent direct surface measurements, which implies more local validations of the satellite samples are necessary.
Korean policy for ammonia reduction is still being formulated, as there exist few continuous NH3-monitoring sites and any reduction targets for NH3 emissions from the livestock industry will require cooperation between the KMOE and the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) [39]. The Korean PM mitigation policy now focuses more on regionally specific pollution controls, through the Basic Plan for Regional Air Quality Management [40].
Korea has very diverse emissions sources in a relatively small spatial area, resulting in numerous complex atmospheric regional chemical environments. Additional comprehensive measurements and analyses of air pollution (including chemically speciated PM precursors) will prove helpful in understanding atmospheric chemical conditions and prioritizing regional PM mitigation policies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.S.; methodology, C.S. and J.H.; validation, C.S. and J.H.; formal analysis, J.H.; investigation, C.S. and J.H.; data curation, C.S., D.K.H., M.W.S., L.Z., S.K.K., E.D. and K.C.-P.; writing—original draft preparation, C.S.; writing—review and editing, J.H., D.K.H., M.W.S., L.Z., N.M., S.K.K. and E.D.; supervision, C.S.; project administration, C.S. and D.K.H.; funding acquisition, C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was jointly supported by the Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program under the National Strategic Project-Fine particle of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT(MSIT), the Ministry of Environment (ME), and the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) (No. 2017M3D8A1092026), (NRF-2018R1A6A3A01011847) and (NRF-2019M1A2A210400311). C. Shim thanks Korea Environment Institute (KEI, GP2019-11) for the institutional support.

Data Availability Statement

Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Acknowledgments

The CrIS Fast Physical Retrieval version 1.5 ammonia data created by Environment and Climate Change Canada are currently available upon request ([email protected]) at: https://hpfx.collab.science.gc.ca/~mas001/satellite_ext/cris/snpp/nh3/v1_5/, accessed on 10 April 2018.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kim, H.C.; Kim, S.; Kim, B.-U.; Jin, C.-S.; Hong, S.; Park, R.; Son, S.; Bae, C.; Bae, M.; Song, C.; et al. Recent increase of surface particulate matter concentrations in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, Korea. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yeo, M.J.; Kim, Y.P. Trends of the PM10 concentrations and high PM10 concentration cases in Korea. J. Korean Soc. Atmos. Environ. 2019, 25, 249–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sun, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Fu, P.; Li, J.; Yang, T.; Yin, Y. Investigation of the source and evolution processes of severe haze pollution in Beijing in January 2013. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2014, 119, 4380–4398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zheng, G.J.; Duan, F.K.; Su, H.; Ma, Y.L.; Cheng, Y.; Zheng, B.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, T.; Kimoto, T.; Chang, D.; et al. Exploring the severe winter haze in Beijing: The impact of synoptic weather, regional transport and heterogeneous reactions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 2969–2983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Seo, J.; Kim, J.Y.; Youn, D.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, H.; Lim, Y.B.; Kim, Y.; Jin, H.C. On the multiday haze in the Asian continental outflow: The important role of synoptic conditions combined with regional and local sources. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2017, 17, 9311–9332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. NIER. Annual Report of Air Pollution in 2017; National Institute of Environmental Research: Incheon, Korea, 2018. (In Korea) [Google Scholar]
  7. Seo, J.; Lim, Y.B.; Youn, D.; Kim, J.Y.; Jin, H.C. Synergistic enhancement of urban haze by nitrate uptake into transported hygroscopic particles in the Asian continental outflow. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 20, 7575–7594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. NIER. Introduction to the KORUS-AQ Rapid Science Synthesis Report; National Institute of Environmental Research: Incheon, Korea, 2018. Available online: https://espo.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/documents/KORUS-AQ%20RSSR.pdf (accessed on 15 December 2019). (In Korea)
  9. Goldberg, D.L.; Saide, P.E.; Lamsal., L.N.; de Foy, B.; Lu, Z.; Woo, J.-H.; Kim, Y.; Kim, J.; Gao, M.; Carmichael, G.; et al. A top-down assessment using OMI NO2 suggests an underestimate in the NOx emissions inventory in Seoul, South Korea, during KORUS-AQ. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019, 19, 1801–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huang, R.-J.; Zhang, Y.; Bozzetti, C.; Ho, K.-F.; Cao, J.-J.; Han, Y.; Daellenbach, K.R.; Slowik, J.G.; Platt, S.M.; Canonaco, F.; et al. High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China. Nature 2014, 514, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shen, G.; Xue, M.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Q.; Li, B.; Wu, H.; Ding, A. Chemical compositions and reconstructed light extinction coefficients of particulate matter in a mega-city in the western Yangtze River Delta, China. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 83, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tao, J.; Gao, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, R.; Che, H.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, Z.; Jing, J.; Cao, J.; Hsu, S.C. PM2.5 pollution in a megacity of southwest China: Source apportionment and implication. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 8679–8699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Park, S.; The Issues of Hazardous Air Pollutants Managements in Korea. Environment Media. 31 July 2019. Available online: http://www.ecomedia.co.kr/news/newsview.php?ncode=1065569200778326 (accessed on 22 October 2019). (In Korea).
  14. Chu, B.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; He, H.; Sun, Y.; Jiang, J.; Li, J.; Hao, J. Synergetic formation of secondary inorganic and organic aerosol: Effect of SO2 and NH3 on particle formation and growth. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 14219–14230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Choi, J.; Park, R.J.; Lee, H.M.; Lee, S.; Jo, D.S.; Jeong, J.I.; Henze, D.K.; Woo, J.H.; Ban, S.J.; Lee, M.D.; et al. Impacts of local vs. trans-boundary emissions from different sectors on PM2.5 exposure in South Korea during the KORUS-AQ campaign. Atmos. Environ. 2019, 203, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shin, H.J.; Lim, Y.J.; Kim, J.H.; Jung, H.J.; Park, S.M.; Park, J.S.; Song, I.H.; Seo, S.J.; Hong, Y.D.; Han, J.S. The characteristics of long-term high PM episode occurred in Feb. J. Korean Soc. Urban Environ. 2014, 14, 223–232. [Google Scholar]
  17. Park, J.S.; Lim, Y.; Seo, Y.; Shin, H.; Anh, J.; Lee, S.; Kim, H.; Choi, J.; Sung, M.; Jeon, H.; et al. Study on the Chemical Characteristics of PM2.5 in Case of High Concentration Episode; National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER); Ministry of Environment (KMOE): Sejong, Korea, 2015. (In Korea) [Google Scholar]
  18. Nault, B.A.; Campuzano-Jost, P.; Day, D.A.; Schroder, J.C.; Anderson, B.; Beyersdorf, A.J.; Blake, D.R.; Brune, W.H.; Choi, Y.; Corr, C.A.; et al. Secondary organic aerosol production from local emissions dominates the organic aerosol budget over Seoul, South Korea, during KORUS-AQ. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2018, 18, 17769–17800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Joint Korean Ministries. The Comprehensive Measures for PM Pollution Management. 2017. Available online: http://www.me.go.kr/home/web/policy_data/read.do?pagerOffset=30&maxPageItems=10&maxIndexPages=10&searchKey=&searchValue=&menuId=10259&orgCd=&condition.deleteYn=N&seq=7053 (accessed on 10 June 2021). (In Korea)
  20. Korean Law Information Center. Special Act on the Reduction and Management of Fine Dust; Ministry of Government Legislation: Sejong, Korea, 2021. Available online: https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/eng/engLsSc.do?menuId=2&query=ENFORCEMENT%20DECREE%20OF%20THE%20SPECIAL%20ACT%20ON%20THE%20REDUCTION%20AND%20MANAGEMENT%20OF%20FINE%20DUST#liBgcolor2 (accessed on 14 December 2021).
  21. Choi, H.S.; The Solutions of Mitigating Korean PM Pollutions. Maeil Business News Korea. 18 April 2019. Available online: https://www.mk.co.kr/news/economy/view/2019/04/242507/ (accessed on 18 May 2019). (In Korea).
  22. Jeong, U.; Kim, J.; Lee, H.; Lee, Y.G. Assessing the effect of long-range pollutant transportation on air quality in Seoul using the conditional potential source contribution function method. Atmos. Environ. 2017, 150, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. NIER. National Air Pollutant Emissions in 2015; National Institute of Environmental Research: Incheon, Korea, 2018. (In Korea) [Google Scholar]
  24. Seinfeld, J.H.; Pandis, S.N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wu, Y.; Gu, B.; Erisman, J.W.; Reis, S.; Fang, Y.; Lu, X.; Zhang, X. PM2.5 pollution is substantially affected by ammonia emissions in China. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 218, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, H.-M.; Park, R.J.; Henze, D.K.; Lee, S.; Shim, C.; Shin, H.J.; Moon, K.J.; Woo, J.-H. PM2.5 source attribution for Seoul in May from 2009 to 2013 using GEOS-Chem and its adjoint model. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 221, 227–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shin, D.W.; Joo, H.S.; Seo, E.J.; Kim, C.Y. Management Strategies to Reduce PM2.5 Emission: Emphasis-Ammonia; Research Reports of Korea Environment Institute (KEI); KEI: Sejong, Korea, 2017; (In Korea with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  28. KMOE & NIER. Guidelines for Installation and Operation of Air Pollution Monitoring Network; Ministry of Environment; National Institute of Environmental Research: Incheon, Korea, 2019. (In Korea) [Google Scholar]
  29. Han, J.; Lee, M.; Shang, X.; Lee, G.; Emmons, L.K. Decoupling peroxyacetyl nitrate from ozone in Chinese outflows observed at Gosan Climate Observatory. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2017, 17, 10619–10631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zavyalov, V.; Esplin, M.; Scott, D.; Esplin, B.; Bingham, G.; Hoffman, E.; Lietzke, C.; Predina, J.; Frain, R.; Suwinski, L.; et al. Noise performance of the CrIS instrument. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2013, 118, 13–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shephard, M.W.; Cady-Pereira, K.E. Cross-track Infrared Sounder (CrIS) satellite observations of tropospheric ammonia. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2015, 8, 1323–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dammers, E.; Shephard, M.; Palm, M.; Cady-Pereira, K.; Capps, S.; Lutsch, E.; Strong, K.; Hannigan, J.W.; Ortega, I.; Toon, G.C.; et al. Validation of the CrIS fast physical NH3 retrieval with ground-based FTIR. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2017, 10, 2645–2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Viatte, C.; Wang, T.; Van Damme, M.; Dammers, E.; Meleux, F.; Clarisse, L.; Shephard, M.W.; Whitburn, S.; Coheur, P.F.; Cady-Pereira, K.E.; et al. Atmospheric ammonia variability and link with particulate matter formation: A case study over the Paris area. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 20, 577–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shephard, M.W.; Dammers, E.; Cady-Pereira, K.E.; Kharol, S.K.; Thompson, J.; Gainariu-Matz, Y.; Zhang, J.; McLinden, C.A.; Kovachik, A.; Moran, M.; et al. Ammonia measurements from space with the Cross-track Infrared Sounder: Characteristics and applications. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 20, 2277–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Huang, X.; Qiu, R.; Chan, C.K.; Ravi Kant, P. Evidence of high PM2.5 strong acidity in ammonia-rich atmosphere of Guangzhou, China: Transition in pathways of ambient ammonia to form aerosol ammonium at [NH4+]/[SO42−]=1.5. Atmos. Res. 2011, 99, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lee, T. Understanding of aerosol formation over South Korea based on in-situ measurements. In On-Line Forum on Fine Particle Research Initiative in East Asia Considering National Differences Project (FRIEND); Seoul, Korea, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  37. Backes, A.M.; Aulinger, A.; Bieser, J.; Matthias, V.; Quante, M. Ammonia emissions in Europe, part II: How ammonia emission abatement strategies affect secondary aerosols. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 126, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Han, S.H.; Kim, Y.P. Long-term Trends of the concentrations of mass and chemical composition in PM2.5 over Seoul. J. Korean Soc. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 31, 143–156. (In Korea) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Joint Korean Ministries. The Comprehensive Management Plan on the Fine Dust. 2019. Available online: https://www.cleanair.go.kr/dust/information/policy.do?mode=view&articleNo=20&article.offset=0&articleLimit=10 (accessed on 10 October 2019). (In Korea)
  40. KMOE. The Study for Basic Plan for Regional Air Quality Management; Ministry of Environment: Sejong, Korea, 2020. (In Korea)
Figure 1. The average concentrations of CrIS surface level NH3 concentration data (unit: ppb) over South Korea (2015–2017) (left) and the data over Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA), which consists of Seoul (denoted as “S”), Incheon (denoted as “IN”), the northern Gyeonggi area (denoted as “N.GY”), and the southern Gyeonggi area (denoted as “S.GY”) are shown (right). The grid with less than 1.5 ppbv were masked out.
Figure 1. The average concentrations of CrIS surface level NH3 concentration data (unit: ppb) over South Korea (2015–2017) (left) and the data over Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA), which consists of Seoul (denoted as “S”), Incheon (denoted as “IN”), the northern Gyeonggi area (denoted as “N.GY”), and the southern Gyeonggi area (denoted as “S.GY”) are shown (right). The grid with less than 1.5 ppbv were masked out.
Atmosphere 13 01227 g001
Figure 2. Annual ammonia emissions at local administrative levels in 2015, based on national emissions inventory (CAPSS, NIER, 2018).
Figure 2. Annual ammonia emissions at local administrative levels in 2015, based on national emissions inventory (CAPSS, NIER, 2018).
Atmosphere 13 01227 g002
Figure 3. Average concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, NO2, and NH3 in the Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA) from 2015 to 2017 (units: PM10 and PM2.5 (µg/m3); NO2 and NH3 (ppbv)). The colored area indicates an area where all the chemical species’ measurements are coincidently available.
Figure 3. Average concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, NO2, and NH3 in the Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA) from 2015 to 2017 (units: PM10 and PM2.5 (µg/m3); NO2 and NH3 (ppbv)). The colored area indicates an area where all the chemical species’ measurements are coincidently available.
Atmosphere 13 01227 g003
Figure 4. The contour plot of annual mean NO2 concentrations over South Korea made only from ground measurements in 2017 (adapted from NIER, 2018). The ground measurements of ammonia at Kangwha (denoted as the northernmost black star) and at Imsil (denoted as the southernmost black star) for validating the CrIS satellite retrievals are shown.
Figure 4. The contour plot of annual mean NO2 concentrations over South Korea made only from ground measurements in 2017 (adapted from NIER, 2018). The ground measurements of ammonia at Kangwha (denoted as the northernmost black star) and at Imsil (denoted as the southernmost black star) for validating the CrIS satellite retrievals are shown.
Atmosphere 13 01227 g004
Figure 5. Three-year monthly variations of PM2.5 (blue line), CrIS NH3 (orange line), and PM2.5/PM10 ratio (%, gray bars) over the SMA. These data were averaged from the measurements estimated with 15 km-grids (shown in Figure 3).
Figure 5. Three-year monthly variations of PM2.5 (blue line), CrIS NH3 (orange line), and PM2.5/PM10 ratio (%, gray bars) over the SMA. These data were averaged from the measurements estimated with 15 km-grids (shown in Figure 3).
Atmosphere 13 01227 g005
Figure 6. Scatter plots representing the correlation between PM2.5/PM10 ratio and CrIS NH3 over the SMA from May to June, when secondary PM formation was increasing. The data were prepared from monthly means at a 15 km resolution (shown in Figure 3).
Figure 6. Scatter plots representing the correlation between PM2.5/PM10 ratio and CrIS NH3 over the SMA from May to June, when secondary PM formation was increasing. The data were prepared from monthly means at a 15 km resolution (shown in Figure 3).
Atmosphere 13 01227 g006
Table 1. Correlation coefficients between the annual means of PM10, PM2.5, NH3, NO2, CO, and SO2 as measured at the national stations and by CrIS retrievals (for NH3) over the Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA) between 2015 and 2017. The correlation coefficients in the parentheses indicate correlations excluding Seoul and Incheon (“S” and “IN” in Figure 1), which have greater emissions from transportation and industry. The horizontal scale was set at 15 km according to CrIS footprints.
Table 1. Correlation coefficients between the annual means of PM10, PM2.5, NH3, NO2, CO, and SO2 as measured at the national stations and by CrIS retrievals (for NH3) over the Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA) between 2015 and 2017. The correlation coefficients in the parentheses indicate correlations excluding Seoul and Incheon (“S” and “IN” in Figure 1), which have greater emissions from transportation and industry. The horizontal scale was set at 15 km according to CrIS footprints.
PM10PM2.5NH3NO2SO2
PM101
PM2.50.66 (0.60) ***1
NH30.32 (0.35) *0.51 (0.59) ***1
NO20.23 (0.011)0.16 (0.09)−0.022 (0.20)1
SO20.17 (0.29)0.14 (0.17)−0.015 (0.14)0.38 (0.33) **1
Note: *** (p < 0.000), ** (p < 0.001), * (p < 0.01).
Table 2. Average concentrations of air pollutants including PM10, PM2.5, NH3, NO2, and SO2 in Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA), South Korea from 2015 to 2017.
Table 2. Average concentrations of air pollutants including PM10, PM2.5, NH3, NO2, and SO2 in Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA), South Korea from 2015 to 2017.
Pollutants (Units)SMA
PM10 (µg/m3)51 ± 4
PM2.5 (µg/m3)26 ± 3
NH3 (ppb)2.26 ± 0.7
NO2 (ppb)25 ± 9
SO2 (ppb)5 ± 1
Note: Average ± SD.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shim, C.; Han, J.; Henze, D.K.; Shephard, M.W.; Zhu, L.; Moon, N.; Kharol, S.K.; Dammers, E.; Cady-Pereira, K. Impact of NH3 Emissions on Particulate Matter Pollution in South Korea: A Case Study of the Seoul Metropolitan Area. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 1227. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13081227

AMA Style

Shim C, Han J, Henze DK, Shephard MW, Zhu L, Moon N, Kharol SK, Dammers E, Cady-Pereira K. Impact of NH3 Emissions on Particulate Matter Pollution in South Korea: A Case Study of the Seoul Metropolitan Area. Atmosphere. 2022; 13(8):1227. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13081227

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shim, Changsub, Jihyun Han, Daven K. Henze, Mark W. Shephard, Liye Zhu, Nankyoung Moon, Shailesh K. Kharol, Enrico Dammers, and Karen Cady-Pereira. 2022. "Impact of NH3 Emissions on Particulate Matter Pollution in South Korea: A Case Study of the Seoul Metropolitan Area" Atmosphere 13, no. 8: 1227. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13081227

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop