1. Introduction
The Cerrado is one of the largest and most important biomes in Brazil, with an area of 2,036,448 km
2, and represents about 24% of the national territory [
1]. Agriculture in the Cerrado region is characterized by two cultivation periods: the main crop season (period with the highest rainfall) from October to January and a second crop “off-season” from February to May. As a result, water shortages are expected to impact up to two-thirds of humanity between 2010 and 2050, and subsistence farmers worldwide would benefit from nutrition and drought-tolerant cover crops [
2].
Winter cultivation in Cerrado, between May and September, presents low rainfall, and irrigation is used. Currently, one of the major challenges in the Cerrado region is to obtain species with a high potential for grain production in the second crop and simultaneously produce enough biomass for coverage and protect the soil during the off-season, since water availability for the plants in these periods is reduced [
3]. The use of cover crop in an agricultural system is mainly beneficial for soil and water conservation [
4]. Cover crops such as
Vicia villosa improved the soil moisture preceding the soybean growing season in very fine sandy loam soil [
5]. On the other hand, Hunter et al. [
6] observed that cover crops, such as clover and radish, neither ameliorated nor exacerbated drought stress tolerance in the following cash crop: maize; in the same work, the authors obtained a negative effect of rye on the subsequent crop. Cover crops, in addition to soil protection against degradation agents such as erosion and compaction, can restore considerable amounts of nutrients since they absorb nutrients from the soil subsurface layers and release them on the soil surface by decomposition of plant residues [
7,
8,
9].
The use of species tolerant to water stress with slower decomposition rate favors soil coverage and a gradual release of nutrients for subsequent crops. Crop residue accumulation and nutrient release into soil depend on their quantity and quality, which influences the processes of plant decomposition [
7,
10]. Cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin contents and C/N ratio are important indicators of crop residue quality for maintaining soil covered due to slower decomposition [
11]. Moreover, the decomposition rates of plant residues are negatively related to the number of compounds rich in aromatic rings and that is difficult to break down, such as lignin [
12].
Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Brown is a traditional crop in West Africa and Asia, with exceptional adaptation to abiotic stresses [
13]. It is one of the most cultivated cover crop species in the Cerrado region due to its greater tolerance to drought, high biomass production and efficient nutrient cycling [
8,
14,
15], and it is adapted to semi-arid regions [
16].
Some species characterized as pseudocereals are potential alternatives as cover crops because of their adaptation to the Cerrado region [
14]. Among them,
Amaranthus cruenthus is a widely cultivated species that produces grains; its leaves are also used for human and animal consumption [
17]. In addition,
A. cruenthus has pivoting roots with abundant lateral roots, which favor the absorption of water and nutrients [
18], and is adapted to arid regions or places with prolonged drought periods.
Chenopodium quinoa (Willd) is a pseudocereal species from the Andes region and is considered an exceptional crop for its potential to contribute to food security [
19]. The species is well-adapted to abiotic stresses, such as water stress, low temperatures, salinity and nutrient-poor soils [
20,
21]. In addition, this species has well-adapted to the Cerrado region due to the amount of biomass and grain production and is an alternative for soil protection in the no-tillage system [
22].
Cover crops may have a secondary purpose, grain production, which would promote economic sustainability, providing income from the commercialization of the grains. The pseudocereals are species with high potential for grain production, and studies have reported
A. cruenthus productivity ranging from 990 to 3692 kg ha
−1 [
23,
24]. Some
C. quinoa genotypes produce up to 8.34 t ha
−1 with a water regime of 389 mm during the crop cycle [
25]. Additionally, the grains of these two species present high nutritional value; are rich in macronutrients and micronutrients, including vitamins and minerals, high protein and essential amino acids; and are considered functional foods [
19,
26].
Therefore, we have tested the hypothesis that, in addition to Pennisetum glaucum, A. cruenthus and C. quinoa consist of alternative species, as they have potential as cover crops, nutrient accumulation and grain yield, even in conditions of low water availability. The objective of this work was to evaluate biomass production and nutrient accumulation in species with potential as cover crops and grain production under different water levels.
2. Materials and Methods
The experiment was conducted at the Embrapa Cerrados in Planaltina, DF, Brazil, located at the geographic coordinates: 15°35′30″ S and 47°42′30″ W. The climate of the region is characterized as Aw, according to the Köppen classification, with two well-defined seasons (dry and rainy). Summer is warm and humid, with dry spells during the rainy season, called
veranicos. It presents average annual rainfall of 1400 mm and an average temperature of 21.3 °C [
27]. The monthly average temperature and rainfall data during the experiment are presented in
Figure 1.
The soil of the experimental area is classified as clayey Oxisol (Typic Haplustox) [
28] and presents the following chemical composition 0–20 cm layer: pH (H
2O) = 5.77 and Ca (cmol
c dm
−3) = 3.34, Mg (cmol
c dm
−3) =1.41, K (mg dm
−3) = 207.55, H + Al (cmol
c dm
−3) = 4.52, P (mg dm
−3) = 48.56, S (mg kg
−1) = 19.71 and organic matter (g kg
−1) = 26.0.
The history of the experimental area over the last nine years is presented in
Table 1. Before being cultivated with soybeans in the 2005/2006 crop season, the area was under native Cerrado vegetation.
The experimental design was randomized blocks with split plots and four replications. The main plots were composed of four water regimes (167 mm, 268 mm, 381 mm and 432 mm), and the subplots were formed by the following cover crops: Amaranthus cruenthus; Chenopodium quinoa “Genotype derived from BRS Piabiru” and Pennisetum glaucum. The plots measured 24 m × 3.2 m, and the subplots measured 8 m × 3.2 m. Each plot was composed of 8 lines, spaced at 0.40 m.
Cover crops were sown in the first week of May 2015. Seeds were sown manually under a no-tillage system. The seeding density was 200 seeds m−1 for A. cruenthus, 150 seeds m−1 for C. quinoa and 58 seeds m−1 for P. glaucum. The high seeding rate was applied to compensate germination failures due to the small seed size. Twenty days after emergence (DAE), thinning was performed, obtaining 10 plants m−1 for A. cruenthus and 20 plants m−1 for C. quinoa and P. glaucum.
NPK fertilization at planting was used with the formulation 04-30-16 at 400 kg ha−1. Thirty days after seedling emergence, nitrogen topdressing was applied at a dose of 100 kg N ha−1 as urea. To avoid the competition of invasive plants, manual weeding was performed.
The water regimes were obtained using a sprinkler irrigator bar 40 m wide, connected to a spool with adjustable speed and ten sprinklers were installed on each side of the bar. During the 35 of germination, irrigation was uniform, and ten irrigations were performed, totaling 135 mm. After this period, the line source methodology was adapted [
29], using sprinklers with decreasing sizes from the central area to the end of the experimental area. The sprinklers overlapped and promoted a decreasing gradient of water. For each side of the irrigation bar, 4 plots were delimited, with a linear distance between them, representing the water regimes (WR). In this phase, 13 irrigations were performed. The accumulated depths of the uniform plus variable irrigations were 167, 268, 381 and 432 mm for the four WRs. Two rows of collectors parallel to the irrigation line were installed to measure the volume of water applied to each irrigation. Irrigations were carried out according to the irrigation monitoring program in the Cerrado [
30], using wheat crop as a reference, the agrometeorological indicators of the region, the soil type and the date of germination.
2.1. Production of Dry Biomass and Structural Components (Lignin, Cellulose, Hemicellulose and Lignin/N)
For dry biomass production, a sample was collected from each plot during the flowering of cover crops, with an area of 3 m2, in the four central lines, with 2.5 m in length. The collected material was kept at 65 °C for 72 h until reaching a constant weight.
From dry biomass samples, three subsamples were collected to determine lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose contents by the sequential method [
31], through of the analysis of fiber neutral detergent (FND) and fiber acid detergent (FAD), modified by Komarek [
32], using an Ankom fiber apparatus (Ankom Technology Corp., Fairport, NY, USA). Lignin analysis was determined by digestion of FAD residue with 72% sulfuric acid, with the extracts of cellulose and hemicellulose, producing lignin inorganic matter as a residue. Hemicellulose and cellulose were quantified by the difference between the FND and FAD residues and between the FAD and lignin residues, respectively. The difference between the acid digestion residue and after burning at 600 °C for four hours was determined the lignin content.
Accumulation of Macro and Micronutrients in the Shoot
The concentrations of phosphorus (P), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), sulfur (S), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), boron (B) and iron (Fe) in the dry biomass were determined using an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrophotometer (ICP-OES, Thermo Cientific, 7000, Waltham, MA USA). The nitrogen (N) concentration in the plants was determined by the Kjeldahl method. The accumulation of macro and micronutrients in plants was calculated by the product between the concentration of each element in the plant tissue and the amount of dry biomass produced. The results were expressed in kg ha−1.
2.2. Grain Productivity
Grain yield was obtained by mechanical harvesting of plants in an area of 7.2 m2 plot−1. A subsample was oven dried at 65 °C until constant weight to determine the moisture of the grains. Productivity was corrected to 13% humidity, and the results were expressed in kg ha−1.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the comparison of means was performed by the Tukey’s test was used, at 5% of probability, using statistical software SAS [
33]. The statistical model was adjusted using the SAS PROC MIXED through the restricted maximum likelihood method (reml). The variation sources were water regimes (plots), cover crops (subplots) and their interactions. For the variables in percentages (cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin), data were transformed into square root of arcsine (x/100). These transformations were necessary to obtain data residue normality.
Data were also submitted to the redundancy analysis (RDA) in the CANOCO
® statistical program [
34] after being transformed into Log C + 1 and meeting the criterion of the gradient length lower than 3 of the distended correspondence analysis (DCA) [
35]. The variables (P, K, S, Al, Fe, Cu, Ca, Mn, Mg, B and Zn) were analyzed as explanatory variables, and the contents of lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose and dry biomass were analyzed as response variables. The Monte Carlo permutation test (permutations = 999) was carried out to determine which explanatory variables were most significant (
p ≤ 0.05) in the model.
3. Results
3.1. Production of Dry Biomass and Structural Components (Lignin, Cellulose, Hemicellulose and Lignin/N)
Amaranthus cruenthus and
P. glaucum presented the highest dry biomass (BS) production, with 10.16 and 9.75 Mg ha
−1 (
p < 0.05), respectively (
Table 2), and
C. quinoa was the species with the lowest BS (7.31 Mg ha
−1), 28% smaller than the best species (A.
cruenthus).
Penisetum glaucum was the species with the lowest concentration of lignin (28% lower than
C. quinoa) and higher concentration of cellulose and hemicellulose: 12 and 45% higher cellulose and hemicellulose content, respectively, compared with
C. quinoa. The cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin concentrations in
A. cruenthus and
C. quinoa were statistically similar.
Regarding the water regime (WR), the lowest BS production occurred in the lower water regime (167 mm), which differed from the other regimes (p < 0.05). Comparing the highest water regime (432 mm) with the lowest one (167 mm), there was a 31% reduction in BS production. Increased water availability enhanced the cellulose and reduced the hemicellulose contents. The lignin contents were not influenced by WRs. No significant difference was obtained for the lignin/N ratio for cover crops and water regimes.
3.2. Accumulation of Macro and Micronutrients in the Shoot
A significant effect of cover crops and water regimes was obtained in the accumulation of macro and micronutrients. The interaction between water regimes and cover crops was significant (
p < 0.05) only for P, Ca, B and Zn (
Table 3). In general,
A. cruenthus was the species that accumulated more nutrients. Under higher water availability (432 mm), this species accumulated up to 37.42 kg ha
−1 of P;
P. glaucum reached up to 30.88 kg ha
−1 (381 mm), and
C. quinoa reached 24.29 kg ha
−1, 33% lower than
A. cruenthus, with the same water amount of applied water (432 mm).
The reduction of water availability resulted in a lower accumulation of P in the shoot for all species. C. quinoa was the most sensitive to a lower water regime, with a reduction of 70% in the P content. For A. cruenthus and P. glaucum, these reductions were 62% and 66%, respectively.
A. cruenthus was the species with the highest Ca content in all WRs (p < 0.05), with values up to 162.36 kg ha−1. P. glaucum and C. quinoa accumulated similar amounts of Ca, except for WR 432 mm, which presented greater accumulation in C. quinoa. The increase in water availability positively influenced the accumulation of this nutrient in A. cruenthus and C. quinoa. As with the P content, the Ca accumulation was more sensitive to lower water availability in C. quinoa, with a reduction of 62% for this species and 51% and 41% for A. cruenthus and P. glaucum, respectively.
The B content was increased by 66.33% and 59.42% for A. cruenthus and C. quinoa, respectively, when comparing the highest and lowest water regime. P. glaucum accumulated the same amount of B, regardless of the applied water. Among the species, in general, a greater accumulation of B was observed in A. cruenthus.
The three species showed similar contents of Zn in the 167, 268 and 381 mm water regimes (
Table 3). In WR 432 mm,
A. cruenthus and
P. glaucum presented the highest and lowest accumulation of Zn (
p < 0.05), respectively. Unlike that observed for P and Ca,
A. cruenthus showed the lowest Zn concentrations at the lowest water regime. The reduction of Zn content was equivalent to 72% for this species, 57% for
C. quinoa and 47% for
P. glaucum, when comparing the highest and the lowest water regime.
P. glaucum was the species less affected by the reduction of water availability in Ca and Zn contents.
N content was similar among the species (
Table 4).
A. cruenthus accumulated most K (416.92 kg ha
−1), Mg (30.88 kg ha
−1), S (43.53 kg ha
−1) and Fe (2.22 kg ha
−1). For Cu, this species presented similar values to
P. glaucum and
C.quinoa; for Mn, this species presented similar content to
C. quinoa.
P. glaucum had the lowest levels of K and Mg (
p < 0.05) and showed similar contents of S, Fe and Mn compared to
C. quinoa. Although it presented lower values than
A. cruenthus, it is worth mentioning the high capacity of
C. quinoa to accumulate K (367.89 kg ha
−1). There was a significant reduction in the concentration of these nutrients in the plant biomass with the decrease in water availability (
p < 0.05), except for Fe, which was not influenced by the water regimes.
3.3. Grain Productivity and Redundancy Analysis (RDA)
The highest grain yields
of A. cruenthus and
C. quinoa were between 3549.45 kg ha
−1 and 3488.86 kg ha
−1, respectively, in WR 432/381 (
p < 0.05) (
Table 5).
A. cruenthus produced higher grain production than
C. quinoa under the two intermediate regimes and did not differ under the extreme ones (168 and 432 mm). However,
A. cruenthus presented a reduction of 71% when comparing the regime with the highest productivity (381 mm) with the lowest (167 mm). For
C. quinoa, the reduction was 80%.
P. glaucum did not produce grains.
In the redundancy analysis, two groups were formed for
A. cruenthus species (
Figure 2A). These groups presented different relations with the dynamics of the explanatory variables. The group was most closely related to the explanatory variables were WR 381 and 432 mm (
Figure 2B). In contrast, the 167 and 268 mm water regimes for
A. cruenthus species presented the lowest relation with the explanatory variables. However, there was a partial overlap in
C. quinoa and
P. glaucum, especially in the intermediary water regimes (268 and 381 mm) (
Figure 2C). Among the explanatory variables of the model, P, Cu, Mn, S and Mg were the significant variables, according to the Monte Carlo permutation test (
Table 6).
In the separation of WRs, the most contrasting water regime, which was not related to the dynamics of the explanatory variables, was 167 mm (
Figure 2B). WR 381 mm was the most closely related to the dynamics of the explanatory and response variables (
Figure 2C). The length of the response vectors in the ordering diagram (
Figure 2A–C) reflected their contribution to the model. The relationship between the variables is expressed in the diagram by the angle formed between them. Thus, dry biomass showed greater contribution among the variables, followed by the lignin and cellulose contents. A possible no correlation between dry biomass and the lignin content was observed, expressed in the diagram as an approximate angle of 90° between these vectors. The lignin content was correlated with
C. quinoa species in the 381-mm water regime (
Figure 2C), whereas the BS was less correlated with all water regimes for this species (
Figure 2C).