Next Article in Journal
Use of Dithiothreitol Assay to Evaluate the Oxidative Potential of Atmospheric Aerosols
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparison of Einstein A Coefficients for OH Rotational Temperature Measurements Using a Large Astronomical Data Set
Open AccessArticle

Comparison of NMC and Ensemble-Based Climatological Background-Error Covariances in an Operational Limited-Area Data Assimilation System

Croatian Meteorological and Hydrological Service, Gric 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2019, 10(10), 570; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10100570
Received: 31 July 2019 / Revised: 9 September 2019 / Accepted: 19 September 2019 / Published: 22 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Climatology and Meteorology)
The evaluation of several climatological background-error covariance matrix (defined as the B matrix) estimation methods was performed using the ALADIN limited-area modeling data-assimilation system at a 4 km horizontal grid spacing. The B matrices compared were derived using the standard National Meteorological Center (NMC) and ensemble-based estimation methods. To test the influence of lateral boundary condition (LBC) perturbations on the characteristics of ensemble-based B matrix, two ensemble prediction systems were established: one used unperturbed lateral boundary conditions (ENS) and another used perturbed lateral boundary conditions (ENSLBC). The characteristics of the three B matrices were compared through a diagnostic comparison, while the influence of the different B matrices on the analysis and quality of the forecast were evaluated for the ENSLBC and NMC matrices. The results showed that the lateral boundary condition perturbations affected all the control variables, while the smallest influence was found for the specific humidity. The diagnostic comparison showed that the ensemble-based estimation method shifted the correlations toward the smaller spatial scales, while the LBC perturbations gave rise to larger spatial scales. The influence on the analysis showed a smaller spatial correlation for the ensemble B matrix compared to that of the NMC, with the most pronounced differences for the specific humidity. The verification of the forecast showed modest improvement for the experiment with the ensemble B matrix. Among the methods tested, the results suggest that the ensemble-based data-assimilation method is the favorable approach for background-error covariance calculation in high-resolution limited-area data assimilation systems. View Full-Text
Keywords: B matrix; data assimilation; NWP; ALADIN B matrix; data assimilation; NWP; ALADIN
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Stanesic, A.; Horvath, K.; Keresturi, E. Comparison of NMC and Ensemble-Based Climatological Background-Error Covariances in an Operational Limited-Area Data Assimilation System. Atmosphere 2019, 10, 570.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop