Next Article in Journal
De Novo Hepatic Transcriptome Assembly and Systems Level Analysis of Three Species of Dietary Fish, Sardinops sagax, Scomber japonicus, and Pleuronichthys verticalis
Previous Article in Journal
mully: An R Package to Create, Modify and Visualize Multilayered Graphs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deciphering the Adaptation of Corynebacterium glutamicum in Transition from Aerobiosis via Microaerobiosis to Anaerobiosis

Genes 2018, 9(11), 520; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9110520

Review
Terpenoid Metabolic Engineering in Photosynthetic Microorganisms
1
Australian Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
2
Climate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
3
CSIRO Synthetic Biology Future Science Platform, GPO Box 2583, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 20 September 2018 / Accepted: 17 October 2018 / Published: 23 October 2018

Abstract

:
Terpenoids are a group of natural products that have a variety of essential and non-essential roles in metabolism, in biotic and abiotic interactions, as well as commercial applications such as pharmaceuticals, food additives, and chemical feedstocks. Economic viability for commercial applications is commonly not achievable by using natural source organisms or chemical synthesis. Engineered bio-production in suitable heterologous hosts is often required to achieve commercial viability. However, our poor understanding of regulatory mechanisms and other biochemical processes makes obtaining efficient conversion yields from feedstocks challenging. Moreover, production from carbon dioxide via photosynthesis would significantly increase the environmental and potentially the economic credentials of these processes by disintermediating biomass feedstocks. In this paper, we briefly review terpenoid metabolism, outline some recent advances in terpenoid metabolic engineering, and discuss why photosynthetic unicellular organisms—such as algae and cyanobacteria—might be preferred production platforms for the expression of some of the more challenging terpenoid pathways.
Keywords:
terpenoids; metabolic engineering; photosynthetic microorganisms; cyanobacteria; diatoms

1. Introduction

Terpenoids are a chemically diverse class of natural products that are present in all domains of life and number in the tens of thousands of compounds isolated to date (more than 70,000 according to the Dictionary of Natural Products database). The wealth of terpenoid structures provides a variety of roles in central cellular processes (such as electron transport, photosynthesis, membrane fluidity, signaling, and cell wall formation). The greatest terpenoid diversity can be found in plants where they have a myriad of roles including mediating in complex interactions with the biotic and abiotic environment [1,2].
Terpenoid biosynthesis starts with two non-homologous metabolic routes including the mevalonate (MVA) and the methyl-D-erythritol (MEP) pathways. These pathways produce the universal 5-carbon prenyl phosphate precursor molecules isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP) (Figure 1). IPP and DMAPP are condensed to form the C10 prenyl phosphate geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP)—the precursor of monoterpenes. Consecutive addition of IPP units forms farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP)—the precursors of sesquiterpenes and diterpenes, respectively (Figure 1). Longer carbon-chain prenyl pyrophosphates are also produced.
The MEP pathway is present in most bacteria, in plastids of photosynthetic organisms, and in some eukaryotic organisms, including pathogens such as the malaria parasite. The MVA pathway appears in archaea and the cytosol of most eukaryotic organisms. Consequently, plants and other eukaryotic organisms—including some algae species—have both pathways present but in different compartments and with distinct roles (e.g., FPP is predominantly supplied by the cytosolic MVA pathway while GPP and GGPP by the chloroplast MEP pathway in plants) [2,3,4]. The prenyl pyrophosphates serve as substrates for specialized terpene synthases that dephosphorylate and rearrange and/or cyclize them by using the energy derived from the pyrophosphate hydrolysis to form the terpenoid skeletons. The last part of the biosynthesis, which delivers the vast terpenoid diversity, is the decoration and modification of the previously mentioned skeleton by enzymes such as cytochrome P450s, acetyl- and methyl- transferases, and cleaving enzymes (Figure 1).
Plant-derived specialized terpenoids are often produced in low quantities or in mixtures of similar compounds (e.g., resins), which makes extraction from natural sources commercially unviable and chemical synthesis very challenging, due to the complexity of the structures of interest [5,6,7]. Consequently, metabolic engineers have turned to heterologous hosts for more efficient production. This, however, presents two fundamental challenges: ensuring a sufficiently high pool of isoprenoid precursors; and the efficient expression and tuning of the heterologous terpenoid pathway to achieve economically viable production.
The industrial workhorses Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) have been the primary target hosts. They are well-characterized heterologous systems with a defined terpenoid background, which facilitates the analytics process and allows the expression of enzymes one by one, or in combinations. This involves the biosynthetic steps of known terpenoids, and even allows the production of new-to-nature compounds [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Key examples of pathways engineered in heterologous hosts using synthetic biology approaches include the production of artemisinic acid [14] and taxadiene [15]—precursors of the anti-malarial artemisinin and cancer chemotherapeutic taxol, respectively. There have been many successful engineering studies that have increased the range of produced compounds and our understanding on how to engineer terpenoid pathways [16,17,18,19,20].
In this review, we summarize key advances that used metabolic engineering to both rewire the host’s primary metabolism to maximize the production of isoprenoid precursors and to enable the production of the desired terpenoid product in tractable, well studied hosts E. coli and yeast. We then explore advances in engineering photosynthetic microorganisms and discuss their potential as alternative production platforms for heterologous terpenoids.

2. Pathway Modules in Terpenoid Biosynthesis

Metabolic engineering is the application of systems and synthetic biology approaches to engineering cells for the production of industrially useful biochemicals. These factories can be designed and engineered for optimal resource allocation towards the desired pathway. Terpenoid precursor and biosynthetic pathways are well characterized in different organisms and have been manipulated in a multitude of studies, which renders them model pathways for metabolic engineering. The biosynthesis of terpenoids has a distinctive modular structure, which makes their pathways particularly suited to synthetic biology-based engineering approaches: a natural grouping of biochemical reaction types creates four distinct modules that can be independently manipulated (Figure 1). Pathway modularization is useful in combinatorial engineering approaches [11,21,22] and is useful as a concept guiding engineering studies.

2.1. Module I: Redirection of Resources Towards Isopentenyl Pyrophosphate and Dimethylallyl Pyrophosphate

Production hosts commonly have insufficient availability of the C5 prenyl pyrophosphate precursors IPP and DMAPP to provide an adequate flux to the heterologous pathways. Successful examples of terpenoid production hosts include maximization of the metabolic flux towards the formation of IPP and DMAPP through the overexpression or manipulation of genes of the endogenous MVA and MEP pathways as well as the insertion of the MEP pathway in organisms with only an MVA pathway to supplement flux [23,24,25,26,27,28]. The latter strategy has the additional objective of overcoming endogenous flux-constraining mechanisms as well as introducing emergent synergistic effects. One interesting study aimed at the production of isoprene pinpointed that, when both the MVA and MEP pathways are co-expressed in E. coli, they work in synergy and both have a higher flux when compared to having only one pathway present [27,29].
In the MEP pathway, the first two steps catalyzed by deoxy-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase and deoxy-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase (DXS and DXR, respectively) as well as the isomerization of C5 prenyl phosphates by the isopentenyl-diphosphate delta-isomerase (IDI) (Figure 1) are rate limiting and must be overexpressed for a high terpenoid yield [15,30,31]. The MVA pathway is limited by the first catalytic steps—from acetyl-coA to mevalonate—and in particular by the 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase [32,33].
In the presence of the MVA/MEP pathway overexpression/augmentation, over-accumulation of prenyl phosphates is problematic and causes cellular toxicity [34]. For this reason, a balance between flux through the DMAPP/IPP synthetic pathways and consumption of prenyl phosphates is required. A strong sink “pull” approach is commonly required to compensate for the upstream pathway flux augmentation.

2.2. Module II: Prenyl Phosphate Metabolism

Different classes of terpenoids are produced from prenyl phosphates with different chain-length carbon skeletons (Figure 1). Hemiterpenes are produced from the C5 prenyl phosphates with the best known example being isoprene, which is derived from the DMAPP. The sequential addition of IPP units to DMAPP generates the longer prenyl phosphate skeletons—namely the precursors GPP (C10 terpenoids), FPP (C15 and C30 terpenoids), and GGPP (C20 and C40 terpenoids) (Figure 1).
Both E. coli and S. cerevisiae preferentially produce FPP, which is a key precursor for the primary isoprenoids produced by these organisms (e.g., sterols in yeast, dolichols in E. coli). As a consequence, sesquiterpene (C15) production in these organisms has yielded relatively high titers especially in yeast [14,35]. The competition for the FPP by sterol catabolism must be alleviated and squalene synthase, which consumes FPP and is the first committed step of sterol biosynthesis, has been targeted for down-regulation for this reason [16,36,37,38].
Directing productivity towards the C10 and C20 branches faces different challenges. In S. cerevisiae and E. coli, the primary prenyl transferase converts GPP immediately to FPP by the addition of a second IPP unit without releasing GPP from the active site under normal conditions [39]. This means that there is a very low in vivo pool of GPP for the production of monoterpenes. In yeast, an FPP synthase (FPPS) engineered to exclude FPP from the active site has been used to increase GPP and monoterpene production [40,41]. An alternative approach is the use of a degradation tag on FPPS to minimize competition and limit flux towards FPP, which enhances monoterpene production [41]. This approach had to be paired with the replacement of the FPPS promoter by the sterol-responsive promoter of squalene epoxidase to ensure sufficient activity of this essential enzyme [41].
Accumulation of GGPP requires an uninhibited flux through GPP and FPP and usually a strong “metabolic pull” strategy is used by overexpressing GGPP synthase [15,42,43]. A more elaborate strategy was also used in S. cerevisiae whereby the GPP/FPP synthase was engineered to expand its substrate binding site, which allows it to add an IPP unit to catalyze GGPP formation [44]. This allowed for the enhanced heterologous diterpenoid production.

2.3. Modules III and IV: Terpene Synthases, Skeleton Decorations, and Further Modifications

The next two modules comprise the specific pathway for each target compound and are where the true terpenoid diversity is unlocked. Terpene synthases (Module III) form a wide variety of carbon skeletons. These skeletons are the substrates of the decorating enzymes of Module IV. This chemistry is highly complex and results in massive diversity. In this case, we outline generic information to provide (a) a more complete overview of terpenoid biosynthesis and (b) context for the following section on terpenoid production by photosynthetic organisms.
Terpene synthases are often multimeric and slow enzymes [45]. These features make them challenging to use in heterologous production. The solution commonly employed is massive overexpression, which, while it can increase catalytic activity, also creates problems such as inclusion of body formation and loss of activity [46,47,48]. In plants, terpene synthases range in number from one (in the case of the moss Physcomitrella patens) to over a hundred per genome [49]. They are thought to have evolved by descent from a single gene resembling the kaurene synthase found in moss and they are notoriously promiscuous enzymes with a high level of substrates and product flexibility [49,50]. While undesirable in many cases (where a specific product is sought), these properties offer opportunities. Terpene synthases can be combined in heterologous systems to produce many different compounds including compounds which are new to nature and have desirable industrial properties [11,12,22,51].
Decorating enzymes—that alter the basic carbon skeleton—are usually the final step of terpenoid biosynthesis. Various enzymes such as oxidative enzymes (especially cytochromes P450, monooxygenases that add hydroxyl groups with a high degree of stereospecificity), methyltransferases, acyltransferases, and prenyltransferases diversify the already numerous terpene skeletons [1]. The cytochromes P450 are one of the keys to unlocking the large terpenoid diversity [5,52]. Cytochrome P450s due to their unique catalytic mechanism are able to introduce hydroxyl groups in a very precise manner even in substrates with a large amount of chiral carbons [53]. They require two electrons per reaction, which is usually provided by NADPH and via a specific cytochrome P450 redox partner even though several other electron carriers can drive the reactions forward [54,55]. Cytochrome P450s are arguably challenging enzymes to engineer in heterologous hosts due to the need for redox power in the form of NADPH, cofactor availability—P450s contain heme molecules—and poor expression of eukaryotic P450s in bacteria [56,57].

2.4. General Considerations Spanning Across Nodes

As discussed above, precise control of the heterologous biosynthetic pathways is often crucial to increase production. One way to help balance pathway flux across metabolic modules is to apply metabolite biosensors linked to feedback control mechanisms. Such a strategy can tie enzyme production (for example, terpene synthases) with internal metabolite pools (such as the enzyme’s substrate or a key precursor molecule), which enables the production of the relevant enzyme exactly when required. Moreover, biosensors can be used to implement directed evolution methodologies, which connect compound concentration with growth or other responses. Two successful examples are the use of an NADPH sensor for neurosporene production enhancement and an IPP sensor for lycopene production enhancement [58,59]. Ng and co-workers explored the notion that terpenoid production relies heavily on NADPH availability (and thus regeneration). They generated an NADPH fluorescent sensor to screen many E. coli strain variants, selecting the ones with higher NADPH regeneration rates [58]. This allowed them to improve 25-fold the production titers of the carotenoid neurosporene. Chou and Keasling constructed an elaborate IPP-controlled genetic circuit: low IPP causes high mutagenesis rate while, as the IPP concentration increases, the mutation rate drops [59]. Since this is tied to a fluorescent reporter, the researchers could select the strains with lower fluorescence (which had higher IPP production rates) and confirm that these strains could accumulate significantly more lycopene.
Flux reporters such as the carotenoids lycopene and beta-carotene are commonly used as indicators of the terpenoid yield since they give a colored phenotype that can be assessed by absorption or fluorescence. This has been exploited in studies to identify elements such as transcription factors that have an effect on production, coupled with directed evolution or high throughput engineering approaches [60,61,62]. There are, however, some problems with using lycopene as a flux reporter in that changes in the cellular redox status result in oxidation of lycopene and loss of color—thereby interfering with its effectiveness as a pathway flux reporter [62]. In addition, accumulation is affected by prenyl phosphate metabolism influencers and may not relate directly to a core isoprenoid (MEP/MVA) pathway flux. These considerations can render lycopene a poor reporter of pathway flux in some cases. Alternative reporters such as isoprene may be more useful, but assays are not as high throughput or as facile as the colored products.
It should be noted that MEP and MVA pathways both consume reducing power by using NADPH and NADH, respectively. The availability of these redox partners as well as haem molecules (serving as enzyme cofactors) and the precursors acetyl-coA (for the MVA pathway) and pyruvate and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (of the MEP pathway) are limiting steps. Therefore, the introduction of pathways that enable the recycling of cofactors or increase their availability have been used successfully to increase terpenoid production [63,64,65,66,67].
Often, it is not easy to optimize all four nodes and produce a terpenoid of interest in a single organism. The use of dual-organism production systems is an interesting alternative. An example has been implemented in the production of oxygenated products of taxadiene. E. coli was optimized to produce taxadiene, which was oxygenated by a yeast expressing taxadiene 5α-hydroxylase (a cytochrome P450) and the P450 reductase [68]. This microbial consortium approach shows that different organisms are needed to optimally catalyze different reactions where the enzymes require bespoken environments provided by different hosts.

3. Photosynthetic Microorganisms as Terpenoid Production Hosts

The heterologous production of terpenes requires the expression of foreign enzymes and often entire metabolic pathways. E. coli and S. cerevisiae are currently the main hosts for terpenoid production chosen for their high growth rates, relative ease of engineering, scalability, bioprocess technology, and—in particular—for the advanced knowledge available on their metabolism and genetic resources. However, these two organisms have not evolved to produce a wide variety of complex terpenoid metabolites.
Photosynthetic organisms produce a much greater diversity of isoprenoids and use them for many more metabolic processes than yeast and E. coli. Theses isoprenoids are also required in higher amounts to satisfy metabolic demands for the production of photosynthetic pigments, sterols, isoprene, and secondary metabolites. Extensive engineering is required to get reasonable flux to isoprenoids in both yeast and E. coli, which suggests that isoprenoid metabolism is relatively inefficient in these organisms [16,69]. Conversely, photosynthetic organisms dedicate a significant—albeit small when compared to the reactions of the central carbon metabolism—amount of metabolic resources to terpenoids to provide the production requirements for chlorophyll, carotenoids, and other photosynthetic pigments (Figure 2). While this means that the potential for interference of native metabolism is higher, it also indicates a much greater flux potential for isoprenoid pathways in photosynthetic organisms. The production of massive amounts of isoprene by numerous photosynthetic land plants and microalgae also points to a higher native flux capacity [70]. Moreover, photosynthetic organisms have an increased NADPH content, use of CO2 as a feedstock (rather than secrete it in the atmosphere), and offer the ability to directly link photosynthesis with heterologous metabolite production via electron transfer proteins [54,71]. Cyanobacteria and eukaryotic microalgae combine photosynthetic growth with simple cellular organization and, in model species, straightforward genetic manipulation methodologies. In the following sections, we review terpenoid engineering in these photosynthetic micro-organisms (Table 1).

3.1. Cyanobacteria

Cyanobacteria are receiving increased attention as potential photosynthetic production hosts due to their simple cellular organization and their metabolic repertoire, which is characterized by high plasticity [71,86,87,88]. The toolbox of synthetic and systems biology resources for metabolic engineering is rapidly increasing and now includes genome-scale metabolic models [89,90], transposon libraries [91], CRISPR tools [92,93,94], and several genetic synthetic biology parts [71,95,96]. Although generation of analysable transgenic lines takes longer than yeast and E. coli, they are attractive production hosts due to their photosynthetic growth and relatively simple cellular organization.
The first study in cyanobacterial terpenoid engineering involved the production of the hemiterpene isoprene in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 [97]. The relatively low initial yield increased fivefold (from 0.05 mg g−1 to 0.25 mg g−1) with the heterologous expression of the MVA pathway [24]. It is interesting to note that the same strategy yielded a much greater, 400-fold increase in isoprene production in E. coli [23]. This highlights differential regulation of isoprenoid metabolism between the two types of organism. It is likely that the large increase in E. coli is due to a low innate pathway flux in this organism relative to Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, which provides a larger dynamic range for improvement. It may also reflect availability of central carbon intermediates to feed into the pathways, differential enzyme behavior in the different organisms, or different availability of DMAPP for isoprene synthase. Isoprene production is limited by the amount of the isoprene synthase expressed. Fusion of the isoprene synthase with the c-phycocyanin beta subunit, which is a highly expressed protein, provided a yield increase to 5.4 mg g−1 [98]. Overexpressing the IPP isomerase to help balance availability of DMAPP conferred a further improvement to 12.3 mg g−1 [72].
A different approach was used in isoprene production in Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942, which resulted in the accumulation of 1.26 g L−1 (approximately 540 mg g−1) isoprene after three weeks of growth [73]. This is an impressive outcome in engineered cyanobacteria and by far the highest titres to date. In this work, Gao and co-workers focused on enhancing the flux of the MEP pathway by using targeted metabolite analysis to identify bottlenecks and combining several terpenoid enhancement strategies. A similar approach was implemented in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 by studying the effect of overexpressing the MEP pathway enzymes in isoprene production [99]. Many (but not all) of the MEP enzymes (DXS, DXR, ispD, ispE, ispF, ispH) as well as the IDI isomerase had a positive effect. The most dramatic effect though was observed when more efficient isoprene synthases were used, which highlights that the true bottleneck lies in the terpene synthase activity.
An early effort to engineer monoterpenoid production in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, which expresses the codon-optimized beta-phellandrene synthase from Lavandula angustifolia and reports 50 μg beta-phellandrene L−1 [100]. Fusion of the beta-phellandrene synthase with the c-phycocyanin beta subunit resulted in beta-phellandrene accumulation at 3.2 mg g−1 [74]. Davies and co-workers explored the production of the monoterpene limonene and the sesquiterpenes bisabolene in Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002, which achieves yields of 4.0 mg L−1 and 0.6 mg L−1, respectively [75]. An increased limonene yield (6.7 mg L−1) was achieved in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 when two enzymes of the pentose phosphate cycle (the ribose 5-phosphate isomerase and ribulose 5-phosphate 3-epimerase) together with a GPP synthase to increase precursor availability were overexpressed [76].
Sesquiterpenoid production was explored in Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 where farnesene titres reached 0.08 mg g−1 after two weeks of growth [77]. The highest sesquiterpenoid production reported so far was in Synechococcus elongatus 7942, which reached 19.8 mg L−1 amorphadiene [78]. The authors achieved this by heterologously overexpressing the E. coli DXS, FPP synthase, and the IPP isomerase. In Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, squalene, a triterpenoid derived from FPP by the action of squalene synthase, accumulated to approximately 1.2 mg g−1 when the downstream squalene hopene cyclase was knocked out [79]. Again, the overexpression of DXS, FPP synthase, and the IPP isomerase resulted in almost 10-fold productivity improvement [78]. The overexpression of the MEP enzymes was implemented in a recent alpha-phellandrine production work in Synechococcus elongatus 7942, which reached 4.6 mg L−1 alpha-farnesene after seven days of cultivation [80].
Diterpenoid expression in cyanobacteria is less studied. Geranyllinalool, which is a diterpene alcohol present in tobacco, was produced in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 with reported titres of 0.36 mg g−1 [81]. Englund and co-workers produced 13R-manoyl oxide and reached titres of 0.75 mg L−1 [101]. Manoyl oxide yield improved to 2 mg L−1 by codon-optimizing the terpene synthases and expressing them in a self-replicating vector under a strong promoter [82].
As summarized above, production of terpenoids in cyanobacteria has not yielded very high titers so far—high µg L−1 (or µg g−1) to low mg L−1 (or mg g−1)—with the notable exception of isoprene production in Synechococcus elongatus (>1 g/L [73]). In an interesting comparison of the isoprene, monoterpene, and sesquiterpenoid yields reported in E. coli and cyanobacteria (normalized to total carbon), Ko et al. note that, in most cases, the cyanobacterial titres are disappointingly low in comparison [102]. The effects of terpenoid engineering on native metabolism are also important to study. In the isoprene production strain developed by Gao et al. [73], the carbon fixation rate of S. elongatus almost doubled. An increased biomass productivity caused by a sink effect has been observed in other metabolic engineering studies (e.g., [103]). Cyanobacteria seem to tolerate the redirection of carbon towards heterologous terpenoid production and increase the flux towards the MEP pathway to compensate for the extra resources consumed [82]. The MEP pathway provides precursors for carotenoids and chlorophyll, which potentially render any significant imbalance due to heterologous terpenoid production unfavorable for growth. Nevertheless, negative effects such as growth retardation and reduction in oxygen evolution have been observed routinely [78,82,104]. An interesting observation is that knocking out competing pathways does not seem to improve terpenoid production, which is observed when glycogen synthase and squalene hopene cyclase were knocked out in an attempt to enhance limonene and manoyl oxide production, respectively [75,101].
Many enzymes involved in terpenoid biosynthesis both in Module I (MEP/MVA pathway) and in Module IV (decorations) require electron donors as redox partners. Therefore, the redox availability increases flexibility and makes redox enzyme expression more straightforward. One example is the expression of cytochrome P450s in cyanobacteria by using ferredoxin as a direct link to a photosynthetic redox power. This strategy not only results in active enzymes but also may increase overall photosynthetic capacity [105,106,107]. Cyanobacteria seems to have efficient regulation mechanisms that buffer the effects of metabolic perturbations to maintain homeostasis in primary metabolism. This can be both advantageous (as important native branching pathways are not affected by the heterologous ones) but may also hinder metabolic engineering [82]. Another noteworthy observation is that different cyanobacterial strains behave very differently. It is important to keep in mind that, despite their similar morphology, cyanobacterial species are genetically divergent and this may result in a varied behavior in terpenoid production. The cyanobacterial species diversified around 2.5–2.1 billion years ago [108], which means that, in practice, Synechococcus elongatus and Nostoc sp. PCC 7129 are more distant phylogenetically to each other than humans are to plants. This may explain significantly different production profiles in the presence of engineering between different species.
These studies highlight that, while native MEP pathway flux in cyanobacteria may be relatively high, engineering heterologous terpenoid production still faces challenges in these organisms. Competition with native terpenoid production as well as a relatively poor understanding of regulatory mechanisms are two key challenges that require further attention. Despite this, the ability of these organisms to tolerate and compensate for heterologous terpenoid production is extremely promising.

3.2. Eukaryotic Algae

Microalgae are unicellular, (mostly) photosynthetic eukaryotes and form an enormously diverse group that spans across several branches of the eukaryotic tree of life. Because of their huge diversity, this group of organisms is largely unexplored. However, their terpenoid repertoire is estimated to be vast and diverse [109]. Microalgae are promising candidates as production platforms for high-value product manufacturing in light of several intrinsic advantages. They are eukaryotic. Therefore, they are capable of carrying out complex biological and biochemical functions. They are photosynthetic and, thus, have inexpensive growth requirements. In most cases, algae are resistant to stresses usually associated with industrial cultivation and they are often suitable for industrial production scale-up.
Recent advances in sequencing technologies, metabolomics, and proteomics have paved the way to the metabolic characterization at the genetic level of representative microalgal species. The development of increasingly efficient genetic toolboxes for model algal species [110,111,112] allows targeted genetic manipulations for metabolic characterization and gene discovery as well as metabolic engineering. In addition, the recent development of metabolic networks [113,114,115] and genome-scale metabolic models of the main model species [116,117,118,119,120,121] have placed those species under the spotlight as promising next generation, solar-powered, cell-sized biofactories. Among many applications, some microalgae species are currently emerging as attractive alternative platforms for the heterologous production of industrially relevant terpenoids.

3.2.1. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

The green alga C. reinhardtii is historically the longest and most widely used model organism for algal genetics. Efforts in engineering this species have provided proof-of-concept for its suitability as a single-celled factory for the synthesis of many bio-products from recombinant therapeuticenzymes to small molecules. The generation of the mutant C. reinhardtii strains that display to consistently high levels of transgene expression such as UMV4 and UMV11 [122], which greatly facilitated metabolic engineering in this algal species. Its isoprenoid metabolism is based on solely the MEP pathway to provide precursors for photosynthetic pigments and sterols and no complex terpenes or terpene-based secondary metabolites have been reported to date. Recent work has shown the potential of using C. reinhardtii to produce the sesquiterpenoid patchoulol by expressing a plant patchoulol synthase gene [83], which is followed by the evaluation of terpene yield in different growth conditions. This reaches the maximum titer of 1.03 mg L−1 in photoautotrophic growth. By comparing previously published sesquiterpenoid yield in cyanobacteria with those of C. reinhardtii, Lauersen et al. hypothesized that C. reinhardtii might have a relatively larger availability of farnesyl pyrophosphate [75,83]. However, this work highlighted the availability of prenylphosphate precursors as bottleneck for the heterologous production of terpenoids in C. reinhardii. To address this, terpenoid metabolism was engineered by RNAi-mediated silencing of genes involved in competing pathways that used FPP as a substrate including a squalene synthase and geranyl-geranyl-pyrophosphate synthase. Down-regulation of these competing enzymes resulted in bisabolene yields up to 4.8 mg L−1. This was further improved to 11.0 mg L−1 by cultivating the engineered algae in mixotrophic light/dark (16 h/8 h) regimes and providing both 3% CO2 and acetate in the growth medium [48]. Yields were, however, significantly lower than yields obtained in yeast (more than 900 mg L−1) [123]. Very recently, Laursen et al. showed that chloroplast localization of diterpenes synthases is essential for the production of diterpenes casbene and manoyl oxide in C. reinhardtii. Further carbon flow optimization by fusing the terpene synthases to a mutated GGPP synthase resulted in the production increase to 25 mg L−1 manoyl oxide [84].
This work demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of fine-tuning of isoprenoid metabolism in C. reinhardii to improve terpenoid yields, but it also underscored that terpenoid production is strongly influenced by cultivation conditions. Therefore, understanding the basis of the endogenous regulation of the isoprenoid pathways will be key toward designing efficient metabolic engineering and bioprocessing strategies. Nuclear transformation in C. reinhardtii occurs by random chromosomal integration of the transgene. Therefore, transgene expression is highly variable across independent cell lines (due to the position-of-integration effects) and may be subjected to currently poorly-understood endogenous silencing mechanisms possibly both at the transcriptional and translational level. Therefore, high-throughput screening platforms are required for identifing the best performing strains. In addition, a targeted gene integration technique would improve reproducibility.

3.2.2. Diatoms

Diatoms are taxonomically distant from higher plants but, being eukaryotic like higher plants, they have both MVA and MEP pathways for isoprenoid precursor production. Diatoms are known to produce high amounts of carotenoids (some of which are high-value and exclusively produced by this group [121]), and a large variety of sterols [121]. Some are also known to emit and contribute a major proportion of marine isoprene [124]. Thalassiosira pseudonona and Phaeodactylum tricornutum have emerged in recent years as models for the two main diatom morphological sub-groups (centric and pennate).
Phaeodactylum tricornutum is a potentially promising candidate because of its peculiar organization of central carbon metabolism, which comprises three different glycolytic pathways. Besides the Emden Meyerof Parnas glycolysis, P. tricornutum possesses a putative phosphoketolase pathway and a functional eukaryotic Entner-Doudoroff pathway [113]. Although the role of the phosphoketolase pathway and Entner-Doudoroff glycolytic pathways in diatoms is not clear yet, they both produce NADPH and molecules that could possibly enter and fuel the MVA and the MEP pathways. In fact, the putative phosphoketolase pathway possibly produces acetyl-coA (and 1 ATP and NADPH) and the Entner-Doudoroff pathway yields glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate and pyruvate (and 1 ATP and NADPH). These two pathways, which are naturally present in P. tricornutum, have been heterologously expressed and employed by engineered yeasts—where they are absent—for increased availability of isoprenoid precursors [69].
An investigation of the genetic basis of isoprenoid metabolism in P. tricornutum revealed several unusual features including the absence of a conventional squalene epoxidase enzyme and the combination of the enzymatic activities of IPP isomerase and squalene synthase in a fusion enzyme [125]. These unusual characteristics likely indicate that a particular selective pressure has been exerted on these parts of the metabolism.
Diatoms benefit from the most advanced genetic toolbox among algae and the availability and the efficiency of the molecular tools to genetically manipulate diatoms has recently progressed enormously. High-efficiency genetic transformation can be achieved by several means ranging from biolistic DNA-coated particle bombardment, electroporation, and bacteria-mediated conjugation in which the latter is compatible with the transfer of large DNA constructs [111]. Methods and resources for transgene expression, RNAi-mediated silencing [126], and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing [127,128] have been established. Key to synthetic biology applications, recent advancements have shown that specific centromeric sequences can be added to large episomes to enable extrachromosomal stable maintenance [111], which theoretically allows the simultaneous transformation of very large constructs or multiple genes. This overcomes issues related to the random genomic insertion of the transgenes, which is one of the main bottlenecks in algal genetics transformation. Moreover, recent efforts have succeeded in developing high efficiency targeted genome editing techniques in diatoms [128]. Metabolic engineering efforts in diatoms have been mostly targeted to their lipid metabolism with only a handful of examples of heterologous terpenoid production. However, recent work has highlighted the potential of these organisms. For example, overexpression of the DXS enzyme in the MEP pathway of P. tricornutum resulted in the 2.4 fold increase in the yield (24.4 mg g−1 DW) of the native high-value carotenoid fucoxanthin [129], which highlights the role of DXS in controlling the flux through the MEP pathway to the carotenoid end-products. DXS is the entry point from central carbon metabolism for the MEP pathway and is the primary rate-limiting step in other organisms used for isoprenoid production.
To date, there is only one example of heterologous terpenoid production in diatoms. This was aimed at the production of plant triterpenoid saponigenin by installing a synthetic branch in the sterol biosynthesis of P. tricornutum. The expression of a Lotus japonicus lupeol synthase in P. tricornutum enabled the conversion of 2,3-epoxysqualene into lupeol to the maximum titre of 0.1 mg l−1 and the conversion of this to trace amounts of betulin by expressing a Medicago truncatula CYP450 oxidase (MtCYP716A12) and its reductase (Mt71CPR) [85]. The production of lupeol was accompanied by a detectable decrease in sterol content, which suggests that the substrate is a limiting factor and that the installed plant pathway competes with the endogenous biosynthesis of sterols [85].
These initial efforts in terpenoid engineering in algae clearly showed the potential and the feasibility of the production of plant terpenoids in algae while underscoring that key bottlenecks provide sufficient pools of substrates and metabolic pull from heterologous production with competing essential pathways such as that from sterol biosynthesis. This points towards the need to characterize and understand endogenous isoprenoid metabolism for efficient engineering. The feasibility of transferring large extrachromosomal genetic constructs provides the opportunity for more complex and multiplexed engineering approaches for heterologous production in diatoms, which makes this group of organisms one of the most promising candidates among photosynthetic eukaryotic microbes.

4. Perspectives

Even though there has been considerable progress in their metabolic engineering, heterologous production of terpenoids is far from straightforward in photosynthetic microorganisms. However, with the expansion of available hosts, engineering tools, and understanding of terpenoid metabolism regulation, increased product titre and diversity will become available. Synthetic and systems biology are expected to contribute greatly to this effort by providing more options and helping in more holistic—taking into account not just the heterologous pathway and the connected metabolic branches, but the whole metabolism—engineering.
Presently, cyanobacteria and algae are limited by small genetic engineering toolboxes compared to model heterotrophs, have a lack of knowledge about regulatory mechanisms, and have relatively slow growth. They also require non-standard equipment (light growth cabinets and photobioreactors). Production under different growth conditions (hetero/mixo/autotrophic) and light regimes (continuous light/photoperiod) has shown some promise but needs to be further evaluated. As toolboxes for manipulation develop further and our knowledge of regulatory systems expands, engineering will become easier in these organisms. Moreover, expanding our engineering efforts to more algal and cyanobacterial species such as the cyanobacterium Synechococcus UTEX 2973, algae members of the genus Nannochloropsis (Eustigmatophyceae), or more non-model species may reveal strains more suitable for high terpenoid productivities. Ultimately, photosynthetic terpenoid ‘chassis cells’ that deliver reasonable base rates, titers, and yields [130] similar to those currently used for industrial production in E. coli and yeast will become available.
A better understanding of flux regulatory mechanisms will improve our ability to successfully redirect carbon to heterologous pathways without impinging unduly on essential metabolic processes. These mechanisms are bound to be different than the ones in heterotrophic mechanisms, given the different origin of metabolic precursors (photosynthetic) and the more complex redox regulation. Historically, terpenoid engineering in photosynthetic microbes has only just begun. The first report was just eight years ago [97] and relatively few groups work in these organisms when compared to several decades and likely hundreds of labs worldwide working in terpenoid engineering in yeast and E. coli. It is probable that increasing the numbers of groups will engage with these microorganisms as tools and understanding improves. This is drawn by the benefits of CO2 fixation as a carbon feedstock and the potential for improved production of specific target terpenoids especially decorated plant terpenoids. Photosynthetic microorganisms may provide more production options including for the expression of more complex plant pathways.

Author Contributions

All authors wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

K.V. is supported by a CSIRO Synthetic Biology Future Science Fellowship co-funded by CSIRO and the University of Queensland, MF is supported by a CSIRO Synthetic Biology Future Science Fellowship co-funded by CSIRO and the University of Technology Sydney. This work is supported under the CSIRO-UQ Synthetic Biology Alliance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pichersky, E.; Raguso, R.A. Why do plants produce so many terpenoid compounds? New Phytol. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pérez-Gil, J.; Rodríguez-Concepción, M.; Vickers, C.E. Formation of Isoprenoids. In Biogenesis of Fatty Acids, Lipids and Membranes; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 1–29. ISBN 978-3-319-43676-0. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tholl, D. Terpene synthases and the regulation, diversity and biological roles of terpene metabolism. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tholl, D. Biosynthesis and Biological Functions of Terpenoids in Plants. In Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 148, pp. 63–106. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pateraki, I.; Heskes, A.M.; Hamberger, B. Cytochromes P450 for terpene functionalisation and metabolic engineering. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2015, 148, 107–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lassen, L.M.; Nielsen, A.Z.; Ziersen, B.; Gnanasekaran, T.; Møller, B.L.; Jensen, P.E. Redirecting Photosynthetic Electron Flow into Light-Driven Synthesis of Alternative Products Including High-Value Bioactive Natural Compounds. ACS Synth. Biol. 2014, 3, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kawamura, S.; Chu, H.; Felding, J.; Baran, P.S. Nineteen-step total synthesis of (+)-phorbol. Nature 2016, 532, 90–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  8. Arendt, P.; Pollier, J.; Callewaert, N.; Goossens, A. Synthetic biology for production of natural and new-to-nature terpenoids in photosynthetic organisms. Plant J. 2016, 87, 16–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  9. Ignea, C.; Athanasakoglou, A.; Ioannou, E.; Georgantea, P.; Trikka, F.A.; Loupassaki, S.; Roussis, V.; Makris, A.M.; Kampranis, S.C. Carnosic acid biosynthesis elucidated by a synthetic biology platform. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 3681–3686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pateraki, I.; Andersen-Ranberg, J.; Jensen, N.B.; Wubshet, S.G.; Heskes, A.M.; Forman, V.; Hallström, B.; Hamberger, B.; Motawia, M.S.; Olsen, C.E.; et al. Total biosynthesis of the cyclic AMP booster forskolin from Coleus forskohlii. eLife 2017, 6, e23001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ignea, C.; Ioannou, E.; Georgantea, P.; Loupassaki, S.; Trikka, F.A.; Kanellis, A.K.; Makris, A.M.; Roussis, V.; Kampranis, S.C. Reconstructing the chemical diversity of labdane-type diterpene biosynthesis in yeast. Metab. Eng. 2015, 28, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zi, J.; Mafu, S.; Peters, R.J. To Gibberellins and Beyond! Surveying the Evolution of (Di)Terpenoid Metabolism. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2014, 65, 259–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  13. Zerbe, P.; Hamberger, B.B.; Yuen, M.M.S.; Chiang, A.; Sandhu, H.K.; Madilao, L.L.; Nguyen, A.; Hamberger, B.B.; Bach, S.S.; Bohlmann, J. Gene discovery of modular diterpene metabolism in nonmodel systems. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 1073–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Paddon, C.J.; Westfall, P.J.; Pitera, D.J.; Benjamin, K.; Fisher, K.; McPhee, D.; Leavell, M.D.; Tai, A.; Main, A.; Eng, D.; et al. High-level semi-synthetic production of the potent antimalarial artemisinin. Nature 2013, 496, 528–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  15. Ajikumar, P.K.; Xiao, W.-H.; Tyo, K.E.J.; Wang, Y.; Simeon, F.; Leonard, E.; Mucha, O.; Phon, T.H.; Pfeifer, B.; Stephanopoulos, G. Isoprenoid Pathway Optimization for Taxol Precursor Overproduction in Escherichia coli. Science 2010, 330, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  16. Vickers, C.E.; Bongers, M.; Liu, Q.; Delatte, T.; Bouwmeester, H. Metabolic engineering of volatile isoprenoids in plants and microbes. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 1753–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  17. Nguyen, T.-D.; MacNevin, G.; Ro, D.-K. De novo synthesis of high-value plant sesquiterpenoids in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 2012, 517, 261–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bian, G.; Deng, Z.; Liu, T. Strategies for terpenoid overproduction and new terpenoid discovery. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2017, 48, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Davies, F.K.; Jinkerson, R.E.; Posewitz, M.C. Toward a photosynthetic microbial platform for terpenoid engineering. Photosynth. Res. 2015, 123, 265–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ward, V.C.A.; Chatzivasileiou, A.O.; Stephanopoulos, G. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of isoprenoids. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2018, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bian, G.; Han, Y.; Hou, A.; Yuan, Y.; Liu, X.; Deng, Z.; Liu, T. Releasing the potential power of terpene synthases by a robust precursor supply platform. Metab. Eng. 2017, 42, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Andersen-Ranberg, J.; Kongstad, K.T.; Nielsen, M.T.; Jensen, N.B.; Pateraki, I.; Bach, S.S.; Hamberger, B.; Zerbe, P.; Staerk, D.; Bohlmann, J.; et al. Expanding the Landscape of Diterpene Structural Diversity through Stereochemically Controlled Combinatorial Biosynthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2016, 128, 2182–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  23. Zurbriggen, A.; Kirst, H.; Melis, A. Isoprene Production via the Mevalonic Acid Pathway in Escherichia coli (Bacteria). BioEnergy Res. 2012, 5, 814–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bentley, F.K.; Zurbriggen, A.; Melis, A. Heterologous expression of the mevalonic acid pathway in cyanobacteria enhances endogenous carbon partitioning to isoprene. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Maury, J.; Asadollahi, M.A.; Møller, K.; Schalk, M.; Clark, A.; Formenti, L.R.; Nielsen, J. Reconstruction of a bacterial isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582, 4032–4038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yang, J.; Guo, L. Biosynthesis of β-carotene in engineered E. coli using the MEP and MVA pathways. Microb. Cell Fact. 2014, 13, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yang, C.; Gao, X.; Jiang, Y.; Sun, B.; Gao, F.; Yang, S. Synergy between methylerythritol phosphate pathway and mevalonate pathway for isoprene production in Escherichia coli. Metab. Eng. 2016, 37, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Alonso-Gutierrez, J.; Chan, R.; Batth, T.S.; Adams, P.D.; Keasling, J.D.; Petzold, C.J.; Lee, T.S. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for limonene and perillyl alcohol production. Metab. Eng. 2013, 19, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Calabria, A.R.; Cervin, M.A.; Chotani, G.K.; La Duca, R.; McAuliffe, J.C.; Miller, M.C.; Sabo, T.A.; Sanford, K.J.; Spring, E.L.; Whited, G.M. Compositions and Methods for Producing Isoprene Free of c5 Hydrocarbons under Decoupling Conditions and/or Safe Operating Ranges. Patent WO 2010/003007 A3, 7 January 2010. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kim, S.-W.; Keasling, J.D. Metabolic engineering of the nonmevalonate isopentenyl diphosphate synthesis pathway in Escherichia coli enhances lycopene production. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2001, 72, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, Y.; Yang, J.; Qin, B.; Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Su, S.; Xian, M. Biosynthesis of isoprene in Escherichia coli via methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 90, 1915–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Goldstein, J.L.; Brown, M.S. Regulation of the mevalonate pathway. Nature 1990, 343, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yang, J.; Xian, M.; Su, S.; Zhao, G.; Nie, Q.; Jiang, X.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, W. Enhancing Production of Bio-Isoprene Using Hybrid MVA Pathway and Isoprene Synthase in E. coli. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. George, K.W.; Thompson, M.G.; Kim, J.; Baidoo, E.E.K.; Wang, G.; Benites, V.T.; Petzold, C.J.; Chan, L.J.G.; Yilmaz, S.; Turhanen, P.; et al. Integrated analysis of isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) toxicity in isoprenoid-producing Escherichia coli. Metab. Eng. 2018, 47, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Meadows, A.L.; Hawkins, K.M.; Tsegaye, Y.; Antipov, E.; Kim, Y.; Raetz, L.; Dahl, R.H.; Tai, A.; Mahatdejkul-Meadows, T.; Xu, L.; et al. Rewriting yeast central carbon metabolism for industrial isoprenoid production. Nature 2016, 537, 694–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Peng, B.; Plan, M.R.; Chrysanthopoulos, P.; Hodson, M.P.; Nielsen, L.K.; Vickers, C.E. A squalene synthase protein degradation method for improved sesquiterpene production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 2017, 39, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jensen, E.D.; Ferreira, R.; Jakočiūnas, T.; Arsovska, D.; Zhang, J.; Ding, L.; Smith, J.D.; David, F.; Nielsen, J.; Jensen, M.K.; et al. Transcriptional reprogramming in yeast using dCas9 and combinatorial gRNA strategies. Microb. Cell Fact. 2017, 16, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  38. Xie, W.; Ye, L.; Lv, X.; Xu, H.; Yu, H. Sequential control of biosynthetic pathways for balanced utilization of metabolic intermediates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 2015, 28, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tarshis, L.C.; Yan, M.; Poulter, C.D.; Sacchettini, J.C. Crystal Structure of Recombinant Farnesyl Diphosphate Synthase at 2.6-.ANG. Resolution. Biochemistry 1994, 33, 10871–10877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ignea, C.; Pontini, M.; Maffei, M.E.; Makris, A.M.; Kampranis, S.C. Engineering monoterpene production in yeast using a synthetic dominant negative geranyl diphosphate synthase. ACS Synth. Biol. 2014, 3, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Peng, B.; Nielsen, L.K.; Kampranis, S.C.; Vickers, C.E. Engineered protein degradation of farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase is an effective regulatory mechanism to increase monoterpene production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Brückner, K.; Tissier, A. High-level diterpene production by transient expression in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Methods 2013, 9, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gnanasekaran, T.; Vavitsas, K.; Andersen-Ranberg, J.; Nielsen, A.Z.; Olsen, C.E.; Hamberger, B.; Jensen, P.E. Heterologous expression of the isopimaric acid pathway in Nicotiana benthamiana and the effect of N-terminal modifications of the involved cytochrome P450 enzyme. J. Biol. Eng. 2015, 9, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ignea, C.; Trikka, F.A.; Nikolaidis, A.K.; Georgantea, P.; Ioannou, E.; Loupassaki, S.; Kefalas, P.; Kanellis, A.K.; Roussis, V.; Makris, A.M.; et al. Efficient diterpene production in yeast by engineering Erg20p into a geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase. Metab. Eng. 2015, 27, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Christianson, D.W. Structural and Chemical Biology of Terpenoid Cyclases. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 11570–11648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Formighieri, C.; Melis, A. Regulation of β-phellandrene synthase gene expression, recombinant protein accumulation, and monoterpene hydrocarbons production in Synechocystis transformants. Planta 2014, 240, 309–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Denby, C.M.; Li, R.A.; Vu, V.T.; Costello, Z.; Lin, W.; Chan, L.J.G.; Williams, J.; Donaldson, B.; Bamforth, C.W.; Petzold, C.J.; et al. Industrial brewing yeast engineered for the production of primary flavor determinants in hopped beer. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  48. Wichmann, J.; Baier, T.; Wentnagel, E.; Lauersen, K.J.; Kruse, O. Tailored carbon partitioning for phototrophic production of (E)-α-bisabolene from the green microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Metab. Eng. 2018, 45, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chen, F.; Tholl, D.; Bohlmann, J.; Pichersky, E. The family of terpene synthases in plants: A mid-size family of genes for specialized metabolism that is highly diversified throughout the kingdom. Plant J. 2011, 66, 212–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Vattekkatte, A.; Garms, S.; Brandt, W.; Boland, W. Enhanced structural diversity in terpenoid biosynthesis: Enzymes, substrates and cofactors. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018, 16, 348–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Moses, T.; Pollier, J.; Almagro, L.; Buyst, D.; Van Montagu, M.; Pedreño, M.A.; Martins, J.C.; Thevelein, J.M.; Goossens, A. Combinatorial biosynthesis of sapogenins and saponins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a C-16α hydroxylase from Bupleurum falcatum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 1634–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bak, S.; Beisson, F.; Bishop, G.; Hamberger, B.; Höfer, R.; Paquette, S.; Werck-Reichhart, D. Cytochromes P450. Arabidopsis Book 2011, 9, e0144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Munro, A.W.; Girvan, H.M.; Mason, A.E.; Dunford, A.J.; McLean, K.J. What makes a P450 tick? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2013, 38, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mellor, S.B.; Vavitsas, K.; Nielsen, A.Z.; Jensen, P.E. Photosynthetic fuel for heterologous enzymes: The role of electron carrier proteins. Photosynth. Res. 2017, 134, 329–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Munro, A.W.; Girvan, H.M.; McLean, K.J. Variations on a (t)heme—Novel mechanisms, redox partners and catalytic functions in the cytochrome P450 superfamily. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2007, 24, 585–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Barnes, H.J.; Arlotto, M.P.; Waterman, M.R. Expression and enzymatic activity of recombinant cytochrome P450 17 alpha-hydroxylase in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 5597–5601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Paddon, C.J.; Keasling, J.D. Semi-synthetic artemisinin: A model for the use of synthetic biology in pharmaceutical development. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 12, 355–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ng, C.Y.; Farasat, I.; Maranas, C.D.; Salis, H.M. Rational design of a synthetic Entner–Doudoroff pathway for improved and controllable NADPH regeneration. Metab. Eng. 2015, 29, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  59. Chou, H.H.; Keasling, J.D. Programming adaptive control to evolve increased metabolite production. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Özaydın, B.; Burd, H.; Lee, T.S.; Keasling, J.D. Carotenoid-based phenotypic screen of the yeast deletion collection reveals new genes with roles in isoprenoid production. Metab. Eng. 2013, 15, 174–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Trikka, F.A.; Nikolaidis, A.; Athanasakoglou, A.; Andreadelli, A.; Ignea, C.; Kotta, K.; Argiriou, A.; Kampranis, S.C.; Makris, A.M. Iterative carotenogenic screens identify combinations of yeast gene deletions that enhance sclareol production. Microb. Cell Fact. 2015, 14, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bongers, M.; Chrysanthopoulos, P.K.; Behrendorff, J.B.Y.H.; Hodson, M.P.; Vickers, C.E.; Nielsen, L.K. Systems analysis of methylerythritol-phosphate pathway flux in E. coli: Insights into the role of oxidative stress and the validity of lycopene as an isoprenoid reporter metabolite. Microb. Cell Fact. 2015, 14, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Chen, Y.; Zhou, Y.J.; Siewers, V.; Nielsen, J. Enabling Technologies to Advance Microbial Isoprenoid Production. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2015, 148, 143–160. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Ma, S.M.; Garcia, D.E.; Redding-Johanson, A.M.; Friedland, G.D.; Chan, R.; Batth, T.S.; Haliburton, J.R.; Chivian, D.; Keasling, J.D.; Petzold, C.J.; et al. Optimization of a heterologous mevalonate pathway through the use of variant HMG-CoA reductases. Metab. Eng. 2011, 13, 588–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kozak, B.U.; van Rossum, H.M.; Luttik, M.A.H.; Akeroyd, M.; Benjamin, K.R.; Wu, L.; de Vries, S.; Daran, J.-M.; Pronk, J.T.; van Maris, A.J.A. Engineering acetyl coenzyme A supply: Functional expression of a bacterial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex in the cytosol of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. MBio 2014, 5, e01696-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Van Rossum, H.M.; Kozak, B.U.; Pronk, J.T.; van Maris, A.J.A. Engineering cytosolic acetyl-coenzyme A supply in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Pathway stoichiometry, free-energy conservation and redox-cofactor balancing. Metab. Eng. 2016, 36, 99–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Bogorad, I.W.; Lin, T.-S.; Liao, J.C. Synthetic non-oxidative glycolysis enables complete carbon conservation. Nature 2013, 502, 693–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zhou, K.; Qiao, K.; Edgar, S.; Stephanopoulos, G. Distributing a metabolic pathway among a microbial consortium enhances production of natural products. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  69. Vickers, C.E.; Williams, T.C.; Peng, B.; Cherry, J. Recent advances in synthetic biology for engineering isoprenoid production in yeast. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2017, 40, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Vickers, C.E.; Gershenzon, J.; Lerdau, M.T.; Loreto, F. A unified mechanism of action for volatile isoprenoids in plant abiotic stress. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Nielsen, A.Z.; Mellor, S.B.; Vavitsas, K.; Wlodarczyk, A.J.; Gnanasekaran, T.; Perestrello Ramos H de Jesus, M.; King, B.C.; Bakowski, K.; Jensen, P.E. Extending the biosynthetic repertoires of cyanobacteria and chloroplasts. Plant J. 2016, 87, 87–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  72. Chaves, J.E.; Melis, A. Biotechnology of cyanobacterial isoprene production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Gao, X.; Gao, F.; Liu, D.; Zhang, H.; Nie, X.; Yang, C. Engineering the methylerythritol phosphate pathway in cyanobacteria for photosynthetic isoprene production from CO2. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1400–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Formighieri, C.; Melis, A. Sustainable heterologous production of terpene hydrocarbons in cyanobacteria. Photosynth. Res. 2016, 130, 123–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Davies, F.K.; Work, V.H.; Beliaev, A.S.; Posewitz, M.C. Engineering Limonene and Bisabolene Production in Wild Type and a Glycogen-Deficient Mutant of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2014, 2, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Lin, P.-C.; Saha, R.; Zhang, F.; Pakrasi, H.B. Metabolic engineering of the pentose phosphate pathway for enhanced limonene production in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 17503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Halfmann, C.; Gu, L.; Gibbons, W.; Zhou, R. Genetically engineering cyanobacteria to convert CO2, water, and light into the long-chain hydrocarbon farnesene. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 9869–9877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Choi, S.Y.; Lee, H.J.; Choi, J.; Kim, J.; Sim, S.J.; Um, Y.; Kim, Y.; Lee, T.S.; Keasling, J.D.; Woo, H.M. Photosynthetic conversion of CO2 to farnesyl diphosphate-derived phytochemicals (amorpha-4,11-diene and squalene) by engineered cyanobacteria. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2016, 9, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Englund, E.; Pattanaik, B.; Ubhayasekera, S.J.K.; Stensjö, K.; Bergquist, J.; Lindberg, P. Production of Squalene in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Lee, H.J.; Lee, J.; Lee, S.-M.; Um, Y.; Kim, Y.; Sim, S.J.; Choi, J.; Woo, H.M. Direct Conversion of CO2 to α-Farnesene Using Metabolically Engineered Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 10424–10428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Formighieri, C.; Melis, A. Heterologous synthesis of geranyllinalool, a diterpenol plant product, in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 2791–2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Vavitsas, K.; Rue, E.Ø.; Stefánsdóttir, L.K.; Gnanasekaran, T.; Blennow, A.; Crocoll, C.; Gudmundsson, S.; Jensen, P.E. Responses of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 to heterologous biosynthetic pathways. Microb. Cell Fact. 2017, 16, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Lauersen, K.J.; Baier, T.; Wichmann, J.; Wördenweber, R.; Mussgnug, J.H.; Hübner, W.; Huser, T.; Kruse, O. Efficient phototrophic production of a high-value sesquiterpenoid from the eukaryotic microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Metab. Eng. 2016, 38, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Lauersen, K.J.; Wichmann, J.; Baier, T.; Kampranis, S.C.; Pateraki, I.; Møller, B.L.; Kruse, O. Phototrophic production of heterologous diterpenoids and a hydroxy-functionalized derivative from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Metab. Eng. 2018, 49, 116–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. D’Adamo, S.; Schiano di Visconte, G.; Lowe, G.; Szaub-Newton, J.; Beacham, T.; Landels, A.; Allen, M.J.; Spicer, A.; Matthijs, M. Engineering the unicellular alga Phaeodactylum tricornutum for high-value plant triterpenoid production. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Xiong, W.; Cano, M.; Wang, B.; Douchi, D.; Yu, J. The plasticity of cyanobacterial carbon metabolism. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2017, 41, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Ducat, D.C.; Way, J.C.; Silver, P.A. Engineering cyanobacteria to generate high-value products. Trends Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Matson, M.M.; Atsumi, S. Photomixotrophic chemical production in cyanobacteria. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2018, 50, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Gudmundsson, S.; Nogales, J. Cyanobacteria as photosynthetic biocatalysts: A systems biology perspective. Mol. Biosyst. 2015, 11, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Broddrick, J.T.; Rubin, B.E.; Welkie, D.G.; Du, N.; Mih, N.; Diamond, S.; Lee, J.J.; Golden, S.S.; Palsson, B.O. Unique attributes of cyanobacterial metabolism revealed by improved genome-scale metabolic modeling and essential gene analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 8344–8353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Rubin, B.E.; Wetmore, K.M.; Price, M.N.; Diamond, S.; Shultzaberger, R.K.; Lowe, L.C.; Curtin, G.; Arkin, A.P.; Deutschbauer, A.; Golden, S.S. The essential gene set of a photosynthetic organism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 6634–6643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Yao, L.; Cengic, I.; Anfelt, J.; Hudson, E.P. Multiple Gene Repression in Cyanobacteria Using CRISPRi. ACS Synth. Biol. 2016, 5, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Li, H.; Shen, C.R.; Huang, C.-H.; Sung, L.-Y.; Wu, M.-Y.; Hu, Y.-C. CRISPR-Cas9 for the genome engineering of cyanobacteria and succinate production. Metab. Eng. 2016, 38, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Xiao, Y.; Wang, S.; Rommelfanger, S.; Balassy, A.; Barba-Ostria, C.; Gu, P.; Galazka, J.M.; Zhang, F. Developing a Cas9-based tool to engineer native plasmids in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Sun, T.; Li, S.; Song, X.; Diao, J.; Chen, L.; Zhang, W. Toolboxes for cyanobacteria: Recent advances and future direction. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Vasudevan, R.; Gale, G.A.; Schiavon, A.A.; Puzorjov, A.; Malin, J.; Gillespie, M.D.; Vavitsas, K.; Zulkower, V.; Wang, B.; Howe, C.J.; et al. CyanoGate: A Golden Gate modular cloning suite for engineering cyanobacteria based on the plant MoClo syntax. bioRxiv 2018, 426700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lindberg, P.; Park, S.; Melis, A. Engineering a platform for photosynthetic isoprene production in cyanobacteria, using Synechocystis as the model organism. Metab. Eng. 2010, 12, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Chaves, J.E.; Rueda-Romero, P.; Kirst, H.; Melis, A. Engineering Isoprene Synthase Expression and Activity in Cyanobacteria. ACS Synth. Biol. 2017, 6, 2281–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Englund, E.; Shabestary, K.; Hudson, E.P.; Lindberg, P. Systematic overexpression study to find target enzymes enhancing production of terpenes in Synechocystis PCC 6803, using isoprene as a model compound. Metab. Eng. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Bentley, F.K.; García-Cerdán, J.G.; Chen, H.-C.; Melis, A. Paradigm of Monoterpene (β-phellandrene) Hydrocarbons Production via Photosynthesis in Cyanobacteria. BioEnergy Res. 2013, 6, 917–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Englund, E.; Andersen-Ranberg, J.; Miao, R.; Hamberger, B.; Lindberg, P. Metabolic Engineering of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 for Production of the Plant Diterpenoid Manoyl Oxide. ACS Synth. Biol. 2015, 4, 1270–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Ko, S.C.; Lee, H.J.; Choi, S.Y.; Choi, J.; Woo, H.M. Bio-solar cell factories for photosynthetic isoprenoids production. Planta 2018, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Ducat, D.C.; Avelar-Rivas, J.A.; Way, J.C.; Silver, P.A. Rerouting Carbon Flux To Enhance Photosynthetic Productivity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 2660–2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  104. Wang, X.; Liu, W.; Xin, C.; Zheng, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Sun, S.; Li, R.; Zhu, X.-G.; Dai, S.Y.; Rentzepis, P.M.; et al. Enhanced limonene production in cyanobacteria reveals photosynthesis limitations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 14225–14230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Wlodarczyk, A.; Gnanasekaran, T.; Nielsen, A.Z.; Zulu, N.N.; Mellor, S.B.; Luckner, M.; Thøfner, J.F.B.; Olsen, C.E.; Mottawie, M.S.; Burow, M.; et al. Metabolic engineering of light-driven cytochrome P450 dependent pathways into Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Metab. Eng. 2016, 33, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Berepiki, A.; Gittins, J.R.; Moore, C.M.; Bibby, T.S. Rational engineering of photosynthetic electron flux enhances light-powered cytochrome P450 activity. Synth. Biol. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Berepiki, A.; Hitchcock, A.; Moore, C.M.; Bibby, T.S. Tapping the Unused Potential of Photosynthesis with a Heterologous Electron Sink. ACS Synth. Biol. 2016, 5, 1369–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  108. Tomitani, A.; Knoll, A.H.; Cavanaugh, C.M.; Ohno, T. The evolutionary diversification of cyanobacteria: Molecular-phylogenetic and paleontological perspectives. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 5442–5447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  109. Sasso, S.; Pohnert, G.; Lohr, M.; Mittag, M.; Hertweck, C. Microalgae in the postgenomic era: A blooming reservoir for new natural products. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 761–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Slattery, S.S.; Diamond, A.; Wang, H.; Therrien, J.A.; Lant, J.T.; Jazey, T.; Lee, K.; Klassen, Z.; Desgagné-Penix, I.; Karas, B.J.; et al. An Expanded Plasmid-Based Genetic Toolbox Enables Cas9 Genome Editing and Stable Maintenance of Synthetic Pathways in Phaeodactylum tricornutum. ACS Synth. Biol. 2018, 7, 328–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Karas, B.J.; Diner, R.E.; Lefebvre, S.C.; Mcquaid, J.; Phillips, A.P.R.; Noddings, C.M.; Brunson, J.K.; Valas, R.E.; Deerinck, T.J.; Jablanovic, J.; et al. Designer diatom episomes delivered by bacterial conjugation—Supplementary Information. Nat. Commun. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Crozet, P.; Navarro, F.J.; Willmund, F.; Mehrshahi, P.; Bakowski, K.; Lauersen, K.J.; Pérez-Pérez, M.-E.; Auroy, P.; Gorchs Rovira, A.; Sauret-Gueto, S.; et al. Birth of a photosynthetic chassis: A MoClo toolkit enabling synthetic biology in the microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. ACS Synth. Biol. 2018, 7, 2074–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Fabris, M.; Matthijs, M.; Rombauts, S.; Vyverman, W.; Goossens, A.; Baart, G.J.E. The metabolic blueprint of Phaeodactylum tricornutum reveals a eukaryotic Entner-Doudoroff glycolytic pathway. Plant J. 2012, 70, 1004–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. May, P.; Jochristianmpimp-golmmpgde, J.O.C.; Kempa, S.; Walthermpimp-golmmpgde, D.W.; Christian, J.-O.; Walther, D. ChlamyCyc: An integrative systems biology database and web-portal for Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. BMC Genom. 2009, 10, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Kroth, P.G.; Chiovitti, A.; Gruber, A.; Martin-Jezequel, V.; Mock, T.; Parker, M.S.; Stanley, M.S.; Kaplan, A.; Caron, L.; Weber, T.; et al. A model for carbohydrate metabolism in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum deduced from comparative whole genome analysis. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Kliphuis, A.M.J.; Klok, A.J.; Martens, D.E.; Lamers, P.P.; Janssen, M.; Wijffels, R.H. Metabolic modeling of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: Energy requirements for photoautotrophic growth and maintenance. J. Appl. Phycol. 2012, 24, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Kim, J.; Fabris, M.; Baart, G.; Kim, M.K.; Goossens, A.; Vyverman, W.; Falkowski, P.G.; Lun, D.S. Flux balance analysis of primary metabolism in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Plant J. 2016, 85, 161–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Zheng, Y.; Quinn, A.H.; Sriram, G. Experimental evidence and isotopomer analysis of mixotrophic glucose metabolism in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Microb. Cell Fact. 2013, 12, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Boyle, N.R.; Morgan, J.A. Flux balance analysis of primary metabolism in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. BMC Syst. Biol. 2009, 3, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Chang, R.L.; Ghamsari, L.; Manichaikul, A.; Hom, E.F.Y.; Balaji, S.; Fu, W.; Shen, Y.; Hao, T.; Palsson, B.Ø.; Salehi-Ashtiani, K.; et al. Metabolic network reconstruction of Chlamydomonas offers insight into light-driven algal metabolism. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7, 518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Levering, J.; Broddrick, J.; Dupont, C.L.; Peers, G.; Beeri, K.; Mayers, J.; Gallina, A.A.; Allen, A.E.; Palsson, B.O.; Zengler, K. Genome-scale model reveals metabolic basis of biomass partitioning in a model diatom. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Neupert, J.; Karcher, D.; Bock, R. Generation of Chlamydomonas strains that efficiently express nuclear transgenes. Plant J. 2009, 57, 1140–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Peralta-Yahya, P.P.; Zhang, F.; del Cardayre, S.B.; Keasling, J.D. Microbial engineering for the production of advanced biofuels. Nature 2012, 488, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Srikanta Dani, K.G.; Silva Benavides, A.M.; Michelozzi, M.; Peluso, G.; Torzillo, G.; Loreto, F. Relationship between isoprene emission and photosynthesis in diatoms, and its implications for global marine isoprene estimates. Mar. Chem. 2017, 189, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Fabris, M.; Matthijs, M.; Carbonelle, S.; Moses, T.; Pollier, J.; Dasseville, R.; Baart, G.J.E.; Vyverman, W.; Goossens, A. Tracking the sterol biosynthesis pathway of the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. New Phytol. 2014, 204, 521–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. De Riso, V.; Raniello, R.; Maumus, F.; Rogato, A.; Bowler, C.; Falciatore, A. Gene silencing in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, e96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Hopes, A.; Nekrasov, V.; Kamoun, S.; Mock, T. Editing of the urease gene by CRISPR-Cas in the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana. Plant Methods 2016, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Nymark, M.; Sharma, A.K.; Sparstad, T.; Bones, A.M.; Winge, P. A CRISPR/Cas9 system adapted for gene editing in marine algae. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Eilers, U.; Bikoulis, A.; Breitenbach, J.; Büchel, C.; Sandmann, G. Limitations in the biosynthesis of fucoxanthin as targets for genetic engineering in Phaeodactylum tricornutum. J. Appl. Phycol. 2016, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Vickers, C.E.; Blank, L.M.; Krömer, J.O. Grand Challenge Commentary: Chassis cells for industrial biochemical production. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010, 6, 875–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Biosynthesis of terpenoids. The pathways have been conceptually separated into four modules, which is representative of the modularized method many metabolic engineers use to approach isoprenoid pathway engineering. Mevalonate (MVA) and methyl-D-erythritol phosphate (MEP) pathways lead to IPP (isopentenyl pyrophosphate) and DMAPP (dimethylallyl pyrophosphate) (module I). Additions of IPP produce higher-order prenyl phosphates (module II), dephosphorylation (often coincident with or followed by bond rearrangement and/or cyclisation) to form specialized terpenoid backbones (module III), chemical decorations, and other modifications to yield end products. Note that not all end products undergo decorations of the carbon skeleton.
Figure 1. Biosynthesis of terpenoids. The pathways have been conceptually separated into four modules, which is representative of the modularized method many metabolic engineers use to approach isoprenoid pathway engineering. Mevalonate (MVA) and methyl-D-erythritol phosphate (MEP) pathways lead to IPP (isopentenyl pyrophosphate) and DMAPP (dimethylallyl pyrophosphate) (module I). Additions of IPP produce higher-order prenyl phosphates (module II), dephosphorylation (often coincident with or followed by bond rearrangement and/or cyclisation) to form specialized terpenoid backbones (module III), chemical decorations, and other modifications to yield end products. Note that not all end products undergo decorations of the carbon skeleton.
Genes 09 00520 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of photosynthetic organisms as heterologous terpenoid biofactories. (A) In cyanobacteria and in algal chloroplasts, photosynthesis provides ATP and NADPH, which are, in turn, used to fix carbon dioxide. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (G3P) links carbon fixation with the rest of metabolism. Pyruvate (PYR) is produced from G3P via glycolysis and these two metabolites are the precursors for the MEP pathway. (B) In eukaryotic algae, mitochondria produce acetyl-CoA (Ac-CoA) from which the MVA pathway is initiated and IPP/DMAPP are produced. Chloroplasts also contribute to the terpenoid precursor pool. Metabolite exchange between cellular compartments, which is not yet fully elucidated, makes terpenoid metabolism more complex.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of photosynthetic organisms as heterologous terpenoid biofactories. (A) In cyanobacteria and in algal chloroplasts, photosynthesis provides ATP and NADPH, which are, in turn, used to fix carbon dioxide. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (G3P) links carbon fixation with the rest of metabolism. Pyruvate (PYR) is produced from G3P via glycolysis and these two metabolites are the precursors for the MEP pathway. (B) In eukaryotic algae, mitochondria produce acetyl-CoA (Ac-CoA) from which the MVA pathway is initiated and IPP/DMAPP are produced. Chloroplasts also contribute to the terpenoid precursor pool. Metabolite exchange between cellular compartments, which is not yet fully elucidated, makes terpenoid metabolism more complex.
Genes 09 00520 g002
Table 1. Summary of terpenoid metabolic engineering works in photosynthetic microbes.
Table 1. Summary of terpenoid metabolic engineering works in photosynthetic microbes.
TerpenoidProduction OrganismTiterReference
isopreneSynechocystis sp. PCC 680312.30 mg g−1[72]
isopreneSynechococcus elongatus PCC 79421.26 g L−1[73]
beta-phellandreneSynechocystis sp. PCC 68033.20 mg g−1[74]
limoneneSynechococcus sp. PCC 70024 mg L−1[75]
limoneneSynechocystis sp. PCC 68036.70 mg L−1[76]
bisaboleneSynechococcus sp. PCC 70020.60 mg L−1[75]
farneseneAnabaena sp. PCC 71200.08 mg g−1[77]
amorphadieneSynechococcus elongatus PCC 794219.80 mg L−1[78]
squaleneSynechocystis sp. PCC 68031.20 mg g−1[79]
farneseneSynechococcus elongatus PCC 79424.60 mg L−1[80]
geranyllinaloolSynechocystis sp. PCC 68030.36 mg g−1[81]
manoyl oxideSynechocystis sp. PCC 68032 mg L−1[82]
(E)-alpha-bisaboleneChlamydomonas reinhardtii11 mg L−1[48]
patchoulolChlamydomonas reinhardtii0.47 mg L−1[83]
manoyl oxideChlamydomonas reinhardtii50 mg L−1[84]
lupeolPhaeodactylum tricornutum0.1 mg L−1[85]

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Back to TopTop