Next Article in Journal
Dissection of Myogenic Differentiation Signatures in Chickens by RNA-Seq Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of Translationally Controlled Tumour Protein from the Sea Anemone Anemonia viridis and Transcriptome Wide Identification of Cnidarian Homologues
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 9
Issue 1
10.3390/genes9010031
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Physiological and Comparative Genomic Analysis of Arthrobacter sp. SRS-W-1-2016 Provides Insights on Niche Adaptation for Survival in Uraniferous Soils

by
Ashvini Chauhan
1,*,
Ashish Pathak
1,
Rajneesh Jaswal
1,
Bobby Edwards III
1,
Demario Chappell
2,
Christopher Ball
3,
Reyna Garcia-Sillas
4,
Paul Stothard
5 and
John Seaman
6
1
Environmental Biotechnology and Genomics Laboratory, School of the Environment, 1515 S. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Suite 305B, FSH Science Research Center, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL 32307, USA
2
Environmental Biotechnology and Genomics Laboratory, School of the Environment, 1515 S.Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Suite 305B, FSH Science Research Center, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL 32307, USA
3
Department of Biological Sciences, Life Science Building, Alabama State University, 915 S Jackson Street, Montgomery, AL 36101, USA
4
School of Life Sciences, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Arizona State University, 723 E 6th St, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
5
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
6
Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Aiken, SC 29802, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2018, 9(1), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9010031
Submission received: 21 November 2017 / Revised: 22 December 2017 / Accepted: 5 January 2018 / Published: 11 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Microbial Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-1-2016 was isolated on high concentrations of uranium (U) from the Savannah River Site (SRS) that remains co-contaminated by radionuclides, heavy metals, and organics. SRS is located on the northeast bank of the Savannah River (South Carolina, USA), which is a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) managed ecosystem left historically contaminated from decades of nuclear weapons production activities. Predominant contaminants within the impacted SRS environment include U and Nickel (Ni), both of which can be transformed microbially into less toxic forms via metal complexation mechanisms. Strain SRS-W-1-2016 was isolated from the uraniferous SRS soils on high concentrations of U (4200 μM) and Ni (8500 μM), but rapid growth was observed at much lower concentrations of 500 μM U and 1000 μM Ni, respectively. Microcosm studies established with strain SRS-W-1-2016 revealed a rapid decline in the concentration of spiked U such that it was almost undetectable in the supernatant by 72 h of incubation. Conversely, Ni concentrations remained unchanged, suggesting that the strain removed U but not Ni under the tested conditions. To obtain a deeper understanding of the metabolic potential, a draft genome sequence of strain SRS-W-1-2016 was obtained at a coverage of 90×, assembling into 93 contigs with an N50 contig length of 92,788 bases. The genomic size of strain SRS-W-1-2016 was found to be 4,564,701 bases with a total number of 4327 putative genes. An in-depth, genome-wide comparison between strain SRS-W-1-2016 and its four closest taxonomic relatives revealed 1159 distinct genes, representing 26.7% of its total genome; many associating with metal resistance proteins (e.g., for cadmium, cobalt, and zinc), transporter proteins, stress proteins, cytochromes, and drug resistance functions. Additionally, several gene homologues coding for resistance to metals were identified in the strain, such as outer membrane efflux pump proteins, peptide/nickel transport substrate and ATP-binding proteins, a high-affinity nickel-transport protein, and the spoT gene, which was recently implicated in bacterial resistance towards U. Detailed genome mining analysis of strain SRS-W-1-2016 also revealed the presence of a plethora of secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters likely facilitating resistance to antibiotics, biocides, and metals. Additionally, several gene homologous for the well-known oxygenase enzyme system were also identified, potentially functioning to generate energy via the breakdown of organic compounds and thus enabling the successful colonization and natural attenuation of contaminants by Arthrobacter sp. SRS-W-1-2016 at the SRS site.

1. Introduction

Savannah River Site (SRS) located in Aiken, South Carolina, functioned as a nuclear materials production facility for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), where metal-clad uranium (U) targets were used in the production of plutonium [1]. From 1954 to 1982, SRS wastewater originating from the metal plating and fabrication processes was released directly into Tims Branch, a second-order stream. Because of these activities, large quantities of both U (depleted as well as naturally-occurring) and Nickel (Ni) were released and deposited into stream sediments and an abandoned farm pond- the Steeds Pond, that served as a natural settling basin along Tims Branch [1,2]. Although contaminant distribution is heterogeneous in the Steeds Pond sediments, U and Ni concentrations are found upwards of 1000 mg/kg [2]. To gauge in-situ remediation (natural attenuation) and recommend appropriate strategies for the decontamination of SRS contaminated ecosystems, it is necessary to obtain a deeper understanding of the mechanisms exhibited by the native soil microbiota that have evolved to resist metals and radionuclides. In fact, microorganisms exposed to the contaminant stresses not only have the unparalleled ability to survive in radionuclide contaminated environments, but also potentially reduce the toxicity of both U [3,4,5] and Ni [6], respectively. Microbially-mediated mechanisms for the reduction of U toxicity include bioreduction, biosorption, biomineralization, and bioaccumulation [4]. For Ni, most commonly known resistance mechanisms are mediated by efflux pumps such as cnr CBA (cobalt-nickel resistance) from Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34, NccCBA (Nickel-cobalt-cadmium) and NreB (nickel resistance) from Achromobacter xylosoxidans 31A, and CznABC (Cadmium-zinc-nickel) from Helicobacter pylori [6]. However, the genomic mechanisms underpinning U and Ni conversions into the less mobile and less toxic forms continue to remain unclear.
Soil samples for this study were collected from site 101 located within the Tims Branch system. At this site, U concentrations are typically present between 700 and 800 ppm [5], which are considered high U concentrations invoking the criteria of Mumtaz et al. [7]. Therefore, this site represents an opportunity to study genome-enabled mechanisms recruited by the SRS-native microorganisms, facilitating their survival in co-contaminated environments. In fact, the stress posed by environmental contaminants facilitates the recruitment of genes by horizontal gene transfer mechanisms that enable the microbial cells to not only resist, but also bioremediate, the contaminants, mostly by the synthesis of proteins for cellular survival [8]. Some examples of such genomic-mechanisms include efflux systems, the presence of metal resistant genes, detoxification genes, and biosorption/bioaccumulation of the contaminant at or within the bacterial cell membrane [9].
Furthermore, a growing body of research is demonstrating that metal contaminants in the environment have the propensity to co-select for antibiotic resistance within the naturally-occurring microbiota [10]. Co-selection occurs through the following mechanisms: (a) co-resistance- when there is physical proximity of the resistome encoding antibiotics and/or metal resistance, e.g., on the same genetic element (plasmid) or in the same cell (e.g., merA and KPC beta-lactamase); (b) cross-resistance- when a single resistome functions to provide efflux and antibiotic resistance (e.g., mdrL confers resistance to metals, such as zinc, cobalt, and chromium, along with antibiotics, such as erythromycin, josamycin, and clindamycin) [11]; and (c) co-regulatory resistance- in this situation, multiple resistance genes conferring resistance to different toxic compounds, including antibiotics, biocides, and metals, are controlled by a single regulatory gene element (e.g., czcR regulating the expression of the CzcCBA efflux pump, resulting in the resistance to zinc, cadmium, and cobalt, along with co-regulating resistance to antibiotic carbapenems) [12].
To further understand environmentally-relevant genomic mechanisms that underpin microbial survival in radionuclide and heavy metal-rich ecosystems, we recently isolated several bacterial strains in the presence of high concentrations of both U and Ni [13]. 16S-gene based analysis revealed that the isolated strains mainly belonged to Burkholderia spp. and Arthrobacter spp.—genera demonstrated to serve as bioindicators of environmental contamination, as well as agents of bioremediation, especially U [14]. In fact, Arthrobacter spp., were found to be predominant in the U-contaminated Hanford site [15], which is another DOE site in Washington State having a similar U contamination history as the SRS site. Arthrobacter spp., have also been isolated from ecosystems under extreme environmental stresses, such as a nuclear waste plume amd U mined site, as well as heavy metal contaminated habitats [14,16,17,18,19,20]. Therefore, it appears that Arthrobacter spp., have recruited strong genomic traits to be able to colonize and survive in radionuclide and metal contaminated habitats. Understanding the basis of metal-microbial interactions, therefore, is a prerequisite for the successful management and/or rehabilitation of nuclear-legacy contaminated environments.
We recently characterized the genomic traits of Burkholderia sp. strain SRS-W-2-2016, a bacterial strain isolated from the same cohort as Arthrobacter sp. SRS-W-1-2016 [13]; which revealed the presence of several gene homologues previously demonstrated to code for the resistance of heavy metals and radionuclides, forming the basis of this study. Specifically, in this study, we report several ecologically relevant genomic traits present in Arthrobacter sp. SRS-W-1-2016, including a suite of substrate binding proteins, permeases, transport regulators, and efflux pumps- likely working in concert to potentially detoxify toxic metals and thus facilitating the natural attenuation of contaminants within the SRS impacted ecosystem. Such genome-enabled studies will facilitate a deeper understanding of heavy metal and antibiotic resistance and hydrocarbon degradative mechanisms in complex, mixed contaminant habitats and provide recommendations for the environmental stewardship of anthropogenically-impacted environments.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Uranium and Nickel Depletion Potential of Arthrobacter sp. SRS-1-W-2016

The ability of bacterial strains to resist U toxicity has been previously demonstrated. In fact, 90% of bacteria representative of taxa Firmicutes, Gammaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Betaproteobacteria identified from the Uranium mining site of Domiastat, India, were found to be resistant to a high U concentration of 4 mM [21]. Kulkarni et al. [22] isolated two phosphatase producing bacteria- Escherichia coli and Deinococcus radiodurans, which were found to grow in as high as 20 mM U. Burkholderia fungorum isolated from Rifle, Colorado, was found to grow on 10 µM U [23]. Similarly, several strains resistant to particularly high concentrations of Ni have been isolated from various contaminated sources. Alboghobeish et al. [24] isolated several strains, namely Methylobacterium sp. ATHA7 and Klebsiella oxytoca ATHA6 resistant to 24 mM and 16 mM Ni, respectively, from industrial sewage. Cupriavidus taiwanensis isolated from the root nodules of Mimosa pudica was found to be resistant to 1.5 mM Ni, along with some other heavy metals [25]. To determine the resistance potential of strain SRS-1-W-2016 against U and Ni, different concentrations of these metals were supplemented in 4M media and the growth results are presented in Figure 1a. Strain SRS-1-W-2016 could resist up to 4.2 mM of U and 8.5 mM of Ni, which are the typical concentrations of these metals in the sampling location [13], albeit, rapid growth was only observed at much lower concentrations of 500 µM U and 1000 µM Ni, respectively; a stationary phase was reached in 48 h. A similar trend was shown in the presence of 1000 µM Ni. When grown in the combination of 1000 µM Ni and 500 µM U, the stationary phase was only achieved after 60 h of incubation, potentially due to the combined stress of both U and Ni. In the native soil environment from where the strain was isolated, both U and Ni are the major co-contaminants and therefore the growth profile obtained for these co-contaminants provides a more accurate representation of the strain’s metal resistance ability.
To further evaluate the bioremediation potential of strain SRS-1-W-2016 for U and Ni separately, as well as in combination, microcosms were established for quantification of the amended metals by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and these results are shown in Figure 1b. It is clear that the initial concentration of U in the microcosms declined rapidly in merely 24 h and most of the spiked U declined completely in the supernatant by 72 h, strongly suggesting that strain SRS-1-W-2016 has the ability to quickly biotransform and/or bioremediate U. Several mechanisms are recognized by which microbes are able to transform and resist toxicity posed by extracellular U. Some of these mechanisms include reductive precipitation by outer membrane cytochromes, conductive pili, or spores, surface adsorption by exopolysaccharide (EPS) or S-layers, or precipitation with phosphate compounds, respectively. To evaluate the mechanism utilized by strain SRS-1-W-2016 to grow in the presence of U, we used the histochemical growth assay on tryptose phosphate methyl green (TPMG) media. We observed an intense green coloration formed by strain SRS-W-1-2016 during growth on an Luria Bertani (LB) plate supplemented with U (Figure 1c), indicating the activity of phosphatase enzyme-based bioremediation of U. Surprisingly, no decline in the concentrations of the amended Ni was observed under the tested conditions (Figure 1b). It is highly likely that efflux mechanisms were employed by the strain to prevent the cellular uptake of Ni and hence no bioremediation activity against Ni was documented.

2.2. Genome-Centric Evaluation of Strain SRS-W-1-2016

The genome size of strain SRS-W-1-2016 was predicted to be approximately 4,564,701 bases with a G+C content of 64.1. Moreover, the strain contained a total of 4327 coding sequences, with 58 total RNA genes, 57 tRNA genes, and two copies of the 16S rRNA genes, respectively. A circular genomic map of strain SRS-W-1-2016 using the 93 contigs with an N50 contig length of 92,788 bases is shown in Figure 2.
Further genome-centric evaluation of strain SRS-W-1-2016 revealed that out of 4318 total protein coding genes, 64.75% genes associated with clusters of orthologous groups of proteins (COGs); 74.34% genes annotated to protein coding function predictions; 24.36% genes annotated as protein coding genes with enzyme production; and 25.59% genes were connected to Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways. Note that COGs represent proteins that are an ortholog or direct evolutionary counterpart among bacterial genomes as they evolve over time. When the whole genome sequence of strain SRS-W-1-2016 was taxonomically analyzed using the One Codex RefSeq database, 52.5% of classified reads (readcount 42) clustered with Arthrobacter aurescens TC1, followed by 25% (readcount 20) with Arthrobacter globiformis NBRC 12,137, respectively (Figure 3). Two-way average nucleotide identity (ANI) between strain SRS-W-1-2016 and the closest relative Arthrobacter aurescens TC1 was estimated to be 80.28%, (SD: 5.24%; Supplementary Figure S1), from 3101 fragments that were included in this analysis, indicating that SRS-W-1-2016 may be a new species that is distinctly different than Arthrobacter aurescens TC1. Similar to the ANI, when digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) was estimated using the Genome-to-Genome Distance web service, it was estimated that strain SRS-W-1-2016 was 21.20% similar to Arthrobacter aurescens TC1 (data not shown). Note that according to the pipeline used, DDH > 70% (via logistic regression) would mean that the two genomes belong to the same species. Together, this is strong evidence that SRS-W-1-2016 has a unique taxonomic position relative to other members of Arthrobacter species for which whole genome sequence data is available.
Arthrobacter species, which are members of the soil actinobacteria, are ubiquitously distributed in diverse ecological habitats, and are known for their ability to survive in extreme conditions such as UV irradiation and radioactivity [26]. Efficient molecular adaptation mechanisms in Arthrobacter enhance the stability of nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids, allowing bacteria to survive in extreme conditions [27], such as the SRS co-contaminated soils. Some species of Arthrobacter such as Arthrobacter crystallopoietes [28] and Arthrobacter chlorophenolicus [29] have been utilized for the bioremediation of chromium and 4-chlorophenol in contaminated soils. Generally, Arthrobacter is known to grow on complex aromatic substrates such as hydroxybenzoates, pyridine, and picoline [30], which is a unique biodegradative ability of this group of soil bacteria. In fact, as stated earlier in this study, Arthrobacter spp., have been shown to successfully colonize habitats characterized by extreme environmental stresses, including nuclear waste plume heavy metal contaminated sites, as well as uraniferous niches, such as the U-impacted DOE Hanford site [15], which points to the genomic-mechanisms possessed by Arthrobacter spp., for the colonization of metal-rich ecosystems.
To further analyze the genome of strain SRS-1-W-2016, a KEGG -based hierarchical functional gene clustering analysis was performed (Table 1), which revealed the presence of a total of 1124 KEGG-associating genes; the top five categories belonged to carbohydrate metabolism (284 genes; 25.27%); amino acid metabolism (256 genes; 22.78%); energy metabolism (135 genes; 12.01%); vitamin and cofactor metabolism (128 genes; 11.39%); and membrane transport (105 genes; 9.34%), respectively. Additionally, a total of 2844 protein coding genes associated with COGs in strain SRS-W-1-2016 were found with further classification into 25 categories, with the most abundant COG subsystems as follows: carbohydrate transport and metabolism; and amino acid transport and metabolism. The transcription of many of these features suggests the propensity of this strain to engage in high metabolic activity in its native contaminated environment. These analyses provide a strong foundation for the presence of several genome-enabled metabolic and catabolic processes in Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-1-2016 which likely play a significant role in its successful colonization and survival within the SRS co-contaminated soil habitat.

2.3. Genes Potentially Conferring Metal Resistance in Strain SRS-W-1-2016

One notable attribute of the Arthrobacter genus is their ability to degrade xenobiotic compounds and resistance to heavy metals [26,31,32,33,34], including U and Ni [27]. Genome-centric assessment of strain SRS-W-1-2016 revealed the presence of several gene homologues previously demonstrated to play a part in the resistance against heavy metal/radionuclides, such as several efflux and MFS transporters, P-type ATPase translocators, and heavy metal-responsive transcriptional regulators.
Specifically, for metals resistance, the genome of strain SRS-W-1-2016 contains the high affinity transport system for nickel/cobalt (NiCoT gene; HoxN/HupN/NixA family), as well as the cobalt/zinc/cadmium resistant protein (CzcD). The NiCoT system, shown relative to four homologous gene systems (Figure 4a), was found to occur as a 1056 bp fragment (contig41300; fig|6666666.232708.peg.2084), while the CzcD subsystem, (Figure 4b) was a 1089 bp gene fragment (contig51456; fig|6666666.232708.peg.2658), respectively. In addition to these genes, bacterial resistance to metals is also governed by genes for the resistance, nodulation, and cell division (RND) family proteins- all part of transenvelope protein complexes which detoxify the cellular environment by exporting toxic metal cations from the periplasm to the outside. Several RND-type efflux gene homologues were found interspersed within the genome of strain SRS-W-1-2016 (data not shown). Additionally, the ABC-type transporters and heavy-metal transport/detoxification proteins were abundantly present within the genome of strain SRS-W-1-2016, potentially maintaining metal homeostasis and survival in the SRS co-contaminated soil habitat.
There are several mechanisms by which bacteria can reduce the mobility and hence toxicity of U and one process that shows bioremediation potential is by a phosphatase enzyme mediated biotransformation of U (VI) into phosphate-minerals [27,29]. It has been demonstrated that microbially-mediated alkaline or acid phosphatase activities can result in the precipitation of more than 90% of soluble U, resulting in the formation of a wide array of uranyl phosphate minerals [30]. Therefore, the microbially-mediated formation of uranyl phosphate from U (VI) warrants further research for the control of U mobility in U.S. DOE contaminated environments. To identify the presence of the phosphatase enzyme within the genome of strain SRS-W-1-2016, we manually queried the annotated genome, revealing the presence of two acid phosphatases (NCBI gene accession # OOP63314 and OOP61946), as well as an alkaline phosphatase (NCBI gene accession # OOP64358). Moreover, we also identified the spoT gene (contig50361; fig|6666666.232708.peg.2556) in strain SRS-W-1-2016 (data not shown); the spoT gene encodes a guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) hydrolase/synthetase which was recently implicated in the resistance of U by Caulobacter crescentus, but only under carbon starvation conditions [35]. Collectively, these mechanisms likely render the metabolic ability to strain SRS-W-1-2016 to not only survive in the SRS soils, but also perform critical biodegradative functions.
Moreover, in addition to the metal-related genes, several genes that potentially confer the ability to degrade organic contaminants were also identified in strain SRS-W-1-2016; especially oxygenase enzymes (data not shown). This finding is relevant because oxygenases have been previously shown to co-metabolize the degradation of trichloroethylene (TCE), one of the widespread organic contaminants identified in SRS-impacted habitats [36]. Therefore, it is likely that strain SRS-W-1-2016 is metabolically active in the biodegradation and biomineralization of not only metals, but also hydrocarbons in the SRS soils.

2.4. Resistome of Arthrobacter sp. Strain SRS-W-1-2016

When the genome of strain SRS-W-1-2016 was mined for the presence of antibiotic resistance genes (the resistome), gene determinants for the following drug resistance were noted (percent identity with matching region are shown in the parenthesis): fluoroquinolone (36%), isoniazid (46%), fosfomycin (43%), aminocoumarin (66%), mupirocin (54%), and rifamycin (33%), respectively. Several other genes that potentially confer antibiotic resistance were also identified, including the antibiotic target protection protein (36%), gene involved in self-resistance to antibiotic (66%), efflux pump complex or subunit conferring antibiotic resistances [(39% with ImrB and 40% with ImrD—both confer resistance to lincosamides) and 55% with novA (resistance to novobiocin)], antibiotic resistant gene variants or mutants, and the antibiotic inactivation enzyme (Supplementary Figure S2). Because a lower degree of homology, ranging between 36% to 66%, was observed between the resistome of strain SRS-W-1-2016 with the previously characterized antibiotic resistance genes, there is a strong possibility of a novel resistome that has developed in this strain, likely due to the selective pressure of heavy metals, U, and organic compounds.
Moreover, when the genome of strain SRS-W-1-2016 was evaluated for the presence of biosynthetic gene clusters (BCs) responsible for the synthesis of secondary metabolites (SMs), seven BCs with 150 associated genes were identified (Supplementary Figure S3). The predominant BC identified from strain SRS-W-1-2016 affiliated with the well-known nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS)- type III polyketide synthase (T3PKS), with a total of 69 pfams; other BCs were also identified for bacteriocin (27 pfams) and butyrolactone (11 pfams). Interestingly, many pfams that were found to be overrepresented across the seven BCs identified in strain SRS-W-1-2016 have been shown to play a role in metals-microbe interactions (appear as red boxes in the heat map; Supplementary Figure S3).
Notably, a total of 46 secondary metabolite clusters were identified using the antiSMASH pipeline with genes homologous to the biosynthesis of (similarity shown in parenthesis): Amphotericin (23%); Streptomycin (15%); Arsenopolyketides (12%); Echosides (11%); Guadinomine (11%); Thiolutin (8%); Kanamycin (7%); Chlorizidine (7%); Pristinamycin (5%); Meilingmycin (2%); Lobosamide (4%); Enduracidin (4%); and Herboxidiene (2%), respectively. Overall, this resistome analysis depicts the broad metabolic and biosynthetic potential of Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-1-2016.

2.5. Prediction of Phenotypic Traits in Arthrobacter sp. Strain SRS-W-1-2016

To further probe the genotype to phenotype traits, a recently developed pipeline was utilized for strain SRS-W-1-2016 relative to several other Arthrobacter spp., which revealed the ability for sugar hydrolysis such as maltose, trehalose, mannitol, rhamnose, and mannose by both the classifiers, while glucose, xylose, and cellobiose were confirmed by only one of the classifiers during Traitar analysis of Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-1-2016 (Figure 5). However, certain traits such as the utilization of arabinose, fermentation of glucose, and utilization of acetate, which were observed in other Arthrobacter strains, were absent in strain SRS-W-1-2016.
Using the phypate + PGL predictor built in the pipeline also confirmed the presence of the alkaline phosphatase enzyme in Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-1-2016, which may be associated with U precipitation and could be one of the factors to confer resistance to the bacterium at a toxic U concentration. Interestingly, Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-1-2016 was the only motile bacterium relative to the other selected Arthrobacter spp. group of bacteria, according to the phypat predictor; motility is a useful trait that can facilitate bacterial chemotaxis and enhance biodegradative functions [37].

2.6. Genomic Islands in Arthrobacter sp. Strain SRS-W-1-2016

Another interesting genomic trait of strain SRS-W-1-2016 is the presence of several genomic islands (GEIs). Bacterial genomes consist of a set of core genes encoding for essential metabolic functions which are supplemented with genes acquired via horizontal gene transfer (HGT) mechanisms that may render additional metabolic functions to the recruiting bacteria such as adaptive traits and genomic plasticity, facilitating evolutionary survival [38]. GEIs have been more commonly known to render virulence or antibiotic resistance to the host bacteria, but more recently, whole genome sequencing studies have also revealed other GEI-encoded functional traits classified into the following four broad categories - pathogenicity islands (PAIs), that code for virulence genes; metabolic islands (MIs), genes for the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites; resistance islands (RIs), genes that code for resistance- typically against antibiotics; and symbiotic islands (SIs), facilitating symbiotic associations of the host with other micro- and macroorganisms.
Interestingly, several genomic islands were identified in strain SRS-W-1-2016 when compared against the complete genome of Arthrobacter aurescens TC1 as the reference strain (Figure 6). When the identified GEI homologues in strain SRS-W-1-2016 were further analyzed by BLAST, several of them closely affiliated with genes previously implicated in the resistance of metals, as well as the biodegradation of contaminant hydrocarbons, suggesting the strong possibility that GEIs are likely recruited via HGT to facilitate survival in an environment that is co-contaminated by heavy metals and aromatic compounds.

2.7. Genomic Comparison of Arthrobacter sp. Strain SRS-W-1-2016

To further infer the evolutionary relatedness of strain SRS-W-1-2016 with close phylogenetic relatives, we ran the EDGAR analysis shown in Figure 7. This revealed that strain SRS-W-1-2016 harbors 1159 distinct genes that are not shared between the other four Arthrobacter species. Moreover, several distinctive genes, shown in parentheses, were also identified for each of the analyzed species: Paenarthrobacter aurescens TC1 (766); A. cupressi strain CGMCC1 (528); A. globiformis strain NBRC 1237 (841); and Pseudoarthrobacter phenanthrenivorans strain SWC37 (535), respectively. Notably, the SRS-W-1-2016—encoded distinct genes constituted approximately 26.7% of its total genome size, with much of this genome found to encode metal resistance proteins (e.g., for cadmium, cobalt, and zinc), transporter proteins, stress proteins, cytochromes, and drug resistance, respectively (Table 2). This comparative genomics analysis confirms the strong catabolic and bioremediation potential possessed by strain SRS-W-1-2016.
Further comparative genomic analysis to identify the presence of large-scale evolutionary events, such as rearrangements and inversions, was performed by the multiple alignment of strain SRS-W-1-2016 with Paenarthrobacter aurescens TC1, A. cupressi strain CGMCC1, A. globiformis strain NBRC 1237, and Pseudoarthrobacter phenanthrenivorans strain SWC37, which revealed the presence of several crisscrossing locally collinear blocks (LCBs), suggesting the complicated rearrangement history of strain SRS-W-1-2016 relative to related Arthrobacter genomes. Regions that are inverted relative to strain SRS-W-1-2016 appear shifted below a genome’s center axis (Figure 8). In fact, visual inspection of the genomic rearrangement pattern for strain SRS-W-1-2016 relative to other Arthrobacter species revealed several instances of local overlapping inversions characteristic of symmetric inversion about the terminus, distinguishable as a “fan” pattern of crossing lines. Therefore, we hypothesize that the genomic collinearity of strain SRS-W-1-2016 was lost relative to its closest taxonomic relatives, most likely due to evolutionary mechanisms associated with genomic inversions and other rearrangements.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Isolation and Physiological Growth Studies of Strain SRS-W-1-2016

Isolation of bacterial strains resistant to high concentrations of U and Ni, including Arthrobacter sp. SRS-W-1-2016, from uraniferous soil samples collected from the Tims Branch/ Steeds Pond area, was achieved following the methodology reported in our recent study [13]. Briefly, soils were serially diluted and 100 μL of this slurry was plated onto LB agar supplemented with U (4200 μM) and Ni (8500 μM), respectively. A rich growth media (LB) was used to isolate U and Ni resistant microorganisms because mineral salts media may have only selected a narrow range of soil microbiota and our intent was to obtain as many different groups of bacteria metal resistant bacteria as possible under the given experimental conditions. Because the strain was isolated on U and Ni concentrations that mimicked the soil concentrations, we evaluated growth on variable U and Ni concentrations using the Bioscreen C system (Growth Curves USA, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Briefly, 4M media [39] (modified with the addition of 0.04% yeast extract) was supplemented with U at an initial concentration of 100 μM that increased to a final concentration of 2000 μM, in increments of 100 μM, and Ni was tested at an initial concentration of 100 μM to a final concentration of 4000 μM, in increments of 200 μM, respectively. The assay was run using the honeycomb Bioscreen C plates containing 290 μL medium and 10 μL of the inoculum, which was grown overnight to an OD600 of 0.45 to 0.5. The instrument was programmed to perform regular shaking and capture OD600 at increments of every 4 h for four days; these experiments were run in triplicate and averaged values are reported. In addition to these studies, the whole genome sequence of strain SRS-1-W-2016 was used to evaluate in-silico phenotypic traits using Traitar (Microbial Trait Analyzer), which is a recently developed pipeline to predict 67 different traits of a bacterial genome sequence [34]; utilizing two different classification models (Phypat and Phypate + PGL) to present results in a single block.

3.2. Uranium Depletion by Strain SRS-W-1-2016

To determine U depletion by strain SRS-W-1-2016, microcosms were established in 4M media that was supplemented with 500 µM U and 1000 µM Ni, which was then inoculated with overnight grown culture to achieve a final OD600 of 0.05 ± 0.01. Flasks were incubated at 28 °C and 120 rpm for four days, with samples withdrawn every 24 h to determine the growth of bacterium (by OD600) and U depletion. Samples were acidified with HNO3 (1% v/v, final concentration) for determination of the spiked U and Ni, by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP) on a NexIon 300 (Perkin Elmer, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) in accordance with the quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) protocols of EPA method 6020B (USEPA, 2014; Method 6020B, Rev. 2. Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Office of Solid Waste, Washington, DC, USA).

3.3. Histochemical Screening of Strain SRS-W-1-2016 for Phosphatase Enzyme

Histochemical plates amended with U were used for the detection of phosphatase activity during growth on U. Briefly, strain SRS-W-1-2016 was streaked onto LB agar plates (pH 7.0) containing TPMG [40]. Plates were incubated at 30 °C for 36 h. The bacterial phosphatase activity hydrolyses phenolphthalein diphosphate (PDP) present in the medium to phenolphthalein and phosphoric acid, which then results in intense bright green to bluish-green precipitates under acidic conditions due to the presence of methyl green (MG) dye (a pH indicator).

3.4. Nucleotide Sequence Accession Number

The draft genome sequence of Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-1-2016 reported in this study has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession MTPV00000000 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MTPV00000000); BioProject: PRJNA352261 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA352261); BioSample: SAMN06030390 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/SAMN06030390). The version described in this paper is version MSDV00000000.1.

3.5. Genomic Characterization of Strain SRS-W-1-2016

Genomic DNA from strain SRS-W-1-2016 was extracted and prepared for sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq2000 instrument as described previously [13,41]. De novo assembly of the raw reads was performed with the SPAdes assembler [42] using default settings. Assembly coverage statistics were computed by mapping raw reads to the assembled genome using bowtie2 [43]. Specifically, we determined a coverage filter for the contigs from the distribution of coverage levels across the assembly. First, contigs were ordered by coverage, and cumulative assembly length was computed across all contigs. We then determined the coverage level at 50% of the total cumulative assembly length; half of that coverage level was selected as a coverage filter. The remaining reads were aligned with nucmer [42] against the complete genome sequence of Arthrobacter sp. Hiyo8 DNA (accession number AP014719.1), which was the closest taxonomic relative determined by a BLAST of the 16S rRNA sequence. All contigs aligned to these references, and the optimal contig ordering and orientation to most closely match the reference was determined using mummerplot [42] with the layout specified. Contigs were then reordered and reversed as needed to match the ordering determined by mummerplot.
A circular genomic map of strain SRS-1-W-2016 was generated using the CGView Comparison Tool [44]. Island Viewer was used to identify chromosomal deviations in GC content, known as genomic islands (GEIs) (http://www.pathogenomics.sfu.ca/islandviewer/) [35]. The genome, with a coverage of 90x, was then annotated and genes predicted by IMG/er [45], RAST [31], and National Center for Biotechnology Information’s (NCBI) Prokaryotic Genomes Automatic Annotation Pipeline (PGAAP), version 2.0. Resources utilized in this study for gene predictions and comparisons of strain SRS-1-W-2016 with other sequenced Arthrobacter spp., included those offered by NCBI [46] (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and Integrated Microbial Genomes Expert Review [47] (https://img.jgi.doe.gov/cgi-bin/er/main.cgi). COGs from strain SRS-1-W-2016 and other Arthrobacter spp., were compared using the Function Category Comparison tool using IMG/ER. IMG computes top COG hits using RPS-BLAST on PSSM’s provided by CDD. A genome-based phylogenetic tree of strain SRS-1-W-2016 was constructed using the One Codex database platform [48], which generates taxonomic classification of nucleotide reads by assessing for exact k-mer matches against their database of bacterial, viral, and fungal genomes, as well as the NCBI’s Reference Sequence Database.

3.6. Characterization of the Resistome of Strain SRS-W-1-2016

Antibiotic resistance genes (the resistome), present in strain SRS-1-W-2016, were identified using the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (“CARD”) pipeline [49]. CARD is a repository of curated sequences and SNPs assembled according to the Antibiotic Resistance Ontology (ARO). Biosynthetic gene clusters (BCs) represented within the genome of strain SRS-1-W-2016 were identified using the IMG-ABC (https://img.jgi.doe.gov/abc) pipeline, which is a repository of previously characterized BCs and associated secondary metabolites (SMs), respectively [50]. Protein families (pfams) within each of the BC were downloaded after IMG-ABC analysis and complete linkage hierarchical clustering was performed in R (https://www.r-project.org/) using a Euclidean distance metric; clustered results were visualized in a heatmap. Additionally, the recently updated “antibiotics and secondary metabolite analysis shell”—antiSMASH pipeline was also utilized to mine the genome of strain SRS-1-W-2016 for the presence of both the resistome and metabolite gene clusters [51].

3.7. Comparative Genomics of Strain SRS-W-1-2016

Initial comparative genomics of strain SRS-1-W-2016 with closest taxonomic relatives was performed by EDGAR [32]. To further infer the evolutionary relatedness of SRS-1-W-2016 with its closest taxonomic relatives, multiple alignments were performed using the progressive Mauve algorithm (http://darlinglab.org/mauve/mauve.html) [52]. Mauve facilitates multiple genome alignments such that rearrangements and inversions from evolutionary events can be identified and comparatively visualized. Because genomic recombination events result in rearrangements, orthologous genomic regions of a bacterial strain may be reordered or inverted relative to another genome, which are clearly identified during Mauve analysis such that conserved genomic segments that appear to be internally free from rearrangements are shown as Locally Collinear Blocks (LCBs).
Average nucleotide identity was obtained as shown previously [53] (http://enve-omics.ce.gatech.edu/ani/) and dDDH was estimated by using the Genome-to-Genome Distance web service [54] (http://ggdc.dsmz.de/home.php), respectively. The ANI calculated utilized both best hits (one-way ANI) and reciprocal best hits (two-way ANI) between two genomic datasets, as shown by Goris et al. [55]. Typically, the ANI values between genomes of the same species are above 95%. GGDC runs comparisons of a query genome relative to a reference genome and generates an intergenomic distance under three different distance formulae. Distances are inferred using three distinct formulas from the set of high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) and maximally unique matches (MUMs) obtained by comparing each pair of genomes with the chosen software. These distances are transformed to values analogous to DDH using a generalized linear model (GLM) inferred from an empirical reference dataset comprising real DDH values and genome sequences. Model-based confidence intervals are specified in square brackets but can also be obtained via bootstrapping. Logistic regression (a special type of GLM) is used for reporting the probabilities that DDH is ≥70% and ≥79%. Percent G+C content cannot differ by >1 within a single species but by ≤1 between distinct species.

4. Discussion

Overall, this study advances our understanding on the genome-wide mechanisms potentially employed by the soil-borne Arthrobacter strain SRS-W-1-2016 to resist and survive in a highly contaminated habitat. Moreover, environmental microorganisms underpin metal biotransformations, including radionuclide precipitation, sorption, intracellular accumulation, and biomineralization, and therefore, such studies enable a better understanding of genes that facilitate bacteria to not only successfully colonize such harsh environments, but also provides a sustainable approach to remediate toxic habitats. By engaging in horizontal gene transfer mechanisms, environmental microorganisms recruit ecologically relevant traits such as metal binding proteins, permeases, transport regulators, and efflux pumps that can mediate the shunting of metals to the extra-cellular environment or prevent their cellular uptake, so the bacterium can flourish under the stress of toxic contaminants. Furthermore, it also appears that metal stress can inadvertently enhance the bacterium’s resistome, i.e., the arsenal of antibiotic resistance genes, as demonstrated in a long-term Ni contamination study [56]. This heavy metal-driven co-selection has the propensity to further intensify the evolutionary processes, leading to the development of highly potent multi-drug resistant ‘superbugs’ with genomic attributes that cause human and animal diseases. Overall, this study forms the basis for obtaining a comprehensive understanding on the genomic mechanisms of metals bioremediation and/or resistance and thereby can potentially provide better management and stewardship of historically polluted habitats, such as the U.S. DOE managed SRS ecosystem.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/9/1/31/s1.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Department of Energy (DOE) Minority Serving Institution Partnership program (MSIPP) managed by the Savannah River National laboratory under SRNS contract DE-AC09-08SR22470 as well as under DOE subcontracts 0000217620 and 0000003889. Seaman’s participation in this study was partially supported by the U. S. Department of Energy under a cooperative agreement (DE-EM0004391) with the University of Georgia Research Foundation. We acknowledge the help provided by Stefan Green and Mark Maienschein-Cline, The University of Illinois at Chicago in the genome sequencing of strain SRS-W-1-2016. Also acknowledged are Zabrenna Griffiths and Robert Lewis for their help on the growth studies. Arthrobacter strain SRS-W-1-2016 is available to the research community and is preserved in the culture collection housed at Chauhan’s laboratory, School of the Environment, Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.

Author Contributions

Ashvini Chauhan, Paul Stothard, and John Seaman conceived the experiments. Ashish Pathak and Ashvini Chauhan performed the genomic analysis. Rajneesh Jaswal and Bobby Edwards III designed the growth experiments, analyzed results and Generated graphs. Demario Chappell, Christopher Ball, and Reyna Garcia-Sillas performed the experiments. Ashvini Chauhan, Ashish Pathak, Paul Stothard, John Seaman, and Rajneesh Jaswal wrote the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Riley, R.G.; Zachara, J. Chemical Contaminants on Doe Lands and Selection of Contaminant Mixtures for Subsurface Science Research; Pacific Northwest Lab.: Richland, WA, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  2. Evans, A.; Bauer, L.; Haselow, J.; Hayes, D.; Martin, H.; McDowell, W.; Pickett, J. Uranium in the Savannah River Site Environment; Westinghouse Savannah River Co.: Aiken, SC, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  3. Martinez, R.J.; Wu, C.H.; Beazley, M.J.; Andersen, G.L.; Conrad, M.E.; Hazen, T.C.; Taillefert, M.; Sobecky, P.A. Microbial community responses to organophosphate substrate additions in contaminated subsurface sediments. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Newsome, L.; Morris, K.; Lloyd, J.R. The biogeochemistry and bioremediation of uranium and other priority radionuclides. Chem. Geol. 2014, 363, 164–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ye, Q. Microbial Diversity Associated with Metal- and Radionuclide-Contamination at the Doe Savannah River Site (SRS), South Carolina, USA; University of Georgia: Athens, GA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mirete, S.; De Figueras, C.G.; González-Pastor, J.E. Novel nickel resistance genes from the rhizosphere metagenome of plants adapted to acid mine drainage. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 6001–6011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mumtaz, S.; Streten-Joyce, C.; Parry, D.L.; McGuinness, K.A.; Lu, P.; Gibb, K.S. Fungi outcompete bacteria under increased uranium concentration in culture media. J. Environ. Radioact. 2013, 120, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Guo, H.; Luo, S.; Chen, L.; Xiao, X.; Xi, Q.; Wei, W.; Zeng, G.; Liu, C.; Wan, Y.; Chen, J. Bioremediation of heavy metals by growing hyperaccumulaor endophytic bacterium Bacillus sp. L14. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 8599–8605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Das, S.; Dash, H.R.; Chakraborty, J. Genetic basis and importance of metal resistant genes in bacteria for bioremediation of contaminated environments with toxic metal pollutants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 2967–2984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pal, C.; Bengtsson-Palme, J.; Kristiansson, E.; Larsson, D.J. Co-occurrence of resistance genes to antibiotics, biocides and metals reveals novel insights into their co-selection potential. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Chapman, J.S. Disinfectant resistance mechanisms, cross-resistance, and co-resistance. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2003, 51, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Perron, K.; Caille, O.; Rossier, C.; van Delden, C.; Dumas, J.-L.; Köhler, T. Czcr-czcs, a two-component system involved in heavy metal and carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 8761–8768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pathak, A.; Chauhan, A.; Stothard, P.; Green, S.; Maienschein-Cline, M.; Jaswal, R.; Seaman, J. Genome-centric evaluation of Burkholderia sp. Strain srs-w-2-2016 resistant to high concentrations of uranium and nickel isolated from the savannah river site (srs), USA. Genom. Data 2017, 12, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Suzuki, Y.; Banfield, J.F. Resistance to, and accumulation of, uranium by bacteria from a uranium-contaminated site. Geomicrobiol. J. 2004, 21, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Katsenovich, Y.; Carvajal, D.; Guduru, R.; Lagos, L.; Li, C.-Z. Assessment of the resistance to uranium (vi) exposure by Arthrobacter sp. Isolated from hanford site soil. Geomicrobiol. J. 2013, 30, 120–130. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fredrickson, J.K.; Zachara, J.M.; Balkwill, D.L.; Kennedy, D.; Li, S.-m.W.; Kostandarithes, H.M.; Daly, M.J.; Romine, M.F.; Brockman, F.J. Geomicrobiology of high-level nuclear waste-contaminated vadose sediments at the hanford site, washington state. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 4230–4241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhang, H.; Duan, C.; Shao, Q.; Ren, W.; Sha, T.; Chen, L.; Zhao, Z.; Hu, B. Genetic and physiological diversity of phylogenetically and geographically distinct groups of Arthrobacter isolated from lead–zinc mine tailings. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2004, 49, 333–341. [Google Scholar]
  18. Macur, R.E.; Jackson, C.R.; Botero, L.M.; Mcdermott, T.R.; Inskeep, W.P. Bacterial populations associated with the oxidation and reduction of arsenic in an unsaturated soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Swer, P.B.; Joshi, S.R.; Acharya, C. Cesium and strontium tolerant Arthrobacter sp. Strain kmszp6 isolated from a pristine uranium ore deposit. AMB Express 2016, 6, 69. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Van Waasbergen, L.G.; Balkwill, D.L.; Crocker, F.H.; Bjornstad, B.N.; Miller, R.V. Genetic diversity among Arthrobacter species collected across a heterogeneous series of terrestrial deep-subsurface sediments as determined on the basis of 16s rrna and reca gene sequences. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 3454–3463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kumar, R.; Nongkhlaw, M.; Acharya, C.; Joshi, S.R. Uranium (u)-tolerant bacterial diversity from u ore deposit of domiasiat in north-east india and its prospective utilisation in bioremediation. Microbes Environ. 2013, 28, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kulkarni, S.; Misra, C.S.; Gupta, A.; Ballal, A.; Apte, S.K. Interaction of uranium with bacterial cell surfaces: Inferences from phosphatase-mediated uranium precipitation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 4965–4974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Koribanics, N.M.; Tuorto, S.J.; Lopez-Chiaffarelli, N.; McGuinness, L.R.; Häggblom, M.M.; Williams, K.H.; Long, P.E.; Kerkhof, L.J. Spatial distribution of an uranium-respiring betaproteobacterium at the rifle, co field research site. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Alboghobeish, H.; Tahmourespour, A.; Doudi, M. The study of nickel resistant bacteria (nirb) isolated from wastewaters polluted with different industrial sources. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2014, 12, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, W.-M.; Wu, C.-H.; James, E.K.; Chang, J.-S. Metal biosorption capability of Cupriavidus taiwanensis and its effects on heavy metal removal by nodulated mimosa pudica. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 151, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Osman, S.; Peeters, Z.; La Duc, M.T.; Mancinelli, R.; Ehrenfreund, P.; Venkateswaran, K. Effect of shadowing on survival of bacteria under conditions simulating the martian atmosphere and uv radiation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 959–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mongodin, E.F.; Shapir, N.; Daugherty, S.C.; DeBoy, R.T.; Emerson, J.B.; Shvartzbeyn, A.; Radune, D.; Vamathevan, J.; Riggs, F.; Grinberg, V. Secrets of soil survival revealed by the genome sequence of Arthrobacter aurescens tc1. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2, e214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Camargo, F.; Bento, F.; Okeke, B.; Frankenberger, W. Hexavalent chromium reduction by an actinomycete, Arthrobacter crystallopoietes es 32. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2004, 97, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Westerberg, K.; Elväng, A.M.; Stackebrandt, E.; Jansson, J.K. Arthrobacter chlorophenolicus sp. Nov., a new species capable of degrading high concentrations of 4-chlorophenol. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2000, 50, 2083–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. O’loughlin, E.J.; Sims, G.K.; Traina, S.J. Biodegradation of 2-methyl, 2-ethyl, and 2-hydroxypyridine by an Arthrobacter sp. Isolated from subsurface sediment. Biodegradation 1999, 10, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Aziz, R.K.; Bartels, D.; Best, A.A.; DeJongh, M.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Formsma, K.; Gerdes, S.; Glass, E.M.; Kubal, M. The rast server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Blom, J.; Albaum, S.P.; Doppmeier, D.; Pühler, A.; Vorhölter, F.-J.; Zakrzewski, M.; Goesmann, A. Edgar: A software framework for the comparative analysis of prokaryotic genomes. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Darling, A.C.; Mau, B.; Blattner, F.R.; Perna, N.T. Mauve: Multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004, 14, 1394–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Weimann, A.; Mooren, K.; Frank, J.; Pope, P.B.; Bremges, A.; McHardy, A.C. From genomes to phenotypes: Traitar, the microbial trait analyzer. mSystems 2016, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yung, M.C.; Park, D.M.; Overton, K.W.; Blow, M.J.; Hoover, C.A.; Smit, J.; Murray, S.R.; Ricci, D.P.; Christen, B.; Bowman, G.R. Transposon mutagenesis paired with deep sequencing of Caulobacter crescentus under uranium stress reveals genes essential for detoxification and stress tolerance. J. Bacteriol. 2015, 197, 3160–3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Suárez-Moreno, Z.R.; Caballero-Mellado, J.; Coutinho, B.G.; Mendonça-Previato, L.; James, E.K.; Venturi, V. Common features of environmental and potentially beneficial plant-associated Burkholderia. Microb. Ecol. 2012, 63, 249–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Marx, R.B.; Aitken, M.D. Bacterial chemotaxis enhances naphthalene degradation in a heterogeneous aqueous system. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 3379–3383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Perez-Pantoja, D.; Nikel, P.I.; Chavarría, M.; de Lorenzo, V. Endogenous stress caused by faulty oxidation reactions fosters evolution of 2, 4-dinitrotoluene-degrading bacteria. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Van Nostrand, J.D.; Khijniak, T.J.; Neely, B.; Sattar, M.A.; Sowder, A.G.; Mills, G.; Bertsch, P.M.; Morris, P.J. Reduction of nickel and uranium toxicity and enhanced trichloroethylene degradation to Burkholderia vietnamiensis pr1301 with hydroxyapatite amendment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 1877–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Riccio, M.; Rossolini, G.; Lombardi, G.; Chiesurin, A.; Satta, G. Expression cloning of different bacterial phosphatase encoding genes by histochemical screening of genomic libraries onto an indicator medium containing phenolphthalein diphosphate and methyl green. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1997, 82, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Moat, A.G.; Foster, J.W.; Spector, M.P. Nitrogen metabolism. Microb. Physiol. Fourth Ed. 1995, 475–502. [Google Scholar]
  42. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D. Spades: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Grant, J.R.; Arantes, A.S.; Stothard, P. Comparing thousands of circular genomes using the cgview comparison tool. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Markowitz, V.M.; Chen, I.-M.A.; Palaniappan, K.; Chu, K.; Szeto, E.; Grechkin, Y.; Ratner, A.; Jacob, B.; Huang, J.; Williams, P. Img: The integrated microbial genomes database and comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 40, D115–D122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Tatusova, T.; DiCuccio, M.; Badretdin, A.; Chetvernin, V.; Nawrocki, E.P.; Zaslavsky, L.; Lomsadze, A.; Pruitt, K.D.; Borodovsky, M.; Ostell, J. Ncbi prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 6614–6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chen, I.-M.A.; Markowitz, V.M.; Palaniappan, K.; Szeto, E.; Chu, K.; Huang, J.; Ratner, A.; Pillay, M.; Hadjithomas, M.; Huntemann, M. Supporting community annotation and user collaboration in the integrated microbial genomes (img) system. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Minot, S.S.; Krumm, N.; Greenfield, N.B. One codex: A sensitive and accurate data platform for genomic microbial identification. BioRxiv 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jia, B.; Raphenya, A.R.; Alcock, B.; Waglechner, N.; Guo, P.; Tsang, K.K.; Lago, B.A.; Dave, B.M.; Pereira, S.; Sharma, A.N. Card 2017: Expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D566–D573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hadjithomas, M.; Chen, I.-M.A.; Chu, K.; Ratner, A.; Palaniappan, K.; Szeto, E.; Huang, J.; Reddy, T.; Cimermančič, P.; Fischbach, M.A. Img-abc: A knowledge base to fuel discovery of biosynthetic gene clusters and novel secondary metabolites. MBio 2015, 6, e00932-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Blin, K.; Wolf, T.; Chevrette, M.G.; Lu, X.; Schwalen, C.J.; Kautsar, S.A.; Duran, S.; Hernando, G.; de los Santos, E.L.; Kim, H.U. Antismash 4.0—Improvements in chemistry prediction and gene cluster boundary identification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Juhas, M.; van der Meer, J.R.; Gaillard, M.; Harding, R.M.; Hood, D.W.; Crook, D.W. Genomic islands: Tools of bacterial horizontal gene transfer and evolution. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 33, 376–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Servín-Garcidueñas, L.E.; Rogel, M.A.; Ormeño-Orrillo, E.; Zayas-del Moral, A.; Sánchez, F.; Martínez-Romero, E. Complete genome sequence of Bradyrhizobium sp. Strain ccge-la001, isolated from field nodules of the enigmatic wild bean phaseolus microcarpus. Genome Announc. 2016, 4, e00126-16. [Google Scholar]
  54. Auch, A.F.; Klenk, H.-P.; Göker, M. Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand. Genom. Sci. 2010, 2, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Goris, J.; Konstantinidis, K.T.; Klappenbach, J.A.; Coenye, T.; Vandamme, P.; Tiedje, J.M. DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Hu, H.-W.; Wang, J.-T.; Li, J.; Shi, X.-Z.; Ma, Y.-B.; Chen, D.; He, J.-Z. Long-term nickel contamination increases the occurrence of antibiotic resistance genes in agricultural soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 790–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 09 00031 g001a 550Genes 09 00031 g001b 550
Figure 1. Shown are (a) growth experiments to determine the resistance abilities of Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-1-2016 to Uranium (U) and Nickel (Ni), respectively. Growth of strain is shown in 4M media without amendments, as well as supplemented with 500 µM U, 1000 µM Ni and, and in the combination of 500 µM U and 1000 µM Ni, respectively; (b) shown are the measured concentrations of U and Ni over a three-day period that were spiked in microcosms containing strain SRS-W-1-2016; (c) histochemical plate-based growth assay to show phosphatase enzyme-based U-precipitation potential of strain SRS-W-1-2016. Bacteria that display a phosphatase-positive phenotype appear bright green on Tryptose Phosphate Methyl GreenTPMG agar plate.
Figure 1. Shown are (a) growth experiments to determine the resistance abilities of Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-1-2016 to Uranium (U) and Nickel (Ni), respectively. Growth of strain is shown in 4M media without amendments, as well as supplemented with 500 µM U, 1000 µM Ni and, and in the combination of 500 µM U and 1000 µM Ni, respectively; (b) shown are the measured concentrations of U and Ni over a three-day period that were spiked in microcosms containing strain SRS-W-1-2016; (c) histochemical plate-based growth assay to show phosphatase enzyme-based U-precipitation potential of strain SRS-W-1-2016. Bacteria that display a phosphatase-positive phenotype appear bright green on Tryptose Phosphate Methyl GreenTPMG agar plate.
Genes 09 00031 g001aGenes 09 00031 g001b
Genes 09 00031 g002 550
Figure 2. Circular genome map of Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-1-2016 with the first (outermost) and fourth rings depicting clusters of orthologous groups of proteins (COG) categories of protein coding genes on the forward and reverse strands, respectively. The second and third rings show the locations of protein coding, tRNA, and rRNA genes on the forward and reverse strands, respectively. The black plot depicts GC content with the peaks extending towards the outside of the circle representing GC content above the genome average, whereas those extending towards the center mark segments with GC content lower than the genome average. The innermost plot depicts GC skew. Both base composition plots were generated using a sliding window of 50,000 nt.
Figure 2. Circular genome map of Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-1-2016 with the first (outermost) and fourth rings depicting clusters of orthologous groups of proteins (COG) categories of protein coding genes on the forward and reverse strands, respectively. The second and third rings show the locations of protein coding, tRNA, and rRNA genes on the forward and reverse strands, respectively. The black plot depicts GC content with the peaks extending towards the outside of the circle representing GC content above the genome average, whereas those extending towards the center mark segments with GC content lower than the genome average. The innermost plot depicts GC skew. Both base composition plots were generated using a sliding window of 50,000 nt.
Genes 09 00031 g002
Genes 09 00031 g003 550
Figure 3. Whole genome sequence-based phylotree of Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-2-2016 relative to a cohort of 24 Arthrobacter spp., for which genome sequences are available. The highest taxonomic affiliation of strain was found with Arthrobacter aurescens TC1 based on the highest number of whole genome sequence reads (42; shown in parenthesis) that clustered with this group. The tree was generated based on the presence of the Pfam function category amongst Arthrobacter spp. available in the integrated microbial genome expert review (IMG/er) database. Displayed nodes are those with at least one read (<1% of classified reads).
Figure 3. Whole genome sequence-based phylotree of Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-2-2016 relative to a cohort of 24 Arthrobacter spp., for which genome sequences are available. The highest taxonomic affiliation of strain was found with Arthrobacter aurescens TC1 based on the highest number of whole genome sequence reads (42; shown in parenthesis) that clustered with this group. The tree was generated based on the presence of the Pfam function category amongst Arthrobacter spp. available in the integrated microbial genome expert review (IMG/er) database. Displayed nodes are those with at least one read (<1% of classified reads).
Genes 09 00031 g003
Genes 09 00031 g004 550
Figure 4. Shown are (a) the chromosomal region of the cobalt/zinc/cadmium subsystem gene (1056 bp) in Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-2-2016 relative to four other organisms and (b) the HoxN/HupN/NixA family nickel/cobalt transporter gene (1089 bp) in Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-2-2016 relative to four other organisms. The graphic is centered on the focus gene, which is red and numbered 1. Sets of genes with a similar sequence are grouped with the same number and color. Genes whose relative position is conserved in at least four other species are functionally coupled and share gray background boxes.
Figure 4. Shown are (a) the chromosomal region of the cobalt/zinc/cadmium subsystem gene (1056 bp) in Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-2-2016 relative to four other organisms and (b) the HoxN/HupN/NixA family nickel/cobalt transporter gene (1089 bp) in Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-2-2016 relative to four other organisms. The graphic is centered on the focus gene, which is red and numbered 1. Sets of genes with a similar sequence are grouped with the same number and color. Genes whose relative position is conserved in at least four other species are functionally coupled and share gray background boxes.
Genes 09 00031 g004
Genes 09 00031 g005 550
Figure 5. In-silico phenotypic comparison of Arthrobacter sp. SRS W-1-2016 with six closely related Arthrobacter spp. using the Traitar pipeline.
Figure 5. In-silico phenotypic comparison of Arthrobacter sp. SRS W-1-2016 with six closely related Arthrobacter spp. using the Traitar pipeline.
Genes 09 00031 g005
Genes 09 00031 g006 550
Figure 6. Shown are the putative genomic islands (GEIs) of Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-1-2016. The outer green circle represents the scale line in Mbps and GEIs obtained from each of the following methods are shown in color: SIGI-HMM (orange), IslandPath-DIMOB (blue), and integrated detection (red), respectively.
Figure 6. Shown are the putative genomic islands (GEIs) of Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-1-2016. The outer green circle represents the scale line in Mbps and GEIs obtained from each of the following methods are shown in color: SIGI-HMM (orange), IslandPath-DIMOB (blue), and integrated detection (red), respectively.
Genes 09 00031 g006
Genes 09 00031 g007 550
Figure 7. Shown are the whole genome-based Venn diagrams generated between Arthrobacter sp. SRS-W-1-2016 with its closest functional relatives. Venn diagram sectors belong to 1, Phenarthrobacter aurescens TC1; 2, Arthrobacter cupressi strain CGMCC; 3, Arthrobacter globiformis strain NBRC12137; 4, Arthrobacter sp. SRS-W-1-2016; and 5, Pseudoarthrobacter phenanthrenivorans strain Sphe3. The number of singleton genes appear in red, green, yellow, blue, and white areas for strains 1–5 listed above, respectively -along with their core genomes (centered gray area).
Figure 7. Shown are the whole genome-based Venn diagrams generated between Arthrobacter sp. SRS-W-1-2016 with its closest functional relatives. Venn diagram sectors belong to 1, Phenarthrobacter aurescens TC1; 2, Arthrobacter cupressi strain CGMCC; 3, Arthrobacter globiformis strain NBRC12137; 4, Arthrobacter sp. SRS-W-1-2016; and 5, Pseudoarthrobacter phenanthrenivorans strain Sphe3. The number of singleton genes appear in red, green, yellow, blue, and white areas for strains 1–5 listed above, respectively -along with their core genomes (centered gray area).
Genes 09 00031 g007
Genes 09 00031 g008 550
Figure 8. Whole genome comparative alignments between Arthrobacter sp. SRS-W-1-2016 with its closest functional relatives- Pseudoarthrobacter phenanthrenivorans strain Sphe3; Phenarthrobacter aurescens TC1; A. globiformis strain NBRC12137; and A. cupressi strain CGMCC. Each genome analyzed is presented horizontally with the scale showing the sequence coordinates and the conserved segments represented as the colored blocks which are connected across genomes. Blocks that are shifted downward in a genome represent those segments that are inverted relative to the reference genomes. The aligned region is in the forward orientation relative to the first genome sequence if a block lies above the center line; blocks below the center line indicate regions that align in the reverse complement (inverse) orientation of the reference genome. Genomic regions falling outside the blocks lack a detectable homology among the genomes analyzed.
Figure 8. Whole genome comparative alignments between Arthrobacter sp. SRS-W-1-2016 with its closest functional relatives- Pseudoarthrobacter phenanthrenivorans strain Sphe3; Phenarthrobacter aurescens TC1; A. globiformis strain NBRC12137; and A. cupressi strain CGMCC. Each genome analyzed is presented horizontally with the scale showing the sequence coordinates and the conserved segments represented as the colored blocks which are connected across genomes. Blocks that are shifted downward in a genome represent those segments that are inverted relative to the reference genomes. The aligned region is in the forward orientation relative to the first genome sequence if a block lies above the center line; blocks below the center line indicate regions that align in the reverse complement (inverse) orientation of the reference genome. Genomic regions falling outside the blocks lack a detectable homology among the genomes analyzed.
Genes 09 00031 g008
Table
Table 1. Functional traits connected with Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways identified from the whole genome sequence of Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-1-2016. This figure was prepared by analysis of the whole genome using the integrated microbial genome expert review (IMG/er) and values were plotted using Microsoft Excel.
Table 1. Functional traits connected with Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways identified from the whole genome sequence of Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-1-2016. This figure was prepared by analysis of the whole genome using the integrated microbial genome expert review (IMG/er) and values were plotted using Microsoft Excel.
KEGG CategoryPercentage (%)
Global and Overview Maps63.08
Carbohydrate Metabolism25.27
Amino Acid Metabolism22.78
Energy Metabolism12.01
Metabolism of Cofactors and Vitamins11.39
Membrane Transport9.34
Nucleotide Metabolism8.72
Lipid Metabolism7.56
Translation7.21
Xenobiotics Biodegradation and Metabolism6.32
Signal Transduction5.87
Metabolism of other Amino Acids4.8
Replication and Repair4.54
Folding, Sorting and Degradation4.18
Metabolism of Terpenoids and Polyketides3.91
Biosynthesis of other Secondary Metabolites3.2
Glycan Biosynthesis and Metabolism2.85
Cell Motility2.67
Cell Growth and Death1.42
Drug Resistance1.33
Transport and Catabolism0.98
Transcription0.44
Environmental Adaptation0.18
Excretory System0.18
Table
Table 2. Shown are PROKKA-annotated gene homologues that likely perform a biodegradative or metal resistance function in Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-1-2016. The analysis was conducted by manually querying the set of 1159 genes that were identified only in Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-1-2016, for desired bioremediation functions.
Table 2. Shown are PROKKA-annotated gene homologues that likely perform a biodegradative or metal resistance function in Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-1-2016. The analysis was conducted by manually querying the set of 1159 genes that were identified only in Arthrobacter sp. strain SRS-W-1-2016, for desired bioremediation functions.
CategoryGene Homologue
Transporter proteinsLow-affinity inorganic phosphate transporter
H(+)/Cl(-) exchange transporter ClcA
Putative inner membrane transporter YhbE
Divalent metal cation transporter MntH
Stress proteinsGeneral stress protein 14
Universal stress protein/MT2085
CytochromesCytochrome P450 107B
Cytochrome bc complex cytochrome b subunit
Metal resistance proteinsCadmim, cobalt and zinc/H(+)-K(+) antiporter
Arsenical resistance operon repressor
Copper resistance protein A precursor
Copper chaperone CopZ
Drug resistanceMultidrug resistance operon repressor
Multidrug resistance protein

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chauhan, A.; Pathak, A.; Jaswal, R.; Edwards III, B.; Chappell, D.; Ball, C.; Garcia-Sillas, R.; Stothard, P.; Seaman, J. Physiological and Comparative Genomic Analysis of Arthrobacter sp. SRS-W-1-2016 Provides Insights on Niche Adaptation for Survival in Uraniferous Soils. Genes 2018, 9, 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9010031

AMA Style

Chauhan A, Pathak A, Jaswal R, Edwards III B, Chappell D, Ball C, Garcia-Sillas R, Stothard P, Seaman J. Physiological and Comparative Genomic Analysis of Arthrobacter sp. SRS-W-1-2016 Provides Insights on Niche Adaptation for Survival in Uraniferous Soils. Genes. 2018; 9(1):31. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9010031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chauhan, Ashvini, Ashish Pathak, Rajneesh Jaswal, Bobby Edwards III, Demario Chappell, Christopher Ball, Reyna Garcia-Sillas, Paul Stothard, and John Seaman. 2018. "Physiological and Comparative Genomic Analysis of Arthrobacter sp. SRS-W-1-2016 Provides Insights on Niche Adaptation for Survival in Uraniferous Soils" Genes 9, no. 1: 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9010031

APA Style

Chauhan, A., Pathak, A., Jaswal, R., Edwards III, B., Chappell, D., Ball, C., Garcia-Sillas, R., Stothard, P., & Seaman, J. (2018). Physiological and Comparative Genomic Analysis of Arthrobacter sp. SRS-W-1-2016 Provides Insights on Niche Adaptation for Survival in Uraniferous Soils. Genes, 9(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9010031

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop