Identification of the Ovine Keratin-Associated Protein 26-1 Gene and Its Association with Variation in Wool Traits
by
, ,
Shaobin Li
1,2
,
Huitong Zhou
1,2,3,
Hua Gong
2,3,
Fangfang Zhao
1,
Jiang Hu
1,2,
Yuzhu Luo
1,2,* and
Jon G. H. Hickford
2,3,* 
1
Gansu Key Laboratory of Herbivorous Animal Biotechnology, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2
International Wool Research Institute, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
3
Gene-marker Laboratory, Faculty of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2017, 8(9), 225; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8090225
Submission received: 11 July 2017
/
Revised: 1 September 2017
/
Accepted: 6 September 2017
/
Published: 13 September 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Complex Genetic Loci)
Abstract
Keratin-associated proteins (KAPs) are structural components of wool and hair fibres, and are believed to play a role in defining the physico-mechanical properties of the wool fibre. In this study, the putative ovine homologue of the human KAP26-1 gene (KRTAP26-1) was sequenced and four variants (named A–D) were identified. The sequences shared some identity with each other and with other KRTAPs, but they had the greatest similarity with the human KRTAP26-1 sequence. This suggests they represent different variants of ovine KRTAP26-1. The association of these KRTAP26-1 variants with wool traits was investigated in the 383 Merino-Southdown cross sheep. The presence of B was associated (p < 0.05) with an increase in mean fibre diameter (MFD), mean fibre curvature, and prickle factor (PF). The presence of C was found to be associated (p < 0.05) with an increase in wool yield (Yield) and mean staple length (MSL), and a decrease in MFD, fibre diameter standard deviation (FDSD), and PF. The results suggest that sheep with C have, on average, higher wool quality. These results may be useful in the future development of breeding programs based on decreasing wool MFD and FDSD, or on increasing wool MSL.
1. Introduction
The keratin-associated proteins (KAPs) are structural components of wool and hair fibres. They form a semi-rigid matrix and cross-link with keratin (K) in the keratin intermediate filaments (IFs) [1]. The KAPs are believed to play an important role in defining the physico-mechanical properties of the hair and wool fibres, and variation in the KAPs may therefore underpin variation in wool quality. The KAPs are a complex group of proteins, and they typically possess high levels of cysteine, or glycine and tyrosine. Different KAPs are encoded by different KAP genes, and a large number of KAP genes have been described, clustered on different chromosomes [2]. The KAPs have been allocated into three broad groups according to their amino acid composition: the high sulphur (HS: ≤30 mol% cysteine) KAPs, the ultra-high sulphur (UHS: >0 mol% cysteine) KAPs, and the high glycine–tyrosine (HGT: 35–60 mol% glycine and tyrosine) KAPs [3].
Over one hundred KAP genes (KRTAPs) have been identified in different species, and they have been allocated to 27 different gene families [4,5,6]. Of these families, numbers 1–3, 11, 13–16, and 23–27 are HS-KAPs; numbers 4, 5, 9, 10, 12, and 17 are UHS-KAPs; and numbers 6–8 and 18–22 are HGT-KAPs. In humans, there are 12 known HS-KAP families, consisting of 25 functional KAP genes [4,5,6], but only twelve ovine HS-KAP genes from six families have been reported to date [3]. These ovine HS-KAP genes are KRTAP1-1 to 1-4, KRTAP2-1, KRTAP2-3, KRTAP3-1 to 3-3, KRTAP11-1, KRTAP13-3, and KRTAP24-1.
The KAP26-1 gene (KRTAP26-1) is a HS-KAP. While the gene has been identified in humans [6], it has not been described in any other species.
In this study, we describe the identification of a sequence encoding a putative ovine KRTAP26-1, report variation in this gene detected using PCR-single strand conformational polymorphism (PCR-SSCP), and reveal associations between variation in the gene and in some wool traits.
2. Materials and Methods
All research involving animals were carried out in accordance with the Animal Welfare Act 1999 (New Zealand Government), and the collection of sheep blood drops by nicking sheep ears is covered by Section 7.5 Animal Identification, of the Animal Welfare (Sheep and Beef Cattle) Code of Welfare 2010; a code of welfare issued under the Animal Welfare Act 1999 (New Zealand Government).
2.1. Sheep Blood and Wool Samples
Three hundred and eighty-three Merino × Southdown lambs, the progeny of four different sires, and ninety-four New Zealand (NZ) Romney lambs, sourced from five farms, were used to search for variation in KRTAP26-1. The 383 Merino × Southdown cross lambs were subsequently used for the association study. Blood samples from all these sheep were collected onto FTA cards (Whatman BioScience, Middlesex, UK) and genomic DNA was purified using a two-step procedure described by Zhou et al. [7].
Wool samples were collected from the mid-side of the Merino × Southdown-cross lambs at 12 months of age. Greasy fleece weight (GFW) was measured at shearing, and other wool traits were measured by the New Zealand Wool Testing Authority Ltd. (Ahuriri, Napier, NZ). The traits measured included mean fibre diameter (MFD), fibre diameter standard deviation (FDSD), coefficient of variation of fibre diameter (CVFD), mean staple length (MSL), mean fibre curvature (MFC), mean staple strength (MSS), and prickle factor (PF). Wool yield (Yield) was measured, and this was used to calculate the clean fleece weight (CFW).
2.2. Search for an Ovine Homologue of Human KRTAP26-1 in the Sheep Genome
A human KRTAP26-1 sequence (AM941740.1) was used to BLAST search the Ovine Genome Assembly v4.0 (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The genome sequences that showed the highest similarity to the human KRTAP26-1 sequence were presumed to be the ovine KRTAP26-1. These sequences were used to design PCR primers for amplifying the entire coding region of this gene from sheep DNA.
2.3. PCR Primers and Amplification of Sheep Genomic DNA
The sequences of the PCR primers designed were: 5′-CAGACGACAACCTGCTCCTG-3′ (123641093 to 123641112) and 5′-GTCTGGGATCTTCAGCGTG-3′ (123641700 to 123641718), with the nucleotide positions referring to NC_019458.2. These primers were synthesised by Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, USA). PCR amplification was performed in a 15 μL reaction containing the genomic DNA on a 1.2 mm punch of the FTA paper, 0.25 μM primers, 150 μM dNTPs (Bioline, London, UK), 2.5 mM Mg2+, 0.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and the 1× reaction buffer supplied with the enzyme. The thermal profile consisted of 2 min at 94 °C; followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 61 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C; with a final extension of 5 min at 72 °C. Amplification was carried out using S1000 thermal cyclers (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
Amplicons were visualised by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gels (Quantum Scientific, Brisbane, QLD, Australia), using 1× Tris/Borate/EDTA (TBE) buffer (89 mM Tris, 89 mM boric acid, 2 mM Na2EDTA) that contained 200 ng/mL of ethidium bromide.
2.4. Screening for Variation in KRTAP26-1
PCR amplicons were screened for sequence variation using SSCP analysis. Each amplicon (0.7 μL) was mixed with 7 μL of loading dye (98% formamide, 10 mM EDTA, 0.025% bromophenol blue, 0.025% xylene cyanol). After denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, the samples were rapidly cooled on wet ice and then loaded on 16 cm × 18 cm, 14% acrylamide/bisacrylamide (37.5:1) (Bio-Rad) gels with 1% glycerol. Electrophoresis was performed using Protean II xi cells (Bio-Rad) in 0.5× TBE buffer, under the following electrophoretic conditions: 32.5 °C at 290 V for 19 h. The gels were silver-stained according to the method of Byun et al. [8].
2.5. Sequencing of Allelic Variants and Sequence Analysis
PCR amplicons representing different banding patterns from sheep that appeared to be homozygous were sequenced in both directions three times at the Lincoln University DNA Sequencing Facility, NZ. Variants that were only found in heterozygous sheep were sequenced using an approach described by Gong et al. [9]. Briefly, a band corresponding to the rare variant was excised as a gel slice from the polyacrylamide gel, macerated, and then used as a template for re-amplification with the original primers. This second amplicon was then sequenced three times in both directions. Sequence alignments, translations, and phylogenetic analysis were carried out using DNAMAN (version 5.2.10, Lynnon BioSoft, Vaudreuil, QC, Canada). The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the predicted amino acid sequences for the putative ovine KRTAP26-1 variants and the human KRTAP26-1 sequence. All previously identified ovine HS-KAP members were included in the tree, including putative amino acid sequences for KRTAP1-1, KRTAP1-2, KRTAP1-3, KRTAP1-4, KRTAP2-3, KRTAP3-1, KRTAP3-2, KRTAP3-3, KRTAP4-1, KRTAP4-3, KRTAP5-1, KRTAP5-4, KRTAP5-5, KRTAP6-1, KRTAP6-2, KRTAP6-3, KRTAP6-4, KRTAP6-5, KRTAP7-1, KRTAP8-1, KRTAP8-2, KRTAP11-1, KRTAP13-3, KRTAP22-1, and KRTAP24-1.
2.6. Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using Minitab version 16. Firstly, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to test the strength of the relationship between the ten wool traits: GFW, CFW, Yield, MFD, FDSD, CVFD, MSL, MSS, CURV, and PF. Next, General Linear Models (GLMs) were used to assess the effect of the presence or absence of the KRTAP26-1 variants on various wool traits. Initially, single-variant models were performed to ascertain which variants would be included in a second series of multi-variant models, where any variant that had an association with a trait in the single-variant models, with p < 0.2, and could thus, potentially impact on the wool trait being tested, were included.
A third series of GLMs were used to compare various wool traits among lambs that had different KRTAP26-1 genotypes, but only if the genotype frequency was greater than 5%, and thus, represented an adequate sample size. When the GLMs indicated significant differences among genotypes, multiple pairwise comparisons were made with a Bonferroni correction being applied to reduce the chances of obtaining false-positive results during the multiple comparisons.
Sire was found to affect all the wool traits, and hence, was included as a random factor in all models. Gender was found to have an effect on GFW, CFW, MSL, MFD, FSDS, MSS, MFC, and PF, and was therefore included as a fixed factor in the models for these traits. Birth rank had an effect on MSL, and was included as a fixed factor in the model for MSL.
3. Results
3.1. Correlations between Wool Traits
Correlations were found between many of the wool traits (Table 1).
3.2. Identification of KRTAP26-1 in the Sheep Genome
A BLAST search of the Ovine Genome Assembly v4.0 using a human KRTAP26-1 coding sequence (AM941740.1) revealed a region on sheep chromosome 1 containing a similar sequence to the test sequence. A 555 bp open reading frame was identified between OAR1: 123641123 and 123641677. Three previously identified ovine KAP genes were also found near this open reading frame and from centromere to telomere these were KRTAP24-1 (123678718 to 123679476), KRTAP13-3 (123511783 to 123512253), and KRTAP6-3 (123220969 to 123221184) (Figure 1). Two PCR primers were designed to amplify this gene, and upon sequencing, the amplicons were confirmed to be 626 bp in size.
3.3. Variation in Ovine KRTAP26-1
There were four PCR-SSCP banding patterns detected for the notional ovine KRTAP26-1, with either one or a combination of two banding patterns observed for each sheep (Figure 2). DNA sequencing revealed that these PCR-SSCP patterns represented four nucleotide acid sequences (named A, B, C, and D). The sequences were most similar to human KRTAP26-1 (Figure 3), and were deposited into GenBank with accession numbers KX644903–KX644906. Seven single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified when comparing the four sequences (Table 2). All of these SNPs were located in the coding region, and two of them were non-synonymous substitutions that would result in amino acid changes in the putative KAP26-1 protein.
The ovine KRTAP26-1 sequences would, if expressed, encode a polypeptide of 184 amino acids. This polypeptide would contain a high content of serine (22.28 mol%), and moderate levels of proline (11.96 mol%), leucine (10.33 mol%), and glycine (8.70 mol%). Other residues that commonly occurred in the polypeptide included cysteine, tyrosine, valine, arginine, and threonine, and these accounted for 8.15, 6.52, 5.43, 4.89, and 4.89 mol%, respectively. The putative KAP26-1 protein would therefore be a basic protein, with a predicted pI value of approximately 7.9.
3.4. Comparison of Variant and Genotype Frequencies between NZ Romney and Merino × Southdown-Cross Sheep
The frequencies of the KRTAP26-1 variants in the NZ Romney sheep were: A: 40.4%; B: 47.3%; C: 0.5%; and D: 11.7%; while those in Merino × Southdown-cross sheep were: A: 49.6%; B: 25.7%; C: 23.0%; and D: 1.7%. Variant B was very common in the NZ Romney sheep, while in Merino × Southdown-cross sheep, A was more common. Variant C was common in the Merino × Southdown-cross sheep, but was found to be rare in the NZ Romney sheep investigated. The frequencies of B and D were much higher in the NZ Romney sheep than the Merino × Southdown-cross sheep. Nine genotypes were detected in the Merino × Southdown-cross sheep, and they were as follows: AA, AB, AC, AD, BB, BC, BD, CC, and CD, while CC and CD were not detected in the NZ Romney sheep. Genotype DD was found in the NZ Romney sheep. Of the genotypes present in the Merino × Southdown-cross sheep, only five (AA, AB, AC, BB and BC) occurred at a frequency over 5%, and these were used in the genotype association analyses.
3.5. Effect of Variation in KRTAP26-1 on Wool Traits
Of the four KRTAP26-1 variants detected in Merino × Southdown-cross lambs, D occurred at a very low frequency, and so its association with wool traits was not tested.
In the single-variant models, the presence of B was associated with an increase in MFD, MFC, and PF (Table 3). The effect of B on these traits was lost when C was introduced into models, but trends were still evident for MFD (p = 0.081) and MFC (p = 0.056). The presence of C was found to be associated with an increase in Yield and MSL; and a decrease in MFD, FDSD, and PF in the single-variant models. These effects on MFD, FDSD, and PF persisted, when corrected for B, in the multi-variant models.
3.6. Effect of Common Genotypes on Wool Traits
With the five common KRTAP26-1 genotypes (AA, AB, AC, BB, and BC), an effect of genotype was observed for MFD, FDSD, MSL, and PF (Table 4). Sheep of genotypes AB and BB were of a predicted mean MFD, from 5.8% to 11.2% higher than those of genotypes AC and BC. Genotypes AA, AB, and BB were associated with a higher predicted mean FDSD, than AC and BC. Genotypes AC and BC were associated with a higher predicted mean MSL over 6% greater than AB and BB. In terms of PF, AB and BB were associated with a higher predicted mean PF compared to AC and BC; especially sheep with BB, which had a predicated mean PF of 5.04%, over 2.7 times higher than that of sheep with AC and BC.
4. Discussion
The phenotypic correlations observed among the various wool traits were similar to other studies [11,12,13], but with some exceptions. The phenotypic correlations between CVFD and GFW, CFW, or MSL were −0.304, −0.334, and −0.306, respectively. These are higher than correlations described by Gong et al. [11], and Huisman and Brown [13]. The phenotypic correlation between CVFD and MSS was −0.290, while Huisman and Brown [13] reported a figure of −0.66. These differences may be a consequence of the different ages, genders, and breeds of sheep being studied. For example, Huisman and Brown [13] reported correlations between MSL and MFC in yearling, hogget and adult Merino sheep of −0.38, −0.48, and −0.52, respectively, while in this study it was −0.442 in yearling Merino-cross sheep. FDSD, which provides an indication of wool quality, was strongly correlated with MFD, CVFD, and PF in this study, which is perhaps unsurprising.
The putative ovine KRTAP26-1 was located on OAR1. The gene was clustered with several previously described KAP genes, and displayed a lower sequence similarity to any previously described ovine KAP gene, when compared to a KRTAP26-1 sequence from humans. The identification of this ovine KRTAP26-1 sequence lifts the number of HS-KAP members identified in sheep from 12 to 13.
The peptide that would be produced from the ovine KRTAP26-1 sequence would contain 184 amino acids. Although human KAP26-1 has been classed as a HS-KAP [6], its cysteine content (8.15%) would be lower than any other high-sulphur ovine KAP protein. This does not sit that comfortably with the current KAP classification system, as the protein would be neither cysteine-rich, nor glycine- and tyrosine-rich. The putative ovine KAP26-1 protein would contain a very high content of serine (22.28%), which reflects what has been reported for other HS-KAPs, such as KAP24-1 [14], KAP11-1 [15], and KAP13-3 [16]. There would be a serine-rich region (amino acids 121 to 124) in KAP26-1, which has not been described in any other ovine KAP proteins described to date. Serine residues can be phosphorylated, so having large amounts of serine may be associated with the phosphorylation of this protein. While phosphorylation has not been detected on wool KAPs, in hair keratins and matrix proteins, phosphorylation and dephosphorylation may affect the organisation and structure of the microfibers [17].
With the PCR-SSCP method, sequence variations were detected in a 626 bp amplicon. It is thought that PCR-SSCP analysis is better suited to small fragments in the range of 150–200 base pairs, but it has been shown to detect variation in larger fragments (up to 640 base pairs) under optimised conditions [18,19,20]. The addition of glycerol to SSCP gels can improve the sensitivity of analysis, and allow an increase in the length of DNA fragments that can be analysed [21]. Our results with 1% glycerol in the gels would appear to support this contention.
Using the PCR-SSCP method, seven SNPs were detected in the ovine KRTAP26-1 sequences and these produced four unique sequence variants. Among the seven SNPs, two of the substitutions would notionally result in amino acid changes. One of them was detected in B: c.215G/A (p.72C/Y), while the other was in C: c.277A/G (p.93S/G). The variation found in B, when compared to the other variants, would result in loss or gain of cysteine, which may affect the protein’s ability to cross-link with the intermediate filaments, or other KAPs. The variation found in C, when compared to the other variants, would result in the loss or gain of serine and glycine, which may also potentially affect the phosphorylation of this KAP.
Sequence variation in KRTAP26-1 was found to be associated with a number of wool traits, including Yield, MFD, FDSD, MSL, MFC, and PF. However, the largest and most enduring effect appeared to be on the fibre diameter associated traits of MFD, FDSD, and PF. Large differences in the predicated means were observed between the common genotypes, and differences that reinforced the conclusions drawn from the variant absence/presence models.
The results suggest that sheep with C have on average higher wool quality, as they have lower predicted mean MFD, FDSD and PF, and higher Yield and MSL. This is consistent with the correlations found between these traits. The correlations between MFD, FDSD, and PF were strong and positive, while these three traits had moderate negative correlations with Yield and MSL. Wool of lower MFD, and reduced FDSD in combination with higher MSL, would be described as being of higher quality and be more desirable in the market [22].
The presence of B seems to have an opposite effect to C, with these sheep having higher predicted mean MFD and PF. The wool traits of sheep with A were between those that have either B or C. The association analysis results were also consistent with the gene frequencies observed in the two sheep breeds. Of the four variants observed; B, C, and D had large differences in frequency between the two breeds. Merino × Southdown-cross sheep (MFD below 21 µm, Table 3) characteristically have lower MFD than Romney sheep (MFD of 33–37 µm) [23]. This may in part explain the difference in the frequency of the variants, between Merino × Southdown-cross sheep and Romney sheep, although the possibility exists that the effects observed for KRTAP26-1 may be due to its linkage to the other KRTAPs in the location of the gene and/or other genes.
Acknowledgments
Financial support from the China Scholarship Council, International S & T Cooperation Program of China (2011DFG33310), Science Foundation of Gansu Agricultural University (GSAU-ZL-2015-033) and the Lincoln University Gene-Marker Laboratory are acknowledged. We acknowledge the support of the AGMARDT Postdoctoral Fellowship to H. Gong and the New Zealand Guardian Trust for the Vernon Willey Trust Fellowship to H. Zhou. We thank Q. Fang, Y. Li, L. Burrows and S. Byun for technical assistance and A. Hogan for collecting the wool trait data.
Author Contributions
S.L., H.Z., Y.L. and J.G.H.H. conceived and designed the project. S.L., H.G. and F.Z. performed the experiments. H.Z., S.L. and J.H. analysed the data. S.L., H.Z., Y.L. and J.G.H.H. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and commented on the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
References
- Powell, B.C.; Rogers, G.E. The role of keratin proteins and their genes in the growth, structure and properties of hair. In Formation and Structure of Human Hair; Jollès, P., Zahn, H., Höcker, H., Eds.; Birkhäuser Verlag: Basel, Switzerland, 1997; pp. 59–148. [Google Scholar]
- Gong, H.; Zhou, H.; McKenzie, G.W.; Yu, Z.; Clerens, S.; Dyer, J.M.; Plowman, J.E.; Wright, M.W.; Arora, R.; Bawden, C.S.; et al. An updated nomenclature for keratin-associated proteins (KAPs). Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 8, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gong, H.; Zhou, H.; Forrest, R.H.; Li, S.; Wang, J.; Dyer, J.M.; Luo, Y.; Hickford, J.G. Wool keratin-associated protein genes in sheep—a review. Genes 2016, 7, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rogers, M.A.; Schweizer, J. Human KAP genes, only the half of it? Extensive size polymorphisms in hair keratin-associated protein genes. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2005, 124, vii–ix. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rogers, M.A.; Winter, H.; Langbein, L.; Wollschläger, A.; Praetzel-Wunder, S.; Jave-Suarez, L.F.; Schweizer, J. Characterization of human KAP24.1, a cuticular hair keratin-associated protein with unusual amino-acid composition and repeat structure. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2007, 127, 1197–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rogers, M.A.; Langbein, L.; Praetzel Wunder, S.; Giehl, K. Characterization and expression analysis of the hair keratin associated protein KAP26.1. Brit. J. Dermatol. 2008, 159, 725–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, H.; Hickford, J.G.H.; Fang, Q. A two-step procedure for extracting genomic DNA from dried blood spots on filter paper for polymerase chain reaction amplification. Anal. Biochem. 2006, 354, 159–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Byun, S.O.; Fang, Q.; Zhou, H.; Hickford, J.G.H. An effective method for silver-staining DNA in large numbers of polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 2009, 385, 174–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gong, H.; Zhou, H.; Hickford, J.G.H. Diversity of the glycine/tyrosine-rich keratin-associated protein 6 gene (KAP6) family in sheep. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2011, 38, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, S.; Zhou, H.; Gong, H.; Zhao, F.; Wang, J.; Liu, X.; Luo, Y.; Hickford, J.G. Identification of the ovine keratin-associated protein 22-1 (KAP22-1) gene and its effect on wool traits. Genes 2017, 8, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gong, H.; Zhou, H.; Hodge, S.; Dyer, J.M.; Hickford, J.G. Association of wool traits with variation in the ovine KAP1-2 gene in Merino cross lambs. Small Rum. Res. 2015, 124, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safari, E.; Fogarty, N.M.; Gilmour, A.R.; Atkins, K.D.; Mortimer, S.I.; Swan, A.A.; Brien, F.D.; Greeff, J.C.; van der Werf, J.H. Genetic correlations among and between wool, growth and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2007, 124, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huisman, A.; Brown, D. Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 4. Genetic relationships between and within wool traits. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2009, 49, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, H.; Gong, H.; Yan, W.; Luo, Y.Z.; Hickford, J.G.H. Identification and sequence analysis of the keratin-associated protein 24-1 (KAP24-1) gene homologue in sheep. Gene 2012, 511, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gong, H.; Zhou, H.; Dyer, J.M.; Hickford, J.G. Identification of the ovine KAP11-1 gene (KRTAP11-1) and genetic variation in its coding sequence. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2011, 38, 5429–5433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gong, H.; Zhou, H.; Dyer, J.M.; Plowman, J.E.; Hickford, J.G. Identification of the keratin-associated protein 13-3 (KAP13-3) gene in sheep. Open J. Gen. 2011, 1, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakamura, A.; Arimoto, M.; Takeuchi, K.; Fujii, T. A rapid extraction procedure of human hair proteins and identification of phosphorylated species. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2002, 25, 569–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, H.; Hickford, J.G.; Fang, Q.; Lin, Y.S. Allelic variation of the ovine Toll-like receptor 4 gene. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2007, 1, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gong, H.; Zhou, H.; Hickford, J.G. Polymorphism of the ovine keratin-associated protein 1-4 gene (KRTAP1-4). Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 37, 3377–3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gong, H.; Zhou, H.; Yu, Z.; Dyer, J.; Plowman, J.E.; Hickford, J. Identification of the ovine keratin-associated protein KAP1-2 gene (KRTAP1-2). Exp. Dermatol. 2011, 20, 815–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nataraj, A.J.; OlivosBGlander, I.; Kusukawa, N.; Highsmith, W.E., Jr. Single-strand conformation polymorphism and heteroduplex analysis for gel-based mutation detection. Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 1177–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holman, B.W.B.; Malau-Aduli, A.E.O. A review of sheep wool quality traits. Annu. Rev. Res. Biol. 2012, 2, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Rippon, J.A. The structure of wool. In The Coloration of Wool and Other Keratin Fibres; Lewis, D.M., Rippon, J.A., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons in association with the Society of Dyers and Colourists; Plenum Press: Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK, 2013; pp. 1–42. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1.
Structure of the sheep chromosome 1 region that contains a sequence similar to human KRTAP26-1. The newly identified ovine KRTAP26-1 is shown in a box, and twelve previously identified KRTAPs [3,10] on sheep chromosome 1 are also shown. Vertical bars represent the location of different KRTAPs and the arrowheads indicate the direction of transcription. The numbers below the bars indicate the name of the respective keratin-associated protein (KAP) genes (i.e., 11.1 is KRTAP11-1). The nucleotide distances refer to NC_019458.
Figure 1.
Structure of the sheep chromosome 1 region that contains a sequence similar to human KRTAP26-1. The newly identified ovine KRTAP26-1 is shown in a box, and twelve previously identified KRTAPs [3,10] on sheep chromosome 1 are also shown. Vertical bars represent the location of different KRTAPs and the arrowheads indicate the direction of transcription. The numbers below the bars indicate the name of the respective keratin-associated protein (KAP) genes (i.e., 11.1 is KRTAP11-1). The nucleotide distances refer to NC_019458.
Figure 2.
Polymerase chain reaction-single stranded conformational polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) identification of variation in the coding region of ovine KAP26-1 gene. Four banding patterns, representing four variants (A to D) are shown, for either homozygous or heterozygous sheep.
Figure 2.
Polymerase chain reaction-single stranded conformational polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) identification of variation in the coding region of ovine KAP26-1 gene. Four banding patterns, representing four variants (A to D) are shown, for either homozygous or heterozygous sheep.
Figure 3.
Phylogenetic tree of all the ovine KAPs identified to date together with human KAP26-1. The tree was constructed using the predicted amino acid sequences derived from the genes. The ovine KAPs are indicated with the prefix “s” and the human KAPs have the prefix “h”. The newly identified ovine KAP26-1 sequences are shown in a box. The numbers at the forks indicate the bootstrap confidence values and only those equal to, or higher than 90%, are shown. The GenBank accession numbers for the human KAP26-1 is AM941740.1. The GenBank accession numbers for the sheep KAPs are X01610, HQ897973, X02925, X01610, U60024, M21099, M21100, M21103, X73462, EU239778, X55294, X73434, X73435, M95719, KT725827, KT725833, KT725838, KT725841, X05638, X05639, KF220646, HQ595347, JN377429, KX377616, and JX112014 for sKAP1-1, sKAP1-2, sKAP1-3, sKAP1-4, sKAP2-3, sKAP3-1, sKAP3-2, sKAP3-3, sKAP4-1, sKAP4-3, sKAP5-1, sKAP5-4, sKAP5-5, sKAP6-1, sKAP6-2, sKAP6-3, sKAP6-4, sKAP6-5, sKAP7-1, sKAP8-1, sKAP8-2, sKAP11-1, sKAP13-3, sKAP22-1, and sKAP24-1, respectively.
Figure 3.
Phylogenetic tree of all the ovine KAPs identified to date together with human KAP26-1. The tree was constructed using the predicted amino acid sequences derived from the genes. The ovine KAPs are indicated with the prefix “s” and the human KAPs have the prefix “h”. The newly identified ovine KAP26-1 sequences are shown in a box. The numbers at the forks indicate the bootstrap confidence values and only those equal to, or higher than 90%, are shown. The GenBank accession numbers for the human KAP26-1 is AM941740.1. The GenBank accession numbers for the sheep KAPs are X01610, HQ897973, X02925, X01610, U60024, M21099, M21100, M21103, X73462, EU239778, X55294, X73434, X73435, M95719, KT725827, KT725833, KT725838, KT725841, X05638, X05639, KF220646, HQ595347, JN377429, KX377616, and JX112014 for sKAP1-1, sKAP1-2, sKAP1-3, sKAP1-4, sKAP2-3, sKAP3-1, sKAP3-2, sKAP3-3, sKAP4-1, sKAP4-3, sKAP5-1, sKAP5-4, sKAP5-5, sKAP6-1, sKAP6-2, sKAP6-3, sKAP6-4, sKAP6-5, sKAP7-1, sKAP8-1, sKAP8-2, sKAP11-1, sKAP13-3, sKAP22-1, and sKAP24-1, respectively.
Table 1.
Pearson correlation coefficients between various wool traits (n = 384 Merino × Southdown-cross sheep).
Table 1.
Pearson correlation coefficients between various wool traits (n = 384 Merino × Southdown-cross sheep).
| GFW | CFW | Yield | MSL | MFD | FDSD | CVFD | MSS | MFC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFW | 0.916 *** | ||||||||
| Yield | 0.165 ** | 0.528 *** | |||||||
| MSL | 0.463 *** | 0.525 *** | 0.341 *** | ||||||
| MFD | 0.053 | −0.091 | −0.341 *** | −0.270 *** | |||||
| FDSD | 0.160 ** | 0.263 *** | 0.309 *** | 0.350 *** | 0.796 *** | ||||
| CVFD | 0.304 *** | 0.334 *** | 0.174 ** | 0.306 *** | 0.306 *** | 0.815 *** | |||
| MSS | 0.188 *** | 0.220 *** | 0.143 *** | 0.067 | 0.069 | −0.143 ** | 0.290 *** | ||
| MFC | 0.329 *** | 0.492 *** | 0.550 *** | 0.442 *** | 0.425 *** | 0.397 *** | 0.238 *** | 0.079 | |
| PF | 0.022 | 0.085 | 0.251 *** | 0.244 *** | 0.819 *** | 0.794 *** | 0.440 *** | 0.061 | 0.224 *** |
Correlations with |r| > 0.7 are in bold, and those with 0.3 <|r| ≤ 0.7 are underlined. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001. GFW: Greasy fleece weight; CFW: clean fleece weight; Yield: wool yield; MSL: mean staple length; MFD: mean fibre diameter; FDSD: fibre diameter standard deviation; CVFD: coefficient of variation of fibre diameter; MSS: mean staple strength; MFC: mean fibre curvature.
Table 2.
Sequence variations identified in the four variants of ovine KRTAP26-1.
| Nucleotide Position | Variant | Amino Acid Change | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRTAP26-1*A | KRTAP26-1*B | KRTAP26-1*C | KRTAP26-1*D | ||
| c.72 | C | T | C | C | No change |
| c.111 | A | C | T | A | No change |
| c.123 | C | G | C | C | No change |
| c.215 | G | A | G | G | p.Cys72Tyr |
| c.277 | A | A | G | A | p.Ser93Gly |
| c.336 | G | G | G | A | No change |
| c.549 | C | T | C | C | No change |
Table 3.
Association between the KRTAP26-1 variants and various wool traits (predicted mean ± predicted SE) 1.
Table 3.
Association between the KRTAP26-1 variants and various wool traits (predicted mean ± predicted SE) 1.
| Trait | Variant Assessed | n | Single-Variant Model | Multi-Variant Model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absent | Present | Absent | Present | p | Variants Fitted | Absent | Present | p | ||
| GFW | A | 71 | 312 | 2.37 ± 0.06 | 2.37 ± 0.03 | 0.958 | ||||
| (kg) | B | 207 | 176 | 2.37 ± 0.04 | 2.37 ± 0.04 | 0.902 | ||||
| C | 212 | 171 | 2.39 ± 0.03 | 2.33 ± 0.05 | 0.361 | |||||
| CFW | A | 71 | 312 | 1.72 ± 0.05 | 1.71 ± 0.02 | 0.764 | ||||
| (kg) | B | 207 | 176 | 1.72 ± 0.03 | 1.70 ± 0.03 | 0.678 | ||||
| C | 212 | 171 | 1.71 ± 0.03 | 1.72 ± 0.04 | 0.877 | |||||
| Yield | A | 71 | 312 | 72.2 ± 0.74 | 71.7 ± 0.35 | 0.471 | B, C | 73.0 ± 0.82 | 71.8 ± 0.41 | 0.201 |
| (%) | B | 207 | 176 | 72.4 ± 0.47 | 71.2 ± 0.44 | 0.070 | C | 72.4 ± 0.47 | 71.7 ± 0.52 | 0.291 |
| C | 212 | 171 | 71.2 ± 0.40 | 73.0 ± 0.65 | 0.027 | B | 71.3 ± 0.41 | 72.8 ± 0.68 | 0.082 | |
| MSL (mm) | A | 71 | 312 | 84.7 ± 1.66 | 82.6 ± 0.87 | 0.253 | C | 85.6 ± 1.64 | 84.0 ± 0.93 | 0.377 |
| B | 207 | 176 | 83.9 ± 1.12 | 82.2 ± 1.04 | 0.236 | C | 84.3 ± 1.10 | 84.4 ± 1.18 | 0.950 | |
| C | 212 | 171 | 80.7 ± 0.99 | 87.9 ± 1.51 | <0.001 | None | 80.7 ± 0.99 | 87.9 ± 1.51 | <0.001 | |
| MFD | A | 71 | 312 | 19.8 ± 0.25 | 19.6 ± 0.13 | 0.375 | B, C | 19.6 ± 0.27 | 19.3 ± 0.14 | 0.397 |
| (µm) | B | 207 | 176 | 19.3 ± 0.17 | 19.9 ± 0.15 | 0.001 | C | 19.2 ± 0.16 | 19.6 ± 0.17 | 0.081 |
| C | 212 | 171 | 20.1 ± 0.15 | 18.6 ± 0.22 | <0.001 | B | 20.0 ± 0.15 | 18.7 ± 0.23 | <0.001 | |
| FDSD | A | 71 | 312 | 4.26 ± 0.09 | 4.22 ± 0.04 | 0.680 | B, C | 4.21 ± 0.09 | 4.13 ± 0.04 | 0.450 |
| (µm) | B | 207 | 176 | 4.16 ± 0.06 | 4.28 ± 0.05 | 0.098 | C | 4.13 ± 0.06 | 4.17 ± 0.06 | 0.626 |
| C | 212 | 171 | 4.35 ± 0.05 | 3.96 ± 0.08 | <0.001 | B | 4.34 ± 0.05 | 3.96 ± 0.08 | <0.001 | |
| CVFD | A | 71 | 312 | 21.4 ± 0.28 | 21.9 ± 0.14 | 0.166 | C | 21.4 ± 0.28 | 21.7 ± 0.15 | 0.248 |
| (%) | B | 207 | 176 | 21.9 ± 0.18 | 21.7 ± 0.17 | 0.471 | A, C | 21.7 ± 0.26 | 21.4 ± 0.20 | 0.330 |
| C | 212 | 171 | 22.0 ± 0.16 | 21.4 ± 0.25 | 0.067 | A | 21.8 ± 0.19 | 21.3 ± 0.26 | 0.093 | |
| MSS | A | 71 | 312 | 23.9 ± 1.06 | 22.6 ± 0.55 | 0.237 | B | 23.6 ± 1.19 | 22.7 ± 0.55 | 0.496 |
| (N/ktex) | B | 207 | 176 | 22.1 ± 0.71 | 23.4 ± 0.65 | 0.145 | None | 22.1 ± 0.71 | 23.4 ± 0.65 | 0.145 |
| C | 212 | 171 | 23.1 ± 0.64 | 22.2 ± 0.98 | 0.434 | B | 22.9 ± 0.66 | 22.6 ± 1.01 | 0.774 | |
| MFC | A | 71 | 312 | 91.2 ± 1.80 | 89.5 ± 0.85 | 0.367 | B, C | 89.4 ± 2.00 | 89.1 ± 1.01 | 0.862 |
| (°/mm) | B | 207 | 176 | 87.7 ± 1.15 | 91.4 ± 1.06 | 0.016 | C | 87.6 ± 1.16 | 90.7 ± 1.26 | 0.056 |
| C | 212 | 171 | 90.8 ± 0.98 | 87.2 ± 1.60 | 0.070 | B | 90.3 ± 1.02 | 88.0 ± 1.65 | 0.278 | |
| PF | A | 71 | 312 | 3.00 ± 0.45 | 2.79 ± 0.23 | 0.654 | B, C | 2.55 ± 0.49 | 2.44 ± 0.26 | 0.845 |
| (%) | B | 207 | 176 | 2.33 ± 0.30 | 3.24 ± 0.27 | 0.017 | C | 2.23 ± 0.29 | 2.69 ± 0.31 | 0.237 |
| C | 212 | 171 | 3.47 ± 0.26 | 1.41 ± 0.40 | <0.001 | B | 3.39 ± 0.27 | 1.53 ± 0.41 | <0.001 | |
1 Predicted means and predicted standard errors derived from GLMs with various factors being included in the models, as described in the Materials and Methods. p < 0.05 are in bold, while 0.05 ≤ p < 0.20 are italicised.
Table 4.
The effect of KRTAP26-1 genotype on various wool traits (predicted mean ± predicted SE) 1.
| Trait | AA (n = 68) | AB (n = 116) | AC (n = 123) | BB (n = 22) | BC (n = 37) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFW (kg) | 2.39 ± 0.05 | 2.36 ± 0.04 | 2.36 ± 0.05 | 2.39 ± 0.09 | 2.40 ± 0.08 | 0.971 |
| CFW (kg) | 1.72 ± 0.04 | 1.68 ± 0.03 | 1.72 ± 0.04 | 1.69 ± 0.07 | 1.77 ± 0.06 | 0.814 |
| Yield (%) | 73.5 ± 1.32 | 72.7 ± 1.22 | 74.6 ± 1.28 | 72.7 ± 1.65 | 74.5 ± 1.58 | 0.310 |
| MSL (mm) | 82.6 ± 1.41 a,b | 81.2 ± 1.07 b | 86.5 ± 1.45 a | 78.2 ± 2.48 b | 88.2 ± 2.17 a | 0.002 |
| MFD (µm) | 19.7 ± 0.22 a,b | 20.2 ± 0.17 a | 18.7 ± 0.23 c | 20.8 ± 0.39 a | 19.1 ± 0.34 b,c | <0.001 |
| FDSD (µm) | 4.41 ± 0.08 a | 4.46 ± 0.06 a | 4.14 ± 0.08 b | 4.67 ± 0.13 a | 4.15 ± 0.12 b | 0.001 |
| CVFD (%) | 22.3 ± 0.26 | 22.0 ± 0.20 | 22.0 ± 0.27 | 22.4 ± 0.47 | 21.7 ± 0.41 | 0.624 |
| MSS (N/ktex) | 22.1 ± 0.89 | 22.7 ± 0.68 | 21.4 ± 0.92 | 25.6 ± 1.58 | 22.7 ± 1.38 | 0.202 |
| MFC (o/mm) | 89.1 ± 1.76 | 91.8 ± 1.31 | 87.0 ± 1.69 | 92.1 ± 3.01 | 88.8 ± 2.61 | 0.260 |
| PF (%) | 3.21 ± 0.40 a,b | 3.50 ± 0.32 a | 1.36 ± 0.15 b | 5.04 ± 1.08 a | 1.39 ± 0.24 b | <0.001 |
1 Predicted means and predicted standard errors derived from GLMs with various factors being included in the models as described in the Materials and Methods. Means within rows that do not share a superscript letter were different at p < 0.05 and the p-values bolded.
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Li, S.; Zhou, H.; Gong, H.; Zhao, F.; Hu, J.; Luo, Y.; Hickford, J.G.H. Identification of the Ovine Keratin-Associated Protein 26-1 Gene and Its Association with Variation in Wool Traits. Genes 2017, 8, 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8090225
AMA Style
Li S, Zhou H, Gong H, Zhao F, Hu J, Luo Y, Hickford JGH. Identification of the Ovine Keratin-Associated Protein 26-1 Gene and Its Association with Variation in Wool Traits. Genes. 2017; 8(9):225. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8090225
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Shaobin, Huitong Zhou, Hua Gong, Fangfang Zhao, Jiang Hu, Yuzhu Luo, and Jon G. H. Hickford. 2017. "Identification of the Ovine Keratin-Associated Protein 26-1 Gene and Its Association with Variation in Wool Traits" Genes 8, no. 9: 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8090225
APA StyleLi, S., Zhou, H., Gong, H., Zhao, F., Hu, J., Luo, Y., & Hickford, J. G. H. (2017). Identification of the Ovine Keratin-Associated Protein 26-1 Gene and Its Association with Variation in Wool Traits. Genes, 8(9), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8090225
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
