Transcriptome–Metabolome Combined Analysis of Central Carbon Metabolites in Anoectochilus roxburghii (Wall.) Lindl. Under Salt Stress
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Growth and Salt Treatment
2.2. Chlorophyll Fluorescence Measured
2.3. Sample Extraction and UPLC Conditions
2.4. RNA-Seq Analysis and Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes
2.5. Correlation Analysis Between Metabolomics and Transcriptomics
2.6. qRT-PCR Analysis
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Growth and the PSII Quantum Yield of A. roxburghii Plants Under Salt Stress
3.2. Metabolome Analysis of A. roxburghii Under Salt Stress
3.3. Transcriptome Analysis of A. roxburghii Plants Under Salt Stress
3.4. Integrated Transcriptome–Metabolome Analysis of DEGs and DAMs in Response to Salt Stress
3.5. qRT-PCR Validation of Key DEGs Involved in Central Carbon Metabolism
4. Discussion
4.1. Metabolic Reconfiguration Towards Osmotic Adjustment and Energy Remodeling
4.2. Transcriptional Reprogramming Underpins the Metabolic Shift
4.3. Integrated Analysis Reveals a Regulatory Network Prioritizing Defense over Growth
4.4. Implications for the Medicinal Quality of A. roxburghii and Future Prospects
4.5. Limitations and Technical Considerations
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| DEGs | Differentially expressed genes |
| DAMs | Differentially accumulated metabolites |
| CCM | Central carbon metabolism |
| TCA | Tricarboxylic acid cycle |
| PSII | Photosystem II |
| QY | Quantum yield |
| LC-MS/MS | Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry |
| UPLC | Ultra Performance LC |
| ESI | Electrospray ionization |
| MRM | Multiple reaction monitoring |
| FDR | False discovery rate |
| KEGG | Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes |
| FPKM | Fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads |
| qRT-PCR | Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction |
| ANOVA | Analysis of variance |
| ROS | Reactive oxygen species |
| GABA | γ-aminobutyric acid |
| PCKA | Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase A |
| PCK1 | Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1 |
| PCK2 | Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 2 |
| PFK3 | Phosphofructokinase 3 |
| SPP2 | Sucrose-phosphatase 2 |
| MODA | Malic enzyme A |
| CSY2 | Citrate synthase 2 |
| SPS | Sucrose phosphate synthase |
| SPS1 | Sucrose phosphate synthase 1 |
| SPS3 | Sucrose phosphate synthase 3 |
| SBEI | Starch branching enzyme I |
| ATP | Adenosine triphosphate |
| ADP | Adenosine diphosphate |
| NADPH | Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate |
References
- Qi, C.X.; Zhou, Q.; Yuan, Z.; Luo, Z.W.; Dai, C.; Zhu, H.C.; Chen, C.M.; Xue, Y.B.; Wang, J.P.; Wang, Y.F.; et al. Kinsenoside: A promising bioactive compound from Anoectochilus species. Curr. Med. Sci. 2018, 38, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, M.; Liu, T.; Tan, W.; Ren, H.; Li, H.; Liu, J.; Cao, H.; Cheng, Q.; Liu, X.; Zhu, H.; et al. Effects of kinsenoside, a potential immunosuppressive drug for autoimmune hepatitis, on dendritic cells/CD8+ T cells communication in mice. Hepatology 2016, 64, 2135–2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, D.; Zhong, X.; Fu, L.; Zhu, W.; Liu, X.; Wu, Z.; Li, Y.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Tao, X.; et al. Therapeutic effect and mechanism of polysaccharides from Anoectochilus roxburghii (Wall.) Lindl. in diet-induced obesity. Phytomedicine 2022, 99, 154031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; He, X.; Chen, H.; Lin, Y.; Zheng, C.; Zheng, B. Extraction and characterization of hepatoprotective polysaccharides from Anoectochilus roxburghii against CCl4-induced liver injury via regulating lipid metabolism and the gut microbiota. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 277, 134305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Xing, Y.; Ma, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, J.; Wang, X.; Jia, X. Investigation of the response of Platycodon grandiflorus (Jacq.) A. DC. to salt stress using combined transcriptomics and metabolomics. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, M.; Kesawat, M.S.; Du, X.; Siddique, K.H.; Kant, S.; Chung, S.M. In silico analysis and expression profiling reveal the presence of abiotic stress and developmental stage specific Aconitase genes in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Stress 2024, 11, 100416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Zhu, J.; Gong, Z.; Zhu, J.K. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022, 23, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, S.; Tariq, F.; Ma, C. Integrative dynamics of cell wall architecture and plant growth under salt stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1644412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elloumi, W.; Jebali, A.; Maalej, A.; Chamkha, M.; Sayadi, S. Effect of mild salinity stress on the growth, fatty acid and carotenoid compositions, and biological activities of the thermal freshwater microalgae Scenedesmus sp. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Rong, H.; Li, H.; Li, N.; Jiang, Y. Physiological responses of Anoectochilus roxburghii to salt stress. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, W.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, J.P.; Qi, Y.N.; Wang, L.M.; Xie, Y.P.; Li, W.J.; Dang, Z.; Yuan, M.L.; Zhang, Y.P. Conjoint transcriptome and metabolome analysis of the response mechanism of flax root to salt stress. Pratacult. Sci. 2022, 39, 1151–1164. [Google Scholar]
- Wahid, A.; Ghazanfar, A. Possible involvement of some secondary metabolites in salt tolerance of sugarcane. J. Plant Physiol. 2006, 163, 723–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, Z.; Liang, X.; Li, M.; Ma, M.; Zheng, Q.; Li, D.; An, T.; Wang, G. Advances in the optimization of central carbon metabolism in metabolic engineering. Microb. Cell. Factories 2023, 22, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abbey, L.; Ofoe, R.; Wang, Z.; Chada, S. How central carbon metabolites of Mexican mint (Plectranthus amboinicus) plants are impacted under different watering regimes. Metabolites 2023, 13, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sharma, K.; Kapoor, R. Arbuscular mycorrhiza differentially adjusts central carbon metabolism in two contrasting genotypes of Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek in response to salt stress. Plant Sci. 2023, 332, 111706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Suo, L.; Li, D.; He, L.; Duan, J.; Wang, Y.; Feng, W.; Guo, T. Exogenous melatonin alleviates drought stress in wheat by enhancing photosynthesis and carbon metabolism to promote floret development and grain yield. Plant Stress 2025, 16, 100885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noor, E.; Eden, E.; Milo, R.; Alon, U. Central carbon metabolism as a minimal biochemical walk between precursors for biomass and energy. Mol. Cell 2010, 39, 809–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.; Li, X.; Wang, W.; Shan, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhu, M.; La, Q.; Zhong, Y.; Xu, Y.; Nan, P.; et al. Integrated metabolomics and transcriptomics study of traditional herb Astragalus membranaceus Bge. var. mongolicus (Bge.) Hsiao reveals global metabolic profile and novel phytochemical ingredients. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, X.; An, T.; Fu, D.; Duan, S.; Jin, H.L.; Wang, H.B. Optimization of central carbon metabolism by Warburg effect of human cancer cell improves triterpenes biosynthesis in yeast. Adv. Biotechnol. 2023, 1, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.S.; Ju, H.K.; Kim, Y.J.; Lim, T.G.; Uddin, M.R.; Kim, Y.B.; Baek, J.H.; Kwon, S.W.; Lee, K.W.; Seo, H.S.; et al. Enhancement of anti-inflammatory activity of Aloe vera adventitious root extracts through the alteration of primary and secondary metabolites via salicylic acid elicitation. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dissanayake, B.M.; Staudinger, C.; Ranathunge, K.; Munns, R.; Rupasinghe, T.W.; Taylor, N.L.; Millar, A.H. Metabolic adaptations leading to an enhanced lignification in wheat roots under salinity stress. Plant J. 2024, 119, 1800–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Wan, S.; Xing, B.; Peng, C.; Zhu, J.; Shao, Q.; Lv, A. An HD-Zip transcription factor ArHDZ22 regulates plant height and decreases salt tolerance in Anoectochilus roxburghii. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2025, 223, 116897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Y.; Hu, G.; Grover, C.E.; Miller, E.R.; Zhu, S.; Wendel, J.F. Parental legacy versus regulatory innovation in salt stress responsiveness of allopolyploid cotton (Gossypium) species. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2022, 111, 872–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Dewey, C.N. RSEM: Accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mortazavi, A.; Williams, B.A.; McCue, K.; Schaeffer, L.; Wold, B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-seq. Nat. Methods 2008, 5, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNAseq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Robinson, M.D.; McCarthy, D.J.; Smyth, G.K. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munns, R.; Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 651–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, B.; Huang, B. Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants: Physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization. Int. J. Genom. 2014, 2014, 701596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacoby, R.P.; Millar, A.H.; Taylor, N.L. Wheat mitochondrial proteomes provide new links between antioxidant defense and plant salinity tolerance. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 6595–6604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Leary, B.; Park, J.; Plaxton, W.C. The remarkable diversity of plant PEPC (phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase): Recent insights into the physiological functions and post-translational controls of non-photosynthetic PEPCs. Biochem. J. 2011, 436, 15–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cramer, G.R.; Urano, K.; Delrot, S.; Pezzotti, M.; Shinozaki, K. Effects of abiotic stress on plants: A systems biology perspective. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krasensky, J.; Jonak, C. Drought, salt, and temperature stress-induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huot, B.; Yao, J.; Montgomery, B.L.; He, S.Y. Growth–defense tradeoffs in plants: A balancing act to optimize fitness. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 1267–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilambi, H.V.; Shweta; Yadav, D.; Tyagi, K. Secondary metabolites and plant abiotic stress responses. In Molecular Response and Genetic Engineering for Stress in Plants; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2022; Volume 1, pp. 13–17. [Google Scholar]






| GeneBank Accession | Gene | Forward Primer (5′-3′) | Reverse Primer (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PP999134 | aconitate hydratase 3 | AGGATCGATCGGCTTCCCTA | TCAACCTGCTTTGGTGCAGA |
| PP973868 | phosphoenolpyruvate/phosphate translocator | TGATACGGGATGGTCCTGGT | ACCAAAGCCCAAAAAGCGAG |
| PP973863 | malate dehydrogenase | GGTGCTCAAGCAAAAGGGTG | GCCTCCACCACTTCAGTACC |
| PP973865 | beta-glucosidase 6 | TCTCCCACAAGCGACCATTC | TCTGAATCCCCCAAAGCACC |
| PP973869 | glycerate dehydrogenase | ACAGAGTCGTGAGCACCAAG | TGACTCCGTCGCATTTGTCA |
| PP973866 | citrate synthase | ACCCATGGCCGAATGTTGAT | TCCAGCCATTCCATGGTCAC |
| PP973864 | alkaline/neutral invertase | CAGCATGCATAAAGACCGGC | AGAGGCTTCATGGCCTTGTC |
| PP973860 | dihydrolipoyllysine-residue acetyltransferase component 2 | TCCAGAGCCGAAGGTTTCAC | CATCGGGGCCAGTACCTTTT |
| PP999135 | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 2 | CGTGTGCCTACAGTGGATGT | TCGTTGTCATACCAGGCCAC |
| PP973862 | pyruvate decarboxylase 1 | TCTGCGTGTGAATGTGCTCT | TGACCTGAAAGCTTCCGTCC |
| PP973867 | glycosyltransferase 2 | CCGCCGTCATCATCGACTTA | AGAGAGCGGGAAGATGGAGT |
| PP973861 | cellulose synthase-like protein G3 | CGGTCATGGCCTACGACTAC | GGGGAGTCGATCATGCTGAG |
| MH899010 | β-actin | AGATGAGGCACAGTCCAAGA | GCTGGAACATTGAAGGTCTC |
| Sample | CleanData (bp) | AF_Q20 (%) | AF_Q30 (%) | AF_GC (%) | Reads | Total_Mapped (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control-1 | 7,296,968,063 | 7,144,959,490 (97.92%) | 6,845,610,687 (93.81%) | 3,393,464,822 (46.51%) | 48,858,088 | 40,676,273 (83.25%) |
| Control-2 | 8,145,348,695 | 7,978,694,514 (97.95%) | 7,646,381,241 (93.87%) | 3,765,892,953 (46.23%) | 54,433,832 | 45,406,833 (83.42%) |
| Control-3 | 7,939,423,333 | 7,755,877,487 (97.69%) | 7,406,460,578 (93.29%) | 3,694,678,830 (46.54%) | 53,067,272 | 44,604,371 (84.05%) |
| NaCl_50-1 | 8,046,778,331 | 7,848,951,235 (97.54%) | 7,477,119,163 (92.92%) | 3,715,520,221 (46.17%) | 53,881,786 | 44,879,929 (83.29%) |
| NaCl_50-2 | 7,251,247,454 | 7,099,570,555 (97.91%) | 6,797,612,034 (93.74%) | 3,339,569,259 (46.06%) | 48,500,784 | 40,500,305 (83.50%) |
| NaCl_50-3 | 6,540,369,191 | 6,394,727,691 (97.77%) | 6,112,573,416 (93.46%) | 2,999,935,404 (45.87%) | 43,696,988 | 36,584,923 (83.72%) |
| NaCl_100-1 | 6,102,162,412 | 5,978,971,536 (97.98%) | 5,732,068,701 (93.94%) | 2,840,210,058 (46.54%) | 40,794,340 | 34,629,992 (84.89%) |
| NaCl_100-2 | 5,447,262,724 | 5,335,182,784 (97.94%) | 5,115,186,646 (93.90%) | 2,505,108,258 (45.99%) | 36,482,362 | 30,200,678 (82.78%) |
| NaCl_100-3 | 6,521,164,870 | 6,372,367,799 (97.72%) | 6,083,955,954 (93.30%) | 3,009,474,750 (46.15%) | 43,660,940 | 36,209,888 (82.93%) |
| NaCl_200-1 | 5,737,470,246 | 5,625,080,399 (98.04%) | 5,401,394,117 (94.14%) | 2,647,072,533 (46.14%) | 38,440,026 | 31,641,302 (82.31%) |
| NaCl_200-2 | 5,986,411,878 | 5,857,382,189 (97.84%) | 5,602,138,421 (93.58%) | 2,780,812,286 (46.45%) | 40,061,364 | 33,394,508 (83.36%) |
| NaCl_200-3 | 6,053,658,208 | 5,901,207,857 (97.48%) | 5,616,179,179 (92.77%) | 2,789,341,942 (46.08%) | 40,522,472 | 33,532,857 (82.75%) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Li, H.; Zhao, F.; Huang, H.; Zhang, S.; Lin, J.; Huang, D.; Dai, Y. Transcriptome–Metabolome Combined Analysis of Central Carbon Metabolites in Anoectochilus roxburghii (Wall.) Lindl. Under Salt Stress. Genes 2026, 17, 523. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17050523
Li H, Zhao F, Huang H, Zhang S, Lin J, Huang D, Dai Y. Transcriptome–Metabolome Combined Analysis of Central Carbon Metabolites in Anoectochilus roxburghii (Wall.) Lindl. Under Salt Stress. Genes. 2026; 17(5):523. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17050523
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Heping, Fangzhou Zhao, Huiming Huang, Shuhe Zhang, Jiangbo Lin, Debao Huang, and Yimin Dai. 2026. "Transcriptome–Metabolome Combined Analysis of Central Carbon Metabolites in Anoectochilus roxburghii (Wall.) Lindl. Under Salt Stress" Genes 17, no. 5: 523. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17050523
APA StyleLi, H., Zhao, F., Huang, H., Zhang, S., Lin, J., Huang, D., & Dai, Y. (2026). Transcriptome–Metabolome Combined Analysis of Central Carbon Metabolites in Anoectochilus roxburghii (Wall.) Lindl. Under Salt Stress. Genes, 17(5), 523. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17050523
