Next Article in Journal
Reassessing Benign ASXL1 Variants in Bohring–Opitz Syndrome: The Role of Population Databases in Variant Reinterpretation
Previous Article in Journal
Next-Generation Sequencing Defines a Molecularly Confirmed ARPKD Core Within the Broader PKHD1-Associated Disease Spectrum
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

CRISPR-Mediated Silkworm: The Oncoming Agricultural Revolutions and a Rising Model Organism

1
Biological Science Research Center, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
2
Key Laboratory of Entomology and Pest Control Engineering, College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
3
College of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2026, 17(2), 230; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17020230
Submission received: 26 January 2026 / Revised: 9 February 2026 / Accepted: 10 February 2026 / Published: 12 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of CRISPR/Cas9 Technology in Insects)

Abstract

The silkworm (Bombyx mori) is essential to sericulture and is also becoming a key model organism in genomics and agriculture. For decades, genetic studies of the silkworm were limited by inefficient and inflexible genome tools. CRISPR genome editing allows precise and scalable alterations to genes regulating development, physiology, and industrial traits. This review summarizes silkworm genome-editing breakthroughs, highlighting CRISPR’s evolution from simple gene knockouts to large-scale genome-wide screening. We highlight how these advancements contribute to disease resistance, higher yields, and the development of new silk-based materials, as well as how they influence the development and growth rate of the sericulture. The creation of high-quality reference genomes, pangenomes, and genome-wide screening systems has made the silkworm a major model for integrating multiple biological datasets and approaches, such as genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic. By considering the unique biological characteristics of the silkworm, this provides new insights for research on silk biology, piRNA synthetic biology, and hormonal signaling regulation. Finally, we examine new areas at the intersection of CRISPR, pangenomics, and artificial intelligence (AI) and suggest future paths for molecular breeding, pest control, and synthetic biology. Moreover, AI-assisted prediction of CRISPR outcomes is utilized to inform the design of targeted trait modifications, representing an approach to enhancing biomanufacturing efficiency and eco-friendly silk production. Together, these advances have made the silkworm a flexible genetic platform and an important part of sustainable agriculture and biomanufacturing.

1. Introduction

Bombyx mori is important in agriculture because it provides high-quality silk fiber, making it a valuable economic insect. Research shows it came from its wild ancestor, Bombyx mandarina. Around 5000 years ago, humans began domesticating and rearing this economically important species, with the selected Chinese trimolters being the earliest to differentiate from wild silkworms. As it traveled along the Silk Road, different regional strains appeared, adding to its rich diversity [1,2]. B. mori serves as a vital model for exploring various aspects of biology, including insect developmental processes, functional genomics, evolutionary patterns, and technological innovations [2,3,4,5]. Due to its distinctive features, such as a short life cycle, ease of large-scale rearing, and simple genetic manipulation, B. mori is highly valued as a silk producer. Its fibers are characterized by a lustrous appearance, soft texture, and considerable flexibility. Therefore, the species has been domesticated for silk production for millennia. Plus, their excellent mechanical strength, compatibility with living tissues, and natural ability to degrade make silk-based materials ideal for biomedical applications, such as tissue engineering, scaffolds, wound dressings, and drug delivery systems [6,7,8,9,10]. Consequently, its great application potential and advantages are establishing silkworm as an emerging model organism in insect research [3].
Understanding the intricate workings of the silkworm genome requires precise genetic techniques. Over the years, as research has deepened, technological demands have continuously evolved. Initially applied in Caenorhabditis elegans, RNAi technology rapidly expanded to other species, becoming a dominant tool for functional genomics in the early 21st century [11,12,13]. However, in the silkworm, RNAi via dsRNA/siRNA injection is often hindered by low success rates and incomplete knockdown [14,15]. More critically, the interference effects induced by dsRNA are transient, precluding the stable inheritance of phenotypes in subsequent generations. The subsequent emergence of gene editing technologies, including Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFNs), Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases (TALENs), and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR), has largely overcome these limitations [16]. Given the limitations of ZFNs and TALENs, such as high construction costs, complex engineering requirements, and low editing efficiency, CRISPR has become the current mainstream tool due to its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, high efficiency, and multiplex editing [16,17,18]. The emergence of the CRISPR system has significantly broken down many barriers. By transforming this natural immune mechanism found in prokaryotes into a versatile and programmable molecular tool, this technology has driven a fundamental shift—from merely disrupting genes to editing genomes with remarkable precision [19,20]. This breakthrough opens new possibilities for genetic research and therapeutic strategies [17]. Since CRISPR was successfully adapted to B. mori in 2013, it has really opened new avenues for genome editing in this species, enabling more efficient and precise trait modification [18,21], and exploring genome functions with remarkable ease and efficiency, driven by high-throughput methods [22,23]. The recent completion of the silkworm pangenome and T2T assemblies offers a comprehensive roadmap for functional screening [1,24,25]. This convergence enables exploration of the wide genetic diversity found in both wild and domestic strains, helping address important agricultural challenges.
This review provides an in-depth look at the latest CRISPR system and its derived tools in B. mori, showing how these technologies are making a big difference in five important areas: (1) industrial strain optimization, targeting economic traits such as enhanced silk yield, disease resistance, and sex-specific selection; (2) silk gland bioreactors, engineered for the efficient production of pharmaceutical proteins and recombinant spider silks; (3) fundamental biological research, uncovering molecular mechanisms underlying insect metamorphosis, physiology, and immunity; (4) genome-wide screening, employing large-scale libraries to systematically identify essential genes governing growth and stress adaptation; and (5) agricultural pest management, utilizing the silkworm as a model to develop genetic control strategies for destructive lepidopteran pests. These new advancements boost the economic prospects of sericulture. They also turn the silkworm into a sophisticated platform for synthetic biology and an essential model for tackling global agricultural challenges.

2. Genome Editing Technologies in Silkworm

As the main model organism for Lepidoptera and a species domesticated for thousands of years for silk production, the silkworm has always played a pivotal role in insect genetics and functional genomics [3]. The announcement of its genome sequence, along with fast-changing technologies, sparked a major boost in research and discoveries [3]. Since 2010, the introduction of programmable nucleases has truly revolutionized genome editing, leading to advances in genetic manipulation. ZFNs enabled the creation of mutations in specific genes via non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) in both somatic and germline cells. This progress has opened up many new possibilities in the field [26], while TALENs later escalated germline mutation efficiencies to approximately 50%, enabling precise site-specific knockouts [27,28]. However, the CRISPR system, noted for its simplicity, high efficiency, and capacity for multiple gene targeting, has driven major advances in genome engineering for this species [18]. These breakthroughs have substantially transformed silkworm research and enabled the development of programmable methods for genome editing. Here, we present a quick overview of how the CRISPR toolbox has evolved in B. mori and highlight some of its transformative applications across different biological fields.

2.1. From Random Mutagenesis to Programmable Genome Reshaping

In silkworms, early genetic changes mainly relied on transposon-based methods, such as the piggyBac system, making the process more accessible and reproducible [29]. These methods often show low transformation efficiency, are hard to target specific genes, and unpredictably insert DNA. The landscape began to change in the late 1990s with the emergence of the first-generation programmable nucleases, ZFNs. These advanced tools were developed by linking customizable zinc-finger DNA-binding domains to the non-specific cleavage domain of the FokI endonuclease. ZFNs operate by dimerizing at adjacent DNA half-sites, inducing a double-strand break (DSB) [30], thereby triggering repair via NHEJ or homologous recombination (HR) [31]. Although ZFNs successfully disrupted BmBLOS2 in B. mori, the germline editing efficiency remained quite low, below 10%. This mainly resulted from the challenges in assembling zinc finger domains, which depend on the specific context [26].
The second-generation TALENs significantly improve upon ZFNs. Derived from a plant pathogen called Xanthomonas, TALENs utilize modular TALE repeats to accurately recognize a reliable RVD-based code. This design simplifies assembly and provides greater accuracy than ZFNs, improving overall efficacy and reducing technical barriers to implementation [32,33]. In 2012, TALENs marked a significant milestone in lepidopteran genome editing by successfully inducing highly efficient mutations at the BmBLOS2 locus. This change led to a translucent appearance in the larvae, with mosaic mutation rates in the G0 generation reaching 27% [27]. However, the need for intricate protein engineering for each new target created technical and financial challenges, limiting their broad use in non-model organisms.
The third-generation molecular scalpel, CRISPR, originated from the adaptive immune system of bacteria [34]. It was not until 2012 that Jinek et al. revealed the key mechanism of the Type II CRISPR system, marking the emergence of a novel, programmable gene editing tool. They discovered that the catalytic activity of the Cas9 endonuclease is dependent on a dual-RNA structure formed by tracrRNA (trans-activating crRNA) and crRNA (CRISPR RNA). The resulting active complex first identifies the DNA target site via a PAM sequence (5′-NGG-3′). Subsequently, the spacer sequence hybridizes with the target strand to form an R-loop structure, driving a conformational change in Cas9 that activates its dual nuclease domains: the HNH domain cleaves the DNA strand complementary to the sgRNA (at the third nucleotide upstream of the PAM), while the RuvC-like domain cleaves the non-target strand. This process generates a blunt-ended DSB at a specific genomic locus [35]. The advent of this programmable DNA scalpel established the decisive molecular foundation for gene editing by harnessing endogenous cellular repair mechanisms, such as non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology-directed repair (HDR). Applying this system to the silkworm, Wang et al. demonstrated that embryonic injection of Cas9 mRNA and two sgRNAs targeting BmBLOS2 could induce a 3482 bp deletion. This mutation resulted in an oily-skin phenotype in 95% of the larvae, providing robust evidence of the method’s efficiency [21]. Ma et al. developed a plasmid-based system to deliver the Cas9 protein and sgRNA. This method became widely used in most subsequent genome-editing experiments. It also showed that knocking out Bmku70, a key part of the NHEJ pathway, could increase the rate of homologous recombination [36]. These significant early studies helped establish B. mori as the second insect species, after Drosophila, to have an established CRISPR-based genome editing system.

2.2. The Ever-Expanding CRISPR Toolbox: From Disruption to Precision Regulation

Since it was first developed, using the CRISPR system in B. mori has gone far beyond just gene disruption. Through continuous improvements, including an expanded range of targets, improved editing efficiency, and enhanced specificity, CRISPR has become a truly versatile tool for genome engineering. Today, its capabilities include not only traditional editing but also spatiotemporally controlled editing, base editing, and epigenetic remodeling (Table 1) [18].

2.2.1. Canonical and Multiplex Editing

Between 2013 and 2014, the practical use of CRISPR/Cas9 in silkworms was established through knockout studies of BmBLOS2 and BmKu70. In 2014, Ma et al. made a breakthrough by combining CRISPR/Cas9 with the PiggyBac transposon system, enabling efficient and heritable gene knockouts. This technology soon progressed to multiplex editing, allowing scientists to target multiple sites for large fragment deletions and simultaneous gene mutations [36,37]. In BmE cells, Ma et al. successfully created long-fragment deletions by co-transfecting a mix of gRNAs that target several sites in BmKu70, making the process more efficient and precise [36]. That same year, Liu et al. successfully performed targeted mutation of a single gene in the BmN cell line. Later, they further advanced the field by establishing multiplex editing of up to six genes, showcasing a major leap forward in editing efficiency [37]. Wei et al. chose the four genes with clear observable traits as targets for knockout in silkworms. The G0 generation displayed mutation frequencies ranging from 16.7% to 35.0%, and deletions in DNA fragments were detected [38]. Additionally, studies have also shown how the CRISPR system can be used to target RNA in silkworms, providing new perspectives for further study [39].
In addition to editing the silkworm genome, Dong et al. developed a system that specifically targets and cuts the key BmNPV replication factor, ie-1, thereby effectively stopping the virus from spreading [40]. To better understand how knocking out multiple sites affects efficiency, selection of various targets within the BmNPV viral genome revealed that multi-site cleavage can greatly boost the antiviral abilities of silkworms, highlighting a promising approach for improving disease resistance [41,42].

2.2.2. Conditional Editing: Tissue-Specific and Inducible Systems

While constitutive knockout offers valuable insights, studying lethal genes demands more precise control. To avoid the lethality or widespread issues that come with universal knockouts, advanced tissue-specific and inducible systems have been designed. In creating these tissue-specific tools, the silkworm’s abundant promoter resources have been used to direct gene editing accurately to particular tissues. Xu et al. utilized a promoter called nanos (Bmnos), which is active in both somatic and germ cells, to ensure germ cell-specific expression. This shows that Bmnos is a reliable natural regulatory element in early embryos and gonads [43], and it has even been used to develop a sex-specific lethal system linked to the W-chromosome, helping to achieve effective sex control [44]. In somatic cells and the silk gland, Liu et al. used a specific BmFibH promoter to target BmlaminA/C (BmLMN) in the posterior silk gland (PSG). This approach led to developmental issues in the PSG and a decrease in silk production [45]. Wang et al. used the epidermis-specific CPG25 promoter to target and disrupt the function of an epidermis-specific cuticular protein gene (Cpr21) and a ubiquitously expressed cuticular gene (Cph18), demonstrating the effectiveness of this method [46]. Additionally, Yu et al. discovered an oocyte-targeting peptide ligand in the silkworm called BmOTP, which is a 29-amino-acid fragment from the N terminus of silkworm vitellogenin. They attached BmOTP to the Cas9 protein, and by injecting this fusion protein complex into female pupae, they successfully achieved heritable gene editing in the offspring [47].
In addition to controlling space, advancements have also been made in special inducible systems, particularly those responsive to pathogens. For example, virus-inducible platforms are now available that activate Cas9 only when a pathogen invades, helping to protect against viral infections [40,41,48]. Additionally, Fang et al. combined the Cas9 protein with the secreted protein NB29-N3 from Nosema bombycis. This created a system that can specifically detect N. bombycis infection, helping to prevent its spread and proliferation [49].

2.2.3. Beyond the DSB: Base Editing, Regulation, and Precise Knock-In

Beyond just disrupting genetic sequences with DSBs, the CRISPR toolkit has grown even more versatile by allowing for the tweaking of gene expression. This is performed by modifying the Cas9 protein or pairing it with other techniques. For example, Li et al. achieved precise nucleotide changes by fusing DNA encoding rAPOBEC1 with a special form of nCas9 carrying the A840H mutation, leading to the successful conversion of C to T at the Blos2 and Yellow-e locations [50]. In 2020, Liu et al. compared Cas9 and BE3 (Base Editor 3) in silkworms and discovered that base editing was more effective than Cas9 in the BmE cell line: BE3 was able to introduce precise stop codons, while Cas9 could not do so [51].
Wang et al. combined catalytically inactive Cas9 (dCas9) with transcriptional repressors (KRAB, SID, SRDX) or activators (VP64 and VPR) to achieve targeted transcriptional repression or activation, respectively, in the BmE cell line [52,53,54]. Interestingly, the VPR domain showed better activation efficiencies compared to VP64. In the field of epigenetics, Liu et al. engineered a dCas9-TET1 fusion, allowing precise DNA demethylation/modification with impressive efficiencies ranging from 17.5% to 40.0% [55]. Similarly, Chen et al. developed a CRISPR–dCas9–METTL4 epigenome-editing tool that can add methyl groups to specific target regions, enabling precise m6A modifications. This helps in regulating the expression of both hypermethylated and hypomethylated genes, providing valuable insights into gene regulation mechanisms [56]. To help visualize specific endogenous genomic locations, Xing et al. created a fusion protein called NLS-dCas9-EGFP-NLS, which includes a nuclear localization signal–dead Cas9–enhanced green fluorescent protein–nuclear localization signal. By optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio in BmE cells, this tool enables the precise labeling of specific gene loci (e.g., BmFibH) as distinct fluorescent foci within the interphase nucleus [57]. Unlike traditional fixed-cell methods, this CRISPR imaging approach allows for the nondestructive tracking of native chromatin trajectories and spatial positioning in living cells, providing a window into the spatiotemporal dynamics of insect genomes.
Moreover, for accurate knock-in, even though it involves DSBs, it primarily utilizes mechanisms like microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) to help achieve precise integration of large DNA fragments at specific sites [58,59,60]. The spider silk protein gene was successfully integrated into the intron of the silkworm FibH gene using a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knock-in strategy, enabling the silkworm to spin natural spider silk [61,62]. Nakade et al. used the CRIS-PITCh system to help with MMEJ, making it easier to insert external fragments into silkworms [58]. Additionally, employing single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide (ssODN) donors to assist knock-in can effectively increase efficiency and broaden the application scope of gene knock-in techniques [63,64].

2.2.4. Expanding the Scope: Variants and Toolkit Optimization

Although these applications are quite versatile, the targeting scope was initially limited by PAM constraints. However, progress has been made by expanding the editable sites through the development of variants like xCas9 and Cas9-NG [65]. Meanwhile, other nucleases like SaCas9 and Cpf1 (Cas12a) have also been explored, along with their respective PAMs (5′-NNGRRT-3′, 5′-TTN-3′) [66,67]. In addition to expanding PAM sites, efforts have also been made to optimize different components. For instance, they have improved the sgRNA scaffold and chosen better promoters, like modifications using U6 or T7 promoters, to make the process even more efficient [68,69], and optimized the codon of Cas9 to improve genome editing efficiency [63]. Delivery methods also received special attention. RNP (ribonucleoprotein) complex injection techniques were crafted that, compared to plasmid injection, not only made the process more efficient but also helped minimize off-target effects [70].
As more data was gathered, evidence indicated interesting patterns in editing results. It has been found that the patterns of CRISPR/Cas9 indels vary between different species. For example, in silkworms, indels mostly happen upstream of the cut site, while in zebrafish (Danio rerio), they mainly occur downstream. Additionally, deletions mediated by proximal microhomologous sequences represent the most frequent mutation type [22]. Deep sequencing has shown that the Cas9 mutation patterns in silkworms are consistent and can be anticipated. It also revealed that insertions and deletions are not entirely random; instead, they often involve microhomology-mediated deletions. This insight offers a helpful foundation for designing more precise experiments [71].
Table 1. Summary of advanced CRISPR/Cas9-derived tools and their applications in Bombyx mori.
Table 1. Summary of advanced CRISPR/Cas9-derived tools and their applications in Bombyx mori.
Ref.StudyCRISPR
Tool/System
Target/StrategyPerformance
in B. mori
Key ApplicationsLimitations
[21]Wang et al., 2013Standard SpCas9Knockout (Indel)
DSB-mediated NHEJ
High
(94.0–95.6%)
Gene disruption;
Large fragment
deletion (~3.5 kb);
Proof-of-concept
(e.g., BmBLOS2).
Random Indels;
Unpredictable
outcomes;
Frameshift
mutations.
[36,38]Ma et al., 2014;
Wei et al., 2014
Multiplex/Heritable Cas9Multiplex
Editing;
PiggyBac/
multi-gRNA
16.7–35.0%
(G0 stage);
Heritable
mutagenesis achieved
Heritable site-directed
mutagenesis
(e.g., BmKu70);
Multiplex genome editing (up to 3 sites/gene).
Variable gRNA
efficiency:
Lower efficiency in
embryos compared to cells.
[43,45,47]Xu et al., 2019;
Liu et al., 2017;
Yu et al., 2023
Tissue-
Specific Cas9
Conditional
Editing Promoter-driven (Bmnos, BmFibH, CPG25) or
Ligand fusion (BmOTP)
Restricted
expression to target tissues (Germline, Silk gland, Epidermis)
Tissue-specific control; Sex-control systems
(W-linked);
Silk yield modification (BmLMN);
Oocyte-targeted editing.
Promoter leakage;
Limited availability of strictly
tissue-specific
promoters.
[40,49]Dong et al., 2016;
Fang et al., 2024
Inducible Cas9Inducible Editing Pathogen-responsive complexHigh antiviral activity;
Triggered by infection
Smart defense systems; Inhibiting BmNPV
replication (ie-1);
Detecting infection of Nosema bombycis.
Response latency;
Dependent on pathogen load for activation.
[50,51]Li et al., 2018;
Liu et al., 2020
Base
Editor (BE3)
Base Editing
C-G to T-A
conversion
40–53.75%Precise point mutation; Creating premature stop codons;
Correcting SNPs
without DSB.
Off-target effects (DNA/RNA);
Restricted by PAM and editing
window.
[58,59]Nakade et al., 2014;
Wan et al., 2024
CRIS-PITCh/MMEJKnock-in MMEJ-mediatedVariable/High (Locus-dependent)Targeted integration;
Inserting fluorescent markers (e.g., 3xP3-DsRed2 into Fib-L).
Lower efficiency than NHEJ;
Requires construction of microhomology vectors.
[52,54]Wang et al., 2019;
Hu et al., 2021
CRISPRaActivation
Transcriptional regulation
dCas9-VP64/VPR
Up to
8000-fold
Gain-of-function;
Upregulating silk proteins (BmFib-H) in BmE.
Context-dependent;
potential toxicity of VPR domain;
Transient effect.
[53]Wang et al., 2019CRISPRiRepression
dCas9-KRAB/SID/
SRDX
Significant
repression
Gene silencing;
Loss-of-function
analysis without DNA damage;
Alternative to RNAi.
Incomplete knockdown:
Transient effect compared to stable KO.
[55]Liu et al., 2019dCas9-TET1Epigenetic
Editing
Demethylation
17.5–40.0%Epigenetic regulation; Modifying DNA
methylation status to study gene regulation.
Incomplete conversion:
Effect may not be heritable or stable.
[56]Chen et al., 2024dCas9-METTL4Epigenetic Editing 6mA ModificationDetected (Qualitative)N6-methyladenine editing;
Site-specific installation of 6mA (e.g., proteasome subunit).
Novel tool;
Functional consequences of 6mA still under
investigation.
[23,72]Ma et al., 2024;
Chang et al., 2020
CRISPR
Library
Screening Genome-wide KO1726 lines (High throughput)Forward genetics;
Identification of essential genes, toxin resistance, and visible phenotypes.
Labor intensive;
Requires large-scale rearing and screening
infrastructure.
[67]Zou et al., 2025Cas12a (Cpf1)Knockout
T-rich PAM
Lower than Cas9AT-rich targets;
Alternative to Cas9 for
T-rich genomic regions;
RNP delivery.
Lower efficiency compared to Cas9;
Temperature
sensitivity.
[57]Xing et al., 2020CRISPR
Imaging
Visualization
dCas9-EGFP
VisualizedLive imaging;
Tracking endogenous
genomic loci dynamics in living cells.
Signal-to-noise
ratio;
non-editing
application only.

3. Agricultural Revolutions: Modernizing Sericulture

3.1. Addressing Long-Standing Challenges in Sericulture

For millennia, sericulture breeding has strived to optimize key economic traits, including silk yield, disease resistance, and developmental timing [73,74,75], as well as to develop specialized strains such as male-only populations and “permanent cocoon” lines [76,77]. While traditional hybridization utilizing natural germplasm resources has ameliorated some issues—such as viral susceptibility—many breeding objectives remain difficult to achieve through classical methods alone. The advent of the CRISPR/Cas9 system has provided a significant opportunity to overcome these challenges (Figure 1).

3.1.1. Yield Enhancement and Developmental Regulation

Increasing silk yield has consistently remained the central objective for maximizing economic returns in sericulture. While traditional hybrid breeding has yielded results, it is constrained by long breeding cycles, unstable traits, and high labor intensity, making it difficult to sustainably select superior strains that possess both high yield and stability [73]. In recent years, CRISPR/Cas9 technology has overcome these problems by editing factors related to growth and development, as well as components in hormone signaling pathways.
Studies by Wang et al. demonstrated that the loss of function of miRNA let-7 promotes endoreplication in silk gland cells, resulting in enlarged posterior silk glands and a concomitant increase in silk yield, although such gains are strictly contingent upon tissue-specific targeting to avoid developmental trade-offs [78,79]. Furthermore, systemic knockout of let-7 was found to promote systemic larval growth and significantly increase silk yield by approximately 50% [80]. Regarding kinase and metabolic regulation, Li et al. discovered that knocking out BmEcKL1, a member of the Ecdysteroid kinase-like family (EcKLs), in the middle and posterior silk glands increased the weight of these glands by approximately 10% and 30%, respectively, leading to increased cocoon weight and silk fiber density [81]. Additionally, Wu et al. identified a previously unannotated negative regulator in insects—SGDAcn. Their research revealed that its knockout relieves the inhibition of the EGFR/PI3K/AKT and SGDAcn-NF-κB pathways, thereby promoting endoreplication and cell growth in silk gland cells. This knockout also enhances ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis within the silk gland, resulting in an approximate 20% increase in the cocoon shell rate of male silkworms [82]. Extensive loss-of-function studies have also elucidated the essentiality of silk protein-related components, signaling pathway constituents, key transcription factors, and metabolic genes for silk gland development [1,83,84,85,86,87].
In addition, regulating developmental duration is also a pivotal strategy for balancing silk yield with production efficiency. Utilizing the CRISPR system to modulate the larval-to-pupal transition typically involves either extending the 5th instar developmental period to augment silk protein accumulation or shortening the life cycle to improve rearing turnover rates. Knockout of the juvenile hormone-related genes BmJHE and let-7 prolonged the development time of the last instar larva, thereby achieving a significant increase in cocoon yield [80,88]. Moreover, mutations in the circadian gene Clock can prolong larval development, resulting in an approximate 7% increase in silk yield and a 25% increase in pupal weight compared to the wild type [89]. Conversely, Cao et al. demonstrated the effects of shortening developmental duration. Knockout of Bmdimm accelerated development from the 3rd instar onwards, advancing the wandering stage by 2.5 days compared to the wild type, which consequently led to thinner cocoon shells [90]. Although this phenotype is currently associated with reduced silk yield, this finding offers important insights for future breeding: specifically, how to maintain cocoon shell volume while shortening the rearing cycle to cultivate “fast-growing, high-yielding” strains.
Given that male silkworms exhibit better traits regarding cocoon shell ratio, quality, and lower food consumption compared to females [44,91,92], the establishment of all-male strains is a critical direction for enhancing industrial efficiency. In 2018, Zhang et al. developed a female-specific embryonic lethality binary system based on TALEN and CRISPR/Cas9 technologies. One strain expresses Cas9 on the W chromosome driven by the germline-specific promoter nanos, while the other utilizes the U6 promoter to drive sgRNA targeting transformer 2 (tra2), a key gene regulating sex determination and embryonic development. The results showed that in the F1 hybrid progeny, approximately 50% of the embryos (the females) died, while the male individuals survived normally to adulthood [44].
Additionally, addressing the post-harvest processing stage, sericulturists typically must employ high-temperature or freezing treatments to kill pupae to prevent moth eclosion and the secretion of cocoonase, which damages the silk. To resolve this issue, Gai et al. created a “permanent cocoon” by knocking out Cocoonase. The resulting mutant moths undergo normal eclosion but are unable to secrete the enzyme required to dissolve the silk, subsequently dying inside the cocoon [77]. This innovation significantly reduces energy consumption and labor costs.

3.1.2. Disease Resistance

As a fully domesticated economic insect, the silkworm has undergone directional selection to achieve efficient silk production. However, high-density rearing environments promote the spread of pathogens, where individual infections can rapidly escalate into devastating population-wide epidemics, causing severe economic losses. Currently, three major categories of pathogenic microorganisms—bacteria, viruses, and fungi—pose serious threats to sericulture, as these diseases not only lead to mass mortality but also significantly reduce the yield and quality of cocoons [93,94]. To address disease challenges, CRISPR-based gene editing technology has been utilized to perform precise single-target or multi-target editing on the silkworm host or pathogen genomes, successfully creating highly resistant germplasm resources.
Regarding defense against bacterial infection, research has focused on editing key innate immunity genes to bolster the host’s defensive capabilities. Ye et al. discovered that knocking out the silk protein gene Sericin1 induces the upregulation of multiple immune-related genes (such as antimicrobial peptides) and protease inhibitors to maintain the immune homeostasis of silk gland cells [95]. KPI5 serves as a key negative regulator of immunity. Studies have shown that although KPI5 mutation inhibits the prophenoloxidase activation pathway in the hemolymph, it simultaneously promotes the expression of antimicrobial peptides, revealing its dual function in regulating innate immune homeostasis [96]. The Toll signaling pathway, as the core of antibacterial defense, is also negatively regulated by serine protease inhibitors. Liu et al. elucidated that serine protease inhibitors Serpin-1a and Serpin-6 inhibit the Toll pathway by suppressing the key enzyme CLIP2, which is responsible for processing Spätzle into its active ligand form. Therefore, knocking out these genes can relieve the inhibition, thereby activating the Toll pathway and enhancing the antibacterial ability of silkworms [97]. Additionally, Xiong et al. confirmed that phospholipase A2 (BmsPLA2-4) is an important component of the midgut immune barrier [98]. The immunoglobulin superfamily member BmHemolin can promote hemocyte aggregation and nodule formation, accelerating the encapsulation and clearance of pathogens [99].
To enhance antiviral capabilities, many studies have used BmNPV as a model, disrupting key viral replication genes to block its proliferation. Early work primarily targeted single viral genes. Dong et al. constructed an inducible knockout system targeting the essential viral replication gene ie-1 in BmN cells [40] and subsequently achieved breakthroughs in practical applications [100]. Knocking out the viral anti-apoptotic gene iap2 inhibits mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and activates host cell apoptosis, accelerating the apoptosis of infected cells to limit viral proliferation [93,101]. Additionally, mutations in the orf76 gene have been proven to be an effective method for blocking BmNPV infection [102]. Notably, to expand the library of BmNPV resistance targets, Chang et al. established the first genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 knockout library in BmE cells. This high-throughput screening platform enabled the identification and validation of a batch of key BmNPV resistance genes [72]. In addition, multi-site editing strategies have been implemented to reduce the risk of viral escape via point mutations. By targeting multiple viral genes (ie-1 and me53, lef-1 and lef-3), they significantly inhibited the replication and proliferation of BmNPV, and the resistance can be inherited by offspring [41,103]. Liao et al. edited multiple sites of ie-1 and found that it could more thoroughly knock out the viral gene and hinder its spread [104]. Additionally, Liu et al. pioneered a “multi-target” cleavage strategy. By designing a single sgRNA targeting widely distributed homologous repeat sequences in BmNPV, it leads to large-scale breaks and deletions in viral DNA, thereby inhibiting its proliferation [42].
Beyond directly targeting viral genes, editing host susceptibility and resistance genes constitutes another potent defense strategy. Liang et al. demonstrated that the midgut membrane protein BmSUH interacts directly with the viral ODV-E66 protein, mediating the adhesion and entry of virions into the midgut epithelium; thus, BmSUH serves as a potential target for blocking viral invasion [105]. Conversely, the serine protease BmSPP directly inhibits viral proliferation by activating the prophenoloxidase system to promote hemolymph melanization [106]. Epigenetic research shows that the N6-methyladenosine (m6A)-related methyltransferases METTL3 and METTL14 are upregulated in expression during BmNPV infection, suggesting that the m6A modification pathway can serve as a potential target for antiviral engineering [107].
Microsporidia represent another critical pathogen causing yield decline. Dong et al. developed an HSP70 promoter-driven inducible CRISPR/Cas9 system to confer resistance. Activated upon infection, this system efficiently edits the host gene BmATAD3A, significantly inhibiting the expression of key microsporidian genes and improving silkworm survival without affecting host development [108]. Regarding immune signaling, STING (Stimulator of Interferon Genes) is a key adaptor in innate immunity that also participates in microsporidian infection. Hua et al. found that BmSTING knockout silkworms exhibited significantly lower morbidity during early infection compared to the wild type [109]. Furthermore, Ran et al. elucidated the mechanism by which microsporidia inhibit host apoptosis: the secreted serine protease inhibitor NbSPN14 binds directly to the silkworm Caspase homolog BmICE, blocking its nuclear translocation. CRISPR-mediated knockout of BmICE or mutation of the NbSPN14 P1 site abolished this anti-apoptotic effect, providing a target to block pathogen proliferation [110]. Fang et al. established a host-mediated inducible CRISPR/Cas9 system. By fusing Cas9 with the microsporidian secretion protein NB29-N3, the fusion protein is transported into the pathogen upon infection or NB29 overexpression, enabling target gene editing [49]. This breakthrough opens new pathways for direct genomic intervention in microsporidia. Besides microsporidia, Beauveria bassiana is also an important pathogen that harms silkworms. It has been revealed that signal peptide peptidase SPP is a key defense factor and confirms the core position of SPP in the antifungal immune defense network [111].

3.2. Expanding the Frontiers of Sericulture: Novel Materials and Dietary Adaptation

The advent of CRISPR/Cas9 has revolutionized the sericulture industry, extending its scope far beyond traditional breeding objectives like high yield and disease resistance. Current research leverages this technology to conquer two new frontiers. One approach involves capitalizing on the natural compartmentalization of the silk gland to engineer novel silk-based materials, most notably recombinant spider silk and biomedical proteins. Another strategy focuses on modifying metabolic pathways to facilitate dietary adaptation, thereby optimizing silkworms for cost-effective rearing on artificial diets (Figure 1).

3.2.1. New Silk Materials

The silkworm silk gland exhibits exceptional silk protein synthesis capability, enabling efficient secretion of large quantities of fibroin and sericin proteins, thereby supplanting other silk-producing animals as an ideal model for green biomaterial research [112]. Leveraging this unique feature, genetic engineering techniques have been creatively applied to precisely integrate exogenous genes into different regions of the silk gland, thus efficiently producing recombinant proteins with distinctive functions.
There are three main strategies for recombinant protein production that leverage the tissue specificity of silk glands. The first strategy involves producing pharmaceutical proteins. As biofactories, silkworm glands are utilized to synthesize high-value therapeutic proteins, ranging from human collagens (types I–III) and growth factors (hEGF, bFGF) to interferons and specialized cuticle proteins [6,113,114,115,116,117,118]. Concurrently, research aimed at augmenting the mechanical properties of silk fibers has achieved significant improvements in toughness and strength by incorporating structural proteins—such as spider dragline silk proteins(MaSp), Drosophila resilin, and the glycoprotein dumpy—as well as molecular modifiers like artificial amino acids (3-AzTyr), bond-forming proteins (BFAPs), and metal ions (Fe3+) [61,119,120,121]. The third category highlights functional modification, such as incorporating fluorescent proteins like GFP and RFP into fibroin to create naturally colored silk. Unlike traditional dyeing methods or pigment expression in sericin—which can fade during degumming—colors embedded directly into the fibroin backbone are highly stable. This approach not only reduces chemical pollution but also helps conserve water resources [122].
Among the many exogenous proteins, spider silk stands out because of its incredible strength, remarkable toughness, and lightness. When comparing weight for weight, its mechanical properties surpass those of steel and Kevlar, establishing it as one of the most robust natural biological materials [123]. However, because spiders tend to be territorial and sometimes even cannibalistic, they are difficult to domesticate. This makes it important to find suitable alternative hosts that can be used for large-scale production of recombinant spider silk proteins [4]. The silkworm is a cost-effective choice as a bioreactor platform for producing recombinant proteins [124]. In 2018, Xu et al. successfully addressed the challenge of low expression levels seen with exogenous gene knock-ins. They used a TALEN-mediated method to replace Fib-H with the spider MaSp1 gene; this approach dramatically improved the expression efficiency of the foreign protein, increasing it from just 2–5% to an impressive 35.2% [4,7]. That same year, You et al. demonstrated that various repetitive motifs in the primary structure of the spider silk protein MaSp1 determine the mechanical properties of the fiber [125]. In 2019, Zhang et al. created high-performance spider silk fibers with the help of the CRISPR/Cas9 system. By using a specially modified CRISPR system, they carefully inserted a natural, ultra-long spider silk gene (about 10 kb) into the intron regions of the silkworm’s fibroin heavy and light chain genes. The resulting transgenic silk showed mechanical strength on par with natural spider silk, which is quite impressive. Plus, because the foreign gene was inserted into non-coding regions, it did not disrupt the inheritance of other genes in the silkworm [62]. Subsequently, Mi et al. completely replaced the repetitive region within the silkworm fibroin component Fib-H with MiSp, enabling transgenic silkworms to express and spin full-length spider silk protein. Compared to industrial materials such as nylon and Kevlar, this novel silk demonstrated exceptional tensile strength (1299 MPa) and ultra-high toughness (319 MJ/m3). This study overcame the previous technical bottleneck regarding the knock-in of full-length spider silk genes and successfully resolved the structural dilemma of balancing high strength with high toughness in recombinant silk fibers [61].

3.2.2. Modification of Dietary Habits and Large-Scale Breeding

The silkworm is a representative example of an oligophagous insect that depends entirely on mulberry leaves in traditional sericulture. While the nutritional makeup of mulberry leaves is well-suited to support silkworm growth and is generally affordable, the seasonal nature of mulberry tree growth means that breeding is limited to spring and autumn, making year-round production challenging. Additionally, cultivating mulberries in open fields can expose the plants to pathogens and pesticide drift. Interestingly, leaves picked during rainy seasons often have excess moisture, which can make silkworms more vulnerable to bacterial and fungal infections, leading to significant economic setbacks [126,127,128,129,130]. To address issues like resource seasonality and safety concerns, expanding the silkworms’ diet options through gene editing and creating affordable, versatile artificial diets are important steps forward. These innovations are key to modernizing and growing the sericulture industry, making it more efficient and reliable.
cis-jasmone, a key volatile compound found in mulberry leaves, is crucial in triggering the silkworm’s feeding response. Studies support that removing the insect-specific odorant receptor co-receptor (Orco) hampers the larvae’s sense of smell, leading to a reduced ability to identify and choose mulberry leaves or cis-jasmone specifically [131]. Regarding specific receptors, BmOR56 has been identified as an olfactory receptor. Although knocking out BmOR56 did not significantly change feeding on mulberry leaves, it caused a noticeable drop in the intake of artificial diets, showing a reliance on the amount of mulberry powder [132]. Gene editing focusing on gustatory receptors (GRs) has shown impressive results. Zhang et al. found that mutations in the taste receptor BmGr66 can directly influence silkworm feeding preferences. Mutant larvae were observed to feed on Mongolian oak leaves (Quercus mongolica), apples, pears, soybeans, and corn, and they experienced notable weight gain when consuming fruits and grains [133]. Similarly, Endo et al. showed that the deletion of BmGr6 and BmGr9—both part of the GR family—leads to a loss of host recognition ability. Further molecular analysis indicated that this change is due to a significant decrease in sensitivity to two important secondary metabolites in mulberry leaves: chlorogenic acid (CGA) and isoquercitrin (ISQ), which results in the loss of feeding preference [134]. Meanwhile, subsequent findings have further explored the GR family. It has been shown that several different GRs—such as Gr15, Gr29, Gr43, and Gr66—play a role in shaping the oligophagy behavior of silkworm larvae [135,136]. Interference with the transcription factor Zfh3 alters both gustatory and olfactory functions in silkworms. This interference removes their single-food preference for mulberry leaves, allowing larvae to try a wider variety of foods and boosting their ability to adapt to artificial diets without mulberry components [137].

4. CRISPR-Driven Elevation of the Silkworm as a Model Organism

Harnessing detailed data from the silkworm’s rich genome, CRISPR/Cas9 and related tools are used to probe its unique biological features, such as silk production linked to silk glands, piRNA biosynthesis, and hormonal networks involved in insect metamorphosis. By combining large-scale functional screening, such as CRISPR libraries, silkworm gene function can be more effectively validated and analyzed, thereby deepening the understanding of the silkworm’s genome. This effort has transformed the silkworm from a traditional economic insect into a versatile model organism that integrates multi-omics and systems biology.

4.1. Comprehensive Genomics and Multi-Omics Resources

Comprehensive and detailed genomic data, coupled with abundant multi-omics resources, have significantly cemented B. mori’s status as a model organism for Lepidoptera, while also serving as the foundation for CRISPR-mediated genome modification (e.g., precise editing) and functional studies (e.g., high-throughput screening). Since the initial release of the silkworm genome in 2004, the assembly has undergone multiple iterations of refinement. The early draft covered approximately 97% of the genome, unveiling a landscape rich in repetitive sequences and transposon-related structures [3]. After that, with improvements in sequencing technology, more complex genomes were assembled. Among them, the most used genome databases are Kaikobase, Silkbase, and SilkDB3.0 [138,139,140]. Most recently, to resolve complex genomic regions such as telomeres, rDNA clusters, and tandem repeats that remained elusive in previous assemblies, the gap-free T2T genome (without the W chromosome) was attempted to be assembled [24,25]. At the same time, the W chromosome also has a refined assembly [141]. To transcend the limitations of a single reference genome in capturing genetic diversity, Tong et al. conducted deep re-sequencing of 1078 silkworm strains and assembled 545 long-read genomes to construct a high-resolution pangenome map [1]. Beyond genomics, the multi-omics landscape has been further enriched by the development of integrated databases such as SGID and the organelle proteome database SilkOrganPDB, as well as the creation of the first high-throughput SNP array, Silk_40K [142,143,144].

4.2. Unique Biological Characteristics and Mechanisms

Given the biological uniqueness of the silkworm, such as the silk gland functioning as a highly efficient protein factory, the unique piRNA mechanism in sex determination, and the clear stage-specific regulation of hormonal signaling, this section will elaborate on the role of CRISPR in these areas and its systematic advances.

4.2.1. Silk Biology

Although studies have shown that at least 140,000 species have been confirmed to secrete silk proteins [112], the silkworm serves as an exemplary species in which precise genome editing has been investigated and well-established. In the realm of silk biology, the CRISPR tools have facilitated the decoding of the molecular machinery of silk synthesis and organ development. For instance, the precise coordination of silk structural proteins has been elucidated by knockout studies targeting the fibroin heavy chain (Fib-H) and fibroin light chain (Fib-L); deficiencies in these genes compromise the integrity of the PSG and result in naked pupae or thin cocoons, highlighting their essential role in preventing premature gland degradation [145,146]. Furthermore, although the Fhx protein is not essential and its loss results only in modest changes in silk quantity, quality, and composition, the integrity of the secretory pathway nevertheless relies on auxiliary proteins, as evidenced by the pronounced reorganization of the rough endoplasmic reticulum following mutation of the Fhx gene [83,147]. More recent investigations have identified novel components such as fhx-L1, which influences the structural assembly and β-sheet content of the silk fiber [148], and BmSuc1, an animal-type β-fructofuranosidase (β-FFase) that modulates silk properties by regulating Ser1 expression in the middle silk gland [149].
Despite current progress in understanding silk gland development and fiber assembly [112,150], the molecular mechanisms driving this ultra-efficient translational machinery remain largely obscure. CRISPR-mediated multiplex gene editing offers an opportunity to systematically dissect the key regulatory factors and genetic networks governing this massive protein output. This could facilitate deciphering the determinants of translational efficiency, thereby optimizing the silk gland as a high-efficiency biofactory for exogenous protein production.

4.2.2. piRNA Biology

Another relatively unique biological characteristic of the silkworm is piRNA-based sex regulation [151]. What makes the silkworm an excellent model for piRNA research is not only this simple, linear, and causally well-defined piRNA sex-determination mechanism, but also the availability of the BmN cell line, a cell line that can normally synthesize piRNAs [152]. Using CRISPR/Cas9 technology, studies have found that, for sex determination in the silkworm, SIWI and its cofactor BmAsh2 play indispensable roles, and that BmSxl and BmPnldc1 are essential for spermatogenesis; in contrast, the factors BmAgo3 and BmMael appear to be nonessential in the sex-determination process [153,154,155].
Regarding the silkworm piRNA pathway, recent studies using BmN4 cells revealed that pre-piRNAs are generated via two parallel endonucleolytic mechanisms: Zucchini (BmZuc)-mediated cleavage, which recognizes specific consensus motifs on Siwi-loaded precursors, and PIWI-catalyzed slicing [156]. Furthermore, a mitochondria-associated endoribonuclease, BmRNase κ, was identified to promote robust piRNA production by generating 2′,3′-cyclic phosphate-containing precursors [157]. Following these cleavage events, the 3′ ends of pre-piRNAs are matured by the exonuclease Trimmer (PNLDC1), a process recruited by the Tudor domain protein Papi and coupled with 2′-O-methylation [152,156]. Other auxiliary factors, such as BmGTSF1, which interacts with BmSIWI [155], and BmQin, which localizes to the nuage [158], are also integral to maintaining the stability and function of this pathway.
The piRNA pathway not only dominates sex determination but also participates in transposon silencing, genome defense, and antiviral processes [159,160,161]. Although numerous factors involved in piRNA transcription, transport, and processing have been identified [162,163], there are still gaps in understanding of this pathway in terms of transgenerational inheritance, evolutionary adaptability, and interspecies differences. Leveraging silkworm cell lines that retain a complete piRNA metabolic network, combined with CRISPR-based high-throughput screening, offers a chance to further dissect these complex mechanisms.

4.2.3. Hormone Signaling

As a holometabolous insect, the silkworm has a clearly demarcated developmental timeline that provides an excellent temporal window for precisely capturing hormone-induced physiological transitions. The molting hormone, 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E), acts as a key signaling molecule for metamorphosis, binding to the canonical nuclear receptor complex EcR/USP and functioning in the nucleus. Once induced by 20E signaling, its downstream primary transcription factors further regulate the expression of secondary transcription factors, thereby initiating larval molting from one instar to the next as well as metamorphic molting from larva to adult [164]. Using the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing system, the roles of the BmEO and BmHR38 genes in the 20E regulatory network are clearly analyzed [165,166]. Juvenile hormone (JH) antagonizes 20E to maintain the larval phenotype [167]. To further elucidate JH signaling and for functional validation, using CRISPR, knockout models of BmJHE, BmFOXO, and Met1 were used to analyze the roles of these genes in the JH signaling regulatory pathway [88,168,169].
Hormone signaling transduction in the silkworm is not a simple linear process. Instead, it functions as a highly integrated complex network of interactions involving developmental, metabolic, and environmental signals [170]. In this context, CRISPR-mediated conditional gene knockouts and activation technologies endow the capability to achieve precise targeted editing under specific conditions, promising to reveal the core genetic mechanisms that dominate developmental fate. Furthermore, the application of CRISPR high-throughput screening will assist in discovering unknown key regulatory factors, thereby systematically completing the overall framework of these signaling regulatory networks.

4.3. Genome-Wide Screening and Libraries

Genome-wide CRISPR screening is a vital tool in functional genomics, widely used in mammalian cell lines, and has led to breakthroughs. However, in non-model multicellular organisms, especially insects, progress has been hampered by challenges such as creating effective sgRNA libraries, ensuring stable transfection, and conducting in vivo physiological validation [22]. Recently, the development of CRISPR screening tools in silkworms—from studying cells to creating large libraries of mutants—has truly pushed this field into a new, high-speed stage of discovery [23].

4.3.1. Cell-Based High-Throughput Screening

The main difficulty in establishing genome-wide screening in non-mammalian animals is the lack of systems capable of supporting large-scale, high-throughput lentiviral library delivery [72]. Silkworm cell lines (such as BmE and BmN), which are easy to culture and transfect, have become ideal platforms for overcoming the technical challenges of genome-wide screening. Chang et al. were the first to construct a CRISPR/Cas9 knockout library covering the whole genome and performed screening in BmE cells, identifying 1006 genes essential for cell survival [72]. They further revealed the critical roles of steroid and fatty acid biosynthesis pathways under temperature stress, as well as 1614 candidate genes associated with BmNPV infection, 10 of which were experimentally validated. This library has subsequently been widely used in studies of responses to environmental toxicants: Liu et al. identified hundreds of genes mediating the toxicity of sodium fluoride and cadmium chloride, elucidating the common or specific roles of MAPK signaling, DNA repair, and the Toll/Imd and autophagy pathways [171].
Further expanded applications include the regulation of hormone signaling and pH homeostasis. Sun et al. used this library in combination with 20E treatment to directly screen and identify 324 20E-responsive genes, which are mainly localized in the nucleus and cytoplasm, revealing that 20E signaling coordinates physiological processes through multiple pathways such as phosphorylation, innate immunity, metabolic homeostasis, and apoptosis [172]. Recently, Chang et al. discovered, through screening, that multiple genes regulate intracellular pH homeostasis, highlighting the powerful potential of the library for dissecting cellular physiological mechanisms [173]. In addition, Sun et al. conducted a screen targeting the juvenile hormone signaling pathway, further enriching the comprehension of hormone regulatory networks [174]. Together, these studies demonstrate that cell-level genome-wide screening has become an efficient engine for functional genomics research in the silkworm and has laid the foundation for subsequent in vivo validation.

4.3.2. Large-Scale Mutant Library Creation and In Vivo Screening

Compared to cell-based screening, in vivo functional validation offers a more accurate reflection of physiological conditions. Traditional single-gene knockout methods are often time-consuming and inefficient, hindering large-scale studies; thus, the development of large-scale mutant libraries is regarded as a breakthrough. These libraries allow pooled screening, enable parallel functional analysis, and serve as valuable resources for studying complex genetic traits in a more accessible and efficient way.
Ma et al. have successfully built a comprehensive mutation library for the silkworm. They designed an impressive 92,917 sgRNAs that target promoter and exon regions across 14,645 protein-coding genes. Additionally, they established 1726 transgenic sgRNA lines and obtained 300 stable mutant lines, demonstrating a range of visible traits and economic benefits. Using CRISPR-based pooled mutant library screening for cadmium tolerance, KWMTBOMO12902 was identified as a potent candidate gene for sericultural breeding applications. Notably, knockout of this gene confers resistance to cadmium [23].
Meanwhile, large-scale genome editing produces extensive sequencing data, opening new opportunities to better understand how CRISPR-Cas9 works in insects. By studying large mutant libraries, researchers have discovered that in silkworms, deletions are the most common result, accounting for 86.50%. These deletions tend to happen mainly in one direction, mostly upstream of the cut site, which aligns with the team’s earlier exploratory findings [22,71]. The study also found that the GC content of the sgRNA sequence, especially nucleotides 2–10 in the PAM-distal region, tends to correlate with higher editing efficiency. Additionally, epigenetic chromatin modifications, such as 6mA methylation, can boost editing success. These findings, based on extensive data, not only help elucidate DNA repair processes in insects but also offer valuable guidance for developing more effective and accurate genome-editing tools for silkworms in the future.

5. Future Directions and Perspectives

The arrival of the CRISPR system has propelled sericultural science, transforming the silkworm from a traditional silk producer into a genetically tractable model organism. While the first decade of CRISPR use helped establish essential editing techniques and uncovered important developmental pathways, we are now moving toward more precise, high-throughput, and industrial-scale applications. We are also seeing the silkworm become a versatile platform for synthetic biology—a living factory that can produce functional proteins and next-generation biomaterials. The blend of high-throughput genomics, AI-driven design, and exact genome editing is overcoming previous technical barriers, opening new possibilities for manipulating this organism. Looking to the future, the success of these technologies will rely on a balanced approach that encourages innovation while ensuring safety. As these milestones are reached, CRISPR-edited silkworms hold great promise as valuable models for basic science and are poised to contribute significantly to a sustainable 21st-century bioeconomy (Figure 2).

5.1. Development of CRISPR Future Technologies in Silkworm

The CRISPR system has truly transformed genome editing in silkworms, opening new possibilities. While there is still much to explore, future efforts will aim to make editing more efficient, minimize off-target effects, and broaden the range of editing techniques, all while better aligning with silkworms’ unique biology. These innovative advancements are set to accelerate progress in functional genomics, molecular breeding, and sericultural biotechnology, benefiting the entire field. Furthermore, incorporating advanced high-throughput screening platforms, like multiplexed sgRNA libraries, will make it easier and faster to test and discover promising sgRNAs. This streamlined approach will accelerate in vivo genome-scale studies, opening new doors for research [23].
Using deep learning methods for CRISPR off-target prediction shows promising results. When we incorporate experimentally validated off-target data and consider important factors such as sequence mismatches, bulges, PAM context, and chromatin accessibility, it can significantly strengthen models and improve their performance across different scenarios [175]. Building and training specialized AI models for genomic analysis can significantly advance research in the silkworm. With these tools, we can better screen and assess sgRNA risks, leading to more accurate control over complex traits such as silk production. This also helps minimize accidental edits that might interfere with important metabolic process pathways.

5.2. CRISPR-Mediated Modification of Synthetic Biology Chassis

The silk gland of the domesticated silkworm provides an excellent foundation for synthetic biology, offering a scalable platform for protein production and biomaterial development. With the help of CRISPR technologies, future research can carefully modify this organ to overcome its natural limitations and connect fundamental biology with industrial uses in sustainable biomanufacturing. The silk gland offers many benefits as a synthetic biology platform; it can produce large amounts of silk proteins and is especially well-suited for high-level expression of complex molecules. This makes it a wonderful choice for creating therapeutic proteins and innovative materials [9,10].
CRISPR systems also serve as powerful tools for the engineering of efficient production hosts, enabling the reconstruction of biological processes and the optimized expression of heterologous genes. Malfunctioning the molecular processes governing high-level endogenous protein expression, such as Fib-H, facilitates the elucidation of the roles of various transcription factors, epigenetic modifications, and noncoding RNAs. Such research results provide guidance for developing improved strategies to increase production [78,145]. For exogenous proteins, using CRISPR-based optimization strategies—like multi-locus knock-in and promoter engineering—can help improve how well these proteins integrate, decrease mosaicism, and strengthen genetic stability [18,63].

5.3. From Silkworm to Lepidopteran Pest Control

The silkworm, as the main genetic model for Lepidoptera, with a well-developed CRISPR toolkit, is an incredibly valuable platform for testing genetic pest control methods. It also sparks innovation and supports new techniques. Thanks to its easy rearing, inability to fly, and great flexibility for genetic changes, it allows for quick development of high-risk strategies like gene drives in a safe and controlled way.
The silkworm has long been a key subject in the study of how insects regulate their sex. Going back to the 1950s, researchers developed a balanced lethal system using non-meiotic division, which allowed silkworms to develop parthenogenetically [176]. CRISPR technology has significantly enhanced the accuracy of this traditional approach. Recent studies have successfully used CRISPR to target the sex-determination genes Bmdsx and BmMasc, leading to outcomes like sexual reversal or female-specific lethality [44,177,178]. These systems can be directly adapted to develop sex-ratio manipulation or sterilization tools for lepidopteran pests, such as corn borer or diamondback moth, to help control their populations.
At the same time, the whole-genome CRISPR library of silkworm creates an opportunity to enhance its ability for target discovery capacity [23]. High-throughput screening, conducted at both cellular and organismal levels, has already opened the door to discovering many genes associated with viral resistance, environmental stress, and pesticides. This progress offers opportunities to develop broad-spectrum pest control solutions that can be applied effectively [72,171].
Finally, it should be noted that although the silkworm provides a powerful model for innovation, translating its outcomes to agricultural pests requires cautious, stepwise validation strategies. For example, at the technical level, it is necessary to consider the high genetic diversity of lepidopteran pests in the field, which may lead to resistance to drive systems through target-site mutations; at the ecological level, rigorous risk assessment of potential off-target effects and their ecological consequences is required; at the regulatory level, the release of such genetic control factors should occur under the supervision of an appropriate regulatory framework.

5.4. High-Throughput Functional Genomics and the Pangenome Era

The future of functional genomics involves using high-throughput CRISPR screens to explore these data. Genome-wide sgRNA libraries that target thousands of genes are now being used to discover the key factors that influence cell survival, resistance to viruses, and how cells respond to environmental toxins [171,179,180]. While cell-based screens have given some valuable early insights, the field is quickly moving towards high-throughput in vivo screening. Instead of relying on labor-intensive methods, the emphasis is now on building individual mutation libraries. This approach makes it possible to study many genes at once within a living organism, pointing towards a future for functional genomics [181].
Moreover, deep learning models that are trained on pangenome data hold potential to predict the causal variants behind complex traits like cocoon weight and silk fineness [1]. Testing these predictions with techniques like CRISPR-based base editing or prime editing can greatly speed up the breeding process, thereby enabling faster adaptation of silkworm strains to industrial needs.

5.5. The Convergence of AI and CRISPR in Sericulture

The integration of AI and CRISPR technology holds significant promise for the ongoing evolution of sericultural science. Deep learning algorithms are changing the way experiments are designed by accurately predicting sgRNA efficiency and off-target effects. Models like CRISPR-Net and various CNN-based architectures trained specifically on genomic data now include factors like chromatin accessibility and sequence context [175,182]. This progress is making gene-editing experiments more successful and reliable. Beyond guide design, generative AI models like ProteinMPNN and AlphaFold are being employed for the de novo design of novel silk proteins [183]. Researchers imagine sequences that do not naturally occur but are designed to fold into stable β-sheet structures. This creative approach allows them to craft synthetic spidroins with mechanical properties that exceed those of natural proteins [184].

5.6. Ecological Safety, Ethics, and Regulatory Landscapes

As genome-edited silkworms move closer to commercial use, it is important to develop robust ecological risk assessments and clear regulatory frameworks. The main ecological concern is the potential for gene transfer to their wild relatives, such as B. mandarina. Such introgression could theoretically alter the genetic integrity of wild populations or introduce traits with unforeseen ecological consequences. Even though domestication has made B. mori flightless and reliant on humans [185], providing a foundational level of physical containment, this passive barrier may be insufficient for large-scale open rearing scenarios. To mitigate these risks, future strain development should incorporate active molecular containment strategies. Approaches such as inducible lethality systems can serve as a “kill switch” to prevent survival outside controlled environments [186]. Finally, future research should also carefully measure the fitness costs of transgenes in hybrid backgrounds. This will help ensure that any escaped alleles are naturally removed from wild populations, contributing to environmental safety.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M. and Q.S.; methodology, S.M.; validation, S.M. and L.J.; formal analysis, L.W. and P.W.; investigation, L.J. and P.W.; resources, L.W. and L.J.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.S. and Y.G.; writing—review and editing, S.M.; visualization, Q.S. and Y.G.; supervision, S.M.; project administration, S.M.; funding acquisition, S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant number 2023YFD1700700), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 32570591), and the Chongqing Natural Science Foundation (grant number CSTB2024NSCQ-JQX0018).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ZFNsZinc Finger Nucleases
TALENsTranscription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases
CRISPRClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats
NHEJNon-Homologous End Joining
RVDRepeat-Variable Diresidue
DSBsDNA Double-Strand Breaks
HDRHomology-Directed Repair
PAMProtospacer Adjacent Motif
BE3Base Editor 3
MMEJMicrohomology-Mediated End-Joining
ssODNSingle-Stranded Oligodeoxynucleotide
RNPRibonucleoprotein
CGAChlorogenic Acid
ISQIsoquercitrin
OrcoOdorant Receptor Co-Receptor
20E20-hydroxyecdysone
JHJuvenile Hormone
T2TTelomere-to-Telomere
CNNConvolutional Neural Network
AIArtificial Intelligence

References

  1. Tong, X.; Han, M.; Lu, K.; Tai, S.; Liang, S.; Liu, Y.; Hu, H.; Shen, J.; Long, A.; Zhan, C.; et al. High-Resolution Silkworm Pan-Genome Provides Genetic Insights into Artificial Selection and Ecological Adaptation. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Xiang, H.; Liu, X.; Li, M.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, L.; Cui, Y.; Liu, L.; Fang, G.; Qian, H.; Xu, A.; et al. The Evolutionary Road from Wild Moth to Domestic Silkworm. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 2, 1268–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xia, Q.; Li, S.; Feng, Q. Advances in Silkworm Studies Accelerated by the Genome Sequencing of Bombyx mori. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2014, 59, 513–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xu, J.; Dong, Q.; Yu, Y.; Niu, B.; Ji, D.; Li, M.; Huang, Y.; Chen, X.; Tan, A. Mass Spider Silk Production through Targeted Gene Replacement in Bombyx mori. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 8757–8762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zou, S.; Luo, Y.; Jin, Y.; Jing, W.; Huang, Y.; Liang, Y.; Li, Y.; Hao, Z.; Xu, Y.; Wang, H. Draper-ATG3 Interaction Positively Regulates Autophagy to Mediate Silk Gland Degradation in Bombyx mori. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, e04664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tomita, M.; Munetsuna, H.; Sato, T.; Adachi, T.; Hino, R.; Hayashi, M.; Shimizu, K.; Nakamura, N.; Tamura, T.; Yoshizato, K. Transgenic Silkworms Produce Recombinant Human Type III Procollagen in Cocoons. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Teulé, F.; Miao, Y.; Sohn, B.; Kim, Y.; Hull, J.J.; Fraser, M.J., Jr.; Lewis, R.V.; Jarvis, D.L. Silkworms Transformed with Chimeric Silkworm/Spider Silk Genes Spin Composite Silk Fibers with Improved Mechanical Properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 923–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Holland, C.; Numata, K.; Rnjak-Kovacina, J.; Seib, F.P. The Biomedical Use of Silk: Past, Present, Future. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2019, 8, e1800465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chouhan, D.; Mandal, B.B. Silk Biomaterials in Wound Healing and Skin Regeneration Therapeutics: From Bench to Bedside. Acta Biomater. 2020, 103, 24–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reizabal, A.; Costa, C.M.; Pérez-Álvarez, L.; Vilas-Vilela, J.L.; Lanceros-Méndez, S. Silk Fibroin as Sustainable Advanced Material: Material Properties and Characteristics, Processing, and Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2210764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fire, A.; Xu, S.; Montgomery, M.K.; Kostas, S.A.; Driver, S.E.; Mello, C.C. Potent and Specific Genetic Interference by Double-Stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 1998, 391, 806–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Boutros, M.; Kiger, A.A.; Armknecht, S.; Kerr, K.; Hild, M.; Koch, B.; Haas, S.A.; Paro, R.; Perrimon, N. Heidelberg Fly Array Consortium Genome-Wide RNAi Analysis of Growth and Viability in Drosophila Cells. Science 2004, 303, 832–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Moffat, J.; Grueneberg, D.A.; Yang, X.; Kim, S.Y.; Kloepfer, A.M.; Hinkle, G.; Piqani, B.; Eisenhaure, T.M.; Luo, B.; Grenier, J.K.; et al. A Lentiviral RNAi Library for Human and Mouse Genes Applied to an Arrayed Viral High-Content Screen. Cell 2006, 124, 1283–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Terenius, O.; Papanicolaou, A.; Garbutt, J.S.; Eleftherianos, I.; Huvenne, H.; Kanginakudru, S.; Albrechtsen, M.; An, C.; Aymeric, J.-L.; Barthel, A.; et al. RNA Interference in Lepidoptera: An Overview of Successful and Unsuccessful Studies and Implications for Experimental Design. J. Insect Physiol. 2011, 57, 231–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kolliopoulou, A.; Swevers, L. Recent Progress in RNAi Research in Lepidoptera: Intracellular Machinery, Antiviral Immune Response and Prospects for Insect Pest Control. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2014, 6, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gaj, T.; Gersbach, C.A.; Barbas, C.F., 3rd. ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-Based Methods for Genome Engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 397–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Doudna, J.A.; Charpentier, E. The New Frontier of Genome Engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 2014, 346, 1258096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ma, S.; Smagghe, G.; Xia, Q. Genome Editing in Bombyx mori: New Opportunities for Silkworm Functional Genomics and the Sericulture Industry. Insect Sci. 2019, 26, 964–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mali, P.; Esvelt, K.M.; Church, G.M. Cas9 as a Versatile Tool for Engineering Biology. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 957–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Chakrabarti, A.M.; Henser-Brownhill, T.; Monserrat, J.; Poetsch, A.R.; Luscombe, N.M.; Scaffidi, P. Target-Specific Precision of CRISPR-Mediated Genome Editing. Mol. Cell 2019, 73, 699–713.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Xu, J.; Zeng, B.; Ling, L.; You, L.; Chen, Y.; Huang, Y.; Tan, A. The CRISPR/Cas System Mediates Efficient Genome Engineering in Bombyx mori. Cell Res. 2013, 23, 1414–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chang, J.; Chen, X.; Zhang, T.; Wang, R.; Wang, A.; Lan, X.; Zhou, Y.; Ma, S.; Xia, Q. The Novel Insight into the Outcomes of CRISPR/Cas9 Editing Intra- and Inter-Species. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 163, 711–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ma, S.; Zhang, T.; Wang, R.; Wang, P.; Liu, Y.; Chang, J.; Wang, A.; Lan, X.; Sun, L.; Sun, H.; et al. High-Throughput and Genome-Scale Targeted Mutagenesis Using CRISPR in a Nonmodel Multicellular Organism, Bombyx mori. Genome Res. 2024, 34, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, T.; Xing, W.; Wang, A.; Zhang, N.; Jia, L.; Ma, S.; Xia, Q. Comparison of Long-Read Methods for Sequencing and Assembly of Lepidopteran Pest Genomes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 24, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, W.-S.; Xiao, Y.-D.; Liu, J.-Q.; Li, S.-L.; Chen, Y.; Xu, Y.-J.; Yang, X.; Wang, Y.-J.; Li, Z.-Q.; Xia, Q.-Y.; et al. The T2T Genome of the Domesticated Silkworm Bombyx mori. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 12341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Takasu, Y.; Kobayashi, I.; Beumer, K.; Uchino, K.; Sezutsu, H.; Sajwan, S.; Carroll, D.; Tamura, T.; Zurovec, M. Targeted Mutagenesis in the Silkworm Bombyx mori Using Zinc Finger Nuclease MRNA Injection. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 40, 759–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ma, S.; Zhang, S.; Wang, F.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xu, H.; Liu, C.; Lin, Y.; Zhao, P.; Xia, Q. Highly Efficient and Specific Genome Editing in Silkworm Using Custom TALENs. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e45035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Takasu, Y.; Sajwan, S.; Daimon, T.; Osanai-Futahashi, M.; Uchino, K.; Sezutsu, H.; Tamura, T.; Zurovec, M. Efficient TALEN Construction for Bombyx mori Gene Targeting. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tamura, T.; Thibert, C.; Royer, C.; Kanda, T.; Abraham, E.; Kamba, M.; Komoto, N.; Thomas, J.L.; Mauchamp, B.; Chavancy, G.; et al. Germline Transformation of the Silkworm Bombyx mori L. Using a PiggyBac Transposon-Derived Vector. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kim, Y.G.; Cha, J.; Chandrasegaran, S. Hybrid Restriction Enzymes: Zinc Finger Fusions to Fok I Cleavage Domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 1156–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Bibikova, M.; Beumer, K.; Trautman, J.K.; Carroll, D. Enhancing Gene Targeting with Designed Zinc Finger Nucleases. Science 2003, 300, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Boch, J.; Scholze, H.; Schornack, S.; Landgraf, A.; Hahn, S.; Kay, S.; Lahaye, T.; Nickstadt, A.; Bonas, U. Breaking the Code of DNA Binding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors. Science 2009, 326, 1509–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Moscou, M.J.; Bogdanove, A.J. A Simple Cipher Governs DNA Recognition by TAL Effectors. Science 2009, 326, 1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Barrangou, R.; Fremaux, C.; Deveau, H.; Richards, M.; Boyaval, P.; Moineau, S.; Romero, D.A.; Horvath, P. CRISPR Provides Acquired Resistance against Viruses in Prokaryotes. Science 2007, 315, 1709–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jinek, M.; Chylinski, K.; Fonfara, I.; Hauer, M.; Doudna, J.A.; Charpentier, E. A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity. Science 2012, 337, 816–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ma, S.; Chang, J.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lu, W.; Gao, J.; Shi, R.; Zhao, P.; Xia, Q. CRISPR/Cas9 Mediated Multiplex Genome Editing and Heritable Mutagenesis of BmKu70 in Bombyx mori. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Liu, Y.; Ma, S.; Wang, X.; Chang, J.; Gao, J.; Shi, R.; Zhang, J.; Lu, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, P.; et al. Highly Efficient Multiplex Targeted Mutagenesis and Genomic Structure Variation in Bombyx mori Cells Using CRISPR/Cas9. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014, 49, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wei, W.; Xin, H.; Roy, B.; Dai, J.; Miao, Y.; Gao, G. Heritable Genome Editing with CRISPR/Cas9 in the Silkworm, Bombyx mori. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e101210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Dai, Z.; Li, H.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, T.; Yuan, D.; Qian, W.; Cheng, D. CRISPR-Cas13-Mediated RNA Editing in the Silkworm Bombyx mori. Zool. Res. 2024, 45, 1249–1260. [Google Scholar]
  40. Dong, Z.; Chen, T.; Zhang, J.; Hu, N.; Cao, M.; Dong, F.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, P.; Lu, C.; Pan, M. Establishment of a Highly Efficient Virus-Inducible CRISPR/Cas9 System in Insect Cells. Antivir. Res. 2016, 130, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, Y.; Chen, D.; Zhang, X.; Chen, S.; Yang, D.; Tang, L.; Yang, X.; Wang, Y.; Luo, X.; Wang, M.; et al. Construction of Baculovirus-Inducible CRISPR/Cas9 Antiviral System Targeting BmNPV in Bombyx mori. Viruses 2021, 14, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, Y.; Yang, X.; Wu, P.; Guo, X.; Liu, Z.; Huang, Y.; Xu, X. Multi-Targets Cleavage of BmNPV Genome through Genome-Wide Repeat Sequence Using CRISPR/Cas9 Antiviral System. Insect Sci. 2025, 32, 1174–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xu, J.; Chen, R.; Chen, S.; Chen, K.; Tang, L.; Yang, D.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Song, H.; Huang, Y. Identification of a Germline-Expression Promoter for Genome Editing in Bombyx mori. Insect Sci. 2019, 26, 991–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, Z.; Niu, B.; Ji, D.; Li, M.; Li, K.; James, A.A.; Tan, A.; Huang, Y. Silkworm Genetic Sexing through W Chromosome-Linked, Targeted Gene Integration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 8752–8756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, Y.; Ma, S.; Chang, J.; Zhang, T.; Wang, X.; Shi, R.; Zhang, J.; Lu, W.; Liu, Y.; Xia, Q. Tissue-Specific Genome Editing of LaminA/C in the Posterior Silk Glands of Bombyx mori. J. Genet. Genom. 2017, 44, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, Y.; Du, T.; Li, A.; Qiao, L.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, W. Establishment and Application of a Silkworm CRISPR/Cas9 Tool for Conditionally Manipulating Gene Disruption in the Epidermis. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2022, 151, 103861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yu, B.; Dong, S.; Jiang, X.; Qiao, L.; Chen, J.; Li, T.; Pan, G.; Zhou, Z.; Li, C. Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing Using Receptor-Mediated Ovary Transduction of Cargo (ReMOT) Control in Bombyx mori. Insects 2023, 14, 932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dong, Z.; Dong, F.; Yu, X.; Huang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Hu, Z.; Chen, P.; Lu, C.; Pan, M. Excision of Nucleopolyhedrovirus Form Transgenic Silkworm Using the CRISPR/Cas9 System. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Fang, W.; Zhou, L.; Deng, B.; Guo, B.; Chen, X.; Chen, P.; Lu, C.; Dong, Z.; Pan, M. Establishment of a Secretory Protein-Inducible CRISPR/Cas9 System for Nosema Bombycis in Insect Cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 13175–13185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Li, Y.; Ma, S.; Sun, L.; Zhang, T.; Chang, J.; Lu, W.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Shi, R.; et al. Programmable Single and Multiplex Base-Editing in Bombyx mori Using RNA-Guided Cytidine Deaminases. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2018, 8, 1701–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Liang, Y.; Wang, T.; Yang, C.; Ma, S.; Xia, Q. Comparative Analysis of Genome Editing Systems, Cas9 and BE3, in Silkworms. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 158, 486–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, X.; Ma, S.; Chang, J.; Shi, R.; Wang, R.; Zhao, P.; Xia, Q. Programmable Activation of Bombyx Gene Expression Using CRISPR/DCas9 Fusion System. Insect Sci. 2019, 26, 983–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, X.; Ma, S.; Liu, Y.; Lu, W.; Sun, L.; Zhao, P.; Xia, Q. Transcriptional Repression of Endogenous Genes in BmE Cells Using CRISPRi System. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 111, 103172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hu, W.; Wang, X.; Ma, S.; Peng, Z.; Cao, Y.; Xia, Q. CRISPR-Mediated Endogenous Activation of Fibroin Heavy Chain Gene Triggers Cellular Stress Responses in Bombyx mori Embryonic Cells. Insects 2021, 12, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Liu, Y.; Ma, S.; Chang, J.; Zhang, T.; Chen, X.; Liang, Y.; Xia, Q. Programmable Targeted Epigenetic Editing Using CRISPR System in Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 110, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, F.; Guo, H.; Lan, W.; Zhou, M.; Geng, W.; Shen, G.; Lin, P.; Xia, Q.; Zhao, P.; Li, Z. Targeted DNA N6-Methyladenine Editing by DCas9 Fused to METTL4 in the Lepidopteran Model Insect Bombyx mori. Insect Sci. 2024, 31, 646–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xing, W.; Ma, S.; Liu, Y.; Xia, Q. CRISPR/DCas9-Mediated Imaging of Endogenous Genomic Loci in Living Bombyx mori Cells. Insect Sci. 2020, 27, 1360–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Nakade, S.; Tsubota, T.; Sakane, Y.; Kume, S.; Sakamoto, N.; Obara, M.; Daimon, T.; Sezutsu, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Sakuma, T.; et al. Microhomology-Mediated End-Joining-Dependent Integration of Donor DNA in Cells and Animals Using TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wan, Z.; Tsubota, T.; Uchino, K.; Sezutsu, H.; Daimon, T. MMEJ-Mediated Precise Gene Knock-in into the Fibroin-L Locus of the Silkworm, Bombyx mori. J. Insect Biotechnol. Sericology 2024, 93, 2_013–2_021. [Google Scholar]
  60. Fujii, T.; Hino, M.; Fujimoto, T.; Kakino, K.; Kaneko, Y.; Abe, H.; Lee, J.M.; Kusakabe, T.; Shimada, T. Peroxiredoxin 6 Is Essential for the Posttranslational Activation of Xanthine Dehydrogenase in the Uric Acid Synthesis of Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2025, 178, 104264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mi, J.; Zhou, Y.; Ma, S.; Zhou, X.; Xu, S.; Yang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Xia, Q.; Zhu, H.; Wang, S.; et al. High-Strength and Ultra-Tough Whole Spider Silk Fibers Spun from Transgenic Silkworms. Matter 2023, 6, 3661–3683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, X.; Xia, L.; Day, B.A.; Harris, T.I.; Oliveira, P.; Knittel, C.; Licon, A.L.; Gong, C.; Dion, G.; Lewis, R.V.; et al. CRISPR/Cas9 Initiated Transgenic Silkworms as a Natural Spinner of Spider Silk. Biomacromolecules 2019, 20, 2252–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Tsubota, T.; Takasu, Y.; Yonemura, N.; Sezutsu, H. Enhancements of the CRISPR-Cas System in the Silkworm Bombyx mori. CRISPR J. 2025, 8, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Nakata, M.; Ueno, M.; Kikuchi, Y.; Iwami, M.; Takayanagi-Kiya, S.; Kiya, T. CRISPR/Cas9- and Single-Stranded ODN-Mediated Knock-In in Silkworm Bombyx mori. Zoolog. Sci. 2024, 41, 540–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sun, L.; Zhang, T.; Lan, X.; Zhang, N.; Wang, R.; Ma, S.; Zhao, P.; Xia, Q. High-Throughput Screening of PAM-Flexible Cas9 Variants for Expanded Genome Editing in the Silkworm (Bombyx mori). Insects 2024, 15, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ma, S.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chang, J.; Zhang, T.; Wang, X.; Shi, R.; Lu, W.; Xia, X.; Zhao, P.; et al. An Integrated CRISPR Bombyx mori Genome Editing System with Improved Efficiency and Expanded Target Sites. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 83, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Zou, Y.; Ye, A.; Dong, M.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, W.; Tang, Y.; Hu, H.; Dai, F.; Tong, X. Silkworm Mutagenesis Using a Ribonucleoprotein-Based CRISPR/Cas12a System. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2025, 182, 104329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zeng, B.; Zhan, S.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Xu, J.; Liu, Q.; Li, Z.; Huang, Y.; Tan, A. Expansion of CRISPR Targeting Sites in Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016, 72, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zou, Y.; Ye, A.; Liu, S.; Wu, W.; Xu, L.; Dai, F.; Tong, X. Expansion of Targetable Sites for the Ribonucleoprotein-Based CRISPR/Cas9 System in the Silkworm Bombyx mori. BMC Biotechnol. 2021, 21, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jia, L.; Ma, S.; Zhang, T.; Xing, W.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Xia, Q. Enhanced Bombyx Genome Editing via Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Injection. Insect Sci. 2019, 26, 1059–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ma, S.; Wang, A.; Chen, X.; Zhang, T.; Xing, W.; Xia, Q. Deep Sequencing Reveals the Comprehensive CRISPR-Cas9 Editing Spectrum in Bombyx mori. CRISPR J. 2021, 4, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Chang, J.; Wang, R.; Yu, K.; Zhang, T.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Shi, R.; Wang, X.; Xia, Q.; Ma, S. Genome-Wide CRISPR Screening Reveals Genes Essential for Cell Viability and Resistance to Abiotic and Biotic Stresses in Bombyx mori. Genome Res. 2020, 30, 757–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ma, S.; Xia, Q. Genetic Breeding of Silkworms: From Traditional Hybridization to Molecular Design. Yi Chuan 2017, 39, 1025–1032. [Google Scholar]
  74. Hu, Z.; Zhu, F.; Chen, K. The Mechanisms of Silkworm Resistance to the Baculovirus and Antiviral Breeding. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2023, 68, 381–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Fan, X.; Wei, M.; Li, Y.; Xia, Q.; Wang, X. Genetic Engineering of Silkworm for Enhanced Silk Mechanical Properties: A Review. Mater. Des. 2025, 260, 115031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Douglas, C.; Turner, J.M.A. Advances and Challenges in Genetic Technologies to Produce Single-Sex Litters. PLoS Genet. 2020, 16, e1008898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gai, T.; Tong, X.; Han, M.; Li, C.; Fang, C.; Zou, Y.; Hu, H.; Xiang, H.; Xiang, Z.; Lu, C.; et al. Cocoonase Is Indispensable for Lepidoptera Insects Breaking the Sealed Cocoon. PLoS Genet. 2020, 16, e1009004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Wang, W.; Wang, X.; Luo, C.; Pu, Q.; Yin, Q.; Xu, L.; Peng, X.; Ma, S.; Xia, Q.; Liu, S. Let-7 MicroRNA Is a Critical Regulator in Controlling the Growth and Function of Silk Gland in the Silkworm. RNA Biol. 2020, 17, 703–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, W.; Ji, L.; Jing, X.; Zhao, P.; Xia, Q. MicroRNA Let-7 Targets BmCDK1 to Regulate Cell Proliferation and Endomitosis of Silk Gland in the Silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Sci. 2024, 31, 1026–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, W.; Zhang, F.; Guo, K.; Xu, J.; Zhao, P.; Xia, Q. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing of the Let-7 Seed Sequence Improves Silk Yield in the Silkworm, Bombyx mori. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 243, 124793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Li, S.; Lao, J.; Sun, Y.; Hua, X.; Lin, P.; Wang, F.; Shen, G.; Zhao, P.; Xia, Q. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Editing of BmEcKL1 Gene Sequence Affected Silk Gland Development of Silkworms (Bombyx mori). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wu, L.; Zhao, L.; Feng, Y.; Wu, J.; Hua, X.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Xia, Q.; Lin, P.; et al. SGDAcn Is a Suppressor for Silk Gland Endoreplication and Development. Insect Sci. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zabelina, V.; Takasu, Y.; Sehadova, H.; Yonemura, N.; Nakajima, K.; Sezutsu, H.; Sery, M.; Zurovec, M.; Sehnal, F.; Tamura, T. Mutation in Bombyx mori Fibrohexamerin (P25) Gene Causes Reorganization of Rough Endoplasmic Reticulum in Posterior Silk Gland Cells and Alters Morphology of Fibroin Secretory Globules in the Silk Gland Lumen. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2021, 135, 103607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Qian, W.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Tang, Y.; Yuan, D.; Huang, Z.; Cheng, D. Fzr Regulates Silk Gland Growth by Promoting Endoreplication and Protein Synthesis in the Silkworm. PLoS Genet. 2023, 19, e1010602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Niu, K.; Peng, Y.; Song, Q.; Feng, Q. G-Quadruplex Is Involved in the Regulation of BmSGF1 Expression in the Silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Sci. 2024, 31, 1440–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Tao, C.; Wang, J.; Cong, J.; Yang, H.; Cao, J.; Liu, C.; Cheng, T. Broad Complex Negatively Regulates Fibrohexamerin/P25 by Binding to the Cis-Element BMFA in the Silkworm, Bombyx mori. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 307, 142114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yi, M.; Yang, X.; Wang, M.; Chen, J.; Xiang, J.; Xiang, L.; Qian, L.; Chen, D.; Huang, Y.; Tong, X.; et al. Consistency, Distinction, and Potential Metabolic Crosstalk of Nitrogen Mobilization-Related Genes in Silk Production and Silk Gland Biology. Zool. Res. 2025, 46, 446–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Zhang, Z.; Liu, X.; Shiotsuki, T.; Wang, Z.; Xu, X.; Huang, Y.; Li, M.; Li, K.; Tan, A. Depletion of Juvenile Hormone Esterase Extends Larval Growth in Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 81, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Brady, D.J.; Saviane, A.; Battistolli, M.; Varponi, I.; Barca, F.; Shiomi, K.; Cappellozza, S.; Sandrelli, F. Enhanced Silk Production and Pupal Weight in Bombyx mori through CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Circadian Clock Gene Disruption. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0317572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cao, J.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, R.; Xu, Y.; Pan, H.; Li, S.; Liu, C.; Cheng, T. Dimmed Gene Knockout Shortens Larval Growth and Reduces Silk Yield in the Silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Mol. Biol. 2023, 32, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Tan, A.; Fu, G.; Jin, L.; Guo, Q.; Li, Z.; Niu, B.; Meng, Z.; Morrison, N.I.; Alphey, L.; Huang, Y. Transgene-Based, Female-Specific Lethality System for Genetic Sexing of the Silkworm, Bombyx mori. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 6766–6770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Fang, S.-M.; Zhou, Q.-Z.; Yu, Q.-Y.; Zhang, Z. Genetic and Genomic Analysis for Cocoon Yield Traits in Silkworm. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Li, K.; Dong, Z.; Dong, F.; Hu, Z.; Huang, L.; Wang, J.; Chen, P.; Lu, C.; Pan, M. Transcriptome Analysis Reveals That Knocking out BmNPV Iap2 Induces Apoptosis by Inhibiting the Oxidative Phosphorylation Pathway. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 233, 123482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Chauhan, P.; Bashir, M.; Pandey, A.; Kaur, A. Silkworm Disease Management. In Sericulture; CRC Press: London, UK, 2025; pp. 128–148. ISBN 9781003717768. [Google Scholar]
  95. Ye, X.; Zhao, S.; Wu, M.; Ruan, J.; Tang, X.; Wang, X.; Zhong, B. Role of Sericin 1 in the Immune System of Silkworms Revealed by Transcriptomic and Proteomic Analyses after Gene Knockout. FEBS Open Bio 2021, 11, 2304–2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Heng, J.; Liu, H.; Xu, J.; Huang, X.; Sun, X.; Yang, R.; Xia, Q.; Zhao, P. KPI5 Is Involved in the Regulation of the Expression of Antibacterial Peptide Genes and Hemolymph Melanization in the Silkworm, Bombyx mori. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 907427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Liu, H.; Xu, J.; Wang, L.; Guo, P.; Tang, Z.; Sun, X.; Tang, X.; Wang, W.; Wang, L.; Cao, Y.; et al. Serpin-1a and Serpin-6 Regulate the Toll Pathway Immune Homeostasis by Synergistically Inhibiting the Spätzle-Processing Enzyme CLIP2 in Silkworm, Bombyx mori. PLoS Pathog. 2023, 19, e1011740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Xiong, J.; Hu, Z.; Wang, G.; Wang, C.; Chen, P. The Role of BmsPLA2-4 in Tissue Defense against Pathogens in Silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Sci. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. He, L.; Liu, L.; Liu, H.; Tang, X.; Meng, Y.; Xie, H.; Zhu, L.; Xia, Q.; Zhao, P. Functional Analysis of BmHemolin in the Immune Defense of Silkworms. Insects 2025, 16, 778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Dong, Z.; Huang, L.; Dong, F.; Hu, Z.; Qin, Q.; Long, J.; Cao, M.; Chen, P.; Lu, C.; Pan, M.-H. Establishment of a Baculovirus-Inducible CRISPR/Cas9 System for Antiviral Research in Transgenic Silkworms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 9255–9265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Huang, L.; Dong, Z.; Dong, F.; Yu, X.; Hu, Z.; Liao, N.; Chen, P.; Lu, C.; Pan, M. Gene Editing the BmNPV Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein 2 (Iap2) as an Antiviral Strategy in Transgenic Silkworm. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 166, 529–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zhu, Y.; Hu, Z.; Chen, P.; Xiao, Q.; Xiao, Y.; Jia, X.; Dong, Z.; Pan, M.; Lu, C. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Disruption of Orf76 as an Antiviral Therapy against BmNPV in the Transgenic Silkworm. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 278, 134773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Chen, S.; Hou, C.; Bi, H.; Wang, Y.; Xu, J.; Li, M.; James, A.A.; Huang, Y.; Tan, A. Transgenic Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat/Cas9-Mediated Viral Gene Targeting for Antiviral Therapy of Bombyx mori Nucleopolyhedrovirus. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e02465-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Liao, N.; Dong, Z.; Zhang, X.; Qin, Q.; Luo, Y.; Huang, L.; Chen, P.; Lu, C.; Pan, M. Construction of a CRISPR/FnCas12a Multi-Sites Editing System for Inhibiting Proliferation of Bombyx mori Nuclearpolyhedrosisvirus. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 193, 585–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Liang, Y.; Xu, W.; Zhou, Y.; Gao, Y.; Tian, H.; Wu, X.; Xu, Y.; Wang, H. Midgut Membrane Protein BmSUH Facilitates Bombyx mori Nucleopolyhedrovirus Oral Infection. PLoS Pathog. 2022, 18, e1010938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Feng, Y.; Yang, C.; Wu, L.; Wang, Y.; Shen, G.; Lin, P. BmSPP Is a Virus Resistance Gene in Bombyx mori. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1377270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Chen, F.; Zhou, M.; Chen, W.; Geng, W.; Lu, L.; Shen, G.; Lin, P.; Xia, Q.; Zhao, P.; Li, Z. N6-Methyladenosine Modification of Host Hsc70 Attenuates Nucleopolyhedrovirus Infection in the Lepidopteran Model Insect Bombyx mori. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 298, 139869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Dong, Z.; Long, J.; Huang, L.; Hu, Z.; Chen, P.; Hu, N.; Zheng, N.; Huang, X.; Lu, C.; Pan, M. Construction and Application of an HSP70 Promoter-Inducible Genome Editing System in Transgenic Silkworm to Induce Resistance to Nosema bombycis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 9583–9592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Hua, X.; Xu, W.; Ma, S.; Xia, Q. STING-Dependent Autophagy Suppresses Nosema Bombycis Infection in Silkworms, Bombyx mori. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2021, 115, 103862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ran, M.; Bao, J.; Li, B.; Shi, Y.; Yang, W.; Meng, X.; Chen, J.; Wei, J.; Long, M.; Li, T.; et al. Microsporidian Nosema Bombycis Secretes Serine Protease Inhibitor to Suppress Host Cell Apoptosis via Caspase BmICE. PLoS Pathog. 2025, 21, e1012373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Feng, Y.; Tan, Q.; Qin, X.; Xia, Q.; Lin, P.; Shen, G. Signal Peptide Peptidase Serves as a Target Gene to Improve the Biological Control Efficacy of Beauveria Bassiana against Lepidopteran Insect Bombyx mori. Pest Manag. Sci. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ma, Y.; Zeng, W.; Ba, Y.; Luo, Q.; Ou, Y.; Liu, R.; Ma, J.; Tang, Y.; Hu, J.; Wang, H.; et al. A Single-Cell Transcriptomic Atlas Characterizes the Silk-Producing Organ in the Silkworm. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hino, R.; Tomita, M.; Yoshizato, K. The Generation of Germline Transgenic Silkworms for the Production of Biologically Active Recombinant Fusion Proteins of Fibroin and Human Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 5715–5724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Kurihara, H.; Sezutsu, H.; Tamura, T.; Yamada, K. Production of an Active Feline Interferon in the Cocoon of Transgenic Silkworms Using the Fibroin H-Chain Expression System. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 355, 976–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Adachi, T.; Wang, X.; Murata, T.; Obara, M.; Akutsu, H.; Machida, M.; Umezawa, A.; Tomita, M. Production of a Non-Triple Helical Collagen Alpha Chain in Transgenic Silkworms and Its Evaluation as a Gelatin Substitute for Cell Culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 106, 860–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Qi, Q.; Yao, L.; Liang, Z.; Yan, D.; Li, Z.; Huang, Y.; Sun, J. Production of Human Type II Collagen Using an Efficient Baculovirus-Silkworm Multigene Expression System. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2016, 291, 2189–2198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Yu, S.; Zheng, H.; Ye, X.; Dai, X.; Wang, X.; Zhao, S.; Dai, X.; Zhong, B. TALEN-Mediated Homologous-Recombination-Based Fibroin Light Chain in-Fusion Expression System in Bombyx mori. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2024, 12, 1399629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Yu, Y.; Chen, K.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, B.; Liu, X.; Lin, Z.; Tan, A. Custom-Designed, Mass Silk Production in Genetically Engineered Silkworms. PNAS Nexus 2024, 3, pgae128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Teramoto, H.; Kojima, K.; Iga, M.; Yoshioka, T. Unique Material Properties of Bombyx mori Silk Fiber Incorporated with 3-Azidotyrosine. Biomacromolecules 2023, 24, 4208–4217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Zhao, S.; Ye, X.; Dai, X.; Wang, X.; Yu, S.; Zhong, B. Drosophila melanogaster Resilin Improves the Mechanical Properties of Transgenic Silk. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0282533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Dai, X.; Ye, X.; Shi, L.; Yu, S.; Wang, X.; Zhong, B. High Mechanical Property Silk Produced by Transgenic Silkworms Expressing the Drosophila Dumpy. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2024, 12, 1359587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Shimizu, K. Genetic Engineered Color Silk: Fabrication of a Photonics Material through a Bioassisted Technology. Bioinspir. Biomim. 2018, 13, 041003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Whittall, D.R.; Baker, K.V.; Breitling, R.; Takano, E. Host Systems for the Production of Recombinant Spider Silk. Trends Biotechnol. 2021, 39, 560–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ma, S.; Shi, R.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Chang, J.; Gao, J.; Lu, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, P.; Xia, Q. Genome Editing of BmFib-H Gene Provides an Empty Bombyx mori Silk Gland for a Highly Efficient Bioreactor. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. You, Z.; Ye, X.; Ye, L.; Qian, Q.; Wu, M.; Song, J.; Che, J.; Zhong, B. Extraordinary Mechanical Properties of Composite Silk through Hereditable Transgenic Silkworm Expressing Recombinant Major Ampullate Spidroin. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 15956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Dong, H.; Zhang, S.; Tao, H.; Chen, Z.; Li, X.; Qiu, J.; Cui, W.; Sima, Y.; Cui, W.; Xu, S. Metabolomics Differences between Silkworms (Bombyx mori) Reared on Fresh Mulberry (Morus) Leaves or Artificial Diets. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Qin, D.; Wang, G.; Dong, Z.; Xia, Q.; Zhao, P. Comparative Fecal Metabolomes of Silkworms Being Fed Mulberry Leaf and Artificial Diet. Insects 2020, 11, 851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Gs, A.; Mayavathi Nr, N.P.; N R, A.; B M, M.; Sherpa, D.C.; C, A.; Suresh, A.; Kammar, S.; M, S.; S, S.; et al. Diversity of Fungal Pathogens in Leaf Spot Disease of Indian Mulberry and Its Management. Heliyon 2023, 9, e21750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Zhang, M.; Yuan, C.; Liu, Q.; Liu, H.; Qiu, X.; Zhao, M. Detection of Mulberry Leaf Diseases in Natural Environments Based on Improved YOLOv8. Forests 2024, 15, 1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Huang, X.; Yuan, T.; Huang, Y.; Qazi, I.H.; Liu, J. Analysis of Causal Pathogens of Mulberry Bacterial Blight in Samples Collected from Eight Provinces of China Using Culturomics and Metagenomic Sequencing Methods. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1517050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Liu, Q.; Liu, W.; Zeng, B.; Wang, G.; Hao, D.; Huang, Y. Deletion of the Bombyx mori Odorant Receptor Co-Receptor (BmOrco) Impairs Olfactory Sensitivity in Silkworms. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 86, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Jiang, L.; Wang, P.; Li, C.; Shen, D.; Chen, A.; Qian, H.; Zhao, Q. Compensatory Effects of Other Olfactory Genes after CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of BmOR56 in Silkworm, Bombyx mori. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part D Genom. Proteom. 2024, 52, 101275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Niu, B.; Ji, D.; Liu, X.; Li, M.; Bai, H.; Palli, S.R.; Wang, C.; Tan, A. A Determining Factor for Insect Feeding Preference in the Silkworm, Bombyx mori. PLoS Biol. 2019, 17, e3000162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Endo, H.; Tsuneto, K.; Mang, D.; Zhang, W.; Yamagishi, T.; Ito, K.; Nagata, S.; Sato, R. Molecular Basis of Host Plant Recognition by Silkworm Larvae. J. Insect Physiol. 2024, 154, 104628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Jiang, J.; Xiao, Q.; Gao, Z.; Gu, J.; Huang, L. Identification and Function Analysis of Two New Gustatory Receptors Related to Silkworm Monophagy. Insect Sci. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Zhang, S.; Gu, Q.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, M.; Li, D.; He, N. An Amino Acid-Tuned Gustatory Receptor Relatively Abundant in the Silkworm Gut Is Crucial for Growth and Development. Pest Manag. Sci. 2025, 81, 4220–4229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Zou, Y.; Wu, W.; Luo, T.; Tang, Y.; Hu, H.; Ye, A.; Xu, L.; Dai, F.; Tong, X. Disruption of Zfh3 Abolishes Mulberry-Specific Monophagy in Silkworm Larvae. Insect Sci. 2024, 31, 1397–1411. [Google Scholar]
  138. Kawamoto, M.; Jouraku, A.; Toyoda, A.; Yokoi, K.; Minakuchi, Y.; Katsuma, S.; Fujiyama, A.; Kiuchi, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Shimada, T. High-Quality Genome Assembly of the Silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 107, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lu, F.; Wei, Z.; Luo, Y.; Guo, H.; Zhang, G.; Xia, Q.; Wang, Y. SilkDB 3.0: Visualizing and Exploring Multiple Levels of Data for Silkworm. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D749–D755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Yang, C.-C.; Yokoi, K.; Yamamoto, K.; Jouraku, A. An Update of KAIKObase, the Silkworm Genome Database. Database 2021, 2021, baaa099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Lee, J.; Fujimoto, T.; Sahara, K.; Toyoda, A.; Shimada, T. Comprehensive Genome Annotation of Bombyx mori P50ma Strain, a Newly Developed Standard Strain. Sci. Data 2025, 12, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Zhu, Z.; Guan, Z.; Liu, G.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z. SGID: A Comprehensive and Interactive Database of the Silkworm. Database 2019, 2019, baz134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Li, T.; Xu, C.; Xu, J.; Luo, J.; Yu, B.; Meng, X.; Li, C.; Pan, G.; Zhou, Z. Proteomic Identification of Bombyx mori Organelles Using the Engineered Ascorbate Peroxidase APEX and Development of Silkworm Organelle Proteome Database (SilkOrganPDB). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Li, C.; Tong, X.; Gao, R.; Jiang, J.; Hu, D.; Zhou, A.; Lu, K.; Han, M.; Zhou, L.; Dai, F. Silk_40K SNP Array Facilitates the Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits in Silkworm (Bombyx mori). J. Adv. Res. 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Cui, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Lin, Y.; Chen, L.; Feng, Q.; Wang, W.; Xiang, H. New Insight into the Mechanism Underlying the Silk Gland Biological Process by Knocking out Fibroin Heavy Chain in the Silkworm. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Ye, X.; Tang, X.; Zhao, S.; Ruan, J.; Wu, M.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Zhong, B. Mechanism of the Growth and Development of the Posterior Silk Gland and Silk Secretion Revealed by Mutation of the Fibroin Light Chain in Silkworm. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 188, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Wu, M.; Ruan, J.; Ye, X.; Zhao, S.; Tang, X.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Zhong, B. P25 Gene Knockout Contributes to Human Epidermal Growth Factor Production in Transgenic Silkworms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Zhang, X.; Dong, Z.; Guo, K.; Jiang, W.; Wu, X.; Duan, J.; Jing, X.; Xia, Q.; Zhao, P. Identification and Functional Study of Fhx-L1, a Major Silk Component in Bombyx mori. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 232, 123371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Yang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Gan, Q.; Liang, D.; Shu, R.; Jiang, S.; Xie, R.; Meng, Y. BmSuc1 Affects Silk Properties by Acting on Sericin1 in Bombyx mori. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Peng, Z.; Yang, X.; Liu, C.; Dong, Z.; Wang, F.; Wang, X.; Hu, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, P.; Xia, Q. Structural and Mechanical Properties of Silk from Different Instars of Bombyx mori. Biomacromolecules 2019, 20, 1203–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Kiuchi, T.; Koga, H.; Kawamoto, M.; Shoji, K.; Sakai, H.; Arai, Y.; Ishihara, G.; Kawaoka, S.; Sugano, S.; Shimada, T.; et al. A Single Female-Specific PiRNA Is the Primary Determiner of Sex in the Silkworm. Nature 2014, 509, 633–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Sakakibara, K.; Siomi, M.C. The PIWI-Interacting RNA Molecular Pathway: Insights from Cultured Silkworm Germline Cells. Bioessays 2018, 40, 1700068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Li, Z.; You, L.; Yan, D.; James, A.A.; Huang, Y.; Tan, A. Bombyx mori Histone Methyltransferase BmAsh2 Is Essential for Silkworm PiRNA-Mediated Sex Determination. PLoS Genet. 2018, 14, e1007245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Chen, K.; Chen, S.; Xu, J.; Yu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Tan, A.; Huang, Y. Maelstrom Regulates Spermatogenesis of the Silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 109, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Chen, K.; Yu, Y.; Yang, D.; Yang, X.; Tang, L.; Liu, Y.; Luo, X.; Walters, J.R.; Liu, Z.; Xu, J.; et al. Gtsf1 Is Essential for Proper Female Sex Determination and Transposon Silencing in the Silkworm, Bombyx mori. PLoS Genet. 2020, 16, e1009194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Izumi, N.; Shoji, K.; Suzuki, Y.; Katsuma, S.; Tomari, Y. Zucchini Consensus Motifs Determine the Mechanism of Pre-PiRNA Production. Nature 2020, 578, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Shigematsu, M.; Kawamura, T.; Morichika, K.; Izumi, N.; Kiuchi, T.; Honda, S.; Pliatsika, V.; Matsubara, R.; Rigoutsos, I.; Katsuma, S.; et al. RNase κ Promotes Robust PiRNA Production by Generating 2′,3′-Cyclic Phosphate-Containing Precursors. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Chen, K.; Ye, L.; Yu, Y.; Guo, P.; Tan, A. Sex-Biased Fertility Degeneration Induced by Depletion of an Auxiliary PiRNA-Pathway Factor Qin in Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2025, 181, 104319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Czech, B.; Munafò, M.; Ciabrelli, F.; Eastwood, E.L.; Fabry, M.H.; Kneuss, E.; Hannon, G.J. PiRNA-Guided Genome Defense: From Biogenesis to Silencing. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2018, 52, 131–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Feng, M.; Kolliopoulou, A.; Zhou, Y.-H.; Fei, S.-G.; Xia, J.-M.; Swevers, L.; Sun, J.-C. The PiRNA Response to BmNPV Infection in the Silkworm Fat Body and Midgut. Insect Sci. 2021, 28, 662–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Kiuchi, T.; Shoji, K.; Izumi, N.; Tomari, Y.; Katsuma, S. Non-Gonadal Somatic PiRNA Pathways Ensure Sexual Differentiation, Larval Growth, and Wing Development in Silkworms. PLoS Genet. 2023, 19, e1010912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Nishida, K.M.; Sakakibara, K.; Iwasaki, Y.W.; Yamada, H.; Murakami, R.; Murota, Y.; Kawamura, T.; Kodama, T.; Siomi, H.; Siomi, M.C. Hierarchical Roles of Mitochondrial Papi and Zucchini in Bombyx Germline PiRNA Biogenesis. Nature 2018, 555, 260–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Wang, X.; Ramat, A.; Simonelig, M.; Liu, M. Emerging Roles and Functional Mechanisms of PIWI-Interacting RNAs. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2023, 24, 123–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Zhao, X. G Protein-Coupled Receptors Function as Cell Membrane Receptors for the Steroid Hormone 20-Hydroxyecdysone. Cell Commun. Signal. 2020, 18, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Li, Z.; You, L.; Zeng, B.; Ling, L.; Xu, J.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Z.; Palli, S.R.; Huang, Y.; Tan, A. Ectopic Expression of Ecdysone Oxidase Impairs Tissue Degeneration in Bombyx mori. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2015, 282, 20150513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Xu, X.; Pu, S.; Jiang, M.; Hu, X.; Wang, Q.; Yu, J.; Chu, J.; Wei, G.; Wang, L. Knockout of Nuclear Receptor HR38 Gene Impairs Pupal-Adult Development in Silkworm Bombyx mori. Insect Mol. Biol. 2024, 33, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Li, K.; Jia, Q.-Q.; Li, S. Juvenile Hormone Signaling—A Mini Review. Insect Sci. 2019, 26, 600–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Cui, Y.; Liu, Z.; Li, C.; Wei, X.; Lin, Y.; You, L.; Zhu, Z.; Deng, H.; Feng, Q.; Huang, Y.; et al. Role of Juvenile Hormone Receptor Methoprene-Tolerant 1 in Silkworm Larval Brain Development and Domestication. Zool. Res. 2021, 42, 637–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Zeng, B.; Huang, Y.; Xu, J.; Shiotsuki, T.; Bai, H.; Palli, S.R.; Huang, Y.; Tan, A. The FOXO Transcription Factor Controls Insect Growth and Development by Regulating Juvenile Hormone Degradation in the Silkworm, Bombyx mori. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 11659–11669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Koyama, T.; Saeed, U.; Rewitz, K.; Halberg, K.V. The Integrative Physiology of Hormone Signaling: Insights from Insect Models. Physiology 2025, 40, 343–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Liu, Y.; Chang, J.; Yang, C.; Zhang, T.; Chen, X.; Shi, R.; Liang, Y.; Xia, Q.; Ma, S. Genome-Wide CRISPR-Cas9 Screening in Bombyx mori Reveals the Toxicological Mechanisms of Environmental Pollutants, Fluoride and Cadmium. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 410, 124666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Sun, H.; Chen, J.; Wang, R.; Liu, D.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, T.; Jia, L.; Ma, S.; Xia, Q. Genome-Wide CRISPR Screening Reveals Key Genes and Pathways Associated with 20-Hydroxyecdysone Signal Transduction in the Silkworm (Bombyx mori). Insect Sci. 2024, 31, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Chang, J.; Li, Q.; Zhang, T.; Sun, H.; Jia, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhang, S.; Sun, T.; Ma, S.; Cao, J. Genome-Wide CRISPR Screening of Genes and Pathways for Insect Cell Responding to Abnormal Environmental PH. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 305, 141000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Sun, H.; Chen, C.; Shi, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, R.; Liu, D.; Zhang, T.; Ma, S.; Jia, L. CRISPR Screening Unravels Genome-Wide Regulators of Juvenile Hormone Signaling in Bombyx mori. Insect Sci. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Cao, M.; Brennan, A.; Lee, C.M.; Park, S.-H.; Bao, G. Deep Learning Based Models for CRISPR/Cas off-Target Prediction. Small Methods 2025, 9, e2500122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Strunnikov, V. Sex Control in Silkworms. Nature 1975, 255, 111–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Yuan, Y.; Zhou, T.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, Z.; Liu, L.; Zheng, L.; Yan, Z.; Hu, H.; Han, M.; et al. Doublesex Gene in Bombyx mori: CRISPR-Mediated Female-to-Male Sex Reversal through Exon Skipping. Pest Manag. Sci. 2025, 81, 5917–5927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Kaneda, T.; Matsuda-Imai, N.; Kosako, H.; Shoji, K.; Suzuki, M.G.; Suzuki, Y.; Kiuchi, T.; Katsuma, S. The Masc-PSI Complex Directly Induces Male-Type Doublesex Splicing in Silkworms. Commun. Biol. 2025, 8, 927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Kim, C.; Tagmount, A.; Zhu, Z.; Wilson, F.; Li, D.; Ostrov, D.A.; Brad Barbazuk, W.; Bacher, R.; Vulpe, C.D. Identification of Functional Genetic Components Modulating Toxicity Response to PFOS Using Genome-Wide CRISPR Screens in HepG2/C3A Cells. Arch. Toxicol. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Shibue, K.; Kahraman, S.; Castillo-Quan, J.I.; De Jesus, D.F.; Hu, J.; Morita, H.; Blackwell, T.K.; Yi, P.; Kulkarni, R.N. Genome-Wide CRISPR Screen Identifies Sec31A as a Key Regulator of Alpha Cell Survival. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 9159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Liu, B.; Jing, Z.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.; Mao, S.; Kaundal, R.; Zou, Y.; Wei, G.; Zang, Y.; Wang, X.; et al. Large-Scale Multiplexed Mosaic CRISPR Perturbation in the Whole Organism. Cell 2022, 185, 3008–3024.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Zhu, W.; Xie, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, G. CrnnCrispr: An Interpretable Deep Learning Method for CRISPR/Cas9 SgRNA on-Target Activity Prediction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 4429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Dauparas, J.; Anishchenko, I.; Bennett, N.; Bai, H.; Ragotte, R.J.; Milles, L.F.; Wicky, B.I.M.; Courbet, A.; de Haas, R.J.; Bethel, N.; et al. Robust Deep Learning-Based Protein Sequence Design Using ProteinMPNN. Science 2022, 378, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Watson, J.L.; Juergens, D.; Bennett, N.R.; Trippe, B.L.; Yim, J.; Eisenach, H.E.; Ahern, W.; Borst, A.J.; Ragotte, R.J.; Milles, L.F.; et al. De Novo Design of Protein Structure and Function with RFdiffusion. Nature 2023, 620, 1089–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Kômoto, N.; Tomita, S. Risk Assessment of Transgenic Silkworms. In GMOs; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 223–237. ISBN 9783030531829. [Google Scholar]
  186. Yan, Y.; Aumann, R.A.; Häcker, I.; Schetelig, M.F. CRISPR-Based Genetic Control Strategies for Insect Pests. J. Integr. Agric. 2023, 22, 651–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. CRISPR-mediated precision breeding as a central engine for sericultural modernization. Instead of relying on traditional selection, targeted genome editing enables the simultaneous optimization of production traits (yield and developmental rate), physiological robustness (disease resistance and dietary adaptability), and product diversification (novel silk materials), thereby transforming the silkworm into a highly efficient and versatile biofactory.
Figure 1. CRISPR-mediated precision breeding as a central engine for sericultural modernization. Instead of relying on traditional selection, targeted genome editing enables the simultaneous optimization of production traits (yield and developmental rate), physiological robustness (disease resistance and dietary adaptability), and product diversification (novel silk materials), thereby transforming the silkworm into a highly efficient and versatile biofactory.
Genes 17 00230 g001
Figure 2. Future directions and perspectives in silkworm. The development directions of the CRISPR system in the silkworm mainly include further enhancing the application of CRISPR technology in silkworms, transforming silkworms into a biosynthesis platform, expanding its use in the control of lepidopteran pests, employing it for genome-wide screening, and integrating it with AI.
Figure 2. Future directions and perspectives in silkworm. The development directions of the CRISPR system in the silkworm mainly include further enhancing the application of CRISPR technology in silkworms, transforming silkworms into a biosynthesis platform, expanding its use in the control of lepidopteran pests, employing it for genome-wide screening, and integrating it with AI.
Genes 17 00230 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, Q.; Guo, Y.; Wang, L.; Jia, L.; Wei, P.; Ma, S. CRISPR-Mediated Silkworm: The Oncoming Agricultural Revolutions and a Rising Model Organism. Genes 2026, 17, 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17020230

AMA Style

Sun Q, Guo Y, Wang L, Jia L, Wei P, Ma S. CRISPR-Mediated Silkworm: The Oncoming Agricultural Revolutions and a Rising Model Organism. Genes. 2026; 17(2):230. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17020230

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Qiaoling, Yongkang Guo, Liting Wang, Ling Jia, Peng Wei, and Sanyuan Ma. 2026. "CRISPR-Mediated Silkworm: The Oncoming Agricultural Revolutions and a Rising Model Organism" Genes 17, no. 2: 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17020230

APA Style

Sun, Q., Guo, Y., Wang, L., Jia, L., Wei, P., & Ma, S. (2026). CRISPR-Mediated Silkworm: The Oncoming Agricultural Revolutions and a Rising Model Organism. Genes, 17(2), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17020230

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop