Next Article in Journal
Copy Number Variants of Uncertain Significance by Chromosome Microarray Analysis from Consecutive Pediatric Patients: Reevaluation Following Current Guidelines and Reanalysis by Genome Sequencing
Previous Article in Journal
Bone Type Selection for Human Molecular Genetic Identification of Skeletal Remains
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Prenatal Rare 16q24.1 Deletion Between Genomics and Epigenetics: A Review

Medical Genetics and Genomic Unit, San Bortolo Hospital, 36100 Vicenza, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2025, 16(8), 873; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16080873
Submission received: 30 May 2025 / Revised: 10 July 2025 / Accepted: 22 July 2025 / Published: 24 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Human Genomics and Genetic Diseases)

Abstract

Alveolar capillary dysplasia with misalignment of pulmonary veins (ACDMPV) is a rare, often fatal congenital disorder characterized by severe neonatal respiratory distress and associated with complex multisystem malformations. In approximately 90% of cases, the condition is linked to deletions or mutations affecting the FOXF1 gene or its upstream enhancer region on chromosome 16q24.1. This review analyzes reported prenatal cases with 16q24.1 deletion involving FOXF1, aiming to identify recurrent sonographic features and elucidate the underlying genomic and epigenetic mechanisms. We reviewed prenatal cases reported in the literature involving deletions of the 16q24.1 region, including the FOXF1 gene. Here, we expand the case series by reporting a fetus with increased nuchal translucency measuring 8 mm and a de novo 16q24.1 deletion. We identified nine prenatal cases with a 16q24.1 deletion, all involving the FOXF1 gene or its enhancer region. The main ultrasound findings included increased nuchal translucency and cystic hygroma during the first trimester, and cardiac, renal, and intestinal malformations from 20 weeks of gestation onward. Prenatal diagnosis of ACDMPV based solely on ultrasound findings is challenging. In most reported cases, the pregnancy was carried to term, with the diagnosis being confirmed by post-mortem histopathological examination. In the only case in which the pregnancy was terminated at 14 weeks’ gestation, histological examination of the fetal lungs, despite them being in the early stages of development, revealed misaligned pulmonary veins in close proximity to the pulmonary arteries and bronchioles. Evidence highlights the significance of non-coding regulatory regions in the regulation of FOXF1 expression. Differential methylation patterns, and possible contributions of parental imprinting, highlight the complexity of FOXF1 regulation. Early detection through array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) or next-generation sequencing to identify point mutations in the FOXF1 gene, combined with increased awareness of ultrasound markers suggestive of the condition, could improve the accuracy of prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling. Further research into the epigenetic regulation of FOXF1 is crucial for refining recurrence risk estimates and improving genetic counseling practices.

1. Introduction

Alveolar capillary dysplasia with pulmonary vein misalignment (ACDMPV, MIM 265380) is a rare and fatal congenital disorder of lung development. This condition was first described in 1981 by Janney et al. [1], in a patient with a failure in the formation and ingrowth of alveolar capillaries. Since then, over 200 cases have been reported. A slight male predominance (60%) was initially observed [2,3], although no supporting evidence has emerged from subsequent studies.
Symptoms of ACDMPV include severe respiratory distress caused by pulmonary arterial hypertension and insufficient oxygen uptake, typically manifesting within the first 24–48 h of life in neonates born at full term with a normal Apgar score. In more than 80% of cases, ACDMPV is associated with other manifestations affecting various systems, such as the cardiovascular system (e.g., hypoplastic left heart, coarctation of the aortic arch), the gastrointestinal system (with malrotation being the most common sign), and the genitourinary system [4].
Regardless of co-morbidities, mortality is high, with most patients dying due to hypoxemic respiratory failure that is resistant to therapy within a few days to a week after disease onset or due to severe irreversible pulmonary arterial hypertension. Some patients with a milder form of ACDMPV exhibit longer survival and, in these cases, lung transplantation may be a potential option [5].
Histologically, the lung tissue in ACDMPV displays a misalignment of the pulmonary veins, characterized by their abnormal positioning in the bronchovascular bundle. Normally located within the interlobular septa, the veins are instead found outside the septa, adjacent to the pulmonary arteries. Additionally, there is medial thickening of the smooth muscle in the pulmonary arteries, leading to the formation of small peripheral arteries. Other features include hyperplasia of the alveolar epithelium, a reduction in the number of capillaries and underdevelopment of the lung lobules [2].
Histological examination is considered the gold standard for diagnosing ACDMPV and the diagnosis is typically confirmed postmortem through autopsy [2].
Heterozygous point mutations of the FOXF1 gene or deletions involving FOXF1 and/or the enhancer region at 16q24.1 are found in about 90% of cases of ACDMPV, suggesting that a haploinsufficiency mechanism involving this gene is responsible for the disease.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Review Strategy

We searched Pubmed (last assessed: March 2025) for papers describing prenatal cases with chromosome 16q24.1 deletion, focusing on reports in English and extended our search to papers mentioned in the reference lists of identified papers.
The search was performed using various combinations of the keywords: ‘prenatal microdeletion 16q24.1,’ ‘FOXF1,’ ‘cystic hygroma,’ and ‘prenatal misalignment of the pulmonary veins.
Identified patients from the literature were grouped according to the cytogenetic location of their deletions and reported symptoms were collected and counted for each group. All genetic coordinates are given in genome build hg19.

2.2. Array-CGH Analysis (Only Case 9)

Prenatal diagnosis of the fetus in case 9 was performed using routine diagnostic procedures. Informed consent signed by the parents was provided. DNAs were isolated from chorionic villus (fetus) and peripheral blood (parents) samples. Array-CGH analysis was performed using CytoSure Oligo array ISCA v2 4 × 180 K OGT( Oxford Gene Technology, Oxford, UK), resolution ~80 kb and CytoSure Interpret Software v4.11. Protocols provided by the suppliers have been followed without modification. Nucleotide designations were assigned according to the GRCh37/hg19 assembly of the human genome.
The 16q24.1 region gene content has been assessed merging the bioinformatics data from UCSC Genome Browser (available online: https://genome.ucsc.edu/ accessed on 2 February 2023), DECIPHER (available online: https://www.deciphergenomics.org/ accessed on 2 February 2023), OMIM (available online: https://www.omim.org/ accessed on 2 February 2023), and gnomAD databases (available online: https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/ accessed on 2 February 2023).

3. Results

3.1. Case 1

The first prenatal case was reported in a fetus at 18 weeks of gestation presenting with cystic hygroma, fetal hydrops, and a single umbilical artery. The family history was negative for genetic diseases, intellectual disabilities, congenital malformations, or consanguinity. A microarray analysis performed on amniotic fluid revealed a 1.1 Mb interstitial deletion in the 16q24.1 region, involving the FOXF1 and FOXC2 genes. Other deleted genes included MTHFSD, FOXL1, IRF8, COX4I1, and COX4NB, none of which are known to be associated with a specific phenotype. The pregnancy was terminated at 22 weeks of gestation. An external evaluation revealed low-set ears and soft tissue edema in the neck. Unfortunately, a histopathological examination of the lungs was not conducted [6].

3.2. Case 2

A fetus at 20 weeks of gestation was described presenting with echographic signs of an atrioventricular septal defect and a dilated bowel loop, likely due to upper gastrointestinal atresia. Karyotype analysis on amniotic fluid revealed a pericentric inversion of chromosome 16: 46,XX,inv(16)(p11.2q24)dn. Microarray analysis confirmed that the inversion was balanced. Using BAC clones from chromosome 16 in combination with dual-color FISH, one of the breakpoints was mapped to the q-arm, between the IRF8 and FOXF1 genes, at a distance of 123 to 163 kb upstream of FOXF1. This region is thought to contain regulatory elements essential for the expression of both genes. A female infant was born at 39 + 4 weeks of gestation with Apgar scores of 4 and 7. At birth, she exhibited mild respiratory distress. Postnatal evaluation confirmed the presence of an atrioventricular septal defect and dilated bowel loops. At 20 h of age, her respiratory condition deteriorated and she passed away at 66 h of life. Autopsy findings confirmed the atrioventricular septal defect and duodenal atresia, while lung biopsy findings were consistent with ACDMPV [7].

3.3. Case 3 and 4

Szafranski et al. [8] reported two fetuses; the first one showed cystic hygroma, hydronephrosis, single umbilical artery and coarctation of aorta, and 1.596 Kb deletion involving FOXF1 and the enhancer region. The second one showed bilateral hydronephrosis and 1.057 Kb deletion of both FOXF1 and the enhancer region.

3.4. Case 5

Cystic hygroma was detected in a fetus at 11 weeks of gestation. Chorionic villus sampling identified a normal female karyotype (46,XX), while microarray analysis revealed a 1.171 Mb microdeletion on 16q24.1 involving the FOXF1 gene. The paternal origin of the deletion could not be determined. Subsequent ultrasound scans detected an atrioventricular septal defect, bilateral superior vena cavae, suspected abnormal pulmonary venous return, and bowel atresia. Postnatally, the baby exhibited severe respiratory distress, suggestive of ACDMPV. An echocardiogram confirmed a complex heart malformation, characterized by a partial atrioventricular septal defect, mild atrioventricular valve insufficiency, bilateral superior vena cavae, a mildly hypoplastic distal transverse aortic arch, normal pulmonary venous return, and suprasystemic right ventricular pressure. She passed away at two days of life. A postmortem lung biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of ACDMPV [9].

3.5. Case 6

A fetus at 12 weeks of gestation with a nuchal translucency of 3.6 mm and subcutaneous edema was suspected of having a univentricular heart malformation. Chorionic villus sampling was performed to study the karyotype, which was found to be normal (46,XY). Microarray analysis identified an interstitial 1.17 Mb deletion of 16q24.1 encompassing two OMIM morbid genes: FOXF1 and IRF8. FISH analysis on the peripheral blood of the parents revealed that the deletion occurred de novo in the fetus. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated at 14 weeks of gestation. External fetal examination did not reveal facial dysmorphism. Autopsy showed severe hypoplastic left heart syndrome associated with mitral stenosis and aortic atresia. The kidneys also exhibited rare tubular and glomerular microdilations and, in the lungs, some misaligned pulmonary veins adjacent to pulmonary arteries and bronchioles were observed [10].

3.6. Case 7

Wang et al. [11] described the pregnancy of a healthy woman with no family history of congenital malformations and no consanguinity between the parents. Prenatal ultrasound at 23 + 5 weeks of gestation revealed multiple malformations, including pulmonary artery dilatation, complete atrioventricular septal defect, a common atrioventricular valve (CAV), foramen ovale closure, atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, and right heart enlargement. Additional anomalies identified included stomach dilatation, esophageal dilation, likely due to pyloric obstruction and a hypodense mass in the upper pole of the left kidney. Karyotype analysis on amniotic fluid was normal (46,XX), while microarray analysis revealed a 2.12 Mb pathogenic microdeletion in the 16q24.1 region, encompassing FOXF1, FOXC2 and other regulatory genes. The microdeletion was confirmed to have occurred de novo. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated.

3.7. Case 8

This was the third pregnancy of non-consanguineous parents with no family history of congenital malformations. A high risk of trisomy 21 (1:108) was detected through a non-invasive serum screening test. The measurement of nuchal translucency was 2.4 mm (<95th percentile) with a CRL of 71.5 mm. At 20 weeks of gestation, ultrasound revealed bilateral pyelectasis. Amniocentesis was performed and microarray analysis identified a 0.74 Mb deletion in the 16q24.1 region, encompassing FOXF1 and other OMIM genes: FOXC2, FOXL1, FENDRR, MTHFSD, LINC01081, and LINC01082. Analysis of parental blood revealed that the deletion occurred de novo on maternal chromosome 16. At 28 weeks of gestation, the fetus developed hydrops and placental hypertrophy. Labor was induced at 34 weeks of gestation. A male infant was born with an Apgar score of 1, presenting with severe respiratory distress consistent with ACDMPV and was placed under palliative care. Postmortem examination revealed right foot contracture, generalized edema, and fluid accumulation in the pleural and peritoneal cavities. The kidneys exhibited characteristics of renal dysplasia and histopathological findings in the lungs were consistent with the spectrum of ACDMPV [5].

3.8. Case 9

In our center, we identified a fetus at 11 + 5 weeks of gestation with high risk of trisomy 21 (1:4) through non-invasive serum screening test and nuchal translucency of 8 mm. Chorionic villus sampling was performed to study the karyotype, which was found to be normal (46,XX). Microarray analysis identified two deletions on chromosome 16: the first, approximately 1.08 Mb on 16p13.3, and the second, approximately 1.43 Mb on 16q24.1 (Figure 1), involving the FOXF1 and other genes: GSE1, GINS2, C16orf74, MIR1910, EMC8, COX4I1, IRF8, MIR6774, LINC01082, LINC01081, LINC02135, LINC00917, FENDRR, MTHFSD, FOXC2-AS1, FOXC2, and FOXL1 genes (Figure 2). Analysis of the peripheral blood of the parents revealed that the deletions occurred de novo in the fetus. Parental karyotype analysis excluded any structural chromosomal rearrangements in the parents. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated at 14 weeks of gestation. Unfortunately, we could not analyze if the deletion occurs in the maternal or paternal chromosome 16, due to the lack of available material.

4. Discussion

We identified nine prenatal cases with a deletion in the 16q24.1 region, all of which involved the FOXF1 gene or enhancer region. According to the literature, the main ultrasound findings emerged from about 20 weeks of gestation onward and predominantly included cardiac, renal, and intestinal malformations. In cases detected earlier (around 11–12 weeks of gestation), the primary ultrasound findings were increased nuchal translucency and cystic hygroma. In most cases where the pregnancy progressed to birth, the infants developed ACDMPV and passed away within a few days. Table 1 summarizes the main clinical and genetic features of the nine 16q24.1 deletion cases reported, with the aim of providing a comprehensive overview of the data.
FOXF1 is a member of the Forkhead Box (FOX) transcription factor superfamily and plays a crucial role in cellular proliferation and differentiation. In particular, it is essential for the proper development of the lungs, as well as the gastrointestinal and urinary tracts.
The significance of FOXF1 in the pathogenesis of alveolar capillary dysplasia with misalignment of pulmonary veins (ACDMPV) was first proposed by Stankiewicz et al. in 2009 [4]. Their research identified recurrent 16q24.1 deletions and point mutations in FOXF1 in several patients diagnosed with ACDMPV, strongly suggesting that FOXF1 plays a fundamental role in the disease.
Complete knockout mice (Foxf1 −/−) do not survive embryonic development due to severe mesodermal and vascularization defects, confirming the gene’s essential role. In contrast, heterozygous mice (Foxf1 +/−), which have only one functional copy of the gene, survive until birth but display pulmonary and gastrointestinal malformations similar to those observed in human patients with ACDMPV. These findings suggest that FOXF1 haploinsufficiency is a key mechanism underlying lung malformations [12].
Studies on mouse embryos have demonstrated that FOXF1 is already expressed in mesenchymal lung tissue, where it is regulated by the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling pathway, which is essential for pulmonary development. FOXF1, in turn, regulates the expression of several downstream genes, such as those involved in the Notch pathway, as well as endothelial and collagen genes. These are implicated in lung development, angiogenesis, and are thought to contribute to pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary fibrosis, and respiratory dysfunction. The interaction between FOXF1-SHH and other membrane proteins, such as semaphorins-neuropilin and vascular endothelial growth factors/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGF/VEGFR2), is also likely responsible for structural anomalies affecting multiple organ systems, including the heart, gastrointestinal tract, and urinary system. This complex interplay may contribute to the severe malformations observed in association with ACDMPV and suggests that FOXF1 does not act alone but likely interacts with additional signaling pathways in the disease’s pathogenesis [2,4,7,11].
In addition, the 16q24.1 chromosomal region, where FOXF1 is located, contains other genes belonging to the Forkhead transcription factor cluster, such as FOXC2 and FOXL1, which are frequently involved in deletions associated with ACDMPV. It is likely that interactions between the deleted genes influence disease severity, particularly the interplay between FOXF1, FOXC2, FOXL1, and FENDRR [11].
Interestingly, FOXC2 has been identified as the key gene responsible for Lymphedema-Distichiasis Syndrome (LDS, MIM 153400), a condition characterized by limb lymphedema and a double row of eyelashes. Mouse models with FOXC2 inactivation exhibit ventricular septal defects (VSD) and interrupted aortic arch. This finding may explain the cardiac malformations frequently observed in our revised prenatal cases. Meanwhile, FENDRR is known to regulate FOXF1 expression both in cis and trans, supporting the hypothesis that it may contribute to ACDMPV pathogenesis [11]. Fendrr (−/−) mice died either during pregnancy due to heart and body wall defects or in the perinatal period due to malformations of the lungs, heart, and gastrointestinal tract [11].
A crucial discovery in many ACDMPV cases is the presence of overlapping deletions upstream of FOXF1, affecting regulatory regions without directly involving the FOXF1 gene itself. This suggests that these upstream sequences contain important regulatory elements that influence FOXF1 expression. Among them, researchers have identified a 60 kb non-coding, evolutionarily conserved enhancer region, located approximately 272 kb upstream of FOXF1 [8,11,13,14].
This enhancer region plays a direct role in regulating FOXF1 expression by physically interacting with its promoter. It also harbors lung-specific non-coding RNA (lncRNA) genes, such as LINC01081, which has been shown to positively regulate FOXF1 expression [8]. Interestingly, this region, in addition to containing the FENDRR gene, also includes HOXA13 [11], which has been shown to be essential for placental maturation in mice and for regulating Foxf1 expression.
In the prenatal cases we reviewed, some clinical variability was observed. To date, no clear genotype–phenotype correlation or phenotypic differences between FOXF1 deletions and enhancer region deletions have been reported. It is hypothesized that this variability may be related to FOXF1 expression levels, which, in turn, could be influenced by the presence of “modifier genes” [2].
Additionally, this region exhibits differential methylation patterns, suggesting epigenetic regulation. Notably, it contains GLI2 binding sites that overlap with a differentially methylated CpG island within the intronic region of another lncRNA, LINC01082 [8]. These findings further support the idea that FOXF1 expression is tightly regulated by both genetic and epigenetic mechanisms and that disruptions in this regulatory network may contribute to ACDMPV.
Further evidence supporting the imprinting of FOXF1 comes from the observation that the 16q24.1 deletion, found in half of ACDMPV patients, occurs de novo and predominantly affects the maternal chromosome [8,13,14,15], suggesting that FOXF1 is partially paternally imprinted on the human lung.
It is well known that chromosome 16 is subject to imprinting mechanisms. Maternal uniparental disomy (UPD16) is one of the most frequently reported forms of UPD and is often associated with confined placental mosaicism with trisomy 16.
Maternal UPD16 has been linked to intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), congenital heart defects, and other malformations, whereas paternal UPD16 is generally associated with a normal phenotype or, at most, isolated IUGR [13].
Epigenetic regulation may explain the differences between maternal and paternal UPD(16). Szafranski et al. (2016) [9] proposed two distinct imprinting models for FOXF1: the paternal imprinting model, in which FOXF1 is active on the maternal allele and inactive on the paternal allele, and the maternal imprinting model, in which the activation pattern of FOXF1 is reversed.
In the paternal imprinting model, deletion of the maternal enhancer region leads to ACDMPV, whereas deletion of the paternal enhancer is benign, as the maternal chromosome remains active.
In contrast, in the maternal imprinting model, deletion of the paternal enhancer significantly reduces FOXF1 expression, resulting in embryonic lethality. Deletion of the maternal enhancer also decreases FOXF1 expression, leading to ACDMPV.
This analysis suggests that the paternal imprinting model is more likely. Supporting this hypothesis is the fact that multiple congenital malformations—such as heart defects and pulmonary hypoplasia are observed in maternal UPD(16), closely resembling ACDMPV, whereas paternal UPD(16) is generally associated with a milder phenotype.
The involvement of FOXF1 in tumor pathogenesis further supports the role of epigenetic mechanisms in cancer. In invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast, FOXF1 is frequently hypermethylated and consequently silenced, suggesting a potential tumor suppressor function. Conversely, other studies propose that FOXF1 may act as an oncogene in the metastatic progression of breast cancer [12,16,17]. To date, however, there is no unanimous consensus regarding the precise role of FOXF1 in cancer development.

5. Conclusions

A comprehensive understanding of the molecular and epigenetic mechanisms involving FOXF1 and the 16q24.1 deletion, together with the recognition of the prenatal ultrasound features associated with ACDMPV, could significantly clarify the etiopathogenesis of the disease. This could improve our knowledge of the disease, enabling specialists to develop better management strategies and provide parents with comprehensive information on prognosis and recurrence risk through informed genetic counseling. Unfortunately, to date, the definitive diagnosis of ACDMPV still depends on histopathological lung examination and, due to the extreme severity and poor prognosis of the condition, is often performed post-mortem. However, the presence of cardiac, renal, and gastrointestinal malformations, as well as increased nuchal translucency/cystic hygroma/fetal hydrops in the first trimester, frequently observed in association with ACDMPV, should raise suspicion and prompt invasive prenatal testing. This includes both fetal karyotyping and array-CGH analysis. These are in accordance with the joint recommendations of the Italian Society of Human Genetics (SIGU) and the Italian Society of Obstetric and Gynecological Ultrasound (SIEOG) (2017). The recommendations are regarding the use of arrays in prenatal diagnosis for ultrasound-detected malformations, particularly when anomalies are nonspecific and not suggestive of a specific genetic condition. The use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques is not currently included in these recommendations, but it may be considered when clinically indicated. Early identification of a deletion involving the FOXF1 gene is crucial for planning appropriate perinatal clinical management. It also empowers parents to make informed decisions based on their individual context and prepares them for the possible evolution of the disease.
The hypothesis that FOXF1 is regulated by epigenetic mechanisms is a crucial element that could significantly impact the estimated recurrence risk of ACDMPV. If epigenetic mechanisms are indeed involved, the recurrence risk may be higher than that observed in other cases caused by de novo microdeletions. Further research is therefore essential to clarify this aspect and improve genetic counseling.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.F. and D.Z.; methodology, A.Z. and V.F.; validation, V.F. and A.Z.; investigation, V.F., A.Z., P.C., N.G. and D.S.; resources, V.F., I.G., and A.Z.; data curation, V.F., F.C. and A.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, V.F.; writing—review and editing, V.F., A.Z., A.B. and I.G.; visualization, V.F., R.B., B.M. and A.Z.; supervision, D.Z.; project administration, D.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study. because it retrospectively analyzed data obtained from routine diagnostic procedures.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Janney, C.G.; Askin, F.B.; Kuhn, C. Congenital Alveolar Capillary Dysplasia—An Unusual Cause of Respiratory Distress in the Newborn. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1981, 76, 722–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Slot, E.; Edel, G.; Cutz, E.; van Heijst, A.; Post, M.; Schnater, M.; Wijnen, R.; Tibboel, D.; Rottier, R.; de Klein, A. Alveolar Capillary Dysplasia with Misalignment of the Pulmonary Veins: Clinical, Histological, and Genetic Aspects. Pulm. Circ. 2018, 8, 2045894018795143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bishop, N.B.; Stankiewicz, P.; Steinhorn, R.H. Alveolar Capillary Dysplasia. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 184, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Stankiewicz, P.; Sen, P.; Bhatt, S.S.; Storer, M.; Xia, Z.; Bejjani, B.A.; Ou, Z.; Wiszniewska, J.; Driscoll, D.J.; Maisenbacher, M.K.; et al. Genomic and Genic Deletions of the FOX Gene Cluster on 16q24.1 and Inactivating Mutations of FOXF1 Cause Alveolar Capillary Dysplasia and Other Malformations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 84, 780–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bzdęga, K.; Kutkowska-Kaźmierczak, A.; Deutsch, G.H.; Plaskota, I.; Smyk, M.; Niemiec, M.; Barczyk, A.; Obersztyn, E.; Modzelewski, J.; Lipska, I.; et al. Prenatal Detection of a FOXF1 Deletion in a Fetus with ACDMPV and Hydronephrosis. Genes 2023, 14, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Garabedian, M.J.; Wallerstein, D.; Medina, N.; Byrne, J.; Wallerstein, R.J. Prenatal Diagnosis of Cystic Hygroma Related to a Deletion of 16q24.1 with Haploinsufficiency of FOXF1 and FOXC2 Genes. Case Rep. Genet. 2012, 2012, 490408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Parris, T.; Nik, A.M.; Kotecha, S.; Langston, C.; Helou, K.; Platt, C.; Carlsson, P. Inversion Upstream of FOXF1 in a Case of Lethal Alveolar Capillary Dysplasia with Misalignment of Pulmonary Veins. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2013, 161A, 764–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Szafranski, P.; Gambin, T.; Dharmadhikari, A.V.; Akdemir, K.C.; Jhangiani, S.N.; Schuette, J.; Godiwala, N.; Yatsenko, S.A.; Sebastian, J.; Madan-Khetarpal, S.; et al. Pathogenetics of Alveolar Capillary Dysplasia with Misalignment of Pulmonary Veins. Hum. Genet. 2016, 135, 569–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Prothro, S.L.; Plosa, E.; Markham, M.; Szafranski, P.; Stankiewicz, P.; Killen, S.A.S. Prenatal Diagnosis of Alveolar Capillary Dysplasia with Misalignment of Pulmonary Veins. J. Pediatr. 2016, 170, 317–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Puisney-Dakhli, C.; Gubana, F.; Petit, F.; Bouchghoul, H.; Gautier, V.; Martinovic, J.; Tachdjian, G.; Receveur, A. Early Prenatal Diagnosis of Alveolar Capillary Dysplasia with Misalignment of Pulmonary Veins Due to a 16q24.1 Deletion. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2021, 185, 1494–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wang, X.; Guo, L.; Zhang, B.; Wu, J.; Sun, Y.; Tao, H.; Sha, J.; Zhai, J.; Liu, M. Haploinsufficiencies of FOXF1, FOXC2 and FOXL1 Genes Originated from Deleted 16q24.1q24.2 Fragment Related with Alveolar Capillary Dysplasia with Misalignment of Pulmonary Veins and Lymphedema-Distichiasis Syndrome: Relationship to Phenotype. Mol. Cytogenet. 2022, 15, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dharmadhikari, A.V.; Szafranski, P.; Kalinichenko, V.V.; Stankiewicz, P. Genomic and Epigenetic Complexity of the FOXF1 Locus in 16q24.1: Implications for Development and Disease. Curr. Genom. 2015, 16, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yıldız Bölükbaşı, E.; Karolak, J.A.; Gambin, T.; Szafranski, P.; Deutsch, G.H.; Stankiewicz, P. Do Paternal Deletions Involving the FOXF1 Locus on Chromosome 16q24.1 Manifest with More Severe Non-Lung Anomalies? Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2022, 65, 104519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Alsina Casanova, M.; Monteagudo-Sánchez, A.; Rodiguez Guerineau, L.; Court, F.; Gazquez Serrano, I.; Martorell, L.; Rovira Zurriaga, C.; Moore, G.E.; Ishida, M.; Castañon, M.; et al. Maternal Mutations of FOXF1 Cause Alveolar Capillary Dysplasia despite Not Being Imprinted. Hum. Mutat. 2017, 38, 615–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Szafranski, P.; Herrera, C.; Proe, L.A.; Coffman, B.; Kearney, D.L.; Popek, E.; Stankiewicz, P. Narrowing the FOXF1 Distant Enhancer Region on 16q24.1 Critical for ACDMPV. Clin. Epigenet. 2016, 8, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lo, P.-K.; Lee, J.S.; Liang, X.; Han, L.; Mori, T.; Fackler, M.J.; Sadik, H.; Argani, P.; Pandita, T.K.; Sukumar, S. Epigenetic Inactivation of the Potential Tumor Suppressor Gene FOXF1 in Breast Cancer. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 6047–6058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wendling, D.S.; Lück, C.; von Schweinitz, D.; Kappler, R. Characteristic Overexpression of the Forkhead Box Transcription Factor Foxf1 in Patched-Associated Tumors. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2008, 22, 787–792. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Molecular cytogenetic analyses: array-CGH profile of chromosome 16 of case 9. The red bar highlights the region of the detected deletion.
Figure 1. Molecular cytogenetic analyses: array-CGH profile of chromosome 16 of case 9. The red bar highlights the region of the detected deletion.
Genes 16 00873 g001
Figure 2. Physical map of the 16q24.1 region (nucleotides 85,586,504 to 87,015,205, GRCh37/hg19) adapted from UCSC Genome Browser, region involved in the microdeletions of case 9. All coding genes included in this region are annotated.
Figure 2. Physical map of the 16q24.1 region (nucleotides 85,586,504 to 87,015,205, GRCh37/hg19) adapted from UCSC Genome Browser, region involved in the microdeletions of case 9. All coding genes included in this region are annotated.
Genes 16 00873 g002
Table 1. Summary of reported prenatal cases with 16q24.1 deletion involving the FOXF1 gene. Gestational weeks (GW) at the time of diagnosis, ultrasound (US), alveolar capillary dysplasia with misalignment of pulmonary veins (ACDMPV), unknown (UNK), and common atrioventricular valve (CAV). The letter X indicates that the FOXF1 gene/Enhancer region is involved in the deletion.
Table 1. Summary of reported prenatal cases with 16q24.1 deletion involving the FOXF1 gene. Gestational weeks (GW) at the time of diagnosis, ultrasound (US), alveolar capillary dysplasia with misalignment of pulmonary veins (ACDMPV), unknown (UNK), and common atrioventricular valve (CAV). The letter X indicates that the FOXF1 gene/Enhancer region is involved in the deletion.
CaseGW US FindingsPostnatal
Investigation
Postnatal FindingsSizeFOXF1Enhancer
Region
Other OMIM Genes
118Cystic hygroma, fetal hydrops, single umbilical arteryDysmorphologic evaluation after deathLow-set ears and edema of the soft tissues in the neck1.1 MbXXMTHFSD, FOXL1, IRF8, COX4I1, COX4NB
220Atrioventricular septal defect, dilated bowel loopsDysmorphologic evaluation after death,
postnatal autopsy,
Histopathological assessment of postmortem lung tissue
Atrioventricular septal defects, dilated bowel loops, duodenal atresia, ACDMPV-XXIRF8
3UNKCystyic hygroma and hydronefrosis, single umbilical artery and aortic coartationUNKUNK1.596 KbXXCOX4I1, EMC8, FENDRR, FOXC2, FOXL1, IRF8, LINC01081, LINC01082, MTHFSD
4UNKBilateral hydronefrosisUNKUNK1.057 KbXXFENDRR, FOXC2, FOXL1, LINC01081, LINC01082, MTHFSD
511Cystic hygroma, atrioventricular septal defect, Bilateral superior vena cavae, suspected abnormal pulmonary venous return, bowel atresiaPostnatal echocardiogram, lung histologic exam on chest autopsyRespiratory distress, partial atrioventricular septal defect, mild atrioventricular valve insufficiency, Bilateral superior vena cavae, hypoplastic aortic arch, ACDMPV1.171 MbX FENDRR, FOXC2, FOXL1, LINC01081, LINC01082, MTHFSD
612Increased fetal nuchal translucency (3.6 mm), subcutaneous edema, suspected univentricular heart malformationFetal autopsy, histopathological assessment of postmortem lung and kidney tissue Hypoplastic left heart syndrome, mitral stenosis and aortic atresia, tubular and glomerular microdilatation, ACDMPV1.17 MbXXCOX4I1, EMC8, FENDRR, GINS2, GSE1, IRF8, LINC01081, LINC01082, MTHFSD
723 + 5Pulmonary artery dilatation, complete atrioventricular septal defect, CAV, foramen ovale closure, atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, right heart enlargement, pyloric obstruction, kidney hypodense massUNKUNK2.12 MbX COX4I1, EMC8, FENDRR, FOXC2, FOXL1, GINS2, GSE1, IRF8, LINC01081, LINC01082, MTHFSD
820Bilateral pyelectasis, Hydrops, placental hypertrophyFetal autopsy, histopathological assessment of postmortem lung and kidney tissueRespiratory distress, ACDMPV, right foot contracture, generalized edema, pleural and peritoneal fluid accumulation, renal dysplasia0.74 MbX FENDRR, FOXC2, FOXL1, LINC01081, LINC01082, MTHFSD
911 + 5increased fetal nuchal translucency (8 mm)Not performedUNK1.43 MbX COX4I1, EMC8, FENDRR, FOXC2, FOXL1, GINS2, GSE1, IRF8, LINC01081, LINC01082, MTHFSD
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fumini, V.; Bonora, R.; Busciglio, A.; Cartisano, F.; Celli, P.; Gabbiato, I.; Guercini, N.; Mancini, B.; Saccilotto, D.; Zilio, A.; et al. Prenatal Rare 16q24.1 Deletion Between Genomics and Epigenetics: A Review. Genes 2025, 16, 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16080873

AMA Style

Fumini V, Bonora R, Busciglio A, Cartisano F, Celli P, Gabbiato I, Guercini N, Mancini B, Saccilotto D, Zilio A, et al. Prenatal Rare 16q24.1 Deletion Between Genomics and Epigenetics: A Review. Genes. 2025; 16(8):873. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16080873

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fumini, Valentina, Romina Bonora, Anna Busciglio, Francesca Cartisano, Paola Celli, Ilaria Gabbiato, Nicola Guercini, Barbara Mancini, Donatella Saccilotto, Anna Zilio, and et al. 2025. "Prenatal Rare 16q24.1 Deletion Between Genomics and Epigenetics: A Review" Genes 16, no. 8: 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16080873

APA Style

Fumini, V., Bonora, R., Busciglio, A., Cartisano, F., Celli, P., Gabbiato, I., Guercini, N., Mancini, B., Saccilotto, D., Zilio, A., & Zuccarello, D. (2025). Prenatal Rare 16q24.1 Deletion Between Genomics and Epigenetics: A Review. Genes, 16(8), 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16080873

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop