Next Article in Journal
Landscape of Noncoding RNA in the Hypoxic Tumor Microenvironment
Previous Article in Journal
The Prevalence of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of the AOC1 Gene Associated with Diamine Oxidase (DAO) Enzyme Deficiency in Healthy Newborns: A Prospective Population-Based Cohort Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Differentially Expressed Genes in Cardiomyocytes of the First Camelized Mouse Model, Nrapc.255ins78 Mouse

1
Department of Animal Sciences, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea
2
Laboratory of Theriogenology, Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Biological Science, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2025, 16(2), 142; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16020142
Submission received: 31 December 2024 / Revised: 20 January 2025 / Accepted: 22 January 2025 / Published: 24 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: The first camelized mouse model (Nrapc.255ins78) was developed to investigate the mechanisms underlying camels’ adaptation to extreme environments. Previous studies demonstrated that these mice exhibit a cold-resistant phenotype, characterized by increased expression of inflammatory cytokine-related genes in the heart under cold stress. Nebulin-related anchoring protein (NRAP) plays a critical role in organizing myofibrils during cardiomyocyte development. This study builds on prior research by analyzing the heart transcriptomes of Nrapc.255ins78 mice under non-stress conditions to explore the origins of inflammatory cytokine responses during cold exposure. Methods: RNA sequencing was performed on the hearts of 12-week-old male and female Nrapc.255ins78 and wild-type control mice. Results: Differential expression analysis identified 25 genes, including 12 associated with cell cycle and division, all consistently downregulated in Nrapc.255ins78. Notably, the calcium and integrin-binding protein gene (Cib3) was significantly upregulated (FDR < 0.05; p < 0.001). Conclusions: These differentially expressed genes suggest altered calcium dynamics in cardiomyocytes and mechanisms for maintaining homeostasis, supporting the hypothesis that inflammatory cytokines during cold exposure may represent an adaptive response. These findings provide valuable insights into the genetic mechanisms of temperature adaptation in camels and highlight potential pathways for enhancing stress resistance in other mammals.

1. Introduction

Camels are unique mammals that have adapted remarkably to extreme environmental conditions, thriving in harsh habitats like deserts [1]. Camelid genomes have been studied to uncover the genetic mechanisms driving their evolution and adaptation to harsh desert environments [2,3]. However, our understanding of the genetic variations that drive environmental adaptation in camels remains incomplete.
Our previous research identified that exon 4 of the NRAP gene in camels plays a significant role in cold resistance. Specifically, the Nrapc.255ins78 variant in mice exhibits a unique expression in the heart, where it enhances inflammatory cytokine production under cold stress, thereby contributing to temperature resilience [4]. NRAP plays a vital role in muscle structure and function, with a mutation at amino acid residue 100 potentially contributing to survival in extreme northern environments [5], and cytokine expression is known to change in mammals exposed to cold [6,7]. For instance, cold exposure has been reported to increase interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-6 levels in cold-resistant humans [8], while in mice, cold stress elevates tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and IL-6 levels [9].
These findings suggest a greater upregulation of inflammatory cytokines in Nrapc.255ins78 mice compared to wild-type mice. To investigate these cytokine mechanisms, this study analyzes changes in the heart transcriptome of Nrapc.255ins78 mice under non-stress conditions using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). RNA-seq is a widely used tool for analyzing transcriptomic changes in organs influenced by internal and external environments [10,11,12,13]. This approach, comparing the differentially expressed gene set under normal conditions, may provide insights into the cytokine expression pathways observed in the heart under cold stress. Ultimately, this study could further contribute to our understanding of temperature adaptation mechanisms in camels and environmental stress adaptation in various mammals.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

The Nrapc.255ins78 mice were generated by the GEM center in Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea), according to a previous study [4], while the C57BL/6N mice were purchased from Orientbio Inc. (Sungnam, Republic of Korea). Both the Nrapc.255ins78 and the wild-type mice, which were used as controls, have a C57BL/6N background and were housed at the GEM center of Macrogen Inc. in a specific pathogen-free environment. The temperature and humidity of the breeding environment were maintained at 22 ± 1 °C and 50%, respectively, with a 12 h light/dark cycle. All feed, individually ventilated cages, and air conditioners were sterilized, with the air being filtered through strainers.

2.2. RNA-Seq

To investigate gender-based differences in gene expression, twelve-week-old Nrapc.255ins78 homozygous mice (2 males and 2 females) were used, along with twelve-week-old wild-type mice (2 males and 2 females) as controls. The excised hearts were photographed to confirm phenotypic characteristics, and total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis and Burlington, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Detailed RNA sequencing procedures were reported previously [4].

2.3. Differentially Expressed Gene (DEG) Analyses

The quality of raw read data for each sample was assessed using FastQC software v0.11.7. Adaptor trimming was conducted with Trimmomatic v0.38, based on quality results. The trimmed reads were then aligned to the reference genome (GRCm39) from the Ensembl genome browser using HISAT2 v2.1.0. Raw counts for each library were calculated based on the exons in Mus musculus GTF v110 (Ensembl) using the featureCounts function of the Subread package v1.6.3. DEG analysis was conducted using edgeR v3.26.5, with raw counts normalized via the TMM (Trimmed Mean of M-values) method. DEGs were identified in the hearts of Nrapc.255ins78 mice compared to wild-type mice, using a false discovery rate (FDR) of < 0.05 and an absolute log2 fold-change (FC) threshold of ≥ 1. A multidimensional scaling (MDS) plot analysis was also performed to illustrate the sample clustering.

2.4. Gene Ontology (GO) Functional Enrichment Analysis

The identified DEGs were annotated with GO terms using DAVID (Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery) v2024q1 [14]. GO annotations were conducted across the categories of Biological Processes (BP), Cellular Components (CC), and Molecular Functions (MF), using thresholds of p-value < 0.05 and counts ≥ 2. Enriched GO terms were grouped with similar terms and visualized in a bubble plot, displaying −log10 p-value and fold enrichment.

2.5. Interaction Network Construction

A network based on the DEGs was constructed using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) in Cytoscape v3.10.2. The interaction score was set to 0.4, representing a medium confidence level.

2.6. RT-qPCR Validation

Reverse transcription–quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed using the SYBR Green PCR mix (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) to validate the RNA-seq results. Actb (β-actin) was used as a control for normalization. The relative quantification of mRNA expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method, and results were presented as the average relative fold change. The primer sequences and amplification temperatures are provided in Table S1.

2.7. Statistics

RNA-seq data analysis and visualization were conducted using R statistical software v4.3.3. The qPCR experiments were independently repeated three times, and the values were presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was evaluated using a paired t-test, with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Data Processing and Transcriptomes

The average overall mapping rate was 99.15%, and the average unique mapping rate was 72.60% (Table S2). Multiclustering was observed in the MDS analysis, with the transcriptomes of each sample showing differentiation by sex and genotype (Figure 1A). DEG analysis was conducted by comparing expression levels, which were visualized in a volcano plot (FDR < 0.05, absolute log2FC ≥ 1) (Figure 1B). In total, 25 DEGs were identified in the heart tissue, with 7 upregulated and 18 downregulated (Table S3).

3.2. Functional Annotations

Functional enrichment analysis was conducted based on GO terms in heart tissue and visualized with a bubble plot (Figure 1C). The most significantly enriched BP included cell division (GO:0051301; p-value = 8.78 × 10−10; FDR = 1.21 × 10−7) and cell cycle (GO:0007049; p-value = 1.30 × 10−9; FDR = 1.21 × 10−7). A comprehensive list and detailed values for each GO term are provided in Table S4.

3.3. Expression Pattern and Validation

We visualized the expression patterns of the 25 DEGs across all samples in a heatmap (Figure 2A) and performed a co-expression network analysis to examine interactions among genes identified in enriched GO terms (Figure 2B). The network analysis revealed interactions based on the GO terms “cell division” and “cell cycle”. Within this network, the Kif11 gene displayed a text-mining association with Cib3, which was identified as an upregulated gene.
To confirm the reliability of the RNA-seq data, we selected three upregulated genes (Cib3, Aldob, Rtn4r), four downregulated genes (Ccnb1, Kif11, Aspm, Ncapg), and two non-significant genes (Nrap, Spkh2) for validation. The expression levels of all genes closely matched the transcriptome analysis results (Figure 2C).

4. Discussion

In mammals, the heart is a critical organ for regulating body temperature and circulating blood to accommodate sudden physiological changes [15,16,17]. In this study, we grouped the heart transcriptomes of Nrapc.255ins78 and wild-type mice by genotype and sex.
MDS visualization revealed transcriptomic differences across the groups (Figure 1A), and the distinct expression patterns grouped by Nrap genotype and biological sex suggest that Nrap expression may have different effects depending on sex. Understanding how genetic variations influence sex-specific cardiac physiology will be highly significant [18], and gene expression differences based on sex remain an important area for further investigation in future studies. In this study, we focused on examining expression differences influenced by the Nrap genotype.
Functional annotation of the 25 DEGs revealed significant associations with the GO terms “cell cycle” and “cell division” (Figure 1C). Notably, all 12 genes (Kif11, Anln, Ccnb1, Kntc1, Kif23, Ncapg, Aspm, Mki67, Pimreg, Knl1, Top2a, Nr4a3) associated with cell cycle and division terms were consistently downregulated in Nrapc.255ins78 mice (Figure 2A,B). Nr4a3 enhances glycolytic activity by directly binding to the promoter regions of two glycolysis-related genes, Aldoa and Pfkl, thereby driving their transcriptional initiation [19]. Given the heart’s continuous workload and its high demand for energy metabolism [17], the reduced expression of Nr4a3 in Nrapc.255ins78 mice may contribute to metabolic differences compared to wild-type mice.
The DEG network highlights interactions among 12 genes involved in cell cycle and division, with Cib3 (calcium and integrin-binding protein 3) linked to Kif11 (Figure 2B). Cib3 was the most significantly upregulated gene in Nrapc.255ins78 mice (Figure 2C, Table S3) and is part of the CIB protein family, which includes Cib1, Cib2, and Cib4 [20]. CIB proteins are small EF-hand calcium-binding proteins that interact with a wide range of biological targets [21]. Notably, both Cib2 and Cib3 show expression in certain overlapping tissues, including the heart [22]. CIB proteins in various tissues across organisms suggest involvement in diverse biochemical processes, initially linked to the interaction with not only integrin but also many other proteins in intracellular and extracellular signaling [23,24,25,26,27]. CIB3 protein can functionally substitute for CIB2 [23]. While the functions of other CIB proteins are better understood, Cib3 remains relatively unexplored, making its high expression levels in Nrapc.255ins78 mice particularly intriguing—especially since no differences were observed in the expression levels of Cib1 and Cib2. The amino acid homology between camel and mouse CIB3 was found to be exceptionally high at 92%, with the coding sequence also being identical at 564 bp (Figure S1). This suggests the possibility that the same mechanism observed in Nrapc.255ins78 mice could also occur in camels.
Inflammatory cytokines have been observed in mammals exposed to cold stress [6,7,8,9] and are known to regulate calcium influx by modulating calcium levels within cellular organelles and the nucleus [28,29]. Calcium signaling begins with the influx of calcium from the extracellular space or its release from the endoplasmic reticulum or mitochondria [30]. Calcium influx into the mitochondria regulates the citric acid cycle to promote ATP production [31]. Maintaining appropriate calcium levels in the heart is crucial for preserving cytoplasmic calcium homeostasis through ATPase pumps, as excessive calcium in cardiomyocytes can increase the heart rate, leading to cell necrosis and apoptosis [32,33]. Although our analysis alone cannot establish a causal relationship between cell proliferation and Cib3 upregulation, the observed inhibition of cell cycle and division genes in Nrapc.255ins78 mouse hearts suggests altered calcium intracellular signaling pathways [30,34].
The transcriptome analysis did not identify a differential expression of the Nrap gene, but the qPCR results indicated a slight increase in its expression (Figure 2C). The NRAP is a Z-disk protein with nebulin-like super-repetitive sequences, and it plays a crucial role in myofibril formation [35,36]. Nebulin can bind to calmodulin (CaM) and regulate calcium release in the skeletal muscle [37,38]. The predictions of the domains and protein structure of Nrapc.255ins78 suggest that there are structural and functional alterations in the protein [4]. Although further in-depth analysis of the protein structure is necessary, this change in the domain structure of the Nrapc.255ins78 protein may lead to altered interactions with proteins like CaM, potentially affecting calcium levels in cardiomyocytes [39].
Transgenic mice with a cardiac-specific overexpression of the human DSC2 developed severe cardiomyopathy shortly after birth, with significantly reduced fractional shortening and ejection fractions [40]. Despite the downregulation of genes involved in cell cycle and division, the hearts of Nrapc.255ins78 mice did not significantly differ in size from those of wild-type mice (Figure S2). Our findings show that downregulated genes such as Angptl4, Ccnb1, Mki67, and Top2a are known to be influenced by YAP/TAZ signaling, and they function as transcriptional co-activators, primarily mediating the Hippo signaling pathway but also involved in other signaling pathways that control tissue growth and organ size [41,42]. While the precise mechanisms of YAP/TAZ remain unclear, compensatory effects on actin cytoskeleton stability may have helped to maintain organ size under these conditions [43]. Based on these findings, future studies should include histological staining, heart rate measurements, and blood composition analyses, such as calcium concentration assessments, to better understand the physiological effects of the molecular mechanisms in Nrapc.255ins78 mice when trying to emulate camels’ cold adaptation.

5. Conclusions

The heart transcriptomes of Nrapc.255ins78 mice under non-stress conditions revealed consistent downregulation of cell proliferation-related genes alongside a significant upregulation of the Cib3 gene. These findings suggest a homeostatic response within cardiomyocytes to altered calcium dynamics, ultimately indicating heightened cytokine sensitivity compared to the wild-type group. This study provides foundational insights into temperature adaptation mechanisms, broadening the understanding of the NRAP gene’s exon 4 function beyond camels.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes16020142/s1, Figure S1: Alignment of Cib3 amino acid sequences between mouse and camel; Figure S2: Comparison of heart tissue Nrapc.255ins75 and wild-type mice; Table S1: RT-qPCR primer sequences; Table S2: Overview of data process for RNA-seq; Table S3: DEG profiling; Table S4: Functional annotations based on identified DEGs.

Author Contributions

S.-Y.L. and K.-S.K.: conceptualization; investigation; S.-Y.L., B.-Y.L. and K.-S.K.: formal analysis. S.-Y.L. and K.-S.K.: writing—original draft. S.-Y.L., B.L., G.J., J.-S.C. and X.-S.C.: methodology; data curation. S.-Y.L. and K.-S.K.: writing—review and editing. K.-S.K. acquired funding and supervised the project. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea, with a grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. 2020R1A4A1017552), Republic of Korea.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal experiments, including standards of euthanasia for this study, were performed according to the Korean Food and Drug Administration (KFDA) guidelines and the relevant legal guidelines and conducted in the GEM division of Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea). The protocols were reviewed and approved by the IACUC (MS-2022-01; 10 June 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

We have submitted the RNA-seq data to the National Center of Biotechnology Information’s Sequence Read Archive under accession number PRJNA1175414.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kandeel, M.; Al-Taher, A.; Venugopala, K.N.; Marzok, M.; Morsy, M.; Nagaraja, S. Camel proteins and enzymes: A growing resource for functional evolution and environmental adaptation. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 911511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wu, H.; Guang, X.; Al-Fageeh, M.B.; Cao, J.; Pan, S.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, L.; Abutarboush, M.H.; Xing, Y.; Xie, Z.; et al. Camelid genomes reveal evolution and adaptation to desert environments. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Alvira-Iraizoz, F.; Gillard, B.T.; Lin, P.; Paterson, A.; Pauža, A.G.; Ali, M.A.; Alabsi, A.H.; Burger, P.A.; Hamadi, N.; Adem, A.; et al. Multiomic analysis of the Arabian camel (Camelus dromedarius) kidney reveals a role for cholesterol in water conservation. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lee, S.; Lee, B.; Lim, B.; Uzzaman, R.; Jang, G.; Kim, K. Exploring the importance of predicted camel NRAP exon 4 for environmental adaptation using a mouse model. Anim. Genet. 2025, 56, e13490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Buggiotti, L.; Yurchenko, A.A.; Yudin, N.S.; Vander Jagt, C.J.; Vorobieva, N.V.; Kusliy, M.A.; Vasiliev, S.K.; Rodionov, A.N.; Boronetskaya, O.I.; Zinovieva, N.A.; et al. Demographic History, Adaptation, and NRAP Convergent Evolution at Amino Acid Residue 100 in the World Northernmost Cattle from Siberia. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3093–3110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Arias, N.; Velapatiño, B.; Hung, A.; Cok, J. Cytokines expression in alpacas and llamas exposed to cold stress. Small Rumin. Res. 2016, 141, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Leon, L.R. Molecular Biology of Thermoregulation Invited Review: Cytokine regulation of fever: Studies using gene knockout mice. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002, 92, 2648–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dugue, B.; Leppaänen, E. Adaptation related to cytokines in man: Effects of regular swimming in ice-cold water. Clin. Physiol. 2000, 20, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Nie, Y.; Yan, Z.; Yan, W.; Xia, Q.; Zhang, Y. Cold exposure stimulates lipid metabolism, induces inflammatory response in the adipose tissue of mice and promotes the osteogenic differentiation of BMMSCs via the p38 MAPK pathway in vitro. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 10875–10886. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  10. Zhang, D.J.; Wang, L.; Ma, S.Z.; Ma, H.; Liu, D. Characterization of pig skeletal muscle transcriptomes in response to low temperature. Vet. Med. Sci. 2023, 9, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Li, G.; Yu, X.; Portela Fontoura, A.B.; Javaid, A.; de la Maza-Escolà, V.S.; Salandy, N.S.; Fubini, S.L.; Grilli, E.; McFadden, J.W.; Duan, J.E. Transcriptomic regulations of heat stress response in the liver of lactating dairy cows. BMC Genom. 2023, 24, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiao, D.; Ji, K.; Liu, H.; Wang, W.; Wu, X.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, H.; Hickford, J.G.H.; Degen, A.A.; et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals genes involved in thermogenesis in two cold-exposed sheep breeds. Genes 2021, 12, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, Y.; Kang, B.E.; Ryu, D.; Oh, S.W.; Oh, C.-M. Comparative Transcriptome Profiling of Young and Old Brown Adipose Tissue Thermogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huang, D.W.; Sherman, B.T.; Lempicki, R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Meijler, F.L.; Meijler, T.D. Archetype, Adaptation and the Mammalian Heart. Neth. Heart J. 2011, 19, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Torrent-Guasp, F.; Kocica, M.J.; Corno, A.F.; Komeda, M.; Carreras-Costa, F.; Flotats, A.; Cosin-Aguillar, J.; Wen, H. Towards new understanding of the heart structure and function. Eur. J. Cardio-Thorac. Surg. 2005, 27, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ma, Y.; Li, J. Metabolic Shifts during Aging and Pathology. Compr. Physiol. 2015, 5, 667–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Prajapati, C.; Koivumäki, J.; Pekkanen-Mattila, M.; Aalto-Setälä, K. Sex Differences in Heart: From Basics to Clinics. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2022, 27, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ma, W.; Jia, K.; Cheng, H.; Xu, H.; Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; Xie, H.; Sun, H.; Yi, L.; Chen, Z.; et al. Orphan Nuclear Receptor NR4A3 Promotes Vascular Calcification via Histone Lactylation. Circ. Res. 2024, 134, 1427–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Yamniuk, A.P.; Vogel, H.J. Insights into the Structure and Function of Calcium- and Integrin-Binding Proteins. Calcium Bind. Proteins 2006, 1, 150–155. [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang, H.; Bogstie, J.N.; Vogel, H.J. Biophysical and structural studies of the human calcium-and integrin-binding protein family: Understanding their functional similarities and differences. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012, 90, 646–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yu, Y.; Song, X.; Du, L.; Wang, C. Molecular Characterization of the Sheep CIB1 Gene. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2009, 36, 1799–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liang, X.; Qiu, X.; Dionne, G.; Cunningham, C.L.; Pucak, M.L.; Peng, G.; Kim, Y.H.; Lauer, A.; Shapiro, L.; Müller, U. CIB2 and CIB3 Are Auxiliary Subunits of the Mechanotransduction Channel of Hair Cells. Neuron 2021, 109, 2131–2149.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dal Cortivo, G.; Dell’orco, D. Calcium-and Integrin-Binding Protein 2 (CIB2) in Physiology and Disease: Bright and Dark Sides. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Olivieri, G.; Dal Cortivo, G.; Dal Conte, R.; Zanzoni, S.; Marino, V.; Dell’Orco, D.; Cantini, F. Structural Dynamics of Calcium and Integrin-Binding Protein 2 (CIB2) Reveal Uncommon Flexibility and Heterogeneous Calcium and Magnesium Loading. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 286, 138003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Naik, M.U.; Naik, U.P. Calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 regulates microtubule organization and centrosome segregation through polo like kinase 3 during cell cycle progression. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2011, 43, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, Z.; Miyata, H.; Kaneda, Y.; Castaneda, J.M.; Lu, Y.; Morohoshi, A.; Yu, Z.; Matzuk, M.M.; Ikawa, M. CIB4 Is Essential for the Haploid Phase of Spermatogenesis in Mice. Biol. Reprod. 2020, 103, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Clark, A.L.; Kanekura, K.; Lavagnino, Z.; Spears, L.D.; Abreu, D.; Mahadevan, J.; Yagi, T.; Semenkovich, C.F.; Piston, D.W.; Urano, F. Targeting Cellular Calcium Homeostasis to Prevent Cytokine-Mediated beta Cell Death. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ramadan, J.W.; Steiner, S.R.; O’Neill, C.M.; Nunemaker, C.S. The central role of calcium in the effects of cytokines on beta-cell function: Implications for type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Cell Calcium 2011, 50, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bootman, M.D.; Bultynck, G. Fundamentals of Cellular Calcium Signaling: A Primer. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2020, 12, a038802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Giorgi, C.; Marchi, S.; Pinton, P. The Machineries, Regulation, and Cellular Functions of Mitochondrial Calcium. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 713–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Boyman, L.; Karbowski, M.; Lederer, W.J. Regulation of Mitochondrial ATP Production: Ca2+ Signaling and Quality Control. Trends Mol. Med. 2020, 26, 21–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lai, L.; Qiu, H. The Physiological and Pathological Roles of Mitochondrial Calcium Uptake in Heart. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Iamartino, L.; Brandi, M.L. The Calcium-Sensing Receptor in Inflammation: Recent Updates. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 1059369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  35. Gehmlich, K.; Geier, C.; Osterziel, K.J.; Van der Ven, P.F.; Furst, D.O. Decreased Interactions of Mutant Muscle LIM Protein (MLP) with N-RAP and α-Actinin and Their Implication for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Cell Tissue Res. 2004, 317, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Vermij, S.H.; Abriel, H.; Van Veen, T.A.B. Refining the molecular organization of the cardiac intercalated disc. Cardiovasc. Res. 2017, 113, 259–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Patel, K.; Strong, P.N.; Dubowitz, V.; Dunn, M.J. Calmodulin-binding profiles for nebulin and dystrophin in human skeletal muscle. FEBS Lett. 1988, 234, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kahl, C.R.; Means, A.R. Regulation of Cell Cycle Progression by Calcium/Calmodulin-Dependent Pathways. Endocr. Rev. 2003, 24, 719–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yuen, M.; Ottenheijm, C.A.C. Nebulin: Big protein with big responsibilities. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 2020, 41, 103–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Brodehl, A.; Belke, D.D.; Garnett, L.; Martens, K.; Abdelfatah, N.; Rodriguez, M.; Diao, C.; Chen, Y.X.; Gordon, P.M.; Nygren, A.; et al. Transgenic Mice Overexpressing Desmocollin-2 (DSC2) Develop Cardiomyopathy Associated with Myocardial Inflammation and Fibrotic Remodeling. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  41. Cai, X.; Wang, K.C.; Meng, Z. Mechanoregulation of YAP and TAZ in Cellular Homeostasis and Disease Progression. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 673599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Halder, G.; Dupont, S.; Piccolo, S. Transduction of mechanical and cytoskeletal cues by YAP and TAZ. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 13, 591–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Totaro, A.; Panciera, T.; Piccolo, S. YAP/TAZ Upstream Signals and Downstream Responses. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018, 20, 888–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Transcriptome in the heart of Nrapc.255ins78 and wild-type mice. (A) Group clustering and multidimensional scaling (MDS). Grouping transcript frequencies between Nrapc.255ins78 and wild- type mice revealed distinct differences. (B) Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified using a volcano plot are displayed, with the x-axis representing the log2 fold change and the y-axis representing the -log10 p-value. (C) The Gene Ontology (GO) bubble plot was created based on the -log p-values and fold enrichment related to the biological processes (BP), cellular components (CC), and molecular functions (MF) terms.
Figure 1. Transcriptome in the heart of Nrapc.255ins78 and wild-type mice. (A) Group clustering and multidimensional scaling (MDS). Grouping transcript frequencies between Nrapc.255ins78 and wild- type mice revealed distinct differences. (B) Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified using a volcano plot are displayed, with the x-axis representing the log2 fold change and the y-axis representing the -log10 p-value. (C) The Gene Ontology (GO) bubble plot was created based on the -log p-values and fold enrichment related to the biological processes (BP), cellular components (CC), and molecular functions (MF) terms.
Genes 16 00142 g001
Figure 2. Expression pattern of Nrapc.255ins78 heart. (A) Heatmap for expression between all differentially expressed genes (DEGs). (B) The interactions using DEGs indicate the associations between the co-expression of each gene. (C) Verification of the RNA-seq by RT-qPCR; * and *** indicate p-value < 0.05 and p-value < 0.001, respectively.
Figure 2. Expression pattern of Nrapc.255ins78 heart. (A) Heatmap for expression between all differentially expressed genes (DEGs). (B) The interactions using DEGs indicate the associations between the co-expression of each gene. (C) Verification of the RNA-seq by RT-qPCR; * and *** indicate p-value < 0.05 and p-value < 0.001, respectively.
Genes 16 00142 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, S.-Y.; Lim, B.; Lee, B.-Y.; Jang, G.; Choi, J.-S.; Cui, X.-S.; Kim, K.-S. Differentially Expressed Genes in Cardiomyocytes of the First Camelized Mouse Model, Nrapc.255ins78 Mouse. Genes 2025, 16, 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16020142

AMA Style

Lee S-Y, Lim B, Lee B-Y, Jang G, Choi J-S, Cui X-S, Kim K-S. Differentially Expressed Genes in Cardiomyocytes of the First Camelized Mouse Model, Nrapc.255ins78 Mouse. Genes. 2025; 16(2):142. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16020142

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Sung-Yeon, Byeonghwi Lim, Bo-Young Lee, Goo Jang, Jung-Seok Choi, Xiang-Shun Cui, and Kwan-Suk Kim. 2025. "Differentially Expressed Genes in Cardiomyocytes of the First Camelized Mouse Model, Nrapc.255ins78 Mouse" Genes 16, no. 2: 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16020142

APA Style

Lee, S.-Y., Lim, B., Lee, B.-Y., Jang, G., Choi, J.-S., Cui, X.-S., & Kim, K.-S. (2025). Differentially Expressed Genes in Cardiomyocytes of the First Camelized Mouse Model, Nrapc.255ins78 Mouse. Genes, 16(2), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16020142

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop