Next Article in Journal
Drought Stress Inhibits the Accumulation of Rotenoids and the Biosynthesis of Drought-Responsive Phytohormones in Mirabilis himalaica (Edgew.) Heim Calli
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Dwarf Form of Purpleback Flying Squid (Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis) and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Family Ommastrephidae
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Retrocopies in Lepidoptera and Impact on Domestication of Silkworm
Previous Article in Special Issue
Three Mitochondrial Genomes of Chrysochroinae (Coleoptera, Buprestidae) and Phylogenetic Analyses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Complete Mitochondrial Genomes of Pluvialis fulva and Charadrius dubius with Phylogenetic Analysis of Charadriiformes

1
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Qinling Ecological Security, Shaanxi Institute of Zoology, Xi’an 710032, China
2
Shaanxi Provincial Field Observation & Research Station for Golden Monkey, Giant Panda and Biodiversity, Xi’an 723400, China
3
Baoji City Forest Musk Engineering Technology Research Center, Feng County, Baoji 721700, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2024, 15(12), 1642; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15121642
Submission received: 15 November 2024 / Revised: 19 December 2024 / Accepted: 19 December 2024 / Published: 21 December 2024

Abstract

:
Background: Plovers (Charadriidae), within the order of Charadriiformes, a group of modern birds distributed worldwide, are a frequent subject of molecular phylogenetic studies. While research on mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) variation within the family Charadriidae, especially intraspecific variation, is limited. Additionally, the monophyly of Charadrius and the phylogenetic placement of Pluvialis remain contentious. Nevertheless, recent studies utilizing complete mitogenomes from available databases to construct phylogenetic trees for Charadriidae and Charadriiformes remain scarce. Methods: This study aims to explore mitogenome variation within Charadrius dubius and clarify the phylogenetic placement of Pluvialis fulva. We sequenced the complete mitogenome of six C. dubius and one P. fulva, and all additional available mitogenomes were integrated within Charadriiformes. The average complete mitogenome length of C. dubius is 16,889 bp, and P. fulva is 16,859 bp. Results: Our results support the suggestion that the monophyly of Charadrius and P. fulva is nested within Charadriidae. The phylogenetic analysis of Charadriiformes based on mitogenomes strongly supports the recognition of three major shorebird clades: Charadrii, Lari and Scolopaci, with Lari and Scolopaci identified as sister clades. Conclusions: Our study reinforces the credibility of the inferred evolutionary relationships within Charadriidae and Charadriiformes.

1. Introduction

Shorebirds (Aves: Charadriiformes) are widely distributed globally—current taxonomic arrangements recognize 19 families and 386 species [1,2]. Within Charadriiformes, plovers (Charadriidae) represent a diverse and widespread group of birds, encompassing 71 species distributed across 12 genera. This diversity and broad ecological and behavioral adaptations make Charadriidae an intriguing subject for studying shorebird evolution [3]. Among Charadriidae, the genus Charadrius includes approximately 40 species of plovers, a diverse group of shorebirds, but the monophyly of Charadrius remains controversial. The genus Pluvialis includes four migratory species; despite their wide distribution, the phylogenetic relationships within this genus remain unresolved [2,4,5]. Specifically, there are three prominent hypotheses about the phylogenetic position of the genus Pluvialis: (i) it is sister to Charadriidae [6,7]; (ii) it is sister to Haematopidae, Recurvirostridae and Ibidorhynchidae [8,9]; and (iii) it is sister to Charadriidae, Haematopidae, Recurvirostridae and Ibidorhynchidae [10]. A recent supermatrix analysis supported the first hypothesis [2].
Mitochondrial genomes (mitogenomes) have a high evolutionary rate and maternal inheritance characteristics, making them widely used in molecular evolution and phylogenetics, especially for closely related species [11,12]. The number of complete mitogenomes has been progressively rising due to advancements in sequencing technology [13]. These genomes, with their intra- and interspecific variation, serve as valuable markers for investigating animal evolution, including humans, particularly in fields such as taxonomy, systematics, ecology and population biology [14,15]. The completed mitogenome has been determined for 183 unique sequences of 103 species in Charadriiformes. Within Charadriidae, 37 completed mitogenome records of 13 species are available in NCBI [2]. Nevertheless, intraspecific variation in plovers’ mitogenomes is rarely studied, and Pluvialis’ phylogenetic position remains unclear, along with the lack of a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of Charadriiformes based on complete mitogenomes, which remains underexplored in previous studies [2,6,9,16].
Here, we sequenced and assembled complete mitogenomes of two species (Pluvialis fulva, Charadrius dubius) from Charadriidae sampled in China. The little ringed plover, C. dubius, is widely distributed from Africa to Eurasia, with breeding grounds spanning Europe and India to East Asia. It is characterized by a black mask around its face with yellow eye rings [17]. The Pacific golden plover, P. fulva, is also a strongly migratory species [18], extending its range south to Asia, Australasia and the Pacific islands [19,20]. To investigate the intraspecific variation in C. dubius, we compared mitogenomes from multiple individuals. Additionally, we sequenced a new mitogenome of P. fulva to clarify its phylogenetic position within Charadriidae further. To ensure the robustness of the phylogenetic tree of Charadriidae and address the lack of a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of Charadriiformes based on complete mitogenomes, we constructed a phylogenetic tree using all available complete mitogenomes of Charadriiformes from GenBank (Until 26 June 2024) [2,6]. Our study provides a solid framework for understanding evolutionary dynamics and relationships of plovers and shorebirds.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Specimen Collection and DNA Extraction

This study collected specimens from natural populations, with pectoral muscle samples preserved in 95% ethanol (Table 1). Total genomic DNA was extracted from the muscle tissue using the Rapid Animal Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The mitogenomes were assembled using low-coverage next-generation sequencing. We collected all available sequences of Charadriiformes. It should be noted that among the sequences we collected, five sequences were deleted in the phylogenetic analysis. The specific accession numbers and reasons for removing these sequences are stated in Table S1. A total of 114 sequences from 86 species were included in the phylogenetic analysis (Table S1).

2.2. Library Preparation and Sequencing

Biomarker Technologies (Biomarker Technologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) performed DNA library construction and sequencing. On the Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), 350 bp paired-end libraries with 150 bp read length were constructed and sequenced. Each sample generated an average of 2 Gb of raw data. Sequencing reads from seven individuals were cleaned by removing adapter sequences and low-quality reads.

2.3. Mitogenome Assembly and Annotation

Geneious Prime (version 2022.1.1) was used to manually assemble each mitogenome using the overlap–layout–consensus approach [21], which consists of firstly identifying overlaps (O) between reads, secondly constructing a layout (L) based on overlaps and, finally, deriving the consensus (C) sequence from the layout. The process involved several iterations of mapping with suitable mismatch rates. The initial mapping was performed against a reference mitogenome, while subsequent mappings were conducted using the progressively lengthening mitochondrial sequence. The gene-coding sequences, tRNAs and rRNAs were annotated using Mitos2 [22], and the reference data selected were metazoa, with the vertebrate mitochondrial genetic code specified. The annotations were manually examined in Geneious Prime (version 2022.1.1) [21]. Proksee was used to generate the mitogenome map (https://irscope.shinyapps.io/Chloroplot/, accessed on 23 May 2024). The mitogenome sequence of grey plover Pluvialis squatarola (accession number: MT561267) was used as a reference [23].

2.4. Comparative Mitogenomic Analyses

Based on the following formulas, we estimated compositional skewness levels: AT skew = (A − T)/(A + T) and GC skew = (G − C)/(G + C). PhyloSuite was used to calculate nucleotide composition and relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) [24]. Based on the following formulas, we estimated compositional skewness levels: AT skew = (A − T)/(A + T) and GC skew = (G − C)/(G + C). Ka and Ks rates and nucleotide diversity (Pi) for each PCG within Charadriidae were calculated using the kaks function from the R package seqinr [25] and the nuc.div function from the R package pegas [26], respectively.

2.5. Mitogenomic Phylogenetic Analyses

We first searched and downloaded all available mitogenome sequences of Charadriiformes from NCBI. In total, 114 sequences were included in the phylogenetic analyses, comprising 118 complete mitochondrial sequences from Charadriiformes, representing 45 genera and 13 families, and an outgroup sequence from Balearica regulorum of the Gruiformes. Among these sequences, 107 were obtained from NCBI, and 7 were generated in this study. Based on a genome-scale analyses [27], which identified Gruiformes as the sister group to shorebirds, B. regulorum from the Gruiformes was assigned as the outgroup, following the methodology described by Černý and Natale [2]. A detailed description of the samples used in the phylogenetic analysis is provided in Table S1.
Geneious Prime (version 2022.1.1) was used to extract the sequences of 13 mitochondrial protein-coding genes (CDSs) from all 114 mitogenomes [21]. For each gene, transitional alignment was performed using default parameters in MUSCLE [28]. Concatenated alignments were partitioned by gene and codon position, and the best substitution model was selected using ModelFinder [29] in IQ-TREE v2.0.622 (option -m MFP + MERGE). Node support values were calculated using an ultrafast bootstrap approximation [30] with 1000 replicates (option -B 1000). A total of 13 PCGs were partitioned using PartitionFinder2 (Lanfear et al., 2016), offering partitions by gene and codon. We used MrBayes v3.2.7 [31] to perform the Bayesian inference (BI) analysis, implementing two independent runs with four concurrent Markov chains for 10,000,000 generations, with sampling every 1000 generations. The convergence and mixing of the chains of each analysis were evaluated using Tracer v1.7.1 [32] to check that the ESS values were all superior to 200. Phylogenetic trees were visualized and annotated using ggtree v3.13.0 [33].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. C. dubius and P. fulva Mitogenome Structure and Organization

We assembled seven mitogenomes of two species for the Charadriidae, including six C. dubius and one P. fulva (Figure 1; Table 1 and Table 2). All seven mitogenomes were complete. Six specimens of C. dubius and one specimen of P. fulva sequenced in this study all have circular double-stranded DNA molecules, each comprising 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), two ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), 22 transfer RNAs (tRNAs) and a noncoding D-loop region (Figure 1). A total of 12 of the 13 PCGs and 14 of the 22 tRNAs were encoded by the J-strand. The remaining eight genes were encoded by the minority strand (N-strand) (Figure 1). All seven mitogenomes in this study had a D-loop region located between tRNA (Glu) and tRNA (Phe) (Figure 1), which was consistent with most bird mitogenomes [34].
The length of C. dubius mitogenomes in this study ranged from 16,883 bp (No. 40) to 16,926 bp (No. 146), similar to C. dubius sequenced in a previous study (16,864 bp, Table 2) [35]. The mitochondrial DNA sequences (without D-loop region) of the six C. dubius samples are 15,538, 15,539, 15,522, 15,517, 15,497 and 15,494 bp in size, respectively. The gene arrangements of these six Charadrius mitogenomes were very conserved and highly consistent with the previously sequenced C. dubius (Figure 1). We did not find mitochondrial gene rearrangements in C. dubius, which is consistent with most investigations in birds [36]. The overall GC content was similar for the six mitogenomes of C. dubius with an average of 44.6% (Table 2). No significant differences in GC content were found between protein-coding genes, tRNA and rRNA. We found substantial differences in the GC content of rRNA in the mitogenomes of C. dubius individuals from different locations. For example, the GC content for individuals with protein-coding genes, rRNA genes and tRNA genes was 45.6%, 45.7% and 45.5%, respectively. These slight variations may reflect selective pressures from different environments, potentially affecting genome stability and function [36,37]. Additionally, variations in GC content could result from differential mutation rates and selection pressures [36]. Identifying these differences provided a deeper understanding into mitogenome adaptive and evolutionary dynamics.
The total length of the mitogenome of P. fulva was 16,859 bp. Excluding the D-loop region, the length was 15,541 bp, similar to the length of 15,538 bp reported in a previous study [6]. The gene arrangement in the mitogenome of P. fulva was extremely conserved and consistent with that of a previously reported mitogenome of this species (NC_033966) [18].

3.2. Codon Usage

C. dubius and P. fulva had very similar start and stop codons for the 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs). Only the stop codon of the ND5 gene differed: TAA in the former and TAG in the latter (Table S2). In C. dubius, ATP8 was the most minor PCG, whereas ND5 was the most prominent. The length of ND5 in C. dubius and P. fulva is 1815 bp (Table S2). ATG is the typical start codon for PCGs in C. dubius and P. fulva, whereas ATC was typical for ND3 (Table S2), while GTG was typical for ND5 and COX1. Columbidae and Phasianidae [38] have also been observed to have the unusual GTG start codon in COX1.
There was a great deal of variation in the stop codons of the 13 PCGs in C. dubius and P. fulva. The stop codons of COX2, ATP8, ATP6, ND3, ND4L, ND5 and CYTB were TAA, while ND2 and ND6 terminated with TAG. COX1, ND1 and ND5 terminated with AGG or ATC, while COX3 and ND4 terminated with the truncated stop codon. It was common in metazoan mitogenomes [39] to have incomplete stop codons, such as TA or T, which could be converted to TAA during mRNA maturation [40].
The lengths of each of the 13 PCGs in C. dubius and P. fulva were nearly identical. However, the length of the ND6 gene in C. dubius varied significantly, with lengths of 528 and 546 bp, respectively. In contrast, the ND6 gene in P. fulva had a length of 519 bp (Table S2).
In Figure 2, we presented codon usage, relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) and codon family proportions (corresponding to amino acid usage) for two shorebird species (C. dubius and P. fulva). The RSCU was statistically analyzed and we found that in C. dubius, the six species had similar codon usage frequencies overall. Leucine1 (14.5–14.54%), Thr (9.24–9.27%) and Ala (7.77–7.82%) were the most abundant amino acids in the PCGs of C. dubius; in contrast, cys (0.79–0.82%) and asp (1.64–1.67%) were relatively scarce (Figure 2). A similar situation was seen in P. fulva (Leu, 17.43%; Thr, 9.3%; Ala, 7.85%; Figure 2).
Nucleotide diversity varied significantly across various mitochondrial genes (Figure 3). For COX1 and ATP8, the average nucleotide diversity was 0.0928 and 0.1434, respectively, with the proportion of variable DNA sites spanning from 27% in COX1 to 45.03% in ATP8 (Figure 3A). COX1 was a slow-evolving gene, while ATP8 evolves rapidly. To gain a deeper understanding of the selective pressure on mitochondrial PCGs among Charadriidae, the average Ka/Ks ratio for each PCG was calculated and compared (Figure 3B). A Ka/Ks ratio of 1 indicates neutral mutations, a Ka/Ks ratio of less than 1 indicates negative selection, and a Ka/Ks ratio of greater than 1 indicates positive selection [41,42]. For all PCGs in Charadriidae mitogenomes, the Ka/Ks ratios were consistently lower than 1, suggesting purifying selection affected all PCGs. There was a high rate of substitution for ATP8 (0.17), while a low rate of evolution for COX1 (0.023) (Figure 3B).
Similarly to most other birds [43,44], all 10 Charadriidae birds had lower G + C contents than A + T contents (Table 3). The analysis of nucleotide composition and skew in the mitogenomes of the 10 Charadriidae species revealed significant variability among the different species (Table 3). AT skew values averaged 0.13 to 0.15, while GC skew values ranged from −0.40 to −0.38. In addition, C. dubius demonstrated consistent AT skews of 0.14 across multiple samples, with GC skews ranging between −0.38 and −0.39, reflecting slight variations in AT and GC content among the samples.

3.3. Phylogenetic Analyses

Our study was the most comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of Charadriidae based solely on mitochondrial data, utilizing 13 mitochondrial genes, including mitogenomes of 11 species from Charadriidae individuals belonging to three genera. We constructed phylogenetic trees of 114 Charadriiformes species using both ML and BI methods and found that the topologies obtained from both methods were identical. This consistency between ML and BI approaches suggests a robust dataset and a reliable phylogenetic structure, reinforcing the credibility of the inferred evolutionary relationships within Charadriiformes. Additionally, our results further support taxonomic recognition of a clade formed by the other members of Lari (i.e., Lari excluding Turnicidae), which has been designated as Larida [2]. Hesperoburhinus (Burhinidae), Chionis (Chionidae) and Pluvianellus (Pluvianellidae) formed a well-supported clade that is sister to all other Charadrii members, referred to as Chionida by Černý and Natale [2]. Rostratulidae and Jacanidae formed a clade with strong support and were sisters to Scolopacidae, forming a clade named Jacanida [2]. The rare Saunders’ Gull Chroicocephalus saundersi was represented by two mitogenome sequences and was sister to a clade formed by Chroicocephalus, Ichthyaetus and Larus. The non-monophyly of Chroicocephalus and the isolated position of Saunders’ Gull support the recognition of a monotypic genus: Saundersilarus [45].
Our results supported a close and strongly supported relationship between Pluvialis and Charadriidae (Figure 4 and Figure 5). The result suggested that Charadriidae was monophyly and supported by high bootstrap values and posterior probability (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Charadrius was monophyletic, although it appeared to be polyphyletic, while C. dubius and C. vociferus were found to be more closely related to two species of Vanellus than to other Charadrius species, which has also been found in other studies [2,4,5]. The non-monophyly of the genus Charadrius results from incorrect taxonomic delimitation of the genus. Specifically, Charadrius morinellus is now named Eudromias morinellus, C. mongolus and C. leschenaultii are now placed in the genus Eupoda, and C. alexandrrinus was moved to the genus Ochthodromus [2,4,5]. The buttonquails (Turnicidae) clustered with and were sisters to all other members of Lari. Turnicidae was positioned on a long branch, consistent with previous findings from studies, including those based on nuclear DNA sequences [8,46]. The underlying reasons for this long branch remain unclear.

4. Conclusions

The mitogenomes of six individuals of Charadrius dubius and one Pluvialis fulva from various locations across China were sequenced in this study. We also annotated and comprehensively described their mitogenomic characteristics. Importantly, this is the first intraspecies mitogenome analysis of C. dubius. Our study supports Charadrius’s monophyly, and P. fulva is nested within Charadriidae. The monophyly of Charadrii, Charadriidae (including Pluvialis), Scolopaci, Lari, Larida and Jacanida was strongly supported, as was the recognition of Saundersilarus as a distinct genus from Chroicocephalus. Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses confirmed the clade of ((Recurvirostridae + Haematopodidae) + Charadriidae) within the suborder Charadrii. Our study contributes six complete mitogenomes of C. dubius and one of P. fulva, enriching the genetic resources of these species. However, additional samples of other species within Charadrii dae are needed to further address unresolved phylogenetic issues.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes15121642/s1, Figure S1: The ML tree of 114 Charadriiformes sequences based on 13 mitochondrial CDSs; Table S1: Taxonomic information and GenBank accession numbers for taxa used in the phylogenetic analysis; Table S2: Gene lengths and start/stop codon information for the 13 CDSs of Charadrius dubius and Pluvialis fulva.

Author Contributions

Methodology, Q.W.; validation, J.T., L.S. and X.H.; investigation, F.L. and K.B.; resources, F.L. and K.B.; data curation, X.H. and K.S.; data analysis, K.S.; manuscript draft, K.S.; supervision, C.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Western Young Scholars Projects of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XAB2021YW01), Science and Technology Projects of Shaanxi Academy of Science, China (Grant No. 2023K-16) and the Special Project of Chinese Medicine Administration of Shaanxi Province (Grant No. 2021-QYZL-03).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the funding agencies for their generous support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sullivan, B.L.; Wood, C.L.; Iliff, M.J.; Bonney, R.E.; Fink, D.; Kelling, S. eBird: A Citizen-Based Bird Observation Network in the Biological Sciences. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142, 2282–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Černý, D.; Natale, R. Comprehensive Taxon Sampling and Vetted Fossils Help Clarify the Time Tree of Shorebirds (Aves, Charadriiformes). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2022, 177, 107620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Winkler, D.W.; Billerman, S.M.; Lovette, I.J. Plovers and Lapwings (Charadriidae); Version 1.0; Birds of the World; Billerman, S.M., Keeney, B.K., Rodewald, P.G., Schulenberg, T.S., Eds.; Cornell Lab of Ornithology: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dos Remedios, N.; Lee, P.L.M.; Burke, T.; Székely, T.; Küpper, C. North or South? Phylogenetic and Biogeographic Origins of a Globally Distributed Avian Clade. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2015, 89, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Barth, J.M.I.; Matschiner, M.; Robertson, B.C. Phylogenetic Position and Subspecies Divergence of the Endangered New Zealand Dotterel (Charadrius obscurus). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chen, W.; Zhang, C.; Pan, T.; Liu, W.; Li, K.; Hu, C.; Chang, Q. The Mitochondrial Genome of the Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus (Charadriiformes: Charadriidae) and Phylogenetic Analysis of Charadrii. Genes Genom. 2018, 40, 955–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Baker, A.J.; Yatsenko, Y.; Tavares, E.S. Eight Independent Nuclear Genes Support Monophyly of the Plovers: The Role of Mutational Variance in Gene Trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2012, 65, 631–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Fain, M.G.; Krajewski, C.; Houde, P. Phylogeny of “Core Gruiformes” (Aves: Grues) and Resolution of the Limpkin–Sungrebe Problem. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 43, 515–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Baker, A.J.; Pereira, S.L.; Paton, T.A. Phylogenetic Relationships and Divergence Times of Charadriiformes Genera: Multigene Evidence for the Cretaceous Origin of at Least 14 Clades of Shorebirds. Biol. Lett. 2007, 3, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ericson, P.G.; Envall, I.; Irestedt, M.; Norman, J.A. Inter-Familial Relationships of the Shorebirds (Aves: Charadriiformes) Based on Nuclear DNA Sequence Data. BMC Evol. Biol. 2003, 3, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ballard, J.W.O.; Whitlock, M.C. The Incomplete Natural History of Mitochondria. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13, 729–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. James, J.E.; Piganeau, G.; Eyre-Walker, A. The Rate of Adaptive Evolution in Animal Mitochondria. Mol. Ecol. 2016, 25, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zardoya, R. Recent Advances in Understanding Mitochondrial Genome Diversity. F1000Research 2020, 9, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lv, L.; Peng, X.; Jing, S.; Liu, B.; Zhu, L.; He, G. Intraspecific and Interspecific Variations in the Mitochondrial Genomes of Nilaparvata (Hemiptera: Delphacidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2015, 108, 2021–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Morón-López, J.; Vergara, K.; Sato, M.; Gajardo, G.; Ueki, S. Intraspecies Variation of the Mitochondrial Genome: An Evaluation for Phylogenetic Approaches Based on the Conventional Choices of Genes and Segments on Mitogenome. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0273330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Burleigh, J.G.; Kimball, R.T.; Braun, E.L. Building the Avian Tree of Life Using a Large-Scale, Sparse Supermatrix. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2015, 84, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Colwell, M.A.; Haig, S.M. An Overview of the World’s Plovers*. In The Population Ecology and Conservation of Charadrius Plovers; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; ISBN 978-1-315-15288-2. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ding, J.; Liu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Chang, Q.; Hu, C. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Pacific Golden Plover Pluvialis fulva (Charadriiformes, Charadriidae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2016, 1, 701–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Johnson, O.; Fielding, L.; Fox, J.; Gold, R.; Goodwill, R.; Johnson, P. Tracking the Migrations of Pacific Golden-Plovers (Pluvialis fulva) between Hawaii and Alaska: New Insight on Flight Performance, Breeding Ground Destinations, and Nesting from Birds Carrying Light Level Geolocators. Wader Study Group Bull. 2011, 118, 26–31. [Google Scholar]
  20. Connors, P.G. Taxonomy, Distribution, and Evolution of Golden Plovers (Pluvialis dominica and Pluvialis fulva). Auk 1983, 100, 607–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kearse, M.; Moir, R.; Wilson, A.; Stones-Havas, S.; Cheung, M.; Sturrock, S.; Buxton, S.; Cooper, A.; Markowitz, S.; Duran, C.; et al. Geneious Basic: An Integrated and Extendable Desktop Software Platform for the Organization and Analysis of Sequence Data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1647–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bernt, M.; Donath, A.; Jühling, F.; Externbrink, F.; Florentz, C.; Fritzsch, G.; Pütz, J.; Middendorf, M.; Stadler, P.F. MITOS: Improved de Novo Metazoan Mitochondrial Genome Annotation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 69, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ding, J.; Qian, R.; Tai, D.; Yao, W.; Hu, C.; Chang, Q. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Grey Plover Pluvialis squatarola (Charadriiformes, Charadriidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2020, 5, 2738–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, D.; Gao, F.; Jakovlić, I.; Zou, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.X.; Wang, G.T. PhyloSuite: An Integrated and Scalable Desktop Platform for Streamlined Molecular Sequence Data Management and Evolutionary Phylogenetics Studies. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2020, 20, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Charif, D.; Lobry, J.R. SeqinR 1.0-2: A Contributed Package to the R Project for Statistical Computing Devoted to Biological Sequences Retrieval and Analysis. In Structural Approaches to Sequence Evolution: Molecules, Networks, Populations; Bastolla, U., Porto, M., Roman, H.E., Vendruscolo, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 207–232. ISBN 978-3-540-35306-5. [Google Scholar]
  26. Paradis, E. Pegas: An R Package for Population Genetics with an Integrated-Modular Approach. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 419–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jarvis, E.D.; Mirarab, S.; Aberer, A.J.; Li, B.; Houde, P.; Li, C.; Ho, S.Y.W.; Faircloth, B.C.; Nabholz, B.; Howard, J.T.; et al. Whole-Genome Analyses Resolve Early Branches in the Tree of Life of Modern Birds. Science 2014, 346, 1320–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple Sequence Alignment with High Accuracy and High Throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Minh, B.Q.; Wong, T.K.F.; von Haeseler, A.; Jermiin, L.S. ModelFinder: Fast Model Selection for Accurate Phylogenetic Estimates. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Hoang, D.T.; Chernomor, O.; Von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q.; Vinh, L.S. UFBoot2: Improving the Ultrafast Bootstrap Approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; Van Der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model Space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Rambaut, A.; Drummond, A.J.; Xie, D.; Baele, G.; Suchard, M.A. Posterior Summarization in Bayesian Phylogenetics Using Tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 2018, 67, 901–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yu, G.; Smith, D.K.; Zhu, H.; Guan, Y.; Lam, T.T.-Y. Ggtree: An r Package for Visualization and Annotation of Phylogenetic Trees with Their Covariates and Other Associated Data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2017, 8, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mindell, D.P.; Sorenson, M.D.; Dimcheff, D.E. Multiple Independent Origins of Mitochondrial Gene Order in Birds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 10693–10697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lee, D.Y.; Roh, S.J.; Kim, S.H.; Jung, T.W.; Lee, D.J.; Kim, H.K.; Jung, J.H.; Cho, S.-Y.; Kim, Y.J.; Kook, J.W.; et al. Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Little Ringed Plover Charadrius dubius (Charadriiformes, Charadriidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2022, 7, 1896–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rousselle, M.; Laverré, A.; Figuet, E.; Nabholz, B.; Galtier, N. Influence of Recombination and GC-Biased Gene Conversion on the Adaptive and Nonadaptive Substitution Rate in Mammals versus Birds. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2019, 36, 458–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rand, D.M. The Units of Selection on Mitochondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2001, 32, 415–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, X.; Huang, Y.; Lei, F. Comparative Mitochondrial Genomics and Phylogenetic Relationships of the Crossoptilon Species (Phasianidae, Galliformes). BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lavrov, D.V.; Pett, W. Animal Mitochondrial DNA as We Do Not Know It: Mt-Genome Organization and Evolution in Nonbilaterian Lineages. Genome Biol. Evol. 2016, 8, 2896–2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ojala, D.; Montoya, J.; Attardi, G. tRNA Punctuation Model of RNA Processing in Human Mitochondria. Nature 1981, 290, 470–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, Z. PAML 4: Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24, 1586–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nei, M.; Kumar, S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhou, X.; Lin, Q.; Fang, W.; Chen, X. The Complete Mitochondrial Genomes of Sixteen Ardeid Birds Revealing the Evolutionary Process of the Gene Rearrangements. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lan, G.; Yu, J.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, R.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, B.; Wei, W.; Liu, J.; Qi, G. Complete Mitochondrial Genome and Phylogenetic Analysis of Tarsiger indicus (Aves: Passeriformes: Muscicapidae). Genes 2024, 15, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Pons, J.-M.; Hassanin, A.; Crochet, P.-A. Phylogenetic Relationships within the Laridae (Charadriiformes: Aves) Inferred from Mitochondrial Markers. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2005, 37, 686–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Paton, T.A.; Baker, A.J.; Groth, J.G.; Barrowclough, G.F. RAG-1 Sequences Resolve Phylogenetic Relationships within Charadriiform Birds. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003, 29, 268–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Charadrius dubius and Pluvialis fulva mitogenomes. The genes in the outermost circle are transcribed clockwise, and the genes in the inner circle are transcribed counterclockwise. GC skews and G + C content are shown in the inside circles.
Figure 1. Charadrius dubius and Pluvialis fulva mitogenomes. The genes in the outermost circle are transcribed clockwise, and the genes in the inner circle are transcribed counterclockwise. GC skews and G + C content are shown in the inside circles.
Genes 15 01642 g001aGenes 15 01642 g001b
Figure 2. A comparative analysis of the mitogenomes of Charadrius dubius and Pluvialis fulva in terms of RSCU.
Figure 2. A comparative analysis of the mitogenomes of Charadrius dubius and Pluvialis fulva in terms of RSCU.
Genes 15 01642 g002
Figure 3. Evolutionary rates of mitochondrial genes for 13 species from 20 Charadriidae sequences. (A) The diversity of nucleotides and the percentage of variable sites. (B) The ratio of non-synonymous substitutions to synonymous substitutions.
Figure 3. Evolutionary rates of mitochondrial genes for 13 species from 20 Charadriidae sequences. (A) The diversity of nucleotides and the percentage of variable sites. (B) The ratio of non-synonymous substitutions to synonymous substitutions.
Genes 15 01642 g003
Figure 4. The BI and ML phylogenetic tree of 114 Charadriiformes species based on 13 mitochondrial CDS. The numbers above branches indicate posterior probability (BI) and bootstrap value (ML), respectively. Families and suborders were labeled on the right. Accession numbers and superfamily labels are shown in Figure S1.
Figure 4. The BI and ML phylogenetic tree of 114 Charadriiformes species based on 13 mitochondrial CDS. The numbers above branches indicate posterior probability (BI) and bootstrap value (ML), respectively. Families and suborders were labeled on the right. Accession numbers and superfamily labels are shown in Figure S1.
Genes 15 01642 g004
Figure 5. The BI and ML phylogenetic tree constructed for suborder Charadrii using 13 mitochondrial protein sequences. It was first built with 86 species of 114 mitochondrial sequences of Charadriiformes and later pruned down to 19 species of 31 sequences with Charadrii. In total, there are six different families (shown with different colors) and Balearica regulorum is included as an outgroup (Gruiformes). The numbers above branches indicate posterior probability (BI) and bootstrap value (ML), respectively. Families were labeled on the right.
Figure 5. The BI and ML phylogenetic tree constructed for suborder Charadrii using 13 mitochondrial protein sequences. It was first built with 86 species of 114 mitochondrial sequences of Charadriiformes and later pruned down to 19 species of 31 sequences with Charadrii. In total, there are six different families (shown with different colors) and Balearica regulorum is included as an outgroup (Gruiformes). The numbers above branches indicate posterior probability (BI) and bootstrap value (ML), respectively. Families were labeled on the right.
Genes 15 01642 g005
Table 1. Details of the Charadrius dubius and Pluvialis fulva mitochondrial genomes sequenced in this study (* indicates nestlings; gender could not be determined).
Table 1. Details of the Charadrius dubius and Pluvialis fulva mitochondrial genomes sequenced in this study (* indicates nestlings; gender could not be determined).
SpeciesSample
ID
Collection DateGenderCollection Site
C. dubius54 June 2018*Hongjiannao Lake, Shenmu, Shaanxi, China
C. dubius64 June 2018*Hongjiannao Lake, Shenmu, Shaanxi, China
C. dubius395 July 2018FemaleTangyu, Lantian, Shaanxi, China
C. dubius405 July 2018MaleTangyu, Lantian, Shaanxi, China
C. dubius14611 June 2020*Yuyang River, Yulin, Shaanxi, China
C. dubius14711 June 2020*Yuyang River, Yulin, Shaanxi, China
P. fulva1502 March 2020MaleXi’an Xianyang International Airport, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
Table 2. Length and GC content of different areas in six individuals of Charadrius dubius and one Pluvialis fulva.
Table 2. Length and GC content of different areas in six individuals of Charadrius dubius and one Pluvialis fulva.
SpeicesSample IDLength (bp)GC Content (%)
MitogenomeOf Protein-Coding
Genes
rRNAtRNAMitogenomeOf Protein-Coding
Genes
rRNAtRNA
C. dubius516,86611,4182567155344.645.345.641.7
616,88811,4182538155344.645.445.641.6
3916,91111,4002566155644.645.345.741.5
4016,83311,3972568155244.645.345.741.6
14616,92611,4002544155344.545.345.541.6
14716,91111,3972544155344.645.345.541.7
P. fulva15016,85911,3912539155145.246.244.841.3
Table 3. GC skew and GC content in the mitogenomes of 10 Charadriidae species.
Table 3. GC skew and GC content in the mitogenomes of 10 Charadriidae species.
SpeciesAT SkewGC SkewAT%GC%
Charadrius alexandrinus0.14−0.3955.2444.76
Charadrius dubius0.14−0.3954.9945.01
Charadrius dubius (No. 146)0.14−0.3855.4844.52
Charadrius dubius (No. 147)0.14−0.3955.4144.59
Charadrius dubius (No. 39)0.14−0.3855.3844.62
Charadrius dubius (No. 40)0.14−0.3855.3744.63
Charadrius dubius (No. 5)0.14−0.3855.4344.57
Charadrius dubius (No. 6)0.14−0.3855.3444.66
Charadrius leschenaultii0.14−0.3955.4744.53
Charadrius mongolus0.13−0.3955.3844.62
Charadrius vociferus0.14−0.4055.5844.42
Pluvialis apricaria0.15−0.4054.3745.63
Pluvialis fulva0.15−0.3954.8745.13
Pluvialis fulva (No. 150)0.14−0.3954.7645.24
Pluvialis squatarola0.14−0.3854.2745.73
Vanellus cinereus0.15−0.3955.1544.85
Vanellus vanellus0.13−0.3855.4744.53
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, K.; Wang, Q.; Bian, K.; Li, F.; Tang, J.; Suo, L.; Hou, X.; Yang, C. Complete Mitochondrial Genomes of Pluvialis fulva and Charadrius dubius with Phylogenetic Analysis of Charadriiformes. Genes 2024, 15, 1642. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15121642

AMA Style

Sun K, Wang Q, Bian K, Li F, Tang J, Suo L, Hou X, Yang C. Complete Mitochondrial Genomes of Pluvialis fulva and Charadrius dubius with Phylogenetic Analysis of Charadriiformes. Genes. 2024; 15(12):1642. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15121642

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Kuo, Qingxiong Wang, Kun Bian, Feiran Li, Jie Tang, Lijuan Suo, Xiang Hou, and Chao Yang. 2024. "Complete Mitochondrial Genomes of Pluvialis fulva and Charadrius dubius with Phylogenetic Analysis of Charadriiformes" Genes 15, no. 12: 1642. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15121642

APA Style

Sun, K., Wang, Q., Bian, K., Li, F., Tang, J., Suo, L., Hou, X., & Yang, C. (2024). Complete Mitochondrial Genomes of Pluvialis fulva and Charadrius dubius with Phylogenetic Analysis of Charadriiformes. Genes, 15(12), 1642. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15121642

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop