Next Article in Journal
Transcriptomic Adjustments in a Freshwater Ectoparasite Reveal the Role of Molecular Plasticity for Parasite Host Shift
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Bueno de Mesquita et al. Methylphosphonate Degradation and Salt-Tolerance Genes of Two Novel Halophilic Marivita Metagenome-Assembled Genomes from Unrestored Solar Salterns. Genes 2022, 13, 148
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cytosolic and Nucleosolic Calcium-Regulated Molecular Networks in Response to Long-Term Treatment with Abscisic Acid and Methyl Jasmonate in Arabidopsis thaliana

1
Beijing Key Laboratory of Gene Resource and Molecular Development, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2
Department of Computational Biology, Beijing Computing Center, Beijing 100094, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2022, 13(3), 524; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13030524
Submission received: 29 January 2022 / Revised: 10 March 2022 / Accepted: 14 March 2022 / Published: 16 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Calcium acts as a universal secondary messenger that transfers developmental cues and stress signals for gene expression and adaptive growth. A prior study showed that abiotic stresses induce mutually independent cytosolic Ca2+ ([Ca2+]cyt) and nucleosolic Ca2+ ([Ca2+]nuc) increases in Arabidopsis thaliana root cells. However, gene expression networks deciphering [Ca2+]cyt and [Ca2+]nuc signalling pathways remain elusive. Here, using transgenic A. thaliana to selectively impair abscisic acid (ABA)- or methyl jasmonate (MeJA)-induced [Ca2+]cyt and [Ca2+]nuc increases, we identified [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated ABA- or MeJA-responsive genes with a genome oligo-array. Gene co-expression network analysis revealed four Ca2+ signal-decoding genes, CAM1, CIPK8, GAD1, and CPN20, as hub genes co-expressed with Ca2+-regulated hormone-responsive genes and hormone signalling genes. Luciferase complementation imaging assays showed interactions among CAM1, CIPK8, and GAD1; they also showed interactions with several proteins encoded by Ca2+-regulated hormone-responsive genes. Furthermore, CAM1 and CIPK8 were required for MeJA-induced stomatal closure; they were associated with ABA-inhibited seed germination. Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis showed the unique expression pattern of [Ca2+]-regulated hormone-responsive genes in cam1, cipk8, and gad1. This comprehensive understanding of distinct Ca2+ and hormonal signalling will allow the application of approaches to uncover novel molecular foundations for responses to developmental and stress signals in plants.

1. Introduction

Sessile plants respond to developmental and environmental cues through various secondary messengers and phytohormones. Calcium ion (Ca2+) is a universal secondary messenger involved in fertilisation, growth, and development; it responds to both biotic and abiotic stresses in plants [1,2,3]. In addition, plants produce hormones (e.g., abscisic acid (ABA) and jasmonic acid (JA)) to help them grow, develop, and adapt to their changing environments [4,5]. Both ABA and methyl jasmonate (MeJA) can induce increases in cytosolic Ca2+ ([Ca2+]cyt) in plant guard cells and roots [6,7,8]. Using tobacco suspension cells transiently transformed with cytosolic- or nucleus-targeted apoaequorin, Walter et al. [9] found that both 12-oxophytodienoic acid, the precursor of JA, and JA itself could separately induce a transient increase in nuclear Ca2+ ([Ca2+]nuc) and [Ca2+]cyt in a concentration-dependent manner. Krebs et al. [10] also demonstrated that external ATP could induce increases in [Ca2+]nuc and [Ca2+]cyt in Arabidopsis thaliana root cells and Nod factor-induced spikes in [Ca2+]nuc and [Ca2+]cyt in Lotus japonicus root hair cells. Additionally, osmotic and salt stresses can separately trigger mutually independent increases in [Ca2+]nuc and [Ca2+]cyt in A. thaliana roots; such increases are involved in specific gene expression, root growth, and lateral root development [11]. Therefore, deciphering the [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated molecular networks and their crosstalk with hormone signalling pathways is essential for greater comprehension of Ca2+ signalling in plants.
Ca2+ signals are characterised as stimulus-specific signatures in terms of duration, amplitude, and frequency of [Ca2+] elevation [3]; they are sensed by intracellular Ca2+ sensor proteins composed of calmodulins (CaMs) and calmodulin-like proteins (CMLs) [12], Ca2+-dependent protein kinases (CPKs), CPK-related kinases (CRKs) [13], Ca2+- and Ca2+/CaM-dependent protein kinases (CCaMKs) [14,15], and calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs), along with CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) [16]. Complex gene families encode these Ca2+ sensors; most possess classical EF-hand motifs, which allow for the binding of Ca2+ and triggering of Ca2+-dependent conformational changes within these proteins for signal transduction [17,18]. Throughout the A. thaliana genome, the CaM/CML family is represented by 6 CaM and 50 CML genes [19], the CBL-CIPK family has 10 CBLs and 25 CIPKs [20], and the CPK/CRK family is encoded by 34 CPK and 8 CRK genes [13]. In contrast to CaMs present in all eukaryotes, CMLs, CBLs-CIPKs, CCaMKs, and CPKs/CRKs—all of which form intricate signalling networks that enable phosphorylation events, changes in protein–protein interactions, and gene expression regulation—are mainly restricted to plants and some protists [21].
In plants, Ca2+ sensors can be classified into two major groups: sensor relays and sensor responders [2]. CaMs, CMLs, and CBLs do not have any known enzymatic functional domains; therefore, they are considered members of the sensor relay group. A notable exception is CaM7, which physically interacts with HY5 and directly binds the T/G- and E-box cis-acting elements in the HY5 promoter to regulate its expression in A. thaliana [22,23]. In contrast, CPKs, CRKs, and CCaMKs are sensor responders; they contain one or more EF-hand motifs and a catalytic or functional domain, the activity of which is regulated by binding of Ca2+ to the EF-hand motifs. Elevated levels of [Ca2+]nuc and [Ca2+]cyt modulate gene expression through sensor relays or sensor responders via different mechanisms. CaMs and CMLs interact with DNA-binding proteins and regulate their activities, resulting in activation or repression of targeted gene expression. Furthermore, CPKs, CRKs, CCaMKs, and CBLs-CIPKs phosphorylate specific DNA-binding proteins to regulate gene expression [24]. In addition, a Ca2+-binding transcription factor, designated as AtNIG1 (A. thaliana NaCl-inducible gene 1), was initially identified as a basic helix–loop–helix-type transcription factor that contained an EF-hand motif and bound the E-box element (CANNTG) within the promoter regions of various salt stress-related genes [25]. CaM antagonists (e.g., N-(6-aminohexyl)-5-chloro-1-naphthelenesulphonamid-hydrochloride, trifluoperazine, fluphenazine-N-2-chloroethane dihydrochloride, and calmidazolium chloride) can induce increases of [Ca2+]cyt in plant cells [26,27]. Therefore, using DNA microarrays to analyse early transcriptome changes, Kaplan and colleagues [27] revealed 230 [Ca2+]cyt-responsive genes. Furthermore, 269 [Ca2+]cyt-upregulated genes were identified in A. thaliana seedlings, using full genome microarray analysis [28]. However, [Ca2+]nuc-regulated genes have not been identified; the crosstalk between Ca2+ and hormone signalling pathways in response to diverse stresses and developmental cues remains elusive.
This study represents a comprehensive investigation of the A. thaliana transcriptome for [Ca2+]nuc- and [Ca2+]cyt-regulated genes in cytosolic-localised parvalbumin (PV-NES) and nucleosolic-localised parvalbumin (PV-NLS) transgenic A. thaliana seedlings in response to ABA and MeJA using full genome microarray analysis. This work revealed 244 [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated ABA-responsive genes and 144 [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated MeJA-responsive genes. Moreover, using systems biology approaches focusing on genes transcriptionally regulated by Ca2+ and hormones, we defined a highly reliable gene co-expression network among [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated genes, Ca2+ signal-decoding proteins, and ABA/JA signalling pathway proteins to uncover dynamic subnetwork structures in response to hormone treatment in A. thaliana.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Growth Conditions

A. thaliana (Col-0 ecotype) plants were grown with a cycle of 16 h light (120 μmol m−2 s−1)/8 h dark at 22 °C and 60% relative humidity. T-DNA insertion mutants cam1 (SALK_202076c), gad1 (SALK_022227), and cipk8 (SALK_139697c) were obtained from The A. thaliana Information Resource (https://www.arabidopsis.org/ (accessed on 6 September 2017)) (Figure S1A). After genotyping progeny from self-crossed plants by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Figure S1B) and assessing target gene transcription in seedlings by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) (Figure S1C), we obtained homozygous lines of cam1, cipk8, and gad1. The used primers are listed in Table S1.
A. thaliana seeds were surface-sterilised with 75% ethanol and plated on half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) salts, 2% sucrose, and 0.8% (w/v) agar at pH 5.8. After stratification at 4 °C in the dark for 3 days, the plates were transferred to a growth chamber under 16 h light (120 μmol m−2 s−1)/8 h dark at 22 °C for another 3 days. Seedlings were then transferred to half-strength MS plates containing 10 μM ABA or 50 μM MeJA, cultured for 5 additional days, and collected for RNA extraction. For the germination assay, seeds were plated on half-strength MS plates containing 0.5 μM ABA or 50 μM MeJA at 4 °C in the dark for 3 days. The plates were then transferred to a growth chamber for 3 days, and the seed germination rate was calculated.

2.2. Imaging of [Ca2+]cyt and [Ca2+]nuc in A. thaliana Roots

[Ca2+] measurements were performed in mature root sections of 1-week-old A. thaliana seedlings, as previously described [11]. Transgenic A. thaliana lines containing cytosolic-localised yellow Cameleon YC 3.6 (NES-YC3.6) or nuclear-localised yellow Cameleon YC 3.6 (NLS-YC3.6) were used to monitor the effects of ABA and MeJA on changes in [Ca2+]cyt and [Ca2+]nuc in root cells. After germination, A. thaliana seedlings were grown vertically on half-strength MS medium for 5–7 days; the roots were immobilised by overlaying 1% (w/v) low-melting-point agarose (AMRESCO, Dallas, TX, USA) in an Attofluor® Cell Chamber (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). After a small tunnel in the agarose had been made to expose the root, 200 μL of bathing solution buffer (0.5× MS salt, 1% sucrose, 10 mM MES-KOH, pH 5.8) were applied to the chamber. ABA (10 µM) and MeJA (50 µM) in the same bathing solution were separately perfused as the stimulus into the chamber. The mean fluorescence resonance energy transfer values in response to different stimuli represented measurement of 20–30 root cells from at least nine independent seedlings, each of which included three to six root cells. Analyses of statistical significance were performed using the unpaired Student’s t-test with GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and the results are presented as means ± standard deviations (SDs).

2.3. Stomatal Aperture Bioassay

Rosette leaves were detached from 3- to 4-week-old A. thaliana plants and floated in a solution containing 10 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, and 10 mM MES-Tris at pH 6.15 for 2 h in a growth chamber under light (120 μmol m−2 s−1) at 22 °C. ABA (10 μM) and MeJA (50 μM) were separately added to the solutions for 2 h to assess stomatal closure, as previously described [29]. Stomatal apertures were imaged with a digital camera (DP72; Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan) attached to a fluorescence microscope (BX51; Olympus Corp.) and measured using DP2-BAW software (Olympus Corp.).

2.4. Total RNA Isolation and Analysis of Microarray Data

Two wild-type (WT) plants and three previously described independent PV-NES lines (1, 7, and 11) and PV-NLS transgenic lines (4, 5, and 8) [11] were used for microarray analysis. First, total RNA was extracted from seedlings that had been treated with 10 μM ABA or 50 μM MeJA for 5 days using the Eastep® Super Total RNA Extraction Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Approximately 2 μg of total RNA were reverse-transcribed into first-strand cDNA using the First-Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (TransScript, Beijing, China). The cDNA was hybridised on an Affymetrix A. thaliana ATH1-121501 genome array using a GPL198 platform (CapitalBio Corporation, Beijing, China). All generated datasets are publicly available in the Gene Expression Omnibus database under the accession number GSE109611.
Files in .cel format were read into R and normalised using the RMA procedure. The cor function was used to calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient, represented by R. The R-value of duplicate samples ranged from 0.98 to 1, indicating high relevance and repeatability. Volcano plot analysis, with a fold-change >2.0 and a false discovery rate-corrected p-value < 0.05, according to Student’s t-test, was performed to identify differentially expressed genes; such genes were visualised using Venn diagrams and heatmaps.

2.5. Construction of the A. thaliana Gene Co-Expression Network

Seven open or published A. thaliana chip datasets regarding ABA and JA hormone processing were collected from the Affymetrix GPL198 platform and downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database on the National Center for Biotechnology Information website: GSE12715, GSE45662 [30], GSE84446, GSE39384 [31], GSE7432 [32], GSE5620 [33], and GSE109611. In accordance with a previously published method [34], R software was used to pre-process the data of each chip, mainly in terms of removing disproportionately low mean expression genes or genes with poor correlations. Finally, the dataset contained 13,083 genes in 165 samples. Then, the weighted gene co-expression network analysis algorithm in R software was used to construct the A. thaliana co-expression network. This algorithm can generate functional modules in various situations [35,36]. To construct the co-expression network, the weight value power selected in this study was 12; the corresponding Pearson correlation coefficient was approximately 0.9. Cytoscape_V3.2.1 was used to display the co-expression network results.

2.6. Firefly Luciferase Complementation Imaging (LCI) Assay

The LCI assay was conducted as previously described [37]. Coding sequences of glutamate decarboxylase 1 (GAD1), calmodulin 1 (CAM1), and calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinase 8 (CIPK8) were inserted into the pCAMBIA-nLUC or pCAMBIA-cLUC vector. The Ca2+-regulated hormone response genes were cloned into the pCAMBIA-cLUC vector. The constructed plasmids and conjugative P19 plasmid were separately transformed into Agrobacterium GV3101 strains. A single colony was inoculated in the corresponding resistant YEB liquid medium and cultured overnight at 28 °C and 200 rpm. After centrifugation for 2 min at 12,000 rpm, the medium was discarded. The pellet was washed five times with tobacco transformation buffer (10 mM MES, 10 mM MgCl2, pH 5.6), resuspended with tobacco transformation buffer containing 0.1 mM acetosyringone, and infiltrated into the leaves of 3-week-old Nicotiana benthamiana (16 h day/8 h night, 25 °C) with pairs of nLUC and cLUC vectors. After 2–3 days, the luciferase assay substrate (Promega) was infiltrated into the leaf and reaction imaging was immediately captured by a low-light cooled charge-coupled device imaging system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The experiments were repeated at least three times.

2.7. qRT-PCR

Four-day-old seedlings were transferred to half-strength MS medium containing 10 μM ABA or 50 μM MeJA for 6 h, followed by RNA extraction and first-strand cDNA as described in Section 2.4. qRT-PCR was performed with Power SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (TransStart, Beijing, China) on a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Value changes of more than two-fold (>2 or <0.5) were considered to indicate the induction or repression of gene expression. All primers used in this study are listed in Table S1. The A. thaliana actin2 gene served as an internal control. At least three independent biological replicates were performed.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data analyses were carried out using the Data Processing System [38]. Data are shown as means ± SDs of at least three independent experiments. Statistical comparisons were performed using one-way or two-way analysis of variance with Student’s t-test to identify significant differences among group means; p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

3. Results

3.1. Both ABA and MeJA Triggered [Ca2+]cyt and [Ca2+]nuc Increases in A. thaliana Roots

Transgenic A. thaliana lines containing cytosolic-localised yellow Cameleon YC 3.6 (NES-YC3.6) or nuclear-localised yellow Cameleon YC 3.6 (NLS-YC3.6) were used to monitor the effects of ABA and MeJA on changes in [Ca2+]cyt and [Ca2+]nuc in root cells. [Ca2+] measurements were performed in mature root sections of 1-week-old A. thaliana seedlings, as previously described [11]. Consistent with previous results from plant stomata [6,39], we demonstrated that both ABA and MeJA triggered [Ca2+]cyt elevations in A. thaliana roots (Figure 1A,B). Moreover, ABA and MeJA induced [Ca2+]nuc increases in A. thaliana root cells (Figure 1C,D), indicating that [Ca2+]nuc, similar to [Ca2+]cyt, participates in ABA and JA signalling within plants. In addition, the elevations of [Ca2+]cyt and [Ca2+]nuc elicited by ABA or MeJA were impaired in root cells of PV-NES/NES-YC3.6 and PV-NLS/NLS-YC3.6 plants, respectively, compared with the WT (Figure 1).

3.2. Elevated [Ca2+]cyt and [Ca2+]nuc Contributed to Significant Changes in ABA- or MeJA-Responsive Gene Expression Profiles in A. thaliana

To further elucidate the roles of [Ca2+]cyt and [Ca2+]nuc in gene expression in A. thaliana, genome microarray analyses were performed in PV-NES and PV-NLS seedlings in response to long-term treatment with ABA or MeJA. Three lines of each transgenic plant and two WT plants were used in the microarray analysis experiments; the datasets were deposited into the Gene Expression Omnibus database with the accession number GSE109611. Using the parameters of a 2.0-fold change and a p-value < 0.05, we identified 1001, 667, and 889 ABA-responsive genes in WT, PV-NES, and PV-NLS lines, respectively (Figure S2A–C); 1145, 1095, and 1262 MeJA-responsive genes were identified in WT, PV-NES, and PV-NLS lines, respectively (Figure S2D–F). Then, we identified 193 [Ca2+]cyt-regulated ABA-responsive genes, 15 [Ca2+]nuc-regulated ABA-responsive genes, and 14 [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-co-regulated ABA-responsive genes between WT and PV-NES or PV-NLS plants (Figure 2A and Figure S3 and Table S2); we also identified 40 [Ca2+]cyt-regulated MeJA-responsive genes, 57 [Ca2+]nuc-regulated MeJA-responsive genes, and 25 [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-co-regulated MeJA-responsive genes between WT and PV-NES or PV-NLS plants (Figure 2B and Figure S3 and Table S3). In addition, among these differentially expressed [Ca2+]cyt- or [Ca2+]nuc-regulated hormone-responsive genes, we identified eight [Ca2+]cyt-regulated ABA- and MeJA-responsive genes; two [Ca2+]nuc-regulated ABA- and MeJA-responsive genes; seven [Ca2+]cyt-regulated ABA-responsive and [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-co-regulated MeJA-responsive genes; two [Ca2+]cyt-regulated ABA-responsive and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated MeJA-responsive genes; one [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-co-regulated ABA-responsive and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated MeJA-responsive gene; one [Ca2+]cyt-regulated MeJA-responsive and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated ABA and MeJA-responsive gene; and one [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-co-regulated ABA and MeJA-responsive gene (Figure S3). These results suggest that both cytosolic and nucleosolic Ca2+ signals are involved in hormone-regulated gene expression and network crosstalk in A. thaliana.

3.3. Integrative Co-Expression Analysis to Identify Hub Genes within Calcium-Regulated Transcriptional Modules

To further characterise the roles of calcium in phytohormone-regulated gene expression, we generated integrative co-expression networks of [Ca2+]-regulated hormone-responsive genes with Ca2+ signal-decoding genes and ABA or JA pathway proteins. First, we collected A. thaliana microarray datasets that were used in the Affymetrix platform GPL198 analysis, filtered outliers from the data using a published method [34], and compiled microarray datasets containing 165 samples and 13,083 genes (Table S4); these covered approximately half of the coding genes in the A. thaliana genome. Subsequently, we constructed a co-expression network map by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient among the expression values of different genes in accordance with the standard WGCNA procedure; we identified modules with biologically correlated genes. The power value was set to 12 and the Pearson correlation coefficient was set to >0.9, indicating a high correlation; the most highly connected genes within each module, designated as ‘hubs’, could be key regulators in response to ABA and/or MeJA in A. thaliana.
Next, we placed Ca2+-regulated ABA-responsive genes, calcium signal-decoding genes (Table S5), and ABA pathway member genes (Table S6) into the constructed A. thaliana gene co-expression database to obtain a Ca2+-regulated ABA signalling co-expression network (Figure 3A,B, Table S7). Similarly, we placed Ca2+-regulated MeJA-responsive genes, calcium decoding protein genes, and JA pathway member genes into the constructed gene co-expression database to obtain a Ca2+-regulated JA signalling co-expression network (Figure 3C,D, Table S7). We found that three calcium signal-decoding genes—calmodulin 1 (CAM1), calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinase 8 (CIPK8), and glutamate decarboxylase 1 (GAD1)—were hub genes in the main submodules of Ca2+-regulated ABA and JA signalling co-expression networks (Figure 3A,C). In these two modules, CAM1, CIPK8, and GAD1 were co-expressed with [Ca2+]cyt-regulated ABA-responsive genes such as AT1G64330, NAD(P)H-quinone oxidoreductase subunit 1 (NDHA), HYPERSENSITIVE INDUCED REACTION 2 (HIR2), CAPE2, PGSIP2, and PSBI; [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-co-regulated ABA-responsive genes such as NTMC2T6.1, RCI2B, and AT4G26190; [Ca2+]cyt-regulated JA-responsive genes such as AT3G45160, AGP14, and HIPP25; [Ca2+]nuc-regulated JA-responsive genes such as PELPK1 and NET2D; [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-co-regulated JA-responsive genes such as AT3G19370, AT1G54410, and AT2G21560; and the [Ca2+]cyt-regulated ABA-responsive and [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-co-regulated JA-responsive gene AT1G28400 (Figure 3A,C). In two other submodules, the calcium decoding protein gene CPN20 co-expressed with PSBZ, a [Ca2+]cyt-regulated ABA-responsive gene, and CLA1, an ABA pathway member, constituted the hub genes of a Ca2+-regulated ABA signalling co-expression network (Figure 3B). Similarly, CPN20 co-expressed with AT3G26440, a [Ca2+]cyt-regulated JA-responsive gene, was identified as a hub component in a Ca2+-regulated JA signalling co-expression network (Figure 3D). These results indicated that these hub genes, CAM1, CIPK8, GAD1, and CPN20, have important regulatory roles in cytosolic and nucleosolic calcium-mediated hormone-responsive gene expression.

3.4. Interactions among the Hub Proteins CAM1, CIPK8, and GAD1 and with Proteins Encoded by Ca2+-Regulated Hormone-Responsive Genes

We next performed the LCI assay in the leaves of 3-week-old N. benthamiana to detect interactions among the three hub proteins, as well as interactions with proteins encoded by Ca2+-regulated hormone-responsive genes. First, we showed an interaction of CIPK8 with CAM1, GAD1, and itself; we also showed an interaction of the protein encoded by AT1G28400, a [Ca2+]cyt-regulated ABA-responsive and [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-co-regulated JA-responsive gene, with CAM1, but not with GAD1 and CIPK8 (Figure 4). Interactions between the encoding proteins of several Ca2+-regulated hormone-responsive genes and each of the three hub genes are summarised in Table 1; the interaction between CAM1 and GAD1 was used as a positive control. In the [Ca2+]cyt-regulated ABA-responsive genes AT1G64330, NDHA, HIR2, CAPE2, PGSIP2, and PSBI, we observed interactions of AT1G64330 with GAD1 or CAM1, PSBI with CAM1 or CIPK8, and PGSIP2 with CAM1 (Figures S4 and S5). The encoded protein of AT3G45160, a [Ca2+]cyt-regulated JA-responsive gene, interacted with GAD1 and CAM1, but not CIPK8 (Figure S5). In the [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-co-regulated ABA-responsive genes NTMC2T6.1 and RCI2B, we observed interactions of RCI2B with GAD1 or CAM1, and NTMC2T6.1 with CAM1 (Figure S6). In the [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-co-regulated JA-responsive genes AT3G19370 and AT1G54410, we observed interactions of AT3G19370 with GAD1 or CAM1; there were no interactions between AT1G54410 and any of the three hub proteins (Figure S7). These results provide clues for dissecting the mechanism underlying hub protein-mediated regulation of the expression of ABA and JA responsive genes.

3.5. CAM1 and CIPK8 Are Required for MeJA-Induced Stomatal Closure and Are Associated with ABA-Inhibited Seed Germination

We monitored the roles of [Ca2+]cyt and [Ca2+]nuc in hormone-induced stomatal closure in A. thaliana. Both ABA- and MeJA-induced stomatal closure were severely impaired in PV-NES plants, but not in PV-NLS plants (Figure 5A,B), indicating that ABA- and MeJA-induced stomatal closure requires [Ca2+]cyt, but not [Ca2+]nuc. Furthermore, ABA-induced stomatal closure was impaired in cam1, but not gad1 and cipk8 (Figure 5C); MeJA-induced stomatal closure was impaired in cam1 and cipk8, but not gad1 (Figure 5D). These results suggest that CAM1 is required for ABA- and MeJA-induced stomatal closure, while CIPK8 is essential for MeJA-induced stomatal closure. In addition, ABA-inhibited seed germination was more severe in both PV-NES and PV-NLS plants than in WT plants (Figure 5E). Similarly, ABA-inhibited seed germination was more severe in cam1 and cipk8 than in gad1 (Figure 5F). However, MeJA had no effect on seed germination in any of the tested plants (Figure 5E,F). These results indicate that CAM1 and CIPK8 regulate ABA-inhibited seed germination.

3.6. CAM1, CIPK8, and GAD1 Regulate the Transcription of [Ca2+]-Regulated Genes in Response to ABA or MeJA Treatment

Here, we found that NCED3 was a [Ca2+]cyt-regulated ABA-responsive gene, ERF104 was a [Ca2+]cyt-regulated ABA- and MeJA-responsive gene, PR1 was a [Ca2+]nuc-regulated ABA- and MeJA-responsive gene, and AGL21 was a [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated MeJA-responsive gene (Tables S2 and S3). Therefore, we monitored the expression patterns of these [Ca2+]-regulated genes in different A. thaliana plants treated with ABA or MeJA for 6 h by qRT-PCR. First, we found that ERF104 was induced by ABA only in PV-NES plants and by MeJA only in WT plants (Figure 6A,B), consistent with our microarray data. In addition, ERF104 was induced by ABA in cam1, but not in cipk8 and gad1; it was not induced by MeJA in these three mutant lines (Figure 6C,D). Thus, CAM1 is required for ABA-induced expression of ERF104; CAM1, CIPK8, and GAD1 positively regulate MeJA-induced expression of ERF104. Second, we found that PR1 was downregulated by ABA and MeJA in WT plants, but strongly upregulated by MeJA in PV-NLS plants (Figure 6A,B). Furthermore, PR1 expression was activated by ABA and MeJA in cipk8, but the effects were less robust in cam1 and gad1 (Figure 6C,D). Third, NCED3 was activated by ABA in WT plants; however, this type of activation was decreased in PV-NES, PV-NLS, and cam1 lines (Figure 6A,C). Finally, AGL21 was induced by MeJA in PV-NLS and cipk8 plants, but not in WT, PV-NES, or gad1 plants (Figure 6B,D). These results suggested that CAM1, CIPK8, and GAD1 act as key regulators that modify the expression patterns of calcium-regulated genes in response to ABA and MeJA in A. thaliana seedlings.

4. Discussion

Ca2+ serves as a vital secondary messenger in the mediation and integration of multiple hormone signalling pathways that specify cell-signalling information during plant growth and development. Therefore, it is challenging to elucidate the complexity of hormone and Ca2+ crosstalk; such analysis requires a combined approach that involves both experimental measurements and systems-level modelling. A prior study revealed 269 [Ca2+]cyt-upregulated genes in A. thaliana seedlings that responded to three specific types of [Ca2+]cyt elevations elicited by artificial electrical stimulation [28]. However, the identification of [Ca2+]-responsive genes under physiological conditions in plants remains challenging. Our recent study demonstrated that both osmotic- and salt-stress-induced [Ca2+]cyt and [Ca2+]nuc increases were impaired in the roots of transgenic A. thaliana lines containing PV-NES or PV-NLS, respectively [11], thus providing a powerful tool for the establishment of an interaction landscape of hormone and Ca2+ signalling in A. thaliana. Here, we identified 244 [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated ABA-responsive and 144 [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated MeJA-responsive genes in A. thaliana seedlings using full genome microarray analysis; we found that 22 genes overlapped. Unlike other Ca2+-based transcriptome studies, we confined our conditions to a long duration of exposure to ABA or MeJA; this facilitated enrichment of late transcriptional events. Through co-expression network analysis, we unveiled two common modules among [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated hormone-responsive genes, Ca2+ signal-decoding genes, and ABA/JA signalling pathway genes; our results provide valuable clues for use in exploring novel functions of known genes or potential functions of unknown genes, while enabling the dissection of crosslinks among Ca2+ signalling and hormonal pathways via co-expression networks.
Previous studies showed that cytosolic and nucleosolic calcium increases in response to various stimuli are mutually independent in animal [40] and plant cells [11]. Moreover, gene expression patterns regulated by nuclear calcium are also independent of cytosolic calcium in animal cells. For example, signalling pathways activated by [Ca2+]cyt target the serum-response element, whereas [Ca2+]nuc increases are critical for cyclic AMP response element-dependent calcium-activated transcription in hippocampal neurons [41]. However, Thompson et al. [42] found that [Ca2+]nuc, but not [Ca2+]cyt, negatively regulates the activity of transcription enhancer factor in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. In plants, [Ca2+]nuc oscillations in response to Nod factor treatment are mediated by three nuclear-localised cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (CNGC15a/b/c); such oscillations are required for the establishment of symbiosis by nitrogen-fixing rhizobial bacteria in Medicago truncatula [43]. Here, we characterised [Ca2+]cyt-activated/repressed, [Ca2+]nuc-activated/repressed, and [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-co-regulated genes in response to ABA and MeJA treatment in A. thaliana seedlings. Furthermore, some genes were shared among the [Ca2+]-regulated ABA-responsive and [Ca2+]-regulated MeJA-responsive genes, indicating that both cytosolic and nucleosolic calcium are involved in the transcriptional regulation triggered by ABA or MeJA treatment in A. thaliana. Notably, we found that four calcium signal-decoding genes, CAM1, GAD1, CIPK8, and CPN20, were hub genes in two modules of Ca2+-regulated ABA and JA signalling co-expression networks. Additionally, we found the direct interactions among hub genes and Ca2+-regulated hormone-responsive genes with different combinations in LCI assays. These results provide important clues concerning hub genes CAM1, GAD1, CIPK8, and CPN20 that mediate crosstalk between Ca signalling and hormone pathways in A. thaliana, suggesting the implications for other plants or crops under biotic and abiotic stress [44,45].
An intriguing finding was that the chloroplast genome encoded several [Ca2+]cyt-activated ABA-responsive genes, including PSBI, YCF9, PSBJ, RPOA, RPL14, RPS3, RPL22, RPS19, YCF1.1, PSAC, ndhE, and ndhA, as well as one [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-activated ABA-responsive gene, PSBT, and one [Ca2+]nuc-repressed MeJA-responsive gene, PSBD. A previous study showed that the chloroplast can function as a sensor for environmental stimuli, such as drought stress, and initiate signals that regulate nuclear gene expression [46]. Plastid-derived signals that target the regulation of nuclear gene expression are considered retrograde signals [47]; nucleus to plastid signalling is considered an anterograde pathway [48]. Wang et al. [49] showed that many genes related to drought stress responses, ABA metabolism, chloroplast biogenesis, and chlorophyll degradation are strongly expressed at early time points, followed by gradual decreases in induction or even suppression at later time points, during long-term ABA treatment in A. thaliana. Here, we found that PSB1 and ndhA were co-expressed with hub genes CAM1, CIPK8, and GAD1, while RPOA was co-expressed with CAM1 and GAD1 in the Ca2+-regulated ABA signalling co-expression network. In addition, LCI assays showed that PSB1 interacts directly with CAM1 and CIPK8. These results indicated that the ABA-induced increase in [Ca2+]cyt, but not in [Ca2+]nuc, has a vital role in combining and coordinating the expression patterns of nuclear and plastid genes for bi-directional communication between chloroplasts and the nucleus [50].
Crosstalk between JA and ABA signalling through interactions of ABA receptor PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE1-Like proteins (PYLs) and JASMONATE ZIM DOMAIN (JAZ) proteins, transcription inhibitors of JA signalling, is known to coordinate the balance between plant growth and defence resistance [51]. Here, we revealed a new crosstalk mechanism between JA and ABA signalling via [Ca2+]cyt and [Ca2+]nuc. We first showed that both ABA and MeJA induce [Ca2+]cyt and [Ca2+]nuc increases in A. thaliana roots; ABA- and MeJA-induced stomatal closure is impaired in PV-NES, but not PV-NLS, plants. In addition, ABA- and MeJA-induced stomatal closure is impaired in cam1 plants. These results indicated that CAM1 perceives ABA- and MeJA-induced increases in [Ca2+]cyt to regulate stomatal closure in A. thaliana. Hossain et al. [52] showed that MeJA-induced, but not ABA-induced, [Ca2+]cyt elevation and stomatal closure are disrupted in the ABA-deficient mutant aba2-2 or by treatment with the ABA synthetic inhibitor fluridon in WT plants, consistent with our results in cipk8 plants; thus, CIPK8 presumably regulates ABA biosynthesis in A. thaliana. Furthermore, we found that ABA-inhibited seed germination is more sensitive in PV-NES, PV-NLS, cam1, and cipk8 plants than in WT plants. These results indicated that both CAM1 and CIPK8 participate in cross-talk during ABA- and JA-regulated biological processes in A. thaliana. Using LCI assays, we showed that CIPK8 interacts with CAM1; many Ca2+-regulated ABA- and JA-responsive genes, such as ERF104, PR1, and AGL21, exhibit various expression patterns in cam1 and cipk8 plants. These results suggested that the CAM1–CIPK8 complex could be a connection between the ABA and JA signalling pathways. Further genetic and molecular studies are needed to explore this potential connection.

5. Conclusions

Here, we found that PV-NES and PV-NLS separately impair ABA- and MeJA-induced increases in [Ca2+]cyt or [Ca2+]nuc. We also identified 244 [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated ABA-responsive and 144 [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated MeJA-responsive genes using an A. thaliana genome oligo array. Moreover, gene co-expression network analysis identified four Ca2+ signal-decoding genes, CAM1, CIPK8, GAD1, and CPN20, as hub genes in two [Ca2+]-regulated ABA/JA-responsive gene co-expression modules. Finally, LCI assays, phenotypic observations, and gene expression analyses showed that the CAM1–CIPK8 complex is a key regulator of stomatal movement, seed germination, and expression of [Ca2+]-regulated hormone-responsive genes in response to hormonal signals in A. thaliana.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes13030524/s1, Figure S1: Characterisation of A. thaliana T-DNA insertion mutants cam1, cipk8, and gad1, Figure S2: Volcano plots of the total gene expression profiles of WT, PV-NES, and PV-NLS transgenic lines after treatment with ABA (A–C) or MeJA (D–F), Figure S3: Venn diagram identifying the unique and shared genes among PV-NES and PV-NLS transgenic lines after treatment with ABA or MeJA, Figure S4: Interactions of several [Ca2+]cyt-regulated ABA-responsive genes with four hub genes in tobacco leaves, as determined by LCI assays, Figure S5: Interactions of two [Ca2+]cyt-regulated JA-responsive genes with three hub genes in tobacco leaves, as determined by LCI assays, Figure S6: Interactions of two [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated ABA-responsive genes with three hub genes in tobacco leaves, as determined by LCI assays, Figure S7: Interactions of two [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated JA-responsive genes with three hub genes in tobacco leaves, as determined by LCI assays, Table S1: Primers used in this study, Table S2: [Ca2+]-regulated ABA-responsive genes, Table S3: [Ca2+]-regulated JA-responsive genes, Table S4: Microarray datasets used for the construction of co-expression networks, Table S5: Decoding Ca2+ signalling proteins, Table S6: Hormone signalling pathway proteins, Table S7: Genes in the co-expression network, Table S8: Genes co-expressed with CAM1, CIPK8, GAD1, and GUN5.

Author Contributions

S.H., Y.W., D.W., F.H., and Y.N. designed the study. D.W., F.H., L.C., J.L., and Y.N. performed the experiments. D.W., F.H., P.Y., L.C., J.L., and H.Z. analysed the data. D.W., F.H., and S.H. wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31070250 and 31970723).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Berridge, M.J.; Lipp, P.; Bootman, M.D. The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000, 1, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sanders, D.; Pelloux, J.; Brownlee, C.; Harper, J.F. Calcium at the crossroads of signaling. Plant Cell 2002, 14, s401–s417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. McAinsh, M.R.; Pittman, J.K. Shaping the calcium signature. New Phytol. 2009, 181, 275–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ahmad, P.; Rasool, S.; Gul, A.; Sheikh, S.A.; Akram, N.A.; Ashraf, M.; Kazi, A.M.; Gucel, S. Jasmonates: Multifunctional roles in stress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Verma, V.; Ravindran, P.; Kumar, P.P. Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Allen, G.J.; Kwak, J.M.; Chu, S.P.; Llopis, J.; Tsien, R.Y.; Harper, J.F.; Schroeder, J.I. Cameleon calcium indicator reports cytoplasmic calcium dynamics in Arabidopsis guard cells. Plant J. 1999, 19, 735–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bai, L.; Zhang, G.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, W.; Du, Y.; Wu, Z.; Song, C.P. Plasma membrane-associated proline-rich extensin-like receptor kinase 4, a novel regulator of Ca signalling, is required for abscisic acid responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2009, 60, 314–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Islam, M.M.; Hossain, M.A.; Jannat, R.; Munemasa, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Mori, I.C.; Murata, Y. Cytosolic alkalization and cytosolic calcium oscillation in Arabidopsis guard cells response to ABA and MeJA. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51, 1721–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Walter, A.; Mazars, C.; Maitrejean, M.; Hopke, J.; Ranjeva, R.; Boland, W.; Mithöfer, A. Structural requirements of jasmonates and synthetic analogues as inducers of Ca2+ signals in the nucleus and the cytosol of plant cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4783–4785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Krebs, M.; Held, K.; Binder, A.; Hashimoto, K.; Herder, G.D.; Parniske, M.; Kudla, J.; Schumacher, K. FRET-based genetically encoded sensors allow high-resolution live cell imaging of Ca2+ dynamics. Plant J. 2012, 69, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huang, F.; Luo, J.; Ning, T.; Cao, W.; Jin, X.; Zhao, H.; Wang, Y.; Han, S. Cytosolic and nucleosolic calcium signaling in response to osmotic and salt stresses are independent of each other in roots of Arabidopsis seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ranty, B.; Aldon, D.; Galaud, J.-P. Plant calmodulins and calmodulin-related proteins. Plant Signal. Behav. 2006, 1, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Hrabak, E.M.; Chan, C.W.M.; Gribskov, M.; Harper, J.F.; Choi, J.H.; Halford, N.; Kudla, J.; Luan, S.; Nimmo, H.G.; Sussman, M.R.; et al. The Arabidopsis CDPK-SnRK superfamily of protein kinases. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 666–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Gleason, C.; Chaudhuri, S.; Yang, T.; Muñoz, A.; Poovaiah, B.W.; Oldroyd, G.E.D. Nodulation independent of rhizobia induced by a calcium-activated kinase lacking autoinhibition. Nature 2006, 441, 1149–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tirichine, L.; Imaizumi-Anraku, H.; Yoshida, S.; Murakami, Y.; Madsen, L.H.; Miwa, H.; Nakagawa, T.; Sandal, N.; Albrektsen, A.S.; Kawaguchi, M.; et al. Deregulation of a Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase leads to spontaneous nodule development. Nature 2006, 441, 1153–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Batistic, O.; Kudla, J. Plant calcineurin B-like proteins and their interacting protein kinases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1793, 985–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Day, I.S.; Reddy, V.S.; Shad, A.G.; Reddy, A.S. Analysis of EF-hand-containing proteins in Arabidopsis. Genome Biol. 2002, 3, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Harper, J.F.; Harmon, A. Plants, symbiosis and parasites: A calcium signalling connection. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6, 555–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. McCormack, E.; Braam, J. Calmodulins and related potential calcium sensors of Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2003, 159, 585–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kolukisaoglu, Ü.; Weinl, S.; Blazevic, D.; Batistic, O.; Kudla, J. Calcium sensors and their interacting protein kinases: Genomics of the Arabidopsis and rice cbl-cipk signaling networks. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Batistic, O.; Kudla, J. Analysis of calcium signaling pathways in plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1820, 1283–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kushwaha, R.; Singh, A.; Chattopadhyay, S. Calmodulin7 plays an important role as transcriptional regulator in Arabidopsis seedling development. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 1747–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Abbas, N.; Maurya, J.P.; Senapati, D.; Gangappa, S.N.; Chattopadhyay, S. Arabidopsis CAM7 and HY5 physically interact and directly bind to the HY5 promoter to regulate its expression and thereby promote photomorphogenesis. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 1036–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Reddy, A.S.N.; Ali, G.S.; Celesnik, H.; Day, I.S. Coping with stresses: Roles of calcium- and calcium/calmodulin-regulated gene expression. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 2010–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Kim, J.; Kim, H.-Y. Functional analysis of a calcium-binding transcription factor involved in plant salt stress signaling. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 5251–5256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Gilroy, S.; Hughes, W.A.; Trewavas, A.J. Calmodulin antagonists increase free cytosolic calcium levels in plant protoplasts in vivo. FEBS Lett. 1987, 212, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kaplan, B.; Davydov, O.; Knight, H.; Galon, Y.; Knight, M.R.; Fluhr, R.; Fromm, H. Rapid transcriptome changes induced by cytosolic Ca2+ transients reveal ABRE-related sequences as Ca2+-responsive cis elements in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 2733–2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Whalley, H.J.; Sargeant, A.W.; Steele, J.F.; Lacoere, T.; Lamb, R.; Saunders, N.J.; Knight, H.; Knight, M.R. Transcriptomic analysis reveals calcium regulation of specific promoter motifs in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 4079–4095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Han, S.C.; Tang, R.H.; Anderson, L.K.; Woerner, T.E.; Pei, Z.M. A cell surface receptor mediates extracellular Ca2+ sensing in guard cells. Nature 2003, 425, 196–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hu, P.; Zhou, W.; Cheng, Z.; Fan, M.; Wang, L.; Xie, D. JAV1 controls jasmonate-regulated plant defense. Molecular Cell 2013, 50, 504–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Goda, H.; Sasaki, E.; Akiyama, K.; Maruyama-Nakashita, A.; Nakabayashi, K.; Li, W.; Ogawa, M.; Yamauchi, Y.; Preston, J.; Aoki, K.; et al. The AtGenExpress hormone and chemical treatment data set: Experimental design, data evaluation, model data analysis and data access. Plant J 2008, 55, 526–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Stepanova, A.N.; Yun, J.; Likhacheva, A.V.; Alonso, J.M. Multilevel interactions between ethylene and auxin in Arabidopsis roots. Plant cell 2007, 19, 2169–2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Kilian, J.; Whitehead, D.; Horak, J.; Wanke, D.; Weinl, S.; Batistic, O.; D’Angelo, C.; Bornberg-Bauer, E.; Kudla, J.; Harter, K. AtGenExpress global stress expression data set: Protocols, evaluation and model data analysis of UV-B light, drought and cold stress responses. Plant J 2007, 50, 347–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Miller, J.A.; Horvath, S.; Geschwind, D.H. Divergence of human and mouse brain transcriptome highlights Alzheimer disease pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 12698–12703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Zhang, B.; Horvath, S. A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2005, 4, 1–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Langfelder, P.; Horvath, S. WGCNA: An R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Chen, H.; Zou, Y.; Shang, Y.; Lin, H.; Wang, Y.; Cai, R.; Tang, X.; Zhou, J.M. Firefly luciferase complementation imaging assay for protein-protein interactions in plants. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146, 368–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Tang, Q.Y.; Zhang, C.X. Data Processing System (DPS) software with experimental design, statistical analysis and data mining developed for use in entomological research. Insect Sci. 2013, 20, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Munemasa, S.; Hossain, M.A.; Nakamura, Y.; Mori, I.C.; Murata, Y. The Arabidopsis calcium-dependent protein kinase, CPK6, functions as a positive regulator of methyl jasmonate signaling in guard cells. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 553–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Oliveira, A.G.; Guimarães, E.S.; Andrade, L.M.; Menezes, G.B.; Leite, F.M. Decoding calcium signaling across the nucleus. Physiology 2014, 29, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hardingham, G.E.; Chawla, S.; Johnson, C.M.; Bading, H. Distinct functions of nuclear and cytoplasmic calcium in the control of gene expression. Nature 1997, 385, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Thompson, M.; Andrade, V.A.; Andrade, S.J.; Pusl, T.; Ortega, J.M.; Goes, A.M.; Leite, M.F. Inhibition of the TEF/TEAD transcription factor activity by nuclear calcium and distinct kinase pathways. Biochem. Biophy. Res. Comm. 2003, 301, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Charpentier, M.; Sun, J.; Martins, T.V.; Radhakrishnan, G.V.; Findlay, K.; Soumpourou, E.; Thouin, J.; Véry, A.-A.; Sanders, D.; Morris, R.J.; et al. Nuclear-localized cyclic nucleotide–gated channels mediate symbiotic calcium oscillations. Science 2016, 352, 1102–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, J.; Song, L.; Gong, X.; Xu, J.; Li, M. Functions of jasmonic acid in plant regulation and response to abiotic stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Salvi, P.; Manna, M.; Kaur, H.; Thakur, T.; Gandass, N.; Bhatt, D.; Muthamilarasan, M. Phytohormone signaling and crosstalk in regulating drought stress response in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 1305–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liang, X.; Ma, M.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, J.; Yang, X.; Rao, S.; Bi, G.; Li, L.; Zhang, X.; Chai, J.; et al. Ligand-triggered de-repression of Arabidopsis heterotrimeric G proteins coupled to immune receptor kinases. Cell Res. 2018, 28, 529–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Chi, W.; Sun, X.; Zhang, L. Intracellular signaling from plastid to nucleus. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 559–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Bräutigam, K.; Dietzel, L.; Pfannschmidt, T. Plastid-nucleus communication: Anterograde and retrograde signalling in the development and function of plastids. In Cell and Molecular Biology of Plastids; Bock, R., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 409–455. [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang, M.; Lee, J.; Choi, B.; Park, Y.; Sim, H.J.; Kim, H.; Hwang, I. Physiological and molecular processes associated with long duration of ABA treatment. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kmiecik, P.; Leonardelli, M.; Teige, M. Novel connections in plant organellar signalling link different stress responses and signalling pathways. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 3793–3807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Yang, J.; Duan, G.; Li, C.; Liu, L.; Han, G.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C. The crosstalks between jasmonic acid and other plant hormone signaling highlight the involvement of jasmonic acid as a core component in plant response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Hossain, M.A.; Munemasa, S.; Uraji, M.; Nakamura, Y.; Mori, I.C.; Murata, Y. Involvement of endogenous abscisic acid in methyl jasmonate-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Impaired [Ca2+]cyt and [Ca2+]nuc increases in responses to ABA and MeJA treatment in root cells of PV-NES and PV-NLS transgenic A. thaliana lines, respectively. (A,B) Changes in [Ca2+]cyt in the roots of 6-day-old WT and PV-NES plants triggered by ABA (50 μM) or MeJA (1 mM). The dynamics of [Ca2+]cyt are shown as changes in the apparent fluorescence resonance energy transfer efficiency of NES-YC3.6. Typical traces (A) and [Ca2+]cyt peak value comparisons (B) are shown (n = 20 cells from 8 different seedlings). (C,D) Changes in [Ca2+]nuc in the roots of 6-day-old WT and PV-NLS plants triggered by ABA (50 μM) or MeJA (1 mM). The dynamics of [Ca2+]cyt are shown as changes in the apparent fluorescence resonance energy transfer efficiency of NES-YC3.6. Typical traces (C) and [Ca2+]cyt peak value comparisons (D) are shown (n = 20 cells from 8 different seedlings). In (B,D), black lines represent the mean value; blue and red lines represent the standard error (p < 0.001).
Figure 1. Impaired [Ca2+]cyt and [Ca2+]nuc increases in responses to ABA and MeJA treatment in root cells of PV-NES and PV-NLS transgenic A. thaliana lines, respectively. (A,B) Changes in [Ca2+]cyt in the roots of 6-day-old WT and PV-NES plants triggered by ABA (50 μM) or MeJA (1 mM). The dynamics of [Ca2+]cyt are shown as changes in the apparent fluorescence resonance energy transfer efficiency of NES-YC3.6. Typical traces (A) and [Ca2+]cyt peak value comparisons (B) are shown (n = 20 cells from 8 different seedlings). (C,D) Changes in [Ca2+]nuc in the roots of 6-day-old WT and PV-NLS plants triggered by ABA (50 μM) or MeJA (1 mM). The dynamics of [Ca2+]cyt are shown as changes in the apparent fluorescence resonance energy transfer efficiency of NES-YC3.6. Typical traces (C) and [Ca2+]cyt peak value comparisons (D) are shown (n = 20 cells from 8 different seedlings). In (B,D), black lines represent the mean value; blue and red lines represent the standard error (p < 0.001).
Genes 13 00524 g001
Figure 2. [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated phytohormone-responsive genes. Significantly differentially expressed gene clusters in WT, PV-NES, and PV-NLS transgenic lines in response to ABA (A) and MeJA (B) treatment. The left column indicates [Ca2+]cyt-regulated ABA- or MeJA-responsive genes. The middle column indicates [Ca2+]nuc-regulated ABA- or MeJA-responsive genes. The right column indicates [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated ABA- or MeJA-responsive genes. Microarray comparison results represented by each column are indicated at the top of the figure. Each row represents one gene; colours represent changes in gene expression levels as indicated. Quantitative data for each gene are shown in Tables S2 and S3.
Figure 2. [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated phytohormone-responsive genes. Significantly differentially expressed gene clusters in WT, PV-NES, and PV-NLS transgenic lines in response to ABA (A) and MeJA (B) treatment. The left column indicates [Ca2+]cyt-regulated ABA- or MeJA-responsive genes. The middle column indicates [Ca2+]nuc-regulated ABA- or MeJA-responsive genes. The right column indicates [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated ABA- or MeJA-responsive genes. Microarray comparison results represented by each column are indicated at the top of the figure. Each row represents one gene; colours represent changes in gene expression levels as indicated. Quantitative data for each gene are shown in Tables S2 and S3.
Genes 13 00524 g002
Figure 3. Calcium-mediated phytohormone-associated gene co-expression networks. (A,B) Sub-models with distinct central genes and their co-expression partners among [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated ABA-responsive genes, genes encoding calcium signalling proteins, and genes encoding ABA pathway proteins. (C,D) Sub-models with distinct central genes and their co-expression partners among [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated MeJA-responsive genes, genes encoding calcium signalling proteins, and genes encoding JA pathway proteins. Different colours and shapes indicate distinct types of proteins. Different genes in the models are listed in Table S8.
Figure 3. Calcium-mediated phytohormone-associated gene co-expression networks. (A,B) Sub-models with distinct central genes and their co-expression partners among [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated ABA-responsive genes, genes encoding calcium signalling proteins, and genes encoding ABA pathway proteins. (C,D) Sub-models with distinct central genes and their co-expression partners among [Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated MeJA-responsive genes, genes encoding calcium signalling proteins, and genes encoding JA pathway proteins. Different colours and shapes indicate distinct types of proteins. Different genes in the models are listed in Table S8.
Genes 13 00524 g003
Figure 4. Interactions among four hub genes in tobacco leaves, as determined by LCI assays. (A) The interaction of CIPK8 with CAM1, GAD1, CIPK8 or At1G28400. (B) The interaction of At1G28400 with CAM1, GAD1, or CIPK8. Tobacco leaves were transformed with constructs encoding full-length GAD1, CAM1, CIPK8, and At1G28400 fused with the C- or N-terminus of luciferase (c- or n-LUC). Empty vectors were used as negative controls. Luminance intensity indicates an interaction between any two proteins. The experiments were repeated three times and a representative read-out is shown.
Figure 4. Interactions among four hub genes in tobacco leaves, as determined by LCI assays. (A) The interaction of CIPK8 with CAM1, GAD1, CIPK8 or At1G28400. (B) The interaction of At1G28400 with CAM1, GAD1, or CIPK8. Tobacco leaves were transformed with constructs encoding full-length GAD1, CAM1, CIPK8, and At1G28400 fused with the C- or N-terminus of luciferase (c- or n-LUC). Empty vectors were used as negative controls. Luminance intensity indicates an interaction between any two proteins. The experiments were repeated three times and a representative read-out is shown.
Genes 13 00524 g004
Figure 5. Impacts of [Ca2+]cyt and [Ca2+]nuc on ABA- or MeJA-induced stomatal closure and seed germination. (AD) Stomatal apertures (W/L, width/length) of rosette leaves from 3-week-old WT, PV-NES, and PV-NLS plants, and gad1, cam1, and cipk8 plants, were measured after treatment with 10 μM ABA (A,C) or 50 μM MeJA (B,D). r.u. indicates relative units. Data from six independent experiments and a total of 120 stomata are shown; data are shown as means ± SDs. Different letters indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05 (Student’s t-test). (E,F) Seed germination of WT, PV-NES, and PV-NLS transgenic lines (E) and of WT, gad1, cam1, and cipk8 plants (F) in response to ABA or JA treatment. Seeds were plated on half-strength MS plates containing ABA (10 μM) or MeJA (50 μM) for 3 days at 4 °C in the dark, then transferred to a growth chamber under 16 h light (120 μmol m−2 s−1)/8 h dark at 22 °C for another 3 days. Error bars represent SDs; n = 600 seeds. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 (Student’s t-test).
Figure 5. Impacts of [Ca2+]cyt and [Ca2+]nuc on ABA- or MeJA-induced stomatal closure and seed germination. (AD) Stomatal apertures (W/L, width/length) of rosette leaves from 3-week-old WT, PV-NES, and PV-NLS plants, and gad1, cam1, and cipk8 plants, were measured after treatment with 10 μM ABA (A,C) or 50 μM MeJA (B,D). r.u. indicates relative units. Data from six independent experiments and a total of 120 stomata are shown; data are shown as means ± SDs. Different letters indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05 (Student’s t-test). (E,F) Seed germination of WT, PV-NES, and PV-NLS transgenic lines (E) and of WT, gad1, cam1, and cipk8 plants (F) in response to ABA or JA treatment. Seeds were plated on half-strength MS plates containing ABA (10 μM) or MeJA (50 μM) for 3 days at 4 °C in the dark, then transferred to a growth chamber under 16 h light (120 μmol m−2 s−1)/8 h dark at 22 °C for another 3 days. Error bars represent SDs; n = 600 seeds. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 (Student’s t-test).
Genes 13 00524 g005
Figure 6. Expression patterns of several [Ca2+]-regulated genes were detected by qRT-PCR in A. thaliana seedlings. (A,B) Transcript abundances of ERF104, PR1, and NCED3 in response to ABA (10 μM) or MeJA (50 μM) in WT, PV-NES, and PV-NLS seedlings. (C,D) Transcript abundances of ERF104, PR1, and NCED3 in response to ABA (10 μM) and abundances of ERF104, PR1, and AGL21 in response to MeJA (50 μM) in WT, cam1, cipk8, and gad1 seedlings. Expression levels of target genes were normalised to the expression level of actin2, and the relative value of the WT was set to 1.0. Data are shown as means ± SDs of three biological replicates.
Figure 6. Expression patterns of several [Ca2+]-regulated genes were detected by qRT-PCR in A. thaliana seedlings. (A,B) Transcript abundances of ERF104, PR1, and NCED3 in response to ABA (10 μM) or MeJA (50 μM) in WT, PV-NES, and PV-NLS seedlings. (C,D) Transcript abundances of ERF104, PR1, and NCED3 in response to ABA (10 μM) and abundances of ERF104, PR1, and AGL21 in response to MeJA (50 μM) in WT, cam1, cipk8, and gad1 seedlings. Expression levels of target genes were normalised to the expression level of actin2, and the relative value of the WT was set to 1.0. Data are shown as means ± SDs of three biological replicates.
Genes 13 00524 g006
Table 1. Protein interactions among three hub genes and several [Ca2+]-regulated hormone-responsive genes detected by LCI assay (Figures S4–S7).
Table 1. Protein interactions among three hub genes and several [Ca2+]-regulated hormone-responsive genes detected by LCI assay (Figures S4–S7).
nLUC-GAD1nLUC-CAM1nLUC-CIPK8
[Ca2+]cyt-regulated ABA-responsive genescLUC-NDHA
cLUC-PSBI++
cLUC-PGSIP2+
cLUC-CAPE2
cLUC-AT1G64330++
cLUC-HIR2
[Ca2+]cyt-regulated JA-responsive genescLUC-AT3G45160++
[Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated ABA-responsive genescLUC-RCI2B++
cLUC-NTMC2T6.1+
[Ca2+]cyt- and [Ca2+]nuc-regulated JA-responsive genescLUC-AT1G54410
cLUC-AT3G19370++
+ indicates interaction; − indicates no interaction.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, D.; Huang, F.; Yan, P.; Nie, Y.; Chen, L.; Luo, J.; Zhao, H.; Wang, Y.; Han, S. Cytosolic and Nucleosolic Calcium-Regulated Molecular Networks in Response to Long-Term Treatment with Abscisic Acid and Methyl Jasmonate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes 2022, 13, 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13030524

AMA Style

Wang D, Huang F, Yan P, Nie Y, Chen L, Luo J, Zhao H, Wang Y, Han S. Cytosolic and Nucleosolic Calcium-Regulated Molecular Networks in Response to Long-Term Treatment with Abscisic Acid and Methyl Jasmonate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes. 2022; 13(3):524. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13030524

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Doudou, Feifei Huang, Pengcheng Yan, Yanli Nie, Lvli Chen, Jin Luo, Heping Zhao, Yingdian Wang, and Shengcheng Han. 2022. "Cytosolic and Nucleosolic Calcium-Regulated Molecular Networks in Response to Long-Term Treatment with Abscisic Acid and Methyl Jasmonate in Arabidopsis thaliana" Genes 13, no. 3: 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13030524

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop