Next Article in Journal
Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Changes Triggered by Fusarium solani in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
Previous Article in Journal
The WUSCHELa (PtoWUSa) is Involved in Developmental Plasticity of Adventitious Root in Poplar
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/genes11020178
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transcriptomics Reveal Altered Metabolic and Signaling Pathways in Podocytes Exposed to C16 Ceramide-Enriched Lipoproteins

by
Samar M. Hammad
1,*,
Waleed O. Twal
1,
Ehtesham Arif
2,
Andrea J. Semler
3,
Richard L. Klein
3,4 and
Deepak Nihalani
2
1
Department of Regenerative Medicine and Cell Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
2
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
3
Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
4
Research Service, Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC 29401, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2020, 11(2), 178; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11020178
Submission received: 23 January 2020 / Revised: 3 February 2020 / Accepted: 4 February 2020 / Published: 7 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Human Genomics and Genetic Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sphingolipids are bioactive lipids associated with cellular membranes and plasma lipoproteins, and their synthesis and degradation are tightly regulated. We have previously determined that low plasma concentrations of certain ceramide species predict the development of nephropathy in diabetes patients with normal albumin excretion rates at baseline. Herein, we tested the hypothesis that altering the sphingolipid content of circulating lipoproteins can alter the metabolic and signaling pathways in podocytes, whose dysfunction leads to an impairment of glomerular filtration. Cultured human podocytes were treated with lipoproteins from healthy subjects enriched in vitro with C16 ceramide, or D-erythro 2-hydroxy C16 ceramide, a ceramide naturally found in skin. The RNA-Seq data demonstrated differential expression of genes regulating sphingolipid metabolism, sphingolipid signaling, and mTOR signaling pathways. A multiplex analysis of mTOR signaling pathway intermediates showed that the majority (eight) of the pathway phosphorylated proteins measured (eleven) were significantly downregulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched HDL2 compared to HDL2 alone and hydroxy ceramide-enriched HDL2. In contrast, C16 ceramide-enriched HDL3 upregulated the phosphorylation of four intermediates in the mTOR pathway. These findings highlight a possible role for lipoprotein-associated sphingolipids in regulating metabolic and signaling pathways in podocytes and could lead to novel therapeutic targets in glomerular kidney diseases.

1. Introduction

Sphingolipids are both structural lipids and signaling molecules with significant physiological functions. Sphingolipids are found associated with cellular membranes and plasma lipoproteins, and their synthesis and degradation are tightly regulated to maintain homeostasis [1,2]. A classic form of chronic renal disease, Fabry disease, results from the genetic impairment of the glycosphingolipid metabolism [3]. Furthermore, diseases associated with kidney dysfunction—including diabetic nephropathy, polycystic kidney disease, and renal cell carcinoma—have been associated with changes in renal glycosphingolipid levels and the associated metabolism [4,5,6]. However, little is known about how changes in plasma sphingolipids and the sphingolipid composition of lipoproteins may contribute to the development of renal disease. Urine protein metabolites in patients with diabetic kidney disease provided some biochemical insights for identifying novel candidate biomarkers for the disease [7]; however, the information regarding plasma and urine lipidomics is still scarce. Sphingolipids are rapidly emerging as clinically important biomolecules due to their effects on multiple metabolic pathways [1]. Unlike other lipid molecules (e.g., cholesterol) small changes in the levels of sphingolipids can elicit potent responses and it is becoming increasingly clear that dysfunctional lipid metabolism extends far beyond cholesterol and triglycerides [8,9].
There is growing evidence that sphingolipid metabolism is altered in diabetes [10,11]; however, the majority of evidence comes from studies in animal models [12,13,14] with little attention given to the delivery of plasma sphingolipids to renal cells. We previously showed that sphingolipidomics can predict the risk of developing nephropathy in type 1 diabetes patients [15]. We measured plasma concentrations of ceramide species to investigate their association with the development of albuminuria in type 1 patients in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) study during 14–20 years of follow-up [15]. The results demonstrated that increased plasma levels of C16 ceramide and very long (C20, C20:1, C22:1, C24:1, C26, and C26:1) chain ceramide species measured at DCCT baseline were associated with a decreased likelihood of developing macroalbuminuria [15]. Other investigators found higher levels of ceramide in HDL particles of obese patients who were insulin insensitive [13]; in the small HDL particles (HDL3) of type 2 diabetes patients with dyslipidemia [16], and in HDL after ingestion of a high fat diet [17].
Ceramides are an integral part of cell membranes associated with macrodomains regulating surface receptors and signaling pathways [18,19,20,21,22,23]. Previous studies addressing the role of ceramide in diabetes focused on insulin resistance [12,13,24,25] and did not address diabetic complications including nephropathy. There is an increasing body of evidence suggesting that injury to podocytes leads to proteinuria and lipiduria (lipuria) in nephropathy [26,27,28] (Figure 1). In this study, we exposed cultured human podocytes to C16 ceramide-enriched lipoproteins (low density lipoproteins (LDL), high-density lipoproteins 2 and 3 (HDL2 and HDL3) and performed a comprehensive transcriptomics analysis. The results revealed possible metabolic and signaling pathways through which extracellular sphingolipids carried on lipoprotein particles can regulate the expression of genes encoding podocyte functionality and pathophysiology. Special focus is on the mTOR signaling pathway, which is well known to regulate the expression of slit diaphragm proteins and cytoskeleton structure in podocytes [29,30,31].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cells and Reagents

Human immortalized podocytes were originally obtained from Dr. Moin Saleem [32]. Tissue culture flasks and plates were obtained from Greiner bio-one, Inc., and tissue culture reagents were from Gibco. Lipoproteins were isolated from healthy volunteers as per our routine procedure [33]. Prior to enrollment in the study, written informed consent was obtained from each volunteer. Blood collection for lipoprotein preparation was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) and was performed according to the protocols approved by our institutions’ institutional review board (IRB), (Protocol number: Pro00070819). All volunteer data were analyzed anonymously. Blood was collected after a 12 h fast from healthy subjects who were normolipemic, not receiving prescription medication for any acute or chronic condition, and without family history of coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, or stroke; none of the subjects were receiving antioxidant therapy. The blood was pooled from 3 or 4 donors in the presence of a lipoprotein preservative cocktail consisting of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (0.1% w/v), chloramphenicol (20 µg/mL), gentamycin sulfate (50 µg/mL), epsilon amino-caproic acid (0.13% w/v), and dithiobisnitrobenzoic acid (0.04% w/v) to inhibit the activity of lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase, a major enzyme on HDL and LDL that converts free cholesterol into cholesteryl ester. Blood was then centrifuged, plasma was obtained, and lipoproteins fractioned by preparative ultracentrifugation as described previously [33]. Lipoprotein fractions were dialyzed against saline/EDTA (150 mM NaCl, 300 µM EDTA, pH 7.4), sterilized by filtering through a 0.22 µm membrane, and stored at 4 °C until used. Protein levels in lipoprotein preparations were measured using the Lowry method.
Podocytes were plated at 0.5–0.6 × 106 cell in 10-cm2 collagen-treated plates in RPMI 1640 media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Corning), 200 units/mL Penicillin/Streptomycin (Roche Applied Science), and 1% insulin-transferrin-sodium selenite (ITS) (Sigma), and incubated overnight at 33 °C, 5% CO2. Media was then changed but without the inclusion ITS, and cells were transferred to a 37 °C-incubator. Cells were grown for 14 days to be differentiated and the growth media were changed every 3–4 days.

2.2. Ceramide Enrichment of Lipoprotein Particles

Stock solution of each lipoprotein: LDL, HDL2 and HDL3 [2 mL of 4113 µg protein/mL in phosphate buffered saline (PBS)] was prepared [33] and used fresh for enrichment procedure. We have selected C16 and C24 ceramide species as representatives of long and very long chain ceramide species, respectively, and because they were previously shown to be negatively associated with the likelihood to develop macroalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes patients [15]. Ceramides were synthesized at the Synthesis Unit of the MUSC Lipidomics Shared Resource. Stock solutions of sphingolipids: D-e-C16 ceramide (C16 ceramide, MW 538.2), D-e-C24 ceramide (C24 ceramide, MW 650.2), and D-e- hydroxy C16 ceramide (2OH C16-Ceramide, MW 554) were prepared in 100% methanol at 100 µM each.
Duplicate aliquots from each lipoprotein (100 µg, 24 μL each) were analyzed at the Analytical Unit of the MUSC Lipidomics Shared Resource for sphingolipid content as previously described [33]. All preparations were performed in foil wrapped sterile glass tubes under yellow light. To each sterile tube, 50 µL of each synthetic ceramide solution was added and evaporated onto the side of the tube using nitrogen. The remaining volume of each 2 mL sterile lipoprotein solution with additional 50 µL of each ceramide solution were added to the tube. Each tube was then sealed under nitrogen and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Duplicate aliquots of each ceramide-enriched lipoprotein (100 µg, 24 µL each) were frozen in glass tube until analysis at the MUSC Lipidomics Shared Resource. The enriched lipoprotein solution was dialyzed against 0.01% EDTA in PBS, and aliquots (100 µg) of each ceramide-enriched lipoprotein were analyzed for sphingolipid content. Control (native) lipoproteins were not supplemented with ceramide but were subjected to a similar processing protocol.

2.3. RNA Sequencing (RNA-Seq) Analysis

Podocytes were differentiated as described above. Media were changed 24 h before the start of the experiment, then lipoproteins with and without enrichment were added to a final concentration of 200 μg/mL. After 7 h of incubation at 37 °C, 5% CO2, the plates were washed with PBS, and stored at −80 °C wrapped with aluminum foil.
RNA was extracted from frozen cells in the stored plates using Qiagen’s RNeasy kit according to manufacturer protocol and concentration quantified. An amount of 100–200 ng of total RNA was used to prepare RNA-Seq libraries using the TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit V2 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), following the protocol described by the manufacturer. High-throughput single read (1 × 50 cycles) sequencing (HTS) was performed using an Illumina HiSeq2500 (v4 chemistry) with each sample sequenced to a minimum depth of ~50 million reads. Data were subjected to Illumina quality control (QC) procedures (>80% of the data yielded a Phred score of 30). Secondary analysis was carried out on an OnRamp Bioinformatics Genomics Research Platform (OnRamp Bioinformatics, San Diego, CA, USA) (Codexis, Redwood City, CA, USA) [34,35]. OnRamp’s advanced Genomics Analysis Engine utilized an automated RNAseq workflow to process the data, including (i) data validation and quality control, (ii) read alignment to the human genome (hg19) using TopHat2 [36], which revealed 96.9% mapping of the single end-reads, and (iii) generation of gene-level count data with HTSeq. The resulting SAM files were sorted and inputted into the Python package HTSeq to generate count data for gene-level differential expression analyses [Genomics Research Platform with RNAseq workflow v1.0.1, including FastQValidator v0.1.1a, Fastqc v0.11.3, Bowtie2 v2.1.0, TopHat2 v2.0.9, HTSeq v0.6.0].
In order to infer differential signal within the data sets with robust statistical power, we utilized the paired-T test on Limma [37]. The data was first converted to log2 with the “voom” function and then fitted to a linear model by “lm.fit” [37]. Fold-change (FC) estimation and hypothesis testing for differential expression were performed using the lm.fit and ebays function [37]. The transcript expression data from Limma analysis of the samples were sorted according to their adjusted p-value or q-value, which is the smallest false discovery rate (FDR) at which a transcript is called significant. FDR is the expected fraction of false positive tests among significant tests and was calculated using the Benjamini–Hochberg multiple testing adjustment procedure. The statistical analysis of pathways and gene ontology terms were carried out using this sorted transcript list as described previously [38,39] and using iPathwayGuide (Advaita Bioinformatics, Plymoth, MI, USA) [40].

2.4. Multiplex Analysis of MTOR Signaling Pathway Intermediates

Cells were plated and differentiated in 6-well collagen-treated plates at 3.0 × 105 cells per well as described above. Media were changed 24 h before the start of the experiment, then lipoproteins with and without enrichment were added to a final concentration of 200 μg/mL. After 2 h of incubation at 37 °C, 5% CO2, cells were washed with cold PBS and extracted using the extraction buffer of the mTOR signaling Millipex kit from Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA) with added enzyme inhibitors (Roche). Extracts were stored at −80 °C until use. Cell lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 16,000× g for 15 min, then by passing in a Costar 0.22 µm spin-x filter unit (Cambridge, MA, USA). A total of 25 µL of cell extract containing 11.5 µg of protein in assay buffer was used for each Millipex assay well. The Millipex mTOR signaling kit contains eleven antibodies against the following phosphorylated intermediates: GSK3B, IGFR1, IRS1, AKT, mTOR, P70S6K, IR, PTEN, GSK3a, TSC2, and RPS6. The kit antibodies were validated by the manufacturer for lack of cross reactivity. The assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions and using the Biorad Bio-Plex 200 Multiplex System (Bio-Rad) at the MUSC Proteogenomics facility. All treatments were performed in duplicate wells and the cell extract from each well was analyzed in duplicates. Results from treatments with ceramide-enriched lipoprotein were compared to those with control lipoproteins using Student t-test at p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

We previously demonstrated that increased plasma levels of baseline C16 ceramide and very long (C20–C26) chain ceramide species were associated with decreased likelihood to develop macroalbuminuria after several years of follow-up [15]. On the other hand, higher levels of circulating long and very long chain ceramides were reported in systemic lupus erythematous patients with confirmed renal involvement [41]. In the present study, we aimed at determining whether lipoproteins enriched with C16 ceramide species could induce critical metabolic and signaling pathways in cultured human podocytes.

3.1. Ceramide Enrichment of Lipoprotein Particles

We previously determined levels of sphingolipid species in isolated lipoprotein classes in healthy human subjects using mass spectroscopy [33]. The smallest lipoprotein particles, HDL3 were found to be the major carriers of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), dihydrosphingosine 1-phosphate, and sphingosine. HDL3 particles contain the lowest levels of sphingomyelin and ceramide; however, HDL2 and HDL3 particles have similar sphingomyelin/ceramide ratios (72.9% and 78.9%, respectively) despite the difference in their particle size (8.5–13 and 7.3–8.5 nm, respectively) [33]. The results of the analysis of the ceramide species in lipoprotein particles showed that the concentration of C24 ceramide is the highest, followed by C24:1, C 22, C20, C16, and C18 ceramide species [33]. Ståhlman et al. found that small HDL-particles predominated in dyslipidemic subjects, with and without diabetes, compared to respective normolipidemic controls, and were distinguished as the primary carrier of ceramides, which is known for promoting inflammation and insulin resistance [16]. In healthy individuals, LDL particles are typically the major carriers of ceramide compared to VLDL and HDL particles [33,42]. In the current study, when lipoprotein particles were incubated in vitro with different ceramide species, C16 ceramide had the highest level of incorporation into all lipoproteins (LDL, HDL2, HDL3) (Figure 2). 2OH C16 ceramide had lower incorporation (Figure 2), whereas the very long-chain C24 ceramide was not incorporated in any lipoprotein incorporation (Data not shown). In vivo, the main tissue sources for circulating sphingolipids, their flux rate and half-life remain unclear. Clues to the origin of sphingolipids in the circulation have come from the recent studies, which identified microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) and ATP binding cassette family A protein 1 (ABCA1) as critical determinants of sphingolipid levels in lipoproteins [43,44]. A possible reason why the very long chain ceramide (C24) was not incorporated into the lipoprotein particles in vitro is probably the lack of an active process that requires MTP, similar to the naturally occurring process in the intracellular in vivo system [43].

3.2. Signaling and Metabolic Pathways Induced by C16 Ceramide-Enriched Lipoproteins

The signaling and metabolic pathways that were affected by exposing cultured human podocytes to ceramide-enriched lipoproteins for seven hours were examined using RNAseq analysis. The pathways that were significantly (p < 0.05) affected by the incubation of ceramide-enriched LDL, HDL2 and HDL3 are presented in Tables S1–S3, respectively. Treatment of podocytes with C16 ceramide-enriched LDL showed that the metabolic and signaling pathways were most affected when compared to C16 ceramide-enriched HDL2 or C16 ceramide-enriched HDL3, each relative to its corresponding control (native) lipoprotein. We focused primarily on the pathways that were significantly affected by C16 ceramide-enriched LDL and are pertinant to kidney functions. Thus, the sphingolipid metabolic pathway, glycophospholipid biosynthesis-ganglio series pathway, sphingolipid signaling pathway, adherens junctions pathway, mTOR signaling pathway, focal adhesion pathway, and apopotosis pathway were studied (Table 1).

3.2.1. Sphingolipid Metabolism Pathway

Our data show that genes regulating the sphingolipid metabolism pathway (Figure S1) partly regulate the sphingolipid signaling pathway (Figure S2). This is not surprising, since several sphingolipid metabolites (e.g., S1P, sphingosine, ceramide, ceramide 1-phosphate) are bioactive signaling molecules. C16 ceramide-enriched LDL induced the upregulation of sphingosine kinase 1 and 2 (SPHK1 & SPHK2), ceramide synthase 1 ((CERS1), generates C18 ceramide), ceramide kinase (CERK). On the other hand, C16 ceramide-enriched LDL elicited the downregulation of alkaline ceramidase (ACER2), delta desturase sphingolipid 2 (DEGS2), ceramide glucosyltransferase enzyme (UGCG), serine palmitoyltransferase long chain subunits 1, 2 and 3 (SPTL1, 2, 3), and ceramide synthase 6 ((CERS6), generates C16 ceramide) (Figure 3A and Table S4). Interestingly, the downregulation of CERS6 gene expression and the likely decrease in ceramide synthase 6 enzyme suggests a rate limiting process regulating this enzyme.
A key regulatory enzyme in lipid metabolism, phosphotidate phosphatase 2C (PPAP2C) was upregulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL. Additionally, SMPD1 and 4 which encode lysosomal acid sphingomyelinase and neutral membrane sphingomyelinase, respectively, were also upregulated. Recent findings strongly support that altered circulating sphingolipids are associated with the development of nephropathy in diabetes [15,45] and lupus [41,46]. How different circulating sphingolipids influence renal sphingolipid metabolism and signaling remains to be investigated.

3.2.2. Glycosphingolipids Biosynthesis-Ganglio Series Pathway

Glycosphingolipids are particularly abundant in the kidney and play a critical role in kidney function [4]. It has been established that sphingolipid enzyme replacement therapy ameliorates kidney disease progression in sphingolipid-associated genetic disorders such as Gaucher and Fabry disease [47]. However, whether circulating sphingolipids regulate renal glycosphingolipid metabolism is still unknown. Our data showed that all genes in the glycospingolipid biosynthesis-ganglio series pathway that were induced by C16 ceramide-enriched LDL were upregulated (Figure S3), with ST3 β-galactoside α-2,3-sialyltransferase 1 (ST3GAL1, 5) (Figure 3B and Table S5) being the most upregulated gene. ST3GAL1 is a type II membrane protein that catalyzes the transfer of sialic acid from CMP-sialic acid to galactose-containing substrates. This sialyltransferase enzyme is believed to be a target for cancer treatment to prevent metastasis [48]. ST3GAL isoform 5 causes GM3 synthase deficiency, which results in the upregulation of ST3GAL1, 5 in podocytes contributing to kidney diseases associated with changes in renal glycosphingolipid levels [4,5,6].
Additionally, the transcripts of ST6 N-acetylgalactosaminide α-2,6-sialyltransferase 4 (ST6GALNAC4) and isoform 6 (ST6GALNAC6) were upregulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL (Figure 3B and Table S5). This enzyme is involved in the synthesis of disialylgalactosylgloboside (DSGG) from monosialylgalactosylgloboside (MSGG) in the kidney [49], and the effect of its upregulation on renal glycosphingolipid levels and associated kidney diseases may possibly be relevant.

3.2.3. Sphingolipid Signaling Pathway

The sphingolipid signaling pathway genes that were regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL are shown in Figure 4, Table S6 and Figure S2. In addition to SPHK1 & SPHK2, sphingosine 1 phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1), CERS1, CERS 6, mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 (MAPK3), ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate1 (RAC1) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase subunit β (PIK3R2) were upregulated. In contrast, C16 ceramide-enriched LDL elicited the downregulation of DEGS2, ACER2, sphingosine 1 phosphate receptor 3 (S1PR3), and mitogen-activated protein kinase 8, 10 and 13 (MAPK 8, 10, 13). Additionally, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), Rho associated protein kinase2 (ROCK2), serine/threonine protein kinase B (AKT3) and phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate 3-kinase subunit β (PIK3CB) were downregulated. It remains to be determined which of these downstream signaling molecules that were induced by circulating sphingolipids could be targeted to modify podocyte pathophysiology.

3.2.4. Adherens Junction Pathway

The effects of C16 ceramide-enriched LDL on podocyte gene expression relating to the adherens junction pathway are presented in Figure 5, Table S7, and Figure S4. The glomerular filtration slit (slit diaphragm) is considered as a modified adherens junction [50]. After the metabolic and lysosome pathways, the adherens junction pathway was the third pathway that was significantly affected in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL (p = 3.3 × 10−09) (Table 1). Genes that are involved in encoding the formation of adherens junctions [51] and were downregulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL include nectin 3 (PVRL3), nectin 4 (PVRL4), β catenin (CTNNB1) and delta catenin (CTNND1) (Figure 5 and Table S7). In contrast, nectin 2 (PVRL2), and the actin genes ACTB and ACTG1 were upregulated along with the actin crosslinking genes α-actinin 1 and 4 (ACTN1 and ACTN4). It has been shown that mutations in ACTN4 are involved in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), which is a leading cause of kidney failure [52]. Mutations in this protein result in increased affinity for actin binding, the formation of intracellular aggregates, and decreased protein half-life, which—as a result of altering podocyte actin cytoskeleton—may induce toxic effects on podocytes. Notably, the α-actinin (ACTN2) gene, which is involved in actin cytoskeleton reorganization, was the most downregulated gene in the adherens junction pathway. The gene encoding the tight junction protein 1/zonula occludens 1 (TJP1/ZO1) was also downregulated (Figure 5 and Table S7). However, the gene encoding vinculin (VCL), another key protein involved in the formation of the tight junction complex was upregulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL.
Genes encoding the transforming growth factor β 1 (TGF-β1) signaling pathway components such as TGFbR1 and SMAD 2, 3, 4 were all downregulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL (Figure 5 and Table S7). Interestingly, the gene encoding epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was downregulated, whereas the gene encoding fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) was upregulated. It has been suggested that such interactions might serve as negative feedback loops to limit the extent of cellular activation [53].
The gene encoding SNAI2—a zinc finger protein commonly known as SLUG—was downregulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL (Figure 5 and Table S7). This protein is a transcriptional repressor which downregulates the expression of E-cadherin, involved in epithelial-mesenchymal transitions, and has anti-apoptotic activity [54]. The downregulation of this protein might have a positive effect on the continued functionality of healthy podocytes.

3.2.5. MTOR Signaling Pathway

The treatment of podocytes for 7 h with C16 ceramide-enriched LDL upregulated several intermediates in the mTOR signaling pathway (Figure S5). These include the genes MAPK3, the regulatory-associated protein of mTOR (RPTOR), proline-rich AKT1 substrate 1 (AKT1S1), ribosomal protein S6 kinase β 1 and 2 (RPS6KB1, 2) and the proline-rich AKT substrate of 40 kDa (PRAS40) (Figure 6A and Table S8). In contrast, several intermediates in the mTOR signaling pathway—including insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), phosphoinositide 3 kinase catalytic subunit α (PIK3CA, a class I PI3K), the proto-oncogene B-RAF (BRAF), AKT3, PTEN, tuberous sclerosis 1 (TSC1) and the rapamycin-insensitive companion of mammalian target of rapamycin (RICTOR)—were downregulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL (Figure 6A, Table S8, and Figure S5).
When human podocytes were incubated for 7 h with C16 ceramide-enriched HDL2, the only gene that was downregulated (by over two folds) was the protein kinase C β (PRKCβ) (Figure 6B, Table S8, and Figure S6). It is possible that after incubation with HDL2 for 7 h, the activation signal went back to background level, whereas that of LDL was still measurable after 7 h. This could be due to the ‘short’ time needed for HDL particle docking to its receptor(s) versus LDL holoparticle endocytosis via the LDL receptor and delivery of its sphingolipid cargo. The mTOR signaling pathway is known to be a major regulatory pathway in the kidney [29,30,31]; therefore, this particular pathway was selected to test the phosphorylated intermediates (Section 3.3 below). Since signaling pathways are activated by phosphorylation and not by gene expression levels per se, the determination of gene regulation was performed at 7 h post incubation with C16 ceramide-enriched lipoproteins, whereas the mTOR signaling pathway multiplex experiment was performed at 2 h post incubation for the early detection of induction effects. How mTOR signaling pathway components induced by circulating sphingolipids affect podocyte pathophysiology certainly warrants further investigation.

3.2.6. Focal Adhesion Pathway

The focal adhesion-related (cytoskeleton reorganization) genes that were differentially regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL treatment of podocytes are shown in Figure 7, Table S9, and Figure S7. The genes encoding filamin (FLNA), paxilin (PXN), vinculin (VCL) and actin (ACTB) were all upregulated, which can result in reorganization of focal adhesion and increase cell motility. Cyclin D, which regulates cell cycle progression, drives the G1/S phase transition, and is involved in cell growth [55] was also upregulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL (Figure 7, Table S9). The Rho pathway genes, including Rho-Associated, Coiled-Coil-Containing Protein Kinase 1 and 2 (ROCK1 and 2) and Rho GTPase Activating Protein 5 (ARHGAP5), which are involved in actin polymerization and the formation of filipodia and lamellipodia were downregulated (Figure 7, Table S9) [56]. In contrast, extracellular matrix (ECM) receptor genes and ECM protein genes including integrin α subunits 4 and V (ITGA 4, V), integrin β subunits 3, 8 and A11 (ITGB 3, 8 and ITGA11, respectively), non-collagenous ECM protein (COMP), collagen 4 α 5 (COL4A5), collagen 6 α 3 (COL6A3), and collagen 9 α 2 (COL9A2) were downregulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL (Figure 7, Table S9). The downregulation of these ECM proteins suggests that C16 ceramide-enriched LDL treatment may be involved in inducing podocyte dysfunction (e.g., effacement) which needs further investigation. Additionally, the genes encoding the cytokine receptors vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 and 3 (VEGFR 2, 3), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) were downregulated (Figure 7, Table S9). The effect of these receptors on focal adhesion and migration of endothelial cells has been studied extensively [57]; however, their effects on podocytes in the context of kidney disease processes remains unknown.

3.2.7. Apoptosis Pathway

It is well-known that podocyte effacement is a major outcome of glomerular diseases and is associated with podocyte loss leading to renal dysfunction. Whether programmed cell death mechanisms contribute to podocyte loss remains contentious, in part because the detection of apoptosis and other pathways of programmed cell death in podocytes has been technically challenging. Our data show that C16 ceramide-enriched LDL induced the upregulation of the apoptosis-related genes encoding α-tubulin (TUBA), ACTN and lamin (LMNA) (Figure 8, Table S10, and Figure S8), which are known to cause microtubule dysfunction [58], shrinkage of cells [59] and loss of nuclear membrane stability [60], respectively. In contrast, the Fas ligand (FasLG) gene, which drives cells into apoptosis [61], was downregulated (Figure 8 and Table S10). Comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms leading to podocyte loss are of particular interest due to the need for developing novel therapeutic strategies targeting these mechanisms to prevent glomerular dysfunction.

3.3. C16 Ceramide-Enriched Lipoproteins Regulate Levels of Phosphorylated Intermediates in the MTOR Signaling Pathway

The mTOR signaling pathway is a well-described pathway in kidney cell biology, and the phosphorylation of its intermediates is a key step in the activation of the pathway. To further validate our RNAseq data, we employed multiplex technology to detect the regulation (phosphorylation) of mTOR signaling intermediates in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL, HDL2 and HDL3 treatments of podocytes. Unlike the qualitative/semi quantitative immunoblot system, the multiplex assay used here offered a quantitative determination of phosphoproteins detected. Each antibody used in this assay was validated and all the antibodies in the provided kits do not cross-react with each other. We found that podocytes treated for two hours with C16 ceramide-enriched HDL2 resulted in downregulation of all phosphorylated intermediates of the mTOR signaling pathway except IGFR1, AKT, and insulin receptor (IR), in comparison to treatment with native HDL2 (Figure 9A). In contrast, C16 ceramide-enriched HDL3 induced the upregulation of GSK3B, AKT and p70S6K phosphorylation, in comparison to treatment with native HDL3 (Figure 9B). It is well-known that not all proteins need to be phosphorylated to be active and that transcript levels do not always translate to protein levels; however, the mTOR pathway after 2 h of incubation with C16 ceramide-enriched HDL2 showed the downregulation of phosphorylation of most activated intermediates measured.
The C16 ceramide-enriched LDL treatment induced downregulation of phosphorylated GSK3a and GSK3B signaling molecules in comparison to treatment with native LDL (Figure 9C). The data thus showed that the effect of C16 ceramide-enriched HDL2 (Figure 9A) and C16 ceramide-enriched LDL (Figure 9C) on the downregulation of phosphorylated GSK3B and GSK3a is similar. This similarity could be attributed to factors relevant to the modification of particle structure and/or size after C16 ceramide-enrichment.
Intriguingly, 2OH C16 ceramide-enriched HDL3 induced upregulation of IR phosphorylation compared to native HDL3, whereas 2OH C16 ceramide-enriched LDL induced upregulation of phosphorylated AKT, mTOR and IR. The pathophysiological relevance of 2OH C16 ceramide modification of lipoproteins is currently unknown.

4. Conclusions

The transcriptomics findings of this study suggest that the analyses of sphingolipid profiles of lipoprotein particles, although more laborious, have the potential for an added value over plasma/serum sphingolipidomics in providing more specific information about not only biomarkers of disease but also mechanistic insights about the pathology of the disease and potential drug target molecules. Sphingolipids are non-soluble molecules and the cell membrane is impermeable to these molecules, and in the circulation they are carried and transported by lipoproteins. Mechanistically, our findings suggest that whereas LDL particles—including their bioactive sphingolipid cargo—are likely internalized and metabolized upon their contact with podocytes, HDL particles (mainly HDL2) remain in contact with the cell surface capable of altering the structure of membrane signaling domains and triggering downstream signaling pathways (e.g., mTOR signaling pathway).
For future research on the effect of sphingolipid-altered lipoproteins on the functionality of renal cells (podocytes, mesangial cells, or tubular epithelial cells), other ceramide or sphingolipid species could be incorporated into lipoproteins in vitro, as described here. For sphingolipids containing very long-chain fatty acids (and therefore not easily incorporated in lipoproteins in vitro), fabricated lipoprotein model particles with incorporated sphingolipids could be utilized to investigate the potential for defined sphingolipid species to modify cell membrane sphingolipid composition and alter the cell signaling cascades involved with the pathophysiology of renal cells. Uncovering the role of lipoprotein sphingolipids in the development and progression of kidney disease could completely change the paradigm of intervention to prevent/delay the development or reduce the progression of nephropathy.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/11/2/178/s1. Figure S1: The sphingolipid metabolism pathway showing genes regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes (iPathwayGuide, Advaita Bioinformatics), Figure S2: The glycosphingolipid biosynthesis-ganglio series pathway showing genes regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes (iPathwayGuide, Advaita Bioinformatics), Figure S3: The sphingolipid signaling pathway showing the genes regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes (iPathwayGuide, Advaita Bioinformatics), Figure S4: The adherens junction pathway showing the genes regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes (iPathwayGuide, Advaita Bioinformatics), Figure S5: The mTOR signaling pathway showing genes regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes (iPathwayGuide, Advaita Bioinformatics), Figure S6: The mTOR signaling pathway showing the gene regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched HDL2 in human podocytes (iPathwayGuide, Advaita Bioinformatics), Figure S7: The focal adhesion pathway showing genes regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes (iPathwayGuide, Advaita Bioinformatics), Figure S8: The apoptosis pathway showing genes regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes (iPathwayGuide, Advaita Bioinformatics), Table S1: Metabolic and signaling pathways that were significantly (p < 0.05) affected by incubation of human podocytes with C16 ceramide-enriched LDL (iPathwayGuide, Advaita Bioinformatics), Table S2: Metabolic and signaling pathways that were significantly (p < 0.05) affected by incubation of human podocytes with C16 ceramide-enriched HDL2 (iPathwayGuide, Advaita Bioinformatics), Table S3: Metabolic and signaling pathways that were significantly (p < 0.05) affected by incubation of human podocytes with C16 ceramide-enriched HDL3 (iPathwayGuide, Advaita Bioinformatics), Table S4: The sphingolipid metabolism genes regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes (iPathwayGuide, Advaita Bioinformatics), Table S5: The glycosphingolipids synthesis genes regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes (iPathwayGuide, Advaita Bioinformatics), Table S6: The sphingolipid signaling pathway genes regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes (iPathwayGuide, Advaita Bioinformatics), Table S7: The adherens junction pathway genes regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes (iPathwayGuide, Advaita Bioinformatics), Table S8: The mTOR signaling pathway genes regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL or HDL2 in human podocytes (iPathwayGuide, Advaita Bioinformatics), Table S9: The focal adhesion pathway genes regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes (iPathwayGuide, Advaita Bioinformatics), Table S10: The apoptosis pathway genes regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes (iPathwayGuide, Advaita Bioinformatics), Table S11: C16 ceramide LDL responsive genes (iPathwayGuide, Advaita Bioinformatics).

Author Contributions

S.M.H., R.L.K. and D.N. conceptualized the study. S.M.H. designed and directed the experiments, wrote the original draft of the manuscript, and reviewed, edited and approved the final version. W.O.T. performed and analyzed the multiplex experiment, and wrote several sections of the manuscript. D.N. and E.A. provided, maintained, and differentiated the cells. E.A. and A.J.S. treated the cells and extracted the RNA. R.L.K. and A.J.S. prepared the lipoproteins and enriched them with ceramide species. S.M.H. and W.O.T. analyzed and revised the data. W.O.T., D.N. and E.A. reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Department of Regenerative Medicine and Cell Biology (S.M.H.), R01 DK087956 (D.N.), and the VA Merit Review Program (R.L.K.). Sphingolipid reagents and analyses supported in part by the Lipidomics Core in the SC Lipidomics and Pathobiology COBRE (P20 RR017677 from NCRR) and Lipidomics Shared Resource, Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC (P30 CA138313 and P30 GM103339). Services of the MUSC Proteogenomics Core Facility supported by NIHNIGMS P30 GM103342 to the SC COBRE for Developmentally Based Cardiovascular Diseases. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Acknowledgments

We thank the MUSC Hollings Cancer Center Genomics & MUSC Bioinformatics Cores for RNA-Seq data processing and analyses, particularly Gary Hardiman. We also thank J. Barth (MUSC) for helpful discussions. Contents do not represent the views of Department of VA or US Government.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hannun, Y.A.; Obeid, L.M. Principles of bioactive lipid signalling: Lessons from sphingolipids. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hammad, S.M. Blood Sphingolipids in Homeostasis and Pathobiology. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2011, 721, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Basic-Jukic, N.; Kes, P.; Coric, M.; Basic-Kes, V. Renal complications of Fabry disease. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2013, 19, 6046–6050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mather, A.R.; Siskind, L.J. Glycosphingolipids and kidney disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2011, 721, 121–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vukovic, I.; Bozic, J.; Markotic, A.; Ljubicic, S.; Ticinovic Kurir, T. The missing link—Likely pathogenetic role of GM3 and other gangliosides in the development of diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2015, 40, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shayman, J.A. Targeting Glycosphingolipid Metabolism to Treat Kidney Disease. Nephron 2016, 134, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sharma, K.; Karl, B.; Mathew, A.V.; Gangoiti, J.A.; Wassel, C.L.; Saito, R.; Pu, M.; Sharma, S.; You, Y.H.; Wang, L.; et al. Metabolomics reveals signature of mitochondrial dysfunction in diabetic kidney disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2013, 24, 1901–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Summers, S.A. Could Ceramides Become the New Cholesterol? Cell Metab. 2018, 27, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Matanes, F.; Twal, W.O.; Hammad, S.M. Sphingolipids as Biomarkers of Disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019, 1159, 109–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fox, T.E.; Kester, M. Therapeutic strategies for diabetes and complication: A role for sphingolipids? Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2010, 688, 206–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Blachnio-Zabielska, A.U.; Pulka, M.; Baranowski, M.; Nikolajuk, A.; Zabielski, P.; Górska, M.; Górski, J. Ceramide metabolism is affected by obesity and diabetes in human adipose tissue. J. Cell. Physiol. 2012, 227, 550–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chavez, J.A.; Summers, S.A. A ceramide-centric view of insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2012, 15, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Boon, J.; Hoy, A.J.; Stark, R.; Brown, R.D.; Meex, R.C.; Henstridge, D.C.; Schenk, S.; Meikle, P.J.; Horowitz, J.F.; Kingwell, B.A.; et al. Ceramides contained in LDL are elevated in Type 2 diabetes and promote inflammation and skeletal muscle insulin resistance. Diabetes 2013, 62, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Fox, T.E.; Bewley, M.C.; Unrath, K.A.; Pedersen, M.M.; Anderson, R.E.; Jung, D.Y.; Jefferson, L.S.; Kim, J.K.; Bronson, S.K.; Flanagan, J.M.; et al. Circulating sphingolipid biomarkers in models of type 1 diabetes. J. Lipid Res. 2011, 52, 509–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Klein, R.L.; Hammad, S.M.; Baker, N.L.; Hunt, K.J.; Al Gadban, M.M.; Cleary, P.A.; Virella, G.; Lopes-Virella, M.F.; DCCT/EDIC Research Group. Decreased plasma levels of select very long chain ceramide species are associated with the development of nephropathy in type 1 diabetes. Metabolism 2014, 63, 1287–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ståhlman, M.; Fagerberg, B.; Adiels, M.; Ekroos, K.; Chapman, J.M.; Kontush, A.; Borén, J. Dyslipidemia, but not hyperglycemia and insulin resistance, is associated with marked alterations in the HDL lipidome in type 2 diabetic subjects in the DIWA cohort: Impact on small HDL particles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1831, 1609–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Averill, M.; Rubinow, K.B.; Cain, K.; Wimberger, J.; Babenko, I.; Becker, J.O.; Foster-Schubert, K.E.; Cummings, D.E.; Hoofnagle, A.N.; Vaisar, T. Postprandial remodeling of high-density lipoprotein following high saturated fat and high carbohydrate meals. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2019, (in press). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Truman, J.P.; Al Gadban, M.M.; Smith, K.J.; Hammad, S.M. Acid sphingomyelinase in macrophage biology. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2011, 68, 3293–3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sonnino, S.; Prinetti, A. Membrane domains and the “Lipid Raft” concept. Curr. Medic. Chem. 2013, 20, 4–21. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Becker, K.A.; Gulbins, E. Ceramide-enriched membrane domains-structure and function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009, 1788, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Cremesti, A.E.; Gone, F.M.; Kolesnick, R. Role of sphingomyelinase and ceramide in modulating rafts: Do biophysical properties determine biologic outcome? FEBS Lett. 2002, 531, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Pinto, S.N.; Silva, L.C.; Futerman, A.H.; Prieto, M. Effect of ceramide structure on membrane biophysical properties: The role of acyl chain length and unsaturation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1808, 2753–2760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Hartmann, D.; Wegner, M.S.; Wanger, R.A.; Ferreirós, N.; Schreiber, Y.; Lucks, J.; Schiffmann, S.; Geisslinger, G.; Grösch, S. The equilibrium between long and very long chain ceramides is important for the fate of the cell and can be influenced by co-expression of CerS. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2013, 45, 1195–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Haus, J.M.; Kashyap, S.R.; Kasumov, T.; Zhang, R.; Kelly, K.R.; Defronzo, R.A.; Kirwan, J.P. Plasma ceramides are elevated in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes and correlate with the severity of insulin resistance. Diabetes 2009, 58, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Adams, J.M., 2nd; Pratipanawatr, T.; Berria, R.; Wang, E.; DeFronzo, R.A.; Sullards, M.C.; Mandarino, L.J. Ceramide content is increased in skeletal muscle from obese insulin resistant humans. Diabetes 2004, 53, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Reiser, J.; Sever, S. Podocyte biology and pathogenesis of kidney disease. Annu. Rev. Med. 2013, 64, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Jefferson, J.A.; Shankland, S.J.; Pichler, R.H. Proteinuria in diabetic kidney disease: A mechanistic viewpoint. Kidn. Intern. 2008, 74, 22–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Reddy, G.R.; Kotlyarevska, K.; Ransom, R.F.; Menon, R.K. The podocyte and diabetes mellitus: Is the podocyte the key to the origins of diabetic nephropathy? Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hyperten. 2008, 17, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vollenbröker, B.; George, B.; Wolfgart, M.; Saleem, M.A.; Pavenstädt, H.; Weide, T. mTOR regulates expression of slit diaphragm proteins and cytoskeleton structure in podocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol. 2009, 296, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lieberthal, W.; Levine, J.S. Mammalian target of rapamycin and the kidney. I. The signaling pathway. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2012, 303, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Inoki, K.; Huber, T.B. Mammalian target of rapamycin signaling in the podocyte. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2012, 21, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Saleem, M.A.; O’Hare, M.J.; Reiser, J.; Coward, R.J.; Inward, C.D.; Farren, T.; Xing, C.Y.; Ni, L.; Mathieson, P.W.; Mundel, P. A conditionally immortalized human podocyte cell line demonstrating nephrin and podocin expression. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2002, 13, 630–638. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Hammad, S.M.; Pierce, J.S.; Soodavar, F.; Smith, K.J.; Al Gadban, M.M.; Rembiesa, B.; Klein, R.L.; Hannun, Y.A.; Bielawski, J.; Bielawska, A. Blood sphingolipidomics in healthy humans: Impact of sample collection methodology. J. Lipid Res. 2010, 51, 3074–3087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Davis-Turak, J.; Courtney, S.M.; Hazard, E.S.; Glen, W.B., Jr.; da Silveira, W.A.; Wesselman, T.; Harbin, L.P.; Wolf, B.J.; Chung, D.; Hardiman, G. Genomics pipelines and data integration: Challenges and opportunities in the research setting. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2017, 17, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Hardiman, G.; Savage, S.J.; Hazard, E.S.; Wilson, R.C.; Courtney, S.M.; Smith, M.T.; Hollis, B.W.; Halbert, C.H.; Gattoni-Celli, S. Systems analysis of the prostate transcriptome in African-American men compared with European-American men. Pharmacogenomics 2016, 17, 1129–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ritchie, M.E.; Phipson, B.; Wu, D.; Hu, Y.; Law, C.W.; Shi, W.; Smyth, G.K. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kozak, I.; Sasik, R.; Freeman, W.R.; Sprague, L.J.; Gomez, M.L.; Cheng, L.; El-Emam, S.; Mojana, F.; Bartsch, D.U.; Bosten, J.; et al. A degenerative retinal process in HIV-associated non-infectious retinopathy. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Paolini, P.; Pick, D.; Lapira, J.; Sannino, G.; Pasqualini, L.; Ludka, C.; Sprague, L.J.; Zhang, X.; Bartolotta, E.A.; Vazquez-Hidalgo, E.; et al. Developmental and extracellular matrix-remodeling processes in rosiglitazone-exposed neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Pharmacogenomics 2014, 15, 759–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Draghici, S.; Khatri, P.; Tarca, A.L.; Amin, K.; Done, A.; Voichita, C.; Georgescu, C.; Romero, R. A systems biology approach for pathway level analysis. Genome Res. 2007, 17, 1537–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Oliveros, J.C. VENNY. An Interactive Tool for Comparing Lists with Venn Diagrams. 2007. Available online: http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html (accessed on 6 February 2020).
  41. Checa, A.; Idborg, H.; Zandian, A.; Sar, D.G.; Surowiec, I.; Trygg, J.; Svenungsson, E.; Jakobsson, P.J.; Nilsson, P.; Gunnarsson, I.; et al. Dysregulations in circulating sphingolipids associate with disease activity indices in female patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A cross-sectional study. Lupus 2017, 26, 1023–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Iqbal, J.; Walsh, M.T.; Hammad, S.M.; Hussain, M.M. Sphingolipids and Lipoproteins in Health and Metabolic Disorders. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 28, 506–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Iqbal, J.; Walsh, M.T.; Hammad, S.M.; Cuchel, M.; Tarugi, P.; Hegele, R.A.; Davidson, N.O.; Rader, D.J.; Klein, R.L.; Hussain, M.M. Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein Transfers and Determines Plasma Concentrations of Ceramide and Sphingomyelin but Not Glycosylceramide. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 25863–25875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Iqbal, J.; Walsh, M.T.; Hammad, S.M.; Cuchel, M.; Rader, D.J.; Hussain, M.M. ATP binding cassette family A protein 1 determines hexosylceramide and sphingomyelin levels in human and mouse plasma. J. Lipid Res. 2018, 59, 2084–2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Lopes-Virella, M.F.; Baker, N.L.; Hunt, K.J.; Hammad, S.M.; Arthur, J.; Virella, G.; Klein, R.L.; DCCT/EDIC Research Group. Glycosylated sphingolipids and progression to kidney dysfunction in type 1 diabetes. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2019, 13, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hammad, S.M.; Hardin, J.R.; Wilson, D.A.; Twal, W.O.; Nietert, P.J.; Oates, J.C. Race disparity in blood sphingolipidomics associated with lupus cardiovascular comorbidity. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Merscher, S.; Fornoni, A. Podocyte pathology and nephropathy—Sphingolipids in glomerular diseases. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2014, 5, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Wu, X.; Zhao, J.; Ruan, Y.; Sun, L.; Xu, C.; Jiang, H. Sialyltransferase ST3GAL1 promotes cell migration, invasion, and TGF-β1-induced EMT and confers paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Senda, M.; Ito, A.; Tsuchida, A.; Hagiwara, T.; Kaneda, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Kasama, K.; Kiso, M.; Yoshikawa, K.; Katagiri, Y.; et al. Identification and expression of a sialyltransferase responsible for the synthesis of disialylgalactosylgloboside in normal and malignant kidney cells: Downregulation of ST6GalNAc VI in renal cancers. Biochem. J. 2007, 402, 459–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Reiser, J.; Kriz, W.; Kretzler, M.; Mundel, P. The glomerular slit diaphragm is a modified adherens junction. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2000, 11, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  51. Miyoshi, J.; Takai, Y. Nectin and nectin-like molecules: Biology and pathology. Am. J. Nephrol. 2007, 27, 590–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mukerji, N.; Damodaran, T.V.; Winn, M.P. TRPC6 and FSGS: The latest TRP channelopathy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2007, 1772, 859–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Helsten, T.; Schwaederle, M.; Kurzrock, R. Fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling in hereditary and neoplastic disease: Biologic and clinical implications. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2015, 34, 479–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Nieto, M.A. The snail superfamily of zinc-finger transcription factors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 3, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bartek, J.; Lukas, J. Pathways governing G1/S transition and their response to DNA damage. FEBS Lett. 2001, 490, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Petrie, R.J.; Yamada, K.M. At the leading edge of three-dimensional cell migration. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 5917–5926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Hofer, E.; Schweighofer, B. Signal transduction induced in endothelial cells by growth factor receptors involved in angiogenesis. Thromb. Haemost. 2007, 97, 355–363. [Google Scholar]
  58. Vemu, A.; Atherton, J.; Spector, J.O.; Moores, C.A.; Roll-Mecak, A. Tubulin isoform composition tunes microtubule dynamics. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2017, 28, 3564–3572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Schwab, A.; Schuricht, B.; Seeger, P.; Reinhardt, J.; Dartsch, P.C. Migration of transformed renal epithelial cells is regulated by K+ channel modulation of actin cytoskeleton and cell volume. Pflugers Arch. 1999, 438, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Holaska, J.M.; Wilson, K.L.; Mansharamani, M. The nuclear envelope, lamins and nuclear assembly. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2002, 14, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Suda, T.; Takahashi, T.; Golstein, P.; Nagata, S. Molecular cloning and expression of the Fas ligand, a novel member of the tumor necrosis factor family. Cell 1993, 75, 1169–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Genes 11 00178 g001 550
Figure 1. Cartoon depicting the microstructure of the glomerulus. Diagram showing the transfer of albumin and lipoproteins including their sphingolipid cargo from the capillary lumen through fenestration of endothelial cells to the podocytes.
Figure 1. Cartoon depicting the microstructure of the glomerulus. Diagram showing the transfer of albumin and lipoproteins including their sphingolipid cargo from the capillary lumen through fenestration of endothelial cells to the podocytes.
Genes 11 00178 g001
Genes 11 00178 g002 550
Figure 2. Enrichment of the lipoprotein particles with ceramide. Lipoproteins isolated from healthy volunteers were incubated with 100 μM of ceramides. After incubation for 24 h at 37 °C, the lipoproteins were dialyzed against PBS and samples of before and after dialysis were analyzed for lipoprotein content. D-e-C16 ceramide had the highest incorporation while D-e-2OH C16 ceramide had low incorporation and D-e-C24 ceramide had no incorporation (Data not shown).
Figure 2. Enrichment of the lipoprotein particles with ceramide. Lipoproteins isolated from healthy volunteers were incubated with 100 μM of ceramides. After incubation for 24 h at 37 °C, the lipoproteins were dialyzed against PBS and samples of before and after dialysis were analyzed for lipoprotein content. D-e-C16 ceramide had the highest incorporation while D-e-2OH C16 ceramide had low incorporation and D-e-C24 ceramide had no incorporation (Data not shown).
Genes 11 00178 g002
Genes 11 00178 g003 550
Figure 3. The sphingolipid metabolism mRNA transcripts regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes. Podocytes were induced with 200 μg/mL C 16 ceramide-enriched or native LDL and incubated for 7 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2; RNA was extracted and RNA-seq assay was performed as described under Methods. (A) Sphingolipid metabolism; (B) glycosphingolipids synthesis. Figure generated using iPathwayGuide (Advaita Bioinformatics) software; log FC, logarithm of fold change of gene expression. Box and whisker plot: The ends of the box are the upper and lower quartiles, box spans the interquartile range. Horizontal line inside the box denotes the median and the whiskers are the two lines outside the box extend to the highest and lowest observations.
Figure 3. The sphingolipid metabolism mRNA transcripts regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes. Podocytes were induced with 200 μg/mL C 16 ceramide-enriched or native LDL and incubated for 7 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2; RNA was extracted and RNA-seq assay was performed as described under Methods. (A) Sphingolipid metabolism; (B) glycosphingolipids synthesis. Figure generated using iPathwayGuide (Advaita Bioinformatics) software; log FC, logarithm of fold change of gene expression. Box and whisker plot: The ends of the box are the upper and lower quartiles, box spans the interquartile range. Horizontal line inside the box denotes the median and the whiskers are the two lines outside the box extend to the highest and lowest observations.
Genes 11 00178 g003
Genes 11 00178 g004 550
Figure 4. The sphingolipid signaling pathway mRNA transcripts regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes. Podocytes were induced with C 16 ceramide-enriched or native LDL and RNA-seq assay was performed as described in Figure 3 legend. Figure generated by iPathwayGuide (Advaita Bioinformatics) software; log FC, logarithm of fold change of gene expression. Box and whisker plot: the ends of the box are the upper and lower quartiles, box spans the interquartile range. Horizontal line inside the box denotes the median and the whiskers are the two lines outside the box extend to the highest and lowest observations.
Figure 4. The sphingolipid signaling pathway mRNA transcripts regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes. Podocytes were induced with C 16 ceramide-enriched or native LDL and RNA-seq assay was performed as described in Figure 3 legend. Figure generated by iPathwayGuide (Advaita Bioinformatics) software; log FC, logarithm of fold change of gene expression. Box and whisker plot: the ends of the box are the upper and lower quartiles, box spans the interquartile range. Horizontal line inside the box denotes the median and the whiskers are the two lines outside the box extend to the highest and lowest observations.
Genes 11 00178 g004
Genes 11 00178 g005 550
Figure 5. The adherens junction pathway mRNA transcripts regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes. Podocytes were induced with C 16 ceramide-enriched or native LDL and RNA-seq assay was performed as described in Figure 3 legend. Figure generated by iPathwayGuide (Advaita Bioinformatics) software; log FC, logarithm of fold change of gene expression. Box and whisker plot: the ends of the box are the upper and lower quartiles, box spans the interquartile range. Horizontal line inside the box denotes the median and the whiskers are the two lines outside the box extend to the highest and lowest observations.
Figure 5. The adherens junction pathway mRNA transcripts regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes. Podocytes were induced with C 16 ceramide-enriched or native LDL and RNA-seq assay was performed as described in Figure 3 legend. Figure generated by iPathwayGuide (Advaita Bioinformatics) software; log FC, logarithm of fold change of gene expression. Box and whisker plot: the ends of the box are the upper and lower quartiles, box spans the interquartile range. Horizontal line inside the box denotes the median and the whiskers are the two lines outside the box extend to the highest and lowest observations.
Genes 11 00178 g005
Genes 11 00178 g006 550
Figure 6. The mTOR signaling pathway mRNA transcripts regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched lipoproteins in human podocytes. Podocytes were induced with C 16 ceramide-enriched or native lipoproteins and RNA-seq assay was performed as described in Figure 3 legend. (A) Cells induced with ceramide-enriched or native LDL; (B) cells induced with ceramide-enriched or native HDL2. Figure generated by iPathwayGuide (Advaita Bioinformatics) software; log FC, logarithm of fold change of gene expression. Box and whisker plot: the ends of the box are the upper and lower quartiles, box spans the interquartile range. Horizontal line inside the box denotes the median and the whiskers are the two lines outside the box extend to the highest and lowest observations.
Figure 6. The mTOR signaling pathway mRNA transcripts regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched lipoproteins in human podocytes. Podocytes were induced with C 16 ceramide-enriched or native lipoproteins and RNA-seq assay was performed as described in Figure 3 legend. (A) Cells induced with ceramide-enriched or native LDL; (B) cells induced with ceramide-enriched or native HDL2. Figure generated by iPathwayGuide (Advaita Bioinformatics) software; log FC, logarithm of fold change of gene expression. Box and whisker plot: the ends of the box are the upper and lower quartiles, box spans the interquartile range. Horizontal line inside the box denotes the median and the whiskers are the two lines outside the box extend to the highest and lowest observations.
Genes 11 00178 g006
Genes 11 00178 g007 550
Figure 7. The focal adhesion pathway mRNA transcripts regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes. Podocytes were induced with C 16 ceramide-enriched or native LDL and RNA-seq assay was performed as described in Figure 3 legend. Figure generated by iPathwayGuide (Advaita Bioinformatics) software; log FC, logarithm of fold change of gene expression. Box and whisker plot: the ends of the box are the upper and lower quartiles, box spans the interquartile range. Horizontal line inside the box denotes the median and the whiskers are the two lines outside the box extend to the highest and lowest observations.
Figure 7. The focal adhesion pathway mRNA transcripts regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes. Podocytes were induced with C 16 ceramide-enriched or native LDL and RNA-seq assay was performed as described in Figure 3 legend. Figure generated by iPathwayGuide (Advaita Bioinformatics) software; log FC, logarithm of fold change of gene expression. Box and whisker plot: the ends of the box are the upper and lower quartiles, box spans the interquartile range. Horizontal line inside the box denotes the median and the whiskers are the two lines outside the box extend to the highest and lowest observations.
Genes 11 00178 g007
Genes 11 00178 g008 550
Figure 8. The apoptosis pathway mRNA transcripts regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes. Podocytes were induced with C 16 ceramide-enriched or native LDL and RNA-seq assay was performed as described in Figure 3 legend. Figure generated by iPathwayGuide (Advaita Bioinformatics) software; log FC, logarithm of fold change of gene expression. Box and whisker plot: the ends of the box are the upper and lower quartiles, box spans the interquartile range. Horizontal line inside the box denotes the median and the whiskers are the two lines outside the box extend to the highest and lowest observations.
Figure 8. The apoptosis pathway mRNA transcripts regulated in response to C16 ceramide-enriched LDL in human podocytes. Podocytes were induced with C 16 ceramide-enriched or native LDL and RNA-seq assay was performed as described in Figure 3 legend. Figure generated by iPathwayGuide (Advaita Bioinformatics) software; log FC, logarithm of fold change of gene expression. Box and whisker plot: the ends of the box are the upper and lower quartiles, box spans the interquartile range. Horizontal line inside the box denotes the median and the whiskers are the two lines outside the box extend to the highest and lowest observations.
Genes 11 00178 g008
Genes 11 00178 g009 550
Figure 9. The mTOR signaling pathway phosphorylated proteins regulated in response to C16 ceramide- or 2OH C16 ceramide-enriched lipoproteins in human podocytes. Podocytes were induced with 200 μg/mL ceramide-enriched or with corresponding native lipoproteins (HDL2, HDL3, or LDL), and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Cells were extracted and processed using the mTOR signaling Millipex kit (Millipore). A total of 11.5 µg protein in 25 µL assay buffer was used for each assay sample. The assay was analyzed using the Bio-Plex 200 Multiplex System (Bio-Rad). All treatments were performed in duplicates and the cell extract from each treatment was analyzed in duplicates. (A) Treatment with C16 ceramide-enriched HDL2, (B) treatment with C16 ceramide-enriched HDL3, (C) treatment with C16 ceramide-enriched LDL. Results from treatments with ceramide-enriched lipoproteins were compared to those with corresponding native lipoproteins using Student t-test at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 9. The mTOR signaling pathway phosphorylated proteins regulated in response to C16 ceramide- or 2OH C16 ceramide-enriched lipoproteins in human podocytes. Podocytes were induced with 200 μg/mL ceramide-enriched or with corresponding native lipoproteins (HDL2, HDL3, or LDL), and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Cells were extracted and processed using the mTOR signaling Millipex kit (Millipore). A total of 11.5 µg protein in 25 µL assay buffer was used for each assay sample. The assay was analyzed using the Bio-Plex 200 Multiplex System (Bio-Rad). All treatments were performed in duplicates and the cell extract from each treatment was analyzed in duplicates. (A) Treatment with C16 ceramide-enriched HDL2, (B) treatment with C16 ceramide-enriched HDL3, (C) treatment with C16 ceramide-enriched LDL. Results from treatments with ceramide-enriched lipoproteins were compared to those with corresponding native lipoproteins using Student t-test at p ≤ 0.05.
Genes 11 00178 g009
Table
Table 1. C16 ceramide-enriched LDL regulate gene expression of metabolic and signaling pathways in human podocytes.
Table 1. C16 ceramide-enriched LDL regulate gene expression of metabolic and signaling pathways in human podocytes.
RankPathwayp Value *Number of Genes
1Metabolic pathways1.1 × 10−10348
2Lysosome2.2 × 10−0952
3Adherens junction3.3 × 10−0941
4Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis5.2 × 10−0850
5Endocytosis5.0 × 10−0787
6Spliceosome5.6 × 10−0544
7AGE-RAGE signaling pathway in diabetic complications0.000345
8Sphingolipid signaling pathway0.000451
12Insulin signaling pathway0.000757
14mTOR signaling pathway0.000831
17Focal adhesion0.001091
18PI3K-Akt signaling pathway0.0013114
20TNF signaling pathway0.001847
* Bonferroni test-validated p values.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hammad, S.M.; Twal, W.O.; Arif, E.; Semler, A.J.; Klein, R.L.; Nihalani, D. Transcriptomics Reveal Altered Metabolic and Signaling Pathways in Podocytes Exposed to C16 Ceramide-Enriched Lipoproteins. Genes 2020, 11, 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11020178

AMA Style

Hammad SM, Twal WO, Arif E, Semler AJ, Klein RL, Nihalani D. Transcriptomics Reveal Altered Metabolic and Signaling Pathways in Podocytes Exposed to C16 Ceramide-Enriched Lipoproteins. Genes. 2020; 11(2):178. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11020178

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hammad, Samar M., Waleed O. Twal, Ehtesham Arif, Andrea J. Semler, Richard L. Klein, and Deepak Nihalani. 2020. "Transcriptomics Reveal Altered Metabolic and Signaling Pathways in Podocytes Exposed to C16 Ceramide-Enriched Lipoproteins" Genes 11, no. 2: 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11020178

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop