Next Article in Journal
bta-miR-23a Regulates the Myogenic Differentiation of Fetal Bovine Skeletal Muscle-Derived Progenitor Cells by Targeting MDFIC Gene
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Transcriptome Profiling Provides Insight on Cholesterol and Lithocholate Degradation Mechanisms in Nocardioides simplex VKM Ac-2033D
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comparative Study of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for the Prediction of Long-Range Chromatin Interactions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Computational Methods for the Analysis of Genomic Data and Biological Processes

by
Francisco Gómez-Vela
*,
Federico Divina
and
Miguel García-Torres
Computer Science Division, Pablo de Olavide University, ES-41013 Seville, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2020, 11(10), 1230; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11101230
Submission received: 14 October 2020 / Accepted: 14 October 2020 / Published: 20 October 2020
Today, new technologies, such as microarrays or high-performance sequencing, are producing more and more genomic data. This fact has brought new opportunities and challenges in the fields of computational biology and bioinformatics, since this huge number of data need to be analysed in order to be exploited.
In this context, new computational methods and tools, such as machine learning approaches or gene expression analysis tools, could provide the solution to such issues.
The overall aim of this Special Issue is to compile the latest research and developments in the field of computational methods for the analysis of gene expression data and, in particular, with the modelling of biological processes.
Among all the submissions, eleven papers were accepted and published in this Special Issue. In this sense, machine learning-based approaches have received particular attention, such as the work presented by Vanhaeren et al. [1]. In this work, the authors used 1D sequencing signals to model cohesin-mediated chromatin interactions in two human cell lines and evaluate the prediction models obtained. To this end, they tested the performance of six popular machine learning algorithms: decision trees, random forests, gradient boosting, support vector machines, multi-layer perceptron and deep learning. The results obtained showed that gradient boost outperformed the other five methods, yielding accuracies of about 95%. Despite these results, the authors established that it was necessary to examine other cell lines and tissues to confirm the obtained observations.
In another article, Rehman and Chong [2] presented work where the authors propose a Convolution Neural Network (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-based tool named DNA6mA-MINT for DNA-6mA modification identification. The tool uses the CNN for feature extraction, while LSTM provides optimal interpretation for those features. The authors showed that the performance of their tool is superior to that achieved with existing state-of-the-art techniques on the “combined-species”, Mus musculus genome, and rice genome datasets. Moreover, the authors carried out a performance analysis on 5- and 10-fold cross-validation in order to obtain a better comparative analysis. The tool is provided by a user-friendly web server, publicly available.
Another example of the use of CNN is the work by Mahmoudi et al. [3], where a new computational model for identifying N6-methyladenosine (m6A) post-transcriptional modification in RNAs is proposed. The technique, called iMethyl-deep, provides a novel computational method for identifying m6A Saccharomyces cerevisiae sites by using single-nucleotide resolution to convert RNA sequences into high-quality feature representations in the CNN. The model is able to extract the relevant features from the input samples. The results obtained show that iMethyl-deep outperforms state-of-the-art methods and achieves accuracies of 89.19% and 87.44% on the M6A2614 and M6A6540 benchmark datasets, respectively.
In the context of machine learning, Delgado-Chaves et al. [4] presented an analysis of the effects of the gene Ly6E in the immune response against the coronavirus responsible for murine hepatitis (MHV). With this aim, the work used different datasets from mice, with and without the ablation of the gene Ly6E, to reconstruct computational gene co-expression networks, by using a machine learning-based algorithm called EnGNet. The authors carried out an integration of differential expression analyses and reconstructed network exploration, and significant differences in the immune response to the virus were observed in Ly6E compared to in wild-type animals. The obtained results show that Ly6E ablation in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) leads to a progressive impaired immune response in both the liver and spleen.
Zahoor and Zafar [5] propose a novel optimization algorithm inspired by the “infiltration tactics” of the war zone (ITO) for the task of classifying microarray datasets. The algorithm integrates parameter-free and parameter-based classifiers to provide a highly accurate and reliable binary classifier. The results are generated in two steps: (a) the Lightweight Infantry Group converges quickly to find non-local maxima and produces comparable results, and (b) the Follow-up Team (FT) applies advanced tuning to enhance the baseline performance. Each soldier is considered as a base model with its own independently chosen subset selection method (pre-processing, and validation methods and classifier). Therefore, successful soldiers are combined for optimal results. The performance of the algorithm was successfully tested using three mouse livers and a rat liver.
In this Special Issue, some tools are presented as well, such as in the work by Zeng et al. [6]. In this article, the authors present a new meta-analytic integration tool, called the Comparative Pathway Integrator (CPI), which is able to deal with multiples studies of different conditions. To do so, the tool uses an adaptive weighted Fisher’s method to discover consensual and differential enrichment patterns, a tight clustering algorithm to reduce pathway redundancy, and a text-mining algorithm to assist the interpretation of the pathway clusters. The authors demonstrate its effectiveness by applying CPI to jointly analyse six psychiatric disorder transcriptomic studies. The results described show functions confirmed by previous biological studies as well as novel enrichment patterns. The tool is publicly available as a CPI R package.
Another interesting tool provided as an R package, named metaRE, was presented by Novikova et al. [7]. MetaRE is able to perform a systematic search for cis-regulatory elements enriched in the promoters of the genes significantly changed in their transcription in a reaction. metaRE extracts datasets of multiple expression profiles generated to test the response of the same organism and identifies simple and composite cis-regulatory elements that are systematically associated with the differential expression of genes. The authors tested metaRE’s performance for the identification of low-temperature-responsive cis-regulatory code in Arabidopsis thaliana and Danio rerio. MetaRE was able to identify potential binding sites for known as well as unknown cold response regulators.
Computationally based analyses of biological processes are also included in this Special Issue. For example, the work by Agioutantis et al. [8] analysed 21 human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines (HCC lines) to explore intertumoral molecular diversity and pertinent drug sensitivity. This article proposes an integrative computational approach based on an exploratory and single-sample gene-set enrichment analysis of transcriptome and proteome data, and then a correlation analysis of drug-screening data. The presented results classified HCC lines into two groups. In particular, the lines were classified as poorly differentiated and well-differentiated, displaying lower/higher enrichment scores in a “Specifically Upregulated in Liver” gene set, respectively. It is worth mentioning that the analysis of correlation showed a differential effectiveness of specific drugs against poorly differentiated compared to well-differentiated HCC lines, which is possibly applicable in clinical research with patients with analogous features. As a result, this study may expand the knowledge of HCC lines and proposes a cost-effective computational approach to precision anti-HCC therapies.
The work by Tian et al. [9] addresses the effect that deleting single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of genes affected by large-effect expression Quantitative Trait Loci (eQTL) may have on gene expression. To this end, CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis was used to delete SNPs, obtaining single-cell clones. The bottlenecks for the fine mapping of such SNPs were suggested to be the impossibility of targeting many SNPs and the clonal variability of single-cell clones, among others.
An analysis of the hypoxia inducible domain family member 2A (HIGD2A) was presented in Salazar et al. [10]. The protein HIG2A is produced by the HIGD2A gene, found in mitochondria and the nucleus, promoting cell survival in hypoxic conditions. The main objective of this study was to carry out a biosystem analysis of HIGD2A with the aim of discovering its implications in cancer biology. The authors used different public databases such Gene Expression Omnibus to evaluate some gene expression datasets. The results presented suggested that the gene’s alterations are present in the different cancers studied.
Finally, Ghanemi et al. [11] presented a review about the therapeutic alternatives to exercise in obesity. The review focuses on a functional genomics perspective, in particular, finding potential therapeutic targets for obesity. The authors point out various approaches, identifying differential gene expression-based studies that aimed at finding genes that are differentially expressed under diverse conditions depending on physical activity and diet (mainly high-fat). The authors suggested that this area of functional genomics-related exploration will lead to novel mechanisms and also new applications and implications along with a new generation of treatments for obesity and the related metabolic disorders.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the authors and peer reviewers for their valuable contributions to this Special Issue. This issue would not be possible without their valuable and professional work. In addition, we would also like to take the opportunity to show our gratitude to the Genes editorial team for their work, due to which this Special Issue has been a success.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vanhaeren, T.; Divina, F.; García-Torres, M.; Gómez-Vela, F.; Vanhoof, W.; Martínez-García, P.M. A comparative study of supervised machine learning algorithms for the prediction of long-range chromatin interactions. Genes 2020, 11, 985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rehman, M.U.; Chong, K.T. DNA6mA-MINT: DNA-6mA modification identification neural tool. Genes 2020, 11, 898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mahmoudi, O.; Wahab, A.; Chong, K.T. iMethyl-Deep: N6 methyladenosine identification of yeast genome with automatic feature extraction technique by using deep learning algorithm. Genes 2020, 11, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Delgado-Chaves, F.M.; Gómez-Vela, F.; Divina, F.; García-Torres, M.; Rodriguez-Baena, D.S. Computational analysis of the global effects of Ly6E in the immune response to coronavirus infection using gene networks. Genes 2020, 11, 831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zahoor, J.; Zafar, K. Classification of microarray gene expression data using an infiltration tactics optimization (ITO) algorithm. Genes 2020, 11, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zeng, X.; Zong, W.; Lin, C.W.; Fang, Z.; Ma, T.; Lewis, D.A.; Enwright, J.F.; Tseng, G.C. Comparative pathway integrator: A framework of meta-analytic integration of multiple transcriptomic studies for consensual and differential pathway analysis. Genes 2020, 11, 696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Novikova, D.D.; Cherenkov, P.A.; Sizentsova, Y.G.; Mironova, V.V. metaRE R package for meta-analysis of transcriptome data to identify the cis-regulatory code behind the transcriptional reprogramming. Genes 2020, 11, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Agioutantis, P.C.; Loutrari, H.; Kolisis, F.N. Computational analysis of transcriptomic and proteomic data for deciphering molecular heterogeneity and drug responsiveness in model human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. Genes 2020, 11, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Tian, R.; Pan, Y.; Etheridge, T.H.A.; Deshmukh, H.; Gulick, D.; Gibson, G.; Bao, G.; Lee, C.M. Pitfalls in single clone CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis to fine-map regulatory intervals. Genes 2020, 11, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Salazar, C.; Yañez, O.; Elorza, A.A.; Cortes, N.; García-Beltrán, O.; Tiznado, W.; Ruiz, L.M. Biosystem analysis of the hypoxia inducible domain family member 2A: Implications in cancer biology. Genes 2020, 11, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Ghanemi, A.; Melouane, A.; Yoshioka, M.; St-Amand, J. Exercise and high-fat diet in obesity: Functional genomics perspectives of two energy homeostasis pillars. Genes 2020, 11, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gómez-Vela, F.; Divina, F.; García-Torres, M. Computational Methods for the Analysis of Genomic Data and Biological Processes. Genes 2020, 11, 1230. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11101230

AMA Style

Gómez-Vela F, Divina F, García-Torres M. Computational Methods for the Analysis of Genomic Data and Biological Processes. Genes. 2020; 11(10):1230. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11101230

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gómez-Vela, Francisco, Federico Divina, and Miguel García-Torres. 2020. "Computational Methods for the Analysis of Genomic Data and Biological Processes" Genes 11, no. 10: 1230. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11101230

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop