Next Article in Journal
MicroRNA-1258 Inhibits the Proliferation and Migration of Human Colorectal Cancer Cells through Suppressing CKS1B Expression
Previous Article in Journal
Massive Loss of Olfactory Receptors But Not Trace Amine-Associated Receptors in the World’s Deepest-Living Fish (Pseudoliparis swirei)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/genes10110911
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Analysis of Members of the WRKY Gene Family and Their Cold Stress Response in Prunus mume

by
Fei Bao
1,2,3,4,5,
Anqi Ding
1,2,3,4,5,6,
Tangren Cheng
2,3,4,5,
Jia Wang
2,3,4,5 and
Qixiang Zhang
1,2,3,4,5,6,*
1
Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Tree Breeding by Molecular Design, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2
Beijing Key Laboratory of Ornamental Plants Germplasm Innovation & Molecular Breeding, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
3
National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
4
Beijing Laboratory of Urban and Rural Ecological Environment, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
5
Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding in Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
6
School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2019, 10(11), 911; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10110911
Submission received: 14 October 2019 / Revised: 5 November 2019 / Accepted: 6 November 2019 / Published: 8 November 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Prunus mume, which is a rosaceous arbor with very high ornamental, edible and medical values, has a distribution that is mainly restricted by low temperature. WRKY transcription factor genes play crucial roles in the growth, development, and stress responses of plants. However, the WRKY gene family has not been characterised in P. mume. There were 58 PmWRKYs identified from genome of P. mume. They were anchored onto eight link groups and categorised into three broad groups. The gene structure and motif composition were reasonably conservative in each group. Investigation of gene duplication indicated that nine and seven PmWRKYs were arranged in tandem and segmental duplications, respectively. PmWRKYs were discriminately expressed in different tissues (i.e., roots, stems, leaves, flowers and fruits) in P. mume. The 17 cold-related candidate genes were selected based on RNA-seq data. Further, to investigate the function of PmWRKYs in low temperatures, the expression patterns under artificial cold treatments were analysed. The results showed that the expression levels of the 12 PmWRKYs genes significantly and 5 genes slightly changed in stems. In particular, the expression level of PmWRKY18 was up-regulated after ABA treatment. In addition, the spatiotemporal expression patterns of 17 PmWRKYs were analysed in winter. These results indicated that 17 PmWRKYs were potential transcription factors regulating cold resistance in P. mume.

1. Introduction

Low temperature is one of the most important abiotic factors affecting plant growth and development, and ultimately affecting the geographical distribution of plants. Chilling stress (0–15 °C) disrupts cellular homeostasis by altering the fatty acid composition of the membrane and accumulating the reactive oxygen species (ROS) in some organelles, which can deactivate proteins and interfere with normal physiological processes, especially for photosynthesis [1,2,3]. Freezing stress causes ice formation in intracellular and intercellular space, which can promote serious injuries and cell dehydration [4,5].
The stress response of plants is regulated by several transcription factors. The WRKYs transcription family was reported to participate in the regulation of plant growth, development, biotic, and abiotic stress responses [6,7]. The WRKY transcription factors have a unique WRKY domain of approximately 60 amino acid (AA) residues that are mainly composed of two parts: the highly conserved heptapeptide sequence WRKYGQK and a metal chelating zinc-finger motif [8]. According to the number of WRKY domains and the type of the zinc-finger motif (C2H2 or C2HC), WRKYs can be categorised into three groups: I, II and III [7]. Group I was composed of WRKYs with two WRKY domains. Group II proteins, which have only one WRKY domain and a C2H2 zinc-finger motif, can be further subdivided into five subgroups (i.e., II a–e) based on short conserved structural motifs [7]. In addition, the only difference in the structure between group III and II proteins is that the former contains another type of zinc-finger motif, which ends with HXC. WRKY transcription factors could regulate the expression of target genes by binding to the W-boxes in the target genes’ promoters. Moreover, clusters of W-boxes could strengthen the effects [9,10,11,12,13]. In addition, WRKYs, which could bind to SURE element, PRE4 element and the WK box, have also been reported [6].
Many WRKY genes have been found and cloned from different plants since SPF1 was isolated from sweet potato in 1994 [9]. So far, only two WRKY homologues have been identified from non-plants, Giardia lamblia and Dictyostelium discoideum [14,15]. A total of 58 PpWRKY genes have been identified in the genome of Prunus persica [16]. WRKY proteins have been verified to be essential in the defense response to various biotic and abiotic stresses, including low or high temperature, mechanical damage, and pathogenic infection [17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. In addition, there is a great deal of definite evidence indicating that the regulation of plant development and metabolism also requires WRKYs.
Prunus mume Sieb. et Zucc. (Rosaceae, Prunus) is a traditional flower with high ornamental value, and has been widely cultivated in China for over three thousand years. P. mume originated from the Yangtze River Basin and was later introduced to northern China. The low-temperature was considered a key ecological factor that affected the distribution of P. mume. Stems and buds are the most important above ground organs of P. mume for safely overwintering. Transcription factors play an important role in regulating this natural abiotic stress response. In this study, 58 WRKY genes were identified in the P. mume genome, and systematic analysis of the phylogeny, gene duplication, genomic localization, gene structure, and tissue-specific expression was conducted. Moreover, RNA-seq data and real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) were employed to determine the expression patterns of PmWRKYs under artificial low temperature and exogenous ABA treatments, and during winter time. In conclusion, this study improves our understanding of the evolution of PmWRKYs family and provides the candidate genes for cold resistance research in P. mume.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Identification of P. mume WRKY Genes

To identify the WRKY family in P. mume, BLASTP and BLASTX were performed in the P. mume genomic database with the WRKY sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana that were downloaded from Plant Transcription Factor Database (http://planttfdb.cbi.pku.edu.cn/index.php). The hidden Markov model (HMM) searches were conducted in P. mume protein sequences using the WRKY domain HMM profile (PF03106). Candidate protein sequences without a WRKY domain were abandoned by screening of the SWISS-MODEL (http://swissmodel.expasy.org/). The sequences of genomic DNA, coding sequences (CDS) and protein sequences of PmWRKYs were obtained from National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (gene ID were shown in Table 1). ExPASy (http://web.expasy.org/compute_pi) and Plant-mPLoc (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/plant-multi/) were used to separately predict the molecular weight (MW), isoelectric point (pI) and protein subcellular localization.

2.2. Genomic Localization and Gene Family Expansion Pattern Analysis

Based on the positional information in the P. mume genome database, genomic localization of PmWRKYs was drawn by MapDraw2.1 and Photoshop CS6.0. Research on gene family expansion pattern focused on tandem and segmental duplications. The tandemly arrayed genes were characterised as tandem duplications when they exhibited close phylogenetic relationships and were located at the same chromosomal location (within 100 kb) according to the criteria reported by Kong [24]. Segmental duplication regions were identified by the method of the Plant Genome Duplication Database [25]. First, the search for potential anchors was conducted by BLASTP (E < e−6). Subsequently, MCscan was applied to identify the homologous regions. Finally, syntenic blocks were evaluated using ColinearScan, and alignments with an E value < e−10 were deemed to be significant matches.

2.3. Phylogenetic and Conserved Domains Analysis

A phylogenetic tree was constructed using Neighbour-Joining (NJ) methods (bootstrap replicates: 1,000) by MEGA5.1 with the default value. To categorise PmWRKYs, 12 referential A. thaliana WRKYs from diverse groups were used: AtWRKY11 (AEE85928.1), AtWRKY14 (AAP21276.1), AtWRKY18 (AAM78067.1), AtWRKY20 (ANM67410.1), AtWRKY21 (AAB63078.1), AtWRKY27 (ABH04558.1), AtWRKY28 (AEE84006.1), AtWRKY31 (AEE84546.1), AtWRKY41 (AEE82969.1), AtWRKY43 (AEC10646.1), AtWRKY45 (ABD57509.1), and AtWRKY49 (AAQ62425.1). To examine the domain organization of WRKY proteins in detail, multiple sequence alignments of the WRKY domain sequences were conducted by DNAMAN 7.

2.4. Gene Structure and Conserved Motif Analysis

The genomic sequences and CDS of PmWRKYs (Additional File 5) were obtained from the P. mume genome database. The exon-intron structures were identified with the Gene Structure Display Server2.0 (GSDS, http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/). It should be noted that since the database only contains the information of gene coding region, the untranslated region (5′ UTR and 3′ UTR) cannot be displayed by mapping the gene structure. PmWRKY protein sequences were submitted to the Multiple Em for the Motif Elucidation program (MEME) (http://meme.nbcr.net/meme/) to identify the conserved motif with the following parameters: any number of repetitions; the motifs number was set to 20; motif width was set to 6–200. SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/) and Pfam were employed to annotate the identified motifs.

2.5. Heat Map Analysis by Transcriptome Data

The RNA-seq data of the five tissues (young roots, young stems, leaves, flowers, and immature fruits) (NCBI, Sequence Read Archive (SRA): SRP014885) and leaf buds collected before and after freezing stress in winter of P. mume cultivar ‘Zhusha’ (NCBI, SRA: SRP131731) have been used to draw the heatmaps of the PmWRKY genes. The ‘before freezing’ samples were collected when the lowest temperature of the day was higher than 5 °C, and the ‘after freezing’ samples were collected when the highest temperature of the day is lower than 0 °C in 2014. The time interval between the two samplings was one month. HemI (Heat map illustrator) was employed to draw heat maps with the default value [26].

2.6. Chilling and ABA Treatments

The annual branches were collected from the P. mume cultivar ‘Yudie’ for artificial treatments. Before the chilling treatment, the braches were exposed to 22 °C overnight by water culture and then transferred to 4 °C for 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h in dark. For the ABA treatment, the branches were sprayed with 100 μM ABA for 0, 0.5, 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. The stems were collected after the artificial treatments. The first time point (0 h) served as a control.
The stems and buds of the cultivar ‘Yudie’ were collected in winter from 5 November, 2017 to 4 March, 2018, which were planted in the open air. The daily land surface temperatures were recorded. Three replications of each sample were collected and all of the test samples were stored at −80 °C before total RNA isolation.

2.7. Gene Expression Analyses

Total RNA of each sample was extracted using the EASYspin Plus Plant RNA Extraction Kit (Aidlab, Beijing, China). The first-strand cDNA was obtained using a TIANScript RT Kit (KR107, Tiangen, Beijing, China). The specific primers were designed by Beacon Designer 8 based on cDNA sequences (Additional File 1). The expression levels of PmWRKYs, PmCBF1 (LOC103333423), PmCBF5 (LOC103337424), PmCBF6 (LOC103344251), PmLEA10 (LOC103340137) and PmLEA29 (LOC103321165) during the artificial low temperature and exogenous ABA treatments were examined using qRT-PCR with the following programme: 95 °C for 30 s, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 30 s. Using the Actin gene of P. mume (ID: LOC103332029) as an internal control gene, the relative expression levels were calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method. Three independent experiments were performed with similar results.

3. Results

3.1. Identification and Classification of WRKY Genes in P. mume

Two strategies were applied to identify PmWRKY genes: an HMM search and BLAST using well-characterised WRKY sequences from A. thaliana as queries. After SWISS-MODEL analysis, 58 sequences, which contained at least one WRKY domain, were obtained (Table 1). The 58 genes were named PmWRKY01-PmWRKY58 according to the order of the gene ID and their corresponding protein sequences varied in length, MW as well as pI, as shown in Table 1. The length ranged between 162 and 884 AA, the MW ranged from 18.46 to 98.18 kDa and the pI varied from 4.92 to 9.68. According to the results of Plant-mPLoc, almost all of the PmWRKYs were predicted to be localised in the nucleus with high reliability except PmWRKY51, which was predicted to be targeted to chloroplasts besides the nucleus.
The relationships among the 58 PmWRKYs are shown in the phylogenetic tree (Figure 1) produced by MEGA5.1; they were phylogenetically clustered into three main groups, which were similar to that of AtWRKYs [7]. Ten WRKYs, which contained WRKY domains and C2H2-type zinc-finger motifs in the N-terminal and the C-terminal were aggregated into group I. Group II consisted of 40 PmWRKYs, which were categorised into five subgroups using 12 diverse AtWRKY proteins, as references. Three members were clustered in subgroup II a, nine in II b, fourteen in II c, six in II d, and seven in II e. Furthermore, subgroup II c showed higher divergence than other subgroups, which was similar to those reported in the similar studies on other species [14,27,28,29]. It is worth mentioning that PmWRKY51 was not clustered into group II although it contained a WRKY domain and a C2H2-type zinc-finger motif. Since the protein length and domain locations were considerably different, PmWRKY51 was classified into another group. In addition, there were also eight WRKY proteins, which contained a C2HC-type zinc-finger motif in group III.

3.2. Genomic Localization and Duplication of the PmWRKY Genes

Based on the genomic database, 57 PmWRKYs were distributed on all eight link groups of P. mume randomly and unevenly (Figure 2), which leaves PmWRKY58 on the scaffolds. There were twelve PmWRKY genes on LG 1 and eleven genes on LG 2. In contrast, LG 8 contained only one gene. LG 6, LG 7, LG 3, LG 4, and LG 5 contained 3, 5, 7, 9 and 9, respectively. It should be noted that group III genes were only located on LG 1, LG 5 and LG 7. Similar phenomenon occurred in P. persica [16], whereas the distribution of WRKY group III genes was even across all chromosomes in Brassica rapa ssp. Pekinensis [29]. The homologues of PmWRKYs in P. persica are shown in Table 1.
Gene duplication events fall into three categories: whole-genome duplication, tandem repeat and segmental duplication, which resulted in gene functional diversity, family evolution and plant adaptations [24]. Among the 58 PmWRKY genes, nine members were found in tandem repeats: PmWRKY08 to PmWRKY10, PmWRKY17 and PmWRKY18, PmWRKY28 and PmWRKY29, and PmWRKY41 and PmWRKY42 (Figure 2). According to Holub’s definition, 3 or more genes within 200 kb are considered a gene cluster [30]. The only gene cluster, which consisted of three group III genes (PmWRKY08, PmWRKY09, and PmWRKY10), was on LG 1. Twenty-eight genes were located on duplicated segments; among them, three genes (PmWRKY21, PmWRKY38 and PmWRKY56) were considered to be close relatives. PmWRKY21, PmWRKY38 and PmWRKY56 were located on LG 2, LG 4 and LG 7, respectively, and there was a triplet relationship among the three chromosomes [31]. Therefore, we surmised that these three PmWRKYs were generated along with a genome triplication process of Prunus. In addition, PmWRKY25 and PmWRKY34, as well as PmWRKY42 and PmWRKY53, were segmental duplicate pairs. The absence of the remaining 21 PmWRKYs’ corresponding relatives may be due to the gene evolution of the P. mume WRKY gene superfamily. No duplication event was observed in group I. Therefore, 15.5% of the PmWRKY genes can be explained by tandem duplication, 12.1% can be accounted for by segmental duplication, whereas 72.4% were monogenes, which indicated that the formation of PmWRKY genes may not rely primarily on gene duplication.

3.3. Gene Structure and Conserved Motif Analysis of PmWRKYs

To make a thorough inquiry into the structural similarities and differences of PmWRKYs, we obtained the exon/intron structure diagrams and conserved motifs on the basis of the phylogenetic tree (Figure 3A). First, according to the genome sequences and CDS of the PmWRKYs, we found that all of the genes contained at least one intron (Figure 3B). Generally, the closest genes had similar structures, which only varied in the length of the intron and exon, whereas some genes exhibited different exon/intron arrangements. For instance, PmWRKY03 contained three exons, whereas its nearby paralogous gene PmWRKY40 had four exons and three introns even though their evolutionary relationships reached a 99% bootstrap value. Finally, all of the members of the subgroups II d and III were consistent with the number of exons. However, there was no significant consistency in the number of exons within other subgroups.
The MEME online tool predicted 20 individual motifs and revealed the specific regions of PmWRKYs (Figure 3C and Additional File 2). An analysis of the 20 motifs revealed that the lengths of PmWRKY motifs ranged from 7 to 113 amino acid residues and the number of motifs varied from 1 to 11 in each PmWRKY protein. As shown in Figure 3C, motif composition was similar among the same subgroup, which suggested functional similarities of these PmWRKYs, whereas those of different subgroups had no common conserved motifs except for the C-terminal conserved motifs. For instance, motifs 3, 12, and 20 were conserved in group I. Motifs 9, 11, 16, 19 were specific to subgroup II b. Motif 10 existed only in group II d. Motifs 1 and 2 were commonly shared by nearly all of the members of groups I and II, which were part of the WRKY domains. The results indicated that the conserved motifs mentioned above may bear special functions. According to the evolutionary analysis, II a and II b are two adjacent subgroups with near genetic distance, three unique motifs (motif 6, motif 7, and motif 14) nearly exist in all of the members of subgroups II a and II b, which supported the classification of PmWRKYs. In groups I and II, motif 1 and motif 8 both corresponded to the conserved heptapeptide domains, whereas motif 2 or motif 3 denoted the C2H2-type zinc-finger domain. However, in group I, motif 2 and motif 3 existed as a part of the N-terminal WRKY domain (NTWD) and the C-terminal WRKY domain (CTWD), respectively, which illustrated that the two WRKY domains belonging to family members of group I may be different in origin or function differentiation. It was also worth mentioning that there are three specific motifs (motif 4, motif 15, and motif 18) in PmWRKY08, PmWRKY09 and PmWRKY10 of group III. Although the function of the major motifs in the PmWRKYs was still indefinite; the PmWRKYs with the same conserved motifs may have similar functions.

3.4. Multiple Sequence Alignment of the WRKY Domains of PmWRKYs

The WRKY domain is an important functional and evolutionary unit of WRKY transcription factors and the conserved heptapeptide WRKYGQK near the N-terminal is regarded as the core sequence of genes; their variation often leads to a decline or loss of DNA binding activity, which means that WRKY gene mutations may no longer have the original biological function [6]. Multiple sequence alignment analysis using WRKY domains of PmWRKYs found that mutations only occurred in PmWRKY04 and PmWRKY16 of subgroup II c. The mutation sites were both changed from Q to K, which formed the WRKYGKK sequence (Figure 4). Interestingly, this type of mutation also occurred in the genome of Populus trichocarpa, O. sativa and A. thaliana [32,33,34]. We identified a CX4CX22-23HXH zinc finger motif in the N-terminal of subgroup I genes, a CX4CX23HXH motif in the C-terminal of subgroup I genes and II c genes, a CX5CX23HXH motif in II a, II b, II d and II e genes, and a CX7CX23HXC motif in subgroup III genes (Figure 4). From the multiple sequence alignment of the WRKY and zinc finger domains, we discovered that the homology of group I and II genes was higher than that of group III genes.
Through an analysis of the CDS and DNA sequences, we found that there were two types of introns in the WRKY domains. One is spliced exactly after the R position, similar to the splicing position found in Arabidopsis [7], and is designated as R-type intron. Another is spliced before the V position at the sixth AA after the second C residue of the C2H2-type zinc-finger motif [35]. We designate this type of intron as the V-type intron. Interestingly, the R-type intron is located before the zinc finger motif region in WRKY domains in subgroups I, II c, II d, II e and III, whereas the V-type intron is in subgroups II a and II b (Figure 4).

3.5. Expression Profiles of PmWRKY Genes in Different Tissues

According to the transcriptome data of five different organs (roots, stems, leaves, flowers and fruits) of P. mume, the heat map has been drawn by the RPKM values of PmWRKY genes (Figure 5 and Additional File 3). As shown in the expression patterns of PmWRKYs in different subgroups in Figure 5A, the expression of WRKYs exhibited a wide range of diversity in five tissues. Most PmWRKYs were expressed in the roots at a high expression level. The expression of PmWRKY09 and PmWRKY10 (which all belonged to group III) could not be detected in the stems, leaves, flowers or fruits, and 12 genes (PmWRKY03, PmWRKY04, PmWRKY13, PmWRKY21, PmWRKY29, PmWRKY38, PmWRKY40, PmWRKY41, PmWRKY44, PmWRKY45, PmWRKY48 and PmWRKY56) lacked expression in one or two tissues. The expression levels of the other 44 genes were discovered in all of the detected tissues, which suggests that these PmWRKYs probably play vital roles in the developmental process of various tissues. We also hold the belief that the functions of duplicated genes diverged after the duplication event, which is supported by evidence that the expression patterns of several duplicated genes (PmWRKY08, PmWRKY09 and PmWRKY10, PmWRKY28 and PmWRKY29, PmWRKY41 and PmWRKY42, and PmWRKY21, PmWRKY38 and PmWRKY56) were quite different. In general, the group I genes had wider expression scopes than groups II and III genes. All of the genes in group I were expressed in all five tissues. However, a minority of groups II and III genes showed tissue-specific expression patterns. All of the subgroups II a and II b genes were hardly expressed in the stems, which meant that these genes might not participate in stem development. Furthermore, in the subgroups II d and II e, all of the members were expressed in five tissues, while PmWRKY48 showed a tissue-specific expression pattern, which demonstrated the functional change of genes in the same subgroups during evolution. The similarity of the expression patterns of subgroup II a, II b and subgroup II d supported the phylogenetic analysis.
As shown in the hierarchical clustering in Figure 5B, 58 PmWRKY genes were classified into six clusters according to their expression patterns. It was found that the genes with a closer phylogenetic relationship were more likely to be clustered into the same group in the heat map. The finest examples are three subgroup II c genes (PmWRKY16, PmWRKY35, and PmWRKY55) in cluster 6 and four subgroup II c genes (PmWRKY04, PmWRKY23, PmWRKY26, and PmWRKY32) in a subcluster of cluster 3, which show similar expression patterns. Among these clusters, clusters 1 and 6 contained the genes whose transcripts were detected in every tissue. However, the genes in other clusters presented tissue-specific expression patterns: cluster 2 genes abundant in the stems and flowers, cluster 3 genes in the roots, leaves and fruits, cluster 4 genes in the roots and leaves, and cluster 5 genes in the roots.

3.6. Expression Analysis of PmWRKY Genes under Chilling Treatment

To further examine the functioning of PmWRKY genes in cold tolerance, the expression patterns of PmWRKY genes before and after freezing stress in winter were analysed using transcriptome data. In Figure 6 and Additional File 4, after undergoing short freezing stress in P. mume ‘Zhusha’, 6 (PmWRKY18, PmWRKY23, PmWRKY32, PmWRKY37, PmWRKY44 and PmWRKY56) and 11 (PmWRKY03, PmWRKY04, PmWRKY06, PmWRKY08, PmWRKY13, PmWRKY14, PmWRKY27, PmWRKY28, PmWRKY42, PmWRKY52 and PmWRKY55) PmWRKYs were found up- or down-regulated over two-fold, respectively. Then, these 17 PmWRKY genes, which may play a role in the cold tolerance of P. mume in winter, were selected for further study.
To clarify the roles WRKYs played in cold resistance, the expression patterns of selected PmWRKY genes in different stages of artificial low temperature (4 °C) (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h) and exogenous ABA (100 μM) (0, 0.5, 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h) treatments were determined by qRT-PCR using cold resistant cultivar ‘Yudie’. As shown in Figure 7A, the expression of PmCBF1, PmCBF5, PmCBF6 and dehydrin genes PmLEA10 and PmLEA29, which were reported to be involved in cold resistance previously [36], was induced significantly after chilling treatment. The expression levels of 17 genes were changed with different patterns during artificial chilling treatment. The expression levels of PmWRKY18, PmWRKY23 and PmWRKY 32 were increased with prolonging of the treatment time in the cold. The largest increase of the expression level (approximately 25-fold) was detected in PmWRKY18 after cold treatment for 24h. PmWRKY23 and PmWRKY32 also had the greatest up-regulation of more than 9.5- and 6-fold, respectively, at 48 h after being exposed to the cold condition. The three genes mentioned above were up-regulated continuously during low temperature treatment, whereas PmWRKY37 showed an irregular pattern. The expression of PmWRKY37 had fluctuations before and after it reached the maximum (nearly 2.7-fold) at 8 h. PmWRKY04 and PmWRKY06 had the greatest down-regulation of nearly 5- and 4-fold, respectively, and then slight up-regulation. The expression levels of six genes (PmWRKY03, PmWRKY08, PmWRKY14, PmWRKY42 and PmWRKY55) gradually decreased over time and ultimately changed over 2-fold, but the expression levels of the other genes (PmWRKY13, PmWRKY27, PmWRKY28, PmWRKY44, and PmWRKY56) only changed slightly.
Based on previous research, the transcriptional regulation of plant cold resistance can usually be categorised into either ABA-independent or ABA-dependent signal pathways; the latter also response to dehydration stress [37]. To explain how the PmWRKYs respond to ABA and whether the PmWRKYs are involved in the ABA-dependent cold signaling pathway or not, annual branches of P. mume were treated with exogenous ABA. Among these 17 genes, only the expression level of PmWRKY18 was continuously up-regulated, peaked (6-fold) at 6h and then gradually decreased during exogenous ABA treatment (Figure 7B), whereas that of the others were lower than 2-fold and had no remarkable changes throughout, which suggested that PmWRKY18 may take part in cold adaptation in an ABA-dependent manner.

3.7. Expression Analysis of PmWRKY Genes in Winter

To verify the function of PmWRKY genes in cold tolerance, the expression patterns were analysed in winter using qRT-PCR. The daily land surface temperature was recorded from 12 Oct. to 4 Mar. As shown in Figure 8A, daily minimum and maximum temperatures below zero first appeared on 4 Nov. and 4 Jan., respectively, while the lowest temperature (−15.224 °C) was recorded on 26 January, after which the temperature began to increase with fluctuations. The stem and bud are the main aboveground organs of P. mume that overwinter. The expression of PmCBFs and PmLEAs was detected first (Figure 8B). The expression levels of PmCBF1, PmLEA10 and PmLEA29 in stems increased during winter and peaked on 4 February then decreased throughout the remaining winter, while the expression levels of PmCBF5 and PmCBF6 decreased during winter. The expression patterns differed in buds and stems. The expression patterns of PmCBF1, PmCBF6, PmLEA10 and PmLEA29 in buds were similar; they increased as the temperature decreased, peaking on 3 December or 4 February The expression pattern of PmCBF5 in buds was similar in stems with both decreasing over winter. The expression patterns of PmWRKY03 and PmWRKY44 in stems were similar to those of PmCBF1, PmLEA10 and PmLEA29, which increased over winter, peaked on 4 February and 7 January then decreased. In contrast, the expression levels of PmWRKY08 and PmWRKY52 decreased over winter, were at their lowest levels on 7 January, then increased. The expression levels of PmWRKY32, PmWRKY37 and PmWRKY55 first decreased then increased during winter, peaking on 7 January or 4 February, then decreasing. The expression patterns of PmWRKY04, PmWRKY06, PmWRKY18, PmWRKY23, PmWRKY27 and PmWRKY28 in stems were similar. Their expression levels increased as temperature decreased with two peaks on 3 December and 4 February The expression levels of PmWRKY14 and PmWRKY42 increased gradually while PmWRKY13 decreased during winter. In addition, the expression of PmWRKY56 in stems did not change significantly in winter. The expression of PmWRKYs in buds also had different patterns. The expression patterns of PmWRKY23 and PmWRKY37 were similar to PmCBF1, PmCBF6, PmLEA10 and PmLEA29 in buds, increasing during winter and peaking on 3 December and 4 February The expression pattern of PmWRKY28 was similar to PmCBF5 in buds, with the highest levels on 5 November then decreasing during winter. In contrast, the expression level of PmWRKY14 increased during winter. The expression pattern of PmWRKY32, PmWRKY42, PmWRKY44 and PmWRKY55 were the same in buds. Their expression levels increased in winter time, and reached the highest peaks at 3 December or 7 January, and then decreased. On the contrary, the expression patterns of PmWRKY03 and PmWRKY27 decreased during winter and increased with increasing temperature. The expression patterns of PmWRKY52 and PmWRKY56 were the same, showing a fluctuating increase over winter. In addition, the expression levels of PmWRKY04, PmWRKY06, PmWRKY08, PmWRKY13, and PmWRKY18 did not change significantly during winter. The results suggest that the transcription factor PmWRKYs may play an important role in overwintering survival of P. mume by different types of mechanisms. PmWRKY08 and PmWRKY28 may regulate negatively, while PmWRKY18, PmWRKY23 and PmWRKY44 may play a positively role in overwintering survival of P. mume.

4. Discussion

With the development of molecular biology, especially sequencing technology, the genomic sequencing of more and more plants has been completed, which provides convenient conditions for research from the genomic level in a systematic and global way. From the P. mume genome database-based analysis, 58 PmWRKY genes were identified (Table 1). Though 58 PpWRKY genes were reported in P. persica [16], these genes in two species do not exactly correspond one by one, PmWRKY28 and PmWRKY29 are the two closest homologues of PpWRKY19. The homologue of PmWRKY51 was not described, and no homologous gene was found for PmWRKY16 in P. persica. Gene duplication, which consists of whole-genome duplication, tandem repeat and segmental duplication, plays a vital role in the amplification and evolution of the plant gene family. The study on the WRKY gene family of O. sativa concluded that the production of 80% OsWRKYs resulted from gene duplication events [35]. However, as Figure 2 shows, there were only 16 PmWRKYs (27.6%) involved in seven gene duplication events, which is much lower than the rate of duplication genes in O. sativa. We speculated that the PmWRKY gene family may mainly originate from two reasons: One is that the formation of PmWRKY genes may not depend on gene duplication. Another, which occurs in the evolution process, is the loss-function or redundant genes in the PmWRKY gene superfamily may be lost in the genome to reduce energy consumption. It was shown that the gene duplication of WRKYs in A. thaliana and O. sativa mainly occurred in group III [35]; in contrast, most of the PmWRKY gene duplication events were found in group II (13/16). In addition, genomic localization indicated that 58 PmWRKY genes were unevenly mapped to all eight chromosomes (Figure 2). This indicated that the WRKY gene families in different species originated from different evolution patterns.
The analysis of PmWRKY domain structure showed that there were two kinds of conserved introns in PmWRKY domains: R-type intron and V-type intron. The R-type introns only existed in the PmWRKY domains of subgroups I, II c, II d, II e and III, whereas the V-type introns were only detected in subgroups II a and II b and this was consistent with previous research on O. sativa [35]. In addition, another form of intron, which was located at the fourth AA residue (K) after the second C residue of the zinc-finger motif, was found in subgroups II a and II b of A. thaliana and C. sativus [7,38]. It is not clear whether or not the insertion of conserved introns in different loci affect the function of WRKYs. The heptapeptide sequence WRKYGQK is the conserved structure of WRKY genes. It can be found in multiple alignment analysis of WRKY domains in P. mume. Some mutations occurred in subgroup II c (Figure 4), which indicated that the selection pressure and evolution pattern of PmWRKY genes vary between subgroups. As is well known, theWRKY domain contains a zinc-finger motif C2H2 or C2HC besides the conserved heptapeptide WRKYGQK [7]. Our study demonstrated that the zinc-finger motif C2HC only existed in the PmWRKY domains of group III whereas C2H2 was owned by PmWRKY domains of other groups. We found that this result is slightly different from that of previous research on O. sativa [35], which announced that zinc-finger motif C2H2 and C2HC simultaneously occurred in the N-termial of OsWRKYs of subgroup I.
RNA-seq data and qRT-PCR analysis provide a good clue to identify the important PmWRKY genes in cold resistance of P. mume. In our study, the expression of some PmWRKYs was changed under cold stress in P. mume cultivar ‘Zhusha’ based on the RNA-Seq (Figure 6). There were 6 and 11 PmWRKYs that were found to be up- or down-regulated over two-fold, respectively, after being subjected to cold stress in winter. Since some factors were uncontrolled during winter time, artificial low temperature treatment was performed to verify the cold response of PmWRKYs. Based on the qRT-PCR results, the expression levels of the 12 selected PmWRKYs were significantly different and 5 slightly changed under the artificial chilling treatment (Figure 7A). In addition, spatiotemporal expression patterns of the 17 PmWRKYs candidate genes varied during winter. The expression patterns of most PmWRKYs differed in stems and buds, which may result from the asynchronous icing of the organs (Figure 8B). However some factors, for example developmental stage, air humidity and day length, which were uncontrollable in winter time, may also affected gene expression. The results suggest that these genes potentially took part in the cold resistance of P. mume. Bud dormancy is the important way plants in Prunus genus respond to the cold winter. It was reported that PpWRKY11 (Prupe.1G071400), PpWRKY18 (Prupe.1G393000), PpWRKY33 (Prupe.6G286000), PpWRKY46 (Prupe.2G185100), PpWRKY48 (Prupe.1G114800) and PpWRKY53 (Prupe.2G307400) may play a role in bud dormancy in P. persica (Table 1) [16]. PmWRKY18, PmWRKY55 and PmWRKY27, the homologous genes of PpWRKY11, PpWRKY33 and PpWRKY48 in P. mume, showed low temperature response in different degrees. These genes may enhance cold tolerance of P. mume by regulating bud dormancy in a low temperature induction pattern.
Low temperature signal transduction pathways are mainly categorized into either ABA-dependent or ABA-independent manners [37], both of which ultimately regulate the expression of functional genes, COR47, RD29A and KIN1, and enhance the chilling tolerance of plants. WRKY transcription factors have been reported to be key nodes in ABA signalling [39]. It is reported that AtWRKY18, AtWRKY40 and AtWRKY60 genes in A. thaliana can be induced by ABA and act as negative regulation factors in the ABA signaling pathway [40,41]. AtWRKY6, the homologous gene of PmWRKY37, functioned as a positive regulator of ABA signalling during the germination process [42]. In this work, we detected the response of 17 selected genes to exogenous ABA treatment. The results showed that only PmWRKY18 was significantly up-regulated after ABA treatment (Figure 7B); whereas other genes had no significant changes compared with the control (data were not shown). We speculated that PmWRKY18 may take a part in an ABA-dependent cold signaling pathway.

5. Conclusions

Although cold tolerance related WRKY genes were studied in various species of plants, the cold signal response mechanism of WRKY genes and the down-stream target genes are mostly unclear. Research on the molecular biological function of PmWRKY genes in response to low temperature needs to be conducted. In this study, the characterisation and the expression analysis of PmWRKYs can create a foundation for further gene isolation and function analysis to clarify the role of WRKY genes in the cold resistance of P. mume.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/10/11/911/s1, Additional File 1: Primers used for qRT-PCR, Additional File 2: Conserved motifs predicted by MEME program in Prunus mume WRKY proteins, Additional File 3: The RPKM values of PmWRKY genes in different tissues, Additional File 4: The RPKM values of PmWRKY genes in leaf buds of ‘Zhusha’ before and after freezing effect in winter, Additional File 5: Supplementary Data 1: The CDS sequences of 58 P. mume WRKY genes, Supplementary Data 2: The genomic sequences of 58 P. mume WRKY genes, Supplementary Data 3: The protein sequences of 58 P. mume WRKY genes and 12 Arabidopsis thaliana WRKY genes.

Author Contributions

Q.Z. supported resources. F.B. wrote and reviewed the manuscript. A.D. performed sample collection and experiments. J.W. and T.C. supported resources. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31800596) and Special Fund for Beijing Common Construction Project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Los, D.A.; Murata, N. Membrane fluidity and its roles in the perception of environmental signals. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1666, 142–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Mittler, R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Xiao, J.; Bao, F. Effects of chilling on the structure, function and development of chloroplasts. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Steponkus, P.L. Role of the plasma membrane in freezing injury and cold acclimation. Annu. Rev. Plant Mol. Biol. 1984, 35, 543–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pearce, R.S. Plant freezing and damage. Ann. Bot. 2001, 87, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rushton, P.J.; Somssich, I.E.; Ringler, P.; Shen, Q.J. WRKY transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Eulgem, T.; Rushton, P.J.; Robatzek, S.; Somssich, I.E. The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, J.J.; Ekramoddoullah, A.K. Identification and characterization of the WRKY transcription factor family in Pinus monticola. Genome 2009, 52, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ishiguro, S.; Nakamura, K. Characterization of a cDNA encoding a novel DNA-binding protein, SPF1, that recognizes SP8 sequences in the 5′ upstream regions of genes coding for sporamin and β-amylase from sweet potato. Mol. Genet. Genomics 1994, 244, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Eulgem, T.; Rushton, P.J.; Schmelzer, E.; Hahlbrock, K.; Somssich, I.E. Early nuclear events in plant defence signalling: Rapid gene activation by WRKY transcription factors. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 4689–4699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Yang, P.; Chen, Z. A family of dispersed repetitive DNA sequences in tobacco contain clusters of W-box elements recognized by pathogen-induced WRKY DNA-binding proteins. Plant Sci. 2001, 161, 655–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Laloi, C.; Mestresortega, D.; Marco, Y.; Meyer, Y.; Reichheld, J.P. The Arabidopsis cytosolic thioredoxin h5 gene induction by oxidative stress and its W-box-mediated response to pathogen elicitor. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1006–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Phillips, J.; Deng, X. A WRKY transcription factor participates in dehydration tolerance in Boea hygrometrica by binding to the W-box elements of the galactinol synthase (BhGolS1) promoter. Planta 2009, 230, 1155–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Wang, L. The WRKY transcription factor superfamily: Its origin in eukaryotes and expansion in plants. BMC Evol. Biol. 2005, 5, 1. [Google Scholar]
  15. Glöckner, G.; Eichinger, L.; Szafranski, K.; Pachebat, J.A.; Bankier, A.T.; Dear, P.H.; Lehmann, R.; Baumgart, C.; Parra, G.; Abril, J.F.; et al. Sequence and analysis of chromosome 2 of Dictyostelium discoideum. Nature 2002, 418, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, M.; Tan, Q.; Sun, M.; Li, D.; Fu, X.; Chen, X.; Xiao, W.; Li, L.; Gao, D. Genome-wide identification of WRKY family genes in peach and analysis of WRKY expression during bud dormancy. Mol. Genet. Genomics 2016, 291, 1319–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chen, L.; Zhang, L.; Li, D.; Wang, F.; Yu, D. WRKY8 transcription factor functions in the TMV-cg defense response by mediating both abscisic acid and ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 1963–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zou, C.; Jiang, W.; Yu, D. Male gametophyte-specific WRKY34 transcription factor mediates cold sensitivity of mature pollen in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 3901–3914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Shen, H.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Meng, X.; Zhou, X.; Chu, C.; Wang, X. OsWRKY30 is activated by MAP kinases to confer drought tolerance in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2012, 80, 241–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Sun, X.; Zhang, L.; Wong, D.C.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Xu, G.; Wang, Q.; Li, S.; Liang, Z.; Xin, H. The ethylene response factor VaERF092 from Amur grape regulates the transcription factor VaWRKY33, improving cold tolerance. Plant J. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Higuera, J.J.; Garrido-Gala, J.; Lekhbou, A.; Arjona-Girona, I.; Amil-Ruiz, F.; Mercado, J.A.; Pliego-Alfaro, F.; Muñoz-Blanco, J.; López-Herrera, C.J.; CABALLERO, J.L. The strawberry FaWRKY1 transcription factor negatively regulates resistance to Colletotrichum acutatum in fruit upon infection. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, L.; Zhao, T.; Sun, X.; Wang, Y.; Du, C.; Zhu, Z.; Gichuki, D.K.; Wang, Q.; Li, S.; Xin, H. Overexpression of VaWRKY12, a transcription factor from Vitis amurensis with increased nuclear localization under low temperature, enhances cold tolerance of plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 100, 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, Y.; Yang, T.; Lin, Z.; Gu, B.; Xing, C.; Zhao, L.; Dong, H.; Gao, J.; Xie, Z.; Zhang, S.; et al. A WRKY transcription factor PbrWRKY53 from Pyrus betulaefolia is involved in drought tolerance and AsA accumulation. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kong, H.; Landherr, L.L.; Frohlich, M.W.; Leebensmack, J.; Ma, H.; Depamphilis, C.W. Patterns of gene duplication in the plant SKP1 gene family in angiosperms: Evidence for multiple mechanisms of rapid gene birth. Plant J. 2007, 50, 873–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lee, T.H.; Tang, H.; Wang, X.; Paterson, A.H. PGDD: A database of gene and genome duplication in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 41, 1152–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Deng, W.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Cheng, H.; Xue, Y. HemI: A toolkit for illustrating heatmaps. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, L.; Zhu, W.; Fang, L.; Sun, X.; Su, L.; Liang, Z.; Wang, N.; Londo, J.P.; Li, S.; Xin, H. Genome-wide identification of WRKY family genes and their response to cold stress in Vitis vinifera. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Song, H.; Wang, P.; Nan, Z.; Wang, X. The WRKY transcription factor genes in Lotus japonicus. Int. J. Genomics 2014, 2014, 420128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Tang, J.; Wang, F.; Hou, X.L.; Wang, Z.; Huang, Z.N. Genome-wide fractionation and identification of WRKY transcription factors in Chinese Cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis) reveals collinearity and their expression patterns under abiotic and biotic stresses. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2014, 32, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Holub, E.B. The arms race is ancient history in Arabidopsis, the wildflower. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001, 2, 516–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhang, Q.; Chen, W.; Sun, L.; Zhao, F.; Huang, B.; Yang, W.; Tao, Y.; Wang, J.; Yuan, Z.; Fan, G.; et al. The genome of Prunus mume. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ross, C.A.; Liu, Y.; Shen, Q.J. The WRKY gene family in Rice (Oryza sativa). JIPB 2007, 49, 827–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. He, H.; Dong, Q.; Shao, Y.; Jiang, H.; Zhu, S.; Cheng, B.; Xiang, Y. Genome-wide survey and characterization of the WRKY gene family in Populus trichocarpa. Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31, 1199–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sultan, S.; Atif, R.M.; Azeem, F.; Nadeem, H.; Siddique, M.H.; Ali, M.A. Genome-wide analysis of stress responsive WRKY transcription factors in Arabidopsis thaliana. Turk. J. Agric. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 4, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wu, K.L.; Guo, Z.J.; Wang, H.H.; Li, J. The WRKY family of transcription factors in rice and Arabidopsis and their origins. DNA Res. 2005, 12, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bao, F.; Du, D.; An, Y.; Yang, W.; Wang, J.; Cheng, T.; Zhang, Q. Overexpression of Prunus mume dehydrin genes in tobacco enhances tolerance to cold and drought. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, J.Z.; Creelman, R.A.; Zhu, J.K. From laboratory to field: Using information from Arabidopsis to engineer salt, cold, and drought tolerance in crops. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 615–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ling, J.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, H.; Mao, Z.; Gu, X.; Huang, S.; Xie, B. Genome-wide analysis of WRKY gene family in Cucumis sativus. BMC Genomics 2011, 12, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Rushton, D.L.; Tripathi, P.; Rabara, R.C.; Lin, J.; Ringler, P.; Boken, A.K.; Langum, T.J.; Smidt, L.; Boomsma, D.D.; Emme, N.J.; et al. WRKY transcription factors: Key components in abscisic acid signalling. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2012, 10, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Chen, H.; Lai, Z.; Shi, J.; Xiao, Y.; Chen, Z.; Xu, X. Roles of Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40 and WRKY60 transcription factors in plant responses to abscisic acid and abiotic stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Shang, Y.; Yan, L.; Liu, Z.Q.; Cao, Z.; Mei, C.; Xin, Q.; Wu, F.Q.; Wang, X.F.; Du, S.Y.; Jiang, T.; et al. The Mg-chelatase H subunit of Arabidopsis antagonizes a group of WRKY transcription repressors to relieve ABA-responsive genes of inhibition. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 1909–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Huang, Y.; Feng, C.Z.; Ye, Q.; Wu, W.H.; Chen, Y.F. Arabidopsis WRKY6 transcription factor acts as a positive regulator of abscisic acid signaling during seed germination and early seedling development. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1005833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 10 00911 g001 550
Figure 1. Tree of PmWRKYs. The unrooted phylogenetic tree of PmWRKY proteins was constructed using MEGA5.1 program by the neighbor-joining method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. AtWRKYs were used as references to categorise PmWRKYs. The tree was divided into seven phylogenetic subgroups, designated as I, IIa-e, and III. The black solid points denote AtWRKYs, and the hollow points denote PmWRKYs.
Figure 1. Tree of PmWRKYs. The unrooted phylogenetic tree of PmWRKY proteins was constructed using MEGA5.1 program by the neighbor-joining method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. AtWRKYs were used as references to categorise PmWRKYs. The tree was divided into seven phylogenetic subgroups, designated as I, IIa-e, and III. The black solid points denote AtWRKYs, and the hollow points denote PmWRKYs.
Genes 10 00911 g001
Genes 10 00911 g002 550
Figure 2. Localization and duplicated gene pairs of PmWRKYs. The 57 PmWRKY genes were mapped to the eight chromosomes. The chromosome number is indicated at the top. The scale refers to a 5 Mb chromosomal distance. Genes in tandem repeats are underlined in black. Segmental duplicate genes are linked by blue lines. There was a WRKY gene (PmWRKY58) that could not be clearly located on the chromosomes, but could be identified on scaffolds.
Figure 2. Localization and duplicated gene pairs of PmWRKYs. The 57 PmWRKY genes were mapped to the eight chromosomes. The chromosome number is indicated at the top. The scale refers to a 5 Mb chromosomal distance. Genes in tandem repeats are underlined in black. Segmental duplicate genes are linked by blue lines. There was a WRKY gene (PmWRKY58) that could not be clearly located on the chromosomes, but could be identified on scaffolds.
Genes 10 00911 g002
Genes 10 00911 g003 550
Figure 3. Relationships, gene structure and motif compositions of PmWRKYs. (A) The full-length PmWRKY protein sequences were aligned by ClustalW and the unrooted phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA5.1 program by the neighbor-joining method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. (B) Exon/intron structures of the PmWRKYs. Yellow boxes represent exons and black lines represent introns. (C) Conserved motif analysis of PmWRKYs by MEME. Different motifs are represented by different colored boxes with numbers 1–20.
Figure 3. Relationships, gene structure and motif compositions of PmWRKYs. (A) The full-length PmWRKY protein sequences were aligned by ClustalW and the unrooted phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA5.1 program by the neighbor-joining method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. (B) Exon/intron structures of the PmWRKYs. Yellow boxes represent exons and black lines represent introns. (C) Conserved motif analysis of PmWRKYs by MEME. Different motifs are represented by different colored boxes with numbers 1–20.
Genes 10 00911 g003
Genes 10 00911 g004 550
Figure 4. Acid residue alignment of WRKY domain. Alignment was performed using DNAMAN. The suffix ‘N’ and ‘C’ indicate the N-terminal WRKY domain and the C-terminal WRKY domain, respectively. The amino acids forming the zinc-finger motif are underlined in black. The conserved heptapeptide is surrounded by red box. The position of a conserved intron was indicated by an arrow head. The color shade of the amino acid residues highlighted the homology level: dark blue = 100%, pink ≥ 75%, and cambridge blue ≥ 50%.
Figure 4. Acid residue alignment of WRKY domain. Alignment was performed using DNAMAN. The suffix ‘N’ and ‘C’ indicate the N-terminal WRKY domain and the C-terminal WRKY domain, respectively. The amino acids forming the zinc-finger motif are underlined in black. The conserved heptapeptide is surrounded by red box. The position of a conserved intron was indicated by an arrow head. The color shade of the amino acid residues highlighted the homology level: dark blue = 100%, pink ≥ 75%, and cambridge blue ≥ 50%.
Genes 10 00911 g004
Genes 10 00911 g005 550
Figure 5. Expression patterns of PmWRKYs in five tissues. Transcriptome data was used to investigate expression profiles of PmWRKY genes. The colour scale represents RPKM expanded 25 times and then normalised log10 transformed counts. Light blue indicates low expression and dark blue indicate high expression. (A) Expression profiles related to subfamilies using heat map and line chart. (B) Hierarchical-clustering analysis of gene expression profiles.
Figure 5. Expression patterns of PmWRKYs in five tissues. Transcriptome data was used to investigate expression profiles of PmWRKY genes. The colour scale represents RPKM expanded 25 times and then normalised log10 transformed counts. Light blue indicates low expression and dark blue indicate high expression. (A) Expression profiles related to subfamilies using heat map and line chart. (B) Hierarchical-clustering analysis of gene expression profiles.
Genes 10 00911 g005
Genes 10 00911 g006 550
Figure 6. Hierarchical-clustering analysis of expression profiles of PmWRKYs in leaf buds of ‘Zhusha’ before and after freezing effect in winter. Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed to investigate expression profiles of PmWRKY genes. The colour scale represents RPKM expanded 25 times and then normalised log10 transformed counts. Light blue indicates low expression. Blue and dark blue indicate high expression. The genes which were up- or down-regulated over two fold were surrounded by red and yellow boxes, respectively.
Figure 6. Hierarchical-clustering analysis of expression profiles of PmWRKYs in leaf buds of ‘Zhusha’ before and after freezing effect in winter. Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed to investigate expression profiles of PmWRKY genes. The colour scale represents RPKM expanded 25 times and then normalised log10 transformed counts. Light blue indicates low expression. Blue and dark blue indicate high expression. The genes which were up- or down-regulated over two fold were surrounded by red and yellow boxes, respectively.
Genes 10 00911 g006
Genes 10 00911 g007 550
Figure 7. Expression patterns of 17 selected PmWRKY genes under artificial low temperature and exogenous ABA treatments. (A) The expression patterns of selected PmWRKYs, PmCBFs and PmLEAs under artificial low temperature treatments. (B) The expression pattern of PmWRKY18 under exogenous ABA treatments. The transcript levels of the selected genes were assessed by qRT-PCR and normalised to Actin gene. Error bars are standard deviation of three technical replicates. Different letters indicate significant difference at level p = 0.05. Three independent experiments were performed with similar results.
Figure 7. Expression patterns of 17 selected PmWRKY genes under artificial low temperature and exogenous ABA treatments. (A) The expression patterns of selected PmWRKYs, PmCBFs and PmLEAs under artificial low temperature treatments. (B) The expression pattern of PmWRKY18 under exogenous ABA treatments. The transcript levels of the selected genes were assessed by qRT-PCR and normalised to Actin gene. Error bars are standard deviation of three technical replicates. Different letters indicate significant difference at level p = 0.05. Three independent experiments were performed with similar results.
Genes 10 00911 g007
Genes 10 00911 g008 550
Figure 8. Expression patterns of 17 selected PmWRKY genes in winter. (A) The daily land surface temperature near the sampling sites in winter from the date 12 October, 2017 to 4 March, 2018. (B) The expression patterns of PmWRKYs, PmCBFs and PmLEAs in winter by qRT-PCR using Actin as reference gene. Different letters indicate significant difference at level p = 0.05. Three independent experiments were performed with similar results.
Figure 8. Expression patterns of 17 selected PmWRKY genes in winter. (A) The daily land surface temperature near the sampling sites in winter from the date 12 October, 2017 to 4 March, 2018. (B) The expression patterns of PmWRKYs, PmCBFs and PmLEAs in winter by qRT-PCR using Actin as reference gene. Different letters indicate significant difference at level p = 0.05. Three independent experiments were performed with similar results.
Genes 10 00911 g008
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the WRKY genes identified in Prunus mume.
Table 1. Characteristics of the WRKY genes identified in Prunus mume.
NameGene IDLocusProtein Length (aa)MW (kDa)pILocalizationEST NumberWRKY DomainSubgroupHomolog in P. persica
Conserved HeptapeptideZinc Finger MotifDomain Number
PmWRKY01LOC103330550Pa1:1070280:107295359064.756.98Nucleus1WRKYGQKC2H22IPpWRKY6
PmWRKY02LOC103344588Pa1:1909602:191293774080.025.65Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H22IPpWRKY5
PmWRKY03LOC103331503Pa1:13787725:1378868923927.209.03Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIcPpWRKY34
PmWRKY04LOC103331584Pa1:13972916:1397543819722.176.20Nucleus0WRKYGKKC2H21IIcPpWRKY35
PmWRKY05LOC103337527Pa1:19841802:1984305832635.779.60Nucleus1WRKYGQKC2H21IIdPpWRKY41
PmWRKY06LOC103339250Pa1:20889375:2089124329733.365.03Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIcPpWRKY36
PmWRKY07LOC103340389Pa1:21713743:2171612247952.288.91Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H22IPpWRKY7
PmWRKY08LOC103342893Pa1:22703478:2270520133537.415.76Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2HC1IIIPpWRKY58
PmWRKY09LOC103343421Pa1:22717809:2271986733738.225.50Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2HC1IIIPpWRKY57
PmWRKY10LOC103343430Pa1:22722643:2272463334037.985.67Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2HC1IIIPpWRKY56
PmWRKY11LOC103318654Pa1:25540026:2554129135440.219.68Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIdPpWRKY42
PmWRKY12LOC103318792Pa1:26409186:2641300173380.435.88Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H22IPpWRKY9
PmWRKY13LOC103319105Pa2:1797770:180008656262.095.17Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIbPpWRKY15
PmWRKY14LOC103320106Pa2:8913661:891522034237.889.48Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIdPpWRKY39
PmWRKY15LOC103320368Pa2:10410393:1041185436439.899.29Nucleus1WRKYGQKC2H21IIdPpWRKY38
PmWRKY16LOC103320597Pa2:11611164:1161185016218.825.35Nucleus0WRKYGKKC2H21IIc-
PmWRKY17LOC103320740Pa2:12418544:1241997628531.688.33Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIaPpWRKY12
PmWRKY18LOC103320741Pa2:12424777:1242618932336.407.62Nucleus1WRKYGQKC2H21IIaPpWRKY11/
Prupe.1G071400
PmWRKY19LOC103321497Pa2:16703139:1670551033036.386.00Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIcPpWRKY24
PmWRKY20LOC103321524Pa2:16839818:1684234951756.526.74Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H22IPpWRKY1
PmWRKY21LOC103321616Pa2:17544191:1754738964370.066.43Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIbPpWRKY14
PmWRKY22LOC103322097Pa2:20999398:2100119916218.469.67Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIcPpWRKY23
PmWRKY23LOC103323186Pa2:32805980:3280760439043.025.82Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIcPpWRKY22
PmWRKY24LOC103324471Pa3:408956:41193959164.447.06Nucleus1WRKYGQKC2H21IIbPpWRKY20
PmWRKY25LOC103324889Pa3:2860917:286202928030.555.45Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIePpWRKY47
PmWRKY26LOC103325015Pa3:3723897:372543234037.696.55Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIcPpWRKY32
PmWRKY27LOC103325306Pa3:5613186:561599051555.886.07Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIePpWRKY48/
Prupe.1G114800
PmWRKY28LOC103326420Pa3:13640842:1364336254759.916.13Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIbPpWRKY19
PmWRKY29LOC103326493Pa3:13656379:1365884354459.516.02Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIbPpWRKY19
PmWRKY30LOC103326638Pa3:15399255:1540741688498.186.98Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H22IPpWRKY4
PmWRKY31LOC103327251Pa4:195608:19839161667.236.42Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIbPpWRKY16
PmWRKY32LOC103327303Pa4:564486:56590232135.776.51Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIcPpWRKY29
PmWRKY33LOC103328175Pa4:6725543:672713432035.258.71Nucleus1WRKYGQKC2H21IIaPpWRKY13
PmWRKY34LOC103328332Pa4:8491309:849407426829.425.37Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIePpWRKY46/
Purpe.2G185100
PmWRKY35LOC103328791Pa4:14169139:1417155436741.677.10Nucleus1WRKYGQKC2H21IIcPpWRKY30
PmWRKY36LOC103329228Pa4:16910810:1691328748653.045.90Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H22IPpWRKY2
PmWRKY37LOC103329304Pa4:17519417:1752189964970.746.11Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIbPpWRKY17
PmWRKY38LOC103329978Pa4:21736698:2173897749954.646.71Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIbPpWRKY18/
Prupe.1G393000
PmWRKY39LOC103330053Pa4:22207825:2221104953358.448.45Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H22IPpWRKY3
PmWRKY40LOC103331676Pa5:13956787:1395977724427.797.29Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIcPpWRKY26
PmWRKY41LOC103332060Pa5:16864359:1686629322124.849.24Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIcPpWRKY27
PmWRKY42LOC103332064Pa5:16887019:1689035541746.737.72Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIePpWRKY44
PmWRKY43LOC103332261Pa5:18120250:1812214835739.804.90Nucleus1WRKYGQKC2HC1IIIPpWRKY51
PmWRKY44LOC103332696Pa5:20443902:2044464520924.049.05Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIcPpWRKY28
PmWRKY45LOC103333076Pa5:21989132:2199111534437.865.78Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2HC1IIIPpWRKY52
PmWRKY46LOC103333154Pa5:23138449:2314044032336.465.70Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2HC1IIIPpWRKY53/
Purpe.2G307400
PmWRKY47LOC103333772Pa5:25721161:2572235733236.125.32Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2HC1IIIPpWRKY54
PmWRKY48LOC103333707Pa5:25986620:2598749922824.634.92Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIePpWRKY45
PmWRKY49LOC103334065Pa6:994260:99536024228.236.02Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIePpWRKY50
PmWRKY50LOC103334153Pa6:1797284:179945435540.249.61Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIdPpWRKY43
PmWRKY51LOC103335291Pa6:8182262:818622647152.517.88Chlo, Nucl0WRKYGQKC2H21IIxppa024204
PmWRKY52LOC103337200Pa7:5945463:594702133037.059.68Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIdPpWRKY40
PmWRKY53LOC103337694Pa7:9472026:947303729132.895.23Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIePpWRKY49
PmWRKY54LOC103337660Pa7:10206830:1020825035640.005.41Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2HC1IIIPpWRKY55
PmWRKY55LOC103338090Pa7:12882417:1288370217019.529.35Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIcPpWRKY33/
Prupe.6G286000
PmWRKY56LOC103338408Pa7:14366251:1436959368373.586.45Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H21IIbPpWRKY21
PmWRKY57LOC103341266Pa8:16767252:1677098453759.395.47Nucleus0WRKYGQKC2H22IPpWRKY10
PmWRKY58LOC103342913scaffold22:94704:9674053659.896.82Nucleus1WRKYGQKC2H22IPpWRKY8

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bao, F.; Ding, A.; Cheng, T.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Q. Genome-Wide Analysis of Members of the WRKY Gene Family and Their Cold Stress Response in Prunus mume. Genes 2019, 10, 911. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10110911

AMA Style

Bao F, Ding A, Cheng T, Wang J, Zhang Q. Genome-Wide Analysis of Members of the WRKY Gene Family and Their Cold Stress Response in Prunus mume. Genes. 2019; 10(11):911. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10110911

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bao, Fei, Anqi Ding, Tangren Cheng, Jia Wang, and Qixiang Zhang. 2019. "Genome-Wide Analysis of Members of the WRKY Gene Family and Their Cold Stress Response in Prunus mume" Genes 10, no. 11: 911. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10110911

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop