Next Article in Journal
Syncytiotrophoblast of Placentae from Women with Zika Virus Infection Has Altered Tight Junction Protein Expression and Increased Paracellular Permeability
Next Article in Special Issue
Update on the Role of the Non-Canonical Wnt/Planar Cell Polarity Pathway in Neural Tube Defects
Previous Article in Journal
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases (MAPKs) and Cholangiocarcinoma: The Missing Link
Previous Article in Special Issue
Intracellular Signals Activated by Canonical Wnt Ligands Independent of GSK3 Inhibition and β-Catenin Stabilization
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 8
Issue 10
10.3390/cells8101173
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Edit a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Wnt Signaling in Neural Crest Ontogenesis and Oncogenesis

by
Yu Ji
1,2,3,*,
Hongyan Hao
3,4,
Kurt Reynolds
1,2,3,
Moira McMahon
2,5 and
Chengji J. Zhou
1,2,3,*
1
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine & Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
2
Institute for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, UC Davis School of Medicine and Shriners Hospitals for Children, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
3
Graduate Program of Biochemistry, Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
4
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
5
College of Letters & Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2019, 8(10), 1173; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8101173
Received: 30 August 2019 / Revised: 23 September 2019 / Accepted: 25 September 2019 / Published: 29 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wnt Signaling in Health and Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Neural crest (NC) cells are a temporary population of multipotent stem cells that generate a diverse array of cell types, including craniofacial bone and cartilage, smooth muscle cells, melanocytes, and peripheral neurons and glia during embryonic development. Defective neural crest development can cause severe and common structural birth defects, such as craniofacial anomalies and congenital heart disease. In the early vertebrate embryos, NC cells emerge from the dorsal edge of the neural tube during neurulation and then migrate extensively throughout the anterior-posterior body axis to generate numerous derivatives. Wnt signaling plays essential roles in embryonic development and cancer. This review summarizes current understanding of Wnt signaling in NC cell induction, delamination, migration, multipotency, and fate determination, as well as in NC-derived cancers.

1. Introduction

Neural crest (NC) cells are a unique group of cells originated from the dorsal margins of the neural tube during early vertebrate development [1,2]. They migrate extensively into most tissue/organs and generate numerous differentiated cell types. Consequently, the NC has long been designated the “fourth germ layer” despite originating from the ectoderm. NC development begins during gastrulation, induced at the junction between the neural plate and non-neural ectoderm [3]. After induction, NC cells delaminate from the neuroepithelium by undergoing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and migrate long distances in distinct streams according to their positions along the anterior-posterior axis within the embryo [4,5]. Subsequently, NC cells differentiate into various cell types to contribute to different organs in a region-specific manner, including the peripheral nervous system, melanocytes, the adrenal medulla, smooth muscle, as well as various skeletal, connective, adipose, and endocrine cell subtypes [6,7].
NC cells originate from four major segments of the neural tube to form cranial (or cephalic), vagal, trunk, and sacral neural crest cells [8] (Figure 1). Distinct populations of cranial NC cells originate from the diencephalon, midbrain, and hindbrain [9] and have the capability to differentiate into craniofacial bone, cartilage, and connective tissue [10]. The rostral cranial NC cells generate the frontonasal skeleton, while the posterior cranial NC cells fulfill the pharyngeal arches in vertebrates (also known as branchial (gill) arches in fish and amphibians), to generate middle ear, bone and cartilage of the jaw and neck [11]. Cranial NC cells also make essential contributions to the membranous bones of the skull vault [11]. The vagal NC, which arises from somites 1–7, has been depicted as a crossbreed between the cranial and trunk NC [12]. The vagal NC forms various cell types in thymus, thyroid, parathyroid, and heart; and also forms ganglia in lung, pancreas, and the gut [13]. Cardiac NC cells arise from the dorsal neural tube between the otic vesicle and the third somite in the vagal crest segment [13,14]. These cells are required in avians to trigger restructuring of the developing cardiac outflow tract [15]. In mammals, NC-derived cells occupy conotruncal cushions and the aorticopulmonary septum during overt septation of the outflow tract and envelop both the thymus and thyroid as these organs form [16]. Trunk NC cells arise in the posterior part of the embryo and migrate along three distinct pathways: a dorsolateral pathway between the ectoderm and the somites, a ventro-lateral pathway between somites, and a ventro-medial pathway between the neural tube and the posterior sclerotome [17]. These cells generate pigment cells of the skin, the peripheral nervous system, and secretory cells of the endocrine system [18].
Environmental cues or cell-autonomous factors can affect appropriate NC cell differentiation, causing cell cycle dysregulation and ectopic tissue formation [19]. Defects in NC cell development are related with numerous serious diseases, many of which mainly affect children [19]. These abnormalities, named neurocristopathies [20], are one of the commonest birth defects in newborns, including congenital heart defects, craniofacial malformations, and familial dysautonomia [19,21,22]. Hirschsprung disease is caused by the failing of vagal NC cell migration to the colon, leading to the absence of enteric ganglia required for peristaltic bowel movement [23,24]. Treacher Collins syndrome is an uncommon human congenital disorder which presents with craniofacial abnormalities due to excessive apoptosis within a pool of cranial NC cells which migrate to the first and second branchial arches [21]. DiGeorge syndrome is a congenital disease which is also caused by abnormal migration of NC cells into the pharyngeal arches. DiGeorge patients usually present with immunodeficiency, cardiac defects, learning disabilities, psychiatric impairment, and craniofacial malformations [25]. Waardenburg syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder that often includes hypopigmented patches of skin. In many cases, patients have mutations in PAX3, SNAI2, or SOX10, which are all involved in NC induction and specification [2]. CHARGE syndrome is induced by mutations in helicase DNA-binding protein 7 (CHD7) gene, which is critical for maintenance of NC multipotency and migration [26,27]. Patients with CHARGE syndrome have malformation in NC-derived tissues, such as heart defects and coloboma [28].
Niche signals acting prior to and after migration of NC cells are known to be involved in NC development [8]. Strong evidence shows that Wingless-type MMTV integration site family member (Wnt) signaling is involved in various stages of NC development [29,30,31]. Exogenous Wnt activation is sufficient to induce human NC cells from pluripotent stem cells [32]. Wnt signaling is both necessary and sufficient for inducing NC cells in Xenopus, chicks, and mice [33,34,35,36]. Furthermore, loss- and gain-of-function experiments reveal that non-canonical Wnt signaling plays an essential role in NC cell migration by regulating actin polymerization [37,38]. In contrast, canonical Wnt signaling may control NC cell lineage differentiation [37,39]. In mice, conditional knockout of intracellular Wnt signal transducer β-catenin (Ctnnb1) in pre-migratory NC cells suppresses both sensory neuron and melanocyte formation [40]. In this review, we summarize current understanding of Wnt signaling in NC development based on published data from the mouse, chick, quail, frog, and zebrafish models, and in NC-derived cancers.

2. Wnt Signaling Pathways

2.1. β-Catenin-Dependent Canonical Wnt Signaling Pathway

Canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling plays vital roles in development and disease [41]. In this pathway, Wnt proteins bind to two distinctly different types of cell surface receptors, Frizzled (Fzd) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-related protein 6 (Lrp6) or Lrp5 [41]. Fzd family proteins are seven-transmembrane proteins with an extracellular cysteine-rich domain (CRD) [42], which interacts with both the N-terminal domains (D1) and C-terminal domains (D2) of Wnt proteins [43,44]. Lrp5 and Lrp6 are single-span transmembrane co-receptors that bind to the D2 domain of Wnt proteins [44,45,46,47]. Therefore, the canonical Wnt proteins have the ability to bridge these different types of receptors Fzd and Lrp5/Lrp6 [44,45]. The binding of Wnt proteins causes a conformational change of the receptor complex, resulting in phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic domain of Lrp5/Lrp6 by several kinases, such as glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3), allowing the recruitment of the scaffold protein Axin [41]. This leads to the inhibition or saturation of β-catenin degradation [48]. Therefore, the newly synthesized β-catenin can be accumulated and translocated to the nucleus [49,50]. Within the nucleus, β-catenin binds to a T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor (TCF/LEF) transcription factor family member to regulate the expression of genes involved in cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [51]. Without Wnts, the cytoplasmic β-catenin is continually degraded by the destruction complex [48]. In this complex, Axin acts as a scaffold and interacts with β-catenin, the tumor suppressor protein adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), and two constitutively active kinases, GSK3, and Casein kinase 1 (CK1) [52]. There, β-catenin is phosphorylated by GSK3, causing its ubiquitination and degradation [41].

2.2. β-Catenin-Independent Non-Canonical Wnt Signaling Pathways

Among the β-catenin-independent non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways is planar cell polarity (PCP) signaling, which provides positional information to mediate asymmetric cytoskeletal organization [53]. Therefore, Wnt/PCP is essential for tissue patterning and morphogenesis as well as polarized cell migration [53,54]. Binding of Wnt proteins to Fzd receptors can activate and recruit Dishevelled (Dvl or Dsh) to the cell membrane where it forms a complex with Dvl-associated activator of morphogenesis 1 (Daam1) [55]. This complex activates Rho GTPases which leads to the subsequent activation of Rho-associated kinase (Rock) [56]. This contributes to asymmetric cytoskeletal organization and polarized cell migration [57]. Another type of non-canonical Wnt signaling is the Wnt-cGMP/Ca2+ signaling pathway, which regulates intracellular Ca2+ flux and levels [58]. In this pathway, the binding of Wnt proteins to Fzd leads to the production of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG) [58,59]. IP3 leads to the releasing of Ca2+ from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). DAG is activated by high concentration of calcium released from the ER, which activates protein kinase C (PKC) [60]. Ca2+ also activates calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) [59]. Both CaMKII and PKC activate various transcription factors, such as NFκB [61].

3. Wnt Signaling in NPB Formation and NC Induction

NC induction is a multistep process regulated by a complex gene regulatory network [62]. It is initiated during gastrulation and continues through neural tube closure [63]. The vertebrate ectoderm can be separated into three major subdivisions at the end of gastrulation: the non-neural ectoderm, the neural plate, and the neural plate border (NPB) [64] (Figure 2). The non-neural ectoderm will develop into the epidermis, and the neural plate will give rise to the central nervous system [65]. In most experimental vertebrate species, the NPB begets the NC as well as the pre-placodal ectoderm [66]. The induction of NC can be distinguished into three steps. First, inductive signals drive the expression of a set of transcription factors that define the NPB, known as NPB specifiers. Subsequently, the NPB specifiers and inductive signals work together to stimulate another set of transcription factors more restricted to the NC, which are known as NC specifiers [62,63,66]. Finally, inhibitory interactions between the neural plate, the non-neural ectoderm, the anterior neural fold, and the NC acutely define the boundaries between these territories [35,67,68]. NPB specifiers, such as Zic1, Gbx2, Msx1, Pax3/7, Gata2/3, Foxi1/2, Dlx5/6, and Hairy2, are expressed in the early gastrula [62,63,64,66,69,70,71,72]. NC specifiers include Snai2, Foxd3, Sox8/9/10, Ets1, cMyc, and Twist [62,71,73,74]. Multiple signals regulate the expression of NPB and NC specifiers, including Wnt, Bmp, Fgf, and Notch [62]. Since the formation of NC occurs at the border between the neural plate and non-neural ectoderm, and ventrally adjacent to mesoderm, these tissues have been suggested as the source of NC induction signals [3]. Here, we summarize the involvement of Wnt signaling (in the order of canonical then non-canonical for classified Wnt signaling molecules) in NPB formation and NC induction ( Figure 2 and Figure 3; Table 1). The general description is based on findings on multiple vertebrates, and the species/region-specific findings are clearly noted in the tables and as much as in the text.

3.1. Wnt Signaling in NPB Formation

The canonical ligand-encoding genes Wnt1 and Wnt3a are expressed in the NPB (Figure 2A) and dorsal neural tube of mice [104]. In the absence of both Wnt1 and Wnt3a, NPB formation is disrupted, resulting in a defect in neural crest derivatives [101]. Wnt3a expression is modulated by retinoic acid (RA) signaling in mice [77]. Ablation of mouse Raldh2 (Aldh1a2), a RA biosynthetic enzyme [105], delays Wnt3a expression in the dorsal neural tube and decreases the expression of NPB specifiers, such as Msx1 and Pax3 [77]. Unlike Wnt1 and Wnt3a, Wnt8 is expressed in the paraxial mesoderm (Figure 2A). In Xenopus, Fgf8 induces the expression of Wnt8 in the paraxial mesoderm and regulates the formation of NPB [83] (Figure 2B). Tcf7l1 is a transcription factor activated by Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Inhibiting Tcf7l1’s ability to bind with β-catenin blocks NPB formation (Msx1) and NC induction (Snai2, Sox9) in Xenopus [98]. The transcription factor Gbx2 is a direct target of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, and impaired Tcf7l1 function negatively affects Gbx2 activation in Xenopus [87]. During early NC formation, Gbx2 interacts with the neural fold gene Zic1 and upregulates the expression of NPB specifiers Pax3 and Msx1. In the absence of Gbx2, Zic1 drives the expression of pre-placodal genes, but Gbx2 activation inhibits pre-placodal fate and induces NC cells [87].
In Xenopus, the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling could induce the expression of Apoc1 that belongs to the apolipoprotein family and binds lipids to form lipoprotein particles and function in lipid transport [106]. Depletion of Apoc1 protein resulted in defective formation of a neural plate border (Msx1, Pax3, Zic1) and loss of neural crest cells (c-Myc, Sox9, Snai2, Twist1, Id3) [78]. The transcription factor Sp5 has also been shown to be a direct target of Wnt signaling in mice [107]. In Xenopus, Sp5 is induced by Fgf8a or Wnt8 signals to promote NC formation [97]. Sp5 has been shown to regulate the expression of NPB specifiers Msx1 and Pax3 and alters Zic1 expression to promote NC fate during gastrulation [97]. Awp1 is a lipid-activated kinase which associates with the serine/threonine polarity kinase Par1 [108]. In Xenopus, Awp1 mediates NPB formation (Msx1, Pax3) and NC induction (Sox10, Snai2) by modulating the stability of β-catenin and regulating Wnt signaling [79].
Non-canonical Wnt signaling also plays an important role in NPB formation mainly based on findings in Xenopus. Gain- and loss-of-function experiments showed that Wnt5a and Wnt11 are required for the formation of NPB (Pax3, Sox8) and NC (Foxd3, Snail2, Twist) through Dvl and Ror2 in Xenopus [84]. Par1 plays an important role in neural crest induction (Sox8, Foxd3, and Snai2). Wnt5/Wnt11 signaling induce the dissociation of Par1 from the cell cortex, upregulating its enzymatic activity, which then regulates the expression of Pax3 [84]. Ror2 is a major regulator of non-canonical Wnt signaling [109]. In Xenopus, Wnt5a-Ror2 signaling upregulates Papc or Pcns which then upregulates Bmp ligand Gdf6, thus activating Bmp signaling (pSmad1/5/8) in the dorsolateral marginal zone [95]. Moreover, Ror2 regulates cell polarity in the neuroectoderm and shapes the NPB during early neurula stages. Ror2 loss-of-function causes reduced expression of neural plate border specifiers (Gbx2, Msx1, Msx2, Zic1) and neural crest marker genes (Twist, Snail2, c-Myc, Tfap2a) [95].

3.2. Wnt Signaling in NC Induction and Specification

Canonical Wnt signaling is well-known to regulate NC induction, and Wnt1, Wnt3a, Wnt7b, Wnt8, Fzd3, and Lrp6 have all been shown to be required for vertebrate NC specification [47,85,88,102,103,110] (Figure 3). In Xenopus, the Wnt receptor Fzd7 is required to induce NC markers (Sox10, Sox9, Snail, Twist, Foxd3). Fzd7 can induce neural crest through binding with different Wnts, including Wnt1, Wnt7b, and Wnt8. Fzd7 may activate both canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways. Fzd7 knockdown can be rescued by overexpressing β-catenin, suggesting that Fzd7 regulates neural crest specification through the canonical Wnt pathway in Xenopus [86]. Canonical Wnt signaling via Wnt1 regulates the expression of RhoV in NC cells, which is required for the induction of NC in Xenopus [94]. RhoV has been shown to regulate Pak1 [111], which can phosphorylate and activate Snai1 [112]. Therefore, RhoV may act as mediator of canonical Wnt signaling in NC development [113]. Axud1 is a transcription factor which acts downstream of Wnt/β-catenin signaling during NC induction in chicks [114]. Axud1 knockdown inhibits the expression of NC specifiers (Sox9, Sox10, and Ets1), but not the NPB gene Pax7 [80]. Axud1 directly interacts with Pax7 and Msx1 to form a transcriptional complex. This complex can bind to the Foxd3 NC1 enhancer to regulate Foxd3 expression [80].
The canonical Wnt mediator β-catenin affects NC survival in mice. Knockout of β-catenin by a Wnt1-driven Cre recombinase causes increased apoptosis in pre-migratory NC cells, suggesting canonical Wnt signaling is needed for the expansion of NC progenitors in mice [115]. However, Wnt1-Cre-mediated reporter activity is first detected about 0.5–1 days after NC induction begins [116]. Therefore, these results may not be able to reject the role of canonical Wnt signaling in NC induction in mice.
Dickkopf-related protein 2 (Dkk2) acts as either an antagonist or activator of Wnt signaling by binding to the Wnt co-receptor Lrp6 [117,118,119]. A recent study in Xenopus shows that Dkk2 is required for neural crest induction [34]. Blocking Dkk2 does not affect the expression of NPB specifiers (Pax3, Sox8, and Snai1) but blocks the formation of neural crest cells by causing a reduction of neural crest specifiers (Snai2, Twist1, and Sox10) [34]. In Dkk2-depleted embryos, overexpression of Lrp6 or β-catenin could rescue neural crest formation; however, inhibition of GSK-3β could not, indicating that Dkk2 also activates Wnt/β-catenin signaling independently of GSK-3β [34]. Moreover, Xenopus Wnt8 induces NC genes in animal cap explants. Dkk2 knockdown significantly blocks the induction of Snail2 by Wnt8, implying two independent mechanisms by either Wnt8 or Dkk2 to activate β-catenin and induce NC formation [34].
The canonical Wnt signaling is also known to be required for anterior-posterior patterning. It has been proposed that NC specification by Wnts is an indirect effect of posteriorization activity rather than a direct effect [120,121]. In Xenopus, canonical Wnt signaling induces posterior neural tissue through activation of Fgf signaling [122]. Therefore, the posteriorizing activity of Wnt signaling can be blocked by inhibiting Fgf signaling [82]. In contrast, studies in Xenopus show that Wnt proteins could induce NC specifiers (Snai2, Twist) even if its posteriorizing activity is inhibited, suggesting that NC induction is a direct consequence of Wnt signaling [82].
Although a requirement for canonical Wnt signaling in NC induction has been thoroughly demonstrated, the role of non-canonical Wnt signaling in this process remains understudied. In chicks, Wnt6 is expressed in the ectoderm and controls the induction of NC through Dvl-mediated non-canonical Wnt signaling [99,100]. Surprisingly, Schmidt et al. showed that canonical Wnt signaling (Wnt1) inhibited neural crest formation in the chicken embryo [100]. These results may indicate evolutionary changes in NC induction during vertebrate evolution. The noncanonical Wnt11 pathway activates the formin family protein Daam1 during NC induction in Xenopus [38]. The ability of Daam1 to induce NC formation requires its FH2 domain, which binds to G-actin, suggesting that Daam1 induces NC through actin polymerization in Xenopus [38]. However, the role of actin remodeling in NC specification has yet to be defined.

3.3. Crosstalk of Wnt Signaling with Upstream Modulators in NC Induction

Many signals control NC induction by regulating canonical Wnt signaling. In zebrafish, regulator of G protein signaling 2 (Rgs2) has been shown to negatively regulate Wnt signaling (Wnt1, Wnt8a) [93]. Disruption of Rgs2 expression in zebrafish caused upregulation of many Wnt target genes (Nfatc2a/b, Nfatc3a/b, Nfatc4, Tcf7l2, Axin2, Tcf7, Pparδ (Pparda/b), Ccnd1, Myca/b, and Tp53) and induced neural crest specifiers (Sox10, snail1b) [93]. Among these genes, the expression of Pparda was upregulated at the neural crest progenitor stage. Pparδ could bind to the promoter of Sox10 directly [93]. Therefore, Rgs2-Wnt1/8a–Pparδ–Sox10 signaling mediates neural crest development in zebrafish [93].
Adams are multi-domain transmembrane proteins involved in many developmental processes. Studies have shown that knockdown of two paralogous disintegrin proteases, Adam13 and Adam19 in Xenopus embryos, inhibits Wnt signaling and the expression of NC specifiers (Snai2, Sox9, Foxd3), but does not affect NPB specifiers (Pax3, Zic1, Msx1) [76]. Moreover, ephrin B1(EfnB1) and ephrin B2 (EfnB2) have been determined as substrates for Adam13 [75]. EfnB1 and EfnB2 are cell-surface ligands for EphB receptor tyrosine kinases which act as antagonists of Wnt signaling [75,123]. Through cleaving EphB2, Adam13 permits Wnt signaling and induces NC cell formation (Snai2) [75]. Unlike Adam13, the ability of Adam19 to induce NC specification does not depend on its protease activity [76]. Using immunocytochemistry and immunoprecipitation, the authors further show that Adam19 interacts with Adam13 in the ER and protects Adam13 from ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation in Xenopus [75,76].
Cadherin-11 (Cdh11) binds β-catenin at cell-cell adhesion complexes. During NC induction in Xenopus, Cdh11 competes with Wnts for the cytoplasmic β-catenin [81]. Depletion of cadherin-11 results in increased levels of β-catenin in the nucleus, and therefore activates canonical Wnt signaling and increases NC marker gene expression (Sox10, AP2) [81,124].
Kremen 2 (Krm2) is a transmembrane receptor for Wnt antagonists Dkk proteins, and its expression is regulated by canonical Wnts (Wnt3a and Wnt8) in Xenopus [125]. Krm2 is required for NC induction in Xenopus, and this function is independent from that of Dkk. Krm2 regulates NC induction by direct binding to Lrp6 to promote Wnt signaling in Xenopus [90].
Rap2 belongs to the Ras GTPase family. Studies in Xenopus showed that Rap2 physically binds with Lrp6 and stabilizes it from proteasome and/or lysosome-dependent degradation [91]. TRAF2/Nck-interacting kinase (TNIK) is a downstream effector of Rap2 that controls the stability of Lrp6 [91]. Rap2/TNIK kinase pathway plays a critical role in Wnt signaling (Wnt8)-mediated NC induction in Xenopus [91]. Depletion of Rap2 could inhibit NC formation (Snai1, Snai2, and Foxd3) [91].
Skip is a transcriptional co-regulator that plays an important role in NC induction in Xenopus [126]. Both under- and overexpression of Skip inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signaling, therefore blocking NC induction (Snai2, Sox3, and engrailed2) in Xenopus [126]. Upon overexpression, Skip forms a complex with Lef1 and Hdac1 to repress Wnt target gene expression [126]. However, Skip also interacts with β-catenin and acts as a scaffold in β-catenin/TCF-mediated transcriptional regulation [126]. These results suggest that Skip expression level needs to be properly modified during NC induction in Xenopus [96].
Finally, inhibiting Wnt signaling in surrounding tissues can sharpen the boundaries between NC and their neighboring territories. In zebrafish, the potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 15 (Kctd15) inhibits NC induction (Sox10, Foxd3, Dlx3b, Sox9b, Tfap2a, Snai1b) by antagonizing Wnt3a signaling and inhibiting the transcription factor Tfap2a, thereby restricting lateral expansion of the neural crest beyond its domain [89,127,128,129]. Hes3 is a member of the Hes family of basic helix-loop-helix transcriptional repressors and is expressed at the boundary of the neural plate [35]. Overexpression of Hes3 blocks Snai2 and Sox10 induction by Wnt8 in Xenopus, suggesting that Hes3 establishes the NP/NC boundary by blocking the mesoderm-derived Wnt signals [35]. Tcf7l1 is a transcriptional repressor of canonical Wnt target genes [130]. In mice, Tcf7l1 is expressed in the anterior neural fold region during neurulation and is required for forebrain development [67]. Conditional inactivation of Tcf7l1 using AP2α-Cre results in anterior expansion of NC cells, suggesting Tcf7l1 defines the anterior boundary between NC and forebrain by inhibiting canonical Wnt signaling [67]. In both mice and Xenopus, the Wnt antagonist Dkk1 is secreted by the prechordal mesoderm to inhibit NC formation and prevents the anterior neural fold from transforming into NC [68].

4. Wnt Signaling and Crosstalk with Other Signaling Pathways in NC Delamination and EMT

After induction and specification, NC cells emigrate from the dorsal neural tube by undergoing EMT. Although all NC cells undergo EMT and become migratory, differences between delamination of cranial NC cells and trunk NC cells exist [131]. For example, cranial NC cells delaminate from the neural tube together in mice and Xenopus [132,133,134]. However, trunk NC cells undergo EMT individually. Moreover, in chicks, the delamination and EMT of cranial NC cells are irrespective of the cell cycle, but almost all trunk NC cells delaminate in S phase [135]. Despite these axial level differences, Wnt signaling participates in the regulation of delamination for both cranial and trunk NC cells [136,137] (Figure 4; Table 2). In order to emigrate from the neural tube, NC cells need to firstly, have an appropriate substratum for migration; secondly, lose intercellular adhesion; and thirdly, obtain migratory ability [138]. Wnt interacts with Bmp, Fgf, retinoic acid (RA), and Yes-associated-protein (YAP) signaling in response to the extracellular microenvironment [92,139]. If the microenvironment is suited for NC migration, such as the segmental plate mesoderm, canonical Wnt signaling induces G1/S transition and prepares NC cells for EMT in the chicken embryo [92,137,139]. Several essential signaling molecules have been identified which regulate NC intercellular adhesion and motility, including the Rho family of small GTPases [140], cadherins [141], and the non-canonical Wnt/planar cell polarity (PCP) signaling [37]. The role of Wnt/PCP signaling in controlling polarized NC cells during migration will be discussed later. Here, we will focus on Wnt interactions with different signaling pathways to regulate NC delamination.

4.1. Wnt Signaling and Crosstalk in Trunk NC Delamination and EMT

Canonical Wnt signaling is required for the delamination of trunk NC cells, and its disruption blocks NC emigration in chicks [137,146]. Rabconnectin-3a (Rbc3a) is a v-ATPase-interacting protein expressed in pre-migratory NC cells of zebrafish and regulates Wnt signaling by controlling intracellular trafficking of Fzd7, while its depletion disrupts Wnt signaling and blocks NC cell emigration in zebrafish [147]. In chicken embryos, the signals from developing somites inhibit Noggin expression in the dorsal neural tube, resulting in high Bmp activity [137]. Bmp4, in turn, up-regulates its downstream target gene, Wnt1 in chicks [137]. Through the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, Wnt1 positively regulates transcription of cyclin D1 and G1/S transition of NC cells in chicks [137]. Since most trunk NC cells delaminate during the S phase in chicks, Wnt-mediated Bmp-dependent G1/S transition is required for NC cell delamination at the rostral segmental plate [135]. However, the segmental plate mesoderm expresses a high level of Noggin, which inhibits Bmp activity and expression of Wnt1 and cyclin D1, blocking the emigration of NC cells from the caudal neural tube [137]. In chicks, Bmp/Wnt signaling also induces Sox9 phosphorylation. Phosphorylated Sox9 can be SUMOylated in vivo to facilitate interaction with Snai2 to trigger NC delamination [162].
N-cadherin belongs to the Ca2+-dependent cell adhesion family. It contains an intracellular β-catenin-binding domain, a transmembrane, and five extracellular cadherin-binding domains [167,168]. In quails, overexpression of N-cadherin inhibits NC delamination by reducing G1/S transition [143]. The cleaved β-catenin-binding cytoplasmic tail of N-cadherin, C-terminal fragment 2 (CTF2), could induce β-catenin and cyclin D1 transcription and therefore stimulate NC delamination [143]. Bmp4 regulates the cleavage of N-cadherin through Adam10. Adam10 cleaves N-cadherin into CTF1, which will be further cleaved by γ-secretase to form soluble CTF2 [143].
Rho signaling has also been shown to regulate NC delamination through Rock activity. In chicken embryos, RhoA and RhoB are expressed in the dorsal neural tube at stages corresponding to the delamination of NC cells [158]. Rho/Rock signaling is regulated by Bmp/Noggin and active at the membrane of NC cells before they undergo EMT [158]. The Rho/Rock signaling stabilizes N-cadherin at the cell membrane, inhibiting NC EMT. Upon delamination, Rho/Rock activities are downregulated, causing a loss of stress fibers and decreased N-cadherin-mediated adhesion [158]. Altogether, these studies suggest that Bmp/Wnt signaling regulates NC delamination through four separate yet converging pathways.
Other than Bmp, Wnt also interacts with YAP, Fgf, and RA signaling to regulate NC EMT. Fgf signaling blocks NC cell emigration by inhibiting the expression of Wnt1 in premature chicken NC cells [92]. Fgf signaling also maintains the expression of Noggin in the caudal neural tube, whereas RA signaling induces the expression of Wnt1 in the dorsal neural tube and controls the initiation of NC cell emigration. Therefore, Fgf and RA signaling play opposing roles to control the timing of NC EMT [92]. The Hippo signaling pathway controls many aspects of developmental processes, such as cell proliferation and survival. YAP, the main effector of Hippo signaling, interacts with a transcriptional co-activator called TAZ to regulate gene expression in response to specific molecular and mechanical signals from the microenvironment [169]. In chicken embryos, YAP regulates Bmp and Wnt signaling and stimulates G1/S transition, survival, and delamination of pre-migratory NC cells [139].
Although canonical Wnt signaling has been suggested to be required for NC delamination, other studies show that emigration of neural crest cells needs transient Wnt inhibition. Tracing the expression of a Wnt-responsive reporter in chicken embryos show that pre-migratory NC cells exhibit endogenous canonical Wnt activity. However, this activity will be transiently inhibited during chicken trunk NC and Xenopus cranial NC delamination [146]. Activation of the small intracellular scaffold proteins Dact1/2 is required for the inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling for NC delamination [146]. Dact1/2 blocks canonical Wnt signaling by binding to β-catenin and accumulating it in nuclear bodies to prevent it. Therefore, Dact1/2 prevents β-catenin from interaction with TCF transcriptional co-activator and inhibits Wnt signaling [146]. Dact2 is expressed in the trunk NC in chicken embryos, whereas pre-migratory NC expresses Dact1 in Xenopus embryos [170]. A chicken neural tube explant assay showed that knockout of Dact1/2 does not influence the motility of NC cells, but forces their release from the dorsal neural tube. These results seem conflicting but may indicate that Wnt signaling plays complicated roles during NC EMT. For example, NC cells must lose intercellular adhesion with neural epithelium and increase motility to delaminate, and Wnt signaling regulates cadherins involved in this adhesion [140].
In chicken NC, Wnt3a increases expression of cadherins Cdh7 and Cdh11, which further accumulate at cell-cell interfaces [141]. In zebrafish, Rbc3a-deficient NC cells also display increased Cdh11 expression levels during EMT [147]. Overexpression of Cdh11 prevents NC migration, suggesting a requirement for Wnt inhibition for NC cells to lose intercellular adhesion and undergo EMT [124]. Additionally, as discussed before, Rho/Rock activity is repressed during EMT. However, activation of Rho by Wnt signaling has been suggested during Xenopus gastrulation [171]. Therefore, the role of canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling in trunk NC delamination remains unclear.

4.2. Wnt Signaling and Crosstalk in Cranial NC Delamination and EMT

Unlike trunk NC, canonical Wnt signaling is repressed during delamination of cranial NC. Draxin, which is temporarily expressed in pre-migratory cranial NC cells before EMT, interacts with Lrp extracellularly, and inhibits canonical Wnt signaling in chicken embryos [136]. Draxin activity causes a decrease in Snai2 expression and an increase in Cad6b expression to block the emigration of pre-migratory cranial NC cells. However, when cranial NC cells become migratory during EMT, Draxin is downregulated and canonical Wnt signaling is activated, which represses Cad6b, and cranial NC can delaminate from the neural tube. Therefore, Draxin controls the timing of cranial NC EMT [136]. In 1982, Newgreen and Gibbins suggested that physical barriers, such as the basal lamina, must be lost for NC cells to emigrate from the neural tube, but it was not experimentally confirmed for many years [138]. A recent study in chicken embryos finally found that during cranial NC EMT, the basement membrane protein laminin continually undergoes remodeling [148]. When pre-migratory NC cells are induced and localized at the dorsal neural tube, the basement membrane will form a space between the non-neural ectoderm and neural tube, which is termed “Regression” [148]. As cranial NC cells begin to delaminate, the basement membrane expands at the junction of the neural tube and ectoderm to encapsulate NC and creates a physical barrier that blocks NC delamination. This stage is called “Expansion” [148]. Finally, the lateral laminin barrier disappears and a laminin-lined “channel” forms, and cranial NC cells complete EMT and migrate through the “channel.” Draxin is involved in the channel formation [148]. Draxin knockdown inhibits basement membrane remodeling during the regression stage, and ectopic introduction of Draxin inhibits the dissolution of the lateral laminin barrier [148]. Snai2 has been shown to rescue the formation defects of laminin channel from Draxin overexpression, suggesting that Wnt/β-catenin signaling is required for the formation of laminin channels and NC EMT at least in chicks [148].

5. Wnt Signaling in NC Migration

After induction and delamination, NC cells migrate long distances to contribute to the development of various tissues [172]. A common feature of all migrating NC cells is that they organize into discrete streams [54,173]. During migration, NC cells are influenced by a large number of activating and inhibitory signals [131,173]. Therefore, the direction of NC migration is regulated by many different signals present in the local environment, including chemotactic signaling, cell-cell interactions, and the extracellular matrix [131,172,173,174].
NC cells need to be polarized to migrate directionally (Figure 5). Protrusions, such as filopodia and lamellipodia, are formed at the leading edge of migrating cells, while a retraction region is usually formed at the trailing edge [54]. Rho family GTPases have been shown to regulate this directional polarity by controlling the polymerization of actin at the leading edge [57]. Rac proteins regulate actin polymerization by activating actin nucleating proteins, such as the Arp2/3 complex [175]. Rho proteins activate Rock (Rho-associated kinase) and induce stress fibers [57]. During NC cell migration, environmental signals control the polarized localization of Rho GTPases and regulate the direction of NC cell migration. However, chemoattractants have been shown to be unable to establish the directionality of NC cell movement due to lack of in vivo chemoattractant gradients through the long migratory routes [172,176]. Therefore, movement directionality is more likely controlled by local signals. Cell-cell interactions such as contact inhibition of locomotion (CIL) have been shown to directly affect the localization of Rho GTPases and NC cell polarity [54,172]. CIL is a process by which a cell paralyzes protrusions in response to a collision with another cell to cease migration in that direction [177]. NC cells exhibit CIL both in vitro and in vivo, and physical contact between two NC cells inhibits their protrusions, leading to movement in opposite directions after collision [54,172,173,176]. At high density, only cells adjacent to a free region may migrate away from the cluster. Moreover, in vivo, CIL can cause the directional migration of NC cells since not all areas are available for migration [54,172,173]. Non-canonical Wnt signaling has been proposed to link CIL with the asymmetric distribution of Rho GTPases during NC migration [54].

5.1. Non-Canonical Wnt Signaling in NC Migration

Many studies have revealed the role of the non-canonical Wnt planar cell polarity (PCP) signaling pathway as the primary source of signals that direct NC cell migration (Figure 5; Table 2). Different factors involved in PCP signaling localize at the cell contact points during CIL. One example is the translocation of Dvl from cytoplasm to membrane during NC migration [178]. Different mechanisms control the localization of Dvl. In Xenopus, two non-canonical Wnt ligands, Wnt11 and Wnt11r, are required for cranial NC migration as extracellular signals. Before migration, Wnt11r, a Xenopus homolog of the mammalian Wnt11 gene, is expressed medially while Wnt11 is expressed lateral to the first migrating NC cells, which express the Wnt receptor Fzd7 [37,166]. Disruption of Wnt11/Fzd7 signaling causes NC cells to generate fewer cell protrusions and lamellipodia at the leading edge during migration, suggesting Wnt11 controls NC migration through the PCP signaling pathway [37]. On the other hand, blocking Wnt11r causes cells to lose contact-mediated inhibition, suggesting that Wnt11r may act as a repellent signal that causes cranial NC cells to move away from the neural plate [166]. Moreover, Wnt11 or Wnt11r, Fzd7, and Dvl also accumulate at the contact site when migrating NC cells collide, suggesting a significant role of Wnt/PCP signaling in CIL and NC migration directionality [179].
Another protein that is essential for recruiting Dvl to the cell membrane is protein tyrosine kinase 7 (Ptk7). Ptk7 is a transmembrane pseudokinase which regulates the Wnt/PCP signaling pathway [180]. Xenopus Ptk7 is expressed in migratory NC cells and interacts with Ror2 through its extracellular domain [156]. Knockdown of Ptk7 inhibits the motility of NC cells and results in a rounded rather than a disperse shape in vitro, while the kinase activity of Ror2 can rescue the Ptk7 loss of function phenotype [156]. These results suggest that the Ptk7/Ror2 complex regulates non-canonical Wnt signaling and NC migration. In Xenopus, Ptk7 forms a complex with Fzd7 and Dvl, suggesting Ptk7 is also required for Fzd7-mediated recruitment of Dvl to the cell membrane. Knockdown of Ptk7 inhibits cranial NC migration, suggesting Ptk7 intersects with the PCP signaling pathway through Dvl localization to regulate NC mobility [157]. The accumulation of Dvl at the cell membrane leads to the localized activation of RhoA in Xenopus [179]. Activated RhoA antagonizes Rac, leading the retraction of protrusions at cell-cell contacts at the trailing edge of a migrating NC cell [57,175,179].
After cell-cell contacts cause the localized activation of Rho GTPases, Wnt/PCP signaling (Wnt11) activates the actin-binding protein calponin 2 (Cnn2) in both chicks and Xenopus [145]. In pre-migratory NC cells, Cnn2 is phosphorylated by RhoA/Rock signaling, leading to its degradation. However, in the early migratory NC cells, RhoA activity restricts Cnn2 to the leading edge of migrating NC cells, which causes the formation of a polarized cortical actin network [145].
Non-canonical Wnt signaling also activates the atypical RhoU GTPase during cranial NC cell migration [159,160]. The level of RhoU activity is essential for NC cells to form polarity and generate adhesive structures [160]. Explants from RhoU-depleted Xenopus embryos show a rounded phenotype and reduced adhesion to the substrate [160]. Overall, these experiments suggest that RhoU regulates the direction of cranial NC migration in Xenopus. Further studies show that RhoU controls cranial NC migration by regulating polarized cell adhesion [160]. Many effectors have been identified for RhoU such as PAKs (P21 activated kinases), including Pak1 and Pak2, which are known to participate in cell adhesion and motility [160,181]. PAK activates Rac1 and induces the formation of lamellipodia [175,182]. Therefore, RhoU regulates NC migration through the Pak1–Rac1 signaling pathway. The non-canonical Wnt4 also induces the expression of Pescadillo (Pes1) in Xenopus [155]. Pescadillo is a nuclear protein involved in ribosomal biogenesis and gene transcription [183,184]. Pescadillo knockdown blocks cranial NC migration and also triggers p53-mediated apoptosis, suggesting dual roles of Pescadillo in NC migration and survival [155].
Moreover, non-canonical Wnt signaling modulates the extracellular matrix to regulate the direction of NC migration in Xenopus and zebrafish. In migrating NC cells, the proteoglycan Syndecan-4 (Syn4) is activated by fibronectin. Activated Syn4 directly inhibits Rac activity [163]. Syn4 also interacts with the Wnt/PCP pathway through Dvl to inhibit Rac at the trailing edge of migrating NC cells, resulting in the formation of cell protrusions such as filopodia and lamellipodia at the leading edge [163]. Since persistent migration depends on the orientation of cell protrusions, Wnt/PCP and Syn4 signaling control the direction of NC migration.
Trunk NC cells migrate along three different pathways: a dorsolateral pathway [185,186], a ventro-lateral pathway [187], and a ventro-medial pathway [185,186]. In the ventro-lateral pathway and the ventro-medial pathway, the continuous migration sheet of NC cells rearranges into narrow, restricted streams. In zebrafish, the initiation of this segmentation is triggered by Nrp2/Sema3F signaling [153]. However, maintenance of the segmental migration is regulated by Wnt/PCP signaling [153]. The zebrafish Wnt11r binds to the surface of the adaxial muscle cells at the central portion of the somite. Wnt11r-Dvl signaling activates the expression of a muscle-specific receptor kinase (MuSK). MuSK signaling possibly modifies the extracellular matrix at the central region of the somite [153]. High-resolution imaging finds that NC cells interact with the extracellular microenvironment using their filopodia and guide the direction of their migration. Therefore, Wnt11r-MuSK signaling keeps NC cells into restricted streams in zebrafish embryos [153].

5.2. Canonical Wnt Signaling in NC Migration

The role of canonical Wnt signaling in controlling NC migration is less well understood. In Xenopus, canonical Wnt activity is decreased in migrating NC cells, while its activation inhibits NC migration [151]. Moreover, inhibition of Efhc1, a ciliary component, upregulates Wnt8, leading to defective NC migration in Xenopus [149]. However, in vitro studies show that although β-catenin is localized at the intercellular contact regions and associates with N-cadherin in most migrating NC cells, early migrating cells have β-catenin in their nuclei, suggesting that canonical Wnt signaling may be only transiently required in early migrating NC cells [150]. Recent studies in Xenopus also show that canonical Wnt signaling is activated in the cranial NC cells shortly after delamination, which drives the re-expression of Snai2 in early migratory NC cells [188]. In zebrafish, Lrp5 is required for cranial NC migration. Knockdown of Lrp5 leads to disrupted migration of cranial NC cells in the branchial stream [152]. In chicks, Wnt3a enhances NC migration along the distal medial pathway [165]. In vitro studies show that Wnt3a induces the expression of Cdh11 [141]. Cdh11 is cleaved by Adam9 and Adam13 to generate a shed extracellular fragment of Cdh11 (EC1-3). EC1-3 promotes Xenopus cranial NC migration through an unknown mechanism [189,190]. Interestingly, other than cleavage of Cdh11, Adam13 also regulates cranial NC cell migration by controlling the expression of many genes through its cytoplasmic domain (C13), such as the protease calpain 8 [142,191]. Gsk3 and Polo-like kinase (Plk) regulate the activity of Adam13 by successive phosphorylation of its C13 domain at two sites (first at S752 and S768 by Gsk3, second by Plk at T833). The phosphorylation of Adam13 is critical for cranial NC migration [142]. In Xenopus, Fzd4 mRNA can be alternatively spliced to generate a secreted Frizzled related protein (Sfrp) Fz4-v1 [192]. Fz4-v1 regulates canonical Wnt signaling in a non-autonomous manner [161]. Knocking down Fz4-v1 blocks NC cell migration [161]. The vestigial-like 3 (Vgll3) protein is expressed at hindbrain rhombomere 2 to activate the expression of Wnt5a and Wnt8b in Xenopus [164]. Depletion of Vgll3 causes a down-regulation of myosin X that is essential for cell-cell adhesion [193]. These results suggest that Vgll3 regulates NC migration through modification of their adhesion properties [164].
Canonical Wnt signaling is also involved in establishing transient cell-cell contacts during NC migration. This process possibly is regulated by localizing N-cadherin to filopodial tips of NC cells, which has been shown to be regulated by canonical Wnt signaling in zebrafish [154]. Wnt signaling activates the expression of Ovo1, a transcription factor gene [194]. Ovo1 inhibits the expression of several genes involved in intracellular trafficking, such as rab12, rab11fip2, rab3c, and sec6, which maintain the balance of cytoplasm and membrane-localized N-cadherin in zebrafish [154]. In mice, N-cadherin and β-catenin colocalize with the gap junction protein, connexin 43 or α1 connexin (Cx43α1) in migrating cardiac NC cells [144]. Further studies show that Wnt1 and N-cadherin regulate gap junction channels in NC cells, suggesting that cadherin-based adherents junction controls NC migration by modulating gap junction communication [144]. An Armadillo protein, p120 catenin (p120ctn), links gap junctions to the actin cytoskeleton [195]. N-cadherin and Cx43α1 interact with p120ctn and regulate cell motility through the Rho GTPases in mice [144].

6. Wnt in NC Multipotency and Fate Determination

The fact that the NC cells can generate many cell and tissue types makes them represent a multipotent stem cell population. Several studies have been performed in vivo to address the developmental potential of individual NC cells by retrovirus-mediated gene transfer or dye injection to label cell lineages [196,197,198]. These studies showed that at least some NC cells generate different cell types in vivo, including smooth muscle cells, neurons, glia, and melanocytes [198,199]. Cultured NC cells from mouse neural tube explants derived prior to NC cell migration demonstrated their multipotency in vitro [200]. After delamination from the neural tube, NC cells can differentiate into various derivatives. The multipotency of chicken pre-migratory NC cells has also been demonstrated using a clonal culture system [201]. A few studies proposed that pre-migratory NC cells are fate-determined before delamination in chicks [202,203]. A recent study employed advanced genetic fate mapping approaches to convincingly demonstrate that both pre-migratory and migratory trunk NC cells are multipotent in mice [204].

6.1. Wnt Signaling and Crosstalk in Maintaining NC Multipotency

In addition to demonstrating the stem cell nature of pre-migratory and migratory NC cells, in vitro studies have also revealed environmental signals regulating multipotential maintenance in NC cells [19]. Combinatorial canonical Wnt and Bmp proteins sustain persistent expression of the NC cell markers p75 and Sox10, suppress sensory neurogenesis and maintain multipotency in early NC stem cells [205] (Table 3). Further studies showed that Bmp/Wnt treatment induces the expression of a chromatin remodeler, chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 7 (Chd7), which maintains the multipotency of NC cells [27]. In mice, Chd7 is expressed in the undifferentiated migratory trunk neural crest cells, the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and sciatic nerve, which normally contain neural crest stem cells [206,207,208]. Therefore, Bmp/Wnt signaling can maintain multipotency in cultured NC cells and increase the number of multipotent cells in DRG in vivo [27]. A more recent study showed that a high concentration of canonical Wnt ligand at the dorsal neural tube directly induces the expression of Lin28a in pre-migratory chicken NC cells [209]. Lin28a is an RNA-binding protein that binds to let7 pre-microRNA and blocks its maturation into let7 miRNA [210]. Therefore, Lin28a protects neural crest specifiers from inhibition by let7 and maintains the multipotency of pre-migratory NC [209]. As NC cells migrate away from the dorsal neural tube, expression of Lin28a decreases, leading to increased let7 activation, resulting in a loss of stem cell identity [209].

6.2. Wnt Signaling in NC Fate Specification and Differentiation

Wnt signaling is also involved in the fate specification and differentiation of NC cells [7] (Table 3). In zebrafish, activation of canonical Wnt signaling in pre-migratory NC cells promotes pigment cell formation, but inhibition of Wnt signaling promotes neuronal fates [214]. However, in mice, activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in pre-migratory NC cells promotes a sensory neuronal fate at the expense of all other NC derivatives [215]. Genetic ablation of β-catenin in pre-migratory NC cells using Wnt1-cre suppresses the formation of both melanocytes and dorsal root ganglia [40]. These contradictory results may be due to taxa-specific differentiation mechanisms, but nevertheless suggest that the role of canonical Wnt signaling in NC lineage specification needs to be addressed further. A recent study in mice shows that induced activation of β-catenin in migratory NC cells using Sox10-cre promotes the formation of melanoblasts and melanocytes, and the repression of other lineages [39]. However, β-catenin activation at later stages, such as glial progenitors or melanoblasts, does not produce similar effects [39]. These results imply a narrow time window in which canonical Wnt signaling controls migratory NC fate determination. It also suggests that NC cells maintain multipotency both before and shortly after delaminating from the dorsal neural tube.
Wnt signaling also affects NC differentiation at late stages in mice. For example, disruption of Axin2 enhances canonical Wnt signaling, increasing osteogenic potential and regeneration of NC-derived frontal bone in adult mice [211]. Conditional knockout of Bmp2 in mouse NC cells increases the expression of Dkk1 in epithelium and reduces Wnt activity, leading to tooth mineralization defects [212]. NC-secreted Bmp4 genetically interacts with Msx1, repressing Osr2-dependent expression of Wnt antagonists Dkk2 and Sfrp2 in mouse tooth organogenesis [213,218]. Cranial NC cells generate cranial mesenchyme, which further develops into the forebrain meningeal progenitors [220]. Studies in mice show that canonical Wnt signaling is required to maintain the meningeal mesenchymal progenitors [216]. In ocular NC cells, canonical Wnt signaling maintains the expression of Pitx2, which is required for eye development [217]. Protein arginine methyltransferase 1 (Prmt1) negatively regulates canonical Wnt signaling [221,222,223,224]. Disruption of Prmt1 in NC cells causes cleft palate and craniofacial defects [219].

7. Wnt Signaling in NC-Derived Cancers

NC derivatives, including melanocytes and glial cells, can transform into cancers such as melanoma, neuroblastoma, and glioblastoma [225]. Indeed, WNT signaling and NC regulators are tightly associated with these types of cancers. Melanoma that develops from the pigment-producing melanocytes is the severest type of skin cancers. Among all skin cancers, melanoma is the most malignant and causes about 80% of all skin cancer deaths [226]. The development of melanoma often involves mutations in BRAF, CDKN2A, CCND1, INK4A, and MAPK signaling pathway components, many of which are also important for the development of neural crest-derived melanocytes [227]. Studies using melanoma cell lines discovered mutations in β-catenin, suggesting that canonical Wnt signaling may play an important role in this type of cancers [228]. Other studies have also detected β-catenin accumulation in the cytoplasm and nucleus of melanoma cells [229,230]. Moreover, expression of WNT proteins, including WNT2, 4, 5A, 7B, and 10B, have been found in melanoma cells or their local environment [231]. However, the sources and spatiotemporal expression patterns of these WNTs as well as the precise role of canonical signaling in melanoma remains unclear [232]. For example, melanomas with high β-catenin levels are correlated with a lower proliferative index [233], suggesting that β-catenin may inhibit melanoma. However, other studies showed that high β-catenin level correlates with enhanced melanoma metastasis [234].
Neuroblastoma is the commonest type of cancers in infants with the median age of 17 months at diagnosis, reflecting the embryonic origin of the disease [235,236,237]. It develops from the NC-derived sympathoadrenal system [238,239]. WNT signaling is implicated in onset and progression of neuroblastoma [240]. The oncogene MYCN, which is important for NC development, has been found to be upregulated in neuroblastoma cell lines or patient samples [241,242]. Xenograft experiments showed that the expression level of WNT5A is higher in human IGR-N-91 neuroblastoma cells than control grafted cells [243]. This is the first evidence for WNT signaling playing a role in human primary neuroblastoma. High WNT5A levels are associated with low-risk neuroblastoma [243]. Further studies showed that the core WNT/PCP signaling components PRICKLE1 and VANGL2 directly inhibit canonical WNT signaling in neuroblastoma cells [244]. High expression level of PRICKLE1 and VANGL2 correlates with low risk of neuroblastoma [244]. In contrast, transcriptome analyses show that high expression of WNT3A or WNT5A correlates with longer survival, while high WNT3 expression level indicates higher risk of neuroblastoma [245]. These seemingly conflicting results suggest that the role of WNT signaling in neuroblastoma needs to be further addressed.
WNT signaling is also implicated in tumors of NC-derived endocrine cells, which include pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma [239,246]. The WNT signaling components β-CATENIN, DVL3, and GSK3 are overexpressed in the MAML3 fusion-positive subtype of these tumors and CSDE1 somatic mutation. WNT4, WNT5A, and WNT11 are also overexpressed after truncated MAML3 activation [246]. These results suggest that overactivation of both canonical and non-canonical WNT signaling pathways may play important roles in these tumors.
Glioblastomas form from astrocytes and can occur in either the brain or spinal cord [247]. Key components of the WNT signaling pathway have been shown to be altered in glioblastoma. For example, CTNNB1, LEF1, TCF7L2, MYC, and CCND1 are not expressed, while APC and GSK3 are downregulated in glioblastoma [248]. Overexpression of WNT5A increases proliferation of glioblastoma cells in vitro, while knockdown inhibits proliferation and tumorigenicity [249]. Notably, the NC specifier Sox10 has been found to be upregulated in human low-grade gliomas and a mouse model of glioma [250].
NC and cancer cells possess similarities in several aspects [251,252]. During development, NC cells undergo EMT, emigrate from the dorsal neural tube, migrate through the embryo. This process is similar to the early stages of metastasis, when cancer cells disseminate from the original location [227]. At molecular and cellular level, the similarity of the development of NC cells and metastasis of cancer cells is more significant. Many signaling pathways, such as the Wnt signaling pathway, are shared by these two processes. For instance, WNT signaling also plays crucial roles in maintenance of cancer stem cells and metastasis [253,254], which is comparable to the roles of Wnt signaling in NC stemness and migration. Thus, NC cells represent an excellent model to study how developmental processes can be re-activated and usurped by cancer cells [255]. Studying the changes in cell-cell junctions, cell polarity, signaling, transcription factors, and the role of Wnt signaling at each step during NC development may provide insightful mechanisms of how cancer processes and hopefully trigger novel ideas for cancer treatments.

8. Conclusions

Since William His identified NC in 1868 [73], great advances have been made in understanding NC development for one and a half centuries. NC cells represent a group of migratory, multipotent stem cell population which are unique to vertebrate evolution. Therefore, NC cells serve as an excellent model for biologists to study the molecular and cellular mechanism of various developmental and evolutionary processes like morphogenetic induction, cell motility, and fate specification. Environmental cues and transcription factors have been shown to control the induction, delamination, migration, and differentiation of NC cells. Wnt signaling is a key driver for most NC developmental processes. Mutations in Wnt signaling components are involved in many diseases and cancers. However, important questions remain for the role of Wnt signaling in NC development and disease. For instance, does Wnt signaling play a role in NC evolution? Does Wnt signaling play a conserved role in human NC development? What are the roles of epigenetic factors, such as non-coding RNAs and DNA/RNA/protein methylation in Wnt signaling regulation of NC development? Whether and how environmental factors modulate Wnt signaling and thus may influence NC development or cause NC-derived disease and cancer? It is no doubt that studying Wnt signaling in NC development can lead to a better understanding of diseases, which hopefully will translate into practical therapies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.J. and C.J.Z.; literature analysis, Y.J.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.J.; writing—review and editing, H.H., K.R., M.M. and C.J.Z.; writing—revision, Y.J., K.R. and C.J.Z.; visualization, Y.J., H.H. and C.J.Z.; supervision, C.J.Z.; funding acquisition, C.J.Z.

Funding

This work is supported by grants from the NIH (R01DE026737, R01NS102261, and R01DE0221696 to C.J.Z.) and the Shriners Hospitals for Children (85105 and 86600 to C.J.Z.).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Chelsey Lee for proofreading and to the rest of Zhou lab members for their supports during the manuscript preparation. We apologize to colleagues whose important work we were unable to cite due to space constraints or inadvertently overlooking.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bronner, M.E. Formation and migration of neural crest cells in the vertebrate embryo. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2012, 138, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  2. Neural crest cells: Evolution, Development and Disease; Trainor, P.A. (Ed.) Academic Press: London, UK, 2014; pp. 1–455. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bae, C.J.; Saint-Jeannet, J.P. Induction and specification of neural crest cells: Extracellular signals and transcriptional switches. In Neural crest cells: Evolution, Development and Disease; Trainor, P.A., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2014; pp. 27–49. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bronner, M.E.; Simoes-Costa, M. The Neural Crest Migrating into the Twenty-First Century. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2016, 116, 115–134. [Google Scholar] [PubMed][Green Version]
  5. Szabo, A.; Mayor, R. Mechanisms of Neural Crest Migration. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2018, 52, 43–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mayor, R.; Theveneau, E. The neural crest. Development 2013, 140, 2247–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  7. Bhatt, S.; Diaz, R.; Trainor, P.A. Signals and switches in Mammalian neural crest cell differentiation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Simoes-Costa, M.; Bronner, M.E. Insights into neural crest development and evolution from genomic analysis. Genome Res. 2013, 23, 1069–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  9. Lumb, R.; Buckberry, S.; Secker, G.; Lawrence, D.; Schwarz, Q. Transcriptome profiling reveals expression signatures of cranial neural crest cells arising from different axial levels. BMC Dev. Biol. 2017, 17, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. La Noce, M.; Mele, L.; Tirino, V.; Paino, F.; De Rosa, A.; Naddeo, P.; Papagerakis, P.; Papaccio, G.; Desiderio, V. Neural crest stem cell population in craniomaxillofacial development and tissue repair. Eur. Cell. Mater. 2014, 28, 348–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Knight, R.D.; Schilling, T.F. Cranial neural crest and development of the head skeleton. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2006, 589, 120–133. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kuo, B.R.; Erickson, C.A. Vagal neural crest cell migratory behavior: A transition between the cranial and trunk crest. Dev. Dyn. 2011, 240, 2084–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  13. Hutchins, E.J.; Kunttas, E.; Piacentino, M.L.; Howard, A.G.A.t.; Bronner, M.E.; Uribe, R.A. Migration and diversification of the vagal neural crest. Dev. Biol. 2018, 444, S98–S109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ezin, A.M.; Sechrist, J.W.; Zah, A.; Bronner, M.; Fraser, S.E. Early regulative ability of the neuroepithelium to form cardiac neural crest. Dev. Biol. 2011, 349, 238–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  15. Plein, A.; Fantin, A.; Ruhrberg, C. Neural crest cells in cardiovascular development. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2015, 111, 183–200. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Jiang, X.; Rowitch, D.H.; Soriano, P.; McMahon, A.P.; Sucov, H.M. Fate of the mammalian cardiac neural crest. Development 2000, 127, 1607–1616. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Krotoski, D.M.; Fraser, S.E.; Bronner-Fraser, M. Mapping of neural crest pathways in Xenopus laevis using inter- and intra-specific cell markers. Dev. Biol. 1988, 127, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vega-Lopez, G.A.; Cerrizuela, S.; Aybar, M.J. Trunk neural crest cells: Formation, migration and beyond. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2017, 61, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Takahashi, Y.; Sipp, D.; Enomoto, H. Tissue interactions in neural crest cell development and disease. Science 2013, 341, 860–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vega-Lopez, G.A.; Cerrizuela, S.; Tribulo, C.; Aybar, M.J. Neurocristopathies: New insights 150 years after the neural crest discovery. Dev. Biol. 2018, 444, S110–S143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Trainor, P.A. Craniofacial birth defects: The role of neural crest cells in the etiology and pathogenesis of Treacher Collins syndrome and the potential for prevention. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2010, 152, 2984–2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Etchevers, H.C.; Dupin, E.; Le Douarin, N.M. The diverse neural crest: From embryology to human pathology. Development 2019, 146, dev169821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Amiel, J.; Sproat-Emison, E.; Garcia-Barcelo, M.; Lantieri, F.; Burzynski, G.; Borrego, S.; Pelet, A.; Arnold, S.; Miao, X.; Griseri, P.; et al. Hirschsprung disease, associated syndromes and genetics: A review. J. Med. Genet. 2008, 45, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Langer, J.C. Hirschsprung disease. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2013, 25, 368–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Epstein, J.A. Developing models of DiGeorge syndrome. Trends Genet. 2001, 17, S13–S17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schulz, Y.; Wehner, P.; Opitz, L.; Salinas-Riester, G.; Bongers, E.M.; van Ravenswaaij-Arts, C.M.; Wincent, J.; Schoumans, J.; Kohlhase, J.; Borchers, A.; et al. CHD7, the gene mutated in CHARGE syndrome, regulates genes involved in neural crest cell guidance. Hum. Genet. 2014, 133, 997–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fujita, K.; Ogawa, R.; Kawawaki, S.; Ito, K. Roles of chromatin remodelers in maintenance mechanisms of multipotency of mouse trunk neural crest cells in the formation of neural crest-derived stem cells. Mech. Dev. 2014, 133, 126–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pauli, S.; Bajpai, R.; Borchers, A. CHARGEd with neural crest defects. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet. 2017, 175, 478–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  29. Trainor, P.; Krumlauf, R. Development. Riding the crest of the Wnt signaling wave. Science 2002, 297, 781–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schmidt, C.; Patel, K. Wnts and the neural crest. Anat. Embryol. 2005, 209, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yanfeng, W.; Saint-Jeannet, J.P.; Klein, P.S. Wnt-frizzled signaling in the induction and differentiation of the neural crest. Bioessays 2003, 25, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gomez, G.A.; Prasad, M.S.; Sandhu, N.; Shelar, P.B.; Leung, A.W.; Garcia-Castro, M.I. Human neural crest induction by temporal modulation of WNT activation. Dev. Biol. 2019, 449, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  33. Jones, N.C.; Trainor, P.A. Role of morphogens in neural crest cell determination. J. Neurobiol. 2005, 64, 388–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Devotta, A.; Hong, C.S.; Saint-Jeannet, J.P. Dkk2 promotes neural crest specification by activating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in a GSK3beta independent manner. Elife 2018, 7, e34404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hong, C.S.; Saint-Jeannet, J.P. The b-HLH transcription factor Hes3 participates in neural plate border formation by interfering with Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Dev. Biol. 2018, 442, 162–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cheung, M.; Chaboissier, M.C.; Mynett, A.; Hirst, E.; Schedl, A.; Briscoe, J. The transcriptional control of trunk neural crest induction, survival, and delamination. Dev. Cell 2005, 8, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. De Calisto, J.; Araya, C.; Marchant, L.; Riaz, C.F.; Mayor, R. Essential role of non-canonical Wnt signalling in neural crest migration. Development 2005, 132, 2587–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  38. Ossipova, O.; Kerney, R.; Saint-Jeannet, J.P.; Sokol, S.Y. Regulation of neural crest development by the formin family protein Daam1. Genesis 2018, 56, e23108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hari, L.; Miescher, I.; Shakhova, O.; Suter, U.; Chin, L.; Taketo, M.; Richardson, W.D.; Kessaris, N.; Sommer, L. Temporal control of neural crest lineage generation by Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Development 2012, 139, 2107–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hari, L.; Brault, V.; Kleber, M.; Lee, H.Y.; Ille, F.; Leimeroth, R.; Paratore, C.; Suter, U.; Kemler, R.; Sommer, L. Lineage-specific requirements of beta-catenin in neural crest development. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 159, 867–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nusse, R.; Clevers, H. Wnt/beta-Catenin Signaling, Disease, and Emerging Therapeutic Modalities. Cell 2017, 169, 985–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bhanot, P.; Brink, M.; Samos, C.H.; Hsieh, J.C.; Wang, Y.; Macke, J.P.; Andrew, D.; Nathans, J.; Nusse, R. A new member of the frizzled family from Drosophila functions as a Wingless receptor. Nature 1996, 382, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Janda, C.Y.; Waghray, D.; Levin, A.M.; Thomas, C.; Garcia, K.C. Structural basis of Wnt recognition by Frizzled. Science 2012, 337, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ke, J.; Xu, H.E.; Williams, B.O. Lipid modification in Wnt structure and function. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2013, 24, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chen, S.; Bubeck, D.; MacDonald, B.T.; Liang, W.X.; Mao, J.H.; Malinauskas, T.; Llorca, O.; Aricescu, A.R.; Siebold, C.; He, X.; et al. Structural and functional studies of LRP6 ectodomain reveal a platform for Wnt signaling. Dev. Cell 2011, 21, 848–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chu, M.L.; Ahn, V.E.; Choi, H.J.; Daniels, D.L.; Nusse, R.; Weis, W.I. structural Studies of Wnts and identification of an LRP6 binding site. Structure 2013, 21, 1235–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Tamai, K.; Semenov, M.; Kato, Y.; Spokony, R.; Liu, C.; Katsuyama, Y.; Hess, F.; Saint-Jeannet, J.P.; He, X. LDL-receptor-related proteins in Wnt signal transduction. Nature 2000, 407, 530–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Li, V.S.; Ng, S.S.; Boersema, P.J.; Low, T.Y.; Karthaus, W.R.; Gerlach, J.P.; Mohammed, S.; Heck, A.J.; Maurice, M.M.; Mahmoudi, T.; et al. Wnt signaling through inhibition of beta-catenin degradation in an intact Axin1 complex. Cell 2012, 149, 1245–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Cselenyi, C.S.; Jernigan, K.K.; Tahinci, E.; Thorne, C.A.; Lee, L.A.; Lee, E. LRP6 transduces a canonical Wnt signal independently of Axin degradation by inhibiting GSK3’s phosphorylation of beta-catenin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008, 105, 8032–8037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Wodarz, A.; Nusse, R. Mechanisms of Wnt signaling in development. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 1998, 14, 59–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Steinhart, Z.; Angers, S. Wnt signaling in development and tissue homeostasis. Development 2018, 145, dev146589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  52. McManus, E.J.; Sakamoto, K.; Armit, L.J.; Ronaldson, L.; Shpiro, N.; Marquez, R.; Alessi, D.R. Role that phosphorylation of GSK3 plays in insulin and Wnt signalling defined by knockin analysis. EMBO J. 2005, 24, 1571–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  53. Humphries, A.C.; Mlodzik, M. From instruction to output: Wnt/PCP signaling in development and cancer. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 2018, 51, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mayor, R.; Theveneau, E. The role of the non-canonical Wnt-planar cell polarity pathway in neural crest migration. Biochem. J. 2014, 457, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kikuchi, A.; Yamamoto, H.; Sato, A. Selective activation mechanisms of Wnt signaling pathways. Trends Cell Biol. 2009, 19, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Simons, M.; Mlodzik, M. Planar cell polarity signaling: From fly development to human disease. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2008, 42, 517–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ridley, A.J. Life at the leading edge. Cell 2011, 145, 1012–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. De, A. Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway: A brief overview. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2011, 43, 745–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kuhl, M.; Sheldahl, L.C.; Malbon, C.C.; Moon, R.T. Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II is stimulated by Wnt and Frizzled homologs and promotes ventral cell fates in Xenopus. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 12701–12711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sheldahl, L.C.; Park, M.; Malbon, C.C.; Moon, R.T. Protein kinase C is differentially stimulated by Wnt and Frizzled homologs in a G-protein-dependent manner. Curr. Biol. 1999, 9, 695–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lilienbaum, A.; Israel, A. From calcium to NF-kappa B signaling pathways in neurons. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23, 2680–2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Simoes-Costa, M.; Bronner, M.E. Establishing neural crest identity: A gene regulatory recipe. Development 2015, 142, 242–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pla, P.; Monsoro-Burq, A.H. The neural border: Induction, specification and maturation of the territory that generates neural crest cells. Dev. Biol. 2018, 444, S36–S46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Plouhinec, J.L.; Medina-Ruiz, S.; Borday, C.; Bernard, E.; Vert, J.P.; Eisen, M.B.; Harland, R.M.; Monsoro-Burq, A.H. A molecular atlas of the developing ectoderm defines neural, neural crest, placode, and nonneural progenitor identity in vertebrates. PLoS Biol. 2017, 15, e2004045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Pera, E.; Stein, S.; Kessel, M. Ectodermal patterning in the avian embryo: Epidermis versus neural plate. Development 1999, 126, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Maharana, S.K.; Schlosser, G. A gene regulatory network underlying the formation of pre-placodal ectoderm in Xenopus laevis. BMC Biol. 2018, 16, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Masek, J.; Machon, O.; Korinek, V.; Taketo, M.M.; Kozmik, Z. Tcf7l1 protects the anterior neural fold from adopting the neural crest fate. Development 2016, 143, 2206–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  68. Carmona-Fontaine, C.; Acuna, G.; Ellwanger, K.; Niehrs, C.; Mayor, R. Neural crests are actively precluded from the anterior neural fold by a novel inhibitory mechanism dependent on Dickkopf1 secreted by the prechordal mesoderm. Dev. Biol. 2007, 309, 208–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  69. Hong, C.S.; Saint-Jeannet, J.P. The activity of Pax3 and Zic1 regulates three distinct cell fates at the neural plate border. Mol. Biol. Cell 2007, 18, 2192–2202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nichane, M.; Ren, X.; Souopgui, J.; Bellefroid, E.J. Hairy2 functions through both DNA-binding and non DNA-binding mechanisms at the neural plate border in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 2008, 322, 368–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Milet, C.; Monsoro-Burq, A.H. Neural crest induction at the neural plate border in vertebrates. Dev. Biol. 2012, 366, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Khudyakov, J.; Bronner-Fraser, M. Comprehensive spatiotemporal analysis of early chick neural crest network genes. Dev. Dyn. 2009, 238, 716–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  73. Bronner, M.E.; LeDouarin, N.M. Development and evolution of the neural crest: An overview. Dev. Biol. 2012, 366, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  74. Meulemans, D.; Bronner-Fraser, M. Gene-regulatory interactions in neural crest evolution and development. Dev. Cell. 2004, 7, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wei, S.; Xu, G.; Bridges, L.C.; Williams, P.; White, J.M.; DeSimone, D.W. ADAM13 induces cranial neural crest by cleaving class B Ephrins and regulating Wnt signaling. Dev. Cell. 2010, 19, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Li, J.; Perfetto, M.; Neuner, R.; Bahudhanapati, H.; Christian, L.; Mathavan, K.; Bridges, L.C.; Alfandari, D.; Wei, S. Xenopus ADAM19 regulates Wnt signaling and neural crest specification by stabilizing ADAM13. Development 2018, 145, dev158154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ribes, V.; Le Roux, I.; Rhinn, M.; Schuhbaur, B.; Dolle, P. Early mouse caudal development relies on crosstalk between retinoic acid, Shh and Fgf signalling pathways. Development 2009, 136, 665–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yokota, C.; Astrand, C.; Takahashi, S.; Hagey, D.W.; Stenman, J.M. Apolipoprotein C-I mediates Wnt/Ctnnb1 signaling during neural border formation and is required for neural crest development. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2017, 61, 415–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Seo, J.H.; Park, D.S.; Hong, M.; Chang, E.J.; Choi, S.C. Essential role of AWP1 in neural crest specification in Xenopus. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2013, 57, 829–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  80. Simoes-Costa, M.; Stone, M.; Bronner, M.E. Axud1 Integrates Wnt Signaling and Transcriptional Inputs to Drive Neural Crest Formation. Dev. Cell. 2015, 34, 544–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  81. Koehler, A.; Schlupf, J.; Schneider, M.; Kraft, B.; Winter, C.; Kashef, J. Loss of Xenopus cadherin-11 leads to increased Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and up-regulation of target genes c-myc and cyclin D1 in neural crest. Dev. Biol. 2013, 383, 132–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wu, J.; Yang, J.; Klein, P.S. Neural crest induction by the canonical Wnt pathway can be dissociated from anterior-posterior neural patterning in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 2005, 279, 220–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hong, C.S.; Park, B.Y.; Saint-Jeannet, J.P. Fgf8a induces neural crest indirectly through the activation of Wnt8 in the paraxial mesoderm. Development 2008, 135, 3903–3910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  84. Ossipova, O.; Sokol, S.Y. Neural crest specification by noncanonical Wnt signaling and PAR-1. Development 2011, 138, 5441–5450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  85. Deardorff, M.A.; Tan, C.; Saint-Jeannet, J.P.; Klein, P.S. A role for frizzled 3 in neural crest development. Development 2001, 128, 3655–3663. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Abu-Elmagd, M.; Garcia-Morales, C.; Wheeler, G.N. Frizzled7 mediates canonical Wnt signaling in neural crest induction. Dev. Biol. 2006, 298, 285–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Li, B.; Kuriyama, S.; Moreno, M.; Mayor, R. The posteriorizing gene Gbx2 is a direct target of Wnt signalling and the earliest factor in neural crest induction. Development 2009, 136, 3267–3278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Saint-Jeannet, J.P.; He, X.; Varmus, H.E.; Dawid, I.B. Regulation of dorsal fate in the neuraxis by Wnt-1 and Wnt-3a. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1997, 94, 13713–13718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  89. Dutta, S.; Dawid, I.B. Kctd15 inhibits neural crest formation by attenuating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling output. Development 2010, 137, 3013–3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Hassler, C.; Cruciat, C.M.; Huang, Y.L.; Kuriyama, S.; Mayor, R.; Niehrs, C. Kremen is required for neural crest induction in Xenopus and promotes LRP6-mediated Wnt signaling. Development 2007, 134, 4255–4263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Park, D.S.; Seo, J.H.; Hong, M.; Choi, S.C. Role of the Rap2/TNIK kinase pathway in regulation of LRP6 stability for Wnt signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 436, 338–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Martinez-Morales, P.L.; Diez del Corral, R.; Olivera-Martinez, I.; Quiroga, A.C.; Das, R.M.; Barbas, J.A.; Storey, K.G.; Morales, A.V. FGF and retinoic acid activity gradients control the timing of neural crest cell emigration in the trunk. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 194, 489–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  93. Lin, S.J.; Chiang, M.C.; Shih, H.Y.; Hsu, L.S.; Yeh, T.H.; Huang, Y.C.; Lin, C.Y.; Cheng, Y.C. Regulator of G protein signaling 2 (Rgs2) regulates neural crest development through Ppardelta-Sox10 cascade. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell. Res. 2017, 1864, 463–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Guemar, L.; de Santa Barbara, P.; Vignal, E.; Maurel, B.; Fort, P.; Faure, S. The small GTPase RhoV is an essential regulator of neural crest induction in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 2007, 310, 113–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  95. Schille, C.; Bayerlova, M.; Bleckmann, A.; Schambony, A. Ror2 signaling is required for local upregulation of GDF6 and activation of BMP signaling at the neural plate border. Development 2016, 143, 3182–3194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  96. Wang, Y.; Fu, Y.; Gao, L.; Zhu, G.; Liang, J.; Gao, C.; Huang, B.; Fenger, U.; Niehrs, C.; Chen, Y.G.; et al. Xenopus skip modulates Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and functions in neural crest induction. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 10890–10901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Park, D.S.; Seo, J.H.; Hong, M.; Bang, W.; Han, J.K.; Choi, S.C. Role of Sp5 as an essential early regulator of neural crest specification in xenopus. Dev. Dyn. 2013, 242, 1382–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Heeg-Truesdell, E.; LaBonne, C. Neural induction in Xenopus requires inhibition of Wnt-beta-catenin signaling. Dev. Biol. 2006, 298, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Garcia-Castro, M.I.; Marcelle, C.; Bronner-Fraser, M. Ectodermal Wnt function as a neural crest inducer. Science 2002, 297, 848–851. [Google Scholar]
  100. Schmidt, C.; McGonnell, I.M.; Allen, S.; Otto, A.; Patel, K. Wnt6 controls amniote neural crest induction through the non-canonical signaling pathway. Dev. Dyn. 2007, 236, 2502–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ikeya, M.; Lee, S.M.; Johnson, J.E.; McMahon, A.P.; Takada, S. Wnt signalling required for expansion of neural crest and CNS progenitors. Nature 1997, 389, 966–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Chang, C.; Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. Neural crest induction by Xwnt7B in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 1998, 194, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. LaBonne, C.; Bronner-Fraser, M. Neural crest induction in Xenopus: Evidence for a two-signal model. Development 1998, 125, 2403–2414. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  104. Summerhurst, K.; Stark, M.; Sharpe, J.; Davidson, D.; Murphy, P. 3D representation of Wnt and Frizzled gene expression patterns in the mouse embryo at embryonic day 11.5 (Ts19). Gene Expr. Patterns 2008, 8, 331–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  105. Duester, G. Retinoic acid synthesis and signaling during early organogenesis. Cell 2008, 134, 921–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Bolanos-Garcia, V.M.; Miguel, R.N. On the structure and function of apolipoproteins: More than a family of lipid-binding proteins. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2003, 83, 47–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Fujimura, N.; Vacik, T.; Machon, O.; Vlcek, C.; Scalabrin, S.; Speth, M.; Diep, D.; Krauss, S.; Kozmik, Z. Wnt-mediated down-regulation of Sp1 target genes by a transcriptional repressor Sp5. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 1225–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Duan, W.; Sun, B.; Li, T.W.; Tan, B.J.; Lee, M.K.; Teo, T.S. Cloning and characterization of AWP1, a novel protein that associates with serine/threonine kinase PRK1 in vivo. Gene 2000, 256, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Oishi, I.; Suzuki, H.; Onishi, N.; Takada, R.; Kani, S.; Ohkawara, B.; Koshida, I.; Suzuki, K.; Yamada, G.; Schwabe, G.C.; et al. The receptor tyrosine kinase Ror2 is involved in non-canonical Wnt5a/JNK signalling pathway. Genes Cells 2003, 8, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Borday, C.; Parain, K.; Thi Tran, H.; Vleminckx, K.; Perron, M.; Monsoro-Burq, A.H. An atlas of Wnt activity during embryogenesis in Xenopus tropicalis. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Weisz Hubsman, M.; Volinsky, N.; Manser, E.; Yablonski, D.; Aronheim, A. Autophosphorylation-dependent degradation of Pak1, triggered by the Rho-family GTPase, Chp. Biochem. J. 2007, 404, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Yang, Z.; Rayala, S.; Nguyen, D.; Vadlamudi, R.K.; Chen, S.; Kumar, R. Pak1 phosphorylation of snail, a master regulator of epithelial-to-mesenchyme transition, modulates snail’s subcellular localization and functions. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 3179–3184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Faure, S.; Fort, P. Atypical RhoV and RhoU GTPases control development of the neural crest. Small GTPases 2011, 2, 310–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  114. Quinlan, R.; Graf, M.; Mason, I.; Lumsden, A.; Kiecker, C. Complex and dynamic patterns of Wnt pathway gene expression in the developing chick forebrain. Neural Dev. 2009, 4, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Brault, V.; Moore, R.; Kutsch, S.; Ishibashi, M.; Rowitch, D.H.; McMahon, A.P.; Sommer, L.; Boussadia, O.; Kemler, R. Inactivation of the beta-catenin gene by Wnt1-Cre-mediated deletion results in dramatic brain malformation and failure of craniofacial development. Development 2001, 128, 1253–1264. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  116. Stuhlmiller, T.J.; Garcia-Castro, M.I. Current perspectives of the signaling pathways directing neural crest induction. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 69, 3715–3737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  117. Wu, W.; Glinka, A.; Delius, H.; Niehrs, C. Mutual antagonism between dickkopf1 and dickkopf2 regulates Wnt/beta-catenin signalling. Curr. Biol. 2000, 10, 1611–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Li, L.; Mao, J.; Sun, L.; Liu, W.; Wu, D. Second cysteine-rich domain of Dickkopf-2 activates canonical Wnt signaling pathway via LRP-6 independently of dishevelled. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 5977–5981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Brott, B.K.; Sokol, S.Y. Regulation of Wnt/LRP signaling by distinct domains of Dickkopf proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22, 6100–6110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Aybar, M.J.; Mayor, R. Early induction of neural crest cells: Lessons learned from frog, fish and chick. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2002, 12, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Villanueva, S.; Glavic, A.; Ruiz, P.; Mayor, R. Posteriorization by FGF, Wnt, and retinoic acid is required for neural crest induction. Dev. Biol. 2002, 241, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Domingos, P.M.; Itasaki, N.; Jones, C.M.; Mercurio, S.; Sargent, M.G.; Smith, J.C.; Krumlauf, R. The Wnt/beta-catenin pathway posteriorizes neural tissue in Xenopus by an indirect mechanism requiring FGF signalling. Dev. Biol. 2001, 239, 148–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Poliakov, A.; Cotrina, M.; Wilkinson, D.G. Diverse roles of eph receptors and ephrins in the regulation of cell migration and tissue assembly. Dev. Cell 2004, 7, 465–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Borchers, A.; David, R.; Wedlich, D. Xenopus cadherin-11 restrains cranial neural crest migration and influences neural crest specification. Development 2001, 128, 3049–3060. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  125. Mao, B.; Wu, W.; Davidson, G.; Marhold, J.; Li, M.; Mechler, B.M.; Delius, H.; Hoppe, D.; Stannek, P.; Walter, C.; et al. Kremen proteins are Dickkopf receptors that regulate Wnt/beta-catenin signalling. Nature 2002, 417, 664–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Leong, G.M.; Subramaniam, N.; Figueroa, J.; Flanagan, J.L.; Hayman, M.J.; Eisman, J.A.; Kouzmenko, A.P. Ski-interacting protein interacts with Smad proteins to augment transforming growth factor-beta-dependent transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 18243–18248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Heffer, A.; Marquart, G.D.; Aquilina-Beck, A.; Saleem, N.; Burgess, H.A.; Dawid, I.B. Generation and characterization of Kctd15 mutations in zebrafish. PLoS ONE 2017, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zarelli, V.E.; Dawid, I.B. Inhibition of neural crest formation by Kctd15 involves regulation of transcription factor AP-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013, 110, 2870–2875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  129. Wong, T.C.; Rebbert, M.; Wang, C.; Chen, X.; Heffer, A.; Zarelli, V.E.; Dawid, I.B.; Zhao, H. Genes regulated by potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 15 (Kctd15) in the developing neural crest. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2016, 60, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Shy, B.R.; Wu, C.I.; Khramtsova, G.F.; Zhang, J.Y.; Olopade, O.I.; Goss, K.H.; Merrill, B.J. Regulation of Tcf7l1 DNA binding and protein stability as principal mechanisms of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Cell Rep. 2013, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Theveneau, E.; Mayor, R. Neural crest delamination and migration: From epithelium-to-mesenchyme transition to collective cell migration. Dev. Biol. 2012, 366, 34–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  132. Nichols, D.H. Neural crest formation in the head of the mouse embryo as observed using a new histological technique. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 1981, 64, 105–120. [Google Scholar]
  133. Nichols, D.H. Ultrastructure of neural crest formation in the midbrain/rostral hindbrain and preotic hindbrain regions of the mouse embryo. Am. J. Anat. 1987, 179, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Sadaghiani, B.; Thiebaud, C.H. Neural crest development in the Xenopus laevis embryo, studied by interspecific transplantation and scanning electron microscopy. Dev. Biol. 1987, 124, 91–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Burstyn-Cohen, T.; Kalcheim, C. Association between the cell cycle and neural crest delamination through specific regulation of G1/S transition. Dev. Cell 2002, 3, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Hutchins, E.J.; Bronner, M.E. Draxin acts as a molecular rheostat of canonical Wnt signaling to control cranial neural crest EMT. J. Cell Biol. 2018, 217, 3683–3697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  137. Burstyn-Cohen, T.; Stanleigh, J.; Sela-Donenfeld, D.; Kalcheim, C. Canonical Wnt activity regulates trunk neural crest delamination linking BMP/noggin signaling with G1/S transition. Development 2004, 131, 5327–5339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  138. Padmanabhan, L.A.T.a.R. The Cell Biology of Neural Crest Cell Delamination and EMT. In Neural Crest Cells: Evolution, Development and Disease; Trainor, P.A., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2014; pp. 51–72. [Google Scholar]
  139. Kumar, D.; Nitzan, E.; Kalcheim, C. YAP promotes neural crest emigration through interactions with BMP and Wnt activities. Cell Commun. Signal. 2019, 17, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Clay, M.R.; Halloran, M.C. Regulation of cell adhesions and motility during initiation of neural crest migration. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2011, 21, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  141. Chalpe, A.J.; Prasad, M.; Henke, A.J.; Paulson, A.F. Regulation of cadherin expression in the chicken neural crest by the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Cell Adh. Migr. 2010, 4, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Abbruzzese, G.; Cousin, H.; Salicioni, A.M.; Alfandari, D. GSK3 and Polo-like kinase regulate ADAM13 function during cranial neural crest cell migration. Mol. Biol. Cell 2014, 25, 4072–4082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Shoval, I.; Ludwig, A.; Kalcheim, C. Antagonistic roles of full-length N-cadherin and its soluble BMP cleavage product in neural crest delamination. Development 2007, 134, 491–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  144. Xu, X.; Li, W.E.; Huang, G.Y.; Meyer, R.; Chen, T.; Luo, Y.; Thomas, M.P.; Radice, G.L.; Lo, C.W. Modulation of mouse neural crest cell motility by N-cadherin and connexin 43 gap junctions. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 154, 217–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  145. Ulmer, B.; Hagenlocher, C.; Schmalholz, S.; Kurz, S.; Schweickert, A.; Kohl, A.; Roth, L.; Sela-Donenfeld, D.; Blum, M. Calponin 2 acts as an effector of noncanonical Wnt-mediated cell polarization during neural crest cell migration. Cell Rep. 2013, 3, 615–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Rabadan, M.A.; Herrera, A.; Fanlo, L.; Usieto, S.; Carmona-Fontaine, C.; Barriga, E.H.; Mayor, R.; Pons, S.; Marti, E. Delamination of neural crest cells requires transient and reversible Wnt inhibition mediated by Dact1/2. Development 2016, 143, 2194–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Tuttle, A.M.; Hoffman, T.L.; Schilling, T.F. Rabconnectin-3a regulates vesicle endocytosis and canonical Wnt signaling in zebrafish neural crest migration. PLoS Biol. 2014, 12, e1001852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Hutchins, E.J.; Bronner, M.E. Draxin alters laminin organization during basement membrane remodeling to control cranial neural crest EMT. Dev. Biol. 2019, 446, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Zhao, Y.; Shi, J.; Winey, M.; Klymkowsky, M.W. Identifying domains of EFHC1 involved in ciliary localization, ciliogenesis, and the regulation of Wnt signaling. Dev. Biol. 2016, 411, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. de Melker, A.A.; Desban, N.; Duband, J.L. Cellular localization and signaling activity of beta-catenin in migrating neural crest cells. Dev. Dyn. 2004, 230, 708–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Maj, E.; Kunneke, L.; Loresch, E.; Grund, A.; Melchert, J.; Pieler, T.; Aspelmeier, T.; Borchers, A. Controlled levels of canonical Wnt signaling are required for neural crest migration. Dev. Biol. 2016, 417, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Willems, B.; Tao, S.; Yu, T.; Huysseune, A.; Witten, P.E.; Winkler, C. The Wnt Co-Receptor Lrp5 Is Required for Cranial Neural Crest Cell Migration in Zebrafish. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0131768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Banerjee, S.; Gordon, L.; Donn, T.M.; Berti, C.; Moens, C.B.; Burden, S.J.; Granato, M. A novel role for MuSK and non-canonical Wnt signaling during segmental neural crest cell migration. Development 2011, 138, 3287–3296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  154. Piloto, S.; Schilling, T.F. Ovo1 links Wnt signaling with N-cadherin localization during neural crest migration. Development 2010, 137, 1981–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  155. Gessert, S.; Maurus, D.; Rossner, A.; Kuhl, M. Pescadillo is required for Xenopus laevis eye development and neural crest migration. Dev. Biol. 2007, 310, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  156. Podleschny, M.; Grund, A.; Berger, H.; Rollwitz, E.; Borchers, A. A PTK7/Ror2 Co-Receptor Complex Affects Xenopus Neural Crest Migration. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0145169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Shnitsar, I.; Borchers, A. PTK7 recruits dsh to regulate neural crest migration. Development 2008, 135, 4015–4024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  158. Groysman, M.; Shoval, I.; Kalcheim, C. A negative modulatory role for rho and rho-associated kinase signaling in delamination of neural crest cells. Neural Dev. 2008, 3, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Tao, W.; Pennica, D.; Xu, L.; Kalejta, R.F.; Levine, A.J. Wrch-1, a novel member of the Rho gene family that is regulated by Wnt-1. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 1796–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Fort, P.; Guemar, L.; Vignal, E.; Morin, N.; Notarnicola, C.; de Santa Barbara, P.; Faure, S. Activity of the RhoU/Wrch1 GTPase is critical for cranial neural crest cell migration. Dev. Biol. 2011, 350, 451–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Gorny, A.K.; Kaufmann, L.T.; Swain, R.K.; Steinbeisser, H. A secreted splice variant of the Xenopus frizzled-4 receptor is a biphasic modulator of Wnt signalling. Cell Commun. Signal. 2013, 11, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Liu, J.A.; Wu, M.H.; Yan, C.H.; Chau, B.K.; So, H.; Ng, A.; Chan, A.; Cheah, K.S.; Briscoe, J.; Cheung, M. Phosphorylation of Sox9 is required for neural crest delamination and is regulated downstream of BMP and canonical Wnt signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013, 110, 2882–2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Matthews, H.K.; Marchant, L.; Carmona-Fontaine, C.; Kuriyama, S.; Larrain, J.; Holt, M.R.; Parsons, M.; Mayor, R. Directional migration of neural crest cells in vivo is regulated by Syndecan-4/Rac1 and non-canonical Wnt signaling/RhoA. Development 2008, 135, 1771–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  164. Simon, E.; Theze, N.; Fedou, S.; Thiebaud, P.; Faucheux, C. Vestigial-like 3 is a novel Ets1 interacting partner and regulates trigeminal nerve formation and cranial neural crest migration. Biol. Open 2017, 6, 1528–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  165. Sinnberg, T.; Levesque, M.P.; Krochmann, J.; Cheng, P.F.; Ikenberg, K.; Meraz-Torres, F.; Niessner, H.; Garbe, C.; Busch, C. Wnt-signaling enhances neural crest migration of melanoma cells and induces an invasive phenotype. Mol. Cancer 2018, 17, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  166. Matthews, H.K.; Broders-Bondon, F.; Thiery, J.P.; Mayor, R. Wnt11r is required for cranial neural crest migration. Dev. Dyn. 2008, 237, 3404–3409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Hatta, K.; Nose, A.; Nagafuchi, A.; Takeichi, M. Cloning and expression of cDNA encoding a neural calcium-dependent cell adhesion molecule: Its identity in the cadherin gene family. J. Cell Biol. 1988, 106, 873–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Tepass, U.; Truong, K.; Godt, D.; Ikura, M.; Peifer, M. Cadherins in embryonic and neural morphogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000, 1, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Varelas, X. The Hippo pathway effectors TAZ and YAP in development, homeostasis and disease. Development 2014, 141, 1614–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  170. Zhang, L.; Gao, X.; Wen, J.; Ning, Y.; Chen, Y.G. Dapper 1 antagonizes Wnt signaling by promoting dishevelled degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 8607–8612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Habas, R.; Kato, Y.; He, X. Wnt/Frizzled activation of Rho regulates vertebrate gastrulation and requires a novel Formin homology protein Daam1. Cell 2001, 107, 843–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Mayor, E.T.a.R. Neural Crest Cell Migration: Guidance, Pathways, and Cell–Cell Interactions. In Neural Crest Cells: Evolution, Development and Disease; Trainor, P.A., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2014; pp. 73–88. [Google Scholar]
  173. Clay, M.R.; Halloran, M.C. Control of neural crest cell behavior and migration: Insights from live imaging. Cell Adh. Migr. 2010, 4, 586–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Shellard, A.; Mayor, R. Integrating chemical and mechanical signals in neural crest cell migration. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2019, 57, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Jaffe, A.B.; Hall, A. Rho GTPases: Biochemistry and biology. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005, 21, 247–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Kulesa, P.M.; McLennan, R. Neural crest migration: Trailblazing ahead. F1000Prime Rep. 2015, 7, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Abercrombie, M.; Heaysman, J.E. Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture. I. Speed of movement of chick heart fibroblasts in relation to their mutual contacts. Exp. Cell Res. 1953, 5, 111–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Theveneau, E.; Steventon, B.; Scarpa, E.; Garcia, S.; Trepat, X.; Streit, A.; Mayor, R. Chase-and-run between adjacent cell populations promotes directional collective migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15, 763–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  179. Carmona-Fontaine, C.; Matthews, H.K.; Kuriyama, S.; Moreno, M.; Dunn, G.A.; Parsons, M.; Stern, C.D.; Mayor, R. Contact inhibition of locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration. Nature 2008, 456, 957–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  180. Hayes, M.; Naito, M.; Daulat, A.; Angers, S.; Ciruna, B. Ptk7 promotes non-canonical Wnt/PCP-mediated morphogenesis and inhibits Wnt/beta-catenin-dependent cell fate decisions during vertebrate development. Development 2013, 140, 1807–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Aspenstrom, P.; Fransson, A.; Saras, J. Rho GTPases have diverse effects on the organization of the actin filament system. Biochem. J. 2004, 377, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Vidal, C.; Geny, B.; Melle, J.; Jandrot-Perrus, M.; Fontenay-Roupie, M. Cdc42/Rac1-dependent activation of the p21-activated kinase (PAK) regulates human platelet lamellipodia spreading: Implication of the cortical-actin binding protein cortactin. Blood 2002, 100, 4462–4469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Adams, C.C.; Jakovljevic, J.; Roman, J.; Harnpicharnchai, P.; Woolford, J.L., Jr. Saccharomyces cerevisiae nucleolar protein Nop7p is necessary for biogenesis of 60S ribosomal subunits. RNA 2002, 8, 150–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  184. Sikorski, E.M.; Uo, T.; Morrison, R.S.; Agarwal, A. Pescadillo interacts with the cadmium response element of the human heme oxygenase-1 promoter in renal epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 24423–24430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Rickmann, M.; Fawcett, J.W.; Keynes, R.J. The migration of neural crest cells and the growth of motor axons through the rostral half of the chick somite. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 1985, 90, 437–455. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  186. Serbedzija, G.N.; Fraser, S.E.; Bronner-Fraser, M. Pathways of trunk neural crest cell migration in the mouse embryo as revealed by vital dye labelling. Development 1990, 108, 605–612. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  187. Raible, D.W.; Wood, A.; Hodsdon, W.; Henion, P.D.; Weston, J.A.; Eisen, J.S. Segregation and early dispersal of neural crest cells in the embryonic zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 1992, 195, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Li, J.; Perfetto, M.; Materna, C.; Li, R.; Thi Tran, H.; Vleminckx, K.; Duncan, M.K.; Wei, S. A new transgenic reporter line reveals Wnt-dependent Snai2 re-expression and cranial neural crest differentiation in Xenopus. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Abbruzzese, G.; Becker, S.F.; Kashef, J.; Alfandari, D. ADAM13 cleavage of cadherin-11 promotes CNC migration independently of the homophilic binding site. Dev. Biol. 2016, 415, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. McCusker, C.; Cousin, H.; Neuner, R.; Alfandari, D. Extracellular cleavage of cadherin-11 by ADAM metalloproteases is essential for Xenopus cranial neural crest cell migration. Mol. Biol. Cell 2009, 20, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Cousin, H.; Abbruzzese, G.; Kerdavid, E.; Gaultier, A.; Alfandari, D. Translocation of the cytoplasmic domain of ADAM13 to the nucleus is essential for Calpain8-a expression and cranial neural crest cell migration. Dev. Cell 2011, 20, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Swain, R.K.; Katoh, M.; Medina, A.; Steinbeisser, H. Xenopus frizzled-4S, a splicing variant of Xfz4 is a context-dependent activator and inhibitor of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Cell Commun. Signal. 2005, 3, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Nie, S.; Kee, Y.; Bronner-Fraser, M. Myosin-X is critical for migratory ability of Xenopus cranial neural crest cells. Dev. Biol. 2009, 335, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  194. Li, B.; Mackay, D.R.; Dai, Q.; Li, T.W.; Nair, M.; Fallahi, M.; Schonbaum, C.P.; Fantes, J.; Mahowald, A.P.; Waterman, M.L.; et al. The LEF1/beta -catenin complex activates movo1, a mouse homolog of Drosophila ovo required for epidermal appendage differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2002, 99, 6064–6069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Noren, N.K.; Liu, B.P.; Burridge, K.; Kreft, B. p120 catenin regulates the actin cytoskeleton via Rho family GTPases. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 150, 567–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Dupin, E.; Sommer, L. Neural crest progenitors and stem cells: From early development to adulthood. Dev. Biol. 2012, 366, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  197. Zurkirchen, L.; Sommer, L. Quo vadis: Tracing the fate of neural crest cells. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2017, 47, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Zhao, H.; Bringas, P., Jr.; Chai, Y. An in vitro model for characterizing the post-migratory cranial neural crest cells of the first branchial arch. Dev. Dyn. 2006, 235, 1433–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Shakhova, O.; Sommer, L. In Vitro Derivation of Melanocytes from Embryonic Neural Crest Stem Cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Replogle, M.R.; Sreevidya, V.S.; Lee, V.M.; Laiosa, M.D.; Svoboda, K.R.; Udvadia, A.J. Establishment of a murine culture system for modeling the temporal progression of cranial and trunk neural crest cell differentiation. Dis. Model. Mech. 2018, 11, dmm035097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Bronner-Fraser, M.; Fraser, S.E. Cell lineage analysis reveals multipotency of some avian neural crest cells. Nature 1988, 335, 161–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Krispin, S.; Nitzan, E.; Kassem, Y.; Kalcheim, C. Evidence for a dynamic spatiotemporal fate map and early fate restrictions of premigratory avian neural crest. Development 2010, 137, 585–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  203. Nitzan, E.; Krispin, S.; Pfaltzgraff, E.R.; Klar, A.; Labosky, P.A.; Kalcheim, C. A dynamic code of dorsal neural tube genes regulates the segregation between neurogenic and melanogenic neural crest cells. Development 2013, 140, 2269–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  204. Baggiolini, A.; Varum, S.; Mateos, J.M.; Bettosini, D.; John, N.; Bonalli, M.; Ziegler, U.; Dimou, L.; Clevers, H.; Furrer, R.; et al. Premigratory and migratory neural crest cells are multipotent in vivo. Cell Stem Cell 2015, 16, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Kleber, M.; Lee, H.Y.; Wurdak, H.; Buchstaller, J.; Riccomagno, M.M.; Ittner, L.M.; Suter, U.; Epstein, D.J.; Sommer, L. Neural crest stem cell maintenance by combinatorial Wnt and BMP signaling. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 169, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  206. Nagoshi, N.; Shibata, S.; Kubota, Y.; Nakamura, M.; Nagai, Y.; Satoh, E.; Morikawa, S.; Okada, Y.; Mabuchi, Y.; Katoh, H.; et al. Ontogeny and multipotency of neural crest-derived stem cells in mouse bone marrow, dorsal root ganglia, and whisker pad. Cell Stem Cell 2008, 2, 392–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Li, H.Y.; Say, E.H.; Zhou, X.F. Isolation and characterization of neural crest progenitors from adult dorsal root ganglia. Stem Cells 2007, 25, 2053–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Joseph, N.M.; Mukouyama, Y.S.; Mosher, J.T.; Jaegle, M.; Crone, S.A.; Dormand, E.L.; Lee, K.F.; Meijer, D.; Anderson, D.J.; Morrison, S.J. Neural crest stem cells undergo multilineage differentiation in developing peripheral nerves to generate endoneurial fibroblasts in addition to Schwann cells. Development 2004, 131, 5599–5612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  209. Bhattacharya, D.; Rothstein, M.; Azambuja, A.P.; Simoes-Costa, M. Control of neural crest multipotency by Wnt signaling and the Lin28/let-7 axis. Elife 2018, 7, e40556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Newman, M.A.; Thomson, J.M.; Hammond, S.M. Lin-28 interaction with the Let-7 precursor loop mediates regulated microRNA processing. RNA 2008, 14, 1539–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  211. Li, S.; Quarto, N.; Senarath-Yapa, K.; Grey, N.; Bai, X.; Longaker, M.T. Enhanced Activation of Canonical Wnt Signaling Confers Mesoderm-Derived Parietal Bone with Similar Osteogenic and Skeletal Healing Capacity to Neural Crest-Derived Frontal Bone. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Malik, Z.; Alexiou, M.; Hallgrimsson, B.; Economides, A.N.; Luder, H.U.; Graf, D. Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 Coordinates Early Tooth Mineralization. J. Dent. Res. 2018, 97, 835–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Jia, S.; Kwon, H.E.; Lan, Y.; Zhou, J.; Liu, H.; Jiang, R. Bmp4-Msx1 signaling and Osr2 control tooth organogenesis through antagonistic regulation of secreted Wnt antagonists. Dev. Biol. 2016, 420, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Dorsky, R.I.; Moon, R.T.; Raible, D.W. Control of neural crest cell fate by the Wnt signalling pathway. Nature 1998, 396, 370–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Lee, H.Y.; Kleber, M.; Hari, L.; Brault, V.; Suter, U.; Taketo, M.M.; Kemler, R.; Sommer, L. Instructive role of Wnt/beta-catenin in sensory fate specification in neural crest stem cells. Science 2004, 303, 1020–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. DiNuoscio, G.; Atit, R.P. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in the mouse embryonic cranial mesenchyme is required to sustain the emerging differentiated meningeal layers. Genesis 2019, 57, e23279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Zacharias, A.L.; Gage, P.J. Canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is required for maintenance but not activation of Pitx2 expression in neural crest during eye development. Dev. Dyn. 2010, 239, 3215–3225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Zhang, Z.; Lan, Y.; Chai, Y.; Jiang, R. Antagonistic actions of Msx1 and Osr2 pattern mammalian teeth into a single row. Science 2009, 323, 1232–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Gou, Y.; Li, J.; Jackson-Weaver, O.; Wu, J.; Zhang, T.; Gupta, R.; Cho, I.; Ho, T.V.; Chen, Y.; Li, M.; et al. Protein Arginine Methyltransferase PRMT1 Is Essential for Palatogenesis. J. Dent. Res. 2018, 97, 1510–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Jiang, X.; Iseki, S.; Maxson, R.E.; Sucov, H.M.; Morriss-Kay, G.M. Tissue origins and interactions in the mammalian skull vault. Dev. Biol. 2002, 241, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Bikkavilli, R.K.; Avasarala, S.; Vanscoyk, M.; Sechler, M.; Kelley, N.; Malbon, C.C.; Winn, R.A. Dishevelled3 is a novel arginine methyl transferase substrate. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  222. Cha, B.; Kim, W.; Kim, Y.K.; Hwang, B.N.; Park, S.Y.; Yoon, J.W.; Park, W.S.; Cho, J.W.; Bedford, M.T.; Jho, E.H. Methylation by protein arginine methyltransferase 1 increases stability of Axin, a negative regulator of Wnt signaling. Oncogene 2011, 30, 2379–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  223. Bikkavilli, R.K.; Malbon, C.C. Arginine methylation of G3BP1 in response to Wnt3a regulates beta-catenin mRNA. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124, 2310–2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Bikkavilli, R.K.; Malbon, C.C. Wnt3a-stimulated LRP6 phosphorylation is dependent upon arginine methylation of G3BP2. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 2446–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  225. Maguire, L.H.; Thomas, A.R.; Goldstein, A.M. Tumors of the neural crest: Common themes in development and cancer. Dev. Dyn. 2015, 244, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Miller, A.J.; Mihm, M.C., Jr. Melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 355, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Powell, D.R.; O’Brien, J.H.; Ford, H.L.; Artinger, K.B. Neural Crest Cells and Cancer: Insights into Tumor Progression. In Neural Crest Cells: Evolution, Development and Disease; Trainor, P.A., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2014; pp. 335–357. [Google Scholar]
  228. Rubinfeld, B.; Robbins, P.; El-Gamil, M.; Albert, I.; Porfiri, E.; Polakis, P. Stabilization of beta-catenin by genetic defects in melanoma cell lines. Science 1997, 275, 1790–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Rimm, D.L.; Caca, K.; Hu, G.; Harrison, F.B.; Fearon, E.R. Frequent nuclear/cytoplasmic localization of beta-catenin without exon 3 mutations in malignant melanoma. Am. J. Pathol. 1999, 154, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Demunter, A.; Libbrecht, L.; Degreef, H.; De Wolf-Peeters, C.; van den Oord, J.J. Loss of membranous expression of beta-catenin is associated with tumor progression in cutaneous melanoma and rarely caused by exon 3 mutations. Mod. Pathol. 2002, 15, 454–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Xue, G.; Romano, E.; Massi, D.; Mandala, M. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in melanoma: Preclinical rationale and novel therapeutic insights. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2016, 49, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Saitoh, A.; Hansen, L.A.; Vogel, J.C.; Udey, M.C. Characterization of Wnt gene expression in murine skin: Possible involvement of epidermis-derived Wnt-4 in cutaneous epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. Exp Cell Res. 1998, 243, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Chien, A.J.; Moore, E.C.; Lonsdorf, A.S.; Kulikauskas, R.M.; Rothberg, B.G.; Berger, A.J.; Major, M.B.; Hwang, S.T.; Rimm, D.L.; Moon, R.T. Activated Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in melanoma is associated with decreased proliferation in patient tumors and a murine melanoma model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2009, 106, 1193–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Damsky, W.E.; Curley, D.P.; Santhanakrishnan, M.; Rosenbaum, L.E.; Platt, J.T.; Gould Rothberg, B.E.; Taketo, M.M.; Dankort, D.; Rimm, D.L.; McMahon, M.; et al. beta-catenin signaling controls metastasis in Braf-activated Pten-deficient melanomas. Cancer Cell 2011, 20, 741–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Gurney, J.G.; Ross, J.A.; Wall, D.A.; Bleyer, W.A.; Severson, R.K.; Robison, L.L. Infant cancer in the U.S.: Histology-specific incidence and trends, 1973 to 1992. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 1997, 19, 428–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. London, W.B.; Castleberry, R.P.; Matthay, K.K.; Look, A.T.; Seeger, R.C.; Shimada, H.; Thorner, P.; Brodeur, G.; Maris, J.M.; Reynolds, C.P.; et al. Evidence for an age cutoff greater than 365 days for neuroblastoma risk group stratification in the Children’s Oncology Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005, 23, 6459–6465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Maris, J.M. Recent advances in neuroblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362, 2202–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  238. Brodeur, G.M. Neuroblastoma: Biological insights into a clinical enigma. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Becker, J.; Wilting, J. WNT signaling, the development of the sympathoadrenal-paraganglionic system and neuroblastoma. Cell. Mol. Life. Sci. 2018, 75, 1057–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Becker, J.; Wilting, J. WNT Signaling in Neuroblastoma. Cancers 2019, 11, 1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Brodeur, G.M.; Seeger, R.C.; Schwab, M.; Varmus, H.E.; Bishop, J.M. Amplification of N-myc in untreated human neuroblastomas correlates with advanced disease stage. Science 1984, 224, 1121–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Schwab, M.; Alitalo, K.; Klempnauer, K.H.; Varmus, H.E.; Bishop, J.M.; Gilbert, F.; Brodeur, G.; Goldstein, M.; Trent, J. Amplified DNA with limited homology to myc cellular oncogene is shared by human neuroblastoma cell lines and a neuroblastoma tumour. Nature 1983, 305, 245–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Blanc, E.; Roux, G.L.; Benard, J.; Raguenez, G. Low expression of Wnt-5a gene is associated with high-risk neuroblastoma. Oncogene 2005, 24, 1277–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Dyberg, C.; Papachristou, P.; Haug, B.H.; Lagercrantz, H.; Kogner, P.; Ringstedt, T.; Wickstrom, M.; Johnsen, J.I. Planar cell polarity gene expression correlates with tumor cell viability and prognostic outcome in neuroblastoma. BMC Cancer 2016, 16, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Duffy, D.J.; Krstic, A.; Schwarzl, T.; Halasz, M.; Iljin, K.; Fey, D.; Haley, B.; Whilde, J.; Haapa-Paananen, S.; Fey, V.; et al. Wnt signalling is a bi-directional vulnerability of cancer cells. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 60310–60331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  246. Fishbein, L.; Leshchiner, I.; Walter, V.; Danilova, L.; Robertson, A.G.; Johnson, A.R.; Lichtenberg, T.M.; Murray, B.A.; Ghayee, H.K.; Else, T.; et al. Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma. Cancer Cell 2017, 31, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Dolecek, T.A.; Propp, J.M.; Stroup, N.E.; Kruchko, C. CBTRUS statistical report: Primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2005-2009. Neuro Oncol 2012, 14, v1–v49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Lee, Y.; Lee, J.K.; Ahn, S.H.; Lee, J.; Nam, D.H. WNT signaling in glioblastoma and therapeutic opportunities. Lab. Invest. 2016, 96, 137–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  249. Yu, J.M.; Jun, E.S.; Jung, J.S.; Suh, S.Y.; Han, J.Y.; Kim, J.Y.; Kim, K.W.; Jung, J.S. Role of Wnt5a in the proliferation of human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2007, 257, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  250. Ferletta, M.; Uhrbom, L.; Olofsson, T.; Ponten, F.; Westermark, B. Sox10 has a broad expression pattern in gliomas and enhances platelet-derived growth factor-B--induced gliomagenesis. Mol. Cancer Res. 2007, 5, 891–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  251. Gallik, K.L.; Treffy, R.W.; Nacke, L.M.; Ahsan, K.; Rocha, M.; Green-Saxena, A.; Saxena, A. Neural crest and cancer: Divergent travelers on similar paths. Mech. Dev. 2017, 148, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  252. Powell, D.R.; Blasky, A.J.; Britt, S.G.; Artinger, K.B. Riding the crest of the wave: Parallels between the neural crest and cancer in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and migration. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 2013, 5, 511–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Zhan, T.; Rindtorff, N.; Boutros, M. Wnt signaling in cancer. Oncogene 2017, 36, 1461–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Reya, T.; Clevers, H. Wnt signalling in stem cells and cancer. Nature 2005, 434, 843–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Kerosuo, L.; Bronner-Fraser, M. What is bad in cancer is good in the embryo: Importance of EMT in neural crest development. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2012, 23, 320–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
Cells 08 01173 g001 550
Figure 1. Anatomically distinct neural crest cell populations and their major derivates. Schematic lateral view of a mouse embryo at embryonic day 9.5 shows the cranial (green), vagal (azure), trunk (purple), and sacral (ruby) neural crest cells and their major derivatives. Vagal segment includes cardiac neural crest (indigo).
Figure 1. Anatomically distinct neural crest cell populations and their major derivates. Schematic lateral view of a mouse embryo at embryonic day 9.5 shows the cranial (green), vagal (azure), trunk (purple), and sacral (ruby) neural crest cells and their major derivatives. Vagal segment includes cardiac neural crest (indigo).
Cells 08 01173 g001
Cells 08 01173 g002 550
Figure 2. Wnt signaling regulates neural plate border (NPB) induction by regulating NPB specifiers. (A) NPB induction begins during gastrulation and is regulated by both canonical (orange) and non-canonical (blue) Wnts secreted from NPB and paraxial mesoderm. (B) Key components and possible interactions between Wnt signaling and NPB specifiers. NNE, non-neural ectoderm; NP, neural plate.
Figure 2. Wnt signaling regulates neural plate border (NPB) induction by regulating NPB specifiers. (A) NPB induction begins during gastrulation and is regulated by both canonical (orange) and non-canonical (blue) Wnts secreted from NPB and paraxial mesoderm. (B) Key components and possible interactions between Wnt signaling and NPB specifiers. NNE, non-neural ectoderm; NP, neural plate.
Cells 08 01173 g002
Cells 08 01173 g003 550
Figure 3. Wnt signaling induces neural crest cells by regulating NC specifiers. (A) NC is induced from the neural plate border at the end of gastrulation (zebrafish and Xenopus) or the beginning of neurulation (chick and mouse). This process is regulated by both canonical (orange) and non-canonical (blue) Wnts secreted from NPB, adjacent NNE, and paraxial mesoderm. (B) Key components and possible interactions between Wnt signaling and NC specifiers. NC, neural crest; NNE, non-neural ectoderm; NT, neural tube.
Figure 3. Wnt signaling induces neural crest cells by regulating NC specifiers. (A) NC is induced from the neural plate border at the end of gastrulation (zebrafish and Xenopus) or the beginning of neurulation (chick and mouse). This process is regulated by both canonical (orange) and non-canonical (blue) Wnts secreted from NPB, adjacent NNE, and paraxial mesoderm. (B) Key components and possible interactions between Wnt signaling and NC specifiers. NC, neural crest; NNE, non-neural ectoderm; NT, neural tube.
Cells 08 01173 g003
Cells 08 01173 g004 550
Figure 4. Bmp/Wnt signaling regulates trunk neural crest cell delamination. Undefined factors from somites inhibit Noggin (purple) expression anteriorly, creating a gradient Bmp (green) activity with a high level in anterior and low level in posterior of the dorsal neural tube. Bmp4, Yap, and RA signaling induce canonical Wnt1 expression, leading to Cyclin D1 transcription and G1/S transition to promote NC cell emigration. However, at the segmental plate mesoderm at the posterior region, Fgf signaling maintains high levels of Noggin that inhibits Bmp activity. Low Bmp activity blocks Wnt signaling, which prevents NC cell delamination from the caudal neural tube.
Figure 4. Bmp/Wnt signaling regulates trunk neural crest cell delamination. Undefined factors from somites inhibit Noggin (purple) expression anteriorly, creating a gradient Bmp (green) activity with a high level in anterior and low level in posterior of the dorsal neural tube. Bmp4, Yap, and RA signaling induce canonical Wnt1 expression, leading to Cyclin D1 transcription and G1/S transition to promote NC cell emigration. However, at the segmental plate mesoderm at the posterior region, Fgf signaling maintains high levels of Noggin that inhibits Bmp activity. Low Bmp activity blocks Wnt signaling, which prevents NC cell delamination from the caudal neural tube.
Cells 08 01173 g004
Cells 08 01173 g005 550
Figure 5. The role of Wnt signaling in CIL (contact inhibition of locomotion)-mediated directional migration of neural crest cells. Cell-cell interaction between NC cells localizes and activates Dsh (Dvl) at the cell membrane of the contact point, activating the small GTPase RhoA. The activation of RhoA is at least partly regulated by non-canonical Wnt signaling. RhoA inhibits Rac activity at the trailing edge of the cell, restricting a maximal Rac activation at the leading edge (green). Rac stimulates branched actin polymerization and drives the directed migration of NC cells.
Figure 5. The role of Wnt signaling in CIL (contact inhibition of locomotion)-mediated directional migration of neural crest cells. Cell-cell interaction between NC cells localizes and activates Dsh (Dvl) at the cell membrane of the contact point, activating the small GTPase RhoA. The activation of RhoA is at least partly regulated by non-canonical Wnt signaling. RhoA inhibits Rac activity at the trailing edge of the cell, restricting a maximal Rac activation at the leading edge (green). Rac stimulates branched actin polymerization and drives the directed migration of NC cells.
Cells 08 01173 g005
Table
Table 1. Experimental findings of Wnt signaling molecules, modulators, and effectors in vertebrate neural crest induction and specification. (cKO, conditional knockout; GOF, gain of function; KO, knockout; LOF, loss of function; MO; morpholino).
Table 1. Experimental findings of Wnt signaling molecules, modulators, and effectors in vertebrate neural crest induction and specification. (cKO, conditional knockout; GOF, gain of function; KO, knockout; LOF, loss of function; MO; morpholino).
MoleculeRole in Wnt SignalingExperimental ApproachFunctionRegionSpeciesPhenotypeReference
ADAM13upregulates canonical Wnt signaling by cleaving class B EphrinsMOLOFcranialXenopusdefective NC induction (Snai2, Sox9, Foxd3) and head cartilage[75]
ADAM19upregulates canonical Wnt signaling by stabilizing ADAM13MOLOFcranialXenopusdefective NC induction (Snai2, Sox9, Foxd3) and head cartilage[76]
Aldh1a2delay Wnt3a and Wnt8a expressionKOLOFtrunkmousediminished NPB specification (Msx1, Pax3)[77]
Apoc1downstream effector of canonical Wnt signalingMOLOFcranialXenopusdefective NPB induction (Msx1, Pax3, Zic1), eyes and head deformation[78]
Awp1stabilizes Ctnnb1MOLOFcranialXenopusdefective NPB induction (Msx1, Pax3), pigmentation and craniofacial cartilage[79]
Axud1downstream effector of canonical Wnt signalingMO, dominant-negative constructLOFtrunkchickdefective NC inductions (Foxd3, Sox9, Sox10, Ets1)[80]
Cdh11competitive binding with Ctnnb1 to repress Wnt/Ctnnb1 signalingMOLOFcranialXenopusincreased Wnt/Ctnnb1 signaling and NC induction (Sox10, Ap2)[81]
Ctnnb1coactivator for Tcf/Lef1 transcription factorRNA injection, MOGOF; LOFcranialXenopusexpanded (GOF) or diminished (LOF) NC induction (Snai2, Twist)[82,83]
Daam1mediator of non-canonical Wnt signaling and actin polymerizationMO, mutationsLOFcranialXenopusdefective NC induction (Twist, Sox8, Snai2, Sox10)[38]
Dkk1antagonist of canonical Wnt signalingblocking antibody, Dkk1-null mouseLOFcranialXenopus, mouseNC generated in the anterior neural fold, expanded cranial cartilages[68]
Dkk2positive regulator of canonical Wnt signaling independent of Gsk3bMOLOFcranialXenopusdefective NC induction (Snai2, Twist1, Sox10), reduced craniofacial cartilages[34]
Dvl (Dsh)canonical and non-canonical Wnt signalingmutants (dd1, dd2)LOFcranialXenopusrepressed NC induction (Snai2)[37]
PCP signalingPCP mutants: ΔN-Dsh, Dsh-DEP+GOF, LOFcranialXenopusexpanded (GOF) or decreased (LOF) NC induction (Foxd3, Sox8, Snai2)[84]
Fgf8ainduce Wnt8 in the paraxial mesodermMO, RNA injectionLOF, GOFcranialXenopusdefective (LOF) NPB induction (Pax3), induced (GOF) NC in anterior neural plate[83]
Fzd3receptor for Wnt1RNA injection, MOGOF, LOFcranialXenopusInduced (GOF) or diminished (LOF) NC induction (Snai, Twist)[85]
Fzd7receptor in canonical Wnt/Ctnnb1 signalingMOLOFcranialXenopusinhibited NC induction, loss of pigment cells[86]
Gbx2direct target of canonical Wnt signalingMO, RNA injectionLOF, GOFcranialXenopusdiminished (LOF) or rescued (GOF) NPB specifiers (Pax3, Msx1)[87]
Gsk3bphosphorylation and degradation of Ctnnb1RNA InjectionsGOFcranialXenopusincreased NC induction (Krox20, Ap2, Snai2)[88]
Hes3inhibition of Wnt/Ctnnb1 signalingexpression constructsGOFcranial, trunkXenopusblocked NC specifiers (Snai2, Sox10), supernumerary pigment cells[35]
kctd15attenuate canonical Wnt/Ctnnb1 signalingMO, mRNA injectionLOFcranialzebrafishdefective NC induction (Sox10, Foxd3), increased pigmentation, loss of jaw elements[89]
expression constructsGOFcranial, trunkzebrafishincreased NC induction (Foxd3, Sox10), loss of pigmentation, small head[89]
Krm2promotes Lrp6-mediated Wnt signaling in the absence of DkksMO, RNA microinjectionLOF, GOFcranialXenopusdiminished (LOF) NC markers, ectopic NC-derived structures (GOF)[90]
Lrp6Wnt co-receptornormal and mutant RNA injectionGOF, LOFcranialXenopusinduced (GOF) or diminished (LOF) NC specifier Snai2[47,90]
Mark2 (Par-1)bind to Dvl and regulated by Wnt5a/Wnt11MO, mRNA injectionLOFcranialXenopusrepressed (LOF) or enhanced NC specification (Sox8, Foxd3, Snai2)[84]
Rap2stabilizes Lrp6 through TNIK kinaseMO, siRNALOFcranialXenopusabrogate ectopic expression of NC markers Snai, Foxd3[91]
retinoic acidregulate Wnt1 and Wnt3a expressionvitamin A deficiencyLOFtrunkquaildefective NPB (Pax7) and NC induction (Snai2 and Sox9)[92]
Rgs2regulates Wnt-Ppard-Sox10 signaling cascadeMO, dominant negative rgs2 constructLOFcranialzebrafishincreased NC induction (Sox10, Snail1b), reduced cranial cartilage formation[93]
RhoVdownstream effector of canonical Wnt signalingMOLOFcranialXenopusdefective NC induction (Sox9, Sox10, Snai), abnormal craniofacial skeletons[94]
Ror2co-receptor in non-canonical Wnt/PCP signalingMOLOFcranialXenopusdefective NPB induction (Gbx2, Zic1, Msx1, Msx2), decreased BMP signaling at NPB[84,95]
Skipa potential scaffold in Ctnnb1/Tcf transcriptional regulationMO, siRNALOFcranialXenopusdefective NC induction (Snai2, Sox3, Foxd3), loss of pigment cells[96]
Sp5downstream effector of canonical Wnt and Fgf pathwaysMOLOFcranialXenopusdefective NPB induction (Msx1, Pax3); defects in craniofacial cartilage and pigmentation[97]
Tcf7l1transcription factorcKO by AP2α-CreLOFcranialmouseanteriorly expanded NC specifiers (Foxd3, Sox9, Sox10, Pax3); exencephaly[67]
inhibitory mutantsLOFcranialXenopusdefective NPB induction (Msx1)[98]
THVGR (hormone-inducible Tcf7l1)GOFcranialXenopusincreased NC induction (Snai2, Twist)[82]
Wnt1ligand, canonical pathwaydominant negative Wnt1LOFtrunkchickrepressed NC induction (Snai2)[99]
Wnt1 expressing cellsGOFtrunkchickinhibited NC induction[100]
Wnt1/Wnt3aligand, canonical pathwayRNA and DNA InjectionsGOFcranialXenopusincreased NC induction (Krox20, Ap2, Snai2)[88]
Wnt1 and/or Wnt3a knockoutsLOFcranial, trunkmousedefective NPB induction (Pax3), cranial skeletons, cranial ganglia[101]
Wnt5aligand, non-canonical pathwayMO, dominant negative, RNA injectionLOF, GOFcranialXenopusdefective (LOF) or enhanced (GOF) NC specification (Pax3, Foxd3, Sox8)[84]
Wnt6ligand, upstream of Dvl-Rho-JNK in PCP signalingWnt6 cell implantation, siRNA,GOF, LOFtrunkchickinduced (GOF) or diminished (LOF) NC induction[100]
Wnt7bligandRNA microinjectionGOFcranialXenopusincreased NC induction (Snai2, Twist)[102]
Wnt8ligand, canonical pathway, downstream of Fgf8aMO, mRNA injectionLOF, GOFcranialXenopusdefective (LOF) NPB induction (Pax3, Sox8), rescued (GOF) NC in Fgf8a-deficient embryos[83]
dominant negative, RNA microinjectionLOF, GOFcranialXenopusdefective (LOF) or increased (GOF) NC induction (Snai2)[103]
Wnt11ligand, non-canonical pathwayMO, dominant negative, RNA injectionLOFcranialXenopusdefective (LOF) or enhanced (GOF) NC specification (Pax3, Foxd3, Sox8)[84]
Wnt11rligand, non-canonical pathwayMOLOFcranialXenopusdefective NC specification (Foxd3, Sox8)[84]
Table
Table 2. Experimental findings of Wnt signaling molecules, modulators, and effectors in vertebrate neural crest delamination and migration. (cKO, conditional knockout; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; GOF, gain of function; KO, knockout; LOF, loss of function; MO; morpholino).
Table 2. Experimental findings of Wnt signaling molecules, modulators, and effectors in vertebrate neural crest delamination and migration. (cKO, conditional knockout; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; GOF, gain of function; KO, knockout; LOF, loss of function; MO; morpholino).
MoleculeRole in Wnt SignalingExperimental ApproachFunctionRegionSpeciesPhenotypeReference
ADAM13regulated by Gsk3 and PlkMOLOFcranialXenopusinhibited NC migration[142]
Bmp4stimulate Wnt1 expressionBMP4-coated microbeadsGOFtrunkchick, quailpromoted G1/S transition and NC delamination[137]
Cdh2cleaved product CTF2 induces Ctnnb1 expressionexpression vectorsGOFtrunkquailenhanced NC delamination[143]
KOLOFcardiacmouseelevated NC proliferation and reduced NC migration[144]
Cnn2downstream PCP signaling, actin dynamicsMOLOFcranialchick, Xenopusinhibited NC migration and reduced cartilage[145]
Ctnnb1coactivator for Tcf/Lef1 transcription factoroverexpressionGOFtrunkchickrescued NC delamination in Noggin-treated neural tubes[143]
Dact1repress Ctnnb1 as the transcriptional coactivatorMO, expression vectorsLOF, GOFcranialXenopusblocked (LOF) or enhanced (GOF) NC delamination[146]
Dact2repress Ctnnb1 as the transcriptional coactivatorRNAi, expression vectorsLOF, GOFtruckchickblocked (LOF) or enhanced (GOF) NC delamination[146]
Dmxl2 (Rbc3a)regulate Fzd7 endocytosis and enhance Wnt signalingMOLOFcranial, trunkzebrafishdefective NC migration, cardiac edema, reduced melanocytes[147]
Draxinrepress Wnt signaling via Lrp5, modulate lamininMO, CRISPR; expression vectorsLOF, GOFcranialchickpremature NC delamination (LOF), inhibited EMT (GOF)[136,148]
Dvl (Dsh)PCP signalingPCP mutants (Dsh-DN, Dsh-DEP+)LOFcranialXenopusrepressed NC migration[37]
Efhc1 (Efhc1b)downregulate Wnt8aMOLOFcranialXenopusupregulated Wnt signaling and defective NC migration[149]
Fgf8/4inhibit Wnt1 expressionFgf8/4-soaked beadsGOFtrunkchickrepressed NC emigration or delamination[92]
Fgfr1inhibit Wnt1 expressiondominant-negative, inhibitorLOFtrunkchickpremature NC emigration[92]
Gsk3phosphorylation and degradation of Ctnnb1Gsk3 inhibitors LiCl, BIOWnt GOFtrunk, cranialchick, Xenopusinhibited NC delamination and migration[150,151]
Lef1transcription factor, canonical pathwayinducible Lef1-GRGOFcranialXenopusrepressed NC migration[151]
Lrp5co-receptorMO, CRISPRLOFcranialzebrafishdefective NC migration, cranial skeleton malformation[152]
Muskdownstream of non-canonical Wnt11r-Dsh signalingtransgenic fish, KO mouseLOFtrunkzebrafish, mousedefective segmental NC migration[153]
Noggininhibit Wnt1 expressionCHO-Noggin cellsLOFtrunkChickinhibited G1/S transition and NC delamination[143]
Ovo1Wnt target, regulate intracellular trafficking of Cdh2MOLOFcranialzebrafishdefective migration of NC-derived pigment precursors[154]
Pes1 (Pescadillo)downstream of Wnt4/Fzd3MOLOFcranialXenopusincreased apoptosis; defective NC migration, eye and craniofacial cartilage[155]
Ptk7co-receptor, interact with Ror2 in Wnt/PCP signalingMOLOFcranialXenopusdefective NC migration[156]
required for Fzd7-mediated Dsh localizationMOLOFcranialXenopusdefective NC migration[157]
Rararegulate Wnt1/Wnt3a expressiondominant negative/active RA receptorsLOF, GOFtrunkchickdiminished (LOF) or enhanced (GOF) NC emigration[92]
RhoA, RhoBregulated by Wnt6 [100]dominant-negative, inhibitor, activatorLOF, GOFtrunkchickenhanced (LOF) or repressed (GOF) NC EMT/delamination[158]
RhoUactivated by Wnt1 [159]mutant construct, MO, RNA injectionLOF, GOFcranialchick, Xenopusblocked (LOF) or impaired NC migration, reduced cartilages[160]
Ror2co-receptor, interact with Ptk in Wnt/PCP signalingexpression vectorGOFcranialXenopusrescued migration defect in Ptk7-deficient NC cells[156]
Sfrp (Fz4-v1)secreted splice variant of fz4 receptorMO, mRNA injectionLOF, GOFcranial, trunkXenopusdefective NC migration (LOF), altered Wnt signaling[161]
Sox9phosphorylated by Wnt1 and Bmp signalingMO; point mutationsLOFtrunkchickfailed to initiate NC delamination[162]
Syn4 (Syndecan4)interact with Wnt5/Dvl/PCP signalingMOLOFtrunkXenopus, zebrafishdiminished NC migration, reduced cartilage and melanocytes[163]
Tcf7l1 (Tcf3)transcription factor, canonical pathwayinducible Tcf3-VP16-GR, Tcf3ΔC-GRGOF, LOFcranialXenopusimpaired NC migration[151]
Vgll3induce Wnt5a and Wnt8b expressionMO, mRNA injectionLOF, GOFcranialXenopusimpaired NC migration, trigeminal and profundal placodes[164]
Wnt1ligand, canonical pathwayWnt1 producing cellsGOFtrunkchickinhibited NC delamination and migration[150]
Wnt1 DNA electroporationGOFtrunkchickenhanced NC delamination[143]
Wnt3aligand, canonical pathwayWnt3a cells, melanoma cellsGOFtrunkchick, human cell lineenhanced EMT and NC migration[165]
Wnt5ligand, PCP signalingMOLOFtrunkXenopusdefective NC migration[163]
Wnt11ligand, PCP signalingexpression vectorsLOF, GOFcranialXenopusinhibited NC migration[37]
Wnt11rligandMO, mRNA injectionLOF, GOFcranialXenopusrepressed or rescued NC migrating[166]
Yap (Yap1)bidirectional crosstalk with Wnt and Bmp signalingexpression vectors, mutants, siRNAGOF, LOFtrunkchick, quailstimulated (GOF) or inhibited (LOF) NC EMT and emigration[139]
Table
Table 3. Experimental findings of Wnt signaling molecules, modulators, and effectors in vertebrate neural crest proliferation and differentiation. (ca, conditional active; cKO, conditional knockout; GOF, gain of function; KO, knockout; LOF, loss of function; MO; morpholino).
Table 3. Experimental findings of Wnt signaling molecules, modulators, and effectors in vertebrate neural crest proliferation and differentiation. (ca, conditional active; cKO, conditional knockout; GOF, gain of function; KO, knockout; LOF, loss of function; MO; morpholino).
MoleculeRole in Wnt SignalingExperimental ApproachFunctionRegionSpeciesPhenotypeReference
Axin2scaffold protein for Ctnnb1 degradationKOLOFcranialmouseenhanced osteogenic potential and regeneration of NC-derived frontal bone[211]
Bmp2crosstalk with Wnt/Ctnnb1 signalingprotein to NC cultureGOFtruckmousesuppressed sensory neurogenesis of early NC stem cells[205]
repress Wnt antagonists Dkk1 and SostcKO by Wnt1-CreLOFtoothmouseearly tooth mineralization defects[212]
Bmp4repress Wnt antagonists Dkk2 and Sfrp2cKO by Wnt1-CreLOFtoothmousebud-stage arrest of the mandibular molar tooth germs[213]
Chd7chromatin remodeler, activated by Wnt/BmpsiRNA, DN, WT expressionLOF, GOFtrunk, DRGmouseinhibited (LOF) or maintained (GOF) undifferentiated state (Sox10, p75) of NCSC[27]
Ctnnb1coactivator for Tcf/Lef1 transcription factormRNA injectionGOFcranialzebrafishpromoted pigment and cartilage fates from NC cells[214]
ca by Wnt1-Cre in premigratory NC cellsGOFtrunkmousesuppressed melanocyte (Dct, Mitf) differentiation from premigratory NC cells[39]
ca by Sox10-Cre in migratory NC cellsGOFtrunkmouseectopic melanocytes, inhibited other lineages from migratory NC cells[39]
cKO by Wnt1-creLOFtrunkmouselack melanocytes and dorsal root ganglia[40]
ca, cKO by Wnt1-CreGOF, LOFtrunk, cranialmousepromoted (GOF) or blocked (LOF) sensory neurogenesis of NC stem cells[215]
cKO by PdgfraCreErt2, Dermo1CreLOFcranialmouseforebrain meningeal hypoplasia derived from NC cells[216]
Wnt1-CreLOFcranialmousedefective maintenance of Pitx2 expression in NC cells and abnormal eyes[217]
Wnt1-creLOFcranialmouseaffected NC survival and differentiation; failure of craniofacial development[115]
let-7 miRNArepressed by Wnt/Lin28aelectroporation of let-7 mimicGOFtrunkchickdown-regulation of NC multipotency, promoted differentiation[209]
Lin28aactivated by WntsiRNA; MO; CRISPRLOFtrunkchicksuppressed NC multipotency (Sox10, Foxd3)[209]
Msx1repress Dkk2 and Sfrp2, interact Bmp4KOLOFtoothmousebud-stage arrest of the mandibular molar tooth germs[213]
Osr2upregulate Dkk2 and Sfrp2 expressionKOLOFtoothmousesupernumerary teeth[213,218]
Prmt1inhibit Wnt, Bmp and other signalingcKO by Wnt1-CreLOFcranialmousedecreased mesenchymal proliferation, cleft palate, craniofacial anomalies[219]
Tcf7l1 (Tcf3)transcription factor of Wnt/Ctnnb1 signalingmutant mRNA injectionLOFcranialzebrafishpromoted neural fates, repressed pigment cells[214]
Wnt1ligand, Ctnnb1-dependentWnt1-expressing fibroblastsGOFtrunkmousepromoted sensory neurogenesis of early NC stem cells[215]
Wnt1 and Bmp2ligandsWnt1 cell and Bmp2 proteinGOFtruckmouserepressed neurogenesis and maintained multipotency of NC stem cells[205]
Wnt3a and Bmp2ligandsproteins to NC cultureGOFtrunk, DRGmousemaintained multipotency (Sox10 or p75) of NC stem cells[27]
Wnt inhibitorsstabilize or elevate AxinXAV939, IWR1LOFcranialXenopusrepressed NC differentiation and defective cartilage[188]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ji, Y.; Hao, H.; Reynolds, K.; McMahon, M.; Zhou, C.J. Wnt Signaling in Neural Crest Ontogenesis and Oncogenesis. Cells 2019, 8, 1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8101173

AMA Style

Ji Y, Hao H, Reynolds K, McMahon M, Zhou CJ. Wnt Signaling in Neural Crest Ontogenesis and Oncogenesis. Cells. 2019; 8(10):1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8101173

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ji, Yu, Hongyan Hao, Kurt Reynolds, Moira McMahon, and Chengji J. Zhou. 2019. "Wnt Signaling in Neural Crest Ontogenesis and Oncogenesis" Cells 8, no. 10: 1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8101173

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop