Next Article in Journal
Major Tumor Suppressor and Oncogenic Non-Coding RNAs: Clinical Relevance in Lung Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Telomere Biology—Insights into an Intriguing Phenomenon
Previous Article in Journal
Distinct Fiber Type Signature in Mouse Muscles Expressing a Mutant Lamin A Responsible for Congenital Muscular Dystrophy in a Patient
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Taking a Bad Turn: Compromised DNA Damage Response in Leukemia

Institute for Molecular Biology and Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 6041 Charleroi, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2017, 6(2), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells6020011
Submission received: 1 March 2017 / Revised: 7 April 2017 / Accepted: 25 April 2017 / Published: 4 May 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue DNA Repair Defects and Telomere Dysfunction in Diseases)

Abstract

Genomic integrity is of outmost importance for the survival at the cellular and the organismal level and key to human health. To ensure the integrity of their DNA, cells have evolved maintenance programs collectively known as the DNA damage response. Particularly challenging for genome integrity are DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) and defects in their repair are often associated with human disease, including leukemia. Defective DSB repair may not only be disease-causing, but further contribute to poor treatment outcome and poor prognosis in leukemia. Here, we review current insight into altered DSB repair mechanisms identified in leukemia. While DSB repair is somewhat compromised in all leukemic subtypes, certain key players of DSB repair are particularly targeted: DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) and Ku70/80 in the non-homologous end-joining pathway, as well as Rad51 and breast cancer 1/2 (BRCA1/2), key players in homologous recombination. Defects in leukemia-related DSB repair may not only arise from dysfunctional repair components, but also indirectly from mutations in key regulators of gene expression and/or chromatin structure, such as p53, the Kirsten ras oncogene (K-RAS), and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2). A detailed understanding of the basis for defective DNA damage response (DDR) mechanisms for each leukemia subtype may allow to further develop new treatment methods to improve treatment outcome and prognosis for patients.
Keywords: DNA damage response; leukemia; double-strand break repair; non-homologous end joining; homologous recombination DNA damage response; leukemia; double-strand break repair; non-homologous end joining; homologous recombination

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nilles, N.; Fahrenkrog, B. Taking a Bad Turn: Compromised DNA Damage Response in Leukemia. Cells 2017, 6, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells6020011

AMA Style

Nilles N, Fahrenkrog B. Taking a Bad Turn: Compromised DNA Damage Response in Leukemia. Cells. 2017; 6(2):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells6020011

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nilles, Nadine, and Birthe Fahrenkrog. 2017. "Taking a Bad Turn: Compromised DNA Damage Response in Leukemia" Cells 6, no. 2: 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells6020011

APA Style

Nilles, N., & Fahrenkrog, B. (2017). Taking a Bad Turn: Compromised DNA Damage Response in Leukemia. Cells, 6(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells6020011

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop