Next Article in Journal
Extracellular Vesicles from iPSC-Derived Glial Progenitor Cells Prevent Glutamate-Induced Excitotoxicity by Stabilising Calcium Oscillations and Mitochondrial Depolarisation
Previous Article in Journal
CFTR Modulator Response in Nasal Organoids Derived from People with Cystic Fibrosis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Pro-Resolving Lipids and miRNAs

by
Rafael I. Jaén
1,2,
Sergio Sánchez-García
1,2,
María Fernández-Velasco
2,3,
Irene Cuadrado
4,
Beatriz de las Heras
4,
Lisardo Boscá
1,2,* and
Patricia Prieto
1,2,3,4,*
1
Department of Metabolism and Cell Signaling, Biomedical Research Institute “Sols-Morreale” CSIC-UAM, 28029 Madrid, Spain
2
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
3
Clinical and Translational Research Group in Cardiology, IdiPAZ/CIBER-CV, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain
4
Pharmacology, Pharmacognosy, and Botany Department, Facultad de Farmacia, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2025, 14(23), 1916; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14231916
Submission received: 13 October 2025 / Revised: 24 November 2025 / Accepted: 28 November 2025 / Published: 2 December 2025

Abstract

Dilated cardiomyopathy is a major cause of heart failure and is one of the most common forms of cardiomyopathy worldwide. Although there has been significant progress in its clinical management, early diagnosis and precise prognosis remain challenging due to the lack of specificity in current biomarkers. As inflammation plays a key role in DCM, we determined the levels of systemic inflammatory markers and specific pro-resolving lipid mediators (SPMs) in a cohort of DCM patients. Our data show that the levels of lipoxin A4 significantly increased in DCM patients (343 + 75.1 pg/mL in controls vs. 482.2 ± 159.1 pg/mL in DCM patients), whereas the opposite was observed for resolving D1 (57.18 ± 32.68 pg/mL in controls vs. 38.55 ± 25.13 pg/mL in DCM patients). These results may indicate that SPMs could be considered new biomarkers related to the progression of this pathology. Moreover, since microRNAs (miRNAs) are also considered potential biomarkers at the molecular level, we conducted comprehensive miRNA expression profiling using a high-throughput array platform in our cohort. Of the differentially expressed miRNAs identified, we chose to focus on two that were significantly upregulated (miR378-3p and miR486-5p; more than two-folds) or downregulated (miR142-3p and miR328-3p < 20% and 40% vs. the control, respectively) in DCM patients, all of them strongly associated with inflammatory pathways. The selected miRNAs showed considerable potential as biomarkers, exhibiting statistical significance after ROC analysis. In fact, improved performance was observed when combining both miR142-3p and miR328-3p, using a LASSO regression model. However, we found no correlation between miRNAs and traditional inflammatory markers or SPMs ruling out the possibility to proposing them as combined biomarkers in this case. The heterogeneity of DCM leads to the need to identify new biomarkers that, either individually or in combination, may improve the prognosis of affected individuals. In our study, we have identified that some of the main SPMs can provide valuable information about disease progression, in addition to the combination of certain circulating miRNAs, which show promising prognostic values in our cohort. Thus, we have identified novel biomarkers that integrate inflammatory profiles with specific circulating miRNA expression patterns is an important step towards more targeted patient stratification in DCM. This approach can improve DCM diagnosis and prognosis, supporting the development of personalized treatments through a multi-parameter panel of biomarkers that can be measured in peripheral blood and used in routine clinical practice. Such a strategy can enable earlier treatment, resulting in better patient outcomes and quality of life.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death worldwide, responsible for approximately 18 million deaths each year, according to the WHO. Among CVDs, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) affects a significant number of patients, with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 250 adults [1]. DCM is characterized by the dilation of one or both ventricles, which results in impaired contractile capacity of the heart, as indicated by an ejection fraction (EF) of less than 40% [2]. The etiology is heterogeneous and several causes of DCM have been proposed, including mutations in various sarcomeric genes (e.g., TTN, DES, and LDB3), genes that are usually associated with severe arrhythmias (e.g., LMNA, FLNC, PLN, TMEM43 and RBM20) [3,4] or with common metabolic disorders, such as diabetes and obesity [4]. Beyond genetic causes, also inflammatory conditions have been related to DCM development, like those associated with viral infections for parvovirus B19, herpesviruses, and SARS-CoV-2 [5].
This disease is progressive and often asymptomatic in the early stages, but it can lead to heart failure and, in some cases, death in later stages. Moreover, it is the primary cause of cardiac transplantation in young patients and contributes to many cases of sudden cardiac death [6]. Despite current knowledge and recent advances, particularly in the genetic aspects of this condition [7], it remains underestimated, mainly due to its high heterogeneity, which lowers the chances of a favorable prognosis for those affected. Therefore, further research is needed to improve early diagnosis and optimize patient treatment.
Several circulating biomarkers related to cardiac damage can be measured to characterize or diagnose the progression of DCM, helping clinicians in making informed treatment decisions. In this context, pro-BNP (N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide) is a standard marker for cardiac damage, as its circulating levels increase after heart overload [8]. This marker is commonly used in the clinical diagnosis of CVDs as a predictor of adverse outcomes. In fact, values above 1000 pg/mL indicate adverse cardiovascular events and are strongly linked to a higher risk of mortality. Another important parameter is CRP (C-reactive protein), with elevated levels (≥5 mg/L) being indicative of a poor prognosis in cardiac disease, regardless of other hemodynamic parameters or even BNP levels [9,10]. However, despite the usefulness of these biomarkers, their specificity is limited, which restricts their predictive power. Therefore, measuring additional molecules and analyzing their combinations remains crucial to establish more effective combined biomarkers. In this regard, specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators (SPMs) are endogenous molecules that reduce inflammation and restore homeostasis [11]. SPMs can be produced by lipoxygenase enzymes from arachidonic acid (such as lipoxins) or from EPA and DHA (such as resolvins, maresins, and protectins). It is broadly known that their levels increase once the damaging stimulus has been removed, and they have the capacity to effectively stop inflammatory cascade, reducing the oxidative stress and promoting tissue regeneration. Thus, SPMs and their derivatives have demonstrated protective effects in animal models of cardiac disease, such as myocarditis [12], diabetic cardiac dysfunction [13], and even myocardial infarction [14]. Among SPMs, lipoxin A4 (LXA4) was the first described in the 80s and it has been broadly described its pro-resolutive role modulating the immune system in order to adequately finalize inflammation and recover tissue homeostasis [15]. Furthermore, high levels of LXA4 have been associated with a lower risk of ischemic events in patients with acute myocardial infarction [16]. More recently, reduced serum RvD1 levels have been linked to worse outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage [17] or those experiencing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [18]. Therefore, SPM levels could help determine the inflammatory profile of DCM patients and potentially improve the prognosis and diagnosis of DCM.
Beyond the inflammation-related markers traditionally used for patient classification, recent studies suggest other potential biomarkers to improve patient stratification. These molecules, which should be detectable in the bloodstream, provide valuable additional information to better characterize disease profiles and enhance personalized treatment strategies. Among them are microRNAs (miRNAs), endogenous non-coding RNA molecules that have become promising prognostic targets. Few works have explored the interaction between the SPMs and the miRNAs, emphasizing how some SPMs regulate miRNAs in acute inflammation and in the cardiovascular system [19,20]. It has been proposed that this interaction could play a key role in reducing the inflammatory response and promoting resolution [21].
Many circulating miRNAs have recently been quantified and proposed as biomarkers for prognosis or early diagnosis in various diseases, including cardiac damage [22]. Specifically, some miRNAs are already linked to DCM and are associated with the development of cardiac fibrosis, hypertrophy, or dysfunction [23,24]. Significant variability exists among cohorts regarding which miRNAs are notably altered in DCM patients, mainly due to a lack of standardized protocols. This underscores the urgent need for continued research into miRNA levels in DCM patients and their relationship with other cardiac damage markers.
Since the origin of DCM involves both genetic factors related to cardiac sarcomeric function and conditions characterized by chronic inflammation—including metabolic syndrome—as well as infectious processes that cause acute inflammation, especially viral infections, the biomarkers associated with DCM will vary depending on the underlying pathology. In this context, this study identified specific signatures involving SPMs and changes in certain circulating miRNAs. Therefore, combining different types of molecules has the potential to create a more accurate biomarker panel for early clinical diagnosis and prognosis of this condition, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes. In fact, the potential relationship between miRNAs and SPMs as biomarkers in the context of dilated cardiomyopathy has not been previously addressed, supporting the novelty of the present study.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Human Samples

Clinical samples and related data from patients diagnosed with DCM (including BNP determinations) were managed and provided by Biobanco La Fe (PT17/0015/0043) or Basque Biobank (Available online: www.biobancovasco.org, accessed on 28 November 2025). They were processed following standard operating procedures with approval from the ethical and scientific committees. Sample processing was conducted according to the standard procedures of both institutions. Due to the limited availability of female samples, the study population was restricted to male participants. Healthy male controls were recruited from the Blood Donation Service at La Paz Hospital after giving informed consent. All procedures complied with Spanish biomedical research regulations (Law 14/2007-3) and followed the principles outlined in the 2013 Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. CRP Determination

CRP concentrations were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA, #ENZ-KIT102) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 100 µL of human serum per sample was incubated in duplicate with CRP conjugate and the corresponding antibody at room temperature for 2 h. After washing, the reaction was developed with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and TMB substrate, and absorbance was read at 450 nm.

2.3. LXA4 and RvD1 Quantification

LXA4 levels in human serum were measured using an ELISA kit (Neogen, Lexington, KY, USA, #407010). Before analysis, lipid enrichment was performed with C18 Sep-Pak cartridges (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA, #WAT023501). RvD1 concentrations were determined using an ELISA kit from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI, USA, #500380). Both determinations were performed following the manufacturer’s instructions. These assays are validated in various human biofluids, including serum, plasma, and urine.

2.4. miRNA Profiling in Human Serum via TLDA

Three healthy male donors (over 50 years old) and three age-matched DCM patients from Biobanco La Fe were selected from the collected serum samples. Total RNA, including miRNAs, was extracted using the MagMAX™ mirVana™ Total RNA Isolation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, #A27828). Complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis was performed with the TaqMan Advanced miRNA cDNA Synthesis Kit (#A25576). miRNA expression profiling was conducted using TaqMan Advanced miRNA human serum/plasma cards (#A34717 Thermo scientific) at the IIBM Sols-Morreale Genomic Service on an Applied Biosystems 7900 HT FAST Real-Time PCR System. These cards are specifically designed to detect 188 miRNAs in human serum or plasma samples including three miRNAs as controls, hsa-miR-16-5p as endogenous and cel-miR-39-3p, ath-miR159 as exogenous. Data analysis was performed using the ΔΔCt method with GraphPad Prism version 8.0.2 software (Dotmatics, Boston, MA, USA), to obtain the corresponding p value. These results were represented as volcano plots and bar graphs where green dots or bars indicate upregulated miRNAs and red dots and bars represent downregulated miRNAs (|log2FC| ≥ 1). Then, significantly regulated miRNAs were categorized by functional pathways based on expression changes using the MiRWalk database and represented in a graph bar regarding their p value.

2.5. miRNA Validation by qPCR Analysis

For validation, miRNA extraction and reverse transcription were performed as described in the section above. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was carried out using TaqMan Advanced miRNA Assays (Table 1) and the TaqMan Fast Advanced Master Mix (#4444556). Relative expression levels were determined using the ΔΔCt method.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.2 software (Dotmatics, Boston, MA, USA). First, we applied the Shapiro-Wilk test to all data sets to determine if they follow a normal distribution. For those that passed the normality test, parametric statistical test was applied: unpaired t-test to compare two groups and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test to compare multiple groups. To those data that did not follow a normal distribution, we used the non-parametric Mann–Whitney test. The specific statistical analysis and corresponding p-values are shown in each figure.
To analyze multiple miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers, a nested cross-validation framework with L1-regularized logistic regression (LASSO) was applied. Samples with any missing values were excluded at the beginning of the analysis. Firstly, nested cross-validation was implemented, with an outer loop of 5 stratified folds for model evaluation, and an inner loop of 3 stratified folds for hyperparameter tuning. In the inner loop, GridSearchCV was used to identify the optimal regularization strength (C parameter) across 10 logarithmically spaced values from 10−3 to 102. The optimal model was refit on the training portion of each outer fold and used to generate predictions for the corresponding test fold. The model’s predictive performance was assessed via the ROC/AUC analysis and classification accuracy on the outer test folds. To evaluate feature stability, the frequency with which each miRNA was assigned a non-zero coefficient across the five outer fold models was recorded. This provided an empirical measure of feature robustness and importance. Thus, the LASSO model retained two miRNAs (miR142-3p and miR328-3p), while the other two (miR378a-3p and miR486-5p) were shrunk to zero. For this reason, the analysis was redone using only the two significant miRNAs in order to maximize the sample size, as some patients had missing values in any of the now discarded miRNAs.
Pearson correlation analysis examined the relationships between the expression levels of differentially expressed miRNAs and clinical variables such as age, CRP, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and NT-proBNP. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

To conduct this study, we recruited a cohort of 21 DCM patients and 26 healthy controls, both groups within the same age range, averaging around 50 years old (Table 2). Regarding the clinical data obtained from the biobank sources, this cohort had a mean LVEF of less than 44%, with 62% (13/21) showing values below 20%. Moreover, DCM patients showed elevated pro-BNP levels, reaching an average of 4.9 ng/mL (±3.4), which may indicate cardiac damage, supporting the diagnosis of DCM.
Since DCM is an inflammatory disease, we analyzed the serum levels of various inflammatory markers in healthy donors and the DCM cohort (Figure 1). Systemic concentration of CRP is a key parameter for assessing inflammation in DCM patients, with higher levels indicating a worse prognosis. As expected, controls have a mean value of 2.12 mg/L (±0.48), which increased tenfold to 21.28 mg/L (±3.08) in DCM patients (Figure 1A).
After analyzing this classic inflammatory marker, we evaluated the levels of SPMs, which are crucial during the resolution phase of inflammation. We observed that LXA4 levels were significantly higher in DCM serum compared to the control group, while RvD1 levels were lower (Figure 1B,C). In fact, when we performed an AUC/ROC analysis to assess the diagnostic potential of both CRP and these SPMs as possible biomarkers in DCM, we detected a significant predictor capacity of CRP and LXA4 (Figure 1D). Next, to explore the potential relationship between pro-inflammatory and pro-resolving mediators in these serums, we conducted a correlation analysis between SPM levels and the pathological markers CRP, BNP, and LVEF (Figure 2). We found that LXA4 was inversely correlated with CRP and BNP levels. The same pattern was observed with LVEF, although it was not statistically significant (Figure 2A). However, the correlations involving RvD1 were not statistically significant (Figure 2B). This lack of correlation may indicate that SPMs are regulated independently from other traditional inflammation markers, especially at the systemic level.
In addition to analyzing inflammatory markers, we aimed to explore potential differences in miRNAs within the DCM cohort, as their regulation is crucial for the development of various pathologies, and several have already been proposed as biomarkers for DCM [24]. Therefore, we initially decided to conduct an array of miRNAs in serum samples from three DCM patients and three healthy male donors, all of whom were over the age of 50 (Figure 3). To abord it, we used miRNAs Taqman® Advanced Cards, that are specifically designed to detect the circulating levels of 188 miRNAs in biological samples of human serums. miRNA profiling revealed significant modulation of various specific miRNAs in DCM patients; 35 were modified more than 2-fold (8 upregulated and 27 downregulated). After identifying which miRNAs are altered in DCM patients, we examined their enrichment in functional clusters using bioinformatics tools and summarized the most relevant pathways in a bar graph (Figure 4). As a result, the significantly changed miRNAs in DCM can be grouped into 17 functional categories, among which we can highlight enriched pathways related to inflammation (TLR signaling, TGFβ pathway, GPCRs, MAPKs, PPARs, etc.), as well as several cardiac-related clusters such as viral myocarditis, cardiac muscle contraction, heart development, and hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy, among others.
To verify these findings, we selected two upregulated (miR-378a-3p, miR-486-5p) and two downregulated (miR-142-3p, and miR-328-3p) miRNAs that had already been shown to influence cardiac disease in published studies in the field of DCM [24]. Thus, miR-378a-3p has been identified as a biomarker for several cardiovascular diseases and acts as a cardioprotective factor [25], and miR-486-5p has been associated with acute myocardial infarction [26]. Regarding miR-142-3p, a decrease has been observed in heart failure and during the progression to fibrosis [27], and miR-328-3p appears to exert protective roles on endothelial cells [28,29]. We then measured the levels of these selected miRNAs in the entire cohort, using Taqman technology and miR-1-3p as a control, to verify the results obtained in the array (Figure 5).
Our previous results were confirmed, as miR-378a-3p and miR-486-5p were significantly upregulated in our samples, decreasing miR-142-3p and miR-328-3p levels. Next, we performed an AUC/ROC analysis to assess the diagnostic potential of these miRNAs as possible biomarkers in DCM (Figure 6). All evaluated miRNAs were statistically significant, indicating their ability to distinguish DCM patients from controls, highlighting their potential as biomarkers (Figure 6A). Additionally, we tested whether combining multiple miRNAs could provide a more accurate prediction using a multivariate LASSO model. The combination of miR-142-3p and miR-328-3p was a stronger predictor than any other combination, including individual miRNAs, as the AUC was shown to be 0.94 (Figure 6B).
Lastly, we created a combined correlation matrix to explore possible relationships among all systemic and miRNA biomarkers (Figure 7). Unfortunately, only a significant correlation was found between miR-328-3p and LVEF, while the others did not reach statistical significance.

4. Discussion

DCM remains a common cardiac condition, with early diagnosis being difficult due to high variability in clinical progression and treatment response among patients. Recently, there has been increased interest in enhancing cardiovascular diagnostic and prognostic tools through the combined analysis of systemic biomarkers easily measured in clinical settings. Instead of relying on single indicators, integrating multiple independent molecular parameters may offer a more comprehensive understanding of disease progression, especially in conditions like DCM. In this study, we aimed to go beyond typical inflammatory markers such as BNP or CRP. We also measured specialized pro-resolving mediators LXA4 and RvD1 to identify differences between groups that could improve diagnostic accuracy. We found that DCM patients have significantly higher circulating levels of LXA4 than controls (483.3 pg/mL vs. 374.3 pg/mL), indicating their bodies’ attempt to resolve inflammation. In fact, the ROC curve shows a significant relevance of this SPM as a biomarker. This aligns with findings in other diseases like COVID-19 [30] and preeclampsia [31], where circulating levels of these SPMs were markedly higher compared to healthy individuals. Notably, LXA4 levels in these studies were within the same range as observed here [32]. Conversely, RvD1 levels were lower in our DCM group, decreasing from an average of 50.36 pg/mL in healthy donors to 38.55 pg/mL in patients. Multiple studies have reported reduced circulating RvD1 levels in various diseases, including arterial hypertension [33], rheumatoid arthritis [34], and ulcerative colitis [35]. Similar reductions have been documented in cardiovascular conditions such as hemorrhagic subarachnoid aneurysm [17], ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [18], and acute coronary syndrome [36]. These findings suggest that inflammatory diseases are characterized by overactivation of pro-inflammatory pathways and an imbalance in the resolution phase of inflammation. This imbalance leads to impaired production of pro-resolving mediators over time, hindering the body’s ability to halt inflammation and restore tissue homeostasis. Beyond measuring each mediator individually, we also investigated whether their correlations could provide diagnostic or prognostic insights in DCM. We found a significant inverse correlation between LXA4 levels and both CRP and BNP. Therefore, although LXA4 levels are elevated in DCM patients, those with greater systemic inflammation exhibit lower LXA4, indicating a potential link between impaired resolution mechanisms and markers of systemic inflammation and cardiac stress. Regarding CRP, this inverse relationship had been previously documented in various cardiovascular studies [37,38]. In fact, the expression of CRP has been associated with decreased LXA4 synthesis in foam cells in a rabbit model of atherosclerosis [32].
Several circulating miRNAs have been identified as potential biomarkers that play essential roles in common diseases [25,39,40,41] and in DCM, some of which align with our panel [24]. Therefore, we examined a panel of miRNAs that enables the identification of the main circulating human miRNAs with known roles in cardiac pathophysiology in our DCM patient cohort. By exploring possible relationships among these molecules, we aimed to develop a new biomarker signature for DCM that could complement the previous ones, enabling earlier diagnosis and improving both short-term and long-term clinical outcomes. Consistent with previous findings, we observed significant changes in several miRNAs linked to inflammation-related pathways such as TLRs, myocarditis, TGFβ, and GPCR signaling, as well as those involved in cardiac functions like muscle contraction and heart development. Interestingly, the main specific receptor for LXA4, known as ALXR, belongs to the GPCR family [42], so it is not surprising that this signaling pathway appears to be modulated in the study. Regarding the others, although these are very general signaling pathways, there is specific evidence that miR-378 is capable of modulating the MAPK pathway [43] whereas miR-486-5p, miR-328-3p or miR-142-3p have been associated with PI3K/Akt [44,45,46]. Among the miRNAs altered in DCM, we selected two upregulated and two downregulated sequences based on their statistical significance and prior association with DCM. Notably, miR378-3p has been connected to heart disease in numerous studies. It has been proposed as a key player in cardiovascular diseases, generally providing protective effects [25]. Specifically, miR-378 has been shown to protect cardiomyocytes from doxorubicin-induced cell death [47], and its expression correlates with a reduction in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy [48,49]. However, some researchers report that this miRNA can also be harmful by increasing cardiomyocyte sensitivity to apoptosis [50], and elevated levels of miR-378 have been suggested as early biomarkers for diabetic cardiomyopathy [51]. In line with this, we observed an increase in miR-378-3p in our DCM cohort. This suggests that this miRNA is a suitable biomarker for some cardiac pathologies, irrespective of its beneficial or prejudicial effects. However, further studies are needed to clarify its specific effects in DCM. Similar effects have been observed for the other upregulated miRNA, which exhibits an even stronger protective role. It has been reported that miR-486-5p protects against cardiomyocyte apoptosis in different models, helping to reduce cardiac injury and improve cardiac function [52,53,54,55,56]. Interestingly, this miRNA also promotes angiogenesis after myocardial infarction, which has been linked to preventing adverse remodeling and supporting tissue repair, ultimately reducing the risk of heart failure [57,58]. Therefore, the increase in miR-486-5p in DCM may reflect a compensatory mechanism for the harmful effects of the disease. Conversely, we observed lower levels of miR-142-3p in DCM patients, consistent with previous findings from Nair et al. [59]. This miRNA is considered protective because its overexpression reduces inflammation, prevents hypertrophy, and improves mitochondrial function [60,61]. Thus, decreased levels could be damaging to the DCM heart. Additionally, high levels of miR-328-3p have been linked to an increased risk of atrial fibrillation [61], suggesting that lowering its levels might benefit DCM hearts. In fact, this miRNA increases cardiomyocyte apoptosis and fosters myocardial infarction in rats [62].
Our next step was to assess whether these miRNAs could serve as diagnostic markers, regardless of their potential beneficial or harmful effects. Our data show that the four selected miRNAs can distinguish between DCM and healthy controls. Notably, both miR142-3p and miR328-3p exhibited AUC ≥ 0.9, indicating that their ability to discriminate between the two groups is excellent. Furthermore, the combination of miR-142-3p and miR-328-3p exhibited superior performance compared to individual miRNAs, achieving an AUC value of 0.94. This indicates that measuring these two miRNAs together could provide a highly effective diagnostic tool in clinical practice. Although we found a correlation between miR-328-3p and LVEF, no other significant associations between miRNAs and circulating inflammatory or resolution biomarkers were observed. This may be due to the limited sample size or the heterogeneity in DCM progression among patients in this cohort. Moreover, biomarker levels vary considerably throughout the course of the disease, from a pro-inflammatory to a resolution phase, meaning that possible correlations may show up depending on the moment when the sample is taken. Nevertheless, a direct correlation exists between reduced miR-328-3p levels and the ejection fraction in DCM patients. In conclusion, we demonstrated that LXA4 levels and at least four miRNAs differentially expressed in DCM patients versus healthy individuals effectively distinguish between the groups. Notably, combining miR-142-3p and miR-328-3p yielded an enhanced predictive capacity. These findings suggest that assessing SPMs and miRNAs alongside traditional biomarkers could improve diagnostic accuracy.

5. Conclusions

Based on the results presented in this work, it can be suggested that differences in biomarker profiles in DCM may be related to the primary cause of the disease. This could facilitate faster patient stratification and the development of targeted therapeutic interventions to prevent DCM progression.

6. Limitations of the Study

The cohort analyzed included only men due to the difficulty in obtaining female samples. Nevertheless, the patients had well-established diagnoses, and the results, which integrated various markers, demonstrated strong robustness and supporting their application in longitudinal studies of disease progression and prognosis in these patients. This is particularly significant because diagnosis is complex and often delayed, usually occurring after the disease has already established itself. Even so, it would be interesting to include female samples in future studies in order to deep into the knowledge of signaling pathways in them.

Author Contributions

R.I.J. and S.S.-G. contributed to conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis and writing. M.F.-V., I.C. and B.d.l.H. contributed with supervision and writing (review and editing). L.B. participated in conceptualization, formal analysis, project administration, validation and writing and P.P. in conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, validation and writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been supported by: PID2023-148933OB-I00 from MICIU/AEI 13039/501100011033, and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CB16/11/00222) from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (co-financed by the European Development Regional Fund “A Way to Achieve Europe”, by the “European Union” and by the “European Union NextGeneration EU/PRTR”); Intramural-CSIC 202320E201, and Comunidad de Madrid, Programa Biociencias (S2022-BMD-7223).

Institutional Review Board statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Biobank of La Fe Hospital (Identification code BB29_2018) on 5 July 2018 and by CEIm from País Vasco (Identification code CES-BIOEF 2017-22) on 9 February 2018.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent for participation was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

For ethical reasons, additional data from the cohort will be available on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Rafael, Leandro, Luiz, David, Antonio, Santos, and Ángel for their valuable and altruistic participation in the study and Fernando Arós for providing samples to Biobank making our study possible. Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gigli, M.; Stolfo, D.; Merlo, M.; Sinagra, G.; Taylor, M.R.G.; Mestroni, L. Pathophysiology of dilated cardiomyopathy: From mechanisms to precision medicine. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2025, 22, 183–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Heymans, S.; Lakdawala, N.K.; Tschöpe, C.; Klingel, K. Dilated cardiomyopathy: Causes, mechanisms, and current and future treatment approaches. Lancet 2023, 402, 998–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mestroni, L.; Brun, F.; Spezzacatene, A.; Sinagra, G.; Taylor, M.R.G. Genetic causes of dilated cardiomyopathy. Prog. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2014, 37, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wieczorek, D. Dilated Cardiomyopathy—Exploring the Underlying Causes. Med. Res. Arch. 2024, 12, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ni, H.; Cao, J.; Kinnamon, D.D.; Jordan, E.; Haas, G.J.; Hofmeyer, M.; Kransdorf, E.P.; Diamond, J.; Owens, A.; Lowes, B.; et al. Antecedent Flu-Like Illness and Onset of Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: The DCM Precision Medicine Study. Circ. Heart Fail. 2025, 18, e012602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Orphanou, N.; Papatheodorou, E.; Anastasakis, A. Dilated cardiomyopathy in the era of precision medicine: Latest concepts and developments. Heart Fail. Rev. 2022, 27, 1173–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Newman, N.A.; Burke, M.A. Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Genetic Journey from Past to Future. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 11460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, X.; Chen, C.; Gan, F.; Wang, Y.; Ding, L.; Hua, W. Plasma NT pro-BNP, hs-CRP and big-ET levels at admission as prognostic markers of survival in hospitalized patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: A single-center cohort study. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2014, 14, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kaneko, K.; Kanda, T.; Yamauchi, Y.; Hasegawa, A.; Iwasaki, T.; Arai, M.; Suzuki, T.; Kobayashi, I.; Nagai, R. C-Reactive protein in dilated cardiomyopathy. Cardiology 1999, 91, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ishikawa, C.; Tsutamoto, T.; Fujii, M.; Sakai, H.; Tanaka, T.; Horie, M. Prediction of mortality by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and brain natriuretic peptide in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Circ. J. 2006, 70, 857–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Serhan, C.N. Pro-resolving lipid mediators are leads for resolution physiology. Nature 2014, 510, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jaén, R.I.; Fernández-Velasco, M.; Terrón, V.; Sánchez-García, S.; Zaragoza, C.; Canales-Bueno, N.; Val-Blasco, A.; Vallejo-Cremades, M.T.; Boscá, L.; Prieto, P. BML-111 treatment prevents cardiac apoptosis and oxidative stress in a mouse model of autoimmune myocarditis. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 10531–10546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fu, T.; Mohan, M.; Bose, M.; Brennan, E.P.; Kiriazis, H.; Deo, M.; Nowell, C.J.; Godson, C.; Cooper, M.E.; Zhao, P.; et al. Lipoxin A4 improves cardiac remodeling and function in diabetes-associated cardiac dysfunction. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2024, 23, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kain, V.; Liu, F.; Kozlovskaya, V.; Ingle, K.A.; Bolisetty, S.; Agarwal, A.; Khedkar, S.; Prabhu, S.D.; Kharlampieva, E.; Halade, G.V. Resolution Agonist 15-epi-Lipoxin A4 Programs Early Activation of Resolving Phase in Post-Myocardial Infarction Healing. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Saqib, U.; Pandey, M.; Vyas, A.; Patidar, P.; Hajela, S.; Ali, A.; Tiwari, M.; Sarkar, S.; Yadav, N.; Patel, S.; et al. Lipoxins as Modulators of Diseases. Cells 2025, 14, 1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, R.; Li, J.; Zhou, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Li, N.; Liu, W.; Liu, C.; Zhou, P.; Chen, Y.; et al. Prognostic impacts of Lipoxin A4 in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A prospective cohort study. Pharmacol. Res. 2023, 187, 106618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yu, D.; Jiang, F.; Xu, W.; He, P.; Chen, F.; Liu, X.; Bao, X. Declined Serum Resolvin D1 Levels to Predict Severity and Prognosis of Human Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Prospective Cohort Study. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2023, 19, 1463–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Karayiǧit, O.; Nurkoç, S.G.; Başyiǧit, F.; Klzlltunç, E. The Role of Serum Resolvin D1 Levels in Determining the Presence and Prognosis of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Med. Princ. Pract. 2022, 31, 548–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Recchiuti, A.; Serhan, C.N. Pro-Resolving Lipid Mediators (SPMs) and Their Actions in Regulating miRNA in Novel Resolution Circuits in Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2012, 3, 33069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fredman, G.; Serhan, C.N. Specialized pro-resolving mediators in vascular inflammation and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2024, 21, 808–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tyszkowski, R.; Mehrzad, R. Resolution of inflammation. In Inflammation and Obesity, A New and Novel Approach to Manage Obesity and Its Consequences; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 175–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lewandowski, P.; Goławski, M.; Baron, M.; Reichman-Warmusz, E.; Wojnicz, R. A Systematic Review of miRNA and cfDNA as Potential Biomarkers for Liquid Biopsy in Myocarditis and Inflammatory Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chiti, E.; Di Paolo, M.; Turillazzi, E.; Rocchi, A. Micrornas in hypertrophic, arrhythmogenic and dilated cardiomyopathy. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Alonso-Villa, E.; Bonet, F.; Hernandez-Torres, F.; Campuzano, Ó.; Sarquella-Brugada, G.; Quezada-Feijoo, M.; Ramos, M.; Mangas, A.; Toro, R. The Role of MicroRNAs in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: New Insights for an Old Entity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, H.; Shi, J.; Wang, J.; Hu, Y. MicroRNA-378: An important player in cardiovascular diseases (Review). Mol. Med. Rep. 2023, 28, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, L.; Tian, L.; Yan, Z.; Wang, J.; Xue, T.; Sun, Q. Diagnostic and prognostic value of miR-486-5p, miR-451a, miR-21-5p and monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Heart Vessel. 2023, 38, 318–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Iwańczyk, S.; Lehmann, T.; Cieślewicz, A.; Malesza, K.; Woźniak, P.; Hertel, A.; Krupka, G.; Jagodziński, P.P.; Grygier, M.; Lesiak, M.; et al. Circulating miRNA-451a and miRNA-328-3p as Potential Markers of Coronary Artery Aneurysmal Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Qin, X.; Guo, J. MicroRNA-328-3p Protects Vascular Endothelial Cells Against Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Induced Injury via Targeting Forkhead Box Protein O4 (FOXO4) in Atherosclerosis. Med. Sci. Monit. 2020, 26, e921877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sánchez-García, S.; Jaén, R.I.; Lozano-Rodríguez, R.; Avendaño-Ortiz, J.; Pascual-Iglesias, A.; Hurtado-Navarro, L.; López-Collazo, E.; Boscá, L.; Prieto, P. Lipoxin A4 levels correlate with severity in a Spanish COVID-19 cohort: Potential use of endogenous pro-resolving mediators as biomarkers. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1509188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Perucci, L.O.; Santos, P.C.; Ribeiro, L.S.; Souza, D.G.; Gomes, K.B.; Dusse, L.M.S.; Sousa, L.P. Lipoxin A4 is increased in the plasma of preeclamptic women. Am. J. Hypertens. 2016, 29, 1179–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mai, J.; Liu, W.; Fang, Y.B.; Zhang, S.; Qiu, Q.; Yang, Y.; Wang, X.; Huang, T.C.; Zhang, H.F.; Xie, Y.; et al. The atheroprotective role of lipoxin A4 prevents oxLDL-induced apoptotic signaling in macrophages via JNK pathway. Atherosclerosis 2018, 278, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yücel, H.; Özdemir, A.T. Low LXA4, RvD1 and RvE1 levels may be an indicator of the development of hypertension. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2021, 174, 102365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Özgül Özdemir, R.B.; Soysal Gündüz, Ö.; Özdemir, A.T.; Akgül, Ö. Low levels of pro-resolving lipid mediators lipoxin-A4, resolvin-D1 and resolvin-E1 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Immunol. Lett. 2020, 227, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Demirci, S.; Sezer, S. Serum Maresin-1 and Resolvin-D1 Levels as Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Monitoring Disease Activity in Ulcerative Colitis. Diagnostics 2025, 15, 834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sun, C.; Zheng, W.; Liang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Sun, W.; Zhou, J.; Qiao, W.; Xie, Q.; Tang, R. Acute Coronary Syndrome May be Associated with Decreased Resolvin D1-to-Leukotriene B4 Ratio. Int. Heart J. 2023, 64, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Reina-Couto, M.; Carvalho, J.; Valente, M.J.; Vale, L.; Afonso, J.; Carvalho, F.; Bettencourt, P.; Sousa, T.; Albino-Teixeira, A. Impaired resolution of inflammation in human chronic heart failure. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 44, 527–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Hu, Z. Decreased plasma lipoxin A4, resolvin D1, protectin D1 are correlated with the complexity and prognosis of coronary heart disease: A retrospective cohort study. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2025, 178, 106990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Searles, C.D. MicroRNAs and Cardiovascular Disease Risk. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2024, 26, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Iacobescu, L.; Ciobanu, A.O.; Macarie, R.; Vadana, M.; Ciortan, L.; Tucureanu, M.M.; Butoi, E.; Simionescu, M.; Vinereanu, D. Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of Circulating microRNAs in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease-Impact on Left Ventricle and Arterial Function. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 8499–8511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rahul, K.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, B.; Chaudhary, V.; Rahul, K.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, B.; Chaudhary, V. Circulating microRNAs as potential novel biomarkers in cardiovascular diseases: Emerging role, biogenesis, current knowledge, therapeutics and the road ahead. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Acad. 2022, 8, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Qin, C.X.; Norling, L.V.; Vecchio, E.A.; Brennan, E.P.; May, L.T.; Wootten, D.; Godson, C.; Perretti, M.; Ritchie, R.H. Formylpeptide receptor 2: Nomenclature, structure, signalling and translational perspectives: IUPHAR review 35. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2022, 179, 4617–4639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, B.; Yao, K.; Wise, A.F.; Lau, R.; Shen, H.H.; Tesch, G.H.; Ricardo, S.D. miR-378 reduces mesangial hypertrophy and kidney tubular fibrosis via MAPK signalling. Clin. Sci. 2017, 131, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Xiao, Y. MiR-486-5p inhibits the hyperproliferation and production of collagen in hypertrophic scar fibroblasts via IGF1/PI3K/AKT pathway. J. Dermatol. Treat. 2021, 32, 973–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jiang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ouyang, J.; Feng, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, J.; Zhang, C.; Tan, L.; Zhong, J.; et al. MicroRNA-142-3P suppresses the progression of papillary thyroid carcinoma by targeting FN1 and inactivating FAK/ERK/PI3K signaling. Cell. Signal. 2023, 109, 110792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Pan, S.; Ren, F.; Li, L.; Liu, D.; Li, Y.; Wang, A.; Li, W.; Dong, Y.; Guo, W. MiR-328-3p inhibits cell proliferation and metastasis in colorectal cancer by targeting Girdin and inhibiting the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Exp. Cell Res. 2020, 390, 111939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Wei, C.; Zhao, L.; Guo, X.; Cui, X.; Shao, L.; Long, J.; Gu, J.; Zhao, M. MiR-378 modulates energy imbalance and apoptosis of mitochondria induced by doxorubicin. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2018, 10, 3600. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang, G.; Feng, L.; Liu, C.; Han, Z.; Chen, X. MiR-378 Inhibits Angiotensin II-Induced Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy by Targeting AKT2. Int. Heart J. 2024, 65, 528–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ganesan, J.; Ramanujam, D.; Sassi, Y.; Ahles, A.; Jentzsch, C.; Werfel, S.; Leierseder, S.; Loyer, X.; Giacca, M.; Zentilin, L.; et al. MiR-378 controls cardiac hypertrophy by combined repression of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway factors. Circulation 2013, 127, 2097–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Knezevic, I.; Patel, A.; Sundaresan, N.R.; Gupta, M.P.; Solaro, R.J.; Nagalingam, R.S.; Gupta, M. A novel cardiomyocyte-enriched MicroRNA, miR-378, targets insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor: Implications in postnatal cardiac remodeling and cell survival. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 12913–12926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Abdul-Jabbar Ali1, S.; Al-Shlah, H.H.; Al-Hamdani, M.M. Evaluating the Sensitivity of (miR-378) as a Circulatory Screening Biomarker for Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: Comparative Study. Med. Leg. Updat. 2021, 21, 912–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, N.; Yu, Y. MiR-486 alleviates hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced H9c2 cell injury by regulating forkhead box D3. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2022, 26, 422–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sun, Y.; Su, Q.; Li, L.; Wang, X.; Lu, Y.; Liang, J. MiR-486 regulates cardiomyocyte apoptosis by p53-mediated BCL-2 associated mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2017, 17, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sun, X.H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Hui, J. Exosomes of bone-marrow stromal cells inhibit cardiomyocyte apoptosis under ischemic and hypoxic conditions via miR-486-5p targeting the PTEN/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Thromb. Res. 2019, 177, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bei, Y.; Lu, D.; Bär, C.; Chatterjee, S.; Costa, A.; Riedel, I.; Mooren, F.C.; Zhu, Y.; Huang, Z.; Wei, M.; et al. miR-486 attenuates cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury and mediates the beneficial effect of exercise for myocardial protection. Mol. Ther. 2022, 30, 1675–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhu, H.; Wang, X.; Sun, Y.; He, W.; Liang, J.; Mo, B.; Li, L. MicroRNA-486-5p targeting PTEN Protects Against Coronary Microembolization-Induced Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis in Rats by activating the PI3K/AKT pathway. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 855, 244–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, Q.; Xu, Y.; Lv, K.; Wang, Y.; Zhong, Z.; Xiao, C.; Zhu, K.; Ni, C.; Wang, K.; Kong, M.; et al. Small extracellular vesicles containing miR-486-5p promote angiogenesis after myocardial infarction in mice and nonhuman primates. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021, 13, eabb0202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Douvris, A.; Viñas, J.; Burns, K.D. miRNA-486-5p: Signaling targets and role in non-malignant disease. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2022, 79, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nair, N.; Kumar, S.; Gongora, E.; Gupta, S. Circulating miRNA as novel markers for diastolic dysfunction. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2013, 376, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, B.; Cheng, M.; Hu, S.; Wang, S.; Wang, L.; Tu, X.; Huang, C.; Jiang, H.; Wu, G. Overexpression of miR-142-3p improves mitochondrial function in cardiac hypertrophy. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 108, 1347–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Su, Q.; Lv, X.; Ye, Z.; Sun, Y.; Kong, B.; Qin, Z.; Li, L. The mechanism of miR-142-3p in coronary microembolization-induced myocardiac injury via regulating target gene IRAK-1. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Huang, H.; Chen, H.; Liang, X.; Chen, X.; Chen, X.; Chen, C.; Moorthy, B.T. Upregulated miR-328-3p and its high risk in atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression. Medicine 2022, 101, E28980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Huang, J.; Wang, F.; Sun, X.; Chu, X.; Jiang, R.; Wang, Y.; Pang, L. Myocardial infarction cardiomyocytes-derived exosomal miR-328-3p promote apoptosis via Caspase signaling. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2021, 13, 2365. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Determination of serum levels of (A) C-reactive protein (CRP), (B) lipoxin A4, and (C) resolvin (D1) in healthy controls and DCM patients. Mann–Whitney test was used in (A,C), and unpaired t-test was used in (B). * p ≤ 0.05 and **** p ≤ 0.0001 versus the corresponding controls. (D). ROC/AUC analysis of CRP, LXA4 and RvD1. Graphs show the ROC curve of each parameter, which reflects their performance as predictors. AUC and p-values are displayed. *** p ≤ 0.001; **** p ≤ 0.0001 versus random prediction (AUC = 0.5).
Figure 1. Determination of serum levels of (A) C-reactive protein (CRP), (B) lipoxin A4, and (C) resolvin (D1) in healthy controls and DCM patients. Mann–Whitney test was used in (A,C), and unpaired t-test was used in (B). * p ≤ 0.05 and **** p ≤ 0.0001 versus the corresponding controls. (D). ROC/AUC analysis of CRP, LXA4 and RvD1. Graphs show the ROC curve of each parameter, which reflects their performance as predictors. AUC and p-values are displayed. *** p ≤ 0.001; **** p ≤ 0.0001 versus random prediction (AUC = 0.5).
Cells 14 01916 g001
Figure 2. Correlation analysis between serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with LXA4 (A) or RvD1 (B) systemic levels in DCM patients. Each red dot corresponds to an independent patient. The values shown in each graph indicate the corresponding Pearson’s r ((A): LVEF) or Spearman’s r ((A): CRP, BNP; (B): CRP, BNP, LVEF) correlation coefficients and p-values * p ≤ 0.05; *** p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 2. Correlation analysis between serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with LXA4 (A) or RvD1 (B) systemic levels in DCM patients. Each red dot corresponds to an independent patient. The values shown in each graph indicate the corresponding Pearson’s r ((A): LVEF) or Spearman’s r ((A): CRP, BNP; (B): CRP, BNP, LVEF) correlation coefficients and p-values * p ≤ 0.05; *** p ≤ 0.001.
Cells 14 01916 g002
Figure 3. Determination of miRNA levels in the DCM cohort by TLDA. (A). Volcano plot showing the distribution of miRNAs in DCM patients. Green dots indicate upregulated miRNAs and red dots represent downregulated miRNAs (vertical dashed lines, |log2FC| ≥ 1). Horizontal dashed lines mark the significantly modified miRNAs (−log(p-value) ≥ 1.3) (B). The most extensively modified miRNAs are shown as a bar graph. Vertical dashed lines indicate |FC| ≥ 2.
Figure 3. Determination of miRNA levels in the DCM cohort by TLDA. (A). Volcano plot showing the distribution of miRNAs in DCM patients. Green dots indicate upregulated miRNAs and red dots represent downregulated miRNAs (vertical dashed lines, |log2FC| ≥ 1). Horizontal dashed lines mark the significantly modified miRNAs (−log(p-value) ≥ 1.3) (B). The most extensively modified miRNAs are shown as a bar graph. Vertical dashed lines indicate |FC| ≥ 2.
Cells 14 01916 g003
Figure 4. Top signaling pathways related to the miRNAs that were significantly modulated in the DCM cohort versus the healthy cohort.
Figure 4. Top signaling pathways related to the miRNAs that were significantly modulated in the DCM cohort versus the healthy cohort.
Cells 14 01916 g004
Figure 5. Determination of the levels of selected miRNAs (miR-378-3p in (A), miR-486-5p in (B), miR-142-3p in (C) and miR-328-3p in (D)) in healthy donors and DCM patients by RT-qPCR. Each dot corresponds to a single individual. Exact p-values are displayed, calculated with Mann–Whitney test. * p ≤ 0.05; *** p ≤ 0.001; **** p ≤ 0.0001 versus control.
Figure 5. Determination of the levels of selected miRNAs (miR-378-3p in (A), miR-486-5p in (B), miR-142-3p in (C) and miR-328-3p in (D)) in healthy donors and DCM patients by RT-qPCR. Each dot corresponds to a single individual. Exact p-values are displayed, calculated with Mann–Whitney test. * p ≤ 0.05; *** p ≤ 0.001; **** p ≤ 0.0001 versus control.
Cells 14 01916 g005
Figure 6. ROC/AUC analysis of selected miRNAs. The graphs show the ROC curves of (A) individual miRNAs or (B) the combination of miR142-3p and miR328-3p, using a nested cross-validation LASSO regression model. AUC values and p-values are displayed. ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001, **** p ≤ 0.0001 versus random prediction (AUC = 0.5).
Figure 6. ROC/AUC analysis of selected miRNAs. The graphs show the ROC curves of (A) individual miRNAs or (B) the combination of miR142-3p and miR328-3p, using a nested cross-validation LASSO regression model. AUC values and p-values are displayed. ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001, **** p ≤ 0.0001 versus random prediction (AUC = 0.5).
Cells 14 01916 g006
Figure 7. Correlation matrix of the selected miRNAs versus EF, BNP and CRP in DCM patients. Color intensity correlates with a higher Pearson’s |r| value. * p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 7. Correlation matrix of the selected miRNAs versus EF, BNP and CRP in DCM patients. Color intensity correlates with a higher Pearson’s |r| value. * p ≤ 0.05.
Cells 14 01916 g007
Table 1. Taqman Advanced miRNA Assay sequences.
Table 1. Taqman Advanced miRNA Assay sequences.
miRNAmiRBase Accession NumberMature miRNA Sequence
Hsa-miR-142-3pMIMAT0000434UGUAGUGUUUCCUACUUUAUGGA
Hsa-miR-328-3pMIMAT0000752CUGGCCCUCUCUGCCCUUCCGU
Hsa-miR-378a-3pMIMAT0000732ACUGGACUUGGAGUCAGAAGGC
Hsa-miR-486-5pMIMAT0002177UCCUGUACUGAGCUGCCCCGAG
Table 2. Demographic (A) and clinical (B) data for healthy donors and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients. N corresponds to the number of people included in each group.
Table 2. Demographic (A) and clinical (B) data for healthy donors and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients. N corresponds to the number of people included in each group.
A
Healthy donors
(N = 26)
DCM
(N = 21)
Age, mean ± SD (years)50.23 ± 9.5853.4 ± 13.45
Age, min–max (years)29–6519–67
B
DCM
PRO-BNP (pg/mL)4908.1 ± 3390
LVEF≤20%13
20–44%7
NOT DATA1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jaén, R.I.; Sánchez-García, S.; Fernández-Velasco, M.; Cuadrado, I.; de las Heras, B.; Boscá, L.; Prieto, P. New Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Pro-Resolving Lipids and miRNAs. Cells 2025, 14, 1916. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14231916

AMA Style

Jaén RI, Sánchez-García S, Fernández-Velasco M, Cuadrado I, de las Heras B, Boscá L, Prieto P. New Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Pro-Resolving Lipids and miRNAs. Cells. 2025; 14(23):1916. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14231916

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jaén, Rafael I., Sergio Sánchez-García, María Fernández-Velasco, Irene Cuadrado, Beatriz de las Heras, Lisardo Boscá, and Patricia Prieto. 2025. "New Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Pro-Resolving Lipids and miRNAs" Cells 14, no. 23: 1916. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14231916

APA Style

Jaén, R. I., Sánchez-García, S., Fernández-Velasco, M., Cuadrado, I., de las Heras, B., Boscá, L., & Prieto, P. (2025). New Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Pro-Resolving Lipids and miRNAs. Cells, 14(23), 1916. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14231916

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop