Next Article in Journal
Pig Liver Esterase Hydrolysis of 2-Arachidonoglycerol Exacerbates PRRSV-Induced Inflammation via PI3K-Akt-NF-κB Pathway
Previous Article in Journal
From COPD to Smoke-Related Arteriopathy: The Mechanical and Immune–Inflammatory Landscape Underlying Lung Cancer Distant Spreading—A Narrative Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Better Understanding of Atrial-like and Ventricular-like Action Potentials in Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes: The Underestimated Role of the L-Type Ca2+ Current

by
Arie O. Verkerk
1,2,†,
Christiaan C. Veerman
2,
Maaike Hoekstra
2,
Harsha D. Devalla
1,† and
Ronald Wilders
1,*
1
Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2
Department of Experimental Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cells 2025, 14(16), 1226; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14161226
Submission received: 30 June 2025 / Revised: 1 August 2025 / Accepted: 6 August 2025 / Published: 8 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Cells of the Cardiovascular System)

Abstract

Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CMs) tend to show a mixed population of action potential (AP) types, including atrial-like (A-like) and ventricular-like (V-like) APs. In the present study, we investigated the membrane currents underlying these two AP types in hESC-CMs. These were generated using standard (Std) and retinoic acid (RA)-based differentiation protocols. Patch clamp methodology was used to correlate AP morphology with major cardiac ion currents by applying alternating current and voltage clamp protocols to each cell, and to measure L-type Ca2+ current (ICa,L) and Na+-Ca2+ exchange current (INCX) in detail, whereas Ca2+ transients were measured ratiometrically using Indo-1. A- and V-like APs were found in both Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs and the AP plateau amplitude (APplat), as a measure of fast phase-1 repolarization, appeared the best AP criterion to separate these two AP types. Traditional voltage clamp experiments revealed a significantly smaller ICa,L density in RA-treated hESC-CMs, as well as larger densities of the transient outward and delayed rectifier K+ currents (Ito1 and IK, respectively), without changes in the inward rectifier K+ current (IK1). The APplat showed strong and moderate correlations with the densities of ICa,L and IK, respectively, in the absence of a clear-cut correlation with the density of Ito1. Using pre-recorded, typical A- and V-like APs, AP clamp demonstrated that the ICa,L-mediated Ca2+ influx during the V-like AP in Std hESC-CMs is 3.15 times larger than the influx during the A-like AP in RA-treated hESC-CMs. Ca2+ transients of A-like hESC-CMs have a lower diastolic and systolic level, as well as a lower amplitude, than those of Std hESC-CMs, while their duration is shorter due to enhanced SERCA activity. In conclusion, ICa,L is an important determinant of the differently shaped A- and V-like APs in hESC-CMs. Furthermore, the Ca2+ homeostasis differs between A- and V-like hESC-CMs due to the smaller ICa,L and enhanced SERCA activity during A-like APs, resulting in a strongly reduced Ca2+ influx, which will cause a substantial reduction in INCX, further contributing to the shorter A-like APs.

1. Introduction

Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CMs) and human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) have become one of the most popular model systems for cardiovascular research over the last decade [1,2,3,4,5]. This reflects the difficulty of obtaining freshly isolated human cardiomyocytes, in combination with a high degree of species dependence of cardiac electrophysiology, including action potential (AP) duration (APD) and shape, that limits the applicability of animal models [6,7]. Further advantages of hESC-CMs and hiPSC-CMs, in addition to their relative ease of availability, is that they can be generated from patient tissue and that they can be genetically modified, making them extremely useful for studying genes and transcription factors underlying arrhythmias [8] and cardiomyopathies [9,10] as well as development [11]. Also, acute and long-term drug studies are relatively easy to perform due to the ability to keep hESC-CMs and hiPSC-CMs in prolonged culture [12]. Finally, (dys)function can be studied not only with very precise methods, but also with rapid screening and relatively easy to perform techniques [13,14,15,16,17,18], enabling personalized disease modeling and drug testing. On the other hand, the wide variability in experimental approaches thus far—including variability across stem cell lines and differentiation protocols—among studies of stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes has led to limited reproducibility and uncertainty in the interpretation of the obtained data [19,20,21].
Huge efforts have been invested in the development of methods for reprogramming, cell differentiation, and generation of engineered heart tissue systems [22,23,24]. However, standard (Std) differentiation protocols, i.e., protocols not specifically designed to push cells toward an atrial or nodal phenotype, tend to result in heterogeneous populations of hiPSC-CMs and hESC-CMs (Table 1) that are typically categorized as nodal-like (N-like), atrial-like (A-like), or ventricular-like (V-like), while Streckfuss-Bömeke et al. [25] also described Purkinje-like (P-like) hiPSC-CMs. Many studies, but not all, categorized the hiPSC-CMs or hESC-CMs of interest into AP shapes according to specific and well-defined AP criteria, as explained in detail below and summarized in Table 1.
Table 1 clearly shows that the AP criteria used to define hiPSC-CMs and hESC-CMs as N-like, A-like, or V-like vary widely between studies, with little standardization to date. A number of studies used the absolute APD and longer APDs at 30, 50, or 90% of repolarization (APD30, APD50, and APD90, respectively) to define APs as V-like. Jara-Avaca et al. [36] also included the ratio of APD90 to APD50 (APD90/50), which was used as a measure for a triangular AP shape, and defined APs with a APD90/50 < 1.4 as V-like. Apart from the absolute APD values, Bett et al. [37] and Kim et al. [38] also included a measure of triangulation, but used the ratio of APD30 to APD90 (APD30/90). Many other studies have used a measure of triangulation as the sole parameter to distinguish between A- and V-like APs. This measure was either one of the already mentioned ratios or the one introduced by Ma et al. [44], who measured the time difference between APD30 and APD40 (APD30–40) and the time difference between APD70 and APD80 (APD70–80), and categorized APs of hiPSC-CMs differentiated with a Std protocol into V-like and A-like with an APD30–40/APD70–80 ratio > 1.5 and <1.5, respectively.
Although the aforementioned quantitative AP criteria for distinguishing between different AP shapes of hiPSC-CMs and hESC-CMs may be correct at least to some extent, there is quite some debate about their usefulness because of the numerous factors that affect AP parameters [50,51,52,53,54]. To start, the absolute APD value used to separate into A- and V-like cells is highly sensitive to experimental settings, such as cell line, culture media, and differentiation method [55,56,57]. Recording conditions, including temperature and the amount of EGTA, if any, in the recording pipette also have a huge impact on APD. Furthermore, APD analysis is very sensitive to the acquired AP amplitude and the associated peak membrane potential [58], so that the APD, and in particular the APD20, in cells with a reduced APA will be analyzed in a different voltage range than in cells with a high APA and thus is a measure of the activity of a different set of ion currents [59,60]. Therefore, we introduced an AP parameter that is independent of APDs, i.e., the voltage amplitude of the AP plateau (APplat) phase at 20 ms after the AP upstroke, to distinguish between A-like and V-like APs of hESC-CMs and hiPSC-CMs [49,61,62]. This APplat is a measure of repolarization during the early AP phase, and using a retinoic acid (RA)-based differentiation protocol we pushed hESC-CMs toward a more transcriptional and electrophysiological atrial phenotype with enhanced expression of KCNA5 and its associated ultrarapid delayed rectifier K+ current (IKur) [49], and defined APs with an APplat < 80 mV as A-like, while those with an APplat > 80 mV as V-like. The hESC-CMs with an A-like AP were sensitive to various atrial-specific drugs [49], with for example an increased APplat upon IKur blockade, and the low APplat agrees with that of freshly isolated human atrial cardiomyocytes [60,63].
Table 1 (rightmost column) also summarizes the percentage of each of the three commonly described cell subtypes (i.e., N-like, A-like, and V-like) obtained with the specific criteria used in each of the studies referred to (including the limitations of these specific criteria, as set out above), demonstrating that these percentages vary widely between studies. Factors that may contribute to the relative abundance of a particular AP shape may include the cell line used, the differentiation protocol, and likely also the degree of maturation, although the latter gives conflicting results. Zhang et al. [47] reported an increased percentage of cells displaying V-like APs between 2 and 4 weeks. However, this is in contrast to the findings of Sheng et al. [64], who found that the percentage of hiPSC-CMs with V-like APs decreased from 79% (day 20) to 49% (day 60), while Seibertz et al. [65] reported unchanged proportions of cardiac subtypes throughout hiPSC-CM culture. Sheng et al. [64] found that the relative abundance of AP shapes in hESC-CMs was also almost unchanged between day 20 and day 60. Interestingly, hiPSC-CMs at day 60 displayed three major shapes of APs with only a slight excess of V-like as compared to A-like AP shapes (V-like 49%, A-like 39%, N-like 12%), in contrast to hESC-CMs at day 60, where the majority of cells revealed V-like APs (V-like 80%, A-like 18%, N-like 2%).
Studies of cardiac cell subtype-related diseases, heart chamber-specific drugs, and development require pure populations of a desired cell type [66] and/or detailed phenotyping of N-, A-, and V-like hiPSC-CMs [67]. However, how a specific N-, A-, or V-like AP morphology is linked to major ion current densities has been studied only to a limited extent. In general, voltage clamp experiments are performed in mixed cell-type populations and without recording of APs to identify whether a cardiomyocyte is N-, A-, or V-like [44]. Only Lieu et al. [68] defined A- or V-like hiPSC-CMs based on AP measurements and subsequently performed voltage clamp experiments to determine differences in hyperpolarization-activated current (If), L-type Ca2+ current (ICa,L), and rapid delayed rectifier K+ current (IKr). A-like hiPSC-CMs had a smaller depolarizing inward ICa,L, but also a smaller repolarizing outward IKr, complicating a direct explanation for the A-like APs.
The contribution of a particular subtype to the obtained cell population can be increased by specific differentiation protocols, as shown in Table 1. This has provided crucial data on electrophysiology and intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis for hESC-CMs and/or hiPSC-CMs generated with Std [44] and more specific differentiation protocols for N-like [69,70,71,72,73] and A-like [45,49,74,75,76,77] hESC-CMs and hiPSC-CMs, but there are still mixed populations of cell types (see Table 1), which hampers detailed phenotyping [74]. For example, Altomare et al. [39] recently tested the effects of 50 µmol/L 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) to block IKur of hiPSC-CMs with A-like and V-like APs that were categorized as such based on their APD20/90 ratio (Table 1). Approximately 20% of the A-like APs were insensitive to 4-AP, thus indicating the absence of the atrial-specific IKur in these cells. Conversely, V-like APs did not respond to 4-AP in around 80% of the cells, while in around 20% an AP prolongation was found. This indicates that even those hiPSC-CMs categorized as A-like or V-like do not necessarily have an ionic phenotype that belongs to the subtype based on AP shape.
In the present study, we focused on hESC-CMs, carrying out an in-depth characterization of their A- and V-like APs in relation to the underlying individual ion currents. Therefore, we followed the approach of Lieu et al. [68] and correlated cardiac phenotype based on AP morphology and major cardiac ion currents by applying both current clamp and voltage clamp protocols to each cell. Thus, we first measured APs of a cell and then carried out voltage clamp experiments on the same cell. We found a strong relationship between ICa,L and APplat, and in subsequent experiments, we studied ICa,L, the Na+-Ca2+ exchange (NCX) current (INCX), and Ca2+ transients of Std and RA-differentiated hESC-CMs in more detail. The AP-clamp technique was further used to specify the role of the AP shape in Ca2+ influx through ICa,L. We used a Std differentiation protocol as well as an RA-based differentiation protocol [78] to increase the amount of A-like APs in the hESC-CMs [49].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. hESC Maintenance, Differentiation, and Dissociation

2.1.1. hESC Maintenance and Differentiation to Cardiomyocytes

No animal experiments have been performed in the present study. hESC-CMs were generated as described previously in detail [49]. In short, undifferentiated colonies of NKX2-5eGFP/w hESCs [79], with Cellosaurus ID HES-3 NKX2.5eGFP/w (CVCL_A8JS) [80], were maintained on irradiated mouse embryonic fibroblasts and differentiation (here defined as Std differentiation) to cardiomyocytes was performed using a Spin-Embryoid Body (Spin-EB) protocol [49]. Therefore, hESCs were harvested and resuspended on day 0 in BPEL (Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) Polyvinylalcohol Essential Lipids) medium [81] supplemented with 20–30 ng/mL hActivin-A (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), 20–30 ng/mL bone morphogenetic protein 4 (R&D Systems), 40 ng/mL stem cell factor (STEMCELL Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada), 30 ng/mL vascular endothelial growth factor (R&D Systems) and 1.5 μmol/L CHIR 99021 (Axon Medchem, Groningen, The Netherlands). EBs were refreshed on day 3 with BPEL and then transferred to gelatin-coated dishes on day 7. To increase the number of hESC-CMs with an atrial-like identity [49], 1 μmol/L all-trans-retinoic acid (RA) (Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA) was added from day 4 to 7 of differentiation. Following plating at day 7, BPEL was refreshed every 3–4 days.

2.1.2. Single Cell Preparation

Spin-EBs resulting from Std and RA-treated differentiations were dissociated at day 14 to obtain single cells using TrypLE (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Single cells were plated on gelatin-coated coverslips and electrophysiological measurements were performed after 7–10 days. Coverslips containing the cells were put into a temperature-controlled (36 ± 0.1 °C) recording chamber [82] mounted on the stage of an inverted microscope (Nikon Diaphot, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), and superfused with modified Tyrode’s solution containing (in mmol/L): NaCl 140, KCl 5.4, CaCl2 1.8, MgCl2 1.0, glucose 5.5, HEPES 5.0; pH 7.4 (NaOH). We selected single GFP+ myocytes that were spontaneously beating or that were intrinsically quiescent but able to contract upon field stimulation [83].

2.2. Patch Clamp Experiments

2.2.1. Data Acquisition

APs and membrane currents were recorded using an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Voltage control and data acquisition were realized with custom software (‘Scope’, version 04.04.27). Data analysis was also performed with custom software (‘MacDaq’, version 8.0). Signals were low-pass filtered with a cut-off frequency of 5 kHz and digitized at 5 kHz for spontaneous APs, 40 kHz for stimulated APs, 4 kHz for net membrane currents, 10 kHz for ICa,L, and 1 kHz for INCX. Cell membrane capacitance (Cm, in pF) was estimated as described in detail elsewhere [84]. Patch pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass (Harvard Apparatus, Waterbeach, UK) using a custom vertical microelectrode puller and had a resistance of 2–3 MΩ after filling with the pipette solutions as indicated below. All potentials were corrected for the estimated liquid junction potential [85]. Cm and series resistance were compensated for at least 80% for ICa,L and INCX, and for ≈60% for net membrane currents. For all cell types and experiments, data were collected from at least 3 independent differentiations.

2.2.2. Action Potentials

APs were measured by the amphotericin-perforated patch clamp methodology. The external bath solution was modified Tyrode’s solution; pipettes were filled with a solution containing (in mmol/L): K-gluconate 125, KCl 20, NaCl 5, amphotericin-B 0.44, HEPES 10, pH 7.2 (KOH). We recorded spontaneous APs or APs elicited at 1 Hz by 3-ms, 1.2–1.4× threshold current pulses through the patch pipette in quiescent cells (see Section 3.1.1 below). We analyzed cycle length, maximum diastolic potential (MDP), AP amplitude (APA), AP plateau amplitude at 20 ms after the AP upstroke (APplat), and AP duration at 20, 50, and 90% repolarization (APD20, APD50, and APD90, respectively). Parameters from 10 consecutive APs were averaged.

2.2.3. Membrane Currents

Net membrane currents were measured by the amphotericin-perforated patch clamp technique, and the pipette and bath solutions were as described in Section 2.2.2. The inward rectifier K+ current (IK1), the delayed rectifier K+ current (IK), and ICa,L were examined by 500-ms voltage clamp steps every 2 s to membrane potentials ranging from −100 to +50 mV. The holding potential was set at −50 mV to inactivate the Na+ current (INa) and the transient outward K+ current (Ito1). ICa,L was analyzed as the current difference between the peak and quasi-steady-state current at the end of the voltage clamp step. IK1 and IK were defined as the quasi-steady-state current at the end of the voltage clamp steps at potentials negative or positive to −50 mV, respectively. Ito1 was examined by 1 s voltage clamp steps every 10 s from a holding potential of −80 mV to membrane potentials ranging from −80 to +40 mV. The voltage dependence of inactivation was determined by a two-step voltage clamp protocol from a holding potential of −80 mV. The first, 1 s, step was to potentials ranging from −80 to +40 mV. The second, 500 ms, step was to +40 mV. Ito1 was measured in the presence of 0.25 mmol/L CdCl2, which blocks ICa,L [86] and strongly inhibits INa [87]. Suppression of these inward currents allows a more accurate determination of Ito1. Each of these voltage clamp protocols are shown graphically in Section 3.1.2 near the associated membrane current recordings.
Detailed ICa,L and INCX measurements were performed by the ruptured patch clamp methodology with strongly modified pipette and bath solutions and specific protocols. ICa,L was measured with a two-pulse square-step voltage clamp protocol with a cycle length of 2 s. The bath solution contained (in mmol/L): TEA-Cl 145, CsCl 5.4, CaCl2 1.8, MgCl2 1.0, HEPES 5.0, pH 7.4 (NMDG-OH). Pipettes were filled with a solution containing (in mmol/L): CsCl 145, HEPES 10, EGTA 10, K2ATP 5, pH 7.2 (NMDG-OH). ICa,L was defined as the difference between the peak current and the steady-state current. In a subset of cells, ICa,L was measured during AP clamp measurements as nifedipine-sensitive current. Therefore, we used a voltage clamp protocol constructed from pre-recorded APs of a typical Std and a typical RA-treated hESC-CM and washed in 5 µmol/L nifedipine, which completely blocks ICa,L in stem cells [88]. INCX was measured as 10 mmol/L NiCl2-sensitive current during a descending voltage ramp protocol [89]. The pipette solution contained (mmol/L): CsCl 145, NaCl 5, Mg-ATP 10, TEA 10, HEPES 10, EGTA 20, CaCl2 10 (calculated free Ca2+: 150 nmol/L); pH 7.2 (NMDG-OH). To suppress membrane currents other than INCX, the following blockers were added to a K+-free Tyrode’s solution (in mmol/L): BaCl2 1, CsCl 2, nifedipine 0.005, ouabain 0.1, DIDS 0.2 [90]. Each of these voltage clamp protocols are shown graphically in Section 3.2 near the associated membrane current recordings.
Current densities were calculated by dividing current amplitudes by Cm. Steady-state activation and inactivation curves were fitted using a Boltzmann equation:
I/Imax = A/{1.0 + exp[(V1/2 − V)/k]},
in which V1/2 is the half-maximum (in)activation potential and k is the slope factor. The decay of ICaL was fitted with the double exponential equation:
I/Imax = Af × exp(−t/τf) + As × exp(−t/τs),
where Af and As are the fractional amplitudes, and τf and τs the time constants of the fast and slow components, respectively.

2.3. Intracellular Ca2+ Measurements

Single cells were prepared for Ca2+ measurements as described in Section 2.1, with the exception that we used 2.4 mmol CaCl2 in the modified Tyrode’s solution (37 °C). Intracellular Ca2+ transients were measured at 1 Hz, using the fluorescent probe Indo-1, as previously described in detail [91]. In short, the intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) was calculated using the formula:
[Ca2+]i = β × Kd × (R − Rmin)/(Rmax − R),
where β is the ratio of maximum to minimum I505 (2.2) and Kd is the dissociation constant for Indo-1 AM, which is 250 nmol/L at 37 °C (data sheet for Indo-1 AM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Rmin and Rmax are the ratios at minimum and maximum [Ca2+]i, respectively. Rmax was determined by blocking the Na+/K+ exchanger with gramicidin (2 μmol/L, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), which rapidly causes [Ca2+]i overload. Rmin was analyzed in Ca2+-free modified Tyrode’s solution. In our hESC-CMs, Rmin was 1.4 ± 0.09 (mean ± SEM, n = 12), and Rmax was 5.1 ± 0.19 (n = 11).
We analyzed diastolic and systolic [Ca2+]i concentrations, [Ca2+]i transient amplitudes, and the time constant (τ) of the [Ca2+]i transient decay. The decay rates of both systolic and caffeine-induced [Ca2+]i transients were obtained by fitting single exponential functions to the decay phase of the transients. The amplitude of [Ca2+]i transients evoked by application of 10 mmol/L caffeine and 10 mmol/L NiCl2 was taken as a measure of sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ content [92]. The various mechanisms involved in Ca2+ extrusion from the cytoplasm were studied as we previously described in detail [91]. In short, the SR-dependent rate of Ca2+ uptake (SERCA activity; KSERCA) was calculated by subtracting the decay rate constant of the caffeine (10 mmol/L)-evoked Ca2+ transient (Kcaff) from the systolic Ca2+ transient decay rate constant (Ksys). The contribution of NCX to Ca2+ removal from the cytoplasm was derived by subtracting the decay of the caffeine-induced Ca2+ transient (Kcaff) from the decay of the caffeine-induced Ca2+ transient in the presence of 10 mmol/L NiCl2 (KCaff+Ni) to block the NCX. The decay rate constants of the caffeine-induced Ca2+ transients in the presence of 10 mmol/L NiCl2 were used to assess the activity of the slow mechanisms (mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake and sarcolemmal Ca-ATPase) during [Ca2+]i decay.

2.4. Statistics

Data are presented as mean ± SEM or box plots (with median and interquartile range). Statistical analysis was carried out with SigmaStat 3.5 (Systat Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA). Normality and equal variance assumptions were tested with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Levene median tests, respectively. Two groups were compared using the unpaired t-test or, if normality and/or equal variance tests failed, the Mann–Whitney rank-sum test. Three or more groups were compared by two-way ANOVA or two-way repeated measures (RM) ANOVA, followed by the Students–Newman–Keuls post hoc test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Action Potential Waveforms Explained by Ionic Currents

In the present section, we want to explain the existence of different AP morphologies of hESC-CMs by membrane current differences. To relate AP morphologies to individual membrane currents, we performed both current clamp and voltage clamp experiments on the same group of cells. We first measured APs (using current clamp) in a large group of cells, as described below in Section 3.1.1, and then performed voltage clamp experiments on a subset of these cells to characterize their major cardiac ion currents, as described below in Section 3.1.2. To obtain hESC-CMs, we used a Std differentiation protocol as well as an RA-based differentiation protocol to increase the amount of A-like APs [49]. The membrane current densities were plotted against the APplat, which provides full insight into how the differences in AP shape are related to these currents (see Section 3.1.3).

3.1.1. AP Parameters in Std and RA-Treated hESC-CM Populations

In a population of stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes, including hESC-CMs, a number of cells typically show spontaneous beating, while others are quiescent. We recorded APs from spontaneously beating hESC-CMs as well as from intrinsically quiescent hESC-CMs that were able to contract upon field stimulation. In the latter cells, APs were elicited at 1 Hz by current pulses through the patch pipette. Table 2 summarizes the average AP parameters of both the spontaneous and the stimulated hESC-CMs from Std and RA-based differentiations.
RA-treated hESC-CMs have a higher spontaneous firing rate than Std hESC-CMs, as indicated by their shorter cycle length. In addition, RA-treated hESC-CMs have shorter APD20 and APD50 in both spontaneous and stimulated APs, while their APD90 is only shorter during spontaneous activity (p = 0.72 in case of the stimulated APs). Furthermore, the APA and the APplat are significantly lower in RA-treated hESC-CMs in both spontaneous and stimulated APs. There are also clear differences between the spontaneous and the stimulated APs. Importantly, the MDP is more hyperpolarized in the stimulated cells in both Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs. However, the APA did not appear to be significantly increased (p = 0.14 (Std); p = 0.51 (RA-treated)). As a result of the more hyperpolarized MDP, the observed maximum AP upstroke velocity (dV/dtmax) is substantially higher in the stimulated cells, due to a higher availability of Na+ channels at more negative membrane potentials [84,93]. The experimental data may suggest that the dV/dtmax of the intrinsically quiescent hESC-CMs is higher in Std than in RA-treated ones, but this increase did not reach the level of significance (p = 0.14). In addition, the APD values appear to be lower in the stimulated cells, which is most evident for the Std hESC-CMs.
While these AP differences between Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs are consistent with many studies that have used RA to increase the number of cells with an atrial fate [31,34,45,48,61,62,72,74,75,76,77,94,95,96,97,98,99], there is a substantial heterogeneity in AP shape in both the Std and RA-treated hESC-CM populations, as illustrated in Figure 1A with stimulated APs. Of note, we restricted Figure 1 to the intrinsically quiescent cells stimulated at 1 Hz to rule out the possibility that the observed differences in AP parameters between the Std and the RA-treated cells are due to their differences in cycle length. To explore this heterogeneity in more detail, we generated dot plots of both the APD90/50 ratio and the APplat of the stimulated cells, as shown in Figure 1B,C, respectively. Both dot plots highlight the heterogeneity, but the APplat seems to be a sharper discriminating factor to separate V- and A-like APs, especially in the RA-treated group. Using an APD90/50 < 2, the APD90/50 ratio defined 83% of the Std cells (n = 36) as V-like (Figure 1B, dashed line). According to this ratio, 35% of the RA-treated hESC-CMs (n = 37) would be defined as V-like (Figure 1B, right). Using the APplat with a cut-off value of 80 mV (Figure 1C, dashed line) [49], 81% of the Std cells would have V-like APs (Figure 1C, left). These are exactly the same cells as found using the discriminating APD90/50 < 2, except for one cell that was V-like with the APD90/50 < 2 but did not have an APplat > 80 mV. However, using the APplat with a cut-off value of 80 mV, just 8% of the RA-treated cells would be defined as V-like (Figure 1C, right), which is thus substantially lower than the 35% obtained using the APD90/50 approach.
We next determined the linear correlation between the APplat and each of the other repolarization-related AP parameters, i.e., APA, APD20, APD50, and APD90 (Table 2). Figure 1E,F, shows that APplat is strongly correlated with both APD20 and APD50 (as indicated by their high R2). This is consistent with the idea that APplat is a strong parameter for the repolarization rate of the early AP phase, which is substantially larger in stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes with an atrial fate [100]. The correlation of APplat with APA is also strong (Figure 1D), but its correlation with APD90 is only moderate (Figure 1G).

3.1.2. Net Membrane Currents in Std and RA-Treated hESC-CM Populations

In a subset of 13 Std and 14 RA-treated intrinsically quiescent hESC-CMs, the AP measurements were followed by voltage clamp experiments to examine net membrane currents. First, we measured the net currents in response to 500 ms hyperpolarizing and depolarizing voltage steps from a holding potential of −50 mV (Figure 2A, inset). Figure 2A shows typical membrane current recordings in response to voltage clamp steps to −100, 0, and 50 mV in a Std and in an RA-treated hESC-CM. The step to 0 mV activates an inwardly directed current, which we defined as ICa,L and which was significantly smaller in RA-treated hESC-CMs (Figure 2B). We defined the quasi-steady-state current during hyperpolarizing voltage steps as IK1, and its current density did not differ between Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs (Figure 2C). The quasi-steady-state current reverses at −68.0 ± 1.6 and −67.9 ± 2.1 mV (p = 0.96; t-test) for Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs, respectively, which is consistent with their MDP values (−70.1 ± 1.5 (Std) and −70.4 ± 1.4 (RA) mV; p = 0.86; t-test) and the strong relationship between the IK1 reversal potential and MDP [101]. The steady-state currents during the depolarizing steps are a mixture of several currents, including at least IKr, the slow delayed rectifier K+ current (IKs), and IKur. The total current amplitude was significantly larger in RA-treated hESC-CMs (Figure 2C), likely due to the larger IKur in these cells [49]. We have now re-analyzed the experimental data from the same type of hESC-CMs that we had obtained in the study of Devalla et al. [49], and it has become evident that blockade of IKur with 50 μmol/L 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) abolished the initial differences in IK (Figure 2D). These data, supported by the fact that IKr is not significantly different between Std and RA-treated hiPSC-CMs [34,68], demonstrate that IKur is responsible for the larger net steady-state currents during the depolarizing steps from a holding potential of −50 mV.
The membrane current measurements from a holding potential of −50 mV were followed by measurements with a holding potential of −80 mV (Figure 2E, inset) in the presence of CdCl2 to determine the transient outward K+ current, Ito1 (see Section 2.2.3). Typical Ito1 recordings upon depolarizing steps to +40 mV are shown in Figure 2E. The magnitude of Ito1 differs between Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs, with a larger density in RA-treated hESC-CMs (Figure 2F). Neither the voltage dependence of activation (Figure 2G) nor the voltage dependence of inactivation (Figure 2H) differs between Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs (p = 0.78 (activation), p = 0.99 (inactivation); two-way RM ANOVA). Thus, the RA-treated hESC-CMs have larger repolarizing steady-state and transient K+ currents at positive potentials, while their depolarizing ICa,L is smaller, which well explains their faster repolarization and shorter APDs.

3.1.3. AP Waveforms Related to Individual Membrane Currents

Next, we related the individual membrane currents to the AP shape for each cell to discover the reason for the AP heterogeneity in the Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs. First, we plotted the measured APplat and IK, Ito1, and ICa,L densities for all 27 cells in one figure (Figure 3A) for an unbiased presentation of the available data. It is immediately apparent from Figure 3A that there is a large scatter of values, consistent with the heterogeneity found in APs, but it is difficult to resolve correlations between APplat and individual membrane currents. Therefore, we next plotted each of the IK, Ito1, and ICa,L densities against APplat (Figure 3B–D). The linear correlation fits demonstrate a moderate correlation between APplat and IK (Figure 3B) and a strong correlation between APplat and ICa,L (Figure 3D), in the absence of a clear-cut correlation between APplat and Ito1 (Figure 3C). This is somewhat surprising because several studies have concluded that both Ito1 and IK, and especially IKur, are important determinants of the plateau amplitude in stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (see Section 4).

3.2. Influx and Efflux of Ca2+ Contribute to Differences in AP Shape

In Section 3.1, we demonstrated that ICa,L, measured as the net inward current, is significantly lower in RA-treated hESC-CMs than in Std hESC-CMs, and that this current has the strongest relationship with the APplat, and thus with an A-like AP shape. The measurements in Section 3.1 allow a direct correlation between the AP shape and individual ionic current densities in a cell, but it may be that the net inward current, which is largely carried by ICa,L during the AP plateau, is influenced by a number of outward currents that may be active at the same time during the AP and are substantially larger in RA-treated hESC-CMs (Figure 2). Therefore, we next determined the ICa,L characteristics in more detail in a separate set of experiments, using modified solutions and standard square-step voltage clamp protocols, as presented in Section 3.2.1. Because the AP shape also strongly determines the behavior of ICa,L [102,103,104], these square-step measurements were followed by AP clamp measurements using pre-recorded typical V- and A-like AP shapes (see Section 3.2.2). While ICa,L is important for Ca2+ influx, the Na+-Ca2+ exchanger is important for Ca2+ efflux [105]. Therefore, we also tested whether the current generated by the Na+-Ca2+ exchanger (INCX) was different between Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs (see Section 3.2.3).

3.2.1. ICa,L Determined by Square-Step Voltage Clamp Protocols

Figure 4A shows typical ICa,L traces in response to a depolarizing step from −60 to 0 mV in a Std and in an RA-treated hESC-CM. Mean I–V relationships are shown in Figure 4B and demonstrate that ICa,L density is significantly larger in Std compared to RA-treated hESC-CMs. For example at 0 mV, the average ICa,L was −36.2 ± 5.0 and −21.8 ± 3.5 pA/pF in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs, respectively, indicating a 67% larger ICa,L density in Std hESC-CMs. The rate of ICa,L inactivation is similar in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs at 0 mV, since their τf, τs, and relative amplitude of the fast and slow components of the current inactivation are not significantly different (Figure 4C; p = 0.63, 0.93, and 0.89 (t-test) for τf, τs, and relative amplitude, respectively). The voltage dependence of ICa,L activation and inactivation are shown in Figure 4D. Neither the voltage dependence of activation nor that of inactivation differs between Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs, as indicated by the virtually overlapping I–V relationships (p = 0.90 (activation), p = 0.88 (inactivation); two-way RM ANOVA). Typical for ICa,L, the steady-state inactivation curve rises at membrane potentials positive to 0 mV (Figure 4D), due to voltage and Ca2+-dependent facilitation [106]. However, this process was not significantly different between the Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs.

3.2.2. ICa,L Determined by AP Clamp Protocols

In general, standard square-step voltage clamp protocols are useful to determine bio-physical parameters in detail, but the functional effects of a membrane current are also importantly determined by the AP shape, as shown for example for ICa,L by Yuan et al. [102]. To assess the effect of AP shape on the total ICa,L-mediated Ca2+ influx we digitized a typical V-like AP from a Std hESC-CM and a typical A-like AP from an RA-treated hESC-CM and combined them within the same AP clamp protocol trace (Figure 4E, top panel). Both Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs were exposed to the two repeating AP shapes and ICa,L was measured as the nifedipine-sensitive current. Typical recordings of ICa,L are shown in Figure 4E, bottom panel. During the plateau of the V-like AP, there is still a considerable activity of ICa,L. Consequently, the electrical charge carried by Ca2+ ions entering the cell during a V-like AP is significantly larger than during an A-like AP in both Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs (Figure 4F). In addition, the electrical charge carried by Ca2+ ions entering the cell during both A- and V-like APs is significantly higher in Std hESC-CMs, likely due to the larger ICa,L densities in this cell type. Interestingly, the electrical charge through L-type Ca2+ channels is 215% larger (p < 0.05; two-way ANOVA) during a V-like AP cycle in Std hESC-CMs (265 ± 31 pQ/pF; Figure 4F, right set of closed symbols) than during an A-like AP cycle in RA-treated hESC-CMs (84 ± 10 pQ/pF; Figure 4F, left set of open symbols). Thus, our AP clamp experiments demonstrate that the difference in Ca2+ influx through ICa,L between V- and A-like APs is much more pronounced than analyzed from conventional square-step voltage clamp measurements, which revealed a 67% larger ICa,L density in Std hESC-CMs compared to RA-treated hESC-CMs (see Section 3.2.1).

3.2.3. INCX Densities in Std and RA-Treated hESC-CMs

The influx of Ca2+ through ICa,L must be extruded by the Na+-Ca2+ exchanger [105]. Therefore, we next measured the density of the Na+-Ca2+ exchange current (INCX) in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs using a pipette solution with a free Ca2+ concentration buffered at 150 nmol/L and a bath solution containing nifedipine to block ICa,L. Thus, the recorded INCX is a measure of current density that is independent of the differences in Ca2+ influx through ICa,L between Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs, as determined in Section 3.2.2. Figure 5A shows typical membrane current recordings measured under baseline conditions and in the presence of NiCl2 during a descending ramp (inset). INCX was defined as the NiCl2-sensitive current. The INCX density did not differ significantly between Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs (p = 0.27; two-way RM ANOVA; Figure 5B).

3.3. Ca2+ Transients Reflect Ionic Current Differences During A- and V-like AP Shapes

The above experiments demonstrate substantial differences in Ca2+ influx between Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs, which may have a major impact on the homeostasis of the intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i). In a final series of experiments, we compared the [Ca2+]i handling between Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs paced at 1 Hz. Figure 6A shows typical [Ca2+]i transients from a Std and an RA-treated hESC-CM. Both systolic and diastolic [Ca2+]i are lower in the RA-treated hESC-CM, as reflected in the average data in Figure 6B (left). The average [Ca2+]i transient amplitude is also significantly smaller in RA-treated hESC-CMs (Figure 6B, left). The initial rise of the [Ca2+]i transient is overlapping in the typical examples of Figure 6A, as reflected by the time it takes to reach a 100 nmol/L rise in [Ca2+]i. On average, the 100 nmol/L rise in [Ca2+]i is reached after 16.1 ± 3.2 and 18.1 ± 4.8 ms in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs, respectively (p = 0.37; Mann–Whitney rank-sum test). In contrast, the decay of the [Ca2+]i transient is significantly faster in the RA-treated hESC-CMs, as reflected by the lower decay time constant obtained from mono-exponential fits to the decay phase of the [Ca2+]i transients (Figure 6B, right).
The mechanisms underlying the faster decay of the [Ca2+]i transient were further assessed by measurements of the activity of the three main cytoplasmic Ca2+ removal pathways [105,107,108]: (1) reuptake of Ca2+ into the SR by SERCA, (2) Ca2+ efflux through the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, and (3) the slow Ca2+ uptake systems (mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter and sarcolemmal Ca2+ ATPase). The SERCA activity (KSERCA) was analyzed by comparing the rates of decay of the 1 Hz triggered [Ca2+]i transient and the caffeine-induced [Ca2+]i transient (Kcaff) of the same cell (Figure 6C). Similarly, the NCX activity (KNCX) was obtained by subtracting Kcaff from that of the caffeine-induced [Ca2+]i transient in the presence of 10 mmol/L NiCl2 (Krest) (Figure 6C). KSERCA is significantly higher in RA-treated hESC-CMs than in Std hESC-CMs, with no significant difference in KNCX or Krest (Figure 6D, top left; p = 0.79 (KNCX) and p = 0.53 (Krest), Mann–Whitney rank-sum test). The relative contribution of SERCA to the [Ca2+]i transient decay is higher, whereas the relative contribution of NCX is lower, in RA-treated hESC-CMs than in Std hESC-CMs (Figure 6D, bottom). The relative contribution of the mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake together with the sarcolemmal Ca2+-ATPase does not differ between Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs (Figure 6D, bottom, rightmost bars; p = 0.24, t-test). The fraction of Ca2+ that is released from the SR during an AP was assessed using the ratio of the amplitude of the 1 Hz stimulated [Ca2+]i transient to the amplitude of the 10 mmol/L caffeine-induced [Ca2+]i transient as a measure of SR Ca2+ content. This fractional Ca2+ release was not different between Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs (Figure 6E; p = 0.66, t-test). The amplitude of the caffeine-induced [Ca2+]i transient appeared to be smaller in RA-treated hESC-CMs (496 ± 102 (RA-treated) vs. 738 ± 86 (Std) nmol/L), but this difference did not reach the level of significance (p = 0.11, t-test), likely due to the relatively small number of cells.

4. Discussion

4.1. Overview

We found mixed populations of AP shapes in both the Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs. Using APplat as our criterion to separate cells with A-like and V-like APs, we demonstrated that 81% of the Std hESC-CMs but only 8% of the RA-treated hESC-CMs had V-like APs (Figure 1). Voltage clamp measurements revealed that hESC-CMs with A-like APs have a larger IK (due to the atrial-specific IKur) and Ito1, as well as a smaller ICa,L, than hESC-CMs with V-like APs (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). Linear correlation fits of the current densities against the APplat demonstrate a strong correlation of APplat with ICa,L and a moderate correlation with IK, but no clear-cut correlation with Ito1. Thus, apart from IK (through IKur), ICa,L also contributes to the different AP shapes. In addition, we observed substantial differences in [Ca2+]i handling between Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs, in the absence of a difference in INCX density (Figure 5 and Figure 6). The Ca2+ influx during an AP cycle is 3.15 times higher in V-like hESC-CMs than in A-like hESC-CMs. This is not only due to the lower current density of ICa,L in A-like CMs, but also to the differences in the membrane potential course of the A- and V-like APs.

4.2. RA Treatment to Increase the Amount of CMs with an Atrial Fate

We used 1 μmol/L RA to induce differentiation towards atrial CMs, which together with 0.5 μmol/L RA is a common concentration used to generate A-like CMs. These concentrations result in the highest expression of the atrial-specific KCNA5 gene [61,76] and the highest density of its associated membrane current, IKur [99]. In addition, it induces the expression of the atrial-specific KCNJ3 and KCNJ5 genes [49,61,72] and the associated acetylcholine-activated K+ current (IK,ACh) [45,49,74,94,98,109], which is virtually absent in CMs of Std differentiations. Even at this optimal concentration of RA, AP heterogeneity is commonly observed in patch clamp studies using single RA-treated CMs, as shown in Table 1 and our Figure 1. Using sharp electrode measurements, AP heterogeneity may be reduced in multicellular preparations [99], since this represents the average AP morphology of many cells due to electrotonic coupling [110]. AP heterogeneity is also observed in human atria, at least due to regional differences (see Elliott et al. [110] and primary references cited therein), but it remains to be elucidated whether this is due to a mixture of ‘regional’ cells within the atria or simply a cell-to-cell variation in membrane current densities. In any case, our study shows that the APplat of hESC-CMs shows clear correlations with APA and APD20, APD50, and APD90, suggesting that the AP heterogeneity is not due to the presence of purely ventricular or purely atrial CMs. This is further supported by the clear correlations between APplat and some membrane current densities, in particular those of IK and ICa,L.
In the present study, we used two different criteria based on AP shape to distinguish between V- and A-like hESC-CMs, i.e., APD90/50 < 2 and APplat > 80 mV. Both criteria gave the same percentage of V- and A-like cells in the Std hESC-CMs, but differed in their estimation of the percentage of V-like cells in the RA-treated cells (see Section 3.1.1). Using the APD90/50 < 2 criterion, 35% of the RA-treated hESC-CMs would be defined as V-like, while using APplat > 80 mV, only 8% of the RA-treated cells would be defined as V-like. Schwach et al. [61] used a dual atrial NKX2.5eGFP/+-COUP-TFIImCherry/+ reporter stem cell line to identify A-like hESC-CMs following cardiac differentiation and using this line 83.6% of Std hESC-CMs were V-like, while in RA-treated hESC-CMs this was 8.9%. These percentages are very close to what we observed using the APplat with a cut-off of 80 mV. In the current study, transcriptional phenotyping of single cells was not performed. Biendarra-Tiegs et al. [67] performed such experiments but were unable to link subtype-associated gene expression to subtype-specific electrophysiology. This could be related to the APD90/APD50 ratio of 1.4 that they used to separate atrial-like and ventricular-like hiPSC-CMs, but might also be related to the intrinsic heterogeneity between cells, even within subtype-specific cells, as demonstrated in our Figure 1 and Figure 3.
Although the APplat cut-off of 80 mV provided a relatively good distinction between A- and V-like hESC-CMs in the present study (Figure 1C), this cut-off value may require some minor adjustment when using other cell lines, differentiation protocols, RA-treatment, and/or measuring conditions, since average APplat values may differ between studies. For example, APplat values at 1 Hz pacing rate were significantly higher when dynamic clamp was used to provide these cells with a regular IK1 than when measurements were performed without dynamic clamp [75,96], likely due to the more negative MDP in the presence of a regular IK1, resulting in higher APplat values. Therefore, we used a cut-off value of 85 mV in a hiPSC-CMs study in which APs of wild-type and Brugada syndrome patient lines were measured using such dynamic clamp [111]. Additionally, APplat increases upon IKur knock-out [76] and IKur blockade [49,62,112] in RA-treated cells by reducing the repolarization rate. Therefore, we advise researchers to make their own estimate of the APplat cut-off value if the percentage of V- and A-like cells needs to be determined.

4.3. A- and V-like APs Explained by Membrane Current Differences

4.3.1. MDP and IK1

We found that the MDP was similar in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs. This finding is consistent with the results of many studies using Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs and hiPSC-CMs [31,45,48,61,76,95,97,109], but contrasts with the findings of Chapotte-Baldacci et al. [35] in hiPSC-CMs and with findings in native human atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes [113,114,115]. In CMs, IK1 is important for setting the MDP and since it is smaller in native human atrial CMs [116,117], their MDP is less negative compared to native human ventricular CMs. Why hESC-CMs and hiPSC-CMs generated with Std or RA-treatment protocols in general do not show such differences may be due to the small or virtually absent IK1 in hESC-CMs and hiPSC-CMs [84], resulting in depolarized and/or spontaneously active CMs in Std as well as in RA-treated conditions.

4.3.2. dV/dtmax and INa

We found that dV/dtmax was higher in paced hESC-CMs compared to spontaneously active hESC-CMs (Table 2). This is a consistent finding in stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte research and is attributed to the more depolarized state and/or to the less negative take-off potential of the spontaneously active cells, resulting in more pronounced inactivation of Na+ channels (see Verkerk and Wilders [84] and primary references cited therein).
At 1 Hz pacing, dV/dtmax was not significantly different between Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs (Table 2), which is consistent with many other studies [31,34,45,49,61,62,97]. However, it should be noted that several studies have found a higher dV/dtmax in V-like cells [35,95,109], similar to that found in native human atrial and ventricular CMs [114]. For example, Goldfracht et al. [95] reported a dV/dtmax of 11.8 ± 1.7 and 6.8 ± 0.8 V/s in V- and A-like APs of hESC-CMs, respectively, but this difference is likely due to differences in ICa,L rather than in INa, because INa channels will be largely inactivated at their RMP potentials (−60 mV) mentioned [84]. However, in the case of a more negative RMP, such as in the study of Seibertz et al. [109] on hiPSC-CMs, the difference in dV/dtmax might be due to the larger INa in V-like hiPSC-CMs compared to A-like hiPSC-CMs [35,109], although this is not a consistent finding [34]. The less negative V1/2 of inactivation in A-like hiPSC-CMs [35], counteracting the lower current density in these cells, may also explain why many studies do not observe differences in dV/dtmax between A- and V-like APs. Of note, we did not observe such less negative V1/2 of inactivation in the A-like hESC-CMs of the present study (Figure 4D).

4.3.3. AP Repolarization and IKur

The shape of the A- and V-like APs of our hESC-CMs differs widely, with lower APD20, APD50, APD90, and APplat in A-like cells, consistent with many other studies with Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs and hiPSC-CMs (see Section 3.1.1) and native human atrial and ventricular CMs [114,115,118]. Various membrane currents may contribute to these differences, as discussed below.
We found a larger IK density in RA-treated hESC-CMs compared to Std hESC-CMs at positive potentials. As already mentioned in Section 3.1.2 and demonstrated in Figure 2D, this is due to the larger IKur in A-like compared to V-like hESC-CMs and hiPSC-CMs [35,49,62]. Accordingly, we observed a clear correlation between the larger IK and the lower APplat.
Kaplan et al. [119] strongly suggested that IKur is the major determinant of the A-like AP morphology, based on drug and dynamic clamp experiments. They demonstrated that APs of A-like hiPSC-CMs took on a V-like shape when treated with 50 μmol/L 4-AP to block IKur. In addition, they observed that injection of a virtual IKur into V-like hiPSC-CMs, employing the dynamic clamp technique using oocytes expressing a cloned Kv1.5 current, resulted in APs similar to those of A-like hiPSC-CMs. Other studies also indicate that IKur is an important player in the fast phase-1 repolarization phase, but knock-out of KCNA5 or IKur blockade by 4-AP in A-like hiPSC-CMs did not result in completely V-like APs [39,49,62,76,99,120], which is consistent with observations on native human atrial CMs (see Verkerk et al. [63], and primary references cited therein). This indicates that, although IKur plays an important role, differences in membrane currents other than IKur also contribute to the observed differences in AP parameters, in particular APplat, as indeed found in the present study.

4.3.4. AP Repolarization and Ito1 Differences

We found a larger Ito1 in RA-treated hESC-CMs compared to Std ones (Figure 2F). This is consistent with findings of Cordeiro et al. [46], who demonstrated that Ito1 converted V-like APs into A-like APs in silico, to which end they turned the Luo-Rudy phase II guinea pig ventricular cell model [121] into a model of spontaneously active hiPSC-CMs by strongly reducing its IK1 current density. In addition, it is also consistent with the studies by Schulz et al. [99] and Chapotte-Baldacci et al. [35], who found that RA-treatment increased Ito1 in hiPSC-CMs. A larger Ito1 density in A-like hESC-CMs is also in line with native human CM studies, in which Ito1 was found to be larger in freshly isolated atrial CMs than in ventricular CMs [113].
Ito1 modulates the AP plateau and duration importantly [122]. Accordingly, the larger Ito1 may contribute to the faster repolarization and smaller APplat in the RA-treated hESC-CMs. In this light, it is surprising that the correlation between the APplat and Ito1 density in our study is relatively weak and not statistically significant (Figure 3C). This may, however, be due to the relatively depolarized membrane potential of our hESC-CMs, which results in voltage-dependent Ito1 inactivation [96] and slow recovery from Ito1 inactivation [46], both of which reduce the functional availability of this ion current. Therefore, it should not be concluded that the relatively weak correlation between the APplat and Ito1 density demonstrates that Ito1 does not play an important role in AP repolarization.

4.3.5. AP Repolarization and ICa,L Differences

Using standard square-step voltage clamp protocols, we found a smaller ICa,L density in RA-treated hESC-CMs compared to Std ones, as determined by either the whole-cell ruptured patch clamp technique (Figure 4B) or the perforated patch clamp technique (Figure 2B). However, there is an apparent discrepancy in the ICa,L density between Figure 4B and Figure 2B. This discrepancy may be due to several reasons, as set out below.
First, the data in Figure 2B are from quiescent cells in Tyrode’s solution that were able to contract upon field stimulation, whereas the data in Figure 4B are from the entire population of cells, which is because the response to field stimulation could not be tested due to the non-physiological solutions optimized for ruptured patch ICa,L measurements. Quiescent cells are the minority in the overall cell population in the recording chamber, but are attractive for AP measurements, since their MDP is significantly more negative than that of spontaneously active cells (see also Table 2). Consequently, they have sodium current-driven APs [49,83]. In addition, any pacing frequency can be chosen without interference with spontaneous AP formation [49]. However, it is conceivable that the quiescent cells have a lower ICa,L density than the spontaneously active ones. Therefore, we have also analyzed voltage clamp data from spontaneously active Std hESC-CMs measured with the perforated patch clamp technique (and otherwise identical recording conditions as in Figure 2B). At 0 mV, their ICa,L density was −8.7 ± 1.9 pA/pF (n = 10), which is not significantly different from the ICa,L density in the quiescent Std hESC-CMs of Figure 2B (−6.3 ± 1.7 pA/pF, n = 13). Therefore, we exclude this as a potential source of the different ICa,L densities.
Second, there are essential differences in the recording conditions. The data in Figure 2B are from amphotericin-perforated patch clamp measurements with close-to-physiological solutions, whereas the data in Figure 4B are from ruptured patch clamp recordings with strongly modified pipette and bath solutions (including EGTA) optimized for selective ICa,L measurements. Ruptured patch clamp typically results in lower access resistances than perforated patch, and consequently voltage clamp control is better. In addition, it is known that EGTA (and other Ca2+ buffers, such as BAPTA) affects ICa,L density, with larger densities by higher Ca2+ buffer capacity [123,124]. We therefore attribute the higher ICa,L density in Figure 4B to the presence of EGTA and the use of the ruptured patch clamp technique.
Both hiPSC-CMs and hESC-CMs are responsive to β-adrenergic and muscarinic antagonists, with similar chronotropic effects in both cell types [64]. However, we did not test whether our hESC-CMs responded to β-adrenergic agonists such as isoproterenol to check on the possibility that the relatively high ICa,L density in Figure 4B represents a phosphorylated state of the ICa,L channels. Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that the relatively high ICa,L density in Figure 4B, in contrast to Figure 2B, is at least partly due to the ICa,L channels being in a phosphorylated state. Of note, we exclude the contribution of INa and the T-type Ca2+ current (ICa,T) to our ICa,L measurements, since these currents are inactivated by our used voltage clamp protocol. Also, the measured voltage dependence of activation and inactivation, as well as the rate of current inactivation, are typical for ICa,L.
The smaller ICa,L density in RA-treated hESC-CMs compared to Std ones of Figure 2B and Figure 4B is consistent with previous findings in hESC-CMs and/or hiPSC-CMs [34,35,45,68,109]. Such difference in ICa,L density has also been observed in native human atrial and ventricular CMs by Cohen and Lederer [118] (their Figure 4), Mewes and Ravens [125] (their Table 2), and Ouadid et al. [126] (their Table 1). Remarkably, the ICa,L densities in our study are up to ten times higher than those found in native CMs, in either case applying the whole-cell configuration of the patch clamp technique with EGTA in the recording pipette. Part of this difference can be explained by the difference in experimental temperature, now that the ICa,L density in ventricular myocytes exhibits a Q10 of 2.3 ± 0.6 (mean ± SD, n = 7) [127]. In our study, the experiments were performed at 36 ± 0.1 °C, whereas Cohen and Lederer [118], Mewes and Ravens [125], and Ouadid et al. [126] all performed their experiments at room temperature. Furthermore, it should be noted that there is quite some variation in the ICa,L densities that have been reported for native human cardiomyocytes as well as for hESC-CMs and/or hiPSC-CMs, even when the recording conditions are largely similar, making it difficult to compare ICa,L densities. However, a direct comparison was made in the study by Uzun et al. [128]. They found that the ICa,L density of hiPSC-CMs was ≈2-fold larger than that of native human CMs. The exact reason for the smaller ICa,L in native human CMs remains unknown, but we cannot exclude that the smaller ICa,L is due to the CMs’ origin from patients with heart failure who received β-blockers [128]. In addition, it may be related to the hiPSC-CM culturing methods, as these affect ICa,L densities [57,128]. Lastly, we exclude the immaturity of hiPSC-CMs because maturation increases ICa,L rather than decreasing it [65].
We observed no difference in half-maximal activation and inactivation potentials (V1/2) between A-like and V-like hESC-CMs (Figure 4D), in agreement with findings in hiPSC-CMs [35,68] and native human atrial and ventricular CMs [118]. However, it should be noted that this is not a completely consistent finding, since Argenziano et al. [45] found a rightward shift of (in)activation properties in RA-treated hiPSC-CMs, whereas both Mewes and Ravens [125] (their Table 2) and Ouadid et al. [126] (their Table 2) observed a leftward shift of the V1/2 of activation in native atrial CMs. The rate of ICa,L inactivation was not different between Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs (Figure 4C), consistent with previous findings in hiPSC-CMs [35] and freshly isolated human CMs [118,126].
Previously, expression of the CACNA1C (CaV1.2) and CACNA1D (CaV1.3) genes has been found in hESC-CMs and hiPSC-CMs, with a higher gene expression in RA-treated cells [29,35,77,97,129]. At present, no pharmacological tools exist that are suitable to confirm or refute a role for CaV1.3 channels in cellular responses, as reviewed recently [130]. CaV1.2 and CaV1.3 have slightly different activation kinetics and CaV1.3 is activated at a more negative membrane potential [131]. However, the I–V curves of ICa,L overlap in our A- and V-like hESC-CMs, suggesting that the contribution of CaV1.3 to our total ICa,L is limited, consistent with the idea that CaV1.2 is the predominant ICa,L channel in the working myocardium [106,132,133].
A finding from the present study that substantially adds to our current knowledge is that there is a longer and stronger activity of ICa,L during the plateau of V-like APs compared to A-like APs. Consequently, the electrical charge due to Ca2+ ions entering the cell during a V-like AP is significantly larger than during an A-like AP. Yuan et al. [102] had performed AP clamp experiments using rabbit and rat ventricular APs and they found a larger Ca2+ influx using the rabbit AP (with a positive plateau level) than the rat AP (with a very negative plateau level), which is thus highly similar to our observation using A- and V-like APs. The substantially smaller Ca2+ influx through ICa,L is thus an important cause of the shorter, A-like APs of the RA-treated hESC-CMs. This is supported by the strong correlation between APplat and ICa,L (Figure 3D) and further substantiated by drug experiments, where RA-treated cells do not respond with AP changes to ICa,L blockade, while their non-RA-treated V-like counterparts show a large AP shortening [34,97,134].

4.3.6. AP Repolarization and INCX

Under Ca2+-buffered conditions, we found that the INCX density did not differ between RA-treated and Std hESC-CMs (Figure 5), consistent with the similar absolute K values of the NCX during the [Ca2+]i transient decay phase (Figure 6D, top). The relative contribution of NCX to the removal of Ca2+ from the cytosol (Figure 6D, bottom) is, however, smaller in RA-treated hESC-CMs because the SERCA is much faster in RA-treated hESC-CMs (Figure 6D, top left). Additionally, and maybe even more importantly, the influx of Ca2+ is much lower in RA-treated hESC-CMs (Figure 4), and therefore fewer Ca2+ ions need to be removed from the cytosol by the NCX [105] to maintain the well-known Ca2+ flux balance [108]. This will result in a smaller INCX [135]. Since the INCX is an inwardly directed, depolarizing current during the plateau and final repolarization phases of APs [136], it importantly regulates APD [105]. While not demonstrated in the present study, it is known from other studies that NCX blockade in stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes results in shorter APs, as demonstrated in silico using hiPSC-CM computer models [65,136] and in vitro using the selective NCX blocker SEA0400 on hiPSC-CM engineered heart tissue [136]. This suggests that a lower INCX plays an additional important role in the shorter APDs of the RA-treated hESC-CMs, although further studies are needed to confirm this. Since Ca2+ homeostasis is very important in AP modulation, with essential differences between A- and V-like APs, we advise to avoid Ca2+ buffering substances like EGTA or BAPTA in pipette solutions for AP measurements. This is especially relevant for the use of A-like hiPSC-CMs in models of atrial fibrillation, since INCX is upregulated in patients with atrial fibrillation [137].

4.4. [Ca2+]i Transient Differences

In adult CMs of various species including humans, Ca2+ signaling shows marked differences between atria and ventricles, as reviewed in detail by Dobrev et al. [138], Bootman et al. [139], Greiser [140], and Denham et al. [141]. An important source for Ca2+ transient differences between adult atrial and ventricular CMs is related to the transverse (T) tubule system [142]. Adult ventricular CMs have well-developed T-tubuli, but these are less pronounced or nearly absent in adult atrial CMs, resulting in a slower and more heterogeneous Ca2+ transient within an atrial CM (for reviews, see Bootman et al. [139], Greiser [140], and Denham et al. [141]). T-tubuli are virtually absent in both Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs [95], but we still observed marked differences between the Std and RA-treated CMs.
We found a lower [Ca2+]i transient amplitude in RA-treated hESC-CMs (Figure 6B), which is consistent with a previous study in hiPSC-CMs [45]. The amplitude of the [Ca2+]i transient is modulated by a number of factors, including the magnitude of ICa,L, SR Ca2+ content, fractional SR release, and diastolic Ca2+ levels (for reviews, see Guatimosim et al. [143], Neef and Maier [107], Eisner [108], and Eisner et al. [144]). Except for the fractional release from the SR, these parameters are all smaller, or show a tendency to be smaller, in RA-treated CMs, explaining the lower [Ca2+]i transient amplitude in this CM type. The Ca2+ transient was shorter in duration due to a faster decay in the RA-treated hESC-CMs (Figure 6B), which is consistent with various Ca2+ transient studies in hiPSC-CMs [35,45,77,97]. The decay phase of the [Ca2+]i transients was faster due to a higher SERCA activity rather than an increased Ca2+ efflux via a higher NCX activity (Figure 6D). In human hearts, atrial CMs have higher SERCA but lower phospholamban (PLB) protein levels [145], and consequently, an enhanced Ca2+ uptake by SERCA in atrial CMs is a consistent finding in human CMs [146], and also in adult CMs of various other species [147,148,149]. Higher SERCA activity is supposed to increase the SR Ca2+ content and Ca2+ transient amplitude (for reviews, see Bers [105], Neef and Maier [107], and Eisner [108]). However, this was not the case in our measurements, suggesting that potential effects on SR Ca2+ content are compensated by the decrease in Ca2+ influx during the short APD of A-like APs [140]. The diastolic [Ca2+]i was lower in RA-treated CMs (Figure 6B). This is likely due to the enhanced SERCA reuptake [144] in combination with a lower Ca2+ influx through ICa,L [150]. Various studies on hiPSC-CMs have reported a faster rise time of the Ca2+ transient [77], resulting in an earlier time-to-peak of the Ca2+ transient in RA-treated cells [45,77,97]. Such conclusions are frequently based on non-ratiometric imaging of the Ca2+ transients, where the recordings are often normalized [144]. Our ratiometric Ca2+ transient analysis, however, demonstrates that the release is not faster, but the [Ca2+]i transient amplitude is much lower, resulting in a peak earlier in time.

4.5. Spontaneous Beating Rate

We found a shorter cycle length in spontaneously beating RA-treated hESC-CMs compared to the Std hESC-CMs, consistent with many other studies [35,39,45,72,77,132]. Since pacing rate influences various AP parameters, we have mainly used intrinsically quiescent cells paced at 1 Hz for our study, but some studies on Std and RA-treated CMs indicate differences in genes and/or the associated currents that may contribute to (differences in) pacemaking. Lower expression of KCNJ2 (encoding the pore-forming Kir2.1 subunit of the IK1 channel) but higher expression of CACNA1H (encoding the pore-forming CaV3.2 subunit of the T-type Ca2+ channel) as well as HCN4 and HCN1 (encoding the pore-forming HCN4 and HCN1 subunits of the If channel) and/or the associated currents have been reported in RA-treated CMs [35,45,68,72,77,95]. This would favor faster pacemaking [151]. On the other hand, the expression of CACNA1C (encoding the pore-forming subunit of the CaV1.2 ICa,L channel) and/or its associated ICa,L has been found to be higher in Std CMs ([45,68,97], present study) and ICa,L is also important for pacemaking [151], complicating a simple and straightforward explanation for the shorter cycle length in the RA-treated CMs. Apart from differences in pacemaking-modulating genes and currents, the AP is shorter in RA-treated CMs, further promoting a shorter cycle length. Further studies are required to elucidate the exact mechanisms involved in the faster pacemaking in RA-treated CMs.

4.6. Limitations

Although some studies have demonstrated the presence of Ca2+-activated currents, such as the Ca2+-activated Cl current (ICl(Ca)) and small, intermediate, and large conductance Ca2+-activated K+ currents, in hiPSC-CMs [152,153], we have not specifically assessed the presence of these currents in our hESC-CMs. However, our specific ICa,L measurements were performed using the ruptured patch clamp methodology with EGTA in the recording pipette solution. Under these conditions, we observed neither Ca2+-activated K+ currents in our hESC-CMs nor any current typical of ICl(Ca) [154]. Also, Zhao et al. [152] performed AP measurements in the presence of EGTA. However, the AP shape and duration were unaffected by apamine, a selective Ca2+-activated K+ current blocker, indicating that this current is not functional under these conditions. Furthermore, we have measured ICa,L during the AP clamp measurements with EGTA in the pipette solution as current sensitive to 10 µmol/L nifedipine. At this concentration, nifedipine completely blocks ICa,L [88], but it may also reduce ICa,T by 14% [155], if present. However, the rate of ICa,T inactivation is very fast and consequently the total amount of Ca2+ flux via ICa,T is small compared to that via ICa,L and likely negligible in working CMs [156]. Therefore, we attribute the currents shown in Figure 4 to ICa,L rather than to other currents.
The type of cardiomyocyte (N-, A-, or V-like) under investigation was not established in the case of the ruptured patch clamp-measured ICa,L and INCX, and in the [Ca2+]i measurements. Although the majority of Std hESC-CMs belong to V-like cardiomyocytes and the majority of RA-treated hESCs-CMs belong to A-like cardiomyocytes (Figure 1), a part of the variability in the results may stem from differences between cardiomyocyte types. To address this issue in the future, simultaneous recording of APs and intracellular Ca2+ will help to distinguish cardiomyocyte type and additionally give temporally synchronized information on the interplay between [Ca2+]i handling and APs. While simultaneous optical voltage and Ca2+ transient recordings are possible [77,97], distinguishing A- and V-like cardiomyocytes is not straightforward in the case of ruptured patch clamp using non-physiological solutions. Selection of a specific cell type could potentially be based on contractions, since A-like cardiomyocytes have faster and shorter contractions. In the past, we have selected beating cardiomyocytes in the same bath solution as used for APs, after which the bath solution was switched to specific extracellular solutions [111]. Thus, the type of contractions before the use of strongly modified solutions may be used as an indication of a particular cardiomyocyte type. Another option is to use specific markers for particular cell types. One might consider the level of expression of dyadic junctions (‘dyads’), which is generally lower in atrial cardiomyocytes than in ventricular ones [157,158]. However, this is not feasible as hESC-CMs lack the highly developed and organized T-tubular system found in adult ventricular myocytes [159,160,161]. Schwach et al. [61] sorted pure A-like cell populations based on the presence of chick ovalbumin upstream promoter transcription factors (COUP-TFs) that were fused with a fluorescent reporter gene (mCherry). Another option is to use modified differentiation methods [162] and/or the RA inhibitor BMS493 [34], which yields populations of pure V-like hiPSC-CMs.
Of note, our study was performed in hESC-CMs and not in hiPSC-CMs. However, the percentages of N-, A-, and V-like cardiomyocytes are largely similar in hiPSC- and hESC-derived cardiomyocytes [29,163]. In addition, hESC-CMs and hiPSC-CMs are functionally and transcriptionally highly similar [163,164,165,166]. This suggests that AP heterogeneity in hiPSC-CMs can also be explained by a heterogeneous distribution of ionic currents, but further experiments are needed to confirm this hypothesis.
We performed our current clamp measurements without the use of dynamic clamp, while we and others (see Verkerk and Wilders [84] and primary references cited therein) have previously strongly advocated its use for iPSC-CM experiments in order to provide these cells with a regular IK1. The reason is that we wanted to link the AP morphology and parameters to ionic currents without the interference of in vitro injected currents, which may affect the APD90/50 ratio, a frequently used marker to describe triangulation of APs (Table 1). However, to overcome the spontaneous activity, we selected intrinsically quiescent CMs that were able to contract upon field stimulation, as set out in Section 4.5 above.

5. Conclusions

Our study on hESC-CMs contributes to a better understanding of (differences between) A-like and V-like APs in stem cell-derived CMs and in particular highlights the importance of ICa,L and [Ca2+]i homeostasis in the observed AP heterogeneity. Such information is indispensable for understanding the basic AP morphology [167] and drug effects [49,97], for the generation and improvement of hiPSC-CM computer models [168], and for the design and/or conception of monolayers [31], engineered composite heart tissue [72,169], and engineered heart tissue models of atrial fibrillation [95].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.O.V. and H.D.D.; hESC-CM handling, H.D.D.; patch clamp measurements, A.O.V., C.C.V. and M.H.; [Ca2+]i measurements, A.O.V. and M.H.; writing—original draft preparation, A.O.V. and R.W.; writing—review and editing, A.O.V., C.C.V., M.H., H.D.D. and R.W.; visualization, A.O.V.; funding acquisition, H.D.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW) and the Dutch Heart Foundation, grant number MKMD 114021512 to H.D.D.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jan G. Zegers, and Antoni C. G. van Ginneken for kindly providing the custom software Scope and MacDaq, respectively.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kolanowski, T.J.; Antos, C.L.; Guan, K. Making human cardiomyocytes up to date: Derivation, maturation state and perspectives. Int. J. Cardiol. 2017, 241, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Brandão, K.O.; Tabel, V.A.; Atsma, D.E.; Mummery, C.L.; Davis, R.P. Human pluripotent stem cell models of cardiac disease: From mechanisms to therapies. Dis. Model. Mech. 2017, 10, 1039–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Van den Brink, L.; Grandela, C.; Mummery, C.L.; Davis, R.P. Inherited cardiac diseases, pluripotent stem cells, and genome editing combined—The past, present, and future. Stem Cells 2020, 38, 174–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Parrotta, E.I.; Lucchino, V.; Scaramuzzino, L.; Scalise, S.; Cuda, G. Modeling cardiac disease mechanisms using induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: Progress, promises and challenges. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Correia, C.D.; Ferreira, A.; Fernandes, M.T.; Silva, B.M.; Esteves, F.; Leitão, H.S.; Bragança, J.; Calado, S.M. Human stem cells for cardiac disease modeling and preclinical and clinical applications—Are we on the road to success? Cells 2023, 12, 1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Joukar, S. A comparative review on heart ion channels, action potentials and electrocardiogram in rodents and human: Extrapolation of experimental insights to clinic. Lab. Anim. Res. 2021, 37, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ripplinger, C.M.; Glukhov, A.V.; Kay, M.W.; Boukens, B.J.; Chiamvimonvat, N.; Delisle, B.P.; Fabritz, L.; Hund, T.J.; Knollmann, B.C.; Li, N.; et al. Guidelines for assessment of cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias in small animals. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2022, 323, H1137–H1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kamga, M.V.K.; Reppel, M.; Hescheler, J.; Nguemo, F. Modeling genetic cardiac channelopathies using induced pluripotent stem cells—Status quo from an electrophysiological perspective. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2021, 192, 114746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Laurita, K.R.; Vasireddi, S.K.; Mackall, J.A. Elucidating arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy with stem cells. Birth Defects Res. 2022, 114, 948–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reisqs, J.B.; Moreau, A.; Sleiman, Y.; Boutjdir, M.; Richard, S.; Chevalier, P. Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy as a myogenic disease: Highlights from cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Front. Physiol. 2023, 14, 1191965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Velichkova, G.; Dobreva, G. Human pluripotent stem cell-based models of heart development and disease. Cells Dev. 2023, 175, 203857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ovics, P.; Regev, D.; Baskin, P.; Davidor, M.; Shemer, Y.; Neeman, S.; Ben-Haim, Y.; Binah, O. Drug development and the use of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes for disease modeling and drug toxicity screening. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Garg, P.; Garg, V.; Shrestha, R.; Sanguinetti, M.C.; Kamp, T.J.; Wu, J.C. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes as models for cardiac channelopathies: A primer for non-electrophysiologists. Circ. Res. 2018, 123, 224–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sala, L.; Van Meer, B.J.; Tertoolen, L.G.J.; Bakkers, J.; Bellin, M.; Davis, R.P.; Denning, C.; Dieben, M.A.E.; Eschenhagen, T.; Giacomelli, E.; et al. MUSCLEMOTION: A versatile open software tool to quantify cardiomyocyte and cardiac muscle contraction in vitro and in vivo. Circ. Res. 2018, 122, e5–e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lodrini, A.M.; Barile, L.; Rocchetti, M.; Altomare, C. Human induced pluripotent stem cells derived from a cardiac somatic source: Insights for an in-vitro cardiomyocyte platform. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Takasuna, K.; Kazusa, K.; Hayakawa, T. Comprehensive cardiac safety assessment using hiPS-cardiomyocytes (Consortium for Safety Assessment using Human iPS cells: CSAHi). Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2020, 21, 829–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Djemai, M.; Cupelli, M.; Boutjdir, M.; Chahine, M. Optical mapping of cardiomyocytes in monolayer derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. Cells 2023, 12, 2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Melgari, D.; Calamaio, S.; Frosio, A.; Prevostini, R.; Anastasia, L.; Pappone, C.; Rivolta, I. Automated patch-clamp and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: A synergistic approach in the study of Brugada syndrome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Germain, P.L.; Testa, G. Taming human genetic variability: Transcriptomic meta-analysis guides the experimental design and interpretation of iPSC-based disease modeling. Stem Cell Rep. 2017, 8, 1784–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Millard, D.; Dang, Q.; Shi, H.; Zhang, X.; Strock, C.; Kraushaar, U.; Zeng, H.; Levesque, P.; Lu, H.R.; Guillon, J.M.; et al. Cross-site reliability of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte based safety assays using microelectrode arrays: Results from a blinded CiPA pilot study. Toxicol. Sci. 2018, 164, 550–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guerrelli, D.; Pressman, J.; Salameh, S.; Posnack, N. hiPSC-CM electrophysiology: Impact of temporal changes and study parameters on experimental reproducibility. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2024, 327, H12–H27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mummery, C.L.; Zhang, J.; Ng, E.S.; Elliott, D.A.; Elefanty, A.G.; Kamp, T.J. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells to cardiomyocytes: A methods overview. Circ. Res. 2012, 111, 344–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Devalla, H.D.; Passier, R. Cardiac differentiation of pluripotent stem cells and implications for modeling the heart in health and disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018, 10, eaah5457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Campostrini, G.; Windt, L.M.; Van Meer, B.J.; Bellin, M.; Mummery, C.L. Cardiac tissues from stem cells: New routes to maturation and cardiac regeneration. Circ. Res. 2021, 128, 775–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Streckfuss-Bömeke, K.; Wolf, F.; Azizian, A.; Stauske, M.; Tiburcy, M.; Wagner, S.; Hübscher, D.; Dressel, R.; Chen, S.; Jende, J.; et al. Comparative study of human-induced pluripotent stem cells derived from bone marrow cells, hair keratinocytes, and skin fibroblasts. Eur. Heart J. 2013, 34, 2618–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Itzhaki, I.; Maizels, L.; Huber, I.; Zwi-Dantsis, L.; Caspi, O.; Winterstern, A.; Feldman, O.; Gepstein, A.; Arbel, G.; Hammerman, H.; et al. Modelling the long QT syndrome with induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2011, 471, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Itzhaki, I.; Maizels, L.; Huber, I.; Gepstein, A.; Arbel, G.; Caspi, O.; Miller, L.; Belhassen, B.; Nof, E.; Glikson, M.; et al. Modeling of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia with patient-specific human-induced pluripotent stem cells. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012, 60, 990–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Li, W.; Stauske, M.; Luo, X.; Wagner, S.; Vollrath, M.; Mehnert, C.S.; Schubert, M.; Cyganek, L.; Chen, S.; Hasheminasab, S.M.; et al. Disease phenotypes and mechanisms of iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes from Brugada syndrome patients with a loss-of-function SCN5A mutation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 592893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lee, Y.-K.; Ng, K.-M.; Lai, W.-H.; Chan, Y.-C.; Lau, Y.-M.; Lian, Q.; Tse, H.-F.; Siu, C.-W. Calcium homeostasis in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2011, 7, 976–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lan, F.; Lee, A.S.; Liang, P.; Sanchez-Freire, V.; Nguyen, P.K.; Wang, L.; Han, L.; Yen, M.; Wang, Y.; Sun, N.; et al. Abnormal calcium handling properties underlie familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy pathology in patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 12, 101–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Laksman, Z.; Wauchop, M.; Lin, E.; Protze, S.; Lee, J.; Yang, W.; Izaddoustdar, F.; Shafaattalab, S.; Gepstein, L.; Tibbits, G.F.; et al. Modeling atrial fibrillation using human embryonic stem cell-derived atrial tissue. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. De la Roche, J.; Angsutararux, P.; Kempf, H.; Janan, M.; Bolesani, E.; Thiemann, S.; Wojciechowski, D.; Coffee, M.; Franke, A.; Schwanke, K.; et al. Comparing human iPSC-cardiomyocytes versus HEK293T cells unveils disease-causing effects of Brugada mutation A735V of NaV1.5 sodium channels. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Peng, S.; Lacerda, A.E.; Kirsch, G.E.; Brown, A.M.; Bruening-Wright, A. The action potential and comparative pharmacology of stem cell-derived human cardiomyocytes. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 2010, 61, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pei, F.; Jiang, J.; Bai, S.; Cao, H.; Tian, L.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, C.; Dong, H.; Ma, Y. Chemical-defined and albumin-free generation of human atrial and ventricular myocytes from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Res. 2017, 19, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chapotte-Baldacci, C.A.; Pierre, M.; Djemai, M.; Pouliot, V.; Chahine, M. Biophysical properties of NaV1.5 channels from atrial-like and ventricular-like cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 20685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jara-Avaca, M.; Kempf, H.; Rückert, M.; Robles-Diaz, D.; Franke, A.; De la Roche, J.; Fischer, M.; Malan, D.; Sasse, P.; Solodenko, W.; et al. EBIO does not induce cardiomyogenesis in human pluripotent stem cells but modulates cardiac subtype enrichment by lineage-selective survival. Stem Cell Rep. 2017, 8, 305–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bett, G.C.L.; Kaplan, A.D.; Lis, A.; Cimato, T.R.; Tzanakakis, E.S.; Zhou, Q.; Morales, M.J.; Rasmusson, R.L. Electronic “expression” of the inward rectifier in cardiocytes derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells. Heart Rhythm 2013, 10, 1903–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kim, J.J.; Yang, L.; Lin, B.; Zhu, X.; Sun, B.; Kaplan, A.D.; Bett, G.C.L.; Rasmusson, R.L.; London, B.; Salama, G. Mechanism of automaticity in cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2015, 81, 81–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Altomare, C.; Bartolucci, C.; Sala, L.; Balbi, C.; Burrello, J.; Pietrogiovanna, N.; Burrello, A.; Bolis, S.; Panella, S.; Arici, M.; et al. A dynamic clamping approach using in silico IK1 current for discrimination of chamber-specific hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Commun. Biol. 2023, 6, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Moretti, A.; Bellin, M.; Welling, A.; Jung, C.B.; Lam, J.T.; Bott-Flügel, L.; Dorn, T.; Goedel, A.; Höhnke, C.; Hofmann, F.; et al. Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem-cell models for long-QT syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 1397–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. El-Battrawy, I.; Lang, S.; Zhao, Z.; Akin, I.; Yücel, G.; Meister, S.; Patocskai, B.; Behnes, M.; Rudic, B.; Tülümen, E.; et al. Hyperthermia influences the effects of sodium channel blocking drugs in human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0166143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Matsa, E.; Rajamohan, D.; Dick, E.; Young, L.; Mellor, I.; Staniforth, A.; Denning, C. Drug evaluation in cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells carrying a long QT syndrome type 2 mutation. Eur. Heart J. 2011, 32, 952–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hayano, M.; Makiyama, T.; Kamakura, T.; Watanabe, H.; Sasaki, K.; Funakoshi, S.; Wuriyanghai, Y.; Nishiuchi, S.; Harita, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; et al. Development of a patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cell model for the investigation of SCN5A-D1275N-related cardiac sodium channelopathy. Circ. J. 2017, 81, 1783–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ma, J.; Guo, L.; Fiene, S.J.; Anson, B.D.; Thomson, J.A.; Kamp, T.J.; Kolaja, K.L.; Swanson, B.J.; January, C.T. High purity human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: Electrophysiological properties of action potentials and ionic currents. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2011, 301, H2006–H2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Argenziano, M.; Lambers, E.; Hong, L.; Sridhar, A.; Zhang, M.; Chalazan, B.; Menon, A.; Savio-Galimberti, E.; Wu, J.C.; Rehman, J.; et al. Electrophysiologic characterization of calcium handling in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived atrial cardiomyocytes. Stem Cell Rep. 2018, 10, 1867–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cordeiro, J.M.; Nesterenko, V.V.; Sicouri, S.; Goodrow, R.J., Jr.; Treat, J.A.; Desai, M.; Wu, Y.; Doss, M.X.; Antzelevitch, C.; Di Diego, J.M. Identification and characterization of a transient outward K+ current in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2013, 60, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, M.; Schulte, J.S.; Heinick, A.; Piccini, I.; Rao, J.; Quaranta, R.; Zeuschner, D.; Malan, D.; Kim, K.-P.; Röpke, A.; et al. Universal cardiac induction of human pluripotent stem cells in two and three-dimensional formats: Implications for in vitro maturation. Stem Cells 2015, 33, 1456–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ma, D.; Wei, H.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, J.; Li, G.; Sahib, N.B.; Tan, T.H.; Wong, K.Y.; Shim, W.; Wong, P.; et al. Modeling type 3 long QT syndrome with cardiomyocytes derived from patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013, 168, 5277–5286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Devalla, H.D.; Schwach, V.; Ford, J.W.; Milnes, J.T.; El-Haou, S.; Jackson, C.; Gkatzi, K.; Elliot, D.A.; Chuva de Sousa Lopes, S.M.; Mummery, C.L.; et al. Atrial-like cardiomyocytes from human pluripotent stem cells are a robust preclinical model for assessing atrial-selective pharmacology. EMBO Mol. Med. 2015, 7, 394–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gorospe, G.; Zhu, R.; Millrod, M.A.; Zambidis, E.T.; Tung, L.; Vidal, R. Automated grouping of action potentials of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2014, 61, 2389–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Du, D.T.M.; Hellen, N.; Kane, C.; Terracciano, C.M.N. Action potential morphology of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes does not predict cardiac chamber specificity and is dependent on cell density. Biophys. J. 2015, 108, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kane, C.; Du, D.T.M.; Hellen, N.; Terracino, C.M. The fallacy of assigning chamber specificity to iPSC cardiac myocytes from action potential morphology. Biophys. J. 2016, 110, 281–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bett, G.C.L.; Kaplan, A.D.; Rasmusson, R.L. Action potential shape is a crucial measure of cell type of stem cell-derived cardiocytes. Biophys. J. 2016, 110, 284–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Choi, S.W.; Lee, H.-A.; Moon, S.-H.; Park, S.-J.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, K.-S.; Zhang, Y.H.; Youm, J.B.; Kim, S.J. Spontaneous inward currents reflecting oscillatory activation of Na+/Ca2+ exchangers in human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Pflügers Arch. 2016, 468, 609–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ribeiro, M.C.; Tertoolen, L.G.; Guadix, J.A.; Bellin, M.; Kosmidis, G.; D’Aniello, C.; Monshouwer-Kloots, J.; Goumans, M.J.; Wang, Y.L.; Feinberg, A.W.; et al. Functional maturation of human pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes in vitro—Correlation between contraction force and electrophysiology. Biomaterials 2015, 51, 138–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sala, L.; Bellin, M.; Mummery, C.L. Integrating cardiomyocytes from human pluripotent stem cells in safety pharmacology: Has the time come? Br. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 174, 3749–3765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Prajapati, C.; Ojala, M.; Lappi, H.; Aalto-Setälä, K.; Pekkanen-Mattila, M. Electrophysiological evaluation of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes obtained by different methods. Stem Cell Res. 2021, 51, 102176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. West, T.C.; Amory, D.W. Single fiber recording of the effects of quinidine at atrial and pacemaker sites in the isolated right atrium of the rabbit. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1960, 130, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Grant, A.O. Cardiac ion channels. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2009, 2, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Sánchez, C.; Bueno-Orovio, A.; Wettwer, E.; Loose, S.; Simon, J.; Ravens, U.; Pueyo, E.; Rodriguez, B. Inter-subject variability in human atrial action potential in sinus rhythm versus chronic atrial fibrillation. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e105897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Schwach, V.; Verkerk, A.O.; Mol, M.; Monshouwer-Kloots, J.J.; Devalla, H.D.; Orlova, V.V.; Anastassiadis, K.; Mummery, C.L.; Davis, R.P.; Passier, R. A COUP-TFII human embryonic stem cell reporter line to identify and select atrial cardiomyocytes. Stem Cell Rep. 2017, 9, 1765–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hilderink, S.; Devalla, H.D.; Bosch, L.; Wilders, R.; Verkerk, A.O. Ultrarapid delayed rectifier K+ channelopathies in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Verkerk, A.O.; Marchal, G.A.; Zegers, J.G.; Kawasaki, M.; Driessen, A.H.G.; Remme, C.A.; De Groot, J.R.; Wilders, R. Patch-clamp recordings of action potentials from human atrial myocytes: Optimization through dynamic clamp. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 649414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sheng, X.; Reppel, M.; Nguemo, F.; Mohammad, F.I.; Kuzmenkin, A.; Hescheler, J.; Pfannkuche, K. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: Response to TTX and lidocain reveals strong cell to cell variability. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e45963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Seibertz, F.; Sutanto, H.; Dülk, R.; Pronto, J.R.D.; Springer, R.; Rapedius, M.; Liutkute, A.; Ritter, M.; Jung, P.; Stelzer, L.; et al. Electrophysiological and calcium-handling development during long-term culture of human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2023, 118, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Cofiño-Fabres, C.; Passier, R.; Schwach, V. Towards improved human in vitro models for cardiac arrhythmia: Disease mechanisms, treatment, and models of atrial fibrillation. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Biendarra-Tiegs, S.M.; Li, X.; Ye, D.; Brandt, E.B.; Ackerman, M.J.; Nelson, T.J. Single-cell RNA-sequencing and optical electrophysiology of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes reveal discordance between cardiac subtype-associated gene expression patterns and electrophysiological phenotypes. Stem Cells Dev. 2019, 28, 659–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Lieu, D.K.; Fu, J.D.; Chiamvimonvat, N.; Tung, K.C.; McNerney, G.P.; Huser, T.; Keller, G.; Kong, C.-W.; Li, R.A. Mechanism-based facilitated maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2013, 6, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Protze, S.I.; Liu, J.; Nussinovitch, U.; Ohana, L.; Backx, P.H.; Gepstein, L.; Keller, G.M. Sinoatrial node cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent cells function as a biological pacemaker. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016, 35, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Schweizer, P.A.; Darche, F.F.; Ullrich, N.D.; Geschwill, P.; Greber, B.; Rivinius, R.; Seyler, C.; Müller-Decker, K.; Draguhn, A.; Utikal, J.; et al. Subtype-specific differentiation of cardiac pacemaker cell clusters from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2017, 8, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wiesinger, A.; Li, J.; Fokkert, L.; Bakker, P.; Verkerk, A.O.; Christoffels, V.M.; Boink, G.J.J.; Devalla, H.D. A single cell transcriptional roadmap of human pacemaker cell differentiation. eLife 2022, 11, e76781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Li, J.; Wiesinger, A.; Fokkert, L.; Boukens, B.J.; Verkerk, A.O.; Christoffels, V.M.; Boink, G.J.J.; Devalla, H.D. Molecular and electrophysiological evaluation of human cardiomyocyte subtypes to facilitate generation of composite cardiac models. J. Tissue Eng. 2022, 13, 20417314221127908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, F.; Yin, L.; Zhang, W.; Tang, Y.; Wang, X.; Huang, C. The method of sinus node-like pacemaker cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells by BMP and Wnt signaling. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2023, 39, 2725–2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lee, J.H.; Protze, S.I.; Laksman, Z.; Backx, P.H.; Keller, G.M. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes develop from distinct mesoderm populations. Cell Stem Cell 2017, 21, 179–194.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Verkerk, A.O.; Veerman, C.C.; Zegers, J.G.; Mengarelli, I.; Bezzina, C.R.; Wilders, R. Patch-clamp recording from human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: Improving action potential characteristics through dynamic clamp. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Marczenke, M.; Piccini, I.; Mengarelli, I.; Fell, J.; Röpke, A.; Seebohm, G.; Verkerk, A.O.; Greber, B. Cardiac subtype-specific modeling of Kv1.5 ion channel deficiency using human pluripotent stem cells. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cyganek, L.; Tiburcy, M.; Sekeres, K.; Gerstenberg, K.; Bohnenberger, H.; Lenz, C.; Henze, S.; Stauske, M.; Salinas, G.; Zimmermann, W.H.; et al. Deep phenotyping of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes. JCI Insight 2018, 3, e99941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Wiesinger, A.; Boink, G.J.J.; Christoffels, V.M.; Devalla, H.D. Retinoic acid signaling in heart development: Application in the differentiation of cardiovascular lineages from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2021, 16, 2589–2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Elliott, D.A.; Braam, S.R.; Koutsis, K.; Ng, E.S.; Jenny, R.; Lagerqvist, E.L.; Biben, C.; Hatzistavrou, T.; Hirst, C.E.; Yu, Q.C.; et al. NKX2-5eGFP/w hESCs for isolation of human cardiac progenitors and cardiomyocytes. Nat. Methods 2011, 8, 1037–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Bairoch, A. The Cellosaurus, a cell-line knowledge resource. J. Biomol. Tech. 2018, 29, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ng, E.S.; Davis, R.; Stanley, E.G.; Elefanty, A.G. A protocol describing the use of a recombinant protein-based, animal product-free medium (APEL) for human embryonic stem cell differentiation as spin embryoid bodies. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 768–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Van Ginneken, A.C.G.; Giles, W. Voltage clamp measurements of the hyperpolarization-activated inward current If in single cells from rabbit sino-atrial node. J. Physiol. 1991, 434, 57–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Davis, R.P.; Casini, S.; Van den Berg, C.W.; Hoekstra, M.; Remme, C.A.; Dambrot, C.; Salvatori, D.; Oostwaard, D.W.; Wilde, A.A.M.; Bezzina, C.R.; et al. Cardiomyocytes derived from pluripotent stem cells recapitulate electrophysiological characteristics of an overlap syndrome of cardiac sodium channel disease. Circulation 2012, 125, 3079–3091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Verkerk, A.O.; Wilders, R. Injection of IK1 through dynamic clamp can make all the difference in patch-clamp studies on hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Front. Physiol. 2023, 14, 1326160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Barry, P.H.; Lynch, J.W. Liquid junction potentials and small cell effects in patch-clamp analysis. J. Membr. Biol. 1991, 121, 101–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Hobai, I.A.; Bates, J.A.; Howarth, F.C.; Levi, A.J. Inhibition by external Cd2+ of Na/Ca exchange and L-type Ca channel in rabbit ventricular myocytes. Am. J. Physiol. 1997, 272, H2164–H2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sheets, M.F.; Hanck, D.A. Mechanisms of extracellular divalent and trivalent cation block of the sodium current in canine cardiac Purkinje cells. J. Physiol. 1992, 454, 299–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Eroglu, T.E.; Mohr, G.H.; Blom, M.T.; Verkerk, A.O.; Souverein, P.C.; Torp-Pedersen, C.; Folke, F.; Wissenberg, M.; Van den Brink, L.; Davis, R.P.; et al. Differential effects on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of dihydropyridines: Real-world data from population-based cohorts across two European countries. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacother. 2020, 6, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kimura, J.; Noma, A.; Irisawa, H. Na-Ca exchange current in mammalian heart cells. Nature 1986, 319, 596–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Verkerk, A.O.; Wilders, R.; Coronel, R.; Ravesloot, J.H.; Verheijck, E.E. Ionic remodeling of sinoatrial node cells by heart failure. Circulation 2003, 108, 760–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Devalla, H.D.; Gélinas, R.; Aburawi, E.H.; Beqqali, A.; Goyette, P.; Freund, C.; Chaix, M.-A.; Tadros, R.; Jiang, H.; Le Béchec, A.; et al. TECRL, a new life-threatening inherited arrhythmia gene associated with overlapping clinical features of both LQTS and CPVT. EMBO Mol. Med. 2016, 8, 1390–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Bassani, R.A.; Bers, D.M. Rate of diastolic Ca release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum of intact rabbit and rat ventricular myocytes. Biophys. J. 1995, 68, 2015–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Berecki, G.; Wilders, R.; De Jonge, B.; Van Ginneken, A.C.G.; Verkerk, A.O. Re-evaluation of the action potential upstroke velocity as a measure of the Na+ current in cardiac myocytes at physiological conditions. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Veerman, C.C.; Mengarelli, I.; Koopman, C.D.; Wilders, R.; Van Amersfoorth, S.C.; Bakker, D.; Wolswinkel, R.; Hababa, M.; De Boer, T.P.; Guan, K.; et al. Genetic variation in GNB5 causes bradycardia by augmenting the cholinergic response via increased acetylcholine-activated potassium current (IK,ACh). Dis. Model. Mech. 2019, 12, dmm037994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Goldfracht, I.; Protze, S.; Shiti, A.; Setter, N.; Gruber, A.; Shaheen, N.; Nartiss, Y.; Keller, G.; Gepstein, L. Generating ring-shaped engineered heart tissues from ventricular and atrial human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Verkerk, A.O.; Wilders, R. Dynamic clamp in electrophysiological studies on stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes—Why and how? J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2021, 77, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gunawan, M.G.; Sangha, S.S.; Shafaattalab, S.; Lin, E.; Heims-Waldron, D.A.; Bezzerides, V.J.; Laksman, Z.; Tibbits, G.F. Drug screening platform using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived atrial cardiomyocytes and optical mapping. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2021, 10, 68–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kayser, A.; Dittmann, S.; Šarić, T.; Mearini, G.; Verkerk, A.O.; Schulze-Bahr, E. The W101C KCNJ5 mutation induces slower pacing by constitutively active GIRK channels in hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Schulz, C.; Sönmez, M.; Krause, J.; Schwedhelm, E.; Bangfen, P.; Alihodzic, D.; Hansen, A.; Eschenhagen, T.; Christ, T. A critical role of retinoic acid concentration for the induction of a fully human-like atrial action potential phenotype in hiPSC-CM. Stem Cell Rep. 2023, 18, 2096–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Gaur, N.; Ortega, F.; Verkerk, A.O.; Mengarelli, I.; Krogh-Madsen, T.; Christini, D.J.; Coronel, R.; Vigmond, E.J. Validation of quantitative measure of repolarization reserve as a novel marker of drug induced proarrhythmia. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2020, 145, 122–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Ernault, A.C.; Verkerk, A.O.; Bayer, J.D.; Aras, K.; Montañés-Agudo, P.; Mohan, R.A.; Veldkamp, M.; Rivaud, M.R.; De Winter, R.; Kawasaki, M.; et al. Secretome of atrial epicardial adipose tissue facilitates reentrant arrhythmias by myocardial remodeling. Heart Rhythm 2022, 19, 1461–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Yuan, W.; Ginsburg, K.S.; Bers, D.M. Comparison of sarcolemmal calcium channel current in rabbit and rat ventricular myocytes. J. Physiol. 1996, 493, 733–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Fülöp, L.; Bányász, T.; Magyar, J.; Szentandrássy, N.; Varró, A.; Nánási, P.P. Reopening of L-type calcium channels in human ventricular myocytes during applied epicardial action potentials. Acta Physiol. Scand. 2004, 180, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Linz, K.W.; Meyer, R. Profile and kinetics of L-type calcium current during the cardiac ventricular action potential compared in guinea-pigs, rats and rabbits. Pflügers Arch. 2000, 439, 588–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Bers, D.M. Calcium cycling and signaling in cardiac myocytes. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2008, 70, 23–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Hofmann, F.; Flockerzi, V.; Kahl, S.; Wegener, J.W. L-type CaV1.2 calcium channels: From in vitro findings to in vivo function. Physiol. Rev. 2014, 94, 303–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Neef, S.; Maier, L.S. Novel aspects of excitation-contraction coupling in heart failure. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2013, 108, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Eisner, D.A. Ups and downs of calcium in the heart. J. Physiol. 2018, 596, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Seibertz, F.; Rubio, T.; Springer, R.; Popp, F.; Ritter, M.; Liutkute, A.; Bartelt, L.; Stelzer, L.; Haghighi, F.; Pietras, J.; et al. Atrial fibrillation-associated electrical remodelling in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived atrial cardiomyocytes: A novel pathway for antiarrhythmic therapy development. Cardiovasc. Res. 2023, 119, 2623–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Elliott, J.; Mainardi, L.; Rodriguez Matas, J.F. Cellular heterogeneity and repolarisation across the atria: An in silico study. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2022, 60, 3153–3168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Veerman, C.C.; Mengarelli, I.; Guan, K.; Stauske, M.; Barc, J.; Tan, H.L.; Wilde, A.A.M.; Verkerk, A.O.; Bezzina, C.R. hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes from Brugada Syndrome patients without identified mutations do not exhibit clear cellular electrophysiological abnormalities. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Quaranta, R.; Fell, J.; Rühle, F.; Rao, J.; Piccini, I.; Araúzo-Bravo, M.J.; Verkerk, A.O.; Stoll, M.; Greber, B. Revised roles of ISL1 in a hES cell-based model of human heart chamber specification. eLife 2018, 7, e31706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Amos, G.J.; Wettwer, E.; Metzger, F.; Li, Q.; Himmel, H.M.; Ravens, U. Differences between outward currents of human atrial and subepicardial ventricular myocytes. J. Physiol. 1996, 491, 31–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ford, J.; Milnes, J.; Wettwer, E.; Christ, T.; Rogers, M.; Sutton, K.; Madge, D.; Virag, L.; Jost, N.; Horvath, Z.; et al. Human electrophysiological and pharmacological properties of XEN-D0101: A novel atrial-selective Kv1.5/IKur inhibitor. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2013, 61, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Horváth, A.; Lemoine, M.D.; Löser, A.; Mannhardt, I.; Flenner, F.; Uzun, A.U.; Neuber, C.; Breckwoldt, K.; Hansen, A.; Girdauskas, E.; et al. Low resting membrane potential and low inward rectifier potassium currents are not inherent features of hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Stem Cell Rep. 2018, 10, 822–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Varró, A.; Nánási, P.P.; Lathrop, D.A. Potassium currents in isolated human atrial and ventricular cardiocytes. Acta Physiol. Scand. 1993, 149, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Wang, Z.; Yue, L.; White, M.; Pelletier, G.; Nattel, S. Differential distribution of inward rectifier potassium channel transcripts in human atrium versus ventricle. Circulation 1998, 98, 2422–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Cohen, N.M.; Lederer, W.J. Calcium current in single human cardiac myocytes. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 1993, 4, 422–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Kaplan, A.D.; Rasmusson, R.L.; Bett, G.C.L. Ionic basis of repolarization of atrial and ventricular specific cell types derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Biophys. J. 2016, 110 (Suppl. 1), 343a. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Lemme, M.; Ulmer, B.M.; Lemoine, M.D.; Zech, A.T.L.; Flenner, F.; Ravens, U.; Reichenspurner, H.; Rol-Garcia, M.; Smith, G.; Hansen, A.; et al. Atrial-like engineered heart tissue: An in vitro model of the human atrium. Stem Cell Rep. 2018, 11, 1378–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Luo, C.H.; Rudy, Y. A dynamic model of the cardiac ventricular action potential. I. Simulations of ionic currents and concentration changes. Circ. Res. 1994, 74, 1071–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Workman, A.J.; Marshall, G.E.; Rankin, A.C.; Smith, G.L.; Dempster, J. Transient outward K+ current reduction prolongs action potentials and promotes afterdepolarisations: A dynamic-clamp study in human and rabbit cardiac atrial myocytes. J. Physiol. 2012, 590, 4289–4305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Hove-Madsen, L.; Tort, L. L-type Ca2+ current and excitation-contraction coupling in single atrial myocytes from rainbow trout. Am. J. Physiol. 1998, 275, R2061–R2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. You, Y.; Pelzer, D.J.; Pelzer, S. Modulation of L-type Ca2+ current by fast and slow Ca2+ buffering in guinea pig ventricular cardiomyocytes. Biophys. J. 1997, 72, 175–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Mewes, T.; Ravens, U. L-type calcium currents of human myocytes from ventricle of non-failing and failing hearts and from atrium. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 1994, 26, 1307–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ouadid, H.; Albat, B.; Nargeot, J. Calcium currents in diseased human cardiac cells. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 1995, 25, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Kiyosue, T.; Arita, M.; Muramatsu, H.; Spindler, A.J.; Noble, D. Ionic mechanisms of action potential prolongation at low temperature in guinea-pig ventricular myocytes. J. Physiol. 1993, 468, 85–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Uzun, A.U.; Mannhardt, I.; Breckwoldt, K.; Horváth, A.; Johannsen, S.S.; Hansen, A.; Eschenhagen, T.; Christ, T. Ca2+-currents in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes effects of two different culture conditions. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Li, J.; Wiesinger, A.; Fokkert, L.; Bakker, P.; De Vries, D.K.; Tijsen, A.J.; Pinto, Y.M.; Verkerk, A.O.; Christoffels, V.M.; Boink, G.J.J.; et al. Modeling the atrioventricular conduction axis using human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac assembloids. Cell Stem Cell 2024, 31, 1667–1684.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Filippini, L.; Ortner, N.J.; Kaserer, T.; Striessnig, J. Cav1.3-selective inhibitors of voltage-gated L-type Ca2+ channels: Fact or (still) fiction? Br. J. Pharmacol. 2023, 180, 1289–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Qu, Y.; Baroudi, G.; Yue, Y.; El-Sherif, N.; Boutjdir, M. Localization and modulation of α1D (Cav1.3) L-type Ca channel by protein kinase A. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2005, 288, H2123–H2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Gaborit, N.; Le Bouter, S.; Szuts, V.; Varro, A.; Escande, D.; Nattel, S.; Demolombe, S. Regional and tissue specific transcript signatures of ion channel genes in the non-diseased human heart. J. Physiol. 2007, 582, 675–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Zaveri, S.; Srivastava, U.; Qu, Y.S.; Chahine, M.; Boutjdir, M. Pathophysiology of Cav1.3 L-type calcium channels in the heart. Front. Physiol. 2023, 14, 1144069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Honda, Y.; Li, J.; Hino, A.; Tsujimoto, S.; Lee, J.-K. High-throughput drug screening system based on human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived atrial myocytes ∼ A novel platform to detect cardiac toxicity for atrial arrhythmias. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 680618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Janvier, N.C.; Boyett, M.R. The role of Na-Ca exchange current in the cardiac action potential. Cardiovasc. Res. 1996, 32, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Ismaili, D.; Gurr, K.; Horváth, A.; Yuan, L.; Lemoine, M.D.; Schulz, C.; Sani, J.; Petersen, J.; Reichenspurner, H.; Kirchhof, P.; et al. Regulation of APD and force by the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger in human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived engineered heart tissue. Cells 2022, 11, 2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Christ, T.; Kovács, P.P.; Acsai, K.; Knaut, M.; Eschenhagen, T.; Jost, N.; Varró, A.; Wettwer, E.; Ravens, U. Block of Na+/Ca2+ exchanger by SEA0400 in human right atrial preparations from patients in sinus rhythm and in atrial fibrillation. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 788, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Dobrev, D.; Teos, L.Y.; Lederer, W.J. Unique atrial myocyte Ca2+ signaling. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2009, 46, 448–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Bootman, M.D.; Smyrnias, I.; Thul, R.; Coombes, S.; Roderick, H.L. Atrial cardiomyocyte calcium signalling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1813, 922–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Greiser, M. Calcium signalling silencing in atrial fibrillation. J. Physiol. 2017, 595, 4009–4017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Denham, N.C.; Pearman, C.M.; Caldwell, J.L.; Madders, G.W.P.; Eisner, D.A.; Trafford, A.W.; Dibb, K.M. Calcium in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Tanaami, T.; Ishida, H.; Seguchi, H.; Hirota, Y.; Kadono, T.; Genka, C.; Nakazawa, H.; Barry, W.H. Difference in propagation of Ca2+ release in atrial and ventricular myocytes. Jpn. J. Physiol. 2005, 55, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Guatimosim, S.; Dilly, K.; Santana, L.F.; Jafri, M.S.; Sobie, E.A.; Lederer, W.J. Local Ca2+ signaling and EC coupling in heart: Ca2+ sparks and the regulation of the [Ca2+]i transient. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2002, 34, 941–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Eisner, D.A.; Caldwell, J.L.; Trafford, A.W.; Hutchings, D.C. The control of diastolic calcium in the heart: Basic mechanisms and functional implications. Circ. Res. 2020, 126, 395–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Bokník, P.; Unkel, C.; Kirchhefer, U.; Kleideiter, U.; Klein-Wiele, O.; Knapp, J.; Linck, B.; Lüss, H.; Müller, F.U.; Schmitz, W.; et al. Regional expression of phospholamban in the human heart. Cardiovasc. Res. 1999, 43, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Maier, L.S.; Barckhausen, P.; Weisser, J.; Aleksic, I.; Baryalei, M.; Pieske, B. Ca2+ handling in isolated human atrial myocardium. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2000, 279, H952–H958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Minajeva, A.; Kaasik, A.; Paju, K.; Seppet, E.; Lompré, A.M.; Veksler, V.; Ventura-Clapier, R. Sarcoplasmic reticulum function in determining atrioventricular contractile differences in rat heart. Am. J. Physiol. 1997, 273, H2498–H2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Lüss, I.; Boknik, P.; Jones, L.R.; Kirchhefer, U.; Knapp, J.; Linck, B.; Lüss, H.; Meissner, A.; Müller, F.U.; Schmitz, W.; et al. Expression of cardiac calcium regulatory proteins in atrium v ventricle in different species. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 1999, 31, 1299–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Walden, A.P.; Dibb, K.M.; Trafford, A.W. Differences in intracellular calcium homeostasis between atrial and ventricular myocytes. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2009, 46, 463–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Dibb, K.M.; Eisner, D.A.; Trafford, A.W. Regulation of systolic [Ca2+]i and cellular Ca2+ flux balance in rat ventricular myocytes by SR Ca2+, L-type Ca2+ current and diastolic [Ca2+]i. J. Physiol. 2007, 585, 579–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Mangoni, M.E.; Nargeot, J. Genesis and regulation of the heart automaticity. Physiol. Rev. 2008, 88, 919–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Zhao, Z.; Lan, H.; El-Battrawy, I.; Li, X.; Buljubasic, F.; Sattler, K.; Yücel, G.; Lang, S.; Tiburcy, M.; Zimmermann, W.H.; et al. Ion channel expression and characterization in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Stem Cells Int. 2018, 2018, 6067096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Horváth, A.; Christ, T.; Koivumäki, J.T.; Prondzynski, M.; Zech, A.T.L.; Spohn, M.; Saleem, U.; Mannhardt, I.; Ulmer, B.; Girdauskas, E.; et al. Case report on: Very early afterdepolarizations in hiPSC-cardiomyocytes—An artifact by big conductance calcium activated potassium current (Ibk,Ca). Cells 2020, 9, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Verkerk, A.O.; Wilders, R.; Zegers, J.G.; Van Borren, M.M.G.J.; Ravesloot, J.H.; Verheijck, E.E. Ca2+-activated Cl current in rabbit sinoatrial node cells. J. Physiol. 2002, 540, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Lacinová, L.; Klugbauer, N.; Hofmann, F. Regulation of the calcium channel α1G subunit by divalent cations and organic blockers. Neuropharmacology 2000, 39, 1254–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Bers, D.M.; Perez-Reyes, E. Ca channels in cardiac myocytes: Structure and function in Ca influx and intracellular Ca release. Cardiovasc. Res. 1999, 42, 339–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Jones, P.P.; MacQuaide, N.; Louch, W.E. Dyadic plasticity in cardiomyocytes. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Lu, F.; Pu, W.T. The architecture and function of cardiac dyads. Biophys. Rev. 2020, 12, 1007–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Satin, J.; Itzhaki, I.; Rapoport, S.; Schroder, E.A.; Izu, L.; Arbel, G.; Beyar, R.; Balke, C.W.; Schiller, J.; Gepstein, L. Calcium handling in human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Stem Cells 2008, 26, 1961–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Lieu, D.K.; Liu, J.; Siu, C.-W.; McNerney, G.P.; Tse, H.-F.; Abu-Khalil, A.; Huser, T.; Li, R.A. Absence of transverse tubules contributes to non-uniform Ca2+ wavefronts in mouse and human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Stem Cells Dev. 2009, 18, 1493–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Gherghiceanu, M.; Barad, L.; Novak, A.; Reiter, I.; Itskovitz-Eldor, J.; Binah, O.; Popescu, L.M. Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells: Comparative ultrastructure. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2011, 15, 2539–2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Dark, N.; Cosson, M.V.; Tsansizi, L.I.; Owen, T.J.; Ferraro, E.; Francis, A.J.; Tsai, S.; Bouissou, C.; Weston, A.; Collinson, L.; et al. Generation of left ventricle-like cardiomyocytes with improved structural, functional, and metabolic maturity from human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Rep. Methods 2023, 3, 100456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Zhang, J.; Wilson, G.F.; Soerens, A.G.; Koonce, C.H.; Yu, J.; Palecek, S.P.; Thomson, J.A.; Kamp, T.J. Functional cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Circ. Res. 2009, 104, e30–e41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Gupta, M.K.; Illich, D.J.; Gaarz, A.; Matzkies, M.; Nguemo, F.; Pfannkuche, K.; Liang, H.; Classen, S.; Reppel, M.; Schultze, J.L.; et al. Global transcriptional profiles of beating clusters derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are highly similar. BMC Dev. Biol. 2010, 10, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Wang, K.; Terrenoire, C.; Sampson, K.J.; Iyer, V.; Osteen, J.D.; Lu, J.; Keller, G.; Kotton, D.N.; Kass, R.S. Biophysical properties of slow potassium channels in human embryonic stem cell derived cardiomyocytes implicate subunit stoichiometry. J. Physiol. 2011, 589, 6093–6104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Mandel, Y.; Weissman, A.; Schick, R.; Barad, L.; Novak, A.; Meiry, G.; Goldberg, S.; Lorber, A.; Rosen, M.R.; Itskovitz-Eldor, J.; et al. Human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes exhibit beat rate variability and power-law behavior. Circulation 2012, 125, 883–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Gharanei, M.; Shafaattalab, S.; Sangha, S.; Gunawan, M.; Laksman, Z.; Hove-Madsen, L.; Tibbits, G.F. Atrial-specific hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes in drug discovery and disease modeling. Methods 2022, 203, 364–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Botti, S.; Bartolucci, C.; Altomare, C.; Paci, M.; Barile, L.; Krause, R.; Pavarino, L.F.; Severi, S. A novel ionic model for matured and paced atrial-like hiPSC-CMs integrating IKur and IKCa currents. Comput. Biol. Med. 2024, 180, 108899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Zhao, Y.; Rafatian, N.; Feric, N.T.; Cox, B.J.; Aschar-Sobbi, R.; Wang, E.Y.; Aggarwal, P.; Zhang, B.; Conant, G.; Ronaldson-Bouchard, K.; et al. A platform for generation of chamber-specific cardiac tissues and disease modeling. Cell 2019, 176, 913–927.e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Action potentials (APs) of Std and RA-treated intrinsically quiescent hESC-CMs stimulated at 1 Hz, measured with amphotericin-perforated patch clamp technique. (A) APs of a selection of Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs, highlighting variability in shape. (B) Dot plot of APD90/50 ratio in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs (n = 36 and n = 37, respectively). Dashed line marks APD90/50 ratio of 2. Note the logarithmic scale. (C) Dot plot of associated APplat values. Dashed line marks APplat of 80 mV. (DG) Relationships between APplat and (D) APA, (E) APD20, (F) APD50, and (G) APD90. Closed and open symbols are Std and RA-treated cells, respectively. *** p < 0.001, RA-treated vs. Std (Mann–Whitney rank-sum test). Solid lines: linear correlation fits (Pearson correlation tests), with R2 and p values as indicated.
Figure 1. Action potentials (APs) of Std and RA-treated intrinsically quiescent hESC-CMs stimulated at 1 Hz, measured with amphotericin-perforated patch clamp technique. (A) APs of a selection of Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs, highlighting variability in shape. (B) Dot plot of APD90/50 ratio in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs (n = 36 and n = 37, respectively). Dashed line marks APD90/50 ratio of 2. Note the logarithmic scale. (C) Dot plot of associated APplat values. Dashed line marks APplat of 80 mV. (DG) Relationships between APplat and (D) APA, (E) APD20, (F) APD50, and (G) APD90. Closed and open symbols are Std and RA-treated cells, respectively. *** p < 0.001, RA-treated vs. Std (Mann–Whitney rank-sum test). Solid lines: linear correlation fits (Pearson correlation tests), with R2 and p values as indicated.
Cells 14 01226 g001
Figure 2. Membrane currents in intrinsically quiescent Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs. (A) Voltage clamp protocol (top panel) and typical currents recorded at −100, 0, and +50 mV in a Std and in an RA-treated hESC-CM. (B) Current–voltage (I–V) relationships of L-type Ca2+ current (ICa,L) in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs. (C) I–V relationships of steady-state currents in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs. (D) I–V relationships of depolarization-activated steady-state currents in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs in absence and presence of 50 µmol/L 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) to block ultrarapid delayed rectifier K+ current (IKur), obtained by re-analysis of data obtained in the study by Devalla et al. [49]. (E) Voltage clamp protocol (top panel) and typical transient outward K+ current (Ito1) recorded at +40 mV in a Std and in an RA-treated hESC-CM. (F) I–V relationships of Ito1 in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs. (G) I–V relationships of Ito1 normalized to its largest amplitude, resulting in overlapping Std and RA curves, indicating that the voltage-dependence of Ito1 activation is similar in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs (p = 0.78 (two-way RM ANOVA)). (H) I–V relationships of voltage-dependence of Ito1 inactivation (p = 0.99; two-way RM ANOVA). Solid lines: Boltzmann fits to mean data. Inset: Two-pulse voltage clamp protocol used. * p < 0.05, RA-treated vs. Std (two-way RM ANOVA).
Figure 2. Membrane currents in intrinsically quiescent Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs. (A) Voltage clamp protocol (top panel) and typical currents recorded at −100, 0, and +50 mV in a Std and in an RA-treated hESC-CM. (B) Current–voltage (I–V) relationships of L-type Ca2+ current (ICa,L) in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs. (C) I–V relationships of steady-state currents in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs. (D) I–V relationships of depolarization-activated steady-state currents in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs in absence and presence of 50 µmol/L 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) to block ultrarapid delayed rectifier K+ current (IKur), obtained by re-analysis of data obtained in the study by Devalla et al. [49]. (E) Voltage clamp protocol (top panel) and typical transient outward K+ current (Ito1) recorded at +40 mV in a Std and in an RA-treated hESC-CM. (F) I–V relationships of Ito1 in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs. (G) I–V relationships of Ito1 normalized to its largest amplitude, resulting in overlapping Std and RA curves, indicating that the voltage-dependence of Ito1 activation is similar in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs (p = 0.78 (two-way RM ANOVA)). (H) I–V relationships of voltage-dependence of Ito1 inactivation (p = 0.99; two-way RM ANOVA). Solid lines: Boltzmann fits to mean data. Inset: Two-pulse voltage clamp protocol used. * p < 0.05, RA-treated vs. Std (two-way RM ANOVA).
Cells 14 01226 g002
Figure 3. Relationships between APplat of hESC-CMs and their individual membrane currents. (A) Unbiased plot of APplat (open and filled circles, top), and IK, Ito1, and ICa,L densities (open and filled bars, bottom) for all 27 cells measured. Dashed line indicates APplat of 80 mV. (BD) Relationships between APplat and (B) IK, (C) Ito1, and (D) ICa,L densities of all hESC-CMs studied. Solid lines: linear correlation fits (Pearson correlation tests), with R2 and p values as indicated.
Figure 3. Relationships between APplat of hESC-CMs and their individual membrane currents. (A) Unbiased plot of APplat (open and filled circles, top), and IK, Ito1, and ICa,L densities (open and filled bars, bottom) for all 27 cells measured. Dashed line indicates APplat of 80 mV. (BD) Relationships between APplat and (B) IK, (C) Ito1, and (D) ICa,L densities of all hESC-CMs studied. Solid lines: linear correlation fits (Pearson correlation tests), with R2 and p values as indicated.
Cells 14 01226 g003
Figure 4. Characteristics of L-type Ca2+ current (ICa,L) in Std and in RA-treated hESC-CMs analyzed with ruptured patch clamp. (A) Voltage clamp protocol (top panel) and typical ICa,L recorded at 0 mV in a Std and in an RA-treated hESC-CM. (B) I–V relationships of ICa,L density in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs (* p < 0.05; two-way RM ANOVA followed by Students–Newman–Keuls post hoc test). (C) Associated box plots and individual data points of rate of ICa,L inactivation in response to depolarizing pulses from −60 to 0 mV (with fast and slow time constants τf and τs, respectively; left) and relative amplitude of its fast and slow components (right). (D) Associated voltage-dependence of ICa,L activation (p = 0.90; two-way RM ANOVA) and voltage-dependence of ICa,L inactivation (p = 0.88; two-way RM ANOVA). Solid lines: Boltzmann fits to the mean data. (E) Top panel: AP clamp protocol consisting of pre-recorded A- and V-like APs from hESC-CMs. Bottom panel: typical example of ICa,L during the two AP shapes in a Std (black line) and in an RA-treated (gray line) hESC-CM. Arrows indicate the peak ICa,L. (F) Box plots and individual data points of electrical charge carried by ICa,L during A- and V-like APs calculated from the area under associated ICa,L traces in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs. * p < 0.05; two-way ANOVA followed by Students–Newman–Keuls post hoc test.
Figure 4. Characteristics of L-type Ca2+ current (ICa,L) in Std and in RA-treated hESC-CMs analyzed with ruptured patch clamp. (A) Voltage clamp protocol (top panel) and typical ICa,L recorded at 0 mV in a Std and in an RA-treated hESC-CM. (B) I–V relationships of ICa,L density in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs (* p < 0.05; two-way RM ANOVA followed by Students–Newman–Keuls post hoc test). (C) Associated box plots and individual data points of rate of ICa,L inactivation in response to depolarizing pulses from −60 to 0 mV (with fast and slow time constants τf and τs, respectively; left) and relative amplitude of its fast and slow components (right). (D) Associated voltage-dependence of ICa,L activation (p = 0.90; two-way RM ANOVA) and voltage-dependence of ICa,L inactivation (p = 0.88; two-way RM ANOVA). Solid lines: Boltzmann fits to the mean data. (E) Top panel: AP clamp protocol consisting of pre-recorded A- and V-like APs from hESC-CMs. Bottom panel: typical example of ICa,L during the two AP shapes in a Std (black line) and in an RA-treated (gray line) hESC-CM. Arrows indicate the peak ICa,L. (F) Box plots and individual data points of electrical charge carried by ICa,L during A- and V-like APs calculated from the area under associated ICa,L traces in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs. * p < 0.05; two-way ANOVA followed by Students–Newman–Keuls post hoc test.
Cells 14 01226 g004
Figure 5. Na+-Ca2+ exchange current (INCX) in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs. (A) Typical traces of membrane current under baseline conditions and in the presence of 10 mmol/L NiCl2 in a Std (left) and in an RA-treated hESC-CM (right) measured during a descending ramp protocol (inset). INCX is obtained by subtraction as current sensitive to 10 mmol/L NiCl2 (bottom traces). (B) Average I–V relationships of INCX.
Figure 5. Na+-Ca2+ exchange current (INCX) in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs. (A) Typical traces of membrane current under baseline conditions and in the presence of 10 mmol/L NiCl2 in a Std (left) and in an RA-treated hESC-CM (right) measured during a descending ramp protocol (inset). INCX is obtained by subtraction as current sensitive to 10 mmol/L NiCl2 (bottom traces). (B) Average I–V relationships of INCX.
Cells 14 01226 g005
Figure 6. Intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs. (A) Typical intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) transients in a Std and in an RA-treated hESC-CM at 1 Hz pacing. (B) Left: Box plots and individual data points of diastolic and systolic [Ca2+]i levels and associated [Ca2+]i transient amplitude. Right: Box plots and individual data points of the time constant (τ) of the [Ca2+]i transient decay. (C) Typical [Ca2+]i transients in a Std (top) and in an RA-treated hESC-CM (bottom) at 1 Hz pacing and in response to a consecutive caffeine (Caff) pulse and in response to a consecutive Caff + NiCl2 pulse. (D) Box plots and individual data points of SERCA, NCX, and residual activity (rate constants KSERCA, KNCX, and Krest) for Ca2+ extrusion (top) and their relative contributions (bottom). (E) Box plots and individual data points of fraction of Ca2+ released from SR. * p < 0.05; RA-treated vs. Std (unpaired t-test or Mann–Whitney rank-sum test).
Figure 6. Intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs. (A) Typical intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) transients in a Std and in an RA-treated hESC-CM at 1 Hz pacing. (B) Left: Box plots and individual data points of diastolic and systolic [Ca2+]i levels and associated [Ca2+]i transient amplitude. Right: Box plots and individual data points of the time constant (τ) of the [Ca2+]i transient decay. (C) Typical [Ca2+]i transients in a Std (top) and in an RA-treated hESC-CM (bottom) at 1 Hz pacing and in response to a consecutive caffeine (Caff) pulse and in response to a consecutive Caff + NiCl2 pulse. (D) Box plots and individual data points of SERCA, NCX, and residual activity (rate constants KSERCA, KNCX, and Krest) for Ca2+ extrusion (top) and their relative contributions (bottom). (E) Box plots and individual data points of fraction of Ca2+ released from SR. * p < 0.05; RA-treated vs. Std (unpaired t-test or Mann–Whitney rank-sum test).
Cells 14 01226 g006
Table 1. Various action potential criteria used to identify cardiac AP subtypes in control hiPSC-CMs and hESC-CMs.
Table 1. Various action potential criteria used to identify cardiac AP subtypes in control hiPSC-CMs and hESC-CMs.
StudyDiff.Temp.
(°C)
EGTACriterion for N-likeCriterion for A-likeCriterion for V-likeN-|A-|V-like (%)
Itzhaki et al. [26]Std32+N/AN/AN/A13|27|60
Itzhaki et al. [27]Std32+N/AN/AN/A14|30|56
Li et al. [28]StdRoomN/AN/AN/AN/A|N/A|81
Streckfuss-Bömeke et al. [25]StdRoomN/AN/AN/A29|17|54 †,A
20|20|60 †,B
29|19|52 †,C
Lee et al. [29]StdN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A45|17|38
Lan et al. [30]Std36–37+N/AN/AN/A≈5|35|60
Laksman et al. [31]Std
RA
22–23N/AN/AN/A7|≈13|≈80
≈7|≈87|≈7
De la Roche et al. [32]StdRoom+N/A20 ms < APD50 < 200 msAPD50 > 200 msN/A|12|88
Peng et al. [33]Std35Slow upstrokes and
fast pacing rate
APD90 < 150 msAPD90 > 150 ms<1|18|82
Pei et al. [34]Std
RA
35Slow upstrokes and
fast pacing rate
APD90 < 150 msAPD90 > 150 msN/A|N/A|93
N/A|90|N/A
Chapotte-Baldacci et al. [35]Std
RA
Room+APD90 < 250 ms,
APD50 − APD20 ≤ 10 ms
APD90 < 250 ms,
APD50 − APD20 > 10 ms
APD90 > 250 ms0|31|69 #
9|66|27 #
Jara-Avaca et al. [36]Std37+Bell-shaped APs,
APD90/50 > 1.4
APD50 < 100 ms,
APD90/50 > 3
APD50 > 100 ms,
APD90/50 < 1.4
0|≈33|≈63
Bett et al. [37]StdRoom+N/AAPD30 < 300 ms,
APD30/90 < 0.75
APD30 > 300 ms,
APD30/90 > 0.75
N/A|≈64|≈28 #
Kim et al. [38]StdRoom+N/AAPD30 < 300 ms,
APD30/90 < 0.75
APD30 > 300 ms,
APD30/90 > 0.75
<1|19|68
Altomare et al. [39]Std
RA
35N/AAPD20/90 < 0.44APD20/90 > 0.44N/A|34|66
N/A|74|26
Moretti et al. [40]Std35+Depolarized;
low dV/dt, low APA
1.3 < APD90/50 < 1.61.1 < APD90/50 <1.318|20|62
El-Battrawy et al. [41]Std36+1.4 < APD90/50 < 1.7APD90/50 > 1.7APD90/50 < 1.45|22|73
Matsa et al. [42]Std37+1.4 < APD90/50 < 1.7APD90/50 > 1.7APD90/50 < 1.4N/A|N/A|N/A
Hayano et al. [43]Std36–37+APD90/50 > 1.2,
APA < 60 mV
APD90/50 > 1.2,
APA > 80 mV
APD90/50 ≤ 1.2,
APA > 80 mV
14|38|48
Ma et al. [44]Std35–37APD30–40/APD70–80 < 1.5,
dV/dtmax < 10 V/s
APD30–40/APD70–80 < 1.5APD30–40/APD70–80 > 1.522|24|54
Argenziano et al. [45] *Std
RA
N/AAPD30–40/APD70–80 < 1.5,
dV/dtmax < 10 V/s
APD30–40/APD70–80 < 1.5APD30–40/APD70–80 > 1.57|7|86
6|85|9
Cordeiro et al. [46] *Std37N/AAPD30–40/APD70–80 < 1.5APD30–40/APD70–80 > 1.5N/A|54|46 D
Zhang et al. [47]StdRoom+APD30–40/APD70–80 < 1.5,
dV/dtmax < 10 V/s
APD30–40/APD70–80 < 1.5APD30–40/APD70–80 > 1.518|65|17 E
0|50|50 F
Ma et al. [48]Std37APD30–40/APD70–80 < 1.5,
dV/dtmax < 10 V/s
APD30–40/APD70–80 < 1.5APD30–40/APD70–80 > 1.511|15|74
Devalla et al. [49]Std
RA
36N/AAPplat < 80 mVAPplat > 80 mV<1|≈19|≈80
<1|≈85|≈14
Percentages of N-, A-, and V-like cells do not add up to 100% in some cases due to cells that did not meet any of the AP criteria; * sharp microelectrode recordings from monolayers or clusters; excluding Purkinje-like hiPSC-CMs; excluding atypical hiPSC-CMs; A derived from mesenchymal stem cells; B derived from hair keratinocytes; C derived from fibroblasts; D recalculated based on their source (their Table 1); E early and F late stage hiPSC-CMs in 2D and 3D differentiated preparations; # using dynamic clamp. APA: AP amplitude; APD20, APD30, APD50, and APD90: AP duration at 20, 30, 50, and 90% of repolarization, respectively; APD20/90: ratio between APD20 and APD90; APD30–40: time difference between APD30 and APD40; APD30/90: ratio between APD30 and APD90; APD70–80: time difference between APD70 and APD80; APD90/50: ratio between APD90 and APD50; APplat: AP plateau amplitude at 20 ms after AP upstroke; dV/dtmax: maximum AP upstroke velocity.
Table 2. Action potential (AP) parameters in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs.
Table 2. Action potential (AP) parameters in Std and RA-treated hESC-CMs.
Spontaneously ActiveQuiescent—1 Hz Stimulation
Std (n = 15)RA-Treated (n = 10)Std (n = 36)RA-Treated (n = 37)
Cycle length (ms)814 ± 69591 ± 56 *N/AN/A
MDP (mV)−63.7 ± 1.9−62.0 ± 2.0−69.4 ± 0.8 #−70.1 ± 0.8 #
APA (mV)90.1 ± 4.576.9 ± 3.7 *98.2 ± 2.480.3 ± 2.2 *
APplat (mV)87.5 ± 4.870.7 ± 5.6 *89.9 ± 3.360.3 ± 2.8 *
dV/dtmax (V/s)8.4 ± 1.27.9 ± 2.560.3 ± 11.3 #41.4 ± 6.8 #
APD20 (ms)107.1 ± 8.864.2 ± 13.6 *74.9 ± 8.3 #26.8 ± 3.9 *,#
APD50 (ms)191.1 ± 21.5103.9 ± 20.3 *121.5 ± 12.6 #59.4 ± 7.1 *
APD90 (ms)267.7 ± 30.1162.6 ± 21.2 *185.8 ± 8.5 #152.8 ± 8.5
MDP: maximum diastolic potential; APA: AP amplitude; APplat: AP plateau amplitude at 20 ms after the AP upstroke; dV/dtmax: maximum AP upstroke velocity; APD20, APD50, and APD90: AP duration at 20, 50, and 90% of repolarization, respectively. * p < 0.05, RA-treated vs. Std; # p < 0.05, spontaneously active vs. intrinsically quiescent upon 1 Hz stimulation (two-way ANOVA followed by Students–Newman–Keuls post hoc test).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Verkerk, A.O.; Veerman, C.C.; Hoekstra, M.; Devalla, H.D.; Wilders, R. A Better Understanding of Atrial-like and Ventricular-like Action Potentials in Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes: The Underestimated Role of the L-Type Ca2+ Current. Cells 2025, 14, 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14161226

AMA Style

Verkerk AO, Veerman CC, Hoekstra M, Devalla HD, Wilders R. A Better Understanding of Atrial-like and Ventricular-like Action Potentials in Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes: The Underestimated Role of the L-Type Ca2+ Current. Cells. 2025; 14(16):1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14161226

Chicago/Turabian Style

Verkerk, Arie O., Christiaan C. Veerman, Maaike Hoekstra, Harsha D. Devalla, and Ronald Wilders. 2025. "A Better Understanding of Atrial-like and Ventricular-like Action Potentials in Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes: The Underestimated Role of the L-Type Ca2+ Current" Cells 14, no. 16: 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14161226

APA Style

Verkerk, A. O., Veerman, C. C., Hoekstra, M., Devalla, H. D., & Wilders, R. (2025). A Better Understanding of Atrial-like and Ventricular-like Action Potentials in Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes: The Underestimated Role of the L-Type Ca2+ Current. Cells, 14(16), 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14161226

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop