Next Article in Journal
Comparative Assessment of miR-185-5p and miR-191-5p Expression: From Normal Endometrium to High-Grade Endometrial Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Brain RFamide Neuropeptides in Stress-Related Psychopathologies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of the Dual FAAH/MAGL Inhibitor AKU-005 on Trigeminal Hyperalgesia in Male Rats
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 13
Issue 13
10.3390/cells13131098
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Navigating the Neurobiology of Migraine: From Pathways to Potential Therapies

by
Masaru Tanaka
1,
Bernadett Tuka
2 and
László Vécsei
1,3,*
1
HUN-REN-SZTE Neuroscience Research Group, Danube Neuroscience Research Laboratory, Hungarian Research Network, University of Szeged (HUN-REN-SZTE), Tisza Lajos krt. 113, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary
2
Department of Radiology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Semmelweis u. 6, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary
3
Department of Neurology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Semmelweis u. 6, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2024, 13(13), 1098; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13131098
Submission received: 14 June 2024 / Accepted: 21 June 2024 / Published: 25 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Migraine Neuroscience: From Experimental Models to Target Therapy)
Versions Notes

1. Introduction

Migraine is a debilitating neurological disorder characterized by recurring episodes of throbbing headaches that are frequently accompanied by sensory disturbances, nausea, and sensitivity to light and sound [1,2,3,4]. With a global prevalence of approximately 15% and a significant impact on individuals’ quality of life, migraine represents a major public health concern [5,6,7]. Despite its high prevalence and impact, the underlying mechanisms of migraine remain complex and multifaceted, involving a combination of genetic, environmental, and neurobiological factors [8,9,10]. Understanding the pathophysiology of migraine is essential for developing targeted therapies that can effectively manage symptoms and improve patient outcomes [11,12,13].
Recent advances in migraine research have emphasized the importance of experimental models in understanding the neurobiological mechanisms that cause migraine attacks [14,15,16,17,18]. Experimental models, particularly murine models, have provided valuable insights into the molecular and cellular pathways involved in migraine pathophysiology, allowing researchers to investigate the neurotransmission, inflammation, and sensitization processes that underpin migraine attacks [19,20,21,22]. Researchers have identified key molecules, pathways, and neural circuits that contribute to the initiation and progression of migraine attacks by simulating migraine conditions in controlled experimental settings [23,24,25]. These experimental models not only enhance our understanding of migraine pathophysiology but also serve as valuable tools for testing potential therapeutic targets and interventions.
The pathophysiology of migraines is significantly influenced by neuroplasticity, which includes modifications to brain excitability, biochemistry, and functional connectivity [26,27,28]. Chronic migraines are linked to persistent changes in neural plasticity, such as central sensitization and impaired pain modulation mechanisms [29,30,31,32,33]. These changes can set off a vicious cycle of pain chronification, in which the brain’s reaction to pain becomes maladaptive and pathological. Several receptors, including calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), transient receptor potential vanilloid subtype 1 (TRPV1), and purinergic receptor P2X subtype 3 (P2X3), have also been implicated in migraine mechanisms. For example, CGRP has been shown to stimulate trigeminal afferent activity and sensitize nociceptive neurons, whereas TRPV1 and P2X3 receptors are involved in mechanical pain modulation and nociceptive signal generation, respectively. Understanding the interplay between neuroplasticity and receptor activity is essential for developing targeted therapies for neurological disorders, including migraine [34,35,36,37].
The following Special Issue, entitled “Migraine Neuroscience: From Experimental Models to Target Therapy”, aims to showcase the latest research findings and advancements in the field of migraine neuroscience, with a specific focus on experimental models and therapeutic targets for migraine treatment. This collection of articles brings together cutting-edge studies that explore the intricate interplay of the neurobiological processes involved in migraine, from neurotransmitter signaling to neuroinflammation and genetic predisposition. By bridging the gap between basic science research and clinical applications, this Special Issue seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of migraine research and offer insights into novel therapeutic strategies for managing this complex neurological disorder.

2. Topic Articles

2.1. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP)-Related Mechanisms and Therapies

CGRP plays a pivotal role in migraine pathophysiology [38,39,40]. During both migraine attacks (ictal phase) and headache-free periods between attacks (interictal phase), CGRP levels are elevated [41,42,43]. However, after abortive and prophylactic treatment, these levels tend to decrease [44,45]. Notably, CGRP can induce migraine-like headaches in patients, and studies have demonstrated its significant release during acute migraine and cluster headache attacks [46,47,48]. Chronic migraine may be associated with chronically elevated CGRP levels [49,50,51]. Beyond headache mechanisms, CGRP also contributes to maintaining a normal resting tone in brain circulation [52,53,54]. Perivascular CGRP appears to mediate a protective vasodilatory reflex triggered in response to vasoconstriction [55,56,57]. Additionally, trigeminal pathway activation leads to the release of both CGRP and substance P [58,59,60]. A literature review highlights the variability in study design, determination methods, and results for CGRP measurements in migraine patients [61]. Overall, the above findings collectively emphasize the importance of CGRP in migraine and highlight the need for standardized measurement methods, potentially informing therapeutic strategies targeting CGRP for migraine treatment.

2.1.1. Interaction between Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) and Nitric Oxide in Migraine

Benedicter et al. investigated the complex relationship between glycerol trinitrate (GTN) and CGRP in the context of trigeminal nociception, a key mechanism in migraine pathogenesis [62]. The researchers used rodent experiments and the anti-CGRP antibody Fremanezumab to better understand GTN’s downstream effects on CGRP signaling. Their findings provide compelling evidence that GTN acts downstream of CGRP in the trigeminal nociceptive system, suggesting that the modulation of CGRP is a critical factor in the complex pathways that drive migraine pain. By unraveling this interplay between two key players in migraine, the authors contribute valuable insights that may inform the development of targeted therapeutic strategies for migraine management. The findings of their study underscore the importance of understanding the intricate mechanisms underlying migraine in order to develop more effective and personalized treatments for this debilitating condition.
Greco et al. investigated the interaction between CGRP and pain mediators involved in neuronal sensitization in an animal model of chronic migraine [63]. The study authors aimed to investigate the central and peripheral mechanisms of CGRP receptor antagonism. The authors revealed that olcegepant reduced the incidence of trigeminal hyperalgesia by lowering the expression of CGRP in the trigeminal nucleus and proinflammatory markers such as cytokines, microRNA-132, and TRPA1. The results suggest that CGRP receptor antagonism is important in both the central and peripheral mechanisms of chronic migraine. The results of the above study have the potential to contribute to the development of novel therapeutic strategies for chronic migraine, potentially leading to improved treatment outcomes and enhanced patient quality of life.
Dux et al. investigated the effects of Fremanezumab, an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody, on CGRP release from the rat dura mater and meningeal blood flow [64]. In the rat model, the authors found that administering Fremanezumab reduced CGRP release from the dura mater and, as a result, meningeal blood flow. These findings shed light on the mechanisms by which anti-CGRP antibodies, such as Fremanezumab, can modulate CGRP-mediated processes critical to migraine pathogenesis. The above study advances our understanding of the therapeutic potential of CGRP-targeted interventions in migraine management by elucidating Fremanezumab’s effect on CGRP release and meningeal blood flow (Table 1).

2.1.2. Real-World Outcomes and New Therapeutic Targets for Migraine

Pavelic et al. conducted a systematic review to assess the real-world outcomes of monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP for migraine prophylaxis [65]. CGRP has been recognized as a key player in migraine pathophysiology, and the development of CGRP-targeted therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, has revolutionized migraine management. In their review, the authors analyzed data from 134 publications, including retrospective and clinic-based studies, case reports, and other articles. The study findings suggest that treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies is associated with lower healthcare utilization, better treatment adherence, and comparable efficacy to randomized controlled trials. The authors do, however, acknowledge that the retrospective study designs, small patient populations, and short follow-up periods used in the examined studies limit the availability of real-world data. They emphasize the need for large prospective studies with long-term follow-up to fully understand the real-world impact of these novel therapies. By synthesizing the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in clinical practice, the authors contribute to the growing body of knowledge on the practical implications of these therapies in migraine management.
Tanaka et al. addressed the potential of other neuropeptides, such as pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), to better understand the evolving landscape of migraine treatment beyond CGRP [66]. These neuropeptides have shown promise in novel migraine management as a potential therapeutic target in addition to CGRP. Their review delves into the transition from CGRP to PACAP, VIP, and beyond, shedding light on the next generation of migraine treatments. By unraveling the roles of these neuropeptides in migraine pathophysiology, the authors contribute to expanding the understanding of potential targets for migraine therapy beyond the traditional focus on CGRP. Their research paves the way for exploring novel treatment avenues and advancing the field of migraine management (Table 1).

2.2. Metabolic Pathways and Migraine

Altered tryptophan (Trp) metabolism plays a crucial role in migraine susceptibility through its main metabolites, serotonin and kynurenine (KYN), which affect pain processing, stress response, neural hypersensitivity, and inflammatory processes [74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82]. These pathways have been extensively studied in the context of migraine, with a focus on their influence on vascular and inflammatory mechanisms [68,83,84,85]. The involvement of Trp metabolism, particularly through the serotonin and KYN pathways, has been a key area of research in understanding migraine pathophysiology [86,87]. The authors of recent studies have identified potential therapeutic targets within these pathways for future drug development, emphasizing the importance of regulating Trp-KYN metabolism in migraine treatment [88,89]. The intricate interplay between neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, and inflammatory mediators underscores the complexity of migraine pathogenesis and the potential for targeted interventions to improve treatment outcomes [90,91].

2.2.1. Altered Tryptophan Metabolism and Migraine Susceptibility

Gecse et al. investigated the neuroendocrine response to citalopram in patients with migraine [67]. The authors used a neuroendocrine challenge to assess the metabolism of Trp and KYN, a key amino acid and its metabolite involved in migraine pathophysiology. The findings of their study indicate that patients with migraine exhibit altered Trp-KYN metabolism compared to healthy controls. Specifically, they observed increased Trp levels and decreased KYN levels in migraine patients. These changes suggest that the metabolism of these amino acids may play a crucial role in the development and continuation of migraine. By elucidating the neuroendocrine response to citalopram in migraine patients, the results of the above study advance our understanding of the complex mechanisms that underpin migraine, highlighting the potential therapeutic implications of targeting Trp-KYN metabolism in migraine management (Table 1).

2.2.2. Tryptophan Metabolism Pathways in Migraine: Therapeutic Implications

Körtési et al. present a narrative review that explores the role of Trp metabolism in migraine pathogenesis [68]. The authors looked at the complex interactions of Trp metabolic pathways and how they affect migraine-related mechanisms such as pain processing, stress response, neural and brain hypersensitivity, and vascular and inflammatory processes. Their review highlights the importance of Trp metabolism in migraine susceptibility and the potential therapeutic implications of targeting these pathways. By synthesizing the current knowledge of Trp metabolism in migraine, they provide a comprehensive overview of the underlying mechanisms and identify promising avenues for future drug development and migraine management strategies (Table 1).

2.3. Experimental Models and Therapeutic Targets

Experimental models and therapeutic targets are critical for better understanding migraine pathophysiology and developing effective treatments [92,93,94]. Experimental models, particularly murine models, provide invaluable insights into the biological mechanisms that underpin migraines, allowing researchers to test various pharmacological interventions [16,95]. These models simulate migraine conditions, allowing researchers to study neurotransmission pathways and identify key molecules involved in migraine attacks. Therapeutic targets identified by the authors of such studies provide promising treatment options, focusing on molecules and pathways that can be modulated to alleviate migraine symptoms [12,96,97,98]. The authors of recent studies have identified several potential targets, including enzymes, ion channels, and signaling pathways, each of which contribute uniquely to our understanding of migraine and offer new opportunities for therapeutic intervention [88,99,100,101,102]. Three papers delve into the specifics of these experimental models and therapeutic targets, providing a thorough overview of current progress and future directions in migraine research [69,70,71].

2.3.1. Dual Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase (FAAH)/Monoacylglycerol Lipase (MAGL) Inhibitor in the Migraine Model

Greco et al. investigated the potential therapeutic benefits of targeting the endocannabinoid system in the context of migraine pathophysiology [69]. Utilizing a male rat model, the authors examined the effects of trigeminal hyperalgesia using AKU-005, a dual fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) and monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) inhibitor. The study reported that administering AKU-005 significantly reduced trigeminal hyperalgesia in the rat model, implying that dual inhibition of FAAH and MAGL could be a useful strategy for managing migraine-related pain. By elucidating the effects of AKU-005 on trigeminal hyperalgesia, the findings of the above study contribute to the growing body of research on the role of the endocannabinoid system in migraine and highlight the potential therapeutic implications of this novel pharmacological intervention for migraine management.

2.3.2. Src Family Kinase (SFK) Activity and Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP)–Cytokine Crosstalk

Nie et al. investigated the role of Src family kinases (SFKs) in the interaction between CGRP and cytokines in sensitizing the trigeminal ganglion [70]. CGRP and cytokines are key players in migraine pathophysiology, and their interaction is thought to contribute to the sensitization of the trigeminal system, a crucial mechanism underlying migraine-related pain. The study authors revealed that SFKs play a crucial role in mediating the crosstalk between CGRP and cytokines in the trigeminal ganglion. Specifically, they demonstrated that SFKs facilitate the transmission of CGRP receptor signaling via the protein kinase A pathway, leading to the sensitization of trigeminal ganglion neurons. By elucidating the mechanisms by which SFKs regulate the interaction between CGRP and cytokines in the trigeminal system, the authors contribute to our understanding of the complex pathways involved in migraine pain and highlight the potential therapeutic implications of targeting SFKs in migraine management.

2.3.3. ATP-Sensitive Potassium (KATP) Channels in Migraine Pathophysiology

Clement et al. explored the potential role of ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channels in migraine pathophysiology and their therapeutic implications [71]. KATP channels are known to be involved in various physiological processes, including vascular regulation and pain perception, making them an intriguing target for migraine research. The researchers synthesized findings from both preclinical and clinical studies to provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of KATP channels in migraine. The above review emphasizes the translational potential of KATP channel modulation in migraine management, with the results of animal studies indicating that KATP channel openers may have anti-nociceptive effects and reduce the incidence of migraine-related behaviors. Additionally, genetic studies involving humans have identified associations between KATP channel subunits and migraine susceptibility. By integrating these findings, Clement et al. propose that targeting KATP channels could be a promising avenue for the development of novel migraine therapies. Their review underscores the importance of translational research in bridging the gap between preclinical discoveries and clinical applications in the field of migraine treatment (Table 1).

2.4. Inflammation in the Pathophysiology of Migraine

Inflammation plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of migraine [1,103,104,105,106]. The complex mechanisms underlying migraine include neurogenic inflammation, which contributes to peripheral and central sensitization, resulting in the condition’s chronicity [107,108,109,110]. Two papers included in the present Special Issue examine the current understanding of neurogenic neuroinflammation and its role in migraine pathophysiology, focusing on how inflammatory processes in the meninges and trigeminal nerve pathways cause and sustain migraine pain [72,73]. Additionally, the authors of the second paper explore the wider symptomatology linked to migraines, highlighting the significance of recognizing and managing symptoms other than headache, such as photophobia and nausea, which have a major influence on patients’ quality of life [73]. The following section provides a brief overview of the inflammatory processes involved in migraine, as well as potential strategies for mitigating these effects in order to improve patient outcomes.

2.4.1. Neurogenic Neuroinflammation in Migraine

Reducha et al. explored the potential of using experimental inflammation models to gain a better understanding of migraine pathophysiology [72]. Their review highlights how, in addition to other mechanisms, neurogenic neuroinflammation has been proposed to play a role in the chronification of migraine, which involves peripheral and central sensitization. Extensive data indicate that CGRP and intracranial meningeal inflammation may play a major role in triggering the sensitivity of trigeminal meningeal nociceptors. The authors discuss how several studies have utilized inflammatory animal models to investigate this concept, with a focus on the sensitization of trigeminovascular afferent nerve terminals. By applying a range of pharmacological interventions, these studies provide insights into the pathways involved in the inflammatory processes underlying migraine. However, the authors emphasize the importance of using animal models with care and carefully evaluating the outcomes in the context of migraine pathophysiology, as the invasive procedures used in these models may have implications for data interpretation. Overall, the above review underscores the potential of experimental inflammation models in enhancing our understanding of the complex mechanisms driving migraine while also highlighting the need for cautious interpretation and translation of the findings into a clinical setting.

2.4.2. Complex Symptomatology of Migraine

Villar-Martinez and Goadsby conducted a comprehensive review of the pathophysiology and treatment of migraine-associated symptoms [73]. Their review highlights that migraine is a complex and heterogeneous disorder that goes beyond the core symptom of headache. The authors discuss the various associated features, including photophobia, vomiting, and other symptoms that are often overlooked but can significantly impact patients’ quality of life. The review authors emphasize the importance of understanding these associated features in the context of migraine pathophysiology as they can provide valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms driving the disorder. Additionally, the authors discuss the therapeutic implications of these associated features, including the potential for targeted interventions to alleviate symptoms and improve patient outcomes. By synthesizing the current understanding of migraine-associated features, the authors of the above review provide a comprehensive overview of the complex interplay between migraine pathophysiology and therapy, highlighting the need for a more holistic approach to managing this debilitating disorder.

3. Discussion

Migraine research has undergone significant advancements in recent years, shedding light on the intricate neurobiological mechanisms that underlie this debilitating neurological disorder [111,112,113]. The present Special Issue on migraine neuroscience serves as a comprehensive compilation of cutting-edge research in the field, with a specific emphasis on experimental models and therapeutic targets aimed at enhancing our understanding of migraine pathophysiology and improving patient outcomes. The ultimate goal of this line of research is to develop targeted therapies that can effectively manage migraine symptoms and alleviate the burden of this complex disorder on individuals’ quality of life. By delving into the molecular and cellular pathways involved in migraine attacks, researchers strive to identify novel therapeutic strategies that can address the diverse array of symptoms experienced by migraine sufferers, ranging from throbbing headaches to sensory disturbances, nausea, and sensitivity to light and sound [66].
However, a significant challenge in the field of migraine research lies in bridging the gap between basic science discoveries and their translation into clinical applications. To overcome this challenge, researchers must collaborate across disciplines, integrating knowledge from neuroscience, genetics, pharmacology, and other fields to develop innovative treatment modalities. Leveraging cutting-edge technologies such as advanced imaging techniques, genetic sequencing, and computational modeling is crucial in unraveling the complexities of migraine pathophysiology and identifying potential therapeutic targets. For example, the functional interplay between error-related brain activity and the autonomic nervous system in migraine emphasizes the significance of coordinated interactions between the central and autonomic nervous systems [114,115]. These interactions are critical for survival because they aid in the detection and correction of errors that could be fatal [116,117,118].
Advancements in migraine research have not only deepened our understanding of the underlying mechanisms driving migraine attacks but have also paved the way for personalized and targeted treatment approaches. These studies expand on previous research on CGRP-related mechanisms, Trp metabolic pathways, and experimental models, providing new insights and having implications for future research directions in migraine neuroscience [119,120,121]. Traditional medicine, particularly those derived from herbal compounds, has proven to be effective in the treatment of a variety of neurological and mental health disorders [122,123,124,125,126,127]. These remedies have played an important role in the field, and ongoing research is being conducted to identify potential antimigraine agents [128,129,130]. Herbs and other traditional forms of treatment have been linked to the treatment of conditions such as migraine [131,132,133,134,135,136]. By investigating the properties of these herbs, researchers hope to develop more effective medicines and targeted treatments for various conditions, including migraine. Furthermore, neurophysiological procedures have emerged as promising non-invasive interventions for migraine treatment, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), with the potential to reduce migraine frequency and severity by modulating cortical excitability and inhibiting cortical spreading depression. [137,138,139,140]. TMS has a lower side effect profile than traditional pharmacological treatments, making it an appealing option for patients who cannot tolerate medication [141,142].
The significance of this line of research extends beyond the realm of academia, with profound implications for clinical practice and patient care. By elucidating the neurobiological underpinnings of migraine and exploring novel therapeutic avenues, researchers aim to revolutionize the management of this complex neurological disorder, providing tailored treatment options that address the individual needs and symptoms of migraine sufferers. Furthermore, the collaborative efforts of basic science researchers and clinicians are essential in driving forward the field of migraine research and translating scientific discoveries into tangible benefits for patients. By embracing multidisciplinary approaches and innovative research methodologies, the study of migraine neuroscience holds enormous promise for future breakthroughs and improved outcomes for individuals affected by this debilitating condition.

4. Conclusions

The following Special Issue on migraine neuroscience has shed light on the intricate mechanisms underlying this debilitating neurological disorder. Through experimental models and therapeutic targets, researchers have made significant strides in understanding migraine pathophysiology, from genetic predisposition to neurotransmitter signaling and neuroinflammation. The emphasis on CGRP-related mechanisms and the exploration of Trp metabolic pathways have provided valuable insights into potential treatment avenues. Moving forward, future research directions could focus on further unraveling the complex interplay of neurobiological processes involved in migraine, including investigating novel therapeutic strategies and exploring the impact of environmental factors on migraine development. Collaborative efforts between basic science researchers and clinicians will be crucial in filling the gap between research findings and clinical applications, ultimately leading to improved management of this complex neurological disorder. By continuing to push the boundaries of our understanding and embracing multidisciplinary approaches, the field of migraine research holds enormous promise for innovative breakthroughs and improved outcomes for migraine sufferers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.V.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T.; writing—review and editing, M.T., B.T., and L.V.; supervision, L.V.; project administration, L.V.; funding acquisition, L.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research, Development, and Innovation Office—NKFIH K138125, SZTE SZAOK-KKA No: 2022/5S729, and the HUN-REN Hungarian Research Network.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

CGRPCalcitonin gene-related peptide
FAAHFatty acid amide hydrolase
GTNGlycerol trinitrate
KATPATP-sensitive potassium
KYNKynurenine
MAGLMonoacylglycerol lipase
PACAPAdenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide
P2X3Purinergic receptor P2X 3
SFKsSrc family kinases
TMSTranscranial magnetic stimulation
TrpTryptophan
TRPV1Transient receptor potential vanilloid subtype 1
VIPVasoactive intestinal peptide

References

  1. Edvinsson, L.; Haanes, K.A. Views on migraine pathophysiology: Where does it start? Neurol. Clin. Neurosci. 2020, 8, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Goadsby, P.J. Primary headache disorders: Five new things. Neurol. Clin. Pract. 2019, 9, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ashina, M.; Hansen, J.M.; Do, T.P.; Melo-Carrillo, A.; Burstein, R.; Moskowitz, M.A. Migraine and the trigeminovascular system—40 years and counting. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 795–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Olesen, J. The International Classification of Headache Disorders: History and future perspectives. Cephalalgia 2024, 44, 03331024231214731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Steiner, T.J.; Stovner, L.J. Global epidemiology of migraine and its implications for public health and health policy. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2023, 19, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shimizu, T.; Sakai, F.; Miyake, H.; Sone, T.; Sato, M.; Tanabe, S.; Azuma, Y.; Dodick, D.W. Disability, quality of life, productivity impairment and employer costs of migraine in the workplace. J. Headache Pain 2021, 22, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Leonardi, M.; Raggi, A. A narrative review on the burden of migraine: When the burden is the impact on people’s life. J. Headache Pain 2019, 20, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sutherland, H.G.; Albury, C.L.; Griffiths, L.R. Advances in genetics of migraine. J. Headache Pain 2019, 20, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Liu, T.-H.; Wang, Z.; Xie, F.; Liu, Y.-Q.; Lin, Q. Contributions of aversive environmental stress to migraine chronification: Research update of migraine pathophysiology. World J. Clin. Cases 2021, 9, 2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qubty, W.; Patniyot, I. Migraine pathophysiology. Pediatr. Neurol. 2020, 107, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rapoport, A.M.; Edvinsson, L. Some aspects on the pathophysiology of migraine and a review of device therapies for migraine and cluster headache. Neurol. Sci. 2019, 40, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Haanes, K.A.; Edvinsson, L. Pathophysiological Mechanisms in Migraine and the Identification of New Therapeutic Targets. CNS Drugs 2019, 33, 525–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fraser, C.L.; Hepschke, J.L.; Jenkins, B.; Prasad, S. Migraine Aura: Pathophysiology, Mimics, and Treatment Options. Semin. Neurol. 2019, 39, 739–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Harriott, A.M.; Strother, L.C.; Vila-Pueyo, M.; Holland, P.R. Animal models of migraine and experimental techniques used to examine trigeminal sensory processing. J. Headache Pain 2019, 20, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Greco, R.; Demartini, C.; De Icco, R.; Martinelli, D.; Putortì, A.; Tassorelli, C. Migraine neuroscience: From experimental models to target therapy. Neurol. Sci. 2020, 41, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tardiolo, G.; Bramanti, P.; Mazzon, E. Migraine: Experimental Models and Novel Therapeutic Approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Veréb, D.; Szabó, N.; Tuka, B.; Tajti, J.; Király, A.; Faragó, P.; Kocsis, K.; Tóth, E.; Kincses, B.; Bagoly, T. Correlation of neurochemical and imaging markers in migraine: PACAP38 and DTI measures. Neurology 2018, 91, e1166–e1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Szabó, N.; Faragó, P.; Király, A.; Veréb, D.; Csete, G.; Tóth, E.; Kocsis, K.; Kincses, B.; Tuka, B.; Párdutz, Á. Evidence for plastic processes in migraine with aura: A diffusion weighted MRI study. Front. Neuroanat. 2018, 11, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Olesen, J. Personal view: Modelling pain mechanisms of migraine without aura. Cephalalgia 2022, 42, 1425–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bertels, Z.; Pradhan, A.A.A. Emerging Treatment Targets for Migraine and Other Headaches. Headache 2019, 59 (Suppl. 2), 50–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Edvinsson, L.; Haanes, K.A.; Warfvinge, K. Does inflammation have a role in migraine? Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2019, 15, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Vuralli, D.; Wattiez, A.S.; Russo, A.F.; Bolay, H. Behavioral and cognitive animal models in headache research. J. Headache Pain 2019, 20, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Borkum, J.M. Brain Energy Deficit as a Source of Oxidative Stress in Migraine: A Molecular Basis for Migraine Susceptibility. Neurochem. Res. 2021, 46, 1913–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Andreou, A.P.; Edvinsson, L. Mechanisms of migraine as a chronic evolutive condition. J. Headache Pain 2019, 20, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mercer Lindsay, N.; Chen, C.; Gilam, G.; Mackey, S.; Scherrer, G. Brain circuits for pain and its treatment. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021, 13, eabj7360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Viganò, A.; Toscano, M.; Puledda, F.; Di Piero, V. Treating chronic migraine with neuromodulation: The role of neurophysiological abnormalities and maladaptive plasticity. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 416813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pozo-Rosich, P.; Coppola, G.; Pascual, J.; Schwedt, T.J. How does the brain change in chronic migraine? Developing disease biomarkers. Cephalalgia 2021, 41, 613–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Veréb, D.; Szabó, N.; Tuka, B.; Tajti, J.; Király, A.; Faragó, P.; Kocsis, K.; Tóth, E.; Bozsik, B.; Kincses, B. Temporal instability of salience network activity in migraine with aura. Pain 2020, 161, 856–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Battaglia, S.; Avenanti, A.; Vécsei, L.; Tanaka, M. Neural Correlates and Molecular Mechanisms of Memory and Learning. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Su, M.; Yu, S. Chronic migraine: A process of dysmodulation and sensitization. Mol. Pain 2018, 14, 1744806918767697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Battaglia, S.; Avenanti, A.; Vécsei, L.; Tanaka, M. Neurodegeneration in cognitive impairment and mood disorders for experimental, clinical and translational neuropsychiatry. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Puledda, F.; Viganò, A.; Sebastianelli, G.; Parisi, V.; Hsiao, F.-J.; Wang, S.-J.; Chen, W.-T.; Massimini, M.; Coppola, G. Electrophysiological findings in migraine may reflect abnormal synaptic plasticity mechanisms: A narrative review. Cephalalgia 2023, 43, 03331024231195780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gregorio, F.D.; Battaglia, S. The intricate brain–body interaction in psychiatric and neurological diseases. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2024, 33, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tanaka, M.; Battaglia, S.; Giménez-Llort, L.; Chen, C.; Hepsomali, P.; Avenanti, A.; Vécsei, L. Innovation at the Intersection: Emerging Translational Research in Neurology and Psychiatry. Cells 2024, 13, 790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Battaglia, S.; Schmidt, A.; Hassel, S.; Tanaka, M. Case reports in neuroimaging and stimulation. Front. Psychiatry 2023, 14, 1264669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tortora, F.; Hadipour, A.L.; Battaglia, S.; Falzone, A.; Avenanti, A.; Vicario, C.M. The role of serotonin in fear learning and memory: A systematic review of human studies. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Battaglia, S.; Di Fazio, C.; Mazzà, M.; Tamietto, M.; Avenanti, A. Targeting Human Glucocorticoid Receptors in Fear Learning: A Multiscale Integrated Approach to Study Functional Connectivity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wattiez, A.S.; Sowers, L.P.; Russo, A.F. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP): Role in migraine pathophysiology and therapeutic targeting. Expert. Opin. Ther. Targets 2020, 24, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Russo, A.F.; Hay, D.L. CGRP physiology, pharmacology, and therapeutic targets: Migraine and beyond. Physiol. Rev. 2023, 103, 1565–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Edvinsson, L.; Warfvinge, K. Recognizing the role of CGRP and CGRP receptors in migraine and its treatment. Cephalalgia 2019, 39, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kamm, K. CGRP and Migraine: What Have We Learned From Measuring CGRP in Migraine Patients So Far? Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 930383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Dodick, D.W. A Phase-by-Phase Review of Migraine Pathophysiology. Headache 2018, 58 (Suppl. 1), 4–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Vincent, M.; Viktrup, L.; Nicholson, R.A.; Ossipov, M.H.; Vargas, B.B. The not so hidden impact of interictal burden in migraine: A narrative review. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 1032103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Argyriou, A.A.; Mantovani, E.; Mitsikostas, D.D.; Vikelis, M.; Tamburin, S. A systematic review with expert opinion on the role of gepants for the preventive and abortive treatment of migraine. Expert. Rev. Neurother. 2022, 22, 469–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Rivera-Mancilla, E.; Villalón, C.M.; MaassenVanDenBrink, A. CGRP inhibitors for migraine prophylaxis: A safety review. Expert. Opin. Drug Saf. 2020, 19, 1237–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ho, T.W.; Edvinsson, L.; Goadsby, P.J. CGRP and its receptors provide new insights into migraine pathophysiology. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2010, 6, 573–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Carmine Belin, A.; Ran, C.; Edvinsson, L. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and cluster headache. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Russo, A.F. CGRP as a neuropeptide in migraine: Lessons from mice. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2015, 80, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Greco, R.; De Icco, R.; Demartini, C.; Zanaboni, A.M.; Tumelero, E.; Sances, G.; Allena, M.; Tassorelli, C. Plasma levels of CGRP and expression of specific microRNAs in blood cells of episodic and chronic migraine subjects: Towards the identification of a panel of peripheral biomarkers of migraine? J. Headache Pain 2020, 21, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Deen, M.; Correnti, E.; Kamm, K.; Kelderman, T.; Papetti, L.; Rubio-Beltrán, E.; Vigneri, S.; Edvinsson, L.; Maassen Van Den Brink, A.; European Headache Federation School of Advanced Studies (EHF-SAS). Blocking CGRP in migraine patients—A review of pros and cons. J. Headache Pain 2017, 18, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Edvinsson, L. T he T rigeminovascular P athway: R ole of CGRP and CGRP R eceptors in M igraine. Headache J. Head. Face Pain 2017, 57, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Brian, J.E., Jr.; Faraci, F.M.; Heistad, D.D. Recent insights into the regulation of cerebral circulation. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 1996, 23, 449–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kee, Z.; Kodji, X.; Brain, S.D. The role of calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) in neurogenic vasodilation and its cardioprotective effects. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 405886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gulbenkian, S.; Uddman, R.; Edvinsson, L. Neuronal messengers in the human cerebral circulation. Peptides 2001, 22, 995–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Thengchaisri, N.; Rivers, R.J. Remote arteriolar dilations caused by methacholine: A role for CGRP sensory nerves? Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2005, 289, H608–H613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Johansson, S.E.; Abdolalizadeh, B.; Sheykhzade, M.; Edvinsson, L.; Sams, A. Vascular pathology of large cerebral arteries in experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage: Vasoconstriction, functional CGRP depletion and maintained CGRP sensitivity. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 846, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Fromy, B.; Merzeau, S.; Abraham, P.; Saumet, J.L. Mechanisms of the cutaneous vasodilator response to local external pressure application in rats: Involvement of CGRP, neurokinins, prostaglandins and NO. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2000, 131, 1161–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Smith, D.; Hill, R.; Edvinsson, L.; Longmore, J. An immunocytochemical investigation of human trigeminal nucleus caudalis: CGRP, substance P and 5-HT1D-receptor immunoreactivities are expressed by trigeminal sensory fibres. Cephalalgia 2002, 22, 424–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Edvinsson, J.C.; Reducha, P.V.; Sheykhzade, M.; Warfvinge, K.; Haanes, K.A.; Edvinsson, L. Neurokinins and their receptors in the rat trigeminal system: Differential localization and release with implications for migraine pain. Mol. Pain 2021, 17, 17448069211059400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Messlinger, K.; Balcziak, L.K.; Russo, A.F. Cross-talk signaling in the trigeminal ganglion: Role of neuropeptides and other mediators. J. Neural Transm. 2020, 127, 431–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gárate, G.; Pascual, J.; Pascual-Mato, M.; Madera, J.; Martín, M.M.-S.; González-Quintanilla, V. Untangling the mess of CGRP levels as a migraine biomarker: An in-depth literature review and analysis of our experimental experience. J. Headache Pain 2024, 25, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Benedicter, N.; Vogler, B.; Kuhn, A.; Schramm, J.; Mackenzie, K.D.; Stratton, J.; Dux, M.; Messlinger, K. Glycerol Trinitrate Acts Downstream of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide in Trigeminal Nociception—Evidence from Rodent Experiments with Anti-CGRP Antibody Fremanezumab. Cells 2024, 13, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Greco, R.; Demartini, C.; Francavilla, M.; Zanaboni, A.M.; Tassorelli, C. Antagonism of CGRP receptor: Central and peripheral mechanisms and mediators in an animal model of chronic migraine. Cells 2022, 11, 3092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Dux, M.; Vogler, B.; Kuhn, A.; Mackenzie, K.D.; Stratton, J.; Messlinger, K. The anti-CGRP antibody fremanezumab lowers CGRP release from rat dura mater and meningeal blood flow. Cells 2022, 11, 1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Pavelic, A.R.; Wöber, C.; Riederer, F.; Zebenholzer, K. Monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide for migraine prophylaxis: A systematic review of real-world data. Cells 2022, 12, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Tanaka, M.; Szabó, Á.; Körtési, T.; Szok, D.; Tajti, J.; Vécsei, L. From CGRP to PACAP, VIP, and Beyond: Unraveling the Next Chapters in Migraine Treatment. Cells 2023, 12, 2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Gecse, K.; Édes, A.E.; Nagy, T.; Demeter, A.K.; Virág, D.; Király, M.; Dalmadi Kiss, B.; Ludányi, K.; Környei, Z.; Denes, A. Citalopram Neuroendocrine Challenge Shows Altered Tryptophan and Kynurenine Metabolism in Migraine. Cells 2022, 11, 2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Körtési, T.; Spekker, E.; Vécsei, L. Exploring the tryptophan metabolic pathways in migraine-related mechanisms. Cells 2022, 11, 3795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Greco, R.; Demartini, C.; Francavilla, M.; Zanaboni, A.M.; Facchetti, S.; Palmisani, M.; Franco, V.; Tassorelli, C. Effects of the Dual FAAH/MAGL Inhibitor AKU-005 on Trigeminal Hyperalgesia in Male Rats. Cells 2024, 13, 830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nie, L.; Sun, K.; Gong, Z.; Li, H.; Quinn, J.P.; Wang, M. Src Family Kinases Facilitate the Crosstalk between CGRP and Cytokines in Sensitizing Trigeminal Ganglion via Transmitting CGRP Receptor/PKA Pathway. Cells 2022, 11, 3498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Clement, A.; Guo, S.; Jansen-Olesen, I.; Christensen, S.L. ATP-sensitive potassium channels in migraine: Translational findings and therapeutic potential. Cells 2022, 11, 2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Reducha, P.V.; Edvinsson, L.; Haanes, K.A. Could experimental inflammation provide better understanding of migraines? Cells 2022, 11, 2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Villar-Martinez, M.D.; Goadsby, P.J. Pathophysiology and therapy of associated features of migraine. Cells 2022, 11, 2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Staud, R.; Spaeth, M. Psychophysical and neurochemical abnormalities of pain processing in fibromyalgia. CNS Spectr. 2008, 13, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Guo, S.; Vecsei, L.; Ashina, M. The L-kynurenine signalling pathway in trigeminal pain processing: A potential therapeutic target in migraine? Cephalalgia 2011, 31, 1029–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Peyrot, F.; Ducrocq, C. Potential role of tryptophan derivatives in stress responses characterized by the generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. J. Pineal Res. 2008, 45, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Won, E.; Kim, Y.-K. Stress, the autonomic nervous system, and the immune-kynurenine pathway in the etiology of depression. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2016, 14, 665–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Staats Pires, A.; Tan, V.X.; Heng, B.; Guillemin, G.J.; Latini, A. Kynurenine and tetrahydrobiopterin pathways crosstalk in pain hypersensitivity. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 518534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Singh, R. Role of tryptophan in health and disease: Systematic review of the anti-oxidant, anti-inflammation, and nutritional aspects of tryptophan and its metabolites. World Heart J. 2019, 11, 161–178. [Google Scholar]
  80. Wang, Q.; Liu, D.; Song, P.; Zou, M.-H. Tryptophan-kynurenine pathway is dysregulated in inflammation, and immune activation. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed.) 2015, 20, 1116–1143. [Google Scholar]
  81. Tuka, B.; Nyári, A.; Cseh, E.K.; Körtési, T.; Veréb, D.; Tömösi, F.; Kecskeméti, G.; Janáky, T.; Tajti, J.; Vécsei, L. Clinical relevance of depressed kynurenine pathway in episodic migraine patients: Potential prognostic markers in the peripheral plasma during the interictal period. J. Headache Pain 2021, 22, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Király, A.; Szabó, N.; Párdutz, Á.; Tóth, E.; Tajti, J.; Csete, G.; Faragó, P.; Bodnár, P.; Szok, D.; Tuka, B. Macro-and microstructural alterations of the subcortical structures in episodic cluster headache. Cephalalgia 2018, 38, 662–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Paolucci, M.; Altamura, C.; Vernieri, F. The role of endothelial dysfunction in the pathophysiology and cerebrovascular effects of migraine: A narrative review. J. Clin. Neurol. 2021, 17, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Fila, M.; Chojnacki, J.; Pawlowska, E.; Szczepanska, J.; Chojnacki, C.; Blasiak, J. Kynurenine pathway of tryptophan metabolism in migraine and functional gastrointestinal disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Jovanovic, F.; Candido, K.D.; Knezevic, N.N. The role of the kynurenine signaling pathway in different chronic pain conditions and potential use of therapeutic agents. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Fila, M.; Chojnacki, C.; Chojnacki, J.; Blasiak, J. The kynurenine pathway of tryptophan metabolism in abdominal migraine in children–A therapeutic potential? Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Tuka, B.; Körtési, T.; Nánási, N.; Tömösi, F.; Janáky, T.; Veréb, D.; Szok, D.; Tajti, J.; Vécsei, L. Cluster headache and kynurenines. J. Headache Pain 2023, 24, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Tajti, J.; Szok, D.; Csáti, A.; Szabó, Á.; Tanaka, M.; Vécsei, L. Exploring novel therapeutic targets in the common pathogenic factors in migraine and neuropathic pain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Martos, D.; Lőrinczi, B.; Szatmári, I.; Vécsei, L.; Tanaka, M. The Impact of C-3 Side Chain Modifications on Kynurenic Acid: A Behavioral Analysis of Its Analogs in the Motor Domain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Jászberényi, M.; Thurzó, B.; Bagosi, Z.; Vécsei, L.; Tanaka, M. The Orexin/Hypocretin System, the Peptidergic Regulator of Vigilance, Orchestrates Adaptation to Stress. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Tanaka, M.; Bohár, Z.; Vécsei, L. Are kynurenines accomplices or principal villains in dementia? Maintenance of kynurenine metabolism. Molecules 2020, 25, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Tanaka, M.; Vécsei, L. A Decade of Dedication: Pioneering Perspectives on Neurological Diseases and Mental Illnesses. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Tanaka, M.; Vécsei, L. From Lab to Life: Exploring Cutting-Edge Models for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Tanaka, M.; Szabó, Á.; Vécsei, L.; Giménez-Llort, L. Emerging Translational Research in Neurological and Psychiatric Diseases: From In Vitro to In Vivo Models. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Spekker, E.; Tanaka, M.; Szabó, Á.; Vécsei, L. Neurogenic inflammation: The participant in migraine and recent advancements in translational research. Biomedicines 2021, 10, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Khan, J.; Al Asoom, L.I.; Al Sunni, A.; Rafique, N.; Latif, R.; Al Saif, S.; Almandil, N.B.; Almohazey, D.; AbdulAzeez, S.; Borgio, J.F. Genetics, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of migraine. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 139, 111557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Rainero, I.; Roveta, F.; Vacca, A.; Noviello, C.; Rubino, E. Migraine pathways and the identification of novel therapeutic targets. Expert. Opin. Ther. Targets 2020, 24, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Edvinsson, L.; Haanes, K.A. Identifying new antimigraine targets: Lessons from molecular biology. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2021, 42, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lisicki, M.; Schoenen, J. Metabolic treatments of migraine. Expert. Rev. Neurother. 2020, 20, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Iannone, L.F.; De Logu, F.; Geppetti, P.; De Cesaris, F. The role of TRP ion channels in migraine and headache. Neurosci. Lett. 2022, 768, 136380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Thuraiaiyah, J.; Kokoti, L.; Al-Karagholi, M.A.-M.; Ashina, M. Involvement of adenosine signaling pathway in migraine pathophysiology: A systematic review of preclinical studies. J. Headache Pain 2022, 23, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Nisar, A.; Ahmed, Z.; Yuan, H. Novel therapeutic targets for migraine. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Moskowitz, M.A. Neurogenic inflammation in the pathophysiology and treatment of migraine. Neurol. Minneap. 1993, 43, S16–S20. [Google Scholar]
  104. Biscetti, L.; Cresta, E.; Cupini, L.M.; Calabresi, P.; Sarchielli, P. The putative role of neuroinflammation in the complex pathophysiology of migraine: From bench to bedside. Neurobiol. Dis. 2023, 106072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Aczél, T.; Benczik, B.; Ágg, B.; Körtési, T.; Urbán, P.; Bauer, W.; Gyenesei, A.; Tuka, B.; Tajti, J.; Ferdinandy, P. Disease-and headache-specific microRNA signatures and their predicted mRNA targets in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in migraineurs: Role of inflammatory signalling and oxidative stress. J. Headache Pain 2022, 23, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Aczél, T.; Körtési, T.; Kun, J.; Urbán, P.; Bauer, W.; Herczeg, R.; Farkas, R.; Kovács, K.; Vásárhelyi, B.; Karvaly, G.B. Identification of disease-and headache-specific mediators and pathways in migraine using blood transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis. J. Headache Pain 2021, 22, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Suzuki, K.; Suzuki, S.; Shiina, T.; Kobayashi, S.; Hirata, K. Central sensitization in migraine: A narrative review. J. Pain Res. 2022, 2673–2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Ramachandran, R. Neurogenic inflammation and its role in migraine. Semin. Immunopathol. 2018, 40, 301–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Mungoven, T.J.; Henderson, L.A.; Meylakh, N. Chronic migraine pathophysiology and treatment: A review of current perspectives. Front. Pain Res. 2021, 2, 705276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Bertels, Z.; Mangutov, E.; Conway, C.; Siegersma, K.; Asif, S.; Shah, P.; Huck, N.; Tawfik, V.L.; Pradhan, A.A. Migraine and peripheral pain models show differential alterations in neuronal complexity. Headache 2022, 62, 780–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Karsan, N.; Goadsby, P.J. Migraine: Beyond pain. Pract. Neurol. 2021, 21, 475–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Tuttolomondo, A.; Simonetta, I. Molecular Research on Migraine: From Pathogenesis to Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Rattanawong, W.; Rapoport, A.; Srikiatkhachorn, A. Neurobiology of migraine progression. Neurobiol. Pain 2022, 12, 100094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Borsook, D.; Aasted, C.M.; Burstein, R.; Becerra, L. Migraine mistakes: Error awareness. Neuroscientist 2014, 20, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Feller, L.; Feller, G.; Ballyram, T.; Chandran, R.; Lemmer, J.; Khammissa, R.A.G. Interrelations between pain, stress and executive functioning. Br. J. Pain 2020, 14, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Battaglia, S.; Nazzi, C.; Thayer, J. Heart's tale of trauma: Fear-conditioned heart rate changes in post-traumatic stress disorder. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2023, 148, 463–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Di Gregorio, F.; Steinhauser, M.; Maier, M.E.; Thayer, J.F.; Battaglia, S. Error-related cardiac deceleration: Functional interplay between error-related brain activity and autonomic nervous system in performance monitoring. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2024, 105542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Battaglia, S.; Nazzi, C.; Thayer, J.F. Genetic differences associated with dopamine and serotonin release mediate fear-induced bradycardia in the human brain. Transl. Psychiatry 2024, 14, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Karsan, N.; Goadsby, P.J. CGRP mechanism antagonists and migraine management. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2015, 15, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Gross, E.C.; Lisicki, M.; Fischer, D.; Sándor, P.S.; Schoenen, J. The metabolic face of migraine—From pathophysiology to treatment. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2019, 15, 627–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Arulmani, U.; Gupta, S.; VanDenBrink, A.M.; Centurión, D.; Villalón, C.; Saxena, P.R. Experimental migraine models and their relevance in migraine therapy. Cephalalgia 2006, 26, 642–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Pagotto, G.L.d.O.; Santos, L.M.O.d.; Osman, N.; Lamas, C.B.; Laurindo, L.F.; Pomini, K.T.; Guissoni, L.M.; Lima, E.P.d.; Goulart, R.d.A.; Catharin, V.M.S. Ginkgo biloba: A Leaf of Hope in the Fight against Alzheimer’s Dementia: Clinical Trial Systematic Review. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Valotto Neto, L.J.; Reverete de Araujo, M.; Moretti Junior, R.C.; Mendes Machado, N.; Joshi, R.K.; dos Santos Buglio, D.; Barbalho Lamas, C.; Direito, R.; Fornari Laurindo, L.; Tanaka, M. Investigating the Neuroprotective and Cognitive-Enhancing Effects of Bacopa monnieri: A Systematic Review Focused on Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, Mitochondrial Dysfunction, and Apoptosis. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Laurindo, L.F.; Rodrigues, V.D.; Minniti, G.; de Carvalho, A.C.A.; Zutin, T.L.M.; DeLiberto, L.K.; Bishayee, A.; Barbalho, S.M. Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) phytochemicals target the components of metabolic syndrome. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2024, 131, 109670. [Google Scholar]
  125. Direito, R.; Barbalho, S.M.; Sepodes, B.; Figueira, M.E. Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds: Exploring Neuroprotective, Metabolic, and Hepatoprotective Effects for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Bássoli, R.; Audi, D.; Ramalho, B.; Audi, M.; Quesada, K.; Barbalho, S. The Effects of Curcumin on Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review. J. Herb. Med. 2023, 42, 100771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Pasierski, M.; Szulczyk, B. Beneficial effects of capsaicin in disorders of the central nervous system. Molecules 2022, 27, 2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Chen, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y. Role of herbal medicine for prevention and treatment of migraine. Phytother. Res. 2022, 36, 730–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Tauchen, J. Natural products and their (semi-) synthetic forms in the treatment of migraine: History and current status. Curr. Med. Chem. 2020, 27, 3784–3808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Wei, T.-H.; Hsieh, C.-L. Headaches, migraine, and herbal medicine. In Treatments, Nutraceuticals, Supplements, and Herbal Medicine in Neurological Disorders; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 401–419. [Google Scholar]
  131. Minniti, G.; Laurindo, L.F.; Machado, N.M.; Duarte, L.G.; Guiguer, E.L.; Araujo, A.C.; Dias, J.A.; Lamas, C.B.; Nunes, Y.C.; Bechara, M.D. Mangifera indica L., By-Products, and Mangiferin on Cardio-Metabolic and Other Health Conditions: A Systematic Review. Life 2023, 13, 2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Yarnell, E. Herbal medicine and migraine. Altern. Complement. Ther. 2017, 23, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Takeda, L.N.; Laurindo, L.F.; Guiguer, E.L.; Bishayee, A.; Araújo, A.C.; Ubeda, L.C.C.; Goulart, R.d.A.; Barbalho, S.M. Psidium guajava L.: A systematic review of the multifaceted health benefits and economic importance. Food Rev. Int. 2023, 39, 4333–4363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Laurindo, L.F.; Barbalho, S.M.; Araújo, A.C.; Guiguer, E.L.; Mondal, A.; Bachtel, G.; Bishayee, A. Açaí (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) in health and disease: A critical review. Nutrients 2023, 15, 989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Nishikito, D.F.; Borges, A.C.A.; Laurindo, L.F.; Otoboni, A.M.B.; Direito, R.; Goulart, R.d.A.; Nicolau, C.C.; Fiorini, A.M.; Sinatora, R.V.; Barbalho, S.M. Anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and other health effects of dragon fruit and potential delivery systems for its bioactive compounds. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Buglio, D.S.; Marton, L.T.; Laurindo, L.F.; Guiguer, E.L.; Araújo, A.C.; Buchaim, R.L.; Goulart, R.d.A.; Rubira, C.J.; Barbalho, S.M. The role of resveratrol in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review. J. Med. Food 2022, 25, 797–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Zhong, J.; Lan, W.; Feng, Y.; Yu, L.; Xiao, R.; Shen, Y.; Zou, Z.; Hou, X. Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on chronic migraine: A meta-analysis. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 1050090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Battaglia, S.; Nazzi, C.; Di Fazio, C.; Borgomaneri, S. The role of pre-supplementary motor cortex in action control with emotional stimuli: A repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2024, 1536, 151–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Saltychev, M.; Juhola, J. Effectiveness of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2022, 101, 1001–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Battaglia, S.; Nazzi, C.; Fullana, M.A.; di Pellegrino, G.; Borgomaneri, S. ‘Nip it in the bud’: Low-frequency rTMS of the prefrontal cortex disrupts threat memory consolidation in humans. Behav. Res. Ther. 2024, 178, 104548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Miron, J.-P.; Voetterl, H.; Fox, L.; Hyde, M.; Mansouri, F.; Dees, S.; Zhou, R.; Sheen, J.; Jodoin, V.D.; Mir-Moghtadaei, A. Optimized repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques for the treatment of major depression: A proof of concept study. Psychiatry Res. 2021, 298, 113790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Zhang, J.-H.; Liang, J.; Yang, Z.-W. Non-invasive brain stimulation for fibromyalgia: Current trends and future perspectives. Front. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1288765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Major subtopics covering the Special Issue “Migraine Neuroscience: From Experimental Models to Target Therapy”.
Table 1. Major subtopics covering the Special Issue “Migraine Neuroscience: From Experimental Models to Target Therapy”.
SubtopicsRef.
1.
CGRP-related mechanisms and therapies
      a. Interaction between CGRP and nitric oxide in migraine[62,63,64]
      b. Real-world outcomes and new therapeutic targets for migraine[65,66]
2.
Metabolic pathways and migraine
      a. Altered tryptophan metabolism and migraine susceptibility[67]
      b. Tryptophan metabolism pathways in migraine: therapeutic implications[68]
3.
Experimental Models and Therapeutic Targets
      a. Dual FAAH/MAGL inhibitor in a migraine model[69]
      b. SFK activity and CGRP–cytokine crosstalk[70]
      c. KATP channels in migraine pathophysiology[71]
4.
Inflammation and pathophysiology in migraine
      a. Neurogenic neuroinflammation in migraine[72]
      b. Complex symptomatology of migraine[73]
CGRP: calcitonin gene-related peptide; FAAH: fatty acid amide hydrolase; KATP: ATP-sensitive potassium; MAGL: monoacylglycerol lipase; SFKs: Src family kinases.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tanaka, M.; Tuka, B.; Vécsei, L. Navigating the Neurobiology of Migraine: From Pathways to Potential Therapies. Cells 2024, 13, 1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13131098

AMA Style

Tanaka M, Tuka B, Vécsei L. Navigating the Neurobiology of Migraine: From Pathways to Potential Therapies. Cells. 2024; 13(13):1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13131098

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tanaka, Masaru, Bernadett Tuka, and László Vécsei. 2024. "Navigating the Neurobiology of Migraine: From Pathways to Potential Therapies" Cells 13, no. 13: 1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13131098

APA Style

Tanaka, M., Tuka, B., & Vécsei, L. (2024). Navigating the Neurobiology of Migraine: From Pathways to Potential Therapies. Cells, 13(13), 1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13131098

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop