Next Article in Journal
Circadian Disruption Primes Myofibroblasts for Accelerated Activation as a Mechanism Underpinning Fibrotic Progression in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Myo/Nog Cells: The Jekylls and Hydes of the Lens
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Inflammation in CKD
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatiotemporal Localisation of Heparan Sulphate Proteoglycans throughout Mouse Lens Morphogenesis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 12
Issue 12
10.3390/cells12121580
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Independent Membrane Binding Properties of the Caspase Generated Fragments of the Beaded Filament Structural Protein 1 (BFSP1) Involves an Amphipathic Helix

by
Miguel Jarrin
1,2,
Alexia A. Kalligeraki
1,2,
Alice Uwineza
1,2,
Chris S. Cawood
1,2,
Adrian P. Brown
1,
Edward N. Ward
1,2,
Khoa Le
2,3,
Stefanie Freitag-Pohl
4,
Ehmke Pohl
2,4,
Bence Kiss
5,
Antal Tapodi
1,2,5,* and
Roy A. Quinlan
1,2,3
1
Department of Biosciences, Upper Mountjoy Science Site, The University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
2
Biophysical Sciences Institute, Durham University, Upper Mountjoy, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
3
Department of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
4
Department of Chemistry, Durham University, Lower Mountjoy, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
5
Department of Biochemistry and Medical Chemistry, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2023, 12(12), 1580; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12121580
Submission received: 12 May 2023 / Revised: 4 June 2023 / Accepted: 5 June 2023 / Published: 7 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Lens Biology and Pathology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: BFSP1 (beaded filament structural protein 1) is a plasma membrane, Aquaporin 0 (AQP0/MIP)-associated intermediate filament protein expressed in the eye lens. BFSP1 is myristoylated, a post-translation modification that requires caspase cleavage at D433. Bioinformatic analyses suggested that the sequences 434–452 were α-helical and amphipathic. Methods and Results: By CD spectroscopy, we show that the addition of trifluoroethanol induced a switch from an intrinsically disordered to a more α-helical conformation for the residues 434–467. Recombinantly produced BFSP1 fragments containing this amphipathic helix bind to lens lipid bilayers as determined by surface plasmon resonance (SPR). Lastly, we demonstrate by transient transfection of non-lens MCF7 cells that these same BFSP1 C-terminal sequences localise to plasma membranes and to cytoplasmic vesicles. These can be co-labelled with the vital dye, lysotracker, but other cell compartments, such as the nuclear and mitochondrial membranes, were negative. The N-terminal myristoylation of the amphipathic helix appeared not to change either the lipid affinity or membrane localisation of the BFSP1 polypeptides or fragments we assessed by SPR and transient transfection, but it did appear to enhance its helical content. Conclusions: These data support the conclusion that C-terminal sequences of human BFSP1 distal to the caspase site at G433 have independent membrane binding properties via an adjacent amphipathic helix.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The transparency and optical function of the eye lens depends upon a functional intermediate filament network [1,2]. In addition to vimentin, there is a pair of intermediate filament proteins that are highly expressed in the lens and form an iconic cytoskeletal structure of the eye lens called the beaded filament [3,4]. For this reason, they are identified as Bead Filament Structural Proteins 1 and 2 [5]. Mutations in both proteins cause cataracts ((https://cat-map.wustl.edu/, accessed on 5 May 2023); [6]), and the targeted removal from the mouse genome not only affects the biomechanical properties of the lens [7], but also affects the transparency and optical properties of the lens ([8,9,10,11,12]; reviewed in [1,2,13,14]) and their loss can also prevent emmetropia developing [15]. BFSP1 (beaded filament structural protein 1; filensin; CP95) and its orthologues are found from cephalopods to mammals [16]. Similar to other intermediate filament proteins, BFSP1 has a central α-helical rod domain flanked by N- and C-terminal domains, although the C-terminal domain is striking because it exhibits lower sequence conservation between species ([2,17]; Figure S1), which is not seen for other intermediate filament proteins such as vimentin. There are, however, some sequences that are highly conserved across species [18,19] and these include the site of a caspase cleavage site (DVPD; human BFSP1 430–433) and adjacent myristoylation signal ([19,20]; (GGQISK; human BFSP1 434–439)). Post-translational myristoylation following caspase cleavage is a recognised mechanism for adding this fatty acid to an exposed N-terminal glycine [21,22] so much so that it is incorporated into computational tools to predict myristoylation sites in the human reference proteome with BFSP1 (Q06002) identified as a probable hit [23]. Imaging mass spectrometry has confirmed BFSP1 myristoylation occurs at G434 following caspase cleavage in BFSP1 [18,24]. This post-translational myristoylation event occurs in a distinct region of the lens as the transition from vimentin to beaded filaments completes [25,26]. This represents an important transition point for the lens, but also because it is the first myristoylation event to be identified in the spectrum of intermediate filament post-translational modifications [27,28,29,30].
The cleavage, release and myristoylation of BFSP1 at G434 then contribute to the regulation of the major water channel protein, AQP0, in the lens [18]. AQP0 and BFSP1 interact directly [31], as shown by chemical cross-linking studies that identified the interaction to occur between BFSP1 450–465 and AQP0 239–259 [31]. The site was identified after tryptic digestion of the cross-linked sample. This demonstrates that BFSP1 binds the C-terminal region of AQP0, a domain that is crucial to its water channel regulation [32,33]. This observation implies that AQP0 could facilitate the binding of BFSP1 [20,24,26,34,35] and its myristoylated fragments [18] to the lens fibre cell plasma membranes. These BFSP1 fragments derived from the C-terminus are tightly associated with the lens plasma membranes and resist extraction with both urea and sodium hydroxide [18], a biochemical property of integral membrane proteins [36]. Myristoylation is an important regulatory post-translation modification that helps target proteins to specific membranes and subcellular compartments [21,37,38]. In the case of some membrane-targeted proteins, such as Adenosine diphosphate Ribosylation Factors (ARF), myristoylation can, however, affect the conformation of the adjacent peptide and change its affinity for the membrane [39,40] and can determine its membrane association [41]. It is important, therefore, to determine whether the caspase released and myristoylated fragments of BFSP1 do or do not require AQP0 for their avid association with lens membranes or whether this property is attributable to sequences/motifs in the C-terminal sequences of BFSP1 itself.
Although there is no crystallographic data for BFSP1, an AlphaFold2 prediction is available (https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/entry/Q12934, accessed on 5 May 2023). AlphaFold2 predicts that the BFSP1 tail domain is mostly intrinsically disordered, but it does predict a short α-helix at the cryptic myristoylation site, G434. Structural data are available for ARF proteins [40,41], and in their case, an amphipathic helix is preceded by N-terminal glycine that is myristoylated. An amphipathic helix behaves similarly to an integral membrane protein in terms of its urea/alkali resistance to extraction from membranes [42], suggesting a possible mechanism to explain how the BFSP1 C-terminal domain fragments associate with the lens membranes. It remains to be determined whether the AlphaFold2 prediction for a short α-helix and whether an amphipathic helix could be formed by the residues immediately distal to the myristoylation site G434 in human BFSP1.
Here we investigate the membrane binding properties of BFSP1 and C-terminal domain fragments generated by caspase cleavage. Using chemically synthesised polypeptides, we show that the BFSP1 region 434–467 adopts an α-helical secondary structure in the presence of trifluoroethanol (TFE) that is enhanced by the presence of a myristoyl group. Using recombinantly expressed and purified fragments from the C-terminal domain of BFSP1, we use surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to measure a sub-micromolar KD for the BFSP1 fragment 434–548. Transient transfection of tissue culture cells with eGFP-tagged constructs demonstrates that providing the 434–460 sequence was present, the transfected C-terminal BFSP1 fragment from the C-terminal domain would localise to the plasma membranes and some intracellular membrane compartments. Our data support the conclusion that myristoylation occurs at the N-terminus of an amphipathic helix, and any BFSP1 C-terminal domain fragments containing this region have the capacity to associate with cell membranes independent of the lens water channel protein AQP0.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bioinformatic Analyses

Potential lipid binding regions in the C-terminal region of BFSP1 were identified using HELIQUEST ([43]; https://heliquest.ipmc.cnrs.fr, accessed on 10 March 2023; version 2.0, Nice, France). The analysis assumed an α-helix and analysed the sequence using an 18-residue window. The “Discrimination factor” was calculated as described [44] using the formula D = 0.944 (<µH>) + 0.33 (z), where µH is the calculated hydrophobic moment and z is the calculated net charge. The combined use of the HELIQUEST discrimination factor and the Eisenberg plot methodology is a robust bioinformatics approach to identifying lipid-binding regions [45]. The fIDPnn webserver (http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/flDPnn/, accessed on 17 February 2023; version 1, Richmond, VA, USA) was used to assess the intrinsic disorder of the same region [46]. The MemBrain 3.0 webserver was used to assess the amphipathic helix-forming propensity of the C-terminal domain of BFSP1 (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/MemBrain/, accessed on 17 February 2023; version 1; Shanghai, China [47]). Sequence alignment of human (Q12934 BFSP1_Human), bovine (Q06002 BFSP1_BOVIN) and rat (Q02435 BFSP1_Rat) downloaded from UniProt [48] was produced using COBALT [49]. AlphaFold2, a protein structure predicting algorithm, was used to predict secondary sequence features of the BFSP1 C-terminal sequence 434–665 [50,51]. The predicted structure was viewed, and images of this region were produced using iCn3D [52].

2.2. Cloning, Expression and Purification of Human BFSP1, Its Fragments and CRYAB

These experimental details have been given in detail previously [18]. Briefly, full-length human BFSP1 was originally obtained from Source Bioscience (http://www.lifesciences.sourcebioscience.com/IMAGE, accessed on 17 February 2023, clones 6154051 and 5406467; Nottingham, UK). Constructs encompassing and within the domain 434–665 of BFSP1 were generated by PCR and, after sequencing, were sub-cloned into pET23b vectors to include a C-terminal hexa-histidine tag and the residues LE encoded by the XhoI site where the amplified fragments were cloned in frame with the His-tag of the vector. Recombinant His-tagged BFSP1 fragments were purified by affinity chromatography on nickel columns according to the manufacturer’s instructions (His-Select Nickel Affinity Gel; Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, UK) and with a final purification step using a size exclusion column (Sephadex G10; Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, UK). In some instances, a Superose 6 10/300 column (Cytiva Lifesciences, Cardiff, UK) was used as a final purification step. Fractions containing the protein of interest were pooled and concentrated in an Amicon Stirred Cell and ultracell regenerated cellulose membranes with 10 and 3 kDa cut-off as appropriate. Recombinant human CRYAB was also produced recombinantly in E.coli as described previously [53]. Native bovine BFSP1 was purified from eye lenses as described previously [54]. The identity of the protein products was confirmed by SDS-PAGE, followed by mass spectrometry.
For expression in mammalian tissue culture cells, BFSP1 constructs were subcloned into pEGFP-N3 (http://www.clontech.com/UK/Support/Applications/Using_Fluorescent_Proteins/EGFP_Vectors, accessed on 14 May 2023; Mountain View, CA, USA) with the eGFP added to the C-terminal end of the expressed BFSP1 construct as detailed previously [18].

2.3. Extraction of Lipids from Bovine Lens Cell Membranes

Bovine lens membranes were prepared as described [55]. The aqua-dissection method allowed membrane fractions to be prepared from the cortex and nucleus of the bovine lens resulting in four fractions corresponding to 18–11 mm, 11–8 mm, 8–6 mm and lastly 6–0 mm. Lens lipids were then extracted from 40 to 50 mg wet weight of each of these isolated bovine lens cell membranes using a Bligh and Dyer method [56]. Bovine lens cell membranes (10 mg/mL) per sample were centrifuged, and pellets were resuspended in 1 mL of 10 mM NaPO4, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, and pH 7.4 buffer. Samples were incubated for 30 min with 2 mL of dichloromethane: methanol (vol ratio 1:2). After incubation, 0.67 mL dichloromethane was added and 1.2 mL of 0.9% (w/v) KCl. Samples were centrifuged at 1000× g for 1 min. The lower phase was transferred to a new centrifuge tube and evaporated under nitrogen. Samples were stored at −20 °C.

2.4. Purification of Lens Membrane Lipids for SPR

Samples of the extracted bovine lens membrane lipids were warmed for 5 min at room temperature prior to incubating for a further 5 min at 37 °C. They were then resuspended in 10 mM NaPO4, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.8, to a final concentration of 6.8 mg/mL. The resuspended lipid samples were resuspended mechanically both by alternating vortex and pipet for 5 min and then incubated for a further 10 min at 37 °C. The lipid samples were then heated to 90 °C and then allowed to cool on the bench to room temperature prior to 20 min sonication in a water bath and a final 5 min incubation at 37 °C. Immediately prior to use and the lipid preparation was mechanically agitated for 5 min. A 1:1 mixture of the lipids extracted from the lens membranes corresponding to the 11–8 mm and 8–6 mm regions of the lens was used to coat the L1 chip as per the manufacturer’s instructions (GE Healthcare).

2.5. Surface Plasmon Resonance to Measure Lipid-Binding of BFSP1 Constructs

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) was used to assess the membrane binding properties of BFSP1 and its various domains. SPR experiments were conducted on a Biacore X100 (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) using an L1 chip (GE Healthcare). Biacore X100 Control Software (Version: 2.0.1) with the Plus upgrade software, using the Kinetics/Affinity analysis workflow strategy according to the manufacturer’s instructions with 4 analysis cycles. The molecular weights used for the different BFSP1 constructs were 434–665 (44 kDa); 434–548 (26 kDa) and 494–550 (5.9 kDa). Molecular weights for human BFSP1 (74.5 kDa), bovine BFSP1 (83.1 kDa) and human CRYAB (20.2 kDa) were calculated using the online Expasy web resource (https://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/, accessed on 11 May 2023). All except the bovine BFSP1 were recombinantly produced proteins. CRYAB is a lens protein with membrane binding potential [57,58] and was used as a positive control. The L1 chip surface was cleaned by injecting 60 mM NaOH: Isopropanol (vol 3:2) and washed thoroughly with 10 mM NaPO4, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.8. Liposomes (0.5 mg/mL) prepared from extracted lens membrane lipids were deposited on sensor chips at a low flow rate (10 μL/min) until a stable resonance unit (RU) level was obtained. Five different concentrations of full-length BFSP1 (human and bovine) and human BFSP1 fragments derived from the C-terminal domain (434–665, 434–548 and 494–550) in 10 mM NaPO4, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.8 buffer were injected. The lipid surface was regenerated with 60 mM NaOH: isopropanol (vol ratio 3:2), providing a consistent baseline that was subsequently observed. All analyses were performed at 25 °C. Experiments determining the dissociation constant (KD) values were performed in triplicate.

2.6. Circular Dichroism Measurements

CD spectra were recorded from 280 to 180 nm with a Jasco-1500 spectropolarimeter (JASCO International Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Spectra were acquired at 20 °C using a 0.1 cm path length quartz cell, averaged over three scans at a scan speed of 20 nm/min, a bandwidth of 3.0 nm, 8 s digital integration time, and 0.5 nm resolution. Following baseline correction, the observed ellipticity, θ (mdeg), was converted to molar ellipticity, [Θ] (deg cm2/dmol), using the relationship [Θ] = θM/10(lc) where ‘l’ is the path length in centimetres, ‘c’ is concentration in g/L, and M is the average molecular weight (g/mol). All spectra were corrected with the appropriate blank. The peptides corresponding to residues 434–467 of BFSP1 were chemically synthesized ±N-terminal myristoyl group, then purified and characterised by Mass Spectrometry by the company Intavis Bioanalytical Instruments Aktiengesellshaft (Köln, Germany). Purified peptides were dissolved in water and trifluoroethanol (TFE; 30% (v/v)) to induce secondary structure formation [59], as previously suggested, to study the amphipathic helix in bee venom [60]. The α-helical content in 30% (v/v) TFE was determined using the online analysis resource (DiChroWeb: http://dichroweb.cryst.bbk.ac.uk/html/home.shtml, accessed on 4 May 2023; Version 1; London, UK [61]) using the algorithm CDSSTR [62] and reference set 7 of proteins [63].

2.7. Proteomic Analyses of Bovine Lens Membrane Preparations

Trypsin was added in a 1:50 weight/weight ratio to a bovine lens membrane sample. Typically, 50 µg of lens membrane protein was digested by overnight incubation at 37 °C. The digestion was terminated by adding trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). The final clean-up and fractionation of each digest were made using StageTips contained two SCX filter pieces as described [64]. Peptide analysis by LC-MS was performed on a SCIEX TripleTOF 6600 mass spectrometer linked to an Eksigent nanoLC 425 chromatography system via a 50-μm ESI electrode in a DuoSpray source (SCIEX). Sample injection and peptide separation used a trap and eluted method flowing at 5 µL/min. Peptides were loaded and washed on a YMC TriArt C18 guard column (1/32, 5 µm, 5 × 0.5 mm) followed by online chromatographic separation performed over 33 min on a YMC TriArt C18 column (1/32″, 12 nm, S-3 μm, 150 × 0.3 mm). A linear gradient of 5–35% (v/v) acetonitrile, 0.1% (v/v) formic acid over 20 min was then shifted to 80% (v/v) acetonitrile, 0.1% (v/v) formic acid over 2 min. The column was washed for 3 min before returning to 5% (v/v) acetonitrile, 0.1% (v/v) formic acid over to 2 min and re-equilibration for 6 min. Data-dependent LC-MS-MS acquisition was programmed for the time period 0.1–24 min. Once completed, the source voltage was lowered from 5500 to 0 V. Each MS cycle comprised a 250 ms precursor-ion scan from 350 to 1500 m/z followed by fragmentation of up to 10 selected ions for 100 ms each. This generated MS/MS spectra of 100 to 1500 m/z (cycle time 1.3 s). The switch criteria applied were +2 to +5 ions of intensity > 400 cps, with a rolling exclusion time of 12 s.
LC-MS/MS peak lists in (.mgf) format were generated from (.wiff) format data files using MSConvert in the ProteoWizard suite of proteomic software tools and peptide/protein identification used PEAKS X+ software (Bioinformatics Solutions Inc., Waterloo, ON, Canada). Default precursor and product ion tolerances for a TripleTOF spectrometer were specified, along with the following modifications: fixed—carbamidomethyl [C], variable—oxidation [M], acetylation [N-term], deamidation [NQ], oxidation [HW]. Search databases were a UniProt bovine reference proteome (March 2019, 22,285 entries) plus 194 known proteomic experiment contaminants, or a human reference proteome (February 2017, 20,106 entries) plus 161 contaminants. Peptide FDR was set at 1%, and a filter of 2 unique peptides was applied to identified proteins.

2.8. SDS PAGE and Immunoblotting

Protein samples were resuspended in SDS sample buffer (1 mM EDTA pH 7.8, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8 and 1% (w/v) SDS) and then mixed with 4× Laemmli sample buffer (containing 2.854 M β-mercaptoethanol) ([65] as modified in [18]). Protein samples were separated on either 10, 12 or 15% (w/v) polyacrylamide gels at 100 V depending on the relative electrophoretic mobility of the sample under investigation. Protein standards (PageRuler Plus, 10–250 kDa; ThermoFisher Scientific, Warrington, UK) were included. Coomassie blue staining (0.25% (w/v) Coomassie Brilliant Blue R250, Merckmillipore, Watford, UK) was used for protein detection, and once de-stained gels were imaged using either an Azure 300 or Thermofisher Scientific iBRIGHT imaging systems.
For immunoblotting, proteins separated by SDS-PAGE were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane for blotting using the semi-dry method, as detailed previously [18]. Briefly, after Ponceau dye staining to check the transfer, the membrane was blocked with 10% (w/v) milk powder and 6% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (Fraction V, Merck) in Tris-HCl Buffered Saline (TBS) at room temperature, for 2 h. Next, membranes were probed with a commercially available BFSP1 rabbit polyclonal antibody, the Atlas Antibody S38 (HPA042038-100UL, Sigma–Aldrich). Primary antibody binding was detected using EIA Grande Anti-Rabbit IgG Horseradish Peroxidase Conjugate (Cat. No. 172-1019) diluted in 3% (w/v) BSA in TBS. A signal was detected using the Azure 300 imaging system by the chemiluminescent method.

2.9. Eukaryotic Cell Culture, Incubation with Recombinant BFSP1 Fragments, Transient Transfections of BFSP1 Constructs and Live Cell Imaging

The mammary carcinoma cell line, MCF7, was grown in DMEM supplemented with glutamine, penicillin, streptomycin and 10% (v/v) foetal bovine serum. MCF7 cells were seeded on glass coverslips in six-well plates prior to transient transfection of the peGFP-N3 vectors containing various BFSP1 constructs, including the G434A mutation, to prevent myristoylation of the BFSP1 434–548 fragments. Purified plasmids were mixed with the GeneJuiceTM transfection reagent (Novagen; http://www.emdmillipore.com/life-science-research/novagen/, accessed on 14 May 2023, Watford, UK) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Cells were left overnight before live cell imaging by light microscopy using Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope in a chamber maintained with 5% (v/v) CO2 and at 37 °C.
To identify which intracellular membrane compartments of MCF7 cells could be labelled with eGFP tagged BFSP1 434–548, 434–460 and 494–550, cells were transiently transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermofisher Scientific, UK). After overnight incubation, an hour before starting live cell imaging, the following vital dyes were added; Bodipy 493/505 (2 μL/mL), Hoescht 33342 (H33342) 2 μL/mL and Mitotracker 1/3000 either alone or in combination with each other according to manufacturer’s instructions (Thermofisher Scientific, UK). In addition, in some cases, transiently transfected cells were treated with 10 µM tamoxifen (MP Biochemicals) to induce plasma membrane blebbing [66].

3. Results

3.1. The C-Terminal Sequences of BFSP1 Contain an Amphipathic Helix That Spans the Myristoylation Motif and Predicted α-Helix

Human BFSP1 is a 665-residue protein. The N-terminal sequences contain an α-helical-rich region and C-terminal sequences in which there is a highly conserved caspase site (430–433) and myristoylation signal (434–439, Figure 1A and Figure S1).
Both the myristoylation and, therefore, by inference so too the caspase cleavage site, have been confirmed by mass spectrometry [20]. This is an example of post-translational myristoylation and was predicted by a recently developed search engine SVMyr for such events [23]. Using two different caspase prediction programmes (GrabCas [67] and CasCleave 2 [68]), three caspase sites were identified within residues 430–665 for human BFSP1 by the two programmes (Figure S2A), but only two in the equivalent region of Bovine BFSP1 (Figure S2B). We confirmed the presence of the D433 site but also identified a second caspase cleavage site with the recognition sequence SFVD (Bovine BFSP1 477–480; Figure S2C). These data suggest that the other caspase sites identified within the C-terminal sequences of BFSP1 are potentially bone-fide cleavage sites in addition to the one adjacent to the myristoylation sequence. These need to be confirmed experimentally, as we have done here for the D480 site in bovine BFSP1, but collectively these data and the bioinformatic predictions suggest that both the caspase cleavage and myristoylation of the C-terminal fragments released from BFSP1 are important to its function and the regulation of AQP0 [57,69].
Interestingly, AlphaFold2 predicted an α-helix overlapping the myristoylation signal and spanning the region 434–452 (Figure 1B). The remaining C-terminal sequences lacked other secondary structures according to that prediction. The algorithm HELIQUEST is used to identify potential lipid-binding domains (LBDs) by combining a Discrimination Factor with the presence of α-helices (Figure 1C). That bioinformatic analysis strongly suggested the presence of an amphipathic helix spanning residues 434–452 (See Figure S3 for full HELIQUEST analysis of sequences 434–665). Using the fIDPnn algorithm (Figure 1D), the 434–452 region, similar to the rest of the C-terminal sequences, is predicted to be intrinsically disordered, which does not entirely support the AlphaFold2 prediction for the 434–452 sequences. The high probability that a predicted α-helix would combine to produce an amphipathic helix was, however, reinforced by the MemBrain3 algorithm designed to identify such motifs (Figure 1E). The amphipathic helix prediction was consistent between human, rat and cow BFSP1, with a major peak between 434 and 454 and a shoulder extending to residues 466–468 between the three mammals (Figure 1E), which corresponds to the Heliquest discrimination factor remaining above the 0.68 threshold [45] until residue 464 (Figure 1A).
To confirm the presence of an α-helix and to monitor the influence of the myristoyl group on their structure, peptides covering residues 434–467 were chemically synthesised. CD spectroscopy revealed a disordered peptide with no α-helical content when dissolved in water (Figure 2A), but in the presence of 30% (v/v) TFE, the spectra for both the myristoylated and unmyristoylated peptides changed to include distinct minima (Figure 2B).
It was noticeable that the presence of the myristoyl group enhanced the spectra for the 434–467 peptide with the minima shifting from 204.5 to 206 and a distinct minimum now at 221 nm suggests α-helical structure (Figure 2B,C) as observed for other amphipathic helices [42,60] including ARF1 [39] and BAR-domain peptides [70]. However, such a secondary structure only becomes apparent when the CD spectra are measured in the presence of TFE and other reagents, such as SDS, that promote the formation of amphipathic helices [60].

3.2. The BFSP1 C-Terminal Sequences Distal to 434 Bind Lipid Membranes Independently of AQP0

For these studies, human BFSP1 and various fragments were produced recombinantly in E.coli (Figure 3). These included full-length BFSP1, 1–433, 434–665, 434–548 and finally, 494–550.
It is noticeable that the fragments from the BFSP1 C-terminal domain all migrated with slower-than-expected relative mobility according to their calculated molecular weights. We interpreted this as the most likely dimerization of the 434–665, 434–548 and 494–550 fragments, given the expected effects of SDS on the amphipathic helix that spans residues 434–447 (Figure 1C,E) and the predicted protein-protein interactions in the region 519–551 (Figure 1D; protein binding indicator). The fragment 434–548 was selected because of an additional predicted caspase site at residues 546–549 in Human BFSP1 (Figure S2) and the 494–550 as a control where no amphipathic helices or LBDs were predicted by the HELIQUEST algorithm (Figure 1C). These fragments (Figure 4A–C), as well as full-length bovine and human BFSP1, were then used to measure by SPR their relative affinities for a lipid bilayer derived from lens membranes formed on the L1 chip. Examples of the sensorgram plots and corresponding equilibrium dissociation constant, KD calculations are provided for the recombinant BFSP1 fragments 434–665 (Figure 4A), 434–548 (Figure 4B) and 494–550 (Figure 4C).
Table 1 summarises the calculated KD for these fragments and for full-length bovine BFSP1 purified from bovine lenses and recombinant human BFSP1. From these data, the BFSP1 434–548 fragment had the greatest affinity as compared to both full-length and other C-terminal sequences of human BFSP1. In addition, removing the sequences 549–665 increased the affinity of the 434–548 fragment for the eye lens lipids compared to 434–665 (Figure 4A,B, respectively; Table 1).
The sequences 494–550 (Figure 4C, Table 1) were similar in affinity to that of recombinant human CRYAB (Figure S4), a lens protein also identified with membrane binding properties [57,58]. Interestingly, full-length human BFSP1 and native bovine BFSP1 had similar affinities to the 434–665 fragment (Table 1), suggesting that sequences within the 434–665 region could be responsible for the binding of both full-length BFSP1 to lens membrane lipids (Figure 4A,B; Table 1). In addition, their affinity was similar to that observed for both the myristoylated and unmyristoylated polypeptides spanning residues 434–467 in human BFSP1 (Figure 4D,E respectively compared to Figure 4F; Table 2).
These data suggest that myristoylation had little effect on the affinity for lens lipids (Table 2). However, it is noticeable that the recombinant fragment spanning residues 434–548 had the greatest affinity for bovine lens membrane lipids (Table 1) compared to the polypeptides spanning 434–467 (Table 2), suggesting that there could also be a contribution from the sequences 467–548 to membrane binding.

3.3. Transient Transfections of eGFP Labelled BFSP1 Constructs Confirms Membrane Association for Fragments Containing the Amphipathic Helix

The transient transfection of a human epithelial cell line MCF7 with eGFP-tagged BFSP1 C-terminal sequences was undertaken to evidence that these constructs (Figure 5A) could associate with membranes in living cells (Figure 5B).
Only those C-terminal sequences that contained the amphipathic helix and adjacent C-terminal sequences localised to the plasma membrane and internal membranes of transfected cells (Figure 5B). These were the fragments 434–548, 434–665 and 434–460. It is worth noting that for all three constructs, it was not only the plasma membranes, but also large cytoplasmic vesicular structures that were eGFP positive. The nuclear membranes, however, remained negative (Figure 5B), suggesting there was selectivity in the observed membrane binding. The BFSP1 C-terminal fragments 461–548 and 550–665 did not localise to any membrane compartments, but their eGFP signal remained in the cytoplasmic compartment (Figure 5B). Preventing myristoylation by transfecting the mutant G434A-548 did not prevent its membrane localisation.
To identify which intracellular compartments were targets for labelling with the BFSP1 sequence 434–548, the vital dyes, Bodipy, Mitotracker and Lysotracker were used to counter label MCF7 cells and then followed by live cell imaging (Figure 6, red channel). Hoechst 33342 was used to label the nucleus (Figure 6, blue channel).
Intracellular vesicles were Bodipy positive (Figure 6 control, red channel), and these were also eGFP positive when transiently transfected with 434–548, but not 494–550. Mitochondrial membranes were negative but lysosomal membranes were positive (Figure 6; green channel) when transfected with 434–548 (Figure 6; arrows, green channel). In some cases, tamoxifen treatment was used to induce plasma membrane blebbing [66], and those vesicular structures that appeared to be extruding from the plasma membrane were also positive for eGFP BFSP1 434–665 and eGFP BFSP1 434–548, but not eGFP BFSP1 494–550 (Figure 6; green channel). These transfection data support the conclusion that the BFSP1 434–548 sequences can direct the association of BFSP1 to membrane compartments in living cells.

4. Discussion

4.1. BFSP1 Contains an Amphipathic Helix at Residues 434–452

The aim of this study was to determine whether the BFSP1 C-terminal domain of BFSP1 had the capacity to bind lens membrane lipids independently of AQP0, an integral membrane protein shown to interact with BFSP1 by chemical cross-linking [31]. We generated data from CD spectroscopy (Figure 2), SPR (Figure 4, Table 1 and Table 2) and transient transfections of eGFP-tagged BFSP1 constructs (Figure 5 and Figure 6) that support this conclusion. The bioinformatic analyses (Figure 1) suggested that a reason for the independent association of the C-terminal sequences of BFSP1 with lens fibre cell membranes [16,20,24,26,34,35] is the presence of an amphipathic helix spanning residues 434–451. Furthermore, the CD spectroscopy data show that a chemically synthesized polypeptide spanning residues 434–467 adopted an intrinsically disordered structure in water (Figure 2) in line with the fIDPnn prediction (Figure 1D) and that the inclusion of TFE [59] induced an α-helical transition (Figure 2) supporting the Heliquest amphipathic helix prediction (Figure 1C, Figure S3). SDS can also provide the hydrophobic environment needed to induce the transition from unstructured to an α-helical domain for amphipathic helices, and we suggest this contributes to the unexpectedly slower relative mobility observed by SDS PAGE of the recombinantly expressed fragments (Figure 3). This important detail was not considered in earlier studies concerning the proteolytic processing of BFSP1 [24,34] and points to the oligomerisation and membrane-directed scaffolding potential for these BFSP1 C-terminal fragments containing the amphipathic helix and the adjacent intrinsically disordered sequences.
The presence of an amphipathic helix is essential for membrane association and membrane remodelling activities. For example, the small GTPases, Atg proteins, ENTH/ANTH- containing proteins and the BAR-domain all require amphipathic helices for their function [71]. Rhodopsin recovery depends upon recoverin binding to an amphipathic helix in its N-terminus [72]. In a broader neurological context, synapse evolution and function owe much to the protein complexin and its amphipathic helix [73]. The amphipathic helix is key to the membrane association and targeting of such proteins as ARF1 [40,42] and other ARF family members [41]. In the case of Arfrp1 and Arl14, their amphipathic helices are sufficient to target these proteins to their appropriate membrane compartment [41]. Interestingly, naturally occurring mutations have been reported in amphipathic helix-containing membrane fission-inducing proteins and are the basis of human diseases [71] such as centronuclear myopathy (amphiphysin 2), Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (GDAP1), Parkinson’s disease (α-synuclein). It is perhaps no coincidence that when the C-terminal domain of BFSP1 is deleted, cataract develops [74], and there are many sequence variants listed for BFSP1 434–548 (https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/Q12934/entry#disease_variants, accessed on 10 May 2023) some such as E468Q listed as likely to be disease-causing, as well as 14 other variants within the amphipathic helix itself that deserve further investigation. For example, Q436R, Y445C and R446S all change the hydrophobic moment of the amphipathic helix in BFSP1, changing the Discrimination Factor scores (Table 3), indicating such sequence variants could have both structural and functional consequences worthy of further investigation.

4.2. Potential Contribution of the Amphipathic Helix and Myristoylation to BFSP1 Structure and Function in the Lens

On binding to a membrane, the amphipathic helix will usually orient itself parallel to the membrane plane. Its hydrophobic side will insert into the bilayer, while the hydrophilic face will interact with the headgroups of the lipids in the membrane [71]. The lipid composition of the lens plasma membranes depends upon the differentiation status of the fibre cells, which is related to whether they are present in the lens nucleus or the lens cortex and the age of the lens [75]. Our studies used lipids extracted from the nucleus of bovine lenses and, therefore, will be enriched in cholesterol and sphingolipid. Clearly, it will be important to investigate how the lipid composition affects BFSP1 binding, but our transient transfection studies evidence that the amphipathic helix in BFSP1 is sufficient to direct membrane association of eGFP in MCF7 cells (Figure 5 and Figure 6). Our data also suggest that other sequences within the 434–548 region likely influence the infinity (cf. Table 1 and Table 2). Our data show that there is membrane selectivity as neither the nuclear nor the mitochondrial membranes were labelled (Figure 6). Intracellular vesicles and the lysosomal membranes were, however, labelled (Figure 6). Both are critical to lens differentiation in organelle removal [76,77] and for aquaporin trafficking by a lysosomal-associated unconventional protein secretion mechanism [78]. Then the process of lens fibre cell compaction [79] and the fenestration of lens fibre cells leading to the formation of a stratified syncytium [80] will require an amphipathic helix containing proteins to be involved. Epitope mapping of bovine BFSP1 showed that the very C-terminal region becomes concentrated on the cell membranes in the bovine lens nucleus [24], which in the context of the data presented here, provides a different perspective on how beaded filaments and aquaporins affect the optical properties of the lens [18,33,81].
BFSP1 is the first intermediate filament protein identified to possess an amphipathic helix and the first to be identified that undergoes post-translational myristoylation. Our data are consistent with the view that myristoylation is not necessary for the membrane association of the 434–548 fragment (Figure 5B), but our previous study has demonstrated that myristoylation of this BFSP1 fragment is important to its regulation of AQP0 [18]. The presence of an amphipathic helix provides yet another mechanism to mediate the membrane association of an intermediate filament protein. Periplakin links vimentin, and the BFSP1 assembly partner BFSP2 to lens membranes [82] and is part of the EPPD complex [83], as well as plakoglobin [84] that links partners to the plasma membrane via the cadherins [83]. Whilst it is recognised that intermediate filaments impart physical properties to the membranes they support [85], there is also a growing appreciation that non-filamentous forms of cytoplasmic intermediate filament proteins, such as vimentin, have functions in the extracellular space [86,87]. The release of a C-terminal fragment of BFSP1 that contains an amphipathic helix capable of association with intracellular vesicles and with secreted membrane vesicles evidences a new cellular role for BFSP1.

5. Patents

The work described here forms the basis for the following patents that are pending (PCT/HU2021/050057 WO 2022/090752).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells12121580/s1, Figure S1: Alignment of BFSP1 protein sequences. Human (Q12934 BFSP1_Human), bovine (Q06002 BFSP1_BOVIN) and rat (Q02435 BFSP1_Rat) BFSP1 sequences were downloaded from UniProt [48] and aligned using COBALT [49]. The structural features were derived from the AlphaFold2 prediction [51], with the rod domain (red bar; residues 40–320). This rod domain comprises several α-helical regions, namely Coil 1A (residues 421–75), Coil 1B (residues 85–184) and Coil 2 (residues 202–320). Members of the intermediate filament protein family contain conserved motifs at either end of the rod domain, and these are indicated in Coil 1A and Coil 2. The rod domain is conserved between humans, cows and rats (identical residues in red; non-identical in blue; species-specific insertions or deletions in grey lowercase). The rod domain is flanked by unstructured regions, and these are striking in their lack of sequence homology. Of those sequences that are conserved within these unstructured regions, the post-translational myristoylation site (caspase and myristoylation sites indicated) and associated amphipathic helix (purple bar; residues 434–460 as predicted by heliQuest (https://heliquest.ipmc.cnrs.fr, accessed on 10 May 2023); see below) are indicated. Figure S2: Identification of a second Caspase Cleavage Site (SVFD) in bovine BFSP1. A. Identification and conservation of potential caspase recognition sites in the C-terminal sequences distal to the myristoylation sequence in human and bovine BFSP1 using GrabCas [67] and CasCleave 2 [68]. B. Schematic comparing the predicted human and bovine caspase cleavage sites and the proteomic strategy to identify the bovine BFSP1 434 and 480 sites. C. Identification of a second caspase cleavage site in the C-terminal sequences of bovine BFSP1 at residue 480. Bovine lens membranes from the lens cortex were subjected to trypsin cleavage, removal of SDS, and then MS-MS identification of the peptides eluted in ReX-Buffer 4 [64]. The search focused on tryptic peptides lacking a C-terminal arginine or lysine. The analysis identified a new caspase site at residues 477–480 (SFVD) in bovine BFSP1. Figure S3: Output from the HeliQuest analysis for the human BFSP1 sequence 434–665. Figure S4: Affinity of recombinant human CRYAB for bovine lens lipids as measured by SPR. Recombinant human CRYAB was assessed for its affinity to the same L1 chip coated with lipids prepared from bovine lens membranes. An affinity of 22.83 µM was measured.

Author Contributions

R.A.Q. conceived the experimental approach and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. M.J. and A.T. provided experimental data with the help of A.A.K., A.U., A.P.B., C.S.C., S.F.-P., E.P., K.L., E.N.W. and B.K., M.J. and A.T. also contributed to the refinement of the experimental analyses and the editing of the first draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by funding from Fight for Sight (M.J., A.T., R.A.Q.; Fight for Sight UK grant #1584/85) and from the National Eye Research Charity (A.K.K.; SAC014) are gratefully acknowledged. AW was funded via the LDLensRad project that received funding from the Euratom research and training programme 2014–2018 in the framework of the CONCERT (grant agreement No. 662287). E.N.W. and K.L. were funded by a vacation scholarship from the Biophysical Sciences Institute. This publication reflects only the author’s view. Responsibility for the information and views expressed therein lies entirely with the authors. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy reasons.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ian Cummins for his support and encouragement as we started the proteomic analyses before his passing on 4 June 2019. We thank Beth Bromley for access and advice to the CD instrument and Ian Edwards for helping maintain the SPR facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of this study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Quinlan, R.A.; Clark, J.I. Insights into the Biochemical and Biophysical Mechanisms Mediating The Longevity of the Transparent Optics of the Eye Lens. J. Biol. Chem. 2022, 298, 102537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Perng, M.D.; Quinlan, R.A. Seeing is believing! The optical properties of the eye lens are dependent upon a functional intermediate filament cytoskeleton. Exp. Cell. Res. 2005, 305, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Carter, J.M.; Hutcheson, A.M.; Quinlan, R.A. In vitro studies on the assembly properties of the lens beaded filament proteins: Co-assembly with a-crystallin but not with vimentin. Exp. Eye Res. 1995, 60, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Maisel, H.; Perry, M.M. Electron microscope observations on some structural proteins of the chick lens. Exp. Eye Res. 1972, 14, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Song, S.; Landsbury, A.; Dahm, R.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Quinlan, R.A. Functions of the intermediate filament cytoskeleton in the eye lens. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 1837–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Shiels, A.; Hejtmancik, J.F. Inherited cataracts: Genetic mechanisms and pathways new and old. Exp. Eye Res. 2021, 209, 108662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fudge, D.S.; McCuaig, J.V.; Van Stralen, S.; Hess, J.F.; Wang, H.; Mathias, R.T.; FitzGerald, P.G. Intermediate filaments regulate tissue size and stiffness in the murine lens. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 3860–3867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Sandilands, A.; Prescott, A.R.; Wegener, A.; Zoltoski, R.K.; Hutcheson, A.M.; Masaki, S.; Kuszak, J.R.; Quinlan, R.A. Knockout of the intermediate filament protein CP49 destabilises the lens fibre cell cytoskeleton and decreases lens optical quality, but does not induce cataract. Exp. Eye Res. 2003, 76, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sandilands, A.; Wang, X.; Hutcheson, A.M.; James, J.; Prescott, A.R.; Wegener, A.; Pekny, M.; Gong, X.; Quinlan, R.A. Bfsp2 mutation found in mouse 129 strains causes the loss of CP49 and induces vimentin-dependent changes in the lens fibre cell cytoskeleton. Exp. Eye Res. 2004, 78, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alizadeh, A.; Clark, J.; Seeberger, T.; Hess, J.; Blankenship, T.; FitzGerald, P.G. Targeted deletion of the lens fiber cell-specific intermediate filament protein filensin. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003, 44, 5252–5258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Alizadeh, A.; Clark, J.I.; Seeberger, T.; Hess, J.; Blankenship, T.; Spicer, A.; FitzGerald, P.G. Targeted genomic deletion of the lens-specific intermediate filament protein CP49. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002, 43, 3722–3727. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kwon, H.J.; Shikinaka, K.; Kakugo, A.; Furukawa, H.; Osada, Y.; Gong, J.P. Motility and structural polymorphism of polymer-actin complex gel. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2007, 7, 844–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. FitzGerald, P.G. Lens intermediate filaments. Exp. Eye Res. 2009, 88, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Landsbury, A.; Perng, M.D.; Pohl, E.; Quinlan, R.A. Functional symbiosis between the intermediate filament cytoskeleton and small heat shock proteins. In Small Stress Proteins and Human Diseases; Nova Science Publishers Inc.: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 55–87. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kalligeraki, A.A.; Isted, A.; Jarrin, M.; Uwineza, A.; Pal, R.; Saunter, C.D.; Girkin, J.M.; Obara, B.; Quinlan, R.A. Three-dimensional data capture and analysis of intact eye lenses evidences emmetropia-associated changes in epithelial cell organization. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. FitzGerald, P.G.; Casselman, J. Immunologic conservation of the fiber cell beaded filament. Curr. Eye Res. 1991, 10, 471–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Der Perng, M.; Zhang, Q.; Quinlan, R.A. Insights into the beaded filament of the eye lens. Exp. Cell. Res. 2007, 313, 2180–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Tapodi, A.; Clemens, D.M.; Uwineza, A.; Jarrin, M.; Goldberg, M.W.; Thinon, E.; Heal, W.P.; Tate, E.W.; Nemeth-Cahalan, K.; Vorontsova, I.; et al. BFSP1 C-terminal domains released by post-translational processing events can alter significantly the calcium regulation of AQP0 water permeability. Exp. Eye Res. 2019, 185, 107585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Masaki, S.; Quinlan, R.A. Gene structure and sequence comparisons of the eye lens specific protein, filensin, from rat and mouse: Implications for protein classification and assembly. Gene 1997, 201, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Z.; Obidike, J.E.; Schey, K.L. Posttranslational modifications of the bovine lens beaded filament proteins filensin and CP49. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 1565–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Martin, D.D.; Beauchamp, E.; Berthiaume, L.G. Post-translational myristoylation: Fat matters in cellular life and death. Biochimie 2011, 93, 18–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lemarié, F.L.; Sanders, S.S.; Nguyen, Y.; Martin, D.D.O.; Hayden, M.R. Full-length huntingtin is palmitoylated at multiple sites and post-translationally myristoylated following caspase-cleavage. Front. Physiol. 2023, 14, 1086112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Madeo, G.; Savojardo, C.; Martelli, P.L.; Casadio, R. SVMyr: A Web Server Detecting Co- and Post-translational Myristoylation in Proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2022, 434, 167605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sandilands, A.; Prescott, A.R.; Hutcheson, A.M.; Quinlan, R.A.; Casselman, J.T.; FitzGerald, P.G. Filensin is proteolytically processed during lens fiber cell differentiation by multiple independant pathways. Eur. J. Cell. Biol. 1995, 67, 238–253. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, Z.; Ryan, D.J.; Schey, K.L. Localization of the lens intermediate filament switch by imaging mass spectrometry. Exp. Eye Res. 2020, 198, 108134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sandilands, A.; Prescott, A.R.; Carter, J.M.; Hutcheson, A.M.; Quinlan, R.A.; Richards, J.; FitzGerald, P.G. Vimentin and CP49/Filensin form distinct networks in the lens which are independantly modulated during lens fibre cell differentiation. J. Cell. Sci. 1995, 108, 1397–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Griesser, E.; Vemula, V.; Mónico, A.; Pérez-Sala, D.; Fedorova, M. Dynamic posttranslational modifications of cytoskeletal proteins unveil hot spots under nitroxidative stress. Redox Biol. 2021, 44, 102014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kaus-Drobek, M.; Mücke, N.; Szczepanowski, R.H.; Wedig, T.; Czarnocki-Cieciura, M.; Polakowska, M.; Herrmann, H.; Wysłouch-Cieszyńska, A.; Dadlez, M. Vimentin S-glutathionylation at Cys328 inhibits filament elongation and induces severing of mature filaments in vitro. Febs J. 2020, 287, 5304–5322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. MacTaggart, B.; Kashina, A. Posttranslational modifications of the cytoskeleton. Cytoskeleton 2021, 78, 142–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Snider, N.T.; Ku, N.O.; Omary, M.B. The sweet side of vimentin. Elife 2018, 7, e35336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Z.; Schey, K.L. Identification of a direct Aquaporin-0 binding site in the lens-specific cytoskeletal protein filensin. Exp. Eye Res. 2017, 159, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schey, K.L.; Petrova, R.S.; Gletten, R.B.; Donaldson, P.J. The Role of Aquaporins in Ocular Lens Homeostasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Varadaraj, K.; FitzGerald, P.G.; Kumari, S.S. Deletion of beaded filament proteins or the C-terminal end of Aquaporin 0 causes analogous abnormal distortion aberrations in mouse lens. Exp. Eye Res. 2021, 209, 108645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Brunkener, M.; Georgatos, S.D. Membrane-binding properties of filensin, a cytoskeletal protein of the lens fibre cells. J. Cell. Sci. 1992, 103, 709–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, Z.; Schey, K.L. Proteomic Analysis of Lipid Raft-Like Detergent-Resistant Membranes of Lens Fiber Cells. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015, 56, 8349–8360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Milks, L.C.; Kumar, N.M.; Houghten, R.; Unwin, N.; Gilula, N.B. Topology of the 32-kd liver gap junction protein determined by site-directed antibody localizations. EMBO J. 1988, 7, 2967–2975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Giglione, C.; Meinnel, T. Mapping the myristoylome through a complete understanding of protein myristoylation biochemistry. Progress. Lipid Res. 2022, 85, 101139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wright, M.H.; Heal, W.P.; Mann, D.J.; Tate, E.W. Protein myristoylation in health and disease. J. Chem. Biol. 2010, 3, 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Harroun, T.A.; Bradshaw, J.P.; Balali-Mood, K.; Katsaras, J. A structural study of the myristoylated N-terminus of ARF1. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1668, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, Y.; Kahn, R.A.; Prestegard, J.H. Structure and membrane interaction of myristoylated ARF1. Structure 2009, 17, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Yang, F.; Li, T.; Peng, Z.; Liu, Y.; Guo, Y. The amphipathic helices of Arfrp1 and Arl14 are sufficient to determine subcellular localizations. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 16643–16654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Brass, V.; Bieck, E.; Montserret, R.; Wölk, B.; Hellings, J.A.; Blum, H.E.; Penin, F.; Moradpour, D. An amino-terminal amphipathic alpha-helix mediates membrane association of the hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 5A. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 8130–8139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Gautier, R.; Douguet, D.; Antonny, B.; Drin, G. HELIQUEST: A web server to screen sequences with specific alpha-helical properties. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 2101–2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Keller, R.C. New user-friendly approach to obtain an eisenberg plot and its use as a practical tool in protein sequence analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 5577–5591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Keller, R.C. Prediction of lipid-binding regions in cytoplasmic and extracellular loops of membrane proteins as exemplified by protein translocation membrane proteins. J. Membr. Biol. 2013, 246, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hu, G.; Katuwawala, A.; Wang, K.; Wu, Z.; Ghadermarzi, S.; Gao, J.; Kurgan, L. flDPnn: Accurate intrinsic disorder prediction with putative propensities of disorder functions. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Feng, S.H.; Xia, C.Q.; Zhang, P.D.; Shen, H.B. Ab-Initio Membrane Protein Amphipathic Helix Structure Prediction Using Deep Neural Networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform./IEEE ACM 2022, 19, 795–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. UniProt: The Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D523–D531. [CrossRef]
  49. Papadopoulos, J.S.; Agarwala, R. COBALT: Constraint-based alignment tool for multiple protein sequences. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 1073–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Jumper, J.; Evans, R.; Pritzel, A.; Green, T.; Figurnov, M.; Ronneberger, O.; Tunyasuvunakool, K.; Bates, R.; Žídek, A.; Potapenko, A.; et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 2021, 596, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Varadi, M.; Anyango, S.; Deshpande, M.; Nair, S.; Natassia, C.; Yordanova, G.; Yuan, D.; Stroe, O.; Wood, G.; Laydon, A.; et al. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: Massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, D439–D444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, J.; Youkharibache, P.; Marchler-Bauer, A.; Lanczycki, C.; Zhang, D.; Lu, S.; Madej, T.; Marchler, G.H.; Cheng, T.; Chong, L.C.; et al. iCn3D: From Web-Based 3D Viewer to Structural Analysis Tool in Batch Mode. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 831740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sharma, S.; Conover, G.; Elliott, J.L.; Perng, M.D.; Herrmann, H.; Quinlan, R.A. αB-crystallin is a sensor for assembly intermediates and for the subunit topology of desmin intermediate filaments. Cell. Stress. Chaperones 2017, 22, 613–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Perng, M.D.; Sandilands, A.; Kuszak, J.; Dahm, R.; Wegener, A.; Prescott, A.R.; Quinlan, R.A. The intermediate filament systems in the eye lens. Intermed. Filam. Cytoskelet. 2004, 78, 597–624. [Google Scholar]
  55. Uwineza, A.; Cummins, I.; Jarrin, M.; Kalligeraki, A.A.; Barnard, S.; Mol, M.; Degani, G.; Altomare, A.A.; Aldini, G.; Schreurs, A.; et al. Identification and quantification of ionising radiation-induced oxysterol formation in membranes of lens fibre cells. Adv. Redox Res. 2023, 7, 100057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bligh, E.G.; Dyer, W.J. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 1959, 37, 911–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cobb, B.A.; Petrash, J.M. alpha-Crystallin Chaperone-like Activity and Membrane Binding in Age-Related Cataracts. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Borchman, D.; Tang, D. Binding capacity of alpha-crystallin to bovine lens lipids. Exp. Eye Res. 1996, 63, 407–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Roccatano, D.; Colombo, G.; Fioroni, M.; Mark, A.E. Mechanism by which 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol/water mixtures stabilize secondary-structure formation in peptides: A molecular dynamics study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 12179–12184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Konno, K.; Hisada, M.; Fontana, R.; Lorenzi, C.C.; Naoki, H.; Itagaki, Y.; Miwa, A.; Kawai, N.; Nakata, Y.; Yasuhara, T.; et al. Anoplin, a novel antimicrobial peptide from the venom of the solitary wasp Anoplius samariensis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2001, 1550, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Miles, A.J.; Ramalli, S.G.; Wallace, B.A. DichroWeb, a website for calculating protein secondary structure from circular dichroism spectroscopic data. Protein Sci. 2022, 31, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sreerama, N.; Woody, R.W. Estimation of protein secondary structure from circular dichroism spectra: Comparison of CONTIN, SELCON, and CDSSTR methods with an expanded reference set. Anal. Biochem. 2000, 287, 252–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sreerama, N.; Venyaminov, S.Y.; Woody, R.W. Estimation of protein secondary structure from circular dichroism spectra: Inclusion of denatured proteins with native proteins in the analysis. Anal. Biochem. 2000, 287, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Rappsilber, J.; Mann, M.; Ishihama, Y. Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 1896–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Laemmli, U. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 277, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Cui, Q.; Tashiro, S.; Onodera, S.; Minami, M.; Ikejima, T. Autophagy preceded apoptosis in oridonin-treated human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 30, 859–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Backes, C.; Kuentzer, J.; Lenhof, H.P.; Comtesse, N.; Meese, E. GraBCas: A bioinformatics tool for score-based prediction of Caspase- and Granzyme B-cleavage sites in protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, W208–W213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Wang, M.; Zhao, X.M.; Tan, H.; Akutsu, T.; Whisstock, J.C.; Song, J. Cascleave 2.0, a new approach for predicting caspase and granzyme cleavage targets. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Nakazawa, Y.; Oka, M.; Furuki, K.; Mitsuishi, A.; Nakashima, E.; Takehana, M. The effect of the interaction between aquaporin 0 (AQP0) and the filensin tail region on AQP0 water permeability. Mol. Vis. 2011, 17, 3191–3199. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  70. Robustelli, J.; Baumgart, T. Membrane partitioning and lipid selectivity of the N-terminal amphipathic H0 helices of endophilin isoforms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2021, 1863, 183660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhukovsky, M.A.; Filograna, A.; Luini, A.; Corda, D.; Valente, C. Protein Amphipathic Helix Insertion: A Mechanism to Induce Membrane Fission. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2019, 7, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Higgins, M.K.; Oprian, D.D.; Schertler, G.F. Recoverin binds exclusively to an amphipathic peptide at the N terminus of rhodopsin kinase, inhibiting rhodopsin phosphorylation without affecting catalytic activity of the kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 19426–19432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Lottermoser, J.A.; Dittman, J.S. Complexin Membrane Interactions: Implications for Synapse Evolution and Function. J. Mol. Biol. 2023, 435, 167774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Ramachandran, R.D.; Perumalsamy, V.; Hejtmancik, J.F. Autosomal recessive juvenile onset cataract associated with mutation in BFSP1. Hum. Genet. 2007, 121, 475–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Borchman, D.; Yappert, M.C. Lipids and the ocular lens. J. Lipid Res. 2010, 51, 2473–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Costello, M.J.; Brennan, L.A.; Mohamed, A.; Gilliland, K.O.; Johnsen, S.; Kantorow, M. Identification and Ultrastructural Characterization of a Novel Nuclear Degradation Complex in Differentiating Lens Fiber Cells. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Bassnett, S. Lens organelle degradation. Exp. Eye Res. 2002, 74, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gletten, R.B.; Cantrell, L.S.; Bhattacharya, S.; Schey, K.L. Lens Aquaporin-5 Inserts into Bovine Fiber Cell Plasma Membranes via Unconventional Protein Secretion. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022, 63, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bassnett, S.; Costello, M.J. The cause and consequence of fiber cell compaction in the vertebrate lens. Exp. Eye Res. 2017, 156, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Shi, Y.; Barton, K.; De Maria, A.; Petrash, J.M.; Shiels, A.; Bassnett, S. The stratified syncytium of the vertebrate lens. J. Cell. Sci. 2009, 122, 1607–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. FitzGerald, P.; Sun, N.; Shibata, B.; Hess, J.F. Expression of the type VI intermediate filament proteins CP49 and filensin in the mouse lens epithelium. Mol. Vis. 2016, 22, 970–989. [Google Scholar]
  82. Yoon, K.H.; Fitzgerald, P.G. Periplakin Serves as a Linker for Both Vimentin and the Highly Divergent Beaded Filament Proteins in the Ocular Lens. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008, 50, 1283–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Straub, B.K.; Boda, J.; Kuhn, C.; Schnoelzer, M.; Korf, U.; Kempf, T.; Spring, H.; Hatzfeld, M.; Franke, W.W. A novel cell-cell junction system: The cortex adhaerens mosaic of lens fiber cells. J. Cell. Sci. 2003, 116, 4985–4995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Franke, W.W.; Kapprell, H.P.; Cowin, P. Plakoglobin is a component of the filamentous subplasmalemmal coat of lens cells. Eur. J. Cell. Biol. 1987, 43, 301–315. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Quinlan, R.A.; Schwarz, N.; Windoffer, R.; Richardson, C.; Hawkins, T.; Broussard, J.A.; Green, K.J.; Leube, R.E. A rim-and-spoke hypothesis to explain the biomechanical roles for cytoplasmic intermediate filament networks. J. Cell. Sci. 2017, 130, 3437–3445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Patteson, A.E.; Vahabikashi, A.; Goldman, R.D.; Janmey, P.A. Mechanical and Non-Mechanical Functions of Filamentous and Non-Filamentous Vimentin. Bioessays 2020, 42, e2000078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Suprewicz, Ł.; Swoger, M.; Gupta, S.; Piktel, E.; Byfield, F.J.; Iwamoto, D.V.; Germann, D.; Reszeć, J.; Marcińczyk, N.; Carroll, R.J.; et al. Extracellular Vimentin as a Target against SARS-CoV-2 Host Cell Invasion. Small 2022, 18, e2105640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 12 01580 g001 550
Figure 1. Bioinformatic analyses of BFSP1 and its C-terminal sequences 434–665. Human BFSP1 is a 665-residue protein, with a large α-helical rod domain (grey rectangle) and a C-terminal domain containing a cryptic myristoylation site (GGQISK) that is released by caspase cleavage at site 433 (A). AlphaFold2 predicted with high confidence an α-helix for residues 434–452, whilst the remaining C-terminal sequences had low/very low secondary structure prediction (B). HELIQUEST was used to calculate the discrimination factor (DF) over the region 434–665, with the X-axis intersect set to a DF of 0.68 as the threshold for identifying LBDs. The strongest score was received for the sequence 434–453 (C), but others were identified starting at residues 597 and 641 in the absence of predicted α-helix. The C-terminal BFSP1 sequences (454–665) were predicted to have a considerable intrinsic disorder as predicted using the algorithm fIDPnn (D). A minimum threshold score of 0.3 is indicated (---), but most of the BFSP1 453–665 sequences scored ≥ 0.8, indicative of significant disorder potential (D). A region potentially involved in protein-protein interactions was identified between 520 and 550 (dark blue bar; D). The 434–665 sequences were assessed for their propensity to form amphipathic helices, and one region was identified within the BFSP1 region 434–455 (E). The same region was identified in rat and bovine sequences (E), in line with the observation that the caspase recognition site and the myristoylation sequences are highly conserved across species [18].
Figure 1. Bioinformatic analyses of BFSP1 and its C-terminal sequences 434–665. Human BFSP1 is a 665-residue protein, with a large α-helical rod domain (grey rectangle) and a C-terminal domain containing a cryptic myristoylation site (GGQISK) that is released by caspase cleavage at site 433 (A). AlphaFold2 predicted with high confidence an α-helix for residues 434–452, whilst the remaining C-terminal sequences had low/very low secondary structure prediction (B). HELIQUEST was used to calculate the discrimination factor (DF) over the region 434–665, with the X-axis intersect set to a DF of 0.68 as the threshold for identifying LBDs. The strongest score was received for the sequence 434–453 (C), but others were identified starting at residues 597 and 641 in the absence of predicted α-helix. The C-terminal BFSP1 sequences (454–665) were predicted to have a considerable intrinsic disorder as predicted using the algorithm fIDPnn (D). A minimum threshold score of 0.3 is indicated (---), but most of the BFSP1 453–665 sequences scored ≥ 0.8, indicative of significant disorder potential (D). A region potentially involved in protein-protein interactions was identified between 520 and 550 (dark blue bar; D). The 434–665 sequences were assessed for their propensity to form amphipathic helices, and one region was identified within the BFSP1 region 434–455 (E). The same region was identified in rat and bovine sequences (E), in line with the observation that the caspase recognition site and the myristoylation sequences are highly conserved across species [18].
Cells 12 01580 g001
Cells 12 01580 g002 550
Figure 2. CD spectrum for myristoylated and unmyristoylated peptides spanning residues 434–467 in BFSP1. The CD spectra for chemically synthesized peptides spanning the residues 434–467 of human BFSP1 ± a myristoyl group were measured in water (A) and in (B) 30% (v/v) TFE. Peptides (0.05 mg/mL) were measured in a Jasco Quartz cell (0556) with a 0.1cm pathlength. Spectra shown are buffer blanked. Note the shift in the minima (206/220 nm) for the myristoylated peptide, which is reflected in the increased α-helical content as indicated from the CDSSTR outputs (C).
Figure 2. CD spectrum for myristoylated and unmyristoylated peptides spanning residues 434–467 in BFSP1. The CD spectra for chemically synthesized peptides spanning the residues 434–467 of human BFSP1 ± a myristoyl group were measured in water (A) and in (B) 30% (v/v) TFE. Peptides (0.05 mg/mL) were measured in a Jasco Quartz cell (0556) with a 0.1cm pathlength. Spectra shown are buffer blanked. Note the shift in the minima (206/220 nm) for the myristoylated peptide, which is reflected in the increased α-helical content as indicated from the CDSSTR outputs (C).
Cells 12 01580 g002
Cells 12 01580 g003 550
Figure 3. Recombinant expression and purification of the BFSP1 protein domains used in these studies. (A). BFSP1 and the domains 434–665, 434–548 and 494–550 were cloned into pET vectors, and their expression was induced by the addition of IPTG. In each of the panels, a sample of the uninduced, followed by a sample after a 3 h induction with IPTG and the subsequent affinity purified proteins are shown. The same markers (M) were used, although the acrylamide concentration changed; 10% (w/v) for BFSP1 1–665; 12% (w/v) for BFSP1 434–665 and 434–548; and lastly, 15% (w/v) for BFSP1 494–550. Markers correspond to 250, 130, 100, 70, 55, 35, 25, 15, and 10 kDa, respectively. (B). Bovine BFSP1 purified from bovine lenses.
Figure 3. Recombinant expression and purification of the BFSP1 protein domains used in these studies. (A). BFSP1 and the domains 434–665, 434–548 and 494–550 were cloned into pET vectors, and their expression was induced by the addition of IPTG. In each of the panels, a sample of the uninduced, followed by a sample after a 3 h induction with IPTG and the subsequent affinity purified proteins are shown. The same markers (M) were used, although the acrylamide concentration changed; 10% (w/v) for BFSP1 1–665; 12% (w/v) for BFSP1 434–665 and 434–548; and lastly, 15% (w/v) for BFSP1 494–550. Markers correspond to 250, 130, 100, 70, 55, 35, 25, 15, and 10 kDa, respectively. (B). Bovine BFSP1 purified from bovine lenses.
Cells 12 01580 g003
Cells 12 01580 g004 550
Figure 4. SPR measurement of the KD for BFSP1 C-terminal domain sequences. The sensorgram and calculated affinity (Equilibrium dissociation constant; KD) of the BFSP1 fragments 434–548 (A), 434–548 (B) and 494–550 (C) for L1 biosensor chip loaded with bovine lens membrane lipids over a five-point concentration range. The plots of RU against concentration for BFSP1 434–665 (A), 434–548 (B) and 494–550 (C). The fragments were produced recombinantly in E.coli, and the final protein preparations after SEC purification used for the SPR experiments are shown in the insets of each panel. The chemically synthesized peptides of BFSP1 434–467 ± myristate (D,E) were compared to a scrambled peptide control (F). In all the plots (A–F), the KD value is included in the plot and can be cross-referenced to Table 1 and Table 2.
Figure 4. SPR measurement of the KD for BFSP1 C-terminal domain sequences. The sensorgram and calculated affinity (Equilibrium dissociation constant; KD) of the BFSP1 fragments 434–548 (A), 434–548 (B) and 494–550 (C) for L1 biosensor chip loaded with bovine lens membrane lipids over a five-point concentration range. The plots of RU against concentration for BFSP1 434–665 (A), 434–548 (B) and 494–550 (C). The fragments were produced recombinantly in E.coli, and the final protein preparations after SEC purification used for the SPR experiments are shown in the insets of each panel. The chemically synthesized peptides of BFSP1 434–467 ± myristate (D,E) were compared to a scrambled peptide control (F). In all the plots (A–F), the KD value is included in the plot and can be cross-referenced to Table 1 and Table 2.
Cells 12 01580 g004
Cells 12 01580 g005 550
Figure 5. Transient transfection of C-terminal domain fragments from BFSP1 confirms 434–460 as a bone fide LBD. A series of eGFP-tagged BFSP1 constructs derived from the C-terminal domain designed to confirm the membrane binding of the amphipathic helix associated with the region 434–452 were subcloned into the peGFP-N3 vector (A). Transient transfection of these different constructs into MCF7 cells produced prominent plasma membrane staining for some (B; 434–665; G434–P548; A434–P548), but not all constructs (B; 461–548, 550–548). Furthermore, preventing myristoylation by replacing the N-terminal glycine residue with alanine (G434A) did not prevent the plasma membrane localization of BFSP1 434–548, suggesting that myristoylation was not necessary for its plasma membrane, or internal membrane localisation. Scale bar = 10 µm (B).
Figure 5. Transient transfection of C-terminal domain fragments from BFSP1 confirms 434–460 as a bone fide LBD. A series of eGFP-tagged BFSP1 constructs derived from the C-terminal domain designed to confirm the membrane binding of the amphipathic helix associated with the region 434–452 were subcloned into the peGFP-N3 vector (A). Transient transfection of these different constructs into MCF7 cells produced prominent plasma membrane staining for some (B; 434–665; G434–P548; A434–P548), but not all constructs (B; 461–548, 550–548). Furthermore, preventing myristoylation by replacing the N-terminal glycine residue with alanine (G434A) did not prevent the plasma membrane localization of BFSP1 434–548, suggesting that myristoylation was not necessary for its plasma membrane, or internal membrane localisation. Scale bar = 10 µm (B).
Cells 12 01580 g005
Cells 12 01580 g006 550
Figure 6. Localisation of BFSP1 434–548 with the lysosomal compartment. MCF7 cells were transiently transfected with BFSP1 434–548 and 434–665 tagged with eGFP and monitored by lice cell imaging. Transfected cells were labelled with the vital dyes, Lysotracker, Mitotracker, Bodipy 494/503 (Bodipy) and Hoechst 33324 *H33324) to follow the distribution of the fragments 434–548, 494–550 and 434–665 in transiently transfected MCF7 cells. Bodipy labelled internal membranes (arrows; Control), and in BFSP1 434–548 transfected cells, these were also co-labelled with eGFP (434–548; arrows). Note the absence (arrows; 434–548) of co-staining of mitochondria (Mitotracker; green channel) and BFSP1 434–548 (green channel), but that the lysosomal marker, Lysotracker (red channel), overlapped (arrows; 434–548) with BFSP1 434–548 signal (green channel). Tamoxifen (10 µM) induced membrane blebbing resulted in 434–548 and 434–665 labelled blebs, but this was not seen in cells transfected with BFSP1 494–554. Scale bars = 10 µm.
Figure 6. Localisation of BFSP1 434–548 with the lysosomal compartment. MCF7 cells were transiently transfected with BFSP1 434–548 and 434–665 tagged with eGFP and monitored by lice cell imaging. Transfected cells were labelled with the vital dyes, Lysotracker, Mitotracker, Bodipy 494/503 (Bodipy) and Hoechst 33324 *H33324) to follow the distribution of the fragments 434–548, 494–550 and 434–665 in transiently transfected MCF7 cells. Bodipy labelled internal membranes (arrows; Control), and in BFSP1 434–548 transfected cells, these were also co-labelled with eGFP (434–548; arrows). Note the absence (arrows; 434–548) of co-staining of mitochondria (Mitotracker; green channel) and BFSP1 434–548 (green channel), but that the lysosomal marker, Lysotracker (red channel), overlapped (arrows; 434–548) with BFSP1 434–548 signal (green channel). Tamoxifen (10 µM) induced membrane blebbing resulted in 434–548 and 434–665 labelled blebs, but this was not seen in cells transfected with BFSP1 494–554. Scale bars = 10 µm.
Cells 12 01580 g006
Table
Table 1. SPR Measurement of KD for BFSP1 protein and C-terminal domain regions binding to Bovine Lens Fibre Cell Membrane Lipids.
Table 1. SPR Measurement of KD for BFSP1 protein and C-terminal domain regions binding to Bovine Lens Fibre Cell Membrane Lipids.
Bovine BFSP1
(Native)		Human
BFSP1 (Recomb.)		Human
BFSP1 434–665		Human
BFSP1 434–548		Human
BFSP1 494–550
6.02 × 10−61.32 × 10−63.06 × 10−61.60 × 10−71.05 × 10−5
6.75 × 10−63.43 × 10−61.34 × 10−62.88 × 10−72.04 × 10−5
7.52 × 10−63.94 × 10−62.19 × 10−62.24 × 10−71.53 × 10−5
6.76 × 10−62.90 × 10−62.20 × 10−62.24 × 10−71.54 × 10−5Mean
4.34 × 10−78.02 × 10−74.94 × 10−73.70 × 10−82.86 × 10−6SEM
Table
Table 2. Effect of myristoylation on the lipid-binding of a polypeptide BFSP1 434–467.
Table 2. Effect of myristoylation on the lipid-binding of a polypeptide BFSP1 434–467.
Unmyristoylated BFSP1 434–467Myristoylated BFSP1 434–467Scrambled Polypeptide Control
1.85 × 10−62.19 × 10−61.39 × 10−4
2.42 × 10−62.31 × 10−61.67 × 10−4
2.13 × 10−62.25 × 10−61.53 × 10−4Mean
2.83 × 10−75.85 × 10−81.37 × 10−5SEM
Table
Table 3. Change in the Heliquest Discrimination Factor as a result of reported sequence variants in the 434–464 sequence of BFSP1, which includes the amphipathic helix (grey highlight). In this table, three sequence variants (Q436R, Y445C and R446S) reported for human BFSP1 (https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/Q12934/entry#disease_variants, accessed on 10 May 2023) are analysed using the Heliquest algorithm (https://heliquest.ipmc.cnrs.fr, accessed on 10 May 2023). The values for the Hydrophic moment (HM) for z (net charge) and then used to calculate the Discrimination Factor (DF) for the wild type and three variants as indicated. Those sequences where a hydrophobic face is predicted are indicated (grey highlight), and DFs that are either higher or lower than the wild type of sequence are indicated (bold).
Table 3. Change in the Heliquest Discrimination Factor as a result of reported sequence variants in the 434–464 sequence of BFSP1, which includes the amphipathic helix (grey highlight). In this table, three sequence variants (Q436R, Y445C and R446S) reported for human BFSP1 (https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/Q12934/entry#disease_variants, accessed on 10 May 2023) are analysed using the Heliquest algorithm (https://heliquest.ipmc.cnrs.fr, accessed on 10 May 2023). The values for the Hydrophic moment (HM) for z (net charge) and then used to calculate the Discrimination Factor (DF) for the wild type and three variants as indicated. Those sequences where a hydrophobic face is predicted are indicated (grey highlight), and DFs that are either higher or lower than the wild type of sequence are indicated (bold).
BFSP1 434–454 (Wild Type)Wild TypeQ436RY445CR446S
Peptide Sequence ScanHMzDFHMzDFHMzDFDMzDF
GGQISKGFGKLYRKVKEK0.5393252.159118080.5670662.515304640.5594952.178158560.4921141.78455184
GQISKGFGKLYRKVKEKV0.5975552.21408720.6271762.572048480.6191352.234458720.5520141.84109744
RISKGFGKLYRKVKEKVR0.6344262.578892480.6617572.9346920.6543162.597668640.5869152.20404304
ISKGFGKLYRKVKEKVRS0.6284562.57325680.6284562.57325680.6480362.591740320.5806152.19809584
SKGFGKLYRKVKEKVRSP0.5752662.523045440.5752662.523045440.5960262.542642880.5287252.14911168
KGFGKLYRKVKEKVRSPK0.5603972.839008160.5603972.839008160.5789372.856509920.5115462.46289376
GFGKLYRKVKEKVRSPKE0.5409952.160694560.5409952.160694560.5596152.178271840.4922241.78465568
FGKLYRKVKEKVRSPKEP0.5466752.166056480.5466752.166056480.5633652.181811840.4962941.78849776
GKLYRKVKEKVRSPKEPE0.422641.71893440.422641.71893440.4364141.731971040.3703931.33964816
KLYRKVKEKVRSPKEPET0.4141641.710967040.4141641.710967040.4287741.724758880.3632731.33292688
LYRKVKEKVRSPKEPETP0.3534131.323619040.3534131.323619040.3625931.332284960.2996820.94289792
YRKVKEKVRSPKEPETPT0.2822531.2564440.2822531.2564440.2951731.268640480.2295120.87665744
RKVKEKVRSPKEPETPTE0.2642720.909470880.2642720.909470880.2642720.909470880.2109810.52916512
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jarrin, M.; Kalligeraki, A.A.; Uwineza, A.; Cawood, C.S.; Brown, A.P.; Ward, E.N.; Le, K.; Freitag-Pohl, S.; Pohl, E.; Kiss, B.; et al. Independent Membrane Binding Properties of the Caspase Generated Fragments of the Beaded Filament Structural Protein 1 (BFSP1) Involves an Amphipathic Helix. Cells 2023, 12, 1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12121580

AMA Style

Jarrin M, Kalligeraki AA, Uwineza A, Cawood CS, Brown AP, Ward EN, Le K, Freitag-Pohl S, Pohl E, Kiss B, et al. Independent Membrane Binding Properties of the Caspase Generated Fragments of the Beaded Filament Structural Protein 1 (BFSP1) Involves an Amphipathic Helix. Cells. 2023; 12(12):1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12121580

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jarrin, Miguel, Alexia A. Kalligeraki, Alice Uwineza, Chris S. Cawood, Adrian P. Brown, Edward N. Ward, Khoa Le, Stefanie Freitag-Pohl, Ehmke Pohl, Bence Kiss, and et al. 2023. "Independent Membrane Binding Properties of the Caspase Generated Fragments of the Beaded Filament Structural Protein 1 (BFSP1) Involves an Amphipathic Helix" Cells 12, no. 12: 1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12121580

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop