Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Magnetic Field Gradient and Gadolinium-Based MRI Contrast Agent Dotarem on Mouse Macrophages
Next Article in Special Issue
Differential Sensitivity of the Protein Translation Initiation Machinery and mTOR Signaling to MECP2 Gain- and Loss-of-Function Involves MeCP2 Isoform-Specific Homeostasis in the Brain
Previous Article in Journal
CRISPR/Cas9 Mediated Knockout of Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene Inhibits Invasiveness in A2058 Melanoma Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/cells11040748
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of MeCP2 in Regulating Synaptic Plasticity in the Context of Stress and Depression

by
Carla L. Sánchez-Lafuente
1,
Lisa E. Kalynchuk
1,
Hector J. Caruncho
1 and
Juan Ausió
2,*
1
Division of Medical Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
2
Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 3P6, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2022, 11(4), 748; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11040748
Submission received: 5 January 2022 / Revised: 10 February 2022 / Accepted: 16 February 2022 / Published: 21 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transcriptional Regulatory Mechanisms in Health and Disease)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2) is a transcriptional regulator that is highly abundant in the brain. It binds to methylated genomic DNA to regulate a range of physiological functions implicated in neuronal development and adult synaptic plasticity. MeCP2 has mainly been studied for its role in neurodevelopmental disorders, but alterations in MeCP2 are also present in stress-related disorders such as major depression. Impairments in both stress regulation and synaptic plasticity are associated with depression, but the specific mechanisms underlying these changes have not been identified. Here, we review the interplay between stress, synaptic plasticity, and MeCP2. We focus our attention on the transcriptional regulation of important neuronal plasticity genes such as BDNF and reelin (RELN). Moreover, we provide evidence from recent studies showing a link between chronic stress-induced depressive symptoms and dysregulation of MeCP2 expression, underscoring the role of this protein in stress-related pathology. We conclude that MeCP2 is a promising target for the development of novel, more efficacious therapeutics for the treatment of stress-related disorders such as depression.

Graphical Abstract

1. Chromatin and Epigenetics: A Brief Overview

In the eukaryote cell, genomic DNA is organized as a nucleoprotein complex in which approximately 200 bp of DNA wraps in two left-handed superhelical turns about a heterotypic histone octamer core comprising two H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 core histones. These repetitive discrete nucleoprotein subunits connect to each other by linker DNA domains (ranging from 20–60 bp), to which linker histones (histone H1) are bound. These complexes are referred to as nucleosomes [1,2,3,4]. They form a repetitive structure (beads on a string) that results in chromatin fiber [4]. The winged-helix domain (WHD) of histone H1 [5] also binds close to the entry and exit sites of DNA in the nucleosome [6,7,8], and this binding plays a critical role in the modulation of the chromatin fiber folding [9]. Both ‘core histones’ and ‘linker histones’ consist of a bipartite/tripartite protein organization in which an N-terminal intrinsically disordered domain (IDD) [10] flanks a structured domain WHD [11] for linker histones or a histone fold domain (HFD) [12] for core histones. Histones H2A, H2B, and histone H1 contain an additional C-terminal IDD. IDDs are a critical site for histone post-translational modifications.
The notion that postsynthetic chemical modifications of histones and DNA could alter gene expression arose as early as 1964 with the seminal observation made by Vincent Allfrey about the potential involvement of histone acetylation and methylation post-translational modifications (PTMs) in the regulation of RNA synthesis [13]. The specific sites and/or the lysine/arginine residues affected in each of the histones were unknown at the time.
In 1983, Feinberg and Vogelstein reported that DNA (gene) hypomethylation could distinguish several human cancers from their normal counterparts [14], indicating an important role of DNA methylation in the gene dysregulation observed in these cancers. In these cases, however, it was not difficult to identify the DNA base affected, as it was believed that 5-methylcytosine (m5C) within a CpG dinucleotide sequence was the only residue methylated in eukaryotes [15,16]. At about the same time, studies on human γ-globin gene expression provided direct evidence for the role of CpG methylation in the regulation of gene expression—namely, that methylation was shown to have a repressive effect [17]. The relevance of CpG methylation to gene expression prompted the search for protein readers of this marker, and soon, the methyl-CpG-binding protein 1 (MeCP1) was discovered [18], as well as several other members of the methyl-binding domain (MBD) family of proteins [19], including MeCP2 [20].
In 2000, Strahl and Allis put forward the histone code hypothesis, according to which, PTMs (acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, etc.) occur at discrete, well-defined residues, and their combinations generate a code that could be read by functional protein effectors (readers). This provides a plethora of markers (more than 16 histone PTMs have been described to date) and combinations of markers with enormous potential for gene regulation that surpasses by orders of magnitude the 5 mC DNA potential. Moreover, although histone PTMs have a highly pervasive distribution in eukaryotes, the extent and function of DNA methylation vary extensively among different organisms within this group [21,22].
In 2005, Esteller’s group clearly showed that lifetime differences between monozygotic human twins are the result of epigenetic changes in DNA methylation and histone acetylation that affect the landscape of their gene expression. It was subsequently shown that such epigenetic molecular drivers could have long-term functional implications. For example, it is now clear that the quality of maternal postnatal care has specific epigenetic effects (DNA methylation, histone methylation) on gene expression within the brain hippocampal region in rats, leading to lasting functional changes in learning, memory, anxiety, and stress regulation [23].
DNA methylation and histone PTMs constitute the main epigenetic markers that are established by a dynamic set of highly specific enzymes (writers) with downstream effects elicited by equally specific individual proteins and/or protein complexes (readers), and they can be removed by enzymatic complexes (erasers) [24,25].

2. The Unique Epigenetics of the Brain

The brain has a set of “exceptional and unique epigenetic” players [26]. At the DNA methylation level, the brain is heavily methylated [27]. Not surprisingly, methyl MeCP2 levels are extremely high in the brain [28]. In cortical neurons, there is about one molecule of MeCP2 for every one to two nucleosomes [29], and hence, it is a unique constitutive chromatin protein of these cells.
A rather unique noncanonical DNA methylation component of the brain is the occurrence of mCH [H = adenine (A), C, or thymine (T)] particularly mCpA, which is present after birth [27]. This DNA methylation plays a very important role in the regulation of gene expression especially in MeCP2 regulated genes [30,31], as MeCP2 is the only member of the MBD family of proteins that selectively binds mCpA and its repeats [32]. Hence, mCH and MeCP2 are two distinct epigenetic regulators of the brain.
MeCP2 has a 60% unstructured organization [33], and hence, it constitutes a genuine representative of the family of intrinsically disordered proteins [10,34]. The protein has two isoforms MeCP2-E1 (498 amino acids) and -E2 (486 amino acids) that are the product of alternative splicing and differ in their 21 first N-terminal amino acids. Despite such small structural differences, the two isoforms exhibit unique structural and functional characteristics, as well as distinct DNA targeting sites [35], where the mCpA-repeat-binding recognition observed in the brain can most likely be attributed to the E1 isoform, the most abundant isoform of MeCP2 in this tissue.
The levels of MeCP2 in the brain change during the circadian cycle (Paz et al., 2015), and alterations affecting this cycle can have a subtle influence on the regulation of gene expression. Considering this and the high abundance of MeCP2 in neurons, the important role of this protein in both normal and altered functions of the brain is not surprising [36].
There is an epigenetic uniqueness that transcends DNA methylation and its readers. Quite recently, evidence has been presented for a new class of histone modifications, serotonylation of glutamine, at position 5 (Q5ser) on histone H3 tri-methylated at lysine 4 (H3K4me3), [H3K4me3Q5ser] [37]. Furthermore, in the adult brain, the histone variant H3.3 (which accumulates with aging) corresponds to over 93% of the total H3 pool [38].
Figure 1 provides a summary of the unique epigenetic elements of the brain described above, framed within the context of the topic of this review. MeCP2 has been shown to play a crucial role in neuronal dendritic arborization [39,40,41], and chronic stress is known to decrease dendrite length and branching [42] as well as synapse density [43] (Figure 1A). Although the role of serotonin in major depressive disorder (referred to as depression throughout this review) has remained somewhat controversial [44], changes in synaptic serotonin levels and receptor levels have been shown to be coupled with altered synaptic plasticity and neurogenesis [45]. In fact, alterations in serotonin availability might affect the production of H3K4me3Q5 serotonylation within neurons [45], and this histone PTM is involved in promoting a BDNF-dependent neurite outgrowth [37]. In addition, MeCP2 preferentially binds to methylated CpA (Figure 1B) [30]. These observations suggest that more investigation of the potential role of CpA methylation in depression is warranted.
Noncoding RNAs, which can be classified as small (sncRNA, <200 nucleotides in length) or long (lncRNAs, >200 nucleotides in length), have also been shown to contribute to depression [49,50], and MeCP2 is an important ncRNA-binding protein (see [48] for a review). For example, miR-184, an imprinted miRNA whose transcription is repressed by MeCP2 under certain neuronal activity conditions [51] is downregulated in older adults with major depressive disorders [52]. Finally, there is evidence that aberrant H3.3 dynamics in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) (a limbic center for reward and mood) promotes vulnerability to depression [53].

3. Stress and Synaptic Plasticity

Stress is described as a state of threatened homeostasis to the body, created by exposure to a variety of different types of stressors. These can range from environmental factors (e.g., deadlines, job loss, sickness, social interactions, noise, weather) to homeostatic challenges (e.g., dehydration, diet, exercise). The ability to cope with stressors relies upon the activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis. The hypothalamus comprises many heterogeneous nuclei that control distinct physiological functions, among which is the paraventricular nucleus (PVN), a main HPA axis regulator [54]. The PVN is activated when stressors are perceived by the body and is responsible for the initiation of a cascade of neuroendocrine events that enable a “flight-or-fight” response to escape from the stress and return to homeostasis [55]. The first step involves the activation of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) in neurons in the parvocellular PVN that project to the anterior pituitary to stimulate the production and secretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) [55,56]. ACTH is then released into the peripheral circulatory system, where it reaches the adrenal gland and stimulates the production and secretion of glucocorticoids (GC). Glucocorticoids are then distributed throughout the body to stimulate glucose metabolism, influence gene expression and immune system activity, etc., to mount a stress response [57,58]. When the stressor ceases, GCs are diminished via inhibitory feedback on the HPA axis, which causes decreased transcriptional activation of proteins involved in the activation of the stress response (i.e., CRH) [54]. As protection against harm, this acute response to a single stressor works remarkably well. However, when chronic stressors occur, the HPA system goes into overdrive and feedback inhibition fails, resulting in abnormal GC levels, which eventually begin to damage homeostatic systems in the body. It is also important to note that there are clear sex differences in the magnitude and length of HPA axis responses to stress [59].
Sex is an important determinant of human health, as evinced by the observation of sex-specific prevalence rates of various mental and physical disorders. There are also sex-specific patterns of HPA axis activation following perceived, or psychological, threats or stressors [60]. Females show a greater hormonal response to stress that provides a higher ability to cope with stress; however, the negative feedback that shuts down the stress response and brings GC levels to baseline is reduced in females, which, in the case of chronic stress, can make them more vulnerable to high levels of GCs. These intrinsic sex differences could underlie differential vulnerabilities that would explain why women are twice as likely as men to develop stress-related disorders such as depression [61,62].
Stress activation in the PVN is also dependent on the nature of the stressor, and it involves a complex system of inhibitory and excitatory projections originating in multiple brain regions, thereby making it a highly plastic nucleus [63,64]. In neurons, plasticity or more precisely synaptic plasticity can be described as the activity-dependent modification of synaptic transmission of pre-existing synapses by the increase in strength or efficacy of their transmission. There are two main types of synaptic plasticity—short-term and long-term plasticity. Synaptic plasticity exists in many forms, lasting from milliseconds to minutes, and plays a critical role in rapid adaptation to sensory input, transient changes in behavior, and short-term memory. Long-term synaptic plasticity, on the other hand, involves an activity-dependent, long-term change in synaptic efficacy that can either enhance (long-term potentiation (LTP)) or depress synaptic strength (long-term depression (LTD)).
Synaptic plasticity is influenced by stress and impairments in synaptic plasticity mechanisms could contribute to stress-related pathology [55,65].

4. MeCP2 and Synaptic Plasticity

MeCP2 has been widely studied for its involvement in Rett syndrome (RTT), a neuronal disorder characterized by a loss of function resulting from mutations in the MeCP2 gene that result in neurodevelopmental and cognitive alterations [66]. The association between MeCP2 and synaptic plasticity was first hypothesized from the observations that RTT individuals present alterations in the number and morphology of dendritic spines [67], decreased dendritic growth [68], and spine dysgenesis [69]. All these alterations, together with the increase that takes place in the neuronal expression of MeCP2 during early development in the normal brain [70,71], suggested an important role of this protein in synapse formation and maintenance, which are key to synaptic plasticity.
As the research that can be performed on human postmortem brains is limited, animal models of RTT have been developed and used to further elucidate the role of MeCP2 in brain synaptic plasticity [66,72]. Hippocampal and cortical synaptic dysfunction is observed in several MeCP2-based mouse models of RTT, as well as dendritic growth and morphology alterations [73,74,75]. Loss-of-function mutations in MeCP2 result in atypical structural synaptic plasticity [76,77] and reduced paired-pulse responses and alterations of other parameters of short-term synaptic plasticity [78,79]. Loss of MeCP2 also leads to changes in neuronal excitability and deficits in experience-dependent and activity-dependent refinement [80].
MeCP2 gain of function is associated with MeCP2 duplication syndrome (MDS), which causes severe mental retardation, stunted motor development, early-onset hypotonia, epileptic seizures, and progressive spasticity [81], and interestingly is also associated with mood alterations such as anxiety, depression, and an autistic-like phenotype [82]. In contrast to MeCP2 loss-of-function models, MeCP2 gain-of-function models show rescue of dendritic defects [83] and display augmented paired-pulse facilitation [84,85] indicative of a tight relationship between MeCP2 and synaptic plasticity. Most recent studies have shown that an aberrant increase in the formation and stabilization of dendritic spines occurs in the cerebral cortex of the mouse model of MECP2-duplication syndrome and seems to be mediated by hyperactivation of the ERK pathway [86,87], a major regulator of clustered spine stabilization [88].
Similar effects in synaptic plasticity have also been observed in vitro (for a review, see [89]). For example, mutation of MeCP2 at S421 blocks dendritic growth and spine maturation in an in vitro overexpression model of RTT [90], whereas knockdown of endogenous MeCP2 using a short-hairpin RNA caused a significant reduction in the total spine density in human postmortem hippocampal cultures [91]. Human neurons derived from patients with RTT show a significant deficit in neuron-specific K+-Cl− cotransporter 2 expression, a target of MeCP2, and a critical transporter for regulating the polarity and efficacy of GABAergic neurons [92].
All these studies show that MeCP2 affects synaptic strength and plasticity, but the specific underlying mechanisms are not completely understood. Phosphorylation of MeCP2 at Serine 421(pS421) occurs upon neuronal depolarization and can lead to an activity-dependent gene transcription important for neuronal connectivity and synaptic plasticity in the nervous system. Indeed, results obtained in vitro and in vivo, using a highly specific antibody recognizing this phosphorylation site (pS421) and using transfections with plasmids expressing an S421A mutation, found that such mutation prevents MeCP2 phosphorylation, which, in turn, causes an impaired dendritic growth and spine maturation [90]. It has recently been documented that MeCP2 is primarily phosphorylated at S421 by CamKII, in response to the calcium influx caused by neuronal depolarization during neuronal activity [93]. However, activation of CamKII and further MeCP2 phosphorylation has also been achieved in neuronal cultures stimulated with the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and neurotrophins 3(NT3) and 4 (NT4), suggesting that neurotrophin signaling may regulate MeCP2 function in cooperation with neuronal activity [90] (Figure 2). Interestingly, MeCP2 pS421 has so far only been detected in the brain, where it seems to play a very important role in stimulus-induced neuronal activity. For example, it plays a role in the light-induced activation of neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) [90]. More importantly, especially in the context of this review, MeCP2 S421 phosphorylation can be induced by early life stress in neurons of the parvocellular hypothalamic PVN [94], the previously described center of stress regulation. Moreover, antidepressant drugs such as imipramine, fluoxetine, or ketamine can induce S421 phosphorylation and reverse stress-induced depression, which will be discussed in the next section of this review [95,96,97].
Evidence regarding the role of MeCP2 in regulating proteins involved in neurotransmitter release also exists. For instance, MeCP2-mutated neurons derived from hiPSCs [98], neurons lacking MeCP2 derived from mice [99], or organoids from RTT patients [89] show alterations in VGLUT1, a specific protein of glutamatergic neurons responsible for loading glutamate into synaptic vesicles. Moreover, a study in the Rett syndrome mouse model revealed alterations in another presynaptic protein, SV2A [100]. There is also plenty of evidence for MeCP2 affecting presynaptic function. MeCP2 increases miniature excitatory postsynaptic current (mEPSC) response and frequency, as well as readily releasable pool (RRP) charge, which could be induced by either altering calcium levels or transcription of presynaptic plasticity genes [78,85,101,102] (Figure 2). As for the effects of MeCP2 in postsynaptic plasticity, studies show that overexpression of MeCP2 causes an increase in glutamatergic synapse number [91]. This increase seems to play a role in mediating homeostatic plasticity and provides a negative feedback mechanism used by neurons to offset excessive excitation or inhibition by adjusting their synaptic strengths [103]. This could be explained by the fact that both calcium or neurotrophin-induced S421 phosphorylation results in the release of MeCP2 from corepressor complexes such as the nuclear receptor corepressor (NCoR) [104] or the switch independent 3 gene-encoded protein A (Sin3A) [105] (Figure 2). This would lead to the transcriptional activation of neuronal modulators that play key roles in neuronal survival, development, and plasticity such as BDNF [90,102,105,106,107,108] (Figure 2). Such mechanisms would suggest mutual functional coregulation of MeCP2 and BDNF.
In summary, there is a wide body of evidence for the involvement of MeCP2 in brain synaptic plasticity, suggesting a bidirectional relationship between short-term plasticity and MeCP2 levels. MeCP2 levels could, either directly affect the calcium concentration in the presynaptic terminal or perhaps may alter proteins involved in neurotransmitter release. Moreover, it can influence postsynaptic plasticity by modulating GABAergic and glutamatergic transmission, leading to alterations in neuronal activity and connectivity. Such alterations could underlie the loss of motor and cognitive abilities and impaired social interactions seen in individuals with RTT, as well as the anxiety and depressive symptoms present in individuals with depression.

5. MeCP2 and Stress-Related Pathology: Focus on Depression

Stress-related disorders such as depression share similar synaptic plasticity alterations to those observed in MeCP2 loss- or gain-of-function models [110]. In this section, we summarize the existing data on the putative involvement of MeCP2 in stress-related pathology with a special focus on depression (Table 1).
Early life stress (ELS) typically results in sustained HPA-axis deregulation and is a major risk factor for stress-related diseases, in particular depression. Interestingly, MeCP2 has been shown to contribute to ELS-dependent epigenetic programming of genes that enhance HPA-axis activity [111]. For instance, MeCP2 acts in association with the histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) and DNA methyltransferase 1(DNMT1) to repress pro-opiomelanocortin (Pomc—the polypeptide precursor of ACTH) gene expression in an ELS paradigm [112]. There is also evidence that ELS induced by maternal separation (MS), which causes depression-like behavior in rats and can be reversed with antidepressants, is associated with an increase in MeCP2 binding to the exon IV but not exon I of the BDNF promoter in the hippocampus, which elicits a negative regulation of BDNF expression that can be reversed by chronic antidepressant treatment with escitalopram [113,114].
Similar alterations have been observed in other stress paradigms. For example, chronic unpredictable stress (CUS) in rodents causes depression-like behaviors that are accompanied by a decrease in MeCP2 and BDNF levels in the hippocampus, as well as an increase in miR-132, which is negatively correlated with MeCP2 and BDNF levels in blood samples from patients with depression [115]. The same decrease in MeCP2 and an increase in oxidative stress were observed in a study using social defeat as a stressor [116]. However, a study using the chronic social defeat stress (CSDS) model, revealed increased protein levels of MeCP2 in the hippocampus, compared with controls and CSDS-resilient mice. In this study, CSDS animals had reduced protein levels of the transcription nuclear factor-erythroid factor 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and BDNF in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and hippocampus, compared with controls and CSDS-resilient mice. Furthermore, activation of Nrf2 by sulforaphane induced fast-acting antidepressant-like effects in mice potentially by activating BDNF transcription, as well as inhibiting MeCP2 expression, which was accompanied by a decrease in abnormal synaptic transmission [117]. Moreover, it has recently been shown that Nrf2 activation in microglia is associated with an improvement in dendritic spine morphology in stressed mice [118]. Finally, a study looking at hippocampal sections of mice stressed by social isolation supported a role of MeCP2 in modulating oxidative stress [119], which has already been seen in RTT [120,121]. This can be explained by the actions of MeCP2 on genes essential in antioxidant and radical scavenger pathways. Interestingly, oxidative stress contributes to both depression and MeCP2-related disorders (for more details, see [122,123]). This compilation of studies using different stress paradigms provide consistent support for the role of MeCP2 in stress-related pathology.
Further evidence of MeCP2 involvement in stress-related pathologies such as depression is provided by the observation that the therapeutic effects of most antidepressant drugs rely on changes in MeCP2 levels. For example, MeCP2- phosphorylation at Ser421 was recently reported to be essential for the sustained, but not the rapid, antidepressant effects of ketamine and scopolamine in mice [118]. Moreover, the ability of imipramine to reverse depression-like behaviors induced by chronic social defeat stress involves MeCP2 phosphorylation [123] and alterations in BDNF and MeCP2 caused by CUS are normalized by escitalopram [124]. Fluoxetine treatment, which improves depressive-like behavior, also dissociates the MeCP2–CREB complex from BDNF promoter IV by protein kinase A (PKA)-mediated phosphorylation of MeCP2 at Ser421, increasing BDNF transcription resulting [107]. Finally, a recent study using a chronic social defeat stress model reported that the fast-acting antidepressant effects of (R)-ketamine, the enantiomer of the FDA-approved antidepressant (S)-ketamine, was mediated by the increased BDNF transcription. Such an increase resulted from the activation of CREB and MeCP2 suppression in microglia [97].
Although these observations in animal models are exciting, it is important to acknowledge that they may not translate to the human condition. There is almost no literature looking at alterations in MeCP2 levels in depressed patients. We have only been able to find two studies that assessed this: An early study examined blood samples of individuals suffering from depression and found a negative correlation between MeCP2 and miR-132 expression levels, which is a microRNA associated with depressive-like behavior [115]. A more recent study examined postmortem brains of individuals who died by suicide and found a decreased BDNF and p-S421p-MeCP2/MeCP2 protein ratio, compared with controls. However, whether these individuals were suffering from depression was not reported [125]. Nevertheless, the results from these two studies are consistent with those from more extensive studies using animal models that we just described.
Altogether, these data indicate that MeCP2 may play a key role in early and adult life stress-induced epigenetic modifications that lead to the development of depression-like behaviors via MeCP2-dependent transcriptional regulation. This might provide more insight into the mechanisms of antidepressant drug action and even provide a new target for novel antidepressants. More clinical studies that focus on examining changes in MeCP2 and other markers of epigenetic change in patients with depression are badly needed.
Table
Table 1. MeCP2 involvement in stress-related pathology, focusing on depressive symptoms.
Table 1. MeCP2 involvement in stress-related pathology, focusing on depressive symptoms.
SubjectExperimental
Paradigm		MeCP2 InvolvementReferences
MiceMeCP2 knock-in and chronic social defeat stress (CSDS)
Imipramine treatment		pMeCP2 is required for the effects of chronic imipramine on depressive-like behaviors induced by chronic social defeat stress.[123]
Early life stress (ELS) by maternal separation (MS)They suggest that MeCP2 acts in association with the chromatin modifiers HDAC2 and DNMT1, to repress Pomc gene expression in the ELS paradigm.[112]
Post-stroke depression (PSD)
fluoxetine treatment(FLX)		Fluoxetine improved depression-like behaviors of PSD mice and upregulated the expression of BDNF in the hippocampus but depletion of BDNF suppressed the effect of fluoxetine. FLX treatment also disassociated the MeCP2-CREB-Bdnf promoter IV complex via phosphorylation of MeCP2 at Ser421 by PKA.[96]
Social isolation stress (SI)Decreased PPAR-α expression in the hippocampus of SI mice was associated with increased MeCP2, which favored hypermethylation and was also associated with increased TLR-4 and pro-inflammatory markers, mediated by NF-κB signaling in the hippocampus of aggressive mice.[119]
Chronic social defeat stressNrf2 induces BDNF transcription via upregulation of Nrf2 and downregulation of MeCP2 in microglia, which is associated with changes in the morphology of damaged dendritic spines in stressed mice.[117]
Chronic social defeat stressActivation of Nrf2 by sulforaphane showed fast-acting antidepressant-like effects in mice by activating BDNF and inhibiting MeCP2 but not in Nrf2 knockout mice. In contrast, levels of MeCP2 in the CSDS-susceptible mice were higher than those of control and CSDS-resilient mice.[126]
Chronic social defeat stress
(R)-ketamine treatment		(R)-ketamine fast-acting antidepressant effects are suggested to be mediated by an increase in BDNF transcription induced by the activation of CREB and MeCP2 suppression in microglia in a CSDS model of Depression.[97]
RatsChronic unpredictable stress (CUS) rat model of depressionKnockdown of MeCP2 expression in primary hippocampal neurons increased miR-132 expression and decreased BDNF expression. CUS-induced depressive-like behaviors correlated with an increase in miR-132 and decreased levels of MeCP2 and BDNF in the hippocampus.[115]
Social defeat stress (SD)
Exercise treatment 		Moderate exercise rescued social defeat induced anxiety-like behavior and memory impairment, and normalized SD-induced increase in oxidative stress, leading to decreased MeCP2 protein levels in the hippocampus.[116]
Early life stress by maternal separation and adult restraint stress (RS).
Escitalopram(ESC) treatment.		Both the MS and RS groups had increased MeCP2 levels at hippocampal BDNF promoter IV with a greater effect by combining MS and RS. This was associated with an increased despair-like behavior measured with the forced swim test. Chronic escitalopram treatment recovered these alterations.[113]
Early life stress by maternal separation (MS).
Escitalopram treatment.		Escitalopram treatment decreased MeCP2 binding to the BDNF promoter exon I in the hippocampus of MS animals; however, MS had no effects on MeCP2 binding levels, compared with controls. MS animals treated with ESC revealed significant increases in BDNF protein and significant decreases in MeCP2 mRNA levels.[114]
Chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) rat model of depression.
Escitalopram treatment.		CUMS increased depressive-like behavior but did not change MeCP2 expression, compared with controls. CUMS reduced BDNF levels in the hippocampus and increased them in the frontal lobe. ESC increased BDNF levels in the hippocampus and increased MeCP2 levels in the hippocampus and the frontal lobe.[124]
HumansMajor DepressionMeCP2 and BDNF negatively correlated with miR-132 expression levels in the blood of depression patients.[115]
Nondiagnosed psychiatric suicideSuicide samples have decreased BDNF, increased H3K27me2, Sin3a levels, and decreased p-S421-MeCP2/ MeCP2 protein ratio. They suggest a role in MeCP2 in lowering BDNF protein levels in suicide patients.[125]
Abbreviations: MeCP2, methyl-CpG-binding protein 2; HDAC2, histone deacetylase 2; DNMT1, DNA methyltransferase 1; Pomc, pro-opiomelanocortin; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; TLR-4, Toll-like receptor 4; PPAR-α, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha; PKA, protein kinase A; Nrf2, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2; miR-132, microRNA-132; H3K27me2, histone 3 lysine 27 dimethylation.

6. MeCP2 and Reelin

Reelin is a pleiotropic extracellular matrix protein that regulates neural migration and maturation, and dendritic sprouting during brain development, and is involved in neural plasticity in the adult brain [127,128,129]. Expression of the reelin gene (RELN) is downregulated in multiple psychiatric disorders, including a decrease in reelin expression levels in the CA4 hippocampal region in major depressive disorder [130]. Similar findings have been observed in animal models of chronic stress, where reelin expression is downregulated in the dentate gyrus subgranular zone and is rescued by antidepressant treatment [131,132]. In fact, intrahippocampal infusions of recombinant reelin rescue the behavioral deficits associated with chronic stress in the repeated-corticosterone paradigm [133]. Investigations on the origin of reelin downregulation in multiple psychiatric disorders prompted the investigation of epigenetic mechanisms, regulating reelin expression (see below).
The human RELN promoter can bind several transcription factors such as Sp1 and CREB and provides several susceptible methylation sites (CpGs) [134,135,136]. As previously described, MeCP2 can bind to mCpG sites in promoters; therefore, it is not surprising to find that MeCP2 binds to hypermethylated RELN promoter suppresses its transcription by recruiting a local repressor complex [137,138]. HDAC inhibitors suppress the actions of histone deacetylases, which can then disrupt repressor complexes such as the one in the RELN promoter, thus leading to an increase in reelin levels. This is interesting because HDAC inhibitors can reverse stress-induced depression-like symptoms in rodents in a similar way to current antidepressants [139], which brings more evidence supporting the role of reelin in the pathophysiology of depression.
Human and animal studies of bipolar, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and schizophrenia have revealed the presence of hypermethylated RELN promoters, which correlate with a decrease in reelin protein levels [137,140,141,142]. Moreover, overexpression of the methyl-transferases DNMT1(maintenance methylation) and DNMT3a (de novo methylation) in GABAergic interneurons, which express high levels of reelin, is present in bipolar and schizophrenia and is associated with alterations in mood and synaptic plasticity [143,144,145,146]. In addition, prenatal stress in rodents increases binding of DNMT1 and MeCP2 and increases 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in specific CpG-rich regions of the RELN and GAD67 promoters. This is associated with alterations in schizophrenia-like behaviors that are corrected with the administration of a histone deacetylase inhibitor (valproic acid) or an atypical antipsychotic with DNA–demethylation activity (clozapine) [147]. Similarly, in postmortem brains of patients with ASD, there is increased binding of MeCP2 to the GAD1 and RELN promoters in the cerebellum, probably mediated by an enrichment of 5-hmC [148]. All these studies support the dysregulation of reelin to be associated with an epigenetic mechanism in several psychiatric disorders that have many commonalities with depression.
Finally, although we demonstrated that stress alters MeCP2 levels and that RELN expression is epigenetically regulated by MeCP2, most of the literature only focuses on the effects of MeCP2 in modulating BDNF. Even though BDNF can also modulate reelin receptor levels [149] (Figure 3) and thus be an indirect link between MeCP2 and reelin, we hypothesize that there might be an interesting direct link between the two supported by the deficient MeCP2 and RELN signaling observed in multiple psychiatric conditions, as well as the related effects observed with BDNF, which itself modulates RELN and synaptic plasticity (Figure 3). We recognize that this association, described in Figure 3, is still speculative due to the lack of substantial evidence; nevertheless, it represents a very interesting research gap worth investigating in the future.
Altogether, in this study, we described the known functions of MeCP2 as an epigenetic regulator, and we provided evidence for its role in modulating synaptic plasticity via the transcriptional regulation of BDNF or other proteins involved in synaptogenesis and synaptic strength like reelin. We also revealed that environmental factors such as chronic stress cause the development of a depressive phenotype that can be reversed with common antidepressants and parallel with alterations in MeCP2 levels. Chronic stress is a potent risk factor for depression, and patients with depression show abnormal synaptic plasticity and reelin levels, which, according to the evidence gathered here, seem to be mediated, in part, by the epigenetic actions of MeCP2. Given the clear need for better treatment options for depression, as up to 50% of patients do not respond to current antidepressants, we believe additional studies of the role of MeCP2 in depression are necessary and may open new opportunities for the development of novel antidepressants.

Author Contributions

C.L.S.-L. and J.A. conceived the review. H.J.C., L.E.K., C.L.S.-L. and J.A. all contributed to the writing of the different sections of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the Ontario Rett Syndrome Association (ORSA) and by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; (CIHR grant MOP-130417) to JA.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; CaMKII, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II; CREB, cAMP response element-binding protein; CRH, corticotropin-releasing hormone; CSDS, chronic social defeat stress; CUS, chronic unpredictable stress; ELS, early life stress; Fkbp5, FK506-binding protein 5; GC, glucocorticoids; HFD, histone fold domain; HPA, hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal; IDD, intrinsically disordered domain; lncRNA, long noncoding RNA; LTD/P, long-term depression/potentiation; MBD, methyl-binding domain; MeCP, methyl-CpG-binding protein; MDD, major depressive disorder; MDS, MeCP2 duplication syndrome; mEPSC, miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents; MPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; MS, maternal separation, NAc, nucleus accumbens; NCoR, nuclear receptor corepressor; ncRNA, noncoding RNA; NMDA, N-Methyl-d-aspartate; Nrf2,nuclear factor-erythroid factor 2-related factor 2; NT3/4, neurotrophin 3/4; PKA, protein kinase A; PSD-95, postsynaptic density protein 95; PTM, post-translational modification; Pomc, pro-opiomelanocortin; PVN, paraventricular nucleus; RRP, readily releasable pool; RTT, Rett syndrome; Sgk1, serum glucocorticoid-inducible kinase 1; SCN, suprachiasmatic nucleus; Sin3A, switch independent 3 gene-encoded protein A; WHD, winged helix domain.

References

  1. Kornberg, R.D.; Thomas, J.O. Chromatin structure; oligomers of the histones. Science 1974, 184, 865–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Olins, A.L.; Olins, D.E. Spheroid chromatin units (v bodies). Science 1974, 183, 330–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Oudet, P.; Gross-Bellard, M.; Chambon, P. Electron microscopic and biochemical evidence that chromatin structure is a repeating unit. Cell 1975, 4, 281–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Van Holde, K.E. Chromatin; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kasinsky, H.E.; Lewis, J.D.; Dacks, J.B.; Ausió, J. Origin of H1 linker histones. FASEB J. 2001, 15, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Allan, J.; Hartman, P.G.; Crane-Robinson, C.; Aviles, F.X. The structure of histone H1 and its location in chromatin. Nature 1980, 288, 675–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, S.; Vogirala, V.K.; Soman, A.; Berezhnoy, N.V.; Liu, Z.B.; Wong, A.S.W.; Korolev, N.; Su, C.J.; Sandin, S.; Nordenskiold, L. Linker histone defines structure and self-association behaviour of the 177 bp human chromatosome. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hao, F.; Kale, S.; Dimitrov, S.; Hayes, J.J. Unraveling linker histone interactions in nucleosomes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2021, 71, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Howe, L.; Iskandar, M.; Ausio, J. Folding of chromatin in the presence of heterogeneous histone H1 binding to nucleosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 11625–11629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Dunker, A.K.; Lawson, J.D.; Brown, C.J.; Williams, R.M.; Romero, P.; Oh, J.S.; Oldfield, C.J.; Campen, A.M.; Ratliff, C.M.; Hipps, K.W.; et al. Intrinsically disordered protein. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2001, 19, 26–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ramakrishnan, V.; Finch, J.T.; Graziano, V.; Lee, P.L.; Sweet, R.M. Crystal structure of globular domain of his-tone H5 and its implications for nucleosome binding. Nature 1993, 362, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Arents, G.; Moudrianakis, E.N. The histone fold: A ubiquitous architectural motif utilized in DNA compaction and protein dimerization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 11170–11174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Allfrey, V.G.; Faulkner, R.; Mirsky, A.E. Acetylation and Methylation of Histones and Their Possible Role in the Regulation of Rna Synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1964, 51, 786–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Feinberg, A.P.; Vogelstein, B. Hypomethylation distinguishes genes of some human cancers from their normal counterparts. Nature 1983, 301, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ehrlich, M.; Wang, R.Y. 5-Methylcytosine in eukaryotic DNA. Science 1981, 212, 1350–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Adams, R.L.; Burdon, R.H. DNA methylation in eukaryotes. CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. 1982, 13, 349–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Busslinger, M.; Hurst, J.; Flavell, R.A. DNA methylation and the regulation of globin gene expression. Cell 1983, 34, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Meehan, R.R.; Lewis, J.D.; McKay, S.; Kleiner, E.L.; Bird, A.P. Identification of a mammalian protein that binds specifically to DNA containing methylated CpGs. Cell 1989, 58, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hendrich, B.; Bird, A. Identification and characterization of a family of mammalian methyl-CpG binding proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18, 6538–6547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lewis, J.D.; Meehan, R.R.; Henzel, W.J.; Maurer-Fogy, I.; Jeppesen, P.; Klein, F.; Bird, A. Purification, sequence, and cellular localization of a novel chromosomal protein that binds to methylated DNA. Cell 1992, 69, 905–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bird, A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 6–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Head, J.A. Patterns of DNA methylation in animals: An ecotoxicological perspective. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2014, 54, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Tammen, S.A.; Friso, S.; Choi, S.W. Epigenetics: The link between nature and nurture. Mol. Asp. Med. 2013, 34, 753–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Marmorstein, R.; Zhou, M.M. Writers and readers of histone acetylation: Structure, mechanism, and inhibition. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014, 6, a018762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Seto, E.; Yoshida, M. Erasers of histone acetylation: The histone deacetylase enzymes. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014, 6, a018713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Luo, C.; Ecker, J.R. Epigenetics. Exceptional epigenetics in the brain. Science 2015, 348, 1094–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Lister, R.; Mukamel, E.A.; Nery, J.R.; Urich, M.; Puddifoot, C.A.; Johnson, N.D.; Lucero, J.; Huang, Y.; Dwork, A.J.; Schultz, M.D.; et al. Global epigenomic reconfiguration during mammalian brain development. Science 2013, 341, 1237905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Thambirajah, A.A.; Ng, M.K.; Frehlick, L.J.; Li, A.; Serpa, J.J.; Petrotchenko, E.V.; Silva-Moreno, B.; Missiaen, K.K.; Borchers, C.H.; Adam Hall, J.; et al. MeCP2 binds to nucleosome free (linker DNA) regions and to H3K9/H3K27 methylated nucleosomes in the brain. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 2884–2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Skene, P.J.; Illingworth, R.S.; Webb, S.; Kerr, A.R.; James, K.D.; Turner, D.J.; Andrews, R.; Bird, A.P. Neuronal MeCP2 is expressed at near histone-octamer levels and globally alters the chromatin state. Mol. Cell 2010, 37, 457–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gabel, H.W.; Kinde, B.; Stroud, H.; Gilbert, C.S.; Harmin, D.A.; Kastan, N.R.; Hemberg, M.; Ebert, D.H.; Green-berg, M.E. Disruption of DNA-methylation-dependent long gene repression in Rett syndrome. Nature 2015, 522, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Chen, L.; Chen, K.; Lavery, L.A.; Baker, S.A.; Shaw, C.A.; Li, W.; Zoghbi, H.Y. MeCP2 binds to non-CG methylated DNA as neurons mature, influencing transcription and the timing of onset for Rett syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 5509–5514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Ibrahim, A.; Papin, C.; Mohideen-Abdul, K.; le Gras, S.; Stoll, I.; Bronner, C.; Dimitrov, S.; Klaholz, B.P.; Hamiche, A. MeCP2 is a microsatellite binding protein that protects CA repeats from nucleosome invasion. Science 2021, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ghosh, R.P.; Nikitina, T.; Horowitz-Scherer, R.A.; Gierasch, L.M.; Uversky, V.N.; Hite, K.; Hansen, J.C.; Wood-cock, C.L. Unique physical properties and interactions of the domains of methylated DNA binding protein 2. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 4395–4410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ausió, J.; de Paz, A.; Esteller, M. MeCP2: The long trip from a chromatin protein to neurological disorders. Trends Mol. Med. 2014, 20, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Martínez de Paz, A.; Khajavi, L.; Martin, H.; Claveria-Gimeno, R.; Tom Dieck, S.; Cheema, M.S.; Sanchez-Mut, J.V.; Moksa, M.M.; Carles, A.; Brodie, N.I.; et al. MeCP2-E1 isoform is a dynamically expressed, weakly DNA-bound protein with different protein and DNA interactions compared to MeCP2-E2. Epigenet. Chromatin 2019, 12, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Ausio, J. Role of MeCP2 in neurological disorders: Current status and future perspectives. Epigenomics 2018, 10, 5–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Farrelly, L.A.; Thompson, R.E.; Zhao, S.; Lepack, A.E.; Lyu, Y.; Bhanu, N.V.; Zhang, B.; Loh, Y.E.; Ramakrishnan, A.; Vadodaria, K.C.; et al. Histone serotonylation is a permissive modification that enhances TFIID binding to H3K4me3. Nature 2019, 567, 535–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Maze, I.; Wenderski, W.; Noh, K.-M.; Bagot, R.C.; Tzavaras, N.; Purushothaman, I.; Elsässer, S.J.; Guo, Y.; Io-nete, C.; Hurd, Y.L.; et al. Critical Role of Histone Turnover in Neuronal Transcription and Plasticity. Neuron 2015, 87, 77–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Johnston, M.V.; Jeon, O.H.; Pevsner, J.; Blue, M.E.; Naidu, S. Neurobiology of Rett syndrome: A genetic disorder of synapse development. Brain Dev. 2001, 23 (Suppl. S1), S206–S213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kishi, N.; Macklis, J.D. MECP2 is progressively expressed in post-migratory neurons and is involved in neuronal maturation rather than cell fate decisions. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2004, 27, 306–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Armstrong, D.D. Neuropathology of Rett syndrome. J. Child Neurol. 2005, 20, 747–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Duman, R.S.; Aghajanian, G.K. Synaptic dysfunction in depression: Potential therapeutic targets. Science 2012, 338, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Duman, R.S.; Aghajanian, G.K.; Sanacora, G.; Krystal, J.H. Synaptic plasticity and depression: New insights from stress and rapid-acting antidepressants. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 238–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Liu, B.; Liu, J.; Wang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L. From Serotonin to Neuroplasticity: Evolvement of Theories for Major Depressive Disorder. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Kraus, C.; Castren, E.; Kasper, S.; Lanzenberger, R. Serotonin and neuroplasticity—Links between molecular, functional and structural pathophysiology in depression. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017, 77, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Petazzi, P.; Sandoval, J.; Szczesna, K.; Jorge, O.C.; Roa, L.; Sayols, S.; Gomez, A.; Huertas, D.; Esteller, M. Dysregulation of the long non-coding RNA transcriptome in a Rett syndrome mouse model. RNA Biol. 2013, 10, 1197–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Maxwell, S.S.; Pelka, G.J.; Tam, P.P.; El-Osta, A. Chromatin context and ncRNA highlight targets of MeCP2 in brain. RNA Biol. 2013, 10, 1741–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Good, K.V.; Vincent, J.B.; Ausio, J. MeCP2: The Genetic Driver of Rett Syndrome Epigenetics. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 620859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lin, R.; Turecki, G. Noncoding RNAs in Depression. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017, 978, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Huang, X.; Luo, Y.L.; Mao, Y.S.; Ji, J.L. The link between long noncoding RNAs and depression. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2017, 73, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Obiols-Guardia, A.; Guil, S.; Obiols-Guardia, A.; Guil, S. The Role of Noncoding RNAs in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: The Case of Rett Syndrome. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017, 978, 23–37. [Google Scholar]
  52. Mendes-Silva, A.P.; Fujimura, P.T.; da Silva, J.R.C.; Teixeira, A.L.; Vieira, E.M.; Guedes, P.H.G.; Barroso, L.S.S.; de Souza Nicolau, M.; Ferreira, J.D.R.; Bertola, L.; et al. Brain-enriched MicroRNA-184 is downregulated in older adults with major depressive disorder: A translational study. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2019, 111, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lepack, A.E.; Bagot, R.C.; Pena, C.J.; Loh, Y.E.; Farrelly, L.A.; Lu, Y.; Powell, S.K.; Lorsch, Z.S.; Issler, O.; Cates, H.M.; et al. Aberrant H3.3 dynamics in NAc promote vulnerability to depressive-like behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 12562–12567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Gao, Y.; Sun, T. Molecular regulation of hypothalamic development and physiological functions. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 4275–4285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Herman, J.P.; McKlveen, J.M.; Ghosal, S.; Kopp, B.; Wulsin, A.; Makinson, R.; Scheimann, J.; Myers, B. Regulation of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenocortical Stress Response. Compr. Physiol. 2016, 6, 603–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Makino, S.; Shibasaki, T.; Yamauchi, N.; Nishioka, T.; Mimoto, T.; Wakabayashi, I.; Gold, P.W.; Hashimoto, K. Psychological stress increased corticotropin-releasing hormone mRNA and content in the central nucleus of the amygdala but not in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus in the rat. Brain Res. 1999, 850, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rivier, C.; Vale, W. Modulation of stress-induced ACTH release by corticotropin-releasing factor, catecholamines and vasopressin. Nature 1983, 305, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cain, D.W.; Cidlowski, J.A. Immune regulation by glucocorticoids. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 17, 233–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Nicolaides, N.C.; Kyratzi, E.; Lamprokostopoulou, A.; Chrousos, G.P.; Charmandari, E. Stress, the stress system and the role of glucocorticoids. Neuroimmunomodulation 2015, 22, 6–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Goel, N.; Workman, J.L.; Lee, T.T.; Innala, L.; Viau, V. Sex differences in the HPA axis. Compr. Physiol. 2014, 4, 1121–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Goel, N.; Innala, L.; Viau, V. Sex differences in serotonin (5-HT) 1A receptor regulation of HPA axis and dorsal raphe responses to acute restraint. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2014, 40, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Heck, A.L.; Handa, R.J. Sex differences in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis’ response to stress: An important role for gonadal hormones. Neuropsychopharmacology 2019, 44, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Marcus, S.M.; Young, E.A.; Kerber, K.B.; Kornstein, S.; Farabaugh, A.H.; Mitchell, J.; Wisniewski, S.R.; Balasubramani, G.K.; Trivedi, M.H.; Rush, A.J. Gender differences in depression: Findings from the STAR*D study. J. Affect. Disord. 2005, 87, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Myers, B.; Mark Dolgas, C.; Kasckow, J.; Cullinan, W.E.; Herman, J.P. Central stress-integrative circuits: Fore-brain glutamatergic and GABAergic projections to the dorsomedial hypothalamus, medial preoptic area, and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Brain Struct. Funct. 2014, 219, 1287–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Herman, J.P.; Flak, J.; Jankord, R. Chronic stress plasticity in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. Prog. Brain Res. 2008, 170, 353–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Chin, E.W.M.; Goh, E.L.K. MeCP2 Dysfunction in Rett Syndrome and Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 2011, 573–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bauman, M.L.; Kemper, T.L.; Arin, D.M. Pervasive neuroanatomic abnormalities of the brain in three cases of Rett’s syndrome. Neurology 1995, 45, 1581–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Armstrong, D.; Dunn, J.K.; Antalffy, B.; Trivedi, R. Selective dendritic alterations in the cortex of Rett syndrome. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 1995, 54, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Belichenko, P.V.; Dahlstrom, A. Confocal laser scanning microscopy and 3-D reconstructions of neuronal structures in human brain cortex. Neuroimage 1995, 2, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jung, B.P.; Jugloff, D.G.; Zhang, G.; Logan, R.; Brown, S.; Eubanks, J.H. The expression of methyl CpG binding factor MeCP2 correlates with cellular differentiation in the developing rat brain and in cultured cells. J. Neurobiol. 2003, 55, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kaufmann, W.E.; Johnston, M.V.; Blue, M.E. MeCP2 expression and function during brain development: Implications for Rett syndrome’s pathogenesis and clinical evolution. Brain Dev. 2005, 27 (Suppl. S1), S77–S87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chen, R.Z.; Akbarian, S.; Tudor, M.; Jaenisch, R. Deficiency of methyl-CpG binding protein-2 in CNS neurons results in a Rett-like phenotype in mice. Nat. Genet. 2001, 27, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Asaka, Y.; Jugloff, D.G.; Zhang, L.; Eubanks, J.H.; Fitzsimonds, R.M. Hippocampal synaptic plasticity is impaired in the Mecp2-null mouse model of Rett syndrome. Neurobiol. Dis. 2006, 21, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Calfa, G.; Li, W.; Rutherford, J.M.; Pozzo-Miller, L. Excitation/inhibition imbalance and impaired synaptic inhibition in hippocampal area CA3 of Mecp2 knockout mice. Hippocampus 2015, 25, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Zhang, W.; Peterson, M.; Beyer, B.; Frankel, W.N.; Zhang, Z.W. Loss of MeCP2 from forebrain excitatory neurons leads to cortical hyperexcitation and seizures. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 2754–2763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Morello, N.; Schina, R.; Pilotto, F.; Phillips, M.; Melani, R.; Plicato, O.; Pizzorusso, T.; Pozzo-Miller, L.; Giustetto, M. Loss of Mecp2 Causes Atypical Synaptic and Molecular Plasticity of Parvalbumin-Expressing Interneurons Reflecting Rett Syndrome-Like Sensorimotor Defects. eNeuro 2018, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Kishi, N.; Macklis, J.D. MeCP2 functions largely cell-autonomously, but also non-cell-autonomously, in neuronal maturation and dendritic arborization of cortical pyramidal neurons. Exp. Neurol. 2010, 222, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Nelson, E.D.; Kavalali, E.T.; Monteggia, L.M. MeCP2-dependent transcriptional repression regulates excitatory neurotransmission. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16, 710–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Moretti, P.; Levenson, J.M.; Battaglia, F.; Atkinson, R.; Teague, R.; Antalffy, B.; Armstrong, D.; Arancio, O.; Sweatt, J.D.; Zoghbi, H.Y. Learning and memory and synaptic plasticity are impaired in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Ip, J.P.K.; Mellios, N.; Sur, M. Rett syndrome: Insights into genetic, molecular and circuit mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2018, 19, 368–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Van Esch, H. MECP2 Duplication Syndrome. Mol. Syndromol. 2012, 2, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Ramocki, M.B.; Tavyev, Y.J.; Peters, S.U. The MECP2 duplication syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2010, 152A, 1079–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Williams, A.A.; White, R.; Siniard, A.; Corneveaux, J.; Huentelman, M.; Duch, C. MECP2 impairs neuronal structure by regulating KIBRA. Neurobiol. Dis. 2016, 91, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Collins, A.L.; Levenson, J.M.; Vilaythong, A.P.; Richman, R.; Armstrong, D.L.; Noebels, J.L.; David Sweatt, J.; Zoghbi, H.Y. Mild overexpression of MeCP2 causes a progressive neurological disorder in mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2004, 13, 2679–2689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Na, E.S.; Nelson, E.D.; Adachi, M.; Autry, A.E.; Mahgoub, M.A.; Kavalali, E.T.; Monteggia, L.M. A mouse model for MeCP2 duplication syndrome: MeCP2 overexpression impairs learning and memory and synaptic transmission. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 3109–3117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Ash, R.T.; Buffington, S.A.; Park, J.; Suter, B.; Costa-Mattioli, M.; Zoghbi, H.Y.; Smirnakis, S.M. Inhibition of Elevated Ras-MAPK Signaling Normalizes Enhanced Motor Learning and Excessive Clustered Dendritic Spine Stabilization in the MECP2-Duplication Syndrome Mouse Model of Autism. eNeuro 2021, 8, 56–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ash, R.T.; Park, J.; Suter, B.; Smirnakis, S.M.; Zoghbi, H.Y. Excessive Formation and Stabilization of Dendritic Spine Clusters in the MECP2-Duplication Syndrome Mouse Model of Autism. eNeuro 2021, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Frank, A.C.; Huang, S.; Zhou, M.; Gdalyahu, A.; Kastellakis, G.; Silva, T.K.; Lu, E.; Wen, X.; Poirazi, P.; Trachtenberg, J.T.; et al. Hotspots of dendritic spine turnover facilitate clustered spine addition and learning and memory. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Gomes, A.R.; Fernandes, T.G.; Cabral, J.M.S.; Diogo, M.M. Modeling Rett Syndrome with Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: Mechanistic Outcomes and Future Clinical Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhou, Z.; Hong, E.J.; Cohen, S.; Zhao, W.N.; Ho, H.Y.; Schmidt, L.; Chen, W.G.; Lin, Y.; Savner, E.; Griffith, E.C.; et al. Brain-specific phosphorylation of MeCP2 regulates activity-dependent Bdnf transcription, dendritic growth, and spine maturation. Neuron 2006, 52, 255–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Chapleau, C.A.; Calfa, G.D.; Lane, M.C.; Albertson, A.J.; Larimore, J.L.; Kudo, S.; Armstrong, D.L.; Percy, A.K.; Pozzo-Miller, L. Dendritic spine pathologies in hippocampal pyramidal neurons from Rett syndrome brain and after expression of Rett-associated MECP2 mutations. Neurobiol. Dis. 2009, 35, 219–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Tang, X.; Kim, J.; Zhou, L.; Wengert, E.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Z.; Carromeu, C.; Muotri, A.R.; Marchetto, M.C.; Gage, F.H.; et al. KCC2 rescues functional deficits in human neurons derived from patients with Rett syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 751–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Buchthal, B.; Lau, D.; Weiss, U.; Weislogel, J.M.; Bading, H. Nuclear calcium signaling controls methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2) phosphorylation on serine 421 following synaptic activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 30967–30974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Murgatroyd, C.; Patchev, A.V.; Wu, Y.; Micale, V.; Bockmuhl, Y.; Fischer, D.; Holsboer, F.; Wotjak, C.T.; Al-meida, O.F.; Spengler, D. Dynamic DNA methylation programs persistent adverse effects of early-life stress. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12, 1559–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Deng, J.V.; Rodriguiz, R.M.; Hutchinson, A.N.; Kim, I.H.; Wetsel, W.C.; West, A.E. MeCP2 in the nucleus accumbens contributes to neural and behavioral responses to psychostimulants. Nat. Neurosci. 2010, 13, 1128–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Jin, H.J.; Pei, L.; Li, Y.N.; Zheng, H.; Yang, S.; Wan, Y.; Mao, L.; Xia, Y.P.; He, Q.W.; Li, M.; et al. Alleviative effects of fluoxetine on depressive-like behaviors by epigenetic regulation of BDNF gene transcription in mouse model of post-stroke depression. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Yao, W.; Cao, Q.; Luo, S.; He, L.; Yang, C.; Chen, J.; Qi, Q.; Hashimoto, K.; Zhang, J.C. Microglial ERK-NRBP1-CREB-BDNF signaling in sustained antidepressant actions of (R)-ketamine. Mol. Psychiatry 2021, 1476–5578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Marchetto, M.C.N.; Carromeu, C.; Acab, A.; Yu, D.; Yeo, G.W.; Mu, Y.; Chen, G.; Gage, F.H.; Muotri, A.R. A model for neural development and treatment of Rett syndrome using human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell 2010, 143, 527–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Chao, H.T.; Zoghbi, H.Y.; Rosenmund, C. MeCP2 controls excitatory synaptic strength by regulating glutamatergic synapse number. Neuron 2007, 56, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. DiFilippo, A.; Ferreira, C.; Engle, J.; Barnhart, T.; Dong, Q.; Chang, Q.; Christian, B. PET imaging of pre-synaptic protein SV2A in Rett syndrome mouse model. J. Nucl. Med. 2019, 60 (Suppl. S1), 117. [Google Scholar]
  101. Jin, X.; Cui, N.; Zhong, W.; Jin, X.T.; Jiang, C. GABAergic synaptic inputs of locus coeruleus neurons in wild-type and Mecp2-null mice. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2013, 304, C844–C857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Bertoldi, M.L.; Zalosnik, M.I.; Fabio, M.C.; Aja, S.; Roth, G.A.; Ronnett, G.V.; Degano, A.L. MeCP2 Deficiency Disrupts Kainate-Induced Presynaptic Plasticity in the Mossy Fiber Projections in the Hippocampus. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Blackman, M.P.; Djukic, B.; Nelson, S.B.; Turrigiano, G.G. A critical and cell-autonomous role for MeCP2 in synaptic scaling up. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 13529–13536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Lyst, M.J.; Ekiert, R.; Ebert, D.H.; Merusi, C.; Nowak, J.; Selfridge, J.; Guy, J.; Kastan, N.R.; Robinson, N.D.; de Lima Alves, F.; et al. Rett syndrome mutations abolish the interaction of MeCP2 with the NCoR/SMRT co-repressor. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16, 898–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Martinowich, K.; Hattori, D.; Wu, H.; Fouse, S.; He, F.; Hu, Y.; Fan, G.; Sun, Y.E. DNA methylation-related chromatin remodeling in activity-dependent BDNF gene regulation. Science 2003, 302, 890–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Degano, A.L.; Park, M.J.; Penati, J.; Li, Q.; Ronnett, G.V. MeCP2 is required for activity-dependent refinement of olfactory circuits. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2014, 59, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Chen, W.G.; Chang, Q.; Lin, Y.; Meissner, A.; West, A.E.; Griffith, E.C.; Jaenisch, R.; Greenberg, M.E. Derepression of BDNF transcription involves calcium-dependent phosphorylation of MeCP2. Science 2003, 302, 885–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ballas, N.; Grunseich, C.; Lu, D.D.; Speh, J.C.; Mandel, G. REST and its corepressors mediate plasticity of neuronal gene chromatin throughout neurogenesis. Cell 2005, 121, 645–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Yang, T.; Nie, Z.; Shu, H.; Kuang, Y.; Chen, X.; Cheng, J.; Yu, S.; Liu, H. The Role of BDNF on Neural Plasticity in Depression. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2020, 14, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Menard, C.; Hodes, G.E.; Russo, S.J. Pathogenesis of depression: Insights from human and rodent studies. Neuroscience 2016, 321, 138–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Zimmermann, C.A.; Hoffmann, A.; Raabe, F.; Spengler, D. Role of mecp2 in experience-dependent epigenetic programming. Genes 2015, 6, 60–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Wu, Y.; Patchev, A.V.; Daniel, G.; Almeida, O.F.; Spengler, D. Early-life stress reduces DNA methylation of the Pomc gene in male mice. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 1751–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Seo, M.K.; Ly, N.N.; Lee, C.H.; Cho, H.Y.; Choi, C.M.; Nhu, L.H.; Lee, J.G.; Lee, B.J.; Kim, G.M.; Yoon, B.J.; et al. Early life stress increases stress vulnerability through BDNF gene epigenetic changes in the rat hippocampus. Neuropharmacology 2016, 105, 388–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Park, S.W.; Seo, M.K.; Lee, J.G.; Hien, L.T.; Kim, Y.H. Effects of maternal separation and antidepressant drug on epigenetic regulation of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor exon I promoter in the adult rat hippocampus. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2018, 72, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Su, M.; Hong, J.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, S.; Xue, X. MeCP2 controls hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression via homeostatic interactions with microRNA132 in rats with depression. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 5399–5406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Patki, G.; Solanki, N.; Atrooz, F.; Ansari, A.; Allam, F.; Jannise, B.; Maturi, J.; Salim, S. Novel mechanistic insights into treadmill exercise based rescue of social defeat-induced anxiety-like behavior and memory impairment in rats. Physiol. Behav. 2014, 130, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Yao, W.; Lin, S.; Su, J.; Cao, Q.; Chen, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Z.; Hashimoto, K.; Qi, Q.; Zhang, J.C. Activation of BDNF by transcription factor Nrf2 contributes to antidepressant-like actions in rodents. Transl. Psychiatry 2021, 11, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kim, J.W.; Autry, A.E.; Na, E.S.; Adachi, M.; Bjorkholm, C.; Kavalali, E.T.; Monteggia, L.M. Sustained effects of rapidly acting antidepressants require BDNF-dependent MeCP2 phosphorylation. Nat. Neurosci. 2021, 24, 1100–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Matrisciano, F.; Pinna, G. PPAR-α Hypermethylation in the Hippocampus of Mice Exposed to Social Isolation Stress Is Associated with Enhanced Neuroinflammation and Aggressive Behavior. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Filosa, S.; Pecorelli, A.; D’Espositoc, M.; Valacchi, G.; Hajek, J. Exploring the possible link between MeCP2 and oxidative stress in Rett syndrome. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2015, 88, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Signorini, C.; de Felice, C.; Leoncini, S.; Møller, R.S.; Zollo, G.; Buoni, S.; Cortelazzo, A.; Guerranti, R.; Durand, T.; Ciccoli, L.; et al. MECP2 Duplication Syndrome: Evidence of Enhanced Oxidative Stress. A Comparison with Rett Syndrome. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0150101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Allen, J.; Romay-Tallon, R.; Brymer, K.J.; Caruncho, H.J.; Kalynchuk, L.E. Mitochondria and Mood: Mitochondrial Dysfunction as a Key Player in the Manifestation of Depression. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Hutchinson, A.N.; Deng, J.V.; Cohen, S.; West, A.E. Phosphorylation of MeCP2 at Ser421 contributes to chronic antidepressant action. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 14355–14363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Dionisie, V.; Ciobanu, A.M.; Toma, V.A.; Manea, M.C.; Baldea, I.; Olteanu, D.; Sevastre-Berghian, A.; Clichici, S.; Manea, M.; Riga, S.; et al. Escitalopram Targets Oxidative Stress, Caspase-3, BDNF and MeCP2 in the Hippo-campus and Frontal Cortex of a Rat Model of Depression Induced by Chronic Unpredictable Mild Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Misztak, P.; Panczyszyn-Trzewik, P.; Nowak, G.; Sowa-Kucma, M. Epigenetic marks and their relationship with BDNF in the brain of suicide victims. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0239335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Tang, R.; Cao, Q.Q.; Hu, S.W.; He, L.J.; Du, P.F.; Chen, G.; Fu, R.; Xiao, F.; Sun, Y.R.; Zhang, J.C.; et al. Sulforaphane activates anti-inflammatory microglia, modulating stress resilience associated with BDNF transcription. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2021, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Weeber, E.J.; Beffert, U.; Jones, C.; Christian, J.M.; Forster, E.; Sweatt, J.D.; Herz, J. Reelin and ApoE receptors cooperate to enhance hippocampal synaptic plasticity and learning. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 39944–39952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Beffert, U.; Weeber, E.J.; Durudas, A.; Qiu, S.; Masiulis, I.; Sweatt, J.D.; Li, W.P.; Adelmann, G.; Frotscher, M.; Hammer, R.E.; et al. Modulation of synaptic plasticity and memory by Reelin involves differential splicing of the lipoprotein receptor Apoer2. Neuron 2005, 47, 567–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Qiu, S.; Zhao, L.F.; Korwek, K.M.; Weeber, E.J. Differential reelin-induced enhancement of NMDA and AMPA receptor activity in the adult hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 12943–12955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Fatemi, S.H.; Earle, J.A.; McMenomy, T. Reduction in Reelin immunoreactivity in hippocampus of subjects with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depression. Mol. Psychiatry 2000, 5, 654–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Brymer, K.J.; Fenton, E.Y.; Kalynchuk, L.E.; Caruncho, H.J. Peripheral Etanercept Administration Normalizes Behavior, Hippocampal Neurogenesis, and Hippocampal Reelin and GABAA Receptor Expression in a Preclinical Model of Depression. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Fenton, E.Y.; Fournier, N.M.; Lussier, A.L.; Romay-Tallon, R.; Caruncho, H.J.; Kalynchuk, L.E. Imipramine protects against the deleterious effects of chronic corticosterone on depression-like behavior, hippocampal reelin expression, and neuronal maturation. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2015, 60, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Brymer, K.J.; Johnston, J.; Botterill, J.J.; Romay-Tallon, R.; Mitchell, M.A.; Allen, J.; Pinna, G.; Caruncho, H.J.; Kalynchuk, L.E. Fast-acting antidepressant-like effects of Reelin evaluated in the repeated-corticosterone chronic stress paradigm. Neuropsychopharmacology 2020, 45, 1707–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Chen, Y.; Sharma, R.P.; Costa, R.H.; Costa, E.; Grayson, D.R. On the epigenetic regulation of the human reelin promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 2930–2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Grayson, D.R.; Chen, Y.; Costa, E.; Dong, E.; Guidotti, A.; Kundakovic, M.; Sharma, R.P. The human reelin gene: Transcription factors (+), repressors (−) and the methylation switch (+/−) in schizophrenia. Pharmacol. Ther. 2006, 111, 272–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Grayson, D.R.; Jia, X.; Chen, Y.; Sharma, R.P.; Mitchell, C.P.; Guidotti, A.; Costa, E. Reelin promoter hypermethylation in schizophrenia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 9341–9346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Kundakovic, M.; Chen, Y.; Costa, E.; Grayson, D.R. DNA methyltransferase inhibitors coordinately induce expression of the human reelin and glutamic acid decarboxylase 67 genes. Mol. Pharmacol. 2007, 71, 644–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Kundakovic, M.; Chen, Y.; Guidotti, A.; Grayson, D.R. The reelin and GAD67 promoters are activated by epige-netic drugs that facilitate the disruption of local repressor complexes. Mol. Pharmacol. 2009, 75, 342–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Covington, H.E., 3rd; Maze, I.; LaPlant, Q.C.; Vialou, V.F.; Ohnishi, Y.N.; Berton, O.; Fass, D.M.; Renthal, W.; Rush, A.J., 3rd; Wu, E.Y.; et al. Antidepressant actions of histone deacetylase inhibitors. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 11451–11460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Abdolmaleky, H.M.; Cheng, K.H.; Russo, A.; Smith, C.L.; Faraone, S.V.; Wilcox, M.; Shafa, R.; Glatt, S.J.; Nguyen, G.; Ponte, J.F.; et al. Hypermethylation of the reelin (RELN) promoter in the brain of schizophrenic patients: A preliminary report. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2005, 134B, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Palacios-Garcia, I.; Lara-Vasquez, A.; Montiel, J.F.; Diaz-Veliz, G.F.; Sepulveda, H.; Utreras, E.; Montecino, M.; Gonzalez-Billault, C.; Aboitiz, F. Prenatal stress downregulates Reelin expression by methylation of its promoter and induces adult behavioral impairments in rats. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0117680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Qin, L.; Tu, W.; Sun, X.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, H. Retardation of neurobehavioral development and reelin down-regulation regulated by further DNA methylation in the hippocampus of the rat pups are associated with maternal deprivation. Behav. Brain Res. 2011, 217, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Veldic, M.; Caruncho, H.J.; Liu, W.S.; Davis, J.; Satta, R.; Grayson, D.R.; Guidotti, A.; Costa, E. DNA-methyltransferase 1 mRNA is selectively overexpressed in telencephalic GABAergic interneurons of schizophrenia brains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Veldic, M.; Kadriu, B.; Maloku, E.; Agis-Balboa, R.C.; Guidotti, A.; Davis, J.M.; Costa, E. Epigenetic mechanisms expressed in basal ganglia GABAergic neurons differentiate schizophrenia from bipolar disorder. Schizophr. Res. 2007, 91, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Ruzicka, W.B.; Zhubi, A.; Veldic, M.; Grayson, D.R.; Costa, E.; Guidotti, A. Selective epigenetic alteration of lay-er I GABAergic neurons isolated from prefrontal cortex of schizophrenia patients using laser-assisted microdissection. Mol. Psychiatry 2007, 12, 385–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Matrisciano, F.; Tueting, P.; Dalal, I.; Kadriu, B.; Grayson, D.R.; Davis, J.M.; Nicoletti, F.; Guidotti, A. Epigenetic modifications of GABAergic interneurons are associated with the schizophrenia-like phenotype induced by prenatal stress in mice. Neuropharmacology 2013, 68, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Zhubi, A.; Chen, Y.; Dong, E.; Cook, E.H.; Guidotti, A.; Grayson, D.R. Increased binding of MeCP2 to the GAD1 and RELN promoters may be mediated by an enrichment of 5-hmC in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) cerebellum. Transl. Psychiatry 2014, 4, e349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Do, H.T.; Bruelle, C.; Tselykh, T.; Jalonen, P.; Korhonen, L.; Lindholm, D. Reciprocal regulation of very low density lipoprotein receptors (VLDLRs) in neurons by brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and Reelin: Involvement of the E3 ligase Mylip/Idol. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 29613–29620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Lee, G.H.; D’Arcangelo, G. New Insights into Reelin-Mediated Signaling Pathways. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 11 00748 g001 550
Figure 1. Molecular epigenetic markers with preferential brain specificity: (A) schematic representation of the decrease in the number of synapses after a period of chronic stress (depression) [43]. MeCP2 plays an important role in dendritic arborization [39]. Additionally, shown is the histone H3K4me3 serotonylation [37] which appears to regulate the expression of brain genes such as BDNF; (B) an important aspect of DNA methylation in the brain in addition to CpG also occurs at CpA [27]. Methylated CpA is preferentially bound by MeCP2 [30], where it displaces nucleosomes from CpA-repeat-binding regions (microsatellites) [32]. MeCP2 is highly abundant in cortical neurons, where it binds with a stoichiometry of approximately one molecule for every two nucleosomes [29]. In addition to methylated DNA, MeCP2 also binds to ncRNAs [46,47] (see [48] for a review).
Figure 1. Molecular epigenetic markers with preferential brain specificity: (A) schematic representation of the decrease in the number of synapses after a period of chronic stress (depression) [43]. MeCP2 plays an important role in dendritic arborization [39]. Additionally, shown is the histone H3K4me3 serotonylation [37] which appears to regulate the expression of brain genes such as BDNF; (B) an important aspect of DNA methylation in the brain in addition to CpG also occurs at CpA [27]. Methylated CpA is preferentially bound by MeCP2 [30], where it displaces nucleosomes from CpA-repeat-binding regions (microsatellites) [32]. MeCP2 is highly abundant in cortical neurons, where it binds with a stoichiometry of approximately one molecule for every two nucleosomes [29]. In addition to methylated DNA, MeCP2 also binds to ncRNAs [46,47] (see [48] for a review).
Cells 11 00748 g001
Cells 11 00748 g002 550
Figure 2. Bidirectional relationship between MeCP2 and short-term plasticity. Evidence shows that MeCP2 increases mEPSC response and frequency, as well as RRP charge, which could be induced by either affecting calcium levels (1) or transcription of presynaptic plasticity proteins involved in vesicle release and trafficking (2) [78,85,101,102]. Moreover, it can influence postsynaptic plasticity by modulating the transcriptional activation of BDNF (5). The activation of BDNF leads to the insertion of NMDA receptors and PSD-95 in the postsynaptic terminal, which increases synaptic strength (6) [109]. Reciprocally, an increase in synaptic activity also influences the levels of MeCP2. For instance, NMDA-receptor-mediated depolarization of the postsynaptic membrane causes an increase in calcium influx that leads to MeCP2 phosphorylation at S421 by CamKII (3) [93]. Stimulation with the neurotrophins BDNF, NT3, and NT4 at the synapse can also trigger CamKII-dependent MeCP2 S421 phosphorylation (4) [90]. Phosphorylation of MeCP2 weakens its interaction with DNA and results in its release from NCoR or Sin3A corepressor complexes allowing DNA polymerase II to initiate the transcription of genes involved in synaptic plasticity such as BDNF (5) [90].
Figure 2. Bidirectional relationship between MeCP2 and short-term plasticity. Evidence shows that MeCP2 increases mEPSC response and frequency, as well as RRP charge, which could be induced by either affecting calcium levels (1) or transcription of presynaptic plasticity proteins involved in vesicle release and trafficking (2) [78,85,101,102]. Moreover, it can influence postsynaptic plasticity by modulating the transcriptional activation of BDNF (5). The activation of BDNF leads to the insertion of NMDA receptors and PSD-95 in the postsynaptic terminal, which increases synaptic strength (6) [109]. Reciprocally, an increase in synaptic activity also influences the levels of MeCP2. For instance, NMDA-receptor-mediated depolarization of the postsynaptic membrane causes an increase in calcium influx that leads to MeCP2 phosphorylation at S421 by CamKII (3) [93]. Stimulation with the neurotrophins BDNF, NT3, and NT4 at the synapse can also trigger CamKII-dependent MeCP2 S421 phosphorylation (4) [90]. Phosphorylation of MeCP2 weakens its interaction with DNA and results in its release from NCoR or Sin3A corepressor complexes allowing DNA polymerase II to initiate the transcription of genes involved in synaptic plasticity such as BDNF (5) [90].
Cells 11 00748 g002
Cells 11 00748 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the putative ways MeCP2 could be contributing to stress-related pathology. Chronic stress instigates an increase in MeCP2 levels, which leads to its increased binding to gene promotors such as BDNF or RELN, inducing their transcriptional repression. MeCP2, BDNF, and reelin all contribute to promoting synaptic strength and neurotransmission; thus, stress-induced alterations in these proteins contribute to a decrease in synaptic plasticity [83,84,85,149]. Moreover, BDNF could also be modulating reelin levels through changes in its receptors [46]. Different SSRIs and ketamine induce the phosphorylation of Ser421 residue in MeCP2, which seem to be necessary for their antidepressant effects [96,118]. Similarly, HDAC inhibitors, which also show antidepressant effects, disrupt the MeCP2 repressor complex in the RELN promoter [140]. BDNF can also participate in this phosphorylation creating a reciprocal relationship with MeCP2 [90]. Finally, a decrease in MeCP2 repressor activity will lead to an increase in transcriptional activation of BDNF and RELN, leading to the restoration of synaptic plasticity and the alleviation of depressive-like symptomatology.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the putative ways MeCP2 could be contributing to stress-related pathology. Chronic stress instigates an increase in MeCP2 levels, which leads to its increased binding to gene promotors such as BDNF or RELN, inducing their transcriptional repression. MeCP2, BDNF, and reelin all contribute to promoting synaptic strength and neurotransmission; thus, stress-induced alterations in these proteins contribute to a decrease in synaptic plasticity [83,84,85,149]. Moreover, BDNF could also be modulating reelin levels through changes in its receptors [46]. Different SSRIs and ketamine induce the phosphorylation of Ser421 residue in MeCP2, which seem to be necessary for their antidepressant effects [96,118]. Similarly, HDAC inhibitors, which also show antidepressant effects, disrupt the MeCP2 repressor complex in the RELN promoter [140]. BDNF can also participate in this phosphorylation creating a reciprocal relationship with MeCP2 [90]. Finally, a decrease in MeCP2 repressor activity will lead to an increase in transcriptional activation of BDNF and RELN, leading to the restoration of synaptic plasticity and the alleviation of depressive-like symptomatology.
Cells 11 00748 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sánchez-Lafuente, C.L.; Kalynchuk, L.E.; Caruncho, H.J.; Ausió, J. The Role of MeCP2 in Regulating Synaptic Plasticity in the Context of Stress and Depression. Cells 2022, 11, 748. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11040748

AMA Style

Sánchez-Lafuente CL, Kalynchuk LE, Caruncho HJ, Ausió J. The Role of MeCP2 in Regulating Synaptic Plasticity in the Context of Stress and Depression. Cells. 2022; 11(4):748. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11040748

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sánchez-Lafuente, Carla L., Lisa E. Kalynchuk, Hector J. Caruncho, and Juan Ausió. 2022. "The Role of MeCP2 in Regulating Synaptic Plasticity in the Context of Stress and Depression" Cells 11, no. 4: 748. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11040748

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop