Next Article in Journal
Shiga Toxin 2 Triggers C3a-Dependent Glomerular and Tubular Injury through Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Structure and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Formation of Tassel, Anther, and Pollen in the Male Inflorescence of Maize (Zea mays L.)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Factors Regulating or Regulated by Myogenic Regulatory Factors in Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/cells11111754
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Efficient Isolation of Lymphocytes and Myogenic Cells from the Tissue of Muscle Regeneration

by
Yasuo Kitajima
*,
Ryoka Tsukahara
,
Shohei Nakamoto
and
Tomoharu Yasuda
Department of Immunology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2022, 11(11), 1754; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11111754
Submission received: 6 May 2022 / Revised: 22 May 2022 / Accepted: 24 May 2022 / Published: 26 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Regulatory Mechanisms of Skeletal Muscle Stem/Progenitor Cells in Physiological and Pathological Conditions - Series 2)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Isolation of both lymphocytes and myogenic cells from muscle tissue is required for elucidating the cellular and molecular mechanisms of muscle regeneration. Here, we aimed to establish an optimal method obtaining a high yield of lymphocytes during muscle regeneration. After the muscle injury, we observed higher infiltration of lymphocytic cells in the muscle on day 3 after injury. Then, we compared two different white blood cell isolation methods, the Percoll gradient and CD45-magnetic bead methods, to assess the percentage and number of T and B cells. Flow cytometry analysis showed that the CD45-magnetic bead method has a better efficiency in isolating CD4+, CD8+ T cells, and B cells from injured muscle tissues of wild-type and mdx mice than that by the Percoll gradient method. Moreover, we found that the CD45-negative fraction from wild-type and mdx mice includes myogenic cells. In conclusion, we report that the CD45-magnetic bead method is suitable to isolate T and B cells during muscle regeneration with higher purity and yield and can also isolate myogenic cells within the same sample. This method provides a technical basis for further studies on muscle regeneration, involving lymphocytes and muscle cells, with a wide range of clinical applications.

1. Introduction

Skeletal muscle is the largest tissue in the body, accounting for approximately 40% of body weight [1], and has an extremely high regenerative capacity attributed to the presence of muscle stem cells, also known as muscle satellite cells, present between the basal lamina and plasmalemma of myofibers [2]. In the intact state, satellite cells remain quiescent, but they are activated in response to muscle injury, leading to their proliferation and differentiation into mature muscle fibers [3,4,5,6]. Muscle stem cells are essential for skeletal muscle homeostasis and muscle regeneration throughout life [3,7,8,9]. Therefore, understanding the dynamics of muscle satellite cells will provide valuable insights into the mechanisms of muscle regeneration during disease and aging.
In addition to satellite cells, other cell types are involved in muscle regeneration [10]. Lymphocytes immediately infiltrate the muscle tissue in response to muscle injury [11,12]. CD4 and CD8 are the membrane proteins [13,14,15] of helper and cytotoxic T cells, respectively, while B220 and CD19 [16,17] are cell surface markers of B cells. The CD4+ helper T cells help B cells to generate high-affinity antibodies [18]. The CD8+ cytotoxic T cells play an important role in immune defense against intracellular pathogens, such as viruses and bacteria, as well as tumors [19]. Single-cell analysis has reported that CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and B cells are increased during muscle regeneration [10,20,21], suggesting their involvement in the process. In CD8-deficient mice lacking MHC class I-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocytes, the regenerating muscle fibers are smaller, and fibrosis increases after muscle injury [22]. In Rag2 and γ-chain double knockout mice (lacking T cells, B cells, and natural killer lymphocytes), the regenerating muscle fibers are smaller owing to the impairments in satellite cell expansion [23]. In addition, regulatory T cells are critical regulators of immune responses [24], and their ablation impairs muscle regeneration after muscle injury [25]. These findings indicate, in part, that skeletal muscle regeneration occurs through interactions between lymphocytes and muscle cells; however, data supporting this hypothesis is lacking. To elucidate the details of this interaction in muscle regeneration, it is important to establish an efficient method for collecting a small number of lymphocytes, such as T and B cells.
However, to date, an optimal method for the fractionation of lymphocytes in skeletal muscle has not been established. Many studies, including ours, have employed enzymatic treatment using collagenase to process skeletal muscle to obtain mononuclear cells [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Isolates obtained post-collagenase treatment of skeletal muscle contain a large amount of myofibrillar debris [34]. These debris make the isolation of cells from muscle less efficient and were therefore removed using Percoll density gradient centrifugation [35,36] and fluorescence-activated cell sorting [37]. The Percoll gradient method is widely used for isolating lymphocytes from tissues other than the muscles [38,39,40]. The CD45-magnetic bead isolation method is another alternative for lymphocyte isolation [41,42,43]. Isolation using CD45 beads would lead to the removal of debris from the muscle generated by enzymatic treatment, and the subsequent use of a cell sorter could aid in concentrating the lymphocytes. Establishing an efficient method for isolating lymphocytes from muscles using these techniques would assist in the detailed study of the involvement of lymphocytes and myogenic cells in muscle regeneration.
In this study, we aimed to compare the Percoll gradient and CD45-magnetic bead isolation methods for the isolation of lymphocytes during skeletal muscle regeneration to obtain a pure and high yield of lymphocytes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Mouse Strains

All the animal experiments were approved by the Experimental Animal Care and Use Committee of Hiroshima University (Ref. No. A21-103). C57BL/6J and mdx mice were acquired from CLEA Japan (Tokyo, Japan) and maintained in a controlled environment with free access to food and water. All the mice used in these experiments were males aged 2–3 months.

2.2. Muscle Injury

A Cardiotoxin (CTX, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, Cat. No. L8102)-induced muscle injury model was created as described previously [44]. CTX was dissolved in 0.9% NaCl to a final concentration of 10 μM and stored at −80 °C until use. Next, 50 μL of CTX (10 μM) was injected percutaneously into the tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius muscles of anesthetized mice. The needle for injection was inserted into the center of these muscles to avoid going too deep into the muscle. Mice were allowed to recover for 3 and 14 days after injury. The injected and non-injected muscles were harvested for flow cytometry analysis.

2.3. Antibodies

The following antibodies were used from BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA): PE-conjugated anti-Sca-1 (Cat. No. 122507, 1:400 dilution), anti-CD31 (Cat. No. 102407, 1:400 dilution), and anti-CD45 antibodies (Cat. No. 103105, 1:400 dilution); biotin-conjugated anti-Vcam1 antibody (Cat. No. 105703, 1:200 dilution); BV650-conjugated streptavidin (Cat. No. 405231, 1:200 dilution); BV605-conjugated anti-CD19 antibody (Cat. No. 115539, 1:400 dilution); and PE/Cy7-conjugated anti-CD4 antibody (Cat. No. 100421, 1:400 dilution). PE-conjugated anti-B220 antibody (Cat. No. 553089, 1:400 dilution), APC-conjugated anti-CD8 antibody (Cat. No. 553035, 1:400 dilution), and anti-CD16/CD32 antibody (Cat. No. 553142, 1:100 dilution) were obtained from BD Biosciences (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

2.4. Isolation of Mononuclear Cells in Muscle

The tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius muscles of the mice were dissected and collected in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The muscles were placed in a new Petri dish containing PBS. Any visible fat and nerve deposits were removed using forceps. The muscles were placed on a plastic plate and minced into a paste using small surgical scissors until no visible muscle deposits remained. The paste was then transferred to a tube containing 0.2% type II collagenase (Worthington Biochemical Corp. Lakewood, NJ, USA, Cat. No. CLS2) dissolved in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM). Approximately 3 mL of collagenase solution for 1 g muscle tissue was prepared. The paste was incubated at 37 °C for 60 min on a shaker. The minced muscle tissue was passed through an 18G syringe needle several times and then incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The homogenate was collected using an 18G syringe needle, dissolved in 40 mL of PBS, then filtered using a 40 μm nylon mesh strainer. The flow-through was collected in a 50 mL conical tube and centrifuged at 500× g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded, and the mononuclear cells were resuspended in PBS.

2.5. Separation of Mononuclear Cells Using Percoll and CD45 Beads

The enzyme-treated mononuclear cells were divided equally into three groups: control, Percoll, and CD45 bead groups. For the control group, the mononuclear cells were stained directly, whereas the Percoll gradient and CD45-magnetic bead methods were used for the Percoll and CD45 bead groups, respectively.
The Percoll gradient method was performed to isolate the leukocyte fraction. First, mononuclear cells were resuspended in 5 mL of 40% Percoll (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA, Cat. No. 17544501), layered on 5 mL of 80% Percoll, and centrifuged at 1400× g for 15 min at 4 °C. The lymphocytes in the layer between the 80% and 40% Percoll solutions were collected and added to 5 mL of DMEM. The solution was centrifuged at 500× g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded, and the cells were stained.
The CD45-magnetic bead method was completed using CD45 MicroBeads (1:10; Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladback, Germany, Cat. No. 130-052-301). The CD45 beads were incubated with mononuclear cells for 15 min at 4 °C. After incubation, 5 mL of PBS containing 2% fetal bovine serum (2% FBS/PBS) was added and centrifuged at 500× g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded, and the cells containing CD45 beads were resuspended in 2 mL of 2% FBS/PBS. CD45-positive cells containing lymphocytes were purified by positive selection using a MACS Separation LS Column (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Glad-back, Germany, Cat. No. 130-042-401) and MidiMACS Separator (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladback, Germany, Cat. No. 130-042-302) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, the LS Column was placed on the MidiMACS separator and 2 mL of cell suspension containing CD45 beads was poured into the LS Column. The cell suspension that flowed through the LS Column was centrifuged at 500× g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded, and the cells were designated as CD45-negative cells. On the other hand, the magnetically labeled fractions were retained in the LS Column and were removed from the MidiMACS Separator. Following this, 5 mL of 2% FBS/PBS was poured into the LS Column and the cell suspension of CD45-positive cells was collected. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 500× g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded, and the cells were designated as CD45-positive cells. The isolated CD45-positive cells containing lymphocytes and CD45-negative cells containing myogenic cells were subsequently stained.

2.6. Staining of Lymphocyte Populations

Cells were incubated with anti-CD16/CD32 for 10 min at 4 °C to reduce non-specific binding of the cells before staining. After incubation, 2% FBS/PBS was added, and the suspension was centrifuged at 500× g for 3 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded, and the cells were incubated with a mixture of antibodies CD4, CD8, CD19, and B220 for 15 min at 4 °C. After incubation, 2% FBS/PBS was added and centrifuged at 500× g for 3 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded, and the stained cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Each lymphocyte cell population was defined as follows: CD4+ T cells (CD4+), CD8+ T cells (CD8+), and B cells (B220+CD19+).

2.7. Myogenic Cells Staining with CD45-Negative Cells

As described in previous studies [45], myogenic cell markers were stained with the antibodies Sca-1, CD31, CD45, and Vcam1. CD45-negative cells were incubated with a mixture of antibodies (Sca-1, CD31, CD45, and Vcam1) for 15 min at 4 °C. After incubation, 2% FBS/PBS was added, and the cells were centrifuged at 500× g for 3 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded, and cells were incubated with a streptavidin antibody for 15 min at 4 °C. After incubation, 2% FBS/PBS was added and centrifuged at 500× g for 3 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded, and the stained cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. The population of myogenic cells was defined as Vcam1+CD31−CD45−Sca1− cells.

2.8. Flow Cytometry Analysis

Isolated cells were stained using respective antibodies and further analyzed using a CytoFLEX S flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) and FlowJo v10 software (Tree Star Inc, San Carlos, CA, USA). Debris and dead cells were excluded using gates based on the forward scatter, side scatter, and propidium iodide staining.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) to determine significant differences based on a two-tailed distribution using a Student’s t-test. For comparisons between more than two groups, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test was used. p-values are as indicated in each figure p < 0.05 (*), <0.01 (**), <0.001 (***), and <0.0001 (****). Data are represented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).

3. Results

3.1. Infiltration of T and B Cells into Injured Muscle

To understand the dynamics of lymphocytes, such as T and B cells, during skeletal muscle regeneration, CTX was injected into the muscle of the mice to induce skeletal muscle injury. The injured muscles were digested using enzymatic treatment to obtain mononuclear cells and analyzed by flow cytometry without injury and on days 3 and 14 after injury. The highest infiltration of T and B cells into the injured muscle was observed 3 days after injury, while there were very few T and B cells in the uninjured muscle (Figure 1A). Quantification of the relative percentage of CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells showed significantly higher infiltration on days 3 and 14 after injury compared to the uninjured muscle, whereas B cells showed a significant increase on day 3 after injury (Figure 1B). In addition, the number of T and B cells on day 3 after injury was significantly higher than that during the uninjured period (Figure 1C). These results indicated that T and B cell infiltration was the highest on day 3 of injury in muscle induced by CTX.

3.2. Efficient Isolation of T and B Cells from Injured Muscle Using CD45 Beads

To investigate the role of T and B cells in muscle regeneration, it is important to isolate these cells with high purity. Therefore, we focused on day 3 after injury, when the infiltration of T and B cells during muscle regeneration was high, and investigated efficient isolation methods using Percoll and CD45 beads (Figure 2A). Percoll is used in density gradient centrifugation to isolate lymphocytes from tissues [25,38]. In addition, CD45 beads have been widely used to isolate lymphocytes because the CD45 antigen is expressed in all cells of hematopoietic origin. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that the usage of CD45 beads as a method of isolation was effective in providing the highest percentage of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and B cells compared to that in the control (Figure 2B,C). Further quantification of cell counts showed that the number of CD8+ T and B cells was significantly higher in the CD45 beads isolate than that in the control (Figure 2D). These data demonstrate that CD45 beads aid in the efficient isolation of T and B cells from injured muscles.

3.3. Isolation of T and B Cells by CD45 Beads in Mdx Mice

We further examined the methods for efficient isolation of T and B cells on day 3 after muscle injury in the mdx mouse model (Figure 3A). Flow cytometry analysis showed that, similar to the wild-type mice, T and B cell isolation using CD45 beads represented the cell population of mdx mice (Figure 3B). Quantification of the percentage of isolated T and B cells revealed that isolation using CD45 beads resulted in the highest percentage of the respective cells in the CD45 bead group compared to that in the controls (Figure 3C). In addition, CD45 beads produced the highest yield of CD4+ T and B cells (Figure 3D). These results indicated that the isolation of T and B cells using CD45 beads is the most efficient method for increasing both the purity and yield of lymphocytes from the muscle of wild-type and mdx mice.

3.4. Isolation of Muscle Stem Cells Using CD45 Negative Cell Population

The presence of muscle stem cells is essential to elucidate the mechanism of muscle homeostasis [46,47,48]; therefore, it is necessary to analyze myogenic cells along with immune cells, such as T and B cells. The isolation of T and B cells from skeletal muscle samples using CD45 beads has an advantage. Towards this, we examined whether CD45− cells could also be used to analyze myogenic cells. In muscle samples from wild-type and mdx mice obtained on day 3 after injury, CD45− cells, which were not used for T and B cells isolation, were stained with antibodies and analyzed using flow cytometry for muscle cells. The analysis indicated a population of myogenic cells with a sufficient number of isolated cells (Figure 4A,B). In wild-type mice, the percentage of myogenic cells in the CD45-negative cells was 14.1 ± 1.3%, with a yield of 6.4 ± 1.4 × 103 cells (Figure 4A), whereas, in mdx mice, the percentage of myogenic cells was 4.6 ± 0.4% and the cell number was 2.1 ± 0.3 × 103 (Figure 4B). Isolated myogenic cells were also confirmed by immunohistology to represent MyoD-positive cells (Figure S1). Taken together, these data clearly demonstrate that in regenerating muscle samples, isolation of T and B cells using CD45 beads is possible with high efficiency in terms of both purity and yield. Furthermore, CD45− cells, obtained from the same samples after CD45+ cell separation, led to efficient myogenic cells isolation (Figure 4C).

4. Discussion

In this study, we compared the isolation of lymphocytes during skeletal muscle regeneration using Percoll and CD45 beads and evaluated the methods for better isolation, purity, and high yield. We found that the CD45-magnetic bead method was superior in the isolation of T and B cells in regenerating muscle. Furthermore, we found that CD45-negative cells could be used to efficiently isolate myogenic cells from the same samples as the T and B cells, which is an additional advantage of isolation using CD45 beads. In addition to lymphocytes, myogenic cells are essential for muscle regeneration [5,46,49]. Examination of these cells together would provide important insights into the mechanisms of muscle regeneration.
On day 3 of muscle regeneration, T and B cells accumulated to a greater extent in the muscle. This result is consistent with a previous study in which CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells were high on day 3 after injury [22,23]. These results clearly indicate that lymphocytes influence myogenic cell activation during muscle regeneration. However, when muscle tissue is in a normal state or completely healed from injury, these lymphocytic cells disappear [11,50]. Therefore, further studies are needed to clarify the interconnection between myogenic cells and these lymphocytes, as these lymphocytes make a transient contribution during muscle regeneration.
Importantly, compared with the collagenase-treated only and antibody-stained groups, the CD45-bead-isolated and antibody-stained groups were superior in terms of cell collection rate and yield. Isolates obtained from collagenase treatment of muscle contain myofibrillar debris [11]. Flow cytometry analysis showed that the CD45-bead-isolated and antibody-stained group had distinctly less debris than the collagenase-treated-only group (data not shown). The reason for the higher yield may be attributed to the removal of debris by CD45 bead treatment. In muscle regeneration, the CD45-magnetic bead method was more efficient in isolating lymphocytes than the Percoll gradient method. Injured muscles often display a large amount of myofibrillar debris [34]. These myofibrillar debris may have possibly impaired the efficiency of lymphocyte isolation by the Percoll separation method. On the contrary, isolation using CD45 beads was unaffected by myofibrillar debris and allowed the isolation of higher yields of the target lymphocytes. A higher yield of cells would be desirable and effective for the subsequent analysis involving the isolated cells including RNA extraction and cell culture. In a previous study [45], the percentage of myogenic cells to total cells on day 3 after injury was 2.8%. The percentage of them from the CD45-negative fraction in this study was 2.1%, which is a similar level to previous data. Thus, for the analysis of T and B lymphocytes together with myogenic cells during the course of muscle regeneration, the CD45 beads isolation method will be suitable method.
Our results showed that the CD45-magnetic bead method was highly efficient in isolating T and B cells, as well as the myogenic cells during muscle regeneration in wild-type and mdx mice models. This method is expected to have a wide range of clinical applications and can aid in further research on muscle regeneration involving lymphocytes and cells.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells11111754/s1, Figure S1: Immunostaining for myogenic markers in sorted cells.

Author Contributions

Y.K. designed the experiments, performed the experiments, interpreted the data, assembled the input data, and wrote the manuscript. R.T. and S.N. performed the experiments. T.Y. interpreted the data, assembled the input data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research KAKENHI (20H04078, 21K19720) and Leading Initiative for Excellent Young Researchers. This work was also supported by the Takeda Science Foundation and Koyanagi Foundation.

Acknowledgments

We thank Takahiro Kawahara (Kyushu university, Japan) for the technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Janssen, I.; Heymsfield, S.B.; Wang, Z.M.; Ross, R. Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18–88 yr. J. Appl. Physiol. 2000, 89, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Mauro, A. Satellite cell of skeletal muscle fibers. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 1961, 9, 493–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Blau, H.M.; Cosgrove, B.D.; Ho, A.T. The central role of muscle stem cells in regenerative failure with aging. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 854–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Morgan, J.E.; Partridge, T.A. Muscle satellite cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2003, 35, 1151–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Relaix, F.; Zammit, P.S. Satellite cells are essential for skeletal muscle regeneration: The cell on the edge returns centre stage. Development 2012, 139, 2845–2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Yin, H.; Price, F.; Rudnicki, M.A. Satellite cells and the muscle stem cell niche. Physiol. Rev. 2013, 93, 23–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sousa-Victor, P.; Garcia-Prat, L.; Munoz-Canoves, P. Control of satellite cell function in muscle regeneration and its disruption in ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 204–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Feige, P.; Brun, C.E.; Ritso, M.; Rudnicki, M.A. Orienting Muscle Stem Cells for Regeneration in Homeostasis, Aging, and Disease. Cell Stem Cell 2018, 23, 653–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mashinchian, O.; Pisconti, A.; Le Moal, E.; Bentzinger, C.F. The Muscle Stem Cell Niche in Health and Disease. Curr. Top Dev. Biol. 2018, 126, 23–65. [Google Scholar]
  10. De Micheli, A.J.; Laurilliard, E.J.; Heinke, C.L.; Ravichandran, H.; Fraczek, P.; Soueid-Baumgarten, S.; De Vlaminck, I.; Elemento, O.; Cosgrove, B.D. Single-Cell Analysis of the Muscle Stem Cell Hierarchy Identifies Heterotypic Communication Signals Involved in Skeletal Muscle Regeneration. Cell Rep. 2020, 30, 3583–3595.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Sciorati, C.; Rigamonti, E.; Manfredi, A.A.; Rovere-Querini, P. Cell death, clearance and immunity in the skeletal muscle. Cell Death Differ. 2016, 23, 927–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Panci, G.; Chazaud, B. Inflammation during post-injury skeletal muscle regeneration. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 119, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, Q.J.; Dinner, A.R.; Qi, S.; Irvine, D.J.; Huppa, J.B.; Davis, M.M.; Chakraborty, A.K. CD4 enhances T cell sensitivity to antigen by coordinating Lck accumulation at the immunological synapse. Nat. Immunol. 2004, 5, 791–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Holler, P.D.; Kranz, D.M. Quantitative analysis of the contribution of TCR/pepMHC affinity and CD8 to T cell activation. Immunity 2003, 18, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Artyomov, M.N.; Lis, M.; Devadas, S.; Davis, M.M.; Chakraborty, A.K. CD4 and CD8 binding to MHC molecules primarily acts to enhance Lck delivery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 16916–16921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Yanaba, K.; Bouaziz, J.D.; Haas, K.M.; Poe, J.C.; Fujimoto, M.; Tedder, T.F. A regulatory B cell subset with a unique CD1dhiCD5+ phenotype controls T cell-dependent inflammatory responses. Immunity 2008, 28, 639–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Li, Y.S.; Wasserman, R.; Hayakawa, K.; Hardy, R.R. Identification of the earliest B lineage stage in mouse bone marrow. Immunity 1996, 5, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Den Haan, J.M.; Bevan, M.J. A novel helper role for CD4 T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 12950–12952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhang, N.; Bevan, M.J. CD8(+) T cells: Foot soldiers of the immune system. Immunity 2011, 35, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Oprescu, S.N.; Yue, F.; Qiu, J.; Brito, L.F.; Kuang, S. Temporal Dynamics and Heterogeneity of Cell Populations during Skeletal Muscle Regeneration. iScience 2020, 23, 100993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Giordani, L.; He, G.J.; Negroni, E.; Sakai, H.; Law, J.Y.C.; Siu, M.M.; Wan, R.; Corneau, A.; Tajbakhsh, S.; Cheung, T.H.; et al. High-Dimensional Single-Cell Cartography Reveals Novel Skeletal Muscle-Resident Cell Populations. Mol. Cell 2019, 74, 609–621.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, J.; Xiao, Z.; Qu, C.; Cui, W.; Wang, X.; Du, J. CD8 T cells are involved in skeletal muscle regeneration through facilitating MCP-1 secretion and Gr1(high) macrophage infiltration. J. Immunol. 2014, 193, 5149–5160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Castiglioni, A.; Corna, G.; Rigamonti, E.; Basso, V.; Vezzoli, M.; Monno, A.; Almada, A.E.; Mondino, A.; Wagers, A.J.; Manfredi, A.A.; et al. FOXP3+ T Cells Recruited to Sites of Sterile Skeletal Muscle Injury Regulate the Fate of Satellite Cells and Guide Effective Tissue Regeneration. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0128094. [Google Scholar]
  24. Josefowicz, S.Z.; Lu, L.F.; Rudensky, A.Y. Regulatory T cells: Mechanisms of differentiation and function. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 30, 531–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Burzyn, D.; Kuswanto, W.; Kolodin, D.; Shadrach, J.L.; Cerletti, M.; Jang, Y.; Sefik, E.; Tan, T.G.; Wagers, A.J.; Benoist, C.; et al. A special population of regulatory T cells potentiates muscle repair. Cell 2013, 155, 1282–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Danoviz, M.E.; Yablonka-Reuveni, Z. Skeletal muscle satellite cells: Background and methods for isolation and analysis in a primary culture system. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 798, 21–52. [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu, L.; Cheung, T.H.; Charville, G.W.; Hurgo, B.M.; Leavitt, T.; Shih, J.; Brunet, A.; Rando, T.A. Chromatin modifications as determinants of muscle stem cell quiescence and chronological aging. Cell Rep. 2013, 4, 189–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Fukada, S.; Uezumi, A.; Ikemoto, M.; Masuda, S.; Segawa, M.; Tanimura, N.; Yamamoto, H.; Miyagoe-Suzuki, Y.; Takeda, S. Molecular signature of quiescent satellite cells in adult skeletal muscle. Stem Cells 2007, 25, 2448–2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sherwood, R.I.; Christensen, J.L.; Conboy, I.M.; Conboy, M.J.; Rando, T.A.; Weissman, I.L.; Wagers, A.J. Isolation of adult mouse myogenic progenitors: Functional heterogeneity of cells within and engrafting skeletal muscle. Cell 2004, 119, 543–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Montarras, D.; Morgan, J.; Collins, C.; Relaix, F.; Zaffran, S.; Cumano, A.; Partridge, T.; Buckingham, M. Direct isolation of satellite cells for skeletal muscle regeneration. Science 2005, 309, 2064–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Joe, A.W.; Yi, L.; Natarajan, A.; Le Grand, F.; So, L.; Wang, J.; Rudnicki, M.A.; Rossi, F.M. Muscle injury activates resident fibro/adipogenic progenitors that facilitate myogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Sacco, A.; Doyonnas, R.; Kraft, P.; Vitorovic, S.; Blau, H.M. Self-renewal and expansion of single transplanted muscle stem cells. Nature 2008, 456, 502–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Pasut, A.; Oleynik, P.; Rudnicki, M.A. Isolation of muscle stem cells by fluorescence activated cell sorting cytometry. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 798, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Yablonka-Reuveni, Z.; Quinn, L.S.; Nameroff, M. Isolation and clonal analysis of satellite cells from chicken pectoralis muscle. Dev. Biol. 1987, 119, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Bischoff, R. Chemotaxis of skeletal muscle satellite cells. Dev. Dyn. 1997, 208, 505–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kastner, S.; Elias, M.C.; Rivera, A.J.; Yablonka-Reuveni, Z. Gene expression patterns of the fibroblast growth factors and their receptors during myogenesis of rat satellite cells. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2000, 48, 1079–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Jankowski, R.J.; Haluszczak, C.; Trucco, M.; Huard, J. Flow cytometric characterization of myogenic cell populations obtained via the preplate technique: Potential for rapid isolation of muscle-derived stem cells. Hum. Gene Ther. 2001, 12, 619–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shi, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Jin, H.; Zeng, Z.; Wei, L.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, D.; Sun, G. Isolation and purification of immune cells from the liver. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020, 85, 106632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, L.; Fan, S.; Lu, Z.; Chen, Z.; Chu, C.; Liu, A.; Xia, F.; Meng, S.; Guo, F.; Qiu, H.; et al. An optimized method for the induction and purification of mouse bone marrow dendritic cells. J. Immunol. Methods 2021, 495, 113073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kurachi, M.; Kurachi, J.; Chen, Z.; Johnson, J.; Khan, O.; Bengsch, B.; Stelekati, E.; Attanasio, J.; McLane, L.M.; Tomura, M.; et al. Optimized retroviral transduction of mouse T cells for in vivo assessment of gene function. Nat. Protoc. 2017, 12, 1980–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schiedlmeier, B.; Kuhlcke, K.; Eckert, H.G.; Baum, C.; Zeller, W.J.; Fruehauf, S. Quantitative assessment of retroviral transfer of the human multidrug resistance 1 gene to human mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells engrafted in nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient mice. Blood 2000, 95, 1237–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Rohlenova, K.; Goveia, J.; Garcia-Caballero, M.; Subramanian, A.; Kalucka, J.; Treps, L.; Falkenberg, K.D.; de Rooij, L.; Zheng, Y.; Lin, L.; et al. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Maps Endothelial Metabolic Plasticity in Pathological Angiogenesis. Cell Metab. 2020, 31, 862–877.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Qi, L.; Martin-Sandoval, M.S.; Merchant, S.; Gu, W.; Eckhardt, M.; Mathews, T.P.; Zhao, Z.; Agathocleous, M.; Morrison, S.J. Aspartate availability limits hematopoietic stem cell function during hematopoietic regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 2021, 28, 1982–1999.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Price, F.D.; von Maltzahn, J.; Bentzinger, C.F.; Dumont, N.A.; Yin, H.; Chang, N.C.; Wilson, D.H.; Frenette, J.; Rudnicki, M.A. Inhibition of JAK-STAT signaling stimulates adult satellite cell function. Nat. Med. 2014, 20, 1174–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Liu, L.; Cheung, T.H.; Charville, G.W.; Rando, T.A. Isolation of skeletal muscle stem cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Nat. Protoc. 2015, 10, 1612–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Murphy, M.M.; Lawson, J.A.; Mathew, S.J.; Hutcheson, D.A.; Kardon, G. Satellite cells, connective tissue fibroblasts and their interactions are crucial for muscle regeneration. Development 2011, 138, 3625–3637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Sambasivan, R.; Yao, R.; Kissenpfennig, A.; Van Wittenberghe, L.; Paldi, A.; Gayraud-Morel, B.; Guenou, H.; Malissen, B.; Tajbakhsh, S.; Galy, A. Pax7-expressing satellite cells are indispensable for adult skeletal muscle regeneration. Development 2011, 138, 3647–3656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Lepper, C.; Partridge, T.A.; Fan, C.M. An absolute requirement for Pax7-positive satellite cells in acute injury-induced skeletal muscle regeneration. Development 2011, 138, 3639–3646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. von Maltzahn, J.; Jones, A.E.; Parks, R.J.; Rudnicki, M.A. Pax7 is critical for the normal function of satellite cells in adult skeletal muscle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 16474–16479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Tidball, J.G.; Dorshkind, K.; Wehling-Henricks, M. Shared signaling systems in myeloid cell-mediated muscle regeneration. Development 2014, 141, 1184–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Cells 11 01754 g001 550
Figure 1. T and B cells infiltrate into injured muscle. (A) Flow cytometry analysis profiles of muscle-derived CD4+ T cells (helper T cells), CD8+ T cells (cytotoxic T cells), and B cells without injury, and at days 3 and 14 after injury. The gated profiles show T cells (CD4+ or CD8+) and B cells (B220+CD19+). (B) Fold change in the percentage of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and B cells in the CTX3d and CTX14d relative to the control group. (C) The number of T and B cells in the three groups was analyzed. Data represented as the mean ± SEM (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test: *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001; n = 6–7 per group).
Figure 1. T and B cells infiltrate into injured muscle. (A) Flow cytometry analysis profiles of muscle-derived CD4+ T cells (helper T cells), CD8+ T cells (cytotoxic T cells), and B cells without injury, and at days 3 and 14 after injury. The gated profiles show T cells (CD4+ or CD8+) and B cells (B220+CD19+). (B) Fold change in the percentage of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and B cells in the CTX3d and CTX14d relative to the control group. (C) The number of T and B cells in the three groups was analyzed. Data represented as the mean ± SEM (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test: *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001; n = 6–7 per group).
Cells 11 01754 g001
Cells 11 01754 g002 550
Figure 2. Isolation of T and B cells from injured muscle using CD45 beads is efficient. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental workflow for the analysis of injured muscle on day 3 after injury with Percoll and CD45 beads isolation methods in wild-type mice. (B) Flow cytometry analysis profiles of muscle-derived CD4+ T cells (helper T cells), CD8+ T cells (cytotoxic T cells), and B cells on day 3 after injury. The gated profiles show T cells (CD4+ or CD8+) and B cells (B220+CD19+). (C) Fold change in the percentage of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and B cells in the Percoll and CD45 bead groups relative to the control group. (D) The number of T and B cells were analyzed. Data represented as the mean ± SEM (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test: * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001; n = 8 per group).
Figure 2. Isolation of T and B cells from injured muscle using CD45 beads is efficient. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental workflow for the analysis of injured muscle on day 3 after injury with Percoll and CD45 beads isolation methods in wild-type mice. (B) Flow cytometry analysis profiles of muscle-derived CD4+ T cells (helper T cells), CD8+ T cells (cytotoxic T cells), and B cells on day 3 after injury. The gated profiles show T cells (CD4+ or CD8+) and B cells (B220+CD19+). (C) Fold change in the percentage of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and B cells in the Percoll and CD45 bead groups relative to the control group. (D) The number of T and B cells were analyzed. Data represented as the mean ± SEM (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test: * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001; n = 8 per group).
Cells 11 01754 g002
Cells 11 01754 g003 550
Figure 3. Isolation of T and B cells using CD45 beads in mdx mice. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental workflow for the analysis of injured muscle on day 3 after injury with Percoll and CD45 beads isolation in mdx mice. (B) Flow cytometry analysis profiles of muscle-derived CD4+ T cells (helper T cells), CD8+ T cells (cytotoxic T cells), and B cells on day 3 after injury. The gated profiles show T cells (CD4+ or CD8+) and B cells (B220+CD19+). (C) Fold change in percentage of CD4+ T, CD8+ T, and B cells for Percoll, and CD45 beads groups relative to the control group. (D) The number of T and B cells was analyzed. Data represent the mean ± SEM (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test: * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001; n = 6–8 per group).
Figure 3. Isolation of T and B cells using CD45 beads in mdx mice. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental workflow for the analysis of injured muscle on day 3 after injury with Percoll and CD45 beads isolation in mdx mice. (B) Flow cytometry analysis profiles of muscle-derived CD4+ T cells (helper T cells), CD8+ T cells (cytotoxic T cells), and B cells on day 3 after injury. The gated profiles show T cells (CD4+ or CD8+) and B cells (B220+CD19+). (C) Fold change in percentage of CD4+ T, CD8+ T, and B cells for Percoll, and CD45 beads groups relative to the control group. (D) The number of T and B cells was analyzed. Data represent the mean ± SEM (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test: * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001; n = 6–8 per group).
Cells 11 01754 g003
Cells 11 01754 g004 550
Figure 4. Isolation of myogenic cells using CD45-negative cells. (A,B) Flow cytometry analysis profiles of myogenic cells on day 3 after injury in (A) wild-type mice (n = 3) and (B) mdx mice (n = 8). The gated profiles show myogenic cells (Vcam1+CD31−CD45−Sca1−). The percentage and number of myogenic cells were analyzed. Data represent the means ± SEM. (C) Schematic representation of this study. Isolation of T and B cells by CD45 beads provides high yield and purity during muscle regeneration. In addition, myogenic cells can also be isolated from the same samples.
Figure 4. Isolation of myogenic cells using CD45-negative cells. (A,B) Flow cytometry analysis profiles of myogenic cells on day 3 after injury in (A) wild-type mice (n = 3) and (B) mdx mice (n = 8). The gated profiles show myogenic cells (Vcam1+CD31−CD45−Sca1−). The percentage and number of myogenic cells were analyzed. Data represent the means ± SEM. (C) Schematic representation of this study. Isolation of T and B cells by CD45 beads provides high yield and purity during muscle regeneration. In addition, myogenic cells can also be isolated from the same samples.
Cells 11 01754 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kitajima, Y.; Tsukahara, R.; Nakamoto, S.; Yasuda, T. Efficient Isolation of Lymphocytes and Myogenic Cells from the Tissue of Muscle Regeneration. Cells 2022, 11, 1754. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11111754

AMA Style

Kitajima Y, Tsukahara R, Nakamoto S, Yasuda T. Efficient Isolation of Lymphocytes and Myogenic Cells from the Tissue of Muscle Regeneration. Cells. 2022; 11(11):1754. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11111754

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kitajima, Yasuo, Ryoka Tsukahara, Shohei Nakamoto, and Tomoharu Yasuda. 2022. "Efficient Isolation of Lymphocytes and Myogenic Cells from the Tissue of Muscle Regeneration" Cells 11, no. 11: 1754. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11111754

APA Style

Kitajima, Y., Tsukahara, R., Nakamoto, S., & Yasuda, T. (2022). Efficient Isolation of Lymphocytes and Myogenic Cells from the Tissue of Muscle Regeneration. Cells, 11(11), 1754. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11111754

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop