Phase Separation in the Nucleus and at the Nuclear Periphery during Post-Mitotic Nuclear Envelope Reformation
Abstract
:1. Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation in the Cell
2. Factors Contributing to Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation
3. Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation in the Nucleus
4. Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation in the Post-Mitotic Reforming Nucleus
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Floris, E.; Piras, A.; Dall’Asta, L.; Gamba, A.; Hirsch, E.; Campa, C.C. Physics of compartmentalization: How phase separation and signaling shape membrane and organelle identity. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 3225–3233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyman, A.A.; Weber, C.A.; Julicher, F. Liquid-liquid phase separation in biology. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2014, 30, 39–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kothari, M.; Cohen, T. Effect of elasticity on phase separation in heterogeneous systems. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2020, 145, 104153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, D.S.W.; Wingreen, N.S.; Brangwynne, C.P. Chromatin mechanics dictates subdiffusion and coarsening dynamics of embedded condensates. Nat. Phys. 2021, 17, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabari, B.R.; Dall’Agnese, A.; Young, R.A. Biomolecular Condensates in the Nucleus. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2020, 45, 961–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Liu, X.; Wang, H.; Dou, Z.; Ruan, K.; Hill, D.L.; Li, L.; Shi, Y.; Yao, X. Phase separation drives decision making in cell division. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 13419–13431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ong, J.Y.; Torres, J.Z. Phase Separation in Cell Division. Mol. Cell 2020, 80, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Zhang, L.; Dai, T.; Qin, Z.; Lu, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, F. Liquid-liquid phase separation in human health and diseases. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, T.W.; Kato, M.; Xie, S.; Wu, L.C.; Mirzaei, H.; Pei, J.; Chen, M.; Xie, Y.; Allen, J.; Xiao, G.; et al. Cell-free formation of RNA granules: Bound RNAs identify features and components of cellular assemblies. Cell 2012, 149, 768–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kato, M.; Han, T.W.; Xie, S.; Shi, K.; Du, X.; Wu, L.C.; Mirzaei, H.; Goldsmith, E.J.; Longgood, J.; Pei, J.; et al. Cell-free formation of RNA granules: Low complexity sequence domains form dynamic fibers within hydrogels. Cell 2012, 149, 753–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ader, C.; Frey, S.; Maas, W.; Schmidt, H.B.; Gorlich, D.; Baldus, M. Amyloid-like interactions within nucleoporin FG hydrogels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 6281–6285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Musacchio, A. On the role of phase separation in the biogenesis of membraneless compartments. EMBO J. 2022, 41, e109952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alberti, S.; Gladfelter, A.; Mittag, T. Considerations and Challenges in Studying Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation and Biomolecular Condensates. Cell 2019, 176, 419–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- McSwiggen, D.T.; Mir, M.; Darzacq, X.; Tjian, R. Evaluating phase separation in live cells: Diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences. Genes Dev. 2019, 33, 1619–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ulianov, S.V.; Velichko, A.K.; Magnitov, M.D.; Luzhin, A.V.; Golov, A.K.; Ovsyannikova, N.; Kireev, I.I.; Gavrikov, A.S.; Mishin, A.S.; Garaev, A.K.; et al. Suppression of liquid-liquid phase separation by 1,6-hexanediol partially compromises the 3D genome organization in living cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, 10524–10541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kroschwald, S.; Maharana, S.; Simon, A. Hexanediol: A chemical probe to investigate the material properties of membrane-less compartments. Matters 2017, 3, e201702000010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Seydoux, G. The P Granules of C. elegans: A Genetic Model for the Study of RNA-Protein Condensates. J. Mol. Biol. 2018, 430, 4702–4710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- King, J.T.; Shakya, A. Phase separation of DNA: From past to present. Biophys. J. 2021, 120, 1139–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montgomery, T.S.H.J. Comparative cytological studies, with especial regard to the morphology of the nucleolus. J. Morphol. 1898, 15, 265–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ehrenberg, L. Influence of temperature on the nucleolus and its coacervate nature. Hereditas 1946, 32, 407–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brangwynne, C.P.; Eckmann, C.R.; Courson, D.S.; Rybarska, A.; Hoege, C.; Gharakhani, J.; Julicher, F.; Hyman, A.A. Germline P granules are liquid droplets that localize by controlled dissolution/condensation. Science 2009, 324, 1729–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dundr, M.; Hebert, M.D.; Karpova, T.S.; Stanek, D.; Xu, H.; Shpargel, K.B.; Meier, U.T.; Neugebauer, K.M.; Matera, A.G.; Misteli, T. In vivo kinetics of Cajal body components. J. Cell Biol. 2004, 164, 831–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wegmann, S.; Eftekharzadeh, B.; Tepper, K.; Zoltowska, K.M.; Bennett, R.E.; Dujardin, S.; Laskowski, P.R.; MacKenzie, D.; Kamath, T.; Commins, C.; et al. Tau protein liquid-liquid phase separation can initiate tau aggregation. EMBO J. 2018, 37, e98049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brangwynne, C.P.; Mitchison, T.J.; Hyman, A.A. Active liquid-like behavior of nucleoli determines their size and shape in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 4334–4339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brand, P.; Lenser, T.; Hemmerich, P. Assembly dynamics of PML nuclear bodies in living cells. PMC Biophys. 2010, 3, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Morris, G.E. The Cajal body. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1783, 2108–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Protter, D.S.W.; Parker, R. Principles and Properties of Stress Granules. Trends Cell Biol. 2016, 26, 668–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Boisvert, F.M.; van Koningsbruggen, S.; Navascues, J.; Lamond, A.I. The multifunctional nucleolus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 574–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lallemand-Breitenbach, V.; de The, H. PML nuclear bodies: From architecture to function. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2018, 52, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cunha, S.; Woldringh, C.L.; Odijk, T. Polymer-mediated compaction and internal dynamics of isolated Escherichia coli nucleoids. J. Struct. Biol. 2001, 136, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngo, H.B.; Kaiser, J.T.; Chan, D.C. The mitochondrial transcription and packaging factor Tfam imposes a U-turn on mitochondrial DNA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18, 1290–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Banani, S.F.; Rice, A.M.; Peeples, W.B.; Lin, Y.; Jain, S.; Parker, R.; Rosen, M.K. Compositional Control of Phase-Separated Cellular Bodies. Cell 2016, 166, 651–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Van Damme, E.; Laukens, K.; Dang, T.H.; Van Ostade, X. A manually curated network of the PML nuclear body interactome reveals an important role for PML-NBs in SUMOylation dynamics. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2010, 6, 51–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhong, S.; Muller, S.; Ronchetti, S.; Freemont, P.S.; Dejean, A.; Pandolfi, P.P. Role of SUMO-1-modified PML in nuclear body formation. Blood 2000, 95, 2748–2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cappadocia, L.; Mascle, X.H.; Bourdeau, V.; Tremblay-Belzile, S.; Chaker-Margot, M.; Lussier-Price, M.; Wada, J.; Sakaguchi, K.; Aubry, M.; Ferbeyre, G.; et al. Structural and functional characterization of the phosphorylation-dependent interaction between PML and SUMO1. Structure 2015, 23, 126–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chang, C.C.; Naik, M.T.; Huang, Y.S.; Jeng, J.C.; Liao, P.H.; Kuo, H.Y.; Ho, C.C.; Hsieh, Y.L.; Lin, C.H.; Huang, N.J.; et al. Structural and functional roles of Daxx SIM phosphorylation in SUMO paralog-selective binding and apoptosis modulation. Mol. Cell 2011, 42, 62–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Banani, S.F.; Lee, H.O.; Hyman, A.A.; Rosen, M.K. Biomolecular condensates: Organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017, 18, 285–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banjade, S.; Rosen, M.K. Phase transitions of multivalent proteins can promote clustering of membrane receptors. eLife 2014, 3, e04123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fung, H.Y.J.; Birol, M.; Rhoades, E. IDPs in macromolecular complexes: The roles of multivalent interactions in diverse assemblies. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2018, 49, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romero, P.; Obradovic, Z.; Li, X.; Garner, E.C.; Brown, C.J.; Dunker, A.K. Sequence complexity of disordered protein. Proteins 2001, 42, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Choi, J.M.; Holehouse, A.S.; Lee, H.O.; Zhang, X.; Jahnel, M.; Maharana, S.; Lemaitre, R.; Pozniakovsky, A.; Drechsel, D.; et al. A Molecular Grammar Governing the Driving Forces for Phase Separation of Prion-like RNA Binding Proteins. Cell 2018, 174, 688–699.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nott, T.J.; Petsalaki, E.; Farber, P.; Jervis, D.; Fussner, E.; Plochowietz, A.; Craggs, T.D.; Bazett-Jones, D.P.; Pawson, T.; Forman-Kay, J.D.; et al. Phase transition of a disordered nuage protein generates environmentally responsive membraneless organelles. Mol. Cell 2015, 57, 936–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hondele, M.; Sachdev, R.; Heinrich, S.; Wang, J.; Vallotton, P.; Fontoura, B.M.A.; Weis, K. DEAD-box ATPases are global regulators of phase-separated organelles. Nature 2019, 573, 144–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Erdel, F.; Rippe, K. Formation of Chromatin Subcompartments by Phase Separation. Biophys. J. 2018, 114, 2262–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Palikyras, S.; Papantonis, A. Modes of phase separation affecting chromatin regulation. Open Biol. 2019, 9, 190167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hnisz, D.; Shrinivas, K.; Young, R.A.; Chakraborty, A.K.; Sharp, P.A. A Phase Separation Model for Transcriptional Control. Cell 2017, 169, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Boija, A.; Klein, I.A.; Sabari, B.R.; Dall’Agnese, A.; Coffey, E.L.; Zamudio, A.V.; Li, C.H.; Shrinivas, K.; Manteiga, J.C.; Hannett, N.M.; et al. Transcription Factors Activate Genes through the Phase-Separation Capacity of Their Activation Domains. Cell 2018, 175, 1842–1855.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gibson, B.A.; Doolittle, L.K.; Schneider, M.W.G.; Jensen, L.E.; Gamarra, N.; Henry, L.; Gerlich, D.W.; Redding, S.; Rosen, M.K. Organization of Chromatin by Intrinsic and Regulated Phase Separation. Cell 2019, 179, 470–484.e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shakya, A.; Park, S.; Rana, N.; King, J.T. Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation of Histone Proteins in Cells: Role in Chromatin Organization. Biophys. J. 2020, 118, 753–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strom, A.R.; Emelyanov, A.V.; Mir, M.; Fyodorov, D.V.; Darzacq, X.; Karpen, G.H. Phase separation drives heterochromatin domain formation. Nature 2017, 547, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bannister, A.J.; Zegerman, P.; Partridge, J.F.; Miska, E.A.; Thomas, J.O.; Allshire, R.C.; Kouzarides, T. Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain. Nature 2001, 410, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, L.; Gao, Y.; Zheng, X.; Liu, C.; Dong, S.; Li, R.; Zhang, G.; Wei, Y.; Qu, H.; Li, Y.; et al. Histone Modifications Regulate Chromatin Compartmentalization by Contributing to a Phase Separation Mechanism. Mol. Cell 2019, 76, 646–659.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trivedi, P.; Stukenberg, P.T. A Condensed View of the Chromosome Passenger Complex. Trends Cell Biol. 2020, 30, 676–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McKinley, K.L.; Cheeseman, I.M. The molecular basis for centromere identity and function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016, 17, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolton, M.A.; Lan, W.; Powers, S.E.; McCleland, M.L.; Kuang, J.; Stukenberg, P.T. Aurora B kinase exists in a complex with survivin and INCENP and its kinase activity is stimulated by survivin binding and phosphorylation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2002, 13, 3064–3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Trivedi, P.; Palomba, F.; Niedzialkowska, E.; Digman, M.A.; Gratton, E.; Stukenberg, P.T. The inner centromere is a biomolecular condensate scaffolded by the chromosomal passenger complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 1127–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chakraborty, A.; Prasanth, K.V.; Prasanth, S.G. Dynamic phosphorylation of HP1alpha regulates mitotic progression in human cells. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sobinoff, A.P.; Pickett, H.A. Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres: DNA Repair Pathways Converge. Trends Genet. 2017, 33, 921–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryan, T.M.; Englezou, A.; Dalla-Pozza, L.; Dunham, M.A.; Reddel, R.R. Evidence for an alternative mechanism for maintaining telomere length in human tumors and tumor-derived cell lines. Nat. Med. 1997, 3, 1271–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, N.W.; Piatyszek, M.A.; Prowse, K.R.; Harley, C.B.; West, M.D.; Ho, P.L.; Coviello, G.M.; Wright, W.E.; Weinrich, S.L.; Shay, J.W. Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer. Science 1994, 266, 2011–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Zhao, R.; Tones, J.; Liu, M.; Dilley, R.L.; Chenoweth, D.M.; Greenberg, R.A.; Lampson, M.A. Nuclear body phase separation drives telomere clustering in ALT cancer cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 2020, 31, 2048–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, F.; Kim, H.; Ji, Z.; Zhang, T.; Chen, B.; Ge, Y.; Hu, Y.; Feng, X.; Han, X.; Xu, H.; et al. The BUB3-BUB1 Complex Promotes Telomere DNA Replication. Mol. Cell 2018, 70, 395–407.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shay, J.W.; Wright, W.E. Telomeres and telomerase: Three decades of progress. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2019, 20, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Corpet, A.; Kleijwegt, C.; Roubille, S.; Juillard, F.; Jacquet, K.; Texier, P.; Lomonte, P. PML nuclear bodies and chromatin dynamics: Catch me if you can! Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, 11890–11912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rhodes, D.; Lipps, H.J. G-quadruplexes and their regulatory roles in biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 8627–8637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, X.; Xiong, Y.; Zhang, C.; Lai, R.; Liu, H.; Peng, R.; Fu, T.; Liu, Q.; Fang, X.; Mann, S.; et al. G-Quadruplex-Induced Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation in Biomimetic Protocells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 11036–11043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Lange, T. Shelterin-Mediated Telomere Protection. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2018, 52, 223–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jack, A.; Kim, Y.; Strom, A.R.; Lee, D.S.W.; Williams, B.; Schaub, J.M.; Kellogg, E.H.; Finkelstein, I.J.; Ferro, L.S.; Yildiz, A.; et al. Compartmentalization of telomeres through DNA-scaffolded phase separation. Dev. Cell 2022, 57, 277–290.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shiloh, Y.; Ziv, Y. The ATM protein kinase: Regulating the cellular response to genotoxic stress, and more. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 14, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, M.D.; Durocher, D. Reading chromatin signatures after DNA double-strand breaks. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2017, 372, 20160280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gudjonsson, T.; Altmeyer, M.; Savic, V.; Toledo, L.; Dinant, C.; Grøfte, M.; Bartkova, J.; Poulsen, M.; Oka, Y.; Bekker-Jensen, S.; et al. TRIP12 and UBR5 suppress spreading of chromatin ubiquitylation at damaged chromosomes. Cell 2012, 150, 697–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kilic, S.; Lezaja, A.; Gatti, M.; Bianco, E.; Michelena, J.; Imhof, R.; Altmeyer, M. Phase separation of 53BP1 determines liquid-like behavior of DNA repair compartments. EMBO J. 2019, 38, e101379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pessina, F.; Giavazzi, F.; Yin, Y.; Gioia, U.; Vitelli, V.; Galbiati, A.; Barozzi, S.; Garre, M.; Oldani, A.; Flaus, A.; et al. Functional transcription promoters at DNA double-strand breaks mediate RNA-driven phase separation of damage-response factors. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 1286–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schellhaus, A.K.; De Magistris, P.; Antonin, W. Nuclear Reformation at the End of Mitosis. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428, 1962–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, D.J.; Hetzer, M.W. Nuclear envelope formation by chromatin-mediated reorganization of the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9, 1160–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gu, M.; LaJoie, D.; Chen, O.S.; von Appen, A.; Ladinsky, M.S.; Redd, M.J.; Nikolova, L.; Bjorkman, P.J.; Sundquist, W.I.; Ullman, K.S.; et al. LEM2 recruits CHMP7 for ESCRT-mediated nuclear envelope closure in fission yeast and human cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E2166–E2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Olmos, Y.; Hodgson, L.; Mantell, J.; Verkade, P.; Carlton, J.G. ESCRT-III controls nuclear envelope reformation. Nature 2015, 522, 236–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Crabbe, L.; Cesare, A.J.; Kasuboski, J.M.; Fitzpatrick, J.A.; Karlseder, J. Human telomeres are tethered to the nuclear envelope during postmitotic nuclear assembly. Cell Rep. 2012, 2, 1521–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Creamer, K.M.; Kolpa, H.J.; Lawrence, J.B. Nascent RNA scaffolds contribute to chromosome territory architecture and counter chromatin compaction. Mol. Cell 2021, 81, 3509–3525.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gatta, A.T.; Carlton, J.G. The ESCRT-machinery: Closing holes and expanding roles. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2019, 59, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hurley, J.H.; Emr, S.D. The ESCRT complexes: Structure and mechanism of a membrane-trafficking network. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2006, 35, 277–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Carlton, J.G.; Martin-Serrano, J. Parallels between cy.ytokinesis and retroviral budding: A role for the ESCRT machinery. Science 2007, 316, 1908–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Morita, E.; Sandrin, V.; Chung, H.Y.; Morham, S.G.; Gygi, S.P.; Rodesch, C.K.; Sundquist, W.I. Human ESCRT and ALIX proteins interact with proteins of the midbody and function in cytokinesis. EMBO J. 2007, 26, 4215–4227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Elia, N.; Sougrat, R.; Spurlin, T.A.; Hurley, J.H.; Lippincott-Schwartz, J. Dynamics of endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) machinery during cytokinesis and its role in abscission. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 4846–4851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Stoten, C.L.; Carlton, J.G. ESCRT-dependent control of membrane remodelling during cell division. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 74, 50–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lie-Jensen, A.; Ivanauskiene, K.; Malerod, L.; Jain, A.; Tan, K.W.; Laerdahl, J.K.; Liestol, K.; Stenmark, H.; Haglund, K. Centralspindlin Recruits ALIX to the Midbody during Cytokinetic Abscission in Drosophila via a Mechanism Analogous to Virus Budding. Curr. Biol. 2019, 29, 3538–3548.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Connell, J.W.; Lindon, C.; Luzio, J.P.; Reid, E. Spastin couples microtubule severing to membrane traffic in completion of cytokinesis and secretion. Traffic 2009, 10, 42–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hurley, J.H.; Yang, D. MIT domainia. Dev. Cell 2008, 14, 6–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Olmos, Y.; Carlton, J.G. The ESCRT machinery: New roles at new holes. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2016, 38, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- von Appen, A.; LaJoie, D.; Johnson, I.E.; Trnka, M.J.; Pick, S.M.; Burlingame, A.L.; Ullman, K.S.; Frost, A. LEM2 phase separation promotes ESCRT-mediated nuclear envelope reformation. Nature 2020, 582, 115–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brachner, A.; Reipert, S.; Foisner, R.; Gotzmann, J. LEM2 is a novel MAN1-related inner nuclear membrane protein associated with A-type lamins. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118 Pt 24, 5797–5810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Margalit, A.; Segura-Totten, M.; Gruenbaum, Y.; Wilson, K.L. Barrier-to-autointegration factor is required to segregate and enclose chromosomes within the nuclear envelope and assemble the nuclear lamina. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 3290–3295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Segura-Totten, M.; Wilson, K.L. BAF: Roles in chromatin, nuclear structure and retrovirus integration. Trends Cell Biol. 2004, 14, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Samwer, M.; Schneider, M.W.G.; Hoefler, R.; Schmalhorst, P.S.; Jude, J.G.; Zuber, J.; Gerlich, D.W. DNA Cross-Bridging Shapes a Single Nucleus from a Set of Mitotic Chromosomes. Cell 2017, 170, 956–972.e23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Raab, M.; Gentili, M.; de Belly, H.; Thiam, H.R.; Vargas, P.; Jimenez, A.J.; Lautenschlaeger, F.; Voituriez, R.; Lennon-Dumenil, A.M.; Manel, N.; et al. ESCRT III repairs nuclear envelope ruptures during cell migration to limit DNA damage and cell death. Science 2016, 352, 359–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Denais, C.M.; Gilbert, R.M.; Isermann, P.; McGregor, A.L.; te Lindert, M.; Weigelin, B.; Davidson, P.M.; Friedl, P.; Wolf, K.; Lammerding, J. Nuclear envelope rupture and repair during cancer cell migration. Science 2016, 352, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Burla, R.; Carcuro, M.; Raffa, G.D.; Galati, A.; Raimondo, D.; Rizzo, A.; La Torre, M.; Micheli, E.; Ciapponi, L.; Cenci, G.; et al. AKTIP/Ft1, a New Shelterin-Interacting Factor Required for Telomere Maintenance. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11, e1005167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merigliano, C.; Burla, R.; La Torre, M.; Del Giudice, S.; Teo, H.; Liew, C.W.; Chojnowski, A.; Goh, W.I.; Olmos, Y.; Maccaroni, K.; et al. AKTIP interacts with ESCRT I and is needed for the recruitment of ESCRT III subunits to the midbody. PLoS Genet. 2021, 17, e1009757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burla, R.; Carcuro, M.; Torre, M.L.; Fratini, F.; Crescenzi, M.; D’Apice, M.R.; Spitalieri, P.; Raffa, G.D.; Astrologo, L.; Lattanzi, G.; et al. The telomeric protein AKTIP interacts with A- and B-type lamins and is involved in regulation of cellular senescence. Open Biol. 2016, 6, 160103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- La Torre, M.; Merigliano, C.; Burla, R.; Mottini, C.; Zanetti, G.; Del Giudice, S.; Carcuro, M.; Virdia, I.; Bucciarelli, E.; Manni, I.; et al. Mice with reduced expression of the telomere-associated protein Ft1 develop p53-sensitive progeroid traits. Aging Cell 2018, 17, e12730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feric, M.; Misteli, T. Phase Separation in Genome Organization across Evolution. Trends Cell Biol. 2021, 31, 671–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Maccaroni, K.; La Torre, M.; Burla, R.; Saggio, I. Phase Separation in the Nucleus and at the Nuclear Periphery during Post-Mitotic Nuclear Envelope Reformation. Cells 2022, 11, 1749. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11111749
Maccaroni K, La Torre M, Burla R, Saggio I. Phase Separation in the Nucleus and at the Nuclear Periphery during Post-Mitotic Nuclear Envelope Reformation. Cells. 2022; 11(11):1749. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11111749
Chicago/Turabian StyleMaccaroni, Klizia, Mattia La Torre, Romina Burla, and Isabella Saggio. 2022. "Phase Separation in the Nucleus and at the Nuclear Periphery during Post-Mitotic Nuclear Envelope Reformation" Cells 11, no. 11: 1749. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11111749