Next Article in Journal
CytokineLink: A Cytokine Communication Map to Analyse Immune Responses—Case Studies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and COVID-19
Next Article in Special Issue
Corneal Epithelial Stem Cells–Physiology, Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Options
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Instability Due to Spindle Anomalies Visualized in Mutants of Dictyostelium
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cell Therapy for Anal Sphincter Incontinence: Where Do We Stand?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/cells10092241
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Stem Cells and Exosomes: New Therapies for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

by
Zoe Krut
1,2,
Gadi Pelled
1,2,3,
Dan Gazit
1,2,3,4 and
Zulma Gazit
1,2,3,*
1
Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
2
Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
3
Department of Orthopedics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
4
Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2021, 10(9), 2241; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10092241
Submission received: 15 July 2021 / Revised: 23 August 2021 / Accepted: 25 August 2021 / Published: 29 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Stem Cells in Tissue Engineering and Regeneration)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) occurs as a result of an imbalance of the anabolic and catabolic processes in the intervertebral disc, leading to an alteration in the composition of the extracellular matrix (ECM), loss of nucleus pulposus (NP) cells, excessive oxidative stress and inflammation. Degeneration of the IVD occurs naturally with age, but mechanical trauma, lifestyle factors and certain genetic abnormalities can increase the likelihood of symptomatic disease progression. IVDD, often referred to as degenerative disc disease (DDD), poses an increasingly substantial financial burden due to the aging population and increasing incidence of obesity in the United States. Current treatments for IVDD include pharmacological and surgical interventions, but these lack the ability to stop the progression of disease and restore the functionality of the IVD. Biological therapies have been evaluated but show varying degrees of efficacy in reversing disc degeneration long-term. Stem cell-based therapies have shown promising results in the regeneration of the IVD, but face both biological and ethical limitations. Exosomes play an important role in intercellular communication, and stem cell-derived exosomes have been shown to maintain the therapeutic benefit of their origin cells without the associated risks. This review highlights the current state of research on the use of stem-cell derived exosomes in the treatment of IVDD.

1. Introduction

Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) is the pathological condition associated with the degeneration of the intervertebral disc (IVD), an avascular structure composed of fibrous tissue and cartilage responsible for spinal kinematics and structural support [1]. IVDD is the most common cause of chronic low back pain (LBP), the leading cause of disability [2,3]. The prevalence of IVDD increases drastically with age; greater than 90% of people over the age of 50 present with degeneration of the intervertebral disc [4,5,6]. Other risk factors for IVDD include mechanical trauma, genetic predisposition, lifestyle factors and certain metabolic disorders [7,8,9]. Current treatments of IVDD aim to manage symptoms and minimize disability, but both pharmacological and surgical interventions can lead to complications, can be costly and have questionable efficacy [10]. Neither treatment option is capable of targeting the underlying cause of degeneration, and both lack the ability to hinder the progression of disease or reverse the degeneration to restore the precedent functionality of the disc [11].
Due to the limitations of the current treatments for IVDD, an increasing number of studies have focused on methods to regenerate the degenerative disc. IVDD is a multifactorial process, and treatments must be able to withstand the harsh microenvironment of the degenerative disc [12,13]. Various biological therapies, including the use of growth factors and platelet-rich plasma (PRP), have been evaluated in both preclinical and clinical studies, but many results have been underwhelming [14,15,16,17]. Preliminary preclinical studies have attempted to use CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing, or to improve current surgical methods using biomaterials, but studies of this kind are still in their infancy [18,19]. Stem cell-based therapies, both allogeneic and autologous, are an attractive method due to their ability to target many of the pathways that result in IVDD [20]. There has been progress with these studies, but there are concerns about a low survival rate of transplanted cells, which would make it difficult for researchers to control for cell viability and differentiation, and the risk of mutation [21,22]. With embryonic stem cells, there is also a potential lack of institutional readiness and societal acceptance [23].
Studies on the mechanism of stem cell-based therapies have provided increasing evidence that exosomes secreted by stem cells are responsible for the regenerative properties and efficacy in treating IVDD [24]. While initially considered a waste product, exosomes have recently been highlighted for their role in intercellular communication [25,26]. Exosomes show pronounced therapeutic competence for tissue regeneration through the maintenance of their endogenous stem cells, their ability to inhibit apoptosis and modulate the immune response, their enhancement of regenerative phenotypic traits, and stimulation of angiogenesis [27,28]. Stem cell-derived exosomes (SC-Exos), specifically, present a significant opportunity for the safe and effective treatment of IVDD because of their ability to maintain the therapeutic benefit of their origin cells without the risks associated with stem cell-based therapies [29]. This review highlights the current studies being conducted on stem cell-derived exosomes and their role in the treatment of degeneration of the intervertebral disc.

2. Intervertebral Disc Disease

2.1. Structure of the IVD

The IVD is comprised of the central nucleus pulposus (NP), surrounded by the annulus fibrosus (AF), and hyaline cartilaginous endplates which encompass these two structures at the junction of the vertebrae, known as the zygapophyseal joint. IVDs are responsible for one-third of the height of the spinal column, ranging from 7 to 10 mm thick depending on their location within the spine [30]. The IVD is an avascular structure and is therefore reliant on concentration gradients for the diffusion of nutrients and oxygen from the adjacent endplates [31]. Proteoglycans and type II collagen are the main components of the NP and aim to retain water to allow for the IVD to bear compressive loads. This is accomplished by the distribution of hydraulic pressure throughout the IVD [32]. The proteoglycans in the NP include both the larger aggrecan, which binds to hyaluronic acid, and several small leucine-rich proteoglycans. Aggrecan is largely responsible for the retention of water within the NP; a healthy NP is made of 66% to 86% water [33]. While of low density, approximately 5000/mm3, the NP contains cells that produce the components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and help maintain the integrity of the NP; these cells are notochordal cells, which range from 25 to 85 µm in diameter, and NP cells, which are “chondrocyte-like” in nature and range from 17 to 23 µm in diameter [34]. NP cells primarily rely on glycolysis for metabolism and contain more mitochondria and rough endoplasmic reticulum (ER), packed with glycogen and cytoplasmic filaments, than notochordal cells [35,36]. While the role of notochordal cells in development is not fully understood, it is suggested that they are not only important for cell movement and proteoglycan synthesis of surrounding cells following senescence, but are also responsible for maintaining the gelatinous consistency of the NP because of their heightened ability to make proteoglycans [37,38].
The AF is stiffer than the NP and therefore able to provide more structural support. The AF is a ring-shaped disc of fibrous connective tissue which surrounds the NP. Type I collagen, the primary form of collagen in the AF, is arranged in concentric rings called lamellae, which are uniformly aligned in a parallel orientation and interconnected through translamellar bridges [39,40]. AF cells have been characterized as elongated fibroblasts with extended cytoplasmic processes of mesenchymal origin [41]. With aging, however, AF cells become more rounded and “chondrocyte-like” in nature [13,42].
The extracellular matrix (ECM) plays an essential role in the mechanical functionality of the IVD; the type I and type II collagen networks provide tensile strength, and water-binding proteoglycans, such as aggrecan, are vital for its integrity [43,44]. The ECM is similar in composition to other musculoskeletal connective tissues, containing collagen, proteoglycans, elastin and glycoproteins, but differs due to the fact that these components are commonly found in a fragmented form [45]. The ECM is a dynamic structure and proteinases synthesized by disc cells are responsible for the breakdown of these matrix macromolecules. Because of the avascular nature of the IVD, these fragmented components will naturally accumulate and degrade over time [46]. With degeneration, the most significant biochemical change to occur is the loss of proteoglycans, which results in the subsequent loss of glycosaminoglycans and the reduction in osmotic pressure of the disc matrix [9]. This has a major effect on the disc’s load-bearing behavior, which is evident by a degenerative disc’s tendency to bulge under pressure.

2.2. Pathogenesis of IVDD

IVDD is characterized by a painful degenerative disc caused by an imbalance of the anabolic and catabolic processes within the IVD. Metabolic dysregulation of NP cells results in a reduced ability to synthesize the components of the ECM, and an increase in the secretion of ECM degradative molecules [47,48]. As a result, the morphology of the disc will become more disorganized and the lamellae in the AF will become irregular [49]. Progressive IVDD involves the calcification of the tiny pores within the endplate, which results in impaired diffusion and a compromised exchange of gases and nutrients, furthering the degenerative cascade [17]. This imbalance leads to an alteration in the composition of the ECM, loss of NP cells, excessive oxidative stress, and inflammation, which ultimately results in a decreased capacity to bear compressive loads [50,51]. Dysregulation, combined with proteoglycan breakdown and a diminished water-binding capacity, will eventually lead to structural collapse.
Degeneration of the IVD is aggravated by inflammation, which plays an important role in the biological process and has emerged as a distinguishing factor in the appearance of the symptomatology of the diseased disc [12,52]. Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) also play a role in the promotion of nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich-repeat containing family, pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation and interleukin-1β release [53]. With metabolic dysregulation, advanced glycation end products (AGEs) accumulate in NP tissues and promote its degeneration, further increasing oxidative stress and the secretion of major inflammatory cytokines, upregulating ECM degradative enzymes and downregulating ECM structural components; thus, initiating a host immune response [54,55,56]. While the pathophysiology of IVDD has not been fully characterized, nerve infiltration is believed to be the source of the pain associated with the degeneration of the intervertebral disc [57].

3. Current Treatment of IVDD

Current treatments for disc degeneration range from changes in lifestyle to surgically invasive interventions. Nonpharmacological treatments such as exercise, weight loss and physical therapy are indicated in the treatment of IVDD, but only in cases where degeneration is not severe. Pharmacological treatments such as opiates, steroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are aimed at achieving pain control for better function and quality of life but are accompanied with their own risk of side effects and, for some, with the potential to develop dependence [10].
Operative interventions include discectomy with fusion and total disc replacement (TDR). Spinal fusion, also known as arthrodesis, is the process of fusing or joining two bones, and is currently considered the gold standard for the management of IVDD [58]. TDR, the replacement of the degenerative intervertebral disc with an artificial disc, is typically only indicated when there is single-level disc disease, and the facet joints are disease-free [59]. Despite the availability of surgical interventions, there is still a clear need for improved IVDD therapies that target the underlying causes of degeneration, rather than simply mitigate the associated symptoms. It is important that new interventions are not accompanied by a significant risk of complications or adverse side effects, like some current IVDD treatments. In hopes of targeting the root cause of disc degeneration, various biological and stem cell-based therapies have been examined.

4. Biological Therapies for IVDD

While IVDD is a multifactorial process, biomolecular therapies primarily focus their treatment efforts on the progressive decline in NP hydration due to the loss of proteoglycans and collagen, which results in a loss of mechanical tension in the AF collagen fibers and results in abnormal spinal axial loading forces and segmental instability [11]. Biomolecular therapies aim to target the diseased state, characterized by decreased anabolism and increased catabolism within the IVD, by introducing recombinant proteins or nucleic acids aiming to reverse the process of degeneration. The goal is to facilitate ECM synthesis and promote NP rehydration and nutrition. To do so, however, biological interventions must be able to mitigate the harsh, proinflammatory, pro-catabolic and anti-anabolic environment within the degenerative IVD.
When the investigation into the use of injectable biological therapies for the treatment of IVDD began, there was significant interest in conducting studies on the transforming growth factor (TGF) superfamily and, more specifically, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). Unfortunately, studies on the use of BMPs, such as BMP-2, BMP-7, recombinant human connective tissue growth factor (rhCTGF) and TGF-β, in various animal models, have either shown minimal or no impact, or have reported serious adverse events (SAEs) [15,16,17,39,60,61]. A study conducted on human recombinant Growth/Differentiation Factor-5 (GDF-5) (rhGDF-5) showed that the stimulation of gene expression led to the synthesis of ECM proteins, type II collagen and aggrecan in IVD. As a result, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial on the intradiscal injection of rhGDF-5 was conducted in 2014 to evaluate safety and tolerability (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Effectiveness of 2 Doses of Intradiscal rhGDF-5 (Single Administration) for the Treatment of Early Stage Lumbar Disc Degeneration. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT01124006 (accessed on 2 July 2021)) [15]. The results of this study were never published, suggesting that treatment with rhGDF-5 either did not have a therapeutic effect or was accompanied by SAEs.
There is the risk that the activity of endogenous proteases within the IVD may degrade injected therapeutic proteins, meaning that the bioavailability and persistence of injected biomolecules may be transient, suggesting that doses may need to be high and repeated frequently [62,63]. With repeated intradiscal doses, however, there is the increasing risk of puncturing of the AF, and it has been previously established from patients who have undergone discography that injury to the AF accelerated disc degeneration [64]. Annular repair techniques, in both sheep and porcine models, are still being investigated and aim to work in conjunction with other treatment modalities [65].
Due to the mixed results of studies evaluating the efficacy of growth factors, studies on other therapies have been conducted [66,67,68]. A clinical trial on the intradiscal injection of a formulation including lactic acid, known as STA363, has been completed but the results have yet to be posted; it was hypothesized that the treatment of STA363 would result in the growth of fibrous, connective tissue in its 15 participants (A Single Ascending Dose Study of Safety and Tolerability of STA363 Compared to Placebo in 15 Patients with Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT03055845 (accessed on 8 July 2021)). A phase 1b, multicenter, double-blind, single ascending dose study is currently underway to evaluate the safety of intradiscal injection of AMG0103, a synthetic nuclear factor-κB decoy oligodeoxynucleotide, in patients with discogenic lumbar back pain (AMG0103 in Subjects with Chronic Discogenic Lumbar Back Pain. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03263611 (accessed on 7 July 2021)). In addition, there have also been recent attempts to use CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to repair dysfunctional gene regulation, but these approaches are still currently only being investigated in vitro [18]. With respect to therapeutic gene delivery, various vectors, including adenovirus, retrovirus and lentivirus, have been investigated, but safety remains a concern [69].
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a fraction of plasma produced by centrifugal separation of whole blood and another potential treatment for disc degeneration [70]. A prospective, randomized controlled trial assessing intradiscal PRP injections in discogenic-mediated low back pain demonstrated improvements in pain and function in patients as early as eight weeks post-treatment [71]. While this singular clinical trial appeared to have somewhat promising results, there has been considerable inconsistency in pre-clinical animal models [14,72,73].
Non-coding RNAs, mainly microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (IncRNAs) and circular RNAs (circRNAs), also play a role in the development of IVDD and can therefore be used as a potential treatment target. These post-transcriptional regulators are known to affect the expression of 30% of protein coding genes and numerous intracellular processes [51]. After incorporation into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), miRNAs can target and inhibit the translation of multiple mRNAs, thereby regulating multiple intracellular processes including cell proliferation, apoptosis and cytokine release [74]. The overexpression of miR-410 has been shown to significantly inhibit pyroptosis by suppressing the NLRP3/caspase-1 pathway, presenting a potentially significant treatment target [56]. It has also been suggested that the development of nanoparticle technology could help with using miRNAs and circRNAs as therapies for IVDD [75].
Biological treatments have also been used to improve on the current surgical interventions for IVDD. Biomaterials used for tissue engineering scaffolds, including fibrin, silk, gelatin and PLGA, have been used in tandem to create biphasic scaffolds with the goal of engineering an artificial IVD which utilizes the unique structures and functions of both the NP and AF [76]. Implantation of injectable collagen hydrogels, such as Atelocollagen, showed the ability to prevent progression of IVD space narrowing and had viability and proliferative activity in an in vivo rabbit model, but clinical trials have not yet been conducted [19].
Currently there are no clinical trials utilizing tissue-engineered IVD (TE-IVD) transplantation, but a pilot study using a biomimetic protein polymer, which mimics the NP, uses NuCore® injectable nucleus (Spine Wave, Inc., Shelton, CT, USA) was reported [77]. The use of biomaterials, while potentially useful on their own, appears to be greatly enhanced when stem cells are utilized in tandem [78,79]. As cell-based therapies are capable of targeting more than just one of the pathways that cause degeneration of the IVD, they may be more effective than other biological treatments currently being investigated.

5. Cell-Based Therapies for IVDD

Cell-based therapies could very well be the optimal treatment strategy for patients with mid-stage degeneration because they could directly address the decreased number of viable NP cells and stem cells within the diseased disc space. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been the focus of most studies utilizing cell-based therapies for the treatment of IVDD, but other studies have evaluated the use of progenitor cells, hematopoietic stem cells, adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), discogenic cells and even fibroblasts. MSCs are multipotent, adult stem cells which can differentiate into osteocytes, adipocytes and chondrocytes, and are found in a variety of human tissues, including the bone marrow, adipose tissue, liver, intestine, connective muscle tissue, skin and umbilical cord [80]. The attractive attributes of MSCs include their ability to recruit into damaged sites and lower immunogenicity due to the lack of expression of any costimulatory molecules, thus suggesting that there is no requirement for the use of immunosuppressive agents with allogeneic transplantation [81]. MSCs also secrete cytokines, immune receptors and anti-inflammatory molecules, allowing them to regulate the microenvironment of the host tissue.
As the therapeutic potential of MSCs has already been established for various diseases, in various animal models, there have recently been several clinical trials investigating the intradiscal injection of autologous MSCs. A pilot phase I trial conducted in Spain utilized bone marrow derived MSCs (BMSCs) and showed that autologous BMSC transplantation is both feasible and safe. The analgesic effect of treatment with BMSCs approached 71% efficacy and was described as rapid because most improvement in pain (85%) was attained by 3 months. Unfortunately, this study did not show an improvement in disc height, but this is consistent with the results from spinal fusion, with or without TDR, and discectomy [20,82]. A phase I/II clinical trial designed to analyze the safety, feasibility and potential clinical efficacy of the implantation of autologous MSCs embedded in tricalcium phosphate, found that 80% of patients achieved lumbar fusion, and no adverse side effects related to the procedure were recorded [83]. There are currently clinical trials in the recruitment process, while others have been completed but have yet to publish their results (Efficacy of Intradiscal Injection of BM-MSC in Subjects with Chronic Low Back Pain (LBP) Due to Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) Unresponsive (RESPINE). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03737461) (accessed on 8 July 2021), Safety and Preliminary Efficacy Study of Mesenchymal Precursor Cells (MPCs) in Subjects with Lumbar Back Pain. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01290367 (accessed on 6 July 2021).
In addition to MSCs, other stem cells have been investigated for their potential to treat IVDD. Autologous hematopoietic stem cells have been of interest due to their differentiation and proliferative capacities, but the hypoxic environment of the degenerative IVD poses a challenge. A study utilizing hyperbaric oxygenation in 10 patients following percutaneous intradiscal injection of autologous hematopoietic precursor stem cells (HSCs) showed no improvement in discogenic pain after one year, and eight of 10 patients underwent surgical treatment within one year of study completion. This study suggested that the use of non-mesenchymal lineage cells in the treatment of IVDD may be limited [84]. In murine and rabbit models of chronic disc degeneration, adipose-derived stem cell (ADSC) transplantation promoted new expression of proteoglycans and increased levels of aggrecan, and exhibited elevated extracellular matrix anabolism and minimal ossification, but no clinical trials have directly utilized ADSCs for the treatment of IVDD [85,86]. ADSCs, however, have been implicated in a clinical trial which utilized stromal vascular fraction (SVF) obtained from a lipoaspirate procedure of fat tissue, in conjunction with PRP obtained from peripheral blood. The 15 participants in this clinical trial experienced improvements in flexion over the 6-month follow-up period and a reduction in pain and discomfort from baseline [87]. Notably, no SAEs were reported during the 12-month follow-up period. This study, however, lacked a placebo control, and therefore additional studies are necessary.
The use of autologous NP cells is another alternative to repair damaged or historically inflamed tissue by addressing multiple propagators of degeneration at once. A clinical trial on the use of autologous disc chondrocyte transplantation (ADCT) administered 12 weeks following discectomy, compared to discectomy alone to mitigate postoperative pain, showed that those who received ADCT had continual improvement of their pain, and that these results persisted at the two-year follow-up, but there was no difference in the mean IVD height between the experimental and control groups [88]. The ADCT system is currently available and utilized in Germany but has not been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [89].
Autologous bone marrow aspirate and bone marrow concentrated cells (BMCs) contain multiple stem and progenitor cells, including MSCs, that can be autografted at the time of surgery. A clinical trial with 55 participants had bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) collected from the iliac crest and injected into the intradiscal space. There were significant improvements in the patients’ pain scores [90]. In addition, this study showed that patients who received >2000 colony-forming unit-fibroblasts (CFU-F) per milliliter of bone marrow aspirate had statistically significant improvements in pain scores compared to those who had less. There are two additional clinical trials which will further evaluate the intradiscal injection of BMAC, one that is currently recruiting participants and the other which is currently underway (A Prospective Study of Clinical Outcomes Following a Single Intradiscal Injection of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) for Single Level Discogenic Low Back Pain. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03912454 (accessed on 6 July 2021), Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMC) Injection in Intervertebral Discs. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04559295 (accessed on 12 July 2021)). Allogeneic stem cells are also an attractive option due to their low harvesting costs, and because a primary harvesting operation is also not necessary in this case. A clinical trial completed in 2017 demonstrated the safety, feasibility and potential effect of allogeneic BMSCs in 24 participants with IVDD [11,22]. There is currently a clinical trial being analyzed that looked at the intradiscal injection of allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells (MPCs) (Safety and Preliminary Efficacy Study of Mesenchymal Precursor Cells (MPCs) in Subjects with Lumbar Back Pain. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01290367 (accessed on 8 July 2021)). Another potential treatment target is conditioned media (CM) from hMSCs, which was found to mitigate the effects of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), the enzymes responsible for ECM degradation, in a 3D in vitro disc cell pellet model [91].
A study in murine and rabbit IVDD models utilized discogenic cells from various human donors. In mice, discogenic cells were able to generate the components of the ECM. The discogenic cells persisted for 4 months after subcutaneous implantation and showed continual recruitment of proteoglycans and collagen. In rabbits, injection of allogeneic discogenic cells increased disc height by up to 15%. This study also demonstrated a lack of toxicity and tumorigenicity [92]. Human clinical testing of discogenic cells combined with a sodium hyaluronate carrier is ongoing in randomized controlled, double-blinded studies in the United States (Study to Evaluate the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of IDCT, a Treatment for Symptomatic Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03347708 (accessed on 10 July 2021)) and in Japan (Study to Evaluate the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of IDCT, a Treatment for Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Degeneration. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03955315 (accessed on 10 July 2021)). A phase 2a study utilizing participants undergoing lumbar spinal fusion has completed evaluating the implantation of allogeneic osteoblastic cells with a ceramic scaffold, but the results have not yet been published (Phase 2a Study on Allogeneic Osteoblastic Cells Implantation in Lumbar Spinal Fusion. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02205138 (accessed on 9 July 2021)). A recent publication on the use of dermal fibroblasts as a possible cellular transplant in Cynomolgus monkeys showed that injection of fibroblasts demonstrated retained IVD height, and it was hypothesized that this treatment resulted in reparative fibrosis repair [93]. This study was limited, however, because the fibroblast transplant occurred immediately at the time of disc injury, the treatment group was only followed for 8 weeks, and there was very broad variability in the MRI data.
Endogenous repair was another treatment target investigated in IVDD models, but the viability of tissue-specific progenitor cells, also known as endogenous progenitor cells, was significantly affected by the adverse microenvironment of the degenerative IVD (hypoxia, low pH, high mechanical load, inflammation, etc.) [94]. When the IVD has been seriously injured, the repair effect of progenitor cells on the IVD cannot meet the need for repair [95,96]. Moreover, progenitor cells have a decreased ability to respond to signals of injury when external pressure is exerted, as a high mechanical load can cause apoptosis in NP cells via a caspase-dependent mitochondrial pathway. A recent study successfully constructed a delivery system of endogenous progenitor cells based on pullulan microbeads and signaling molecules involved in cell recruitment into NP tissue, followed by the release of growth factors to complete the ECM remodeling, but there is significant research that still needs to be done before endogenous progenitor cells are used in the treatment of IVDD [97].
Nucleus pulposus-derived progenitor cells (NPPCs) did perform better than other progenitor cells in in vitro studies, as they have many similarities with MSCs in their surface markers, and have similar rates of cell proliferation and stem cell-like gene expression [98]. AF and cartilage endplate (CEP) progenitor cells also show specific similarities to BMSCs [99]. NPPCs are more adaptable to acidic microenvironments and actually undergo more proliferation and exhibit greater chondrogenic differentiation potential in hypoxic conditions. Progenitor cell homing, where endogenous cells are actively recruited into a desired anatomic site for therapeutic applications, when compared with exogenous cell transplantation, has better biological safety and rationality and would therefore be able to overcome some of the limitations that exogenous cell transplantation faces [95,96,100].
Despite the promising results outlined above, there are still several limitations that need to be addressed before the use of stem cell-based therapies can be introduced as a standard treatment in the clinical setting. A primary concern with stem cell-based therapies is with the potential loss of cells and diminished viability upon administration [28]. Due to the biological and ethical concerns that arise with the use of stem cells, it would be difficult to justify repeated implantation, which could potentially be necessary if challenges associated with administration cannot be adequately addressed [23]. Furthermore, the transplantation of exogenous cells is expensive. Even within clinical trials, there is currently no consensus with respect to the number of cells that ought to be transplanted; injections of BMSCs in clinical trials currently range from 6 × 106 to 25 × 106 cells (Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease with Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSV) (Disc_allo). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT01860417 (accessed on 7 July 2021), Safety and Preliminary Efficacy Study on Mesenchymal Precursor cells (MPCs) in Subjects with Lumbar Back Pain. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01290367 (accessed on 9 July 2021)) [22]. Finally, while whole stem cells have been shown to impact IVD degeneration, a study aiming to establish the ability of MSCs to inhibit pyroptosis in NP cells found that when MSCs were treated with GW4869, which inhibits exosome secretion, the effect of the MSCs was abolished [24]. This led researchers to hypothesize that the effect of MSCs on pyroptosis is mainly caused by its derived exosomes, leading to the investigation into the use of stem cell-derived exosomes as a cell-free treatment for IVDD.

6. Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes as a Treatment for IVDD

6.1. Overview of Exosomes

Exosomes are nano-sized extracellular vesicles (EVs) composed of a lipid bilayer membrane, originating from multivesicular endosomes [101]. Exosomes are differentiated from the other EV subtypes—microvesicles (MVs) and apoptotic bodies—based on their biogenesis, physical composition, release pathways and function [102]. The diameter of an exosome ranges from 30–150 nm, with an average diameter of 100 nm, and exosomes have a density ranging from 1.13 g/mL to 1.19 g/mL [103,104]. Exosomes originate from the endocytic pathway, during which the inward budding of the intracellular endosomal membrane forms an early secretory endosome, intracellular multivesicular bodies (MVBs) containing intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) are formed, and the maturation of the endosome, as a result of acidification, causes ILVs to be secreted as exosomes by fusion with the plasma membrane [105].
Despite their identification in the late 1980s, exosomes were only recently recognized as novel mediators in intercellular communication [25]. Their tough lipid bilayer tolerates lyophilization and other extremes, while allowing for the retention of bioactivity, immune tolerability and efficiency after systemic delivery [29,106]. Secreted by various cell types and able to be isolated from small amounts of biological fluids, including blood, urine, semen, saliva, breast milk, bile and synovial fluid, exosomes impact cell–cell communication via transference of their various bioactive molecules: mRNA, microRNAs (miRNAs), proteins and bioactive lipids [26,107,108]. Proteomic analysis of exosomes has revealed more than 4000 different proteins, lending to their ability to engage in multifaceted functions [50,109]. Transferred exosomal mRNA can be translated after entering another cell; one study proposes that this type of RNA be called “exosomal shuttle RNA (esRNA)” [110].
Exosomes show pronounced therapeutic competence for tissue recovery through the maintenance of their endogenous stem cells, enhancement of regenerative phenotypic traits, inhibition of apoptosis with immune modulation and stimulation of angiogenesis [27,111]. The secretion of exosomes has been shown to be elevated in response to inflammation, hypoxia and acidic microenvironments, and can be used by tumors to induce immunosuppression and promote angiogenesis by delivering miRNA [112,113]. While the delivery of miRNA is contraindicated for patients with cancer, it may prove useful in the treatment of IVDD. Exosomes are suspected to restore damaged tissue and can uphold their therapeutic efficacy by transferring biologically active molecules and affecting target molecules, which regulate the gene expression and phenotype of damaged recipient cells [110,114]. In addition, exosomes are able to maintain viability under extreme conditions, and can even provide recipient cells with a resistance against oxidative stress [115,116].

6.2. Overview of Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes

Stem cell-derived exosomes (SC-Exos) have been used for the treatment of various forms of tissue injury in preclinical trials due to the maintenance of their stemness, induction of regenerative phenotypes, apoptosis inhibition and immune response regulation [117]. Wnt and mTOR pathways are master regulators required for MSC-Exos secretion, and they support the self-renewal of MSCs [118]. While the exact underlying mechanism of MSC-derived exosomes (MSC-Exos) in the restoration of damaged tissue has yet to be elucidated, research suggests that MSC-Exos are responsible for the maintenance of endogenous stem cells, induction of regenerative phenotypes by promoting cell proliferation and angiogenesis, protection of cells from apoptosis, the attenuation of oxidative stress and the adjustment of the immune response through the delivery of immunomodulatory mediators to damaged tissue [117,119].

6.3. Effect of Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes on IVDD

Various studies have evaluated the use of stem-cell derived exosomes in the treatment of IVDD (Table 1) [24,119,120,121,122]. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes (BMSC-Exos) were found to reduce interleukin-1β-induced inflammatory cytokine secretion and MAPK signaling activation by delivering miR142-3p, which targets mixed lineage kinase 3 (MLK3) [123]. Another study found that BMSC-Exos have an abundance of miR-532-5p, which targets RASSF5 [124]. The knockdown of RASSF5 is suspected to decrease apoptotic cells. An in vitro study on the efficacy of hBMSC-derived exosomes resulted in more than a 50% increase in cell proliferation and decreases in cellular apoptosis in 3D human degenerative disc cell cultures, and ECM production was observed as early as day 7 [125]. NP cell-derived exosomes can not only induce the differentiation of MSCs into NP-like cells in vitro, but were also found to promote the migration of MSCs and the downregulation of the Notch1 pathway [126,127]. NP cells from a rodent herniation model were found to produce exosomes containing miR223, which has been shown to downregulate inflammation through modulation of the NF-κB pathway [128,129,130]. The reduction in notochordal cell number with age is believed to be associated with the onset of IVD degeneration, and as a result, treatment with notochordal cell-derived exosomes was found to increase DNA and glycosaminoglycan content in human NP cell microaggregates, although the underlying mechanism was not analyzed [131,132].
In vivo studies on the use of stem cell-derived exosomes have more recently been conducted (Table 2). In a rabbit IVDD model, exosomes significantly prevented the progression of degenerative disease, confirming that the NLRP3 inflammasome is an effective target for disc degeneration, and that the injection of exosomes presents a promising therapeutic strategy [50,133]. In addition, it has been suggested that exosomes might supply mitochondrial proteins to NP cells and that damaged mitochondria in a degenerative disc could be restored [50]. MSC-Exos play an anti-pyroptosis role by suppressing the NLRP3 pathway, and it was proposed that this effect was attributed to miR-410, which, when derived from MSC-Exos, could directly bind to NLRP3mRNA [24,117]. In a rat model, intradiscal injection of BMSC-Exos alleviated NP cell apoptosis and IVD degeneration via miR-21 contained in the exosomes [134]. Exosomal miR-21 restrains the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), which results in the activation of the PI3K-AKT pathway [24]. MSC-Exos could also potentially decrease ER stress-induced apoptosis by activating AKT and ERK signaling. Delivery of BMSC-Exos in vivo modulated ER stress-related apoptosis and diminished the progression of degeneration in a rat tail model [135]. Human placental MSC (hPLMSC)-derived exosomes carrying AntagomiR-4450 were verified for their therapeutic effects on mouse NP cells in vivo and in vitro. Inhibiting miR-4450 upregulates ZNF121, which alleviates inflammation, apoptosis and damage to NP cells [136]. In vivo experiments in a rat model also indicate that sub-endplate injection of MSC-Exos can ameliorate IVDD, and it is suggested that this mechanism is related to the regulation of miR-31-5p and ATF6-related ER stress [137].
While the majority of in vivo studies have been conducted on MSC-Exos, exosomes secreted by other cell lines have also been evaluated for their potential use in tissue regeneration. A rat model was used to evaluate the intradiscal injection of exosomes derived from induced pluripotent stem cell (iPS)-derived MSCs (iMSCs), and this study showed that injection diminished the progression of IVDD and the senescence of NP cells, and was capable of restoring IVD height [138]. A study on normal cartilage endplate stem cell (CESC)-derived exosomes (N-Exos) showed a decrease in the apoptotic rate of NP cells. Utilizing a rat model of IVDD, this study showed that N-Exos attenuated the progression of disc degeneration by activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), AKT and autophagy pathways [139].
Table 1. Stem cell-derived exosomes for IVDD therapy referenced in this review.
Table 1. Stem cell-derived exosomes for IVDD therapy referenced in this review.
Cell TypeCell OriginScope of StudyReference
Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs)HumanIn vitro and in vivo[24,137]
Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (BMSCs)RatIn vitro[123]
MouseIn vitro[124]
HumanIn vitro[119,125,127]
HumanIn vitro and in vivo[134,135]
Placental-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (PLMSCs)HumanIn vitro and in vivo[136]
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (iMSCs)HumanIn vitro[120]
HumanIn vitro and In vivo[138]
Embryonic Stem Cell (ESC)-Derived Hematopoietic Stem Cells (HSCs)MouseIn vitro[121]
Chondrocytes RabbitIn vitro[122]
FibroblastsHumanIn vitro and in vivo[24]
Cartilage Endplate Stem Cells (CESCs)RatIn vitro and in vivo[139]
Nucleus Pulposus (NP) CellsRatIn vitro[126]
HumanIn vitro[127]
Notochordal CellsPigIn vitro[131]
Table 2. In vivo studies utilizing stem-cell derived exosomes for IVDD therapy.
Table 2. In vivo studies utilizing stem-cell derived exosomes for IVDD therapy.
Origin of ExosomesAuthorExperimental ObjectiveAnimal ModelResultsReference
MSCsZhang et al., 2020To demonstrate NLRP3-mediated NP cell pyroptosis induction in IVDD mice model and identify regulators of this processMouseTreatment with MSC-Exos and miR-410 reversed the increased protein levels of NLRP3 and alleviated the severity degree of IVDD[24]
BMSCsXia et al., 2019To investigate the therapeutic effect of exosomes via a reduction in NLRP3 inflammasome expressionRabbitTreatment with BMSC-Exos attenuates the progression of IVDD and delays matrix degradation[50]
BMSCsCheng et al., 2018To evaluate the protective effect of MSC-Exos on NP cell apoptosis and IVDD, and the regulatory effect of miRNAsRatIntradiscal injection of MSC-Exos alleviates NP cell apoptosis via miR-21 contained in exosomes[134]
BMSCsLiao et al., 2019To determine if the delivery of MSC-Exos could modulate endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in the IVDRatDelivery of MSC-Exos modulates ER stress-related apoptosis in AGEs-associated IVDD[135]
PLMSCsYuan et al., 2020To elucidate the potential therapeutic role of human placental MSC-derived exosomes carrying AntagomiR-4450MouseInhibition of miR-4450 alleviates inflammation, apoptosis and damage to NP cells by upregulating ZNF121 [136]
MSCsXie et al., 2020To characterize the effect and mechanism of MSC-derived exosomes and the inhibition of apoptosis and calcification in endplate chondrocytes (EPCs)RatSub-endplate injection of MSC-Exos reduces apoptosis and calcification in EPCs via regulation of miR-31-5p and ATF6-related ER stress[137]
iMSCs Sun et al., 2021To explore the therapeutic effect of exosomes derived from induced pluripotent stem cell (iPS)-derived MSCs (iMSCs) on IVDD RatIntradiscal injection could rejuvenate senescent NP cells and restore IVD height 4 weeks after needle puncture[138]
CESCsLuo et al., 2021To compare the use of normal and degenerated cartilage endplate stem cell-derived exosomes to diminish apoptosis of NP cellsRatCEP inflammation aggravates IVDD and normal CESC-derived exosomes are better equipped to decrease the apoptotic rate of NP cells by activating the PI3K, AKT and autophagy pathways[139]

7. Discussion

In this review, we summarized the current state of research on biological therapies for IVDD and highlighted new studies focused on stem cell-derived exosomes (Figure 1). Exosomes have the potential to be a more beneficial treatment than stem cell-based therapies because the therapeutic benefit of their origin cells is maintained, despite not being a cell, and therefore they do not have the associated risks of immunoreactivity, differentiation to the an undesired adult cell lineage, tumorigenesis or unwanted gene mutation [29]. There is also the potential to genetically modify exosomes to express special ligands, such as chemokine receptors, that will better direct them toward the site of injury and transfer small molecular drugs directly to the target sites, enabling exosomes to act as a targeted drug delivery mechanism [140,141,142]. While the avascular nature of the IVD poses a threat to the efficacy of systemically injected MSC-Exos, endeavors to prolong their half-life may enable this to be become a more prominent method of delivery [143,144]. The potential low yield of MSC-Exos, compared to MSCs, could be overcome by technical advancements in the expansion of MSCs and the enhanced release of exosomes [144]. It has been suggested that culturing MSCs in a low-density culture environment can activate exosome-mediated cell signaling and promote exosomes secretion [145]. It might be beneficial to consider the age, passage and differentiation state of the parental stem cells, as this can impact exosomes secretion, differentiation potential and the exosomal cargo transferred from MSCs [146,147]. Viability is also not a concern with exosomes, as it is with stem cell-based therapies. One study suggested that exosomes are potentially much easier to use post-thaw, and there is preliminary evidence that the thawing process may alter exosomal membranes so that they are absorbed more easily by target cells, although more research is needed to confirm this finding [148].
Currently there is only one clinical trial relating to the treatment of IVDD using exosomes, set to be conducted in India once all participants have been recruited. This trial is focused on the intradiscal injection of PRP that has been enriched with exosomes (Intra-discal Injection of Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) Enriched with Exosomes in Chronic Low Back Pain. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04849429 (accessed on 2 July 2021)). While stem cell-derived exosomes are a promising treatment for IVDD, there are many challenges that need to be addressed before they can be brought into the clinical setting. These include creating a method of selecting suitable donors to produce MSCs for the production of exosomes, the development of an exosome isolation protocol that meets good manufacturing practice (GMP) standards and a consensus on the required criteria and markers that need to be present before exosomes can be delivered to patients. There is also an immense need for methods to evaluate and ensure the safety of this patient population, which will need to be addressed and implemented prior to the initiation of clinical trials. It will be necessary to establish the course of action should the patient experience off-target or adverse side effects.
Standardization will need to begin with the selection of parental stem cells and will require effective upscaling of the processes which ensure that the specific culture environment, age, passage and differentiation state are uniform. Currently, isolation and purification techniques for exosomes are not uniform, affecting the potential reproducibility of the current research; the isolation of exosomes from raw biological fluids can be challenging because other components, including microvesicles, may overlap in size, highlighting the need for standardization of these processes [149,150]. There is also the need for standardization of the release criterion of exosomes, which includes the size, surface marker expression and cargo. It will be vital to evaluate how exosome isolation techniques and the parental stem cell culture environment, which has been found to impact the contents and functions of their secreted exosomes, specifically impacts the efficacy of stem cell-derived exosomes in IVDD [117,151]. In the future, it will be necessary to develop assays capable of predicting the therapeutic potency of MSC-Exos that have high clinical sensitivity and specificity [152]. Because of the complexity of the role MSC-Exos in various diseases, it will most likely be necessary to develop assays that are disease specific [153].
As is the case with MSCs, the optimal dose of MSC-Exos is unknown, and even the best route of administration is still unclear, requiring further research [154,155]. Due to the avascular nature of the IVD and the limitations observed with the systemic injection of MSCs, it is suspected that direct injection of MSC-Exos will be the most effective delivery method for the treatment of IVDD [22]; however, an in vivo study published in 2020 administered MSC-Exos via injection into the tail vein, rather than the intradiscal injection method noted in other studies [24]. While the current in vivo studies only utilized a single dose, if systemic injections were to be implemented multiple doses may be necessary to achieve and maintain a therapeutic effect. In this case, it would be necessary to determine the safety and efficacy of multiple infusions, as well as the required dose and frequency. Finally, there are also concerns regarding legal classification, institutional readiness, and infrastructural support for successful clinical translation [121]. Although exosomes are not cells, their origination from stem cells may pose a challenge in terms of defining their legal classification and receiving approval from the U.S. FDA for use in the clinical setting [115]. Once these considerations are addressed, clinical trials on the use of stem cell-derived exosomes for the treatment of IVDD will be able to commence.

Author Contributions

Z.K.: writing—original draft preparation, G.P.: review and editing, D.G.: review, Z.G.: writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by NIH/NIAMS, grant number R01AR066517 to Debiao Li and Dan Gazit.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

G.P., D.G. and Z.G. declare that they are co-inventors of a pending patent application titled: A method for regenerating the intervertebral disc with notochordal cells. Application number: US 20200093961. Applicant: Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. The patent application covers the use of induced notochordal stem cells for IVD regeneration. Z.K. declares no competing interests.

References

  1. Chan, W.C.; Sze, K.L.; Samartzis, D.; Leung, V.Y.; Chan, D. Structure and biology of the intervertebral disk in health and disease. Orthop. Clin. N. Am. 2011, 42, 447–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Choi, Y.S. Pathophysiology of degenerative disc disease. Asian Spine J. 2009, 3, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Maher, C.; Underwood, M.; Buchbinder, R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet 2017, 389, 736–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Teraguchi, M.; Yoshimura, N.; Hashizume, H.; Muraki, S.; Yamada, H.; Minamide, A.; Oka, H.; Ishimoto, Y.; Nagata, K.; Kagotani, R.; et al. Prevalence and distribution of intervertebral disc degeneration over the entire spine in a population-based cohort: The Wakayama Spine Study. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2014, 22, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Andersson, G.B. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 1999, 354, 581–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cheung, K.M.; Karppinen, J.; Chan, D.; Ho, D.W.; Song, Y.Q.; Sham, P.; Cheah, K.S.; Leong, J.C.; Luk, K.D. Prevalence and pattern of lumbar magnetic resonance imaging changes in a population study of one thousand forty-three individuals. Spine 2009, 34, 934–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Clouet, J.; Vinatier, C.; Merceron, C.; Pot-Vaucel, M.; Hamel, O.; Weiss, P.; Grimandi, G.; Guicheux, J. The intervertebral disc: From pathophysiology to tissue engineering. Joint Bone Spine 2009, 76, 614–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hadjipavlou, A.G.; Tzermiadianos, M.N.; Bogduk, N.; Zindrick, M.R. The pathophysiology of disc degeneration: A critical review. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2008, 90, 1261–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Urban, J.P.; Roberts, S. Degeneration of the intervertebral disc. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2003, 5, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  10. Kloppenburg, M.; Berenbaum, F. Osteoarthritis year in review 2019: Epidemiology and therapy. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2020, 28, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pennicooke, B.; Moriguchi, Y.; Hussain, I.; Bonssar, L.; Härtl, R. Biological Treatment Approaches for Degenerative Disc Disease: A Review of Clinical Trials and Future Directions. Cureus 2016, 8, e892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Johnson, Z.I.; Schoepflin, Z.R.; Choi, H.; Shapiro, I.M.; Risbud, M.V. Disc in flames: Roles of TNF-α and IL-1β in intervertebral disc degeneration. Eur. Cells Mater. 2015, 30, 104–116; discussion 116–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pritzker, K.P. Aging and degeneration in the lumbar intervertebral disc. Orthop. Clin. N. Am. 1977, 8, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nagae, M.; Ikeda, T.; Mikami, Y.; Hase, H.; Ozawa, H.; Matsuda, K.; Sakamoto, H.; Tabata, Y.; Kawata, M.; Kubo, T. Intervertebral disc regeneration using platelet-rich plasma and biodegradable gelatin hydrogel microspheres. Tissue Eng. 2007, 13, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chujo, T.; An, H.S.; Akeda, K.; Miyamoto, K.; Muehleman, C.; Attawia, M.; Andersson, G.; Masuda, K. Effects of growth differentiation factor-5 on the intervertebral disc--in vitro bovine study and in vivo rabbit disc degeneration model study. Spine 2006, 31, 2909–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Willems, N.; Bach, F.C.; Plomp, S.G.; van Rijen, M.H.; Wolfswinkel, J.; Grinwis, G.C.; Bos, C.; Strijkers, G.J.; Dhert, W.J.; Meij, B.P.; et al. Intradiscal application of rhBMP-7 does not induce regeneration in a canine model of spontaneous intervertebral disc degeneration. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2015, 17, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  17. Matta, A.; Erwin, W.M. Injectable Biologics for the Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease. Curr. Rev. Musculoskelet. Med. 2020, 13, 680–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Farhang, N.; Ginley-Hidinger, M.; Berrett, K.C.; Gertz, J.; Lawrence, B.; Bowles, R.D. Lentiviral CRISPR Epigenome Editing of Inflammatory Receptors as a Gene Therapy Strategy for Disc Degeneration. Hum. Gene Ther. 2019, 30, 1161–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sato, M.; Asazuma, T.; Ishihara, M.; Ishihara, M.; Kikuchi, T.; Kikuchi, M.; Fujikawa, K. An experimental study of the regeneration of the intervertebral disc with an allograft of cultured annulus fibrosus cells using a tissue-engineering method. Spine 2003, 28, 548–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hohaus, C.; Ganey, T.M.; Minkus, Y.; Meisel, H.J. Cell transplantation in lumbar spine disc degeneration disease. Eur. Spine J. 2008, 17 (Suppl. 4), 492–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yoshikawa, T.; Ueda, Y.; Miyazaki, K.; Koizumi, M.; Takakura, Y. Disc regeneration therapy using marrow mesenchymal cell transplantation: A report of two case studies. Spine 2010, 35, E475–E480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Noriega, D.C.; Ardura, F.; Hernández-Ramajo, R.; Martín-Ferrero, M.Á.; Sánchez-Lite, I.; Toribio, B.; Alberca, M.; García, V.; Moraleda, J.M.; Sánchez, A.; et al. Intervertebral Disc Repair by Allogeneic Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cells: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Transplantation 2017, 101, 1945–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Wang, W.; Guo, Z.; Yang, F.; Cai, X.; Xiong, L. Current Progress in the Endogenous Repair of Intervertebral Disk Degeneration Based on Progenitor Cells. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 8, 1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, W.; Ni, W.; Huang, X.; Yuan, J.; Zhao, B.; Xiao, H.; Xue, F. Mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes ameliorate intervertebral disc degeneration through inhibiting pyroptosis. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2020, 24, 11742–11754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Isola, A.L.; Chen, S. Exosomes: The Messengers of Health and Disease. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2017, 15, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Patel, G.K.; Khan, M.A.; Zubair, H.; Srivastava, S.K.; Khushman, M.d.; Singh, S.; Singh, A.P. Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bobrie, A.; Colombo, M.; Raposo, G.; Théry, C. Exosome secretion: Molecular mechanisms and roles in immune responses. Traffic 2011, 12, 1659–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hassanzadeh, A.; Rahman, H.S.; Markov, A.; Endjun, J.J.; Zekiy, A.O.; Chartrand, M.S.; Beheshtkhoo, N.; Kouhbanani, M.A.J.; Marofi, F.; Nikoo, M.; et al. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell-derived exosomes in regenerative medicine and cancer; overview of development, challenges, and opportunities. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021, 12, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Marbán, E. The Secret Life of Exosomes: What Bees Can Teach Us About Next-Generation Therapeutics. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 71, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Roberts, S.; Menage, J.; Urban, J.P. Biochemical and structural properties of the cartilage end-plate and its relation to the intervertebral disc. Spine 1989, 14, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. De Geer, C.M. Intervertebral Disk Nutrients and Transport Mechanisms in Relation to Disk Degeneration: A Narrative Literature Review. J. Chiropr. Med. 2018, 17, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Newell, N.; Little, J.P.; Christou, A.; Adams, M.A.; Adam, C.J.; Masouros, S.D. Biomechanics of the human intervertebral disc: A review of testing techniques and results. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2017, 69, 420–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nedresky, D.; Reddy, V.; Singh, G. Anatomy, Back, Nucleus Pulposus. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  34. Maroudas, A.; Stockwell, R.A.; Nachemson, A.; Urban, J. Factors involved in the nutrition of the human lumbar intervertebral disc: Cellularity and diffusion of glucose in vitro. J. Anat. 1975, 120, 113–130. [Google Scholar]
  35. Trout, J.J.; Buckwalter, J.A.; Moore, K.C. Ultrastructure of the human intervertebral disc: II. Cells of the nucleus pulposus. Anat. Rec. 1982, 204, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Holm, S.; Maroudas, A.; Urban, J.P.; Selstam, G.; Nachemson, A. Nutrition of the intervertebral disc: Solute transport and metabolism. Connect. Tissue Res. 1981, 8, 101–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bayliss, M.T.; Johnstone, B.; O’Brien, J.P. 1988 Volvo award in basic science. Proteoglycan synthesis in the human intervertebral disc. Variation with age, region and pathology. Spine 1988, 13, 972–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Risbud, M.V.; Shapiro, I.M. Notochordal cells in the adult intervertebral disc: New perspective on an old question. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2011, 21, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fernandez-Moure, J.; Moore, C.A.; Kim, K.; Karim, A.; Smith, K.; Barbosa, Z.; Van Eps, J.; Rameshwar, P.; Weiner, B. Novel therapeutic strategies for degenerative disc disease: Review of cell biology and intervertebral disc cell therapy. SAGE Open Med. 2018, 6, 2050312118761674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Marchand, F.; Ahmed, A.M. Investigation of the laminate structure of lumbar disc anulus fibrosus. Spine 1990, 15, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hastreiter, D.; Ozuna, R.M.; Spector, M. Regional variations in certain cellular characteristics in human lumbar intervertebral discs, including the presence of alpha-smooth muscle actin. J. Orthop. Res. 2001, 19, 597–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Feng, G.; Yang, X.; Shang, H.; Marks, I.W.; Shen, F.H.; Katz, A.; Arlet, V.; Laurencin, C.T.; Li, X. Multipotential differentiation of human anulus fibrosus cells: An in vitro study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2010, 92, 675–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sztrolovics, R.; Alini, M.; Roughley, P.J.; Mort, J.S. Aggrecan degradation in human intervertebral disc and articular cartilage. Biochem. J. 1997, 326 (Pt 1), 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Eyre, D.R.; Muir, H. Quantitative analysis of types I and II collagens in human intervertebral discs at various ages. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1977, 492, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Donohue, P.J.; Jahnke, M.R.; Blaha, J.D.; Caterson, B. Characterization of link protein(s) from human intervertebral-disc tissues. Biochem. J. 1988, 251, 739–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sivan, S.S.; Hayes, A.J.; Wachtel, E.; Caterson, B.; Merkher, Y.; Maroudas, A.; Brown, S.; Roberts, S. Biochemical composition and turnover of the extracellular matrix of the normal and degenerate intervertebral disc. Eur. Spine J. 2014, 23, 344–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Roberts, S.; Caterson, B.; Menage, J.; Evans, E.H.; Jaffray, D.C.; Eisenstein, S.M. Matrix metalloproteinases and aggrecanase: Their role in disorders of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 2000, 25, 3005–3013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Vo, N.V.; Hartman, R.A.; Yurube, T.; Jacobs, L.J.; Sowa, G.A.; Kang, J.D. Expression and regulation of metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in intervertebral disc aging and degeneration. Spine 2013, 13, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Buckwalter, J.A. Aging and degeneration of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 1995, 20, 1307–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Xia, C.; Zeng, Z.; Fang, B.; Tao, M.; Gu, C.; Zheng, L.; Wang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Fang, C.; Mei, S.; et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes ameliorate intervertebral disc degeneration via anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 143, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cazzanelli, P.; Wuertz-Kozak, K. MicroRNAs in Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, Apoptosis, Inflammation, and Mechanobiology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wuertz, K.; Haglund, L. Inflammatory mediators in intervertebral disk degeneration and discogenic pain. Global Spine J. 2013, 3, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhao, K.; An, R.; Xiang, Q.; Li, G.; Wang, K.; Song, Y.; Liao, Z.; Li, S.; Hua, W.; Feng, X.; et al. Acid-sensing ion channels regulate nucleus pulposus cell inflammation and pyroptosis via the NLRP3 inflammasome in intervertebral disc degeneration. Cell Prolif. 2021, 54, e12941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Song, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Geng, W.; Liu, W.; Gao, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, K.; Wu, X.; Kang, L.; et al. Advanced glycation end products regulate anabolic and catabolic activities via NLRP3-inflammasome activation in human nucleus pulposus cells. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2017, 21, 1373–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, J.; Nisar, M.; Huang, C.; Pan, X.; Lin, D.; Zheng, G.; Jin, H.; Chen, D.; Tian, N.; Huang, Q.; et al. Small molecule natural compound agonist of SIRT3 as a therapeutic target for the treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018, 50, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sudo, H.; Minami, A. Regulation of apoptosis in nucleus pulposus cells by optimized exogenous Bcl-2 overexpression. J. Orthop. Res. 2010, 28, 1608–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Risbud, M.V.; Shapiro, I.M. Role of cytokines in intervertebral disc degeneration: Pain and disc content. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2014, 10, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lee, Y.C.; Zotti, M.G.; Osti, O.L. Operative Management of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease. Asian Spine J. 2016, 10, 801–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fritzell, P.; Hägg, O.; Wessberg, P.; Nordwall, A. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: A multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 2001, 26, 2521–2532; discussion 2532–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, J.; Yoon, S.T.; Hutton, W.C. Effect of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) on matrix production, other BMPs, and BMP receptors in rat intervertebral disc cells. J. Spinal Disord. Tech. 2004, 17, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Thompson, J.P.; Oegema, T.R., Jr.; Bradford, D.S. Stimulation of mature canine intervertebral disc by growth factors. Spine 1991, 16, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Moriguchi, Y.; Alimi, M.; Khair, T.; Manolarakis, G.; Berlin, C.; Bonassar, L.J.; Härtl, R. Biological Treatment Approaches for Degenerative Disk Disease: A Literature Review of In Vivo Animal and Clinical Data. Global Spine J. 2016, 6, 497–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Walsh, A.J.; Bradford, D.S.; Lotz, J.C. In vivo growth factor treatment of degenerated intervertebral discs. Spine 2004, 29, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Guterl, C.C.; See, E.Y.; Blanquer, S.B.; Pandit, A.; Ferguson, S.J.; Benneker, L.M.; Grijpma, D.W.; Sakai, D.; Eglin, D.; Alini, M.; et al. Challenges and strategies in the repair of ruptured annulus fibrosus. Eur. Cell Mater. 2013, 25, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Dowdell, J.; Erwin, M.; Choma, T.; Vaccaro, A.; Iatridis, J.; Cho, S.K. Intervertebral Disk Degeneration and Repair. Neurosurgery 2017, 80, S46–S54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhao, Y.; Qiu, C.; Wang, W.; Peng, J.; Cheng, X.; Shangguan, Y.; Xu, M.; Li, J.; Qu, R.; Chen, X.; et al. Cortistatin protects against intervertebral disc degeneration through targeting mitochondrial ROS-dependent NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Theranostics 2020, 10, 7015–7033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Tang, P.; Gu, J.M.; Xie, Z.A.; Gu, Y.; Jie, Z.W.; Huang, K.M.; Wang, J.Y.; Fan, S.W.; Jiang, X.S.; Hu, Z.J. Honokiol alleviates the degeneration of intervertebral disc via suppressing the activation of TXNIP-NLRP3 inflammasome signal pathway. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018, 120, 368–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. He, D.; Zhou, M.; Bai, Z.; Wen, Y.; Shen, J.; Hu, Z. Propionibacterium acnes induces intervertebral disc degeneration by promoting nucleus pulposus cell pyroptosis via NLRP3-dependent pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 526, 772–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Takeoka, Y.; Yurube, T.; Nishida, K. Gene Therapy Approach for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration: An Update. Neurospine 2020, 17, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sawamura, K.; Ikeda, T.; Nagae, M.; Okamoto, S.; Mikami, Y.; Hase, H.; Ikoma, K.; Yamada, T.; Sakamoto, H.; Matsuda, K.; et al. Characterization of in vivo effects of platelet-rich plasma and biodegradable gelatin hydrogel microspheres on degenerated intervertebral discs. Tissue Eng. Part A 2009, 15, 3719–3727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tuakli-Wosornu, Y.A.; Terry, A.; Boachie-Adjei, K.; Harrison, J.R.; Gribbin, C.K.; LaSalle, E.E.; Nguyen, J.T.; Solomon, J.L.; Lutz, G.E. Lumbar Intradiskal Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injections: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study. PM&R 2016, 8, 1–10; quiz 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gullung, G.B.; Woodall, J.W.; Tucci, M.A.; James, J.; Black, D.A.; McGuire, R.A. Platelet-rich plasma effects on degenerative disc disease: Analysis of histology and imaging in an animal model. Evid. Based Spine Care J. 2011, 2, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Monfett, M.; Harrison, J.; Boachie-Adjei, K.; Lutz, G. Intradiscal platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for discogenic low back pain: An update. Int. Orthop. 2016, 40, 1321–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Krol, J.; Loedige, I.; Filipowicz, W. The widespread regulation of microRNA biogenesis, function and decay. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11, 597–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Jiang, J.; Sun, Y.; Xu, G.; Wang, H.; Wang, L. The role of miRNA, lncRNA and circRNA in the development of intervertebral disk degeneration (Review). Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 21, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Ruan, D.; He, Q.; Ding, Y.; Hou, L.; Li, J.; Luk, K.D. Intervertebral disc transplantation in the treatment of degenerative spine disease: A preliminary study. Lancet 2007, 369, 993–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Berlemann, U.; Schwarzenbach, O. An injectable nucleus replacement as an adjunct to microdiscectomy: 2 year follow-up in a pilot clinical study. Eur. Spine J. 2009, 18, 1706–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Vadalà, G.; Russo, F.; Ambrosio, L.; Loppini, M.; Denaro, V. Stem cells sources for intervertebral disc regeneration. World J. Stem Cells 2016, 8, 185–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Richardson, S.M.; Kalamegam, G.; Pushparaj, P.N.; Matta, C.; Memic, A.; Khademhosseini, A.; Mobasheri, R.; Poletti, F.L.; Hoyland, J.A.; Mobasheri, A. Mesenchymal stem cells in regenerative medicine: Focus on articular cartilage and intervertebral disc regeneration. Methods 2016, 99, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Hwang, N.S.; Zhang, C.; Hwang, Y.S.; Varghese, S. Mesenchymal stem cell differentiation and roles in regenerative medicine. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 2009, 1, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Le Blanc, K.; Ringdén, O. Mesenchymal stem cells: Properties and role in clinical bone marrow transplantation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2006, 18, 586–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Guyer, R.D.; McAfee, P.C.; Banco, R.J.; Bitan, F.D.; Cappuccino, A.; Geisler, F.H.; Hochschuler, S.H.; Holt, R.T.; Jenis, L.G.; Majd, M.E.; et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: Five-year follow-up. Spine 2009, 9, 374–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Blanco, J.F.; Villarón, E.M.; Pescador, D.; da Casa, C.; Gómez, V.; Redondo, A.M.; López-Villar, O.; López-Parra, M.; Muntión, S.; Sánchez-Guijo, F. Autologous mesenchymal stromal cells embedded in tricalcium phosphate for posterolateral spinal fusion: Results of a prospective phase I/II clinical trial with long-term follow-up. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Haufe, S.M.; Mork, A.R. Intradiscal injection of hematopoietic stem cells in an attempt to rejuvenate the intervertebral discs. Stem Cells Dev. 2006, 15, 136–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Marfia, G.; Campanella, R.; Navone, S.E.; Zucca, I.; Scotti, A.; Figini, M.; Di Vito, C.; Alessandri, G.; Riboni, L.; Parati, E. Potential use of human adipose mesenchymal stromal cells for intervertebral disc regeneration: A preliminary study on biglycan-deficient murine model of chronic disc degeneration. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2014, 16, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chun, H.J.; Kim, Y.S.; Kim, B.K.; Kim, E.H.; Kim, J.H.; Do, B.R.; Hwang, S.J.; Hwang, J.Y.; Lee, Y.K. Transplantation of human adipose-derived stem cells in a rabbit model of traumatic degeneration of lumbar discs. World Neurosurg. 2012, 78, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Comella, K.; Silbert, R.; Parlo, M. Effects of the intradiscal implantation of stromal vascular fraction plus platelet rich plasma in patients with degenerative disc disease. J. Transl. Med. 2017, 15, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Meisel, H.J.; Siodla, V.; Ganey, T.; Minkus, Y.; Hutton, W.C.; Alasevic, O.J. Clinical experience in cell-based therapeutics: Disc chondrocyte transplantation A treatment for degenerated or damaged intervertebral disc. Biomol. Eng. 2007, 24, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ju, D.G.; Kanim, L.E.; Bae, H.W. Intervertebral Disc Repair: Current Concepts. Global Spine J. 2020, 10, 130s–136s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Pettine, K.A.; Murphy, M.B.; Suzuki, R.K.; Sand, T.T. Percutaneous injection of autologous bone marrow concentrate cells significantly reduces lumbar discogenic pain through 12 months. Stem Cells 2015, 33, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hingert, D.; Nawilaijaroen, P.; Ekström, K.; Baranto, A.; Brisby, H. Human Levels of MMP-1 in Degenerated Disks Can Be Mitigated by Signaling Peptides from Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Cells Tissues Organs 2020, 209, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Silverman, L.I.; Dulatova, G.; Tandeski, T.; Erickson, I.E.; Lundell, B.; Toplon, D.; Wolff, T.; Howard, A.; Chintalacharuvu, S.; Foley, K.T. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of discogenic cells, an investigational cell therapy for disc degeneration. Spine J. 2020, 20, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chen, C.; Zhou, T.; Sun, X.; Han, C.; Zhang, K.; Zhao, C.; Li, X.; Tian, H.; Yang, X.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Autologous fibroblasts induce fibrosis of the nucleus pulposus to maintain the stability of degenerative intervertebral discs. Bone Res. 2020, 8, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ouyang, A.; Cerchiari, A.E.; Tang, X.; Liebenberg, E.; Alliston, T.; Gartner, Z.J.; Lotz, J.C. Effects of cell type and configuration on anabolic and catabolic activity in 3D co-culture of mesenchymal stem cells and nucleus pulposus cells. J. Orthop. Res. 2017, 35, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ma, K.; Chen, S.; Li, Z.; Deng, X.; Huang, D.; Xiong, L.; Shao, Z. Mechanisms of endogenous repair failure during intervertebral disc degeneration. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2019, 27, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Xia, H.; Li, X.; Gao, W.; Fu, X.; Fang, R.H.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, K. Tissue repair and regeneration with endogenous stem cells. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 174–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Frapin, L.; Clouet, J.; Chédeville, C.; Moraru, C.; Samarut, E.; Henry, N.; André, M.; Bord, E.; Halgand, B.; Lesoeur, J.; et al. Controlled release of biological factors for endogenous progenitor cell migration and intervertebral disc extracellular matrix remodelling. Biomaterials 2020, 253, 120107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Li, Z.; Peroglio, M.; Alini, M.; Grad, S. Potential and limitations of intervertebral disc endogenous repair. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2015, 10, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Liu, L.T.; Huang, B.; Li, C.Q.; Zhuang, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Y. Characteristics of stem cells derived from the degenerated human intervertebral disc cartilage endplate. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Liang, H.; Chen, S.; Huang, D.; Deng, X.; Ma, K.; Shao, Z. Effect of Compression Loading on Human Nucleus Pulposus-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Stem Cells Int. 2018, 2018, 1481243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Zomer, A.; Vendrig, T.; Hopmans, E.S.; van Eijndhoven, M.; Middeldorp, J.M.; Pegtel, D.M. Exosomes: Fit to deliver small RNA. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2010, 3, 447–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Doyle, L.M.; Wang, M.Z. Overview of Extracellular Vesicles, Their Origin, Composition, Purpose, and Methods for Exosome Isolation and Analysis. Cells 2019, 8, 727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Dai, J.; Su, Y.; Zhong, S.; Cong, L.; Liu, B.; Yang, J.; Tao, Y.; He, Z.; Chen, C.; Jiang, Y. Exosomes: Key players in cancer and potential therapeutic strategy. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Kalluri, R.; LeBleu, V.S. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science 2020, 367, eaau6977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Hessvik, N.P.; Llorente, A. Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Akers, J.C.; Ramakrishnan, V.; Yang, I.; Hua, W.; Mao, Y.; Carter, B.S.; Chen, C.C. Optimizing preservation of extracellular vesicular miRNAs derived from clinical cerebrospinal fluid. Cancer Biomark. 2016, 17, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Admyre, C.; Johansson, S.M.; Qazi, K.R.; Filén, J.-J.; Lahesmaa, R.; Norman, M.; Neve, E.P.A.; Scheynius, A.; Gabrielsson, S. Exosomes with Immune Modulatory Features Are Present in Human Breast Milk. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Gao, M.; Gao, W.; Papadimitriou, J.M.; Zhang, C.; Gao, J.; Zheng, M. Exosomes—The enigmatic regulators of bone homeostasis. Bone Res. 2018, 6, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Welton, J.L.; Khanna, S.; Giles, P.J.; Brennan, P.; Brewis, I.A.; Staffurth, J.; Mason, M.D.; Clayton, A. Proteomics analysis of bladder cancer exosomes. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2010, 9, 1324–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Valadi, H.; Ekström, K.; Bossios, A.; Sjöstrand, M.; Lee, J.J.; Lötvall, J.O. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9, 654–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Eldh, M.; Ekström, K.; Valadi, H.; Sjöstrand, M.; Olsson, B.; Jernås, M.; Lötvall, J. Exosomes communicate protective messages during oxidative stress; possible role of exosomal shuttle RNA. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Brennan, K.; Martin, K.; FitzGerald, S.P.; O’Sullivan, J.; Wu, Y.; Blanco, A.; Richardson, C.; Mc Gee, M.M. A comparison of methods for the isolation and separation of extracellular vesicles from protein and lipid particles in human serum. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Eirin, A.; Riester, S.M.; Zhu, X.Y.; Tang, H.; Evans, J.M.; O’Brien, D.; van Wijnen, A.J.; Lerman, L.O. MicroRNA and mRNA cargo of extracellular vesicles from porcine adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Gene 2014, 551, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ratajczak, J.; Miekus, K.; Kucia, M.; Zhang, J.; Reca, R.; Dvorak, P.; Ratajczak, M.Z. Embryonic stem cell-derived microvesicles reprogram hematopoietic progenitors: Evidence for horizontal transfer of mRNA and protein delivery. Leukemia 2006, 20, 847–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Nazari-Shafti, T.Z.; Neuber, S.; Falk, V.; Emmert, M.Y. Toward next-generation advanced therapies: Extracellular vesicles and cell therapy—Partners or competitors? Regen. Med. 2021, 16, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Maqsood, M.; Kang, M.; Wu, X.; Chen, J.; Teng, L.; Qiu, L. Adult mesenchymal stem cells and their exosomes: Sources, characteristics, and application in regenerative medicine. Life Sci. 2020, 256, 118002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Yin, L.; Liu, X.; Shi, Y.; Ocansey, D.K.W.; Hu, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, C.; Xu, W.; Qian, H. Therapeutic Advances of Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Regenerative Medicine. Cells 2020, 9, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. D’Alimonte, I.; Lannutti, A.; Pipino, C.; Di Tomo, P.; Pierdomenico, L.; Cianci, E.; Antonucci, I.; Marchisio, M.; Romano, M.; Stuppia, L.; et al. Wnt signaling behaves as a "master regulator" in the osteogenic and adipogenic commitment of human amniotic fluid mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2013, 9, 642–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Harting, M.T.; Srivastava, A.K.; Zhaorigetu, S.; Bair, H.; Prabhakara, K.S.; Toledano Furman, N.E.; Vykoukal, J.V.; Ruppert, K.A.; Cox, C.S., Jr.; Olson, S.D. Inflammation-Stimulated Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Attenuate Inflammation. Stem Cells 2018, 36, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Qi, X.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, H.; Xu, Z.; Li, Q.; Niu, X.; Hu, B.; Wang, Y.; Li, X. Exosomes Secreted by Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Repair Critical-Sized Bone Defects through Enhanced Angiogenesis and Osteogenesis in Osteoporotic Rats. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 12, 836–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Liao, F.L.; Tan, L.; Liu, H.; Wang, J.J.; Ma, X.T.; Zhao, B.; Chen, Y.; Bihl, J.; Yang, Y.; Chen, R.L. Hematopoietic stem cell-derived exosomes promote hematopoietic differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells in vitro via inhibiting the miR126/Notch1 pathway. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2018, 39, 552–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Chen, Y.; Xue, K.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, Z.; Liu, K. Exosomes derived from mature chondrocytes facilitate subcutaneous stable ectopic chondrogenesis of cartilage progenitor cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018, 9, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Zhu, L.; Shi, Y.; Liu, L.; Wang, H.; Shen, P.; Yang, H. Mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes ameliorate nucleus pulposus cells apoptosis via delivering miR-142-3p: Therapeutic potential for intervertebral disc degenerative diseases. Cell Cycle 2020, 19, 1727–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Zhu, G.; Yang, X.; Peng, C.; Yu, L.; Hao, Y. Exosomal miR-532–5p from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells reduce intervertebral disc degeneration by targeting RASSF5. Exp. Cell Res. 2020, 393, 112109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Hingert, D.; Ekström, K.; Aldridge, J.; Crescitelli, R.; Brisby, H. Extracellular vesicles from human mesenchymal stem cells expedite chondrogenesis in 3D human degenerative disc cell cultures. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020, 11, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Lan, W.R.; Pan, S.; Li, H.Y.; Sun, C.; Chang, X.; Lu, K.; Jiang, C.Q.; Zuo, R.; Zhou, Y.; Li, C.Q. Inhibition of the Notch1 Pathway Promotes the Effects of Nucleus Pulposus Cell-Derived Exosomes on the Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells into Nucleus Pulposus-Like Cells in Rats. Stem Cells Int. 2019, 2019, 8404168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Lu, K.; Li, H.Y.; Yang, K.; Wu, J.L.; Cai, X.W.; Zhou, Y.; Li, C.Q. Exosomes as potential alternatives to stem cell therapy for intervertebral disc degeneration: In-vitro study on exosomes in interaction of nucleus pulposus cells and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2017, 8, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Moen, A.; Jacobsen, D.; Phuyal, S.; Legfeldt, A.; Haugen, F.; Røe, C.; Gjerstad, J. MicroRNA-223 demonstrated experimentally in exosome-like vesicles is associated with decreased risk of persistent pain after lumbar disc herniation. J. Transl. Med. 2017, 15, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Poon, K.-S.; Palanisamy, K.; Chang, S.-S.; Sun, K.-T.; Chen, K.-B.; Li, P.-C.; Lin, T.-C.; Li, C.-Y. Plasma exosomal miR-223 expression regulates inflammatory responses during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Wang, H.; Hao, P.; Zhang, H.; Xu, C.; Zhao, J. MicroRNA-223 inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response by directly targeting Irak1 in the nucleus pulposus cells of intervertebral disc. IUBMB Life 2018, 70, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Bach, F.; Libregts, S.; Creemers, L.; Meij, B.; Ito, K.; Wauben, M.; Tryfonidou, M. Notochordal-cell derived extracellular vesicles exert regenerative effects on canine and human nucleus pulposus cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 88845–88856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Rodrigues-Pinto, R.; Richardson, S.M.; Hoyland, J.A. An understanding of intervertebral disc development, maturation and cell phenotype provides clues to direct cell-based tissue regeneration therapies for disc degeneration. Eur. Spine J. 2014, 23, 1803–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Li, Y.; Jin, D.; Xie, W.; Wen, L.; Chen, W.; Xu, J.; Ding, J.; Ren, D.; Xiao, Z. Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Derived Exosomes: A Possible Therapeutic Strategy for Osteoporosis. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018, 13, 362–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Cheng, X.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, L.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, K.; Sun, X.; Zhao, C.; Li, H.; Li, Y.M.; Zhao, J. Mesenchymal stem cells deliver exogenous miR-21 via exosomes to inhibit nucleus pulposus cell apoptosis and reduce intervertebral disc degeneration. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2018, 22, 261–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Liao, Z.; Luo, R.; Li, G.; Song, Y.; Zhan, S.; Zhao, K.; Hua, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.; Yang, C. Exosomes from mesenchymal stem cells modulate endoplasmic reticulum stress to protect against nucleus pulposus cell death and ameliorate intervertebral disc degeneration in vivo. Theranostics 2019, 9, 4084–4100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Yuan, Q.; Wang, X.; Liu, L.; Cai, Y.; Zhao, X.; Ma, H.; Zhang, Y. Exosomes Derived from Human Placental Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Carrying AntagomiR-4450 Alleviate Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Through Upregulation of ZNF121. Stem Cells Dev. 2020, 29, 1038–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Xie, L.; Chen, Z.; Liu, M.; Huang, W.; Zou, F.; Ma, X.; Tao, J.; Guo, J.; Xia, X.; Lyu, F.; et al. MSC-Derived Exosomes Protect Vertebral Endplate Chondrocytes against Apoptosis and Calcification via the miR-31-5p/ATF6 Axis. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2020, 22, 601–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Sun, Y.; Zhang, W.; Li, X. Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells deliver exogenous miR-105-5p via small extracellular vesicles to rejuvenate senescent nucleus pulposus cells and attenuate intervertebral disc degeneration. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021, 12, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Luo, L.; Jian, X.; Sun, H.; Qin, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Shen, Z.; Yang, D.; Li, C.; Zhao, P.; et al. Cartilage endplate stem cells inhibit intervertebral disc degeneration by releasing exosomes to nucleus pulposus cells to activate Akt/autophagy. Stem Cells 2021, 39, 467–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Tang, W.H. Exosomes: Biogenesis, biologic function and clinical potential. Cell Biosci. 2019, 9, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Shahabipour, F.; Banach, M.; Sahebkar, A. Exosomes as nanocarriers for siRNA delivery: Paradigms and challenges. Arch. Med. Sci. 2016, 12, 1324–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Malekpour, K.; Hazrati, A.; Zahar, M.; Markov, A.; Zekiy, A.O.; Navashenaq, J.G.; Roshangar, L.; Ahmadi, M. The Potential Use of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Derived Exosomes for Orthopedic Diseases Treatment. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2021, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Riau, A.K.; Ong, H.S.; Yam, G.H.F.; Mehta, J.S. Sustained Delivery System for Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Piazza, N.; Dehghani, M.; Gaborski, T.R.; Wuertz-Kozak, K. Therapeutic Potential of Extracellular Vesicles in Degenerative Diseases of the Intervertebral Disc. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Patel, D.B.; Gray, K.M.; Santharam, Y.; Lamichhane, T.N.; Stroka, K.M.; Jay, S.M. Impact of cell culture parameters on production and vascularization bioactivity of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2017, 2, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Kretlow, J.D.; Jin, Y.-Q.; Liu, W.; Zhang, W.J.; Hong, T.-H.; Zhou, G.; Baggett, L.S.; Mikos, A.G.; Cao, Y. Donor age and cell passage affects differentiation potential of murine bone marrow-derived stem cells. BMC Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Wang, X.; Omar, O.; Vazirisani, F.; Thomsen, P.; Ekström, K. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes have altered microRNA profiles and induce osteogenic differentiation depending on the stage of differentiation. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Cheng, Y.; Zeng, Q.; Han, Q.; Xia, W. Effect of pH, temperature and freezing-thawing on quantity changes and cellular uptake of exosomes. Protein Cell 2019, 10, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Li, X.; Corbett, A.L.; Taatizadeh, E.; Tasnim, N.; Little, J.P.; Garnis, C.; Daugaard, M.; Guns, E.; Hoorfar, M.; Li, I.T.S. Challenges and opportunities in exosome research-Perspectives from biology, engineering, and cancer therapy. APL Bioeng. 2019, 3, 011503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Wei, W.; Ao, Q.; Wang, X.; Cao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, S.G.; Tian, X. Mesenchymal Stem Cell–Derived Exosomes: A Promising Biological Tool in Nanomedicine. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 11, 1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Nikfarjam, S.; Rezaie, J.; Zolbanin, N.M.; Jafari, R. Mesenchymal stem cell derived-exosomes: A modern approach in translational medicine. J Transl. Med. 2020, 18, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Ayers, L.; Pink, R.; Carter, D.R.F.; Nieuwland, R. Clinical requirements for extracellular vesicle assays. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2019, 8, 1593755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Witwer, K.W.; Van Balkom, B.W.M.; Bruno, S.; Choo, A.; Dominici, M.; Gimona, M.; Hill, A.F.; De Kleijn, D.; Koh, M.; Lai, R.C.; et al. Defining mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC)-derived small extracellular vesicles for therapeutic applications. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2019, 8, 1609206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Forsberg, M.H.; Kink, J.A.; Hematti, P.; Capitini, C.M. Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Exosomes: Progress and Challenges. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Loibl, M.; Wuertz-Kozak, K.; Vadala, G.; Lang, S.; Fairbank, J.; Urban, J.P. Controversies in regenerative medicine: Should intervertebral disc degeneration be treated with mesenchymal stem cells? JOR Spine 2019, 2, e1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 10 02241 g001
Figure 1. Stem cell-derived exosomes for IVDD treatment.
Figure 1. Stem cell-derived exosomes for IVDD treatment.
Cells 10 02241 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Krut, Z.; Pelled, G.; Gazit, D.; Gazit, Z. Stem Cells and Exosomes: New Therapies for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration. Cells 2021, 10, 2241. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10092241

AMA Style

Krut Z, Pelled G, Gazit D, Gazit Z. Stem Cells and Exosomes: New Therapies for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration. Cells. 2021; 10(9):2241. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10092241

Chicago/Turabian Style

Krut, Zoe, Gadi Pelled, Dan Gazit, and Zulma Gazit. 2021. "Stem Cells and Exosomes: New Therapies for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration" Cells 10, no. 9: 2241. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10092241

APA Style

Krut, Z., Pelled, G., Gazit, D., & Gazit, Z. (2021). Stem Cells and Exosomes: New Therapies for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration. Cells, 10(9), 2241. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10092241

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop