Next Article in Journal
Control of Genome Stability by EndoMS/NucS-Mediated Non-Canonical Mismatch Repair
Next Article in Special Issue
Loss of Motor Protein MYO1C Causes Rhodopsin Mislocalization and Results in Impaired Visual Function
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing the Anti-Inflammatory Activity of the Anxiolytic Drug Buspirone Using CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing in LPS-Stimulated BV-2 Microglial Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Expression of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Marker GRP78 in the Normal Retina and Retinal Degeneration Induced by Blue LED Stimuli in Mice
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Advancing Diabetic Retinopathy Research: Analysis of the Neurovascular Unit in Zebrafish

Cells 2021, 10(6), 1313; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10061313
by Chiara Simone Middel 1,2, Hans-Peter Hammes 2 and Jens Kroll 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Cells 2021, 10(6), 1313; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10061313
Submission received: 30 April 2021 / Revised: 17 May 2021 / Accepted: 18 May 2021 / Published: 25 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Retina in Health and Disease)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

as requested, I reviewed the manuscript (ID cells-1224038) "Advancing diabetic retinopathy research: Analysis of the neurovascular unit in zebrafish", by CS Middel, HP Hammes, J Kroll.

 

The review manuscript deals with the main research focusing on the zebrafish (Danio rerio) as model organism adopted in the study of diabetes and, more in detail, of diabetic retinopathy. Authors’ narrative approach is based on the description of the different cell types that form the neurovascular unit, and their physiological and pathophysiological roles in diabetic retinopathy. Moreover, a description of the specific advantages of the model is discussed.

In my opinion, the Introduction is quite effective and well-targeted, and the overall discussion contains all the elements for comprehension of the subject, for understanding the cited literature and for finding hints to deepen information.

The reading sounds like a good and comprehensible continuum, and there’s no evidence of fragmented information. The manuscript is quite conceived for giving the necessary keywords to enter the investigated subject, and actually reaches this goal.

On this basis, the author demonstrated scientific mastery of the research.

 

I only have a minor comment which might enhance the editorial appreciability, that is: I would rebalance the titles and therefore the number of the various paragraphs.

-           it is a bit of a stretch that there is a subsection 2.1 immediately after section 2; a few lines of general meaning are desirable before starting section 2.1.

-           section 3.3 should probably be section 3.

 

Thank you very much for your attention to my opinion.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper by Dr. Middel describes zebrafish as diabetic retinopathy research model animal have some advantage in comparison with other animal such as mouse. The authors have some great review but some of description need to be clarified.

  1. Please clarify what sentences mention fig 1.
  2. Please describe function of glo1. (line 273)
  3. What is the staining in fig 2?
  4. Please clarify what fig 2 explain.
  5. What sentences explain table 1?

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop